Item 3. Legal Proceedings
Item 3. Legal Proceedings.
On November 11, 2021, we, and certain of our officers, were named as defendants in a federal securities class-action lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court Central District of California. The lawsuit was purportedly brought on behalf of purchasers of our Class A common stock. The lawsuit alleges that we and certain of our officers made false or misleading statements and omissions concerning the impact that Apple’s App Tracking Transparency framework would have on our business. Defendants seek monetary damages and other relief. We believe we have meritorious defenses to the lawsuit, and continue to defend it vigorously, but litigation is inherently uncertain and an unfavorable outcome could seriously harm our business.
Beginning on January 20, 2022, we were named as defendants in various federal and state courts by plaintiffs alleging that the design and use of our platform, and those of our competitors, is addictive and harmful to minor users’ mental health. The majority of cases have been consolidated in either a federal Multi-District Litigation pending in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California (“MDL”) or a California Judicial Council Coordinated Proceeding (“JCCP”) pending in the Complex Division of the Los Angeles County Superior Court. On October 13, 2023, the court in the JCCP litigation issued a ruling dismissing some of the claims against us, but allowing the plaintiffs’ negligence claim to proceed. Numerous school districts have filed public nuisance claims based on similar allegations, which also have been consolidated in either the MDL or JCCP. We believe we have meritorious defenses to these lawsuits, and continue to defend them vigorously, but litigation is inherently uncertain and an unfavorable outcome could seriously harm our business.
On August 2, 2022, we, and certain of our directors, were named as defendants in a class-action lawsuit in Delaware Chancery Court purportedly brought on behalf of Class A stockholders, alleging that a transaction between our co-founders and us, in which our co-founders agreed to employment agreements and we agreed to amend our certificate of incorporation and issue a stock dividend if certain conditions were met, was not advantageous to the stockholders, constituted a breach of fiduciary duty, and should have been put to a vote of the Class A stockholders. In June 2023, we entered into a Stipulation of Compromise and Settlement to settle and dismiss the lawsuit, with prejudice, subject to approval by the court and the satisfaction of various conditions. The parties entered an amended Stipulation of Compromise and Settlement in December 2023. The settlement would, among other things, modify the conditions for the issuance of the stock dividend. While we continue to believe we have meritorious defenses to the lawsuit, we understand
51
Table of Contents
that litigation is inherently uncertain and have agreed to the settlement to resolve the disputes, avoid the costs and risks of further litigation, and avoid unwarranted distractions to our management.
On October 13, 2022, we were named as a defendant in a lawsuit in Los Angeles Superior Court alleging that we should be responsible for the deaths of young people who died from ingesting fatal doses of fentanyl after communicating on Snapchat with drug dealers concerning drug transactions. Other similar lawsuits were filed on behalf of other families, which were coordinated with the first-filed case and assigned to the same judge. On January 2, 2024, the judge granted in part and overruled in part our demurrer to the lawsuit, allowing several of the claims to proceed. We believe we have meritorious defenses to these lawsuits, and plan to continue to defend them vigorously, but litigation is inherently uncertain and an unfavorable outcome could seriously harm our business.
We are currently involved in, and may in the future be involved in, legal proceedings, claims, inquiries, and investigations in the ordinary course of our business, including claims for infringing intellectual property rights related to our products and the content contributed by our users and partners. Although the results of these proceedings, claims, inquiries, and investigations cannot be predicted with certainty, we do not believe that the final outcome of these matters is reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or results of operations. Regardless of final outcomes, however, any such proceedings, claims, inquiries, and investigations may nonetheless impose a significant burden on management and employees and may come with costly defense costs or unfavorable preliminary and interim rulings.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.
Not applicable.
52
Table of Contents
PART II