/stocks — the workspaceLOADING
All SIMO SEC filings, by type → · Earnings date & implied move · Search inside filings
Silicon Motion Technology CORP (SIMO) is a semiconductors & related devices company. Piotroski F-Score 5/8. Fundamentals from SEC filings; prices are end-of-day.
What’s behind SIMO’s latest move — the size, how unusual the volume is, and the catalyst on the tape, explained and cited to the source.
End-of-day bars · delayed, not real-time · data: Databento · studies computed in your browser from these barsCharting by TradingView Lightweight Charts™
FY ending 2025-12-31 vs 2024-12-31. original 1968 formula; calibrated on manufacturers, read financials/REITs with care
Stage-1 growth down the side, discount rate across the top, with terminal growth at 2.5% and 10 years of stage 1. Every cell runs the same two-stage DCF as the card above, so moving a slider moves the grid.
| Growth ↓ Discount → | 7% | 8% | 9% | 10% | 11% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4% | 4.82 | 3.93 | 3.31 | 2.86 | 2.51 |
| 6% | 5.67 | 4.59 | 3.85 | 3.31 | 2.90 |
| 8% | 6.66 | 5.37 | 4.48 | 3.83 | 3.34 |
| 10% | 7.82 | 6.28 | 5.21 | 4.44 | 3.85 |
| 12% | 9.18 | 7.33 | 6.06 | 5.14 | 4.45 |
| Growth the close implies | 54.1% | 58.4% | 62.2% | 65.7% | 69.0% |
Outlined: your current pair. Shaded: at or above the last close, 187.39 USD. The heavy line runs between the cells on either side of it.
Per ADS: one ADS is 4 ordinary shares (20-F filed 2026-04-30), so EPS and book value are multiplied by 4 and the share count divided by it.
Estimates, not targets. The DCF treats free cash flow as cash flow to equity and divides by shares (the common retail shortcut — it skips net debt and a full WACC), so it’s a sanity-check, not a valuation opinion. All inputs are from SIMO’s SEC filings; change any assumption above and the numbers update live. Educational only — not investment advice.
A plain-English read on SIMO plus an auto-SWOT — built from SIMO's SEC filings and market data, every point cited, nothing invented. Educational, not investment advice.
Four AI analysts — a bull, a bear, a risk manager, and a PM — debate SIMO using only the SEC-filing and market facts below. Every point cites its evidence; nothing is invented. This is educational research, not investment advice.
Educational only — not financial advice. Data from SEC EDGAR public filings; no live market data is shown. Figures reflect the company's own reported XBRL facts and may lag.
XBRL company facts, SEC EDGAR. TTM = last four reported quarters. Valuation ratios arrive with a price source — we don't fake quotes.
No recent 10-K / 10-Q / 8-K filings found.
Has SIMO been issuing shares? Offering history →
↓ Download the fiscal-year statement table: XLSX · CSV · revenue, income, EPS, cash flow, balance sheet · from SEC XBRL, dated
As filed. We do not recategorize line items. Each chart plots one XBRL concept exactly as SIMO tagged it: revenue us-gaap:RevenueFromContractWithCustomerExcludingAssessedTax, net income us-gaap:NetIncomeLoss, EPS us-gaap:EarningsPerShareDiluted, with EPS multiplied to a per-ADS figure, as its chart title says, period by period; a period the company did not tag on its own is left out, not estimated. A figure that disagrees with the filing is a bug in our extraction, not a policy, and we fix it: report a mismatch.
Projected from SIMO's own SEC 8-K filing history — the year-over-year reporting pattern (about 47% land the exact day, about 91% within a week, measured across 4,713 past reports). No analyst estimates and nothing invented, and every confirmed date links to the source it came from, so you can check it yourself. It upgrades the momentSIMO files or announces.
Earnings dates are the company's 8-K Item 2.02 filings (SEC). Reactions from Databento EOD.
No lawmaker has disclosed a trade in SIMO under the STOCK Act.
Total return including reinvested dividends, from SIMO’s adjusted closing prices. Past return is not a forecast and not investment advice.
1 of 5 estimators could run on SIMO's filings. A band needs at least 2.
One estimator is a point estimate, not a range, so no band and no valuation label are published for SIMO. Below is everything that was checked, so the refusal can be read rather than taken on trust.
No fiscal year of price history was on record; the historical multiples need 5. No sector peer set is priced for SIMO, so sector medians could not fill the gaps.
Every refusal recorded for SIMO → · How often we decline, and why →
Free cash flow does not currently cover the dividend. That is the single most important test here, and it failing outweighs the tests that passed.
The score is passed over computable, not passed out of five. If only three tests could be run on SIMO’s filings, the score is out of three and the other two are listed with the reason they were skipped. Scoring a skipped test as a failure would punish a company for how its industry reports, and scoring it as a pass would flatter one.
Labels come from that ratio:
Below three computable tests we publish no label at all and show the individual results instead. A summary drawn from one or two tests is not a summary.
Free cash flow coverage carries the most weight in practice, because dividends are paid in cash and free cash flow is the cash actually available to pay them. The earnings payout ratio is the better-known test but the weaker one — earnings are an accounting figure, dividends are not. Where the two disagree, believe the cash.
Why tests get skipped. A REIT gets no earnings payout ratio: GAAP depreciation on appreciating property understates a REIT’s distributable earnings, which is exactly why the industry reports FFO and why REITs are required to distribute most of their taxable income. Banks and insurers get no leverage test, because deposits are debt and structurally high leverage is what a balance-sheet business is, not a warning sign.
The biggest limitation, stated plainly. The coverage tests read a single fiscal year, and one year of cash flow is far more volatile than a dividend record. A legal settlement, a tax payment or an acquisition can sink coverage in a year that says nothing about the dividend. Where a weak year contradicts a long unbroken record, we say so above rather than letting the harsher number stand alone — but you should still check what happened in that specific year.
The streak is the weakest test here, and it is deliberately listed last. Every dividend that was ever cut had an unbroken streak right up until the year it was cut. A freeze does not break the run — a company that holds its dividend flat through a bad year has not cut it — so raises are counted separately, and a long flat run cannot pass itself off as dividend growth.
Every figure above is from SIMO’s own SEC filings and the arithmetic is stated on this page. This describes what the filings show about the dividend’s coverage — it is not a prediction that the dividend will or will not be cut, not a recommendation, and not investment advice. A covered dividend can still be cut, and a strained one can still be maintained for years. Educational information only.
No tracked institution reported a position in SIMO in the latest 13F round.
Shareholder returns exceeded free cash flow this period — the difference was funded from cash on hand, debt, or asset sales rather than the business itself. Common and sustainable for a period; worth watching if it persists.
Both dividends and buybacks are in use — a mixed return policy. Buybacks flex with cash flow; dividends carry a stronger implicit commitment to maintain.
Every figure is from SIMO’s SEC cash-flow statement. This describes how management deployed cash last period — it is not a grade of that deployment, not a forecast, and not investment advice. Whether reinvesting, paying down debt, or returning cash was the right call depends on the return each earns, which the filings do not settle. Educational information only.
Of 3 sales in the last ~6 months, 0 were filed with the Rule 10b5-1 box checked, set up in advance under a written trading plan; 3 were filed without it.
| SHIEH HAN-PINGDirector | SELL | $629K | view → |
| LIN KUAN-MINGDirector | SELL | $930K | view → |
| DUANN SHII TYNGDirector | SELL | $368K | view → |
2 of the 2 checks that ran found nothing new for SIMO. 2 could not run.
Each event check looks back 30 days from the date its own source was stored, read or generated, never from the date this page was built. A check that finds nothing is a measurement of that window, not a forecast, and a check that cannot be dated does not make the claim at all.
From SEC Form 4 and 13F filings. Both are backward-looking disclosures on different reporting clocks, and neither predicts price. Educational information only — not investment advice.
Head office: Hong Kong Island, Hong Kong SAR China · the company’s charter and its head office are in different countries.
Source: the cover page of Silicon Motion Technology CORP’s 20-F filed 2026-04-30, on EDGAR. Filings checked 2026-10-25. Incorporation is where the company’s charter was filed. It is not where the business operates or earns, which no filing cover states. How this works