Spero Therapeutics, Inc. 10-K

Item 3. Legal Proceedings. Securities Class Action Lawsuits and Derivative Actions Two putative class action lawsuits were filed against the Company and certain of its current and former officers in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, one captioned Richard S. Germond v. Spero Therapeutics, Inc., Ankit Mahadevia, and Satyavrat Shukla, Case No. 1:22-cv-03125, filed on May 26, 2022, and the other captioned Kashif Memon v. Spero Therapeutics, Inc., Ankit Mahadevia, and Satyavrat Shukla Case No. 1:22-cv-04154, filed on July 15, 2022. The parties moved to consolidate the two complaints on July 22, 2022, which were ordered consolidated on August 5, 2022 (“Consolidated Putative Class Action”). The parties filed an Amended Complaint on December 5, 2022, purported to be brought on behalf of stockholders who purchased our common stock from September 8, 2020 through May 2, 2022. The Amended Complaint generally alleges that the Company and certain of its current and former officers violated Sections 10(b) and/or 20(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by making allegedly false and/or misleading statements concerning the NDA for tebipenem HBr in an effort to lead investors to believe that the drug would receive approval from the FDA. Plaintiffs seek unspecified damages, interest, attorneys’ fees, and other costs. The Company filed a fully-briefed Motion to Dismiss on June 21, 2023. By Order entered on September 30, 2024, the Motion to Dismiss was granted, dismissing the Amended Complaint in its entirety. The Court ordered the case to be closed by Memorandum and Order entered on October 28, 2024. A stockholder derivative action was filed against the Company, as nominal defendant, and certain of the Company's current and former officers in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, captioned Marti v. Mahadevia, et al., Case. No. 1:23-cv-01133-RGA (the “First Derivative Complaint”), on October 11, 2023. The plaintiffs both purport to be current stockholders, and the allegations are primarily the same as those made in the Consolidated Putative Class Action. The First Derivative Complaint was transferred to the Eastern District of New York on November 13, 2023. A second stockholder derivative action was filed against the Company, as nominal defendant, and certain of its current and former officers in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Kings County, captioned Heil v. Mahadevia, et al., Case. No. 505153/2024 (the “Second Derivative Complaint”), on February 21, 2024. The Second Derivative Complaint makes primarily the same allegations as the First Derivative Complaint, and the Consolidated Putative Class Action. The plaintiffs in both derivative suits agreed to a stay pending decision on the class action, subject to court approval. By Order entered on September 30, 2024, the motion to stay the First Derivative Complaint was denied as moot due to the dismissal of the Consolidated Putative Class Action. On March 20, 2025, the Second Derivative Complaint was voluntarily dismissed by the plaintiff. On March 31, 2025, the First Derivative Complaint was voluntarily dismissed by the plaintiff. Additional lawsuits against the Company and certain of its officers or directors may be filed in the future. If additional similar complaints are filed, absent new or different allegations that are material, the Company will not necessarily announce such additional filings. SEC Investigation and Wells Notice On January 9, 2025, the Company responded to a “Wells Notice” from the Staff of the SEC regarding its preliminary determination to recommend a civil enforcement action or administrative proceeding against the Company, its former Chief Executive Officer and a former member of its Board of Directors, Ankit Mahadevia, M.D. (“Dr. Mahadevia”), and its former Chief Financial Officer and President and Chief Executive Officer, Satyavrat “Sath” Shukla (“Mr. Shukla”), relating to certain public disclosures by the Company from March 31, 2022 leading up to the Company’s announcement on May 3, 2022 that it had determined to cease commercialization of tebipenem HBr based on feedback from the FDA, and whether the Company’s disclosures may have violated the federal securities laws. A Wells Notice is neither a formal charge of wrongdoing nor a final determination that the recipient has violated any law, but is a preliminary determination by the Staff to recommend to the SEC Commissioners that a civil enforcement action or administrative proceeding be brought against the recipients. It provides the recipients the opportunity to address in a non-public forum the issues raised by the Staff before a recommendation is made to the SEC regarding an enforcement action. If the SEC were to authorize an action against the Company and/or any of the identified individuals, it may seek an injunction or cease-and-desist order against future violations of provisions of the federal securities laws, the imposition of civil monetary penalties, disgorgement or other equitable relief. On January 16, 2026, acting pursuant to an offer of settlement submitted by each of Dr. Mahadevia and Mr. Shukla, the SEC issued an order instituting cease-and-desist proceedings, making findings, and imposing a cease-and-desist order pursuant to Section 8A of the 1933 Act, directing Dr. Mahadevia and Mr. Shukla to cease and desist from committing or causing any violations of Section 17(a)(2) of the 1933 Act, 15 U.S.C. § 77q(a)(2) (the “SEC Order”). In the SEC Order, the SEC made findings that, from March 31, 2022 to May 3, 2022, Dr. Mahadevia and Mr. Shukla, violated Section 17(a)(2) of 1933 Act, which provides that it is unlawful for any person, in the offer or sale of a security, to “obtain money or property by means of any untrue statement of material fact” or a material 75 omission necessary to make statements made not misleading. A violation of this provision does not require scienter and may rest on a finding of negligence. Dr. Mahadevia and Mr. Shukla consented to entry of the SEC Order without admitting or denying the findings contained therein, except as to jurisdiction. On January 20, 2026, the Company received a letter (the “Letter”) from the SEC advising the Company that the SEC has concluded its investigation into the Company and that, based on the information as of the date of the Letter, the SEC does not intend to recommend an enforcement action against the Company at this time. The Letter was provided under the guidelines set out in the final paragraph of Securities Act Release No. 5310. The Company and Mr. Shukla mutually decided to separate, and Mr. Shukla resigned from the Board of Directors, in each case effective as of May 2, 2025. On January 30, 2026, Dr. Mahadevia resigned from the Board of Directors, including from his service on the Development Committee of the Board and from all officer and director positions he then held with any and all subsidiaries of the Company, effective as of January 30, 2026. Item 4. Mine Saf ety Disclosures. Not applicable. 76 PART II