/stocks — the workspaceLOADING
All ZBRA SEC filings, by type → · Earnings date & implied move · Search inside filings
ZEBRA TECHNOLOGIES CORP (ZBRA). Fundamentals from SEC filings; prices are end-of-day.
What’s behind ZBRA’s latest move — the size, how unusual the volume is, and the catalyst on the tape, explained and cited to the source.
XBRL company facts, SEC EDGAR. TTM = last four reported quarters. Valuation ratios arrive with a price source — we don't fake quotes.
No recent 10-K / 10-Q / 8-K filings found.
Has ZBRA been issuing shares? Offering history →
A plain-English read on ZBRA plus an auto-SWOT — built from ZBRA's SEC filings and market data, every point cited, nothing invented. Educational, not investment advice.
Four AI analysts — a bull, a bear, a risk manager, and a PM — debate ZBRA using only the SEC-filing and market facts below. Every point cites its evidence; nothing is invented. This is educational research, not investment advice.
Educational only — not financial advice. Data from SEC EDGAR public filings; no live market data is shown. Figures reflect the company's own reported XBRL facts and may lag.
The fair-value line is ZBRA’s own median P/E, P/S, P/B and P/FCF applied to each year’s fundamentals — the price its typical valuation would have implied. Where the solid line sits above the dashed one, the stock traded at a premium to its own history that year; below, a discount. This is a description of past valuation, computed from ZBRA’s filings and price history — not a forecast and not investment advice. A stock can trade above or below its own median for years.
Total return including reinvested dividends, from ZBRA’s adjusted closing prices. Past return is not a forecast and not investment advice.
No tracked institution reported a position in ZBRA in the latest 13F round.
Every registered fund files its complete portfolio with the SEC. These weights come from those filings, so each one carries the period it describes. Holdings are quarterly and filed in arrears — the figures below are as of 2026-05-31 to 2026-07-31, not today.
| Fund | Weight | As of |
|---|---|---|
| RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 0.26% | 2026-07-31 |
| VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.10% | 2026-05-31 |
| XLK Technology Select Sector SPDR | 0.07% | 2026-06-30 |
| IWD iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF | 0.04% | 2026-06-30 |
| SPY SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust | 0.02% | 2026-06-30 |
| IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 0.02% | 2026-06-30 |
| VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 0.02% | 2026-06-30 |
| IWB iShares Russell 1000 ETF | 0.02% | 2026-06-30 |
| VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 0.02% | 2026-06-30 |
| ITOT iShares Core S&P Total US Stock Market ETF | 0.02% | 2026-06-30 |
Drawn from 39 large US equity funds we scan, not every fund in existence, so a missing fund means we do not scan it rather than that it holds none. Holdings are joined to tickers by issuer name, which does not resolve every position; what that misses is published.
No lawmaker has disclosed a trade in ZBRA under the STOCK Act.
The band is the interquartile range of every estimator that could run on ZBRA’s filings: the median P/E, P/S, P/B and P/FCF this stock has actually traded at over 19 years of history applied to today’s fundamentals, a two-stage discounted-cash-flow estimate. With four or more estimators we take the interquartile range, so a single wild reading cannot define the band; with two or three we show the full spread, because trimming the tails off three points does not remove noise, it manufactures confidence. We publish a range rather than one number because the estimators genuinely disagree, and averaging that disagreement away would hide the most useful part.
Valuation labels describe only where the price sits against that band:
These labels are positional, not predictive. Premium means the current share price sits above the band computed from ZBRA’s own filings and trading history. It does not mean the stock cannot keep rising, that a fall is expected, or that the market has it wrong. Equally, Discount means the price sits below that band — it does not imply the stock is cheap in any meaningful sense, that it is worth buying, or that the market has mispriced it. A company can trade above or below its own historical range for years, and often does, for reasons the range knows nothing about.
The labels describe where today’s price falls against a calculated band. Nothing more than that.
Measured disagreement is our answer to a locked “uncertainty rating”: it is simply how far the estimators spread as a share of the midpoint, tiered Low / Moderate / High / Extreme, with the raw spread shown beside it. A wide band earns a high tier because the answer then depends heavily on which yardstick you pick — that is a finding, not a defect.
Filing health is computed separately and never looks at price. It reads the Piotroski F-Score, the Altman Z-Score and the Beneish M-Score straight from the filings: means none of them flagged, means one moderate flag, means a distress or manipulation flag, or several softer ones. For banks and insurers it reads : all three scores were built on non-financial companies and their authors excluded financials, so for a balance-sheet business they measure the shape of the business rather than its health. Keeping the two axes apart is deliberate — a cheap company with weak filings is a very different object from a cheap company with sound ones, and a single blended verdict would hide which you are looking at.
This is a computed description of a security against a published formula — not investment advice, not a recommendation, and not a price target. Labels describe ZBRA against the band above; they say nothing about whether it suits your circumstances. Historical multiples are not a forecast, and a company can stay outside its own historical range for years. Educational information only.
Why some estimators are skipped. A multiple can be arithmetically computable and still meaningless. GAAP depreciation crushes REIT earnings, so we do not price a REIT off P/E; revenue and free cash flow are not comparable measures for a bank or an insurer, so those are dropped too. We would rather show you the estimators we trust and name every one we withheld, with the reason, than quietly fold in a number we do not believe.
Every number above is arithmetic you can redo. The inputs are ZBRA’s own SEC filings and our price history; the formulas are stated on this page. There is no proprietary black box, and there is nothing here you have to take on trust.
No open-market Form 4 buys or sells reported for ZBRA in the last ~6 months.