Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Item 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company’s Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer have evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of September
30, 2018. The term “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to
ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Management
recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of
achieving their objectives and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost benefit relationship of possible
controls and procedures. Based on its evaluation, management concluded as of September 30, 2018 that its disclosure controls and
procedures were not effective because of material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, described below
in Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Notwithstanding the identified material weaknesses,
management believes the financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly represent in all material respects
our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows at and for the periods presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
Management’s Report on Internal
Control Over Financial Reporting
The Company’s management is responsible
for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Responsibility, estimates and judgments by
management are required to assess the expected benefits and related costs of control procedures. The objectives of internal control
include providing management with reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that assets are safeguarded against loss from unauthorized
use or disposition, and that transactions are executed in accordance with management’s authorization and recorded properly
to permit the preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer assessed the effectiveness of its internal
control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2018. In making this assessment, its management used the criteria based on
the framework in Internal Control - Integrated Framework 2013 issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of
the Treadway Commission. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of September
30, 2018, its internal control over financial reporting was not effective in providing reasonable assurance regarding the reliability
of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with US generally accepted
accounting principles. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer reviewed the results of his assessment
with its board of directors.
Based on its evaluation under this framework,
management concluded that its internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of the evaluation date due to the
factors stated below.
· Insufficient
Resources : The Company has inadequate number of personnel with requisite expertise in the key functional areas of finance
and accounting to be able to have appropriately designed and operating entity level controls including risk assessment; information
and communication; monitoring; and financial reporting.
· Inadequate Segregation of
Duties: The Company has inadequate number of personnel to properly segregate duties to implement control procedures.
This annual report does not
include an attestation report of its Company’s independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control
over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s independent registered
public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management’s
report in this annual report.
14
Inherent Limitations on Effectiveness
of Controls
Internal control over financial reporting
has inherent limitations which include but is not limited to the use of independent professionals for advice and guidance, interpretation
of existing and/or changing rules and principles, segregation of management duties, scale of organization, and personnel factors.
Internal control over financial reporting is a process that involves human diligence and compliance and is subject to lapses in
judgment and breakdowns resulting from human failures. Internal control over financial reporting also can be circumvented by collusion
or improper management override. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent
or detect misstatements on a timely basis, however these inherent limitations are known features of the financial reporting process
and it is possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce, though not eliminate, this risk. Therefore, even those systems
determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.
Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because
of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial
Reporting
During the period covered by this report,
the following change was made in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or
are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting:
· The Company has implemented
a robust check disbursement policy that includes the following key control points: first, the controller who handles check disbursements
is not an authorized signer on any bank account and cannot sign checks; second, any disbursement amount less than $5,000.00 requires
written approval from one (1) member of the leadership team; third, any disbursement amount of more than $5,000.00 and equal to
or less than $24,999.99 requires written approval of two (2) members of the leadership team; fourth, any disbursement amount of
$25,000.00 or more requires approval by the Board of Directors; and fifth, all disbursements are reviewed and approved by the Chief
Operating Officer. As an additional control, all disbursement checks are signed by the CEO when available, and if the CEO is unable
to sign, disbursement checks are signed by a member of the leadership team. All disbursements are controlled through a formal check
disbursement process that includes an official check disbursement request form. This form is reviewed and signed by the appropriate
parties as referenced above. The leadership team currently comprises the following members: The Chief Executive Officer, the Chief
Operating Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, the Chief Tax Strategist, the Chief Sales Officer, and the Director of Operations.
Item 9B. OTHER INFORMATION.
None.
15
PART III
Item 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.
Directors and Executive Officers
Set forth below is certain information
regarding the persons who were directors and executive officers at any time during the fiscal year 2018.
Name
Age
Position with the Company
John Pollock
51
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer
Paul Williams
62
Vice Chairman of the Board, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer
Dan Sundby
55
Chief Sales Officer
Edward A. Lyon
53
Chief Tax Strategist and Board Member
George Crumley
50
Assistant Secretary, Assistant Treasurer and Board Member
David Myers
66
Board Member
Michael Ashby
65
Board Member
Todd Bourgeois
57
Board Member
Debbie Buckner
55
President, Chief Operating Officer, and Board Member
John Pollock , 51, has been
CEO/Founder of Business Legacy, Inc. since 2002, Pollock Advisory Group since 2007 and he is currently CEO and Chairman of Financial
Gravity Companies, Inc. Mr. Pollock’s specific experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that led to the conclusion
that he should serve as a director for the Company:
· Has served as CEO and Chairman of Financial
Gravity since its inception
· A seasoned manager
Paul O. Williams, 62, has
served on the Financial Gravity Companies, Inc. (OTC: FGCO) Board of Directors and as Vice Chairman of the Board since 2015, and
has served as our Chief Financial Officer and Secretary – Treasurer since 2016. He graduated from Austin College in Sherman,
Texas in 1978 and the Institute for Organization Management in Washington, DC in 1982. Since 2007, Mr. Williams has served as Chief
Executive Officer of Bison Financial Group, Inc., a corporate financial advisory and business development firm serving middle market
growth companies.
Mr. Williams also serves as an officer
and director of two other public companies. On behalf of Worldwide Specialty Chemicals, Inc. based in Dallas, TX, Mr. Williams
has served as Vice Chairman of the Board and Chief Financial Officer since 2018. On behalf of Light Engine Design Corp. (OTC: TLED)
based in Phoenix, AZ, Mr. Williams has served as Chairman of the Board and Chief Financial Officer since 2017.
Mr. Williams also serves as an officer
and director of three other private companies. Mr. Williams currently serves as: Vice Chairman of the Board & Chief Financial
Officer of Dynamic Chemical Solutions, Inc. in Frisco, Texas since 2016; Chairman of the Board & Chief Financial Officer of
Curtis Mathes, Inc. in Frisco, Texas since 2013; and Chairman of the Board of Championship Sports Group, Inc. in Frisco, Texas
since 2012. Mr. Williams also currently serves on the Board of Directors and Executive Committee of the Frisco (Texas) Chamber
of Commerce and served as their Chairman of the Board in 2007. In 2009, he was recognized as the CFO of the Year for North Texas
by the Dallas Business Journal.
Within the last five years, on behalf of
Halo Companies, Inc. (OTC: HALN), Mr. Williams previously served as Vice Chairman of the Board, Treasurer, and Assistant Secretary
from 2009 to 2017, and served as Chief Financial Officer from 2009 to 2012 and from 2015 to 2017.
16
The breadth of Mr. Williams’ entrepreneurial
and financial services experience led the Board of Directors to the conclusion that he is qualified to serve as a director for
the Company. Mr. Williams’ specific experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that led to the conclusion that he should
serve as a director for the Company:
· Over 40 years of business experience, primarily in capital markets, mergers, and acquisitions
· Has served as both officer and director of other public companies
· Financial Gravity is the third public company for which Mr. Williams is serving as Chief Financial
Officer
· Within the last 5 years, Mr. Williams served as Vice-Chairman of the Board and Chief Financial
Officer at Halo Companies, Inc., a public company, and Chairman of the Board and Chief Financial Officer of Light Engine Design
Corp., a public company
Dan Sundby , 55, brings over
30 years of experience in sales, sales management, and sales training. Before joining Financial Gravity in 2017, Mr. Sundby served
as the Sales Manager-Columbus Division for Fischer Homes in Erlanger, KY from October 2013 to March 2017. In that role, Mr. Sundby
was primarily responsible for recruiting, training, and leading sales teams for the Columbus Division. Prior to joining Fischer
Homes, in October 2008 Mr. Sundby founded Insurance Green Marketing Group in Colorado, where he recruited and trained sales teams
for an insurance marketing group and also operated as an independent sales agent in the insurance industry. He has built sales
teams nationally within the insurance and financial services industries. Dan’s organization was consistently the top producing
team with each company he recruited and trained for. Dan also recruited and trained sales teams in the receivables management industry
and with a regional home builder with record setting performance in each. Dan is currently serving as Chief Sales Officer for Financial
Gravity and is responsible for building the Company’s nationwide agent team.
Edward A.
Lyon , 53, has been the Company’s Chief Tax Strategist and a Director since October 2015. From 2005 until 2015, he
was Partner-in-Charge of Content at Tax Coach Software, which he founded in 2005. Mr. Lyon received a B.A. in History from Hamilton
College in 1986 and a J.D. from the University of Cincinnati College of Law in 1991. Mr. Lyon’s specific experience, qualifications,
attributes or skills that led to the conclusion that he should serve as a director for the Company:
· The founder of Tax Coach Software, managing the company for 11 years
· A deep knowledge of accounting and financial services industries
· A nationally-recognized expert on tax planning
· The author of 8 books, and has appeared on over 500 radio and television broadcasts to speak about
his areas of expertise
George E. Crumley , 50, has
been on the Board of Directors since January 2015 and has served as our Assistant Secretary – Assistant Treasurer since October
2017. From 1994 to 2007 he was a practicing litigation attorney with the law firm of Stradley & Wright in Dallas, Texas where
he was named partner in 2001. He formed Pittenger, Nuspl & Crumley in 2008 where he continues to practice, advising businesses
in matters including formation, contracts, employees, real estate and litigation among other areas of law. He received BA. and
J.D. degrees from Baylor University in 1989 and 1993, respectively. Mr. Crumley currently serves on the Board of Directors for
Legacy Christian Academy in Frisco, Texas. Mr. Crumley’s specific experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that led
to the conclusion that he should serve as a director for the Company:
·
23 years of experience in civil litigation and representing businesses with formation, contracts, lawsuits, employee disputes, real estate, and other matters.
David Myers , 66, has been
on the Board of Directors since August 28, 2018. From 2013 to March 2018, he served as Vice President, Strategy & Analytics
for McGraw-Hill Education, a learning science company and one of the “big three”
educational publishers that provide customized educational content, software, and services for pre-K through postgraduate education.
At McGraw-Hill, he was responsible for market analytics, market research, pricing strategy, business and competitive intelligence,
state adoption planning and strategic planning. From 2011 to 2013, Mr. Myers served as Senior Manager, Business Development for
Mimio Interactive Teaching Technologies, which provides i nnovative, engaging, and affordable educational
technology and solutions that provide a better way to learn. At Mimio, he was responsible for developing a team
and implementing a suite of business intelligence programs (market research, competitive intelligence, global market share and
financial scenario models). Mr. Myers’ specific experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that led to the conclusion
that he should serve as a director for the Company:
·
A deep understanding of the role technology plays as an enabler of competitive business advantage
·
Deep experience building and leading skilled teams
·
Adept at applying marketing analytics, market research, pricing strategy and competitive intelligence to the strategic planning for enterprises
·
Skills in team-building, analytics, operations and organizational optimization
17
Michael Ashby , 65, has been
on the Board of Directors since August 28, 2018. Since March 2015, he has managed a variety of consulting engagements -- both domestic
and internationally – through his personal consulting company. In January 2015, he served as a consultant for Ashby OpsComm,
an industrial consulting and engineering firm. In that role, Mr. Ashby as Startup
Manager for the Al Hosn super sour gas plant startup in the UAE – and successfully brought on line the largest sour gas processing
plant in the world with no major incidents . Mr. Ashby also spent over a decade with Occidental
Petroleum in a series of management roles with ever-growing responsibility, most recently as World Wide Engineering Chief
of Surface Operations and Engineering responsible for operations and technical support of all business units across the globe .
Mr. Ashby’s specific experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that led to the conclusion that he should serve
as a director for the Company:
·
Decades of experience working in complex project management
·
Strong people skills at all levels of an organization, from front-line workers to senior management
·
Superior planning and execution skills
Todd Bourgeois , 57, has been
on the Board of Directors since August 28, 2018. Mr. Bourgeois has had a long career with Coca-Cola Bottlers, Inc. (from 1982 forward),
most recently as Vice President of Business Integration for Coca-Cola Southwest Beverages. In his most recent role, Mr. Bourgeois
was responsible for leading a team that spearheaded all Critical Business Transformation Projects throughout Coca Cola Southwest
Beverages, Inc. including formulation of ROI Synergy initiatives as well as Operational Plans for execution of these projects.
He reported directly to the CEO of Coca-Cola Southwest Beverages and managed a Team of Project Coordinators, Analysts and multiple
external consultant teams (McKinsey, Deloitte, Accenture). Mr. Bourgeois’ specific experience, qualifications, attributes
or skills that led to the conclusion that he should serve as a director for the Company:
·
Over 30 years of experience managing diverse teams for a broad range of business improvement projects
·
Experience managing large sales and marketing organizations
Debbie Buckner , 55, has
been on the Board of Directors since August 28, 2018. Immediately prior to joining the Company, Ms. Buckner served as Chief Operations
Officer for CDR Electronics, a retail provider of consumer electronics, based in Oklahoma City. Ms. Buckner served in that role
since 2017 and during her tenure, re-engineered the company’s organizational foundation to create clarity, discipline and
accountability. She also exceeded the annual budget, and successfully led the implementation of several major company-wide initiatives.
From 2016 to 2017, Ms. Buckner served as an independent consultant and coach, working in McKinney, Texas through two organizations:
IRIO – with a focus on technology & experiential marketing; and Nicka & Associates – with a focus on medical
coding, compliance and education. From 2005 to 2015, Ms. Buckner worked for Crossmark, a sales and marketing services company
in the consumer goods and services industry, based in Plano, Texas. In her most recent role for Crossmark, Ms. Buckner served
as Vice President of Operations (Training & Development/Support Services/Client Operations). During her service in that senior
role, Ms. Buckner led the company’s Learning Management System implementation for 30,000 field-based employees, as well
as several other key initiatives having direct P&L impact. Ms. Buckner’s specific experience, qualifications, attributes
or skills that led to the conclusion that she should serve as a director for the Company:
·
Over 10 years of experience directing teams and leading company-wide initiatives in the consumer goods and services industry
·
Success leading multi-million dollar domestic and international initiatives
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), requires officers, directors and persons who beneficially own more than
10% of a class of our equity securities registered under the Exchange Act to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership
with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Based solely upon a review of Forms 3 and 4 and amendments thereto furnished to us
during fiscal year 2018 and Forms 5 and amendments thereto furnished to us with respect to fiscal year 2018, or written representations
that Form 5 was not required for fiscal year 2018, we believe that all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to each of
our officers, directors and greater-than-ten percent stockholders were fulfilled in a timely manner. We have notified all known
beneficial owners of more than 10% of our common stock of their requirement to file ownership reports with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
18
Code of Ethics
The Company has adopted a code of ethics
that applies to its principal executive, financial, and accounting officers and is included as an exhibit with this filing.
No Committees of the Board of Directors; No Financial
Expert
The Company does not presently have a separately
constituted audit committee, compensation committee, nominating committee, executive committee or any other committees of its Board
of Directors. Nor does it have an audit committee “financial expert”. At present, its entire Board of Directors acts
as its audit committee. None of the members of its Board of Directors meets the definition of “audit committee financial
expert” as defined in Item 407(d) of Regulation S-K promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. It has not retained
an audit committee financial expert because it does not believe that it can do so without undue cost and expense. Moreover, it
believes that the present members of the Board of Directors, taken as a whole, have sufficient knowledge and experience in financial
affairs to effectively perform their duties.
Item 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.
Summary Compensation Table
The particulars of compensation paid to
the following persons during the fiscal period ended September 30, 2018 and 2017 are set out in the summary compensation table
below:
·
our Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer);
·
our Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer);
·
each of our three most highly compensated executive officers, other than the Principal Executive Officer and the Principal Financial Officer, who were serving as executive officers at the end of the fiscal year ended September 30, 2018 and 2017; and
·
up to two additional individuals for whom disclosure would have been provided under the item above but for the fact that the individual was not serving as our executive officer at the end of the fiscal year ended September 30, 2018 and 2017.
(collectively, the “ Named Executive
Officers ”):
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
Name and Principal Position
Year
Salary
Bonus
Stock Awards
Option Awards
All Other
Compensation
Total
John Pollock
2018
$
23,660
$
–
$
–
$
–
$
203,000
$
226,660
CEO, Principal Executive Officer
2017
100,000
–
–
–
200,000
300,000
Paul Williams
2018
$
94,584
$
–
$
–
$
–
$
–
$
94,584
CFO, Principal Financial Officer
2017
96,000
–
–
–
–
96,000
Dan Sundby
2018
$
132,797
$
15,000
$
–
$
116,292
(1)
$
–
$
264,089
CSO
2017
100,000
–
–
19,382
(1)
–
119,382
Dave Crowley
2018
$
258,158
$
20,000
$
–
$
–
$
–
$
278,158
Principal Advisor
2017
100,000
–
–
–
–
100,000
Edward A. Lyon
2018
$
42,000
$
–
$
–
$
–
$
198,000
$
240,000
CTS
2017
42,000
–
–
–
198,000
240,000
(1)
The Company recognizes the fair value of the stock-based compensation awards as wages in the accompanying statements of
operations on a straight-line basis over the vesting period based on the Black-Scholes option pricing model based on a risk-free
rate from 1.49% to 2.55% in 2018 and 0.85% to 1.41% in 2017, dividend yield of 0%, expected life of 2 years and volatility of
36% - 137%. The aggregate grant date fair value of the option award is $232,596, to be recognized over the term of the option
award.
19
Except as described below, none of the Named Executive Officers
has an employment agreement.
Edward A. Lyon, a member of the Board of
Directors, is party to an employment agreement with Tax Coach Software, LLC, a subsidiary of the Company. The Agreement was entered
into effective November 1, 2015, and provides for Mr. Lyon to serve as General Manager, responsible for supervising the business
and affairs of Tax Coach Software. The agreement has a three-year term, which may be extended. The agreement provides for base
salary of $42,000 per year, plus bonus. The annual bonus is the sum of the following: (i) for Tax Coach Software revenues in excess
of $850,000 and less than $950,000, forty percent (40%) of Tax Coach Software’s gross profit (as determined in accordance
with generally acceptable accounting principles, net of amounts paid under employment agreements and consulting agreements), plus
(ii) for Tax Coach Software revenues in excess of $950,000, twenty percent (20%) of Tax Coach Software’s gross profit (as
determined in accordance with generally acceptable accounting principles, net of amounts paid under employment agreements and consulting
agreements).
(*) For Mr. Pollock, the amount shown in the Summary Compensation
Table under the heading All Other Compensation represents amounts paid by the Company to a consulting firm owned and controlled
by Mr. Pollock, in compensation for services not related to his roles as an officer and director of the Company.
(**) For Mr. Lyon, the amount shown in the Summary Compensation
Table under the heading All Other Compensation represents amounts paid by the Company to a consulting firm owned and controlled
by Mr. Lyon, in compensation for services not related to his roles as an officer and director of the Company.
Summary Compensation
Except as described above, the Company
has no employment agreements with any of its Directors or executive officers.
For the fiscal year ended September 30,
2018, no outstanding stock options or other equity-based awards were re-priced or otherwise materially modified. No stock appreciation
rights have been granted to any of the Directors or executive officers and none of the Directors or executive officers exercised
any stock options or stock appreciation rights. There are no non-equity incentive plan agreements with any of the Directors or
executive officers.
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-end
Dan Sundby has options currently vesting
and the options will be fully vested in July 2019.
Compensation of Directors
This section is not applicable as there was no director compensation
for year ended September 30, 2018.
Employment Contracts, Termination of Employment, Change-in-Control
Arrangements
There is no employment or other contracts
or arrangements with officers or Directors. There are no compensation plans or arrangements, including payments to be made by us,
with respect to the Company’s officers, Directors or consultants that would result from the resignation, retirement or any
other termination of service in respect of such Directors, officers or consultants. There are no arrangements for Directors, officers,
employees or consultants that would result from a change-in-control.
20
Item 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
The following table sets forth certain
information with respect to the beneficial ownership, as of September 30, 2018, of the Company’s common stock, which is the
Company’s only outstanding class of voting securities, and the voting power resulting from such beneficial ownership, by
·
each stockholder known by the Company to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the Company’s outstanding common stock;
·
each director of the Company;
·
each executive officer of the Company; and
·
all directors and executive officers of the Company as a group.
(1)
except as noted below, each beneficial owner has sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares attributable to that owner.
(2)
The address for each such beneficial owner is 800 N. Watters Road, Suite 120, Allen, Texas 75013.
(3)
Includes 180,000 options that vested upon closing of the merger on September 30, 2016.
(4)
Includes 650,000 options that vested upon closing of the merger on September 30, 2016.
(5)
Non-director or executive officer with more than 5% ownership.
*
indicates an ownership percentage of less than one percent.
Beneficial Owner (1)
Amount of Beneficial Ownership (1)
Percentage of Shares
John Pollock (2)
15,037,962
39.3%
Dave Crowley (2, 4)
3,000,000
7.8%
Keith VandeStadt (2, 4, 5)
2,821,500
7.4%
Edward A. Lyon (2)
2,593,500
6.8%
Paul Williams (2)
1,896,414
5.0%
Michael Ashby (2, 6)
895,000
*
Dan Sundby (2, 3)
354,167
*
Todd Bourgeois (2, 7)
325,000
*
George Crumley (2, 5)
150,000
*
David Myers (2, 5)
150,000
*
Debbie Buckner (2)
–
–
Directors and executive officers as group (nine persons)
21,402,043
55.9%
(1)
Each beneficial owner has sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares attributable to that owner.
(2)
The address for each such beneficial owner is 800 N. Watters Road, Suite 120, Allen, Texas 75013.
(3)
Includes 291,667 shares subject to options that are currently vested, plus an additional 208,333 shares subject to options that vest within 10 months not used.
(4)
Non-director or executive officer with more than 5% ownership.
(5)
Represents shares subject to options that are currently vested.
(6)
Includes 150,000 shares subject to options that are currently vested, and 25,000 shares subject to warrants that are currently vested, and 720,000 shares of common stock.
(7)
Includes 175,000 shares subject to options that are currently vested, and 150,000 shares of common stock.
*
indicates an ownership percentage of less than one percent.
21
Changes in Control
The Company is not aware of any contract
or other arrangement the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change of control of the Company.
Securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation
plans
The following table provides information
as of the end of the most recently completed fiscal year, with respect to Company compensation plans (including individual compensation
arrangements) under which equity securities of the Company are authorized for issuance.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
A (1)
B
C
Plan Category
Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights
Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights
Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plan (excluding securities reflected in Column A)
Equity compensation plans approved by security
holders (2015 Stock Option Plan)
9,000,000
(2,4)
$
–
–
(4)
Equity compensation plans not approved by
security holders (2016 Stock Option Plan)
20,000,000
(3)
0.58
16,368,462
(5)
Total
29,000,000
(4)
$
0.58
16,368,462
(1)
As consequence of the Merger, outstanding options of the 2015 Plan in the amount of 2,200,346 of the Company’s shares have vested.
(2)
Shares subject to stock options under 2015 Stock Option Plan.
(3)
Shares subject to stock options under 2016 Stock Option Plan.
(4)
The 2015 Stock Option Plan was replaced by the 2016 Stock Option Plan.
(5)
Shares available for grant of stock options to employees, directors and consultants under the 2016 Stock Option Plan.
Following is a brief description of the
material features of each compensation plan under which equity securities of the Company are authorized for issuance. The 2015
Stock Option Plan and the 2016 Stock Option Plan were adopted without approval of Company security holders.
The Company has granted stock options to
certain employees and contractors under its 2015 Stock Option Plan, assumed from Financial Gravity Holdings and under its 2016
Stock Option Plan. The Company is authorized to issue an aggregate of 20,000,000 options, of which 16,368,462 remain available
for issuance, as non- statutory (non-qualified) stock options, under the 2016 Stock Option Plan. Currently outstanding options
under the 2015 and 2016 Stock Option Plans vest over a period of no greater than two years and expire ten years from the grant
date.
22
Item 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS,
AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE. Transactions with Related Persons, Promoters and Certain Control Persons
Except as set forth below, none of the
Company’s directors or officers, nor any person who beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, shares carrying more than
10% of the voting rights attached to the Company’s shares, nor any relative or spouse of any of the foregoing persons, has
had any material interest, direct or indirect, in any transaction to which the Company was a party, and in which the amount involved
exceeds the lesser of (i) $120,000 or (ii) one percent of the average of the Company’s total assets at year-end for the last
two completed fiscal years.
Effective as of October 1, 2015, Financial Gravity
Holdings, a subsidiary of the Company, purchased all of the equity interests of Tax Coach Software, LLC, an Ohio limited liability
company, for aggregate consideration of 2,000,000 shares of the common stock of Financial Gravity (the “Tax Coach Software
Transaction”). The Purchase Agreement for the Tax Coach Software Transaction was amended effective as of March 25, 2016 to
give effect to a three-for-one (3:1) forward split of the Financial Gravity Holdings common stock, bringing the aggregate consideration
to 6,000,000 shares of the common stock of Financial Gravity Holdings.
TaxTuneup, LLC, which is an entity owned
by Mr. Edward A. Lyon, a current director of the Company, received approximately 43% of the shares of Financial Gravity Holdings
issued in the Tax Coach Software Transaction, then having an approximate value of $864,500. As a consequence of such issuance,
Mr. Lyon is the beneficial owner of 6.8% of the Company’s common stock as of September 30, 2018 (after giving effect to the
Merger).
Additionally, Van Data, LLC, which is an
entity owned Keith VandeStadt, a greater than 5% beneficial shareholder of the Company, received approximately 47% of the shares
of Financial Gravity Holdings issued in the Tax Coach Software Transaction, then having an approximate value of $940,500. As a
consequence of such issuance, Mr. VandeStadt is the beneficial owner of 7.4% of the Company’s common stock as of September
30, 2018 (after giving effect to the Merger).
In the Tax Coach Software Transaction,
the shares of Financial Gravity Holdings common stock received by TaxTuneup, LLC (owned by Mr. Lyon), do not include any of the
shares of Financial Gravity Holdings common stock received by Van Data, LLC (owned by Mr. VandeStadt). Their respective holdings
of Company common stock are completely separated.
During fiscal 2018 and 2017, TaxTuneup,
LLC, an entity owned by Mr. Edward A. Lyon, received the sum of $198,000 and $198,000, respectively, from the Company, in compensation
for strategic tax planning recommendations and research, business consulting and writing of books and tax planning and Tax Master
Network® related content.
During fiscal year 2018 and 2017, the Company
paid $138,980 and $198,000, respectively, to Van Data, LLC, a consulting firm owned and controlled
by Keith VandeStadt, in compensation for maintaining the Tax Coach Software application and data, making enhancements and modifications
to software as needed, maintaining server platform and web environment, applying updates to licensed content, and other services
agreed upon in writing.
During fiscal 2018 and 2017, a company
owned and controlled by Mr. John Pollock (Fourly Enterprises, LLC) received the sum of $203,000 and $200,000, respectively, from
the Company, in compensation for strategic business planning and consulting, business development, process and technology development.
Director Independence; Board Leadership Structure
The Company’s common stock is quoted
through the OTC System. For purposes of determining whether members of the Company’s Board of Directors are “independent,”
the Company’s Board utilizes the standards set forth in the NASDAQ Stock Market Marketplace Rules. At present, the Company’s
entire Board serves as its Audit, Compensation and Nominating Committees. The Company’s Board of Directors has determined
that, of the Company’s present directors, each of George Crumley, David Myers, Michael Ashby, and Todd Bourgeois, constituting
four of the eight members of the Board, is an “independent director,” as defined under NASDAQ’s Marketplace Rules,
for purposes of qualifying as independent members of the Board and an Audit, Compensation and Nominating Committee of the Board,
but that John Pollock, Debbie Buckner, Paul Williams and Edward A. Lyon are not “independent directors” since they
currently serve as executive officers of the Company.
23
The Company’s Board of Directors
is of the view that the current leadership structure is suitable for the Company at its present stage of development, and that
the interests of the Company are best served by the combination of the roles of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer.
As a matter of regular practice, and as
part of its oversight function, the Company’s Board of Directors undertakes a review of the significant risks in respect
of the Company’s business. Such review is conducted in concert with outside professionals (including legal counsel) with
expertise in substantive areas germane to the Company’s business. With the Company’s current governance structure,
the Company’s Board of Directors and senior executives are, by and large, the same individuals, and consequently, there is
not a significant division of oversight and operational responsibilities in managing the material risks facing the Company.
Item 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES.
The following information summarizes the
fees billed to us by Whitley Penn LLP for professional services rendered for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017,
respectively.
Audit Fees . Fees billed for
services by Whitley Penn LLP were $103,238 for fiscal year 2018 and $126,687 for fiscal year 2017. Audit fees include fees associated
with the annual audit and the reviews of the Company’s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and other SEC filings.
Audit-Related Fees. None
Tax Fees . Fees billed or remainder to be billed
for tax services by Whitley Penn LLP were $13,500 for fiscal year 2018 and $11,200 for fiscal year 2017
All Other Fees. None
Consistent with SEC policies regarding
auditor independence, the audit committee has responsibility for appointing, setting compensation, approving and overseeing the
work of the independent auditor. In recognition of this responsibility, the audit committee pre-approves all audit and permissible
non-audit services provided by the independent auditor. The Board of Directors serves as the audit committee for the Company.
24
PART IV
Item 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a) Financial
Statements and financial statement schedules
(1)
and (2) The financial statements and financial statement schedules required to be filed as part of this report are set forth in Item 8 of Part II of this report.
(3) Exhibits. See Item 15(b) below.
(b) Exhibits required by Item
601 of Regulation S-K
Exhibit No.
Description
14.1
Code of Ethics
31.1
Sarbanes-Oxley Section 302(a) Certification of John Pollock
31.2
Sarbanes-Oxley Section 302(a) Certification of Paul Williams
32.1
Sarbanes-Oxley Section 906 Certifications
101.INS
XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH
XBRL Schema Document
101.CAL
XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF
XBRL Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB
XBRL Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE
XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document
25
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Date: January 15, 2019
By:
/s/ John Pollock
John Pollock
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Date: January 15, 2019
By:
/s/ Paul Williams
Paul Williams
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities
and on the dates indicated.
Signature
Capacity
Date
/s/ John Pollock
Chairman, CEO
January 15, 2019
John Pollock
(principal executive officer)
/s/ Paul Williams
Vice Chairman, CFO
January 15, 2019
Paul Williams
(principal financial officer)
/s/ George E. Crumley
Director
January 15, 2019
George E. Crumley
/s/ Edward A. Lyon
Director
January 15, 2019
Edward A. Lyon
/s/ David Myers
Director
January 15, 2019
David Myers
/s/ Michael Ashby
Director
January 15, 2019
Michael Ashby
/s/ Todd Bourgeois
Director
January 15, 2019
Todd Bourgeois
/s/ Debbie Buckner
Debbie Buckner
Director
January 15, 2019
26
FINANCIAL GRAVITY COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM
SEPTEMBER 30, 2018 AND 2017
CONTENTS
Page
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
F-2
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
F-3
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
F-3
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
F-4
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
F-5
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW
F-6
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
F-7
F- 1
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
of
Financial Gravity Companies, Inc.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets of Financial Gravity Companies, Inc. (the “Company”), as of September 30, 2018 and 2017, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years then ended, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial
statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of the Company as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years
then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Emphasis of Matter
The accompanying consolidated financial
statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated
financial statements, the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations and has a working capital deficiency that raises
substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in regard to these matters are also described
in Note 1. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility
of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB")
and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable
rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with
the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have,
nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required
to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the
effectiveness of the entity’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures
to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures
that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures
in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
We have served as the Company's auditor
since 2016.
/s/ Whitley Penn LLP
Dallas, Texas
January 15, 2019
F- 2
Financial Gravity Companies, Inc. and
Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
As of September 30,
2018
2017
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents
$ 32,220
$ 444,420
Trade accounts receivable, net
15,907
109,795
Accounts receivable - related party
1,791
4,506
Prepaid expenses
25,657
64,603
Total current assets
75,575
623,324
OTHER ASSETS
Property and equipment, net
138,286
127,503
Customer relationships, net
11,225
22,450
Proprietary content, net
328,188
393,824
Trade name
69,300
69,300
Non-compete agreements, net
10,520
15,780
Intellectual Property
48,940
30,085
Goodwill
1,094,702
1,094,702
TOTAL ASSETS
$ 1,776,736
$ 2,376,968
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable - trade
$ 105,435
$ 51,814
Accrued expenses
132,989
122,552
Deferred revenue
–
95,601
Line of credit
59,646
–
Notes payable
356,173
165,562
Total current liabilities
654,243
435,529
NOTES PAYABLE
676,233
281,031
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 300,000,000 shares authorized; 35,837,900 shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2018 and 35,737,900 shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2017
35,838
35,738
Additional paid-in capital
5,986,052
5,679,668
Accumulated deficit
(5,575,630 )
(4,054,998 )
Total stockholders’ equity
446,260
1,660,408
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
$ 1,776,736
$ 2,376,968
The accompanying notes are an integral part
of these consolidated financial statements.
F- 3
Financial Gravity Companies, Inc. and
Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Years Ended September 30,
2018
2017
REVENUE
Investment management fees
$ 1,775,838
$ 1,279,206
Service income
2,109,765
2,195,718
Commissions
1,390
50,575
Rental income
–
5,000
Total revenue
3,886,993
3,530,499
OPERATING EXPENSES
Cost of services
85,998
73,004
Professional services
827,272
997,117
Depreciation and amortization
113,122
99,744
General and administrative
956,784
748,481
Management fees - related party
203,000
200,000
Marketing
266,930
375,499
Salaries and wages
2,847,559
1,961,126
Total operating expenses
5,300,665
4,454,971
Net operating loss
(1,413,672 )
(924,472 )
OTHER EXPENSE
Interest expense
(106,960 )
(51,503 )
Total other expense
(106,960 )
(51,503 )
NET LOSS
$ (1,520,632 )
$ (975,975 )
LOSS PER SHARE - Basic and Diluted
$ (0.04 )
$ (0.03 )
The accompanying notes are an integral part
of these consolidated financial statements.
F- 4
Financial Gravity Companies, Inc. and
Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
For the years ended September 30, 2018
and 2017
Number of Shares Issued and Outstanding
Common Stock Par Value Amount
Additional Paid-In Capital
Accumulated
Deficit
Total
Balance at September 30, 2016
34,862,900
34,863
4,768,596
(3,079,023 )
1,724,436
Common stock issued under a private placement memorandum
725,000
725
724,275
–
725,000
Release of Pacific Oil Company shares for settlement of pre-acquisition liabilities
–
–
23,674
–
23,674
Common stock issued in exchange for services
150,000
150
112,350
–
112,500
Stock based compensation
–
–
50,773
–
50,773
Net loss
–
–
–
(975,975 )
(975,975 )
Balance at September 30, 2017
35,737,900
35,738
5,679,668
(4,054,998 )
1,660,408
Common stock issued under a private placement memorandum
100,000
100
99,900
–
100,000
Stock based compensation
–
–
206,484
–
206,484
Net loss
–
–
–
(1,520,632 )
(1,520,632 )
Balance at September 30, 2018
35,837,900
$ 35,838
$ 5,986,052
$ (5,575,630 )
$ 446,260
The accompanying notes are an integral part
of these consolidated financial statements.
F- 5
Financial Gravity Companies, Inc. and
Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Years Ended September 30,
2018
2017
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss
$ (1,520,632 )
$ (975,975 )
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities
Depreciation and amortization
113,122
99,744
Common stock issued in exchange for services
–
112,500
Stock based compensation
206,484
50,773
Bad debt expense
21,876
–
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
Trade accounts receivable, net
72,012
(30,952 )
Accounts receivable - related party
2,715
–
Prepaid expenses
38,946
(32,364 )
Accounts payable - trade
53,621
24,585
Accrued expenses
10,437
18,898
Deferred revenue
(95,601 )
62,862
Pre-merger payables
–
(75,382 )
Net cash used in operating activities
(1,097,020 )
(745,311 )
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Cash from the sale of investment
–
10,000
Cash paid for purchase of property and equipment
(41,783 )
(4,043 )
Purchases of trademarks
(18,856 )
(7,493 )
Net cash used in investing activities
(60,639 )
(1,536 )
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Borrowings from line of credit
77,561
42,377
Payments on line of credit
(110,089 )
(62,109 )
Borrowings from note payable
740,000
450,000
Payments on note payable
(62,013 )
(96,804 )
Proceeds from the sale of common stock
100,000
725,000
Net cash provided by financing activities
745,459
1,058,464
TOTAL CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
(412,200 )
311,617
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF YEAR
444,420
132,803
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR
$ 32,220
$ 444,420
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the year for:
Interest
$ 95,756
$ 48,586
Taxes
$ –
$ –
Settlement of payables owed by legacy Pacific Oil Company Stockholders
$ –
$ 23,674
The accompanying notes are an integral part
of these consolidated financial statements.
F- 6
Financial Gravity Companies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NATURE OF BUSINESS
Financial Gravity Companies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
(the “Company”) is located in Allen, Texas. The wholly-owned subsidiaries of the organization include: Financial Gravity
Holdings, Inc., Financial Gravity Operations, Inc., Financial Gravity Tax, Inc., Financial Gravity Wealth, Inc., Cloud9 Holdings
Company, Financial Gravity Business, LLC, Financial Gravity Ventures, LLC., SASH Corporation (doing business as Metro Data Processing)
and Tax Coach Software, LLC.
Financial Gravity Holdings, Inc. (“FGH”)
was established on September 29, 2014 to engage in the acquisition and integration of financial and other businesses which will
deliver a wide range of accounting, tax planning and management services to high net worth individuals and businesses in the Dallas/Fort
Worth region, with further expansion into other markets in accordance with its long-term growth rate and strategic business plan.
Financial Gravity Operations, Inc. (“FGO”)
was established as a wholly-owned subsidiary of FGH in Texas on September 29, 2014. FGO did not have any activity through September
30, 2014. Activity commenced in 2015 for FGO related to the management of operational expenses for the shared services of the subsidiaries.
Financial Gravity Business, LLC. (“FGB”)
formerly Cloud9b2b, LLC (“Cloud9 B2B”) was acquired by Cloud9 Holdings Company effective December 31, 2014 and provides
business consulting services to Small Business Owners that identify ways to leverage a business’ current assets (people,
platforms and processes) and reduce exposure to risk, both short-term and long-term, while simplifying the business and increasing
profitability. FGB does not have any financial activity through September 30, 2018.
Financial Gravity Ventures, LLC. (“FGV”)
formerly Cloud9 Accelerator, LLC was acquired by Cloud9 Holdings Company (Cloud9) effective December 31, 2014 and holds acquired
companies and business assets until they are integrated into the main stream Financial Gravity business structure. FGV did not
have any financial activity through September 30, 2018.
Effective January 1, 2015, Cloud9 assigned
100% of the membership interest in Cloud9 Accelerator, LLC and Cloud9B2B, to FGO.
Financial Gravity Tax, Inc. (“FG
Tax”) formerly Business Legacy, Inc., (“BLI”) was acquired by FGO for no cost effective January 1, 2015 and is
located in Allen, Texas. BLI is a bookkeeping, tax planning, tax preparation, and payroll service provider to small companies and
individuals.
Financial Gravity Wealth, Inc. (“FG
Wealth”) formerly Pollock Advisory Group, Inc., (“PAG”) was acquired by FGO for no cost-effective January 1,
2015 and is a registered investment advisor, located in Allen, Texas. PAG provides asset management services.
SASH Corporation, an Oklahoma corporation
doing business as Metro Data Processing (“MDP”) was acquired August 12, 2015. The purchase was made by Cloud9Accelerator,
LLC. MDP is located in Tulsa, Oklahoma, and provides payroll services, software, and support solutions to business owners. This
business was sold during fiscal 2018 for a net gain of $28,585.
Tax Coach Software, LLC (“TCS”),
was acquired effective October 1, 2015, and is an Ohio limited liability company. The purchase was made by FGH. TCS, located in
Cincinnati, Ohio, provides three primary services including monthly subscriptions to the “Tax Coach” software system,
coaching and email marketing services.
1.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A summary of the significant accounting
polices consistently applied in the preparation of the accompanying consolidated financial statement in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) is as follows.
Basis of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements
include the accounts of FGH, FGO, including Cloud9B2B and Cloud9 Accelerator, LLC, FGW (PAG), FGT (BLI), TMN (TCS) and MDP (through
June 2018), (collectively referred to as the “Company”). All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have
been eliminated on consolidation.
F- 7
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid
investments with an initial maturity of three months or less, when purchased, to be cash equivalents. The Company maintains cash
balances at several financial institutions located throughout the United States, which at times may exceed insured limits. The
Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts and believes it is not exposed to any significant credit risk on cash and
cash equivalents.
Trade Accounts Receivable
Trade accounts receivable are carried at
the invoiced amount less an estimate made for doubtful accounts based on management’s review of outstanding balances. The
collectability of the Company’s accounts receivable is reviewed on an ongoing basis, using historical payment trends and
a review of specific accounts. Accounts receivable are written off after all reasonable collection efforts have been exhausted
and when management determines the amounts to be uncollectible. Recoveries of receivables previously written off are recorded when
received. The allowance for doubtful accounts was $21,876 and $17,014 as of September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
In the normal course of business, the Company
may extend credit to its customers, on an unsecured basis, substantially all of whom are located in the United States of America.
The Company does not believe that they are exposed to any significant risk of loss on accounts receivable.
Prepaid Expenses
Prepaid expenses consist of expenses the
Company has paid for prior to the service or good being provided. These prepaid expenses will be recorded as expense at the time
the service has been provided.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost,
less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is provided in amounts sufficient to relate the cost of depreciable assets to earnings
over their estimated service lives by the straight-line method.
Maintenance and repairs are charged to
earnings as incurred; major repairs and replacements are capitalized. When items of property or equipment are sold or retired,
the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is included in operations.
Property and equipment operated under material
leases which transfer substantially all benefits and risks associated with the assets to the Company are capitalized. An asset
and liability equal to the present or fair value, if appropriate, of minimum payments over the term of the leases are recorded.
Amortization of the asset is computed using the straight-line method. Expenses associated with all other leases (operating leases)
are charged to income as incurred.
Customer Relationships
The customer relationships acquired from
the TCS purchase have been recognized in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at $44,900, the value attributed to it on
the date of the purchase . The customer relationships are being amortized on a straight-line basis over a four- year estimated
life. During the years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, the Company recorded amortization expense of $11,225 on this intangible
asset, which is included in depreciation and amortization expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Accumulated
amortization at September 30, 2018 and 2017 was $33,675, and $22,450 respectively.
Future amortization of customer relationships
is estimated to be as follows for the years ended September 30:
2019
$ 11,225
$ 11,225
F- 8
Proprietary Content
The proprietary content acquired as a part
of the TCS purchase has been recognized in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at $525,100, the value attributed to it
on the date of the purchase. The proprietary content is being amortized on a straight-line basis over an eight- year estimated
life. During the years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, the Company recorded amortization expense of $65,638 on this intangible
asset, which is included in depreciation and amortization expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Accumulated
amortization at September 30, 2018 and 2017 was $196,912 and $131,276, respectively.
Future amortization of proprietary content
is estimated to be as follows for the years ended September 30:
2019
$ 65,638
2020
65,638
2021
65,638
2022
65,638
2023
65,636
$ 328,188
Trade Name
The trade name acquired as a part of the
TCS purchase has been recognized in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at $69,300, the value attributed to it on the
date of the purchase. Management has determined that the trade name has an indefinite life and does not consider the value of the
trade name recorded in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet to be impaired as of September 30, 2018 and 2017.
Non-compete Agreements
Non-compete agreements established as a
part of the TCS purchase have been recognized in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at $26,300, the value attributed
to them on the date of the purchase. The non-compete agreements are being amortized on a straight-line basis over the five-year
term of the non-compete clause of the agreement. During the years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, the Company recorded amortization
expense of $5,260 on this intangible asset, which is included in depreciation and amortization expense in the accompanying consolidated
statements of operations. Accumulated amortization at September 30, 2018 and 2017 was $15,780 and $10,520, respectively.
Future amortization of the non-compete
agreements is estimated to be as follows for the years ended September 30:
2019
$ 5,260
2020
5,260
$ 10,520
Trademarks
The Company accounts for trademarks in
accordance with GAAP and accordingly, trademarks are stated at cost. Trademarks with indefinite lives are not amortized but are
tested for impairment at least annually. Management has determined that the trademarks have an indefinite life and do not consider
the value of trademarks recorded in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet to be impaired as of September 30, 2018 and 2017.
F- 9
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of the value
of the purchase price and related costs over the identifiable assets from business acquisitions. The Company conducts an annual
impairment assessment, at the reporting unit level, of its recorded goodwill. The Company assesses qualitative factors in order
to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than it is carrying amount. The
qualitative factors evaluated by the Company include: macro-economic conditions of the local business environment, overall financial
performance, and other entity specific factors as deemed appropriate. If, through this qualitative assessment, the conclusion is
made that it is more likely than not that a reporting unit’s fair value is less than it is carrying amount, a two-step impairment
test is performed. Management determined, by assessing the qualitative factors, that it is more likely than not that the fair value
of the reporting unit is greater than it carries value. Management does not consider the value of goodwill recorded for TCS in
the accompanying consolidated balance sheet to be impaired as of September 30, 2018, and 2017. However, goodwill attributed to
Cloud9 and MDP was deemed to be impaired as of September 30, 2017 as that business offering has been discontinued.
The fair values of the assets acquired,
and liabilities assumed were determined primarily using the income approach, which determines the fair value for the asset based
on the present value of cash flows projected to be generated by the asset. Projected cash flows are discounted at a rate of return
that reflects the relative risk of achieving the cash flow and the time value of money. The fair value of relationships was determined
by projecting expected cash flows and subtracting the portion of the cash flow derived by the relevant contributory assets.
The accompanying consolidated balance sheets, consolidated statements
of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows include the results of operations of the acquired subsidiaries
from the date of acquisition.
Goodwill consists of the following:
Goodwill at September 30, 2017
$ 1,094,702
Goodwill at September 30, 2018
$ 1,094,702
Income Taxes
The Company accounts for Federal and state
income taxes pursuant to GAAP, which requires an asset and liability approach for financial accounting and reporting for income
taxes based on tax effects of differences between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities.
The Company accounts for all uncertain
tax positions in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”)
740 – Income Taxes (“ASC 740”). ASC 740 provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties
and disclosure related to uncertain income tax positions. The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized
tax benefits as a component of income tax expense. There was no accrued interest or penalties as of September 30, 2018 and 2017.
From time to time, the Company is audited
by taxing authorities. These audits could result in proposed assessments of additional taxes. The Company believes that its tax
positions comply in all material respects with applicable tax law. However, tax law is subject to interpretation, and interpretations
by taxing authorities could be different from those of the Company, which could result in the imposition of additional taxes. The
Company’s Federal returns since 2015 are still subject for examination by taxing authorities.
Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per common share is computed
by dividing net earnings available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the reporting
period. Average number of common shares were 35,830,228 and 35,361,321 for years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
For the years ended September 30, 2018
and 2017, approximately 3,631,538 and 2,817,146 common stock options, respectively, were not added to the diluted average shares
because inclusion of such shares would be antidilutive.
F- 10
Revenue Recognition
FG Wealth generates investment management fees for services
provided by the Company. Investment management fees include fees earned from assets under management by providing professional
services to manage client investments.
FG Tax and MDP generate service income from its consulting and
other professional services performed.
Commission revenue is derived from the
sale of annuities and premiums on life insurance policies held by third parties. The revenue is recognized at the time the policy
is issued.
Revenue represents gross billings less
discounts, and are net of sales taxes, as applicable. Amounts invoiced for work not yet completed are shown as deferred revenue
in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
TaxCoach Software has 3 types of services
that are charged and collected on a month to month subscription basis (TaxCoach basic membership, All-Stars coaching, and Wire
Service weekly broadcast email). None of these programs come with a long-term commitment or contract, and there is no up-front
payment beyond the monthly subscription fee. Cancellations are processed within the month requested and memberships are closed
at the end of the period for which the most recent payment was made. Members are not entitled to refunds for unused memberships.
Advertising
Advertising costs are charged to operations
when incurred. Advertising and marketing expense were $266,930 and $375,499 for the years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company recognizes the fair value of
the stock-based compensation awards as wages in the accompanying statements of operations on a straight-line basis over the vesting
period based on the Black-Scholes option pricing model based on a risk-free rate from 1.49% to 2.55% in 2018 and 0.85% to 1.41%
in 2017, dividend yield of 0%, expected life of 2 years and volatility of 36% to 137%.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the consolidated financial
statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported assets and liabilities
and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and reported amounts of
revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Going Concern
The accompanying consolidated financial
statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates the Company will need
to manage additional asset units under contract and/or additional financing to fully implement its business plan, including continued
growth and establishment of a stronger brand.
F- 11
On May 23, 2017, the Company and GHS Investments,
LLC (“GHS Investments”) entered into an Equity Financing Agreement (the “Agreement”). The Agreement was
filed as an exhibit to a registration statement on Form S-1, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 18,
2017. The Agreement contemplates a series of transactions, pursuant to which the Company will “put” shares of its common
stock to GHS in consideration of the payment to the Company of eighty percent (80%) of the “Market Price” of such shares.
“Market Price” shall mean the average of the two lowest trading prices of the Company’s Common Stock during the
ten (10) consecutive trading days preceding the receipt of the applicable put notice. Accordingly, on each instance the Company
exercises a put option, the Company will know in advance, both the number of shares issuable upon exercise of the put option, and
the dollar amount of the purchase price for such shares. The maximum purchase price for shares to be purchased by GHS Investments
under the Agreement is $11,000,000. To facilitate the sale of the shares so purchased by GHS Investments, the Company agreed to
file a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company also entered into a Registration Rights
Agreement with GHS Investments, pursuant to which the Company has agreed to provide certain registration rights under the Securities
Act of 1933, the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, and applicable state securities laws. The Agreement will terminate
(i) when GHS Investments has purchased an aggregate of $11,000,000 of the common stock of the Company, or (ii) 36 months after
the effective date of the Agreement, or (iii) at such time that the registration statement is no longer in effect.
Additionally, the Company is also actively
seeking growth of its service offerings, both organically and via new client relationships. Management, in the ordinary course
of business, is trying to raise additional capital through sales of common stock as well as seeking financing via equity or debt,
or both from third parties. There are no assurances that additional financing will be available on favorable terms, or at all.
If additional financing is not available, the Company will need to reduce, defer or cancel development programs, planned initiatives
and overhead expenditures. The failure to adequately fund its capital requirements could have a material adverse effect on the
Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations. Moreover, the sale of additional equity securities to
raise financing will result in additional dilution to the Company’s stockholders and incurring additional indebtedness could
involve an increased debt service cash obligation, the imposition of covenants that restrict the Company’s operations or
the Company’s ability to perform on its current debt service requirements. The consolidated financial statements do not include
any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.
Future Accounting Pronouncements
In February 2017, the FASB issued ASU Update
No. 2017-02 Leases (Topic 842). Under the new guidance, a lessee will be required to recognize assets and liabilities for leases
with lease terms of more than 12 months. Consistent with current GAAP, the recognition, measurement, and presentation of expenses
and cash flows arising from a lease by a lessee primarily will depend on its classification as a finance or operating lease. However,
unlike current GAAP - which requires only capital leases to be recognized on the balance sheet - the new ASU will require both
types of leases to be recognized on the balance sheet. ASU 2017-02 is effective for the years beginning after December 15, 2018
and for all periods presented. Early application of the amendments in this ASU is permitted. The Company does not expect any significant
financial impact to the financial statements upon adoption of this standard.
In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU Update
No. 2017-07, Investments – Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323). The amendments in this Update eliminate the requirement
that when an investment qualifies for use of the equity method as a result of an increase in the level of ownership interest or
degree of influence, an investor must adjust the investment, results of operations, and retained earnings retroactively on a step-by-step
basis as if the equity method had been in effect during all previous periods that the investment had been held. ASU 2017-07 is
effective for the years beginning after December 15, 2017. Early application of the amendments in this ASU is permitted. The Company
does not expect any significant financial impact to the financial statements upon adoption of this standard.
In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU Update
No. 2017-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). The amendments in this Update are intended to improve the operability
and understandability of the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations by clarifying the criteria in determining
a principal versus agent relationship. The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict
the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects
to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. To achieve this core principle, an entity should apply the following five
steps: (1) identify contracts with customers, (2) identify the performance obligations in the contracts, (3) determine the transaction
price, (4) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligation in the contract, and (5) recognize revenue as the entity
satisfies performance obligations. The new guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018,
including interim periods within that reporting period. Early application is permitted for annual reporting periods beginning after
December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. We are currently evaluating what impact adoption of
this guidance will have on our financial position, results of operations, cash flows and disclosures. The Company does not expect
any significant financial impact to the financial statements upon adoption of this standard.
F- 12
In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU Update
No. 2017-09, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718). The amendments in this Update are to simplify several aspects
of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either
equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. ASU 2017-09 is effective for annual periods beginning
after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Company has yet to do a full analysis on the impact
this will have but will do during the next fiscal year. The Company does not expect any significant financial impact to the financial
statements upon adoption of this standard.
2.
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment consist of the following at September
30:
Estimated
Service
Lives
2018
2017
Furniture, fixtures and equipment
2 to 5 years
$ 53,721
$ 11,039
Internally developed software
10 years
152,000
152,000
205,721
163,039
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
67,435
35,536
$ 138,286
$ 127,503
Depreciation expense was $31,899 and $17,622
during the years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
3.
INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY
Intellectual property consists of the
following:
Trademarks at September 30, 2016
22,592
Trademarks purchased at cost
7,493
Trademarks at September 30, 2017
$ 30,085
Trademarks purchased at cost
18,855
Trademarks at September 30, 2018
$ 48,940
4. LINE
OF CREDIT
The Company has a revolving line of credit
with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. in the amount of $67,500. Amounts drawn under this line of credit are due on demand, and monthly interest
and principal payments are required. The interest rate on the line of credit is 9.5%. This line of credit is collateralized by
the personal guarantee of the majority stockholder. Line of credit balance was $59,646 and $0 for the years ended September 30,
2018 and 2017, respectively.
5. NOTES
PAYABLE
With the acquisition of Tax Coach Software,
LLC, the Company also acquired a promissory note payable to The Huntington National Bank. The note permits maximum borrowings of
$100,000. Interest is paid monthly at prime plus 1.25% and the balance is due on demand. The facility matured in February 2018
(paid off on November 30, 2017), is collateralized by substantially all assets of Tax Coach Software, LLC, and is secured by a
personal guarantee from Keith VandeStadt, a significant stockholder of the Company. The balance outstanding under this note payable
was $0 and $92,197 at September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
The Company entered into a Business Loan and Security Agreement
to Small Business Financial Solutions, LLC, on October 28, 2017 in the amount of $100,000. The transaction is structured as an
advance against assets. The lender has a security interest in all collateral of the Company, and outstanding under this note payable
was $0 and $7,935 at September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
F- 13
On July 31, 2017, the Company entered into
a Promissory Note Payable with Fourly Enterprises, LLC (“Fourly”) in the amount of $50,000. The interest rate on the
note is 20%. The note matured on August 16, 2018. Fourly is owned by the majority stockholder of the Company. The outstanding balance
was $0 and $46,461 at September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
On August 9, 2017 the Company entered into
a Promissory Note Payable with Elmer Fink in the amount of $100,000. The interest rate on the note is 10%. First year payment is
equal to 10% of the loan value. A second year payment equal to 10% of the loan value was issued on January 1, 2019 with monthly
principal and interest of $4,614 starting on year three. The note matures July 15, 2021. The outstanding balance was $100,000 at
September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
On August 9, 2017 the Company entered
into a Promissory Note Payable with Mike and Terri Ashby in the amount of $100,000. The interest rate on the note is 10%. First
year payment is equal to 10% of the loan value with monthly principal and interest of $4,614 starting on year two. The note matures
August 15, 2020. The outstanding balance was $92,406 and $100,000 at September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
On September 5, 2017 the Company entered
into a Promissory Note Payable with Heleon Investment Company, Ltd. in the amount of $100,000. The interest rate on the note is
10%. First year payment is equal to 10% of the loan value with monthly principal and interest of $4,614 starting on year two. The
remaining principal and accrued interest of this note is due on the maturity date, August 15, 2020. The outstanding balance was
$100,000 at September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
On October 2, 2017 the Company entered
into a Promissory Note Payable with Indar and Sybil Bally in the amount of $100,000. The interest rate on the note is 10%. First
year payment is equal to 10% of the loan value with monthly principal and interest of $4,614 starting on year two. The remaining
principal and accrued interest of this note is due on the maturity date, October 2, 2020. The outstanding balance was $100,000
and $0 at September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
On October 2, 2017 the Company entered
into a Promissory Note Payable with Paul Frueh in the amount of $100,000. The interest rate on the note is 10%. First year payment
is equal to 10% of the loan value with monthly principal and interest of $4,614 starting on year two. The remaining principal and
accrued interest of this note is due on the maturity date, October 20, 2020. The outstanding balance was $100,000 and $0 at September
30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
On November 2, 2017 the Company entered
into a Promissory Note Payable with Michael and Donna Dade in the amount of $340,000. The interest rate on the note is 10%. First
year payment is equal to 10% of the loan value with monthly principal and interest of $15,689 starting on year two. The remaining
principal and accrued interest of this note is due on the maturity date, October 20, 2020. The outstanding balance was $340,000
and $0 at September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
On March 15, 2018 the Company entered into
a Promissory Note Payable with Helen Janssen in the amount of $200,000. The interest rate on the note is 10%. First year payment
is equal to 10% of the loan value with monthly principal and interest of $9,229 starting on year two. The remaining principal and
accrued interest of this note is due on the maturity date, February 15, 2021. The outstanding balance was $200,000 and $0 at September
30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
The Company’s maturities of debt
subsequent to September 30, 2018 are as follows:
2019
$ 356,173
2020
522,953
2021
153,280
$ 1,032,406
F- 14
6. ACCRUED
EXPENSES
Accrued expenses consist of the following
at September 30:
2018
2017
Accrued payroll
$ 19,489
$ 19,165
Accrued operating expenses
113,500
103,137
Deferred rent
–
250
$ 132,989
$ 122,552
7. INCOME
TAXES
The Company elected C Corporation tax status
upon inception in 2014. Net operating losses (“NOL”) since that date total $3,233,265 as of September 30, 2018 and
may be carried forward to offset future taxable income; accordingly, no current provision for income tax has been recorded in the
accompanying statements of operations. NOL carry-forward benefits begin to expire in 2035.
The following table summarizes the difference
between the actual tax provision and the amounts obtained by applying the statutory tax rates to the income or loss before income
taxes for the years ended September 30:
2018
2017
Tax benefit calculated at statutory rate
24.25%
35.00%
Expense not deductible
(0.16 )
(0.37 )
State tax, net of federal benefit
(0.45 )
–
Effect of rate change
(26.99 )
–
Changes to valuation allowance
3.35
(34.63 )
Provision for income taxes
–%
–%
A deferred tax liability or asset is determined
based on the difference between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities as measured by the enacted tax
rates which will be in effect when these differences reverse. Deferred tax expense or benefit in the accompanying consolidated
statements of operations are the result of changes in the assets and liabilities for deferred taxes. The measurement of deferred
tax assets is reduced, if necessary, by the amount for any tax benefits that, based on available evidence, are not expected to
be realized. Income tax expense is the current tax payable or refundable for the year plus or minus the net change in the deferred
tax assets and liabilities. Deferred income taxes of the Company arise from the temporary differences between financial statement
and income tax recognition of NOL carry-forwards.
The deferred tax assets and liabilities in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets include the following components at September 30:
2018
2017
Net non-current deferred tax assets:
Net operating loss carry-forward
$ 1,098,314
$ 1,131,643
Property and equipment
3,456
10,719
1,101,770
1,142,362
Net non-current deferred tax liabilities:
Intangible assets
7,996
728
Net
1,093,774
1,141,634
Less valuation allowance
(1,093,774 )
(1,141,634 )
Net deferred taxes
$ –
$ –
F- 15
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”), which
was enacted December 22, 2017, reduced the corporate income tax rate effective January 1, 2018 from 35% to 21%. Among the other
significant tax law changes that potentially affect the Company are the limitations on the deduction for interest incurred in
2018 or later of up to 70% of its taxable income for the carryforward year and the limitation of the utilization of post 2017
net operating loss carryforwards. At September 30, 2018, the Company has not completed its accounting for the tax effects of enactment
of the Tax Act, however, it has made reasonable estimates of the effects on its existing deferred tax balances. The Company does
not anticipate material changes to its income tax provision as a result of the passage of the Tax Act until pretax law change
net operating losses are fully utilized or expire in 2026. The Company has remeasured certain deferred federal tax assets and
liabilities based on the rates at which they are expected to reverse in the future, which is generally 21%. The deferred tax assets
of the Company were reduced by $408,041 as a result of this remeasurement. This change was fully offset by the corresponding change
in the valuation allowance. The Company is still analyzing certain aspects of the Tax Act, and refining its calculations, which
could potentially affect the measurement of those balances or potentially give rise to new deferred tax amounts. The Company’s
estimates may also be affected in the future as the Company gains a more thorough understanding of the Tax Act, and how the individual
states are implementing this new law.
8.
COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENCIES AND CONCENTRATIONS
Leases
The Company conducts operations from leased
premises leased through 2024. Some of these leases provide for payment of taxes, insurance, utilities and maintenance. The Company
also leases certain equipment under operating leases. Total rent expense for the years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017 was $125,297
and $118,126, respectively. Rent expense is recorded on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. The difference between
rental expense and rental payments is recorded as deferred rent within accrued expenses in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets. Management expects that in the normal course of business, leases will be renewed or replaced by other leases.
Minimum future annual rental payments under
non-cancelable operating leases having original terms in excess of one year are as follows:
2019
$ 74,022
2020
92,544
2021
92,544
2022
96,016
2023
65,168
Thereafter
65,168
$ 485,462
Contingencies
Under the terms of the TCS purchase agreement,
the common stock issued had been placed in escrow. The sellers maintain the right to unwind this transaction under certain conditions.
One agreement with one of the employees was terminated during December 2016.
At September 30, 2016, Pacific Oil Company
had some outstanding payables that the previous owners were in the process of liquidating. Those liabilities have been shown here
but are expected to be settled by the previous owners. Shares of the Company were held in escrow to cover the possibility that
these liabilities will ultimately have to be settled by the Company. The liabilities were settled during 2017.
Legal Proceedings
From time to time, we are a party to or
otherwise involved in legal proceedings, claims and other legal matters, arising in the ordinary course of our business or otherwise.
A subsidiary of the Company is currently involved in one legal proceeding, the outcome of which will not be material to our ability
to operate or market our services, our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
F- 16
9.
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Common Stock
The Company is authorized to issue up to 300,000,000 shares
of common stock, par value $0.001 per share.
Preferred Stock
The Company does not have a preferred stock authorization in
its articles of incorporation.
Financial Gravity Holdings, a subsidiary
of the Company, has authorized the issuance of up to 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, by action of the Board of Directors.
The preferred stock authorization has not been formalized via the filing of an amendment to the certificate of formation of Financial
Gravity Holdings. The rights and obligations of the preferred stock are as determined by the Board of Directors at the time of
issuance.
For each of the Company and Financial Gravity
Holdings, its subsidiary, there were no preferred shares issued or outstanding as of September 30, 2018 and 2017.
Warrants
As part of the sale of common shares starting
October 2016, the Company granted to investors who invest at value of $100,000 or above common stock purchase warrants (the "Warrants").
In the quarter ended December 31, 2016 there were three individual investments of $100,000 for which the Company issued warrants
for the purchase of 75,000 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $1.25 per share for a 1-year term and
an additional 75,000 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $1.50 for a 2-year term.
In the quarter ended March 31, 2017 there
were two individual investments for an aggregate of $250,000 for which the Company issued warrants for the purchase of 50,000 shares
of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $1.25 per share for a l-year term and an additional 50,000 shares of common
stock of the Company at an exercise price of $1.50 for a 2-year term.
In the quarter ended September 30, 2017,
there was one additional investment of $100,000 for which the Company issued warrants for the purchase of 25,000 shares of common
stock of the Company after exercise price of $1.25 per share for 1-year term and an additional 25,000 shares of common stock of
the Company at an exercise price of $1.50 for a 2-year term.
In the quarter ended December 31, 2017,
an aggregate of 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock had been sold for $100,000 for which the Company issued warrants
for the purchase of 25,000 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $1.25 per share for a 1 year term and
an additional 25,000 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $1.50 for a 2-year term.
The Company follows the provisions of ASC
815, “Derivatives and Hedging”. ASC 815 requires freestanding contracts that are settled in a company’s own stock
to be designated as an equity instrument, assets or liability. Under the provisions of ASC 815, a contract designated as an asset
or liability must be initially recorded and carried at fair value until the contract meets the requirements for classification
as equity, until the contract is exercised or until the contract expires. However, the Company determined that these warrants should
be accounted for as equity and as such no determination of fair value was necessary.
Private Placement Memorandum, Financial Gravity Holdings,
Inc.
On October 31, 2014, Financial Gravity
Holdings, Inc. issued a private placement memorandum (“PPM”) for stock purchases of up to 2,000,000 shares of common
stock at a cost of $1.00 and a par value of $0.00001, with a minimum purchase level of $50,000 per investor. The subscription period
initially expired June 30, 2015, however, the Board of Directors extended the offering period indefinitely, and increased the number
of shares authorized for sale under the PPM incrementally to accommodate additional investor interest.
F- 17
Additional Common Stock Issuances, Financial
Gravity Companies, Inc.
On April 1, 2017, the Company entered into
an agreement with FMW Media Works Corp (“FMW”), wherein FMW would provide television, production, and media analysis
to the Company. The Company issued 50,000 shares of common stock, worth $52,500, to FMW along with $3,500 cash as payment for services.
On August 22, 2017, the Company issued
100,000 shares of common stock, worth $60,000 to Nationwide EZ Cash Flow in exchange for professional services.
During the years ended September 30, 2018
and 2017, 100,000 shares and 725,000 shares, respectively, were issued for $100,000 and $725,000, respectively.
Stock Split, Financial Gravity Holdings
Effective October 20, 2015, Financial Gravity
Holdings declared a three for one stock split of its common stock. Upon the stock split, everyone shares of common stock issued
and outstanding was automatically reclassified and converted into three shares of common stock. The common stock retained a par
value of $0.00001 per share.
10.
STOCK OPTION PLAN
Effective February 27, 2015, the Company
established the 2015 Stock Option Plan (the “2015 Plan”). The Board of Directors of the Company has the authority and
discretion to grant stock options. The maximum number of shares of stock that may be issued and exercised under the Plan is 9,000,000.
Eligible individuals include any employee of the Company or any director, consultant, or other person providing services to the
Company. The expiration date and exercise price are as established by the Board of Directors of the Company. The last date any
options were granted under the 2015 Plan was March 14, 2016.
Effective November 22, 2016, the Company
established the 2016 Stock Option Plan (the “2016 Plan”). The Board of Directors of the Company has the authority and
discretion to grant stock options. The maximum number of shares of stock that may be issued and exercised under the Plan is 20,000,000.
Eligible individuals include any employee of the Company or any director, consultant, or other person providing services to the
Company. The expiration date and exercise price are as established by the Board of Directors of the Company. The first date any
options were granted under the 2017 Plan was December 19, 2016.
Stock option activity is summarized as follows:
2018
2017
Shares Under Option
Value of Shares Under Option
Weighted Average Exercise Price
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life
Shares Under Option
Value of Shares Under Option
Weighted Average Exercise Price
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life
Outstanding - beginning of year
2,817,146
$ 317,561
$ 0.67
2,200,346
$ 22,129
$ 0.64
–
Granted
895,000
119,736
0.27
113
months
661,400
323,927
0.78
116 months
Exercised
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Canceled or expired
80,596
20,052
0.29
–
44,600
28,495
1.00
–
Outstanding - end of year
3,631,538
$ 417,245
$ 0.58
101 months
2,817,146
$ 317,561
$ 0.67
101
months
Exercisable - end of year
3,232,875
–
$ 0.57
101
months
2,276,813
–
$ 0.65
97 months
F- 18
All outstanding 2015 Plan stock options
at September 30, 2016 became immediately vested upon the completion of the reverse merger with Pacific Oil Company. Most of the
stock options granted under the 2016 Plan have 2-year vesting periods but there were 20,000 and 450,000 options that vested at
issuance during fiscal 2017 and 2018, respectively. Total compensation expense included in salaries and wages of previously unamortized
stock compensation was $206,484 and $50,773 for the years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Unamortized share-based
compensation expense as of September 30, 2018 amounted to $162,287 which is expected to recognize over the next 1.5 years.
11.
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Accounts receivable due from the majority
stockholder of the entity, included in accounts receivable – related party in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets
was $1,791 and $4,506 as of September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Management fees paid to the majority stockholder
of the entity, included as management fees - related party in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations were $203,000
and $200,000 for fiscal 2018 and 2017, respectively.
On July 31, 2017, the Company entered into
a Promissory Note Payable with Fourly Enterprises, LLC (“Fourly”) in the amount of $50,000. The interest rate on the
note is 20%. The note matures on August 16, 2018. Fourly is owned by the majority stockholder of the Company. The outstanding balance
was $0 and $46,461 at September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Three employment agreements were made as
a condition of the TCS acquisition during fiscal 2016. Each agreement has an effective date as of November 1, 2015 and is effective
for a period of three years. Two employee agreements include a base salary of $42,000 per year, per employee. These same two agreements
include a bonus that is calculated, for each employee, as the sum of 40% of the gross profit of Tax Coach Software for all revenues
that exceed $850,000 and are less than $950,000 and 20% of the gross profit of Tax Coach Software for all revenues earned in excess
of $950,000. One employee agreement includes a base salary of $60,000 per year. This same agreement includes a bonus that is calculated
as the sum of 20% of the gross profit of Tax Coach Software for all revenues that exceed $850,000 and are less than $950,000 and
10% of the gross profit of Tax Coach Software for all revenues earned in excess of $950,000. Gross profit is determined in accordance
with generally acceptable accounting principles, net of other amounts paid under employment and consulting agreements. The agreements
also include other certain termination and non-compete clauses. Compensation during the month of October 2015 to be paid to the
three employees totals an aggregate amount of $49,150. Three consulting agreements were made as a condition to the acquisition.
Two agreements require certain services at a fixed fee of $17,000 per month, per agreement, commencing on November 1, 2015 with
a 90-day termination clause. One agreement was terminated by the Company during December 2017. One agreement requires certain services
at a fixed fee of $3,500 per month, commencing on November 1, 2015 with a 90-day termination clause. $403,160 and $444,600 in professional
fees were paid under these 3 agreements during the years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and are included in selling,
general and administrative expenses in the accompanying statement of operations.
12.
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Subsequent to September 30, 2018, an aggregate of 150,000 options
to purchase the Company’s common stock have been granted.
Financial Gravity entered into a new lease agreement with HPC
Services, LLC. Starting November 1, 2018. Financial Gravity will be expanding its new headquarters office space in the same building
and moving to a new suite. The new corporate headquarters address will be at 800 N. Watters Rd. Suite 150, Allen, TX 75013 where
the company will have 5,214 square feet of office space under the new lease. Financial Gravity is required to make monthly payments
of $7,712 per month (including operating expense) for the next 2 years. The rent will increase February 2022 to $8,146 per month
(including operating expense) until the lease expires in January 2024.
F- 19
Text extracted from the filing as submitted to EDGAR. Formatting, tables and exhibits are simplified for reading; the original document is authoritative for anything you rely on.