4 unchanged sentences
Other than as disclosed below, management is not aware of any other material legal proceedings pending or that have been threatened against us or our properties.
−Removed: On or about March 9, 2011, the TCEQ granted our Company’s applications for a Class III Injection Well Permit, Permit Area Authorization and Aquifer Exemption (“AE”) for our Goliad Project.
−Removed: On or about December 4, 2012, the EPA concurred with the TCEQ issuance of the AE permit.
+Added: On or about March 9, 2011, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (the “TCEQ”) granted our Company’s applications for a Class III Injection Well Permit, Permit Area Authorization and Aquifer Exemption (“AE”) for our Goliad Project.
+Added: On or about December 4, 2012, the U.S.
+Added: Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”) concurred with the TCEQ issuance of the AE permit.
With the receipt of this concurrence, the final authorization required for uranium extraction, our Goliad Project achieved fully-permitted status.
11 unchanged sentences
On December 9, 2013, by way of a procedural order from a three-judge panel of the Fifth Circuit, the Court granted the remand without vacatur and initially limited the review period to 60 days.
−Removed: In March of 2014, at the EPA’s request, the Fifth Circuit extended the EPA’s time period for review and additionally, during that same period, our Company conducted a joint groundwater survey of the site, the result of which reaffirmed our previously filed groundwater direction studies.
+Added: In March of 2014, at the EPA’s request, the Fifth Circuit extended the EPA’s time period for review and additionally, during that same period, our Company conducted a joint groundwater survey of the site, the results of which reaffirmed our previously filed groundwater direction studies.
On or about June 17, 2014, the EPA reaffirmed its earlier decision to uphold the granting of our existing AE, with the exception of a northwestern portion containing less than 10% of the uranium resource which was withdrawn, but not denied, from the AE area until additional information is provided in the normal course of mine development.
12 unchanged sentences
The executive director, via Executive Director’s Exceptions to the Proposal for Decision (“PFD”), respectfully disagreed with the recommendation presented in the PFD to remand the application to the executive director for further consideration.
−Removed: The executive director commented that the ALJ’s PFD improperly broaden the scope of the refereed contested case hearing;
+Added: The executive director commented that the ALJ’s PFD improperly broadened the scope of the refereed contested case hearing;
misapplied the application requirements in commission rule for providing geoscientific information;
4 unchanged sentences
No other information is available on the potential proceeding at this time.
−Removed: We continue to believe that the pending appeal is without merit and the Goliad Project remains fully permitted for uranium extraction.
−Removed: The Company has had communications and filings with the MOPC, the mining regulator in Paraguay, whereby the MOPC is taking the position that certain concessions forming part of the Company’s Yuty, Alto Parana and Colonel Oviedo Projects are not eligible for extension as to exploration or continuation to exploitation in their current stages.
+Added: We continue to believe that the pending appeal is without merit and that the Goliad Project remains fully permitted for uranium extraction.
+Added: The Company has had communications and filings with the Paraguayan Ministry of Public Works and Communications (the “MOPC”), the mining regulator in Paraguay, whereby the MOPC is taking the position that certain concessions forming part of the Company’s Yuty, Alto Parana and Colonel Oviedo Projects are not eligible for extension as to exploration or continuation to exploitation in their current stages.
While we remain fully committed to our development path forward in Paraguay, we have filed certain applications and appeals in Paraguay to reverse the MOPC’s position in order to protect the Company’s continuing rights in those concessions.
Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.