1 unchanged sentence
Intermodal Drayage Classification Claims
−Removed: Certain of our intermodal drayage subsidiaries are defendants in several multi-plaintiff and putative class action litigations brought by independent contract carriers in California who contracted with these subsidiaries.
+Added: Certain of our intermodal drayage subsidiaries are defendants in several multi-plaintiff and class action litigations brought by independent contract carriers in California who contracted with these subsidiaries.
In these cases, the contract carriers, and in some instances the contract carriers’ employees, assert that they should be classified as employees, rather than independent contractors.
−Removed: The particular claims asserted vary from case to case but generally include claims for unpaid wages, unpaid overtime, unpaid wages for missed meal and rest periods, and reimbursement of the contract carriers’ business expenses.
+Added: The particular claims asserted vary from case to case but generally include claims for unpaid wages, unpaid overtime, unpaid wages for missed meal and rest periods, reimbursement of certain of the contract carriers’ business expenses, and Labor Code penalties under California’s Private Attorneys General Act.
+Added: In two cases in which a federal district court in Los Angeles has certified classes, we are contesting the certification rulings.
We are unable at this time to estimate the amount of the possible loss or range of loss, if any, that we may incur as a result of these claims given, among other reasons, that the range of potential loss could be impacted substantially by future rulings by the courts involved, including on the merits of the claims.
7 unchanged sentences
XPO Logistics, Inc.
−Removed: 3:18-cv-02062 (D.
−Removed: Conn.) was filed in the U.S.
+Added: , was filed in the U.S.
District Court for the District of Connecticut against us and some of our current and former executives, alleging violations of Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act, based on alleged material misstatements and omissions in our public filings with the U.S.
9 unchanged sentences
Jacobs, et al.
−Removed: 19-cv-889-RGA (D.
−Removed: Del.) (“ Jez complaint”) in the U.S.
+Added: , (“Jez complaint”) in the U.S.
District Court for the District of Delaware, alleging breaches of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, waste of corporate assets, and violations of the Exchange Act against some of our current and former directors and officers, with the company as a nominal defendant.
The Jez complaint was later consolidated with similar derivative complaints filed by purported shareholders Erin Candler and Kevin Rose under the caption In re XPO Logistics, Inc.
−Removed: Derivative Litigation , No.
−Removed: 19-cv-889-RGA (D.
+Added: Derivative Litigation .
On December 12, 2019, the court ordered plaintiffs to designate an operative complaint or file an amended complaint within 45 days.
7 unchanged sentences
Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.