Item 4. Controls and Procedures
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our principal executive and principal financial officers, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act")) as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive and principal financial officers concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of such time.
Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports, filed or submitted under the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms, including, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in such reports is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, and principal accounting officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable and not absolute assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. In reaching a reasonable level of assurance, management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. In addition, the design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, a control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or the degree of compliance with policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
32
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEG AL PROCEEDINGS
Except as discussed below, there are no material changes from the legal proceedings previously disclosed in our 2024 Annual Report during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025.
On June 14, 2022, the Company received a paragraph IV notice of certification (the “Fresenius Kabi Notice”) from Fresenius Kabi advising that Fresenius Kabi had submitted an ANDA to the FDA seeking approval to manufacture, use or sell a generic version of CINVANTI in the U.S. prior to the expiration of U.S. Patent Nos.: 9,561,229; 9,808,465; 9,974,742; 9,974,793; 9,974,794; 10,500,208; 10,624,850; 10,953,018; and 11,173,118 (the “CINVANTI Patents”), which are listed in the FDA’s Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations (the “Orange Book”). The Fresenius Kabi Notice alleges that the CINVANTI Patents are invalid, unenforceable and/or will not be infringed by the commercial manufacture, use or sale of the generic product described in Fresenius Kabi’s ANDA.
On July 27, 2022, the Company filed a complaint for patent infringement of the CINVANTI Patents against Fresenius Kabi and a related entity in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware (the “Court”) in response to Fresenius Kabi’s ANDA filing. The complaint seeks, among other relief, equitable relief enjoining Fresenius Kabi from infringing the CINVANTI Patents. On May 15, 2024, the Court granted partial summary judgment of infringement for the Company and found no indefiniteness of U.S. Patent Nos. 9,561,229 and 9,974,794. On June 24, 2024, the parties commenced a four-day bench trial centered on Fresenius Kabi’s defense of obviousness of claims from U.S. Patent Nos. 9,561,229 and 9,974,794 that cover CINVANTI. Oral argument was held on August 29, 2024.
On December 3, 2024, the Court issued a ruling in the Company’s favor. The Court found that the Company’s U.S. Patent Nos. 9,561,229 and 9,974,794, which expire in 2035, are valid and would be infringed by Fresenius Kabi’s proposed generic product. In view of the decision, the Court ordered that the effective date of any final approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration of Fresenius Kabi’s ANDA shall not be a date earlier than September 18, 2035, the expiration date of each of U.S. Patents Nos. 9,561,229 and 9,974,794. On January 8, 2025, Fresenius Kabi filed notice of appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“Federal Circuit”). On September 24, 2025, the briefing was completed, and the Company awaits a date for oral argument. The Company intends to vigorously enforce its intellectual property rights relating to CINVANTI.
On August 4, 2023, the Company received a Notice Letter (the “Mylan August Notice”) from Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. (“Mylan”) advising that Mylan had submitted an abbreviated new drug application ("ANDA") to the FDA seeking approval to manufacture, use or sell a generic version of CINVANTI (“Mylan’s ANDA for a generic version of CINVANTI”) in the U.S. prior to the expiration of U.S. Patent Nos. 9,561,229; 9,808,465; 9,974,742; 9,974,793; 9,974,794; 10,500,208; 10,624,850; 10,953,018; and 11,173,118 (the “CINVANTI Patents”), which are listed in the Orange Book. The Mylan August Notice alleges that the CINVANTI Patents are invalid, unenforceable and/or will not be infringed by the commercial manufacture, use or sale of the generic product described in Mylan’s ANDA for a generic version of CINVANTI. On September 15, 2023, the Company filed a complaint for patent infringement of the CINVANTI Patents against Mylan in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware in response to the filing of Mylan’s ANDA for a generic version of CINVANTI. The complaint seeks, among other relief, equitable relief enjoining Mylan from infringing the CINVANTI Patents. On November 9, 2023, the Company received an updated Notice Letter from Mylan advising that it had submitted an amendment to Mylan’s ANDA for a generic version of CINVANTI to include a Paragraph IV certification to the Company's recently listed U.S. Patent No. 11,744,800. On May 6, 2025, the Company announced that it entered into a settlement agreement with Mylan to resolve the ongoing patent litigation in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware related to Mylan’s ANDA for a generic version of CINVANTI. Pursuant to the terms of the settlement agreement, the Company has granted Mylan a license under the Orange Book-listed patents for CINVANTI to market a generic version of CINVANTI in the United States beginning June 1, 2032, or earlier under certain customary circumstances. In connection with the settlement, on May 6, 2025, the Court granted the Stipulation and Order of Dismissal with the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware requesting that the Court dismiss the pending litigation between the parties.
On December 16, 2023, the Company received a Notice Letter (the “Mylan December Notice”) from Mylan advising that Mylan had submitted an ANDA to the FDA seeking approval to manufacture, use or sell a generic version of APONVIE in the U.S. (“Mylan’s ANDA for a generic version of APONVIE”) prior to the expiration of U.S. Patent Nos.: 9,561,229; 9,808,465; 9,974,742; 9,974,793; 9,974,794; 10,500,208; 10,624,850; 10,953,018; 11,173,118; and 11,744,800 (the “APONVIE Patents”), which are listed
33
in the Orange Book. The Mylan December Notice Letter alleges that the APONVIE Patents are invalid, unenforceable and/or will not be infringed by the commercial manufacture, use or sale of the generic product described in Mylan’s ANDA for a generic version of APONVIE. On January 11, 2024, the Company filed a complaint for patent infringement of the APONVIE Patents against Mylan in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware in response to Mylan filing an ANDA for a generic version of APONVIE. The complaint seeks, among other relief, equitable relief enjoining Mylan from infringing the APONVIE Patents. On January 26, 2024, the Court consolidated this litigation concerning Mylan’s ANDA for a generic version of APONVIE with the previously-filed litigation concerning Mylan’s ANDA for a generic version of CINVANTI. On May 6, 2025, the Company announced that it entered into a settlement agreement with Mylan to resolve the ongoing patent litigation in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware related to Mylan’s ANDA for a generic version of APONVIE. Pursuant to the terms of the settlement agreement, the Company has granted Mylan a license under the Orange Book-listed patents for APONVIE to market a generic version of APONVIE in the United States beginning June 1, 2032, or earlier under certain customary circumstances. In connection with the settlement, on May 6, 2025, the Court granted the Stipulation and Order of Dismissal with the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware requesting that the Court dismiss the pending litigation between the parties.
On December 11, 2023, the Company received a Paragraph IV notice of certification (the “Slayback Notice”) from Slayback Pharma LLC ("Slayback") (now owned by Azurity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ("Azurity")) advising that Slayback had submitted an new drug application under Section 505(b)(2) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to the FDA seeking approval to manufacture, use or sell a generic version of CINVANTI in the U.S. (“Slayback’s NDA”) prior to the expiration of the patents listed in the Orange Book. The Slayback Notice alleges that the CINVANTI Patents are invalid, unenforceable and/or will not be infringed by the commercial manufacture, use or sale of the generic product described in Slayback’s NDA. On January 24, 2024, the Company filed a complaint for patent infringement of the CINVANTI Patents against Slayback and a related entity in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey in response to Slayback’s NDA filing. The complaint seeks, among other relief, equitable relief enjoining Slayback from infringing those patents. On July 2, 2024, the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey granted Slayback’s motion to transfer this matter to the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware. On December 12, 2024, the Company filed a complaint against Slayback, Azurity, and related entities in the U.S. District Court for District of Delaware for patent infringement of the U.S. Patent Nos. 12,115,254 and 12,115,255. On May 23, 2025, the Company filed an amended complaint against Slayback, Azurity, and related entities adding an allegation of patent infringement of U.S. Patent No. 12,290,520. The parties completed expert discovery. The parties’ entered into a stipulation (Case No. 24-1363, D.I. 119) limiting the issues for trial. A bench trial is currently scheduled for November 17, 2025. The Company intends to vigorously enforce its intellectual property rights relating to CINVANTI. As a result of our initial complaint for patent infringement, the FDA may not approve Slayback’s NDA until the earlier of June 12, 2026 or resolution of the litigation.
On February 28, 2025, Azurity, Azurity Pharma India LLP, and Slayback requested Post-Grant Review ("PGR") of U.S. Patent Nos. 12,115,254 and 12,115,255 in PGR2025-00035 and PGR2025-00036, respectively. On April 14, 2025, the Petitions were accorded a filing date. On June 16, 2025, the Company filed a brief requesting discretionary denial of the Petitions in PGR2025-00035 and PGR2025-00036. On July 14, 2025, the Company filed its Patent Owner Preliminary Response. On August 14, 2025, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board discretionarily denied institution of Azurity’s PGRs.
On February 7, 2025, the Company received a Notice Letter (the “Qilu Notice”) from Qilu Pharmaceutical (Hainan) Co., Ltd and Qilu Pharma, Inc. (“Qilu”) advising that Qilu had submitted an ANDA to the FDA seeking approval to manufacture, use or sell a generic version of APONVIE in the U.S. (“Qilu’s ANDA”) prior to the expiration of U.S. Patent Nos.: 9,561,229; 9,808,465; 9,974,742; 9,974,793; 9,974,794; 10,500,208; 10,624,850; 10,953,018; 11,173,118; 11,744,800, 12,115,254, and 12,115,255 (the “Noticed APONVIE Patents”), which are listed in the Orange Book, Qilu's ANDA alleges that the Noticed APONVIE Patents are invalid, unenforceable and/or will not be infringed by the commercial manufacture, use or sale of the generic product described in Qilu’s ANDA for a generic version of APONVIE. On March 21, 2025, the Company filed a complaint for patent infringement of the Noticed APONVIE Patents against Qilu in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware in response to Qilu's ANDA for a generic version of APONVIE. The complaint seeks, among other relief, equitable relief enjoining Qilu from infringing the Noticed APONVIE Patents.
On June 11, 2025, the Company received a Notice Letter (the “Qilu CINVANTI Notice”) from Qilu Pharmaceutical (Hainan) Co., Ltd and Qilu Pharma, Inc. (“Qilu”) advising that Qilu had submitted an ANDA to the FDA seeking approval to manufacture, use or sell a generic version of CINVANTI in the U.S. (“Qilu’s CINVANTI ANDA”) prior to the expiration of U.S. Patent Nos.: 9,561,229; 9,808,465; 9,974,742; 9,974,793; 9,974,794; 10,500,208; 10,624,850; 10,953,018; 11,173,118; 11,744,800; 12,115,254;
34
12,115,255; and 12,290,520 (the “Noticed CINVANTI Patents”), which are listed in the Orange Book for CINVANTI. Qilu’s CINVANTI ANDA alleges that the Noticed CINVANTI Patents are invalid, unenforceable, and/or will not be infringed by the commercial manufacture, use or sale of the generic product described in Qilu’s CINVANTI ANDA. On July 3, 2025, the Company filed a complaint for patent infringement of the Noticed CINVANTI Patents against Qilu in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware in response to Qilu’s CINVANTI ANDA. The complaint seeks, among other relief, equitable relief enjoining Qilu from infringing the Noticed CINVANTI Patents.
On July 15, 2025, the Qilu CINVANTI and APONVIE litigations were consolidated. The Company entered into a settlement agreement with Qilu to resolve the ongoing patent litigation in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware related to Qilu’s ANDAs for generic versions of CINVANTI and APONVIE. In connection with the settlement, on November 3, 2025, the parties filed a Stipulation and Order of Dismissal with the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware requesting that the Court dismiss the pending litigation between the parties.
ITEM 1A. RIS K FACTORS
Investing in our common stock involves risks. We operate in a rapidly changing environment that involves a number of risks that could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results, some of which are beyond our control. In addition to the other information described below, the risks and uncertainties that we believe are most important for you to consider are discussed in Part I, Item 1A. "Risk Factors" in our 2024 Annual Report, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, and other reports, including our financial statements and the related notes thereto, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and the information contained in the section entitled "Forward-Looking Statements." The occurrence of any of the events or developments described below could adversely our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. In such an event, the market price of our common stock could decline and you may lose all or part of your investment. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial also may impair our business operations. Other than the factors described below, there are no material changes to the risk factors described in the 2024 Annual Report.
Changes in government policies, laws, and regulations and with respect to the government workforce may have a negative impact on our business and the markets in which we operate.
The laws and regulations governing our operations, as well as their interpretation, may change from time to time, and new laws and regulations may be enacted. Similarly, operational changes at government agencies, including actions intended to reduce government spending at agencies that regulate significant parts of our business, such as the FDA and CMS, could have a significant impact on the implementation of laws and regulations that impact our business.
For example, the layoffs and reorganizations at several U.S. health agencies, including the FDA, the Department of Health and Human Services (the "HHS"), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Institutes of Health, are expected to impact the FDA's ability to review and approve new medicines and conduct necessary inspections. Over the last several years, the U.S. government has also shut down several times and certain regulatory agencies, such as the FDA and SEC, have had to furlough critical employees and stop critical activities. In addition, government funding of agencies on which our operations may rely, including those that fund research and development activities, is subject to the political process, which is inherently fluid and unpredictable. Such disruptions at the FDA and other agencies may also increase the time necessary for new drugs or modifications to approved drugs to be reviewed and/or approved by necessary government agencies, which would adversely affect our business. There is also a great degree of uncertainty related to the impact of recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions and executive orders on the enforcement and decision-making authority of regulatory agencies, including those in the FDA, which may lead to delays, if not cancellations, of pending and proposed regulations at federal agencies and subject significant regulatory actions by the agencies to presidential supervision and control.
Accordingly, any change in these laws or regulations, changes in their interpretation, or newly enacted laws or regulations and any failure by us to comply with these laws or regulations could require changes to certain of our business practices, negatively impact our operations, cash flow or financial condition, impose additional costs on us or otherwise adversely affect our business. For example, significant changes to U.S. trade policy, including potential new or increased tariffs, along with countermeasures by the affected countries, may impact global trade, create sourcing challenges with respect to raw materials and instruments and increase our costs, potentially harming our business. The U.S. has recently imposed increased tariffs on certain countries, focusing on those with which it has the largest trade deficits. Other countries have responded, and may continue to respond, by announcing retaliatory tariffs on U.S. imports. The tariffs have disrupted and may continue to disrupt the global markets and escalate geopolitical tensions between
35
the U.S. and other countries. The extent of the impact of such tariffs and proposed regulations on our business specifically, or on the U.S. market and global economy generally, are uncertain and unpredictable, and could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Further, the U.S. may also enact other regulations or policies that affect trade or otherwise impact the pharmaceutical industry by restricting U.S. pharmaceutical companies from contracting with certain countries for the development, research or manufacturing of pharmaceutical products. For example, the U.S. Department of Commerce initiated national security investigations into the importation of pharmaceuticals and pharmaceutical ingredients pursuant to Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, which could result in the imposition of new tariffs on imports within the pharmaceutical industry.
In addition, the U.S. announced a 100% tariff, effective October 1, 2025, on any branded or patented pharmaceuticals imported into the U.S., unless the relevant drug manufacturer has or is in the process of building a manufacturing facility in the U.S. The imposition of such tariffs is currently delayed as the U.S. administration seeks to negotiate drug pricing agreements with large drug manufacturers. The outcome of such ongoing negotiations is currently unclear and the final terms and impact remain uncertain. While we currently do not anticipate a material impact from such tariffs on our business or operations, such tariffs could have implications on drug pricing, drug production levels and patient access, and may result in supply chain or other operational disruptions. Further, if we are required to change our current manufacturing partners or suppliers now or in the future in order to avoid such tariffs, the terms of new agreements that we may enter into may not be favorable to us and related operational disruptions may heighten manufacturing and compliance risks and derail commercialization plans.
Moreover, uncertainty with respect to legislation, regulation and government policy at the federal, state and local levels, has introduced new and difficult-to-quantify macroeconomic and geopolitical risks with potentially far-reaching implications. There are currently a number of laws and regulations in the U.S. that have recently been adopted but not yet implemented, have been proposed or are being considered to which we or our customers may become subject, including healthcare reform initiatives and potential spending and tax proposals, but at this time their impact on our business and results of operations remains uncertain. Changes in legislation, regulation or policy increase the likelihood that we will fail to appropriately adapt to changes in our compliance obligations, particularly when such changes happen abruptly, such as following a change in government. Any of the foregoing changes could increase our litigation and regulatory exposure, directly impact our results of operations and cash flows, adversely affect our ability to provide our products, or adversely impact the demand for our Products. Such changes may also impact our business by creating increased volatility and uncertainty in the markets in which we operate. At this time, we cannot predict the ultimate content, timing, or effect of these changes, including any legislative, regulatory and other actions under the new U.S. administration, or estimate the overall impact of any such changes on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
36
Text extracted from the filing as submitted to EDGAR. Formatting, tables and exhibits are simplified for reading; the original document is authoritative for anything you rely on.