QUEST PATENT RESEARCH CORP 10-K

ITEM 1. BUSINESS Overview We are an intellectual property asset management company. Our principal operations include the acquisition, licensing and enforcement of intellectual property rights that are either owned or controlled by us or one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries. We currently own, control or manage twenty-four intellectual property portfolios of which we are currently seeking or may seek monetization with respect to seven, which principally consist of patent rights. As part of our intellectual property asset management activities and in the ordinary course of our business, it has been necessary for us or the intellectual property owner who we represent to initiate, and it is likely to continue to be necessary to initiate, patent infringement lawsuits and engage in patent infringement litigation in order to generate revenue. We anticipate that our primary source of revenue will come from the grant of licenses to use our intellectual property, including primarily licenses granted as part of the settlement of patent infringement lawsuits. Intellectual property monetization includes the generation of revenue and proceeds from the licensing of patents, patented technologies and other intellectual property rights. Patent litigation is often, and for us has been, a necessary element of intellectual property monetization where a patent owner, or a representative of the patent owner, seeks to protect its patent rights against the unlicensed manufacture, sale, and use of the owner’s patent rights or products which incorporate the owner’s patent rights. In general, we seek to monetize the bundle of rights granted by the patents through structured licensing and when necessary, enforcement of those rights through litigation, although to date all of our patent license revenues have resulted from litigation. To date all of our revenue from the licensing of our patents has resulted from litigation commenced by us. We intend to seek to develop our business by acquiring intellectual property rights, either in the form of ownership of or an exclusive license to the underlying intellectual property. Our goal is to enter into agreements with inventors or owners of innovative technologies for which we believe there may be a significant market for products which use or incorporate the intellectual property. We seek to purchase all of, or interests in, intellectual property in exchange for cash, securities of our company, the formation or a joint venture or separate subsidiary in which the owner has an equity interest, and/or interests in the monetization of those assets. Our revenue from this aspect of our business can be generated through licensing and, when necessary, which is typically the case, litigation. We engage in due diligence and a principled risk underwriting process to evaluate the merits and potential value of any acquisition, partnership or joint venture. We seek to structure the terms of our acquisitions in a manner that will achieve the highest risk-adjusted returns possible, in the context of our financial condition which often results in a structure whereby either the seller or the financing source receives the first net proceeds from monetization of the intellectual property. Thus, in connection with the acquisition of intellectual property portfolios, we have granted the party providing the financing an interest in any recovery we have with respect to the intellectual property purchased with the financing, and we expect that we will have to continue to grant such interests until and unless we have generated sufficient cash from licensing our intellectual property to enable us to acquire additional intellectual property portfolios without outside financing. However, we cannot assure you that we will ever generate sufficient revenues to enable us to purchase additional intellectual property without third-party financing. We employ a due diligence process before completing the acquisition of an intellectual property interest. We begin with an investment thesis supporting the potential transaction and then proceed to test the thesis through an examination of the critical drivers of the value of the underlying intellectual property asset. Such an examination focuses on areas such as title and inventorship issues, the quality of the drafting and prosecution of the intellectual property assets, legal risks inherent in licensing programs generally, the applicability of the invention to the relevant marketplace and other issues such as the effects of venue and other procedural issues. If we require financing to acquire intellectual property, we will have to satisfy our financing sources, which may be QPRC Finance and QF3, that we have the ability to monetize the intellectual property. However, our financial position may affect our ability to conduct adequate due diligence with respect to intellectual property rights or to acquire valuable intellectual property. This due diligence effort is conducted by our chief executive officer, who is our only full-time employee. 1 It has been necessary to commence litigation in order to obtain a recovery for past infringement of, or to license the use of, our intellectual property rights. Intellectual property litigation is very expensive, with no certainty of any recovery. To the extent possible we seek to engage counsel on a contingent fee or partial contingent fee basis, which significantly reduces our litigation cost, but which also reduces the value of the recovery to us. We do not have the resources to enable us to fund the cost of litigation. To the extent that we cannot secure counsel on a contingent basis and cannot fund litigation ourselves, which, considering our financial position, is likely to be the case, we may enter into an agreement with a third-party, which may be an independent third-party, such as QPRC Finance or QF3, to finance the cost of litigation. In view of our limited cash and our working capital deficiency, we are not able to institute any monetization program that may require litigation unless we engage counsel on a fully contingent basis, or we obtain funding from third-party funding sources. In these cases, counsel may be afforded a greater participation in the recovery and the third-party that funds the litigation would be entitled to participate in any recovery. Agreements with QPRC Finance On April 11, 2025, the Company and its newly-formed wholly-owned subsidiary, MR Licensing LLC, a Texas limited liability company (“MR”), entered into a series of agreements, all dated April 11, 2025, with QPRC Corporate Finance Alpha LLC and QPRC Corporate Finance Bravo LLC, both of which are not affiliated with the Company and are related to QFL and QF3 and who are collectively referred to as “QPRC Finance.” The agreements are (i) a prepaid forward purchase agreement (the “QPRC Finance Purchase Agreement”), (ii) a security agreement (the “QPRC Finance Security Agreement”), (iii) a patent security agreement (the “QPRC Finance Patent Security Agreement”), (iv) an intercreditor agreement and subordination agreement (the “Subordination Agreement”) among the Company, MR, other subsidiaries of the Company and Intelligent Partners, (v) an irrevocable letter of instructions to Fabricant LLP, the law firm that is to represent MR in the litigation relating to the monetization of the patents to be purchased with the proceeds of the financing from QPRC Finance (the “Law Firm”) as to the disposition of any funds generated from the proceeds of the financing, (the “Letter of Instructions”), (vi) a waterfall agreement among the Company, MR, QPRC Finance and the Law Firm as to allocation of proceeds of such monetization (the “Waterfall Agreement” and, together with the QPRC Finance Purchase Agreement, the QPRC Finance Security Agreement, the QPRC Finance Patent Security Agreement, the Subordination Agreement and the Letter of Instructions, the “QPRC Finance Investment Documents”). On April 17, 2025, Intelligent Partners executed the Subordination Agreement. Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, QPRC Finance agreed to make available to the Company a financing facility of: (a) up to $3,000,000 for operating expenses, of which approximately $1,500,000 has been drawn down as of December 31, 2025; (b) up to $9,000,000 to fund the purchase by MR of certain patent assets from Monterey Research LLC (“Monterey”) pursuant to the agreement between MR and Monterey (the “Monterey Agreement”) and (c) up to $7,500,000 for patent enforcement costs, including legal fees subject to budget limitations to be agreed upon, of which approximately $4,054,000 was drawn down during the year ended December 31, 2025. In return, the Company transferred to QPRC Finance the right to receive a portion of net proceeds generated from the monetization of those patents. On April 18, 2025, MR took down $9,000,000 of proceeds from the QPRC Finance financing to purchase the patent portfolio from Monterey, which consisted of more than 2,500 United States patents, foreign patents and patent applications, pursuant to the Monterey Agreement. These patents relate to data storage device security and semiconductor circuitry. The payment was made directly from QPRC Finance to Monterey in accordance with instructions from the Company and MR. The Monterey Agreement provides that after MR has received an amount equal to 200% of the sum of the purchase price plus other money deployed to the monetization of the assigned patents, the next $7,000,000 is paid to Monterey and thereafter Monterey is to receive 20% of net licensing revenues. 2 Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the Company and MR transferred to QPRC Finance the right to receive a portion of net proceeds generated from the monetization of those patents covered by the Security Agreement, during which time the Company and MR do not receive any portion of the net proceeds. The Waterfall Agreement sets forth the details of the order of payment. Pursuant to the Waterfall Agreement, (i) 100% of the net proceeds is paid to QPRC Finance until QPRC Finance has received its initial recovery amount; (ii) 90% of the net proceeds are distributed to QPRC Finance and 10% to the Company and MR until QPRC Finance has received an amount determined pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, and (iii) any net proceeds remaining after the foregoing distributions are paid to the Company and MR and the Law Firm in accordance with the Waterfall Agreement, in view of the plan to pay the Law Firm pursuant to a budget from the distribution allocated to patent enforcement costs. Any contingent payments due Monterey in addition to the $9,000,000 paid from the initial distribution from QPRC Finance shall be paid from the funds paid to the Company and MR pursuant to the Waterfall Agreement. Except in an Event of Default, as defined therein, all payment obligations by the Company and MR to QPRC Finance pursuant to the Purchase Agreement are non-recourse and shall be paid only from net proceeds from monetization, if any, of the patent rights owned or acquired by the Company or MR utilizing the QPRC Finance facility. Agreements with QF3, QFL and Intelligent Partners On March 12, 2023, we entered into a funding agreement with QF3. Pursuant to the QF3 Purchase Agreement, QF3 agreed to make available to us a financing facility of: (a) up to $25,000,000 for the acquisition of mutually agreed patent rights that we intend to monetize, of which no amounts have been requested or received as of December 31, 2025; (b) up to $4,334,000 for operating expenses, of which the we have requested and received $4,334,000 as of December 31, 2025; and (iii) $3,300,000 to fund the cash payment portion of the purchase price of a patent portfolio acquired from Tower Semiconductor Ltd. (“Tower”). In return we transferred to QF3 a right to receive a portion of net proceeds generated from the monetization of the Tower patents. We used $3,300,000 proceeds from the QF3 financing as the cash payment portion of the purchase price of a portfolio acquired from Tower. Our obligations to QF3 are secured by the proceeds from the patents acquired with QF3’s funding, the patents and all general intangibles now or hereafter arising from or related to the foregoing and the proceeds and products of the foregoing. On February 22, 2021, we entered into a funding agreement with QFL and a restructure agreement with Intelligent Partners. Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement with QFL, QFL made available to us a total of $6,402,000, consisting of (a) $2,653,000 for the acquisition of mutually agreed patent rights that we intended to monetize; (b) $2,000,000 for operating expenses; and (iii) $1,750,000 to fund the cash payment portion of the restructure of our obligations to Intelligent Partners. In return we transferred to QFL a right to receive a portion of net proceeds generated from the monetization of those patents. On May 2, 2024 the funding agreement with QFL was amended and restated to terminate QFL’s funding obligation. During the year ended December 31, 2024 we repaid the full outstanding principal balance of $1,525,502. No further advances are to be made pursuant to the Purchase Agreement. In connection with the QFL Purchase Agreement, we also granted QFL a ten-year warrant to purchase a total of up to 962,463 shares of our common stock, with an exercise price of $0.54 per share which may be exercised through February 18, 2031 on a cash or cashless basis, subject to certain limitations on exercisability. The warrant also contains certain minimum ownership percentage antidilution rights pursuant to which the aggregate number of shares of common stock purchasable upon the initial exercise of the Warrant shall not be less than 10% of the aggregate number of outstanding shares of our capital stock (determined on a fully diluted basis). A portion of any gain from sale of the shares, net of taxes and costs of exercise, realized prior to the completion of all monetization activities shall be credited against the total return due to QFL pursuant to the Purchase Agreement. We also agreed to take all commercially reasonable steps necessary to regain compliance with the OTCQB eligibility standards as soon as practicable, but in no event later than 12 months from the closing date, and we regained compliance on May 7, 2021. We granted QFL registration rights with respect to the common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants. We also granted QFL certain board observation rights. Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, all of the net proceeds from the monetization of the intellectual property acquired with funds from QFL are paid directly to QFL. After QFL has received a negotiated rate of return, we and QFL share net proceeds equally until QFL achieves its investment return, as defined in the agreement. Thereafter, we retain 100% of all net proceeds. Except in an Event of Default, as defined therein, all payments by us to QFL pursuant to the Purchase Agreement are non-recourse and shall be paid only if and after net proceeds from monetization of the patent rights owned or acquire by us are received, or to be received. 3 Contemporaneously with the execution of the agreements with QFL, we entered into a restructure agreement with Intelligent Partners to eliminate any obligations we had with respect to the outstanding notes and the securities purchase agreement. As part of the restructure of our agreements with Intelligent Partners, we amended the existing MPAs and granted Intelligent Partners certain rights in the monetization proceeds from any new intellectual property we acquire. Under these MPAs, Intelligent Partners receives a 60% interest in the proceeds from our intellectual property owned by the eight Subsidiary Guarantors. Intelligent Partners also participates in the monetization proceeds from new intellectual property that we acquire until the total payments under all the monetization participation agreements equal $2,805,000, as follows: for net proceeds between $0 and $1,000,000, Intelligent Partners receives 10% of the net proceeds realized from new patents, except that if, in any calendar quarter, net proceeds realized by us exceed $1,000,000, Intelligent Partners’ entitlement for that quarter only shall increase to 30% on the portion of net proceeds in excess of $1,000,000 but less than $3,000,000. If in the same calendar quarter, net proceeds exceed $3,000,000, Intelligent Partners’ entitlement for that quarter only shall increase to 50% on the portion of net proceeds in excess of $3,000,000. The payments with respect to the new patents terminate once total payments to Intelligent Partners under all monetization participation agreements reach $2,805,000. The payments to Intellectual Partners with respect new patents are payable from the proceeds which are allocated to us under the QFL and QF3 agreements, which start after QFL and QF3 have received a negotiated rate of return. In connection with the restructure agreement with Intelligent Partners, we entered into a board observation rights agreement with Intelligent Partners. On April 17, 2025, Intelligent Partners notified the Company that it plans to exercise its rights under the board observation rights agreement. Our Organization We were incorporated in Delaware on July 17, 1987 under the name Phase Out of America. On September 21, 1997, we changed our name to Quest Products Corporation, and, on June 6, 2007, we changed our name to Quest Patent Research Corporation. We have been engaged in the intellectual property monetization business since 2008. Our executive principal office is located at 411 Theodore Fremd Ave., Suite 206S, Rye, New York 10580-1411, telephone (888) 743-7577. Our website is www.qprc.com. Information contained on or derived from our website, or any other website or any social media does not constitute a part of this annual report. Our Intellectual Property Portfolios Intellectual Property Rights We have twenty-four intellectual property portfolios of which we are seeking to monetize the intellectual property rights of seven portfolios. Our operating subsidiaries own or control the rights to these patent portfolios, covering technologies used in a variety of industries. We generate revenues and related cash flows primarily from licenses granted as part of the settlement of patent infringement lawsuits for the use of patented technologies that our operating subsidiaries control or own. The seven portfolios which we are currently planning or seeking to monetize are described below. EDI Portfolio In July 2022, EDI acquired, via assignment from Edward D. Ioli Trust, all right title and interest to a portfolio of five United States patents and related applications relating to a system and method for controlling vehicles and for providing assistance to operated vehicles (“EDI Portfolio”) for a purchase price consisting of 50% of the net proceeds resulting from monetization of the EDI Portfolio. HPE Portfolio Acquired in July 2022 pursuant to an agreement with Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP and Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company, the HPE portfolio consists of eight United States Patents across five patent families which relate generally to systems and methods around hardware, software and system security and capabilities (“HPE Portfolio”). We requested and received a capital advance from QFL in the amount of $350,000, which was used to make payment of the purchase price pursuant to the terms of the purchase agreement. The HPE Portfolio is held by our wholly owned subsidiary, Flash Uplink LLC. HID Portfolio Acquired by Harbor in March 2023 from Tower, the HID Portfolio consists of seven United States Patents which relate generally to the field of fabrication of semiconductor structures and circuits. We requested and received a capital advance from QF3 in the amount of $3,300,000, which was used to make payment of the purchase price pursuant to the terms of the purchase agreement. Pursuant to the acquisition agreement, Tower is entitled to a portion of the net proceeds, if any, from monetization of the HID Portfolio. 4 Koyo Portfolio Acquired in August 2023 by our wholly owned subsidiary, Koyo Licensing LLC pursuant to a purchase agreement with Koji Yoden for the acquisition of two United States Patents relating generally to a user interface at a computing device with a sensitive display (“Koyo Portfolio”). Pursuant to the purchase agreement, after recovery of the purchase price Mr. Yoden is entitled to a portion of net proceeds, if any, as defined in the purchase agreement. Taasera Portfolio Acquired by our wholly-owned subsidiary, Taasera Licensing LLC (“TLL”), this portfolio consists of 29 United States patents and two foreign patents which generally relate to the field of network security (the “Taasera Portfolio”). In June 2021 seven patents were acquired via assignment from Taasera, Inc. for the purchase price of $250,000. In August 2021 acquired a portfolio of network security patents from Daedalus Blue LLC (“DBL”) consisting of 22 United States patents and 2 foreign patents. Original assignees of the patents acquired from DBL include International Business Machines Corporation, Internet Security Systems, Inc. and Fiberlink Communications Corporation (“Fiberlink”). ISS and Fiberlink were acquired by IBM in 2006 and 2013, respectively. In September 2019, IBM divested over 500 United States patent assets, as well as a number of foreign counterparts in Asia, Europe, and elsewhere, to Daedalus Group, and affiliate of DBL. Pursuant to the acquisition agreement, DBL is entitled to a portion of the net proceeds from monetization of the TLL portfolio. Multimodal Media Portfolio Acquired by our wholly owned subsidiary, Multimodal Media LLC (“MML”), the Multimodal Media portfolio consists of fifteen United States patents and one pending application which generally relate to systems and methods of recording and sending interactive messages and voice messages using mobile devices, as well as completing a communication after an incomplete call (the “Multimodal Media Portfolio”). MML advanced $642,000 at closing pursuant to an agreement, as amended, with Aawaaz Inc. (“AI”). Under the agreement, MML retains an amount equal to the purchase price plus any fees incurred out of net proceeds, as defined in the agreement, after which AI is entitled to a percentage of further net proceeds realized, if any. MR Portfolio Acquired by our wholly owned subsidiary, MR Licensing LLC (“MR”), the MR portfolio consists of over 2,500 United States patents which generally relate to data storage device security and semiconductor circuitry. MR advanced $9,000,000 at closing pursuant to an agreement with Monterey Research LLC (“Monterey”). Under the agreement, MR retains an amount equal to the purchase price plus any fees incurred out of net proceeds, as defined in the agreement, after which Monterey is entitled to a percentage of further net proceeds realized, if any. Other Portfolios We also own 17 additional portfolios; however, we do not anticipate allocating any resources to the monetization of the intellectual property of these portfolios. During 2025 and 2024, we generated revenue from the portfolios described below. Deepwell Portfolio Acquired in January 2022, the Deepwell portfolio consists of 12 United States patents and related assets (“Deepwell Portfolio”). Certain of the patents relate generally to the manufacture and operation of integrated circuits. More particularly, embodiments of the present invention relate to 1) selectively coupling Voltage feeds to body bias Voltage in an integrated circuit device; 2) routing body-bias voltage to the MOSFETS (metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistors). Certain other patents in the portfolio relate generally to method and system for conservatively managing store capacity available to a processor issuing stores including but not limited to the utilization of a counter mechanism, whereas the counter mechanism is incremented or decremented based on the occurrence of particular events. In September 2023, Deepwell brought a patent infringement suit in the U.S. District for the Eastern District of Texas against MediaTek Inc. The actions against MediaTek Inc. were resolved in 2024 and revenue for the year ended December 31, 2024 includes revenue from the related settlement. 5 Pending Litigation and Recent Settlements In November 2021, TLL brought patent infringement suits in the U.S. District for the Eastern District of Texas against Trend Micro Incorporated. In March 2022, Trend Micro, Inc. filed a complaint against TLL in the U.S. District for the Western District of Texas seeking declaratory judgement of non-infringement of the patents subject to the litigation. In February 2022, TLL brought patent infringement suits in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas against Checkpoint Software Technologies Ltd. and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. In March 2022, TLL voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice, the action against Palo Alto Networks, Inc. In March 2022, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. filed a complaint against TLL and the Company in the U.S. District for the Southern District of New York seeking declaratory judgement of non-infringement of the patents in suit. In May 2022, Trend Micro Inc. filed a motion with the Panel on Multidistrict Litigation seeking to have the pending actions consolidated into a centralized multidistrict litigation for pretrial proceedings. In August 2022, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation consolidated all actions in the U.S. District for the Eastern District of Texas. In October 2022, TLL brought patent infringement suits in the U.S. District for the Eastern District of Texas against Fortinet, Inc., Crowdstrike, Inc. et.al., and Musarubra US, LLC. The actions against Trend Micro Incorporated, Checkpoint Software Technologies Ltd, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Crowdstrike, Inc. were resolved in 2023 and our revenue for the year ended December 31, 2023 included revenue from the related settlements. In February 2024, TLL brought patent infringement suits in the U.S. Districdt for the Eastern District of Texas against Sonicwall, Inc. The actions against Fortinet, Inc., Musarubra US LLC, and Sonicwall Inc. have been resolved and revenue for the year ended December 31, 2024 includes revenue from the related settlements. In November 2021, MML brought patent infringement suits in the U.S. District for the Eastern District of Texas against ZTE Corporation and Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Corp., Ltd. In November 2022, MML brought patent infringement suits in the U.S. District for the Eastern District of Texas against Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al and TCL Technology Group Corporation et al. In June 2022, MML and AI agreed to amend the Purchase Agreement to add two additional patent families for an additional $92,000. We requested and received a capital advance from QFL in the amount of $92,000, which we used to make payment to AI in August 2022 pursuant to the amendment to the Purchase Agreement. The actions against ZTE Corporation and Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Corp., Ltd. were resolved in 2023 and revenue for the year ended December 31, 2023 included revenue from the related settlements. The actions against Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Et al were resolved in 2024 and revenue for the year ended December 31, 2024 includes revenue from the related settlement. In September 2023, Deepwell brought a patent infringement suit in the U.S. District for the Eastern District of Texas against MediaTek Inc. The action against MediaTek, Inc. has been resolved and revenue for the year ended December 31, 2024 includes revenue from the related settlement. In February 2024, Harbor Island Dynamic brought a patent infringement suit in the U.S. District for the Eastern District of Texas against Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. (“Samsung”). In August 2024, Harbor Island Dynamic brought a patent infringement suit in the U.S. District for the Eastern District of Texas against NXP Semiconductors NV et. al. Samsung’s 2024 petitions for review were granted in April 2025. These actions are pending. In April 2025, MR brought patent infringement suits in the U.S. District for the Eastern District of Texas against Renesas Electronics Corporation, Denso Corporation and Denso International America. In June 2025, MR brought patent infringement suits in the U.S. District for the Eastern District of Texas against Seagate Technology Holdings Plc, Seagate Singapore International Headquarters Pte. Ltd, Seagate Technology International, Seagate Technology (Thailand) Limited, and Seagate Technology (Netherlands) BV. In August 2025, MR brought a patent infringement suit in the U.S. District for the Eastern District of Texas against Texas Instruments, Inc. In December 2025, Koyo brought patent infringement suits in the U.S. District for the Eastern District of Texas against Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. The actions by MR and Koyo are pending. 6 Competition We encounter and expect to continue to encounter competition in the areas of intellectual property acquisitions for the sake of licensure from both private and publicly traded companies that engage in intellectual property monetization activities. Such competitors and potential competitors include companies seeking to acquire the same intellectual property assets and intellectual property rights that we may seek to acquire. Entities such as Acacia Research Corporation, Intellectual Ventures, Quarterhill Inc., MOSAID Technologies Inc., Network-1 Security Solutions, Interdigital, Inc., IPValue Management Inc., Pendrell Corporation, Inventergy Global, Inc., Netlist Inc., Parkervision Inc., Walker Innovation, Inc., Anjay Venture Partners, LLC, Daedalus Group LLC, Netlist Inc. and others derive all or a substantial portion of their revenue from intellectual property monetization activities, and we expect more entities to enter the market. Most of our competitors have longer operating histories and significantly greater financial resources and personnel than we have. We also compete with venture capital firms, strategic corporate buyers and various industry leaders for intellectual property and technology acquisitions and licensing opportunities. Many of these competitors have more financial and human resources than our company. In seeking to obtain intellectual property assets or intellectual property rights, we seek to both demonstrate our understanding of the intellectual property that we are seeking to acquire or license and our ability to monetize their intellectual property rights. Our weak cash position and history of losses, together with our low stock price and our stock not being listed on a stock exchange, may impair our ability to negotiate successfully with the intellectual property owners. Other companies may develop competing technologies that offer better or less expensive alternatives to intellectual property rights that we may acquire and/or license. Many potential competitors may have significantly greater resources than we do. The development of technological advances or entirely different approaches could render certain of the technologies owned or controlled by our operating subsidiaries obsolete and/or uneconomical. Research and Development We did not incur research and development expenses during 2025 or 2024, since research and development are not part of our business. Consulting Contracts On February 22, 2021, we entered into advisory service agreement with three consultants pursuant to which they will provide services to us in connection with the development of our business. The agreements have a term of ten years and may be terminated by us for cause or upon the death or disability of the consultants. Pursuant to the consulting agreement, we granted options to purchase a total of 900,000 shares of Common Stock which options expire on February 21, 2031. Option to purchase 300,000 shares of Common Stock at $1.00 per share, 100,000 shares at $3.00 per share and 100,000 shares at $5.00 per share are currently exercisable. Option to purchase 200,000 shares at an exercise price of $3.00 per share, become exercisable on the first day on which the Company files with the SEC a Form 10-K or Form 10-Q which reports stockholders’ equity of at least $5,000,000 and options to purchase 200,000 shares at an exercise price of $5.00 per share become exercisable on the date on which the Common Stock is listed for trading on the Nasdaq Stock Market or the New York Stock Exchange. Employees As of March 15, 2026, we have two employees, who are our officers, one of whom works on a part-time basis. Our employees are not represented by a labor union, and we consider our employee relations to be good.