Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Item 7.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations
Management’s
discussion
and
analysis
of
financial
condition
and
results
of
operations
analyzes
the
consolidated
financial condition and results of operations of the Company and
the Bank, its wholly owned subsidiary, for the years ended
December 31,
2025
and
2024.
This
discussion
and
analysis
is best
read
in
conjunction
with
the
Consolidated
Financial
Statements and related
footnotes of the Company
presented in Item
8 “Financial Statements
and Supplementary Data”
of
this Annual Report on Form
10-K. In addition to
historical information, this
discussion contains forward-looking
statements
that
involve
risks,
uncertainties
and
assumptions
that
could
cause
actual
results
to
differ
materially
from
management's
expectations.
Factors
that
could
cause
such
differences
are
discussed
in
the
sections
entitled
"Forward-Looking
Statements" and Item 1A “Risk Factors" of this Annual Report.
In this Annual Report on Form 10-K, unless the context indicated otherwise, references to “we,” “us,”, and “our” refer to
the Company and the Bank, as the contest dictates.
Table of Contents
53
USCB Financial Holdings, Inc.
2025 10-K
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD
-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This
Annual
Report
on
Form
10-K
contains
statements
that
are
not
historical
in
nature
are
intended
to
be,
and
are
hereby identified as, forward-looking
statements for purposes of
the safe harbor provided by
Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act
of 1934,
as amended.
The words
“may,” “will,” “anticipate,” “could,”
“should,” “would,” “believe,”
“contemplate,”
“expect,”
“aim,”
“plan,”
“estimate,”
“seek,”
“continue,”
and
“intend,”
the
negative
of
these
terms,
as
well
as
other
similar
words and expressions of the
future, are intended to identify forward-looking statements.
These forward-looking statements
include statements related to
our projected growth, anticipated
future financial performance, and
management’s long-term
performance goals, as well as statements
relating to the anticipated effects
on results of operations and financial condition
from
expected
developments
or
events,
or
business
and
growth
strategies,
including
anticipated
internal
growth
and
potential future additional balance sheet restructuring.
These forward-looking statements involve significant risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ
materially from those anticipated in such statements.
Potential risks and uncertainties include, but are not
limited to:
•
the strength of the United States economy
in general and the strength of the local
economies in which we conduct
operations;
•
our ability to successfully manage interest rate risk, credit
risk, liquidity risk, and other risks inherent to our industry;
•
the accuracy of our financial statement estimates and assumptions, including the estimates used for our credit loss
reserve and deferred tax asset valuation allowance;
•
the efficiency and effectiveness of our
internal control procedures and processes;
•
our ability
to comply
with the
extensive laws
and regulations
to which
we are
subject, including
the laws
for each
jurisdiction where we operate;
•
adverse
changes
or
conditions
in
the
capital
and
financial
markets,
including
actual
or
potential
stresses
in
the
banking industry;
•
deposit attrition and the level of our uninsured deposits;
•
legislative or
regulatory changes and
changes including the
enactment of the
One Big Beautiful
Bill Act
and changes
in accounting principles, policies, practices or guidelines,
including the on-going effects of the CECL standard
;
•
the lack of a significantly diversified loan portfolio and concentration in the South Florida market, including the risks
of geographic, depositor,
and industry concentrations,
including our concentration
in loans secured by
real estate,
in particular, commercial real estate;
•
the effects of climate change;
•
the concentration of ownership of our common stock;
•
fluctuations in the price of our common stock;
•
our ability to fund or access the capital markets at attractive
rates and terms and manage our growth, both organic
growth as well as growth through other means, such as
future acquisitions;
•
inflation, interest rate, unemployment rate, market, and monetary
fluctuations;
•
the effects of potential new or increased tariffs,
retaliatory tariffs and trade restrictions;
•
impacts of international hostilities and geopolitical events;
•
increased
competition
and
its
effect
on
the
pricing
of
our
products
and
services
as
well
as
our
net
interest
rate
spread and net interest margin;
•
the loss of key employees;
•
the effectiveness of our risk management strategies, including operational risks, including, but not limited to, client,
employee, or third-party fraud and security breaches; and
•
other risks described in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
and other filings we make with the SEC.
All
forward-looking
statements
are
necessarily
only
estimates
of
future
results,
and
there
can
be
no
assurance
that
actual results will
not differ
materially from expectations.
Therefore, you are
cautioned not to
place undue reliance
on any
forward-looking
statements.
Further,
forward-looking
statements
included in
this
Annual Report
on Form
10-K are
made
only
as of
the
date
hereof,
and
we
undertake
no
obligation
to
update
or
revise
any forward
-looking
statement
to reflect
events or circumstances after the date on which the statement is made or to reflect the
occurrence of unanticipated events,
unless required to do so under
the federal securities laws. You
should also review the risk
factors described in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K and in the reports the
Company filed or will file with the SEC.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
This Annual Report on Form 10-K includes
financial information determined by methods
other than in accordance with
generally
accepted
accounting
principles
(“GAAP”).
This
financial
information
includes
certain
operating
performance
measures. Management has included these non-GAAP
measures because it believes these measures may
provide useful
supplemental information
for evaluating
the Company’s
underlying performance
trends. Further,
management uses
these
measures
in
managing
and
evaluating
the
Company’s
business
and
intends
to
refer
to
them
in
discussions
about
our
Table of Contents
54
USCB Financial Holdings, Inc.
2025 10-K
operations and performance.
Operating performance
measures should be
viewed in addition
to, and not
as an alternative
to or
substitute
for,
measures
determined
in
accordance
with
GAAP,
and
are
not
necessarily
comparable
to non-GAAP
measures
that
may
be
presented
by
other
companies.
To
the
extent
applicable,
reconciliations
of
these
non-GAAP
measures to the most directly
comparable GAAP measures can be found
in the ‘Non-GAAP Reconciliation Tables’ included
in this Annual Report on form 10-K.
Overview
For the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company reported net income of
$26.1 million compared with net income
of $24.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2024.
In
evaluating
our
financial
performance,
we
consider
the
level
of
and
trends
in
net
interest
income,
the
net
interest
margin, the
cost of
deposits, growth
and composition
of our
loan portfolio,
levels and
composition of
non-interest income
and non-interest
expense,
performance
ratios,
asset
quality ratios,
regulatory
capital
ratios,
and any
significant
event or
transaction.
The following significant highlights are of note for the year
ended December 31, 2025:
•
Net interest income
before provision
for credit losses
totaled $83.6
million, an
increase of $13.7
million or 19.6%,
compared to $69.9 million for the year ended December
31, 2024.
•
Net interest margin (“NIM”) was 3.20% for the year
ended December 31, 2025, an improvement from 2.94% for the
year ended December 31, 2024.
•
Total assets
grew to
$2.8 billion
at December 31,
2025,
an increase
of $210.3
million or
8.1%, compared
to $2.6
billion at December 31, 2024.
•
Total loans held for investment
grew to $2.2 billion
at December 31, 2025,
an increase of $216.4
million or 11.0%,
compared to $2.0 billion at December 31, 2024.
•
Return on average assets for the year ended December
31, 2025 was 0.96% compared to 0.99%
for 2024.
•
Return on average
stockholders’ equity for
the year ended
December 31, 2025
was 11.79% compared
to 12.11%
for 2024.
•
Nonperforming assets totaled $3.1 million at December
31, 2025 compared to $2.7 million at December 31, 2024.
•
The
Bank
maintained
its
strong
capital
position.
As
of
December 31,
2025,
the
Bank
was
well-capitalized
for
regulatory capital purposes,
with a
total risk-based capital
ratio of 13.67%,
a tier 1
risk-based capital ratio
of 12.47%,
a
common
equity
tier
1
capital
ratio
of
12.47%,
and
a
leverage
ratio
of
9.65%. As
of
December 31,
2025
and
December 31, 2024, all of the Bank’s regulatory capital ratios exceeded the thresholds to be well-capitalized under
the applicable
bank regulatory
requirements. The
Company,
as a
small
bank holding
company,
is not
subject
to
regulatory capital requirements.
•
On August 14,
2025, the
Company entered
into a
Subordinated Note
Purchase Agreement
with certain
qualified
institutional buyers pursuant to which the
Company sold and issued $40.0 million
in aggregate principal amount of
its 7.625%
fixed-to-floating rate
subordinated notes
due August 15,
2035 in
a private
placement transaction.
This
transaction was
conducted under
the provisions
of Regulation
D promulgated
under the
Securities Act 1933. The
subordinated notes were issued by
the Company to the
purchasers at a price equal
to 100% of their face
amount.
The majority of
the net proceeds
were used to
repurchase 2.0 million
shares of Class
A
common stock in
September
2025, from certain institutional shareholders through privately negotiated transactions, at a weighted average price
per share
of $17.19.
The aggregate
purchase
price for
these transactions
was
approximately
$34.4 million.
The
repurchases
were
supplemental
and
not
part
of
the
Company’s
two
previously
announced
stock
repurchase
programs.
•
During the fourth quarter
of 2025 the Company
executed a portfolio restructuring
strategy which resulted in
a sale
of $44.6
million of
its lower-yielding
available-for sale
securities for
a pre-tax
loss of
$7.5 million.
The majority
of
proceeds from the sale were reinvested into loans at quarter-end.
Table of Contents
55
USCB Financial Holdings, Inc.
2025 10-K
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The
consolidated
financial
statements
are
prepared
based
on
the
application
of
U.S.
GAAP,
the
most
significant
of
which are described
in Note 1 “Summary
of Significant Accounting
Policies” to our
Consolidated Financial Statements.
To
prepare financial statements in conformity with GAAP,
management makes estimates, assumptions,
and judgments based
on
available
information.
These
estimates,
assumptions,
and
judgments
affect
the
amounts
reported
in
the
financial
statements and accompanying notes. These estimates, assumptions, and judgments are based on
information available as
of
the
date
of
the
financial
statements
and,
as
this
information
changes,
actual
results
could
differ
from
the
estimates,
assumptions
and
judgments
reflected
in
the
financial
statements.
In
particular,
management
has
identified
accounting
policies that, due to
the estimates, assumptions
and judgments inherent
in those policies, are
critical in understanding
our
financial statements.
Management
has presented
the application
of these
policies
to the
audit and
risk committee
of our
Board.
Allowance for Credit Losses - Loans
The allowance for credit
losses (“ACL”) is
a valuation allowance that
is established through charges
to earnings in the
form of
a provision for
credit losses. The
amount of the
ACL is
affected by the
following: (i) charge-offs
of loans that
decrease
the allowance;
(ii) subsequent
recoveries on
loans previously
charged off
that increase
the allowance;
and (iii)
provisions
for credit losses charged to income that increase or decrease the allowance. Management considers the policies related to
the ACL as the most critical to the Company’s financ
ial statement presentation.
ACL is calculated using
CECL methodology.
The CECL methodology
measures expected credit
losses and applies to
financial assets measured at amortized cost, including loan receivables and
held-to-maturity debt securities. It also applies
to off
-balance
sheet
credit
exposures
not
accounted
for
as insurance
(e.g.,
loan
commitments,
standby
letters
of credit,
financial guarantees,
and similar
instruments), as
well as
net investments
in leases
recognized by
lessors in
accordance
with
Topic
842
on
leases.The
Company
estimates
the
allowance
for
credit
losses
by
utilizing
pertinent
available
data,
sourced both internally
and externally, relating to
past events, current
conditions, and reasonable
and supportable forecasts.
Historical
credit
losses
provide
the
foundation
for
the
estimation
of
expected
credit
losses.
Qualitative
adjustments
are
applied to the estimated
expected credit losses
for the loan portfolio
to account for
potential constraints of
the quantitative
model. Management
employs
a scorecard
to facilitate
the evaluation
of qualitative
factor adjustments
made to
expected
credit losses.
The estimation's
quantitative aspect
relies on
the statistical
correlation between
the anticipated
value of
an economic
indicator and the
historical loss
experience implied
within a
selected group
of peers.
The Company conducted
regression
analyses using
peer data,
inclusive of
the Company
itself, where
observed credit
losses and chosen
economic indicators
were utilized to identify
appropriate drivers for
modeling the lifetime
probability of default (“PD”)
rates. A loss given
default
rate (“LGD”) is assigned to each pool
of loans for each period based on
these PD outcomes. The model
primarily employs
an expected
discounted cash
flow (“DCF”)
analysis for
segments within
the loan
portfolio. This
DCF analysis
operates at
the
individual
instrument
level
and
incorporates
various
loan-specific
data
points
and
segment-specific
assumptions
to
ascertain the lifetime expected
loss associated with each
instrument. An implicit "hypothetical
loss" is determined for
each
period of the DCF,
aiding in establishing the
present value of future
cash flows for each
period. The reserve allocated
to a
particular loan represents the disparity
between the sum of the
present value of future cash
flows and the book balance
of
the loan at the measurement date.
Management
uses
the
Remaining
Life
(“WARM”)
methodology
for
five
segments
within
the
loan
portfolio.
For
each
segment,
a
long-term
average
loss
rate
is
computed
and
applied
quarterly
throughout
the
remaining
life
of
the
pool.
Qualitative assessments
are conducted
to adjust for
economic expectations.
To
estimate the remaining
life, management
employed a software solution utilizing an attrition-based calculation. This software conducts quarterly cohort-based attrition
measurements based on the loan portfolio.
Portfolio
segments
represent
the
level
at
which
loss
assumptions
are
applied
to
a
pool of
loans,
determined
by
the
similarity of
risk characteristics inherent
in the
included instruments, based
on collateral
codes and
FFIEC Call Report
codes.
Currently,
the Company segments
the portfolio based on
collateral codes to establish
reserves. Each segment
is linked to
regression
models
(Loss
Driver
Analyses)
using
peer
data
for
loans
with
similar
risk
characteristics.
The
Company
has
established connections
between
internal portfolio
segmentation and
FFIEC Call
Report codes
for this
purpose. The
loss
driver
for
each
loan
portfolio
segment
is
derived
from
a
readily
available
and
reasonable
economic
forecast,
including
Federal
Reserve
Bank
projections
of
the
U.S.
civilian
unemployment
rate
and
year-over-year
real
GDP
growth.
For
the
residential
loan
segment,
House
Price
Index
(“HPI”)
projections
published
by
Fannie
Mae’s
Economic
and
Strategic
Research Group are utilized for the forecast. Forecasts are applied for the first
four quarters of the credit loss estimate and
then linearly revert to the historical mean of the economic indicator
over the expected life of the loans.
Table of Contents
56
USCB Financial Holdings, Inc.
2025 10-K
The model integrates qualitative
factor adjustments to
fine-tune risk calibration
for each portfolio
segment, addressing
aspects that quantitative analysis may
not fully capture. Decisions concerning
qualitative adjustments reflect management's
anticipation of loss conditions deviating from those already accounted
for in the quantitative aspect of the model.
Our ACL
included residential
loans. To
assess the
potential impact
of changes
in qualitative
factors related
to these
loans,
management
performed
a sensitivity
analysis.
The Company
evaluated
the
impact
of the
HPI
used
in calculating
expected losses on the residential loan segment.
As of December 31, 2025, for every
100 basis points increase in the HPI
index, the
forecast reduces
reserves by
approximately $398
thousand and
about 2
basis points
to the
reserve coverage
ratio, everything else being
constant. This sensitivity analysis
provides a hypothetical result
to assess the sensitivity
of the
ACL and does not represent a change in management’s
judgement.
As of
December 31, 2025,
we stress
tested two
qualitative factors
in our
commercial real
estate loan
pool, as
it’s the
largest segment
in our
portfolio. We
evaluated the
impact of
a change
in the
qualitative factors
from no
risk to
maximum
loss to
measure the
sensitivity of
the qualitative
factors. The
change resulted
in a
$10.3 million
or 39.6%
increase in
the
ACL. This sensitivity
analysis provides a
hypothetical result to
assess the sensitivity
of the ACL
and does
not represent a
change in management’s judgement.
The Company calculates a reserve for unfunded commitments, distinct from
the allowance for credit losses reported in
accrued interest
and other liabilities.
This reserve
is determined
using both quantitative
and qualitative
factors identical
to
those applied to the collectively evaluated loan portfolio.
Results of Operations
General
The following tables
present selected balance sheet, income statement, and profitability ratios for the dates and for the
periods indicated (in thousands, except ratios):
As of December 31,
2025
2024
Consolidated Balance Sheets:
Total
assets
$
2,791,540
$
2,581,216
Total
loans held for investment
(1)
$
2,189,257
$
1,972,848
Total
deposits
$
2,345,080
$
2,174,004
Total
stockholders' equity
$
217,183
$
215,388
(1)
Loan amounts include deferred fees/costs.
Years Ended December 31,
2025
2024
Consolidated Statements of Operations:
Net interest income before provision for credit losses
$
83,630
$
69,936
Provision for credit losses
$
2,297
$
3,157
Total
non-interest income
$
6,592
$
12,740
Total
non-interest expense
$
52,009
$
47,042
Net income
$
26,100
$
24,674
Net income available to common stockholders
$
26,100
$
24,674
Profitability:
Efficiency ratio
57.65%
56.90%
Net interest margin
3.20%
2.94%
The Company’s results
of operations
depend substantially on
net interest income
and non-interest income.
Other factors
contributing to the
results of operations
include our provision
for credit losses,
non-interest expense, and
the provision for
income taxes.
Net income
for the
year ended
December 31, 2025
was $26.1 million
,
compared with
net income
of $24.7 million
for
the same
period in
2024. The Company
reported
net income
per diluted
share for
the year
ended December 31,
2025 of
$1.33 compared to net income per diluted share for the
same period in 2024 of $1.24.
Table of Contents
57
USCB Financial Holdings, Inc.
2025 10-K
Net Interest Income
Net
interest
income
is
the
difference
between
interest
earned
on
interest-earning
assets
and
interest
incurred
on
interest-bearing liabilities and
is the
primary driver of
core earnings. Interest
income is generated
from interest and
dividends
on
interest-earning
assets,
including
loans,
investment
securities
and
other
short-term
investments.
Interest
expense
is
incurred
from
interest
paid
on
interest-bearing
liabilities,
including
interest-bearing
deposits,
FHLB
advances
and
other
borrowings.
To evaluate net
interest income, we
measure and monitor
(i) yields on
loans and other
interest-earning assets, (ii)
the
costs of deposits
and other funding
sources, (iii) net
interest spread, and
(iv) net interest margin.
Net interest spread is
equal
to the
difference between
the weighted
average yields
earned on interest
-earning assets
and the weighted
average rates
paid on
interest-bearing liabilities.
Net interest
margin is
equal to
net interest
income divided
by average
interest-earning
assets. Because non-interest-bearing
sources of funds,
such as non-interest-bearing
deposits and stockholders’
equity, also
fund interest-earning assets, net interest margin includes
the benefit of these non-interest-bearing sources.
Changes in
the market
interest rates
and interest
rates we
earn on
interest-earning assets
or pay on
interest-bearing
liabilities, as well
as the volume
and types of
interest-earning assets and interest-bearing
and non-interest-bearing liabilities,
are usually the
largest drivers of
periodic changes in
net interest spread,
net interest margin
and net interest
income. The
Asset-Liability Committee (“ALCO”) has in place asset-liability management techniques to manage major factors that affect
net interest income and net interest margin.
Table of Contents
58
USCB Financial Holdings, Inc.
2025 10-K
The following table
contains information
related to average
balances, average
yields on assets,
and average
costs of
liabilities for the periods indicated (in thousands).
Years Ended December 31,
2025
2024
Average
Balance
(1)
Interest
Yield/Rate
Average
Balance
(1)
Interest
Yield/Rate
Assets
Interest-earning assets:
Loans
(2)
$
2,069,039
$
128,160
6.19
%
$
1,862,013
$
115,236
6.19
%
Investment securities
(3)
460,089
13,715
2.98
%
427,567
11,480
2.68
%
Other interest-earning assets
86,183
3,612
4.19
%
88,758
4,517
5.09
%
Total
interest-earning assets
2,615,311
145,487
5.56
%
2,378,338
131,233
5.52
%
Non-interest earning assets
105,874
108,215
Total
assets
$
2,721,185
$
2,486,553
Liabilities and stockholders' equity
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing demand deposits
$
51,803
1,283
2.48
%
$
54,667
1,509
2.76
%
Savings and money market deposits
1,255,719
38,027
3.03
%
1,109,853
40,098
3.61
%
Time deposits
470,213
18,104
3.85
%
326,373
13,354
4.09
%
Total
interest-bearing deposits
1,777,735
57,414
3.23
%
1,490,893
54,961
3.69
%
FHLB advances
86,382
3,238
3.75
%
158,484
6,336
4.00
%
Subordinated notes
16,463
1,205
7.32
%
-
-
-
%
Total
interest-bearing liabilities
1,880,580
61,857
3.29
%
1,649,377
61,297
3.72
%
Non-interest-bearing demand deposits
577,232
596,073
Other non-interest-bearing liabilities
41,955
37,399
Total
liabilities
2,499,767
2,282,849
Stockholders' equity
221,418
203,704
Total
liabilities and stockholders' equity
$
2,721,185
$
2,486,553
Net interest income
$
83,630
$
69,936
Net interest spread
(4)
2.27
%
1.80
%
Net interest margin
(5)
3.20
%
2.94
%
(1)
Average balances - Daily average balances are used
to calculate yields/rates.
(2)
Average loan balances include non-accrual loans. Interest income
on loans includes accretion of deferred
loan fees, net of deferred loan costs.
(3)
At fair value except for securities held to maturity. This amount includes
FHLB stock.
(4)
Net interest spread is the weighted average
yield earned on total interest-earning assets
minus the weighted average rate paid on total interest-
bearing liabilities.
(5)
Net interest margin is the ratio of net interest
income to average total interest-earning assets.
Net interest
income before
the provision
for credit
losses was
$83.6 million for
the year
ended December 31,
2025, a
increase of $13.7
million or 19.6%,
from $69.9 million
for the year
ended December 31,
2024. The increase
was primarily
driven by a decrease in the weighted
‑
average rates paid on interest
‑
bearing liabilities, which lowered overall funding costs,
combined with higher weighted
‑
average yields on interest
‑
earning assets. In addition, growth in the
loan portfolio increased
the volume of interest
‑
earning assets, further contributing to the increase in net
interest income.
The
net
interest
margin
(“NIM”)
was
3.20%
for
the
year
ended
December 31,
2025
and
2.94%
for
the
year
ended
December 31, 2024. The NIM increased
primarily due to a decrease
in the weighted average rate
paid on interest-bearing
Table of Contents
59
USCB Financial Holdings, Inc.
2025 10-K
liabilities, in
particular a
decrease in
weighted average
rate paid
on saving
and money
market deposits.
The decrease
in
our cost of funds was primarily due to the interest rate
market.
Provision for Credit Losses
ACL represents expected
credit losses
in our
portfolio as
the measurement
date. We
maintain an
adequate ACL that
can
mitigate
expected
credit
losses
in
the
loan
portfolio.
The ACL
is
increased
by
the
provision
for
credit
losses
and
is
decreased by charge-offs, net
of recoveries on prior
loan charge-offs. There are
multiple credit quality metrics
that we use
to base
our determination
of the
amount
of the
ACL and
corresponding
provision
for
credit
losses. These
credit metrics
evaluate the
credit quality
and level
of credit
risk inherent
in our
loan portfolio,
assess non-performing
loans and
charge-
offs levels, consider statistical trends and economic conditions
and other applicable factors.
The
provision
for
credit
loss
for
the
year
ended
December 31,
2025,
was
$2.3
million
compared
to
$3.2
million
in
provision expense for the
same period in 2024. The ACL as a
percentage of total
loans was 1.16%
at December 31, 2025
compared to 1.22% at December
31, 2024. The ratio of ACL to total loans decreased due
to several payoffs of individually
reserved
loans during 2025 and the improvement of the expected loss
rate for various categories of pooled loans.
See “Allowance
for Credit
Losses” below
for further
discussion on
how the
ACL was
calculated for
the periods
presented.
Non-Interest Income
Net interest income
and other types of
recurring non-interest
income are generated
from our operations.
Our services
and products generate service charges and
fees, mainly from our depository accounts.
We also generate income from
our
interest
swap
program
and
from
the
gain
on
sale
of
loans
though
our
SBA program.
In
addition,
we
own
life
insurance
policies on several
key employees and
generate income reflecting
the increase in
the cash surrender
value of these
policies.
The following table presents the components of non-interest
income for the periods indicated (in thousands):
Years Ended December 31,
2025
2024
Service fees
$
9,603
$
8,839
(Loss) gain on sale of securities available for sale, net
(7,526)
14
Gain on sale of loans held for sale, net
1,001
747
Other non-interest income
3,514
3,140
Total
non-interest income
$
6,592
$
12,740
Non-interest income
for the
year ended
December 31, 2025
was $6.6
million compared
to $12.7
million for
the same
period in
2024. This
decrease was
primarily driven
by a
$7.5 million
loss on
sale of
securities available
for sale
resulting
from a portfolio restructuring strategy
approved by the Board of
Directors and implemented in December 2025.
The portfolio
restructuring strategy
resulted in
the sale of
lower-yielding available-for-sale
securities at
a loss in
order to better
position
our securities portfolio.
Proceeds from the sale
transactions were primarily
reinvested in assets
bearing higher yields
than
those on the securities that were
sold. Service fees increased $764
thousand or 8.6%, primarily due
to title insurance fees
and prepayment
penalties.
The gain
on sale
of SBA 7a
loans increased
$254 thousand
or 34.0%,
and other
non-interest
income
increased
$374
thousand
or
11.9%,
primarily
due
to
increases
in
the
cash
surrender
values
of
bank-owned
life
insurance policies.
Non-Interest Expense
The following table presents the components of non-interest
expense for the periods indicated (in thousands):
Years Ended December 31,
2025
2024
Salaries and employee benefits
$
32,167
$
28,793
Occupancy
5,330
5,258
Regulatory assessment and fees
1,637
1,766
Consulting and legal fees
1,941
1,568
Network and information technology services
2,324
1,993
Other operating
8,610
7,664
Total
non-interest expense
$
52,009
$
47,042
Table of Contents
60
USCB Financial Holdings, Inc.
2025 10-K
Non-interest expense
for the
year ended
December 31, 2025
increased $5.0 million
or 10.6%,
compared to
the year
ended December 31, 2024.
The increase is
primarily due to
$3.4 million or
11.7% increase in
salaries and employee
benefits
consisting of a $2.2
million or 11.0% increase
due to merit
promotions and new hires,
a $455 thousand or
13.6% increase
in benefits
(health insurance)
and payroll
taxes,
and a
$876 thousand
increase in
stock-based
compensation due
to the
Company’s favorable financial performance in 2025. Other operating
expense had an increase of $946 thousand or 12.3%
consisting of
an increase
of $204
thousand in
item processing,
$146 thousand
in internet
banking fees,
a $169
thousand
increase
in
promotional
expense,
a
$207
thousand
increase
in
director
fees,
and
a
$220
thousand
in
other
operating
expenses.
Provision for Income Tax
Fluctuations in the effective tax rate reflect the effect of the differences in the inclusion or deductibility of certain income
and expense for income tax purposes.
Therefore, future decisions on the investments we
choose will affect our effective tax
rate. Changes in the
cash surrender value
of bank-owned life
insurance policies for
key employees, purchasing
municipal
bonds, and overall taxable income will be important elements
in determining our effective tax rate.
Income tax
expense for
the year
ended December
31, 2025
was
$9.8 million,
compared
to $7.8 million
for the
year
ended December 31,
2024. The effective
tax rate
increased to 27.3%
for the year
ended December 31,
2025 from 24.0%
for the
year ended
December 31, 2024.
The increase
in effective
tax rate
in 2025
was due
primarily to
the recognition
of
$1.1 million of state tax liability expense for the year ended December 31, 2024. The state tax liability
expense was related
to taxes due on interest income on loans whose collateral
is located outside the State of Florida.
The Company did not have any tax-exempt securities
at both December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024.
For a further
discussion on income taxes, see
Note 6 “Income Taxes”
to the Consolidated Financial Statements
set forth
in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Rate/Volume Analysis
The
table
below
sets
forth
information
regarding
changes
in
interest
income
and
interest
expense
for
the
periods
indicated (in thousands).
For each category of
interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities,
information is provided
on changes attributable to (i) changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by old volume); (ii) changes in volume (changes in
volume multiplied by old rate); and (iii) changes in rate-volume (change in
rate multiplied by change in volume). Changes in
rate-volume are proportionately allocated between rate and volume
variance (in thousands).
Years Ended 2025 vs. 2024
Years Ended 2024 vs. 2023
Increase (decrease) due to change in
Increase (decrease) due to change in
Volume
Rate
Net
Change
Volume
Rate
Net
Change
Interest-earning assets:
Loans
(1)
$
12,812
$
112
$
12,924
$
13,949
$
13,403
$
27,352
Investment securities
(2)
873
1,362
2,235
90
1,378
1,468
Other interest-earning assets
(130)
(775)
(905)
1,077
319
1,396
Total increase in interest income
$
13,555
$
699
$
14,254
$
15,116
$
15,100
$
30,216
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing demand deposits
$
(79)
$
(147)
$
(226)
$
23
$
585
$
608
Savings and money market deposits
5,270
(7,341)
(2,071)
4,498
5,942
10,440
Time deposits
5,885
(1,135)
4,750
1,824
3,030
4,854
FHLB advances
(2,882)
(216)
(3,098)
2,269
677
2,946
Subordinated notes
1,205
-
1,205
-
-
-
Total increase (decrease) in interest expense
9,399
(8,839)
560
8,614
10,235
18,848
Increase in net interest income
$
4,156
$
9,538
$
13,694
$
6,502
$
4,865
$
11,368
(1)
Average loan balances include non-accrual loans. Interest income
on loans includes accretion of deferred
loan fees, net of deferred loan costs.
(2)
At fair value except for securities held to maturity. This amount includes
FHLB stock.
Table of Contents
61
USCB Financial Holdings, Inc.
2025 10-K
During
the
year
ended
December 31,
2025
average
rates
paid
on
interest-bearing
liabilities
decreased,
while
yields
earned
on
interest-earning
assets
increased
slightly.
The
Company
was
able
to
reprice
its
interest-bearing
liabilities
downward more rapidly than its interest-earning assets.
Analysis of Financial Condition
Total
assets at December 31,
2025, were $2.8 billion,
an increase of $210.3
million, or 8.1%, over
total assets of $2.6
billion
at
December 31,
2024.
Total
loans
held
for
investment
increased
$216.4
million,
or
11.0%,
to
$2.2
billion
at
December 31, 2025
compared to
$2.0 billion
at December 31,
2024. Total
deposits increased
by $171.1
million, or
7.9%,
to $2.3
billion at December 31, 2025 compared to $2.2
billion at December 31, 2024.
Investment Securities
The investment portfolio
is used and
managed to provide
liquidity through cash
flows, marketability
and, if necessary,
collateral for
borrowings. The
investment portfolio
is also
used as
a tool
to manage
interest rate
risk and
the Company’s
capital market risk exposure. The
operating philosophy of the portfolio is
to maximize the Company’s profitability,
taking into
consideration the
Company’s risk
appetite and
tolerance, manage
it’s asset
composition and
diversification, and
maintain
adequate risk-based capital ratios.
The
investment
portfolio
is
managed
in
accordance
with
the
Asset
and
Liability
Management
(“ALM”)
policy,
which
includes
investment
guidelines,
approved
by
the
Board.
Such
policy
is
reviewed
at
least
annually
or
more
frequently
if
deemed necessary,
depending on
market
conditions
and/or
unexpected
events.
The investment
portfolio
composition
is
subject
to
change
depending
on
the
funding
and
liquidity
needs
of
the
Company,
and
the
interest
risk
management
objectives directed by the ALCO. The portfolio of investments can be used to modify the duration of the balance sheet.
The
allocation of cash into securities takes into consideration anticipated
future cash flows (uses and sources) and all available
sources of credit.
Our
investment
portfolio
consists
primarily
of
securities
issued
by
U.S.
government-sponsored
agencies,
agency
mortgage-backed securities,
collateralized mortgage
obligation securities,
municipal securities,
and other
debt securities,
all with varying contractual maturities and coupons. Due to the optionality embedded in these securities, the final maturities
do not
necessarily represent the
expected life of
the portfolio. Some
of these
securities will be
called or paid
down depending
on capital market conditions and expectations. The investment portfolio is regularly reviewed by the Chief Financial Officer,
Treasurer, and/or the ALCO of the Company to ensure an appropriate risk and return profile as
well as for adherence to the
Company’s investment policy.
As of December 31, 2025, the investment portfolio consisted of available-for-sale
(“AFS”) and held-to-maturity (“HTM”)
debt securities. In 2022, the Company transferred investment securities from
AFS to HTM with an amortized cost basis and
fair value
amount of
$74.4 million
and $63.8
million, respectively.
On the
date of
transfer,
these securities
had a
total net
unrealized loss of $10.6 million. The transfer of the debt securities from the AFS to HTM
category was made at fair value at
the date of transfer. The unrealized gain or loss at the date of transfer is retained in accumulated other comprehensive loss
and in the carrying value
of the HTM securities. Such
amounts are amortized over
the remaining life of the security.
There
was no impact
to net income on
the date of transfer. There were
no securities transferred from
AFS to HTM
in 2025 or 2024.
The book value of the AFS securities is adjusted quarterly for
unrealized gain or loss as a valuation allowance, and any
gain or loss is reported on an after-tax basis as a component
of other comprehensive loss in stockholders’ equity.
CECL requires a loss reserve for securities
classified as HTM. The reserve should reflect
historical credit performance
as well as the impact of projected economic forecast.
For U.S. Government bonds and U.S. Agency issued
bonds in HTM,
the explicit guarantee of the U.S.
Government is sufficient to conclude that a
credit loss reserve is not required.
The reserve
requirement
is
for three
primary
assets
groups:
municipal
bonds,
corporate
bonds,
and
non-agency
securitizations.
The
Company calculates quarterly the loss reserve
utilizing Moody’s ImpairmentStudio. The CECL measurement for investment
securities
incorporates
historical
data,
containing
defaults
and
recoveries
information,
and
Moody’s
baseline
economic
forecast. The
solution uses
probability of
default/loss
given default
(“PD/LGD”)
approach. PD
represents the
likelihood a
borrower will
default.
Within the
Moody’s
model, this
is determined
using historical
default data,
adjusted for
the current
economic environment. LGD projects the expected loss
if a borrower were to default.
The Company
monitors the credit
quality of HTM
securities through the
use of
credit ratings. Credit
ratings are monitored
by the Company
on at least
a quarterly basis.
As of December
31, 2025 and
December 31, 2024,
all HTM securities
held
by the Company were rated investment grade.
Table of Contents
62
USCB Financial Holdings, Inc.
2025 10-K
At December 31, 2025, HTM securities included $144.9
million of U.S. Government and U.S.
Agency issued bonds and
mortgage-backed
securities.
Because
of
the
explicit
and/or
implicit
guarantee
on
these
bonds,
the
Company
holds
no
reserves
on
these
holdings.
The
remaining
portion
of
the
HTM
portfolio
is
made
up
of
$9.0
million
in
investment
grade
corporate bonds. The required reserve for these
holdings is determined each quarter using the model described above.
For
the portion of the HTM exposed to non-government credit risk,
the Company utilized the PD/LGD methodology
to estimate
a $2 thousand
ACL as of
December 31, 2025. The
book value for
debt securities classified
as HTM represents
amortized
cost less ACL.
As of December 31, 2025, securities with a fair value of $43.5
million were pledged to secure public deposits.
Table of Contents
63
USCB Financial Holdings, Inc.
2025 10-K
The
following
table
presents
the
amortized
cost
and
fair
value
of
investment
securities
for
the
dates
indicated
(in
thousands):
December 31, 2025
Available-for-sale:
Amortized
Cost
Unrealized
Gains
Unrealized
Losses
Fair Value
U.S. Government Agency
$
15,169
$
18
$
(1,043)
$
14,144
Collateralized mortgage obligations
92,871
-
(17,043)
75,828
Mortgage-backed securities - residential
35,865
135
(6,083)
29,917
Mortgage-backed securities - commercial
174,622
347
(6,861)
168,108
Municipal securities
5,196
-
(933)
4,263
Bank subordinated debt securities
15,284
189
(243)
15,230
$
339,007
$
689
$
(32,206)
$
307,490
December 31, 2025
Held-to-maturity:
Amortized
Cost
Unrecognized
Gains
Unrecognized
Losses
Fair Value
U.S. Government Agency
$
41,158
$
91
$
(3,279)
$
37,970
Collateralized mortgage obligations
51,431
854
(5,499)
46,786
Mortgage-backed securities - residential
37,221
760
(3,263)
34,718
Mortgage-backed securities - commercial
15,088
-
(1,037)
14,051
Corporate bonds
9,045
-
(62)
8,983
$
153,943
$
1,705
$
(13,140)
$
142,508
Allowance for credit losses - securities held-to-maturity
(2)
Securities held-to maturity, net of allowance for credit losses
$
153,941
December 31, 2024
Available-for-sale:
Amortized
Cost
Unrealized
Gains
Unrealized
Losses
Fair Value
U.S. Government Agency
$
14,279
$
14
$
(1,668)
$
12,625
Collateralized mortgage obligations
101,808
15
(22,918)
78,905
Mortgage-backed securities - residential
58,995
1
(12,063)
46,933
Mortgage-backed securities - commercial
86,604
40
(7,905)
78,739
Municipal securities
24,925
-
(5,614)
19,311
Bank subordinated debt securities
24,314
438
(1,044)
23,708
$
310,925
$
508
$
(51,212)
$
260,221
December 31, 2024
Held-to-maturity:
Amortized
Cost
Unrecognized
Gains
Unrecognized
Losses
Fair Value
U.S. Government Agency
$
42,538
$
-
$
(5,094)
$
37,444
Collateralized mortgage obligations
56,987
57
(7,785)
49,259
Mortgage-backed securities - residential
40,681
53
(4,613)
36,121
Mortgage-backed securities - commercial
15,272
-
(1,385)
13,887
Corporate bonds
9,222
-
(393)
8,829
164,700
$
110
$
(19,270)
$
145,540
Allowance for credit losses - securities held-to-maturity
(6)
Securities held-to maturity, net of allowance for credit losses
$
164,694
Table of Contents
64
USCB Financial Holdings, Inc.
2025 10-K
AFS and
HTM investment
securities in
aggregate increased
$36.5 million
or 8.6%
to $461.4
million at
December 31,
2025 from $424.9 million at December 31, 2024.
The following
table shows
the weighted
average yields,
categorized by
contractual maturity,
for investment
securities
as of December 31, 2025 (in thousands, except ratios):
Within 1 year
After 1 year
through 5 years
After 5 years
through 10 years
After 10 years
Total
Amortized
Cost
Yield
Amortized
Cost
Yield
Amortized
Cost
Yield
Amortized
Cost
Yield
Amortized
Cost
Yield
Available-for-sale:
U.S. Government Agency
$
-
-
$
-
-
$
-
-
15,169
4.00%
$
15,169
4.00%
Collateralized mortgage obligations
-
-
-
-
-
-
92,871
1.74%
92,871
1.74%
Mortgage-backed securities - residential
-
-
-
-
-
-
35,865
2.41%
35,865
2.41%
Mortgage-backed securities - commercial
-
-
-
-
-
-
174,622
4.02%
174,622
4.02%
Municipal securities
-
-
-
-
5,196
1.87%
-
-
5,196
1.87%
Bank subordinated debt securities
-
-
4,473
8.14%
10,811
5.65%
-
-
15,284
6.38%
$
-
-
$
4,473
8.14%
$
16,007
4.42%
$
318,527
3.17%
$
339,006
3.30%
Held-to-maturity:
U.S. Government Agency
$
2,999
0.64%
$
19,773
1.25%
$
5,001
1.99%
$
13,385
1.85
$
41,158
1.49%
Collateralized mortgage obligations
-
-
-
-
-
-
51,431
1.67%
51,431
1.67%
Mortgage-backed securities - residential
675
2.96%
3,888
1.66%
5,051
1.62%
27,607
2.18%
37,221
2.06%
Mortgage-backed securities - commercial
-
-
3,042
1.63%
-
-
12,046
2.56%
15,088
2.37%
Corporate bonds
9,045
2.82%
-
-
-
-
-
-
9,045
2.82%
$
12,719
2.31%
$
26,703
1.35%
$
10,052
1.81%
$
104,469
1.92%
$
153,943
1.85%
The Company did not have any tax-exempt securities
at both December 31, 2025 and 2024.
Loans
Loans are
the largest
category of
interest-earning assets
on the
Consolidated
Balance Sheets,
and usually
provides
higher yields than the remainder of the Company’s
interest-earning assets. Higher yields typically carry
inherent credit and
liquidity risks in
comparison to lower
yielding assets. The
Company manages and
mitigates such risks
in accordance with
the credit and ALM policies, risk tolerance and balance
sheet composition.
The following table shows the loan portfolio composition
as of the dates indicated (in thousands):
December 31, 2025
December 31, 2024
Total
Percent of
Total
Total
Percent of
Total
Residential Real Estate
$
307,692
14.1
%
$
289,961
14.8
%
Commercial Real Estate
1,244,835
57.0
%
1,136,417
57.8
%
Commercial and Industrial
295,548
13.5
%
258,311
13.1
%
Correspondent Banks
127,968
5.9
%
82,438
4.2
%
Consumer and Other
207,215
9.5
%
198,091
10.1
%
Total
gross loans
2,183,258
100.0
%
1,965,218
100.0
%
Plus: Deferred costs/fees
5,999
7,630
Total
loans held for investment, net of deferred costs/fees
2,189,257
1,972,848
Less: Allowance for credit losses
25,500
24,070
Total
loans held for investment, net of allowance
$
2,163,757
$
1,948,778
Total
loans held for investment net
of deferred costs/fees increased
by $216.4 million or 11.0%
at December 31, 2025
compared to December 31,
2024. The most
significant growth was
in the commercial
real estate and
correspondent bank
loan pools.
Commercial real estate continues to
be the main category of
our portfolio, reflective of the
market in which we
operate. We continue
to grow our non-CRE
loan pools to further
diversify the loan portfolio
overall composition, but we
do
not expect any significant changes over the foreseeable
future in the composition of our loan portfolio.
Table of Contents
65
USCB Financial Holdings, Inc.
2025 10-K
The
growth
experienced
over
the
last
couple
of
years
is
primarily
due
to
implementation
of
our
relationship-based
banking
model,
our
diversified
business
verticals,
and
the
success
of
our
relationship
managers
in
competing
for
new
business in a highly competitive metropolitan area.
From a
liquidity perspective,
our loan
portfolio provides
us with
additional
liquidity due
to repayments
or unexpected
prepayments.
The
following
table
shows
maturities
and
sensitivity
to
interest
rate
changes
for
the
loan
portfolio
at
December 31, 2025 (in thousands):
Due in 1 year or
less
Due in 1 to 5
years
Due after 5 to 15
years
Due after 15
years
Total
Residential Real Estate
$
8,435
$
61,279
$
66,063
$
171,915
$
307,692
Commercial Real Estate
69,664
527,784
641,905
5,482
1,244,835
Commercial and Industrial
10,369
120,412
120,845
43,922
295,548
Correspondent Banks
127,968
-
-
-
127,968
Consumer and Other
2,493
1,152
24,760
178,810
207,215
Total
gross loans
$
218,929
$
710,627
$
853,573
$
400,129
$
2,183,258
Interest rate sensitivity:
Fixed interest rates
$
176,933
$
188,621
$
164,498
$
310,107
$
840,159
Floating or adjustable rates
41,996
522,006
689,075
90,022
1,343,099
Total
gross loans
$
218,929
$
710,627
$
853,573
$
400,129
$
2,183,258
The information
presented in
the table
above is
based upon
contractual maturities
of the
individual loans,
which may
be subject to renewal at their contractual maturity. Renewals will depend on approval by our credit department and balance
sheet composition
at the
time of
the analysis,
as well
as any
modification of
terms at
the loan’s maturity. Additionally, maturity
concentrations,
loan duration,
prepayment
speeds
and
other interest
rate
sensitivity
measures
are discussed,
reviewed,
and analyzed by the ALCO. Decisions on term and rate
modifications are discussed as well.
As of
December 31,
2025,
approximately
61.5%
of the
loans
have adjustable/variable
rates
and
38.5%
of the
loans
have fixed rates.
The adjustable/variable
loans re-price to
different benchmarks
and tenors in
different periods
of time. By
contractual characteristics, there are no
material concentrations on anniversary repricing. Additionally, it is
important to note
that most
of our
loans have
interest rate
floors. This
embedded option
protects the
Company from
a decrease
in interest
rates and positions us to gain in the scenario of higher interest
rates.
As of
December 31, 2025, the
commercial real estate
portfolio was $1.2
billion or 57.0%
of the
total gross loans
portfolio.
At
such
date,
$193.0
million
of
outstanding
balances
are
characterized
as
owner
occupied
and
$1.05
billion
are
characterized as non-owner occupied.
The retail sector
was the largest
segment comprising $320.1 million
of the non-owner
occupied commercial real estate portfolio.
The
following
table
is
a
summary
of
the
distribution
of
non-owner
occupied
commercial
real
estate
loans
held
for
investment by loan type (dollars in thousands):
December 31, 2025
Balance
# of Notes
% of Total
Gross Loans
Average Loan Size
Non-Accruals
Weighted Avg
LTV
(1)
Retail
$
320,132
145
15%
$
2,208
$
-
56%
Multifamily
252,041
197
12%
1,279
-
64%
Warehouse
134,190
68
6%
1,973
-
54%
Office
122,887
59
6%
2,083
-
49%
Hotels/Motels
117,226
52
5%
2,254
-
63%
Construction/Land
73,080
22
3%
3,322
-
46%
Other
32,272
28
1%
1,153
-
59%
$
1,051,828
571
48%
$
1,842
$
-
$
57%
(1) Loan-to-value is calculated based on the real estate value at the time of origination, renewal, or update, whichever is more recent.
Table of Contents
66
USCB Financial Holdings, Inc.
2025 10-K
The following table is a summary of non-owner occupied commercial real estate loans held for investment by collateral
geographical location (dollars in thousands):
December 31, 2025
South Florida
(1)
Rest of Florida
(2)
Outside Florida
(3)
Balance
% of Non-
Owner
Occupied
CRE Loans
Balance
% of Non-
Owner
Occupied
CRE Loans
Balance
% of Non-
Owner
Occupied
CRE Loans
Retail
$
220,390
21%
$
46,268
4%
$
53,475
5%
Multifamily
177,152
17%
74,888
7%
-
0%
Warehouse
70,399
7%
59,465
6%
4,326
0%
Office
90,470
9%
26,788
3%
5,629
1%
Hotels/Motels
89,754
9%
27,472
3%
-
0%
Construction/Land
59,039
6%
14,041
1%
-
0%
Other
17,112
2%
11,659
1%
3,500
0%
$
724,316
71%
$
260,581
25%
$
66,930
6%
(1) Miami-Dade, Broward, and West Palm Beach counties
(2) All other Florida counties
(3) Within the U.S.
As of
December 31, 2025,
71% of
the non-owner
occupied CRE
portfolio were
located within
South Florida.
26 loan
notes with an
outstanding principal
balance of
$66.9 million
are located
outside Florida.
Balances of
non-owner occupied
CRE loans outside
Florida were: $44.2
million in New
York,
$7.3 million in
Georgia,
$7.1 million in
Indiana, $4.3 million
in
Arkansas, and $4.1 million in North Carolina.
Asset Quality
Our asset quality grading
analysis estimates the capability of
the borrower to repay
the contractual obligation of
the loan
agreement as scheduled or at all. The Company’s internal credit risk grading system is based on experiences with similarly
graded loans. Internal
credit risk
grades are evaluated
at least annually,
or more frequently
if deemed necessary.
Internal
credit
risk
ratings
may
change
based
on
management’s
assessment
of
the
results
from
the
annual
review,
portfolio
monitoring and other developments observed with borrowers.
The internal credit risk grades used by the Company to
assess the credit worthiness of a loan are shown below:
Pass
– Loans indicate different levels of satisfactory
financial condition and performance.
Special Mention
– Loans classified as special mention have a potential weakness
that deserves management’s
close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses
may result in deterioration of the repayment
prospects for the loan or of the institution’s
credit position at some future date.
Substandard
– Loans classified as substandard are inadequately protected
by the current net worth and paying
capacity of the obligator or of the collateral pledged, if
any. Loans so classified
have a well-defined weakness or
weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt.
They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the
institution will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are
not corrected.
Doubtful
– Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent
in those classified at substandard, with
the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection
or liquidation in full on the basis of currently existing
facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable.
Loss
– Loans classified as loss are considered uncollectible.
Table of Contents
67
USCB Financial Holdings, Inc.
2025 10-K
Loan credit exposures by internally assigned grades are
as follows for the dates indicated (in thousands):
December 31, 2025
Pass
Special Mention
Substandard
Doubtful
Total
Residential Real Estate
$
304,276
$
916
$
2,500
$
-
$
307,692
Commercial Real Estate
1,230,823
11,613
2,399
-
1,244,835
Commercial and Industrial
293,169
907
1,472
-
295,548
Correspondent Banks
127,968
-
-
-
127,968
Consumer and Other
207,215
-
-
-
207,215
$
2,163,451
$
13,436
$
6,371
$
-
$
2,183,258
December 31, 2024
Pass
Special Mention
Substandard
Doubtful
Total
Residential Real Estate
$
289,401
$
-
$
560
$
-
$
289,961
Commercial Real Estate
1,133,965
-
2,452
-
1,136,417
Commercial and Industrial
256,031
-
2,280
-
258,311
Correspondent Banks
82,438
-
-
-
82,438
Consumer and Other
196,101
-
1,990
-
198,091
$
1,957,936
$
-
$
7,282
$
-
$
1,965,218
Non-Performing Assets
The following table presents non-performing assets as
of December 31, 2025 and 2024 (in thousands, except
ratios):
2025
2024
Total
non-performing loans
$
3,138
$
2,707
Other real estate owned
-
-
Total
non-performing assets
3,138
2,707
Asset quality ratios:
Allowance for credit losses to total loans
1.16%
1.22%
Allowance for credit losses to non-performing loans
813%
889%
Non-performing loans to total loans
0.14%
0.14%
Non-performing
assets
include
all
loans
categorized
as non-accrual
or restructured,
impaired
securities,
OREO
and
other repossessed assets. Problem loans for which the collection or liquidation in full is reasonably uncertain are placed on
non-accrual
status.
This
determination
is
based
on
current
existing
facts
concerning
collateral
values
and
the
paying
capacity of the borrower. When the collection of the full contractual balance is unlikely,
the loan is placed on non-accrual to
avoid overstating the Company’s income for a loan with
increased credit risk.
If the
principal or
interest on
a commercial
loan becomes
due and
unpaid for
90 days
or more,
the loan
is placed
on
non-accrual status as of
the date it becomes
90 days past due
and remains in non-accrual
status until it meets
the criteria
for restoration to accrual status.
Residential loans, on
the other hand, are placed
on non-accrual status when
the principal
or interest
becomes due
and unpaid
for 120
days or
more and remains
in non-accrual
status until
it meets
the criteria
for
restoration
to
accrual
status.
Restoring
a
loan
to
accrual
status
is
possible
when
the
borrower
resumes
payment
of
all
principal and interest payments for a period of six consecutive months and the Company
has a documented expectation of
repayment of the remaining contractual principal and interest or the loan becomes secured and in the process of collection.
The
Company
may
grant
a
loan
concession
to
a
borrower
experiencing
financial
difficulties.
This
determination
is
performed during
the annual
review process
or whenever
problems are
surfacing regarding
the client’s
ability to
repay in
accordance with
the original
terms of
the loan
or line
of credit.
The concessions
are given
to the
debtor in
various forms,
including interest rate
reductions, principal forgiveness, extension
of maturity date,
waiver, or deferral of
payments and other
concessions intended to minimize potential losses.
For further discussion on non-performing loans, see Note
3 “Loans” to the Consolidated Financial Statements
set forth
in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Table of Contents
68
USCB Financial Holdings, Inc.
2025 10-K
Allowance for Credit Losses
The ACL
represents
an amount
that,
in
management's
evaluation,
is adequate
to provide
coverage
for
all
expected
future credit losses on outstanding loans as of the measurement date. Additionally, qualitative adjustments are made to the
ACL when,
based on
management’s judgment,
there are
factors impacting
the allowance
estimate not
considered by
the
quantitative calculations.
See Note 3
“Loans” to the
Consolidated Financial
Statements set forth
in Item 8
of Part 1
of this
Annual Report as Form 10-K for more information on the
allowance for credit losses.
The following table presents ACL and net charge-offs to average loans by
type for the periods indicated (in thousands):
Residential
Real Estate
Commercial
Real Estate
Commercial
and Industrial
Correspondent
Banks
Consumer
and Other
Total
December, 31, 2025
Beginning balance
$
5,121
$
8,788
$
4,633
$
654
$
4,874
$
24,070
Provision for credit losses
(1)
763
688
164
361
143
2,119
Recoveries
24
-
17
-
2
43
Charge-offs
-
-
-
-
(732)
(732)
Ending Balance
$
5,908
$
9,476
$
4,814
$
1,015
$
4,287
$
25,500
Average loans
$
307,199
$
1,186,105
$
266,095
$
99,580
$
210,060
$
2,069,039
Net charge-offs (recoveries) to
average loans
(0.01)%
-
(0.01)%
-
0.35%
0.03%
December, 31, 2024
Beginning balance
$
2,695
$
10,366
$
3,974
$
911
$
3,138
$
21,084
Provision for credit losses
(2)
2,403
(1,578)
640
(257)
1,752
2,960
Recoveries
23
-
19
-
3
45
Charge-offs
-
-
-
-
(19)
(19)
Ending Balance
$
5,121
$
8,788
$
4,633
$
654
$
4,874
$
24,070
Average loans
$
256,112
$
1,068,574
$
238,266
$
103,345
$
195,716
$
1,862,013
Net charge-offs (recoveries) to
average loans
(0.01)%
-
(0.01)%
-
0.01%
(0.00)%
(1) Provision for credit losses excludes $182 thousand provision for unfunded commitments included in accrued interest and other
liabilities and $4 thousand release for investment securities held to maturity.
(2) Provision for credit losses excludes $199 thousand provision for unfunded commitments included in accrued interest and other
liabilities and $2 thousand release for investment securities held to maturity.
The
following
table
presents
ACL
by
type
and
its
individual
percentage
to
total
loans
for
the
periods
indicated
(in
thousands):
December 31,
2025
2024
Loan Category
Allowance
% of Loans in
Each Category to
Total Loans
Allowance
% of Loans in
Each Category to
Total Loans
Residential Real Estate
$
5,908
14.1
%
$
5,121
14.8
%
Commercial Real Estate
9,476
57.0
%
8,788
57.8
%
Commercial and Industrial
4,814
13.5
%
4,633
13.1
%
Correspondent Banks
1,015
5.9
%
654
4.2
%
Consumer and Other
4,287
9.5
%
4,874
10.1
%
Total
$
25,500
100.0
%
$
24,070
100.0
%
Table of Contents
69
USCB Financial Holdings, Inc.
2025 10-K
Bank-Owned Life Insurance
At
December 31,
2025,
the
combined
cash
surrender
value
of
all
bank-owned
life
insurance
(“BOLI”)
policies
was
$59.4 million.
Changes
in
cash
surrender
value
are
recorded
in
non-interest
income
on
the
Consolidated
Statements
of
Operations. In
2025, the Company
maintained BOLI
policies with
five insurance
carriers. The
Company is
the beneficiary
of these policies.
Deposits
Customer deposits are the
primary funding source for
the Bank’s growth.
Through our network of
banking centers, we
offer a competitive array of deposit
accounts and treasury management services designed
to meet our customers’ business
needs. Our primary
deposit customers
are SMBs,
and the personal
business of owners
and operators
of these SMBs,
as
well as the retail/consumer relationships of the employees
of these businesses. Our focus on quality and customer
service
has created a strong brand recognition within
our depositors, which reflects in the composition
of our deposits; most of our
funding sources are customer
deposits. In addition
to our banking centers
network, we have developed
business verticals
to diversify our
portfolio in different specialty industries
and we offer public
fund deposit products to
municipalities and public
agencies in our geographical footprint.
Furthermore, our
personal and
private banking
management
line of
business is
focused on
the needs
of the
owners
and operators of
our business customers,
offering a suite
of checking, savings,
money market and
time deposit accounts,
and utilizing superior
client service
to build and
expand client relationships.
A unique aspect
of our business
model is our
ability to offer correspondent services to banks in
Central America and the Caribbean.
The following
table presents
the daily
average balance
and average
rate paid
on deposits
by category
for the
years
ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 (in thousands, except
ratios):
Years Ended December 31,
2025
2024
Average Balance
Average Rate
Paid
Average Balance
Average Rate
Paid
Non-interest bearing demand deposits
$
577,232
0.00%
$
596,073
0.00%
Interest-bearing demand deposits
51,803
2.48%
54,667
2.76%
Savings and money market deposits
1,255,719
3.03%
1,109,853
3.61%
Time deposits
470,213
3.85%
326,373
4.09%
$
2,354,967
2.44%
$
2,086,966
2.63%
Total average deposits for the year ended December 31, 2025 was $2.4 billion,
an increase of $268.0 million,
or 12.8%
over total
average deposits
of $2.1 billion
for the
same period
in 2024.
The greatest
increase was
in savings
and money
market deposits which
increased by
$145.9 million, or
13.1%. Non-interest-bearing
demand deposits
decreased by
$18.8
million or 3.2%.
The
uninsured
deposits
are
estimated
based
on
the
FDIC
deposit
insurance
limit
of
$250 thousand
for
all
deposit
accounts at the Bank per account holder. Total
estimated uninsured deposits was $1.2 billion at December 31, 2025 and at
December 31, 2024. As of December 31, 2025,
49% of our deposits were estimated to
be FDIC-insured.
At December 31,
2025, our
deposit portfolio
included 7%
of total
deposits were
public funds
(partially collateralized),
11%
of total
deposits
were
brokered
deposits
(FDIC-insured),
and
8%
were
deposits
in
ICS/CDARs
deposit
programs
(FDIC-insured).
The
estimated average
account size
of our deposit
portfolio is
$113
thousand. Time
deposits with
balances of
$250 thousand
or more totaled $111.5
million and $94.0 million at December 31, 2025 and 2024,
respectively. At December
31, 2025, our
top 10 depositors held 15.59% of our
total deposit portfolio. At December 31, 2024, our top 10
depositors held 16.7% of our
total deposit portfolio.
Critical elements of our liquidity
risk management include: effective corporate governance consisting of
oversight by the
Board and ALCO and
involvement by senior management;
appropriate strategies, policies,
procedures, and limits
used to
identify
and
mitigate
liquidity
risk;
comprehensive
liquidity
risk
measurement
and
monitoring
systems
(including
assessments
of
the
current
and
prospective
cash
flows
or
sources
and
uses
of
funds)
that
are
commensurate
with
the
complexity and business
activities of the
Company; management of intraday
liquidity and collateral;
an appropriately diverse
mix
of
existing
and
potential
future
funding
sources;
adequate
levels
of
highly
liquid
marketable
securities
free
of
legal,
regulatory,
or
operational
impediments,
that
can
be
used
to
meet
liquidity
needs
in
stressful
situations;
comprehensive
contingency
funding
plans
that
sufficiently
address
potential
adverse
liquidity
events
and
emergency
cash
flow
Table of Contents
70
USCB Financial Holdings, Inc.
2025 10-K
requirements;
and
internal
controls and
internal
audit
processes
sufficient
to
determine
the
adequacy
of
the
institution’s
liquidity risk management process.
We
expect
funds
to
be
available
from
several
basic
banking
activity
sources,
including
the
core
deposit
base,
the
repayment and maturity of loans and investment security
cash flows. Other potential funding sources include
federal funds
purchased, brokered certificates of deposit, listing services certificates of deposit, Fed Funds lines and borrowings from the
FHLB
Atlanta.
Accordingly,
our liquidity
resources
were
at sufficient
levels
to fund
loans
and
meet
other
cash
needs as
necessary.
The following table shows scheduled maturities of uninsured
time deposits as of December 31, 2025 (in thousands):
Total
Three months or less
$
59,593
Over three through six months
16,190
Over six through twelve months
9,552
Over twelve months
26,146
$
111,481
Borrowings
FHLB Advances
As
a
member
of
the
FHLB
Atlanta,
we
are
eligible
to
obtain
advances
with
various
terms
and
conditions.
This
accessibility of additional
funding allows us
to efficiently and
timely meet both
expected and unexpected
outgoing cash flows
and collateral needs without adversely affecting
either daily operations or the financial condition
of the Company.
Outstanding fixed-rate
advances from the
FHLB were
at $158.3 million
and $163.0 million,
as of December
31, 2025,
and
December 31,
2024,
respectively.
The
weighted
average
rate
for
outstanding
FHLB
advances
was
3.8%
as
of
December 31, 2025 and 2024.
The following table presents the FHLB fixed-rate advances
as of December 31, 2025 (in thousands):
December, 31, 2025
Interest Rate
Type of Rate
Maturity Date
Amount
3.77%
Fixed
March 16, 2026
$
104,750
3.88%
Variable
May 22, 2026
42,500
3.76%
Fixed
January 24, 2028
11,000
$
158,250
December, 31, 2024
Interest Rate
Type of Rate
Maturity Date
Amount
2.05%
Fixed
March 27, 2025
$
10,000
1.07%
Fixed
July 18, 2025
6,000
3.76%
Fixed
January 24, 2028
11,000
3.77%
Fixed
April 25, 2028
50,000
3.68%
Fixed
September 13, 2027
21,000
3.79%
Fixed
March 23, 2026
20,000
4.65%
Fixed
February 13, 2025
45,000
$
163,000
We
have
also
established
Fed
Funds
lines
of
credit
with
our
upstream
correspondent
banks
to
manage
temporary
fluctuations in our daily
cash balances. As of
December 31, 2025, there were no
outstanding balances under the Fed
Funds
lines of credit.
The Board
of Governors
of the Federal
Reserve System,
on March
12, 2023,
announced the
creation of
a new
Bank
Term
Funding Program (“BTFP”). The BTFP offered loans of up to one year in length to banks, savings associations, credit
unions,
and
other
eligible
depository
institutions
pledging
U.S.
Treasuries,
U.S.
agency
debt
and
mortgage-backed
securities, and other qualifying assets as collateral. The
BTFP program ceased making new loans as of March
2024.
Table of Contents
71
USCB Financial Holdings, Inc.
2025 10-K
The Company paid off $80 million in borrowings under the BTFP
program during the third quarter of 2024. The original
maturity of this borrowing by the Bank under the BTFP program was January 2025, and there are no remaining borrowings
under this program.
Subordinated Notes
On
August
14,
2025,
the
Company
entered
into
a
Subordinated
Note
Purchase
Agreement
with
certain
qualified
institutional
buyers
pursuant
to
which
the
Company
sold
and
issued
$40.0
million
in
aggregate
principal
amount
of
its
7.625% Fixed-to-Floating
Rate Subordinated
Notes due 2035.
The Notes were
issued by the
Company to the
purchasers
at a
price equal
to 100%
of their
face amount.
The Notes
were offered
and sold
by the
Company in
a private
placement
transaction in reliance
on exemptions from
the registration
requirements of the
Securities Act,
pursuant to
Section 4(a)(2)
of the Securities
Act and
Rule 506(b) of
Regulation D thereunder. For additional
information, see the
Form 8-K the
Company
filed on August 14, 2025.The subordinated debt was originally issued at a cost of $760 thousand. The carrying value of the
issuance
cost
has
been
reduced
to
$700
thousand,
reflecting
the
scheduled
expense
recognition
over
the
term
of
the
subordinated
debt.
The
subordinated
notes
are
presented
net
of
these
costs
on
the
consolidated
balance
sheet.
At
December 31, 2025, the outstanding balance of subordinated
notes, net of costs, totaled $39.3 million.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We engage
in various financial
transactions in
our operations
that, under GAAP,
may not be
included on
the balance
sheet. To
meet the financing needs
of our customers we may
include commitments to extend
credit and standby letters
of
credit. To
a varying
degree, such
commitments involve
elements of
credit, market,
and interest
rate risk
in excess
of the
amount recognized
in the
balance sheet.
We use
more conservative
credit and
collateral policies
in making
these credit
commitments as we
do for on-balance sheet
items. We are not
aware of any accounting
loss to be
incurred by funding
these
commitments; however, we maintain an allowance for off-balance sheet
credit risk which is recorded
under accrued interest
and other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Since commitments associated with letters of
credit and commitments to extend
credit may expire unused, the
amounts
shown do not necessarily
reflect the actual
future cash funding requirements
.
The following table
presents lending related
commitments outstanding as of December 31, 2025 and
2024 (in thousands):
December 31, 2025
December 31, 2024
Commitments to grant loans and unfunded lines of credit
$
161,606
$
122,578
Standby and commercial letters of credit
2,700
5,389
Total
$
164,306
$
127,967
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend funds to a client, as long as there is no violation of any condition
established
in
the
contract,
for
a
specific
purpose.
Commitments
generally
have
variable
interest
rates,
fixed
expiration
dates or
other
termination
clauses
and
may require
payment
of
a fee.
Since many
of the
commitments
are
expected to
expire without being
fully drawn, the
total commitment
amounts disclosed
above do not
necessarily represent
future cash
requirements.
Unfunded lines of credit represent unused portions of credit facilities to our current borrowers that represent no change
in credit risk in our portfolio. Lines of credit
generally have variable interest rates. The
maximum potential number of future
payments we could
be required to
make is represented
by the contractual
amount of the
commitment, less
the amount of
any advances made.
Letters of credit are
conditional commitments issued
by us to guarantee
the performance of a
client to a third
party.
In
the event of nonperformance by
the client in accordance with the
terms of the agreement with the
third party,
we would be
required to fund
the commitment.
If the commitment
is funded, we
would be entitled
to seek recovery
from the client
from
the underlying collateral,
which can include
commercial real estate,
physical plant and
property, inventory, receivables, cash
or marketable securities.
Asset and Liability Management Committee
The asset and liability management committee of our Company, or ALCO, consists of members of senior management
and our Board. Senior management is responsible for
ensuring in a timely manner that Board
approved strategies, policies,
and procedures
for managing
and mitigating
risks are
appropriately executed
within the
designated lines
of authority
and
responsibility.
Table of Contents
72
USCB Financial Holdings, Inc.
2025 10-K
ALCO
oversees
the
establishment,
approval,
implementation,
and
review
of
interest
rate
risk,
management,
and
mitigation strategies, ALM related policies, ALCO procedures
and risk tolerances and appetite.
While some degree of interest
rate risk (“IRR”) exposure is inherent
to the banking business, our ALCO
has established
what it believes are sound risk management practices
in place to identify,
measure, monitor and mitigate IRR exposures.
When assessing the scope
of IRR exposure and
impact on the consolidated
balance sheet, cash flows
and statement
of operations,
management considers
both earnings
and economic
impacts. Asset price
variations, deposits
volatility and
reduced earnings or outright losses could adversely affect
the Company’s liquidity,
performance, and capital adequacy.
Income simulations
are used
to assess
the impact
of changing
rates on
earnings under
different rates
scenarios and
time horizons.
These simulations
utilize both
instantaneous and
parallel changes
in the
level of
interest rates,
as well
as
non-parallel changes such as changing slopes (flat and steeping) and
twists of the yield curve, Static simulation models are
based on current exposures and
assume a constant balance sheet with
no new growth. Dynamic simulation analysis
is also
utilized to have a
more comprehensive assessment
on IRR. This simulation
relies on detailed
assumptions outlined in
our
budget and strategic plan, and in assumptions regarding changes in
existing lines of business, new business, management
strategies and client expected behavior.
To
have a more complete
picture of IRR, the Company
also evaluates the economic
value of equity.
This assessment
allows
us
to
measure
the
degree
to
which
the
economic
values
will
change
under
different
interest
rate
scenarios.
The
economic value of equity approach focuses on a longer-term time horizon and captures all future cash flows expected from
existing assets and liabilities. The economic value model utilizes a static approach in that the analysis does not incorporate
new business; rather, the
analysis shows a snapshot in time of the risk inherent
in the balance sheet.
Market and Interest Rate Risk Management
As of December 31, 2025, both the
static and dynamic scenarios of the
ALCO model indicate that the Bank’s
balance
sheet is
liability
sensitive
in
year
one.
This means
that
our liabilities
reprice
more
quickly than
our
assets,
resulting in
a
favorable expansion in net interest income
(NII) when market interest rates
decline. For year two, the static
model shifts to
a neutral position, while the dynamic model reflects an asset sensitive
posture, driven primarily by projected balance sheet
growth.
This
divergence
is
expected,
as
the
dynamic
model
incorporates
forward
looking
assumptions
that
include
loan
growth and
mix shifts
over time.
Many assumptions
are used to
calculate the
impact of
interest rate
variations on
our net
interest
income,
such
as
asset
prepayment
speeds,
non-maturity
deposit
price
sensitivity,
pricing
correlations,
deposit
truncations and decay rates, and key interest rate drivers
.
Because of the inherent use
of these estimates and
assumptions in the model,
our actual results may,
and most likely
will, differ from static measures results. In addition, static measures like the economic value of equity
do not include actions
that management may undertake to
manage the risks in response
to anticipated changes in interest
rates or client deposit
behavior. As part of our ALM strategy and
policy, management has the ability to modify the balance sheet
to either increase
or decrease
asset
duration
and
increase
or decrease
liability
duration
to
modify
the balance
sheet
sensitivity
to interest
rates.
Additionally, utilizing an EVE approach, we analyze the risk to capital from the effects
of various interest rate scenarios
through a long-term discounted
cash flow model. This
measures the difference
between the economic value
of our assets
and
the
economic
value
of
our
liabilities,
which
is
a
proxy
for
our
liquidation
value.
According
to
our
balance
sheet
composition, and
as expected,
our model
stipulates that
an increase
of interest
rates will
have a
negative impact
on the
EVE. Results and
analysis are presented
quarterly to the
ALCO, and strategies
are reviewed and
refined. The Bank
remains
within policy limits for long-term interest
rate risk based on EVE
results as of December 31, 2025. The
balance sheet shows
larger EVE swings
when rates go
up than when
rates go down.
This happens because,
in rising rate
scenarios, the value
of our longer
term assets
falls more
quickly,
especially when
loan prepayments
slow while our
liabilities do
not reprice as
fast. In contrast,
when rates
decline, faster
loan prepayments
and quicker
asset repricing
help soften the
impact on
EVE.
Additionally, during 2025, we have been taking actions to reduce
our asset sensitivity by extending asset duration. This has
reduced our NII
volatility for the
first and second
year in the
analysis and has
helped us to
maintain the NII
in accordance
with ALCO expectations.
Liquidity
Liquidity is
defined as
a Company’s capacity
to meet
its cash
and collateral
obligations at
a reasonable
cost. Maintaining
an adequate level of liquidity depends on the Company’s ability to
efficiently meet both expected and unexpected cash flow
and collateral needs without adversely affecting
either daily operations or the financial condition of the
Company.
Table of Contents
73
USCB Financial Holdings, Inc.
2025 10-K
Liquidity risk
is the
risk that
we will
be unable
to meet
our short-term
and long-term
obligations as
they become
due
because of an
inability to liquidate
assets or obtain
adequate funding on
acceptable terms in
a timely matter. The
Company’s
obligations, and the funding sources used to meet them, depend significantly
on our business mix, balance sheet structure
and composition, credit quality of
our assets, interest rate
environment and the cash flow
profiles of our on- and
off-balance
sheet obligations.
In
managing
cash
inflows
and
outflows,
management
regularly
monitors
situations
that
can
give
rise
to
increased
liquidity risk.
These include
funding mismatches, market
constraints on
the ability
to convert
assets (particularly investments)
into cash or in
accessing sources of
funds (i.e., market
liquidity), and contingent
liquidity events. Management
presents to
the ALCO,
on a
quarterly basis, liquidity
stress tests following
the scenarios
described in
the Company’s contingency
funding
plan.
Changes
in
macroeconomic
conditions,
exposure
to
credit
deterioration,
market,
operational,
legal
and
reputational
risks, including cybersecurity risk and
social media events could
also affect the Company’s liquidity risk
profile unexpectedly
and are considered in the assessment of liquidity and ALM
framework.
Management has established
a comprehensive and
holistic management process for
identifying, measuring, monitoring
and
mitigating
liquidity
risk.
Due
to
its
critical
importance
to
the
viability
of
the
Company,
liquidity
risk
management
is
integrated into our risk management processes, Contingency
Funding Plan and ALM policy.
Critical elements of our liquidity
risk management include: effective corporate governance consisting of
oversight by the
Board and ALCO and
involvement by senior management;
strategies, policies, procedures,
and limits used to
identify and
mitigate
liquidity
risk;
comprehensive
liquidity
risk
measurement
and
monitoring
systems
(including
assessments
of
the
current and prospective cash flows or sources and uses of funds) that are commensurate with the complexity and
business
activities
of the
Company;
management
of intraday
liquidity and
collateral;
a diverse
mix of
existing
and
potential
future
funding sources; adequate levels of highly liquid marketable securities free
of legal, regulatory, or operational impediments,
that can
be used
to meet
liquidity needs
in stressful situations;
comprehensive contingency
funding plans
that sufficiently
address potential adverse
liquidity events and
emergency cash
flow requirements; and
internal controls and
internal audit
processes sufficient to determine the adequacy
of the institution’s liquidity risk management
process.
We
expect
funds
to
be
available
from
several
basic
banking
activity
sources,
including
the
core
deposit
base,
the
repayment and maturity of loans and investment security
cash flows. Other potential funding sources include
federal funds
purchased, brokered
certificates of
deposit, listing
certificates of
deposit, Fed
Funds lines
and borrowings
from the
FHLB
Atlanta. Accordingly, our liquidity resources were at sufficient levels to
fund loans and meet other
cash needs as necessary.
At December 31, 2025, the
Company had $321.4
million in available liquidity
on balance sheet, including
$286.9 million in
unpledged securities available to
use as collateral and
$34.5 million in
excess cash. The Company
had an additional $349.0
million in off-balance sheet liquidity including excess FHLB Atlanta borrowing
capacity, the Federal Reserve
Bank discount
window and Fed
Fund lines of credit, excluding
access to brokered deposits
and other off-balance sheet sources
of funding.
Table of Contents
74
USCB Financial Holdings, Inc.
2025 10-K
Capital Adequacy
As
of
December 31,
2025,
the
Bank
was
well
capitalized
under
the
FDIC’s
prompt
corrective
action
framework.
Additionally,
we follow the capital conservation
buffer framework, and according to
our actual ratios, the Bank
exceeds the
capital conversation
buffer in
all capital ratios
as of December
31, 2025. The
Company is not
subject to regulatory
capital
requirements because it is deemed by the Federal Reserve
to be a small bank holding company.
The
following
table
presents
the
capital
ratios
for
the
Bank
at
December 31,
2025
and
2024
(in
thousands,
except
ratios):
Actual
Minimum Capital
Requirements
To be Well Capitalized Under
Prompt Corrective Action
Provisions
Amount
Ratio
Amount
Ratio
Amount
Ratio
December 31, 2025
Total
risk-based capital:
$
299,596
13.67%
$
175,387
8.00%
219,234
10.00%
Tier 1 risk-based capital:
$
273,342
12.47%
$
131,541
6.00%
175,387
8.00%
Common equity tier 1 capital:
$
273,342
12.47%
$
98,655
4.50%
142,502
6.50%
Leverage ratio:
$
273,342
9.65%
$
113,296
4.00%
141,620
5.00%
December 31, 2024
Total
risk-based capital:
$
266,387
13.34%
$
159,795
8.00%
199,744
10.00%
Tier 1 risk-based capital:
$
241,740
12.10%
$
119,846
6.00%
159,795
8.00%
Common equity tier 1 capital:
$
241,740
12.10%
$
89,885
4.50%
129,834
6.50%
Leverage ratio:
$
241,740
9.38%
$
103,074
4.00%
128,843
5.00%
Impact of Inflation
Our Consolidated
Financial Statements
and related
notes have been
prepared in
accordance with U.S.
GAAP,
which
requires the
measurement of
financial position
and operating
results in
terms of
historical dollars,
without considering
the
changes
in
the
relative
purchasing
power
of
money
over
time due
to
inflation.
The
impact
of
inflation
is
reflected
in
the
increased cost of operations.
Unlike most industrial companies,
nearly all our assets and
liabilities are monetary in
nature.
As a result,
interest rates have a
greater impact on our
performance than do the
effects of general levels
of inflation. Periods
of high inflation
are often accompanied
by relatively higher
interest rates, and
periods of low
inflation are accompanied
by
relatively lower interest rates.
As market interest rates
rise or fall in relation
to the rates earned
on loans and investments,
the value of these assets decreases or increases respectively.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
Recently issued accounting
pronouncements are discussed
in Note 1 “Summary
of Significant Accounting
Policies” in
the Consolidated Financial Statements of this Annual Report
on Form 10-K.
Table of Contents
75
USCB Financial Holdings, Inc.
2025 10-K
Reconciliation and Management Explanation of Non
-GAAP Financial Measures
Management has included
the non-GAAP measures
set forth below
because it believes
these measures may
provide
useful supplemental information
for evaluating the Company’s
underlying performance trends.
Further, management
uses
these measures in managing and evaluating the Company’s business and intends to refer to them in discussions about our
operations and performance.
Operating performance
measures should be
viewed in addition
to, and not
as an alternative
to or
substitute
for,
measures
determined
in
accordance
with
GAAP,
and
are
not
necessarily
comparable
to non-GAAP
measures
that
may be
presented
by other
companies.
The Company
believes
these
non-GAAP
measurements
are key
indicators of the
earnings power
of the Company.
The following
table reconciles
the non-GAAP
financial measurement
of
operating net income available to common stockholders
for the periods presented (in thousands,
except per share data):
As of and for the years ended December 31,
2025
2024
Pre-Tax Pre-Provision ("PTPP") income: (1)
Net income (GAAP)
$
26,100
$
24,674
Plus: Provision for income taxes
9,816
7,803
Plus: Provision for credit losses
2,297
3,157
PTPP income
$
38,213
$
35,634
Operating net income: (1)
Net income (GAAP)
$
26,100
$
24,674
Less: Net gain (loss) on sale of securities
(7,526)
14
Less: Tax
effect on sale of securities
1,908
(4)
Plus: Tax
liability expenses from prior periods
764
-
Operating net income
$
32,482
$
24,664
Operating revenue: (1)
Net interest income
$
83,630
$
69,936
Non-interest income
6,592
12,740
Less: Net gain (losses) on sale of securities
(7,526)
14
Operating revenue
$
97,748
$
82,662
Operating efficency ratio: (1)
Total
non-interest expense
$
52,009
47,042
Operating revenue
$
97,748
82,662
Operating efficency ratio
53.21%
56.91%
(1) The Company believes these non-GAAP measurements are key indicators of the ongoing earnings power of the Company.
Item 7A.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
As a smaller reporting company,
we are not required to provide the information required
by this item.
Table of Contents
76
USCB Financial Holdings, Inc.
2025 10-K