/stocks — the workspaceLOADING
All UCL SEC filings, by type → · Earnings date & implied move · Search inside filings
uCloudlink Group Inc. (UCL) is a communications services, nec company. Piotroski F-Score 5/8. 6 insider Form 4 filings in the last 90 days. Fundamentals from SEC filings; prices are end-of-day.
What’s behind UCL’s latest move — the size, how unusual the volume is, and the catalyst on the tape, explained and cited to the source.
End-of-day bars · delayed, not real-time · data: Databento · studies computed in your browser from these barsCharting by TradingView Lightweight Charts™
FY ending 2025-12-31 vs 2024-12-31. original 1968 formula; calibrated on manufacturers, read financials/REITs with care
Per-share inputs withheld: the ADS ratio read from its filings (20,100,000) fails the share-count check.
Estimates, not targets. The DCF treats free cash flow as cash flow to equity and divides by shares (the common retail shortcut — it skips net debt and a full WACC), so it’s a sanity-check, not a valuation opinion. All inputs are from UCL’s SEC filings; change any assumption above and the numbers update live. Educational only — not investment advice.
Not reported in XBRL for this filer.
↓ Download the fiscal-year statement table: XLSX · CSV · revenue, income, EPS, cash flow, balance sheet · from SEC XBRL, dated
As filed. We do not recategorize line items. Each chart plots one XBRL concept exactly as UCL tagged it: revenue us-gaap:Revenues, net income us-gaap:NetIncomeLoss, EPS us-gaap:EarningsPerShareDiluted, period by period; a period the company did not tag on its own is left out, not estimated. A figure that disagrees with the filing is a bug in our extraction, not a policy, and we fix it: .
A plain-English read on UCL plus an auto-SWOT — built from UCL's SEC filings and market data, every point cited, nothing invented. Educational, not investment advice.
Four AI analysts — a bull, a bear, a risk manager, and a PM — debate UCL using only the SEC-filing and market facts below. Every point cites its evidence; nothing is invented. This is educational research, not investment advice.
Educational only — not financial advice. Data from SEC EDGAR public filings; no live market data is shown. Figures reflect the company's own reported XBRL facts and may lag.
EPS and P/E withheld: the ADS ratio read from its filings (20,100,000) fails the share-count check.
XBRL company facts, SEC EDGAR. TTM = last four reported quarters. Valuation ratios arrive with a price source — we don't fake quotes.
No recent 10-K / 10-Q / 8-K filings found.
Has UCL been issuing shares? Offering history →
Projected from UCL's own SEC 8-K filing history — the year-over-year reporting pattern (about 47% land the exact day, about 91% within a week, measured across 4,713 past reports). No analyst estimates and nothing invented, and every confirmed date links to the source it came from, so you can check it yourself. It upgrades the momentUCL files or announces.
Earnings dates are the company's 8-K Item 2.02 filings (SEC). Reactions from Databento EOD.
None of the 5 estimators could run on UCL's filings.
One estimator is a point estimate, not a range, so no band and no valuation label are published for UCL. Below is everything that was checked, so the refusal can be read rather than taken on trust.
Nothing produced a value.
No fiscal year of price history was on record; the historical multiples need 5. No sector peer set is priced for UCL, so sector medians could not fill the gaps.
Every refusal recorded for UCL → · How often we decline, and why →
No lawmaker has disclosed a trade in UCL under the STOCK Act.
Only 1 of 5 tests could be computed from the filings — too few to summarise, so the individual results are shown without an overall label.
The score is passed over computable, not passed out of five. If only three tests could be run on UCL’s filings, the score is out of three and the other two are listed with the reason they were skipped. Scoring a skipped test as a failure would punish a company for how its industry reports, and scoring it as a pass would flatter one.
Labels come from that ratio:
Below three computable tests we publish no label at all and show the individual results instead. A summary drawn from one or two tests is not a summary.
Free cash flow coverage carries the most weight in practice, because dividends are paid in cash and free cash flow is the cash actually available to pay them. The earnings payout ratio is the better-known test but the weaker one — earnings are an accounting figure, dividends are not. Where the two disagree, believe the cash.
Why tests get skipped. A REIT gets no earnings payout ratio: GAAP depreciation on appreciating property understates a REIT’s distributable earnings, which is exactly why the industry reports FFO and why REITs are required to distribute most of their taxable income. Banks and insurers get no leverage test, because deposits are debt and structurally high leverage is what a balance-sheet business is, not a warning sign.
The biggest limitation, stated plainly. The coverage tests read a single fiscal year, and one year of cash flow is far more volatile than a dividend record. A legal settlement, a tax payment or an acquisition can sink coverage in a year that says nothing about the dividend. Where a weak year contradicts a long unbroken record, we say so above rather than letting the harsher number stand alone — but you should still check what happened in that specific year.
The streak is the weakest test here, and it is deliberately listed last. Every dividend that was ever cut had an unbroken streak right up until the year it was cut. A freeze does not break the run — a company that holds its dividend flat through a bad year has not cut it — so raises are counted separately, and a long flat run cannot pass itself off as dividend growth.
Every figure above is from UCL’s own SEC filings and the arithmetic is stated on this page. This describes what the filings show about the dividend’s coverage — it is not a prediction that the dividend will or will not be cut, not a recommendation, and not investment advice. A covered dividend can still be cut, and a strained one can still be maintained for years. Educational information only.
Every figure is from UCL’s SEC cash-flow statement. This describes how management deployed cash last period — it is not a grade of that deployment, not a forecast, and not investment advice. Whether reinvesting, paying down debt, or returning cash was the right call depends on the return each earns, which the filings do not settle. Educational information only.
No tracked institution reported a position in UCL in the latest 13F round.
| Peng ZhipingDirector | BUY | $11K | view → |
2 of the 2 checks that ran found nothing new for UCL. 2 could not run.
Each event check looks back 30 days from the date its own source was stored, read or generated, never from the date this page was built. A check that finds nothing is a measurement of that window, not a forecast, and a check that cannot be dated does not make the claim at all.
From SEC Form 4 and 13F filings. Both are backward-looking disclosures on different reporting clocks, and neither predicts price. Educational information only — not investment advice.
Head office: Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR China · the company’s charter and its head office are in different countries.
Source: the cover page of uCloudlink Group Inc.’s 20-F filed 2026-03-27, on EDGAR. Filings checked 2026-10-25. Incorporation is where the company’s charter was filed. It is not where the business operates or earns, which no filing cover states. How this works