UNITED BANKSHARES INC/WV 10-K

Form 10-K UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K ☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2022 OR ☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from _______ to _______ Commission File Number: 002-86947 United Bankshares, Inc. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) West Virginia 55-0641179 (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 300 United Center 500 Virginia Street, East Charleston , West Virginia 25301 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: ( 304 ) 424-8716 Securities registered pursuant to section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Trading Symbol(s) Name of each exchange on which registered Common Stock , par value $2.50 per share UBSI NASDAQ Global Select Market Securities registered pursuant to 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☒ No ☐ Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐ UNITED BANKSHARES, INC. FORM 10-K (Continued) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act: Large accelerated filer ☒ Accelerated filer ☐ Non-accelerated filer ☐ Smaller reporting company ☐ Emerging growth company ☐ If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☒ If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐ Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ☐ No ☒ The aggregate market value of United Bankshares, Inc. common stock, representing all of its voting stock that was held by non-affiliates on June 30, 2022, was approximately $ 4,522,371,470 . As of January 31, 2023, United Bankshares, Inc. had 134,745,394 shares of common stock outstanding with a par value of $2.50 . Auditor Firm PCAOB ID: 42 Auditor Name: Ernst & Young LLP Auditor Location: Charleston, WV, USA Documents Incorporated By Reference Certain specifically designated portions of the Definitive Proxy Statement for the United Bankshares, Inc. 2023 Annual Shareholders’ Meeting to be held on May 10, 2023 are incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K. 2 UNITED BANKSHARES, INC. FORM 10-K, PART I Item 1. BUSINESS Organizational History and Subsidiaries United Bankshares, Inc. (“United,” “we,” “us,” “our,” or the “Company”) is a West Virginia corporation registered as a financial holding company pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended. United was incorporated on March 26, 1982, organized on September 9, 1982, and began conducting business on May 1, 1984 with the acquisition of three wholly-owned subsidiaries. Since its formation in 1982, United has acquired thirty-three banking institutions. United has one banking subsidiary “doing business” under the name of United Bank, operating under the laws of Virginia. United Bank offers a full range of commercial and retail banking services and products. United also owns nonbank subsidiaries which engage in other community banking services such as asset management, real property title insurance, financial planning, mortgage banking, and brokerage services. Web Site Address United’s web site address is “www.ubsi-inc.com”. United makes available free of charge on its web site the annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments thereto, as soon as reasonably practicable after United files such reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The reference to United’s web site does not constitute incorporation by reference of the information contained in the web site and should not be considered part of this document. The SEC also maintains a website at www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. Business of United As a financial holding company, United’s present businesses are community banking and mortgage banking. As of December 31, 2022, United’s consolidated assets approximated $29.5 billion and total shareholders’ equity approximated $4.5 billion. United is permitted to acquire other banks and bank holding companies, as well as thrift institutions. United is also permitted to engage in certain non-banking activities which are closely related to banking under the provisions of the Bank Holding Company Act and the Federal Reserve Board’s Regulation Y. Management continues to consider such opportunities as they arise, and in this regard, management from time to time makes inquiries, proposals, or expressions of interest as to potential opportunities, although no agreements or understandings to acquire other banks or bank holding companies or non-banking subsidiaries or to engage in other nonbanking activities, other than those identified herein, presently exist. On December 3, 2021, United completed its acquisition of Community Bankers Trust Corporation (“Community Bankers Trust”), the parent company of Essex Bank (“Essex”) with $1.8 billion in assets, headquartered in Richmond, Virginia. The acquisition of Community Bankers Trust enhanced United’s existing presence in the DC Metro MSA and took United into new markets including Baltimore, Annapolis, Lynchburg, Richmond, and the Northern Neck of Virginia. It also strategically connected our Mid-Atlantic and Southeast footprints. See Note B—Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of United’s merger with Community Bankers Trust. On May 1, 2020, United completed its acquisition of Carolina Financial Corporation (“Carolina Financial”), the parent company of CresCom Bank (“CresCom”) with $5.0 billion in assets, headquartered in Charleston, South Carolina. The acquisition of Carolina Financial broadened United’s footprint in the Southeast region with some of the most desirable banking markets in the nation. Prior to Carolina Financial, United more than doubled its size through three acquisitions in less than three and a half years. In January 2014, United closed its acquisition of Virginia Commerce Bancorp, Inc., followed by the November 2015 announcement of the Bank of Georgetown transaction which closed June 2016. In August 2016, United announced the Cardinal Financial Corporation acquisition which closed April 2017. 4 Business of Subsidiaries United, through its subsidiaries, engages primarily in community banking and mortgage banking offering most types of business permitted by law and regulation. Included among the banking services offered are the acceptance of deposits in checking, savings, time and money market accounts; the making and servicing of personal, commercial, and floor plan loans; and the making of construction and real estate loans. Also offered are individual retirement accounts, safe deposit boxes, wire transfers and other standard banking products and services. As part of its lending function, United Bank offers credit card services. United Bank maintains a trust department which acts as trustee under wills, trusts and pension and profit sharing plans, as executor and administrator of estates, and as guardian for estates of minors and incompetents, and in addition performs a variety of investment and security services. United Bank provides services to its correspondent banks such as the buying and selling of federal funds. George Mason Mortgage, LLC (“George Mason”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of United Bank, is engaged in the operation of a general mortgage and agency business, including the origination and acquisition of residential real estate loans for resale and generally the activities commonly conducted by a mortgage banking company. Residential real estate loans are sold without the servicing rights retained. These loans are for single-family, owner-occupied residences with either adjustable or fixed rate terms, with a variety of maturities tailored to effectively serve its markets. Crescent Mortgage Company (“Crescent”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of United Bank, is primarily a correspondent/wholesale mortgage company approved to originate loans in 48 states partnering with community banks, credit unions and mortgage brokers. Much like George Mason, Crescent is also engaged in the operation of a general mortgage and agency business, including the origination and acquisition of residential real estate loans for resale and the activities commonly conducted by a mortgage banking company. Depending on the pricing of residential real estate loans sold, Crescent may retain the servicing rights. In addition, at certain times, Crescent may purchase or sell rights to service mortgage loans from or to third parties. United Brokerage Services, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of United Bank, is a fully-disclosed broker/dealer and a Registered Investment Advisor with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”), the Securities and Exchange Commission, and a member of the Securities Investor Protection Corporation. United Brokerage Services, Inc. offers a wide range of investment products as well as comprehensive financial planning and asset management services to the general public. United Bank is a member of a network of automated teller machines known as the New York Currency Exchange (“NYCE”) ATM network. The NYCE is an interbank network connecting the ATMs of various financial institutions in the United States and Canada. United Bank offers secure Digital Banking for consumer and commercial customers. Digital Banking is available on a multitude of devices to include a browser-based experience, mobile (Apple, Android) and tablet applications. Digital Banking allows customers to manage their financial lives from any place they can access the internet (cellular or Wi-Fi). Customers can quickly check balances, pay bills, complete internal and Zelle ® transfers; all from the convenience of their devices. They can also set-up text and email alerts to notify them of large transactions and help them avoid overdraft fees. Commercial customers have many of the same services, including balance inquiry, cash management, sweeps and wire transfers. Consumers can also research United Bank products and open deposits accounts online and apply for mortgages from United Bank’s website. United Bank also offers an automated telephone banking system, Telebanc, which allows customers to access their personal account(s) or business account(s) information from a touch-tone telephone. 5 Lending Activities United’s loan and lease portfolio, net of unearned income, increased $2.5 billion or 14.06% in 2022 due mainly to substantial loan growth in almost all major categories of loans. The loan and lease portfolio is mainly comprised of commercial, real estate and consumer loans including credit card and home equity loans. Since year-end 2021, commercial, financial and agricultural loans increased $471.6 million or 4.23%. In particular, commercial real estate loans increased $321.4 million or 4.18% while commercial loans (not secured by real estate) increased $150.2 million or 4.34%. Within commercial loans (not secured by real estate), Payment Protection Program (“PPP”) loans declined $267.4 million. Construction and land development loans increased $912.8 million or 45.32%, residential real estate loans increased $971.4 million or 26.31%, and consumer loans increased $173.1 million or 14.51% due to an increase in indirect automobile financing. Commercial Loans and Leases The commercial loan and lease portfolio consists of loans and leases to corporate borrowers primarily in small to mid-size industrial and commercial companies, as well as automobile dealers, service, retail and wholesale merchants. Collateral securing these loans includes equipment, machinery, inventory, receivables, vehicles and commercial real estate. Commercial loans and leases are considered to contain a higher level of risk than other loan types although care is taken to minimize these risks. Numerous risk factors impact this portfolio including industry specific risks such as economy, new technology, labor rates and cyclicality, as well as customer specific factors, such as cash flow, financial structure, operating controls and asset quality. United diversifies risk within this portfolio by closely monitoring industry concentrations and portfolios to ensure that it does not exceed established lending guidelines. Diversification is intended to limit the risk of loss from any single unexpected economic event or trend. Underwriting standards require a comprehensive credit analysis and independent evaluation of virtually all larger balance commercial loans by the loan committee prior to approval. Real Estate Loans Commercial real estate loans consist of commercial mortgages, which generally are secured by nonresidential and multi-family residential properties. Also included in this portfolio are loans that are secured by owner-occupied real estate, but made for purposes other than the construction or purchase of real estate. Commercial real estate loans are to many of the same customers and carry similar industry risks as the commercial loan portfolio. Real estate mortgage loans to consumers are secured primarily by a first lien deed of trust. These loans are traditional one-to-four family residential mortgages. The loans generally do not exceed an 80% loan to value ratio at the loan origination date and most are at a variable rate of interest. These loans are considered to be of normal risk. Also included in the category of real estate mortgage loans are home equity loans. As of December 31, 2022, approximately $406.8 million or 1.98% of United’s loan portfolio were real estate loans that met the regulatory definition of a high loan-to-value loan. A high loan-to-value real estate loan is defined as any loan, line of credit, or combination of credits secured by liens on or interests in real estate that equals or exceeds a certain percentage established by United’s primary regulator of the real estate’s appraised value, unless the loan has other appropriate credit support. The certain percentage varies depending on the loan type and collateral. Appropriate credit support may include mortgage insurance, readily marketable collateral, or other acceptable collateral that reduces the loan-to-value ratio below the certain percentage. Consumer Loans Consumer loans are secured by automobiles, boats, recreational vehicles, and other personal property. Personal loans, student loans and unsecured credit card receivables are also included as consumer loans. United monitors the risk associated with these types of loans by monitoring such factors as portfolio growth, lending policies and economic conditions. Underwriting standards are continually evaluated and modified based upon these factors. Underwriting Standards United’s loan underwriting guidelines and standards are updated periodically and are presented for approval by the Board of Directors of United Bank. The purpose of the standards and guidelines is to grant loans on a sound and collectible basis; to invest available funds in a safe, profitable manner; to serve the legitimate credit needs of the communities of United’s primary market area; and to ensure that all loan applicants receive fair and equal treatment in the lending process. It is the intent of the underwriting guidelines and standards to minimize loan losses by carefully investigating the credit history of each applicant, verify the source of repayment and the ability of the applicant to repay, collateralize those loans in which collateral is deemed to be required, exercise care in the documentation of the application, review, approval, and origination process, and administer a comprehensive loan collection program. 6 United’s underwriting standards and practices are designed to originate both fixed and variable rate loan products in a manner which is consistent with the prudent banking practices applicable to these exposures. Typically, both fixed and variable rate loan underwriting practices incorporate conservative methodology, including the use of stress testing for commercial loans, and other product appropriate measures designed to provide an adequate margin of safety for the full collection of both principal and interest within contractual terms. Consumer real estate secured loans are underwritten to the initial rate, and to a higher assumed rate commensurate with normal market conditions. Therefore, it is the intent of United’s underwriting standards to ensure that adequate primary repayment capacity exists to address both future increases in interest rates, and fluctuations in the underlying cash flows available for repayment. Historically, and at December 31, 2022, United has not offered “teaser rate” loans, and had no loan portfolio products which were specifically designed for “sub-prime” borrowers. Management defines “sub-prime” borrowers as consumer borrowers with a credit score of less than 660. The above guidelines are adhered to and subject to the experience, background and personal judgment of the loan officer assigned to the loan application. A loan officer may grant, with justification, a loan with variances from the underwriting guidelines and standards. However, the loan officer may not exceed his or her respective lending authority without obtaining the prior, proper approval as outlined in United’s loan policy from a superior, a regional supervisor or market president (dual approval per policy) or the Loan Committee, whichever is deemed appropriate for the nature of the variance. Loan Concentrations United has commercial loans, including real estate and owner-occupied, income-producing real estate and land development loans, of approximately $14.2 billion as of December 31, 2022. These loans are primarily secured by real estate located in West Virginia, southeastern Ohio, southwestern Pennsylvania, Virginia, Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina and the District of Columbia. United categorizes these commercial loans by industry according to the North American Industry Classification System (“NAICS”) to monitor the portfolio for possible concentrations in one or more industries. As of the most recent fiscal year-end, United has one such industry classification that exceeded 10% of total loans. As of December 31, 2022, approximately $9.6 billion or 46.38% of United’s total loan portfolio were for real estate and construction. The loans were originated by United’s subsidiary bank using underwriting standards as set forth by management. United’s loan administration policies are focused on the risk characteristics of the loan portfolio, including commercial real estate loans, in terms of loan approval and credit quality. It is the opinion of management that these loans do not pose any unusual risks and that adequate consideration has been given to the above loans in establishing the allowance for loan losses. United does not have a loan classification concentration in the restaurants, hotel and accommodations industry. As of December 31, 2022, approximately $1.2 billion or 5.57% of United’s total loan portfolio were to hotels and other traveler accommodations. In addition, United does not have a loan classification concentration in the mining, quarrying and oil and gas extraction industry. As of December 31, 2022, approximately $185.5 million or less than 1% of United’s total loan portfolio were for the purpose of extracting, manufacturing and distributing oil, coal and natural gas. Secondary Markets United generally originates loans within the primary market area of United Bank. United may from time to time make loans to borrowers and/or on properties outside of its primary market area as an accommodation to its existing customers. United Bank, George Mason, and Crescent originate and acquire residential real estate loans for resale in the secondary market. Mortgage loan originations are generally intended to be sold in the secondary market on a best efforts or mandatory basis. Depending on the pricing in the marketplace, servicing rights are either sold or retained. 7 During 2022, United originated $1.9 billion of real estate loans for sale in the secondary market and sold $2.2 billion of loans designated as held for sale in the secondary market. Net gains on the sales of these loans during 2022 were $41.3 million. The principal sources of revenue from United’s mortgage banking business are: (i) loan origination fees; (ii) gains or losses from the sale of loans, (iii) interest earned on mortgage loans during the period that they are held by United pending sale, if any; and (iv) income on mortgage loans with servicing retained. Loan Servicing United through its mortgage banking subsidiary, Crescent, may retain the rights to service a portion of the loans sold in the third-party market, as part of its mortgage banking activities, for which United receives service fee income. In addition, at certain times United may purchase rights to service from third parties. These rights are known as mortgage servicing rights, or MSRs, where the owner of the MSR acts on behalf of the mortgage loan owner and has the contractual right to receive a stream of cash flows in exchange for performing specified mortgage servicing functions. These duties typically include, but are not limited to, performing loan administration, collection, and default activities, including the collection and remittance of loan payments, responding to customer inquiries, accounting for principal and interest, holding custodial (impound) funds for the payment of property taxes and insurance premiums, counseling delinquent mortgagors, modifying loans and supervising foreclosures and property dispositions. United subservices the duties and responsibilities obligated to the owner of the MSR to a third party provider for which we pay a fee. Investment Activities United’s investment policy stresses the management of the investment securities portfolio, which includes both securities held to maturity and securities available for sale, to maximize return over the long-term in a manner that is consistent with good banking practices and relative safety of principal. United currently does not engage in trading account activity. The Asset/Liability Management Committee of United is responsible for the coordination and evaluation of the investment portfolio. Sources of funds for investment activities include “core deposits”. Core deposits include certain demand deposits, savings and NOW accounts. These deposits are relatively stable and they are the lowest cost source of funds available to United. Short-term borrowings have also been a significant source of funds. These include federal funds purchased, securities sold under agreements to repurchase and FHLB borrowings. United’s investment portfolio is comprised of a significant amount of mortgage-backed securities, asset-backed securities, obligations of states and political subdivisions, U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. Government corporations and agencies and corporate securities. Obligations of states and political subdivisions are comprised of primarily “investment grade” rated municipal securities. Interest and dividends on securities for the years of 2022, 2021, and 2020 were $114.5 million, $61.9 million, and $66.8 million, respectively. For the year of 2022, United realized net gains on sales of securities of $2 thousand. For the years of 2021 and 2020, United realized net gains on sales of securities of $2.8 million and $3.2 million, respectively. Human Capital At United, one of our key competitive advantages is our people. Investment in our human capital is a top priority for the Company. As of December 31, 2022, United and its subsidiaries had 2,765 employees and officers. Of the 2,765 employees and officers, 2,331 are employed in the community banking segment, 366 are employed in the mortgage banking segment and 68 are in a general support and administrative function for the Company. None of these employees are represented by a collective bargaining unit and management considers employee relations to be excellent. We emphasize positive attitudes, communication, teamwork, goal attainment, personal growth, and the pursuit of excellence when it comes to delivering high-quality service to our customers and fellow employees. Our human capital management strategy focuses on recruiting, developing, and engaging a talented and diverse workforce. Our strategy embodies our core values of integrity, teamwork, hard work, and caring, and foster positive attitudes, communication, goal attainment, personal growth, and the pursuit of United’s mission of excellence in service to our shareholders, our customers, our communities, and our employees. 8 Focusing on talent selection and developing top talent remains a strong pillar of our organization. Our primary focus is to attract and advance the careers of employees with diverse backgrounds, experiences, ideas, and skills. We host college recruiting and internship programs that attract candidates from a variety of colleges and universities within our footprint. These two programs build a talent pipeline and prioritize these individuals for internal openings. Our Leadership Development Program provides an opportunity for the Company’s rising talent from across our footprint and various business lines to strengthen their leadership and communication skills, increase their visibility within the organization, and establish internal networks. This program helps to cultivate a future pipeline of leaders across the institution. Over a period of four years, these individuals are empowered to work on pertinent projects designed to enhance revenue, reduce expenses, and improve risk management functions, while developing the members’ leadership, interactive, and managerial skills. Past members now hold key positions across the Company ranging from Department Managers to Line of Business Leaders to Executive Officers. One of our strategic priorities to ensure leadership continuity is effective succession planning. The Company has a formal plan to identify potential successors and actively develop those employees. The plan includes all critical management positions throughout the organization and is updated annually. This process is dynamic, and we have added additional management positions to the plan as the Company continues to evolve and grow. The Company’s executives constantly review and evaluate personnel to identify pools of candidates with high levels of leadership potential and promote their progress by engineering their range of work experiences. We also have an internal and external training platform to ensure our employees have the necessary tools to fill these key positions effectively. United also has an effective and efficient onboarding program, introducing new team members to the culture and enabling an environment that helps them be engaged in their roles. We have rigorous interdepartmental training and development programs that provide employees with capabilities to perform their job functions, deliver results, and advance their careers. We partnered with West Virginia University to develop an executive training program aimed at developing the technical, theoretical, and applied skills needed for a successful launch into a career in Business Banking. High-performing employees are given opportunities to attend state and national banking schools, conferences, industry peer groups, and training webinars. All United employees have access to career development and skills-based training through our internal online Human Resources (“HR”) management system. United makes every effort to ensure that our compensation and benefits packages are inclusive and competitive to attract and retain talent. Our comprehensive benefit plans are designed to fully support our full-time and eligible part-time employees and their families through every stage of their life cycle, recognizing our employees’ individual needs and offering flexible benefit options. As an enhanced benefit, we recently increased our parental leave and family medical leave and added coverage for enhanced infertility coverage. We provide comprehensive health and wellness plans for all eligible employees as well as retirees of United. We also provide other paid-time off benefits such as vacation, sick time, personal days, and birthdays. The Company also provides financial wellness benefits to all employees through our 401K Plan in which the Company provides a competitive match of employee contributions. All employees are eligible to take advantage of United’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan through payroll deductions. United Bank’s annual performance evaluation process provides the opportunity for discussing, planning, and reviewing the performance of each employee. The goal is to help employees clearly define and understand the responsibilities and expectations of their position while also identifying employees with high potential for advancement within the company. Performance evaluations also provide an opportunity for employees to be awarded additional compensation based on merit. Managers are expected to maintain open communication throughout the year as it pertains to the performance and mentorship of their employees. Training is provided to managers annually to prepare them for difficult conversations, analyzing team compensation, and maintaining fairness, among other topics. 9 We are committed to providing a safe and healthy work environment for our employees and offer services to foster the best physical, mental, and social well-being of our workforce. United’s Employee Assistance Program provides all employees a comprehensive and personalized process with a tailored approach to meet employees where they are and supports them through whatever journey they may be facing. The Employee Assistance Program provides unlimited phone access for information, resources, and referrals and provides sessions with a counselor for the employee and their family members. The employee, and their family, can also take advantage of a host of web-based resources the program provides. The commitment to our employees and their family’s well-being is at the forefront for United and allows us to be competitive in attracting and retaining top talent and ensuring our employee benefits remain competitive when compared with other institutions. In addition, at United, we are committed to nurturing an inclusive culture that: is reflective of the communities we serve; celebrates diversity of thought, backgrounds, and experience; promotes respect and a shared purpose; and aligns with our core values. United has a cross-functional Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Council (“DE&I Council”) to advise executive and senior leadership on the Company’s diversity, equity, and inclusion strategy and to implement and manage programs to accomplish and support these priorities. United added a diversity trainer to the Learning & Talent Development Team who facilitates workshops available to all employees. In 2022, 100% of new hires completed implicit bias training and new supervisors participated in cultivating inclusive team workshops. DE&I employee liaisons were selected through an application process, received training on courageous conversations, and then held open forums with local colleagues related to various DE&I topics. The Management Information System (“MIS”) team has collaborated with the HR department to apply best practices in data governance to the metrics that are so critical to measuring success in DE&I. To continue to cultivate our inclusive culture, United offers employees a way to report confidential and anonymous issues of concern through our website. Whether it is a compliance or regulatory violation, wrongdoing, improper conduct, or harassment, the confidential report will be instantly and discreetly forwarded for review. Competition United faces a high degree of competition in all of the markets it serves. We face strong competition in gathering deposits, making loans and obtaining client assets for management by our investment or trust operations. United considers all of West Virginia to be included in its market area. This area includes the five largest West Virginia Metropolitan Statistical Areas (“MSA”): the Parkersburg MSA, the Charleston MSA, the Huntington MSA, the Morgantown MSA and the Wheeling MSA. United serves the Ohio counties of Lawrence, Belmont, Jefferson and Washington and Fayette county in Pennsylvania primarily because of their close proximity to the Ohio and Pennsylvania borders and United banking offices located in those counties or in nearby West Virginia. United’s Virginia markets include the Maryland, northern Virginia and Washington, D.C. MSA, the Winchester MSA, the Harrisonburg MSA, and the Charlottesville MSA. Through its acquisition of Carolina Financial, United’s market also includes the Coastal, Midlands, and Upstate regions of South Carolina, including the Charleston (Charleston, Dorchester and Berkeley Counties), Myrtle Beach (Horry and Georgetown Counties), Columbia (Richland and Lexington Counties), and the Upstate (Greenville and Spartanburg Counties) areas as well as areas in North Carolina including Wilmington (New Hanover County), Raleigh-Durham (Durham and Wake Counties), Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia (NC and SC) and the southeastern coastal region of North Carolina (Bladen, Brunswick, Columbus, Cumberland, Duplin and Robeson Counties). Through its acquisition of Community Bankers Trust, United added new markets in Baltimore and Annapolis, Maryland and Lynchburg and Richmond, Virginia as well as the Northern Neck of Virginia. United considers all of the above locations to be the primary market areas for the business of its banking and mortgage banking subsidiaries. With prior regulatory approval, Virginia banks are permitted unlimited branch banking throughout each state. In addition, interstate acquisitions of and by Virginia banks and bank holding companies are permissible on a reciprocal basis, as well as reciprocal interstate acquisitions by thrift institutions. These conditions serve to intensify competition within United’s market. 10 As of December 31, 2022, there were 67 bank holding companies operating in the State of West Virginia registered with the Federal Reserve System and the West Virginia Board of Banking and Financial Institutions, 115 bank holding companies operating in the Commonwealth of Virginia registered with the Federal Reserve System and the Virginia State Corporation Commission, 88 bank holding companies operating in the State of North Carolina registered with the Federal Reserve System and the N.C. Office of the Commissioner of Banks and 76 bank holding companies operating in the State of South Carolina registered with the Federal Reserve System and the South Carolina State Board of Financial Institutions. These holding companies are headquartered in various states and control banks throughout West Virginia, Virginia, North Carolina and South Carolina, which compete for business as well as for the acquisition of additional banks. Regulation and Supervision United, as a financial holding company, is subject to the restrictions of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, and is registered pursuant to its provisions. As such, United is subject to the reporting requirements of and examination by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (“Board of Governors”). The Bank Holding Company Act prohibits the acquisition by a bank holding company of direct or indirect ownership of more than five percent of the voting shares of any bank within the United States without prior approval of the Board of Governors. With certain exceptions, a bank holding company also is prohibited from acquiring direct or indirect ownership or control of more than five percent of the voting shares of any company which is not a bank, and from engaging directly or indirectly in business unrelated to the business of banking, or managing or controlling banks. The Board of Governors, in its Regulation Y, permits financial holding companies to engage in preapproved non-banking activities closely related to banking or managing or controlling banks. Approval of the Board of Governors is necessary to engage in certain other non-banking activities which are not preapproved or to make acquisitions of corporations engaging in these activities. In addition, on a case-by-case basis, the Board of Governors may approve other non-banking activities. A financial holding company may also engage in financial activities, including securities underwriting and dealing, insurance agency and underwriting activities, and merchant banking activities. As a financial holding company doing business in West Virginia, United is also subject to regulation and examination by the West Virginia Board of Banking and Financial Institutions (the “West Virginia Banking Board”) and must submit annual reports to the West Virginia Banking Board. Further, any acquisition application that United must submit to the Board of Governors must also be submitted to the West Virginia Banking Board for approval. The Board of Governors has broad authority to prohibit activities of financial holding companies and their non-banking subsidiaries that represent unsafe and unsound banking practices or which constitute violations of laws or regulations. The Board of Governors also can assess civil money penalties for certain activities conducted on a knowing and reckless basis, if those activities caused a substantial loss to a depository institution. The penalties can be as high as $1 million for each day the activity continues. United Bank, as a Virginia state member bank, is subject to supervision, examination, and regulation by the Federal Reserve System, and as such, is subject to applicable provisions of the Federal Reserve Act and regulations issued thereunder. United Bank is subject to the Virginia banking statutes and regulations, and is primarily regulated by the Virginia Bureau of Financial Institutions. As a member of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), United Bank’s deposits are insured as required by federal law. Bank regulatory authorities regularly examine revenues, loans, investments, management practices, and other aspects of United Bank. These examinations are conducted primarily to protect depositors and not shareholders. In addition to these regular examinations, United Bank must furnish to regulatory authorities quarterly reports containing full and accurate statements of its affairs. 11 United is also under the jurisdiction of the SEC and certain state securities commissions in regard to the offering and sale of its securities. Generally, United must file under the Securities Exchange Act of 1933, as amended, to issue additional shares of its common stock. United is also registered under and is subject to the regulatory and disclosure requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as administered by the SEC. United is listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the quotation symbol “UBSI,” and is subject to the rules of the NASDAQ for listed companies. SEC regulations require us to disclose certain types of business and financial data on a regular basis to the SEC and to our shareholders. We are required to file annual, quarterly and current reports with the SEC. We prepare and file an annual report on Form 10-K with the SEC that contains detailed financial and operating information, as well as a management response to specific questions about United’s operations. SEC regulations require that our annual reports to shareholders contain certified financial statements and other specific items such as management’s discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations. We must also file quarterly reports with the SEC on Form 10-Q that contain detailed financial and operating information for the prior quarter and we must file current reports on Form 8-K to provide the pubic with information on recent material events. In addition to periodic reporting to the SEC, we are subject to proxy rules and tender offer rules issued by the SEC. Our officers, directors and principal shareholders (holding 10% or more of our stock) must also submit reports to the SEC regarding their holdings of our stock and any changes to such holdings, and they are subject to short-swing profit liability. Dividends and Stock Repurchases The principal source of United’s liquidity is dividends from United Bank. The prior approval of the Federal Reserve Board is required if the total of all dividends declared by a state-chartered member bank in any calendar year would exceed the sum of the bank’s net profits for that year and its retained net profits for the preceding two calendar years, less any required transfers to surplus or to fund the retirement of preferred stock. Federal law also prohibits a state-chartered, member bank from paying dividends that would be greater than the bank’s undivided profits. United Bank is also subject to limitations under Virginia state law regarding the level of dividends that may be paid. In addition, United and United Bank are subject to other regulatory policies and requirements relating to the payment of dividends, including requirements to maintain adequate capital above regulatory minimums. The appropriate federal regulatory authority is authorized to determine under certain circumstances relating to the financial condition of a bank holding company or a bank that the payment of dividends would be an unsafe or unsound practice and to prohibit payment thereof. The appropriate federal regulatory authorities have stated that paying dividends that deplete a bank’s capital base to an inadequate level would be an unsafe and unsound banking practice and that banking organizations should generally pay dividends only out of current operating earnings. In addition, in the current financial and economic environment, the Federal Reserve Board has indicated that bank holding companies should carefully review their dividend policy and has discouraged payment ratios that are at maximum allowable levels unless both asset quality and capital are very strong. In July 2019, the federal bank regulators adopted final rules (the “Capital Simplifications Rules”) that, among other things, eliminated the standalone prior approval requirement in the Basel III Capital Rules for any repurchase of common stock. In certain circumstances, United’s repurchases of its common stock may be subject to a prior approval or notice requirement under other regulations, policies or supervisory expectations of the Federal Reserve Board. Any redemption or repurchase of preferred stock or subordinated debt remains subject to the prior approval of the Federal Reserve Board. The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (the “IRA”) imposes a new 1% excise tax on the fair market value of stock repurchased after December 31, 2022 by publicly traded U.S. corporations. With certain exceptions, the value of stock repurchased is determined net of stock issued in the year, including shares issued pursuant to compensatory arrangements. Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 On July 21, 2010, President Obama signed the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the Dodd-Frank Act), into law. The Dodd-Frank Act significantly changes regulation of financial institutions and the financial services industry. The Dodd-Frank Act includes, among other things, provisions creating a Financial Services Oversight Council to identify emerging systemic risks and improve interagency cooperation; centralizing the responsibility for 12 consumer financial protection by creating a new agency, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which is responsible for implementing, examining and enforcing compliance with federal consumer financial laws; permanently raising the current standard maximum deposit insurance amount to $250,000; establishing strengthened capital standards for banks, and disallowing trust preferred securities as qualifying for Tier 1 capital (subject to certain grandfather provisions for existing trust preferred securities); establishing new minimum mortgage underwriting standards; granting the Federal Reserve Board the power to regulate debit card interchange fees; and implementing corporate governance changes. On May 24, 2018, President Trump signed into law the “Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act (the EGRRCPA Act)” which provides certain limited amendments to the Dodd-Frank Act, as well as certain targeted modifications to other post-financial crisis regulatory requirements. In addition, the legislation establishes new consumer protections and amends various securities- and investment company-related requirements. The EGRRCPA Act primarily amends several other laws, including the Truth in Lending Act (TILA), Federal Credit Union Act, Federal Deposit Insurance Act, Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) and Securities Act of 1933. The Act is divided into six titles, which aim to: improve consumer access to mortgage credit (Title I); provide regulatory relief and protect consumer access to credit (Title II); protect the credit information of consumers, including veterans and servicemembers (Title III); tailor regulations for certain bank holding companies, including raising the threshold levels for exemption from certain prudential standards and stress testing (Title IV); encourage capital formation by reforming certain Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) regulations (Title V); and protect student borrowers (Title VI). Deposit Insurance The deposits of United Bank are insured by the FDIC to the extent provided by law. Accordingly, United Bank is also subject to regulation by the FDIC. United Bank is subject to deposit insurance assessments to maintain the Deposit Insurance Fund (“DIF”) of the FDIC. The FDIC utilizes a risk-based assessment system that imposes insurance premiums based upon a risk matrix that takes into account a bank’s capital level and supervisory rating (CAMELS rating) and certain financial measures to assess an institution’s ability to withstand asset-related stress and funding-related stress. The risk matrix utilizes four risk categories which are distinguished by capital levels and supervisory ratings. In April 2011, the FDIC implemented rulemaking under the Dodd-Frank Act to reform the deposit insurance assessment system. The final rule redefined the assessment base used for calculating deposit insurance assessments. Specifically, the rule bases assessments on an institution’s total assets less tangible capital, as opposed to total deposits. Since the new base is larger than the prior base, the FDIC also proposed lowering assessment rates so that the rules would not significantly alter the total amount of revenue collected from the industry. The new assessment scale ranges from 2.5 basis points for the least risky institutions to 45 basis points for the riskiest. As part of its changes in April 2011, the FDIC established a new methodology for determining assessment rates for large and highly complex institutions, as defined in the rules. In October 2012, the FDIC announced revised changes to some of the definitions used to determine assessment rates for these large and highly complex insured depository institutions. The rule generally applies to FDIC-regulated banks with assets greater than $10 billion and took effect April 1, 2013. In the second quarter of 2018, United Bank was reclassified as a large institution for deposit insurance assessment purposes. Generally, this new classification resulted in higher FDIC insurance premiums. On September 30, 2018, the Deposit Insurance Fund Reserve Ratio reached 1.36%, exceeding the statutorily required minimum reserve ratio of 1.35% ahead of the September 30, 2020, deadline required under the Dodd-Frank Act. FDIC regulations provide for two changes to deposit insurance assessments upon reaching the minimum: (1) surcharges on insured depository institutions with total consolidated assets of $10 billion or more (large banks) ceased on December 28, 2018; and (2) small banks will receive assessment credits for the portion of their assessments that contributed to the growth in the reserve ratio from between 1.15% and 1.35%, to be applied when the reserve ratio is at or above 1.38%. United benefited from both these changes. On October 18, 2022, the FDIC adopted a final rule to increase initial base deposit insurance assessment rates for insured depository institutions by 2 basis points, beginning with the first quarterly assessment period of 2023. The increased assessment rate schedules would remain in effect unless and until the reserve ratio of the Deposit Insurance Fund meets or exceeds 2 percent. As a result of the new rule, the FDIC insurance costs of insured depository institutions, including United Bank, would generally increase. 13 United’s FDIC insurance expense totaled $12.0 million, $8.3 million, and $10.1 million in 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Capital Requirements United and United Bank are each required to comply with applicable capital adequacy standards established by the Federal Reserve Board (the “Basel III Capital Rules”). Since fully phased in on January 1, 2019, the Basel III Capital Rules require United and United Bank to maintain the following: • A minimum ratio of Common Equity Tier 1 (“CET1”) to risk-weighted assets of at least 4.5%, plus a 2.5% “capital conservation buffer” (resulting in a minimum ratio of CET1 to risk-weighted assets of 7.0%); • A minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 6.0%, plus the capital conservation buffer (resulting in a minimum Tier 1 capital ratio of 8.5%); • A minimum ratio of total capital (Tier 1 capital plus Tier 2 capital) to risk-weighted assets of at least 8.0%, plus the capital conservation buffer (resulting in a minimum total capital ratio of 10.5%); and • A minimum leverage ratio of 4.0%, calculated as the ratio of Tier 1 capital to average consolidated assets as reported on consolidated financial statements (known as the “leverage ratio”). Banking institutions that fail to meet the effective minimum ratios once the capital conservation buffer is taken into account, as detailed above, will be subject to constraints on capital distributions, including dividends and share repurchases, and certain discretionary executive compensation. The severity of the constraints depends on the amount of the shortfall and the institution’s “eligible retained income” (that is, the greater of (i) net income for the preceding four quarters, net of distributions and associated tax effects not reflected in net income and (ii) the average net income over the preceding four quarters). The Basel III Capital Rules and the Capital Simplification Rules also provide for a number of deductions from and adjustments to CET1. These include, for example, the requirement that certain deferred tax assets and significant investments in non-consolidated financial entities be deducted from CET1 to the extent that any one such category exceeds 25% of CET1. Prior to the adoption of the Capital Simplification Rules in July 2019, amounts were deducted from CET1 to the extent that any one such category exceeded 10% of CET1 or all such items, in the aggregate, exceeded 15% of CET1. The Capital Simplification Rules took effect for United and United Bank as of January 1, 2020. These limitations did not impact our regulatory capital during any of the reported periods. In addition, under the general risk-based capital rules, the effects of accumulated other comprehensive income items included in capital were excluded for the purposes of determining regulatory capital ratios. Under the Basel III Capital Rules, the effects of certain accumulated other comprehensive income items are not excluded; however, non-advanced approaches banking organizations, including United and United Bank, were able to make a one-time permanent election to continue to exclude these items. Both United and United Bank made this election in order to avoid significant variations in the level of capital depending upon the impact of interest rate fluctuations on the fair value of their available-for-sale securities portfolio. Under the Basel III Capital Rules, trust preferred securities no longer included in our Tier 1 capital may nonetheless be included as a component of Tier 2 capital on a permanent basis without phase-out. In February 2019, the federal bank regulatory agencies issued a final rule (the “2019 CECL Rule”) that revised certain capital regulations to account for changes to credit loss accounting under U.S. GAAP. The 2019 CECL Rule included a transition option that allows banking organizations to phase in, over a three-year period, the day-one adverse effects of adopting a new accounting standard related to the measurement of current expected credit losses (“CECL”) on their regulatory capital ratios (three-year transition option). In March 2020, the federal bank regulatory agencies issued an interim final rule that maintains the three-year transition option of the 2019 CECL Rule and also provides banking organizations that were required under U.S. GAAP (as of January 2020) to implement CECL before the end of 2020 the option to delay for two years an estimate of the effect of CECL on regulatory capital, relative to the incurred loss methodology’s effect on regulatory capital, followed by a three-year transition period (five-year transition option). We elected to adopt the five-year transition option. 14 The Basel III Capital Rules prescribe a standardized approach for risk weightings that expanded the risk-weighting categories from the general risk-based capital rules to a much larger and more risk-sensitive number of categories, depending on the nature of the assets, generally ranging from 0% for U.S. government and agency securities, to 600% for certain equity exposures (and higher percentages for certain other types of interests), and resulting in higher risk weights for a variety of asset categories. In November 2019, the federal banking agencies adopted a rule revising the scope of commercial real estate mortgages subject to a 150% risk weight. In December 2017, the Basel Committee published standards that it described as the finalization of the Basel III post-crisis regulatory reforms (the standards are commonly referred to as “Basel IV”). Among other things, these standards revise the Basel Committee’s standardized approach for credit risk (including by recalibrating risk weights and introducing new capital requirements for certain “unconditionally cancellable commitments,” such as unused credit card lines of credit) and provides a new standardized approach for operational risk capital. Under the Basel framework, these standards generally became effective on January 1, 2022, with an aggregate output floor phasing in through January 1, 2027. Under the current U.S. capital rules, operational risk capital requirements and a capital floor apply only to advanced approaches institutions, and not to United or United Bank. The impact of Basel IV on us will depend on the manner in which it is implemented by the federal bank regulators. Failure to meet statutorily mandated capital guidelines or more restrictive ratios separately established for a financial institution could subject United to a variety of enforcement remedies, including issuance of a capital directive, the termination of deposit insurance by the FDIC, a prohibition on accepting or renewing brokered deposits, limitations on the rates of interest that the institution may pay on its deposits and other restrictions on its business. As described below, significant additional restrictions can be imposed on United if it would fail to meet applicable capital requirements. Prompt Corrective Action The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 (“FDICIA”) establishes a regulatory scheme, which ties the level of supervisory intervention by bank regulatory authorities primarily to a depository institution’s capital category. Among other things, FDICIA authorizes regulatory authorities to take “prompt corrective action” with respect to depository institutions that do not meet minimum capital requirements. FDICIA establishes five capital tiers: well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized and critically undercapitalized. Effective January 1, 2015, under the Basel III Capital Rules, the current prompt corrective action requirements for an institution to be “well-capitalized” is a total risk-based capital ratio of 10% or greater, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 8% or greater, a CET1 ratio of 6.5% or greater and a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 5 percent or greater. United Bank was considered a “well capitalized” institution as of December 31, 2022. Well-capitalized institutions are permitted to engage in a wider range of banking activities, including among other things, the accepting of “brokered deposits,” and the offering of interest rates on deposits higher than the prevailing rate in their respective markets. Community Reinvestment Act The Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 (“CRA”) requires depository institutions to assist in meeting the credit needs of their market areas consistent with safe and sound banking practice. Under the CRA, each depository institution is required to help meet the credit needs of its market areas by, among other things, providing credit to low- and moderate-income individuals and communities. Depository institutions are periodically examined for compliance with the CRA and are assigned ratings. Banking regulators take into account CRA ratings when considering approval of a proposed transaction. 15 In the third quarter of 2022, United Bank received a Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”) Performance Evaluation from the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (the “FRB”) with a rating of “Needs to Improve.” Based on its performance on the individual components of the CRA exam, United Bank received a rating of “Satisfactory.” These individual components were a “High Satisfactory” rating for the Lending Test, an “Outstanding” rating for the Investment Test and a “High Satisfactory” rating for the Service Test. United Bank’s final overall rating, however, was downgraded to “Needs to Improve” as a result of a Fair Housing Act violation cited in the Washington DC Metropolitan Statistical Area following a FRB fair lending examination of United Bank and its wholly-owned subsidiary, George Mason Mortgage, LLC. This matter was also the subject of an investigation by the Department of Justice. The Department of Justice, however, has advised United Bank in writing that it has completed its review of this matter and determined that the circumstances of this matter do not require enforcement action by the Department of Justice at this time. The FRB Performance Evaluation states that “United Bank management has taken action to address the deficiencies and committed to taking further voluntary corrective actions to prevent further violations.” A “Needs to Improve” rating results in restrictions on certain expansionary activities, including certain mergers and acquisitions and the establishment of bank branches. These restrictions will remain in place until the FRB issues a higher CRA rating following a subsequent CRA examination. The next CRA examination commenced in October 2022 and United Bank is awaiting the results. The precise timing of any results therefrom will not be known until later. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”), the Federal Reserve Board and the FDIC issued a joint notice of proposed rulemaking on May 5, 2022, proposing revisions to the CRA regulations. Comments on the proposed rulemaking were due by August 5, 2022. In September, 2022, legislation was introduced to significantly revise the CRA to add a number of new substantive and procedural requirements. This legislation may delay the pending proposed rulemaking by the banking regulators. We will continue to evaluate the impact of any changes to the regulations implementing the CRA and their impact to our financial condition, results of operations, and/or liquidity, which cannot be predicted at this time. The Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”) The CARES Act, which became law on March 27, 2020, provided over $2 trillion to combat the coronavirus (“COVID-19”) and stimulate the economy. Many of the CARES Act’s programs, including the Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”), are dependent upon the direct involvement of U.S. financial institutions and have been implemented through rules and guidance adopted by federal departments and agencies, including the U.S. Department of Treasury, the Federal Reserve and other federal banking agencies, including those with direct supervisory jurisdiction over United and United Bank. Furthermore, as the on-going COVID-19 pandemic evolves, federal regulatory authorities continue to issue additional guidance with respect to the implementation, lifecycle, and eligibility requirements for the various CARES Act programs as well as industry-specific recovery procedures for COVID-19. On December 27, 2020, then President Trump signed into law the 2021 Consolidated Appropriations Act (the “CAA”), an approximately $900 billion bill, which extended several provisions of the CARES Act as well as provided additional COVID-19 relief. In particular, the CAA extended weekly unemployment benefits, provided another round of economic stimulus payments to individuals and families, lengthened temporary suspensions and modifications of several-bank related provisions and provided more aid to small businesses. On March 11, 2021, President Joe Biden signed into law the $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan Act of 2021. The legislation included additional stimulus checks to eligible individuals and an extension of the $300-per-week supplement to federal unemployment benefits through September 6, 2021. The legislation also allocates funding to small businesses, state and local governments, and COVID-19 vaccination and testing and tracing efforts. The legislation also modified the PPP to clarify that the SBA affiliation rules would not apply to certain applicants. Specifically, 501(c)(3) organizations that employ not more than 500 employees per physical location of the organization would become eligible for the program. The legislation also provided an additional $7.25 billion for the program. However, the legislation did not extend the March 31, 2021 application deadline. On March 27, 2021, the COVID-19 Bankruptcy Relief Extension Act of 2021 was enacted, extending the bankruptcy relief provisions enacted in the CARES Act of 2020 bill until March 27, 2022. These provisions provide financially distressed small businesses and individuals greater access to bankruptcy relief. 16 On March 30, 2021, President Biden signed into law the PPP Extension Act of 2021. This bill extended the PPP through June 30, 2021. For the final 30 days of the program (i.e., from June 1 until June 30), the SBA may only process applications submitted prior to June 1, and it may not accept any new loan applications. On June 24, 2021, President Biden announced that the three federal agencies that back mortgages – the Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”), Department of Veterans Affairs (“VA”), and Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) – extended their respective foreclosure moratorium for one, final month, until July 31, 2021. The Federal Housing Finance Agency (“FHFA”) also announced that it extended the foreclosure moratorium for mortgages backed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac until July 31, 2021. President Biden emphasized that this was the final extension. On January 30, 2023, President Biden announced that he intends to end both the national emergency and the public health emergency declarations related to COVID-19 on May 11, 2023. Cybersecurity In February 2018, the SEC published interpretive guidance to assist public companies in preparing disclosures about cybersecurity risks and incidents. These SEC guidelines, and any other regulatory guidance, are in addition to notification and disclosure requirements under state and federal banking law and regulations. The federal banking regulators regularly issue new guidance and standards, and update existing guidance and standards, regarding cybersecurity intended to enhance cyber risk management among financial institutions. Financial institutions are expected to comply with such guidance and standards and to accordingly develop appropriate security controls and risk management processes. If we fail to observe such regulatory guidance or standards, we could be subject to various regulatory sanctions, including financial penalties. In November 2021, the federal banking agencies adopted a final rule, with compliance by May 1, 2022, that requires banking organizations to notify their primary banking regulator within 36 hours of determining that a “computer-security incident” has materially disrupted or degraded, or is reasonably likely to materially disrupt or degrade, the banking organization’s ability to carry out banking operations or deliver banking products and services to a material portion of its customer base, its businesses and operations that would result in material loss, or its operations that would impact the stability of the United States. In the ordinary course of business, United relies on electronic communications and information systems to conduct its operations and to store sensitive data. United employs an in-depth, layered, defensive approach that leverages people, processes and technology to manage and maintain cybersecurity controls. United employs a variety of preventative and detective tools to monitor, block, and provide alerts regarding suspicious activity, as well as to report on any suspected advanced persistent threats. Notwithstanding the strength of its defensive measures, the threat from cyber-attacks is severe, attacks are sophisticated and increasing in volume, and attackers respond rapidly to changes in defensive measures. While to date, United and United Bank have not experienced a significant compromise, significant data loss or any material financial losses related to cybersecurity attacks, United’s systems and those of its customers and third-party service providers are under constant threat and it is possible that United could experience a significant event in the future. Risks and exposures related to cybersecurity attacks, including litigation and enforcement risks, are expected to be elevated for the foreseeable future due to the rapidly evolving nature and sophistication of these threats, as well as due to the expanding use of Internet banking, mobile banking and other technology-based products and services by United and its customers. See Item 1A. Risk Factors for a further discussion of risk related to cybersecurity. Deposit Acquisition Limitation Under West Virginia banking law, an acquisition or merger is not permitted if the resulting depository institution or its holding company, including its affiliated depository institutions, would assume additional deposits to cause it to control deposits in the State of West Virginia in excess of twenty five percent (25%) of such total amount of all deposits held by insured depository institutions in West Virginia. This limitation may be waived by the Commissioner of Banking by showing good cause. 17 Consumer Laws and Regulations In addition to the banking laws and regulations discussed above, bank subsidiaries are also subject to certain consumer laws and regulations that are designed to protect consumers in transactions with banks. Among the more prominent of such laws and regulations are the Truth in Lending Act, the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, the Truth in Savings Act, the Electronic Funds Transfer Act, the Expedited Funds Availability Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair Credit Reporting Act, the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, the Right to Financial Privacy Act and the Fair Housing Act. These laws and regulations mandate certain disclosure requirements and regulate the manner in which financial institutions must deal with customers when taking deposits or making loans to such customers. United’s bank subsidiary must comply with the applicable provisions of these consumer protection laws and regulations as part of its ongoing customer relations. As discussed above, the Dodd-Frank Act centralized responsibility for consumer financial protection by creating the CFPB, and giving it responsibility for implementing, examining and enforcing compliance with federal consumer protection laws. The CFPB has broad rulemaking, supervisory and enforcement authority over consumer financial products and services, including deposit products, residential mortgages, home-equity loans, and credit cards. The CFPB’s functions include investigating consumer complaints, rulemaking, supervising and examining banks’ consumer transactions, and enforcing rules related to consumer financial products and services. Banks with more than $10 billion in assets, such as United Bank, are subject to supervision by the CFPB with respect to these federal consumer financial laws. Anti-Money Laundering and the USA Patriot Act A major focus of governmental policy on financial institutions in recent years has been aimed at combating money laundering and terrorist financing. The USA PATRIOT Act of 2001, or the USA Patriot Act, substantially broadened the scope of United States anti-money laundering laws and regulations by imposing significant new compliance and due diligence obligations, creating new crimes and penalties and expanding the extra-territorial jurisdiction of the United States. Financial institutions are also prohibited from entering into specified financial transactions and account relationships and must use enhanced due diligence procedures in their dealings with certain types of high-risk customers and implement a written customer identification program. Financial institutions must take certain steps to assist government agencies in detecting and preventing money laundering and report certain types of suspicious transactions. Regulatory authorities routinely examine financial institutions for compliance with these obligations, and failure of a financial institution to maintain and implement adequate programs to combat money laundering and terrorist financing, or to comply with all of the relevant laws or regulations, could have serious financial, legal and reputational consequences for the institution, including causing applicable bank regulatory authorities not to approve merger or acquisition transactions when regulatory approval is required or to prohibit such transactions even if approval is not required. Regulatory authorities have imposed cease and desist orders and civil money penalties against institutions found to be violating these obligations. The Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020 (“AMLA”), which amends the Bank Secrecy Act of 1970 (“BSA”), was enacted in January 2021. The AMLA is intended to be a comprehensive reform and modernization to U.S. bank secrecy and anti-money laundering laws. Among other things, it codifies a risk-based approach to anti-money laundering compliance for financial institutions; requires the U.S. Department of the Treasury to promulgate priorities for anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism policy; requires the development of standards for testing technology and internal processes for BSA compliance; expands enforcement- and investigation-related authority, including increasing available sanctions for certain BSA violations; and expands BSA whistleblower incentives and protections. Many of the statutory provisions in the AMLA will require additional rulemakings, reports and other measures, and the impact of the AMLA will depend on, among other things, rulemaking and implementation guidance. In June 2021, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, a bureau of the U.S. Department of the Treasury, issued the priorities for anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism policy required under the AMLA. The priorities include: corruption, cybercrime, terrorist financing, fraud, transnational crime, drug trafficking, human trafficking and proliferation financing. 18 Incentive Compensation The Federal Reserve Board reviews, as part of its regular, risk-focused examination process, the incentive compensation arrangements of banking organizations, such as United, that are not “large, complex banking organizations.” These reviews are tailored to each organization based on the scope and complexity of the organization’s activities and the prevalence of incentive compensation arrangements. The findings of this supervisory initiative will be included in reports of examination. Deficiencies will be incorporated into the organization’s supervisory ratings, which can affect the organization’s ability to make acquisitions and take other actions. Enforcement actions may be taken against a banking organization if its incentive compensation arrangements, or related risk-management control or governance processes, pose a risk to the organization’s safety and soundness and the organization is not taking prompt and effective measures to correct the deficiencies. In June 2010, the Federal Reserve Board, OCC and FDIC issued comprehensive final guidance on incentive compensation policies intended to ensure that the incentive compensation policies of banking organizations do not undermine the safety and soundness of such organizations by encouraging excessive risk-taking. The guidance, which covers all employees that have the ability to materially affect the risk profile of an organization, either individually or as part of a group, is based upon the key principles that a banking organization’s incentive compensation arrangements should (i) provide incentives that do not encourage risk-taking beyond the organization’s ability to effectively identify and manage risks, (ii) be compatible with effective internal controls and risk management, and (iii) be supported by strong corporate governance, including active and effective oversight by the organization’s board of directors. In April and May of 2016, the Federal Reserve Board, other federal banking agencies and the SEC (the “Agencies”) jointly published proposed rulemaking designed to implement provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act prohibiting incentive compensation arrangements that would encourage inappropriate risk taking at a covered institution, which includes a bank or bank holding company with $1 billion or more of assets, such as United. The proposed rule expanded beyond the June 2010 principals based guidance and broadened the scope to include community banks. The proposed rules (i) prohibit incentive-based compensation arrangements that encourage executive officers, employees, directors or principal shareholders to expose the institution to inappropriate risks by providing excessive compensation (based on the standards for excessive compensation adopted pursuant to the FDIA) and (ii) prohibit incentive-based compensation arrangements for executive officers, employees, directors or principal shareholders that could lead to a material financial loss for the institution. The proposed rule requires covered institutions to establish policies and procedures for monitoring and evaluating their compensation practices. In August 2022, the SEC adopted final rules requiring public companies to disclose the relationship between the executive compensation actually paid to the company’s named executive officers (“NEOs”) and the company’s financial performance. The final rules implement the “pay versus performance” disclosure requirements mandated by Section 953(a) of the Dodd-Frank Act. Disclosure related to these final rules will be effective for United’s proxy statement filed in 2023. In October 2022, the SEC adopted the final “clawback” rule mandated by Section 954 of the Dodd-Frank Act directing national securities exchanges and associations, including the NASDAQ, to implement listing standards that require listed companies to adopt policies mandating the recovery or “clawback” of excess incentive-based compensation earned by a current or former executive officer during the three fiscal years preceding the date the listed company is required to prepare an accounting restatement, including to correct an error that would result in a material misstatement if the error were corrected in the current period or left uncorrected in the current period. The final rule requires United to adopt a clawback policy within 60 days after such listing standard becomes effective. The scope and content of the U.S. banking regulators’ policies on incentive compensation are continuing to develop. It cannot be determined at this time whether or when a final rule will be adopted and whether compliance with such a final rule will adversely affect the ability of United and United Bank to hire, retain and motivate their key employees. Item 1A. RISK FACTORS United is subject to risks inherent to the Company’s business. The material risks and uncertainties that management believes affect the Company are described below. Before making an investment decision, you should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below together with all of the other information included or incorporated by reference in this report. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones facing the Company. Additional risks and uncertainties that management is not aware of or focused on or that management currently deems immaterial may also impair United’s business operations. This report is qualified in its entirety by these risk factors. 19 REGULATORY AND LITIGATION RISKS Our Needs to Improve rating under The Community Reinvestment Act may restrict our operations and limit our ability to pursue certain strategic opportunities. In the third quarter of 2022, United Bank received a Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”) Performance Evaluation from the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (the “FRB”) with a rating of “Needs to Improve.” Based on its performance on the individual components of the CRA exam, the Bank received a rating of “Satisfactory.” These individual components were a “High Satisfactory” rating for the Lending Test, an “Outstanding” rating for the Investment Test and a “High Satisfactory” rating for the Service Test. The Bank’s final overall rating, however, was downgraded to “Needs to Improve” as a result of a Fair Housing Act violation cited in the Washington DC Metropolitan Statistical Area following a FRB fair lending examination of the Bank and its wholly-owned subsidiary, George Mason Mortgage, LLC. This matter was also the subject of an investigation by the Department of Justice. The Department of Justice, however, has advised the Bank in writing that it has completed its review of this matter and determined that the circumstances of this matter do not require enforcement action by the Department of Justice at this time. The FRB Performance Evaluation states that “United Bank management has taken action to address the deficiencies and committed to taking further voluntary corrective actions to prevent further violations.” A “Needs to Improve” rating results in restrictions on certain expansionary activities, including certain mergers and acquisitions and the establishment of bank branches. These restrictions will remain in place until the FRB issues a higher CRA rating following a subsequent CRA examination. The next CRA examination commenced in October 2022 and United Bank is awaiting the results. The precise timing of any results therefrom will not be known until later. United is subject to extensive government regulation and supervision. United is subject to extensive federal and state regulation, supervision and examination which vests significant discretion in the various regulatory authorities. Banking regulations are primarily intended to protect depositors’ funds, federal deposit insurance funds and the banking system as a whole, not shareholders. These regulations affect United’s lending practices, capital structure, investment practices, dividend policy, operations and growth, among other things. These regulations also impose obligations to maintain appropriate policies, procedures and controls, among other things, to detect, prevent and report money laundering and terrorist financing and to verify the identities of United’s customers. Congress and federal regulatory agencies continually review banking laws, regulations and policies for possible changes. The Dodd-Frank Act, enacted in July 2010, instituted major changes to the banking and financial institutions regulatory regimes. Other changes to statutes, regulations or regulatory policies, including changes in interpretation or implementation of statutes, regulations or policies, could affect United in substantial and unpredictable ways. Such changes could subject the Company to additional costs, limit the types of financial services and products United may offer and/or increase the ability of nonbanks to offer competing financial services and products, among other things. United expends substantial effort and incurs costs to improve its systems, audit capabilities, staffing and training in order to satisfy regulatory requirements, but the regulatory authorities may determine that such efforts are insufficient. Failure to comply with relevant laws, regulations or policies could result in enforcement and other legal actions, sanctions by regulatory agencies, civil money and criminal penalties, the loss of FDIC insurance, the revocation of a banking charter, significant fines and/or reputation damage, which could have a material adverse effect on United’s business, financial condition and results of operations. In this regard, government authorities, including the bank regulatory agencies, are pursuing aggressive enforcement actions with respect to compliance and other legal matters involving financial activities, which heightens the risks associated with actual and perceived compliance failures. Directives issued to enforce such actions may be confidential and thus, in some instances, we are not permitted to publicly disclose these actions. Any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. See the section captioned “Regulation and Supervision” included in Item 1. While the Company has policies and procedures designed to prevent any such violations, there can be no assurance that such violations will not occur. 20 In the normal course of business, United and its subsidiaries are routinely subject to examinations and challenges from federal and state tax authorities regarding the amount of taxes due in connection with investments that the Company has made and the businesses in which United has engaged. Recently, federal and state taxing authorities have become increasingly aggressive in challenging tax positions taken by financial institutions. These tax positions may relate to tax compliance, sales and use, franchise, gross receipts, payroll, property and income tax issues, including tax base, apportionment and tax credit planning. The challenges made by tax authorities may result in adjustments to the timing or amount of taxable income or deductions or the allocation of income among tax jurisdictions. If any such challenges are made and are not resolved in the Company’s favor, they could have a material adverse effect on United’s financial condition and results of operations. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) may reshape the consumer financial laws through rulemaking and enforcement of the prohibitions against unfair, deceptive and abusive business practices. Compliance with any such change may impact the business operations of depository institutions offering consumer financial products or services, including United Bank . The CFPB has broad rulemaking authority to administer and carry out the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act with respect to financial institutions that offer covered financial products and services to consumers. The CFPB has also been directed to write rules identifying practices or acts that are unfair, deceptive or abusive in connection with any transaction with a consumer for a consumer financial product or service, or the offering of a consumer financial product or service. The concept of what may be considered to be an “abusive” practice is relatively new under the law. Moreover, United Bank is supervised and examined by the CFPB for compliance with the CFPB’s regulations and policies. The costs and limitations related to this additional regulatory reporting regimen have yet to be fully determined, although they may be material and the limitations and restrictions that will be placed upon United Bank with respect to its consumer product offering and services may produce significant, material effects on United Bank (and United’s) profitability. United is subject to higher regulatory capital requirements and failure to comply with these standards may impact dividend payments, equity repurchases and executive compensation. United and United Bank are each required to comply with applicable capital adequacy standards established by the Federal Reserve Board (the “FRB”). From time to time, the FRB changes these capital adequacy standards. In particular, the capital requirements applicable to United under the Basel III rules became fully effective on January 1, 2019. Under the Basel III rules, United is required to maintain a common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 4.5%, a Tier 1 capital ratio of 6%, a total capital ratio of 8%, and a leverage ratio of 4%. In addition, United must maintain an additional capital conservation buffer of 2.5% of total risk weighted assets. Banking institutions that fail to meet the effective minimum ratios including the capital conservation buffer will be subject to constraints on capital distributions, including dividends and share repurchases, and certain discretionary executive compensation. The severity of the constraints depends on the amount of the shortfall and the institution’s “eligible retained income” (that is, four quarter trailing net income, net of distributions and tax effects not reflected in net income). The Basel III changes have resulted in generally higher minimum capital ratios than in the past that requires United and its subsidiaries to maintain capital buffers above minimum requirements to avoid restrictions on capital distributions and executive bonus payments. In addition, the application of more stringent capital requirements for United could, among other things, result in lower returns on invested capital, require the raising of additional capital and result in additional regulatory actions if United were to be unable to comply with such requirements. Implementation of changes to asset risk weightings for risk based capital calculations, items included or deducted in calculating regulatory capital and/or additional capital conservation buffers could result in management modifying its business strategy and could limit United’s ability to make distributions, including paying dividends. 21 United’s earnings are significantly affected by the fiscal and monetary policies of the federal government and its agencies . The policies of the Federal Reserve impact United significantly. The Federal Reserve regulates the supply of money and credit in the United States. Its policies directly and indirectly influence the rate of interest earned on loans and paid on borrowings and interest-bearing deposits and can also affect the value of financial instruments we hold. Those policies determine to a significant extent our cost of funds for lending and investing. Changes in those policies are beyond our control and are difficult to predict. Federal Reserve policies can also affect our borrowers, potentially increasing the risk that they may fail to repay their loans. For example, a tightening of the money supply by the Federal Reserve could reduce the demand for a borrower’s products and services. This could adversely affect the borrower’s earnings and ability to repay its loan, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. United may be terminated as a servicer of mortgage loans, be required to repurchase a mortgage loan or reimburse investors for credit losses on a mortgage loan, or incur costs, liabilities, fines and other sanctions if we fail to satisfy our servicing obligations, including our obligations with respect to mortgage loan foreclosure actions . United, through its mortgage banking subsidiary, Crescent, acts as servicer for approximately $3.4 billion of mortgage loans owned by third parties as of December 31, 2022. As a servicer for those loans, United has certain contractual obligations, including foreclosing on defaulted mortgage loans or, to the extent applicable, considering alternatives to foreclosure such as loan modifications or short sales. If United commits a material breach of its obligations as servicer, United may be subject to termination as servicer if the breach is not cured within a specified period of time following notice, causing United to lose servicing income. In some cases, United may be contractually obligated to repurchase a mortgage loan or reimburse the investor for credit losses incurred on the loan as a remedy for servicing errors with respect to the loan. If United has increased repurchase obligations because of claims that United did not satisfy our obligations as a servicer, or increased loss severity on such repurchases, United may have a significant reduction to net servicing income within its noninterest income. United may incur costs if United is required to, or if United elects to, re-execute or re-file documents or take other action in its capacity as a servicer in connection with pending or completed foreclosures. United may incur litigation costs if the validity of a foreclosure action is challenged by a borrower. If a court were to overturn a foreclosure because of errors or deficiencies in the foreclosure process, United may have liability to the borrower and/or to any title insurer of the property sold in foreclosure if the required process was not followed. These costs and liabilities may not be legally or otherwise reimbursable to United. In addition, if certain documents required for a foreclosure action are missing or defective, United could be obligated to cure the defect or repurchase the loan. United may incur liability to securitization investors relating to delays or deficiencies in its processing of mortgage assignments or other documents necessary to comply with state law governing foreclosures. The fair value of United’s mortgage servicing rights may be negatively affected to the extent our servicing costs increase because of higher foreclosure costs. United may be subject to fines and other sanctions imposed by federal or state regulators as a result of actual or perceived deficiencies in our foreclosure practices or in the foreclosure practices of other mortgage loan servicers. Any of these actions may harm United’s reputation or negatively affect its home lending or servicing business. United may be required to repurchase mortgage loans or indemnify buyers against losses in some circumstances, which could harm liquidity, results of operations and financial condition . When mortgage loans are sold, whether as whole loans or pursuant to a securitization, United is required to make customary representations and warranties to purchasers, guarantors and insurers, including the government sponsored enterprises, about the mortgage loans and the manner in which they were originated. Whole loan sale agreements require repurchase or substitute mortgage loans, or indemnification of buyers against losses, in the event United breaches these representations or warranties. In addition, United may be required to repurchase mortgage loans as a result of early payment default of the borrower on a mortgage loan. With respect to loans that are originated through United’s broker or correspondent channels, the remedies available against the originating broker or correspondent, if any, may not be as broad as the remedies available to purchasers, guarantors and insurers of mortgage loans against United. United faces further risk that the originating broker or correspondent, if any, may not have financial capacity to perform remedies that otherwise may be available. Therefore, if a purchaser, guarantor or insurer enforces its remedies against United, it may not be able to recover losses from the originating broker or correspondent. If repurchase and indemnity demands increase and such demands are valid claims and are in excess of United’s provision for potential losses, its liquidity, results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected. 22 CREDIT RISKS There are no assurances as to adequacy of the allowance for credit losses. The FASB’s Accounting Standards Update 2016-13, effective for United as of January 1, 2020, substantially changes the accounting for credit losses on loans, leases and other financial assets held by banks, financial institutions and other organizations. The new standard requires the recognition of credit losses on loans, leases and other financial assets based on an entity’s current estimate of expected losses over the lifetime of each loan, lease or other financial asset, referred to as the Current Expected Credit Loss (“CECL”) model as opposed to the previous “incurred loss” model, which required recognition of losses on loans, leases and other financial assets only when those losses had incurred. Under the CECL model, United is required to present these certain financial assets, carried at amortized cost, at the net amount expected to be collected over the life of the financial asset. The measurement of expected credit losses is based on information about past events, including credit quality, our historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable macroeconomic forecasts that may affect the collectability of the reported amount. This measurement will take place at the time a financial asset is first added to the balance sheet and at least quarterly thereafter. CECL also requires management judgment that is supported by new models and more data elements, including macroeconomic forecasts, than the previous allowance standard. This increased the complexity and associated risk, particularly in times of economic uncertainty or other unforeseen circumstances, which could impact United’s results of operations and capital levels as well as place stress on our internal controls over financial reporting. The determination of the appropriate level of allowance for credit losses inherently involves a high degree of subjectivity and requires us to make significant estimates related to current and expected future credit risks and trends, all of which may undergo material changes. Deterioration in economic conditions affecting borrowers and securities issuers; new information regarding existing loans, credit commitments and securities holdings; natural disasters and risks related to climate change; and identification of additional problem loans, ratings down-grades and other factors, both within and outside of our control, may require an increase in the allowances for credit losses on loans, securities and off-balance sheet credit exposures. In addition, federal and state regulators, as an integral part of their respective supervisory functions, periodically review United’s allowance for credit losses on loans, and may require an increase in the provision for credit losses or the recognition of further loan charge-offs, based on judgments different than those of management. Any increases in the allowance for credit losses on loans will result in a decrease in net income and, possibly, capital, and may have a material adverse effect on United’s business, financial condition and results of operations. See the section captioned “Provision for Credit Losses” in in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in Part II, Item 7 of this Form 10-K for further discussion related to our process for determining the appropriate level of the allowance for credit losses. United is subject to credit risk in its loan portfolio. There are risks inherent in making any loan, including risks with respect to the period of time over which the loan may be repaid, risks resulting from changes in economic and industry conditions, risks inherent in dealing with individual borrowers and risks resulting from uncertainties as to the future value of collateral. United seeks to mitigate the risk inherent in its loan portfolio by adhering to prudent loan approval practices. Although United believes that its loan approval criteria are appropriate for the various kinds of loans the Company makes, United may incur losses on loans that meet our loan approval criteria. A significant decline in general economic conditions caused by inflation or deflation, recession, unemployment, changes in government fiscal and monetary policies, acts of terrorism, or other factors beyond our control could cause our borrowers to default on their loan payments, and the collateral values securing such loans to decline and be insufficient to repay any outstanding indebtedness. In such events, we could experience significant loan losses, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. 23 Certain of our credit exposures are concentrated in industries that may be more susceptible to the long-term risks of climate change, natural disasters or global pandemics. To the extent that these risks may have a negative impact on the financial condition of borrowers, it could also have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. See the section captioned “Loans” in Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations elsewhere in this report for further discussion related to commercial and industrial, energy, construction and commercial real estate loans. OPERATIONAL RISKS United’s information systems may experience an interruption or breach in security. United relies heavily on communications and information systems to conduct its business. In addition, as part of its business, United collects, processes and retains sensitive and confidential client and customer information. United’s facilities and systems, and those of our third-party service providers, may be vulnerable to security breaches, acts of vandalism, computer viruses, misplaced or lost data, programming and/or human errors, or other similar events. Any failure, interruption or breach in security of these systems could result in failures or disruptions in the Company’s customer relationship management, general ledger, deposit, loan and other systems. While United has policies and procedures designed to prevent or limit the effect of the failure, interruption or security breach of its information systems, there can be no assurance that any such failures, interruptions or security breaches will not occur or, if they do occur, that they will be adequately addressed. The occurrence of any failures, interruptions or security breaches of the Company’s information systems could damage United’s reputation, result in a loss of customer business, subject United to additional regulatory scrutiny, or expose the Company to civil litigation and possible financial liability, any of which could have a material adverse effect on United’s financial condition and results of operations. Unauthorized disclosure of sensitive or confidential client or customer information, whether through a cyber-attack, other breach of our computer systems or otherwise, could severely harm our business. In the normal course of our business, we collect, process and retain sensitive and confidential client and customer information on our behalf and on behalf of other third parties. Despite the security measures we have in place, our facilities and systems may be vulnerable to cyber-attacks, security breaches, acts of vandalism, computer viruses, misplaced or lost data, programming and/or human errors, or other similar events. Information security risks for financial institutions like us have increased recently in part because of new technologies, the use of the internet and telecommunications technologies (including mobile devices) to conduct financial and other business transactions, employees working from home and the increased sophistication and activities of organized crime, perpetrators of fraud, hackers, terrorists and others. In addition to cyber-attacks or other security breaches involving the theft of sensitive and confidential information, hackers have engaged in attacks against large financial institutions, particularly denial of service attacks, designed to disrupt key business services such as customer-facing web sites. We are not able to anticipate or implement effective preventive measures against all security breaches of these types. Although we employ detection and response mechanisms designed to contain and mitigate security incidents, early detection may be thwarted by persistent sophisticated attacks and malware designed to avoid detection. We also face risks related to cyber-attacks and other security breaches in connection with card transactions that typically involve the transmission of sensitive information regarding our customers through various third parties. Some of these parties have in the past been the target of security breaches and cyber-attacks, and because the transactions involve third parties and environments that we do not control or secure, future security breaches or cyber-attacks affecting any of these third parties could impact us through no fault of our own, and in some cases we may have exposure and suffer losses for breaches or attacks relating to them. We also rely on numerous other third-party service providers to conduct other aspects of our business operations and face similar risks relating to them. While we conduct security assessments on our higher risk third parties, we cannot be sure that their information security protocols are sufficient to withstand a cyber-attack or other security breach. 24 Any cyber-attack or other security breach involving the misappropriation, loss or other unauthorized disclosure of confidential customer information could severely damage our reputation, erode confidence in the security of our systems, products and services, expose us to the risk of litigation and liability, disrupt our operations and have a material adverse effect on our business. United’s business continuity plans or data security systems could prove to be inadequate, resulting in a material interruption in, or disruption to, its business and a negative impact on results of operations. United relies heavily on communications and information systems to conduct its business. Any failure, interruption or breach in security of these systems, whether due to severe weather, natural disasters, cyber-attack, acts of war or terrorism, criminal activity or other factors, could result in failures or disruptions in general ledger, deposit, loan, customer relationship management and other systems. While United has disaster recovery and other policies and procedures designed to prevent or limit the effect of the failure, interruption or security breach of its information systems, there can be no assurance that any such failures, interruptions or security breaches will not occur or, if they do occur, that they will be adequately addressed. The occurrence of any failures, interruptions or security breaches of United’s information systems could damage its reputation, result in a loss of customer business, subject it to additional regulatory scrutiny or expose it to civil litigation and possible financial liability, any of which could have a material adverse effect on results of operations. The negative economic effects caused by terrorist attacks, including cyber-attacks, potential attacks and other destabilizing events would likely contribute to the deterioration of the quality of United’s loan portfolio and could reduce its customer base, level of deposits, and demand for its financial products such as loans. High inflation, natural disasters, acts of terrorism, including cyber-attacks, an escalation of hostilities or other international or domestic occurrences, and other factors could have a negative impact on the economy of the Mid-Atlantic and Southeast regions in which United operates. An additional economic downturn in its markets would likely contribute to the deterioration of the quality of United’s loan portfolio by impacting the ability of its customers to repay loans, the value of the collateral securing loans, and may reduce the level of deposits in its bank and the stability of its deposit funding sources. An additional economic downturn could also have a significant impact on the demand for United’s products and services. The cumulative effect of these matters on United’s results of operations and financial condition would likely be adverse and material. Our growth-oriented business strategy could be adversely affected if we are not able to attract and retain skilled employees or if we lose the services of our senior management team. Our ability to manage growth will depend upon our ability to continue to attract, hire and retain skilled employees. The unanticipated loss of members of our senior management team, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and ability to execute our strategic goals. Our success will also depend on the ability of our officers and key employees to continue to implement and improve our operational and other systems, to manage multiple, concurrent customer relationships and to hire, train and manage our employees. United’s vendors could fail to fulfill their contractual obligations, resulting in a material interruption in, or disruption to, its business and a negative impact on results of operations. United is dependent upon third parties for certain information system, data management and processing services and to provide key components of its business infrastructure. United has entered into subcontracts for the supply of current and future services, such as data processing, mortgage loan processing and servicing, and certain property management functions. These services must be available on a continuous and timely basis and be in compliance with any regulatory requirements. Failure to do so could substantially harm United’s business. 25 United often purchases services from vendors under agreements that typically can be terminated on a periodic basis. There can be no assurance, however, that vendors will be able to meet their obligations under these agreements or that United will be able to compel them to do so. Risks of relying on vendors include the following: • If an existing agreement expires or a certain service is discontinued by a vendor, then United may not be able to continue to offer its customers the same breadth of products and its operating results would likely suffer unless it is able to find an alternate supply of a similar service. • Agreements United may negotiate in the future may commit it to certain minimum spending obligations. It is possible United will not be able to create the market demand to meet such obligations. • If market demand for United’s products increases suddenly, its current vendors might not be able to fulfill United’s commercial needs, which would require it to seek new arrangements or new sources of supply, and may result in substantial delays in meeting market demand. • United may not be able to control or adequately monitor the quality of services it receives from its vendors. Poor quality services could damage United’s reputation with its customers. In addition, these third party service providers are sources of operational and informational security risk to United, including risks associated with operational errors, information system interruptions or breaches, and unauthorized disclosures of sensitive or confidential client or customer information. If third party service providers encounter any of these issues, or if United has difficulty communicating with them, United could be exposed to disruption of operations, loss of service or connectivity to customers, reputational damage, and litigation risk that could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or our business. Potential problems with vendors such as those discussed above could have a significant adverse effect on United’s business, lead to higher costs and damage its reputation with its customers and, in turn, have a material adverse effect on its financial condition and results of operations. MARKET AND INTEREST RATE RISKS Changes in economic and political conditions could adversely affect our earnings, as our borrowers’ ability to repay loans and the value of the collateral securing our loans decline . United’s success depends, to a certain extent, upon local and national economic and political conditions, as well as governmental monetary policies. Conditions such as an economic recession, rising unemployment, changes in interest rates, money supply and other factors beyond its control may adversely affect United’s and United Bank’s asset quality, deposit levels and loan demand and, therefore, its earnings. Because United has a significant amount of real estate loans, decreases in real estate values could adversely affect the value of property used as collateral. Adverse changes in the economy may also have a negative effect on the ability of our borrowers to make timely repayments of their loans, which could have an adverse impact on our earnings. Consequently, declines in the economy in our market area could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. While recent economic conditions have seen improving trends since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, there can be no assurance that this improvement will continue. Evolving responses from federal and state governments and other regulators, and our customers or our third-party partners or vendors, to new challenges such as climate change have impacted and could continue to impact the economic and political conditions under which we operate. Economic and inflationary pressure on consumers and uncertainty regarding continuing economic improvement could result in changes in consumer and business spending, borrowing and savings habits. Such conditions could have a material adverse effect on the credit quality of our loans and our business, financial condition and results of operations. 26 The value of certain investment securities is volatile and future declines in value could have a materially adverse effect on future earnings and regulatory capital. Continued volatility in the fair value for certain investment securities, whether caused by changes in market conditions, interest rates, credit risk of the issuer, the expected yield of the security, or actual defaults in the portfolio could result in significant fluctuations in the value of the securities as well as any regulatory rulemaking such as the Volcker Rule which could exclude or limit the holdings of certain investment securities. This could have a material adverse impact on United’s accumulated other comprehensive income and shareholders’ equity depending on the direction of the fluctuations. Furthermore, future downgrades, defaults or prepayments, including the liquidation of the underlying collateral in certain securities, could result in the recording of an allowance for credit losses related to these securities. This could have a material impact on United’s future earnings, although the impact on shareholders’ equity will be offset by any amount already included in other comprehensive income. United operates in a highly competitive market. United faces a high degree of competition in all of the markets it serves. United faces strong competition in gathering deposits, making loans and obtaining client assets for management by its investment or trust operations. United considers all of West Virginia to be included in its market area. This area includes the five largest West Virginia Metropolitan Statistical Areas (“MSA”): the Parkersburg MSA, the Charleston MSA, the Huntington MSA, the Morgantown MSA and the Wheeling MSA. United serves the Ohio counties of Lawrence, Belmont, Jefferson and Washington and Fayette county in Pennsylvania primarily because of their close proximity to the Ohio and Pennsylvania borders and United banking offices located in those counties or in nearby West Virginia. United’s Virginia markets include the Maryland, northern Virginia and Washington, D.C. MSA, the Winchester MSA, the Harrisonburg MSA, and the Charlottesville MSA. Through its acquisition of Carolina Financial, United’s market also includes the Coastal, Midlands, and Upstate regions of South Carolina, including the Charleston (Charleston, Dorchester and Berkeley Counties), Myrtle Beach (Horry and Georgetown Counties), Columbia (Richland and Lexington Counties), and the Upstate (Greenville and Spartanburg Counties) areas as well as areas in North Carolina including Wilmington (New Hanover County), Raleigh-Durham (Durham and Wake Counties), Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia (NC and SC) and the southeastern coastal region of North Carolina (Bladen, Brunswick, Columbus, Cumberland, Duplin and Robeson Counties). Through its acquisition of Community Bankers Trust, United added new markets in Baltimore and Annapolis, Maryland and Lynchburg and Richmond, Virginia as well as the Northern Neck of Virginia. United considers all of the above locations to be the primary market area for the business of its banking and mortgage banking subsidiaries. There is a risk that aggressive competition could result in United controlling a smaller share of these markets. A decline in market share could lead to a decline in net income which would have a negative impact on shareholder value. United may be adversely affected by the soundness of other financial institutions. Financial services institutions are interrelated as a result of trading, clearing, counterparty, or other relationships. United has exposure to many different industries and counterparties, and routinely executes transactions with counterparties in the financial services industry, including brokers and dealers, commercial banks, investment banks, mutual and hedge funds, or other institutional clients. Defaults by financial services institutions, and even rumors or questions about a financial institution or the financial services industry in general, may lead to market wide liquidity problems and could lead to losses or defaults by United or other institutions. Any such losses could adversely affect United’s financial condition or results of operations. Changes in interest rates may adversely affect United’s business. United’s earnings, like most financial institutions, are significantly dependent on its net interest income. Net interest income is the difference between the interest income United earns on loans and other assets which earn interest and the interest expense incurred to fund those assets, such as on savings deposits and borrowed money. Therefore, changes in general market interest rates, such as a change in the monetary policy of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System or otherwise beyond those which are contemplated by United’s interest rate risk model and policy, could have an effect on net interest income. For more information concerning United’s interest rate risk model and policy, see the discussion in Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk included in Part II, under Item 7A of this Form 10-K. 27 Uncertainty relating to the LIBOR determination process and LIBOR discontinuance may adversely affect our results of operations. The London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) and certain other “benchmarks” are the subject of recent national, international, and other regulatory guidance and proposals for reform. These reforms may cause such benchmarks to perform differently than in the past or have other consequences, which cannot be predicted. The United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority and the administrator of LIBOR have announced that the publication of the most commonly used U.S. dollar LIBOR settings will cease to be published or cease to be representative after June 30, 2023. The publication of all other LIBOR settings ceased to be published as of December 31, 2021. The bank regulatory agencies indicated that entering into new contracts that use LIBOR as a reference rate after December 31, 2021, would create safety and soundness risks and that they would examine bank practices accordingly. The Adjustable Interest Rate (LIBOR) Act, enacted in March 2022, provides a statutory framework to replace U.S. dollar LIBOR with a benchmark rate based on the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) for contracts governed by U.S. law that have no or ineffective fallback, and in December 2022, the Federal Reserve Board adopted related implementing rules. United has taken steps to ensure that no new contracts using LIBOR were originated after December 31, 2021. At this time, United intends to prioritize SOFR and Prime as the preferred alternatives to LIBOR; however, these preferred alternatives could change over time based on market developments. There can be no assurances on which benchmark rate(s) may replace LIBOR or how LIBOR will be determined for purposes of financial instruments that are currently referencing LIBOR when it ceases to exist. The discontinuance of LIBOR may result in uncertainty or differences in the calculation of the applicable interest rate or payment amount depending on the terms of the governing documents, may adversely affect the value of our floating rate obligations, loans, deposits, derivatives, and other financial instruments tied to LIBOR rates and may also increase operational and other risks to the Company and the industry. In addition, the implementation of LIBOR reform proposals may result in increased compliance costs and operational costs, including costs related to continued participation in LIBOR and the transition to a replacement reference rate or rates. We cannot reasonably estimate the expected cost. RISKS RELATED TO ACQUISITION ACTIVITY Potential acquisitions may disrupt our business and dilute shareholder value We generally seek merger or acquisition partners that are culturally similar and have experienced management and possess either significant market presence or have potential for improved profitability through financial management, economies of scale or expanded services. Acquiring other banks, businesses, or branches involves various risks commonly associated with acquisitions, including, among other things, (i) potential exposure to unknown or contingent liabilities of the target company; (ii) exposure to potential asset quality issues of the target company; (iii) potential disruption to our business; (iv) potential diversion of our management’s time and attention; (v) the possible loss of key employees and customers of the target company; (vi) difficulty in estimating the value of the target company; and (vii) potential changes in banking or tax laws or regulations that may affect the target company. Acquisitions typically involve the payment of a premium over book and market values, and, therefore, some dilution of our tangible book value and net income per common share may occur in connection with any future transaction. Acquisitions may also result in potential dilution to existing shareholders of our earnings per share if we issue common stock in connection with the acquisition. Furthermore, failure to realize the expected revenue increases, cost savings, increases in geographic or product presence, and/or other projected benefits from an acquisition could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, from time to time, bank regulators may restrict the Company from making acquisitions. See “Regulation and Supervision” in Item 1, “Business,” of this Form 10-K for additional detail and further discussion of these matters. 28 Acquisitions may be delayed, impeded, or prohibited due to regulatory issues Acquisitions by financial institutions, including us, are subject to approval by a variety of federal and state regulatory agencies (collectively, “regulatory approvals”). The process for obtaining these required regulatory approvals has become substantially more difficult since the global financial crisis, and our ability to engage in certain merger or acquisition transactions depends on the bank regulators’ views at the time as to our capital levels, quality of management, and overall condition, in addition to their assessment of a variety of other factors, including our compliance with law. Regulatory approvals could be delayed, impeded, restrictively conditioned or denied due to existing or new regulatory issues we have, or may have, with regulatory agencies, including, without limitation, issues related to Bank Secrecy Act compliance, Community Reinvestment Act issues, fair lending laws, fair housing laws, consumer protection laws, unfair, deceptive, or abusive acts or practices regulations and other laws and regulations. We may fail to pursue, evaluate or complete strategic and competitively significant acquisition opportunities as a result of our inability, or perceived or anticipated inability, to obtain regulatory approvals in a timely manner, under reasonable conditions or at all. Difficulties associated with potential acquisitions that may result from these factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. SECURITY OWNERSHIP RISKS United’s stock price can be volatile . Stock price volatility may make it more difficult for United shareholders to resell their common stock when they want and at prices they find attractive. United’s stock price can fluctuate significantly in response to a variety of factors, including, among other things: • Actual or anticipated negative variations in quarterly results of operations; • Negative recommendations by securities analysts; • Poor operating and stock price performance of other companies that investors deem comparable to United; • News reports relating to negative trends, concerns and other issues in the financial services industry or the economy in general; • Negative perceptions in the marketplace regarding United and/or its competitors; • New technology used, or services offered, by competitors; • Adverse changes in interest rates or a lending environment with prolonged low interest rates; • Adverse changes in the real estate market; • Negative economic news; • Failure to integrate acquisitions or realize anticipated benefits from acquisitions; • Adverse changes in government regulations; and • Geopolitical conditions such as acts or threats of terrorism or military conflicts. General market fluctuations, industry factors and general economic and political conditions and events, such as economic slowdowns or recessions, interest rate changes or credit loss trends, could also cause United’s stock price to decrease regardless of operating results. Dividend payments by United’s subsidiaries to United and by United to its shareholders can be restricted. The declaration and payment of future cash dividends will depend on, among other things, United’s earnings, the general economic and regulatory climate, United’s liquidity and capital requirements, and other factors deemed relevant by United’s board of directors. Federal Reserve Board policy limits the payment of cash dividends by bank holding companies, without regulatory approval, and requires that a holding company serve as a source of strength to its banking subsidiaries. United’s principal source of funds to pay dividends on its common stock is cash dividends from its subsidiaries. The payment of these dividends by its subsidiaries is also restricted by federal and state banking laws and regulations. As of December 31, 2022, approximately $276.2 million was available for dividend payments from United Bank to United without regulatory approval. 29 An investment in United common stock is not an insured deposit. United common stock is not a bank deposit and, therefore, is not insured against loss by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, any other deposit insurance fund or by any other public or private entity. Investment in United common stock is inherently risky for the reasons described in this section and elsewhere in this report and is subject to the same market forces that affect the price of common stock in any company. As a result, someone who acquires United common stock, could lose some or all of their investment. Failure to maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting in the future could impair United’s ability to accurately and timely report its financial results or prevent fraud, resulting in loss of investor confidence and adversely affecting United’s business and stock price . Effective internal controls over financial reporting are necessary to provide reliable financial reports and prevent fraud. Management believes that United’s internal controls over financial reporting are currently effective. Management will continually review and analyze the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting for Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404 compliance. Any failure to maintain, in the future, an effective internal control environment could impact United’s ability to report its financial results on an accurate and timely basis, which could result in regulatory actions, loss of investor confidence, and adversely impact United’s business and stock price. Certain banking laws may have an anti-takeover effect. Provisions of federal banking laws, including regulatory approval requirements, could make it more difficult to be acquired by a third party, even if perceived to be beneficial to United’s shareholders. These provisions effectively inhibit a non-negotiated merger or other business combination, which could adversely affect the market price of United’s common stock. GENERAL RISKS United may elect or be compelled to seek additional capital in the future, but capital may not be available when it is needed. United is required by federal and state regulatory authorities to maintain adequate levels of capital to support the Company’s operations. In addition, United may elect to raise additional capital to support the Company’s business or to finance acquisitions, if any, or United may otherwise elect to raise additional capital. United’s ability to raise additional capital, if needed, will depend on conditions in the capital markets, economic conditions and a number of other factors, many of which are outside the Company’s control, and on United’s financial performance. Accordingly, United cannot be assured of its ability to raise additional capital if needed or on terms acceptable to the Company. If United cannot raise additional capital when needed, it may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations and prospects. New accounting or tax pronouncements or interpretations may be issued by the accounting profession, regulators or other government bodies which could change existing accounting methods. Changes in accounting methods could negatively impact United’s results of operations and financial condition. Current accounting and tax rules, standards, policies and interpretations influence the methods by which financial institutions conduct business, implement strategic initiatives and tax compliance, and govern financial reporting and disclosures. These laws, regulations, rules, standards, policies, and interpretations are constantly evolving and may change significantly over time. Events that may not have a direct impact on United, such as the bankruptcy of major U.S. companies, have resulted in legislators, regulators and authoritative bodies, such as the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the SEC, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, and various taxing authorities, responding by adopting and/or proposing substantive revision to laws, regulations, rules, standards, policies, and interpretations. New accounting pronouncements and varying interpretations of accounting pronouncements have occurred and may occur in the future. A change in accounting standards may adversely affect reported financial condition and results of operations. 30 United could face unanticipated environmental liabilities or costs related to real property owned or acquired through foreclosure. Compliance with federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations, including those related to investigation and clean-up of contaminated sites, could have a negative effect on expenses and results of operations. A significant portion of United’s loan portfolio is secured by real property. During the ordinary course of business, United may foreclose on and take title to properties securing certain loans. In doing so, there is a risk that hazardous or toxic substances could be found on these properties. If hazardous or toxic substances are found, United may be liable for remediation costs, as well as for personal injury and property damage. Environmental laws may require United to incur substantial expenses and may materially reduce the affected property’s value or limit United’s ability to use or sell the affected property. In addition, future laws or more stringent interpretations or enforcement policies with respect to existing laws may increase exposure to environmental liability. Although United has policies and procedures to perform an environmental review before initiating any foreclosure action on real property, these reviews may not be sufficient to detect all potential environmental hazards. The remediation costs and any other financial liabilities associated with an environmental hazard could have a material adverse effect on results of operations. Severe weather, natural disasters, public health issues, acts of war or terrorism, and other external events could significantly impact United’s ability to conduct business. Severe weather, natural disasters, public health issues, acts of war or terrorism, and other external events could affect the stability of United’s deposit base, impair the ability of borrowers to repay outstanding loans, impair the value of collateral securing loans, adversely impact United’s employee base, cause significant property damage, result in loss of revenue, and / or cause the Company to incur additional expenses. Although management has established disaster recovery policies and procedures, the occurrence of any such event could have a material adverse effect on United’s business, which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations. Increasing scrutiny and evolving expectations from customers, regulators, investors, and other stakeholders with respect to United’s environmental, social and governance practices may impose additional costs on us or expose us to new or additional risks. Companies are facing increasing scrutiny from customers, regulators, investors, and other stakeholders related to their environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) practices and disclosure. Investor advocacy groups, investment funds and influential investors are also increasingly focused on these practices, especially as they relate to the environment, health and safety, diversity, labor conditions and human rights. Increased ESG-related compliance costs for United as well as among our suppliers, vendors and various other parties within our supply chain could result in increases to our overall operational costs. Failure to adapt to or comply with regulatory requirements or investor or stakeholder expectations and standards could negatively impact United’s reputation, ability to do business with certain partners, access to capital, and our stock price. New government regulations could also result in new or more stringent forms of ESG oversight and expanding mandatory and voluntary reporting, diligence, and disclosure. Climate change and related legislative and regulatory initiatives may materially affect United’s business and results of operations. The effects of climate change continue to create an alarming level of concern for the state of the global environment. As a result, the global business community has increased its political and social awareness surrounding the issue, and the United States has entered into international agreements in an attempt to reduce global temperatures, such as reentering the Paris Agreement. Further, the U.S. Congress, state legislatures and federal and state regulatory agencies continue to propose numerous initiatives to supplement the global effort to combat climate change. Similar and even more expansive initiatives are expected under the current administration, including potentially increasing supervisory expectations with respect to banks’ risk management practices, accounting for the effects of climate change in stress testing scenarios and systemic risk assessments, revising expectations for credit portfolio concentrations based on climate-related factors and encouraging investment by banks in climate-related initiatives and lending to communities disproportionately impacted by the effects of climate change. The lack of empirical data surrounding the credit and other financial risks posed 31 by climate change render it impossible to predict how specifically climate change may impact our financial condition and results of operations; however, the physical effects of climate change may also directly impact us. Specifically, unpredictable and more frequent weather disasters may adversely impact the value of real property securing the loans in our portfolios. Additionally, if insurance obtained by our borrowers is insufficient to cover any losses sustained to the collateral, or if insurance coverage is otherwise unavailable to our borrowers, the collateral securing our loans may be negatively impacted by climate change, which could impact our financial condition and results of operations. Further, the effects of climate change may negatively impact regional and local economic activity, which could lead to an adverse effect on our customers and impact the communities in which we operate. We are also subject to reputational risk from shareholder concerns about our practices related to climate change, our carbon footprint and our business relationships with customers who operate in carbon-intensive industries. Our business, reputation and ability to attract and retain employees may also be harmed if our response to climate change is perceived to be ineffective or insufficient. Climate change also exposes us to transition risks associated with the transition to a less carbon-dependent economy. Transition risks may result from changes in policies; laws and regulations; technologies; and/or market preferences to address climate change. Such changes could materially, negatively impact our business, results of operations, financial condition and/or our reputation, in addition to having a similar impact on our customers. We have customers who operate in carbon-intensive industries like oil and gas that are exposed to climate risks, such as those risks related to the transition to a less carbon-dependent economy, as well as customers who operate in low-carbon industries that may be subject to risks associated with new technologies. Federal and state banking regulators and supervisory authorities, investors and other stakeholders have increasingly viewed financial institutions as important in helping to address the risks related to climate change both directly and with respect to their customers, which may result in financial institutions coming under increased pressure regarding the disclosure and management of their climate risks and related lending and investment activities. Given that climate change could impose systemic risks upon the financial sector, either via disruptions in economic activity resulting from the physical impacts of climate change or changes in policies as the economy transitions to a less carbon-intensive environment, we face regulatory risk of increasing focus on our resilience to climate-related risks, including in the context of stress testing for various climate stress scenarios. Ongoing legislative or regulatory uncertainties and changes regarding climate risk management and practices may result in higher regulatory, compliance, credit and reputational risks and costs. Item 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS None Item 2. PROPERTIES Offices United is headquartered in the United Center at 500 Virginia Street, East, Charleston, West Virginia. United’s executive offices are located in Parkersburg, West Virginia at Fifth and Avery Streets. United operates two hundred and twenty (220) full service offices—forty-seven (47) offices located throughout West Virginia, one hundred (100) offices in the Shenandoah Valley region, the Northern Neck, the Richmond and Lynchburg metropolitan areas of Virginia and the Northern Virginia, Maryland and Washington, D.C. metropolitan area, forty-three (43) offices in the Mountains, Piedmont, Coastal Plains and Tidewater regions of North Carolina, twenty-five (25) offices in the Coastal, Midlands, and Upstate regions of South Carolina, four (4) offices in southwestern Pennsylvania and one (1) office in southeastern Ohio. United owns forty-one (41) of its West Virginia facilities while leasing six (6) of its offices under operating leases. In Virginia, United leases forty-four (44) of its branches under operating leases while owning thirty-eight (38) branches. United owns three (3) branches and leases eight (8) of its branches under operating leases in Maryland. In Washington, DC, United leases all seven (7) of its branch facilities under operating leases. United leases twenty-five (25) of its branch offices in North Carolina under operating leases while owning eighteen (18) branches. In South Carolina, United owns twenty-one (21) of its facilities while leasing under operating leases four (4) branch offices. United owns all four (4) of its Pennsylvania facilities. 32 In Ohio, United owns its one branch. United leases operations centers in the Charleston, West Virginia and Chantilly, Virginia areas and owns two operations centers in the Morgantown, West Virginia area and Washington, North Carolina. Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS United and its subsidiaries are currently involved in various legal proceedings in the normal course of business. Management is vigorously pursuing all its legal and factual defenses and, after consultation with legal counsel, believes that all such litigation will be resolved with no material effect on United’s financial position. Item 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES Not applicable. 33 UNITED BANKSHARES, INC. FORM 10-K, PART II Item 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES Stock As of January 31, 2023, 200,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $2.50 per share, were authorized for United, of which 142,011,832 were issued, including 7,266,438 shares held as treasury shares. The outstanding shares are held by approximately 9,485 shareholders of record, as well as 50,813 shareholders in street name as of January 31, 2023. The unissued portion of United’ s authorized common stock (subject to registration approval by the SEC) and the treasury shares are available for issuance as the Board of Directors determines advisable. United offers its shareholders the opportunity to invest dividends in shares of United stock through its dividend reinvestment plan. United has also established stock option plans and a stock bonus plan as incentive for certain eligible officers. In addition to the above incentive plans, United is occasionally involved in certain mergers in which additional shares could be issued and recognizes that additional shares could be issued for other appropriate purposes. In October of 2019, United’s Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase plan (the “2019 Plan”) to repurchase up to 4,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock on the open market at prevailing prices. United repurchased 2,846,989 shares under this plan. On May 11, 2022, the Board of Directors approved a new repurchase plan (the “2022 Plan”) to repurchase up to 4,750,000 shares of United’s common stock on the open market. The 2022 Plan replaced the 2019 Plan. During 2022, United repurchased 378,761 shares under the 2022 Plan. As of December 31, 2022, United still has 4,371,239 shares available for repurchase under the 2022 Plan. The Board of Directors believes that the availability of authorized but unissued common stock of United is of considerable value if opportunities should arise for the acquisition of other businesses through the issuance of United’s stock. Shareholders do not have preemptive rights, which allow United to issue additional authorized shares without first offering them to current shareholders. Currently, United has only one voting class of stock issued and outstanding and all voting rights are vested in the holders of United’s common stock. On all matters subject to a vote of shareholders, the shareholders of United will be entitled to one vote for each share of common stock owned. Shareholders of United have cumulative voting rights with regard to election of directors. United’s common stock is traded over the counter on the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotations System, Global Select Market (“NASDAQ”) under the trading symbol UBSI. The closing sale price reported for United’s common stock on February 22, 2023, the last practicable date, was $40.85. On December 23, 2008, the shareholders of United authorized the issuance of preferred stock up to 50,000,000 shares with a par value of $1.00 per share. The authorized preferred stock may be issued by the Company’s Board of Directors in one or more series, from time to time, with each such series to consist of such number of shares and to have such voting powers, full or limited, or no voting powers, and such designations, preferences and relative, participating, optional or other special rights, and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof, as shall be stated in the resolution or resolutions providing for the issuance of such series adopted by the Board of Directors. Currently, no shares of preferred stock have been issued. The authorization of preferred stock will not have an immediate effect on the holders of the Company’s common stock. The actual effect of the issuance of any shares of preferred stock upon the rights of the holders of common stock cannot be stated until the Board of Directors determines the specific rights of any shares of preferred stock. However, the effects might include, among other things, restricting dividends on common stock, diluting the voting power of common stock, reducing the market price of common stock or impairing the liquidation rights of the common stock without further action by the shareholders. Holders of the common stock will not have preemptive rights with respect to the preferred stock. 34 There are no preemptive or conversion rights or, redemption or sinking fund provisions with respect to United’s stock. All of the issued and outstanding shares of United’s stock are fully paid and non-assessable. Stock Performance Graph The following Stock Performance Graph and related information shall not be deemed “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each as amended, except to the extent that United specifically incorporates it by reference into such filing. The following graph compares United’s cumulative total shareholder return (assuming reinvestment of dividends) on its common stock for the five-year period ending December 31, 2022, with the cumulative total return (assuming reinvestment of dividends) of the Standard and Poor’s Midcap 400 Index and with the NASDAQ Bank Index. The cumulative total shareholder return assumes a $100 investment on December 31, 2017 in the common stock of United and each index and the cumulative return is measured as of each subsequent fiscal year-end. There is no assurance that United’s common stock performance will continue in the future with the same or similar trends as depicted in the graph. Period Ending 12/31/17 12/31/18 12/31/19 12/31/20 12/31/21 12/31/22 United Bankshares, Inc. 100.00 92.95 119.74 106.01 123.35 143.14 NASDAQ Bank Index 100.00 83.83 104.26 96.44 137.82 115.38 S&P Mid-Cap Index 100.00 88.90 112.17 127.48 159.01 138.18 35 Issuer Repurchases The table below includes certain information regarding United’s purchase of its common shares during the three months ended December 31, 2022: Period Total Number of Shares Purchased (1) (2) Average Price Paid per Share Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans (3) Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet be Purchased Under the Plans (3) 10/01 – 10/31/2022 0 $ 00.00 0 4,371,239 11/01 – 11/30/2022 0 $ 00.00 0 4,371,239 12/01 – 12/31/2022 5 $ 42.82 0 4,371,239 Total 5 $ 42.82 (1) Includes shares exchanged in connection with the exercise of stock options or the vesting of restricted stock under United’s long-term incentive plans. Shares are purchased pursuant to the terms of the applicable plan and not pursuant to a publicly announced stock repurchase plan. For the quarter ended December 31, 2022 – no shares were exchanged by participants in United’s long-term incentive plans. (2) Includes shares purchased in open market transactions by United for a rabbi trust to provide payment of benefits under a deferred compensation plan for certain key officers of United and its subsidiaries. For the quarter ended December 31, 2022, the following shares were purchased for the deferred compensation plan: December 2022 – 5 shares at an average price of $42.82. (3) In May of 2022, United’s Board of Directors approved a new repurchase plan to repurchase up to 4,750,000 shares of United’s common stock on the open market (the “2022 Plan”). The timing, price and quantity of purchases under the plans are at the discretion of management and the plan may be discontinued, suspended or restarted at any time depending on the facts and circumstances. The 2022 Plan replaces a repurchase plan approved by United’s Board of Directors in October of 2019. Item 6. [RESERVED] Item 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS Congress passed the Private Securities Litigation Act of 1995 to encourage corporations to provide investors with information about the company’s anticipated future financial performance, goals, and strategies. The act provides a safe haven for such disclosure; in other words, protection from unwarranted litigation if actual results are not the same as management expectations. United desires to provide its shareholders with sound information about past performance and future trends. Consequently, any forward-looking statements contained in this report, in a report incorporated by reference to this report, or made by management of United in this report, in any other reports and filings, in press releases and in oral statements, involve numerous assumptions, risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of the words “expect,” “may,” “could,” “intend,” “project,” “estimate,” “believe,” “anticipate,” and other words of similar meaning. Such forward-looking statements are based on assumptions and estimates, which although believed to be reasonable, may turn out to be incorrect, such as statements about the potential impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, undue reliance should not be placed upon these estimates and statements. United cannot assure that any of these statements, estimates, or beliefs will be realized and actual results may differ from those contemplated in these “forward-looking statements.” United undertakes no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. 36 The discussion in Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” lists some of the factors that could cause United’s actual results to vary materially from those expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements, and such discussion is incorporated into this discussion by reference. CORONAVIRUS (“COVID-19”) PANDEMIC During 2020, and to a lesser extent in 2021, the COVID-19 pandemic had a severe disruptive impact on the U.S. and global economy. As the pandemic is ongoing and dynamic in nature, there are many uncertainties related to COVID-19 including, among other things, the ongoing impact to our customers, employees and vendors; the impact to the financial services and banking industry; and the impact to the economy as a whole as well as the effect of actions taken, or that may yet be taken, or inaction by governmental authorities to contain the outbreak or to mitigate its impact (both economic and health-related). Refer to our 2021 Form 10-K for further information regarding (i) the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our operations and our results thereof, as well as the impact on our financial position and (ii) legislative and regulatory actions taken related to the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly as they relate to the banking and financial services industry. As the COVID-19 pandemic continues to be on-going, there continues to be uncertainties related to its magnitude, duration and persistent effects. This is particularly the case with the emergence, contagiousness and threat of new and different strains of the virus as well as the availability, acceptance and effectiveness of vaccines. However, United is currently unable to fully assess or predict the extent of the effects of COVID-19 on its operations and results in the future as the ultimate impact will depend on factors that are currently unknown and/or beyond our control. ACQUISITIONS On December 3, 2021, United acquired 100% of the outstanding common stock of Community Bankers Trust Corporation (“Community Bankers Trust”), a Virginia corporation headquartered in Richmond, Virginia. Immediately following the Merger, Essex Bank, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Community Bankers Trust, merged with and into United Bank, a wholly-owned subsidiary of United. United Bank survived the Bank Merger and continues to exist as a Virginia banking corporation. The acquisition of Community Bankers Trust enhanced United’s existing presence in the DC Metro MSA and took United into new markets including Baltimore, Annapolis, Lynchburg, Richmond, and the Northern Neck of Virginia. It also strategically connected our Mid-Atlantic and Southeast footprints. The Community Bankers Trust merger was accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting. At consummation, Community Bankers Trust had assets of $1.79 billion, loans and leases, net of unearned income of $1.28 billion and deposits of $1.52 billion. On May 1, 2020, United acquired 100% of the outstanding common stock of Carolina Financial Corporation (“Carolina Financial”), headquartered in Charleston, South Carolina. Immediately following the Merger, CresCom Bank, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Carolina Financial, merged with and into United Bank, a wholly-owned subsidiary of United (the “Bank Merger)”. United Bank survived the Bank Merger and continues to exist as a Virginia banking corporation. The acquisition of Carolina Financial afforded United the opportunity to expand its existing footprint in North Carolina and South Carolina. The merger resulted in a combined company with more than 200 locations in some of the best banking markets in the United States. CresCom Bank owned and operated Crescent Mortgage Company (“Crescent”), which is based in Atlanta. Crescent is approved to originate loans in 48 states partnering with community banks, credit unions and mortgage brokers. As a result of the merger, Crescent became an indirectly-owned subsidiary of United. The Carolina Financial merger was accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting. At consummation, Carolina Financial had assets of $5.00 billion, loans and leases, net of unearned income of $3.29 billion and deposits of $3.87 billion. 37 The results of operations of Community Bankers Trust and Carolina Financial are included in the consolidated results of operations from their date of acquisition. As a result of the Community Bankers Trust acquisition, the year of 2022 was impacted by increased levels of average balances, income, and expense as compared to the year 2021. As a result of the Community Bankers Trust and Carolina Financial acquisitions, the year of 2021 was impacted by increased levels of average balances, income, and expense from both the Community Bankers Trust and Carolina Financial acquisition as compared to the year of 2020. In addition, the year of 2021 included $21.42 million of merger-related expenses from Community Bankers Trust acquisition as compared to $54.24 million of merger-related expenses from the Carolina Financial acquisition in the year of 2020. TRANSITION FROM THE LONDON INTERBANK OFFERED RATE (“LIBOR”) In 2017, the United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority, which regulates LIBOR, publicly announced its intention to stop persuading or compelling banks to submit the rates used to calculate LIBOR after 2021. ICE Benchmark Administration (the publisher of LIBOR) discontinued publication of the one-week and two-month U.S. Dollar LIBOR settings on December 31, 2021, and will cease the publication of overnight, one-month, three-month, six-month, and twelve-month U.S. Dollar LIBOR settings on June 30, 2023. It is assumed that LIBOR will either cease to be provided by any administrator or will no longer be representative of an acceptable market benchmark after these respective dates. Additionally, the Federal Reserve Board, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation have issued joint supervisory guidance encouraging banks to cease entering into any new contracts using LIBOR by December 31, 2021. Accordingly, United took steps to ensure compliance with the joint supervisory guidance, and no new contracts using LIBOR have been originated after December 31, 2021. Working groups comprised of various regulators and other industry groups have been formed in the United States and other countries in order to provide guidance on this topic. In particular, the Alternative Reference Rates Committee (“ARRC”) has been formed in the United States by the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. The ARRC has identified the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) as its preferred alternative reference rate for U.S. Dollar LIBOR. The ARRC has also published recommended fall-back language for LIBOR-linked financial instruments, among numerous other areas of guidance. In addition, the Adjustable Interest Rate (LIBOR) Act, enacted in March 2022, provides a statutory framework to replace U.S. dollar LIBOR with a benchmark rate based on the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) for contracts governed by U.S. law that have no or ineffective fallback, and in December 2022, the Federal Reserve Board adopted related implementing rules. At this time, however, it is unclear to what extent these recommendations will be broadly accepted by industry participants, whether they will continue to evolve, and what other alternatives may be adopted by the broader markets that utilize LIBOR as a reference rate. United has formed a project team comprised of individuals across various lines of business throughout the company to identify risks, monitor market developments, evaluate replacement benchmark alternatives, and manage the company’s transition away from LIBOR. At this time, United is prioritizing SOFR and Prime as the preferred alternatives to LIBOR; however, these preferred alternatives could change over time based on market developments. United has loans, derivative contracts, borrowings, and other financial instruments that are directly or indirectly dependent on LIBOR. The transition from LIBOR will cause changes to payment calculations for existing contracts that use LIBOR as the reference rate. These changes will create various risks surrounding the financial, operational, compliance and legal aspects associated with changing certain elements of existing contracts. United will also be subject to risks surrounding changes to models and systems that currently use LIBOR reference rates, as well as market and strategic risks that could arise from the use of alternative reference rates. Additionally, United could face reputational risks if this transition is not managed appropriately with its customers. While the full impact of the transition is not yet known, failure to adequately manage the transition could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. 38 INTRODUCTION The following discussion and analysis presents the more significant changes in financial condition as of December 31, 2022 and 2021 and the results of operations of United and its subsidiaries for each of the years then ended. This discussion and the consolidated financial statements and the notes to Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of United Bankshares, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, unless otherwise indicated. Management has evaluated all significant events and transactions that occurred after December 31, 2022, but prior to the date these financial statements were issued, for potential recognition or disclosure required in these financial statements. Refer to Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 1, 2022 (the 2021 Form 10-K) for a discussion and analysis of the more significant factors that affected periods prior to 2021. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes thereto, which are included elsewhere in this document. USE OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES This discussion and analysis contains certain financial measures that are not recognized under GAAP. Under SEC Regulation G, public companies making disclosures containing financial measures that are not in accordance with GAAP must also disclose, along with each “non-GAAP” financial measure, certain additional information, including a reconciliation of the non-GAAP financial measure to the closest comparable GAAP financial measure, as well as a statement of the company’s reasons for utilizing the non-GAAP financial measure. Generally, United has presented a non-GAAP financial measure because it believes that this measure provides meaningful additional information to assist in the evaluation of United’s results of operations or financial position. Presentation of a non-GAAP financial measure is consistent with how United’s management evaluates its performance internally and this non-GAAP financial measure is frequently used by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties in the evaluation of companies in the banking industry. Specifically, this discussion contains certain references to financial measures identified as tax-equivalent (“FTE”) net interest income and return on average tangible equity. Management believes these non-GAAP financial measures to be helpful in understanding United’s results of operations or financial position. Net interest income is presented in this discussion on a tax-equivalent basis. The tax-equivalent basis adjusts for the tax-favored status of income from certain loans and investments. Although this is a non-GAAP measure, United’s management believes this measure is more widely used within the financial services industry and provides better comparability of net interest income arising from taxable and tax-exempt sources. United uses this measure to monitor net interest income performance and to manage its balance sheet composition. Average tangible equity is calculated as GAAP total shareholders’ equity minus total intangible assets. Tangible equity can thus be considered a more conservative valuation of the company. When considering net income, a return on average tangible equity can be calculated. Management provides a return on average equity to facilitate the understanding of as well as to assess the quality and composition of United’s capital structure. This measure, along with others, is used by management to analyze capital adequacy and performance. However, this non-GAAP information should be considered supplemental in nature and not as a substitute for related financial information prepared in accordance with GAAP. Where the non-GAAP financial measure is used, the comparable GAAP financial measure, as well as reconciliation to that comparable GAAP financial measure, as well as a statement of the company’s reasons for utilizing the non-GAAP financial measure, can be found within this discussion and analysis. Investors should recognize that United’s presentation of this non-GAAP financial measure might not be comparable to a similarly titled measure at other companies. APPLICATION OF CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES The accounting and reporting policies of United conform with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management is required to make estimates, assumptions and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. These estimates, assumptions and judgments, which are reviewed with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, are based on information available as 39 of the date of the financial statements. Actual results could differ from these estimates. These policies, along with the disclosures presented in the financial statement notes and in this financial review, provide information on how significant assets and liabilities are valued in the financial statements and how those values are determined. Based on the valuation techniques used and the sensitivity of financial statement amounts to the methods, assumptions, and estimates underlying those amounts, management has identified the determination of the allowance for loan and lease losses, the calculation of the income tax provision, and the use of fair value measurements to account for certain financial instruments to be the accounting areas that require the most subjective or complex judgments, and as such could be most subject to revision as new information becomes available. The most significant accounting policies followed by United are presented in Note A, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses The allowance for loan and lease losses is an estimate of the expected credit losses on financial assets measured at amortized cost to present the net amount expected to be collected as of the balance sheet date. Such allowance is based on the credit losses expected to arise over the life of the asset (contractual term). Determining the allowance for loan losses requires management to make estimates of expected credit losses that are highly uncertain and require a high degree of judgment. At December 31, 2022, the allowance for loan losses was $234.75 million and is subject to periodic adjustment based on management’s assessment of expected credit losses in the loan portfolio. Such adjustment from period to period can have a significant impact on United’s consolidated financial statements. To illustrate the potential effect on the financial statements of our estimates of the allowance for loan losses, a 10% increase in the allowance for loan losses would have required $23.47 million in additional allowance (funded by additional provision for loan losses), which would have negatively impacted the year of 2022 net income by approximately $18.54 million, after-tax or $0.14 diluted per common share. Management’s evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses and the appropriate provision for loan losses is based upon a quarterly evaluation of the loan portfolio. This evaluation is inherently subjective and requires significant estimates, including estimates related to the amounts and timing of future cash flows, value of collateral, losses on pools of homogeneous loans and leases based on historical loss experience, and consideration of qualitative factors such as current economic trends, all of which are susceptible to constant and significant change. The allowance allocated to specific credits and loan pools grouped by similar risk characteristics is reviewed on a quarterly basis and adjusted as necessary based upon subsequent changes in circumstances. In determining the components of the allowance for loan losses, management considers the risk arising in part from, but not limited to, qualitative factors which include charge-off and delinquency trends, current business conditions and reasonable and supportable economic forecasts, lending policies and procedures, the size and risk characteristics of the loan portfolio, concentrations of credit, and other various factors. The methodology used to determine the allowance for loan losses is described in Note A, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. A discussion of the factors leading to changes in the amount of the allowance for loan losses is included in the Provision for Credit Losses section of this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”). For a discussion of concentrations of credit risk, see Item 1, under the caption of Loan Concentrations in this Form 10-K. Income Taxes United’s calculation of income tax provision is inherently complex due to the various different tax laws and jurisdictions in which we operate and requires management’s use of estimates and judgments in its determination. The current income tax liability also includes income tax expense related to our uncertain tax positions as required in ASC Topic 740, “Income Taxes.” Changes to the estimated accrued taxes can occur due to changes in tax rates, implementation of new business strategies, resolution of issues with taxing authorities and recently enacted statutory, judicial and regulatory guidance. These changes can be material to the Company’s operating results for any particular reporting period. The analysis of the income tax provision requires the assessments of the relative risks and merits of the appropriate tax treatment of transactions, filing positions, filing methods and taxable income calculations after considering statutes, regulations, judicial precedent and other information. United strives to keep abreast of changes in the tax laws and the issuance of regulations which may impact tax reporting and provisions for income tax expense. United is also subject to audit by federal and state authorities. Because the application of tax laws is subject to varying interpretations, results of these audits may produce indicated liabilities which differ from United’s estimates and provisions. United continually evaluates its exposure to possible tax assessments arising from audits and records its estimate of probable exposure based on current facts and circumstances. The potential impact to United’s operating results for any of the changes cannot be reasonably estimated. See Note O, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding United’s ASC Topic 740 disclosures. 40 Use of Fair Value Measurements United determines the fair value of its financial instruments based on the fair value hierarchy established in ASC Topic 820, whereby the fair value of certain assets and liabilities is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. ASC Topic 820 establishes a three-level hierarchy for disclosure of assets and liabilities recorded at fair value. The classification of assets and liabilities within the hierarchy is based on whether the inputs in the methodology for determining fair value are observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect market-based information obtained from independent sources (Level 1 or Level 2), while unobservable inputs reflect management’s estimate of market data (Level 3). For assets and liabilities that are actively traded and have quoted prices or observable market data, a minimal amount of subjectivity concerning fair value is needed. Prices and values obtained from third party vendors that do not reflect forced liquidation or distressed sales are not adjusted by management. When quoted prices or observable market data are not available, management’s judgment is necessary to estimate fair value. At December 31, 2022, approximately 15.67% of total assets, or $4.62 billion, consisted of financial instruments recorded at fair value. Of this total, approximately 98.92% or $4.57 billion of these financial instruments used valuation methodologies involving observable market data, collectively Level 1 and Level 2 measurements, to determine fair value. Approximately 1.08% or $50.11 million of these financial instruments were valued using unobservable market information or Level 3 measurements. Most of these financial instruments valued using unobservable market information were loans held for sale at our mortgage banking segment. At December 31, 2022, only $561 thousand or less than 1% of total liabilities were recorded at fair value. This entire amount was valued using methodologies involving observable market data. United does not believe that any changes in the unobservable inputs used to value the financial instruments mentioned above would have a material impact on United’s results of operations, liquidity, or capital resources. See Note W for additional information regarding ASC Topic 820 and its impact on United’s financial statements. Any material effect on the financial statements related to these critical accounting areas is further discussed in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. 2022 COMPARED TO 2021 United’s total assets as of December 31, 2022 were $29.49 billion, which was an increase of $160.48 million or less than 1% from December 31, 2021. This increase was mainly due to an increase of $2.53 billion or 14.06% in portfolio loans and leases and an increase of $576.86 million or 13.43% in investment securities. These increases in assets were partially offset by a decrease of $2.58 billion or 68.69% in cash and cash equivalents and a decrease of $447.54 million or 88.72% in loans held for sale. Total liabilities increased $362.91 million or 1.47% from year-end 2021. Borrowings increased $1.41 billion or 149.23% and the allowance for lending-related commitments increased $14.75 million or 46.90%. Mostly offsetting these increases in liabilities was a $1.05 billion or 4.48% decrease in deposits and a $10.95 million or 12.63% decrease in the operating lease liability. Shareholders’ equity decreased $202.44 million or 4.29%. The following discussion explains in more detail the changes in financial condition by major category. Cash and Cash Equivalents Cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2022 decreased $2.58 billion or 68.69% from year-end 2021. In particular, interest-bearing deposits with other banks decreased $2.59 billion or 74.63% as United placed less cash in an interest-bearing account with the Federal Reserve. Cash and due from banks increased $11.28 million or 3.99% from year-end 2021 while federal funds sold increased $152 thousand or 16.40%. During the year of 2022, net cash of $760.82 million and $105.32 million were provided by operating and financing activities, respectively, while net cash of $3.45 billion was used in investing activities. Further details related to changes in cash and cash equivalents are presented in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. 41 Securities Total investment securities at December 31, 2022 increased $576.86 million or 13.43%. Securities available for sale increased $499.23 million or 12.35%. This change in securities available for sale reflects $1.57 billion in purchases, $575.75 million in sales, maturities and calls of securities and a decrease of $481.01 million in market value. The majority of the purchase activity was related to securities of the U.S. Treasury and obligations of U.S. Government corporations and agencies, mortgage-backed securities, and asset-backed securities. Securities held to maturity were flat from year-end 2021. Equity securities were $7.63 million at December 31, 2022, a decrease of $4.78 million or 38.50% due mainly to sales. Other investment securities increased $82.40 million or 34.39% from year-end 2021 due to purchases of Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) and Federal Reserve Bank (“FRB”) stock as well as investment tax credits. The following table summarizes the changes in the available for sale securities since year-end 2021: (Dollars in thousands) December 31 2022 December 31 2021 $ Change % Change U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. Government corporations and agencies $ 529,492 $ 81,850 $ 447,642 546.91 % State and political subdivisions 709,530 847,298 (137,768 ) (16.26 %) Mortgage-backed securities 1,849,470 1,828,244 21,226 1.16 % Asset-backed securities 911,611 656,572 255,039 38.84 % Single issue trust preferred securities 16,284 16,811 (527 ) (3.13 %) Corporate securities 525,538 611,924 (86,386 ) (14.12 %) Total available for sale securities, at fair value $ 4,541,925 $ 4,042,699 $ 499,226 12.35 % The following table summarizes the changes in the held to maturity securities since year-end 2021: (Dollars in thousands) December 31 2022 December 31 2021 $ Change % Change State and political subdivisions $ 982 (1) $ 981 (2) $ 1 0.10 % Other corporate securities 20 20 0 0.00 % Total held to maturity securities, at amortized cost $ 1,002 $ 1,001 $ 1 0.10 % (1) net of allowance for credit losses of $18 thousand. (2) net of allowance for credit losses of $19 thousand. At December 31, 2022, gross unrealized losses on available for sale securities were $470.06 million. Securities with the most significant gross unrealized losses at December 31, 2022 consisted primarily of agency residential mortgage-backed securities, state and political subdivision securities, agency commercial mortgage-backed securities, asset-backed securities and other corporate securities. As of December 31, 2022, United’s available for sale mortgage-backed securities had an amortized cost of $2.12 billion, with an estimated fair value of $1.85 billion. The portfolio consisted primarily of $1.37 billion in agency residential mortgage-backed securities with a fair value of $1.17 billion, $121.34 million in non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities with an estimated fair value of $111.97 million, and $627.77 million in commercial agency mortgage-backed securities with an estimated fair value of $562.55 million. As of December 31, 2022, United’s available for sale state and political subdivisions securities had an amortized cost of $820.17 million, with an estimated fair value of $709.53 million. The portfolio relates to securities issued by various municipalities located throughout the United States, and no securities within the portfolio were rated below investment grade as of December 31, 2022. As of December 31, 2022, United’s available for sale corporate securities had an amortized cost of $1.52 billion, with an estimated fair value of $1.45 billion. The portfolio consisted of $17.34 million in single issue trust preferred securities with an estimated fair value of $16.28 million. In addition to the single issue trust preferred securities, the Company held positions in various other corporate securities, including asset-backed securities with an amortized cost of $943.81 million and a fair value of $911.61 million and other corporate securities, with an amortized cost of $563.43 million and a fair value of $525.54 million. 42 United’s available for sale single issue trust preferred securities had a fair value of $16.28 million as of December 31, 2022. Of the $16.28 million, $7.63 million or 46.83% were investment grade; $3.17 million or 19.50% were split rated; and $5.48 million or 33.67% were unrated. The two largest exposures accounted for 76.24% of the $16.28 million. These included Truist Bank at $6.93 million and Emigrant Bank at $5.48 million. All single issue trust preferred securities are currently receiving full scheduled principal and interest payments. During 2022, United did not recognize any credit losses on its available for sale investment securities. Management believes that any decline in value on an individual security with an unrealized loss as of December 31, 2022 resulted from changes in market interest rates, credit spreads and liquidity, not a deterioration of credit. Based on a review of each of the securities in the available for sale investment portfolio, management concluded that it was more-likely-than-not that it would be able to realize the cost basis investment and appropriate interest payments on such securities. United has the intent and the ability to hold these securities until such time as the value recovers or the securities mature. As of December 31, 2022, there was no allowance for credit losses related to the Company’s available for sale securities. However, United acknowledges that any securities in an unrealized loss position may be sold in future periods in response to significant, unanticipated changes in asset/liability management decisions, unanticipated future market movements or business plan changes. Further information regarding the amortized cost and estimated fair value of investment securities, including remaining maturities as well as a more detailed discussion of management’s impairment analysis, is presented in Note C, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Loans Held For Sale Loans held for sale decreased $447.54 million or 88.72% from year-end 2021. Loan sales in the secondary market exceeded originations during the year of 2022. Originations of loans for the year of 2022 were $1.90 billion while sales of loans were $2.20 billion. Loans held for sale were $56.88 million at December 31, 2022 as compared to $504.42 million at year-end 2021. Portfolio Loans Loans, net of unearned income, increased $2.53 billion or 14.06%. Since year-end 2021, commercial, financial and agricultural loans increased $471.64 million or 4.23%. In particular, commercial real estate loans increased $321.44 million or 4.18% while commercial loans (not secured by real estate) increased $150.21 million or 4.34%. Construction and land development loans increased $912.81 million or 45.32%, residential real estate loans increased $971.35 million or 26.31%, and consumer loans increased $173.06 million or 14.51% due to an increase in indirect automobile financing. The following table summarizes the changes in the major loan classes since year-end 2021: (Dollars in thousands) December 31 2022 December 31 2021 $ Change % Change Loans held for sale $ 56,879 $ 504,416 $ (447,537 ) (88.72 %) Commercial, financial, and agricultural: Owner-occupied commercial real estate $ 1,724,927 $ 1,733,176 $ (8,249 ) (0.48 %) Nonowner-occupied commercial real estate 6,286,974 5,957,288 329,686 5.53 % Other commercial loans 3,612,568 3,462,361 150,207 4.34 % Total commercial, financial, and agricultural $ 11,624,469 $ 11,152,825 $ 471,644 4.23 % Residential real estate 4,662,911 3,691,560 971,351 26.31 % Construction & land development 2,926,971 2,014,165 912,806 45.32 % Consumer: Bankcard 9,273 8,913 360 4.04 % Other consumer 1,356,539 1,183,844 172,695 14.59 % Total gross loans $ 20,580,163 $ 18,051,307 $ 2,528,856 14.01 % Less: Unearned income (21,997 ) (27,659 ) 5,662 (20.47 %) Total Loans, net of unearned income $ 20,558,166 $ 18,023,648 $ 2,534,518 14.06 % 43 The following table shows the amount of loans acquired and outstanding by major loan classes as of December 31, 2022 and 2021: December 31, 2022 December 31, 2021 (In thousands) Originated Acquired Total Originated Acquired Total Commercial, financial, and agricultural: Owner-occupied commercial real estate $ 1,031,330 $ 693,597 $ 1,724,927 $ 864,795 $ 868,381 $ 1,733,176 Nonowner-occupied commercial real estate 4,515,059 1,771,915 6,286,974 3,925,144 2,032,144 5,957,288 Other commercial loans 3,110,273 502,295 3,612,568 2,555,285 907,076 3,462,361 Total commercial, financial, and agricultural $ 8,656,662 $ 2,967,807 $ 11,624,469 $ 7,345,224 $ 3,807,601 $ 11,152,825 Residential real estate 3,999,088 663,823 4,662,911 2,795,608 895,952 3,691,560 Construction & land development 2,618,810 308,161 2,926,971 1,502,804 511,361 2,014,165 Consumer: Bankcard 9,273 0 9,273 8,913 0 8,913 Other consumer 1,346,699 9,840 1,356,539 1,166,719 17,125 1,183,844 Total gross loans $ 16,630,532 $ 3,949,631 $ 20,580,163 $ 12,819,268 $ 5,232,039 $ 18,051,307 The following table shows the maturity of loans and leases, outstanding as of December 31, 2022: (In thousands) Less Than One Year One To Five Years Five to Fifteen Years Greater than Fifteen Years Total Commercial, financial and agricultural: Owner-occupied commercial real estate $ 95,831 $ 824,297 $ 775,783 $ 29,016 $ 1,724,927 Nonowner-occupied commercial real estate 631,850 3,569,350 1,950,518 135,256 6,286,974 Other commercial loans 626,754 2,217,213 670,943 97,658 3,612,568 Total commercial, financial, and agricultural $ 1,354,435 $ 6,610,860 $ 3,397,244 $ 261,930 $ 11,624,469 Residential real estate 104,812 532,659 682,355 3,343,085 4,662,911 Construction & land development 913,146 1,614,349 304,817 94,659 2,926,971 Consumer: Bankcard 0 4,102 5,171 0 9,273 Other consumer 14,391 670,548 670,399 1,201 1,356,539 Total $ 2,386,784 $ 9,432,518 $ 5,059,986 $ 3,700,875 $ 20,580,163 44 At December 31, 2022, for loans and leases due after one year, interest rate information is as follows: (In thousands) One To Five Years Five to Fifteen Years Greater than Fifteen Years Total Commercial, financial and agricultural: Owner-occupied commercial real estate Outstanding with fixed interest rates $ 677,411 $ 318,456 $ 9,433 $ 1,005,300 Outstanding with adjustable interest rates 146,886 457,327 19,583 623,796 Total owner-occupied 824,297 775,783 29,016 1,629,096 Nonowner-occupied commercial real estate Outstanding with fixed interest rates $ 2,602,677 $ 1,144,298 $ 15,540 $ 3,762,515 Outstanding with adjustable interest rates 966,673 806,220 119,716 1,892,609 Total non-owner occupied 3,569,350 1,950,518 135,256 5,655,124 Other commercial loans Outstanding with fixed interest rates $ 1,788,957 $ 468,944 $ 58,019 $ 2,315,920 Outstanding with adjustable interest rates 428,256 201,999 39,639 669,894 Total other commercial 2,217,213 670,943 97,658 2,985,814 Residential real estate Outstanding with fixed interest rates $ 352,727 $ 262,619 $ 1,680,827 $ 2,296,173 Outstanding with adjustable interest rates 179,932 419,736 1,662,258 2,261,926 Total residential real estate 532,659 682,355 3,343,085 4,558,099 Construction Outstanding with fixed interest rates $ 495,230 $ 113,745 $ 81,833 $ 690,808 Outstanding with adjustable interest rates 1,119,119 191,072 12,826 1,323,017 Total construction 1,614,349 304,817 94,659 2,013,825 Consumer: Bankcard Outstanding with fixed interest rates $ 622 $ 252 $ 0 $ 874 Outstanding with adjustable interest rates 3,480 4,919 0 8,399 Total bankcard 4,102 5,171 0 9,273 Other consumer Outstanding with fixed interest rates $ 670,309 $ 670,261 $ 1,201 $ 1,341,771 Outstanding with adjustable interest rates 239 138 0 377 Total other consumer 670,548 670,399 1,201 1,342,148 Total outstanding with fixed interest rates $ 6,587,933 $ 2,978,575 $ 1,846,853 $ 11,413,361 Total outstanding with adjustable rates $ 2,844,585 $ 2,081,411 $ 1,854,022 $ 6,780,018 Total $ 9,432,518 $ 5,059,986 $ 3,700,875 $ 18,193,379 More information relating to loans is presented in Note D, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Other Assets Other assets increased $72.98 million or 31.52% from year-end 2021 as a result of a $106.31 million increase in deferred tax assets due to a decrease in the fair value of available-for-sale securities. In addition, dealer reserve increased $4.20 million and net pension asset increased $7.48 million primarily due to an increase in the discount rate used in the year-end valuation. Partially offsetting these increases in other assets were decreases of $12.60 million in income tax receivable due to timing differences, $12.82 million in other real estate owned properties (“OREO”) due to sales and write downs, $26.67 million in derivative assets, and $5.52 million in core deposit intangibles due to amortization. Deposits Deposits represent United’s primary source of funding. Total deposits at December 31, 2022 decreased $1.05 billion or 4.48%. In terms of composition, noninterest-bearing deposits decreased $296.88 million or 3.96% while interest-bearing deposits decreased $750.22 million or 4.73% from December 31, 2021. Noninterest-bearing deposits, which consist of noninterest-bearing demand deposit and noninterest-bearing money market (“MMDA”) account balances, decreased $296.88 million from year-end 2021 due to a $139.87 million decrease in commercial noninterest-bearing deposits and a $148.83 million decrease in public funds noninterest-bearing deposits. 45 Interest-bearing deposits consist of interest-bearing transaction accounts, regular savings, interest-bearing MMDA, and time deposit account balances. Interest-bearing transaction accounts decreased $101.38 million or 1.94% since year-end 2021 as the result of a $182.47 million decrease in personal interest-bearing transaction accounts and a $20.84 million decrease in public funds interest-bearing transaction accounts partially offset by an increase of $101.94 million in nonpersonal interest-bearing transaction accounts. Regular savings accounts increased $36.90 million or 2.25% mainly as a result of a $43.52 million increase in personal savings accounts. Interest-bearing MMDAs decreased $62.48 million or less than 1%. In particular, commercial MMDAs decreased $27.94 million, brokered MMDAs decreased $31.86 million, and public funds MMDAs decreased $43.97 million while personal MMDAs increased $41.30 million. Time deposits under $100,000 decreased $187.06 million or 18.14% from year-end 2021. This decrease in time deposits under $100,000 was the result of a $174.13 million decrease in fixed rate Certificates of Deposits (“CDs”) under $100,000, a $8.75 million decrease in CDs under $100,000 obtained through the use of deposit listing services, and a $4.60 million decrease in variable rate CDs. Since year-end 2021, time deposits over $100,000 decreased $436.20 million or 27.24% as fixed rate CDs decreased $320.18 million, CDARS over $100,000 decreased $52.26 million, public funds CDs over $100,000 decreased $51.74 million, and brokered certificates of deposits decreased $11.27 million. The table below summarizes the changes by deposit category since year-end 2021: (Dollars in thousands) December 31 2022 December 31 2021 $ Change % Change Noninterest-bearing accounts $ 7,199,678 $ 7,496,560 (1) $ (296,882 ) (3.96 %) Interest-bearing transaction accounts 5,116,966 5,218,342 (1) (101,376 ) (1.94 %) Regular savings 1,678,302 1,641,404 36,898 2.25 % Interest-bearing money market accounts 6,299,404 6,361,887 (62,483 ) (0.98 %) Time deposits under $100,000 843,950 1,031,008 (187,058 ) (18.14 %) Time deposits over $100,000 (2)(3) 1,164,866 1,601,062 (436,196 ) (27.24 %) Total deposits $ 22,303,166 $ 23,350,263 $ (1,047,097 ) (4.48 %) (1) For December 31, 2021, $1,483,987 was reclassed from noninterest-bearing accounts to interest-bearing transaction accounts. (2) Includes time deposits of $250,000 or more of $454,477 and $640,752 at December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively. (3) Includes $246,505 and $375,510 of uninsured time deposits at December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively. At December 31, 2022, the scheduled maturities of time deposits are as follows: Year Amount (In thousands) 2023 $ 1,476,438 2024 357,142 2025 86,189 2026 40,656 2027 and thereafter 48,391 TOTAL $ 2,008,816 Maturities of estimated uninsured time deposits of $100,000 or more outstanding at December 31, 2022 are summarized as follows: (Dollars in thousands) 3 months or less Over 3 through 6 months Over 6 through 12 months Over 12 months Time deposits in amounts in excess of the FDIC Insurance limit $ 77,573 $ 34,131 $ 75,721 $ 59,080 46 The amounts of uninsured time deposits of $100,000 or more outstanding at December 31, 2022 are based on estimates using the same methodologies and assumptions used for regulatory reporting requirements. The average daily amount of deposits and rates paid on such deposits is summarized for the years ended December 31: 2022 2021 2020 Interest Interest Interest Amount Expense Rate Amount (1) Expense Rate Amount (2) Expense Rate (Dollars in thousands) Noninterest-bearing $ 7,580,624 $ 0 0.00 % $ 6,709,510 $ 0 0.00 % $ 5,153,258 $ 0 0.00 % Interest-bearing transaction and money market 11,540,192 67,240 0.58 % 11,010,496 23,498 0.21 % 8,897,140 40,322 0.45 % Regular savings 1,744,841 2,427 0.14 % 1,455,305 2,085 0.14 % 1,149,201 2,087 0.18 % Time deposits 2,181,353 10,570 0.48 % 2,462,044 16,037 0.65 % 2,952,944 36,170 1.22 % TOTAL $ 23,047,010 $ 80,237 0.35 % $ 21,637,355 $ 41,620 0.19 % $ 18,152,543 $ 78,579 0.43 % (1) For the year of 2021, $1,571,758 was reclassed from noninterest-bearing accounts to interest-bearing transaction accounts. (2) For the year of 2020, $1,280,091 was reclassed from noninterest-bearing accounts to interest-bearing transaction accounts. More information relating to deposits is presented in Note K, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Borrowings Total borrowings at December 31, 2022 increased $1.41 billion or 149.23% since year-end 2021. During the year of 2022, short-term borrowings increased $31.85 million or 24.72% due to an increase in securities sold under agreements to repurchase. Long-term borrowings increased $1.38 billion or 168.86% from year-end 2021 due to an increase in FHLB advances. The table below summarizes the change in the borrowing categories since year-end 2021: December 31 December 31 $ % (Dollars in thousands) 2022 2021 Change Change Short-term securities sold under agreements to repurchase $ 160,698 $ 128,844 $ 31,854 24.72 % FHLB advances 1,910,775 532,199 1,378,576 259.03 % Subordinated debt 9,892 9,872 20 0.20 % Issuances of trust preferred capital securities 276,989 275,323 1,666 0.61 % Total borrowings $ 2,358,354 $ 946,238 $ 1,412,116 149.23 % For a further discussion of borrowings see Notes L and M, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Accrued Expenses and Other Liabilities Accrued expenses and other liabilities at December 31, 2022 decreased $5.90 million or 3.02% from year-end 2021. In particular, accrued employee expenses and deferred compensation decreased $5.48 million and $2.77 million, respectively, and derivative liabilities decreased $3.13 million. Partially offsetting these decreases was a $7.48 million increase in interest payable due mainly to an increase in FHLB borrowings and rising interest rates. Shareholders’ Equity Shareholders’ equity at December 31, 2022 was $4.52 billion, which was a decrease of $202.44 million or 4.29% from year-end 2021. 47 Retained earnings increased $184.65 million or 13.28% from year-end 2021. Earnings net of dividends for the year of 2022 were $184.65 million. Accumulated other comprehensive income decreased $327.84 million or 6,707.12% from year-end 2021 due to a decrease of $368.93 million in the fair value of United’s available for sale investment portfolio, net of deferred income taxes, primarily the result of an increase in market interest rates. Partially offsetting this decrease was a $36.66 million increase in the fair value of cash flow hedges, net of deferred income taxes. The after-tax accretion of pension costs was $2.75 million for the year of 2022 while the after-tax pension accounting adjustment at year-end 2022 resulted in an increase of $1.68 million. Treasury stock increased $79.79 million or 46.76% from year-end 2021. During the year of 2022, United repurchased 2,259,546 shares of its common stock on the open market under repurchase plans approved by United’s Board of Directors at a cost of $78.38 million or an average price per share of $34.69. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Overview The following table sets forth certain consolidated income statement information of United: Year Ended (Dollars in thousands except per share amounts) 2022 2021 2020 Interest income $ 1,001,990 $ 795,117 $ 798,382 Interest expense 105,559 52,383 108,609 Net interest income 896,431 742,734 689,773 Provision for credit losses 18,822 (23,970 ) 106,562 Noninterest income 153,261 278,128 354,775 Noninterest expense 555,087 581,979 578,246 Income before income taxes 475,783 462,853 359,740 Income taxes 96,156 95,115 70,717 Net income $ 379,627 $ 367,738 $ 289,023 PER COMMON SHARE: Net income: Basic $ 2.81 $ 2.84 $ 2.40 Diluted 2.80 2.83 2.40 Net income for the year 2022 was $379.63 million or $2.80 per diluted share, an increase of $11.89 million or 3.23% from $367.74 million or $2.83 per diluted share for the year of 2021. Higher net income for the year 2022 compared to the year of 2021 was primarily driven by strong loan growth and net interest margin expansion primarily as a result of a rising rate environment. As previously mentioned, United completed its acquisition of Community Bankers Trust on December 3, 2021. The results of operations for Community Bankers Trust are included in the consolidated results of operations from the date of the acquisition. In addition, the year of 2022 included merger-related expenses of $537 thousand related to the Community Bankers Trust acquisition compared to merger-related expenses of $21.42 million in 2021. 48 United’s return on average assets for the year of 2022 was 1.31% and the return on average shareholders’ equity was 8.25% as compared to 1.35% and 8.30% for the year of 2021. For the year of 2022, United’s return on average tangible equity, a non-GAAP measure, was 14.11%, as compared to 14.18% the year of 2021. Year Ended (Dollars in thousands) December 31, 2022 December 31, 2021 Return on Average Tangible Equity: (a) Net Income (GAAP) $ 379,627 $ 367,738 Average Total Shareholders’ Equity (GAAP) 4,601,440 4,430,688 Less: Average Total Intangibles (1,910,377 ) (1,837,609 ) (b) Average Tangible Equity (non-GAAP) $ 2,691,063 $ 2,593,079 Return on Tangible Equity (non-GAAP) [(a) / (b)] 14.11 % 14.18 % Net interest income for the year of 2022 was $896.43 million, an increase of $153.70 million or 20.69% from the prior year. Mainly, this increase in net interest income for 2022 compared to 2021 was due to the impact of rising market interest rates on earning assets, an increase in average earning assets from the Community Bankers Trust acquisition as well as organic loan growth and a change in the asset mix to higher earning assets. The provision for credit losses was $18.82 million for the year 2022 as compared to a benefit of $23.97 million for the year 2021. Noninterest income was $153.26 million for the year of 2022 which was a decrease of $124.87 million or 44.90% from the year of 2021. Noninterest expense was $555.09 million which was a decrease of $26.89 million or 4.62%. Income taxes for the year of 2022 were $96.16 million as compared to $95.12 million for the year of 2021. United’s effective tax rate was approximately 20.2% and 20.6% for years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, as compared to 19.7% for 2020. Business Segments United operates in two business segments: community banking and mortgage banking. Community Banking Net income attributable to the community banking segment for the year of 2022 was $397.32 million compared to net income of $327.08 million for the year of 2021. The higher net income within the community banking segment in 2022 was due primarily to the impact of the Community Bankers Trust acquisition, organic loan growth and the positive impact of rising market interest rates on the net interest margin. The full year of 2022 was impacted by the Community Bankers Trust acquisition as compared to one month in 2021. Net interest income increased $159.27 million to $890.58 million for the year of 2022, compared to $731.31 million for the same period of 2021. Generally, net interest income for the year of 2022 increased from the year of 2021 due to an increase in average earning assets as a result of the Community Bankers Trust acquisition, organic loan growth and an increase in the average yield on earning assets due to rising market interest rates. Provision for credit losses was $18.82 million for the year of 2022 compared to a net benefit of $23.97 million for the same period of 2021. The increase in the provision for credit losses was primarily due to an increase in loans outstanding. Noninterest income for the year of 2022 was relatively flat from the year of 2021, decreasing $877 thousand or less than 1%. 49 Noninterest expense was $472.81 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to $443.49 million for the same period of 2021. The increase of $29.32 million in noninterest expense was primarily attributable to the additional employees and branch offices from the Community Bankers Trust acquisition as most major categories of noninterest expense showed increases. Mortgage Banking The mortgage banking segment reported a net loss of $7.22 million for the year of 2022 as compared to net income of $43.93 million for the year of 2021. Noninterest income, which consists mainly of realized and unrealized gains associated with the fair value of commitments and loans held for sale, was $69.31 million for the year of 2022 as compared to $183.22 million for the year of 2021. The decrease of $113.91 million in 2022 was due mainly to lower originations and sales of mortgage loans driven by the rising rate environment and a lower margin on loans sold in the secondary market. Noninterest expense was $88.98 million for the year of 2022 as compared to $138.51 million the year of 2021. Noninterest expense consists mainly of salaries, commissions, and benefits of mortgage segment employees. The decrease in 2022 was primarily due to a decrease in employee compensation due to lower employee incentives and commissions related to a decrease in mortgage banking production. The following discussion explains in more detail the consolidated results of operations by major category. Net Interest Income Net interest income represents the primary component of United’s earnings. It is the difference between interest income from earning assets and interest expense incurred to fund these assets. Net interest income is impacted by changes in the volume and mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, as well as changes in market interest rates. Such changes, and their impact on net interest income in 2022 and 2021, are presented below. Net interest income for the year of 2022 was $896.43 million, which was an increase of $153.70 million or 20.69% from the year of 2021. The $153.70 million increase in net interest income occurred because total interest income increased $206.87 million while total interest expense increased $53.18 million from the year of 2021. Generally, interest income for the year of 2022 increased from the year of 2021 due mainly to a higher amount of interest earning assets, mainly as result of the Community Bankers Trust acquisition and organic loan growth, and an increase in the yield on those earning assets mainly as a result of a rise in market interest rates. Interest expense increased primarily due to an increase in the amount of interest-bearing funds, mainly as result of the Community Bankers Trust acquisition and to partially fund loan growth, as well as an increase in market interest rates which resulted in higher funding costs. For the purpose of this remaining discussion, net interest income is presented on a tax-equivalent basis to provide a comparison among all types of interest earning assets. The tax-equivalent basis adjusts for the tax-favored status of income from certain loans and investments. Although this is a non-GAAP measure, United’s management believes this measure is more widely used within the financial services industry and provides better comparability of net interest income arising from taxable and tax-exempt sources. United uses this measure to monitor net interest income performance and to manage its balance sheet composition. Tax-equivalent net interest income for the year of 2022 increased $153.95 million, or 20.61%, from the year of 2021. The increase in net interest income and tax-equivalent net interest income was primarily due to the impact of rising market interest rates on earning assets, an increase in average earning assets from the Community Bankers Trust acquisition as well as organic loan growth and a change in the asset mix to higher earning assets. These increases were partially offset by higher interest expense primarily driven by deposit rate repricing, lower Paycheck Protection Plan (“PPP”) loan fee income and lower acquired loan accretion income. The interest rate spread for the year of 2022 increased 30 basis points from the year of 2021 due to a 61 basis point increase in the average yield on earning assets partially offset by a 31 basis point increase in the average cost of funds. Average earning assets for the year of 2022 increased $1.52 billion, or 6.26%, from the year of 2021 due to a $1.68 billion increase in average net loans and loans held for sale and a $1.40 billion increase in average investment securities partially offset by a $1.57 billion decrease in average short-term investments. Net PPP loan fee income was $9.62 million and $33.22 million for the year of 2022 and 2021, respectively, a decrease of $23.59 million. Acquired loan accretion income was $18.32 million and $33.86 million for the year of 2022 and 2021, respectively, a decrease of $15.54 million. The net interest margin of 3.50% for the year of 2022 was an increase of 41 basis points from the net interest margin of 3.09% for the year of 2021. 50 United’s tax-equivalent net interest income also includes the impact of acquisition accounting fair value adjustments. The following table provides the discount/premium and net accretion impact to tax-equivalent net interest income for the year ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020. Year Ended (Dollars in thousands) December 31 2022 December 31 2021 December 31 2020 Loan accretion $ 18,315 $ 33,857 $ 41,766 Certificates of deposit 2,765 4,305 7,925 Long-term borrowings (262 ) 684 1,278 Total $ 20,818 $ 38,846 $ 50,969 The following table reconciles the difference between net interest income and tax-equivalent net interest income for the year ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020. Year Ended (Dollars in thousands) December 31 2022 December 31 2021 December 31 2020 Net interest income (GAAP) $ 896,431 $ 742,734 $ 689,773 Tax-equivalent adjustment (non-GAAP) (1) 4,467 4,218 3,888 Tax-equivalent net interest income (non-GAAP) $ 900,898 $ 746,952 $ 693,661 (1) The tax-equivalent adjustment combines amounts of interest income on federally nontaxable loans and investment securities using the statutory federal income tax rate of 21% for 2022, 2021, and 2020. All interest income on loans and investment securities was subject to state income taxes. 51 The following table shows the consolidated daily average balance of major categories of assets and liabilities for each of the three years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 with the consolidated interest and rate earned or paid on such amount. The interest income and yields on federally nontaxable loans and investment securities are presented on a tax-equivalent basis using the statutory federal income tax rate of 21% for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020. Interest income on all loans and investment securities was subject to state taxes. Year Ended December 31, 2022 Year Ended December 31, 2021 Year Ended December 31, 2020 (Dollars in thousands) Average Balance Interest (1) Avg. Rate (1) Average Balance Interest (1) Avg. Rate (1) Average Balance Interest (1) Avg. Rate (1) ASSETS Earning Assets: Federal funds sold, securities repurchased under agreements to resell & other short-term investments $ 1,597,108 $ 22,950 1.44 % $ 3,162,814 $ 8,734 0.28 % $ 1,501,771 $ 9,780 0.65 % Investment Securities: Taxable 4,532,713 105,780 2.33 % 3,193,414 54,678 1.71 % 2,700,416 61,808 2.29 % Tax-exempt 410,037 10,983 2.68 % 352,843 9,129 2.59 % 217,836 6,285 2.89 % Total Securities 4,942,750 116,763 2.36 % 3,546,257 63,807 1.80 % 2,918,252 68,093 2.33 % Loans and leases, net of unearned income (2) 19,389,485 866,744 4.47 % 17,714,288 726,794 4.10 % 17,151,291 724,397 4.22 % Allowance for credit losses (216,104 ) (225,740 ) (186,640 ) Net loans and leases 19,173,381 4.52 % 17,488,548 4.16 % 16,964,651 4.27 % Total earning assets 25,713,239 $ 1,006,457 3.91 % 24,197,619 $ 799,335 3.30 % 21,384,674 $ 802,270 3.75 % Other assets 3,360,609 3,058,476 2,752,396 TOTAL ASSETS $ 29,073,848 $ 27,256,095 $ 24,137,070 LIABILITIES Interest-Bearing Funds: Interest-bearing deposits (3) $ 15,466,386 $ 80,237 0.52 % $ 14,927,845 $ 41,620 0.28 % $ 12,999,285 $ 78,579 0.60 % Short-term borrowings 140,773 1,785 1.27 % 132,489 693 0.52 % 145,768 1,027 0.70 % Long- term borrowings 1,014,655 23,537 2.32 % 819,440 10,070 1.23 % 1,645,783 29,003 1.76 % Total Interest-Bearing Funds 16,621,814 105,559 0.64 % 15,879,774 52,383 0.33 % 14,790,836 108,609 0.73 % Noninterest-bearing deposits (3) 7,580,624 6,709,510 5,153,258 Accrued expenses and other liabilities 269,970 236,123 236,007 TOTAL LIABILITIES 24,472,408 22,825,407 20,180,101 SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY 4,601,440 4,430,688 3,956,969 TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY $ 29,073,848 $ 27,256,095 $ 24,137,070 NET INTEREST INCOME $ 900,898 $ 746,952 $ 693,661 INTEREST SPREAD 3.27 % 2.97 % 3.02 % NET INTEREST MARGIN 3.50 % 3.09 % 3.24 % (1) The interest income and the yields on federally nontaxable loans and investment securities are presented on a tax-equivalent basis using the statutory federal income tax rate of 21% for 2022, 2021 and 2020. (2) Nonaccruing loans are included in the daily average loan amounts outstanding. (3) For the years of 2021 and 2020, average balances of $1,571,758 and $1,280,091, respectively, were reclassed from noninterest- bearing deposits to interest-bearing deposits. 52 The following table sets forth a summary for the periods indicated of the changes in consolidated interest earned and interest paid detailing the amounts attributable to (i) changes in volume (change in the average volume times the prior year’s average rate), (ii) changes in rate (change in the average rate times the prior year’s average volume), and (iii) changes in rate/volume (change in the average volume times the change in average rate). 2022 Compared to 2021 2021 Compared to 2020 Increase (Decrease) Due to Increase (Decrease) Due to (In thousands) Volume Rate Rate/ Volume Total Volume Rate Rate/ Volume Total Interest income: Federal funds sold, securities purchased under agreements to resell and other short-term investments $ (4,384 ) $ 36,689 $ (18,089 ) $ 14,216 $ 10,797 $ (5,557 ) $ (6,286 ) $ (1,046 ) Investment securities: Taxable 22,902 19,799 8,401 51,102 11,290 (15,662 ) (2,758 ) (7,130 ) Tax-exempt (1) 1,481 318 55 1,854 3,902 (654 ) (404 ) 2,844 Loans (1),(2) 70,089 62,959 6,902 139,950 22,370 (18,661 ) (1,312 ) 2,397 TOTAL INTEREST INCOME 90,088 119,765 (2,731 ) 207,122 48,359 (40,534 ) (10,760 ) (2,935 ) Interest expense: Interest-bearing deposits $ 1,508 $ 35,827 $ 1,282 $ 38,617 $ 11,571 $ (41,598 ) $ (6,932 ) $ (36,959 ) Short-term borrowings 43 994 55 1,092 (93 ) (262 ) 21 (334 ) Long-term borrowings 2,401 8,932 2,134 13,467 (14,544 ) (8,723 ) 4,334 (18,933 ) TOTAL INTEREST EXPENSE 3,952 45,753 3,471 53,176 (3,066 ) (50,583 ) (2,577 ) (56,226 ) NET INTEREST INCOME $ 86,136 $ 74,012 $ (6,202 ) $ 153,946 $ 51,425 $ 10,049 $ (8,183 ) $ 53,291 (1) Yields and interest income on federally tax-exempt loans and investment securities are computed on a fully tax-equivalent basis using the statutory federal income tax rate of 21% for 2022, 2021 and 2020. (2) Nonaccruing loans are included in the daily average loan amounts outstanding. Provision for Credit Losses United’s provision for credit losses was $18.82 million for the year of 2022 while the provision for credit losses was a net benefit of $23.97 million for the year of 2021. United’s provision for credit losses relates to its portfolio of loans and leases, held to maturity securities and interest receivable on loans which are discussed in more detail in the following paragraphs. The provision for loan and lease losses for the year of 2022 was $18.83 million as compared to a net benefit of $23.72 million for the year of 2021. The higher amount of provision expense for 2022 compared to 2021 was mainly due to an increase in overall loans outstanding. Net charge-offs for the year of 2022 were $101 thousand as compared to $8.72 million for the year of 2021. The lower amount of net charge-offs for the year of 2022 as compared to the year of 2021 was primarily due to charge-offs recognized on several large commercial credits in 2021. Net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans and leases were zero and 0.05% for the year of 2022 and 2021, respectively. As of December 31, 2022, nonperforming loans and leases were $58.64 million or 0.29% of loans and leases, net of unearned income as compared to $90.76 million or 0.50% of loans, net of unearned income at December 31, 2021. The components of nonperforming loans and leases include: 1) nonaccrual loans and leases, 2) loans and leases which are contractually past due 90 days or more as to interest or principal, but have not been put on a nonaccrual basis and 3) loans and leases whose terms have been restructured for economic or legal reasons due to financial difficulties of the borrowers. 53 Loans past due 90 days or more were $15.57 million at December 31, 2022, a decrease of $3.31 million or 17.55% from $18.88 million at year-end 2021. This decrease was primarily due to a large delinquent commercial credit brought current. At December 31, 2022, nonaccrual loans were $23.69 million, which was a decrease of $12.34 million or 34.26% from $36.03 million at year-end 2021. This decrease was due to the repayment of several mid-sized commercial nonaccrual loans as well as the return to accrual status for three commercial relationships. Restructured loans were $19.39 million at December 31, 2022, a decrease of $16.47 million or 45.93% from $35.86 million at year-end 2021. The decrease was mainly due to the repayment of six large commercial relationships during the year of 2022. The loss potential on these loans has been properly evaluated and allocated within the Company’s allowance for loan losses. Nonperforming assets include nonperforming loans and leases and real estate acquired in foreclosure or other settlement of loans (“OREO”). Total nonperforming assets of $60.69 million, including OREO of $2.05 million at December 31, 2022, represented 0.21% of total assets. United maintains an allowance for loan and lease losses and a reserve for lending-related commitments. The combined allowance for loan and lease losses and reserve for lending-related commitments is considered the allowance for credit losses. At December 31, 2022, the allowance for credit losses was $280.94 million as compared to $247.46 million at December 31, 2021. At December 31, 2022, the allowance for loan and lease losses was $234.75 million as compared to $216.02 million at December 31, 2021. The increase in the allowance for loan and lease losses was due mainly to an increase in outstanding loans as well as lower forecasted Gross Domestic Product (“GDP”) and a higher forecasted unemployment rate within the reasonable and supportable forecast. This increase was offset slightly due to improvement in historical loss rates and a decrease in allocations established for individually assessed loans. As a percentage of loans and leases, net of unearned income, the allowance for loan losses was 1.14% at December 31, 2022 and 1.20% at December 31, 2021. The ratio of the allowance for loan and lease losses to nonperforming loans and leases or coverage ratio was 400.33% and 238.00% at December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively. The increase in this ratio was due mainly to a decline in nonperforming loans. The following table summarizes United’s credit loss experience for loan and leases losses, based on loan categories, for the year of 2022 and 2021: (Dollars in thousands) 2022 2021 Commercial, financial and agricultural: Owner-occupied commercial real estate Loans & leases charged off $ 68 $ 414 Recoveries 489 869 Net loans & leases (recovered) charged off $ (421 ) $ (455 ) Average gross loans & leases outstanding 1,716,201 1,612,387 Net recoveries as a percentage of average gross loans & leases outstanding (0.02 %) (0.03 %) Nonowner-occupied commercial real estate Loans & leases charged off $ 0 $ 3,531 Recoveries 234 1,907 Net loans & leases (recovered) charged off $ (234 ) $ 1,624 Average gross loans & leases outstanding 6,042,221 5,045,006 Net charge-offs as a percentage of average gross loans & leases outstanding 0.00 % 0.03 % Other Commercial Loans & leases charged off $ 4,308 $ 6,182 Recoveries 5,367 4,307 Net loans & leases (recovered) charged off $ (1,059 ) $ 1,875 Average gross loans & leases outstanding 3,613,204 3,777,988 Net (recoveries) charge-offs as a percentage of average gross loans & leases outstanding (0.03 %) 0.05 % 54 (Dollars in thousands) 2022 2021 Residential Real Estate Loans & leases charged off $ 1,546 $ 6,016 Recoveries 1,507 2,400 Net loans & leases charged off $ 39 $ 3,616 Average gross loans & leases outstanding 4,080,515 3,624,157 Net charge-offs as a percentage of average gross loans & leases outstanding 0.00 % 0.10 % Construction Loans & leases charged off $ 2 $ 560 Recoveries 1,414 604 Net loans & leases (recovered) charged off $ (1,412 ) $ (44 ) Average gross loans & leases outstanding 2,517,561 1,961,661 Net recoveries as a percentage of average gross loans & leases outstanding (0.06 %) (0.00 %) Consumer: Bankcard Loans & leases charged off $ 355 $ 190 Recoveries 9 42 Net loans & leases charged off $ 346 $ 148 Average gross loans & leases outstanding 8,766 8,298 Net charge-offs as a percentage of average gross loans & leases outstanding 3.95 % 1.78 % Other consumer Loans & leases charged off $ 3,371 $ 2,404 Recoveries 529 449 449 Net loans & leases charged off $ 2,842 $ 1,955 Average gross loans & leases outstanding 1,309,773 1,174,323 Net charge-offs as a percentage of average gross loans & leases outstanding 0.22 % 0.17 % Total Loans & leases charged off $ 9,650 $ 19,297 Recoveries 9,549 10,578 Net loans & leases charged off $ 101 $ 8,719 Average gross loans & leases outstanding 19,288,241 17,203,820 Net charge-offs as a percentage of average gross loans & leases outstanding 0.00 % 0.05 % Nonaccrual loans & leases $ 30,871 $ 58,449 Allowance for loan & lease losses 234,746 216,016 Loans & leases (net of unearned income) 20,558,166 18,023,648 Allowance for loan & lease losses as a percentage of loans (net of unearned income) 1.14 % 1.20 % Nonaccrual loans as a percentage of loans & leases (net of unearned income) 0.15 % 0.32 % Allowance for loan & lease losses as a percentage of nonaccrual loans & leases 760.41 % 369.58 % United continues to evaluate risks which may impact its loan and lease portfolios. Reserves are initially determined based on losses identified from the PD/LGD and Cohort models which utilize the Company’s historical information. Then, any qualitative adjustments are applied to account for the Company’s view of the future and other factors. If current conditions underlying any qualitative adjustment factor were deemed to be materially different than historical conditions, an adjustment was made for that factor. 55 The year of 2022 qualitative adjustments include analyses of the following: • Current conditions – United considered the impact of inflation, rising interest rates, increased oil and gas prices and the potential impact of the geopolitical situation when making determinations related to factor adjustments, such as changes in economic and business conditions; collateral values for dependent loans; past due, nonaccrual and adversely classified loans and leases; concentrations of credit and external factors. • Reasonable and supportable forecasts – The forecast is determined on a portfolio-by-portfolio basis by relating the correlation of real GDP and the unemployment rate to loss rates to forecasts of those variables. The reasonable and supportable forecast selection is subjective in nature and requires more judgment compared to the other components of the allowance. Assumptions for the economic variables were the following: Ø The forecast for real GDP shifted downward in the fourth quarter, from a projection of 1.20% for 2023 as of mid-September 2022 to 0.50% for 2023 as of mid-December with projections of 1.60% for 2024 and 1.80% for 2025. The unemployment rate forecast shifted slightly upward compared to the third quarter of 2022 with an increasing trend expected throughout 2024 and 2025. Ø Reversion to historical loss data occurs via a straight-line method during the year following the one-year reasonable and supportable forecast period. The following table presents the allocation of United’s allowance for credit losses for the years ended December 31: 2022 2021 (in thousands) Commercial, financial & agricultural: Owner-occupied commercial real estate $ 13,945 $ 14,443 Nonowner-occupied commercial real estate 38,543 42,156 Other commercial 79,706 78,432 Total commercial, financial & agricultural 132,194 135,031 Residential real estate 36,227 26,404 Construction & land development 48,390 39,395 Consumer: Bankcard 561 317 Other consumer 17,374 14,869 Allowance for loan losses $ 234,746 $ 216,016 Reserve for lending-related commitments 46,189 31,442 Allowance for credit losses $ 280,935 $ 247,458 The following is a summary of loans and leases outstanding as a percent of gross loans at December 31: 2022 2021 Commercial, financial & agricultural: Owner-occupied commercial real estate 8.38 % 9.60 % Nonowner-occupied commercial real estate 30.55 % 33.00 % Other commercial 17.55 % 19.18 % Total commercial, financial & agricultural 56.48 % 61.78 % Residential real estate 22.66 % 20.45 % Construction & land development 14.22 % 11.16 % Consumer: Bankcard 0.05 % 0.05 % Other consumer 6.59 % 6.56 % Total 100.00 % 100.00 % United’s review of the allowance for loan and lease losses at December 31, 2022 produced increased reserves in three of the four loan categories as compared to December 31, 2021. The residential real estate reserve increased $9.82 million. The real estate construction and development loan pool reserve increased $8.99 million. The consumer loan pool reserve increased $2.75 million. Each of these increases were primarily due to increased outstanding balances. The allowance related to the commercial, financial & agricultural loan pool decreased $2.84 million. This decrease is due to improvement in historical loss rates and a decrease in allocations established for individually assessed loans. 56 An allowance is established for estimated lifetime losses for loans that are individually assessed. Nonperforming commercial loans and leases are regularly reviewed to identify expected credit losses. A loan is individually assessed for expected credit losses when the loan does not share similar characteristics with other loans in the portfolio. Measuring expected credit losses of a loan requires judgment and estimates, and the eventual outcomes may differ from those estimates. Expected credit losses are measured based upon the present value of expected future cash flows from the loan discounted at the loan’s effective rate or the fair value of collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. When the selected measure is less than the recorded investment in the loan, an expected credit loss has occurred. The allowance for loans and leases that were individually assessed was $1.27 million at December 31, 2022 and $6.53 million at December 31, 2021. In comparison to the prior year-end, this element of the allowance decreased $5.26 million due to repayment of individually assessed loans, improved borrowers’ financial conditions such that individual assessments were no longer necessary and improved collateral valuations. Management believes that the allowance for credit losses of $280.94 million at December 31, 2022 is adequate to provide for expected losses on existing loans and lending-related commitments based on information currently available. United’s loan administration policies are focused on the risk characteristics of the loan portfolio in terms of loan approval and credit quality. The commercial loan portfolio is monitored for possible concentrations of credit in one or more industries. Management has lending limits as a percentage of capital per type of credit concentration in an effort to ensure adequate diversification within the portfolio. Most of United’s commercial loans are secured by real estate located in West Virginia, southeastern Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia, Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, and the District of Columbia. It is the opinion of management that these commercial loans do not pose any unusual risks and that adequate consideration has been given to these loans in establishing the allowance for credit losses. The provision for credit losses related to held to maturity securities for the year of 2022 and 2021 was immaterial. The allowance for credit losses related to held to maturity securities was $18 thousand as of December 31, 2022 as compared to $19 thousand as of December 31, 2021. There was no provision for credit losses recorded on available for sale investment securities for the year of 2022 and 2021 and no allowance for credit losses on available for sale investment securities as of December 31, 2022 and 2021. Loan interest payment deferrals granted by United under the CARES Act ended on of January 1, 2022. Therefore, United released all of its remaining $8 thousand in reserves in the year of 2022 related to these loan interest payment deferrals granted under the CARES Act as compared to the release of $242 thousand in the year of 2021. The allowance for accrued interest receivables not expected to be collected as of December 31, 2021 was $8 thousand. Management is not aware of any potential problem loans or leases, trends or uncertainties, which it reasonably expects, will materially impact future operating results, liquidity, or capital resources which have not been disclosed. Additionally, management has disclosed all known material credits, which cause management to have serious doubts as to the ability of such borrowers to comply with the loan repayment schedules. Other Income Other income consists of all revenues, which are not included in interest and fee income related to earning assets. Noninterest income has been and will continue to be an important factor for improving United’s profitability. Recognizing the importance, management continues to evaluate areas where noninterest income can be enhanced. Noninterest income for the year of 2022 was $153.26 million, which was a decrease of $124.87 million or 44.90% from the year of 2021. The decrease was due mainly to a decrease in income from mortgage banking activities primarily as a result of lower mortgage loan originations and sales volume driven by a rising interest rate environment and a lower margin on loans sold in the secondary market. 57 Income from mortgage banking activities totaled $42.69 million for the year of 2022 compared to $171.69 million for the year of 2021. The decrease of $129.00 million or 75.14% for the year of 2022 was due mainly to lower mortgage loan origination and sale volume driven by the rising rate environment and a lower margin on loans sold in the secondary market. Mortgage loan sales were $2.20 billion in the year of 2022 as compared to $6.41 billion in the year of 2021. Mortgage loans originated for sale were $1.90 billion for the year of 2022 as compared to $6.19 billion for the year of 2021. United recognized a net gain of $776 thousand on investment securities’ activity in 2022 as compared to a net gain of $2.68 million on investment securities activity in 2021. In particular, United recognized a net gain of $1.36 million on an equity security without a readily determinable market value and a $589 thousand net loss on equity securities for the year of 2022 as compared to net gains of $1.55 million on the sales, calls and redemption of available-for-sale securities investment securities, $670 thousand on equity securities and $455 thousand on an equity security without a readily determinable market value for the year of 2021. In addition, United did not recognize any impairment on investment securities for the year of 2022 and 2021. Fees from trust services for the year of 2022 were $17.22 million, an increase of $664 thousand or 4.01% from the year of 2021 due to an increase in managed assets. Fees from brokerage services for the year of 2022 were $16.41 million, an increase of $853 thousand or 5.48% from the year of 2021 due to increased volume. Fees from deposit services for the year of 2022 were $40.56 million, an increase of $1.87 million or 4.83% from the year of 2021. Debit card income increased $741 thousand and overdraft fees increased $713 thousand. Partially offsetting fees from deposit services was the impact of implemented changes to United’s overdraft policy during the third quarter of 2022. Bankcard fees for the year of 2022 increased $1.10 million or 19.96% from the year of 2021 due mainly to an increase in interchange income from increased volume. Income from bank-owned life insurance (“BOLI”) for the year of 2022 increased $2.35 million or 34.33% from the year of 2021 due to an increase of $2.64 million in death benefits and the addition of $30.64 million in BOLI from the Community Bankers Trust acquisition. Other miscellaneous income decreased $700 thousand or 8.71% mainly due to an decrease in prepayment fees received on Delegated Underwriting and Servicing (“DUS”) securities. Other Expense Just as management continues to evaluate areas where noninterest income can be enhanced, it strives to improve the efficiency of its operations to reduce costs. Other expense includes all items of expense other than interest expense, the provision for credit losses and income tax expense. Noninterest expense for the year of 2022 was $555.09 million, which was a decrease of $26.89 million or 4.62% from the year of 2021. Employee compensation for the year of 2022 decreased $37.56 million or 13.42% from the year of 2021. The decrease for 2022 was due mainly to lower employee commissions, incentives and overtime related to a decline in mortgage banking production partially offset by additional employees from the Community Bankers Trust acquisition. Employee benefits expense for the year of 2022 decreased $7.93 million or 14.71% as compared to the year of 2021. For the year of 2022, postretirement expense, which includes expense associated with United’s pension plan, supplemental early retirement plans (“SERPs”) and Savings and Stock Investment Plan (“401K plan”), decreased $8.25 million from the year of 2021. United uses certain valuation methodologies to measure the fair value of the assets within United’s pension plan which are presented in Note P, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The funded status of United’s pension plan is based upon the fair value of the plan assets compared to the projected benefit obligation. The determination of the projected benefit obligation and the associated periodic benefit expense involves significant judgment and estimation of future employee compensation levels, the discount rate and the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets. If United assumes a 1% increase or decrease in the estimation of future employee compensation levels while 58 keeping all other assumptions constant, the benefit cost associated with the pension plan would increase by approximately $909 thousand and decrease by approximately $849 thousand, respectively. If United assumes a 1% increase or decrease in the discount rate while keeping all other assumptions constant, the benefit cost associated with the pension plan would decrease by approximately $3.15 million and increase by approximately $3.61 million, respectively. If United assumes a 1% increase or decrease in the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets while keeping all other assumptions constant, the benefit cost associated with the pension plan would decrease and increase by approximately $2.07 million, respectively. Net occupancy expense increased $3.10 million or 7.36% for the year of 2022 as compared to the prior year. The increase was due mainly to increases of $1.17 million in building maintenance expense and $998 thousand in depreciation due mainly to the offices added in the Community Bankers Trust acquisition partially offset by a decline of $479 thousand in building rental expense due to the closing of certain leased offices. OREO expense for the year of 2022 decreased $3.23 million or 60.19% from the year of 2021 due mainly to fewer declines in the fair value of OREO properties. Equipment expense increased $3.34 million or 12.86% for the year of 2022 as compared to the year of 2021. The increase was due mainly to higher maintenance costs of $2.32 million and depreciation expense of $684 thousand primarily due to the Community Bankers Trust acquisition. Data processing expense decreased $1.45 million or 4.61% for the year of 2022 as compared to the year of 2021. The decrease for year of 2022 was due to $3.47 million of merger conversion and Community Bankers Trust contract termination costs included in the year of 2021. Mortgage loan servicing expense and impairment for the year of 2022 decreased $5.15 million from the year of 2021. The decrease was due to the recovery of past temporary impairment and lower amortization expense of mortgage servicing rights. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) expense for the year of 2022 increased $3.64 million or 43.64% from the year of 2021 due to a higher assessment base. Other expense for the year of 2022 increased $17.48 million or 14.46% from the year of 2021. The increase in other noninterest expense mainly resulted from higher amounts of certain general operating expenses primarily related to consulting and legal costs. Additionally, the expense for the reserve for unfunded loan commitments increased $2.71 million and charitable contributions increased $1.41 million from the year of 2021. Income Taxes For the year ended December 31, 2022, income taxes were $96.16 million, compared to $95.12 million for 2021, an increase of $1.04 million or 1.09%. The increase was due to higher earnings partially offset by a slightly lower effective tax rate. United’s effective tax rate was approximately 20.2% and 20.6% for years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, as compared to 19.7% for 2020. For further details related to income taxes, see Note O, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Quarterly Results Net income for the first quarter of 2022 was $81.66 million as compared to earnings of $106.90 million for the first quarter of 2021. Earnings for the first quarter of 2022, as compared to the first quarter of 2021, decreased primarily due to lower income from mortgage banking activities mainly as a result of the rising rate environment partially offset by lower noninterest expense associated with decreased mortgage banking production. Net interest income for the first quarter of 2022 was relatively flat from the first quarter of 2021, increasing $542 thousand, or less than 1%, to $191.50 million from net interest income of $190.96 million for the first three months of 2021. The slight increase of $542 thousand in net interest income occurred because total interest income decreased $2.86 million while total interest expense decreased $3.40 million from the first quarter of 2021. The provision for credit losses was a net benefit of $3.41 million for the first quarter of 2022 59 as compared to a provision for credit losses expense of $143 thousand for the first quarter of 2021. The decrease in the provision for credit losses was mainly due to the impact of better performance trends within the loan portfolio. Noninterest income was $46.02 million for the first three months of 2022, a decrease of $46.55 million or 50.28% from the first three months of 2021 due mainly to decreased income from mortgage banking activities due to a lower volume of mortgage loan originations and sales in the secondary market mainly the result of a rising interest rate environment. Noninterest expense for the first three months of 2022 decreased $9.75 million or 6.55% from the first three months of 2021 due mainly to lower employee compensation expense as a result of lower employee commissions, incentives and overtime related to mortgage banking production and lower OREO expense due to fewer declines in the fair value of OREO properties. Income taxes decreased $7.47 million or 27.09% for the first three months of 2022 as compared to the first three months of 2021 primarily due to lower earnings and a lower effective tax rate. The effective tax rate was 19.75% and 20.50% for the first quarter of 2022 and 2021, respectively. Net income for the second quarter of 2022 was $95.61 million or $0.71 per diluted share, as compared to $94.84 million or $0.73 per diluted share for the prior year second quarter. Net interest income for the second quarter of 2022 was $214.90 million, which was an increase of $28.39 million or 15.22% from the second quarter of 2021. The $28.39 million increase in net interest income occurred because total interest income increased $27.59 million while total interest expense decreased $801 thousand from the second quarter of 2021. United’s provision for credit losses was a net benefit of $1.81 million for the second quarter of 2022 while the provision for credit losses was a net benefit of $8.88 million for the second quarter of 2021. The lower net benefit amount for 2022 compared to 2021 was mainly due to an increase in total loans outstanding. For the second quarter of 2022, noninterest income was $43.61 million, which was a decrease of $19.26 million or 30.63% from the second quarter of 2021. The decrease in noninterest income were primarily due to decreased income from mortgage banking activities due to a lower volume of mortgage loan originations and sales in the secondary market mainly the result of a rising interest rate environment. For the second quarter of 2022, noninterest expense increased $2.21 million or 1.59% from the second quarter of 2021 due mainly to an increase in the expense for the reserve for unfunded loan commitments as well as higher amounts of certain general operating expenses. Income taxes for the second quarter of 2022 were $23.53 million as compared to $24.46 million for the second quarter of 2021. For the quarters ended June 30, 2022 and June 30, 2021, United’s effective tax rate was 19.75% and 20.50%, respectively. Net income for the third quarter of 2022 was $102.59 million or $0.76 per diluted share, as compared to $92.15 million or $0.71 per diluted share for the prior year third quarter. Net interest income for the third quarter of 2022 was $240.62 million, which was an increase of $59.04 million or 32.52% from the third quarter of 2021. The $59.04 million increase in net interest income occurred because total interest income increased $69.60 million while total interest expense increased $10.56 million from the third quarter of 2021. The provision for credit losses was $7.67 million for the third quarter of 2022 while the provision for credit losses was a net benefit of $7.83 million for the third quarter of 2021. For the third quarter of 2022, noninterest income was $32.75 million, which was a decrease of $35.88 million or 52.28% from the third quarter of 2021 primarily due to decreased income from mortgage banking activities due to a lower volume of mortgage loan originations and sales in the secondary market mainly the result of a rising interest rate environment. For the third quarter of 2022, noninterest expense decreased $5.08 million or 3.58% from the third quarter of 2021 due mainly to lower employee compensation expense as a result of lower employee commissions, incentives and overtime related to mortgage banking production. Income tax expense for the third quarter of 2022 was $25.92 million as compared to $23.60 million for the third quarter of 2021 primarily due to higher earnings partially offset by a slightly lower effective tax rate. United’s effective tax rate was 20.17% and 20.39% for the third quarter of 2022 and 2021, respectively. Net income for the fourth quarter of 2022 was $99.77 million or $0.74 per diluted share as compared to earnings of $73.85 million or $0.56 per diluted share for the fourth quarter of 2021. Net interest income for the fourth quarter of 2022 was $249.40 million, which was an increase of $65.73 million or 35.78% from the fourth quarter of 2021. The $65.73 million increase in net interest income occurred because total interest income increased $112.55 million while total interest expense increased $46.82 million from the fourth quarter of 2021. The provision for credit losses was $16.37 million for the fourth quarter of 2022 as compared to a net benefit of $7.41 million for the fourth quarter of 2021. The increase in the provision for credit losses was primarily due to loan growth and the impact of reasonable and supportable forecasts of future macroeconomic conditions. Partially offsetting the fourth quarter of 2021 net benefit was a provision for loan losses of $12.29 million recorded on purchased non-credit deteriorated (“non-PCD”) loans from Community Bankers Trust. Noninterest income for the fourth quarter of 2022 was $30.88 million, which was a decrease of $23.17 million, or 42.87% 60 from the fourth quarter of 2021. The decrease in noninterest income was driven primarily by a $22.72 million decrease in income from mortgage banking activities mainly due to lower mortgage loan origination and sale volume and a lower margin on loans sold in the secondary market. Noninterest expense for the fourth quarter of 2022 was $137.54 million, a decrease of $14.25 million, or 9.39%, from the fourth quarter of 2021 primarily due to decreases of $14.01 million in employee compensation and $3.39 million in data processing expense. The decrease in employee compensation was primarily due to lower employee commissions and incentives related to mortgage banking production and the impact of $2.53 million of merger-related expenses recognized in the fourth quarter of 2021. Data processing expense for the fourth quarter of 2021 included $3.47 million of merger-related expenses associated with the Community Bankers Trust acquisition. For the fourth quarter of 2022, income tax expense was $26.61 million as compared to $19.49 million for the fourth quarter of 2021. The increase of $7.12 million was primarily due to higher earnings and a slightly higher effective tax rate. United’s effective tax rate was 21.06% for the fourth quarter of 2022 and 20.88% for the fourth quarter of 2021. Additional quarterly financial data for 2022 and 2021 may be found in Note Z, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The Effect of Inflation United’s income statements generally reflect the effects of inflation. Since interest rates, loan demand and deposit levels are impacted by inflation, the resulting changes in the interest-sensitive assets and liabilities are included in net interest income. Similarly, operating expenses such as salaries, rents and maintenance include changing prices resulting from inflation. One item that would not reflect inflationary changes is depreciation expense. Subsequent to the acquisition of depreciable assets, inflation causes price levels to rise; therefore, historically presented dollar values do not reflect this inflationary condition. Inflationary pressure on consumers and uncertainty regarding the economy could result in changes in consumer and business spending, borrowing and savings habits. Such conditions could have a material adverse effect on the credit quality of our loans and our business, financial condition and results of operations. Management will monitor the impact of inflation as conditions warrant. The Effect of Regulatory Policies and Economic Conditions United’s business and earnings are affected by the monetary and fiscal policies of the United States government, its agencies and various other governmental regulatory authorities. The Federal Reserve Board regulates the supply of money in order to influence general economic conditions. Among the instruments of monetary policy available to the Federal Reserve Board are (i) conducting open market operations in United States government obligations, (ii) changing the discount rate on financial institution borrowings, (iii) imposing or changing reserve requirements against financial institution deposits, and (iv) restricting certain borrowings and imposing or changing reserve requirements against certain borrowings by financial institutions and their affiliates. These methods are used in varying degrees and combinations to affect directly the availability of bank loans and deposits, as well as the interest rates charged on loans and paid on deposits. United’s business and earnings are also affected by general and local economic conditions. Certain credit markets can experience difficult conditions and volatility. Downturns in the credit market can cause a decline in the value of certain loans and securities, a reduction in liquidity and a tightening of credit. A downturn in the credit market often signals a weakening economy that can cause job losses and thus distress on borrowers and their ability to repay loans. Uncertainties in credit markets and the economy present significant challenges for the financial services industry. Regulatory policies and economic conditions have had a significant effect on the operating results of financial institutions in the past and are expected to continue to do so in the future; however, United cannot accurately predict the nature, timing or extent of any effect such policies or economic conditions may have on its future business and earnings. Liquidity and Capital Resources In the opinion of management, United maintains liquidity that is sufficient to satisfy its depositors’ requirements and the credit needs of its customers. Like all banks, United depends upon its ability to renew maturing deposits and other liabilities on a daily basis and to acquire new funds in a variety of markets. A significant source of funds available to United 61 is “core deposits”. Core deposits include certain demand deposits, statement and special savings and NOW accounts. These deposits are relatively stable, and they are the lowest cost source of funds available to United. Short-term borrowings have also been a significant source of funds. These include federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase as well as advances from the FHLB. Repurchase agreements represent funds which are obtained as the result of a competitive bidding process. Liquid assets are cash and those items readily convertible to cash. All banks must maintain sufficient balances of cash and near-cash items to meet the day-to-day demands of customers and United’s cash needs. Other than cash and due from banks, the available for sale securities portfolio and maturing loans are the primary sources of liquidity. The goal of liquidity management is to ensure the ability to access funding which enables United to efficiently satisfy the cash flow requirements of depositors and borrowers and meet United’s cash needs. Liquidity is managed by monitoring funds’ availability from a number of primary sources. Substantial funding is available from cash and cash equivalents, unused short-term borrowing and a geographically dispersed network of branches providing access to a diversified and substantial retail deposit market. Short-term needs can be met through a wide array of outside sources such as correspondent and downstream correspondent federal funds and utilization of Federal Home Loan Bank advances. Other sources of liquidity available to United to provide long-term as well as short-term funding alternatives, in addition to FHLB advances, are long-term certificates of deposit, lines of credit, borrowings that are secured by bank premises or stock of United’s subsidiaries and issuances of trust preferred securities. In the normal course of business, United through its Asset Liability Committee evaluates these as well as other alternative funding strategies that may be utilized to meet short-term and long-term funding needs. See Notes L and M, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Cash flows provided by operations in 2022 were $760.82 million due mainly to net income of $379.63 million for the year of 2022. In 2021, cash flows provided by operations were $609.54 million due mainly to net income of $367.74 million for the year of 2021. In 2022, net cash of $3.45 billion was used in investing activities which was primarily due to net loan growth of $2.37 billion and net purchases of $1.09 billion of investment securities over proceeds from sales of investment securities. In 2021, net cash of $15.65 million was provided by investing activities which was primarily due to net loan repayments of $882.15 million and net cash of $39.42 million acquired in the Community Bankers Trust merger partially offset by $813.94 million of purchases of investment securities over proceeds from sales of investment securities and the purchase of $85.00 million of bank-owned life insurance policies. During the year of 2022, net cash of $105.32 million was provided by financing activities due primarily to net advances of $1.38 billion from long-term FHLB borrowings partially offset by a decline of $1.04 billion in deposits. Other uses of cash within funding activities for the year of 2022 were $193.04 million for cash dividends paid and $79.46 million for the acquisition of treasury stock. During the year of 2021, net cash of $923.91 million was provided by financing activities due primarily to net growth of $1.25 billion in deposits. This source of cash from funding activities was partially offset by net repayment of $40.21 million in short-term borrowings, net repayment of $97.79 million in long-term FHLB advances and cash dividends paid of $181.28 million for year of 2021. The net effect of the cash flow activities was a decrease in cash and cash equivalents of $2.58 billion for the year of 2022 as compared to an increase in cash and cash equivalents of $1.55 billion for the year of 2021. See the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows in the Consolidated Financial Statements. United enters into derivative contracts, mainly to protect against adverse interest rate movements on the value of certain assets or liabilities, under which it is required to either pay cash to or receive cash from counterparties depending on changes in interest rates. Derivative contracts are carried at fair value and not notional value on the consolidated balance sheet and therefore do not represent the amounts that may ultimately be paid under these contracts. Further discussion of derivative instruments is included in Note S, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. United is also a party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include loan commitments and standby letters of credit. United’s maximum exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the counterparty to the financial instrument for the loan commitments and standby letters of credit is the contractual or notional amount of those instruments. United uses the same policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance sheet instruments. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. 62 The following table details the amounts of significant commitments and letters of credit as of December 31, 2022: (In thousands) Amount Commitments to extend credit: Revolving open-end secured by 1-4 residential $ 853,539 Credit card and personal revolving lines 219,446 Commercial 6,177,170 Total unused commitments $ 7,250,155 Financial standby letters of credit $ 57,782 Performance standby letters of credit 89,729 Commercial letters of credit 16,389 Total letters of credit $ 163,900 Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses, generally within one year, and may require the payment of a fee. Further discussion of commitments is included in Note R, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. United anticipates it can meet its obligations over the next 12 months and has no material commitments for capital expenditures. There are no known trends, demands, commitments, or events that will result in or that are reasonably likely to result in United’s liquidity increasing or decreasing in any material way. United also has lines of credit available. See Notes L and M to the accompanying unaudited Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more details regarding the amounts available to United under lines of credit. The Asset Liability Committee monitors liquidity to ascertain that a liquidity position within certain prescribed parameters is maintained. No changes are anticipated in the policies of United’s Asset Liability Committee. United’s capital position is financially sound. United seeks to maintain a proper relationship between capital and total assets to support growth and sustain earnings. United has historically generated attractive returns on shareholders’ equity. United is well-capitalized based upon regulatory guidelines. United’s risk-based capital ratio is 14.37% at December 31, 2022 while its Common Equity Tier 1 capital, Tier 1 capital and leverage ratios are 12.30%, 12.30% and 10.79%, respectively. The December 31, 2022 ratios reflects United’s election of a five-year transition provision, allowed by the Federal Reserve Board and other federal banking agencies in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, to delay for two years the full impact of CECL on regulatory capital, followed by a three-year transition period. The regulatory requirements for a well-capitalized financial institution are a risk-based capital ratio of 10.0%, a Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 6.5%, a Tier 1 capital ratio of 8.0% and a leverage ratio of 5.0%. Total shareholders’ equity was $4.52 billion at December 31, 2022, which was a decrease of $202.44 million or 4.29% from December 31, 2021. This decrease is primarily due to a decrease of $327.84 million in accumulated other comprehensive income due mainly to an after-tax decrease in the fair value of available for sale securities as a result of a rising interest rate environment. In addition, treasury stock increased $79.79 million or 46.76% due to the repurchase of 2,259,546 shares of United common stock under stock repurchase plans approved by United’s Board of Directors. Partially offsetting these decreases was an increase of $184.65 million in retained earnings (net income less dividends declared). United’s equity to assets ratio was 15.31% at December 31, 2022 as compared to 16.09% at December 31, 2021. The primary capital ratio, capital and reserves to total assets and reserves, was 16.11% at December 31, 2022 as compared to 16.79% at December 31, 2021. United’s average equity to average asset ratio was 15.83% at December 31, 2022 as compared to 16.26% at December 31, 2021. All of these financial measurements reflect a financially sound position. 63 During the fourth quarter of 2022, United’s Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.36 per share. Dividends per share of $1.44 for the year of 2022 represented an increase over the $1.41 per share paid for 2021. Total cash dividends declared to common shareholders were $194.98 million for the year of 2022 as compared to $182.36 million for the year of 2021. The year 2022 was the forty-nineth consecutive year of dividend increases to United shareholders. Item 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK The objective of United’s Asset/Liability Management function is to maintain consistent growth in net interest income within United’s policy guidelines. This objective is accomplished through the management of balance sheet liquidity and interest rate risk exposures due to changes in economic conditions, interest rate levels and customer preferences. Interest Rate Risk Management considers interest rate risk to be United’s most significant market risk. Interest rate risk is the exposure to adverse changes in United’s net interest income as a result of changes in interest rates. United’s earnings are largely dependent on the effective management of interest rate risk. Management of interest rate risk focuses on maintaining consistent growth in net interest income within Board-approved policy limits. United’s Asset/Liability Management Committee (“ALCO”), which includes senior management representatives and reports to the Board of Directors, monitors and manages interest rate risk to maintain an acceptable level of change to net interest income as a result of changes in interest rates. Policy established for interest rate risk is stated in terms of the change in net interest income over a one-year and two-year horizon given an immediate and sustained increase or decrease in interest rates. The current limits approved by the Board of Directors are structured on a staged basis with each stage requiring specific actions. United employs a variety of measurement techniques to identify and manage its exposure to changing interest rates. One such technique utilizes an earnings simulation model to analyze the sensitivity of net interest income to movements in interest rates. The model is based on actual cash flows and repricing characteristics for on and off-balance sheet instruments and incorporates market-based assumptions regarding the impact of changing interest rates on the prepayment rate of certain assets and liabilities. The model also includes executive management projections for activity levels in product lines offered by United. Assumptions based on the historical behavior of deposit rates and balances in relation to changes in interest rates are also incorporated into the model. Rate scenarios could involve parallel or nonparallel shifts in the yield curve, depending on historical, current, and expected conditions, as well as the need to capture any material effects of explicit or embedded options. These assumptions are inherently uncertain and, as a result, the model cannot precisely measure net interest income or precisely predict the impact of fluctuations in interest rates on net interest income. Actual results will differ from simulated results due to timing, magnitude and frequency of interest rate changes as well as changes in market conditions and management’s strategies. Interest sensitive assets and liabilities are defined as those assets or liabilities that mature or are repriced within a designated time frame. The principal function of managing interest rate risk is to maintain an appropriate relationship between those assets and liabilities that are sensitive to changing market interest rates. The difference between rate sensitive assets and rate sensitive liabilities for specified periods of time is known as the “GAP.” Earnings-simulation analysis captures not only the potential of these interest sensitive assets and liabilities to mature or reprice, but also the probability that they will do so. Moreover, earnings-simulation analysis considers the relative sensitivities of these balance sheet items and projects their behavior over an extended period of time. United closely monitors the sensitivity of its assets and liabilities on an on-going basis and projects the effect of various interest rate changes on its net interest margin. 64 The following table shows United’s estimated earnings sensitivity profile as of December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021: Change in Interest Rates Percentage Change in Net Interest Income (basis points) December 31, 2022 December 31, 2021 +200 (6.83%) 4.61% +100 (3.00%) 2.70% -100 2.12% (0.98%) -200 2.16% (2.42%) At December 31, 2022, given an immediate, sustained 100 basis point upward shock to the yield curve used in the simulation model, net interest income for United is estimated to decrease by 3.00% over one year as compared to an increase of 2.70% at December 31, 2021. A 200 basis point immediate, sustained upward shock in the yield curve would decrease net interest income by an estimated 6.83% over one year as of December 31, 2022, as compared to an increase of 4.61% as of December 31, 2021. A 100 basis point immediate, sustained downward shock in the yield curve would increase net interest income by an estimated 2.12% over one year as of December 31, 2022 as compared to a decrease of 0.98%, over one year as of December 31, 2021. A 200 basis point immediate, sustained downward shock in the yield curve would increase net interest income by an estimated 2.16% over one year as of December 31, 2022 as compared to a decrease of 2.42% over one year as of December 31, 2021. In addition to the one year earnings sensitivity analysis, a two-year analysis is also performed. Compared to the one year analysis, United is projected to show improved performance in year two within the upward rate shock scenarios. Given an immediate, sustained 100 basis point upward shock to the yield curve used in the simulation model, net interest income for United is estimated to increase by 0.75% in year two as of December 31, 2022. A 200 basis point immediate, sustained upward shock in the yield curve would increase net interest income by an estimated 0.08% in year two as of December 31, 2022. A 100 basis point immediate, sustained downward shock in the yield curve would decrease net interest income by an estimated 2.32% in year two as of December 31, 2022. A 200 basis point immediate, sustained downward shock in the yield curve would decrease net interest income by an estimated 8.34% in year two as of December 31, 2022. While it is unlikely market rates would immediately move 100 or 200 basis points upward or downward on a sustained basis, this is another tool used by management and the Board of Directors to gauge interest rate risk. All of these estimated changes in net interest income are and were within the policy guidelines established by the Board of Directors. To further aid in interest rate management, United’s subsidiary bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”). The use of FHLB advances provides United with a low risk means of matching maturities of earning assets and interest-bearing funds to achieve a desired interest rate spread over the life of the earning assets. In addition, United uses credit with large regional banks and trust preferred securities to provide funding. As part of its interest rate risk management strategy, United may use derivative instruments to protect against adverse price or interest rate movements on the value of certain assets or liabilities and on future cash flows. These derivatives commonly consist of interest rate swaps, caps, floors, collars, futures, forward contracts, written and purchased options. Interest rate swaps obligate two parties to exchange one or more payments generally calculated with reference to a fixed or variable rate of interest applied to the notional amount. United accounts for its derivative activities in accordance with the provisions of ASC Topic 815, “Derivatives and Hedging.” Extension Risk A key feature of most mortgage loans is the ability of the borrower to repay principal earlier than scheduled. This is called a prepayment. Prepayments arise primarily due to sale of the underlying property, refinancing, or foreclosure. In general, declining interest rates tend to increase prepayments, and rising interest rates tend to slow prepayments. Like other fixed-income securities, when interest rates rise, the value of mortgage- related securities generally declines. The rate of prepayments on underlying mortgages will affect the price and volatility of mortgage-related securities and may shorten or extend the effective maturity of the security beyond what was anticipated at the time of purchase. If interest rates rise, United’s holdings of mortgage-related securities may experience reduced returns if the borrowers of the underlying mortgages pay off their mortgages later than anticipated. This is generally referred to as extension risk. 65 At December 31, 2022, United’s mortgage related securities portfolio had an amortized cost of $2.1 billion, of which approximately $934.1 million or 44% were fixed rate collateralized mortgage obligations (“CMOs”). These fixed rate CMOs consisted primarily of planned amortization class (“PACs”), sequential-pay and accretion directed (“VADMs”) bonds having an average life of approximately 5.5 years and a weighted average yield of 2.12%, under current projected prepayment assumptions. These securities are expected to have moderate extension risk in a rising rate environment. Current models show that an immediate, sustained upward shock of 300 basis points, the average life of these securities would only extend to 6.5 years. The projected price decline of the fixed rate CMO portfolio in rates up 300 basis points would be 15%, or less than the price decline of a 7-year treasury note. By comparison, the price decline of a 30-year 5% coupon mortgage backed security (“MBS”) in rates higher by 300 basis points would be approximately 18.9%. United had approximately $600.6 million in fixed rate Commercial Mortgage Backed Securities (CMBS) with a projected yield of 2.02% and a projected average life of 4.7 years on December 31, 2022. This portfolio consisted primarily of Freddie Mac Multifamily K securities and Fannie Mae Delegated Underwriting and Servicing (“DUS”) securities with a weighted average maturity (“WAM”) of 8 years. United had approximately $27.8 million in 15-year mortgage backed securities with a projected yield of 2.02% and a projected average life of 4.8 years as of December 31, 2022. This portfolio consisted of seasoned 15-year mortgage paper with a weighted average loan age (“WALA”) of 3.3 years and a weighted average maturity (“WAM”) of 12 years. United had approximately $353.7 million in 20-year mortgage backed securities with a projected yield of 1.82% and a projected average life of 7.1 years on December 31, 2022. This portfolio consisted of seasoned 20-year mortgage paper with a weighted average loan age (“WALA”) of 1.8 years and a weighted average maturity (“WAM”) of 18.1 years. United had approximately $162.1 million in 30-year mortgage backed securities with a projected yield of 2.46% and a projected average life of 7.8 years on December 31, 2022. This portfolio consisted of seasoned 30-year mortgage paper with a weighted average loan age (“WALA”) of 2.7 years and a weighted average maturity (“WAM”) of 24.6 years. The remaining 2% of the mortgage related securities portfolio on December 31, 2022, included floating rate CMO, CMBS and mortgage backed securities. 66 MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING Management of United Bankshares, Inc. (the “Company”) is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Company’s management and board of directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013 framework). Based on our assessment, we believe that, as of December 31, 2022, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria. Ernst & Young LLP (“Ernst & Young”), the independent registered public accounting firm who audited the Company’s consolidated financial statements, has also issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022. Ernst & Young’s report on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting appears on the following page. /s/ Richard M. Adams, Jr. /s/ W. Mark Tatterson Richard M. Adams, Jr. Chief Executive Officer W. Mark Tatterson Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer March 1, 2023 67 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of United Bankshares, Inc. Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting We have audited United Bankshares, Inc. and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, United Bankshares, Inc . and subsidiaries (the Company) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, based on the COSO criteria. We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022, and the related notes and our report dated March 1, 2023 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon. Basis for Opinion The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB. We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. /s/ Ernst & Young LLP Charleston, West Virginia March 1, 2023 68 Item 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of United Bankshares, Inc. Opinion on the Financial Statements We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of United Bankshares, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2022 and 2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated March 1, 2023 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon. Basis for Opinion These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. Critical Audit Matters The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of the critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate. 69 Allowance for Loan Losses Description of the Matter The Company’s loan portfolio totaled $20.6 billion as of December 31, 2022, and the associated allowance for loan losses (ALL) for the loan portfolio was $235 million. As discussed in Notes A and F to the consolidated financial statements, the ALL is an estimate of the expected credit losses on loans at amortized cost to present the net amount expected to be collected as of the balance sheet date. The ALL is based on the credit losses expected to arise over the life of the asset. Management pools its loans based on similar risk characteristics and assigns an appropriate calculation method to estimate the expected credit losses. For loans that do not share risk characteristics, management evaluates the ALL on an individual basis based on the present value of expected future cash flows using the loan’s effective interest rate, or as a practical expedient, the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral-dependent. For loans not specifically reviewed on an individual basis, management measures the ALL using a probability of default/loss given default method or cohort method based on portfolio segment. Management also records qualitative adjustments to expected credit losses for differences in current loan-specific risk characteristics such as differences in underwriting standards, portfolio mix, delinquency level or term as well as reasonable and supportable forecast adjustments for changes in macroeconomic and environmental conditions, such as changes in unemployment rates, gross domestic product or other relevant factors, that have not been fully captured in the allowance calculation. Auditing management’s estimate used in determining the ALL for the loan portfolio involved a high degree of subjectivity in evaluating management’s determination of the forecast selection used to derive the reasonable and supportable forecast qualitative adjustment. How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of controls over the Company’s ALL process for the loan portfolio. Controls tested included, among others, those over the risk rating process, management’s review and approval of the calculations used to determine the ALL, including the underlying data and data inputs and outputs of those calculations, and management’s evaluation and review of the qualitative adjustments, including the reasonable and supportable forecast qualitative adjustment. To test the Company’s reasonable and supportable forecast qualitative adjustment for the loan portfolio, we tested the underlying data used in the estimate calculation to determine it was accurate, complete and relevant. Further, we evaluated management’s basis for the adjustment in relation to changes in economic conditions and forecasts. Our procedures included evaluating management’s inputs and assumptions used in determining the qualitative adjustment by comparing the information to internal and external source data including, among others, the economic forecasts utilized by the Company and third-party economic outlook reports. We involved our internal modeling specialists in evaluating the model performance. In addition, we evaluated the overall ALL amount, inclusive of the qualitative adjustments, and whether the amount appropriately reflects losses expected in the loan portfolios as of the consolidated balance sheet date. For example, we evaluated the Company’s analysis of their historical loss experience and peer losses to the Company’s recorded ALL to test the ALL in totality. We also reviewed subsequent events and transactions and considered whether they corroborate or contradict the Company’s conclusion. /s/ Ernst & Young, LLP We have served as the Company’s auditor since 1986. Charleston, West Virginia March 1, 2023 70 UNITED BANKSHARES, INC. FORM 10-K (Continued) As of the date of filing this Annual report, neither the annual shareholders’ report for the year ended December 31, 2022, nor the proxy statement for the annual United shareholders’ meeting has been mailed to shareholders. CROSS-REFERENCE INDEX Part I Page Item 1. BUSINESS 4 Item 1A. RISK FACTORS 19 Item 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS 32 Item 2. PROPERTIES 32 Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS 33 Item 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES 33 Part II Item 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON STOCK, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES 34 Item 6. [RESERVED] 36 Item 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS 36 Item 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK 64 Item 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA 69 Item 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES 141 Item 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES 141 Item 9B. OTHER INFORMATION 141 Item 9C. DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS 141 Part III Item 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 142 Item 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION 142 Item 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS 142 Item 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE 142 Item 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES 143 Part IV Item 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES 144 Item 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY 147 3 Table of Contents CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS UNITED BANKSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES (Dollars in thousands, except par value) December 31 December 31 2022 2021 Assets Cash and due from banks $ 294,155 $ 282,878 Interest-bearing deposits with other banks 881,418 3,474,365 Federal funds sold 1,079 927 Total cash and cash equivalents 1,176,652 3,758,170 Securities available for sale at estimated fair value (amortized cost-$ 5,011,729 at December 31, 2022 and $ 4,031,494 at December 31, 2021, allowance for credit losses of $ 0 at December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021) 4,541,925 4,042,699 Securities held to maturity, net of allowance for credit losses of $ 18 at December 31, 2022 and $ 19 at December 31, 2021 (estimated fair value-$ 1,020 at December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021) 1,002 1,001 Equity securities at estimated fair value 7,629 12,404 Other investment securities 322,048 239,645 Loans held for sale measured using fair value option 56,879 504,416 Loans and leases 20,580,163 18,051,307 Less: Unearned income ( 21,997 ) ( 27,659 ) Loans and leases, net of unearned income 20,558,166 18,023,648 Less: Allowance for loan and lease losses ( 234,746 ) ( 216,016 ) Net loans and leases 20,323,420 17,807,632 Bank premises and equipment 199,161 197,220 Operating lease right-of-use assets 71,144 81,942 Goodwill 1,888,889 1,886,494 Mortgage servicing rights, net of valuation allowance of $ 0 at December 31, 2022 and $ 883 at December 31, 2021 21,022 23,144 Bank-owned life insurance (“BOLI”) 480,184 478,067 Accrued interest receivable, net of allowance for credit losses of $ 0 at December 31, 2022 and $ 8 at December 31, 2021 94,890 64,512 Other assets 304,535 231,556 TOTAL ASSETS $ 29,489,380 $ 29,328,902 Liabilities Deposits: Noninterest-bearing $ 7,199,678 $ 7,496,560 Interest-bearing 15,103,488 15,853,703 Total deposits 22,303,166 23,350,263 Borrowings: Securities sold under agreements to repurchase 160,698 128,844 Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) borrowings 1,910,775 532,199 Other long-term borrowings 286,881 285,195 Reserve for lending-related commitments 46,189 31,442 Operating lease liabilities 75,749 86,703 Accrued expenses and other liabilities 189,729 195,628 TOTAL LIABILITIES 24,973,187 24,610,274 Shareholders’ Equity Preferred stock, $ 1.00 par value; Authorized- 50,000,000 shares, no ne issued 0 0 Common stock, $ 2.50 par value; Authorized- 200,000,000 shares; issued- 142,011,560 and 141,360,266 at December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively, including 7,266,438 and 4,967,508 shares in treasury at December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively 355,029 353,402 Surplus 3,168,874 3,149,955 Retained earnings 1,575,426 1,390,777 Accumulated other comprehensive loss ( 332,732 ) ( 4,888 ) Treasury stock, at cost ( 250,404 ) ( 170,618 ) TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY 4,516,193 4,718,628 TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY $ 29,489,380 $ 29,328,902 See notes to consolidated unaudited financial statements. 71 Table of Contents CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME UNITED BANKSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES (Dollars in thousands, except per share data) Year Ended December 31 2022 2021 2020 Interest income Interest and fees on loans and leases $ 864,583 $ 724,493 $ 721,829 Interest on federal funds sold and other short-term investments 22,950 8,734 9,780 Interest and dividends on securities: Taxable 105,780 54,678 61,808 Tax-exempt 8,677 7,212 4,965 Total interest income 1,001,990 795,117 798,382 Interest expense Interest on deposits 80,237 41,620 78,579 Interest on short-term borrowings 1,785 693 1,027 Interest on long-term borrowings 23,537 10,070 29,003 Total interest expense 105,559 52,383 108,609 Net interest income 896,431 742,734 689,773 Provision for credit losses 18,822 ( 23,970 ) 106,562 Net interest income after provision for credit losses 877,609 766,704 583,211 Other income Fees from trust services 17,216 16,552 13,903 Fees from brokerage services 16,412 15,559 11,758 Fees from deposit services 40,557 38,689 34,833 Bankcard fees and merchant discounts 6,580 5,485 4,066 Other service charges, commissions, and fees 3,267 2,990 2,596 Income from bank-owned life insurance 9,188 6,840 7,217 Income from mortgage banking activities 42,690 171,692 266,094 Mortgage loan servicing income 9,235 9,605 6,213 Net gain on the sale of bank premises 0 0 2,229 Net investment securities gains 776 2,676 3,155 Other income 7,340 8,040 2,711 Total other income 153,261 278,128 354,775 Other expense Employee compensation 242,408 279,970 274,661 Employee benefits 45,944 53,871 48,870 Net occupancy expense 45,129 42,034 41,303 Other real estate owned (“OREO”) expense 2,138 5,370 3,805 Net losses on the sales of OREO properties 700 54 1,972 Equipment expense 29,320 25,979 20,861 Data processing expense 29,997 31,446 35,420 Mortgage loan servicing expense and impairment 7,099 12,246 9,431 Bankcard processing expense 1,938 1,706 1,735 FDIC insurance expense 11,988 8,346 10,132 FHLB prepayment penalties 0 15 10,385 Other expense 138,426 120,942 119,671 Total other expense 555,087 581,979 578,246 Income before income taxes 475,783 462,853 359,740 Income taxes 96,156 95,115 70,717 Net income $ 379,627 $ 367,738 $ 289,023 72 Table of Contents CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME UNITED BANKSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES (Dollars in thousands, except per share data) Year Ended December 31 2022 2021 2020 Earnings per common share: Basic $ 2.81 $ 2.84 $ 2.40 Diluted $ 2.80 $ 2.83 $ 2.40 Dividends per common share $ 1.44 $ 1.41 $ 1.40 Average outstanding shares: Basic 134,776,241 129,276,452 120,017,247 Diluted 135,117,512 129,512,853 120,090,232 See notes to consolidated financial statements 73 Table of Contents CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME UNITED BANKSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES (Dollars in thousands) Year Ended December 31 2022 2021 2020 Net income $ 379,627 $ 367,738 $ 289,023 Change in net unrealized (loss) gain on available-for-sale (“AFS”) securities, net of tax ( 368,934 ) ( 56,611 ) 57,249 Change in net unrealized gain on cash flow hedge, net of tax 36,655 13,001 3,358 Change in defined benefit pension plan, net of tax 4,435 16,352 ( 3,368 ) Comprehensive income, net of tax $ 51,783 $ 340,480 $ 346,262 See notes to consolidated financial statements 74 Table of Contents CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY UNITED BANKSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES (Dollars in thousands, except per share data) Accumulated Common Stock Other Total Par Retained Comprehensive Treasury Shareholders’ Shares Value Surplus Earnings (Loss) Income Stock Equity Balance at January 1, 2020 105,494,290 $ 263,736 $ 2,140,175 $ 1,132,579 $ ( 34,869 ) $ ( 137,788 ) $ 3,363,833 Cumulative effect of adopting Accounting Standard Update 2016-13 0 0 0 ( 44,331 ) 0 0 ( 44,331 ) Comprehensive income: Net income 0 0 0 289,023 0 0 289,023 Other comprehensive income, net of tax 0 0 0 0 57,239 0 57,239 Total comprehensive income, net of tax 346,262 Stock based compensation expense 0 0 5,980 0 0 0 5,980 Acquisition of Carolina Financial Corporation ( 28,031,501 shares) 28,031,501 70,079 747,751 0 0 0 817,830 Purchase of treasury stock ( 679,331 shares) 0 0 0 0 0 ( 21,317 ) ( 21,317 ) Distribution of treasury stock for deferred compensation plan ( 29 shares) 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 Cash dividends ($ 1.40 per share) 0 0 0 ( 171,876 ) 0 0 ( 171,876 ) Stock grant forfeiture ( 946 shares) 0 0 35 0 0 ( 35 ) 0 Net issuance of common stock under stock-based compensation plans ( 283,583 shares) 283,583 708 530 0 0 0 1,238 Balance at December 31, 2020 133,809,374 334,523 2,894,471 1,205,395 22,370 ( 159,139 ) 4,297,620 Comprehensive income: Net income 0 0 0 367,738 0 0 367,738 Other comprehensive loss, net of tax 0 0 0 0 ( 27,258 ) 0 ( 27,258 ) Total comprehensive income, net of tax 340,480 Stock based compensation expense 0 0 8,018 0 0 0 8,018 Acquisition of Community Bankers Trust Corporation ( 7,135,771 shares) 7,135,771 17,839 242,440 0 0 0 260,279 Purchase of treasury stock ( 339,241 shares) 0 0 0 0 0 ( 11,211 ) ( 11,211 ) Cash dividends ($ 1.41 per share) 0 0 0 ( 182,356 ) 0 0 ( 182,356 ) Stock grant forfeiture ( 7,400 shares) 0 0 268 0 0 ( 268 ) 0 Net issuance of common stock under stock-based compensation plans ( 415,121 shares) 415,121 1,040 4,758 0 0 0 5,798 Balance at December 31, 2021 141,360,266 353,402 3,149,955 1,390,777 ( 4,888 ) ( 170,618 ) 4,718,628 Comprehensive income: Net income 0 0 0 379,627 0 0 379,627 Other comprehensive loss, net of tax 0 0 0 0 ( 327,844 ) 0 ( 327,844 ) Total comprehensive income, net of tax 51,783 Stock based compensation expense 0 0 9,881 0 0 0 9,881 Stock grant forfeiture ( 9,071 shares) 0 0 326 0 0 ( 326 ) 0 Purchase of treasury stock ( 2,289,859 shares) 0 0 0 0 0 ( 79,460 ) ( 79,460 ) Cash dividends ($ 1.44 per share) 0 0 0 ( 194,978 ) 0 0 ( 194,978 ) Net issuance of common stock under stock-based compensation plans ( 651,294 shares) 651,294 1,627 8,712 0 0 0 10,339 Balance at December 31, 2022 142,011,560 $ 355,029 $ 3,168,874 $ 1,575,426 $ ( 332,732 ) $ ( 250,404 ) $ 4,516,193 See notes to consolidated financial statements 75 Table of Contents CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS UNITED BANKSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES (Dollars in thousands) Year Ended December 31 2022 2021 2020 OPERATING ACTIVITIES Net income $ 379,627 $ 367,738 $ 289,023 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: Provision for credit losses 18,822 ( 23,970 ) 106,562 Amortization and accretion 5,433 ( 8,672 ) ( 29,900 ) Loss on sales of bank premises, OREO, leases and equipment 457 460 1,214 Write-downs on bank premises, OREO, leases and equipment 2,007 5,100 3,803 Depreciation 18,237 16,583 13,464 Gain on securities ( 776 ) ( 2,676 ) ( 3,155 ) Loans originated for sale ( 1,903,981 ) ( 6,190,675 ) ( 6,528,080 ) Proceeds from sales of loans 2,238,093 6,566,304 6,521,198 Gain on sales of loans ( 41,274 ) ( 161,108 ) ( 258,784 ) Mortgage repurchase loan losses paid, net of recoveries ( 69 ) ( 59 ) ( 888 ) Stock-based compensation 9,881 8,018 5,980 Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation arrangements 1,040 303 351 Deferred income tax expense (benefit) 6,887 3,015 ( 174 ) Amortization of tax credit investments 13,567 12,718 9,950 Originations of mortgage servicing rights ( 1,417 ) ( 10,584 ) ( 7,310 ) Impairment of mortgage servicing rights 0 629 1,383 Recoveries of impairment on mortgage servicing rights ( 883 ) ( 1,129 ) 0 Increase in cash surrender value of bank-owned life insurance policies ( 14,064 ) ( 6,836 ) ( 5,959 ) Contribution to pension plan 0 0 ( 20,000 ) Amortization of net periodic pension costs ( 1,640 ) 2,073 3,004 Changes in: Interest receivable ( 30,370 ) 2,562 1,106 Other assets 57,380 42,704 46,267 Accrued expenses and other liabilities 3,865 ( 12,959 ) ( 8,608 ) NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES 760,822 609,539 140,447 INVESTING ACTIVITIES Proceeds from maturities and calls of held to maturity securities 0 215 211 Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale 410 52,820 192,085 Proceeds from maturities and calls of securities available for sale 575,338 679,082 515,983 Purchases of securities available for sale ( 1,572,482 ) ( 1,522,076 ) ( 596,923 ) Proceeds from sales of equity securities 6,782 1,250 1,650 Purchases of equity securities ( 2,596 ) ( 2,266 ) ( 1,379 ) Proceeds from sales and redemptions of other investment securities 4,829 11,790 148,766 Purchases of other investment securities ( 99,435 ) ( 34,755 ) ( 137,395 ) Purchases of bank-owned life insurance policies 0 ( 85,000 ) 0 Redemption of bank-owned life insurance policies 11,947 1,114 5,729 Purchases of bank premises and equipment ( 16,862 ) ( 15,380 ) ( 19,025 ) Proceeds from sales of bank premises and equipment 902 1,618 4,354 Acquisition of subsidiaries, net of cash paid 0 39,420 629,107 Proceeds from sales of OREO properties 10,571 5,675 14,398 Net change in loans and leases ( 2,367,060 ) 882,147 ( 619,976 ) NET CASH (USED IN) PROVIDED BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES ( 3,447,656 ) 15,654 137,585 FINANCING ACTIVITIES Cash dividends paid ( 193,041 ) ( 181,277 ) ( 162,713 ) Acquisition of treasury stock ( 79,460 ) ( 11,211 ) ( 21,317 ) Proceeds from exercise of stock options 10,295 5,206 1,241 Distribution of treasury stock from deferred compensation plan 0 0 1 Repayment of long-term Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings ( 520,000 ) ( 597,791 ) ( 1,847,000 ) Proceeds from issuance of long-term Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings 1,900,000 500,000 500,000 Changes in: Time deposits ( 623,254 ) ( 275,900 ) 584,175 Other deposits ( 421,078 ) 1,525,093 2,271,510 Federal funds purchased, securities sold under agreements to repurchase and other short-term borrowings 31,854 ( 40,211 ) ( 232,354 ) NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES 105,316 923,909 1,093,543 (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS ( 2,581,518 ) 1,549,102 1,371,575 CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF YEAR 3,758,170 2,209,068 837,493 CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR $ 1,176,652 $ 3,758,170 $ 2,209,068 76 Table of Contents CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS UNITED BANKSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES (Dollars in thousands) Year Ended December 31 2022 2021 2020 Supplemental information Cash paid for: Interest on deposits and borrowed funds $ 98,161 $ 54,591 $ 115,347 Income taxes 93,680 101,227 65,378 Noncash investing activities: Transfers of loans to OREO 1,546 2,769 28,038 Acquisition of subsidiaries and purchase price adjustments: Assets acquired, net of cash ( 345 ) 1,763,843 4,172,611 Liabilities assumed 2.050 1,619,438 4,302,722 Goodwill 2,395 76,454 318,834 See notes to consolidated financial statements 77 Table of Contents NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS UNITED BANKSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES December 31, 2022 NOTE A—SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Nature of Operations: United Bankshares, Inc. (“United”, the “Company”) is a financial holding company headquartered in Charleston, West Virginia. United considers all of West Virginia to be included in its market area. This area includes the five largest West Virginia Metropolitan Statistical Areas (“MSA”): the Parkersburg MSA, the Charleston MSA, the Huntington MSA, the Morgantown MSA and the Wheeling MSA. United serves the Ohio counties of Lawrence, Belmont, Jefferson and the Pennsylvania counties of Washington and Fayette, primarily because of their close proximity to the Ohio and Pennsylvania borders and United banking offices located in those counties in nearby West Virginia. United’s Virginia markets include the Maryland, northern Virginia and Washington, D.C. MSA, the Winchester MSA, the Harrisonburg MSA, and the Charlottesville MSA. Through its acquisition of Carolina Financial, United’s market also includes the Coastal, Midlands, and Upstate regions of South Carolina, including the Charleston (Charleston, Dorchester and Berkeley Counties), Myrtle Beach (Horry and Georgetown Counties), Columbia (Richland and Lexington Counties), and the Upstate (Greenville and Spartanburg Counties) areas as well as areas in North Carolina including Wilmington (New Hanover County), Raleigh-Durham (Durham and Wake Counties), Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia (NC and SC) and the southeastern coastal region of North Carolina (Bladen, Brunswick, Columbus, Cumberland, Duplin and Robeson Counties). Through its acquisition of Community Bankers Trust, United added new markets in Baltimore and Annapolis, Maryland and Lynchburg and Richmond, Virginia as well as the Northern Neck of Virginia. United considers all of the above locations to be the primary market areas for the business of its banking and mortgage banking subsidiaries. Operating Segments: United operates in two business segments: community banking and mortgage banking. Through its community banking segment, United offers a full range of banking products and services through various delivery channels. Included among the banking products and services offered are the acceptance of deposits in checking, savings, time and money market accounts; the making and servicing of personal, credit card, commercial, and floor plan loans; and the making of construction and real estate loans. Also offered are trust and brokerage services, safe deposit boxes, and wire transfers. The mortgage banking segment engages primarily in the origination and acquisition of residential mortgages for sale into the secondary market through George Mason Mortgage, LLC (“George Mason”) and Crescent Mortgage Company (“Crescent”), indirectly owned subsidiaries of United. In addition, United, through Crescent, may retain the rights to service a portion of the loans sold in the third-party market as part of its mortgage banking activities, for which United receives service fee income. In addition, at certain times United may purchase or sell rights to service from or to third parties. These rights are known as mortgage servicing rights, or MSRs, where the owner of the MSR acts on behalf of the mortgage loan owner and has the contractual right to receive a stream of cash flows in exchange for performing specified mortgage servicing functions. Basis of Presentation: The consolidated financial statements and the notes to consolidated financial statements include the accounts of United and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidated financial statements. United determines whether it has a controlling financial interest in an entity by first evaluating whether the entity is a voting interest entity or a variable interest entity (“VIE”) under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Voting interest entities are entities in which the total equity investment at risk is sufficient to enable the entity to finance itself independently and provides the equity holders with the obligation to absorb losses, the right to receive residual returns and the right to make decisions about the entity’s activities. United consolidates voting interest entities in which it has all, or at least a majority of, the voting interest. As defined in applicable accounting standards, VIEs are entities that lack one or more of the characteristics of a voting interest entity. A controlling financial interest in a VIE is present when an enterprise has both the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance and an obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the VIE. The enterprise with a controlling financial interest, known as the primary beneficiary, consolidates the VIE. United’s wholly owned and indirect wholly owned statutory trust subsidiaries are VIEs for which United is not the primary beneficiary. Accordingly, its accounts are not included in United’s consolidated financial statements. 78 Table of Contents The accounting and reporting policies of United conform with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. To conform to the 2022 presentation, certain reclassifications have been made to prior period amounts, which had no impact on net income, comprehensive income or shareholders’ equity. In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of financial position and results of operations have been made. Such adjustments are of a normal and recurring nature. In addition, $ 1,483,987 ,000 was reclassed from noninterest-bearing deposits to interest-bearing deposits on United’s Consolidated Balance Sheets for the period ended December 31, 2021 due to the nature of the underlying deposit accounts and a misclassification in the previous presentation. This reclassification did not impact any other amounts reported or disclosed in the consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of financial position and results of operations have been made. The Company has evaluated events and transactions subsequent to December 31, 2022 through the date these financial statements were issued. Based on definitions and requirements of generally accepted accounting principles for “Subsequent Events,” the Company has not identified any events that would require adjustments to, or disclosure in the financial statements. Cash and Cash Equivalents: United considers cash and due from banks, interest-bearing deposits with other banks and federal funds sold as cash and cash equivalents. Debt securities : The Company accounts for debt securities in two categories: held to maturity (“HTM”) and available for sale (“AFS”). Premiums and discounts on debt securities are deferred and recognized into income over the contractual life of the asset using the effective interest method. HTM securities are accounted for at amortized cost, but the Company must have both the positive intent and the ability to hold those securities to maturity. There are very limited circumstances under which securities in the HTM category can be sold without jeopardizing the cost basis of accounting for the remainder of the securities in this category. Substantially all of the Company’s HTM debt securities are issued by state and political subdivisions (municipalities). As of December 31, 2022, United considers its HTM debt securities portfolio to be immaterial. AFS securities are accounted for at fair value. Gains and losses realized on the sale of these securities are accounted for based on the specific identification method. Unrealized gains and losses for AFS securities are excluded from earnings and reported net of the related tax effect in the accumulated other comprehensive income component of shareholders’ equity. Allowance for Credit Losses (HTM Debt Securities) : For HTM debt securities, the Company is required to utilize a current expected credit losses (“CECL”) methodology to estimate expected credit losses. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the Company recorded an allowance for credit losses of $ 18 ,000 and $ 19 ,000, respectively, on its HTM debt securities portfolio. Allowance for Credit Losses (AFS Debt Securities) : The impairment model for available-for-sale (“AFS”) debt securities differs from the CECL methodology applied for HTM debt securities because AFS debt securities are measured at fair value rather than amortized cost. Although ASC Topic 326, “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses” replaced the legacy other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) model with a credit loss model, it retained the fundamental nature of the legacy OTTI model. For AFS debt securities in an unrealized loss position, the Company first assesses whether it intends to sell, or it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell, the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis. If either criteria is met, the security’s amortized cost basis is written down to fair value through income. For AFS debt securities where neither of the criteria are met, the Company evaluates whether the decline in fair value has resulted from credit losses or other factors. In making this assessment, management considers the extent to which fair value is less than amortized cost, any changes to the credit rating of the security by a rating agency, and adverse conditions specifically related to the security, among other factors. If this assessment indicates that a credit loss exists, the present value of cash flows expected to be collected from the security are compared to the amortized cost basis of the security. If the present value of cash flows expected to be collected is less than the amortized cost basis, a credit loss exists and an allowance for credit losses is recorded for the credit loss, limited to the amount that the fair value is less than the amortized cost basis. Any remaining discount that has not been recorded through an allowance for credit losses is recognized in other comprehensive income. 79 Table of Contents An entity may no longer consider the length of time fair value has been less than amortized cost. Changes in the allowance for credit losses are recorded as a provision (or release) for credit losses. Losses are charged against the allowance when management believes the uncollectibility of an AFS security is confirmed or when either of the criteria regarding intent or requirement to sell is met. As of December 31, 2022, the Company determined that the unrealized loss positions in AFS securities were no t the result of credit losses, and therefore, an allowance for credit losses was not recorded. United has the intent and the ability to hold these securities until such time as the value recovers or the securities mature. Equity securities: Investments in equity securities with readily determinable fair values (marketable) are measured at fair value, with changes in the fair value recognized in Net investment securities gains in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Other investment securities: Certain security investments such as Federal Reserve Bank stock and Federal Home Loan Bank stock that do not have readily determinable fair values (non-marketable) are accounted for at cost minus impairment, if any. For other security investments that do not have readily determinable fair values (non-marketable), they are accounted for at cost minus impairment, if any, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for the identical or similar investment of the same issuer, also referred to as the measurement alternative. Any adjustments to the carrying value of these investments are recorded in Other income in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Securities Purchased Under Resale Agreements and Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase: Securities purchased under agreements to resell and securities sold under agreements to repurchase are accounted for as collateralized financing transactions. They are recorded at the amounts at which the securities were acquired or sold plus accrued interest. Securities, generally U.S. government and federal agency securities, pledged as collateral under these financing arrangements cannot be repledged or sold, unless replaced, by the secured party. The fair value of the collateral either received from or provided to a third party is continually monitored and additional collateral is obtained or is requested to be returned to United as deemed appropriate. Loans: Loans are reported at the principal amount outstanding, net of unearned income, except loans acquired through transfer (see below). Interest on loans is accrued and credited to operations using methods that produce a level yield on individual principal amounts outstanding. Loan origination and commitment fees and related direct loan origination costs are deferred and amortized as an adjustment of loan yield over the estimated life of the related loan. Loan fees net of costs accreted and included in interest income were $ 57,424 ,000, $ 92,545 ,000, and $ 76,064 ,000, for the years of 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The accrual of interest income on commercial and most consumer loans generally is discontinued when a loan becomes 90 to 120 days past due as to principal or interest. When interest accruals are discontinued, unpaid interest recognized in income in the current year is reversed, and interest accrued in prior years is charged to the allowance for loan losses. Management may elect to continue the accrual of interest when the estimated net realizable value of collateral exceeds the principal balance and accrued interest, and the loan is in the process of collection. A loan is categorized as a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”) if a concession is granted and there is deterioration in the financial condition of the borrower. A loan classified as a TDR will generally retain such classification until the loan is paid in full. However, a one-to-four-family residential mortgage TDR loan that yields a market rate and demonstrates the ability to pay under the terms of the restructured note through a sustained period of repayment performance, which is generally one year, is removed from the TDR classification. Interest income on TDRs is accrued at the reduced rate and the loan is returned to performing status once the borrower demonstrates the ability to pay under the terms of the restructured note through a sustained period of repayment performance, which is generally six months . TDRs can take the form of a reduction of the stated interest rate, splitting a loan into separate loans and leases with market terms on one loan and concessionary terms on the other loan, receipts of assets from a debtor in partial or full satisfaction of a loan, the extension of the maturity date or dates at a stated interest rate lower than the current market rate for new debt with similar risk, the reduction of the face amount or maturity amount of the debt as stated in the instrument or other agreement, or the reduction of accrued interest or any other concessionary type of renegotiated debt. Under United’s current loan policy, a loan is not recognized as a TDR until it becomes probable that the loan will be a TDR. In response to the coronavirus (“COVID-19”) pandemic and its economic impact on our customers, United implemented a short-term modification program that complied with the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (“CARES”) Act to provide temporary payment relief to those borrowers directly impacted by COVID-19 who were not more than 30 days past due as of December 31, 2019. This program allowed for a deferral of payments from the period beginning March 1, 2020 until January 1, 2022 . As provided for under the CARES Act, these loan modifications were exempt by law from classification as a TDR as defined by GAAP. 80 Table of Contents Loans Acquired Through Transfer: Acquired loans are recorded at fair value at the date of acquisition based on a discounted cash flow methodology that considers various factors including the type of loan and related collateral, classification status, fixed or variable interest rate, term of loan and whether or not the loan was amortizing, and a discount rate reflecting the Company’s assessment of risk inherent in the cash flow estimates. Certain purchased loans are individually evaluated while certain purchased loans are grouped together according to similar risk characteristics and are treated in the aggregate when applying various valuation techniques. These cash flow evaluations are inherently subjective as they require material estimates, all of which may be susceptible to significant change. Loans acquired in a business combination that have experienced more-than-insignificant deterioration in credit quality since origination are considered purchased credit deteriorated (“PCD”) loans. At the acquisition date, an estimate of expected credit losses is made for groups of PCD loans with similar risk characteristics and individual PCD loans without similar risk characteristics. This initial allowance for credit losses is allocated to individual PCD loans and added to the purchase price or acquisition date fair values to establish the initial amortized cost basis of the PCD loans. As the initial allowance for credit losses is added to the purchase price, there is no credit loss expense recognized upon acquisition of a PCD loan. Any difference between the unpaid principal balance of PCD loans and the amortized cost basis is considered to relate to noncredit factors and results in a discount or premium. Discounts and premiums are recognized through interest income on a level-yield method over the life of the loans. For loans and leases acquired after the adoption of ASC Topic 326, United will likely take several factors into consideration when determining if loans and leases meet the definition of PCD. ASC Topic 326 lists some, but not all, factors for consideration in the bifurcation of PCD versus non-PCD assets: · Financial assets that are delinquent as of the acquisition date · Financial assets that have been downgraded since origination · Financial assets that have been placed on nonaccrual status For acquired loans not deemed purchased credit deteriorated at acquisition, the differences between the initial fair value and the unpaid principal balance are recognized as interest income on a level-yield basis over the lives of the related loans. Loans Held for Sale: Loans held for sale consist of one-to-four family conforming residential real estate loans originated for sale in the secondary market. Loans held for sale are recorded under the fair value option at a fair value measured using valuations from investors for loans with similar characteristics adjusted for the Company’s actual sales experience versus the investor’s indicated pricing. Gains and losses on sale of loans are recorded within income from mortgage banking activities. Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses: The allowance for loan losses is an estimate of the expected credit losses on financial assets measured at amortized cost to present the net amount expected to be collected as of the balance sheet date. Such allowance is based on the credit losses expected to arise over the life of the asset (contractual term). Assets are charged off when United determines that such financial assets are deemed uncollectible or based on regulatory requirements, whichever is earlier. Charge-offs are recognized as a deduction from the allowance for loan losses. Expected recoveries of amounts previously charged-off, not to exceed the aggregate of the amount previously charged-off, are included in determining the necessary reserve at the balance sheet date. United made a policy election to present the accrued interest receivable balance separately in its consolidated balance sheets from the amortized cost of a loan. United estimates the allowance balance using relevant available information, from internal and external sources, relating to past events, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Historical credit loss experience provides the basis for the estimation of expected credit losses. Adjustments to historical loss information are made for differences in current loan-specific risk characteristics such as differences in underwriting standards, portfolio mix, delinquency level or term as well as reasonable and supportable forecast adjustments for changes in environmental conditions, such as changes in unemployment rates, property values or other relevant factors. A reversion to historical loss data occurs via a straight-line method during the year following the one-year reasonable and supportable forecast period. 81 Table of Contents United pools its loans and leases based on similar risk characteristics in estimating expected credit losses. United has identified the following portfolio segments and measures the allowance for credit losses using the following methods: · Method: Probability of Default/Loss Given Default (PD/LGD) Ø Commercial Real Estate Owner-Occupied Ø Commercial Real Estate Nonowner-Occupied Ø Commercial Other · Method: Cohort Ø Residential Real Estate Ø Construction & Land Development Ø Consumer Ø Bankcard Risk characteristics of commercial real estate owner-occupied loans and commercial other loans and leases are similar in that they are normally dependent upon the borrower’s internal cash flow from operations to service debt. Commercial real estate nonowner-occupied loans differ in that cash flow to service debt is normally dependent on external income from third parties for use of the real estate such as rents, leases and room rates. Residential real estate loans are dependent upon individual borrowers who are affected by changes in general economic conditions, demand for housing and resulting residential real estate valuation. Construction and land development loans are impacted mainly by demand whether for new residential housing or for retail, industrial, office and other types of commercial construction within a given area. Consumer loan pool risk characteristics are influenced by general, regional and local economic conditions. Loans that do not share risk characteristics are evaluated on an individual basis. Loans evaluated individually are not also included in the collective evaluation. When management determines that foreclosure is probable or when the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty at the reporting date and repayment is expected to be provided substantially through the operation or sale of the collateral but may also include other non-performing loans or TDRs, expected credit losses are based on the fair value of the collateral at the reporting date, adjusted for selling costs as appropriate. These individually evaluated loans are removed from their respective pools and typically represent collateral dependent loans. In addition, the Company individually evaluates “reasonably expected” TDRs, which are identified by the Company as a loan expected to be classified as a TDR. Expected credit losses are estimated over the contractual term of the loans and leases, adjusted for expected prepayments when appropriate. The contractual term excludes expected extensions, renewals and modifications unless either of the following applies: management has a reasonable expectation at the reporting date that a troubled debt restructuring will be executed with an individual borrower, or the extension or renewal options are included in the original or modified contract at the reporting date and are not unconditionally cancelable by United. At the acquisition date, an initial allowance for expected credit losses for non-PCD loans is estimated and recorded as credit loss expense. The subsequent measurement of expected credit losses for all acquired loans is the same as the subsequent measurement of expected credit losses for originated loans. For allowance for credit losses under ASC Topic 326 calculation purposes, United includes its acquired loans and leases in their relevant pool unless they meet the criteria for specific review. Bank Premises and Equipment: Bank premises and equipment are stated at cost, less allowances for depreciation and amortization. The provision for depreciation is computed principally by the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets. Useful lives range primarily from three to 15 years for furniture, fixtures and equipment and five to 40 years for buildings and improvements. Leasehold improvements are generally amortized over the lesser of the term of the respective leases or the estimated useful lives of the improvements. Other Real Estate Owned : At December 31, 2022 and 2021, other real estate owned (“OREO”) included in other assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets was $ 2,052 ,000 and $ 14,823 ,000 , respectively. OREO consists of real estate acquired in foreclosure or other settlement of loans. Such assets are carried at the lower of the investment in the assets or the fair value of the assets less estimated selling costs. Any adjustment to the fair value at the date of transfer is charged against the 82 Table of Contents allowance for loan losses. Any subsequent valuation adjustments as well as any costs relating to operating, holding or disposing of the property are recorded in other expense in the period incurred. At December 31, 2022 and 2021, the recorded investment of consumer mortgage loans secured by residential real estate properties for which formal foreclosure proceedings are in process was $ 1,309 ,000 and $ 13 ,000 , respectively. Intangible Assets: Intangible assets relating to the estimated fair value of the deposit base of the acquired institutions are being amortized on an accelerated basis over a one to ten-year period. Management reviews intangible assets on an annual basis, or sooner if indicators of impairment exist, and evaluates changes in facts and circumstances that may indicate impairment in the carrying value. United incurred amortization expense of $ 5,516 ,000 , $ 5,908 ,000 , and $ 6,605 ,000, in 2022, 2021, and 2020, respectively, related to all intangible assets. Goodwill is tested for impairment at least annually or sooner if indicators of impairment exist. United may elect to perform a qualitative analysis to determine whether or not it is more-likely-than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If United elects to bypass this qualitative analysis, or concludes via qualitative analysis that it is more-likely-than-not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value, United may use either a market or income quantitative approach, whichever is more practical, to determine the fair value of the reporting unit to compare to its carrying value. If the estimated fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value, an impairment charge would be recorded for the excess, not to exceed the amount of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit. At each reporting date, the Company considers potential indicators of impairment. United utilized a qualitative approach to test goodwill for impairment as of September 30, 2022. The goodwill impairment test did not identify any indicators of goodwill impairment. As of December 31, 2022, and 2021, total goodwill approximated $ 1,888,889 , 000 and $ 1,886,494 ,000 , respectively. Mortgage Servicing Rights, Fees and Costs: The Company initially measures servicing assets and liabilities retained related to the sale of residential loans held for sale (“MSRs”) at fair value. For subsequent measurement purposes, the Company measures servicing assets and liabilities using the amortization method. MSRs are amortized in proportion to, and over the period of, estimated net servicing income. The amortization of the MSRs is analyzed periodically and is adjusted to reflect changes in prepayment rates and other estimates. The Company evaluates potential impairment of MSRs based on the difference between the carrying amount and current estimated fair value of the servicing rights. In determining impairment, the Company aggregates all servicing rights and stratifies them into tranches based on predominant risk characteristics. If impairment exists, a valuation allowance is established for any excess of amortized cost over the current estimated fair value by a charge to income. If the Company later determines that all or a portion of the impairment no longer exists for a particular tranche, a reduction of the allowance may be recorded as an increase to income. Service fee income is recorded for fees earned for servicing mortgage loans under servicing agreements with the Federal National Mortgage Association (“FNMA”), the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“FHLMC”), Government National Mortgage Association (“GNMA”) and certain private investors. The fees are based on a contractual percentage of the outstanding principal balance of the loans serviced and are recorded in noninterest income. Amortization of MSRs and mortgage servicing costs are charged to expense when incurred. Accrued Interest Receivable : In accordance with ASC Topic 326, the Company made the following elections regarding accrued interest receivable (“AIR”): • Presenting accrued interest receivable balances separately from their underlying instruments within the consolidated statements of financial condition. • Excluding accrued interest receivable that is included in the amortized cost of financing receivables from related disclosure requirements. • Continuing our policy to write off accrued interest receivable by reversing interest income in cases where the Company does not reasonably expect to receive payment. • Generally, not measuring an allowance for credit losses for accrued interest receivable due to the Company’s policy of writing off uncollectible accrued interest receivable balances in a timely manner. However, due to loan interest payment deferrals on certain loans and leases granted by United under the CARES Act, United assessed the collectability of the accrued interest receivables on these deferring loans and leases. As a result of this assessment, United did no t record an allowance for credit losses for accrued interest receivables not expected to be collected as of December 31, 2022 as compared to an allowance for credit losses of $ 8 ,000 as of December 31, 2021 83 Table of Contents Revenue Recognition : Interest and dividend income, loans fees, fees from trust and brokerage services, deposit services and bankcard fees are recognized and accrued as earned. Descriptions of our revenue-generating activities that are within the scope of ASC Topic 606, which are presented in our Consolidated Statements of Income as components of Other Income are discussed below. There are no significant judgements relating to the amount and timing of revenue recognition for those revenue streams under the scope of ASC Topic 606. Fees from Trust Services Revenue from trust services primarily is comprised of fees earned from the management and administration of trusts and other customer assets. Trust services include custody of assets, investment management, escrow services, and similar fiduciary activities. The Company’s performance obligation is generally satisfied over time and the resulting fees are recognized monthly, based upon the month-end market value of the assets under management and the applicable fee rate. Payment is generally received a few days after month end through a direct charge to customers’ accounts. Fees from Brokerage Services Revenue from brokerage services are recorded as the income is earned at the time the related service is performed. In return for such services, the Company charges a commission for the sales of various securities products primarily consisting of investment company shares, annuity products, and corporate debt and equity securities, for its selling and administrative efforts. For account supervision, advisory and administrative services, revenue is recognized over a period of time as earned based on customer account balances and activity. Fees from Deposit Services Service charges on deposit accounts consist of account analysis fees (i.e., net fees earned on analyzed business and public checking accounts), monthly service fees, check orders, ATM activity fees, debit card fees, and other deposit account related fees. Revenue is recognized when our performance obligation is completed which is generally monthly for account maintenance services or when a transaction has been completed (ATM or debit card activity). Bankcard Fees and Merchant Discounts Bankcard fees and merchant discounts are primarily comprised of credit card income and merchant services income. Credit card income is primarily comprised of interchange fees earned whenever the Company’s credit cards are processed through card payment networks such as Visa. Merchant services income mainly represents fees charged to merchants to process their credit card transactions. The Company’s performance obligation for bankcard fees and interchange are largely satisfied, and related revenue recognized at the time services are rendered. Payment is typically received immediately or in the following month. Advertising Costs: Advertising costs are generally expensed as incurred and included in Other Expense on the Consolidated Statements of Income. Advertising expense was $ 8,160 ,000, $ 5,781 ,000, and $ 5,611 ,000, for the years of 2022, 2021, and 2020, respectively. Income Taxes: Income tax expense is the total of the current year income tax due or refundable and the change in deferred tax assets and liabilities (excluding deferred tax assets and liabilities related to business combinations or components of other comprehensive income). Deferred tax assets and liabilities are the expected future tax amounts for the temporary differences between carrying amounts and tax bases of assets and liabilities, computed using enacted tax rates. A valuation allowance, if needed, reduces deferred tax assets to the expected amount most likely to be realized. Realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of a sufficient level of future taxable income and recoverable taxes paid in prior years. Although realization is not assured, management believes it is more-likely-than-not that all of the deferred tax assets will be realized. Interest and/or penalties related to income taxes are reported as a component of income tax expense. 84 Table of Contents For uncertain income tax positions, United records a liability based on a recognition threshold of more-likely-than-not, and a measurement attribute for all tax positions taken on a tax return, in order for those tax positions to be recognized in the financial statements. United files a consolidated income tax return with its subsidiaries. Federal income tax expense or benefit has been allocated to subsidiaries on a separate return basis. Derivative Financial Instruments: United accounts for its derivative financial instruments in accordance with ASC Topic 815 which requires all derivative instruments to be carried at fair value on the balance sheet. United has designated certain derivative instruments used to manage interest rate risk as hedge relationships with certain assets, liabilities or cash flows being hedged. Certain derivatives used for interest rate risk management are not designated in a hedge relationship. Derivative instruments designated in a hedge relationship to mitigate exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset, liability, or firm commitment attributable to a particular risk, such as interest rate risk, are considered fair value hedges. Derivative instruments designated in a hedge relationship to mitigate exposure to variability in expected future cash flows, or other types of forecasted transactions, are considered cash flow hedges. For a fair value hedge, the fair value of the interest rate swap is recognized on the balance sheet as either a freestanding asset or liability with a corresponding adjustment to the hedged financial instrument. Subsequent adjustments due to changes in the fair value of a derivative that qualifies as a fair value hedge are offset in current period earnings either in interest income or interest expense depending on the nature of the hedged financial instrument. For a cash flow hedge, the fair value of the interest rate swap is recognized on the balance sheet as either a freestanding asset or liability with a corresponding adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income within shareholders’ equity, net of tax. Subsequent adjustments due to changes in the fair value of a derivative that qualifies as a cash flow hedge are offset to accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax and reclassified into earnings in the same line associated with the forecasted transaction when the forecasted transaction affects earnings. Fair value hedges may be eligible for offset on the consolidated balance sheets because they are subject to master netting arrangements or similar agreements. United has elected not to offset the assets and liabilities subject to such arrangements on the consolidated financial statements. At inception of a hedge relationship, United formally documents the hedged item, the particular risk management objective, the nature of the risk being hedged, the derivative being used, how effectiveness of the hedge will be assessed and how the ineffectiveness of the hedge will be measured. United also assesses hedge effectiveness at inception and on an ongoing basis using regression analysis. Hedge ineffectiveness is measured by using the change in fair value method. The change in fair value method compares the change in the fair value of the hedging derivative to the change in the fair value of the hedged exposure, attributable to changes in the benchmark rate. United through its mortgage banking subsidiaries enters into interest rate lock commitments to finance residential mortgage loans with its customers. These commitments, which contain fixed expiration dates, offer the borrower an interest rate guarantee provided the loan meets underwriting guidelines and closes within the timeframe established by United. Interest rate risk arises on these commitments and subsequently closed loans if interest rates change between the time of the interest rate lock and the delivery of the loan to the investor. Market risk on interest rate lock commitments and mortgage loans held for sale is managed using corresponding forward mortgage loan sales contracts. United is a party to these forward mortgage loan sales contracts to sell loans with servicing either released or retained and short sales of mortgage-backed securities. When the interest rate is locked with the borrower, the rate lock commitment, forward sale agreement, and mortgage-backed security position are undesignated derivatives and marked to fair value through earnings. The fair value of the rate lock derivative is measured using valuations from investors for loans with similar characteristics as well as considering the probability of the loan closing (i.e. the “pull-through” rate) with some adjusted for the Company’s actual sales experience versus the investor’s indicated pricing. Fair values of TBA mortgage-backed securities are measured using valuations from investors for mortgage-backed securities with similar characteristics. Income from mortgage banking activities includes the gain recognized for the period presented and associated elements of fair value. United is subject to the Dodd-Frank Act clearing requirement for eligible derivatives. United has executed and cleared eligible derivatives through the London Clearing House (“LCH”). Variation margin at the LCH is distinguished as settled-to-market and settled daily based on the prior day value, rather than collateralized-to-market. The daily settlement of the derivative exposure does not change or reset the contractual terms of the instrument. 85 Table of Contents For derivatives that are not designated in a hedge relationship, changes in the fair value of the derivatives are recognized in earnings in the same period as the change in the fair value. Off-balance-sheet credit exposures : United maintains a reserve for lending-related commitments such as unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit. United estimates expected credit losses over the contractual period in which United is exposed to credit risk via a contractual obligation to extend credit, unless that obligation is unconditionally cancellable by United. The estimate includes consideration of the likelihood that funding will occur and an estimate of expected credit losses on commitments expected to be funded over its estimated life. Methodology is based on a loss rate approach that starts with the probability of funding based on historical experience. Similar to methodology discussed previously related to the loans and leases receivable portfolio, adjustments are made to the historical losses for current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecast. Adjustments to the reserve for lending-related commitments on off-balance sheet credit exposures is recorded as other expense in the consolidated statements of income. The reserve for lending-related commitments is separately classified on the balance sheet and is included in other liabilities. The combined allowance for loan losses and reserve for lending-related commitments is considered the allowance for credit losses on loans and leases. Stock-Based Compensation : Compensation expense related to stock options, restricted stock awards (“RSA”) and restricted stock units (“RSU”) issued to participants is based upon the fair value of the award at the date of grant. The fair value of stock options is estimated at the date of grant using a binomial lattice option pricing model, while the fair value of RSAs is based upon the stock price at the date of grant. RSU grants could be time-vested RSUs, performance-vested RSUs, or a combination of both. The value of the time-vested RSUs and the performance-vested, based on a performance condition, RSUs awarded is established as the fair market value of the stock at the time of the grant. The value of the performance-vested, based on a market condition, RSUs awarded is estimated through the use of a Monte Carlo valuation model as of the grant date. Compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period for all stock-based awards and grants. Stock-based compensation expense was $ 9,881 ,000 in 2022, $ 8,018 ,000 in 2021, and $ 5,980 ,000 in 2020. Treasury Stock : United records common stock purchased for treasury at cost. At the date of subsequent reissuance, the treasury stock account is reduced by the cost of such stock using the weighted-average cost method. Trust Assets and Income: Assets held in a fiduciary or agency capacity for customers are not included in the balance sheets since such items are not assets of the company. Trust income is reported on an accrual basis. Earnings Per Common Share: United calculates earnings per common share in accordance with ASC Topic 260, “Earnings Per Share,” which provides that unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. United has determined that its outstanding non-vested restricted stock awards are participating securities. Under the two-class method, basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing net earnings allocated to common stock by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the applicable period, excluding outstanding participating securities. Diluted earnings per common share is computed using the weighted-average number of shares determined for the basic earnings per common share computation plus the dilutive effect of stock compensation using the treasury stock method. Antidilutive stock options and restricted stock outstanding of 656,432 , 1,024,612 , and 1,926,840 for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively, were excluded from the earnings per diluted common share calculation. 86 Table of Contents The reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of basic earnings per share with that of diluted earnings per share is presented as follows: Year Ended December 31 (Dollars in thousands, except per share) 2022 2021 2020 Distributed earnings allocated to common stock $ 194,052 $ 181,614 $ 171,403 Undistributed earnings allocated to common stock 184,572 185,082 116,879 Net earnings allocated to common shareholders $ 378,624 $ 366,696 $ 288,282 Average common shares outstanding 134,776,241 129,276,452 120,017,247 Dilutive effect of stock compensation 341,271 236,401 72,985 Average diluted shares outstanding 135,117,512 129,512,853 120,090,232 Earnings per basic common share $ 2.81 $ 2.84 $ 2.40 Earnings per diluted common share $ 2.80 $ 2.83 $ 2.40 Fair Value Measurements : United determines the fair values of its financial instruments based on the fair value hierarchy established in ASC Topic 820, which also clarifies that fair value of certain assets and liabilities is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. ASC Topic 820 specifies a hierarchy of valuation techniques based on whether the inputs to those valuation techniques are observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect United’s market assumptions. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy based on these two types of inputs are as follows: Level 1 - Valuation is based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities. Level 2 - Valuation is based on observable inputs including quoted prices in active markets for similar assets and liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in less active markets, and model-based valuation techniques for which significant assumptions can be derived primarily from or corroborated by observable data in the market. Level 3 - Valuation is based on model-based techniques that use one or more significant inputs or assumptions that are unobservable in the market. When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities, United looks to active and observable markets to price identical assets or liabilities whenever possible and classifies such items in Level 1. When identical assets and liabilities are not traded in active markets, United looks to market observable data for similar assets and liabilities and classifies such items as Level 2. Nevertheless, certain assets and liabilities are not actively traded in observable markets and United must use alternative valuation techniques using unobservable inputs to determine a fair value and classifies such items as Level 3. For assets and liabilities that are not actively traded, the fair value measurement is based primarily upon estimates that require significant judgment. Therefore, the results may not be realized in an actual sale or immediate settlement of the asset or liability. Additionally, there are inherent weaknesses in any calculation technique, and changes in the underlying assumptions used, including discount rates and estimates of future cash flows, could significantly affect the results of current or future values. The level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant in the fair value measurement. Recent Accounting Pronouncements : In December 2022, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2022-06, “Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Deferral of the Sunset Date of Topic 848.” ASU 2022-06 extends the period of time financial statement preparers can utilize the reference rate reform relief guidance. In 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-04 to provide temporary, optional expedients related to the accounting for contract modifications and hedging transactions as a result of the global markets’ anticipated transition away from the use of LIBOR and other interbank offered rates to alternative reference rates. At the time ASU 2020-04 was issued, the United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) had established the intent that it would no longer be necessary to persuade, or compel, banks to submit to LIBOR after December 31, 2021. As a result, the sunset provision was set for December 31, 2022; 12 months after the 87 Table of Contents expected cessation date of all currencies and tenors of LIBOR. In March 2021, the FCA announced that the intended cessation date of LIBOR in the United States would be June 30, 2023. Accordingly, ASU 2022-06 defers the expiration date of ASU 848 to December 31, 2024. The Company has implemented a transition plan to identify and modify its loans and other financial instruments with attributes that are either directly or indirectly influenced by LIBOR. In addition, the Company took steps to ensure that no new contracts using LIBOR were originated after December 31, 2021. At this time, the Company is prioritizing the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) and Prime as the preferred alternatives to LIBOR; however, these preferred alternatives could change over time based on market developments. In June 2022, the FASB issued ASU 2022 - 03, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Fair Value Measurement of Equity Securities Subject to Contractual Sale Restrictions.” ASU 2022-03 clarifies that a contractual restriction on the sale of an equity security is not considered part of the unit of account of the equity security and, therefore, is not considered in measuring fair value. ASU 2022-03 also clarifies that an entity cannot, as a separate unit of account, recognize and measure a contractual sale restriction and requires certain new disclosures for equity securities subject to contractual sale restrictions. ASU 2022-03 will be effective for United on January 1, 2024 though early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2022-03 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations. In March 2022, the FASB issued ASU No. 2022-02, “Troubled Debt Restructurings and Vintage Disclosures”. ASU 2022-02 updates the requirements for accounting for credit losses under ASC 326, eliminates the accounting guidance on troubled debt restructurings for creditors in ASC 310-40, and enhances creditors’ disclosure requirements related to loan refinancings and restructurings for borrowers experiencing financial difficulty. ASU 2022-02 also amends the guidance on “vintage disclosures” to require disclosure of gross write-offs by year of origination. ASU No. 2022-02 is effective for public business entities that have adopted Topic 326 for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption of the amendment is permitted. ASU No. 2022-02 was adopted by United on January 1, 2023. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations. However, ASU No. 2022-02 will have an effect on the Company’s disclosures for United’s March 31, 2023 Form 10-Q. In March 2022, the FASB issued ASU No. 2022-01, “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Fair Value Hedging – Portfolio Layer Method”. ASU 2022-01 further aligns risk management objectives with hedge accounting results on the application of the last-of-layer method, which was first introduced in ASU No. 2017-12. The enhanced guidance further improves the last-of-layer concepts to expand to nonprepayable financial assets and allows more flexibility in the derivative structures used to hedge the interest rate risk. ASU 2022-01 also provides guidance on the relationship between the portfolio layer method requirements and other areas of GAAP. ASU No. 2022-01 is effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption of the amendment is permitted if an entity has adopted ASU 2017-12 for the corresponding period. ASU No. 2022-01 was adopted by United on January 1, 2023. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations. In October 2021, the FASB issued ASU No. 2021-08, “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Accounting for contract assets and contract liabilities from contracts with customers”. ASU 2021-08 amends ASC 805 to add contract assets and contract liabilities to the list of exceptions to the recognition and measurement principles that apply to business combinations and to require that an entity acquirer recognize and measure contract assets and contract liabilities acquired in a business combination in accordance with Topic 606. As a result of these amendments, it is expected that an acquirer will generally recognize and measure acquired contract assets and contract liabilities in a manner consistent with how the acquiree recognized and measured them in its preacquisition financial statements. ASU No. 2021-08 is effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The amendments should be applied prospectively to business combinations occurring on or after the effective date of the amendments. Early adoption of the amendments is permitted. ASU No. 2020-08 was adopted by United on January 1, 2023. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations. In July 2021, the FASB issued ASU No. 2021-05, “Leases (Topic 842): Lessors-Certain Leases with Variable Lease Payments (Topic 848)”. This new guidance requires a lessor to classify a lease with variable lease payments that do not depend on an index or rate as an operating lease at lease commencement if the lease would have been classified as a sales-type lease or direct financing lease in accordance with the classification criteria in ASC 842-10-25-2 and 25-3, respectively and if the lessor would have recognized a selling loss at lease commencement. When applying the guidance in ASC 842-10-24-3A, the lessor would not derecognize the underlying asset over its useful life. ASU No. 2021-05 is effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2021, including interim periods within those fiscal years. 88 Table of Contents Entities may elect to adopt the amendments through either a retrospective application to leases that commenced or were modified after the beginning of the period in which ASC 842 was adopted or a prospective application to leases that commence or are modified subsequent to the date the amendments in ASU 2021-05 are first applied. ASU No. 2021-05 was adopted by United on January 1, 2022. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations. In January 2021, the FASB issued ASU No. 2021-01, “Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848).” This update to ASU No. 2020-04, “Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting,” refines the scope of ASC Topic 848 and permits entities to elect certain optional expedients and exceptions when accounting for derivative contracts and certain hedging relationships affected by change in the interest rates used for discounting cash flows, for computing variation margin settlements, and for calculating price alignment interest in connection with reference rate reform activities under way in global financial markets. ASU No. 2021-01 is effective for public business entities upon issuance through December 31, 2022. The Company has implemented a transition plan to identify and modify its loans and other financial instruments with attributes that are either directly or indirectly influenced by LIBOR. In addition, the Company took steps to ensure that no new contracts using LIBOR were originated after December 31, 2021. At this time, United is prioritizing the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) and Prime as the preferred alternatives to LIBOR; however, these preferred alternatives could change over time based on market developments. In August 2020, the FASB issued No. 2020-06, “Debt – Debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging – Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40).” The amendments in the ASU remove certain separation models for convertible debt instruments and convertible preferred stock that require the separation of a convertible debt instrument into a debt component and an equity or derivative component. The ASU also amends the derivative scope exception guidance for contracts in an entity’s own equity. The amendments remove three settlement conditions that are required for equity contracts to qualify for the derivative scope exception. In addition, the ASU expands disclosure requirements for convertible instruments and simplifies areas of the guidance for diluted earnings-per-share calculations that are impacted by the amendments. ASU No. 2020-06 is effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2021, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Entities may elect to adopt the amendments through either a modified retrospective method of transition or a fully retrospective method of transition. ASU No. 2020-06 was adopted by United on January 1, 2022. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations. In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2020-04, “Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting.” The ASU provides “optional expedients and exceptions for applying generally accepted accounting principles to contract modifications and hedging relationships, subject to meeting certain criteria, that reference LIBOR or another reference rate expected to be discontinued.” ASU No. 2020-04 is effective for public business entities on March 12, 2020 through December 31, 2022. United is implementing a transition plan to identify and modify its loans and other financial instruments with attributes that are either directly or indirectly influenced by LIBOR. The Company is assessing ASU No. 2020-04 and its impact on the Company’s transition away from LIBOR for its loan and other financial instruments. In February 2020, FASB issued ASU No. 2020-03, “Codification Improvements to Financial Instruments.” This update makes narrow-scope changes that are intended to improve the board’s standards for financial instruments accounting, including the credit losses standard issued in 2016, as part of FASB’s ongoing project to improve and clarify its Accounting Standards Codification and avoid unintended application. ASU No. 2020-03 was effective for public business entities upon issuance of this final update in March 2020. ASU No. 2020-03 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations. In January 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2020-01, “Investments—Equity Securities (Topic 321), Investments—Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323), and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815)—Clarifying the Interactions between Topic 321, Topic 323, and Topic 815.” The new guidance addresses accounting for the transition into and out of the equity method and measuring certain purchased options and forward contracts to acquire investments. ASU No. 2020-01 is effective for public companies for fiscal years, and interim fiscal periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2020; early adoption is permitted. ASU No. 2020-01 was adopted by United on January 1, 2021. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations. 89 Table of Contents NOTE B—MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS On December 3, 2021 (the “Acquisition Date”), United completed its acquisition of Community Bankers Trust Corporation (“Community Bankers Trust”). Community Bankers Trust was merged with and into United (the “Merger”), pursuant to the terms of the Agreement and Plan of Reorganization, dated June 2, 2021, by and between United and Community Bankers Trust (the “Agreement”). Under the terms of the Agreement, each outstanding share of common stock of Community Bankers Trust was converted into the right to receive 0.3173 shares of United common stock, par value $ 2.50 per share. Also, pursuant to the Agreement, at the effective time of the Merger, each outstanding Community Bankers Trust stock option granted under a Community Bankers Trust stock plan, whether vested or unvested as of the date of the Merger, vested as provided pursuant to the terms of such Community Bankers Trust stock plan and converted into an option to acquire United common stock adjusted based on the 0.3173 exchange ratio. Also, at the effective time of the Merger, each restricted stock unit granted under a Community Bankers Trust stock plan that was outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the Merger vested in accordance with the formula and other terms of the Community Bankers Trust stock plan and converted into the right to receive shares of United common stock based on the 0.3173 exchange ratio. Immediately following the Merger, Essex Bank, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Community Bankers Trust, merged with and into United Bank, a wholly-owned subsidiary of United (the “Bank Merger”) pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated June 2, 2021. United Bank survived the Bank Merger and continues to exist as a Virginia banking corporation. The Merger was accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting. The results of operations of Community Bankers Trust are included in the consolidated results of operations from the Acquisition Date. The acquisition of Community Bankers Trust enhanced United’s existing presence in the DC Metro MSA and took United into new markets including Baltimore, Annapolis, Lynchburg, Richmond, and the Northern Neck of Virginia. It also strategically connected our Mid-Atlantic and Southeast footprints. As of the Acquisition Date, Community Bankers Trust had $ 1,788,013,000 in total assets, $ 1,282,997,000 in loans and leases, net of unearned income and $ 1,517,502,000 in deposits. For the year of 2022, United recorded acquisition-related costs for the Community Bankers Trust merger of $ 537,000 as compared to acquisition-related costs of $ 21,418,000 , including a provision for credit losses of $ 12,288,000 for non-PCD loans, for the year of 2021. The aggregate purchase price was approximately $ 260,304,000 , including common stock valued at $ 252,321 ,000, stock options assumed valued at $ 7,958,000 , and cash paid for fractional shares of $ 25,000 . The number of shares issued in the transaction was 7,135,771 , which were valued based on the closing market price of $ 35.36 for United’s common shares on December 3, 2021. The purchase price was allocated to the identifiable tangible and intangible assets resulting in additions to goodwill, and core deposit intangibles of $ 78,849,000 and $ 3,398,000 , respectively. The goodwill recognized results from the expected synergies and potential earnings from the combination of United and Community Bankers Trust. The core deposit intangible is expected to be amortized on an accelerated basis over ten years. Because the consideration paid was greater than the net fair value of the acquired assets and liabilities, the Company recorded goodwill as part of the acquisition. None of the goodwill from the Community Bankers Trust acquisition is expected to be deductible for tax purposes. United used an independent third party to help determine the fair values of the assets and liabilities acquired from Community Bankers Trust. As a result of the merger, United recorded fair value discounts of $ 7,744,000 on the loans and leases acquired, $ 230,000 on land acquired, $ 50,000 on OREO properties acquired and $ 415,000 on a trust preferred issuance, and premiums of $ 6,766,000 on investment securities acquired, $ 492,000 on buildings acquired, $ 2,741,000 on interest-bearing deposits, and $ 457,000 on long-term FHLB advances, respectively. United also recorded an allowance for credit losses, including a reserve for unfunded commitments, of $ 25,920,000 on the loans and commitments acquired split between $ 12,788,000 for purchased credit deteriorated (“PCD”) loans which is part of the acquisition date fair value, $ 12,288,000 for non-PCD loans recorded to the provision for credit losses and $ 844,000 for commitments acquired on non-PCD loans recorded in other expense. The discounts and premium amounts, except for discount on the land, OREO and FHLB advances acquired, are being accreted or amortized on an accelerated or straight-line basis, based on the type of asset or liability, over each asset’s or liability’s estimated remaining life at the time of acquisition. The FHLB advances acquired were subsequently repaid prior to year-end. At December 31, 2022, the discount on the trust preferred issuance had an estimated remaining life of 11.25 years and the premiums on the buildings, and interest-bearing deposits each had an average estimated remaining life of 30.25 years, and 4.25 years, respectively. 90 Table of Contents Portfolio loans and leases acquired from Community Bankers Trust were recorded at their fair value at the Acquisition Date based on a discounted cash flow methodology. The estimated fair value incorporates adjustments related to market loss assumptions and prevailing market interest rates for comparable assets and other market factors such as liquidity from the perspective of a market participant. Also, acquired portfolio loans and leases were evaluated upon acquisition and classified as either PCD, which indicates that the loan has experienced a more-than-insignificant deterioration in credit quality since origination, or non-PCD. United considered a variety of factors in evaluating the acquired loans and leases for a more-than-insignificant deterioration in credit quality, including but not limited to risk grades, delinquency, nonperforming status, current or previous troubled debt restructurings or bankruptcies, watch list credits and other qualitative factors that indicated a deterioration in credit quality since origination. For PCD loans and leases, an initial allowance is determined based on the same methodology as other portfolio loans and leases. This initial allowance for credit losses is allocated to individual PCD loans and leases and added to the acquisition date fair values to establish the initial amortized cost basis for the PCD loans and leases. The difference between the unpaid principal balance (“UPB”), or par value, of PCD loans and leases and the amortized cost basis is considered to relate to noncredit factors and resulted in a discount of $ 3,559,000 at Acquisition Date. This discount will be recognized through interest income on a level-yield method over the life of the loans which is estimated to be a weighted-average of 5.5 years. For non-PCD acquired loans and leases, the differences between the initial fair value and the UPB, or par value, are recognized as interest income on a level-yield basis over the lives of the related loans and leases which is estimated to be a weighted-average of 5.6 years. The total fair value mark on the non-PCD loans and leases at the Acquisition Date was $ 4,186,000 . At the Acquisition Date, an initial allowance for expected credit losses of $ 12,288,000 was recorded with a corresponding charge to the provision for credit losses in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Subsequent changes in the allowance for credit losses related to PCD and non-PCD loans and leases are recognized in the provision for credit losses. The following table provides a reconciliation of the difference between the purchase price and the par value of portfolio PCD loans and leases acquired from Community Bankers Trust as of the Acquisition Date: (Dollars in thousands) Purchase price of PCD loans and leases at acquisition $ 360,638 Allowance for credit losses at acquisition 12,629 Non-credit discount at acquisition 3,559 Par value (UPB) of acquired PCD loans and leases at acquisition $ 376,826 The consideration paid for Community Bankers Trust’s common equity and the amounts of acquired identifiable assets and liabilities assumed as of the Community Bankers Trust Acquisition Date were as follows: (Dollars in thousands) Purchase price: Value of common shares issued (7,135,771 shares) $ 252,321 Fair value of stock options assumed 7,958 Cash for fractional shares 25 Total purchase price 260,304 Identifiable assets: Cash and cash equivalents 39,445 Investment securities 395,249 Net loans and leases 1,280,016 Premises and equipment 25,857 Operating lease right-of-use asset 8,127 Core deposit intangible 3,398 Other assets 50,851 Total identifiable assets $ 1,802,943 Identifiable liabilities: Deposits $ 1,520,243 Short-term borrowings 26,755 Long-term borrowings 51,500 Operating lease liability 8,127 Other liabilities 14,863