1 unchanged sentence
Shareholder Derivative Litigation
−Removed: On November 13, 2020 ,  Naresh Rammohan filed a shareholder derivative action in the United States District Court for the Central District of California against current and former Company officers Tom Smith, James Barnes, Mike Rothans, Marc Thomas, and David Norris, as well as current and former Company directors Messrs.
−Removed: Scot Cohen, Patrick Kinsella, Michael Parris, and Wayne Walker, alleging unjust enrichment, breach of fiduciary duty, waste of corporate assets, and contribution claims under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ,  docketed as Case No. 2:20-cv-10444-DMG-PVCx. On January 20, 2021 ,  Ray Westerman filed a second derivative action in the same court against the same parties, alleging breach of fiduciary duty and contribution claims under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ,  docketed as Case No. 2:21-cv-00550-DMG-PVCx.
−Removed: On January 22, 2021 ,  Jesse Lowe filed a third derivative action in the same court against the same parties, alleging breach of fiduciary duty and asserting various claims under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ,  docketed as Case No. 2:21-cv-00597-DMG-PVCx.  The Company was named as a nominal defendant in each of these actions.
+Added: On November 13, 2020, Naresh Rammohan filed a shareholder derivative action in the United States District Court for the Central District of California against current and former Company officers Tom Smith, James Barnes, Mike Rothans, Marc Thomas, and David Norris, as well as current and former Company directors Messrs.
+Added: Scot Cohen, Patrick Kinsella, Michael Parris, and Wayne Walker, alleging unjust enrichment, breach of fiduciary duty, waste of corporate assets, and contribution claims under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, docketed as Case No.
+Added: 2:20-cv-10444-DMG-PVCx.
+Added: On January 20, 2021 ,  Ray Westerman filed a second derivative action in the same court against the same parties, alleging breach of fiduciary duty and contribution claims under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ,  docketed as Case No. 2:21-cv-00550-DMG-PVCx.
+Added: On January 22, 2021, Jesse Lowe filed a third derivative action in the same court against the same parties, alleging breach of fiduciary duty and asserting various claims under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, docketed as Case No.
+Added: 2:21-cv-00597-DMG-PVCx.
+Added: The Company was named as a nominal defendant in each of these actions.
On February 16, 2021 ,  the Honorable Dolly M.
16 unchanged sentences
These provisions are reviewed and adjusted to include the impacts of negotiations, estimated settlements, legal rulings, advice of legal counsel, and other information and events pertaining to a particular matter.
−Removed: At June 30, 2022, we had no provision for liability under existing litigation.
+Added: At September 30, 2022, we had no provision for liability under existing litigation.
An unfavorable outcome on any litigation matters could require payment of substantial damages, or, in connection with any intellectual property infringement claims, could require us to pay ongoing royalty payments or could prevent us from selling certain of our products.
1 unchanged sentence
Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.