Lipocine Inc. 10-Q

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS On February 15, 2019, a purported shareholder filed a shareholder derivative complaint in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, John Wajda, derivatively on behalf of Lipocine Inc. v. Mahesh Patel, et al., against certain of our current and former officers and directors as well as the Company as a nominal defendant. The complaint asserts claims for alleged breaches of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment arising out of our dissemination of purportedly false and misleading statements relating to the filing of the New Drug Application (“NDA”) for TLANDO. The relief sought in the complaint includes unspecified damages, changes to our corporate governance procedures, equitable and/or injunctive relief, restitution, and attorneys’ fees. On August 16, 2019, defendants filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. In response, the plaintiff’s filed an amended stockholder derivative complaint. Defendants’ motion to dismiss the amended complaint was filed on December 12, 2019; plaintiff’s response was filed on January 27, 2020 and defendants’ reply was filed on February 26, 2020. Oral arguments on the motion to dismiss were held on July 28, 2020. On July 30, 2020, the court entered an order dismissing the complaint in its entirety. On April 2, 2019, we filed a lawsuit against Clarus in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware alleging that Clarus’s JATENZO® product infringes six of Lipocine’s issued U.S. patents: 9,034,858; 9,205,057; 9,480,690; 9,757,390; 6,569,463; and 6,923,988. Clarus has answered the complaint and asserted counterclaims of non-infringement and invalidity. We answered Clarus’s counterclaims on April 29, 2019. The Court held a scheduling conference on August 15, 2019, a claim construction hearing on February 11, 2020 and scheduled a five-day jury trial beginning on February 8, 2021. On February 11, 2020, we voluntarily dismissed allegations of patent infringement for expired U.S. Patent Nos. 6,569,463 and 6,923,988 in an effort to streamline the issues and associated costs for dispute. The parties are currently engaged in the fact discovery and expert testimony phase of the lawsuit. On November 14, 2019, the Company and certain of its officers were named as defendants in a purported shareholder class action lawsuit, Solomon Abady v. Lipocine Inc. et al ., 2:19-cv-00906-PMW, filed in the United District Court for the District of Utah. The complaint alleges that the defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that our filing of the NDA for TLANDO to the FDA contained deficiencies and as a result the defendants’ statements about our business and operations were false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis in violation of federal securities laws. The lawsuit seeks certification as a class action (for a purported class of purchasers of the Company’s securities from March 27, 2019 through November 8, 2019), compensatory damages in an unspecified amount, and unspecified equitable or injunctive relief. We have insurance that covers claims of this nature. The retention amount payable by us under our policy is $1.25 million. We filed a motion to dismiss this class action lawsuit on July 24, 2020. In response, the plaintiff’s filed their response to the motion to dismiss the class action lawsuit on September 22, 2020. Further, we intend to vigorously defend ourselves and our current and former officers and directors against these allegations and have not recorded a liability related to this shareholder class action lawsuit as the outcome is not probable nor can an estimate be made of loss, if any. 41