/stocks — the workspaceLOADING
All NBIS SEC filings, by type → · Earnings date & implied move · Search inside filings
Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) is a services-computer programming, data processing, etc. company. Piotroski F-Score 5/8. 25 insider Form 4 filings in the last 90 days. Fundamentals from SEC filings; prices are end-of-day.
What’s behind NBIS’s latest move — the size, how unusual the volume is, and the catalyst on the tape, explained and cited to the source.
End-of-day bars · delayed, not real-time · data: Databento · studies computed in your browser from these barsCharting by TradingView Lightweight Charts™
FY ending 2025-12-31 vs 2024-12-31. original 1968 formula; calibrated on manufacturers, read financials/REITs with care
No sensitivity grid: free cash flow is not positive, so the DCF gives no value at any growth or discount rate.
Estimates, not targets. The DCF treats free cash flow as cash flow to equity and divides by shares (the common retail shortcut — it skips net debt and a full WACC), so it’s a sanity-check, not a valuation opinion. All inputs are from NBIS’s SEC filings; change any assumption above and the numbers update live. Educational only — not investment advice.
A plain-English read on NBIS plus an auto-SWOT — built from NBIS's SEC filings and market data, every point cited, nothing invented. Educational, not investment advice.
Four AI analysts — a bull, a bear, a risk manager, and a PM — debate NBIS using only the SEC-filing and market facts below. Every point cites its evidence; nothing is invented. This is educational research, not investment advice.
Educational only — not financial advice. Data from SEC EDGAR public filings; no live market data is shown. Figures reflect the company's own reported XBRL facts and may lag.
XBRL company facts, SEC EDGAR. TTM = last four reported quarters. Valuation ratios arrive with a price source — we don't fake quotes.
No recent 10-K / 10-Q / 8-K filings found.
Has NBIS been issuing shares? Offering history →
↓ Download the fiscal-year statement table: XLSX · CSV · revenue, income, EPS, cash flow, balance sheet · from SEC XBRL, dated
As filed. We do not recategorize line items. Each chart plots one XBRL concept exactly as NBIS tagged it: revenue us-gaap:Revenues, net income us-gaap:ProfitLoss, EPS us-gaap:EarningsPerShareDiluted, period by period; a period the company did not tag on its own is left out, not estimated. A figure that disagrees with the filing is a bug in our extraction, not a policy, and we fix it: report a mismatch.
Projected from NBIS's own SEC 8-K filing history — the year-over-year reporting pattern (about 47% land the exact day, about 91% within a week, measured across 4,713 past reports). No analyst estimates and nothing invented, and every confirmed date links to the source it came from, so you can check it yourself. It upgrades the momentNBIS files or announces.
Earnings dates are the company's 8-K Item 2.02 filings (SEC). Reactions from Databento EOD.
No lawmaker has disclosed a trade in NBIS under the STOCK Act.
Total return including reinvested dividends, from NBIS’s adjusted closing prices. Past return is not a forecast and not investment advice.
None of the 5 estimators could run on NBIS's filings.
One estimator is a point estimate, not a range, so no band and no valuation label are published for NBIS. Below is everything that was checked, so the refusal can be read rather than taken on trust.
Nothing produced a value.
No fiscal year of price history was on record; the historical multiples need 5. No sector peer set is priced for NBIS, so sector medians could not fill the gaps.
Every refusal recorded for NBIS → · How often we decline, and why →
Shareholder returns exceeded free cash flow this period — the difference was funded from cash on hand, debt, or asset sales rather than the business itself. Common and sustainable for a period; worth watching if it persists.
Every figure is from NBIS’s SEC cash-flow statement. This describes how management deployed cash last period — it is not a grade of that deployment, not a forecast, and not investment advice. Whether reinvesting, paying down debt, or returning cash was the right call depends on the return each earns, which the filings do not settle. Educational information only.
| Situational Awareness (Leopold Aschenbrenner) | $1.23B | 6.1% of portfolio |
| Lone Pine Capital (Steve Mandel) | $1.18B | 7.2% of portfolio |
| Soros Fund Management | $85.6M | 1.1% of portfolio |
| Ticker | Held by | Which funds |
|---|---|---|
| BTDR | 2 of 3 | Situational Awareness, Lone Pine Capital |
| LIN | 2 of 3 | Lone Pine Capital, Soros Fund Management |
| SHAZ | 2 of 3 | Situational Awareness, Lone Pine Capital |
How each row is counted: of the 3 tracked funds whose 25 largest 13F positions include NBIS, the number whose same list also includes that ticker. Funds, not shares or dollars, so one large position cannot outweigh several ordinary ones; a ticker needs at least 2 of them to appear. From each fund’s latest 13F-HR (quarter ended Jun 30, 2026 for 3), long US stock only, matched to tickers by issuer name, so a holding below a fund’s top 25 is not counted. A list of what these funds reported, not a ranking and not a recommendation. Every tracked fund →
Every registered fund files its complete portfolio with the SEC. These weights come from those filings, so each one carries the period it describes. Holdings are quarterly and filed in arrears — the figures below are as of 2026-06-30, not today.
| Fund | Weight | As of |
|---|---|---|
| QQQ Invesco QQQ Trust | 0.26% | 2026-06-30 |
Drawn from 39 large US equity funds we scan, not every fund in existence, so a missing fund means we do not scan it rather than that it holds none. Holdings are joined to tickers by issuer name, which does not resolve every position; what that misses is published.
Head office: Netherlands
Source: the cover page of Nebius Group N.V.’s 20-F filed 2026-04-30, on EDGAR. Filings checked 2026-10-27. Incorporation is where the company’s charter was filed. It is not where the business operates or earns, which no filing cover states. How this works
Of 12 sales in the last ~6 months, 8 were filed with the Rule 10b5-1 box checked, set up in advance under a written trading plan; 4 were filed without it.
| Grimme ArneDirector | BUY | $122K | view → |
| Grimme ArneDirector | BUY | $50K | view → |
| Grimme ArneDirector | BUY | $25K | view → |
| Boynton John Wilson IVDirector | SELLplan | $1.3M | view → |
| Grimme ArneDirector | BUY | $50K | view → |
| Boroditsky MarcChief Revenue Officer | SELLplan | $1.5M | view → |
| Nave OphirCOO | SELLplan | $117.8M | view → |
| Korolenko AndreyChief Infrastructure Officer | SELL | $6.8M | view → |
2 of the 2 checks that ran found nothing new for NBIS. 2 could not run.
Each event check looks back 30 days from the date its own source was stored, read or generated, never from the date this page was built. A check that finds nothing is a measurement of that window, not a forecast, and a check that cannot be dated does not make the claim at all.
These two signals are 114 days apart. Form 4 is filed within two business days of the trade; 13F is filed up to 45 days after quarter end and describes positions as they stood on that date. Agreement between them is not confirmation — the funds may have moved months before the insiders did, or the other way round. Read them as two separate observations that happen to point the same way, never as one signal backing up another.
From SEC Form 4 and 13F filings. Both are backward-looking disclosures on different reporting clocks, and neither predicts price. Educational information only — not investment advice.