Item 1. Legal Proceedings
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
NSC and AdR
Immediately following CW-Cooperatief’s acquisition of its initial 50% ownership in NSC, the remaining 50% ownership interest in NSC was held by an unrelated company, Norte Sur Agua, S. de R.L. de C.V. (“NSA”). NSA subsequently transferred ownership of half of its shares in NSC to EWG Water LLC (“EWG”) and the other half of its shares in NSC to an individual (the “individual shareholder”). In February 2012, CW-Cooperatief paid $300,000 to enter into an agreement (the “Option Agreement”) that provided it with an option, exercisable through February 7, 2014, to purchase the shares of NSC owned by the individual shareholder for a price of $1.0 million along with an immediate usufruct and power of attorney to vote those shares. Such shares constituted 25% of the ownership of NSC as of February 2012. In May 2013, NSC repaid a $5.7 million loan payable to CW-Cooperatief by issuing additional shares of its stock. As a result of this share issuance to CW-Cooperatief, we indirectly acquired 99.99% of the ownership of NSC. The Option Agreement contained an anti-dilution provision that required CW-Cooperatief to transfer or otherwise cause the individual shareholder to acquire, for a total price of $1 (regardless of their par or market value), shares in NSC of an amount sufficient to maintain the individual shareholder’s 25% ownership interest in NSC if (i) any new shares of NSC were issued subsequent to the execution of the Option Agreement (causing the individual shareholder’s 25% ownership interest in NSC to be decreased); and (ii) CW-Cooperatief did not exercise its share purchase option by February 7, 2014. CW-Cooperatief exercised its option and paid the $1.0 million to the individual shareholder to purchase the Option Agreement shares in February 2014.
41
Table of Contents
In January 2018, EWG initiated an ordinary mercantile claim against the individual shareholder, NSC and CW-Cooperatief, (with AdR being named as a third party to be called to trial) before the Tenth Civil Judge in Tijuana, Baja California for Mercantile Matters (the “Tenth Civil Judge”). In the ordinary mercantile claim, EWG challenged, among other things, the transactions contemplated under the Option Agreement, and therefore, the capital investment transactions that increased the ownership interest of CW-Cooperatief in NSC to 99.99% as a consequence of the Option Agreement. EWG requested that the court, as a preliminary matter (a) suspend the effectiveness of the challenged transactions; (b) order certain public officials in Mexico to record the pendency of the lawsuit in the public records (including a special request to register a lien over the real estate owned by NSC); (c) appoint an inspector for NSC to oversee its commercial activities; and (d) order public officials in Mexico and credit institutions abroad to refrain from authorizing or executing any legal act related with the activities of the plaintiff, the co-defendants and the third party called to trial to avoid damages to third parties, including those with whom negotiations or any form of commercial or administrative activities, or activities of any other nature related with the “Rosarito” water desalination project, are being conducted. The Tenth Civil Judge granted, ex-parte, the preliminary relief sought by EWG, which resulted in the issuance of official writs to several governmental and public entities involved with the “Rosarito” water desalination project, including the registration of the pendency of the lawsuit in certain public records.
On October 16, 2018, NSC was served with the ordinary mercantile claim. On November 7, 2018, NSC filed a legal response to the claim, vigorously opposing the claims made by EWG. In addition to such legal response, NSC filed (i) a request to submit the claim to arbitration, based on certain provisions of the by-laws of NSC, (ii) an appeal remedy against the preliminary relief (which was resolved in December 2019, and ordered the revocation of the order of the Tenth Civil Judge granting EWG the preliminary relief), and (iii) a request for the setting of a guarantee to release the preliminary relief granted in favor of EWG.
On October 1, 2020 and following an order from a Federal Judge obtained by NSC, the Tenth Civil Judge resolved to (i) move the claim of EWG to arbitration, and (ii) suspend the corresponding ordinary mercantile procedure. EWG challenged such resolution, arguing that its notification was not lawful. The Tenth Civil Judge dismissed such challenge, and thereafter EWG filed a remedy against such dismissal. NSC appeared before the court to vigorously oppose such remedy, and the remedy was subsequently dismissed. To date, arbitration has not been initiated by either party.
Notwithstanding the resolution of the Tenth Civil Judge to move to EWG’s claim to arbitration and the dismissal of the remedy requested by EWG discussed in the previous paragraph, subparagraphs a) and b) that follow describe certain amparo claims, and an appeal remedy arising therefrom.
a) Amparo filed by EWG against a resolution of the Tenth Civil Judge.
In July 2021, EWG filed an amparo claim against the resolution of the Tenth Civil Judge dismissing the remedy filed by EWG against the October 1, 2020 resolution within the mentioned ordinary mercantile claim. NSC filed before the corresponding amparo court a writ vigorously opposing this claim. Considering the foregoing, and that AdR was only named as a third party with interest, it was not necessary for AdR to submit arguments against EWG in this claim. Further, CW-Cooperatief was not notified of this amparo claim.
Within this amparo claim, the Third District Court in Tijuana granted a suspension in favor of EWG, merely for the effect of holding in place the referral to arbitration subject matter of the October 1, 2020 resolution mentioned above. Such suspension was conditioned on the posting by EWG of a guarantee in the amount of 50,000 Mexican pesos, which was not posted. Regardless of the effects of the suspension and the lack of the posting of a guarantee, NSC filed an appeal remedy against its granting (as described in item b) below).
Following a final hearing that took place in March 2022, a resolution dismissing this claim was issued and notified to NSC at the beginning of April 2022. Based upon publicly available information, EWG failed to submit a remedy against such resolution within the applicable term, which expired at the end of April 2022. NSC submitted a writ requesting an official confirmation on the expiration of such term without EWG having filed a remedy. Such writ was resolved through a confirmation of the expiration
42
Table of Contents
of such term, issued near the end of May 2022. By means of such resolution, this amparo claim has concluded.
b) Appeal filed by NSC against the suspension granted in favor of EWG.
The appeal remedy mentioned in the second paragraph of item a) immediately above was admitted by the superior court on October 18, 2021. Considering the definitive conclusion of the amparo claim mentioned in item a) immediately above, in July 2022 this appeal was resolved as having no subject matter.
Text extracted from the filing as submitted to EDGAR. Formatting, tables and exhibits are simplified for reading; the original document is authoritative for anything you rely on.