13 unchanged sentences
(b) order certain public officials in Mexico to record the pendency of the lawsuit in the public records (including a special request to register a lien over the real estate owned by NSC);
−Removed: (c) appoint an inspector for NSC to oversee its commercial
+Added: (c) appoint an inspector for NSC to oversee its commercial activities;
and (d) order public officials in Mexico and credit institutions abroad to refrain from authorizing or executing any legal act related with the activities of the plaintiff, the co-defendants and the third party called to trial to avoid damages to third parties, including those with whom negotiations or any form of commercial or administrative activities, or activities of any other nature related with the “Rosarito” water desalination project, are being conducted.
6 unchanged sentences
The Tenth Civil Judge dismissed such challenge, and thereafter EWG filed a remedy against such dismissal.
−Removed: NSC appeared before the court to vigorously oppose such remedy, which has been dismissed.
−Removed: To date, the referral to arbitration has not occurred and, as such, the procedure is currently suspended.
−Removed: Notwithstanding the resolution of the Tenth Civil Judge to move to arbitration, subparagraphs a) and b) that follow describe certain separate amparo claims, and appeal remedies arising from or relating to such ordinary mercantile claim and amparo claims, all in chronological order.
−Removed: Due to the global COVID-19 pandemic, most tribunals in Mexico suspended their activities intermittently since March 2020, with certain such tribunals partially restarting on different dates and with different special rules.
−Removed: As such, several resolutions are pending issuance.
+Added: NSC appeared before the court to vigorously oppose such remedy, and the remedy was subsequently dismissed.
+Added: To date, arbitration has not been initiated by either party.
+Added: Notwithstanding the resolution of the Tenth Civil Judge to move to EWG’s claim to arbitration and the dismissal of the remedy requested by EWG discussed in the previous paragraph, subparagraphs a) and b) that follow describe certain amparo claims, and an appeal remedy arising therefrom.
a) Amparo filed by EWG against a resolution of the Tenth Civil Judge.
In July 2021, EWG filed an amparo claim against the resolution of the Tenth Civil Judge dismissing the remedy filed by EWG against the October 1, 2020 resolution within the mentioned ordinary mercantile claim.
−Removed: NSC has filed before the corresponding amparo court a writ vigorously opposing this claim.
−Removed: Considering the foregoing, and that AdR was only named as a third party with interest, it is unnecessary for it to submit arguments against EWG in this claim.
−Removed: Further, CW-Cooperatief has not been notified of this amparo claim.
+Added: NSC filed before the corresponding amparo court a writ vigorously opposing this claim.
+Added: Considering the foregoing, and that AdR was only named as a third party with interest, it was not necessary for AdR to submit arguments against EWG in this claim.
+Added: Further, CW-Cooperatief was not notified of this amparo claim.
Within this amparo claim, the Third District Court in Tijuana granted a suspension in favor of EWG, merely for the effect of holding in place the referral to arbitration subject matter of the October 1, 2020 resolution mentioned above.
−Removed: Such suspension was conditioned on the posting of a guarantee in the amount of 50,000 Mexican pesos, which has not been posted.
−Removed: Regardless of the effects of the suspension and the lack of the posting of a guarantee, NSC has filed an appeal remedy against its granting.
+Added: Such suspension was conditioned on the posting by EWG of a guarantee in the amount of 50,000 Mexican pesos, which was not posted.
+Added: Regardless of the effects of the suspension and the lack of the posting of a guarantee, NSC filed an appeal remedy against its granting (as described in item b) below).
Following a final hearing that took place in March 2022, a resolution dismissing this claim was issued and notified to NSC at the beginning of April 2022.
−Removed: From the publicly available information, it would seem that EWG failed to submit a remedy against such resolution within the applicable term, which expired at the end of April 2022.
−Removed: NSC has submitted a writ requesting an official confirmation on the expiration of such term without EWG having filed a remedy.
+Added: Based upon publicly available information, EWG failed to submit a remedy against such resolution within the applicable term, which expired at the end of April 2022.
+Added: NSC submitted a writ requesting an official confirmation on the expiration of such term without EWG having filed a remedy.
+Added: Such writ was resolved through a confirmation of the expiration
+Added: of such term, issued near the end of May 2022.
+Added: By means of such resolution, this amparo claim has concluded.
b) Appeal filed by NSC against the suspension granted in favor of EWG.
−Removed: The appeal remedy mentioned in the second paragraph of item a) immediately above was admitted by the superior court on October 18, 2021 and is still pending to be resolved.
−Removed: Notwithstanding the resolution to move to arbitration mentioned previously, CW-Cooperatief has not been officially served with the ordinary mercantile claim, and AdR has not been notified that it has to appear for such trial.
−Removed: In any event, AdR is only a named third party called to trial in this claim, and no claims have been made by EWG against AdR.
−Removed: We cannot presently determine what impact the resolution of this litigation may have on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows .
+Added: The appeal remedy mentioned in the second paragraph of item a) immediately above was admitted by the superior court on October 18, 2021.
+Added: Considering the definitive conclusion of the amparo claim mentioned in item a) immediately above, in July 2022 this appeal was resolved as having no subject matter.
Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.