/stocks — the workspaceLOADING
All FINV SEC filings, by type → · Earnings date & implied move · Search inside filings
FinVolution Group (FINV) is a loan brokers company. Piotroski F-Score 2/6. Fundamentals from SEC filings; prices are end-of-day.
What’s behind FINV’s latest move — the size, how unusual the volume is, and the catalyst on the tape, explained and cited to the source.
End-of-day bars · delayed, not real-time · data: Databento · studies computed in your browser from these barsCharting by TradingView Lightweight Charts™
FY ending 2025-12-31 vs 2024-12-31.
Per-share inputs withheld: it files no share count to check the ADS ratio read from its filings (5) against.
Estimates, not targets. The DCF treats free cash flow as cash flow to equity and divides by shares (the common retail shortcut — it skips net debt and a full WACC), so it’s a sanity-check, not a valuation opinion. All inputs are from FINV’s SEC filings; change any assumption above and the numbers update live. Educational only — not investment advice.
Not reported in XBRL for this filer.
↓ Download the fiscal-year statement table: XLSX · CSV · revenue, income, EPS, cash flow, balance sheet · from SEC XBRL, dated
As filed. We do not recategorize line items. Each chart plots one XBRL concept exactly as FINV tagged it: revenue us-gaap:RevenueFromContractWithCustomerExcludingAssessedTax, net income us-gaap:NetIncomeLoss, EPS us-gaap:EarningsPerShareDiluted, period by period; a period the company did not tag on its own is left out, not estimated. A figure that disagrees with the filing is a bug in our extraction, not a policy, and we fix it: .
A plain-English read on FINV plus an auto-SWOT — built from FINV's SEC filings and market data, every point cited, nothing invented. Educational, not investment advice.
Four AI analysts — a bull, a bear, a risk manager, and a PM — debate FINV using only the SEC-filing and market facts below. Every point cites its evidence; nothing is invented. This is educational research, not investment advice.
Educational only — not financial advice. Data from SEC EDGAR public filings; no live market data is shown. Figures reflect the company's own reported XBRL facts and may lag.
EPS and P/E withheld: it files no share count to check the ADS ratio read from its filings (5) against.
XBRL company facts, SEC EDGAR. TTM = last four reported quarters. Valuation ratios arrive with a price source — we don't fake quotes.
No recent 10-K / 10-Q / 8-K filings found.
Has FINV been issuing shares? Offering history →
Projected from FINV's own SEC 8-K filing history — the year-over-year reporting pattern (about 47% land the exact day, about 91% within a week, measured across 4,713 past reports). No analyst estimates and nothing invented, and every confirmed date links to the source it came from, so you can check it yourself. It upgrades the momentFINV files or announces.
Earnings dates are the company's 8-K Item 2.02 filings (SEC). Reactions from Databento EOD.
No lawmaker has disclosed a trade in FINV under the STOCK Act.
No tracked institution reported a position in FINV in the latest 13F round.
None of the 5 estimators could run on FINV's filings.
One estimator is a point estimate, not a range, so no band and no valuation label are published for FINV. Below is everything that was checked, so the refusal can be read rather than taken on trust.
Nothing produced a value.
No fiscal year of price history was on record; the historical multiples need 5. No sector peer set is priced for FINV, so sector medians could not fill the gaps.
Every refusal recorded for FINV → · How often we decline, and why →
The score is passed over computable, not passed out of five. If only three tests could be run on FINV’s filings, the score is out of three and the other two are listed with the reason they were skipped. Scoring a skipped test as a failure would punish a company for how its industry reports, and scoring it as a pass would flatter one.
Labels come from that ratio:
Below three computable tests we publish no label at all and show the individual results instead. A summary drawn from one or two tests is not a summary.
Free cash flow coverage carries the most weight in practice, because dividends are paid in cash and free cash flow is the cash actually available to pay them. The earnings payout ratio is the better-known test but the weaker one — earnings are an accounting figure, dividends are not. Where the two disagree, believe the cash.
Why tests get skipped. A REIT gets no earnings payout ratio: GAAP depreciation on appreciating property understates a REIT’s distributable earnings, which is exactly why the industry reports FFO and why REITs are required to distribute most of their taxable income. Banks and insurers get no leverage test, because deposits are debt and structurally high leverage is what a balance-sheet business is, not a warning sign.
The biggest limitation, stated plainly. The coverage tests read a single fiscal year, and one year of cash flow is far more volatile than a dividend record. A legal settlement, a tax payment or an acquisition can sink coverage in a year that says nothing about the dividend. Where a weak year contradicts a long unbroken record, we say so above rather than letting the harsher number stand alone — but you should still check what happened in that specific year.
The streak is the weakest test here, and it is deliberately listed last. Every dividend that was ever cut had an unbroken streak right up until the year it was cut. A freeze does not break the run — a company that holds its dividend flat through a bad year has not cut it — so raises are counted separately, and a long flat run cannot pass itself off as dividend growth.
Every figure above is from FINV’s own SEC filings and the arithmetic is stated on this page. This describes what the filings show about the dividend’s coverage — it is not a prediction that the dividend will or will not be cut, not a recommendation, and not investment advice. A covered dividend can still be cut, and a strained one can still be maintained for years. Educational information only.
Both dividends and buybacks are in use — a mixed return policy. Buybacks flex with cash flow; dividends carry a stronger implicit commitment to maintain.
Every figure is from FINV’s SEC cash-flow statement. This describes how management deployed cash last period — it is not a grade of that deployment, not a forecast, and not investment advice. Whether reinvesting, paying down debt, or returning cash was the right call depends on the return each earns, which the filings do not settle. Educational information only.
Of 1 sale in the last ~6 months, 0 were filed with the Rule 10b5-1 box checked, set up in advance under a written trading plan; 1 was filed without it.
| Xiang BingDirector | SELL | $80K | view → |
2 of the 2 checks that ran found nothing new for FINV. 2 could not run.
Each event check looks back 30 days from the date its own source was stored, read or generated, never from the date this page was built. A check that finds nothing is a measurement of that window, not a forecast, and a check that cannot be dated does not make the claim at all.
From SEC Form 4 and 13F filings. Both are backward-looking disclosures on different reporting clocks, and neither predicts price. Educational information only — not investment advice.
Head office: Shanghai, China · the company’s charter and its head office are in different countries.
Source: the cover page of FinVolution Group’s 20-F filed 2026-04-29, on EDGAR. Filings checked 2026-11-01. Incorporation is where the company’s charter was filed. It is not where the business operates or earns, which no filing cover states. How this works