Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
In May 2020, we were named as a defendant in three California state court class action lawsuits arising from a data breach that we experienced in January 2020. Collectively, these lawsuits seek statutory, compensatory, actual, and punitive damages; equitable relief, including restitution; pre- and post-judgment interest; injunctive relief; and attorney fees, costs, and expenses from us. On July 24, 2020, these three pending lawsuits were consolidated into a single case in the Superior Court of the State of California in the County of San Bernardino entitled Joseph Deluna et al v. Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. The consolidated case alleges violations of the Confidentiality of Medical Information Act (CMIA), CCPA, California’s Unfair Competition Law (UCL), and breach of contract. We filed a demurrer seeking dismissal of all claims, which was heard by the Court on October 27, 2020, and which resulted in the following outcome: (i) the demurrer to the CMIA claim was denied; (ii) the demurrer to the CCPA claim was sustained; and (iii) the demurrer to the UCL and contract claims were sustained with leave to amend the pending complaint. A second demurrer was heard by the Court on March 29, 2021 with the following outcome: (i) the demurrer to the CMIA claim was denied; and (ii) the demurrer to the UCL and contract claims was sustained without leave to amend as to three of the named plaintiffs. The plaintiffs filed a motion for class certification on January 7, 2021 to which the Company filed its opposition on April 11, 2022. The Company filed a motion for summary adjudication on the CMIA claim on April 7, 2021, which is still pending.
In September 2020, we were named as a defendant in a lawsuit entitled Buck Walsh, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated v. Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. , which was filed in the Superior Court of the State of California in San Diego County. The alleged violations include business and professions code and labor code violations for failure to compensate wages, unpaid meal and rest periods, and failure to reimburse for necessary business-related expenses. The proposed class of plaintiffs includes hourly paid or non-exempt employees of the Company who were employed from April 6, 2016 through the date of adjudication. The material terms of the settlement are set forth in a binding Memorandum of Agreement dated as of July 1, 2021, which was approved by the independent arbitrator on April 18, 2022. Subsequent to this filing, the Company anticipates receipt of the final settlement amount from the settlement administrator. This lawsuit will be resolved and closed upon disbursement of the settlement amount.
Although we intend to vigorously defend against these claims, there is no guarantee that we will prevail. Accordingly, we are unable to determine the ultimate outcome of these lawsuits or determine the amount or range of potential losses associated with the lawsuits.
From time to time, we are involved in various other legal proceedings arising from or related to claims incident to the normal course of our business activities, including actions with respect to intellectual property, employment, regulatory, product liability and contractual matters. Although the results of such legal proceedings and claims cannot be predicted with certainty, we believe we are not currently a party to any legal proceeding(s) which, if determined adversely to us, would, individually or taken together, have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, financial condition or cash flows. However, regardless of the merit of the claims raised or the outcome, legal proceedings may have an adverse impact on us as a result of defense and settlement costs, diversion of management time and resources, and other factors.
Text extracted from the filing as submitted to EDGAR. Formatting, tables and exhibits are simplified for reading; the original document is authoritative for anything you rely on.