Item 1. Business
Item 1.
Business
We are a commercial stage biotechnology company pioneering the development of a novel class of TCR bispecific immunotherapies called ImmTAX ( I mmune
m obilizing m onoclonal T CRs A gainst X
disease) designed to treat a broad range of diseases, including cancer, infectious and autoimmune diseases. Leveraging our proprietary, flexible, off-the-shelf ImmTAX platform, we are developing a deep pipeline in multiple therapeutic areas,
including five clinical stage programs in oncology and infectious disease, advanced pre-clinical programs in autoimmune disease and earlier pre-clinical programs across three therapeutic areas.
In 2022, we received approval for our lead product, KIMMTRAK, for the treatment of unresectable metastatic uveal melanoma from the FDA, the European Commission and other health
authorities. KIMMTRAK is now approved in 38 countries for the treatment of unresectable or mUM. In 2023, we launched KIMMTRAK in Austria, Israel, Italy, Finland, Switzerland and Belgium, and, reached price agreements with Canada and Australia
with further commercial launches planned in additional territories where KIMMTRAK is approved.
3
Table of Contents
KIMMTRAK is the lead product from our ImmTAX platform and was the first approved therapy in mUM. To date, we have treated over 2,000 cancer patients with KIMMTRAK, tebentafusp,
and our other ImmTAX product candidates, which we believe is the largest clinical data set of any T cell engager bispecific in solid tumors and any TCR therapeutic. Our clinical programs are being conducted with patients with a broad range of
cancers including melanoma, ovarian, lung, and colorectal, among others. We believe that these other tumor types have large addressable patient populations and significant unmet need. We are progressing two late-stage clinical programs within our
ImmTAC ( I mmune m obilizing m onoclonal T CRs A gainst
C ancer) portfolio, including KIMMTRAK and the PRAME-targeted IMC-F106C.
KIMMTRAK is manufactured at facilities located in Denmark and Germany, with final packaging completed in the Netherlands. We are supporting the appropriate use of KIMMTRAK in the
United States and Europe through a well-equipped and fit-for-purpose trained commercial team that includes commercial, medical, sales, and value access team members. We utilize a hybrid commercialization model that includes in-house and
contracted resources in the United States and Europe. To support our commercial efforts, we have entered into an exclusive multi-regional agreement with Medison Pharma Ltd., or Medison, to help seek regulatory authorization and commercialize
KIMMTRAK in Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Israel, Central and Eastern Europe, South and Central America, and the Caribbean.
Unlike antibody targeted immunotherapies that have a relatively small target pool, our approach relies on the power of T cell receptors, or TCRs, which are naturally occurring
receptors found on the surface of T cells that have the ability to target nearly all of the human proteome. Natural TCRs give T cells the ability to scan for abnormalities in nearly any cell in the body that are presented as protein fragments, or
antigens, by human leukocyte antigen, or HLA, on the cell surface. Our ImmTAX platform builds upon these natural TCRs to engineer soluble targeted and high-affinity TCRs. By engineering these TCRs through our ImmTAX platform, we are developing
off-the-shelf, bispecific therapeutics, which are able to precisely target a wide range of proteins uniquely expressed by unhealthy and abnormal cells that cannot be targeted by current antibody-based immunotherapies.
Our ImmTAX bispecific therapeutics couple the targeting power of these engineered TCRs on one end with the other end displaying pre-optimized effector functions, which have the
ability to drive a desired immune response at the site of the disease. This combination is designed to provide us with significant flexibility as we are able to engineer and tailor our ImmTAX therapeutics to target proteins that are specific to
the disease we are trying to treat and then modulate the corresponding immune response by either boosting or inhibiting the immune system.
Our Pipeline
We are currently leveraging our platform within three therapeutic areas: cancer, infectious diseases, and autoimmune diseases. Our current pipeline includes five
clinical stage assets . Our oncology portfolio includes numerous pre-clinical to late stage programs, including KIMMTRAK in advanced cutaneous melanoma and adjuvant uveal melanoma, IMC-F106C in a Phase 3 clinical trial in first- line
advanced cutaneous melanoma, and in a Phase 1/2 clinical trial in multiple tumor types, IMC-R117C for which we filed a clinical trial application, or CTA, in December 2023, and two ImmTAC molecules, IMC-P115C and
IMC-T119C, approaching targeted submission of investigational new drug, or IND, applications or CTAs in the next twelve months. In infectious diseases, we are currently evaluating two candidates, IMC-M113V
and IMC-109V, in Phase 1 clinical trials for a potential functional cure in human immunodeficiency virus, or HIV, and hepatitis B virus, or HBV, respectively. In January 2024, we expanded the ImmTAX platform into autoimmune diseases with the
addition of two potential first-in-class new bispecific candidates entering the pipeline. Our current pipeline is below.
4
Table of Contents
Our ImmTAC Platform (Oncology)
Within our ImmTAC platform, KIMMTRAK is approved in 38 countries for HLA-A*02:01-positive adult patients with unresectable or metastatic uveal melanoma, and is being evaluated in
late-stage trials for adjuvant uveal melanoma and advanced cutaneous melanoma. IMC-F106C, a PRAME-targeted candidate, has advanced to a Phase 3 registrational trial, PRISM-MEL-301, in first-line advanced cutaneous melanoma, for which we expect to
start enrolling patients in the first quarter of 2024, and we are enrolling patients in multiple expansion arms of the Phase 1/2 clinical trial. Additionally, there are three additional ImmTAC molecules approaching either the start of a Phase 1
clinical trial or IND/CTA submission in the next twelve months, and additional undisclosed pre-clinical programs. Our ImmTAC product candidates are bispecific, soluble TCR molecules featuring an antigen-specific targeting module based on our
high-affinity, highly specific TCR system and our proprietary cluster of differentiation 3 (CD3) effector module for T cell recruitment, engagement and activation.
Our ImmTAC programs include:
•
KIMMTRAK (tebentafusp), our ImmTAC molecule targeting an HLA-A*02:01 gp100 antigen, is our first approved product. The FDA and the European Commission have approved KIMMTRAK (tebentafusp-tebn
and tebentafusp, respectively) for the treatment of HLA-A*02:01-positive adult patients with unresectable or mUM. KIMMTRAK is currently approved in 38 countries. As of February 2024, we have commercially launched KIMMTRAK in 12 countries,
including the United States, with further commercial launches underway in additional territories where we have received regulatory approval.
•
KIMMTRAK is also being evaluated for the treatment of 2L+ advanced cutaneous melanoma, or CM. We are currently enrolling patients in a randomized Phase 2/3 clinical trial (TEBE-AM) to
investigate the potential of tebentafusp as a monotherapy or in combination with an anti-PD(L)1 therapy. This trial is enrolling patients with advanced CM, excluding only uveal melanoma, who have progressed on an anti-PD1, received prior
ipilimumab and, if applicable, received a prior targeted therapy (BRAF mutant). We expect topline data from the Phase 2 portion of the trial to be available by the fourth quarter of 2024.
•
KIMMTRAK will also be evaluated for the treatment of adjuvant therapy for uveal (or ocular) melanoma. In 2023, we signed an agreement for a European Organisation for Research and Treatment of
Cancer (EORTC)-sponsored trial to study KIMMTRAK as adjuvant therapy for uveal (or ocular) melanoma (ATOM) in HLA-A*02:01 positive patients. We anticipate that the EORTC will randomize the first patient in the trial in the second half of
2024.
5
Table of Contents
•
IMC-F106C, the first PRAME x CD3 ImmTAC bispecific protein, is being evaluated in patients with first-line advanced CM in our PRISM-MEL-301 Phase 3 clinical trial in combination with nivolumab
with a primary endpoint of progression-free survival, or PFS. PRISM-MEL301, the first PRAME Phase 3 clinical trial with IMC-F106C, will randomize patients with HLA-A*02:01-positive, first-line advanced CM to IMC-F106C + nivolumab versus a
control arm of either nivolumab or nivolumab + relatlimab, depending on the country where the patient is enrolled. The trial was designed based on our analysis of the ongoing Phase 1 data in previously treated CM which demonstrated
monotherapy clinical activity including partial responses (PR), durable tumor reduction, disease control (PR and stable disease), PFS and ctDNA reduction (consistent with prior reported data for IMC-F106C and tebentafusp). Additional
rationale includes safety in combination with checkpoints (from the ongoing Phase 1 data and prior experience with tebentafusp) and evidence from across the platform for increased clinical activity in earlier line patients compared to
later line.
•
IMC-F106C is also being tested in the, currently enrolling, monotherapy and combination arms of the Phase 1/2 clinical trial across multiple tumor types, including expansion arms for patients
with platinum resistant ovarian, non-small cell lung, and endometrial carcinoma. The initial data from the Phase 1 clinical trial of IMC-F106C was presented at the 2022 European Society for Medical Oncology, or ESMO, Congress in September
2022. Durable Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, or RECIST, responses and reduction in circulating tumor DNA, or ctDNA, were observed across multiple solid tumors. In August 2023, we provided an updated analysis of the initial
eighteen uveal and cutaneous melanoma patients in the data set presented at ESMO 2022, which continued to show promising durability of the clinical activity (range of duration of patient response from 6 months to 17 months). We expect to
report data from the ongoing monotherapy and combination cohorts throughout 2024 including CM (expected in the second quarter of 2024), ovarian (expected by third quarter of 2024), and non-small cell lung carcinoma (expected by fourth
quarter of 2024).
•
IMC-P115C , our half-life extended ImmTAC molecule targeting an optimal HLA-A*02 PRAME, is advancing towards a targeted IND application / CTA submission for IMC-P115C in the middle of 2024. This
ImmTAC candidate was designed with the aim of improving patient convenience. IMC-P115C targets the same PRAME-A02 peptide and uses essentially the same CD3 end and T-cell-receptor, or TCR, specificity as IMC-F106C.
•
IMC-T119C, our ImmTAC molecule targeting an optimal HLA-A*24 PRAME, is advancing towards a targeted IND application or CTA submission for IMC-T119C in the fourth quarter of 2024. HLA-A24 is an
HLA-type that is estimated to be present in 60% of people in Japan and 15-20% in Western populations.
•
IMC-R117C , our ImmTAC molecule targeting an optimal HLA-A*02 PIWIL1, is expected to enter a Phase 1 clinical trial in 2024. We submitted a CTA in December 2023. PIWIL1 is believed to play a role
in tumor progression and is expressed across a range of tumors including colorectal, which is historically insensitive to immune checkpoints, as well as other gastrointestinal cancers. PIWIL1 is also reported to be a negative prognostic
marker. We believe IMC-R117C is the first PIWIL1 targeted immunotherapy.
In February 2023, we elected to withdraw from co-funding the MAGE-A4 HLA-A02 program, IMC-C103C with Genentech, Inc. Genentech, therefore, has acquired an exclusive worldwide
license to the MAGE-A4 HLA-A02 soluble TCR bispecific therapeutic candidate compounds, and is fully responsible for all further development and commercialization of such candidate compounds, at its expense. The licenses granted to Genentech do
not include any rights to (i) affinity-enhanced TCRs or (ii) TCR therapeutic compounds, in each case (i) and (ii) that are directed to targets other than MAGE-A4 .
Our ImmTAV Platform (Infectious Diseases)
We have advanced the first two programs from our ImmTAV ( I mmune m obilizing m onoclonal T CRs A gainst V irus) platform into the clinic. Our ImmTAV product candidates
are bispecific soluble TCR molecules featuring our ImmTAX TCR-based targeting system with high specificity for low-expression viral antigens, combined with the proprietary anti-CD3 effector module for T cell engagement and activation that has
been evidenced by our clinical oncology pipeline. We are seeking to develop therapeutics that can provide a functional cure to chronic viral disease and are focusing initially on HIV and HBV.
Our ImmTAV programs include:
•
IMC-M113V , our ImmTAV molecule targeting a human immunodeficiency virus gag antigen bispecific TCR molecule, is being evaluated in a Phase 1 clinical trial for which we are currently enrolling
patients. Our goal is to develop a functional cure for HIV. Initial Phase 1 safety and pharmacodynamic activity data from the single ascending dose, or SAD, portion of the trial was presented at the Conference on Retroviruses and
Opportunistic Infections (CROI) in 2023. IMC-M113V was well tolerated at doses where we observed biomarkers of T cell engagement. We are enrolling up to 28 participants living with HIV in the multiple ascending dose, or MAD, part of the
trial, to identify a safe and tolerable dosing schedule that could lead to reduction in the viral reservoir and control of HIV after stopping antiretroviral therapies, or functional cure. We expect to present a data update from the Phase
1 clinical trial in the second half of 2024.
•
IMC-I109V , our ImmTAV molecule targeting a conserved hepatitis B virus envelope antigen, is being evaluated in a Phase 1 clinical trial in patients with chronic HBV who are non-cirrhotic,
hepatitis B e-Antigen negative, and virally suppressed on chronic nucleot(s)ide analogue therapy. In 2023, we amended the trial design in the ongoing Phase 1 clinical trial with IMC-I109V for people living with HBV to include HBV-positive
hepatocellular carcinoma. Our goal is to develop a functional cure for HBV. We are enrolling patients in the SAD portion of the trial.
6
Table of Contents
Our ImmTAAI Platform (Autoimmune Diseases)
While our ImmTAC and ImmTAV platforms attempt to provide therapeutic benefit by driving an immune response against targeted cells, our ImmTAAI ( I mmune
m odulating m onoclonal T CRs A gainst A uto I mmune disease) platform leverages our ImmTAX platform to generate product candidates designed to provide precision tissue-specific downmodulation of the immune system for the treatment of autoimmune diseases.
When tethered to the tissue of interest, the ImmTAAI candidates suppress pathogenic T cells via PD1 receptor agonism. We believe we can use our ImmTAAI platform to develop a portfolio of product candidates to treat autoimmune diseases with a high
unmet medical need and provide significant benefit to patients.
Our ImmTAAI programs include:
•
IMC-S118AI , our ImmTAAI molecule specifically targeted to the pancreatic beta-cells for disease modifying treatment in type 1 diabetes, will be advancing towards GMP manufacturing in 2024.
IMC-S118AI recognizes a peptide from pre-proinsulin presented by HLA-A2*01 on beta-cells coupled with a PD1 agonist effector arm. Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune condition in which the patient’s immune system attacks and kills the
beta-cells responsible for controlling glucose levels through the release of insulin. Progressive loss of beta cells leads to loss of glucose control requiring life-long monitoring and treatment with exogenous insulin. We believe
IMC-S118AI has the potential to provide a differentiated option for treatment with advantages of tissue-specific down modulation without immunosuppression.
•
Undisclosed universal skin antigen-presenting cells, or APCs, targeted ImmTAAI , targets a non-HLA restricted or ‘universal’ target expressed on APCs in the skin. APCs, through their role of
priming and restimulating T cells are believed to play a role in many autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. We believe that precision targeting of our PD1 agonist based immune inhibitory molecule to these key cells involved in the
establishment and maintenance of disease will provide clinical benefit to patients and the potential to modify the course of disease. We are considering this target for treatment of a range of dermatological diseases.
Our 2024 Strategic Priorities
Our strategic priorities for 2024 include:
•
Growing sales of KIMMTRAK (tebentafusp) in the United States and globally in HLA-A02+ metastatic uveal melanoma patients. Expanding KIMMTRAK beyond its initial approved indication with the registrational TEBE-AM trials for second-line
or later cutaneous melanoma and the EORTC-sponsored trial for adjuvant uveal (or ocular) melanoma, or ATOM.
•
Advancing our PRAME franchise in multiple solid tumors and broadening the addressable population (HLA-A24). Randomization is expected to begin in the first quarter of 2024 in the PRISM-MEL301 registrational trial for IMC-F106C in
first-line cutaneous melanoma, and we expect to present data from the Phase 1/2 clinical trial monotherapy and combination cohorts throughout 2024. We expect to submit clinical trial applications (CTAs)/INDs for IMC-P115C (PRAME HLA-A2
Half-Life-Extended) and IMC-T119C (PRAME HLA-A24) candidates in 2024.
•
Bringing novel ImmTAC candidates to the clinic, leading with IMC-R117C, a potential first-in-class ImmTAC candidate targeting PIWIL1 with focus on colorectal and gastric cancers.
•
Evaluating the potential for a functional cure in infectious diseases with lead candidates for HIV and HBV.
•
Initiating GMP manufacturing for our first two autoimmune candidates, including the potential first in class, tissue tethered, TCR bispecific PD1 agonist for type 1 diabetes and a novel non-HLA restricted (universal) PD1 agonist for
dermatology.
7
Table of Contents
Overview of ImmTAX Platform
Our therapeutic platform takes advantage of human TCRs through engineering of novel therapies known as I mmune m obilizing m onoclonal T CRs A gainst X disease, or ImmTAX. Our
ImmTAX product candidates are bispecific therapeutics that are comprised of two key elements—a TCR targeting system and an effector function—that, when combined, are designed to give our platform significant flexibility to treat a range of
diseases.
Specifically, our optimized ImmTAX bispecifics couple a high-affinity TCR targeting system with a range of effector functions tailored for the specific disease being addressed.
TCRs are naturally found on the surface of T cells and are programmed to scan for abnormalities in the body through binding protein fragments presented by HLA on the surface of other cells. We have been able to build upon the activity of natural
TCRs to develop high-affinity TCRs, which allow for a precise targeting by our therapeutics of unhealthy and abnormal cells. Our TCR targeting system can be customized to target almost any protein within the human proteome, thereby increasing the
potential for an on-target immune response. We accomplish this by identifying proteins that are specific to a disease, and customizing the TCR domain of our ImmTAX molecules to target the HLA fragment presented by that specific protein. Below is
a depiction of how our ImmTAX molecules combine a TCR targeting domain with a range of effector functions that can either activate or turn off the immune system (e.g., anti-CD3 or PD1 agonist).
The other component of our ImmTAX molecules is an effector antibody fragment designed to mimic the body’s natural mechanisms for modulating the immune system, thereby allowing us
to develop product candidates which are designed to generate a range of immune responses depending on the disease that is being treated. For example, for diseases such as cancer or infectious disease where an enhanced immune response is required,
certain effectors can be applied to drive a potent immune response recruiting any T cell to attack the targeted cell. Alternatively, for certain autoimmune diseases where establishing control of an aberrant immune response is required, certain
other effectors can be used to mimic the body’s natural control mechanisms.
We believe the flexibility of our approach will allow us to develop therapeutics designed to treat a broad range of diseases. While we have focused our initial efforts on
oncology, we are broadening our development efforts to infectious diseases and autoimmune conditions. We have named each of these platforms according to their therapeutic area to distinguish the type of target recognized by the TCR targeting
system and the selected effector function:
•
ImmTAC – I mmune m obilizing m onoclonal T CRs
A gainst C ancer
•
ImmTAV – I mmune m obilizing m onoclonal T CRs
A gainst V iruses
•
ImmTAAI – I mmune m odulating m onoclonal T CRs
A gainst A uto I mmune disease
Advantages of our ImmTAX Platform
Our ImmTAX platform enables us to combine a high-affinity TCR targeting system with a range of immune-activating effector domains resulting in what we believe is a highly tailored
and flexible approach to treat a broad range of diseases with a number of potential advantages, which are described below:
8
Table of Contents
Ability to access significantly larger pool of cellular targets compared to currently approved therapies. Currently approved
antibody-targeted therapies are limited to cell surface protein targets, a subset that makes up approximately 10% of the human proteome. Our ImmTAX platform has the potential to access a significantly larger pool of cellular targets when compared
to antibody-targeted therapies, given their ability to target intracellular proteins, thereby expanding the total addressable therapeutic landscape. By using TCRs specific to HLA complexes, our ImmTAX platform allows for the selection of targets
expressed by indications for which there are no currently effective antibody targets. Additionally, our platform benefits from the ability to select targets with very high levels of differential expression between healthy and diseased cells,
thereby allowing clinical doses to be increased with manageable toxicity. The targeting advantage of our platform versus antibody-targeted therapies is shown below.
Ability to engineer ImmTAX with million-fold greater affinity and enhanced specificity allows for precise cellular targeting . Natural TCRs
have binding half-lives measured in seconds and broad specificity profiles. Our processes are unique in our ability to consistently engineer TCRs with million-fold improvements in affinity over natural TCRs while simultaneously improving
specificity. We believe this proprietary engineering technology will allow us to develop therapeutics that have antibody-like binding properties with high specificity and target binding half-lives measured in hours to days. These properties are
designed to enable low doses of drug required and prolonged binding to cell targets. Additionally, the high specificity and affinity of ImmTAX give them the ability to bind to targets that are present with extremely low density across the cell
surface.
Ability to address a broad range of disease types by leveraging a variety of precise effector domains to drive a specific immune response .
Affinity enhanced TCRs are coupled in a modular fashion to one of our pre-optimized immune-modulatory effectors to fine tune the characteristics of the therapy specific to the biology factors for a disease indication. By optimizing factors such
as potency, therapeutic index and clearance characteristics, we aim to maximize potential clinical benefit. Using this modular approach, we are developing immune activating therapies for both cancer and infectious diseases which are designed to
potently and specifically eliminate TCR targeted cells through redirection of non-exhausted polyclonal T cells. For autoimmune diseases, we employ an effector function that provides potent tissue-specific downmodulation of the immune system, with
the goal of minimizing harmful systemic immunosuppression.
Sales and Marketing
We have launched KIMMTRAK in 12 countries, including the United States, Germany, France and a number of other countries, and we are focused on driving increasing awareness and
adoption of KIMMTRAK as a treatment for mUM amongst mUM patients and their healthcare providers. Our focus is to utilize our commercial capabilities to continue to meet patient demand in our major markets, and to launch in further markets in
2024. A breakdown of net product revenue from the sale of KIMMTRAK and net pre-product revenue from the sale of tebentafusp as part of a compassionate use and early access program is presented by country / region based on the location of the
customer below.
2023
2022
2021
United States
$
169,791
$
96,893
$
—
Europe
67,628
42,745
4,078
International
1,316
1,049
—
Total revenue from the sale of therapies
$
238,735
$
140,687
$
4,078
Medison is the exclusive distribution partner for KIMMTRAK in Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Israel, Central and Eastern Europe, South and Central America, and the Caribbean.
Reimbursement
Coverage in the United States, Europe and other territories
9
Table of Contents
In the United States, it is essential to obtain third-party payor coverage policies, coding mechanisms, and adequate payment to expand market acceptance and adoption of KIMMTRAK
as a treatment for mUM. In 2023, we continued working with the U.S. commercial third-party payor community in order to maintain coverage for KIMMTRAK.
In Europe, pricing and reimbursement agreements were signed in Germany and Italy. Commercial KIMMTRAK is sold in France according to the government’s early access programs, while
final price negotiations are ongoing.
In order to maximize KIMMTRAK revenue, we are continuing our reimbursement and pricing submissions and negotiations in several additional countries, with price agreements reached
recently in Canada and Australia.
Manufacturing and Drug Supply
We have an internal Chemistry, Manufacturing and Controls (CMC) group which conducts studies in molecular bioengineering, process development, analytical assay development,
product characterization, formulation development and stability studies in support of current Good Manufacturing Practice, or cGMP-compliant manufacturing.
We do not currently own or operate manufacturing facilities for the production of clinical or commercial ImmTAX product candidates and we have no intention to build out our own
manufacturing capabilities in the foreseeable future. Instead, we outsource to contract manufacturing organizations, or CMOs, for both drug substance and drug product production and have a successful cGMP-compliant manufacturing history of
production of cGMP batches. We develop the upstream fermentation and downstream purification processes, as well as developing the analytical assays for quality control batch release testing and stability studies in-house and then transfer the
technology and know-how to the CMOs to establish, scale-up, validation and manufacturing. This outsourced approach to manufacturing requires the CMOs to establish master and working cell banks, ImmTAX reference standards and produce the
cGMP-compliant drug substance, and/or cGMP-compliant drug product. We conduct quality and technical audits of the CMOs to monitor the manufacturing operations and ensure compliance with the mutually agreed process operations and cGMP-regulations.
For KIMMTRAK, we currently contract with the following well-established third-party manufacturers:
•
AGC Biologics A/S, headquartered in Copenhagen, Denmark; and
•
Simtra Biopharma Solutions, headquartered in Halle/Westfalen, Germany
In previous years, our manufacturers have manufactured triplicate Process Performance Qualification batches, and, more recently, commercial large-scale manufacturing batches of
drug substance and drug product of KIMMTRAK. We believe the manufacturing capacity of our CMOs will be sufficient for further commercial launches and ongoing commercial supply. AGC Biologics A/S and Simtra Biopharma Solutions are positioned to
provide longer term commercial manufacture of KIMMTRAK, with the storage, global distribution, packaging and labelling operations being provided by Deutsche Post DHL Group.
Competition
The biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries are characterized by rapidly advancing technologies and intense competition. We believe that our approach, strategy, TCR experience
and ultimately, our ImmTAX platform provide us with competitive advantages. However, we expect substantial competition from multiple sources, including major pharmaceutical, specialty pharmaceutical, and existing or emerging biotechnology
companies, academic research institutions and governmental agencies and public and private research institutions worldwide. Many of our competitors, either alone or with their collaborations, have significantly greater financial resources and
expertise in research and development, manufacturing, preclinical testing, conducting clinical trials, obtaining regulatory approvals and marketing approved products than we do. Smaller or early-stage companies may also prove to be significant
competitors, particularly through collaborative arrangements with large and established companies. These competitors also compete with us in recruiting and retaining qualified scientific and management personnel and establishing clinical trial
sites and patient enrollment in clinical trials, as well as in acquiring technologies complementary to, or necessary for, our programs. As a result, our competitors may discover, develop, license or commercialize products before or more
successfully than we do.
We face competition from segments of the pharmaceutical, biotechnology and other related markets that pursue the development of TCR based therapeutics to address unmet needs in
cancer including: Adaptimmune Therapeutics plc, Immatics Biotechnologies GmbH, or Immatics (alone and in collaboration with Bristol Myers Squibb), Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation, or Adaptive, pure MHC, LLC, BioNTech SE, Genentech,
Matterhorn, Anocca, Enara Bio and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., or Regeneron, who are also seeking to identify peptide HLA targets and develop product candidates; T-Knife GmbH, Adaptive, 3T Biosciences, Inc., MediGene, Regeneron, bluebird Bio,
Inc., Takara Bio Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, GSK, Kite Pharma, Lion TCR, TCR Cure, Corregene Biotechnology Co. LTD, and TScan who are developing TCR-based cell therapies; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Amgen, Inc., Genmab, Inc., Molecular
Partners, 3T Biosciences, Inc., and CDR-Life Inc. are developing CD3-based TCR bispecific compounds or TCR mimetic antibodies.
10
Table of Contents
We are aware of various companies and academic institutions that are developing TCR transduced cell therapies against a range of pHLA targets, some of which may overlap with
product candidates in our pipeline such as PRAME. Specifically in regards to PRAME, we are aware that Immatics and Medigene are both conducting Phase 1 clinical trials of PRAME-directed cellular therapies and Immatics has also initiated a Phase
1/2 clinical trial of a PRAME TCRxCD3 half-life extended bispecific approach.
Oncology
Any ImmTAC product candidates that we successfully develop and commercialize for oncology indications may compete with existing products and new products that may become available
in the future. There is intense competition in the field of oncology from multiple different treatment modalities and new approaches are continually emerging.
In August 2023, Delcath Systems, Inc. announced the approval and U.S. launch of HEPZATO KIT, a liver directed therapy that delivers a high dose of melphalan to the liver via
percutaneous hepatic perfusion. This system is marketed in the European Union as a CE Marked medical device under the trade name Delcath Hepatic CHEMOSAT® Delivery System for Melphalan (CHEMOSAT). We are aware of several other companies with
product candidates in clinical development including anticipated program updates from Ideaya Biosciences’ first-line non-HLA-A2 mUM registration Phase 2/3 clinical trial in 2024, in addition to clinical efficacy and regulatory updates for the
neoadjuvant UM Phase 2 by mid-2024 and 2024, respectively.
HIV
There are now over 30 antiretroviral medications in six drug classes approved for the treatment of HIV. Antiretroviral therapy (ART) consists of treatment with a combination of
two or three agents targeting different stages of the virus life cycle. If started early, ART provides a normal lifespan, prevents immunodeficiency and stops the spread of HIV. However, treatment does not provide a cure and must be taken
continuously for life to prevent relapse. Furthermore, there is no effective vaccine to prevent HIV. We are aware of competitors pursuing a cure (e.g. by targeting the viral reservoir or using therapeutic antibodies to suppress viral relapse) but
these are in early-stage clinical trials and have not yet demonstrated functional cure, as opposed to viral control.
Chronic HBV
There are numerous antiviral therapies approved by the FDA for the treatment of chronic HBV infections. These treatments consist of life-long antiviral therapy to suppress virus
replication. This can slow the progression of liver cirrhosis and reduce the incidence of liver cancer, but most patients do not achieve functional cure. There are also FDA-approved vaccinations that provide effective prophylaxis against HBV,
although they do not reverse or cure the disease in people who have already contracted the virus.
Intellectual Property
We strive to protect and enhance the proprietary technologies, inventions and improvements that we believe are important to our business, including by seeking, maintaining,
enforcing and defending patent rights for our therapeutics and platform, whether developed internally or licensed from third parties. Our success will depend on our ability to obtain and maintain patent, trademark and other intellectual property
protection for our therapeutic products, product candidates and platform technology, preserve the confidentiality of our know-how and operate without infringing, misappropriating or otherwise violating the valid and enforceable patents and
proprietary rights of third parties. For more information, please see “Item 1A. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Intellectual Property.”
We seek to protect our proprietary position by filing patent applications in territories that are commercially important for our therapeutic products, product candidates and
technology platform technologies, generally including but not limited to the United States, Europe, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, India, Israel, Japan, Mexico, New Zealand, South Africa and South Korea. We also rely on data exclusivity,
market exclusivity and patent term extensions where available, including any relevant exclusivity through supplementary protection certificates and orphan or pediatric drug designation.
As of December 31, 2023 , our global portfolio
comprises over 600 patents and pending applications, including at least 25 issued U.S. patents and more than 300 ex-US patents. The majority of our patents and patent applications are solely owned. The portfolio includes solely owned patents and
patent applications directed to our commercial TCR product (KIMMTRAK), our product candidates (including IMC-F106C, IMC-M113V, IMC-I109V, IMC-P115C, IMC-R117C, IMC-T119C, and IMC-S118AI), and our platform technology used to identify and generate
our therapeutic candidates, novel targets, formulations and methods of treatment. A minor proportion of the portfolio, comprising certain older platform IP, is jointly owned in equal share with Adaptimmune. We control the prosecution of the
jointly owned patents and patent applications, and we have rights under the joint patents as required to develop and commercialize our therapeutics. For more information on our assignment and exclusive license agreement with Adaptimmune, see
“Item 1. Business—Our Collaborations and License Agreements—Assignment and Exclusive License Agreement with Adaptimmune.”
We can provide no assurance that any of our current or future patent applications will result in issued patents or that any issued patents will provide us with any competitive
advantage.
11
Table of Contents
We have not in-licensed any issued patents relating to our product or product candidates.
KIMMTRAK (tebentafusp)
As of December 31, 2023 , we own granted patents and
patent applications covering the composition of matter of our commercial product KIMMTRAK (tebentafusp). The patents include claims that cover the specific sequence of KIMMTRAK, as well as claims that cover TCR variants with similar biological
properties. Granted patents have been obtained in major territories including two in the United States and 28 in foreign jurisdictions, including Europe (including United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Ireland, Denmark and the
Netherlands), Australia, Canada, China, Hong Kong, Japan, Mexico, Eurasia and South Africa. These granted patents are expected to expire in 2030. Applications for patent term extension and/or supplementary protection certificates have been filed
in several jurisdictions including the United States, which, if granted, could extend protection by up to 5 years to 2035. Further patent families have been filed including to cover the label dosing regimen, formulation, and methods of treatment.
If granted these applications would extend protection to at least 2042.
ImmTAX pipeline
As of December 31, 2023, we solely own patent
families covering the composition of matter of each of our oncology, infectious disease, and autoimmune pipeline candidates, including issued U.S. patents covering the composition of matter of our PRAME (IMC-F106C) candidate. In each case, claims
of the composition of matter patents or patent applications are directed to the therapeutic candidates and to variants with similar biological properties. The issued U.S. patents for IMC-F106C composition of matter patents are estimated to expire
in 2038, excluding any additional term for patent term adjustments or patent term extensions. Further patent applications have been filed relating to IMC-F106C dosing regimens and methods of treatment.
Our ImmTAX platform
As of December 31, 2023 , we solely own a number of
patents and patent applications related to our ImmTAX platform. The oldest patent families relating to our ImmTAX TCR bispecific format will expire starting in 2030. We have filed further platform patent families relating to TCR bispecifics with
improved therapeutic properties, including formats with extended in vivo half-life and improved anti-CD3 effector functions, as well as therapeutic formats for the treatment of autoimmune indications. Such pending patent applications, if granted,
are expected to expire between 2039 and 2043, excluding any additional term for patent term adjustments or patent term extensions.
We jointly own in 50% equal share with Adaptimmune platform patent families relating to methods and tools for selecting TCRs in the early pipeline. The latest of these will expire
in 2036.
HLA target peptide patent applications
As of December 31, 2023, we own a number of patent
families relating to novel HLA-restricted peptide targets and their use. Such patents and pending patent applications, if granted, are expected to expire between 2036 and 2037, excluding any additional term for patent term adjustments or patent
term extensions.
Patent term
Typically, we file our priority applications at the U.K. Intellectual Property Office, or UKIPO, and/or at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, or USPTO. This is followed 12
months later by the filing of a patent application under the PCT claiming priority from the initial application(s), and/or national applications. Further data can be added to the application during the priority year and the resulting patent term
is calculated from the PCT filing date. This strategy allows us to obtain an early priority date while additional experimental data are generated. At the end of the PCT period, generally two and a half years from the priority date, separate
patent applications can be pursued in any of the 157 PCT member states. Our PCT patent applications are not eligible to become issued patents until, among other things, we file national stage patent applications within such PCT period in the
countries in which we seek patent protection. If we do not timely file any national stage patent applications, we may lose any patent protection on the inventions disclosed in such patent applications. For all patent applications, we determine
claiming strategy and territory coverage on a case-by-case basis. Advice of counsel and alignment with overarching business objectives is always considered. We regularly reassess the value of the patents and patent applications in our portfolio.
12
Table of Contents
The term of individual patents depends upon the legal term for patents in the countries in which they are obtained. In most countries in which we have filed patent applications,
including the United States, the patent term is 20 years from the earliest filing date of a non-provisional patent application. In the United States, a patent’s term may be lengthened by patent term adjustment, which compensates a patentee for
administrative delays by the USPTO in examining and granting a patent, or may be shortened if a patent is terminally disclaimed over an earlier filed patent. The term of a patent that covers a drug or biological product may also be eligible for
patent term extension when FDA approval is granted for a portion of the term effectively lost as a result of the FDA regulatory review period, subject to certain limitations and provided statutory and regulatory requirements are met. For more
information on patent term extension, see “Item 1. Business—Government Regulation—Patent Term Restoration and Extension.” As with other biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies, our ability to maintain and solidify our proprietary and
intellectual property position for our product candidates will depend on our success in obtaining effective patent claims and enforcing those claims if granted. However, our owned pending patent applications, and any patent applications that we
may in the future file or license from third parties may not result in the issuance of patents. We also cannot predict the breadth of claims that may be allowed or enforced in our patents. Any issued patents that we may receive in the future may
be challenged, invalidated, narrowed, held unenforceable, infringed or circumvented. In addition, because of the extensive time required for clinical development and regulatory review of a product candidate we may develop, it is possible that,
before any of our product candidates can be commercialized, any related patent may expire or remain in force for only a short period following commercialization, thereby limiting the protection such patent would afford the respective product and
any competitive advantage such patent may provide. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Intellectual Property.”
Trade secrets
In addition to patent protections, we rely upon trade secrets and know-how and continuing technological innovation to develop and maintain our competitive position. However, trade
secrets and know-how can be difficult to protect. We seek to protect our proprietary information, in part, by using confidentiality agreements with our collaborators, employees and consultants and invention assignment agreements with our
employees. We also have confidentiality agreements and invention assignment agreements with our collaborators and consultants. These agreements are designed to protect our proprietary information and, in the case of the invention assignment
agreements, to grant us ownership of technologies that are developed through a relationship with a third party. We cannot guarantee, however, that we have executed such agreements with all applicable counterparties. Furthermore, these agreements
may be breached, and we may not have adequate remedies for any breach. In addition, our trade secrets may otherwise become known or be independently discovered by competitors and other third parties. To the extent that our collaborators,
employees and consultants use intellectual property owned by others in their work for us, disputes may arise as to the rights in related or resulting know-how and inventions. For more information, please see “Item 1A. Risk Factors — Risks Related
to Intellectual Property.”
Third-party rights
Our commercial success will also depend in part on not infringing upon the proprietary rights of third parties. It is uncertain whether the issuance of any third-party patent
would require us to alter our development or commercial strategies, or our product candidates or processes, obtain licenses or cease certain activities. Our breach of any license agreements or failure to obtain a license to proprietary rights
that we may require to develop or commercialize our current or future product candidates may have an adverse impact on us. For more information, please see “Item 1A. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Intellectual Property.”
Trademarks
As of December 31, 2023 , our trademark portfolio
contains registrations or registration applications for our commercial product KIMMTRAK as well as for IMMUNOCORE, in the United States and other relevant jurisdictions. , We also have trademark registrations or registration
applications relating to our platform technology, including ImmTAX, ImmTAC, ImmTAV and ImmTAAI in the United States and in certain foreign jurisdictions.
Our Collaborations and License Agreements
Genentech Collaboration
In June 2013, we entered into a research collaboration and license agreement, or the 2013 Genentech Agreement, with Genentech, and F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, or Roche,
pursuant to which we along with Genentech and Roche agreed to collaborate in the development, manufacture and ultimately, commercialization of soluble TCR bispecific therapeutic candidate compounds. Under the 2013 Genentech Agreement, Genentech
paid us an initial upfront payment of $20 million in exchange for exclusive licenses to two of our targets, MAGE-A4 and as well as an undisclosed target. In November 2018, Genentech exercised its right of first negotiation under the 2013
Genentech Agreement with respect to our IMC-C103C program and we entered into a research collaboration and license agreement, or the 2018 Genentech Agreement, pursuant to which we and Genentech agreed to collaborate in the development and
commercialization of certain compounds targeting MAGE-A4, specifically pHLA-A2. We received an aggregate of $100 million from Genentech, consisting of an initial upfront payment of $50 million and $50 million paid upon an IND filing for the first
clinical trial of the product candidate compound, in exchange for granting Genentech rights to co-develop/co-promote our program called IMC-C103C. Under the 2018 Genentech Agreement, we granted Genentech a co-exclusive worldwide license to our
intellectual property rights in MAGE-A4 soluble TCR bispecific therapeutic candidate compounds to advance the development and commercialization of such compounds.
13
Table of Contents
In February 2023, Genentech accepted our proposal to cease co-funding of the development of all MAGE-A4 HLA-A02 targeted programs, except for our equal share of the wind-down
costs of the IMC-C103C Phase 1 clinical trial. Following withdrawal of our co-funding arrangement, Genentech acquired an exclusive worldwide license to MAGE-A4 HLA-A02 soluble TCR bispecific therapeutic candidate compounds developed under the
collaboration. In addition, Genentech became wholly responsible for all further development and commercialization of any candidate compounds, at their expense. The licenses granted to Genentech following the 2023 co-funding withdrawal do not
include any rights to (i) affinity-enhanced TCRs or (ii) TCR therapeutic compounds, in each case (i) and (ii) that are directed to targets other than MAGE-A4 HLA-A2.
Under the 2018 Genentech Agreement we are still eligible to receive potential development and commercial milestone payments, and potential royalties from Genentech on any
sales of a MAGE-A4 HLA-A02 targeted product, estimated to be at least through 2037 if applicable patent application(s) are granted, based on terms related to valid patent claim(s) remaining in force and/or a minimum of 10 years following first
commercial sale.
Genentech continues to maintain a right of negotiation in respect of other TCR therapeutic candidate compounds that target MAGE-A4 by binding to an antigen other than
HLA-A02, should we discover any therapeutic candidate compounds and seek to license the rights to a third party, as prescribed under terms of the 2018 Genentech Agreement.
GSK Collaboration
In 2022, we terminated our collaboration and license agreement, or the GSK Agreement, with GlaxoSmithKline Intellectual Property Development Ltd, or GSK, and no further revenue is
expected from GSK. GSK has no further rights to targets under the GSK Agreement.
We originally entered into the GSK Agreement in June 2013, pursuant to which we and GSK agreed to collaborate in the development of soluble TCR bispecific therapeutic compounds,
for up to four targets, and we received payments totaling $31.8 million in upfront payments and early development milestones under the GSK Agreement.
Lilly Collaboration
In 2022, we terminated our development and license agreement, referred to, as subsequently amended, as the Lilly Collaboration, with Eli Lilly and Company, or Lilly, and no
further revenue is expected from Lilly. Lilly has no further rights to targets under the Lilly Collaboration.
We originally entered into the Lilly Collaboration in July 2014, pursuant to which we and Lilly agreed to collaborate in the development, manufacture and commercialization of
soluble TCR bispecific therapeutic compounds for up to three targets, and we received an upfront fee payment of $45 million under the Lilly Collaboration.
Gates Collaboration
In September 2017, we entered into a $40 million convertible loan agreement and a global access agreement with the Gates Foundation, pursuant to which we agreed to develop,
manufacture and commercialize soluble TCR bispecific therapeutic candidates targeted to neglected diseases, primarily tuberculosis and HIV, with the potential to treat people at an affordable price in developing countries. In March 2020, we and
the Gates Foundation amended and restated the global access agreement, or the Gates Agreement, pursuant to which we are required to take certain actions to support the mission of the Gates Foundation. The Gates Agreement was further amended in
February 2021. The initial tranche of $25 million was directed to the development of product candidates for the treatment of tuberculosis or HIV, and converted into equity as part of our series B preferred share financing. In connection with our
entry into a subscription agreement with the Gates Foundation, we terminated the outstanding convertible loan note purchase agreement with the Gates Foundation by deed of termination, as the Gates Foundation instead subscribed for the remaining
amount of the loan ($15 million) as part of a concurrent private placement in connection with our initial public offering.
Pursuant to the terms of the Gates Agreement, the Gates Foundation has the ability to request additional product development work for the development of product candidates for the
treatment of indications aligned with the Gates Foundation’s charitable goals, with the terms of any such work to be negotiated in good faith between us and the Gates Foundation.
We are required to use diligent efforts to complete agreed upon research plans for tuberculosis and HIV. While we delivered a potential product candidate for the treatment of
tuberculosis, under a program within the Gates Agreement, leveraging our universal HLA-E capabilities, the governing committee selected instead a potential HIV product candidate for GMP manufacture and for evaluation in a Phase 1 clinical trial.
If requested by the Gates Foundation, we will be required to continue further development of the HIV program through commercialization of a final product with the terms of any such work to be negotiated in good faith between us and the Gates
Foundation.
14
Table of Contents
In the event of certain defaults by us under the Gates Agreement, the Gates Foundation has a right to sell (or require a buy-back by us of) any of the equity securities held by
the Gates Foundation. In such an event, if within 12 months after such redemption or sale, we experience a change in control at a valuation of more than 150% of the valuation used for the redemption or the sale of the shares, we have agreed to
pay the Gates Foundation compensation equal to the excess of what it would have received in such transaction if it still held its shares at the time of such a change of control over what it received in the sale or redemption of its shares.
Under the terms of the Gates Agreement, we have full control over the development, commercialization and pricing of the Gates Foundation funded programs in developed countries.
Within a defined list of developing countries, we have an obligation to abide by the Gates Foundation global access principles, which includes pricing restrictions and a requirement that we use diligent efforts to make funded products available
in such countries. We also grant the Gates Foundation certain non-exclusive, perpetual, royalty-free licenses under our intellectual property and products developed using funds from the Gates Foundation for the benefit of people in identified
developing countries. These licenses would only be exercised in certain defined default events, including where we are unwilling or unable to continue with the development of a program or where we are in breach of certain obligations under the
Gates Agreement (including the global access commitments). Under the terms of the Gates Agreement, the Gates Foundation can request that we work on further neglected diseases (excluding hepatitis, oncology or autoimmune diseases) provided
acceptable terms can be reached. We also have an obligation to make available certain research tools on a royalty-free basis to certain entities supported by the Gates Foundation and other third parties and certain obligations relating to
publishing of scientific results of our work.
Gadeta Collaboration
In December 2022, we entered into a Collaboration, Option and License Agreement, or the Gadeta Collaboration, with Gadeta B.V., or Gadeta, which was acquired by Clade
Therapeutics, or Clade, in October 2023. Under the Gadeta Collaboration, we will collaborate on ‘201 γδ-TCR target discovery, and we will have the option to develop ImmTAC therapies derived from the ‘201 TCR as part of the research collaboration.
Following the acquisition of Gadeta by Clade, the rights under the Gadeta Collaboration then were transferred to a newly established entity called Ateda Therapeutics, or Ateda. Our rights and obligations under the terms of the Gadeta
Collaboration have not altered through this transfer and we have an option for an exclusive license to further research, develop and commercialize an ImmTAC candidate from the Gadeta Collaboration. If we exercised this option, Ateda could be
eligible to receive further payments from us. We have made total payments of $2.0 million to Gadeta under the Gadeta Collaboration as of December 31, 2023. Any further payments under the Gadeta Collaboration will be due to Ateda.
Assignment and Exclusive License Agreement with Adaptimmune
In May 2013, we entered into an assignment and exclusive license agreement with Adaptimmune Limited, which is the U.K. subsidiary of Adaptimmune Therapeutics plc. Our agreement
with Adaptimmune relates to the joint ownership and licensing of certain patents, patent applications, rights in know-how and other intellectual property rights, or the Adaptimmune License. Pursuant to the Adaptimmune License, we and Adaptimmune
jointly own certain identified patents, patent applications, rights in know-how and other intellectual property rights in equal shares. We each grant the other party an exclusive, royalty-free, irrevocable license, with the right to sub-license,
under those jointly owned intellectual property rights in separate fields. Adaptimmune’s exclusive field relates to treatment of patients with engineered TCR therapeutic candidates and our exclusive field relates to the treatment of patients with
soluble TCRs. There is no royalty payable under the Adaptimmune License but we share equally in the costs associated with the filing, maintenance and prosecution of the jointly owned patents and patent applications covered by the Adaptimmune
License.
The Adaptimmune License is effective until the later of the expiration of the last to expire jointly owned patent under the Adaptimmune License or the jointly owned know-how
ceasing to be confidential. The Adaptimmune License cannot be terminated by either party. Upon the insolvency of either party, the other party has the right to take over patent prosecution of the licensed patents and to request assignment of the
insolvent party’s interest in all the licensed patents, know-how and results on commercially reasonable terms.
Government Regulation
Government authorities in the United States, at the federal, state and local level, and in the European Union (EU) and other countries and jurisdictions, extensively regulate,
among other things, the research, development, testing, manufacturing, quality control, approval, labeling, packaging, storage, record-keeping, promotion, advertising, distribution, post-approval monitoring and reporting, marketing and export and
import of pharmaceutical products, including biological products. The processes for obtaining marketing approvals in the United States and in foreign countries and jurisdictions, along with subsequent compliance with applicable statutes and
regulations and other regulatory authorities, require the expenditure of substantial time and financial resources.
15
Table of Contents
Data Privacy and Security Laws
We also are or may become subject to privacy laws in the jurisdictions in which we operate, have partners, or sell or market our products or run clinical trials. For example, we
are or may become subject to privacy and data protection laws, such as the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation, or EU GDPR, the United Kingdom’s equivalent law, or U.K. GDPR, and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act as
amended, or, HIPAA, in the United States, among many others. Our regulatory obligations in foreign jurisdictions could harm the use or cost of our solution in international locations as data protection and privacy laws and regulations around the
world continue to evolve.
Certain aspects of our business, including those for which we rely upon collaborators, service providers, contractors or others, are or may become subject to HIPAA and its
implementing regulations, which establish standards for covered entities (certain healthcare providers, health plans and healthcare clearinghouses) governing the conduct of certain electronic healthcare transactions and protecting the security
and privacy of protected health information, including, among other requirements, mandatory contractual terms and technical safeguards designed to protect the privacy, security and transmission of protected health information and notification to
affected individuals and regulatory authorities in the event of certain breaches of security of protected health information. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, commonly referred to as the economic stimulus package, included
sweeping expansion of HIPAA’s privacy and security standards called the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act, or HITECH, which became effective on February 17, 2010. Among other things, the HITECH makes HIPAA’s
privacy and security standards directly applicable to business associates, or independent contractors or agents of covered entities, that receive or obtain protected health information in connection with providing a service on behalf of a covered
entity, as well as their covered subcontractors. HITECH also increased the civil and criminal penalties that may be imposed against covered entities, business associates and possibly other persons, and gave state attorneys general new authority
to file civil actions for damages or injunctions in federal courts to enforce the federal HIPAA laws and seek attorney’s fees and costs associated with pursuing federal civil actions.
Failing to take appropriate steps to keep consumers’ personal information secure can constitute unfair acts or practices in or affecting commerce and be construed as a violation
of Section 5(a) of the Federal Trade Commission Act, or the FTCA, 15 U.S.C § 45(a). The FTC expects a company’s data security measures to be reasonable and appropriate in light of the sensitivity and volume of consumer information it holds, the
size and complexity of its business, and the cost of available tools to improve security and reduce vulnerabilities.
As a company established in the United Kingdom, our processing of personal data is subject to the U.K. GDPR; it is also, or may also become, in certain circumstances subject to
the EU GDPR. Each of these regulations requires stringent standards of data privacy and security concerning personal data and potentially significant sanctions.
The United Kingdom and Member States of the EU, or Member States, each may introduce further restrictions on personal data processing, including limitations which could limit our
ability to collect, use and share personal data (including health and medical information), or could cause our compliance costs to increase. In particular, the U.K. GDPR and EU GDPR significantly restrict the transfer of personal data to the
United States and other countries whose privacy laws are considered ‘inadequate’ for the purposes of either or both of those regulations, as they may apply. If there is no lawful manner for us to effect cross-border transfers of personal data in
compliance with the U.K. GDPR and/or EU GDPR, as applicable, or if the requirements for a legally-compliant transfer are too onerous, we could face significant adverse consequences, including the interruption or degradation of our operations, the
need to relocate certain parts of our operations, increased exposure to regulatory actions, substantial fines and penalties, the inability to work with certain collaborators, partners, vendors and other third parties, and injunctions against our
processing or transferring of personal data necessary to operate our business.
Sanctions for breaches of the U.K. GDPR and/or EU GDPR are significant: companies may face temporary or definitive bans on processing of personal data and other corrective
actions; fines of up to 17.5 million pounds sterling under the U.K. GDPR and 20 million Euros under the EU GDPR, or, in each case, 4% of annual global revenue, whichever is greater; or private litigation related to processing of personal data
brought by classes of data subjects or consumer protection organizations authorized at law to represent their interests.
In the United States, state consumer privacy laws are stringent, broad in scope and offer individuals the ability to exercise certain privacy rights. These state laws differ from
each other, which may complicate compliance efforts. By way of example, the California Consumer Privacy Act, as amended by the California Privacy Rights Act, or CCPA, creates certain privacy rights for California residents and places increased
privacy and security obligations on entities that are subject to the law. The CCPA requires covered businesses to provide specific disclosures to California residents about such covered businesses’ data collection, use and sharing practices and
provide such residents mechanisms to opt out of certain disclosures of personal information. The CCPA provides for fines of $2,500 per non-intentional violation or $7,500 per intentional violation and authorizes private lawsuits to recover
statutory damages for certain data breaches.
16
Table of Contents
Patent Term Restoration and Extension
Depending upon the timing, duration and specifics of FDA approval of product candidates, some of a sponsor’s U.S. patents may be eligible for limited patent term extension under
the Hatch-Waxman Amendments. The Hatch-Waxman Amendments permit a patent restoration term of up to five years as compensation for patent term lost during product development and the FDA regulatory review process. However, patent term restoration
cannot extend the remaining term of a patent beyond a total of 14 years from the product’s approval date. The patent term restoration period generally is one-half the time between the effective date of an IND and the submission date of a BLA less
any time the sponsor did not act with due diligence during the period, plus the time between the submission date of a BLA and the approval of that application less any time the sponsor did not act with due diligence during the period. Only one
patent applicable to an approved biologic product is eligible for the extension, only those claims covering the approved drug, a method for using it, or a method for manufacturing it may be extended, and the application for the extension must be
submitted prior to the expiration of the patent. Moreover, a given patent may only be extended once based on a single product. The USPTO, in consultation with the FDA, reviews and approves the application for any patent term extension or
restoration. Similar provisions are available in Europe and other foreign jurisdictions to extend the term of a patent that covers an approved drug. In the future, if and when our products receive FDA approval, we expect to apply for patent term
extensions on patents covering those products, however there is no guarantee that the applicable authorities, including the FDA in the United States, will agree with our assessment of whether such extensions should be granted, and if granted, the
length of such extensions. For more information regarding the risks related to our intellectual property, see “Item 1A. — Risk Factors—Risks Related to Intellectual Property.”
Licensure and Regulation of Biologics in the United States
In the United States, biological products are subject to regulation under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, or FDCA, and the Public Health Service Act, or PHSA, and their
implementing regulations. Product candidates must be approved by the FDA before they may be legally marketed in the United States.
An applicant seeking approval to market and distribute a new biologic in the United States generally must satisfactorily complete each of the following steps:
•
nonclinical laboratory tests, animal studies and formulation studies all performed in accordance with the FDA’s good laboratory practices, or GLP, regulations;
•
submission to the FDA of an IND application for human clinical testing, which must become effective before human clinical trials may begin;
•
approval by an institutional review board, or IRB, representing each clinical site before each clinical trial may be initiated;
•
performance of adequate and well-controlled human clinical trials to establish the safety, potency and purity of the product candidate for each proposed indication, in accordance with Good Clinical Practices, or
GCP;
•
preparation and submission to the FDA of a BLA for a biological product requesting marketing for one or more proposed indications, including submission of detailed information on the manufacture and composition
of the product in clinical development and proposed labeling;
•
review of the product by an FDA advisory committee, if applicable;
•
one or more FDA inspections of the manufacturing facility or facilities, including those of third parties, at which the product, or components thereof, are produced to assess compliance with current Good
Manufacturing Practices, or cGMP, requirements and to assure that the facilities, methods and controls are adequate to preserve the product’s identity, strength, quality and purity;
•
FDA audits of the clinical study sites to assure compliance with GCPs, and the integrity of clinical data in support of the BLA;
•
payment of user fees and securing FDA approval of the BLA and licensure of the new biological product; and
•
compliance with any post-approval requirements, including the potential requirement to implement a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy, or REMS, and any post-approval studies required by the FDA.
Nonclinical Studies and Investigational New Drug Application
Before testing any biological product candidate in humans, the product candidate must undergo nonclinical testing. Nonclinical tests include laboratory evaluations of product
formulation and stability, as well as animal studies to evaluate the potential for activity and toxicity. The results of the nonclinical tests, together with manufacturing information and analytical data, are submitted to the FDA as part of an
IND application. The IND automatically becomes effective 30 days after receipt by the FDA, unless before that time the FDA raises concerns or questions about the product or conduct of the proposed clinical trial, including concerns that human
research subjects will be exposed to unreasonable health risks. In that case, the IND sponsor and the FDA must resolve any outstanding FDA concerns before the clinical trial can begin.
17
Table of Contents
As a result, submission of the IND may result in the FDA not allowing the trial to commence or on the terms originally specified by the sponsor in the IND. If the FDA raises
concerns or questions either during this initial 30-day period, or at any time during the IND process, it may choose to impose a partial or complete clinical hold. This order issued by the FDA would delay either a proposed clinical study or cause
suspension of an ongoing study, or in the case of a partial clinical hold place limitations on the conduct of the study such as duration of treatment, until all outstanding concerns have been adequately addressed and the FDA has notified the
company that investigation may proceed and then only under terms authorized by the FDA. This could cause significant delays or difficulties in completing planned clinical trials in a timely manner. The FDA may impose clinical holds on a
biological product candidate at any time before or during clinical trials due to safety concerns or non-compliance.
Human Clinical Trials in Support of a BLA
Clinical trials involve the administration of the investigational product candidate to healthy volunteers or patients with the disease to be treated under the supervision of a
qualified principal investigator in accordance with GCP requirements. Clinical trials are conducted under study protocols detailing, among other things, the objectives of the study, inclusion and exclusion criteria, the parameters to be used in
monitoring safety, and the effectiveness criteria to be evaluated. A protocol for each clinical trial and any subsequent protocol amendments must be submitted to the FDA as part of the IND.
A sponsor who wishes to conduct a clinical trial outside the United States may, but need not, obtain FDA authorization to conduct the clinical trial under an IND. If a foreign
clinical trial is not conducted under an IND, the sponsor may submit data from the clinical trial to the FDA in support of the BLA so long as the clinical trial is well-designed and well-conducted in accordance with GCP, including review and
approval by an independent ethics committee, and the FDA is able to validate the study data through an onsite inspection, if necessary.
Further, each clinical trial must be reviewed and approved by an institutional review board, or IRB, either centrally or individually at each institution at which the clinical
trial will be conducted. The IRB will consider, among other things, clinical trial design, patient informed consent, ethical factors and the safety of human subjects. An IRB must operate in compliance with FDA regulations. The FDA, IRB, or the
clinical trial sponsor may suspend or discontinue a clinical trial at any time for various reasons, including a finding that the clinical trial is not being conducted in accordance with FDA requirements or the subjects or patients are being
exposed to an unacceptable health risk. Clinical testing also must satisfy extensive GCP rules and the requirements for informed consent. Additionally, some clinical trials are overseen by an independent group of qualified experts organized by
the clinical trial sponsor, known as a data safety monitoring board or committee. This group may recommend continuation of the study as planned, changes in study conduct, or cessation of the study at designated check points based on access to
certain data from the study. Information about certain clinical studies must be submitted within specific timeframes to the National Institutes of Health for public dissemination.
Clinical trials typically are conducted in three sequential phases, but the phases may overlap or be combined. Additional studies may be required after approval.
Phase 1 clinical trials are initially conducted in a limited population to test the product candidate for safety, including adverse effects, dose tolerance, absorption,
metabolism, distribution, excretion and pharmacodynamics in healthy humans or, on occasion, in patients, such as cancer patients.
Phase 2 clinical trials are generally conducted in a limited patient population to identify possible adverse effects and safety risks, evaluate the efficacy of the product
candidate for specific targeted indications and determine dose tolerance and optimal dosage. Multiple Phase 2 clinical trials may be conducted by the sponsor to obtain information prior to beginning larger Phase 3 clinical trials.
Phase 3 clinical trials proceed if the Phase 2 clinical trials demonstrate that a dose range of the product candidate is potentially effective and has an acceptable safety
profile. Phase 3 clinical trials are undertaken within an expanded patient population to gather additional information about safety and effectiveness necessary to evaluate the overall benefit-risk relationship of the drug and to provide an
adequate basis for physician labeling.
In some cases, the FDA may approve a BLA for a product candidate but require the sponsor to conduct additional clinical trials to further assess the product candidate’s safety and
effectiveness after approval. Such post-approval trials are typically referred to as Phase 4 clinical trials. These studies are used to gain additional experience from the treatment of patients in the intended therapeutic indication and to
document a clinical benefit in the case of biologics approved under accelerated approval regulations. If the FDA approves a product while a company has ongoing clinical trials that were not necessary for approval, a company may be able to use the
data from these clinical trials to meet all or part of any Phase 4 clinical trial requirement or to request a change in the product labeling. Failure to exhibit due diligence with regard to conducting required Phase 4 clinical trials could result
in withdrawal of approval for products.
18
Table of Contents
Compliance with cGMP Requirements
Before approving a BLA, the FDA typically will inspect the facility or facilities where the product is manufactured. The FDA will not approve an application unless it determines
that the manufacturing processes and facilities are in full compliance with cGMP requirements and adequate to assure consistent production of the product within required specifications. The PHSA emphasizes the importance of manufacturing control
for products like biologics whose attributes cannot be precisely defined. The manufacturing process must be capable of consistently producing quality batches of the product candidate and, among other things, the sponsor must develop methods for
testing the identity, strength, quality, potency and purity of the final biological product. Additionally, appropriate packaging must be selected and tested and stability studies must be conducted to demonstrate that the biological product
candidate does not undergo unacceptable deterioration over its shelf life.
Manufacturers and others involved in the manufacture and distribution of products must also register their establishments with the FDA and certain state agencies. Both domestic
and foreign manufacturing establishments must register and provide additional information to the FDA upon their initial participation in the manufacturing process. Any product manufactured by or imported from a facility that has not registered,
whether foreign or domestic, is deemed misbranded under the FDCA. Establishments may be subject to periodic unannounced inspections by government authorities to ensure compliance with cGMPs and other laws. Manufacturers may have to provide, on
request, electronic or physical records regarding their establishments. Delaying, denying, limiting or refusing inspection by the FDA may lead to a product being deemed to be adulterated.
Review and Approval of a BLA
The results of product candidate development, nonclinical testing and clinical trials, including negative or ambiguous results as well as positive findings, are submitted to the
FDA as part of a BLA requesting a license to market the product. The BLA must contain extensive manufacturing information and detailed information on the composition of the product and proposed labeling as well as payment of a user fee.
The FDA has 60 days after submission of the application to conduct an initial review to determine whether the BLA is sufficient to accept for filing based on the agency’s
threshold determination that it is sufficiently complete to permit substantive review. Once the submission has been accepted for filing, the FDA begins an in-depth review of the application. Under the goals and policies agreed to by the FDA under
the Prescription Drug User Fee Act, or the PDUFA, the FDA has ten months in which to complete its initial review of a standard application and respond to the applicant, and six months for a priority review of an application. The FDA does not
always meet its PDUFA goal dates for standard and priority BLAs. The review process may often be significantly extended by FDA requests for additional information or clarification. The review process and the PDUFA goal date may be extended by
three months if the FDA requests or if the applicant otherwise provides additional information or clarification regarding information already provided in the submission within the last three months before the PDUFA goal date.
On the basis of the FDA’s evaluation of the application and accompanying information, including the results of the inspection of the manufacturing facilities and any FDA audits of
clinical trial sites to assure compliance with GCPs, the FDA may issue an approval letter or a complete response letter. An approval letter authorizes commercial marketing of the product with specific prescribing information for specific
indications. Under the PHSA, the FDA may approve a BLA if it determines that the product is safe, pure and potent and the facility where the product will be manufactured meets standards designed to ensure that it continues to be safe, pure and
potent. If the application is not approved, the FDA may issue a complete response letter, which will contain the conditions that must be met in order to secure final approval of the application, and when possible will outline recommended actions
the sponsor might take to obtain approval of the application. Sponsors that receive a complete response letter may submit to the FDA information that represents a complete response to the issues identified by the FDA or withdraw the application
or request a hearing. The FDA will not approve an application until issues identified in the complete response letter have been addressed.
The FDA may also refer the application to an advisory committee for review, evaluation and recommendation as to whether the application should be approved. In particular, the FDA
may refer applications for novel biological products or biological products that present difficult questions of safety or efficacy to an advisory committee. Typically, an advisory committee is a panel of independent experts, including clinicians
and other scientific experts, that reviews, evaluates and provides a recommendation as to whether the application should be approved and under what conditions. The FDA is not bound by the recommendations of an advisory committee, but it considers
such recommendations carefully when making decisions.
If the FDA approves a new product, it may limit the approved indications for use of the product. It may also require that contraindications, warnings or precautions be included in
the product labeling. In addition, the FDA may call for post-approval studies, including Phase 4 clinical trials, to further assess the product’s safety after approval. The agency may also require testing and surveillance programs to monitor the
product after commercialization or impose other conditions, including distribution restrictions or other risk management mechanisms, including REMS, to help ensure that the benefits of the product outweigh the potential risks. REMS can include
medication guides, communication plans for healthcare professionals, and elements to assure safe use, or ETASU. ETASU can include, but are not limited to, special training or certification for prescribing or dispensing, dispensing only under
certain circumstances, special monitoring and the use of patent registries. The FDA may prevent or limit further marketing of a product based on the results of post-market studies or surveillance programs. After approval, many types of changes to
the approved product, such as adding new indications, manufacturing changes and additional labeling claims, are subject to further testing requirements and FDA review and approval.
19
Table of Contents
Fast Track, Breakthrough Therapy and Priority Review Designations
The FDA is authorized to designate certain products for expedited review if they are intended to address an unmet medical need in the treatment of a serious or life-threatening
disease or condition. These programs are referred to as fast track designation, breakthrough therapy designation and priority review designation.
The FDA may designate a product for fast track review if it is intended, whether alone or in combination with one or more other products, for the treatment of a serious or
life-threatening disease or condition, and it demonstrates the potential to address unmet medical needs for such a disease or condition. For fast track products, sponsors may have greater interactions with the FDA and the FDA may initiate review
of sections of a fast track product’s application before the application is complete. This rolling review may be available if the FDA determines, after preliminary evaluation of clinical data submitted by the sponsor, that a fast track product
may be effective. The sponsor must also provide, and the FDA must approve, a schedule for the submission of the remaining information and the sponsor must pay applicable user fees. However, the FDA’s time period goal for reviewing a fast track
application does not begin until the last section of the application is submitted. Fast track designation may be withdrawn by the FDA if the FDA believes that the designation is no longer supported by data emerging in the clinical trial process.
A product may be designated as a breakthrough therapy if it is intended, either alone or in combination with one or more other products, to treat a serious or life-threatening
disease or condition and preliminary clinical evidence indicates that the product may demonstrate substantial improvement over existing therapies on one or more clinically significant endpoints, such as substantial treatment effects observed
early in clinical development. The FDA may take certain actions with respect to breakthrough therapies, including holding meetings with the sponsor throughout the development process; providing timely advice to the product sponsor regarding
development and approval; involving more senior staff in the review process; assigning a cross-disciplinary project lead for the review team; and taking other steps to design the clinical trials in an efficient manner.
The FDA may designate a product for priority review if it is a product that treats a serious condition and, if approved, would provide a significant improvement in safety or
effectiveness. The FDA determines, on a case-by-case basis, whether the proposed product represents a significant improvement when compared with other available therapies. Significant improvement may be illustrated by evidence of increased
effectiveness in the treatment of a condition, elimination or substantial reduction of a treatment-limiting product reaction, documented enhancement of patient compliance that may lead to improvement in serious outcomes and evidence of safety and
effectiveness in a new subpopulation. A priority designation is intended to direct overall attention and resources to the evaluation of such applications, and to shorten the FDA’s goal for taking action on a marketing application from ten months
to six months.
Accelerated Approval Pathway
The FDA may grant accelerated approval to a product for a serious or life-threatening condition that provides meaningful therapeutic advantage to patients over existing treatments
based upon a determination that the product has an effect on a surrogate endpoint that is reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit. The FDA may also grant accelerated approval for such a condition when the product has an effect on an
intermediate clinical endpoint that can be measured earlier than an effect on irreversible morbidity or mortality, or IMM, and that is reasonably likely to predict an effect on IMM or other clinical benefit, taking into account the severity,
rarity or prevalence of the condition and the availability or lack of alternative treatments. Products granted accelerated approval must meet the same statutory standards for safety and effectiveness as those granted traditional approval.
For the purposes of accelerated approval, a surrogate endpoint is a marker, such as a laboratory measurement, radiographic image, physical sign or other measure that is thought to
predict clinical benefit but is not itself a measure of clinical benefit. Surrogate endpoints can often be measured more easily or more rapidly than clinical endpoints. An intermediate clinical endpoint is a measurement of a therapeutic effect
that is considered reasonably likely to predict the clinical benefit of a product, such as an effect on IMM. The FDA has limited experience with accelerated approvals based on intermediate clinical endpoints, but has indicated that such endpoints
generally may support accelerated approval where the therapeutic effect measured by the endpoint is not itself a clinical benefit and basis for traditional approval, if there is a basis for concluding that the therapeutic effect is reasonably
likely to predict the ultimate clinical benefit of a product.
The accelerated approval pathway is most often used in settings in which the course of a disease is long and an extended period of time is required to measure the intended
clinical benefit of a product, even if the effect on the surrogate or intermediate clinical endpoint occurs rapidly. Thus, accelerated approval has been used extensively in the development and approval of products for treatment of a variety of
cancers in which the goal of therapy is generally to improve survival or decrease morbidity and the duration of the typical disease course requires lengthy and sometimes large trials to demonstrate a clinical or survival benefit.
20
Table of Contents
The accelerated approval pathway is usually contingent on a sponsor’s agreement to conduct, in a diligent manner, additional post-approval confirmatory studies to verify and
describe the product’s clinical benefit. As a result, a product candidate approved on this basis is subject to rigorous post-marketing compliance requirements, including the completion of Phase 4 or post-approval clinical trials to confirm the
effect on the clinical endpoint. Failure to conduct required post-approval studies or confirm a clinical benefit during post-marketing studies, would allow the FDA to withdraw the product from the market on an expedited basis. All promotional
materials for product candidates approved under accelerated regulations are subject to prior review by the FDA.
Post-Approval Regulation
If regulatory approval for marketing of a product or new indication for an existing product is obtained, the sponsor will be required to comply with all post-approval regulatory
requirements as well as any post-approval requirements that the FDA has imposed as part of the approval process. The sponsor will be required to report certain adverse reactions and production problems to the FDA, provide updated safety and
efficacy information and comply with requirements concerning advertising and promotional labeling. Manufacturers and certain of their subcontractors are required to register their establishments with the FDA and certain state agencies, and are
subject to periodic unannounced inspections by the FDA and certain state agencies for compliance with ongoing regulatory requirements, including cGMP regulations, which impose certain procedural and documentation requirements upon manufacturers.
Accordingly, the sponsor and its third-party manufacturers must continue to expend time, money and effort in the areas of production and quality control to maintain compliance with cGMP regulations and other regulatory requirements.
A biological product may also be subject to official lot release, meaning that the manufacturer is required to perform certain tests on each lot of the product before it is
released for distribution. If the product is subject to official lot release, the manufacturer must submit samples of each lot, together with a release protocol showing a summary of the history of manufacture of the lot and the results of all of
the manufacturer’s tests performed on the lot, to the FDA. The FDA may in addition perform certain confirmatory tests on lots of some products before releasing the lots for distribution. Finally, the FDA will conduct laboratory research related
to the safety, purity, potency and effectiveness of pharmaceutical products.
Once an approval is granted, the FDA may withdraw the approval if compliance with regulatory requirements and standards is not maintained or if problems occur after the product
reaches the market. Later discovery of previously unknown problems with a product, including adverse events of unanticipated severity or frequency, or with manufacturing processes, or failure to comply with regulatory requirements, may result in
revisions to the approved labeling to add new safety information; imposition of post-market studies or clinical trials to assess new safety risks; or imposition of distribution or other restrictions under a REMS program. FDA also has authority to
require post-market studies, in certain circumstances, on reduced effectiveness of a product and may require labeling changes related to new reduced effectiveness information. Other potential consequences for a failure to maintain regulatory
compliance include, among other things:
•
restrictions on the marketing or manufacturing of the product, complete withdrawal of the product from the market or product recalls;
•
fines, untitled letters or warning letters or holds on post-approval clinical trials;
•
refusal of the FDA to approve pending applications or supplements to approved applications, or suspension or revocation of product license approvals;
•
product seizure or detention, or refusal to permit the import or export of products; or
•
injunctions or the imposition of civil or criminal penalties.
The FDA strictly regulates marketing, labeling, advertising and promotion of products that are placed on the market. Pharmaceutical products may be promoted only for the approved
indications and in accordance with the provisions of the approved label. The FDA and other agencies actively enforce the laws and regulations prohibiting the promotion of off-label uses, and a company that is found to have improperly promoted
off-label uses may be subject to significant liability.
Orphan Drug Designation
Orphan Drug Designation in the United States is designed to encourage sponsors to develop products intended for rare diseases or conditions. In the United States, a rare disease
or condition is statutorily defined as a condition that affects fewer than 200,000 individuals in the United States or that affects 200,000 or more individuals in the United States and for which there is no reasonable expectation that the cost of
developing and making available the product for the disease or condition will be recovered from sales of the product in the United States.
21
Table of Contents
Orphan Drug Designation qualifies a company for tax credits and market exclusivity for seven years following the date of the product’s marketing approval if granted by the FDA. An
application for designation as an orphan product can be made any time prior to the filing of an application for approval to market the product. A product becomes an orphan when it receives Orphan Drug Designation from the Office of Orphan
Products Development, or OOPD, at the FDA based on an acceptable confidential request made under the regulatory provisions. The product must then go through the review and approval process like any other product in order to be marketed.
A sponsor may request Orphan Drug Designation of a previously unapproved product or new orphan indication for an already marketed product. In addition, a sponsor of a product that
is otherwise the same product as an already approved orphan drug may seek and obtain Orphan Drug Designation for the subsequent product for the same rare disease or condition if it can present a plausible hypothesis that its product may be
clinically superior to the first drug. More than one sponsor may receive Orphan Drug Designation for the same product for the same rare disease or condition, but each sponsor seeking Orphan Drug Designation must file a complete request for
designation.
The period of exclusivity begins on the date that the marketing application is approved by the FDA and applies only to the indication for which the product has been designated.
The FDA may approve a second application for the same product for a different use or a second application for a clinically superior version of the product for the same use. The FDA cannot, however, approve the same product made by another
manufacturer for the same indication during the market exclusivity period unless it has the consent of the sponsor or the sponsor is unable to provide sufficient quantities.
Pediatric Studies and Exclusivity
Under the Pediatric Research Equity Act of 2003, as amended, a BLA or supplement thereto must contain data that are adequate to assess the safety and effectiveness of the product
for the claimed indications in all relevant pediatric subpopulations, and to support dosing and administration for each pediatric subpopulation for which the product is safe and effective. Sponsors must also submit pediatric study plans prior to
the assessment data. Those plans must contain an outline of the proposed pediatric study or studies the applicant plans to conduct, including study objectives and design, any deferral or waiver requests and other information required by
regulation. The applicant, the FDA, and the FDA’s internal review committee must then review the information submitted, consult with each other and agree upon a final plan. The FDA or the applicant may request an amendment to the plan at any
time.
The FDA may, on its own initiative or at the request of the applicant, grant deferrals for submission of some or all pediatric data until after approval of the product for use in
adults, or full or partial waivers from the pediatric data requirements. Generally, the pediatric data requirements do not apply to products with orphan designation.
Pediatric exclusivity is another type of non-patent marketing exclusivity in the United States and, if granted, provides for the attachment of an additional six months of
marketing protection to the term of any existing regulatory exclusivity, including the non-patent and orphan exclusivity. This six-month exclusivity may be granted if a BLA sponsor submits pediatric data that fairly respond to a written request
from the FDA for such data. The data do not need to show the product to be effective in the pediatric population studied; rather, if the clinical trial is deemed to fairly respond to the FDA’s request, the additional protection is granted. If
reports of requested pediatric studies are submitted to and accepted by the FDA within the statutory time limits, whatever statutory or regulatory periods of exclusivity or patent protection cover the product are extended by six months. This is
not a patent term extension, but it effectively extends the regulatory period during which the FDA cannot approve another application.
Biosimilars and Exclusivity
The Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act, or BPCIA, established a regulatory scheme authorizing the FDA to approve biosimilars and interchangeable biosimilars.
Under the BPCIA, a manufacturer may submit an application for licensure of a biologic product that is “biosimilar to” or “interchangeable with” a previously approved biological
product or “reference product.” For the FDA to approve a biosimilar product, it must find that there are no clinically meaningful differences between the reference product and proposed biosimilar product in terms of safety, purity and potency.
For the FDA to approve a biosimilar product as interchangeable with a reference product, the agency must find that the biosimilar product can be expected to produce the same clinical results as the reference product, and (for products
administered multiple times) that the biologic and the reference biologic may be switched after one has been previously administered without increasing safety risks or risks of diminished efficacy relative to exclusive use of the reference
biologic.
Under the BPCIA, an application for a biosimilar product may not be submitted to the FDA until four years following the date of approval of the reference product. The FDA may not
approve a biosimilar product until 12 years from the date on which the reference product was approved. Even if a product is considered to be a reference product eligible for exclusivity, another company could market a competing version of that
product if the FDA approves a full BLA for such product containing the sponsor’s own nonclinical data and data from adequate and well-controlled clinical trials to demonstrate the safety, purity and potency of their product.
22
Table of Contents
Regulation and Procedures Governing Approval of Medicinal Products in the EU
In order to market any product outside of the United States, a company also must comply with numerous and varying regulatory requirements of other countries and jurisdictions
regarding quality, safety and efficacy and governing, among other things, clinical trials, marketing authorization, commercial sales and distribution of products. Whether or not it obtains FDA approval for a product, an applicant will need to
obtain the necessary approvals by the comparable foreign regulatory authorities before it can initiate clinical trials or marketing of the product in those countries or jurisdictions. Specifically, the process governing approval of medicinal
products in the EU generally follows the same lines as in the United States. It entails satisfactory completion of pharmaceutical development, nonclinical studies and adequate and well-controlled clinical trials to establish the safety and
efficacy of the medicinal product for each proposed indication. It also requires the submission to relevant competent authorities for clinical trials authorization and to the European Medicines Agency, or EMA, or to competent authorities in the
Member States for a marketing authorization application, or MAA, and granting of a marketing authorization by these authorities before the product can be marketed and sold in the EU.
Clinical Trial Approval
In the EU, clinical trials are governed by the Clinical Trials Regulation (EU) No 536/2014, or CTR, which entered into application on January 31, 2022 repealing and replacing the former Clinical
Trials Directive 2001/20, or CTD.
The CTR is intended to harmonize and streamline clinical trial authorizations, simplify adverse-event reporting procedures, improve the supervision of clinical trials and increase transparency.
Specifically, the Regulation, which is directly applicable in all Member States, introduces a streamlined application procedure through a single-entry point, the “EU portal”, the Clinical Trials Information System, or CTIS; a single set of
documents to be prepared and submitted for the application; as well as simplified reporting procedures for clinical trial sponsors. A harmonized procedure for the assessment of applications for clinical trials has been introduced and is divided
into two parts. Part I assessment is led by the competent authorities of a reference Member State selected by the trial sponsor and relates to clinical trial aspects that are considered to be scientifically harmonized across Member States. This
assessment is then submitted to the competent authorities of all concerned Member States in which the trial is to be conducted for their review. Part II is assessed separately by the competent authorities and Ethics Committees in each concerned
Member State. Individual Member States retain the power to authorize the conduct of clinical trials on their territory.
The extent to which on-going clinical trials will be governed by the CTR will depend on the duration of the individual clinical trial. For clinical trials in relation to which an application for
approval was made on the basis of the CTD before January 31, 2023, the CTD will continue to apply on a transitional basis until January 31, 2025. By that date, all ongoing trials will become subject to the provisions of the CTR. The CTR will
apply to clinical trials from an earlier date if the related clinical trial application was made on the basis of the CTR or if the clinical trial has already transitioned to the CTR framework before January 31, 2025.
Marketing Authorization
In the EU, medicinal products can only be commercialized after a related marketing authorization, or MA, has been granted. To obtain an MA for a product in the EU, an applicant
must submit an MAA either under a centralized procedure administered by the EMA or one of the procedures administered by the competent authorities of the Member States (decentralized procedure, national procedure, or mutual recognition
procedure). A marketing authorization may be granted only to an applicant established in the EU.
The centralized procedure provides for the grant of a single marketing authorization by the European Commission that is valid for the European Economic Area or EEA (which is
comprised of the 27 Member States plus Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein). Pursuant to Regulation (EC) No. 726/2004, the centralized procedure is compulsory for specific products, including for medicines produced by certain biotechnological
processes, products designated as orphan medicinal products, advanced therapy products and products with a new active substance indicated for the treatment of HIV/AIDS, cancer, neurodegenerative diseases, diabetes, autoimmune and other immune
dysfunctions and viral diseases. For products with a new active substance indicated for the treatment of other diseases and products that are highly innovative or for which the centralized procedure is in the interest of public health, the
centralized procedure may be optional.
Under the centralized procedure, the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use, or the CHMP, established at the European Medicines Agency (EMA) is responsible
for conducting the initial assessment of a product, including the definition of its risk/benefit profile. The CHMP is also responsible for several post-authorization and maintenance activities, such as the assessment of modifications or
extensions to an existing MA. Under the centralized procedure, the maximum timeframe for the evaluation of an MAA is 210 days, excluding clock stops when additional information or written or oral explanation is to
be provided by the applicant in response to questions of the CHMP. Accelerated assessment may be granted by the CHMP in exceptional cases, when a medicinal product is of major interest from the point of view of public health and, in particular,
from the viewpoint of therapeutic innovation. If the CHMP accepts such a request, the time limit of 210 days will be reduced to 150 days (excluding clock stops), but it is possible that the CHMP may revert to the standard time limit for the
centralized procedure if it determines that it is no longer appropriate to conduct an accelerated assessment.
23
Table of Contents
Unlike the centralized authorization procedure, the decentralized MA procedure requires a separate application to, and leads to separate approval by, the competent authorities of each Member
State in which the product is to be marketed. This application is identical to the application that would be submitted to the EMA for authorization through the centralized procedure. The reference Member State prepares a draft assessment and
drafts of the related materials within 120 days after receipt of a valid application. The resulting assessment report is submitted to the concerned Member States who, within 90 days of receipt, must decide whether to approve the assessment report
and related materials. If a concerned Member State cannot approve the assessment report and related materials due to concerns relating to a potential serious risk to public health, disputed elements may be referred to the Heads of Medicines
Agencies’ Coordination Group for Mutual Recognition and Decentralised Procedures – Human, or CMDh, for review. The subsequent decision of the European Commission is binding on all Member States.
The mutual recognition procedure allows companies that have a medicinal product already authorized in one Member State to apply for this authorization to be recognized by the competent
authorities in other Member States. Like the decentralized procedure, the mutual recognition procedure is based on the acceptance by the competent authorities of the Member States of the MA of a medicinal product by the competent authorities of
other Member States. The holder of a national MA may submit an application to the competent authority of a Member State requesting that this authority recognize the MA delivered by the competent authority of another Member State.
A marketing authorization has an initial validity for five years, in principle, and it may be renewed after five years on the basis of a re-evaluation of the risk
benefit balance by the EMA or by the competent authority of the Member State in which the original marketing authorization was granted. To that end, the marketing authorization holder must provide the EMA or the competent authority with a
consolidated version of the Common Technical Document providing up-to-date data concerning the quality, safety and efficacy of the product, including all variations introduced since the marketing authorization was granted, at least nine months
before the marketing authorization ceases to be valid. The European Commission or the competent authorities of the Member States may decide on justified grounds relating to pharmacovigilance, to proceed with one further five year
renewal period for the MA. Once subsequently definitively renewed, the marketing authorization is valid for an unlimited period. Any authorization that is not followed by the placement of the drug on the EU market
(in the case of the centralized procedure) or on the market of the authorizing Member State within three years after authorization ceases to be valid (the so-called sunset clause).
In the EU , a “conditional” MA may be granted in cases where all the required safety and efficacy data are not yet available. The European Commission may
grant a conditional MA for a medicinal product if it is demonstrated that all of the following criteria are met: (i) the benefit-risk balance of the medicinal product is positive; (ii) it is likely that the applicant will be able to provide
comprehensive data post-authorization; (iii) the medicinal product fulfils an unmet medical need; and (iv) the benefit of the immediate availability to patients of the medicinal product is greater than the risk inherent in the fact that
additional data are still required. The conditional MA is subject to conditions to be fulfilled for generating the missing data or ensuring increased safety measures. It is valid for one year and must be renewed annually until all related
conditions have been fulfilled. Once any pending studies are provided, the conditional MA can be converted into a traditional MA. However, if the conditions are not fulfilled within the timeframe set by the EMA and approved by the European
Commission, the MA will cease to be renewed.
An MA may also be granted “under exceptional circumstances” where the applicant can show that it is unable to provide comprehensive data on efficacy and safety under normal conditions of use even
after the product has been authorized and subject to specific procedures being introduced. These circumstances may arise in particular when the intended indications are very rare and, in the state of scientific knowledge at that time, it is not
possible to provide comprehensive information, or when generating data may be contrary to generally accepted ethical principles. Like a conditional MA, an MA granted in exceptional circumstances is reserved to medicinal products intended to be
authorized for treatment of rare diseases or unmet medical needs for which the applicant does not hold a complete data set that is required for the grant of a standard MA. However, unlike the conditional MA, an applicant for authorization in
exceptional circumstances is not subsequently required to provide the missing data. Although the MA “under exceptional circumstances” is granted definitively, the risk-benefit balance of the medicinal product is reviewed annually, and the MA will
be withdrawn if the risk-benefit ratio is no longer favorable.
Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products in the EU
Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products, or ATMPs, include gene therapy products as well as somatic cell therapy products and tissue engineered products. The grant of marketing authorization in the EU for products containing viable human tissues or cells such as gene therapy medicinal products is governed by Regulation (EC) No. 1394/2007 on ATMPs, read in combination with Directive (EC) No. 2001/83 of the
European Parliament and of the Council, commonly known as the Community code on medicinal products. Regulation (EC) No. 1394/2007 establishes specific rules concerning the authorization, supervision and pharmacovigilance of gene therapy medicinal
products, somatic cell therapy medicinal products and tissue engineered products. Manufacturers of advanced therapy medicinal products must demonstrate the quality, safety and efficacy of their products to the EMA which is required to provide an
opinion regarding the application for marketing authorization. The European Commission grants or refuses marketing authorization in light of the opinion delivered by the EMA.
24
Table of Contents
Cell-based products must also comply with Directive (EC) No. 2004/23 of the European Parliament and of the Council of March 31, 2004 on setting standards of quality and safety for the donation,
procurement, testing, processing, preservation, storage and distribution of human tissues and cells, or the Tissues and Cells Directive, as well as its technical implementing directives. This Directive describes the conditions and quality
requirements which must be applied when sourcing the cells intended for manufacturing of the cell-based medicinal product. The Member States have transposed the Tissues and Cells Directive into their national laws. However, various
interpretations of the Tissue and Cells Directive have occurred and are reflected in individual Member States national implementing legislation which have led to diverging approaches.
Pediatric Development
In the EU , Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006 provides that all MAAs for
new medicinal products have to include the results of trials conducted in the pediatric population, in compliance with a pediatric investigation plan, or PIP, agreed with the EMA’s Pediatric Committee, or PDCO. The PIP sets out the timing and
measures proposed to generate data to support a pediatric indication of the medicinal product for which MA is being sought. The PDCO can grant a deferral of the obligation to implement some or all of the measures provided in the PIP until there
are sufficient data to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of the product in adults. Further, the obligation to provide pediatric clinical trial data can be waived by the PDCO when these data are not needed or appropriate because the product is likely to be ineffective or unsafe in children, the disease or condition for which the product is intended occurs only in adult populations, or when the product does not represent a
significant therapeutic benefit over existing treatments for pediatric patients. Once the MA is obtained in all Member States and study results are included in the product information, even when negative, the product is eligible for a six-month
extension to the Supplementary Protection Certificate, or SPC, if any is in effect at the time of authorization or, in the case of orphan medicinal products, a two-year extension of orphan market exclusivity.
Manufacturing Regulation in the EU
In addition to an MA, various other requirements apply to the manufacturing and placing on the EU’s market of medicinal products. The manufacturing of
medicinal products in the EU requires a manufacturing authorization and import of medicinal products into the EU requires a manufacturing authorization allowing for
import. The manufacturing authorization holder must comply with various requirements set out in the applicable laws of the EU , regulations and guidance, including the EU’s
cGMP standards. Similarly, the distribution of medicinal products within the EU is subject to compliance with the applicable laws, regulations and guidelines, of the EU, including the requirement to hold
appropriate authorizations for distribution granted by the competent authorities of Member States. Marketing authorization holders and/or manufacturing and import authorization, or MA holders and/or distribution authorization holders may be
subject to civil, criminal or administrative sanctions, including suspension of manufacturing authorization, in case of non-compliance with the EU’s or Member States’ requirements applicable to the manufacturing of medicinal products.
Data and Market Exclusivity
The EU provides opportunities for data and market exclusivity related to MAs. Upon receiving an MA, innovative medicinal
products are generally entitled to receive eight years of data exclusivity and 10 years of market exclusivity. Data exclusivity, if granted, prevents regulatory authorities in the EU from referencing the
innovator’s data to assess a generic application or biosimilar application for eight years from the date of authorization of the innovative product, after which a generic or biosimilar MAA can be submitted, and the innovator’s data may be
referenced. The market exclusivity period prevents a successful generic or biosimilar applicant from commercializing its product in the EU until 10 years have elapsed from the initial MA of the reference
product in the EU . The overall ten-year period may, occasionally, be extended for a further year to a maximum of 11 years if, during the first eight years of those ten years, the MA holder obtains an
authorization for one or more new therapeutic indications which, during the scientific evaluation prior to their authorization, are held to bring a significant clinical benefit in comparison with existing therapies. However, there is no
guarantee that a product will be considered by the EU’s regulatory authorities to be a new chemical/biological entity, and products may not qualify for data exclusivity.
In the EU , there is a special regime for biosimilars, or biological medicinal products that are similar to a reference medicinal product but that do not meet the definition of a generic medicinal product. For such products, the results of appropriate preclinical or clinical trials must be provided in support of an application
for MA. Guidelines from the EMA detail the type of quantity of supplementary data to be provided for different types of biological product.
Orphan Designation
In the EU, Regulation (EC) No. 141/2000, as implemented by Regulation (EC) No. 847/2000 provides that a medicinal product can be designated as an orphan medicinal product by the European
Commission if its sponsor can establish that: (i) the product is intended for the diagnosis, prevention or treatment of life-threatening or chronically debilitating conditions; (ii) either (a) such conditions affect not more than 5 in 10,000
persons in the EU when the application is made, or (b) the product without the benefits derived from orphan status, would not generate sufficient return in the EU to justify the necessary investment in developing the medicinal product; and (iii)
there exists no satisfactory authorized method of diagnosis, prevention, or treatment of the condition that has been authorized in the EU, or even if such method exists, the product will be of significant benefit to those affected by that
condition.
25
Table of Contents
Regulation (EC) No 847/2000 sets out further provisions for implementation of the criteria for designation of a medicinal product as an orphan medicinal product. An application for the
designation of a medicinal product as an orphan medicinal product must be submitted at any stage of development of the medicinal product but before filing of an MAA. An MA for an orphan medicinal product may only include indications designated as
orphan. For non-orphan indications treated with the same active pharmaceutical ingredient, a separate marketing authorization has to be sought.
Orphan medicinal product designation entitles an applicant to incentives such fee reductions or fee waivers, protocol assistance, and access to the centralized marketing authorization procedure.
Upon grant of a marketing authorization, orphan medicinal products are entitled to a ten-year period of market exclusivity for the approved therapeutic indication, which means that the EMA cannot accept another marketing authorization application
or accept an application to extend for a similar product and the European Commission cannot grant a marketing authorization for the same indication for a period of ten years. The period of market exclusivity is extended by two years for orphan
medicinal products that have also complied with an agreed PIP. No extension to any supplementary protection certificate can be granted on the basis of pediatric studies for orphan indications. Orphan medicinal product designation does not convey
any advantage in, or shorten the duration of, the regulatory review and approval process.
The period of market exclusivity may, however, be reduced to six years if, at the end of the fifth year, it is established that the product no longer meets the criteria on the basis of which it
received orphan medicinal product destination, including where it can be demonstrated on the basis of available evidence that the original orphan medicinal product is sufficiently profitable not to justify maintenance of market exclusivity or
where the prevalence of the condition has increased above the threshold. Additionally, an MA may be granted to a similar medicinal product with the same orphan indication during the 10 year period if: (i) if the applicant consents to a second
original orphan medicinal product application, (ii) if the manufacturer of the original orphan medicinal product is unable to supply sufficient quantities; or (iii) if the second applicant can establish that its product, although similar, is
safer, more effective or otherwise clinically superior to the original orphan medicinal product. A company may voluntarily remove a product from the register of orphan products.
Post-approval Requirements
Where an MA is granted in relation to a medicinal product in the EU , the holder of the MA is required to comply with a range of
regulatory requirements applicable to the manufacturing, marketing, promotion and sale of medicinal products. Similar to the United States, both MA holders and manufacturers of medicinal products are subject to comprehensive regulatory
oversight by the EMA, the European Commission and/or the competent regulatory authorities of the individual Member States. The holder of an MA must establish and maintain a pharmacovigilance system and appoint an individual qualified person for
pharmacovigilance who is responsible for oversight of that system. Key obligations include expedited reporting of suspected serious adverse reactions and submission of periodic safety update reports, or PSURs.
All new MAAs must include a risk management plan, or RMP, describing the risk management system that the company will put in place and documenting measures to prevent or minimize the risks
associated with the product. The regulatory authorities may also impose specific obligations as a condition of the MA. Such risk- minimization measures or post-authorization obligations may include additional safety monitoring, more frequent
submission of PSURs, or the conduct of additional clinical trials or post-authorization safety studies.
In the EU , the advertising and promotion of medicinal products are subject to both the EU’s and Member States’ laws governing
promotion of medicinal products, interactions with physicians and other healthcare professionals, misleading and comparative advertising and unfair commercial practices. General requirements for advertising and promotion of medicinal
products, such as direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription medicinal products are established in the law of the EU. However, the details are governed by regulations in individual Member States and can differ from one country to another. For
example, applicable laws require that promotional materials and advertising in relation to medicinal products comply with the product’s Summary of Product Characteristics, or SmPC, which may require approval by the competent national authorities
in connection with an MA. The SmPC is the document that provides information to physicians concerning the safe and effective use of the product. Promotional activity that does not comply with the SmPC is considered off-label and is prohibited in
the EU.
Regulation of Companion Diagnostics in the EU
In the EEA, companion diagnostics are deemed to be in vitro diagnostic medical devices, or IVDs, and are governed by Regulation 2017/746, or IVDR, which
entered into application on May 26, 2022, repealing and replacing Directive 98/79/EC. The IVDR defines a companion diagnostic as a device which is essential for the safe and effective use of a corresponding medicinal product to: (a) identify,
before and/or during treatment, patients who are most likely to benefit from the corresponding medicinal product; or (b) identify, before and/or during treatment, patients likely to be at increased risk of serious adverse reactions as a result of
treatment with the corresponding medicinal product.
26
Table of Contents
The IVDR and its associated guidance documents and harmonized standards govern, among other things, device design and development, preclinical and clinical or performance testing, premarket
conformity assessment, registration and listing, manufacturing, labeling, storage, claims, sales and distribution, export and import and post-market surveillance, vigilance, and market surveillance. IVDs, including companion diagnostics, must
conform with the general safety and performance requirements, or GSPR, of the IVDR. Compliance with these requirements is a prerequisite to be able to affix the CE mark to devices, without which they cannot be marketed or sold in the EEA. To
demonstrate compliance with the GSPR laid down in Annex I to the IVDR, and obtain the right to affix the CE mark, IVD manufacturers must conduct a conformity assessment procedure, which varies according to the type of IVD and its classification.
Apart from low risk IVDs (Class A which are not sterile), in relation to which the manufacturer may issue an EU Declaration of Conformity based on a self-assessment of the conformity of its products with the GSPRs, a conformity assessment
procedure requires the intervention of a Notified Body, which is an organization designated by a Competent Authority of an EEA country to conduct conformity assessments. Depending on the relevant conformity assessment procedure, the Notified Body
audits and examines the technical documentation and the quality system for the manufacture, design and final inspection of the medical devices. The Notified Body issues a CE Certificate of Conformity following successful completion of a
conformity assessment procedure conducted in relation to the medical device and its manufacturer and their conformity with the GSPRs. This Certificate and the related conformity assessment process entitles the manufacturer to affix the CE mark to
its medical devices after having prepared and signed a related EC Declaration of Conformity.
Companion diagnostics must undergo a conformity assessment by a Notified Body. If the related medicinal product has, or is in the process of, been authorised through the centralized procedure for
the authorization of medicinal products, the notified body will, before it can issue a CE Certificate of Conformity, be required to seek a scientific opinion from the EMA on the suitability of the companion diagnostic for use in relation to the
medicinal product concerned. For medicinal products that have or are in the process of authorisation through any other route provided in EU legislation, the Notified Body must seek the opinion of the national competent authority of a Member
State.
Regulation in the United Kingdom
The withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the EU on January 31, 2020, commonly referred to as Brexit, has changed the regulatory relationship between the United Kingdom and the EU . The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, or MHRA, is now the United Kingdom’s
standalone regulator for medicinal products and medical devices. Great Britain (England, Scotland and Wales) is now no longer a Member State of the European Union and therefore a “third country”.
The United Kingdom’s regulatory framework in relation to clinical trials is governed by the Medicines for Human Use (Clinical
Trials) Regulations 2004, as amended, which is derived from the CTD, as implemented into the United Kingdom’s national law through secondary legislation. On January 17, 2022, the MHRA launched an eight-week consultation on reframing the
United Kingdom’s legislation of the United Kingdom for clinical trials, and which aimed to streamline clinical trials approvals, enable innovation, enhance clinical trials transparency, enable greater risk
proportionality, and promote patient and public involvement in clinical trials. The United Kingdom’s Government published its response to the consultation on March 21, 2023 confirming that it would bring
forward changes to the legislation. These resulting legislative amendments will determine how closely the United Kingdom’s regulations will align with the CTR. In October 2023, the MHRA announced a new
Notification Scheme for clinical trials which enables a more streamlined and risk-proportionate approach to initial clinical trial applications for Phase 4 and low-risk Phase 3 clinical trial applications.
Marketing authorizations in the United Kingdom are governed by the Human Medicines Regulations (SI 2012/1916), as amended. Since January 1, 2021, an applicant for the EU’s centralized procedure marketing authorization can no longer be established in the United Kingdom. As a result, since this date,
companies established in the United Kingdom cannot use the EU’s centralized procedure and instead must follow one of the United Kingdom’s national authorization procedures or one of the remaining
post-Brexit international cooperation procedures to obtain a marketing authorization to market products in the United Kingdom. A ll existing marketing authorizations of the EU for centrally authorized products
were automatically converted or grandfathered into the United Kingdom’s marketing authorization, effective in Great Britain only, free of charge on January 1, 2021, unless the marketing authorization holder
opted-out of this possibility. Northern Ireland currently remains within the scope of authorizations of the EU in relation to centrally authorized medicinal products. Accordingly, u ntil the Windsor Framework is
implemented in Northern Ireland on January 1, 2025, products falling within the scope of the EU’s centralized procedure can only be authorized through the United
Kingdom’s national authorization procedures in Great Britain.
The MHRA has also introduced changes to national marketing authorization procedures. This includes introduction of procedures to prioritize access to new medicines that will benefit patients,
including a 150-day assessment route, a rolling review procedure and the International Recognition Procedures which entered into application on January 1, 2024. Since January 1, 2024, the MHRA may rely on the International Recognition Procedure,
or IRP, when reviewing certain types of marketing authorization applications. This procedure is available for applicants for marketing authorization who have already received an authorization for the same product from a reference regulator. These
include the FDA, the EMA, and national competent authorities of individual EEA countries. A positive opinion from the EMA and CHMP, or a positive end of procedure outcome from the mutual recognition or decentralized procedures are considered to
be authorizations for the purposes of the IRP.
27
Table of Contents
There is no pre-marketing authorization orphan designation for medicinal products in the United Kingdom . Instead, the MHRA reviews
applications for orphan designation in parallel to the corresponding marketing authorization application. The criteria are essentially the same as those in the EU, but have been tailored for the market. This includes the criterion that prevalence
of the condition in Great Britain, rather than the EU, must not be more than five in 10,000. Upon the grant of a marketing authorization with orphan status, the medicinal product will benefit from up to 10 years of market exclusivity from similar
products in the approved orphan indication. The start of this market exclusivity period will be set from the date of first approval of the product in Great Britain.
Other Healthcare Laws and Regulations
Healthcare providers, physicians and third-party payors play a primary role in the recommendation and use of pharmaceutical products that are granted marketing approval.
Arrangements with third-party payors, existing or potential customers and referral sources, including healthcare providers, are subject to broadly applicable fraud and abuse, and these laws and regulations may constrain the business or financial
arrangements and relationships through which manufacturers conduct research, market, sell and distribute the products for which they obtain marketing approval. Such restrictions under applicable federal and state healthcare laws and regulations
include the following:
•
the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, which prohibits, among other things, persons and entities from knowingly and wilfully soliciting, receiving, offering or paying remuneration, directly or indirectly, in cash or
kind, in exchange for, or to induce, either the referral of an individual for, or the purchase, order or recommendation of, any good or service for which payment may be made, in whole or in part, under federal healthcare programs such as
the Medicare and Medicaid programs. This statute has been interpreted to apply to arrangements between pharmaceutical manufacturers, on the one hand, and prescribers, purchasers, formulary managers and other individuals and entities on
the other. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act, or collectively, the ACA, amended the intent requirement of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute such that a person or
entity no longer needs to have actual knowledge of this statute or specific intent to violate it in order to commit a violation;
•
the federal civil and criminal false claims, including the civil False Claims Act, or the FCA, and civil monetary penalties laws, which prohibit, among other things, individuals or entities from knowingly
presenting, or causing to be presented, claims for payment from Medicare, Medicaid or other third-party payors that are false or fraudulent, or knowingly making, or causing to be made, a false record or statement material to a false or
fraudulent claim to avoid, decrease, or conceal an obligation to pay money to the federal government. Certain marketing practices, including off-label promotion, also may implicate the FCA. In addition, the ACA codified case law that a
claim including items or services resulting from a violation of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the FCA;
•
HIPAA imposes criminal and civil liability, among other things, for executing, or attempting to execute, a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program or making false statements relating to healthcare
matters;
•
the federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act, which requires certain manufacturers of drugs, devices, biologics and medical supplies for which payment is available under Medicare, Medicaid, or the Children’s
Health Insurance Program, with specific exceptions, to report annually to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, or CMS, information related to payments and other transfers of value made to physicians (defined to include
doctors, dentists, optometrists, podiatrists and chiropractors), other healthcare professionals (such as physicians assistants and nurse practitioners), and teaching hospitals, and ownership and investment interests held by physicians and
their immediate family members;
•
HIPAA, as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act, and their implementing regulations, which imposes certain obligations, including mandatory contractual terms, with
respect to safeguarding the transmission, security and privacy of individually identifiable health information on covered entities, such as health plans, health care clearinghouses and certain healthcare providers, and their respective
business associates that create, receive, maintain or transmit individually identifiable health information for or on behalf of a covered entity, and their subcontractors that use, disclose, access, or otherwise process individually
identifiable protected health information; and
•
state and foreign law equivalents of each of the above federal laws, such as anti-kickback and false claims laws which may apply to items or services reimbursed by any third- party payor, including commercial
insurers; state and foreign laws that require pharmaceutical companies to comply with the pharmaceutical industry’s voluntary compliance guidelines and the relevant compliance guidance promulgated by the federal government that otherwise
restrict payments that may be made to healthcare providers and other potential referral sources; state and foreign laws that require drug manufacturers to report information related to payments and other transfers of value to physicians
and other healthcare providers, drug pricing and/or marketing expenditures; state and local laws requiring the registration of pharmaceutical sales representatives; and state and foreign laws governing the privacy and security of health
information in certain circumstances, many of which differ from each other in significant ways and often are not pre-empted by HIPAA, and may not have the same effect, thus complicating compliance efforts.
28
Table of Contents
Outside the United States, interactions between pharmaceutical companies and health care professionals are also governed by strict laws, such as national anti-bribery laws of European countries,
national sunshine rules, regulations, industry self-regulation codes of conduct and physicians’ codes of professional conduct. Failure to comply with these requirements could result in reputational risk, public reprimands, administrative
penalties, fines or imprisonment.
Violation of the laws described above or any other governmental laws and regulations may result in significant penalties, including administrative, civil and criminal penalties,
damages, fines, the curtailment or restructuring of operations, the exclusion from participation in federal and state healthcare programs, disgorgement, contractual damages, reputational harm, diminished profits and future earnings, imprisonment,
and additional reporting requirements and oversight if a person becomes subject to a corporate integrity agreement or similar agreement to resolve allegations of non-compliance with these laws. Furthermore, efforts to ensure that business
activities and business arrangements comply with applicable healthcare laws and regulations can be costly.
Coverage and Reimbursement
Significant uncertainty exists as to the coverage and reimbursement status of KIMMTRAK or any other products for which we may obtain regulatory approval. In the United States,
sales of any product candidates for which regulatory approval for commercial sale is obtained will depend in part on the availability of coverage and adequate reimbursement from third-party payors. Third-party payors include government
authorities and health programs in the United States such as Medicare and Medicaid, managed care providers, private health insurers and other organizations. These third-party payors are increasingly reducing reimbursements for medical products
and services. The process for determining whether a payor will provide coverage for a drug product may be separate from the process for setting the reimbursement rate that the payor will pay for the drug product. Third-party payors may limit
coverage to specific drug products on an approved list, or formulary, which might not include all of FDA-approved drugs for a particular indication. Additionally, the containment of healthcare costs has become a priority of federal and state
governments, and the prices of drugs have been a focus in this effort. The U.S. government, state legislatures and foreign governments have shown significant interest in implementing cost-containment programs, including price controls,
restrictions on reimbursement and requirements for substitution of generic products for branded prescription drugs. Adoption of price controls and cost-containment measures, and adoption of more restrictive policies in jurisdictions with existing
controls and measures, could further limit our net revenue and results.
A payor’s decision to provide coverage for a drug product does not imply that an adequate reimbursement rate will be approved. Further, coverage and reimbursement for drug
products can differ significantly from payor to payor. As a result, the coverage determination process is often a time-consuming and costly process that will require us to provide scientific and clinical support for the use of our products to
each payor separately, with no assurance that coverage and adequate reimbursement will be applied consistently or obtained in the first instance.
Third-party payors are increasingly challenging the price and examining the medical necessity and cost-effectiveness of medical products and services, in addition to their safety
and efficacy. New metrics frequently are used as the basis for reimbursement rates, such as average sales price, average manufacturer price and actual acquisition cost. In order to obtain coverage and reimbursement for any product that might be
approved for sale, it may be necessary to conduct expensive pharmacoeconomic studies in order to demonstrate the medical necessity and cost-effectiveness of the products, in addition to the costs required to obtain regulatory approvals. If
third-party payors do not consider a product to be cost-effective compared to other available therapies, they may not cover the product after approval as a benefit under their plans or, if they do, the level of payment may not be sufficient to
allow a company to sell its products at a profit. Additionally, any companion diagnostic test that we develop will be required to obtain coverage and reimbursement separate and apart from the coverage and reimbursement we seek for our product
candidates, if approved. If any companion diagnostic is unable to obtain reimbursement or is inadequately reimbursed, that may limit the availability of such companion diagnostic, which would negatively impact prescriptions for our product
candidates, if approved.
The marketability of any product candidates for which we receive regulatory approval for commercial sale may suffer if the government and third-party payors fail to provide
adequate coverage and reimbursement. In addition, emphasis on managed care in the United States has increased and we expect will continue to increase the pressure on pharmaceutical pricing. Coverage policies and third-party reimbursement rates
may change at any time. Even if favorable coverage and reimbursement status is attained for one or more products for which we or our collaborators receive regulatory approval, less favorable coverage policies and reimbursement rates may be
implemented in the future.
In the EU, pricing and reimbursement schemes vary widely from country to country. Some Member States provide that products may be marketed only after a reimbursement
price has been agreed. Other Member States may approve a specific price for a product, or they may instead adopt a system of direct or indirect controls on the profitability of the company placing the product on the market. Other Member
States allow companies to fix their own prices for products but monitor and control prescription volumes and issue guidance to physicians to limit prescriptions.
29
Table of Contents
In addition, some Member States may require the completion of additional studies that compare the cost-effectiveness of a particular medicinal product candidate to currently available therapies.
This Health Technology Assessment, or HTA, process is the procedure according to which the assessment of the public health impact, therapeutic impact and the economic and societal impact of use of a given medicinal product in the national
healthcare systems of the individual country is conducted. The outcome of HTA regarding specific medicinal products will often influence the pricing and reimbursement status granted to these medicinal products by the competent authorities of
individual Member States.
Health Reform
The United States and some foreign jurisdictions are considering or have enacted a number of reform proposals to change the healthcare system. There is significant interest in
promoting changes in healthcare systems with the stated goals of containing healthcare costs, improving quality or expanding access. In the United States, the pharmaceutical industry has been a particular focus of these efforts and has been
significantly affected by federal and state legislative initiatives, including those designed to limit the pricing, coverage, and reimbursement of pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical products, especially under government-funded health care
programs, and increased governmental control of drug pricing.
By way of example, in March 2010, the ACA was signed into law, which, among other things, was intended to broaden access to health insurance, reduce or constrain the growth of
healthcare spending, enhance remedies against fraud and abuse, add transparency requirements for the healthcare and health insurance industries, impose taxes and fees on the healthcare industry and impose additional health policy reforms.
There have been executive, judicial and Congressional challenges to certain aspects of the ACA. For example, on June 17, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court dismissed a challenge on
procedural grounds that argued the ACA is unconstitutional in its entirety because the “individual mandate” was repealed by Congress. Further, on August 16, 2022, President Biden signed the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, or IRA, into law, which
among other things, extends enhanced subsidies for individuals purchasing health insurance coverage in ACA marketplaces through plan year 2025. The IRA also eliminates the “donut hole” under the Medicare Part D program beginning in 2025 by
significantly lowering the beneficiary maximum out-of-pocket cost and creating a new manufacturer discount program.
Other legislative changes have been proposed and adopted in the United States since the ACA was enacted. For example, in August 2011, the Budget Control Act of 2011 was signed
into law, which, among other things, created measures for spending reductions by Congress. A Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction, tasked with recommending a targeted deficit reduction of at least $1.2 trillion for the years 2012 through
2021, was unable to reach its target goals, thereby triggering the legislation’s automatic reduction to several government programs. This includes aggregate reductions of Medicare payments to providers of up to 2% per fiscal year, which went into
effect in April 2013 and, due to subsequent legislative amendments to the statute, will remain in effect until 2031 unless additional Congressional action is taken. In January 2013, the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012, among other things,
further reduced Medicare payments to certain providers, and increased the statute of limitations period for the government to recover overpayments to providers from three to five years.
In the fourth quarter of 2023, a rule proposed by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, or CMS, for the physician fee schedule (the “CMS Rule”) was finalized and
became effective on January 1, 2024. The CMS Rule names KIMMTRAK as a medicine identified as meeting the proposed criteria for unique circumstances, whereby it is granted an increased applicable percentage of unused or discarded product volume
subject to refund to CMS of 45%, as opposed to the 10% used for medicines without these unique circumstances. Therefore, we do not currently expect to be required to make refund payments under the CMS Rule.
There also has been heightened governmental scrutiny in the United States of pharmaceutical pricing practices in light of the rising cost of prescription drugs and biologics. Such
scrutiny has resulted in several recent Congressional inquiries and proposed and enacted federal and state legislation designed to, among other things, bring more transparency to product pricing, review the relationship between pricing and
manufacturer patient programs, and reform government program reimbursement methodologies for products. At the federal level, for example, in July 2021, the Biden administration released an executive order, “Promoting Competition in the American
Economy,” with multiple provisions aimed at prescription drugs. In response to Biden’s executive order, on September 9, 2021, HHS released a Comprehensive Plan for Addressing High Drug Prices that outlines principles for drug pricing reform and
sets out a variety of potential legislative policies that Congress could pursue to advance these principles. Further, the IRA, among other things: (i) directs HHS to negotiate the price of certain high-expenditure, single-source drugs and
biologics covered under Medicare and (ii) imposes rebates under Medicare Part B and Medicare Part D to penalize price increases that outpace inflation. These provisions will take effect progressively starting in fiscal year 2023. On August 29,
2023, HHS announced the list of the first ten drugs that will be subject to price negotiations, although the Medicare drug prices negotiation program is currently subject to legal challenges. It is currently unclear how the IRA will be
implemented but it is likely to have a significant impact on the pharmaceutical industry. Further in response to the Biden administration’s October 2022 executive order, on February 14, 2023, HHS released a report outlining three new models for
testing by the CMS Innovation Center which will be evaluated on their ability to lower the cost of drugs, promote accessibility, and improve quality of care. It is unclear whether the models will be utilized in any health reform measures in the
future. Further, on December 7, 2023, the Biden administration announced an initiative to control the price of prescription drugs through the use of march-in rights under the Bayh-Dole Act. On December 8, 2023, the National Institute of Standards
and Technology published for comment a Draft Interagency Guidance Framework for Considering the Exercise of March-In Rights which for the first time includes the price of a product as one factor an agency can use when deciding to exercise
march-in rights. While march-in rights have not previously been exercised, it is uncertain if that will continue under the new framework. Additionally, the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act requires certain manufacturers to refund the
government for discarded amounts of certain drugs from single use containers under Medicare Part B. At the state level, individual states in the United States have increasingly passed legislation and implemented regulations designed to control
pharmaceutical and biological product pricing, including price or patient reimbursement constraints, discounts, restrictions on certain product access and marketing cost disclosure and transparency measures, and, in some cases, designed to
encourage importation from other countries and bulk purchasing.
30
Table of Contents
We expect that these initiatives, as well as other healthcare reform measures that may be adopted in the future, may result in more rigorous coverage criteria and lower
reimbursement, and in additional downward pressure on the price that we receive for any approved product. Further, any reduction in reimbursement from Medicare or other government-funded programs may result in a similar reduction in payments from
private payors. The implementation of cost containment measures or other healthcare reforms may prevent us from being able to generate revenue, attain profitability or commercialize our product candidates.
Further, additional healthcare reform initiatives may arise from future legislation or administrative action.
In December 2021, Regulation No 2021/2282 on Health Technology Assessment, or HTA Regulation, was adopted. The HTA Regulation is intended to boost
cooperation among Member States in assessing health technologies, including new medicinal products, and providing the basis for cooperation at level of the EU for joint clinical assessments in these areas. When it enters into application in 2025,
the HTA Regulation will be intended to harmonize the clinical benefit assessment of HTA across the EU. In light of the fact that the United Kingdom has left the EU, Regulation No 2021/2282 on HTA will not apply in the United Kingdom. However, the
MHRA is working with UK HTA bodies and other national organizations, such as the Scottish Medicines Consortium, or SMC, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, or NICE, and the All-Wales Medicines Strategy Group, to introduce new
pathways supporting innovative approaches to the safe, timely and efficient development of medicinal products.
Additional Regulation
In addition to the foregoing, provincial, state and federal U.S. and EU laws regarding environmental protection and hazardous substances affect our business. These and other laws
govern our use, handling and disposal of various biological, chemical and radioactive substances used in, and wastes generated by, our operations. If our operations result in contamination of the environment or expose individuals to hazardous
substances, we could be liable for damages and governmental fines. We believe that we are in material compliance with applicable environmental laws and that continued compliance therewith will not have a material adverse effect on our business.
We cannot predict, however, how changes in these laws may affect our future operations.
Anti-Corruption Laws
We are subject to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended, or the FCPA, the U.S. domestic bribery statute contained in 18 U.S.C. § 201, the U.S. Travel Act, the
USA PATRIOT Act, the U.K. Bribery Act 2010 and the U.K. Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 and possibly other state and national anti-bribery and anti-money laundering laws in countries in which we conduct activities, collectively, Anti-Corruption Laws.
Among other matters, such Anti-Corruption Laws prohibit corporations and individuals from directly or indirectly paying, offering to pay or authorizing the payment of money or anything of value to any foreign government official, government staff
member, political party or political candidate, or certain other persons, in order to obtain, retain or direct business, regulatory approvals or some other advantage in an improper manner. We can also be held liable for the acts of our
third-party agents under the FCPA, the U.K. Bribery Act 2010 and possibly other Anti-Corruption Laws. In the healthcare sector, anti-corruption risk can also arise in the context of improper interactions with doctors, key opinion leaders and
other healthcare professionals who work for state-affiliated hospitals, research institutions or other organizations.
Government Regulation Outside of the United States and the EU
In addition to regulations in the United States and EU, we may be subject to a variety of regulations in other jurisdictions governing, among other things, clinical studies and
any commercial sales and distribution of their products. Whether or not we obtain FDA or EU approval for a product, we must obtain the requisite approvals from regulatory authorities in foreign countries prior to the commencement of clinical
studies or marketing of the product in those countries. Certain countries outside of the United States and the EU have a similar process that requires the submission of a clinical study application much like the IND prior to the commencement of
human clinical studies. The requirements and process governing the conduct of clinical studies, product licensing, coverage, pricing and reimbursement vary from country to country. In all cases, the clinical studies are conducted in accordance
with GCP and the applicable regulatory requirements and the ethical principles that have their origin in the Declaration of Helsinki.
31
Table of Contents
Human Capital Resources
As of December 31, 2023, we had 497 full-time employees who work primarily in the United Kingdom and the United States. Of these employees, 262 are engaged in research and development
activities and 235 are engaged in commercial, business development, finance, information systems, facilities, human resources or administrative support. Further, we have 139 employees (28%) who hold Ph.D. degrees. None of our employees are
subject to collective bargaining agreements. We consider our relationship with our employees to be good.
Our human capital resources objectives include, as applicable, identifying, recruiting, retaining, incentivizing and integrating our existing and additional employees. The principal purposes of
our equity incentive plans are to attract, retain and motivate employees and directors through the granting of equity-based compensation awards.
We are dedicated to attracting and retaining the best possible talent. Our compensation program, including short- and long-term incentives and benefits, is designed to allow us to attract and
retain individuals whose skills are critical to our current and long-term success. Total compensation is generally positioned within a competitive range of the peer market median, with differentiation based on skills, proficiency, and performance
to attract and retain key talent.
The contribution of each individual Immunocore employee is key to our success. This is why we are committed to offer a rewarding employee experience. As we strive each day to deliver our
mission, we have built a culture rooted in five values:
1)
We lead with Science to benefit patients
2)
We Trust and Respect each other
3)
We act with Integrity
4)
We value Diversity to drive innovation
5)
We are Entrepreneurial
Immunocore strives to create a diverse and inclusive workplace, and to create an environment where individual contributions and initiatives can be maximized, while fostering a culture of
collaboration, based on respect and integrity.
We conduct a Performance Development Review at mid- and end-of-year. These performance reviews assess and provide feedback on delivery of individual objectives and demonstration of company
values. The end of year performance rating is used to determine compensation awards, including yearly salary increase, bonus payment, and equity option award (offered to every single employee). The salary budget is approved by the Remuneration
Committee after reviewing the Company annual scorecard, which is shared every quarter within the company, during town halls, to communicate progress towards delivering company goals.
We believe that continued growth and development are essential to the professional well-being of our team. We also want each individual employee to own their career, contribute to
high-performing teams through access to training, continuous learning programs and other development initiatives, as well as constructive feedback. During 2023 we updated our job architecture and career development framework to include
descriptors for each job level and career track aiding development and career planning. In 2023, we also introduced a recognition and discounts platform, through which employees can acknowledge colleagues’ or teams’ work and benefit from a range
of discounts across a number of retailers, restaurants, cinemas, and other options.
Driven by our belief that innovation is driven by diverse thinking, we’re working to create an inclusive and supportive environment where individual contributions and initiatives can be
maximized, while fostering a culture of collaboration, based on respect and integrity. We use industry benchmarks and annual internal equity reviews to make salary adjustments as needed in efforts to ensure a fair and bias-free compensation
system. As we grow, we are continuing to implement initiatives to advance the development of diverse talent and succession plans both in our employee workforce management and our board of directors, and to support equity and inclusion for all.
Staying in good health, mind and body, is important to us, which is why we offer employees a range of benefits including subsidized access to gyms, private healthcare insurance, life insurance,
enhanced parental benefits and an employee assistance program, so that they can thrive at work as well as at home and enjoy all things in life.
We always strive to identify ways to improve what we do and how we do. That is why we regularly conduct an employee survey. We have a highly engaged workforce and the 2023 employee
survey data had a high response rate and showed an improvement in engagement versus the previous survey held in 2021.
32
Table of Contents
Corporate Information
We were originally incorporated under the laws of England and Wales in December 2007 as a private company with limited liability called Immunocore Limited. Immunocore Holdings
Limited was incorporated on January 7, 2021 as a private limited company under the laws of England and Wales with nominal assets and liabilities for the purpose of becoming the holding company of Immunocore Limited and consummating the corporate
reorganization. On February 1, 2021, Immunocore Holdings Limited re-registered as a public limited company and was re-named Immunocore Holdings plc.
Our principal executive offices are located at 92 Park Drive, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxfordshire OX14 4RY, United Kingdom, and the telephone number of our registered office is +44
(0)1235 438600. Our principal executive offices in the United States are located at Six Tower Bridge, Suite 200, 181 Washington Street, Conshohocken, Pennsylvania 19428, and the telephone number of our U.S. office is +1 484-534-5261.
Our website address is www.immunocore.com . Information contained on, or that can be accessed through, our website is not incorporated by
reference into this Annual Report, and you should not consider information on our website to be part of this Annual Report. Our agent for service of process in the United States is Immunocore, LLC.
Available Information
Our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to reports filed pursuant to Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, are filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC. Such reports and other information filed by us with the SEC are available free of charge on our website at ir.immunocore.com when such reports are available on the SEC’s website. The SEC maintains a website that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file
electronically with the SEC at www.sec.gov . The information contained on the websites referenced in this Annual Report is not incorporated by reference into this filing. Further, our references to website
URLs are intended to be inactive textual references only.