18 unchanged sentences
We and the TCEQ filed a request to the Fifth Circuit for the motion to remand without vacatur, and if granted, to be limited to a 60-day review period. 
−Removed: On December 9, 2013, by way of a procedural order from a three-judge panel of the Fifth Circuit, the Court granted the remand without vacatur and initially limited the review period to 60 days.
+Added: On December 9, 2013, by way of a procedural order from a three-judge panel of the Fifth Circuit, the Court granted the remand without vacatur and initially limited the review period to 60 days. 
In March of 2014, at the EPA’s request, the Fifth Circuit extended the EPA’s time period for review and additionally, during that same period, our Company conducted a joint groundwater survey of the site, the result of which reaffirmed our previously filed groundwater direction studies.
On or about June 17, 2014, the EPA reaffirmed its earlier decision to uphold the granting of our existing AE, with the exception of a northwestern portion containing less than 10% of the uranium resource which was withdrawn, but not denied, from the AE area until additional information is provided in the normal course of mine development.
−Removed: On or about September 9, 2014, the petitioners filed a status report with the State District Court which included a request to remove the stay agreed to in August 2013 and to set a briefing schedule.
+Added: On or about September 9, 2014, the petitioners filed a status report with the State District Court which included a request to remove the stay agreed to in August 2013 and to set a briefing schedule. 
In that Status Report the petitioners also stated that they had decided not to pursue their appeal at the Fifth Circuit.
We continue to believe that the pending appeal is without merit and is continuing as planned towards uranium extraction at its fully-permitted Goliad Project.
+Added: A Class I renewal application for the Goliad Project disposal wells was received by the TCEQ on January 23, 2020 and declared administratively complete on April 27, 2020. 
+Added: The application went through technical review and, on September 13, 2022, the executive director of the TCEQ made a decision that the permit application met the requirements of the law. 
+Added: On or around October 4, 2022, petitioners in Goliad County requested a hearing and reconsideration on the renewal permits. 
+Added: The TCEQ considered the requests on December 14, 2022, during its open meeting, and denied the petitioner’s request for reconsideration but granted its request for hearing. 
+Added: The TCEQ referred the application to the State Office of Administrative Hearing (“SOAH”) to discuss three issues:
+Added: 1) whether the permit application adequately characterizes the geology and identified and assessed faults in the vicinity of the proposed injections wells;
+Added: 2) whether the draft permit provides for adequate monitoring of migration of injected fluids in the vicinity of the proposed injection wells:
+Added: and 3) whether the location and design of the injection wells and pre-injection facilities are adequate. 
+Added: At this time, the petitioner’s first set of interrogatories, requests for production and request for admission have been submitted. 
+Added: The hearing and SOAH decision is expected by March 31, 2024.
The Company has had communications and filings with the MOPC, the mining regulator in Paraguay, whereby the MOPC is taking the position that certain concessions forming part of the Company’s Yuty and Alto Paraná
Projects are not eligible for extension as to exploration or continuation to exploitation in their current stages.
−Removed: While we remain fully committed to our development path forward in Paraguay, we have filed certain applications and appeals in Paraguay to reverse the MOPC’s position in order to protect the Company’s continuing rights in those concessions. 
+Added: While we remain fully committed to our development path forward in Paraguay, we have filed certain applications and appeals in Paraguay to reverse the MOPC’s position in order to protect the Company’s continuing rights in those concessions.
Mine Safety Disclosures
2 unchanged sentences
Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.