We are a leader in the field of gene therapy, seeking to develop single treatments with potentially curative results for patients suffering from genetic and other devastating diseases.
−Removed: We are advancing a focused pipeline of innovative gene therapies.
−Removed: Our lead program, etranacogene dezaparvovec for the treatment of hemophilia B, is currently being evaluated in a Phase III HOPE-B pivotal trial.
−Removed: In September 2019, we completed the enrollment of the lead-in phase of the HOPE-B pivotal trial.
−Removed: We are also developing a novel gene therapy product candidate, AMT-130, for patients with Huntington’s disease.
−Removed: In January 2019, we received notice from the United States Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) of the clearance of our Investigational New Drug (“IND”) application and recently initiated a Phase I/II clinical study of AMT-130.
−Removed: Beyond our lead clinical program for hemophilia B and our Huntington’s disease program, we have a pipeline of additional AAV-based gene therapy programs in various stages of preclinical development.
+Added: We are advancing a focused pipeline of innovative gene therapies, including product candidates for the treatment of hemophilia B, which we intend to license to CSL Behring pursuant to the CSL Behring Agreement (as defined below), and Huntington’s disease.
We believe our validated technology platform and manufacturing capabilities provide us distinct competitive advantages, including the potential to reduce development risk, cost, and time to market.
We produce our Adeno-associated virus (“AAV”) -based gene therapies in our own facilities with a proprietary, commercial-scale, current good manufacturing practices (“cGMP”)-compliant, manufacturing process.
−Removed: We believe our Lexington, Massachusetts-based facility is one of the world's leading, most versatile, gene therapy manufacturing facilities.
−Removed: Conducting a pivotal study of hemophilia B lead candidate – Etranacogene dezaparvovec (AMT-061)
−Removed: Etranacogene dezaparvovec is our lead gene therapy candidate and includes an AAV5 vector incorporating the Factor IX-Padua variant.
+Added: We believe our Lexington, Massachusetts-based facility is one of the world’s most versatile gene therapy manufacturing facilities.
+Added: CSL Behring commercialization and license agreement
+Added: On June 24, 2020, uniQure biopharma B.V., a wholly-owned subsidiary of uniQure N.V., entered into a commercialization and license agreement (as amended, the “CSL Behring Agreement”) with CSL Behring LLC (“CSL Behring”) pursuant to which CSL Behring will receive exclusive global rights to etranacogene dezaparvovec, our investigational gene therapy for patients with hemophilia B (the “Product”).
+Added: Under the terms of the CSL Behring Agreement, we will receive a $450.0 million upfront cash payment upon the closing of the CSL Behring Agreement and be eligible to receive up to $1.6 billion in additional payments based on regulatory and commercial milestones.
+Added: The CSL Behring agreement also provides that we will be eligible to receive tiered double-digit royalties in a range of up to a low-twenties percent of net sales of the Product based on sales thresholds.
+Added: Pursuant to the CSL Behring Agreement, we will be responsible for the completion of the HOPE-B clinical trial, manufacturing process validation, and the manufacturing supply of the Product until such time that these capabilities may be transferred to CSL Behring or its designated contract manufacturing organization.
+Added: Concurrently with the execution of the CSL Behring Agreement, we and CSL Behring entered into a development and commercial supply agreement, pursuant to which, among other things, we will supply the Product to CSL Behring at an agreed-upon price.
+Added: Clinical development and regulatory activities performed by us pursuant to the CSL Behring Agreement will be reimbursed by CSL Behring.
+Added: CSL Behring will be responsible for global regulatory submissions and commercialization requirements for the Product.
+Added: Other than under the CSL Behring Agreement, neither we nor CSL Behring may perform any clinical trials, with the exception of trials required to extend the label or gain marketing authorization outside the United States or the European Union, for any gene therapy product, gene-editing product, or any other product comprising an AAV vector to conduct nucleotide transfer (including deoxyribonucleic acid (“DNA”) and ribonucleic acid (“RNA”)) for the treatment, prevention, or cure of hemophilia B for a period commencing on June 24, 2020 and continuing for a period of four years following the first commercial sale of the Product in the United States, and neither we nor CSL Behring may commercialize such a product for a period commencing as of June 24, 2020 and continuing for a period of seven years following the first commercial sale of the Product in the United States.
+Added: This exclusivity commitment would not bind an acquirer of us that owns or controls such a product so long as certain precautions are followed to ensure that CSL Behring’s confidential information and our proprietary technology related to the Product are not used or accessed by personnel of such acquirer who are developing or commercializing such competing product.
+Added: Unless earlier terminated as described below, the CSL Behring Agreement will continue on a country-by-country basis until expiration of the royalty term in a country.
+Added: The royalty term expires in a country on the later of (a) 15 years after the first commercial sale of the Product in such country, (b) expiration of regulatory exclusivity for the Product in such country and (c) expiration of all valid claims of specific licensed patents covering the Product in such country.
+Added: Either we or CSL Behring may terminate the CSL Behring Agreement for the other party’s material breach if such breach is not cured within a specified cure period.
+Added: In addition, if CSL Behring fails to commercialize the Product in any of a group of major countries for an extended period of time following the first regulatory approval of the Product in any of such group of countries (other than due to certain specified reasons) and such failure has not been cured within a specified cure period, then we may terminate the CSL Behring Agreement.
+Added: CSL Behring may also terminate the CSL Behring Agreement for convenience.
+Added: The effectiveness of the transactions contemplated by the CSL Behring Agreement is contingent on completion of review under antitrust laws in the United States, Australia, and the United Kingdom, and certain provisions of the CSL Behring Agreement will not become effective until after we receive all such regulatory approvals.
+Added: On November 11, 2020, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (“ACCC”) determined, pursuant to section 50 of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 of Australia, that it will not intervene in the CSL Behring Agreement.
+Added: Thus, the ACCC has completed its review of the CSL Behring Agreement, and the transactions contemplated by the CSL Behring Agreement may close from the perspective of the Australian competition authority.
+Added: On November 24, 2020, the Competition and Markets Authority in the United Kingdom (the “CMA”) adopted a decision not to refer the CSL Behring Agreement for proceedings under section 33 of the Enterprise Act 2002 of the United Kingdom.
+Added: The decision was made public by the CMA on January 6, 2021.
+Added: Thus, the CMA has completed its review of the CSL Behring Agreement, and the transactions contemplated by the CSL Behring Agreement may close from the perspective of the United Kingdom competition authority.
+Added: On December 3, 2020, we and CSL Behring filed a premerger notification and report form under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 (the “HSR Act”).
+Added: On January 4, 2021, the United States Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) issued to us a request for additional information and documentary material (a “Second Request”) under the HSR Act.
+Added: The FTC similarly issued a Second Request to CSL Behring also with respect to the antitrust review of the CSL Behring Agreement.
+Added: The effect of the Second Request is to extend the waiting period imposed under the HSR Act until 30 days after all parties to the CSL Behring Agreement have substantially complied with the requests unless the waiting period is terminated earlier by the FTC or voluntarily extended by the parties.
+Added: We do not believe that the FTC will determine that the consummation of the transaction will result in a violation of the HSR Act.
+Added: However, there can be no assurance as to the outcome of the Second Request.
+Added: Closing of the transaction is expected to materially impact our profitability and cash flows.
+Added: Receipt of the $450.0 million payment due on closing would extend the funding of our operations into the second half of 2024 (assuming a full repayment of funds borrowed from Hercules Capital Inc.
+Added: (“Hercules”) under our term loan facility by 2023).
+Added: However, we expect to continue to incur losses and to generate negative cash flows beyond the fiscal year in which we would close the transaction.
+Added: Hemophilia B program – Etranacogene dezaparvovec (AMT-061)
+Added: Etranacogene dezaparvovec is our lead gene therapy candidate and includes an Adeno-associated virus (“AAV”) serotype 5 (together “AAV-5”) vector incorporating the functional human Factor IX (“FIX”) Padua variant.
We are currently conducting a pivotal study in patients with severe and moderately-severe hemophilia B.
−Removed: Etranacogene dezaparvovec has been granted Breakthrough Therapy Designation by the FDA and access to the PRIME initiative by the European Medicines Agency (“EMA”).
−Removed: In June 2018, we initiated our Phase III HOPE-B pivotal trial of etranacogene dezaparvovec for hemophilia B.
−Removed: In January 2019, we dosed the first patient in the trial and in September 2019, we completed the enrollment of approximately 60 patients in the lead-in phase of this trial.
−Removed: The trial is a multinational, multi-center, open-label, single-arm study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of etranacogene dezaparvovec.
−Removed: After the six-month lead-in period, patients are receiving a single intravenous administration of etranacogene dezaparvovec.
−Removed: The primary endpoint of the study will be based on the Factor IX (“FIX”) activity level achieved following the administration of etranacogene dezaparvovec, and the secondary endpoints will measure annualized FIX replacement therapy usage, annualized bleed rates and safety.
−Removed: Patients enrolled in the HOPE-B pivotal trial have been tested for the presence of pre-existing neutralizing antibodies to AAV5 but are not being excluded from the trial based on their titers.
−Removed: In February, May, July and December 2019, we presented updated data related to the three patients treated in our Phase IIb dose-confirmation study of etranacogene dezaparvovec.
−Removed: Data from the Phase IIb study of etranacogene dezaparvovec show that all three patients experienced increasing and sustained FIX levels after a one-time administration of etranacogene dezaparvovec.
−Removed: Mean FIX activity was 41% of normal at 52 weeks of follow-up, exceeding threshold FIX levels generally considered sufficient to significantly reduce the risk of bleeding events.
−Removed: The first patient achieved FIX activity of 50% of normal.
−Removed: FIX activity in the second patient was 31% of normal and the third patient was 41% of normal.
+Added: In August 2018, we initiated a Phase IIb dose-confirmation study of etranacogene dezaparvovec and in September 2018, we completed the dosing for that study.
+Added: In February, May, July, and December 2019, and in December 2020, we presented updated data from the Phase IIb dose-confirmation study of etranacogene dezaparvovec.
+Added: The most recent data that we announced from the Phase IIb study of etranacogene dezaparvovec show that all three patients experienced increasing and sustained FIX levels after a one-time administration of etranacogene dezaparvovec.
+Added: Mean FIX activity was 44.2% of normal two years after administration, exceeding threshold FIX levels generally considered sufficient to significantly reduce the risk of bleeding events.
+Added: The first patient achieved FIX activity of 44.7% of normal, the second patient was 51.6% of normal and the third patient was 36.3% of normal.
The second and third patients had previously screen-failed and were excluded from another gene therapy study due to pre-existing neutralizing antibodies to a different AAV vector.
−Removed: Based on the data obtained through October 24, 2019, no patient experienced a material loss of FIX activity, reported any bleeding events or required any infusions of FIX replacement therapy for bleeds.
−Removed: One patient underwent hip surgery due to a pre-existing condition and was treated pre-operatively with short-acting factor replacement.
−Removed: This was reported by the investigator as a serious adverse event unrelated to etranacogene dezaparvovec.
−Removed: Enrolling Phase I/II clinical study of Huntington product candidate (“AMT-130”)
+Added: At two years after dosing, two of the three participants remain free from bleeds and use of FIX replacement therapy.
+Added: A single bleed has been reported in one participant, who has used a total of two FIX infusions (excluding surgery).
+Added: All patients have remained free of prophylaxis in the two years since receiving etranacogene dezaparvovec.
+Added: In June 2018, we initiated the six-month lead-in period of our Phase III HOPE-B pivotal trial of etranacogene dezaparvovec (the “HOPE-B trial”).
+Added: The HOPE-B trial is a multinational, multi-center, open-label, single-arm study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of etranacogene dezaparvovec.
+Added: After the six-month lead-in period, patients received a single intravenous administration of etranacogene dezaparvovec.
+Added: Patients enrolled in the HOPE-B trial were tested for the presence of pre-existing neutralizing antibodies to AAV5 but not excluded from the trial based on their titers.
+Added: The primary endpoints of the study are based on the FIX activity level achieved following the administration of etranacogene dezaparvovec after 26 weeks and 52 weeks after dosing as well as annualized bleed rates during the 52 weeks after dosing.
+Added: In March 2020, we completed dosing of the 54 patients in the HOPE-B trial.
+Added: The targeted number of patients to be dosed per the clinical trial protocol was 50.
+Added: As set forth below, we have implemented and continue to implement various measures to allow us to closely monitor the trial within the guidance provided by the U.S.
+Added: Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) regarding the impact of the COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic (“COVID-19”) to minimize any risk or disruption in patient follow-up visits.
+Added: In December 2020, we announced top-line data from the HOPE-B trial.
+Added: The 26-week follow-up date from the trial showed that FIX activity in the 54 patients increased after dosing from ≤ 2% to a mean of 37.2% at 26 weeks, meeting a first primary endpoint of the HOPE-B trial.
+Added: No correlation between pre-existing neutralizing antibodies and FIX activity was found in patients with neutralizing antibody titers up to 678.2, a range expected to include more than 95% of the general population;
+Added: one patient with a neutralizing antibody titer of 3,212.3 did not show an increase in FIX activity.
+Added: Less than 1% of the general population is expected to have neutralizing antibody titers of greater than 3,000.
+Added: During the 26-week period after dosing, 15 patients (28%) reported a total of 21 bleeding events, representing a reduction of 83% compared to the 123 bleeding events reported by 38 patients (70%) during the observational lead-in phase of the trial.
+Added: Total bleeds include any bleeding event reported after the treatment of etranacogene dezaparvovec, including spontaneous, traumatic, and those associated with unrelated medical procedures, whether or not FIX treatment was required.
+Added: Of the total bleeding events reported during the 26-week period after dosing, only three were classified as spontaneous bleeds requiring treatment, representing a reduction of 92% compared to the 37 such bleeding events reported during the observational lead-in phase.
+Added: Mean annualized usage of FIX replacement therapy, a secondary endpoint in the clinical trial, declined by 96% during the 26-week period after dosing compared to the observational lead-in phase.
+Added: Etranacogene dezaparvovec was generally well-tolerated.
+Added: As of the November 2020 cut-off date, most adverse events were classified as mild (81.5%).
+Added: The most common events included transaminase elevation treated with steroids per protocol (9 patients;
+Added: 17%), infusion-related reactions (7 patients;
+Added: 13%), headache (7 patients;
+Added: 13%) and influenza-like symptoms (7 patients;
+Added: Liver enzyme elevations resolved with a tapering course of corticosteroids and FIX activity remained in the mild range in the steroid treated patients.
+Added: No relationship between safety and neutralizing antibody titers was observed.
+Added: Based on interactions with the FDA and the European Medicines Agency (“EMA”), we plan to incorporate FIX activity and bleeding rates at 52 weeks as additional co-primary endpoints in the study.
+Added: On December 21, 2020, our clinical trials of etranacogene dezaparvovec, including our HOPE-B trial, were placed on clinical hold by the FDA.
+Added: The clinical hold was initiated following the submission of a safety report in mid-December relating to a possibly related serious adverse event associated with a preliminary diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (“HCC”), a form of liver cancer, in one patient in the HOPE-B trial that was treated with etranacogene dezaparvovec in October 2019.
+Added: The patient has multiple risk factors associated with HCC, including a twenty-five-year history of hepatitis C (“HCV”), hepatitis B virus (“HBV”), evidence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and advanced age.
+Added: Chronic infections with hepatitis B and C have been associated with approximately 80% of HCC cases.
+Added: The liver lesion was detected during a routine abdominal ultrasound conducted as part of the required study assessments in patients at one-year post dosing.
+Added: A surgical resection of the lesion has occurred, and an analysis of the tissue samples was initiated in early 2021.
+Added: On February 19, 2021, we reported initial results from this analysis to the FDA in accordance with pharmacovigilance requirements.
+Added: We are gathering final data from these molecular analyses and will be preparing a detailed response to the FDA’s clinical hold questions regarding this event.
+Added: Currently, we do not have adequate data to determine a possible causal relationship, especially in the context of the other known risk factors.
+Added: We currently do not anticipate any impact on our regulatory submission timelines, including the filing of a BLA.
+Added: No other cases of HCC have been reported in our clinical trials conducted in more than 67 patients in hemophilia B, with some patients dosed more than 5 years ago.
+Added: Etranacogene dezaparvovec has been granted Breakthrough Therapy Designation by the FDA and access to the current priority medicines (“PRIME”) initiative by the EMA.
+Added: Huntington’s disease program (AMT-130)
AMT-130 is our novel gene therapy candidate for the treatment of Huntington’s disease.
−Removed: AMT-130 utilizes our miQURE™ proprietary, gene-silencing platform and incorporates an AAV vector carrying a microRNA (“miRNA”) specifically designed to silence the huntingtin gene and the potentially highly toxic exon 1 protein fragment.
+Added: AMT-130 utilizes our proprietary, gene-silencing miQURE platform and incorporates an AAV vector carrying an miRNA specifically designed to silence the huntingtin gene and the potentially highly toxic exon 1 protein fragment.
AMT-130 has received orphan drug and Fast Track designations from the FDA and Orphan Medicinal Product Designation from the EMA.
−Removed: In January 2019, our IND application for AMT-130 was cleared by the FDA enabling us to initiate our planned Phase I/II clinical study.
−Removed: The Phase I/II protocol is a randomized, imitation surgery-controlled, double-blinded study.
−Removed: The study will include three surgical sites and multiple referring, non-surgical sites in the U.S.
+Added: In June 2020, we announced the completion of the first two patient procedures in the Phase I/II clinical trial of AMT-130 for the treatment of Huntington’s disease.
+Added: These procedures occurred after a postponement that resulted from the COVID-19 pandemic and the associated states of emergency declarations in the United States.
+Added: The Phase I/II protocol is a randomized, imitation surgery-controlled, double-blinded study conducted at three surgical sites, and multiple referring, non-surgical sites in the U.S.
The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of AMT-130 at two doses.
−Removed: Patient screening for the study is currently underway.
−Removed: Additionally, we manufactured cGMP clinical material at our Lexington facility during 2019 and have released the clinical material for shipment.
−Removed: Expanding our preclinical pipeline and proprietary technology platform
−Removed: In November 2018, we announced the expansion of our research pipeline with three new AAV-based product candidates.
−Removed: Our lead preclinical candidate, AMT-180, is a novel hemophilia A gene therapy candidate that we believe has the potential to treat all hemophilia A patients, including those with past and current inhibitors.
−Removed: We are currently conducting safety and toxicology studies of AMT-180 to support the submission of an IND application.
−Removed: Our next most advanced preclinical candidates, AMT-190 and AMT-150, are differentiated gene therapy candidates for the treatment of Fabry disease and Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3 (“SCA3”), respectively.
−Removed: We are currently preparing to initiate safety and toxicology studies of AMT-150 to support the submission of an IND application.
−Removed: We are currently conducting additional preclinical studies to identify a lead candidate for AMT-190 for further safety testing.
−Removed: We are actively engaged in the research and development of other potential product candidates that are currently in the pre-clinical stage of development as well as other related technologies in the field of gene therapy.
−Removed: In September 2019, we raised $242.7 million of net proceeds, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and other offering expenses payable by the Company, through a follow-on public offering of 5,625,000 ordinary shares at a public offering price of $46.00 per ordinary share.
+Added: On September 25, 2020, we announced that the independent Data Safety Monitoring Board (“DSMB”) overseeing the Phase I/II clinical trial of AMT-130 for the treatment of Huntington’s disease had met and reviewed 90-day safety data from the first two patients enrolled in the trial.
+Added: No significant safety concerns were noted to prevent further dosing.
+Added: On October 13, 2020, we announced the completion of the third and fourth patient procedures in the Phase I/II clinical trial.
+Added: On February 8, 2021, we announced that the DSMB had met and reviewed the six-month safety data from the first two enrolled patients and the 90-day safety data from the next two enrolled patients in the study.
+Added: No significant safety concerns were noted to prevent further dosing, and the final six patients in the first cohort are now cleared for enrollment.
+Added: BMS collaboration
+Added: We and Bristol-Myers Squibb (“BMS”) entered into a collaboration and license agreement in May 2015 (“BMS CLA”).
+Added: BMS had initially designated four Collaboration Targets in 2015 and in accordance with the terms of the BMS CLA could have designated a fifth to tenth Collaboration Target.
+Added: In February 2019, BMS requested a one-year extension of the initial research term.
+Added: In April 2019, following an assessment of the progress of this collaboration and our expanding proprietary programs, we notified BMS that we did not intend to agree to an extension of the initial research term.
+Added: Accordingly, the initial four-year research term under the collaboration terminated on May 21, 2019.
+Added: On December 1, 2020, we and BMS amended the BMS CLA (“amended BMS CLA”).
+Added: Following the amendment BMS is no longer entitled to designate a fifth to tenth Collaboration Target and as such we are no longer entitled to receive an aggregate $16.5 million in target designation payments for research, development, and regulatory milestone payments related to the fifth and tenth Collaboration Targets.
+Added: For a period of one-year from the effective date of the amended BMS CLA, BMS may replace up to two of the four active Collaboration Targets with two new targets in the field of cardiovascular disease.
+Added: We continue to be entitled to receive up to $217.0 million for each of the four Collaboration Targets if defined milestones are achieved, as well as royalties on net sales associated with any Collaboration Target.
+Added: On December 17, 2020, BMS designated one of the four Collaboration Targets as a candidate to advance into IND-enabling studies entitling us to receive a $4.4 million research milestone payment.
+Added: We recorded the $4.4 million as License Revenue in the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2020.
+Added: The amended BMS CLA does not extend the initial research term.
+Added: BMS may place purchase orders to provide limited services primarily related to analytical and development efforts in respect of the four Collaboration Targets.
+Added: BMS may request such services for a period not to exceed the earlier of (i) the completion of all activities under a Research Plan and (ii) either (A) three years after the last replacement target has been designated by BMS during the one-year replacement period following the amended BMS CLA effective date or (B) three years if no replacement targets are designated during this one-year period and BMS continues to reimburse us for these services.
+Added: For as long as any of the four Collaboration Targets are being advanced, BMS may place a purchase order to be supplied with research, clinical and commercial supplies.
+Added: Subject to the terms of the amended BMS CLA, BMS has the right to terminate the research, clinical and commercial supply relationships, and has certain remedies for failures of supply, up to and including technology transfer for any such failure that otherwise cannot be reasonably resolved.
+Added: Both we and BMS may agree to a technology transfer of manufacturing capabilities pursuant to the terms of the amended BMS CLA.
+Added: We have agreed to certain restrictions on our ability to work independently of the collaboration, either directly or indirectly through any affiliate or third party, on certain programs that would be competitive with a Collaboration Target.
+Added: We have agreed to indication exclusivity for the current four Collaboration Targets.
+Added: BMS may add or change the exclusive indications in the process of replacing Collaboration Targets as described above.
+Added: We can opt out of the indication exclusivity by giving up certain economic rights under the amended BMS CLA for each such indication that is affected by us opting out.
+Added: If we opt out of an exclusive indication, we could pursue other targets for such indication other than a Collaboration Target.
+Added: The amended BMS CLA also terminated two warrants to increase BMS ownership in the Company up to 19.9% through purchasing a specific number of our ordinary shares following the designation of a seventh, and a tenth Collaboration Target, respectively.
+Added: We and BMS agreed that upon the consummation of a change of control transaction of uniQure that occurs prior to the earlier of (i) December 1, 2026 and (ii) BMS’ delivery of a target cessation notice for all four Collaboration Targets, uniQure (or its third party acquirer) shall pay to BMS a one-time, non-refundable, non-creditable cash payment of $70.0 million, provided that (x) if $70.0 million is greater than five percent of the net proceeds (as contractually defined) from such change of control transaction, the payment shall be an amount equal to five percent of such net proceeds, and (y) if $70.0 million is less than one percent of such net proceeds, the change of control payment shall be an amount equal to one percent of such net proceeds.
+Added: We have not consummated any change of control transaction as of December 31, 2020 that would obligate us to make a payment to BMS.
+Added: The amended BMS CLA did not change any of the provisions of the Investor Agreement with BMS that we entered into in 2015.
+Added: We have granted BMS certain registration rights that allow BMS to require us to register our securities beneficially held by BMS under the U.S.
+Added: Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”).
+Added: BMS may make up to two such demands for us to register the shares, provided that we may deny such demand if (i) the market value of the shares to be registered is less than $10.0 million (provided however, if BMS holds less than $10.0 million worth of our shares, we must comply with their demand for registration), (ii) we certify to BMS that we plan to effect a registration within 120 days of their demand or we are engaged in a transaction that would be required to be disclosed in a registration statement and that is not reasonably practicable to be disclosed at that time, or (iii) we have already effected one registration statement within the twelve months preceding BMS’s demand for registration.
+Added: In addition, independent of their demand registration rights, upon the occurrence of certain events, we must also provide BMS the opportunity to include their ordinary shares in any registration statement that we effect.
+Added: We also continue to grant BMS certain information rights under the Investor Agreement, although these requirements may be satisfied by our public filings required by U.S.
+Added: securities laws.
+Added: BMS also continues to be subject to a lock up pursuant to the Investor Agreement for as long as BMS holds more than 4.9% of our ordinary shares (as of December 31, 2020 BMS holds 5.3%).
+Added: Without our prior consent, BMS may not sell or dispose any of its current ordinary shares.
+Added: The Investor Agreement also continues to require BMS to vote all of our ordinary shares it beneficially holds in favor of all items on the agenda for the relevant general meeting of shareholders of our company as proposed on behalf of our company, unless, in the context of a change of control or similar transaction, BMS has itself made an offer to our company or our board in connection with the transaction that is the subject of the vote, in which case it is free to vote its shares at its discretion.
+Added: This voting provision will terminate upon the later of the date on which BMS no longer beneficially owns at least 4.9% of our outstanding ordinary shares, the closing of a transaction that provides BMS exclusive and absolute discretion to vote our shares it beneficially holds, or the termination of the amended BMS CLA for breach by us.
+Added: Term loan facility
+Added: As of December 31, 2020, a $35.0 million term loan was outstanding in accordance with the Second Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement (“2018 Amended Facility”) between us and Hercules.
+Added: On January 29, 2021 we and Hercules entered into amendments to the 2018 Amended Facility (the “2021 Amended Facility”).
+Added: Pursuant to the 2021 Amended Facility, Hercules agreed to make additional term loans in the maximum aggregate amount of $100.0 million (the “2021 Term Loan”), increasing the aggregate principal amount of the term loan facility from $35.0 million to up to $135.0 million.
+Added: On January 29, 2021 we drew down $35.0 million of the 2021 Term Loan.
+Added: We may draw down the remaining $65.0 million under the 2021 Term Loan in a series of one or more advances of not less than $20.0 million each until December 15, 2021.
+Added: Advances under the 2021 Term Loan bear interest at a rate equal to the greater of (i) 8.25% or (ii) 8.25% plus the prime rate, less 3.25% per annum.
+Added: The principal balance and all accrued but unpaid interest on advances under the 2021 Term Loan is due on June 1, 2023, which date may be extended by us by up to two twelve-month periods.
+Added: Advances under the 2021 Term Loan may not be prepaid until six-months after the Closing Date, following which we may prepay all such advances without charge.
+Added: In addition to the 2021 Term Loan, the amendment also extends the interest only payment period of the previously funded $35.0 million term loan from January 1, 2022 to June l, 2023.
+Added: COVID-19 measures
+Added: The coronavirus disease (“COVID-19) caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (“Sars-CoV 2 virus) was characterized as a pandemic by the World Health Organization (“WHO”) on March 11, 2020.
+Added: During late 2020 various, potentially more infectious, variants of the Sars-CoV 2 virus causing COVID-19 were identified.
+Added: Starting March 2020, we implemented measures to address the impact of COVID-19 on our business.
+Added: We mandated a work-from-home policy for all non-essential employees at our Amsterdam and Lexington facilities when the pandemic began.
+Added: We implemented a series of protocols governing the operations of our Lexington facility to comply with the requirements of the various orders and guidance from the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and other related orders, guidance, laws, and regulations.
+Added: We supported our employees in setting up a healthy and efficient remote working environment.
+Added: In conjunction with implementing this policy, we accelerated the roll-out of several information technology security measures, such as dual factor authentication, to address the increased risks to which we might be exposed as a result of remote working conditions.
+Added: In addition, we conducted awareness training around cybersecurity for critical functions involved in making payments to vendors such as finance and supply chain.
+Added: We continue to monitor local government rules and recommendations and office protocols will be aligned with these rules and recommendations.
+Added: We conduct frequent status video-meetings of local management at our two sites as well as leadership-team video meetings to implement these measures and to monitor the evolving situation.
+Added: In addition, we inform our employees through periodic newsletters and have organized virtual local and global townhalls to share information and provide direction and support to our employees.
+Added: We started to reopen the Amsterdam and Lexington facilities in phases, in line with the reopening plans that are prescribed by the local government.
+Added: Between June 1, 2020 until September 29, 2020, we encouraged our Amsterdam employees to work a minimum of two days per week from the office, and approximately 50% of local staff worked on site during that period.
+Added: As of September 29, 2020, we reinstated the mandatory work-from-home policy that was initiated in March in Amsterdam to align with the updated Dutch government’s measures.
+Added: Employees based in Amsterdam who cannot perform their duties outside of our Amsterdam facility will continue to work at our Amsterdam facility.
+Added: We adapted to operate our laboratories at our Amsterdam site to comply with social distancing rules and to ensure the health and wellbeing of our employees under the current circumstances.
+Added: All other employees in Amsterdam will work from home through at least the end of August 2021, partly in conjunction with the ongoing expansion of our laboratory space.
+Added: As a biopharma research and development company, we were deemed to provide essential services under the “stay at home” advisory that was issued by the Governor of Massachusetts on March 23, 2020 and we therefore have maintained our manufacturing operations at our Lexington site.
+Added: To ensure adequate social distancing in our Lexington facility, our COVID-19 protocols generally have limited occupancy to numbers below those allowed by the Massachusetts COVID-19 guidelines.
+Added: In our Lexington facility, we currently have implemented an occupancy limitation of approximately 25%.
+Added: Our employees that cannot perform their duties outside of our Lexington facility continue to work at our Lexington facility.
+Added: All other employees are required to work remotely to the extent possible through at least the end of the second quarter of 2021.
+Added: Our actual occupancy at the Lexington facility has been less than approximately 25% of our permitted occupancy during all phases of the Massachusetts reopening plan.
+Added: We have also implemented a mandatory COVID-19 PCR testing protocol effective February 11, 2021 that requires employees to have tested negative for COVID-19 prior to entering the Lexington facility.
+Added: We have adapted our ongoing clinical research activities based on the directions and flexibility provided by the “FDA Guidance on Conduct of Clinical Trials of Medical Products during COVID-19 Pandemic” issued on March 18, 2020 and updated throughout the pandemic to minimize any risk, disruption, or delay in either patient dosing or follow-up visits.
+Added: These procedures occurred after a postponement that resulted from the COVID-19 pandemic and the associated states of emergency declarations in the United States.
+Added: The broader implications of COVID-19 on our results of operations and overall financial performance remain uncertain.
+Added: The COVID-19 pandemic and its adverse effects have become more prevalent in the locations where we, and our third-party business partners conduct business.
+Added: While we have experienced disruptions in our operations as a result of COVID-19, we are adapting to the current environment to minimize the effect to our business.
+Added: However, we may experience more pronounced disruptions in our operations in the future.
+Added: On September 14, 2020, we appointed Ricardo Dolmetsch, Ph.D.
+Added: as President, Research and Development.
+Added: Dolmetsch succeeded Sander van Deventer, M.D., Ph.D., our former Executive Vice President, Research and Product Development.
+Added: On October 14, 2020, our Chief Medical Officer, Robert Gut, M.D., Ph.D., resigned to allow him to return as a non-executive director on our Board of Directors.
+Added: Gut was appointed to our Board of Directors as a non-executive director at an extraordinary meeting of shareholders on December 1, 2020.
+Added: On June 17, 2020, our shareholders voted to approve the appointment of Leonard E.
+Added: as a non-executive director of the Board of Directors.
+Added: Post replaced Dr.
+Added: David Schaffer, whose term as a non-executive director of the Board of Directors ended on the same date.
+Added: Post has also assumed the role of chair of our Research & Development Committee of the Board of Directors.
Our Mission and Strategy
3 unchanged sentences
Etranacogene dezaparvovec combines the potential advantages of AAV5 with an enhanced Padua-FIX transgene, and may provide optimized clinical and tolerability benefits to all, or nearly all patients with hemophilia B.
−Removed: In September 2019, we completed enrollment of approximately 60 patients in the lead-in phase of our Phase III HOPE-B pivotal study.
+Added: In March 2020, we completed dosing of 54 patients in our Phase III HOPE-B pivotal study.
Maintain our leadership position in commercial-scale AAV manufacturing.
We have established cGMP, commercial-scale manufacturing capabilities for AAV-based gene therapies in our state-of-the-art Lexington, Massachusetts facility.
−Removed: We successfully produced batches of multiple gene therapy products using the same fundamental manufacturing process, methods and controls.
We believe the modularity of our platform provides us with distinct advantages, including the potential for reduced development risk and faster times to market.
8 unchanged sentences
We are developing proprietary technologies that have the potential to augment the safety and efficacy of our product candidates and broaden the applicability of our gene therapies to a wider range of diseases and patients.
−Removed: These technologies include (i) miQURE TM , our one-time administered gene silencing platform, (ii) tailored vectors, promoters and other enhancers;
+Added: These technologies include (i) miQURE, our one-time administered gene silencing platform, (ii) tailored vectors, promoters, and other enhancers;
(iii) optimized delivery and administration techniques;
9 unchanged sentences
Liver-directed diseases
+Added: Hemophilia B (etranacogene dezaparvovec)
Hemophilia B Disease and Market Background
6 unchanged sentences
Hemophilia B occurs in approximately 1 out of 30,000 live male births.
+Added: CSL Behring collaboration
+Added: On June 24, 2020, we entered into the CSL Behring Agreement pursuant to which CSL Behring would receive exclusive global rights to etranacogene dezaparvovec.
+Added: Pursuant to the CSL Behring Agreement, we would be responsible for the completion of the HOPE-B clinical trial, manufacturing process validation, and the manufacturing supply of etranacogene dezaparvovec until such time that these capabilities may be transferred to CSL Behring or its designated contract manufacturing organization.
+Added: Concurrently with the execution of the CSL Behring Agreement we and CSL Behring entered into a development and commercial supply agreement, pursuant to which, among other things, we would supply etranacogene dezaparvovec to CSL Behring at an agreed-upon price.
+Added: Clinical development and regulatory activities performed by us pursuant to the CSL Behring Agreement would be reimbursed by CSL Behring.
+Added: CSL Behring would be responsible for global regulatory submissions and commercialization requirements for etranacogene dezaparvovec.
+Added: The CSL Behring Agreement continues to be subject to antitrust review in the U.S.
+Added: and as such is not yet effective.
Our Development of etranacogene dezaparvovec for Hemophilia B
10 unchanged sentences
- broad patient eligibility, including the potential to treat all or nearly all patients with hemophilia B.
−Removed: AAV5-based gene therapies have been used in a multitude of clinical trials, including five clinical trials conducted by uniQure in patients with hemophilia B and other disorders.
+Added: AAV5-based gene therapies have been used in a multitude of clinical trials, including five clinical trials conducted by us in patients with hemophilia B and other disorders.
No patient treated in clinical trials with our AAV5-based gene therapies has experienced any confirmed, cytotoxic T-cell-mediated immune response to the capsid.
1 unchanged sentence
Data from our clinical, preclinical, and nonclinical studies suggest that all, or nearly all patients may be eligible for treatment with etranacogene dezaparvovec.
−Removed: The FDA has agreed that etranacogene dezaparvovec will fall under the existing Breakthrough Therapy Designation and IND for AMT-060, and the EMA has also agreed that etranacogene dezaparvovec will fall under the current priority medicines (“PRIME”) designation.
+Added: The FDA has agreed that etranacogene dezaparvovec will fall under the existing Breakthrough Therapy Designation and IND for AMT-060, and the EMA has also agreed that etranacogene dezaparvovec will fall under the PRIME designation.
In June 2018, we initiated our Phase III HOPE-B pivotal trial of etranacogene dezaparvovec.
The trial is a multinational, multi-center, open-label, single-arm study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of etranacogene dezaparvovec.
−Removed: In January 2019 we dosed the first patient in our HOPE-B pivotal trial and in September 2019, we completed the enrollment of approximately 60 patients in the lead-in phase of the trial.
−Removed: The adult hemophilia B patients, which were classified as severe or moderately severe, were enrolled in a six-month observational period during which time they will continue to use their current standard of care to establish a baseline control.
−Removed: After the six-month lead-in period, patients will receive a single IV-administration of etranacogene dezaparvovec.
−Removed: The primary endpoint of the study is based on the FIX activity level achieved following the administration of etranacogene dezaparvovec, and the secondary endpoints are
−Removed: annualized FIX replacement therapy usage, annualized bleed rates and safety.
−Removed: Patients enrolled in the HOPE-B trial were tested for the presence of pre-existing neutralizing antibodies to AAV5 but were not excluded from the trial based on their titers.
+Added: In March 2020, we completed dosing of the 54 patients in the HOPE-B trial.
+Added: The targeted number of patients to be dosed per the clinical trial protocol was 50.
+Added: As set forth previously, we have implemented and continue to implement various measures to allow us to closely monitor the trial within the guidance provided by the FDA regarding the impact of the COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic to minimize any risk or disruption in patient follow-up visits.
+Added: The adult hemophilia B patients, who were classified as severe or moderately severe, were enrolled in a six-month observational period prior to dosing during which time they continued to use their current standard of care to establish a baseline control.
+Added: After the six-month lead-in period, patients received a single IV-administration of etranacogene dezaparvovec.
+Added: Patients enrolled in the HOPE-B trial were tested for the presence of pre-existing neutralizing antibodies to AAV5 but not excluded from the trial based on their titers.
+Added: The primary endpoints of the study are based on the FIX activity level achieved following the administration of etranacogene dezaparvovec after 26 weeks and 52 weeks after dosing as well as annualized bleed rates during the 52 weeks after dosing.
+Added: In December 2020, we announced top-line data from the HOPE-B trial.
+Added: The 26-week follow-up date from the trial showed that FIX activity in the 54 patients increased after dosing from ≤ 2% to a mean of 37.2% at 26 weeks, meeting a first primary endpoint of the HOPE-B trial.
+Added: No correlation between pre-existing neutralizing antibodies and FIX activity was found in patients with neutralizing antibody titers up to 678.2, a range expected to include more than 95% of the general population;
+Added: one patient with a neutralizing antibody titer of 3,212.3 did not show an increase in FIX activity.
+Added: Less than 1% of the general population is expected to have neutralizing antibody titers of greater than 3,000.
+Added: During the 26-week period after dosing, 15 patients (28%) reported a total of 21 bleeding events, representing a reduction of 83% compared to the 123 bleeding events reported by 38 patients (70%) during the observational lead-in phase of the trial.
+Added: Total bleeds include any bleeding event reported after the treatment of etranacogene dezaparvovec, including spontaneous, traumatic, and those associated with unrelated medical procedures, whether or not FIX treatment was required.
+Added: Of the total bleeding events reported during the 26-week period after dosing, only three were classified as spontaneous bleeds requiring treatment, representing a reduction of 92% compared to the 37 such bleeding events reported during the observational lead-in phase.
+Added: Mean annualized usage of FIX replacement therapy, a secondary endpoint in the clinical trial, declined by 96% during the 26-week period after dosing compared to the observational lead-in phase.
+Added: Etranacogene dezaparvovec was generally well-tolerated.
+Added: As of the November 2020 cut-off date, most adverse events were classified as mild (81.5%).
+Added: The most common events included transaminase elevation treated with steroids per protocol (9 patients;
+Added: 17%), infusion-related reactions (7 patients;
+Added: 13%), headache (7 patients;
+Added: 13%) and influenza-like symptoms (7 patients;
+Added: Liver enzyme elevations resolved with a tapering course of corticosteroids and FIX activity remained in the mild range in the steroid treated patients.
+Added: No relationship between safety and neutralizing antibody titers was observed.
+Added: Based on interactions with the FDA and the EMA, we plan to incorporate FIX activity and bleeding rates at 52 weeks as additional co-primary endpoints in the study.
+Added: On December 21, 2020, our clinical trials of etranacogene dezaparvovec, including our HOPE-B trial were placed on clinical hold by the FDA.
+Added: The clinical hold was initiated following the submission of a safety report in mid-December relating to a possibly related serious adverse event associated with a preliminary diagnosis of HCC, a form of liver cancer, in one patient in the HOPE-B trial that was treated with etranacogene dezaparvovec in October 2019.
+Added: The patient has multiple risk factors associated with HCC, including a twenty-five-year history of HCV, HBV, evidence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and advanced age.
+Added: Chronic infections with hepatitis B and C have been associated with approximately 80% of HCC cases.
+Added: The liver lesion was detected during a routine abdominal ultrasound conducted as part of the required study assessments in patients at one-year post dosing.
+Added: A surgical resection of the lesion has occurred, and an analysis of the tissue samples was initiated in early 2021.
+Added: On February 19, 2021, we reported initial results from this analysis to the FDA in accordance with pharmacovigilance requirements.
+Added: We are gathering final data from these molecular analyses and will be preparing a detailed response to the FDA’s clinical hold questions regarding this event.
+Added: Currently, we do not have adequate data to determine a possible causal relationship, especially in the context of the other known risk factors.
+Added: We currently do not anticipate any impact on our regulatory submission timelines, including the filing of a BLA.
+Added: No other cases of HCC have been reported in our clinical trials conducted in more than 67 patients in hemophilia B, with some patients dosed more than 5 years ago.
In September 2018, we completed the dosing of a Phase IIb dose-confirmation study of etranacogene dezaparvovec.
3 unchanged sentences
Patients were evaluated for the presence of pre-existing neutralizing antibodies to AAV5 but were not excluded from the trial on this basis.
−Removed: We followed the patients for a total 52 weeks to assess FIX activity, bleeding rates and usage of FIX replacement therapy, and will monitor the three patients for a total of five years to evaluate the safety of etranacogene dezaparvovec.
+Added: We have followed the patients for more than two years to assess FIX activity, bleeding rates and usage of FIX replacement therapy, and will monitor the three patients for a total of five years to evaluate the safety of etranacogene dezaparvovec.
In December 2018, the study’s Data Monitoring Committee evaluated initial data from the Phase IIb study and confirmed the dose of 2x10 13 gc/kg for the Phase III pivotal trial.
−Removed: In February, May, July and December 2019, we presented updated data from the Phase IIb dose-confirmation study of etranacogene dezaparvovec.
−Removed: The most recent data that we announced from the Phase IIb study of etranacogene dezaparvovec show that all three patients experienced increasing and sustained FIX levels after a one-time administration of etranacogene dezaparvovec, with two of the three patients maintaining FIX activity in the normal range.
−Removed: Mean FIX activity was 41% of normal at 52 weeks of follow-up, exceeding threshold FIX levels generally considered sufficient to significantly reduce the risk of bleeding events.
+Added: In February, May, July, and December 2019, and in December 2020, we presented updated data from the Phase IIb dose-confirmation study of etranacogene dezaparvovec.
+Added: The most recent data that we announced in December 2020 from the Phase IIb study of etranacogene dezaparvovec show that all three patients experienced increasing and sustained FIX levels after a one-time administration of etranacogene dezaparvovec.
+Added: Mean FIX activity was 44.2% of normal two years after administration, exceeding threshold FIX levels generally considered sufficient to significantly reduce the risk of bleeding events.
The first patient achieved FIX activity of 44.7% of normal, the second patient was 51.6% of normal and the third patient was 36.3% of normal.
The second and third patients had previously screen-failed and were excluded from another gene therapy study due to pre-existing neutralizing antibodies to a different AAV vector.
−Removed: Based on the data obtained through October 24, 2019, no patient experienced a material loss of FIX activity, reported any bleeding events or required any infusions of FIX replacement therapy for bleeds.
−Removed: One patient underwent hip surgery due to a pre-existing condition and was treated perioperatively with short-acting factor replacement.
−Removed: This was reported by the investigator as a serious adverse event unrelated to etranacogene dezaparvovec.
+Added: At two years after dosing, two of the three participants remain free from bleeds and use of FIX replacement therapy.
+Added: A single bleed has been reported in one participant, who has used a total of two FIX infusions (excluding surgery).
+Added: All patients have remained free of prophylaxis in the two years since receiving etranacogene dezaparvovec.
Intellectual Property for etranacogene dezaparvovec
13 unchanged sentences
patents, on February 20, 2018, the Canadian Intellectual Property Office granted Patent Number 2,737,094, which covers FIX-Padua nucleic acids for use in gene therapy and FIX-Padua polypeptides for use in FIX replacement therapy.
−Removed: On June 13, 2018, we were granted European Patent 2337849 B1 directed to a FIX polypeptide protein.
+Added: On June 13, 2018, we were granted European Patent 2337849 directed to a FIX polypeptide protein.
The opposition period with respect to such patent expired on March 13, 2019, by which time five parties had filed an opposition.
−Removed: On July 25, 2019, we submitted responses to such oppositions with the European Patent Office, or EPO, and oral proceedings with respect to such oppositions will take place in June and July 2020.
+Added: On July 25, 2019, we submitted responses to such oppositions with the European Patent Office (“EPO”).
+Added: Oral proceedings were scheduled for June and July 2020 but were postponed due to COVID-19.
+Added: New dates for virtual oral proceedings have been set for May 2021.
In addition, on May 15, 2019, a divisional European patent application in the FIX-Padua family, EP 3252157, was refused.
3 unchanged sentences
and in Europe, we have pending divisional applications still in prosecution phases.
+Added: The appeal process has been delayed as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, and we do not currently know when the appeal is likely to be resolved.
+Added: On January 4, 2020, a petition seeking Inter Partes Review of U.S.
+Added: 9,249,405 (the “’405 Patent”) was filed by Pfizer, Inc.
+Added: (the “IPR Proceeding”).
+Added: The petition sought to invalidate claims 6 and 9-15 of the ‘405 Patent.
+Added: On April 17, 2020, we filed our preliminary response to the petition, disclaiming claims 6 and 9-13 of the ‘405 patent and otherwise requesting the denial of the petition.
+Added: On July 13, 2020, the United States Patent and Trademark Office issued its decision to institute the Inter Partes Review.
+Added: On October 13, 2020, we filed a motion to amend the patent claims at issue in the proceeding.
+Added: On January 13, 2021, Pfizer filed a brief in opposition to our motion to amend the claims.
+Added: On February 3, 2021 the Patent Appeals Board of the USPTO (the “PTAB”) provided its preliminary guidance with respect to the proposed amended claims, which stated among other things that the proposed amended claims were not anticipated but were obvious in light of the cited prior art.
+Added: On February 16, 2021 and in response to the preliminary guidance, we moved to dismiss our motion to amend the claims before the PTAB and requested an adverse judgement in the IPR Proceeding.
+Added: As a result, we expect to maintain the currently issued and unchallenged claims of the ‘405 Patent and pursue additional claims based on our proposed amended claims in continuation applications before the USPTO.
Phase I/II Clinical Trial of AMT-060
3 unchanged sentences
The study is a five-year, open-label, uncontrolled, single-dose, dose-ascending multi-center trial that includes two cohorts, with the low-dose cohort using a treatment of 5x10 12 gc/kg and the second-dose cohort using 2x10 13 gc/kg.
−Removed: We enrolled five patients into the low dose cohort in the third quarter 2015.
+Added: We enrolled five patients into the low dose cohort in the third quarter of 2015.
Another five patients were enrolled into the high dose cohort between March and May 2016.
−Removed: In December 2019, we presented four-year follow-up data related to this Phase I/II clinical trial.
−Removed: All 10 patients enrolled continue to show long-term meaningful clinical impact, including sustained increases in FIX activity and improvements in their disease state as measured by reduced usage of FIX replacement therapy and decreased bleeding frequency.
−Removed: At up to four years of follow-up, AMT-060 continues to be generally well-tolerated, with no new serious adverse events and no development of inhibitors since the last reported data.
−Removed: All five patients in the high-dose cohort of 2x10 13 gc/kg continue to be free of routine FIX replacement therapy at up to three and a half years after treatment.
−Removed: Based on the six months of data collected during the fourth year of follow-up, the mean annualized bleeding rate was zero compared to an average of four bleeds during the year prior to treatment, representing a 100% reduction.
−Removed: Steadystate mean yearly FIX activity at three and a half years was 7.5%, compared with 7.1% in the first, 8.4% in the second and 7.9% in the third year.
−Removed: Hemophilia A program (AMT-180)
−Removed: Hemophilia A Disease and Market Background
−Removed: Hemophilia A, also called factor VIII (“FVIII”) deficiency or classic hemophilia, is a genetic disorder caused by missing or defective factor VIII, a clotting protein.
−Removed: Although it is passed down from parents to children, about 1/3 of cases are caused by a spontaneous mutation, or change, in a gene.
−Removed: More than half of the patients have the severe form of hemophilia A.
−Removed: Patients with severe hemophilia A experience bleeding following an injury and may have frequent spontaneous bleeding episodes, often into their joints and muscles.
−Removed: Hemophilia A occurs in approximately one in 5,000 live births.
−Removed: Approximately 30% of patients with severe hemophilia A will develop an inhibitor that neutralizes the infused FVIII activity.
−Removed: Historically, this patient population has been underserved due to past exclusion from gene therapy research in clinical development.
−Removed: Our Development of AMT-180 for Hemophilia A
−Removed: AMT-180 is a novel hemophilia A gene therapy that we believe has the potential to treat all hemophilia A patients including those with past and current inhibitors.
−Removed: AMT-180 is a one-time, intravenously-administered, AAV5-based gene therapy incorporating a proprietary, exclusively licensed, modified FIX gene, FIX-FIAV, that has been demonstrated in preclinical studies to convey Factor VIII-independent activity and circumvent inhibitors to Factor VIII.
−Removed: Preclinical studies in wild-type and hemophilia A mice indicated that administration of FIX-FIAV resulted in FVIII-independent activity and was not associated with hypercoagulability.
−Removed: A separate study in non-human primates indicated that a single dose of AMT-180 resulted in expression levels that translate into FVIII-independent activity.
−Removed: In addition, FIX-FIAV induced thrombin activation in FVIII-depleted human plasma with or without inhibitors.
−Removed: These data indicate that AMT-180 may lead to durable expression in hemophilia A patients and may provide long-term prevention of bleeds.
−Removed: In May 2019, we presented preclinical data at the American Society of Gene and Cell Therapy (“ASGCT”) Annual Meeting demonstrating that AMT-180 induced thrombin activation, and up to 29% of Factor VIII-independent activity, in FVIII-depleted human plasma.
−Removed: In these studies, a single intravenous administration of AMT-180 resulted in sustained, dose-dependent hemostatic effect as measured by one-stage clotting assay.
−Removed: Further, AMT-180 demonstrated activation kinetics similar to native FIX and was not hyperactive.
−Removed: In a pilot study in non-human primates we demonstrated that administration of AMT-180 resulted in sufficient FIX protein expression that could be translated to Factor VIII-independent activity in humans.
−Removed: No elevation of coagulation activation markers or signs of thrombi formation were observed.
−Removed: We are currently conducting safety and toxicology studies of AMT-180 to support the submission of a clinical trial application.
+Added: In December 2020, we presented five-year follow-up data related to this Phase I/II clinical trial.
+Added: All 10 patients enrolled continue to show long-term clinical benefit, including sustained increases in FIX activity, reduced usage of FIX replacement therapy, and decreased bleeding frequency.
+Added: At up to five years of follow-up, AMT-060 continues to be well-tolerated, with no new treatment-related adverse events since the last reported data and no development of inhibitors during the study.
+Added: All five patients in the second dose cohort of 2x10 13 gc/kg (the same dose being studied in the Phase III HOPE-B study of etranacogene dezaparvovec) continue to be free of routine FIX replacement therapy at four-and-a-half years after treatment.
+Added: Based on the six months of data collected during the fifth year of follow-up, the mean annualized bleeding rate was zero compared to an average of four bleeds during the year prior to treatment, representing a 100% reduction.
+Added: During this same period, the usage of FIX replacement therapy declined to zero compared to 354,800 IU in the year prior to treatment, representing a 100% reduction.
+Added: Mean FIX activity over 4.5 years was 7.4% (compared to 7.5% at three and a half years, 7.9% in the third year, 8.4% in the second year and 7.1% in the first year), while in the lower dose cohort, mean FIX activity was 5.2% over 5 years since treatment.
Fabry disease program (AMT-190)
18 unchanged sentences
Our Development of AMT-190 for Fabry Disease
−Removed: AMT-190 is a one-time, IV-administered, AAV5-based gene therapy designed to circumvent GLA antibodies that can inhibit efficacy in Fabry patients.
−Removed: AMT-190 incorporates a proprietary, exclusively licensed, modified NAGA (“ModNAGA”) variant.
−Removed: ModNAGA may have several advantages over other therapies for Fabry disease, including higher stability in blood, circumvention of inhibitors, better biodistribution in the target organs, secondary toxic metabolite reduction and improved cross-correction of neighboring cells.
−Removed: As such, AMT-190 has the potential to be a more effective, longer-term treatment of Fabry disease.
−Removed: In cultured cells and in a study in wild-type mice, AMT-190 resulted in significant increases in GLA activity.
−Removed: In a preclinical study, Fabry mice were injected with a single dose of AMT-190, resulting in ModNAGA expression with subsequent GLA-activity in plasma.
−Removed: We believe that these studies may demonstrate proof-of-concept of AMT-190 as a gene therapy candidate for Fabry disease.
−Removed: At the ASGCT Annual Meeting in May 2019, we presented data from in vitro and in vivo studies showing that AMT-190 has the potential to become a one-time treatment option that could be an improvement upon the enzyme replacement standard of care with more efficient uptake in the kidney and heart and an improved immunogenicity profile.
−Removed: In particular, data from a study in wild-type mice showed a single intravenous administration of AMT-190 resulted in a ten- to twenty-fold higher GLA activity in the plasma compared to the control group.
−Removed: Additionally, in a study in a diseased mouse model, GLA activity was significantly increased in plasma, and lyso-Gb3 was significantly reduced in target organs after a single dose of AMT-190.
−Removed: In silico and in vitro studies also showed that the modifications introduced into NAGA are believed to pose a very low immunogenicity risk.
+Added: In September 2020, we selected a lead gene therapy candidate (AMT-190) for the treatment of Fabry disease to advance into IND-enabling studies.
+Added: The lead candidate is a one-time administered AAV5 gene therapy incorporating the GLA transgene.
+Added: In preclinical studies comparing multiple product candidates, including constructs incorporating a modified alpha-N-acetylgalactosaminidase transgene (modNAGA), AMT-190 demonstrated the most robust and sustained increases in GLA activity.
+Added: Hemophilia A program (AMT-180)
+Added: In June 2020, we announced that we plan to de-prioritize our research program of AMT-180 for patients with hemophilia A, as part of our effort to focus on those gene therapy programs that have the greatest potential to improve patients’ lives and generate long-term value for shareholders.
Central Nervous System diseases
9 unchanged sentences
Our Development of AMT-130 for Huntington’s Disease
−Removed: AMT-130 is our gene therapy candidate targeting Huntington’s disease that utilizes an AAV vector carrying an engineered miRNA designed to silence HTT and exon 1 HTT, a potentially highly toxic protein fragment that may also contribute to disease pathology.
−Removed: AMT-130 comprises a recombinant AAV5 vector carrying a DNA cassette, encoding a miRNA that non-selectively lowers or knocks-down HTT and exon 1 HTT in Huntington’s disease patients.
+Added: AMT-130 is our gene therapy candidate targeting Huntington’s disease that utilizes an AAV vector carrying an engineered micro ribonucleic acid (“miRNA”) designed to silence HTT and exon 1 HTT, a potentially highly toxic protein fragment that may also contribute to disease pathology.
+Added: AMT-130 comprises a recombinant AAV5 vector carrying a deoxyribonucleic acid (“DNA”) cassette, encoding a miRNA that non-selectively lowers or knocks-down HTT and exon 1 HTT in Huntington’s disease patients.
AMT-130 was developed using our miQURE technology, a proprietary, one-time administered gene silencing platform.
5 unchanged sentences
(3) Safe, on-target and durable knockdown of HTT and exon 1 HTT.
−Removed: In April 2017, we presented preclinical data on AMT-130 in transgenic mini pigs.
−Removed: The data demonstrated widespread, dose-dependent distribution of the vector throughout the mini pig brain that corresponded strongly with the mutant HTT expression.
−Removed: Researchers also observed a dose-dependent reduction in mutant HTT protein levels, as well as similar trends in cerebral spinal fluid.
−Removed: There were no serious adverse events related to the surgical procedure or the AMT-130 treatment.
−Removed: In October 2017, we presented preclinical data on AMT-130 in a mouse model with a highly aggressive form of Huntington’s disease which demonstrated significant improvements in both motor-coordination and survival, as well as a dose-dependent, sustained reduction in HTT.
In April 2018, we presented an overview of preclinical data establishing proof-of-concept for AMT-130 at the 2018 American Academy of Neurology Annual Meeting in Los Angeles, California.
4 unchanged sentences
The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability and efficacy of AMT-130 at two doses.
−Removed: The cGMP clinical material has been manufactured in 2019 at our Lexington facility and has been released for shipment.
In February 2019, we presented new preclinical data at the 14 th Annual CHDI Huntington’s disease Therapeutics Conference that illustrate the therapeutic potential of AMT-130 in restoring function of damaged brain cells in Huntington’s disease.
In that study, AMT-130 was generally well-tolerated and resulted in a sustained reduction of mutant huntingtin protein.
+Added: In June 2020, we announced the completion of the first two patient procedures in the Phase I/II clinical trial of AMT-130 for the treatment of Huntington’s disease.
+Added: These procedures occurred after a postponement that resulted from the COVID-19 pandemic and the associated states of emergency declarations in the United States.
+Added: The Phase I/II protocol is a randomized, imitation surgery-controlled, double-blinded study conducted at three surgical sites, and multiple referring, non-surgical sites in the U.S.
+Added: The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of AMT-130 at two doses.
+Added: On September 25, 2020, we announced that the independent DSMB overseeing the Phase I/II clinical trial of AMT-130 for the treatment of Huntington’s disease had met and reviewed 90-day safety data from the first two patients enrolled in the trial.
+Added: No significant safety concerns were noted to prevent further dosing.
+Added: On October 13, 2020, we announced the completion of the third and fourth patient procedures in the Phase I/II clinical trial.
+Added: On February 8, 2021, we announced that the DSMB had met and reviewed the six-month safety data from the first two enrolled patients and the 90-day safety data from the next two enrolled patients in the study.
+Added: No significant safety concerns were noted to prevent further dosing, and the final six patients in the first cohort are now cleared for enrollment.
Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3 program
Spinocerebellar Ataxia type 3 and Market Background
−Removed: SCA3, also known as Machado-Joseph disease, is a central nervous system disorder caused by a CAG-repeat expansion in the ATXN3 gene that results in an abnormal form of the protein ataxin-3.
+Added: Spinocerebellar Ataxia type 3 (“SCA3”), also known as Machado-Joseph disease, is a central nervous system disorder caused by a cytosine-adenine-guanine (“CAG”)-repeat expansion in the ATXN3 gene that results in an abnormal form of the protein ataxin-3.
Patients with SCA3 experience brain degeneration that results in movement disorders, rigidity, muscular atrophy, and paralysis.
1 unchanged sentence
Prevalence of SCA3 is estimated to be one to two per 100,000 with significant geographical and ethnic variations, with the highest prevalence rates observed in the Azores (Flores Island (1/239)), the intermediate prevalence rates observed in Portugal, Germany, the Netherlands, China and Japan, and the lower prevalence observed in North America, Australia, and India.
−Removed: SCA3 is the most common form of ADCA1 in most genetically characterized populations.
−Removed: Our preclinical SCA3 program
+Added: SCA3 is the most common form of autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia (“ADCA”) type 1 in most genetically characterized populations.
+Added: Our preclinical SCA3 program (AMT-150)
AMT-150 is a one-time, intrathecally-administered, AAV gene therapy incorporating our proprietary miQURE silencing technology that is designed to halt ataxia in early manifest SCA3 patients.
1 unchanged sentence
We also performed a proof-of-concept in-life study in SCA3 mice demonstrating that AMT-150 was able to lower toxic ataxin-3 protein by up to 53% in the cerebellum and up to 65% in the brain stem after a single administration.
−Removed: Further studies in non-human primates demonstrate the ability to distribute and express a reporter gene in the most degenerated brain regions in SCA3.
+Added: Further studies in non-human primates (“NHP”) demonstrate the ability to distribute and express a reporter gene in the most degenerated brain regions in SCA3.
In these preclinical studies, a single administration of AMT-150 resulted in sustained expression and efficient processing with on-target engagement.
Additionally, AMT-150 lacked off-target activity in these studies.
−Removed: We are currently preparing to initiate safety and toxicology studies of AMT-150 to support the submission of an IND application.
−Removed: Bristol-Myers Squibb Collaboration
−Removed: In May 2015, we entered into a collaboration and license agreement and various related agreements with Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (“BMS”), that provided BMS with exclusive access to our gene therapy technology platform for the research, development and commercialization of therapeutics aimed at multiple targets in cardiovascular and other diseases.
−Removed: The collaboration agreement provides that we may collaborate on up to ten collaboration targets in total.
−Removed: BMS has currently designated four collaboration targets.
−Removed: We agreed to certain restrictions on our ability to work independently of the collaboration, either directly or indirectly through any affiliate or third party, on certain programs that would be competitive with the collaboration programs.
−Removed: For any collaboration targets that are advanced to clinical development, we would be responsible for manufacturing of clinical and commercial supplies.
−Removed: BMS has been reimbursing us for our research and development costs in support of the collaboration during the initial research term and would lead development, regulatory and commercial activities for any collaboration targets that may be advanced.
−Removed: During the initial four-year research term, we supported BMS in discovery, non-clinical, analytical and process development efforts in respect of the designated collaboration targets.
−Removed: In February 2019, BMS requested a one-year extension of the research term.
−Removed: In April 2019, following an assessment of the progress of this collaboration and our expanding proprietary programs, we notified BMS that we did not intend to agree to an extension of the research term, but rather we preferred to restructure the collaboration to reduce or eliminate certain of our obligations under it.
−Removed: Accordingly, the research term under the collaboration terminated on May 21, 2019, and we are currently in discussions with BMS potentially to restructure the collaboration and license agreement and other related agreements following the expiration of the research term.
−Removed: Although such discussions are ongoing and may not result in any amendment to these arrangements, we believe that the final resolution of these discussions may result in material changes to our collaboration with BMS.
−Removed: Equity arrangements
−Removed: After entering into the collaboration in 2015, BMS acquired 2.4 million or 9.9% of our outstanding shares following the issuance for aggregate consideration of $75.5 million.
−Removed: As of December 31, 2019, BMS held 5.5% of our outstanding ordinary shares.
−Removed: We also granted BMS two warrants.
−Removed: BMS may at its option acquire, at a premium to the market, an additional number of shares such that BMS owns 14.9% and 19.9%, respectively, of our outstanding ordinary shares immediately after such purchase.
−Removed: The exercise of each warrant is conditioned upon the designation of a specified number of additional collaboration targets and payment of related fees by BMS, as well as a minimum number of collaboration programs under development.
−Removed: As of December 31, 2019, BMS had designated a total of four Collaboration Targets, and as such, the warrants were not exercisable.
−Removed: We also entered into an Investor Agreement with BMS regarding the rights and restrictions relating to the ordinary shares to be acquired by BMS.
−Removed: We have granted BMS certain registration rights that allow BMS to require us to register our securities beneficially held by BMS under the Exchange Act.
−Removed: BMS may make up to two such demands (or three, in the event that either warrant is exercised) for us to register the shares, provided that we may deny such demand if (i) the market value of the shares to be registered is less than $10 million (provided however, if BMS holds less than $10 million worth of our shares, we must comply with their demand for registration), (ii) we certify to BMS that we plan to effect a registration within 120 days of their demand or we are engaged in a transaction that would be required to be disclosed in a registration statement and that is not reasonably practicable to be disclosed at that time, or (iii) we have already effected one registration statement within the twelve months preceding BMS’s demand for registration.
−Removed: In addition, independent of their demand registration rights, upon the occurrence of certain events, we must also provide BMS the opportunity to include their shares in any registration statement that we effect.
−Removed: We also granted BMS certain information rights under the Investor Agreement, although these requirements may be satisfied by our public filings required by U.S.
−Removed: securities laws.
−Removed: Pursuant to the Investor Agreement, without our consent, BMS may not (i) acquire a number of shares such that the number of shares that BMS beneficially holds is greater than the percentage acquired, or which may be acquired, after giving effect to each of the tranches under the Share Subscription Agreement and the two warrants;
−Removed: (ii) propose, offer or participate in any effort to acquire us or one of our subsidiaries;
−Removed: (iii) propose, offer or participate in a tender offer for our shares or any exchange of shares that would effect a change of control of our company;
−Removed: (iv) seek to control or influence our governance or policies;
−Removed: (v) join or participate in any group regarding the voting of our ordinary shares;
−Removed: or (vi) take certain other similar actions.
−Removed: BMS may still, among other things, make a non-public, confidential proposal to enter into a business combination or similar transaction with our company.
−Removed: These standstill restrictions will terminate upon the occurrence of certain events including, but not limited to, the acquisition of a certain material number of shares by a third party, if we enter into a merger agreement or similar transaction with a third party, or upon the passage of a defined period of time subsequent to the acquisition of shares pursuant to the Share Subscription Agreement or the warrants.
−Removed: BMS is also subject to a lock-up pursuant to the Investor Agreement.
−Removed: Without our prior consent, BMS may not sell or dispose of its shares in respect of each ordinary share acquired pursuant to the Share Subscription Agreement and the warrants, until the first anniversary of issuance of each such ordinary shares.
−Removed: However, this lock-up may terminate sooner or its terms could change in the event the Collaboration Agreement is terminated or amended.
−Removed: The Investor Agreement also requires BMS to vote all of our ordinary shares it beneficially holds in favor of all items on the agenda for the relevant general meeting of shareholders of our company as proposed on behalf of our company, unless, in the context of a change of control or similar transaction, BMS has itself made an offer to our company or our board in connection with the transaction that is the subject of the vote, in which case it is free to vote its shares at its discretion.
−Removed: This voting provision will terminate upon the later of the date on which BMS no longer beneficially owns at least 4.9% of our outstanding ordinary shares, the closing of a transaction that provides BMS exclusive and absolute discretion to vote our shares it beneficially holds, or the termination of the Collaboration Agreement for breach by us.
+Added: At the 2019 American Academy of Neurology Annual Meeting, we presented preclinical data on AMT-150 demonstrating mechanistic proof-of-concept of the non-allele-specific ataxin-3 protein-silencing approach by using artificial miRNA candidates engineered to target the ataxin-3 gene in a SCA3 knock-in mouse model.
+Added: In this proof-of-concept study, a single AMT-150 injection in the cerebrospinal fluid resulted in AAV transduction and mutant ataxin-3 lowering at the primary sites of disease neuropathology, the cerebellum (up to 53%) and the brainstem (up to 65%).
+Added: In May 2020, we presented preclinical data at the American Society of Gene and Cell Therapy (“ASGCT”) Annual Meeting, on our gene therapy candidate SCA3.
+Added: In an in vivo preclinical study, six NHP received a one-time injection of AMT-150 via the cisterna magna to assess expression and distribution.
+Added: Samples taken after eight weeks showed widespread transduction of the brain and spinal cord, with the highest genome copies found in the posterior fossa and cortical regions.
+Added: In other preclinical studies, researchers evaluated AMT-150 in SCA3 mouse models, as well as human induced pluripotent stem cell (“iPSC”)-derived neurons and astrocytes, to investigate potential off-target effects of AAV5-micro ataxin type 3 (“miATXN3”).
+Added: The iPSC-derived cell cultures, which were derived from two SCA3 patients, represent the most disease-relevant cell type for therapeutic targeting of AMT-150.
+Added: A clear dose-dependent expression of miATXN3 was observed in the iPSC-derived neurons and astrocytes transduced with AMT-150.
+Added: Mature miATXN3 molecules were also associated with extracellular vesicles that strongly correlated with the dose and miATXN3 expression, suggesting the potential therapeutic spread of the engineered miATXN3.
+Added: Additionally, AMT-150 demonstrated ATXN3 knockdown in human neurons and various SCA3 mouse models with subsequent neuropathology improvement.
+Added: In September 2020, we initiated a safety and toxicology study of AMT-150 in NHP.
New Technology Development
8 unchanged sentences
We believe we have significant expertise in vector engineering and have created promising genetically engineered capsids using a “rational design” approach.
−Removed: Multiple capsid engineering projects are currently ongoing including directed evolution with 4D Molecular Therapeutics (“4DMT”) for improved tissue-specific targeted transduction of AAV.
−Removed: Briefly, identification of next generation capsids via “directed evolution” involves a capsid selection process in which libraries of mutant variants are screened for optimal properties.
−Removed: In January 2014, we entered into a collaboration and license agreement with 4DMT for the discovery and optimization of next-generation AAV capsids targeting the liver and the brain, which we amended and restated (the “Amended and Restated CLA”) in August 2019.
−Removed: In connection with the execution of the Amended and Restated CLA we entered into a separate Collaboration and License Agreement (“New CLA”) with 4DMT.
−Removed: Pursuant to the terms of the Amended and Restated CLA, we received from 4DMT an exclusive sublicensable, worldwide license under certain 4DMT intellectual property rights to research, develop, make, use and commercialize previously selected AAV capsid variants and certain associated products using 4DMT proprietary AAV technology for delivery of gene therapy constructs to cells in the central nervous system and the liver (“the Field”).
−Removed: In accordance with the New CLA, the parties agreed to research and develop, at 4DMT’s cost, new AAV capsid variants using 4DMT proprietary AAV technology for delivery of up to six additional transgene constructs in the Field that will be selected by us.
In addition to the directed evolution approach where we screen a library of AAV mutants, we are also rationally engineering the AAV capsids to target them to specific cells and/or tissues.
4 unchanged sentences
Synthetic promoters, which do not exist in nature, are optimally tailored to drive gene expression at a desired level and specificity.
−Removed: In January 2015, we entered into an agreement with Synpromics Limited (“Synpromics”), a United Kingdom-based biotechnology company, to jointly fund research relating to the development of optimized promoters for liver-directed gene therapies.
−Removed: This resulted in an array of liver-specific promoters proprietary to uniQure and one such promoter from the Synpromics collaboration is being utilized in our AMT-180 program for the treatment of hemophilia A.
−Removed: In October 2018, we presented non-clinical data demonstrating that this optimized promoter is capable of generating up to a 40-fold increase in expression compared to a reference promoter.
−Removed: The new promoters may enable us to tailor expression levels required for a specific therapeutic transgene.
−Removed: In order to further tailor gene therapies to optimally address certain disorders we may also incorporate specific modifications into the transgenes of our gene therapy constructs.
−Removed: For example, we incorporated the Padua-FIX variant into our hemophilia B gene therapy in order to substantially increase the resulting FIX activity and potentially improve clinical outcomes.
−Removed: For other programs, such as our gene therapy constructs for hemophilia A and Fabry disease, we have also utilized modified transgenes with the goal of enhancing efficacy, durability and safety, as well as expanding the access of gene therapies to patients with inhibitors.
+Added: To further tailor gene therapies to optimally address certain disorders we may also incorporate specific modifications into the transgenes of our gene therapy constructs.
+Added: For example, we incorporated the Padua-FIX variant into our hemophilia B gene therapy to substantially increase the resulting FIX activity and potentially improve clinical outcomes.
+Added: For other programs, such as our gene therapy construct for Fabry disease, we have also utilized modified transgenes with the goal of enhancing efficacy, durability, and safety, as well as expanding the access of gene therapies to patients with inhibitors.
We have also demonstrated the ability to deliver engineered DNA constructs that can silence or suppress disease-causing genes.
−Removed: Our miQURE ™ gene silencing platform, based on exclusively licensed technology from CSHL, is designed to degrade mutated genes without off-target toxicity and induce silencing of the mutated gene in the entire target organ through secondary exosome-mediated delivery.
+Added: Our miQURE gene silencing platform, based on exclusively licensed technology from Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (“CSHL”), is designed to degrade mutated genes without off-target toxicity and induce silencing of the mutated gene in the entire target organ through secondary exosome-mediated delivery.
miQURE-based gene therapy candidates, such as AMT-130, incorporate proprietary, therapeutic miRNA constructs that can be delivered using AAVs to potentially provide long-lasting activity.
2 unchanged sentences
The ability to reliably produce at a high quality and at commercial scale is a critical success factor in AAV gene therapy.
−Removed: We produce our gene therapies using patent-protected, insect cell-based, baculovirus AAV production systems.
+Added: We produce our gene therapies at our state-of-the-art, Lexington, Massachusetts-based manufacturing facility using a proprietary baculovirus expression vector system.
We believe our integrated manufacturing capabilities provide us several potential advantages, including:
+Added: (1) Know-how.
Since our founding in 1998, we have invested heavily in developing optimized processes and methods to reliably and reproducibly manufacture AAV-based gene therapies at commercial scale.
During this time, we have accumulated significant internal experience and knowledge of the underlying production technology and critical quality attributes of our products.
−Removed: These learnings have been essential in developing a modular, third generation production system that can be used to produce all of our gene therapy products.
+Added: These learnings have been essential in developing a modular, third generation production system that can be used to produce all our gene therapy products.
(2) Flexibility.
1 unchanged sentence
By controlling our manufacturing, we do not rely on contract manufacturers, nor do we require costly and time-consuming technology transfers to third parties.
−Removed: Our facilities are designed to commercially supply multiple products and are flexibly designed to accommodate expansion and scale up as our needs change.
+Added: Our facility is designed to commercially supply multiple products and are flexibly designed to accommodate expansion and scale up as our needs change.
(3) Faster Path to Market.
9 unchanged sentences
Additionally, our production system does not require the use of plasmids, which can be a costly raw material.
−Removed: In October 2018, we presented new data demonstrating the ability to manufacture gene therapies using a 500-liter single-use, stirred tank reactor that has the potential to significantly increase manufacturing capacity and enhance scalability.
−Removed: We produce our AAV-based gene therapies in our state-of-the-art, Lexington-based manufacturing facility using a proprietary baculovirus expression vector system.
Intellectual Property
7 unchanged sentences
We anticipate that we will require additional licenses in the future.
−Removed: Because most patent applications throughout the world are confidential for 18 months after the earliest claimed priority date, and since the publication of discoveries in the scientific and patent literature often lags behind actual discoveries, we cannot be certain that we were the first to invent or file applications for the inventions covered by our pending patent applications.
+Added: Because most patent applications throughout the world are confidential for 18 months after the earliest claimed priority date, and since the publication of discoveries in the scientific and patent literature often lags actual discoveries, we cannot be certain that we were the first to invent or file applications for the inventions covered by our pending patent applications.
Moreover, we may have to participate in post-grant proceedings in the patent offices of the United States or foreign jurisdictions, such as oppositions, reexaminations, or interferences, in which the patentability or priority of our inventions are challenged.
9 unchanged sentences
We also may seek, usually on a case-by-case basis, local patent protection in Canada, Australia, Japan, China, India, Israel, South Africa, New Zealand, South Korea, and Eurasia, as well as South American jurisdictions such as Brazil and Mexico.
−Removed: As of December 31, 2019, our intellectual property portfolio included the following rights:
−Removed: ● 28 patent families that we own;
−Removed: ● 7 patent families that we exclusively in-license;
−Removed: ● 1 patent family that we non-exclusively in-license.
−Removed: As of December 31, 2019, the geographic breakdown of our owned and exclusively in-licensed patent portfolio was as follows:
+Added: As of December 31, 2020, our intellectual property portfolio included 99 issued or granted patents and 121 pending patent applications.
+Added: The geographic breakdown of our owned and exclusively in-licensed patent portfolio was as follows:
● 26 issued U.S.
5 unchanged sentences
● 83 pending and 60 granted patent applications in other jurisdictions.
−Removed: The patent portfolios for our manufacturing, administration and technology platform and for our most advanced programs are summarized below.
−Removed: Our Manufacturing and Technology Platform Patent Portfolios
−Removed: We own a patent family directed to large scale production of AAV vectors in insect cells relating to first-generation technology that we developed for improvement of manufacturing in insect cells.
−Removed: The family includes issued patents in the United States, Europe, Japan and other jurisdictions and pending applications in the United States and other jurisdictions.
−Removed: The standard 20-year term for patents in this family will expire in 2027.
−Removed: Furthermore, we own patent families directed to improving AAV vectors and covering AAV vectors manufactured at large scale relating to our second-generation technology.
−Removed: One patent family includes issued patents in the United States, Europe, Japan, Australia, China and other jurisdictions and pending applications in the United States, Europe and other jurisdictions.
−Removed: The standard 20-year term for patents in this family will expire in 2028.
−Removed: Another patent family contains issued patents in the United States and pending patents in the United States and Europe.
−Removed: The standard 20-year term for patents in this family will expire in 2031.
−Removed: We also have a patent family relating to our third-generation technology for improved manufacturing.
−Removed: The patent family contains issued patents in the United States and Europe and other jurisdictions, and has patents pending in Europe and other jurisdictions.
−Removed: The standard 20-year term for patents in this family will expire in 2029.
−Removed: We own patent families directed to improved AAV manufacturing with regard to capsid protein expression.
−Removed: One such patent family includes issued patents issued in the United States, Europe, and other jurisdictions.
−Removed: The standard 20-year term for patents in this family will expire in 2026.
−Removed: Another such patent family contains pending patent applications in the United States, Europe and other jurisdictions.
−Removed: The standard 20-year term for patents in this family will expire in 2035.
−Removed: A third such patent family includes a PCT application that we filed in 2018 directed to large scale production of parvoviral particles in insect cells.
−Removed: The standard 20-year term for patents in this family, if issued, will expire in 2038.
−Removed: We own a patent family directed to a proprietary baculovirus removal process that contributes to developing regulatory-compliant AAV vector products.
−Removed: This family contains granted patents in the United States, Europe, Japan, China, and other jurisdictions.
−Removed: The standard 20-year term for patents in this family, if issued, will expire in 2032.
−Removed: We own a patent family directed to the analysis of manufactured AAV product.
−Removed: This patent family has been granted a patent in Europe and contains patent applications pending in the United States, Europe and other jurisdictions.
−Removed: The standard 20-year term for patents in this family, if issued, will expire in 2035.
−Removed: We own a patent family directed to AAV5 administration technology through intrathecal delivery routes.
−Removed: This family includes patent applications in the US, Europe and other jurisdictions.
−Removed: The standard 20-year term of patents, if issued, in this family will expire in 2034.
−Removed: We own a patent family directed to AAV5 administration technology in patients utilizing an immunoadsorption procedure.
−Removed: This family includes a PCT-application and a concomitantly filed US patent application.
−Removed: The standard 20-year term of patents in this family, if issued, will expire in 2037.
−Removed: We own a patent family directed to AAV5 administration technology in patients combined with an intralipid infusion procedure.
−Removed: This family includes a PCT-application.
−Removed: The standard 20-year term of patents in this family, if issued, will expire in 2038.
−Removed: We own a patent family directed to the treatment of human patients that may be suspected to have neutralizing antibodies against the AAV5 or other AAV.
−Removed: The family includes a PCT-application.
−Removed: The standard 20-year-term of patents in this family, if issued, will expire in 2038.
−Removed: We own a patent family directed to AAV gene therapy vectors comprising liver-specific promoters.
−Removed: The standard 20-year term of patents in this family, if issued, will expire in 2039.
−Removed: The liver-specific promoters owned by us were identified under a co-operation and license agreement with Synpromics, pursuant to which development milestone payments and future single-digit royalties on net sales of a product commercialized in connection with such liver-specific promoters, if any, are payable to Synpromics.
−Removed: We own patent families directed to gene therapy involving miRNA, including the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases and the monitoring of the effects of such treatment.
−Removed: The standard 20-year term of patents in these families, if issued, will expire in 2039.
−Removed: Our Patent Portfolio Related to Development Programs
+Added: These patents relate to a variety of technologies including our product candidates that are in development and our manufacturing and technology platform.
+Added: Our Patent Portfolio Related to Certain Development Programs
+Added: Hemophilia B (AMT-061)
We own a patent family, including patents and patent applications, directed to the use of the Padua mutation in hFIX for gene therapy in etranacogene dezaparvovec.
5 unchanged sentences
The opposition period with respect to such patent expired on March 13, 2019, by which time five parties had filed an opposition.
−Removed: On July 25, 2019, we submitted responses to such oppositions with the EPO and oral proceedings with respect to such oppositions will take place in June and July 2020.
+Added: On July 25, 2019, we submitted responses to such oppositions with the EPO and oral proceedings with respect to such oppositions were scheduled for June and July 2020 but were postponed due to COVID-19.
+Added: New dates for virtual oral proceedings have been set for May 2021.
In addition, on May 15, 2019, a divisional European patent application in the FIX-Padua family, EP 3252157, was refused.
1 unchanged sentence
We are also pursuing a European divisional patent application that was filed on May 14, 2019.
−Removed: On January 4, 2020, a petition seeking Inter Partes Review of U.S.
−Removed: 9,249,405 (the “’405 Patent”) was filed by Pfizer, Inc.
−Removed: The petition seeks to invalidate claims 6 and 9-15 of the ‘405 Patent.
−Removed: We are in the process of responding to the petition.
−Removed: Huntington’s disease
+Added: Both in the U.S.
+Added: and in Europe, we have pending divisional applications still in prosecution phases.
+Added: The appeal process has been delayed as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, and we do not currently know when the appeal is likely to be resolved.
+Added: On November 5, 2019, the USPTO granted us a third patent, U.S.
+Added: Patent Number 10,465,180, which covers any AAV comprising a nucleic acid encoding a FIX-Padua protein, and promoter sequences, transcription termination and control elements.
+Added: The claims also cover FIX-Padua variants with at least 70% sequence identity to FIX-R338L.
+Added: On January 4, 2020, the IPR Proceeding was filed by Pfizer, Inc.
+Added: The petition sought to invalidate claims 6 and 9-15 of the ‘405 Patent.
+Added: On April 17, 2020, we filed our preliminary response to the petition, disclaiming claims 6 and 9-13 of the ‘405 patent and otherwise requesting the denial of the petition.
+Added: On July 13, 2020, the United States Patent and Trademark Office issued its decision to institute the Inter Partes Review.
+Added: On October 13, 2020, we filed a motion to amend the patent claims at issue in the proceeding.
+Added: On January 13, 2021, Pfizer filed its opposition to our motion to amend the claims.
+Added: On February 3, 2021 the PTAB provided its preliminary guidance with respect to the proposed amended claims, which stated among other things that the proposed amended claims were not anticipated but were obvious in light of the cited prior art.
+Added: On February 16, 2021 and in response to the preliminary guidance, we moved to dismiss our motion to amend the claims before the PTAB and requested an adverse judgement in the IPR Proceeding.
+Added: As a result, we expect to maintain the currently issued and unchallenged claims of the ‘405 Patent and pursue additional claims based on our proposed amended claims in continuation applications before the USPTO.
+Added: Huntington’s disease (AMT-130)
We own a patent family directed to gene therapy treatment of Huntington’s disease within AMT-130.
3 unchanged sentences
Patent 10,174,321 and European Patent EP 3237618 B1.
−Removed: The claims as granted cover the RNA constructs specifically designed to target exon1 and the embedding of these Huntington’s disease RNA sequences into the miR451 scaffold, which is exclusively licensed to us from Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (“CSHL”).
+Added: The claims as granted cover the RNA constructs specifically designed to target exon1 and the embedding of these Huntington’s disease RNA sequences into the miR451 scaffold, which is exclusively licensed to us from CSHL.
The claims also cover certain expression cassettes comprising the RNA constructs and the use of gene therapy vectors including AAV vectors encompassing the described expression cassettes.
In addition, this patent family has multiple pending family members, including pending applications in U.S.
−Removed: AMT-130 incorporates the Company’s proprietary miQURE™ gene silencing technology platform, which is designed to degrade disease-causing genes, without off-target toxicity, and induce silencing of the entire target organ through secondary exosome-mediated delivery.
+Added: AMT-130 incorporates our proprietary miQURE gene silencing technology platform, which is designed to degrade disease-causing genes, without off-target toxicity, and induce silencing of the entire target organ through secondary exosome-mediated delivery.
We have filed additional patent applications related to this technology generally and AMT-130, specifically which will potentially provide further patent protection for our Huntington’s disease clinical candidate AMT-130.
−Removed: Hemophilia A (AMT-180)
−Removed: We co-own a patent family directed to AAV-based gene therapies for treatment of hemophilia with DRK-Blutspendedienst Baden-Wuerttemberg-Hessen GmbH (“DRK”).
−Removed: Discussion on assignment and license are ongoing.
−Removed: Upon completion, this patent family would be assigned to us.
−Removed: In addition, two patent families currently owned by DRK-Blutspendedienst would also be assigned to us.
−Removed: SCA3 (AMT-150)
−Removed: We own a patent family directed to AAV-based gene therapies for treatment of SCA3.
−Removed: The standard 20-year term of patents in this family, if issued, will expire in 2039.
We have obtained exclusive or non-exclusive rights from third parties under a range of patents and other technology that we use in our product and development programs, as described below.
5 unchanged sentences
We are exploiting technology from third-party sources described below in more than one of our programs.
+Added: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
+Added: In 2015, we entered into a license agreement with CSHL in which CSHL granted to us an exclusive, sublicensable license to develop and commercialize certain of CSHL’s patented RNAi-related technology for use in connection with the treatment or prevention of Huntington’s disease.
+Added: The standard 20-year patent term for the licensed patents expires in 2031.
+Added: In 2018, we entered into an amendment of the license agreement with CSHL that expanded the license to include the diagnosis, treatment, or prevention of all CNS diseases in the Field, including but not limited to Huntington’s disease.
+Added: In addition, under the amended license agreement CSHL granted to us an exclusive license for a three-year term to develop and commercialize therapeutic products for the additional disease classifications in the Field of liver diseases, neuromuscular diseases, and cardiovascular diseases.
+Added: If we meet certain diligence milestones during the initial three-year development term, we may include exclusively additional disease classifications within the additional Fields on similar terms and conditions as the CNS diseases.
+Added: We are currently using the technology in our Huntington’s disease and SCA 3 programs.
+Added: Under this license agreement, annual fees, development milestone payments and future single-digit royalties on net sales of a licensed product are payable to CSHL.
+Added: Protein Sciences
+Added: In 2016, we revised our existing license contract with Protein Sciences Corporation for the use of its expresSF + insect cell line and associated technology for human therapeutic and prophylactic uses (except influenza) to provide us with a royalty free, perpetual right and license to the licensed technology in the field of AAV-based gene therapy.
+Added: Technology Used for Specific Development Programs
National Institutes of Health—AAV production
6 unchanged sentences
and an annual maintenance fee creditable against royalties.
−Removed: We do not have to pay royalties or milestone fees under this agreement if we have to pay royalties or milestone fees under our 2011 agreement with the NIH, described below, for the same product.
+Added: We do not have to pay royalties or milestone fees under this agreement if we must pay royalties or milestone fees under our 2011 agreement with the NIH, described below, for the same product.
Under the license agreement, we have agreed to meet benchmarks in our development efforts, including as to development events, clinical trials, and marketing approval, within specified timeframes.
5 unchanged sentences
Under this agreement, the NIH granted us an exclusive, worldwide license to patents relating to AAV5 for use in therapeutic products to be delivered to the brain or liver for treatment of human diseases originating in the brain or liver but excluding arthritis-related diseases, and a non-exclusive, worldwide license to patents relating to AAV5 for all other diseases.
+Added: The license technology under the patents of this license is also used in connection with the Huntington’s disease program.
We refer to the products licensed under this agreement as AAV5 products.
9 unchanged sentences
We may terminate this agreement for any reason, in any country or territory, subject to a specified notice period.
−Removed: Protein Sciences
−Removed: In 2016, we revised our existing license contract with Protein Sciences Corporation for the use of its expresSF + insect cell line and associated technology for human therapeutic and prophylactic uses (except influenza) to provide us with a royalty free, perpetual right and license to the licensed technology in the field of AAV-based gene therapy.
−Removed: Technology Used for Specific Development Programs
On April 17, 2017, we entered into an Assignment and License Agreement with Dr.
5 unchanged sentences
Simioni with an initial license fee and reimbursement of past expenses, as well as payments that may come due upon the achievement of certain milestone events related to the development of the Padua IP and may also include royalties on a percentage of certain revenues.
−Removed: We have granted a license back of the Padua IP to Dr.
+Added: We have granted a license of the Padua IP back to Dr.
Simioni for therapeutic or diagnostic use of a modified Factor IX protein (other than in connection with gene therapy) and any application for non-commercial research purposes.
19 unchanged sentences
We may terminate the agreement for convenience at any time subject to a specified notice period.
−Removed: Huntington’s disease and SCA3
−Removed: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
−Removed: In 2015, we entered into a license agreement with CSHL in which CSHL granted to us an exclusive, sublicensable license to develop and commercialize certain of CSHL’s patented RNAi-related technology for use in connection with the treatment or prevention of Huntington’s disease.
−Removed: The standard 20-year patent term for the licensed patents expires in 2031.
−Removed: In 2018, we entered into an amendment of the license agreement with CSHL that expanded the license to include the diagnosis, treatment or prevention of all CNS diseases in the Field, including but not limited to Huntington’s disease.
−Removed: In addition, under the amended license agreement CSHL granted to us an exclusive license for a three-year term to develop and commercialize therapeutic products for the additional disease classifications in the Field of liver diseases, neuromuscular diseases and cardiovascular diseases.
−Removed: If we meet certain diligence milestones during the initial three-year development term, we may include exclusively additional disease classifications within the additional Fields on similar terms and conditions as the CNS diseases.
−Removed: Under this license agreement, annual fees, development milestone payments and future single-digit royalties on net sales of a licensed product are payable to CSHL.
−Removed: DRK Blutspendedienst
−Removed: In 2018, we entered into a research and option agreement with DRK.
−Removed: Under the agreement, we received an option to exclusively license from DRK patents and other intellectual property in the area of FIX variants potentially useful in treating Hemophilia A and Hemophilia B, and the parties agreed to undertake a research plan to allow us to evaluate whether we desire to exercise the option.
−Removed: The option was exercised in 2019.
−Removed: The associated Assignment and License Agreement (ALA) will, if executed, give us a worldwide exclusive, sublicensable license to develop and commercialize under the DRK patents FIX-variants for the treatment of Hemophilia by gene therapy.
−Removed: We are currently finalizing discussion on execution of the ALA.
−Removed: The standard 20-year patent terms for the patents and patent applications that are the subject of this research and option agreement will expire in 2029 and 2034 respectively.
−Removed: Under the proposed terms of the ALA, we would pay an option fee, milestone payments when certain development milestones are achieved, and a single-digit royalty on net sales of products commercialized under the DRK patents.
−Removed: If we do not meet certain development milestones in either field of hemophilia A or hemophilia B, we could lose our license to the DRK intellectual property in that field.
−Removed: We are currently negotiating with DRK the terms of a proposal to apportion the rights to intellectual property that was created during the term of the research and option agreement, which may affect the final terms of the ALA.
−Removed: Fabry’s disease
−Removed: Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science (“TMIMS”)
−Removed: In 2018, we entered into a license agreement with TMIMS.
−Removed: Under the agreement, TMIMS granted us an exclusive, sublicensable license to develop and commercialize certain TMIM’s patented modified alpha-N-acetylgalactoaminidases for the treatment of Fabry by gene therapy.
−Removed: The standard 20-year patent term for the patent families which are the subject of this license agreement expire in 2026 and 2028.
−Removed: Under the terms of the license agreement we will pay development milestones and a single-digit royalty on net sales of a commercialized product.
Trade Secrets
3 unchanged sentences
We also seek to preserve the integrity and confidentiality of our data, trade secrets and know-how by maintaining physical security of our premises and physical and electronic security of our information technology systems.
−Removed: uniQure is a registered trademark in various jurisdictions including the United States and the European Union.
−Removed: In 2018, we applied for trademark protection for the marks miQURE ™ and Super9, related to our gene silencing and hemophilia technologies, respectively.
+Added: We have a number of material registered trademarks, including “uniQure”, that we have registered in various jurisdictions including the United States and the European Union.
We may seek trademark protection for other product candidates and technologies as and when appropriate.
1 unchanged sentence
We face substantial competition from many different sources, including large and specialty pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, academic research institutions and governmental agencies and public and private research institutions.
−Removed: We are aware of numerous companies focused on developing gene therapies in various indications, including Applied Genetic Technologies Corp., Abeona Therapeutics, Adverum Biotechnologies, Allergan, Ally Therapeutics, Asklepios BioPharmaceutical, Astellas, AVROBIO, Axovant Gene Therapies, Bayer, Biogen, BioMarin, bluebird bio, CRISPR Therapeutics, Editas Medicine, Expression Therapeutics, Freeline Therapeutics, Generation Bio, Genethon, GlaxoSmithKline, Homology Medicines, Intellia Therapeutics, Johnson & Johnson, Krystal Biotech, LogicBio Therapeutics, Lysogene, MeiraGTx, Milo Biotechnology, Mustang Bio, Novartis, Orchard Therapeutics, Oxford Biomedica, Pfizer, REGENXBIO, Renova Therapeutics, Roche, Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Sangamo Therapeutics, Sanofi, Selecta Biosciences, Sarepta Therapeutics, Solid Biosciences, Takeda, Ultragenyx, Vivet Therapeutics, and Voyager Therepeutics, as well as several companies addressing other methods for modifying genes and regulating gene expression.
−Removed: We may also face competition with respect to the treatment of some of the diseases that we are seeking to target with our gene therapies from protein, nucleic acid, antisense, RNAi and other pharmaceuticals under development or commercialized at pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies such as Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Amgen, Bayer, Biogen, BioMarin, CSL Behring, Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Translate Bio, Roche, Sanofi, Sobi, WaVe Life Sciences, and numerous other pharmaceutical and biotechnology firms.
+Added: We are aware of numerous companies focused on developing gene therapies in various indications, including Applied Genetic Technologies Corp., Abbvie, Abeona Therapeutics, Adverum Biotechnologies, Ally Therapeutics, Apic Bio, Asklepios BioPharmaceutical, Astellas, AVROBIO, Bayer, Biogen, BioMarin, bluebird bio, CRISPR Therapeutics, Editas Medicine, Expression Therapeutics, Fate, Freeline Therapeutics, Generation Bio, Genethon, GlaxoSmithKline, Homology Medicines, Intellia Therapeutics, Johnson & Johnson, Krystal Biotech, Lexeo Therapeutics, LogicBio Therapeutics, Lysogene, MeiraGTx, Milo Biotechnology, Mustang Bio, Novartis, Orchard Therapeutics, Oxford Biomedica, Passage Bio, Pfizer, REGENXBIO, Renova Therapeutics, Roche, Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Sangamo Therapeutics, Sanofi, Selecta Biosciences, Sarepta Therapeutics, Sio Therapeutics, Solid Biosciences, SwanBio, Takeda, Taysha Gene Therapies, Ultragenyx, Vivet Therapeutics, and Voyager Therapeutics, as well as several companies addressing other methods for modifying genes and regulating gene expression.
+Added: We may also face competition with respect to the treatment of some of the diseases that we are seeking to target with our gene therapies from protein, nucleic acid, antisense, RNAi and other pharmaceuticals under development or commercialized at pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies such as Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Bayer, BioMarin, CSL Behring, Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Translate Bio, Roche, Sanofi, Sobi, Takeda, WaVe Life Sciences, and numerous other pharmaceutical and biotechnology firms.
We also compete with existing standards of care, therapies, and symptomatic treatments, as well as any new therapies that may become available in the future for the indications we are targeting.
8 unchanged sentences
Government authorities in the United States, European Union and other countries extensively regulate, among other things, the approval, research, development, preclinical and clinical testing, manufacture (including any manufacturing changes), packaging, storage, recordkeeping, labeling, advertising, promotion, distribution, marketing, post-approval monitoring and reporting, reimbursement, and import and export of pharmaceutical products, biological products, and medical devices.
−Removed: We believe that all of our product candidates will be regulated as biological products, or biologics, and in particular, as gene therapies, and will be subject to such requirements and regulations under U.S.
+Added: We believe that all our product candidates will be regulated as biological products, or biologics, and in particular, as gene therapies, and will be subject to such requirements and regulations under U.S.
and foreign laws.
3 unchanged sentences
In the United States, the FDA regulates biologics under the Public Health Service Act (“PHSA”) and the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (“FDCA”) and regulations and guidance implementing these laws.
+Added: These laws and regulatory guidance are continually evolving.
+Added: By example, in March 2020, the U.S.
+Added: Congress passed the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act, or CARES Act, which includes various provisions regarding FDA drug shortage reporting requirements, as well as provisions regarding supply chain security, such as risk management plan requirements, and the promotion of supply chain redundancy and domestic manufacturing.
+Added: The FDA has also issued a number of guidance documents concerning how sponsors and investigators may address COVID-19 challenges, including challenges specific to gene therapies.
+Added: These guidance documents are continually evolving.
Obtaining regulatory approvals and ensuring compliance with applicable statutes and regulatory requirements entails the expenditure of substantial time and financial resources, including payment of user fees for applications to the FDA.
−Removed: All of our current product candidates are subject to regulation by the FDA as biologics.
+Added: All our current product candidates are subject to regulation by the FDA as biologics.
An applicant seeking approval to market and distribute a new biologic in the United States must typically undertake the following:
3 unchanged sentences
● approval by an independent institutional review board (“IRB”) and Institutional Biosafety Committee (“IBC”) before each clinical trial may be initiated;
−Removed: ● performance of adequate and well-controlled human clinical trials in accordance with the FDA’s or EMA’s good clinical practices (“GCP”) to establish the safety, potency, purity and efficacy of the proposed biological product for each indication;
+Added: ● performance of adequate and well-controlled human clinical trials in accordance with the FDA’s current good clinical practices (“cGCP”) to establish substantial evidence of the proposed biological product for each indication;
● preparation and submission to the FDA of a Biologics License Application (“BLA”);
−Removed: ● satisfactory completion of one or more FDA inspections of the manufacturing facility or facilities at which the product, or components thereof, are produced to assess compliance with cGMP requirements and to assure that the facilities, methods and controls are adequate to preserve the product’s identity, strength, quality and purity, as well as selected clinical trial sites and investigators to determine GCP compliance;
+Added: ● satisfactory completion of one or more FDA inspections of the manufacturing facility or facilities at which the product, or components thereof, are produced to assess compliance with cGMP requirements and to assure that the facilities, methods, and controls are adequate to preserve the product’s identity, strength, quality, and purity, as well as selected clinical trial sites and investigators to determine cGCP compliance;
● approval of the BLA by the FDA, in consultation with an FDA advisory committee, if deemed appropriate by the FDA;
1 unchanged sentence
Human Clinical Studies in the United States under an IND
−Removed: Clinical trials involve the administration of the investigational biologic to human subjects under the supervision of qualified investigators in accordance with cGCP requirements, which includes requirements for informed consent, study conduct, and IRB review and approval.
+Added: Before initiating clinical studies in the United States or under an IND, investigational product sponsors must first complete pre-clinical studies.
+Added: Preclinical studies include laboratory evaluation of chemistry, pharmacology, toxicity, and product formulation, as well as animal studies to assess potential safety and efficacy.
+Added: Such studies must generally be conducted in accordance with the FDA’s Good Laboratory Practices (“GLPs”).
+Added: Clinical trials involve the administration of the investigational biologic to human subjects under the supervision of qualified investigators in accordance with current GCP requirements, which includes requirements for informed consent, study conduct, and IRB review and approval.
A protocol for each clinical trial and any subsequent protocol amendments must be submitted to the FDA as part of an IND.
1 unchanged sentence
A clinical trial may not proceed in the United States unless and until an IND becomes effective, which is 30 days after its receipt by the FDA.
−Removed: The FDA may raise concerns or questions related to one or more components of an IND if during its review the FDA determines that study subjects would be exposed to significant risk of illness or injury the trial may be put on clinical hold.
−Removed: The protocol and informed consent documents must also be approved by an IRB.
+Added: The FDA may raise concerns or questions related to one or more components of an IND and place the IND on clinical hold if during its review the FDA determines that study subjects would be exposed to significant risk of illness or injury the trial may be put on clinical hold.
+Added: In such a case, the IND sponsor and the FDA must resolve any outstanding concerns before the clinical trial can begin.
+Added: Clinical holds also may be imposed by the FDA at any time before or during trials due to safety concerns or non-compliance.
+Added: The protocol and informed consent documents, as well as other subject communications must also be approved by an IRB that continues to oversee that trial.
In the case of gene therapy studies, an IBC at the local level must also review and maintain oversight over the particular study, in addition to the IRB.
1 unchanged sentence
Information about certain clinical trials, including results, must be submitted within specific timeframes for listing on the ClinicalTrials.gov website.
+Added: Sponsors or distributors of investigational products for the diagnosis, monitoring, or treatment of one or more serious diseases or conditions must also have a publicly available policy on evaluating and responding to requests for expanded access requests.
+Added: Investigators must also provide certain information to the clinical trial sponsors to allow the sponsors to make certain financial disclosures to the FDA.
Subsequent clinical protocols and amendments must also be submitted to an active IND but are not subject to the 30-day review period imposed on an original IND.
+Added: Progress reports detailing the results of the clinical trials must also be submitted at least annually to the FDA and the IRB and more frequently if serious adverse events or other significant safety information is found.
There is a risk that once a new protocol or amendment is submitted to an active IND there may be an extended period before the FDA may comment or provide feedback.
4 unchanged sentences
The biological product is administered to a limited patient population to further identify possible adverse effects and safety risks, to preliminarily evaluate the efficacy of the product for specific targeted diseases and to determine dosage tolerance and optimal dosage.
−Removed: The biological product is administered to an expanded patient population in adequate and well-controlled clinical trials to generate sufficient data to statistically confirm the potency and safety of the product for approval, to establish the overall risk-benefit profile of the product and to provide adequate information for the labelling of the product.
−Removed: Additional kinds of data may also help support a BLA or NDA, such as patient experience data and real-world evidence.
−Removed: Real world evidence may also be used to assist in clinical trial design or support an NDA for already approved products.
−Removed: For genetically targeted populations and variant protein targeted products intended to address an unmet medical need in one or more patient subgroups with a serious or life threatening rare disease or condition, the FDA may allow a sponsor to rely upon data and information previously developed by the sponsor or for which the sponsor has a right of reference, that was submitted previously to support an approved application for a product that incorporates or utilizes the same or similar genetically targeted technology or a product that is the same or utilizes the same variant protein targeted drug as the product that is the subject of the application.
+Added: The biological product is administered to an expanded patient population, generally at geographically dispersed clinical trial sites, in adequate and well-controlled clinical trials to generate sufficient data to statistically confirm the potency and safety of the product for approval, to establish the overall risk-benefit profile of the product and to provide adequate information for the labelling of the product.
+Added: Typically, two Phase 3 trials are required by the FDA for product approval.
+Added: Under some limited circumstances, however, the FDA may approve a BLA based upon a single Phase 3 clinical study plus confirmatory evidence or a single large multicenter trial without confirmatory evidence.
In addition, under the Pediatric Research Equity Act, or PREA, a BLA or BLA supplement for a new active ingredient, indication, dosage form, dosage regimen, or route of administration, must contain data that are adequate to assess the safety and effectiveness of the product for the claimed indications in all relevant pediatric subpopulations, and to support dosing and administration for each pediatric subpopulation for which the product is safe and effective.
13 unchanged sentences
the proper design of tests to measure product potency in support of an IND or BLA application;
−Removed: and measures to observe delayed adverse effects in subjects who have been exposed to investigational gene therapies via long-term follow-up.
+Added: and measures to observe delayed adverse effects in subjects and patients who have been exposed to gene therapies via long-term follow-up with associated regulatory reporting.
Compliance with cGMP Requirements
Manufacturers of biologics must comply with applicable cGMP regulations, including quality control and quality assurance and maintenance of records and documentation.
−Removed: Manufacturers and others involved in the manufacture and distribution of such products must also register their establishments with the FDA and certain state agencies.
−Removed: Both domestic and foreign manufacturing establishments must register and provide additional information to the FDA upon their initial participation in the manufacturing process.
+Added: Manufacturers and others involved in the manufacture and distribution of such products must also register their establishments with the FDA and certain state agencies, and provide the FDA a list of products manufactured at the facilities.
+Added: Recently, the information that must be submitted to the FDA regarding manufactured products was expanded through the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security, or CARES, Act to include the volume of drugs produced during the prior year.
Establishments may be subject to periodic unannounced inspections by government authorities to ensure compliance with cGMPs and other laws.
−Removed: Discovery of problems may result in a government entity placing restrictions on a product, manufacturer, or holder of an approved BLA, and may extend to requiring withdrawal of the product from the market, among other consequences.
+Added: Discovery of non-compliance may result in the FDA placing restrictions on a product, manufacturer, or holder of an approved BLA, and may extend to requiring withdrawal of the product from the market, among other consequences.
The FDA will not approve an application unless it determines that the manufacturing processes and facilities are in compliance with cGMP requirements and adequate to assure consistent production of the product within required specifications.
14 unchanged sentences
All promotional materials for drug or biologic candidates approved under accelerated regulations are subject to prior review by the FDA.
+Added: Even if a product qualifies for one or more of these programs, the FDA may later decide that the product no longer meets the conditions for qualification or decide that the time period for FDA review or approval will not be shortened.
Submission of a BLA
The results of the preclinical and clinical studies, together with detailed information relating to the product’s chemistry, manufacture, controls, and proposed labeling, among other things, are submitted to the FDA as part of a BLA requesting a license to market the product for one or more indications.
−Removed: The submission of a BLA is subject to an application user fee, currently exceeding $2.9 million in fiscal year 2020 (2019:
−Removed: $2.6 million);
−Removed: products with orphan designation are exempt from the BLA filing fee.
−Removed: The sponsor of an approved BLA is also subject to annual program user fees for each, currently exceeding $325,000 in fiscal year 2020 (2019:
+Added: The submission of a BLA is subject to an application user fee, products with orphan designation are exempt from the BLA filing fee.
+Added: The sponsor of an approved BLA is also subject to annual program user fees for each.
Orphan products may also be exempt from program fees provided that certain criteria are met.
These fees are typically increased annually.
−Removed: The FDA has agreed to specified performance goals in the review of BLAs.
+Added: Under the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (“PDUFA”) the FDA has agreed to specified performance goals in the review of BLAs.
Most such applications are meant to be reviewed within ten months from the filing acceptance date (typically 60 days after date of filing), and most applications for priority review products are meant to be reviewed within six months of the filing acceptance date (typically 60 days after date of filing).
Priority review designation may be assigned to product candidates that are intended to treat serious conditions and, if approved, would provide significant improvements in the safety or effectiveness of the treatment, diagnosis, or prevention of the serious condition.
−Removed: The FDA may request additional information rather than accept an application for filing.
+Added: The FDA may refuse to file an application and request additional information.
In this event, the application must be refiled with the additional information.
1 unchanged sentence
Once the submission is accepted, the FDA begins an in-depth substantive review.
−Removed: The FDA will assign a date for its final decision for the product (the PDUFA action date) but can request an extension to complete review of a product application.
−Removed: The FDA may issue an approval letter or a complete response letter.
+Added: The FDA will assign a date for its final decision for the product (the PDUFA action date) but can extend this date to complete review of a product application.
+Added: The PDUFA action date is only a goal, thus, the FDA does not always meet its PDUFA dates.
+Added: The FDA may also refer certain applications to an advisory committee.
+Added: Before approving a product candidate for which no active ingredient (including any ester or salt of active ingredients) has previously been approved by the FDA, the FDA must either refer that product candidate to an external advisory committee or provide in an action letter, a summary of the reasons why the FDA did not refer the product candidate to an advisory committee.
+Added: The FDA may also refer other product candidates to an advisory committee if the FDA believes that the advisory committee’s expertise would be beneficial.
+Added: An advisory committee is typically a panel that includes clinicians and other experts, which review, evaluate, and make a recommendation as to whether the application should be approved and under what conditions.
+Added: The FDA is not bound by the recommendations of an advisory committee, but it considers such recommendations carefully when making decisions.
+Added: The FDA reviews applications to determine, among other things, whether a product candidate meets the agency’s approval standards and whether the manufacturing methods and controls are adequate to assure and preserve the product’s identity, strength, quality, potency, and purity.
+Added: Before approving a marketing application, the FDA typically will inspect the facility or facilities where the product is manufactured, referred to as a Pre-Approval Inspection.
+Added: The FDA will not approve an application unless it determines that the manufacturing processes and facilities, including contract manufacturers and subcontractors, are in compliance with cGMP requirements and adequate to assure consistent production of the product within required specifications.
+Added: Additionally, before approving a marketing application the FDA will inspect one or more clinical trial sites to assure compliance with GCPs.
+Added: After evaluating the marketing application and all related information, including the advisory committee recommendation, if any, and inspection reports regarding the manufacturing facilities and clinical trial sites, the FDA may issue an approval letter or a complete response letter.
An approval letter authorizes commercial marketing of the biological product with specific prescribing information for specific indications.
−Removed: A complete response letter generally outlines the deficiencies in the submission and may require substantial additional testing or information in order for the FDA to reconsider the application.
+Added: A complete response letter generally outlines the deficiencies in the submission and may require substantial additional testing or information for the FDA to reconsider the application.
+Added: Even with submission of this additional information, the FDA ultimately may decide that the application does not satisfy the regulatory criteria for approval.
If and when those deficiencies have been addressed to the FDA’s satisfaction in a resubmission of the BLA, the FDA will issue an approval letter.
13 unchanged sentences
REMS, such as these, can be expensive and burdensome to implement, and burdensome for hospitals, clinics, and health care providers to comply with.
−Removed: Following approval, some types of changes to the approved product, such as adding new indications, manufacturing changes and additional labeling claims, are subject to further testing requirements and the FDA review and approval.
−Removed: The product may also be subject to official lot release, meaning that the manufacturer is required to perform certain tests on each lot of the product.
−Removed: The results of such tests, along with samples, are submitted to FDA for approval before the lot may be released for distribution.
−Removed: Other post-approval requirements include reporting of cGMP deviations that could affect the identity, potency, purity and overall safety of a distributed product, reporting of adverse effects, reporting new information regarding safety and efficacy, maintaining adequate record-keeping, and complying with electronic record and signature requirements.
Biosimilars and Exclusivity
1 unchanged sentence
Under the BCPIA, a manufacturer may submit an application for licensure of a biologic product that is biosimilar to or interchangeable with a previously approved biological product or reference product.
−Removed: In order for the FDA to approve a biosimilar product, it must find that it is highly similar to the reference product notwithstanding minor differences in clinically inactive components and that there are no clinically meaningful differences between the reference product and proposed biosimilar product in safety, purity or potency.
+Added: For the FDA to approve a biosimilar product, it must find that it is highly similar to the reference product notwithstanding minor differences in clinically inactive components and that there are no clinically meaningful differences between the reference product and proposed biosimilar product in safety, purity or potency.
A finding of interchangeability requires that a product is determined to be biosimilar to the reference product, and that the product can be expected to produce the same clinical results as the reference product and, for products administered multiple times, the biologic and the reference biologic may be switched after one has been previously administered without increasing safety risks or risks of diminished efficacy relative to exclusive use of the reference biologic.
5 unchanged sentences
for biologics has been controversial and may be shortened in the future.
+Added: The PHSA also includes provisions to protect reference products that have patent protection.
+Added: The biosimilar product sponsor and reference product sponsor may exchange certain patent and product information for the purpose of determining whether there should be a legal patent challenge.
+Added: Based on the outcome of negotiations surrounding the exchanged information, the reference product sponsor may bring a patent infringement suit and injunction proceedings against the biosimilar product sponsor.
+Added: The biosimilar applicant may also be able to bring an action for declaratory judgment concerning the patent.
+Added: To increase competition in the drug and biologic product marketplace, Congress, the executive branch, and the FDA have taken certain legislative and regulatory steps.
+Added: By example, in 2020 the FDA finalized a guidance to facilitate biologic product importation.
+Added: Moreover, the 2020 Further Consolidated Appropriations Act included provisions requiring that sponsors of approved biologic products, including those subject to REMS, provide samples of the approved products to persons developing biosimilar products within specified timeframes, in sufficient quantities, and on commercially reasonable market-based terms.
+Added: Failure to do so can subject the approved product sponsor to civil actions, penalties, and responsibility for attorney’s fees and costs of the civil action.
+Added: This same bill also includes provisions with respect to shared and separate REMS programs for reference and generic drug products.
Orphan Drug Exclusivity
Under the Orphan Drug Act of 1983, the FDA may designate a biological product as an orphan drug if it is intended to treat a rare disease or condition that affects fewer than 200,000 individuals in the United States, or more in cases in which there is no reasonable expectation that the cost of developing and making a biological product available in the United States for treatment of the disease or condition will be recovered from sales of the product.
−Removed: If a product with orphan designation receives the first FDA approval, it will be granted seven years of marketing exclusivity, which means that the FDA may not approve any other applications for the same product for the same indication for seven years, unless clinical superiority is demonstrated in a head-to-head trial.
+Added: Additionally, sponsors must present a plausible hypothesis for clinical superiority to obtain orphan drug designation if there is a product already approved by the FDA that is considered by the FDA to be the same as the already approved product and is intended for the same indication.
+Added: This hypothesis must be demonstrated to obtain orphan exclusivity.
+Added: If a product with orphan designation receives the first FDA approval, it will be granted seven years of marketing exclusivity, which means that the FDA may not approve any other applications for the same product for the same indication for seven years, unless clinical superiority is demonstrated.
Competitors may receive approval of different products for the indication for which the orphan product has exclusivity and may obtain approval for the same product but for a different indication.
2 unchanged sentences
meaning that they would receive orphan drug exclusivity if they are the first products approved for their respective indications.
+Added: Orphan product sameness decisions are an evolving space when it comes to gene therapies.
+Added: Specifically, the FDA has issued guidance regarding how it will determine whether a gene therapy product is the same as another product for the purpose of the agency’s orphan drug regulations.
+Added: Any of the FDA sameness determinations could impact our ability to receive approval for our product candidates and to obtain or retain orphan drug exclusivity.
Pediatric Exclusivity
11 unchanged sentences
These early interactions may be used to discuss potential surrogate or intermediate endpoints to support accelerated approval.
−Removed: In 2017 FDA stated in draft guidance that human gene therapies, including genetically modified cells, that lead to a sustained effect on cells or tissues, may meet the definition of a regenerative therapy.
−Removed: FDA Regulation of Companion Diagnostics
+Added: In 2019 the FDA stated in guidance that human gene therapies, including genetically modified cells, that lead to a sustained effect on cells or tissues, may meet the definition of a regenerative therapy.
+Added: FDA Regulation of Companion Diagnostics and Other Combination Products
We may seek to develop companion diagnostics for use in identifying patients that we believe will respond to our gene therapies.
−Removed: FDA officials have issued draft guidance to address issues critical to developing in vitro companion diagnostics with therapeutics, such as establishing clinical validity, study design, the appropriate patient population and when the FDA will require that the companion diagnostic and the drug be approved simultaneously.
−Removed: The guidance issued in August 2014 states that if safe and effective use of a therapeutic product depends on an in vitro diagnostic device, then the FDA generally will require approval or clearance of the diagnostic device by the Center for Devices and Radiological Health at the same time that the FDA approves the therapeutic product.
−Removed: Anti-Kickback Provisions and Requirements
−Removed: The federal anti-kickback statute prohibits, among other things, knowingly and willfully offering, paying, soliciting or receiving remuneration to induce or in return for purchasing, leasing, ordering or arranging for the purchase, lease or order of any healthcare item or service reimbursable under Medicare, Medicaid or other federally financed healthcare programs.
+Added: Similarly, our product candidates may require delivery devices.
+Added: A biologic product may be regulated as a combination product if it is intended for use in conjunction with a medical device, such as a drug delivery device or in vitro diagnostic device.
+Added: For combination products, the biologic and device components must, when used together, be safe and effective and the product labeling must reflect their combined use.
+Added: In some cases, the medical device component may require a separate premarket submission.
+Added: Moreover, clinical trial sponsors using investigational devices in their studies must comply with FDA’s investigational device exemption regulations.
+Added: Once approved or cleared, the device component sponsor (or the combination product sponsor, if both components are covered by one application) must comply with the FDA’s post-market device requirements, including establishment registration, device listing, device labeling, unique device identifier, quality system regulation, medical device reporting, and reporting of corrections and removals requirements.
+Added: If the safety or effectiveness of a biologic product is dependent on the results of a diagnostic, the FDA may require that the in vitro companion diagnostic device and biologic product be contemporaneously approved, with labeling that describes the use of the two products together.
+Added: The type of premarket submission required for a companion diagnostic device will depend on the FDA device classification.
+Added: A premarket approval (“PMA”), application is required for high risk devices classified as Class III;
+Added: a 510(k) premarket notification is required for moderate risk devices classified as Class II;
+Added: and a de novo request may be used for novel devices not previously classified by the FDA that are low or moderate risk.
+Added: Except in some limited circumstances, the FDA generally will not approve a biologic that is dependent upon the use of a companion diagnostic device if the device is not contemporaneously FDA-approved or -cleared.
+Added: Post-approval Requirements
+Added: Any products manufactured or distributed pursuant to the FDA approvals are subject to pervasive and continuing regulation by the FDA, including, among other things, requirements related to manufacturing, recordkeeping, and reporting, including adverse experience reporting, deviation reporting, shortage reporting, and periodic reporting, product sampling and distribution, advertising, marketing, promotion, certain electronic records and signatures, and post-approval obligations imposed as a condition of approval, such as Phase 4 clinical trials, REMS, and surveillance to assess safety and effectiveness after commercialization.
+Added: After approval, most changes to the approved product, such as adding new indications or other labeling claims, are subject to prior FDA review and approval.
+Added: There also are continuing annual program user fee requirements for approved products, excluding orphan products.
+Added: Regulatory authorities may withdraw product approvals, require label modifications, or request product recalls, among other actions, if a company fails to comply with regulatory standards, if it encounters problems following initial marketing, or if previously unrecognized problems are subsequently discovered.
+Added: Changes to the manufacturing process are strictly regulated and often require prior FDA approval or notification before being implemented.
+Added: FDA regulations also require investigation and correction of any deviations from cGMP and specifications and impose reporting and documentation requirements upon the sponsor and any third-party manufacturers that the sponsor may decide to use.
+Added: Accordingly, manufacturers must continue to expend time, money, and effort in production and quality control to maintain cGMP compliance.
+Added: The FDA also strictly regulates marketing, labeling, advertising, and promotion of products that are placed on the market.
+Added: A company can make only those claims relating to a product that are approved by the FDA.
+Added: Physicians, in their independent professional medical judgment, may prescribe legally available products for unapproved indications that are not described in the product’s labeling and that differ from those tested and approved by the FDA.
+Added: Biopharmaceutical companies, however, are required to promote their products only for the approved indications and in accordance with the provisions of the approved label.
+Added: The FDA and other agencies actively enforce the laws and regulations prohibiting the promotion of off-label uses, and a company that is found to have improperly promoted off-label uses may be subject to significant liability, including, but not limited to, criminal and civil penalties under the FDCA and False Claims Act, exclusion from participation in federal healthcare programs, mandatory compliance programs under corporate integrity agreements, suspension and debarment from government contracts, and refusal of orders under existing government contracts.
+Added: In addition, the distribution of prescription biopharmaceutical samples is subject to the Prescription Drug Marketing Act (the “PDMA”), which regulates the distribution of samples at the federal level.
+Added: Both the PDMA and state laws limit the distribution of prescription biopharmaceutical product.
+Added: Certain reporting related to samples is also required samples and impose requirements to ensure accountability in distribution.
+Added: Free trial or starter prescriptions provided through pharmacies are also subject to regulations under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program and potential liability under anti-kickback and false claims laws.
+Added: Moreover, the enacted Drug Quality and Security Act (“DQSA”), imposes obligations on sponsors of biopharmaceutical products related to product tracking and tracing.
+Added: Among the requirements of this legislation, sponsors are required to provide certain information regarding the products to individuals and entities to which product ownership is transferred, are required to label products with a product identifier, and are required to keep certain records regarding the product.
+Added: The transfer of information to subsequent product owners by sponsors is also required to be done electronically.
+Added: Sponsors must also verify that purchasers of the sponsors’ products are appropriately licensed.
+Added: Further, under this legislation, manufactures have product investigation, quarantine, disposition, and notification responsibilities related to counterfeit, diverted, stolen, and intentionally adulterated products that would result in serious adverse health consequences of death to humans, as well as products that are the subject of fraudulent transactions or which are otherwise unfit for distribution such that they would be reasonably likely to result in serious health consequences or death.
+Added: Similar requirements additionally are and will be imposed through this legislation on other companies within the biopharmaceutical product supply chain, such as distributors and dispensers, as well as certain sponsor licensees and affiliates.
+Added: Later discovery of previously unknown problems with a product, including adverse events of unanticipated severity or frequency, or with manufacturing processes, or failure to comply with regulatory requirements before or after approval, may result in significant regulatory actions.
+Added: Such actions may include refusal to approve pending applications, license or approval suspension or revocation, imposition of a clinical hold or termination of clinical trials, warning letters, untitled letters, cyber letters, modification of promotional materials or labeling, provision of corrective information, imposition of post-market requirements including the need for additional testing, imposition of distribution or other restrictions under a REMS, product recalls, product seizures or detentions, refusal to allow imports or exports, total or partial suspension of production or distribution, FDA debarment, injunctions, fines, consent decrees, corporate integrity agreements, suspension and debarment from government contracts, and refusal of orders under existing government contracts, exclusion from participation in federal and state healthcare programs, restitution, disgorgement, or civil or criminal penalties, including fines and imprisonment, and adverse publicity, among other adverse consequences.
+Added: Additional controls for biologics
+Added: To help reduce the increased risk of the introduction of adventitious agents, the PHSA emphasizes the importance of manufacturing controls for products whose attributes cannot be precisely defined.
+Added: The PHSA also provides authority to the FDA to immediately suspend licenses in situations where there exists a danger to public health, to prepare or procure products in the event of shortages and critical public health needs, and to authorize the creation and enforcement of regulations to prevent the introduction or spread of communicable diseases in the United States and between states.
+Added: After a BLA is approved, the product may also be subject to official lot release as a condition of approval.
+Added: As part of the manufacturing process, the manufacturer is required to perform certain tests on each lot of the product before it is released for distribution.
+Added: If the product is subject to official release by the FDA, the manufacturer submits samples of each lot of product to the FDA together with a release protocol showing the results of all the manufacturer’s tests performed on the lot.
+Added: The FDA may also perform certain confirmatory tests on lots of some products before releasing the lots for distribution by the manufacturer.
+Added: In addition, the FDA conducts laboratory research related to the regulatory standards on the safety, purity, potency, and effectiveness of biological products.
+Added: Certain gene therapy studies are also subject to the National Institutes of Health’s Guidelines for Research Involving Recombinant DNA Molecules, (“NIH Guidelines”).
+Added: The NIH Guidelines include the review of the study by an IBC.
+Added: The IBC assesses the compliance of the research with the NIH Guidelines, assesses the safety of the research and identifies any potential risk to public health or the environment.
+Added: The FDA has also issued guidance with respect to gene therapies, such as guidance concerning preclinical studies, chemistry manufacturing and controls, potency testing, and long-term patient and clinical study subject follow up and regulatory reporting.
+Added: The FDA further issued a draft guidance specific to the development of gene therapy products for neurodegenerative diseases as such products may face special challenges.
+Added: Patent Term Restoration
+Added: If approved, biologic products may also be eligible for periods of U.S.
+Added: patent term restoration.
+Added: If granted, patent term restoration extends the patent life of a single unexpired patent, that has not previously been extended, for a maximum of five years.
+Added: The total patent life of the product with the extension also cannot exceed fourteen years from the product’s approval date.
+Added: Subject to the prior limitations, the period of the extension is calculated by adding half of the time from the effective date of an IND to the initial submission of a marketing application, and all the time between the submission of the marketing application and its approval.
+Added: This period may also be reduced by any time that the applicant did not act with due diligence.
+Added: Anti-Kickback Provisions and other Fraud and Abuse Requirements
+Added: The federal Anti-Kickback Statute prohibits, among other things, knowingly and willfully offering, paying, soliciting, or receiving remuneration directly or indirectly, overtly or covertly, in cash or in kind, to induce or in return for purchasing, leasing, ordering, or arranging for the purchase, lease or order of any healthcare item or service reimbursable under Medicare, Medicaid or other federally financed healthcare programs, in whole or in part.
This statute has been interpreted to apply to arrangements between pharmaceutical manufacturers on the one hand and prescribers, purchasers and formulary managers on the other.
−Removed: Violations of the anti-kickback statute are punishable by imprisonment, criminal fines, civil monetary penalties and exclusion from participation in federal healthcare programs.
−Removed: Although there are a number of statutory exemptions and regulatory safe harbors protecting certain common activities from prosecution or other regulatory sanctions, the exemptions and safe harbors are drawn narrowly, and practices that involve remuneration intended to induce prescribing, purchases or recommendations may be subject to scrutiny if they do not qualify for an exemption or safe harbor.
−Removed: Federal false claims laws prohibit any person from knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, a false claim for payment to the federal government, or knowingly making, or causing to be made, a false statement to have a false claim paid.
−Removed: Pharmaceutical and other healthcare companies have been prosecuted under these laws for allegedly inflating drug prices they report to pricing services, which in turn were used by the government to set Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement rates, and for allegedly providing free product to customers with the expectation that the customers would bill federal programs for the product.
−Removed: In addition, certain marketing practices, including off-label promotion, have also been alleged by government agencies to violate false claims laws.
+Added: The term “remuneration” has been interpreted broadly to include anything of value.
+Added: The Anti-Kickback Statute has been interpreted to apply to arrangements between biopharmaceutical industry members on one hand and prescribers, purchasers, formulary managers, and beneficiaries on the other.
+Added: There are certain statutory exceptions and regulatory safe harbors protecting some common activities from prosecution.
+Added: The exceptions and safe harbors are drawn narrowly, and practices that involve remuneration that may be alleged to be intended to induce prescribing, purchases, or recommendations may be subject to scrutiny if they do not qualify for an exception or safe harbor.
+Added: Failure to meet all the requirements of a particular applicable statutory exception or regulatory safe harbor does not make the conduct per se illegal under the Anti-Kickback Statute.
+Added: Instead, the legality of the arrangement will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis based on a cumulative review of all its facts and circumstances.
+Added: The Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) recently promulgated a regulation with respect to the safe harbors that is effective in two phases.
+Added: First, the regulation excludes from the definition of “remuneration” limited categories of (a) Pharmacy Benefit Manager (“PBM”) rebates or other reductions in price to a plan sponsor under Medicare Part D or a Medicaid Managed Care Organization plan reflected in point-of sale reductions in price and (b) PBM service fees.
+Added: Second, as amended, effective January 1, 2023, the regulation expressly provides that rebates to plan sponsors under Medicare Part D either directly to the plan sponsor under Medicare Part D, or indirectly through a pharmacy benefit manager will not be protected under the anti-kickback discount safe harbor.
+Added: Several courts have interpreted the statute’s intent requirement to mean that if any one purpose of an arrangement involving remuneration is to induce referrals of federal healthcare covered business, including purchases of products paid by federal healthcare programs, the statute has been violated.
+Added: The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, of 2010, as amended, (the “ACA”) modified the intent requirement under the Anti-Kickback Statute to a stricter standard, such that a person or entity no longer needs to have actual knowledge of the statute or specific intent to violate it to have committed a violation.
+Added: In addition, the ACA also provided that a violation of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute is grounds for the government or a whistleblower to assert that a claim for payment of items or services resulting from such violation constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the federal civil False Claims Act.
+Added: Federal civil false claims laws prohibit any person from knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, a false or fraudulent claim for payment to, or approval by, the federal government, knowingly making, using, or causing to be made or used a false record or statement material to a false or fraudulent claim to the federal government, or avoiding, decreasing, or concealing an obligation to pay money to the federal government.
+Added: A claim includes “any request or demand” for money or property presented to the U.S.
+Added: The civil False Claims Act has been used to assert liability on the basis of kickbacks and other improper referrals, improperly reported government pricing metrics such as Best Price or Average Manufacturer Price, improper use of Medicare provider or supplier numbers when detailing a provider of services, improper promotion of off-label uses not expressly approved by the FDA in a product’s label, and allegations as to misrepresentations with respect to products, contract requirements, and services rendered.
+Added: In addition, private payers have been filing follow-on lawsuits alleging fraudulent misrepresentation, although establishing liability and damages in these cases is more difficult than under the FCA.
+Added: Intent to deceive is not required to establish liability under the civil False Claims Act.
+Added: Rather, a claim may be false for deliberate ignorance of the truth or falsity of the information provided or acts in reckless disregard of the truth or falsity of that information.
+Added: Civil False Claims Act actions may be brought by the government or may be brought by private individuals on behalf of the government, called “qui tam” actions.
+Added: If the government decides to intervene in a qui tam action and prevails in the lawsuit, the individual will share in the proceeds from any fines or settlement funds.
+Added: If the government declines to intervene, the individual may pursue the case alone.
+Added: The civil FCA provides for treble damages and a civil penalty for each false claim, such as an invoice or pharmacy claim for reimbursement, which can aggregate into millions of dollars.
+Added: For these reasons, since 2004, False Claims Act lawsuits against biopharmaceutical companies have increased significantly in volume and breadth, leading to several substantial civil and criminal settlements, as much as $3.0 billion, regarding certain sales practices and promoting off label uses.
+Added: Civil False Claims act liability may further be imposed for known Medicare or Medicaid overpayments, for example, overpayments caused by understated rebate amounts, that are not refunded within 60 days of discovering the overpayment, even if the overpayment was not caused by a false or fraudulent act.
+Added: In addition, conviction, or civil judgment for violating the FCA may result in exclusion from federal health care programs, and suspension and debarment from government contracts, and refusal of orders under existing government contracts.
The majority of states also have statutes or regulations similar to the federal anti-kickback law and false claims laws, which apply to items and services reimbursed under Medicaid and other state programs, or, in several states, apply regardless of the payer.
+Added: The government may further prosecute conduct constituting a false claim under the criminal False Claims Act.
+Added: The criminal False Claims Act prohibits the making or presenting of a claim to the government knowing such claim to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent and, unlike the civil False Claims Act, requires proof of intent to submit a false claim.
+Added: The civil monetary penalties statute is another potential statute under which biopharmaceutical companies may be subject to enforcement.
+Added: Among other things, the civil monetary penalties statue imposes fines against any person who is determined to have knowingly presented, or caused to be presented, claims to a federal healthcare program that the person knows, or should know, is for an item or service that was not provided as claimed or is false or fraudulent.
+Added: Payment or reimbursement of prescription therapeutics by Medicaid or Medicare requires sponsors to submit certified pricing information to Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”).
+Added: The Medicaid Drug Rebate statute requires sponsors to calculate and report price points, which are used to determine Medicaid rebate payments shared between the states and the federal government and Medicaid payment rates for certain therapeutics.
+Added: For therapeutics paid under Medicare Part B, sponsors must also calculate and report their Average Sales Price, which is used to determine the Medicare Part B payment rate.
+Added: In addition, therapeutics covered by Medicaid are subject to an additional inflation penalty which can substantially increase rebate payments.
+Added: For products approved under a BLA (including biosimilars), the Veterans Health Care Act, (the “VHCA”), requires sponsors to calculate and report to the Veterans Administration, or VA, a different price called the Non-Federal Average Manufacturing Price, which is used to determine the maximum price that can be charged to certain federal agencies, referred to as the Federal Ceiling Price, (“FCP”).
+Added: Like the Medicaid rebate amount, the FCP includes an inflation penalty.
+Added: A Department of Defense regulation requires sponsors to provide this discount on therapeutics dispensed by retail pharmacies when paid by the TRICARE Program.
+Added: All these price reporting requirements create risk of submitting false information to the government, potential FCA liability and exclusion from certain of these programs.
+Added: The VHCA also requires sponsors of covered therapeutics participating in the Medicaid program to enter into Federal Supply Schedule contracts with the VA through which their covered therapeutics must be sold to certain federal agencies at FCP.
+Added: This necessitates compliance with applicable federal procurement laws and regulations, including submission of commercial sales and pricing information, and subjects companies to contractual remedies as well as administrative, civil, and criminal sanctions.
+Added: In addition, the VHCA requires sponsors participating in Medicaid to agree to provide different mandatory discounts to certain Public Health Service grantees and other safety net hospitals and clinics under the 340B program based on the sponsor’s reported Medicaid pricing information.
+Added: The 340B program has its own regulatory authority to impose sanctions for non-compliance and adjudicate overcharge claims against sponsors by the purchasing entities and, impose civil monetary penalties for instances of overcharging.
+Added: The federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, (“HIPAA”), also created federal criminal statutes that prohibit, among other actions, knowingly and willfully executing, or attempting to execute, a scheme to defraud or to obtain, by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations or promises, any of the money or property owned by, or under the custody or control of, a healthcare benefit program, regardless of whether the payor is public or private, in connection with the delivery or payment for health care benefits, knowingly and willfully embezzling or stealing from a health care benefit program, willfully obstructing a criminal investigation of a health care offense and knowingly and willfully falsifying, concealing, or covering up by any trick or device a material fact or making any materially false statements in connection with the delivery of, or payment for, healthcare benefits, items, or services relating to healthcare matters.
+Added: Additionally, the ACA amended the intent requirement of certain of these criminal statutes under HIPAA so that a person or entity no longer needs to have actual knowledge of the statute, or the specific intent to violate it, to have committed a violation.
+Added: In addition, as part of the ACA, the federal government enacted the Physician Payment Sunshine Act.
+Added: Manufacturers of drugs biologics and devices for which payment is available under Medicare, Medicaid, or the Children’s Health Insurance Program (with certain exceptions) are required to annually report to CMS payments and transfers of value made to or at the request of covered recipients, such as, but not limited to, physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, clinical nurse specialists, and certified registered nurse anesthetists and teaching hospitals, as well as ownership and investment interests held by physicians and their immediate family.
+Added: Payments made to physicians and certain research institutions for clinical trials are also included within this law.
+Added: Reported information is made publicly available by CMS.
+Added: Failure to submit required information may result in civil monetary penalties.
+Added: If not preempted by this federal law, several states currently also require reporting of marketing and promotion expenses, as well as gifts and payments to healthcare professionals.
+Added: State legislation may also prohibit various other marketing related activities or require the public posting of information.
+Added: Certain states also require companies to implement compliance programs.
+Added: Further, we may be subject to data privacy and security regulation by both the federal government and the states in which we conduct our business.
+Added: HIPAA, as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act, (“HITECH Act”), and their respective implementing regulations impose certain requirements on covered entities relating to the privacy, security, and transmission of individually identifiable health information, known as protected health information.
+Added: Among other things, the HITECH Act, through its implementing regulations, makes HIPAA’s security standards and certain privacy standards directly applicable to business associates, defined as a person or organization, other than a member of a covered entity’s workforce, that creates, receives, maintains, or transmits protected health information on behalf of a covered entity for a function or activity regulated by HIPAA.
+Added: The HITECH Act also strengthened the civil and criminal penalties that may be imposed against covered entities, business associates, and individuals, and gave state attorneys general new authority to file civil actions for damages or injunctions in federal courts to enforce the federal HIPAA laws and seek attorneys’ fees and costs associated with pursuing federal civil actions.
+Added: In addition, other federal and state laws, such as the California Consumer Privacy Act, may govern the privacy and security of health and other information in certain circumstances, many of which differ from each other in significant ways and may not be preempted by HIPAA, thus complicating compliance efforts.
+Added: Many states have also adopted laws similar to each of the above federal laws, which may be broader in scope and apply to items or services reimbursed by any third-party payor, including commercial insurers.
+Added: Certain state laws also regulate sponsors’ use of prescriber-identifiable data.
+Added: Certain states also require implementation of commercial compliance programs and compliance with the pharmaceutical industry’s voluntary compliance guidelines and the applicable compliance guidance promulgated by the federal government, or otherwise restrict payments or the provision of other items of value that may be made to healthcare providers and other potential referral sources;
+Added: impose restrictions on marketing practices;
+Added: or require sponsors to track and report information related to payments, gifts, and other items of value to physicians and other healthcare providers.
+Added: Recently, states have enacted or are considering legislation intended to make drug prices more transparent and deter significant price increases.
+Added: These laws may affect our future sales, marketing, and other promotional activities by imposing administrative and compliance burdens.
+Added: If our operations are found to be in violation of any of the laws or regulations described above or any other laws that apply to us, we may be subject to penalties or other enforcement actions, including criminal and significant civil monetary penalties, damages, fines, disgorgement, imprisonment, exclusion from participation in government healthcare programs, corporate integrity agreements, suspension and debarment from government contracts, and refusal of orders under existing government contracts, reputational harm, diminished profits and future earnings, and the curtailment or restructuring of our operations, any of which could adversely affect our business.
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
4 unchanged sentences
Third-party payers and independent non-profit healthcare research organizations such as the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review are also increasingly challenging the prices charged for medical products and services and examining the medical necessity, budget-impact, and cost-effectiveness of medical products and services, in addition to their safety and efficacy.
−Removed: If these third party payers do not consider a product to be cost-effective compared to other available therapies and/or the standard of care, they may not cover the product after approval as a benefit under their plans or, if they do, measures including prior authorization and step-throughs could be required and/or the level of payment may not be sufficient to allow a company to sell its products at a profit.
−Removed: federal and state governments and foreign governments have shown significant interest in implementing cost containment programs to limit the growth of government-paid health care costs, including price controls, restrictions on reimbursement and requirements for substitution of generic products for branded prescription drugs.
−Removed: Adoption of such controls and measures and tightening of restrictive policies in jurisdictions with existing controls and measures, could limit payments for pharmaceuticals.
+Added: If these third-party payers do not consider a product to be cost-effective compared to other available therapies and/or the standard of care, they may not cover the product after approval as a benefit under their plans or, if they do, measures including prior authorization and step-throughs could be required, manufacturer rebates may be negotiated or required and/or the level of payment may not be sufficient to allow a company to sell its products at a profit.
+Added: federal and state governments and foreign governments have shown significant interest in implementing cost containment programs to limit the growth of government-paid health care costs, including price controls, restrictions on coverage and reimbursement and requirements for substitution of generic products for branded prescription drugs.
+Added: In this regard, for example, on November 27, 2020, CMS issued an interim final rule implementing a Most Favored Nation payment model under which reimbursement for certain Medicare Part B drugs and biologicals will be based on a price that reflects the lowest per capital Gross Domestic Product-adjusted (“GDP-adjusted”) price of any non-U.S.
+Added: member country of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (“OECD”) with a GDP per capita that is at least sixty percent of the U.S.
+Added: GDP per capita.
+Added: Adoption of additional healthcare reform controls and measures and tightening of restrictive policies in jurisdictions with existing controls and measures, could limit payments for pharmaceuticals.
As a result, the marketability of any product which receives regulatory approval for commercial sale may suffer if the government and third-party payers choose to provide low coverage and reimbursement.
1 unchanged sentence
Coverage policies, third party reimbursement rates and drug pricing regulation may change at any time.
−Removed: In particular, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act contains provisions that may reduce the profitability of drug products, including, for example, increased rebates for drugs sold to Medicaid programs, extension of Medicaid rebates to Medicaid managed care plans, mandatory discounts for certain Medicare Part D beneficiaries and annual fees based on pharmaceutical companies’ share of sales to federal health care programs.
+Added: In particular, the ACA contains provisions that may reduce the profitability of drug products, including, for example, increased rebates for drugs sold to Medicaid programs, extension of Medicaid rebates to Medicaid managed care plans, mandatory discounts for certain Medicare Part D beneficiaries and annual fees based on pharmaceutical companies’ share of sales to federal health care programs.
+Added: Multiple other current and proposed legislative and regulatory efforts require and likely will in the future require payment of increased manufacturer rebates and implement mechanisms to reduce drug prices.
Even if favorable coverage and reimbursement status is attained for one or more products that receive regulatory approval, less favorable coverage policies and reimbursement rates may be implemented in the future.
3 unchanged sentences
In addition, drugs are subject to the extensive price and reimbursement regulations of the various EU member states.
−Removed: The Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC, as amended (and to be replaced by the Clinical Trial Regulation EU 536/2014), provides a system for the approval of clinical trials in the European Union via implementation through national legislation of the member states.
+Added: The Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC, as amended (“CTD”) (and to be replaced by the Clinical Trial Regulation EU 536/2014) (“CTR”) (it is anticipated by December 2021), provides a system for the approval of clinical trials in the European Union via (in the case of the CTD) implementation through national legislation of the member states.
+Added: The CTR is directly applicable in all member states without the need for national implementation.
Under this system, approval must be obtained from the competent national authority of an EU member state in which the clinical trial is to be conducted.
−Removed: Furthermore, a clinical trial may only be started after a competent ethics committee has issued a favorable opinion on the clinical trial application (“CTA”), which must be supported by an investigational medicinal product dossier with supporting information prescribed by the Clinical Trials Directive and corresponding national laws of the member states and further detailed in applicable guidance documents.
−Removed: The sponsor of a clinical trial, or its legal representative, must be based in the European Economic Area.
+Added: Once the CTR comes into effect however, it will be possible within the EU to make a single harmonized electronic submission and have a single assessment process for clinical trials conducted in multiple member states.
+Added: Furthermore, a clinical trial may only be started after a competent ethics committee has issued a favorable opinion on the clinical trial application (“CTA”), which must be supported by an investigational medicinal product dossier with supporting information prescribed by the CTD and corresponding national laws of the member states and further detailed in applicable guidance documents.
+Added: In the case of Advanced Therapy Investigational Medical Products (“ATIMPs”) consisting of or containing Genetically Modified Organisms (“GMOs”), as is the case for uniQure’s products, an additional approval for the environmental and biosafety aspects of the use and release of the GMO is required by the GMO competent authorities and GMO directives have been implemented in different ways by Member States;
+Added: either following the directive for “Contained use” (Directive 2009/41/EC) or “deliberate release” (Directive2001/18/EC).
+Added: This results in some EU member states, the GMO application must be approved before the Clinical Trial Application (CTA) is submitted, in some after approval of the CTA and in some parallel.
+Added: The sponsor of a clinical trial, or its legal representative, must be based in the European Economic Area (“EEA”).
European regulators and ethics committees also require the submission of adverse event reports during a study and a copy of the final study report.
+Added: When the CTR comes into force member states may dispense with the requirement for a legal representative for a non-EU resident sponsor provided there is a contact person based in the EEA.
Marketing approval
3 unchanged sentences
Drugs for human use containing a new active substance for which the therapeutic indication is the treatment of specified diseases, including but not limited to acquired immune deficiency syndrome, neurodegenerative disorders, auto-immune diseases and other immune dysfunctions, as well as drugs designated as orphan drugs pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 141/2000, as amended, also fall within the mandatory scope of the centralized procedure.
−Removed: Because of our focus on gene therapies, which fall within the category of advanced therapy medicinal products (“ATMPs”) and orphan indications, our products and product candidates are expected to qualify for the centralized procedure.
−Removed: In the marketing authorization application (“MAA”) the applicant has to properly and sufficiently demonstrate the quality, safety and efficacy of the drug.
+Added: Because of our focus on gene therapies, which fall within the category of advanced therapy medicinal products (“ATMPs”) and orphan indications, our products and product candidates will need to go through the centralized procedure.
+Added: In the marketing authorization application (“MAA”) the applicant must properly and sufficiently demonstrate the quality, safety, and efficacy of the drug.
Guidance on the factors that the EMA will consider in relation to the development and evaluation of ATMPs have been issued and include, among other things, the preclinical studies required to characterize ATMPs;
1 unchanged sentence
and post-approval measures required to monitor patients and evaluate the long-term efficacy and potential adverse reactions of ATMPs.
−Removed: Although these guidelines are not legally binding, we believe that our compliance with them is likely necessary to gain and maintain approval for any of our product candidates.
+Added: Although these guidelines are not legally binding, we believe that our compliance will effectively be necessary to gain and maintain approval for any of our product candidates.
The maximum timeframe for the evaluation of an MAA under the centralized procedure is 210 days after receipt of a valid application subject to clock stops during which the applicant deals with EMA questions.
Market access can be expedited through the grant of conditional authorization for a medicine that may fulfil unmet needs which may be granted provided that the benefit-risk balance of the product is positive.
−Removed: The benefit-risk balance is likely to be positive if the applicant is able to provide comprehensive data and the benefit to public health of the medicinal product's immediate availability on the market outweighs the risks due to need for further data.
+Added: The benefit-risk balance is likely to be positive if the applicant can provide comprehensive data and the benefit to public health of the medicinal product's immediate availability on the market outweighs the risks due to need for further data.
Such authorizations are valid for one year and can be renewed annually.
3 unchanged sentences
Applicants for conditional authorizations can benefit from early dialogue with EMA through scientific advice or protocol assistance and discuss their development plan well in advance of the submission of a marketing-authorization application.
−Removed: Other stakeholders (e.g.
−Removed: health technology assessment bodies) can be included.
+Added: Other stakeholders (e.g., health technology assessment bodies) can be included.
In addition, the priority medicines (PRIME) scheme for medicines that may offer a major therapeutic advantage over existing treatments, or benefit patients without treatment options based on early clinical data, is intended to support the development of medicines that target an unmet medical need.
3 unchanged sentences
According to Article 14(11) of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004, as amended, and Article 10 of Directive 2001/83/EC, as amended, upon receiving marketing authorization, new chemical entities approved on the basis of complete independent data package benefit from eight years of data exclusivity and an additional two years of market exclusivity.
−Removed: Data exclusivity prevents regulatory authorities in the European Union from referencing the innovator’s data to assess a generic (abbreviated) application during the eight-year period.
+Added: Data exclusivity prevents regulatory authorities in the European Union from referencing the innovator’s data to assess a generic (abbreviated) application during the eight-year period from when the first placement of the product on the EEA market.
During the additional two-year period of market exclusivity, a generic marketing authorization can be submitted, and the innovator’s data may be referenced, but no generic medicinal product can be marketed until the expiration of the market exclusivity.
The overall ten-year period will be extended to a maximum of eleven years if, during the first eight years of those ten years, the marketing authorization holder obtains an authorization for one or more new therapeutic indications which, during the scientific evaluation prior to their authorization, are held to bring a significant clinical benefit in comparison with existing therapies.
−Removed: Even if a compound is considered to be a new chemical entity and the innovator is able to gain the period of data exclusivity, another company nevertheless could also market another version of the drug if such company obtained marketing authorization based on an
−Removed: MAA with a complete independent data package of pharmaceutical test, preclinical tests and clinical trials.
+Added: Even if a compound is considered to be a new chemical entity and the innovator can gain the period of data exclusivity, another company nevertheless could also market another version of the drug if such company obtained marketing authorization based on an MAA with a complete independent data package of pharmaceutical test, preclinical tests, and clinical trials.
The EMA has also issued guidelines for a comprehensive comparability exercise for biosimilars, and for specific classes of biological products.
Under Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 article 3 as amended (Orphan Drug Regulation, (“ODR”)) a product can benefit from orphan drug status if it is intended for the diagnosis, prevention, or treatment of a life-threatening or chronically debilitating condition affecting not more than five in 10,000 people in the European Community (EC) when the application is made.
−Removed: The principle benefit of such status is 10 years’ market exclusivity once they are approved preventing the subsequent approval of similar medicines with similar indications.
+Added: The principal benefit of such status is 10 years’ market exclusivity once they are approved preventing the subsequent approval of similar medicines with similar indications although this may be reduced to six years under certain circumstances including if the product is sufficiently profitable not to justify maintenance of market exclusivity.
Additional rules apply to medicinal products for pediatric use under Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006, as amended.
1 unchanged sentence
Instead, medicinal products designated as orphan medicinal product may enjoy an extension of the ten-year market exclusivity period granted under Regulation (EC) No 141/2000, as amended, to twelve years subject to the conditions applicable to orphan drugs.
−Removed: Manufacturing and manufacturers’ license
+Added: Manufacturing and promotion
Pursuant to Commission Directive 2003/94/EC as transposed into the national laws of the member states, the manufacturing of investigational medicinal products and approved drugs is subject to a separate manufacturer’s license and must be conducted in strict compliance with cGMP requirements, which mandate the methods, facilities, and controls used in manufacturing, processing, and packing of drugs to assure their safety and identity.
8 unchanged sentences
Other Regulatory Requirements
−Removed: A holder of a marketing authorization for a medicinal product is legally obliged to fulfill a number of obligations by virtue of its status as a marketing authorization holder (“MAH”).
+Added: A holder of a marketing authorization for a medicinal product is legally obliged to fulfill several obligations by virtue of its status as a marketing authorization holder (“MAH”).
The MAH can delegate the performance of related tasks to third parties, such as distributors or marketing collaborators, provided that this delegation is appropriately documented and the MAH maintains legal responsibility and liability.
18 unchanged sentences
Some jurisdictions operate positive and negative list systems under which products may only be marketed once a reimbursement price has been agreed.
−Removed: Other member states allow companies to determine the prices for their medicines but monitor and control company profits and may limit or restrict reimbursement.
+Added: Other member states allow companies to determine the prices for their medicines but monitor and control company profits and may limit or restrict reimbursement and can include retrospective rebates to the Government.
The downward pressure on healthcare costs in general, particularly prescription drugs, has become very intense.
−Removed: As a result, increasingly high barriers are being erected to the entry of new products and some of EU countries require the completion of studies that compare the cost-effectiveness of a particular product candidate to currently available therapies in order to obtain reimbursement or pricing approval.
+Added: As a result, increasingly high barriers are being erected to the entry of new products and some of EU countries require the completion of studies that compare the cost-effectiveness of a particular product candidate to currently available therapies to obtain reimbursement or pricing approval.
Special pricing and reimbursement rules may apply to orphan drugs.
2 unchanged sentences
In addition, results-based rules or agreements on reimbursement may apply.
−Removed: Recently, a process has been formalized that allows sponsors to receive parallel advice from EMA and HTA’s for pivotal clinical studies designed to support marketing approval.
+Added: Recently, a process has been formalized that allows sponsors to receive parallel advice from EMA and relevant national health technology assessment (“HTA”) bodies for pivotal clinical studies designed to support marketing approval.
This process was followed for etranacogene dezaparvovec.
15 unchanged sentences
Orphan drug designation does not shorten the duration of the regulatory review and approval process.
−Removed: As of December 31, 2019, we had a total of 248 employees, 116 of whom are based in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, and 132 in Lexington, Massachusetts.
+Added: Human Capital Resources
+Added: As of December 31, 2020, we had a total of 332 employees, 162 of whom are based in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, and 170 in Lexington, Massachusetts, United States of America.
As of December 31, 2020, 62 of our employees had an M.D.
2 unchanged sentences
None of our employees are subject to collective bargaining or other labor organizations.
−Removed: We believe that we have good relations with all of our employees and with the works council in the Netherlands.
+Added: We believe that we have good relations with all our employees and with the works council in the Netherlands.
+Added: Our values are to:
+Added: ● Be passionate about the patient;
+Added: ● Act with integrity and respect;
+Added: ● Take ownership and act with urgency;
+Added: ● Collaborate for success;
+Added: ● Innovate every day;
+Added: ● Focus relentlessly on quality.
+Added: Development of our culture is reflected as part of our annual corporate goals.
+Added: We invest in numerous learning opportunities focused on individual, management and team development and other initiatives to support our employees and build our culture.
Corporate Information
4 unchanged sentences
acquired the entire business and assets of AMT and completed a share-for-share exchange with the shareholders of AMT.
−Removed: Effective February 10, 2014, in connection with the initial public offering, the Company converted into a public company with limited liability (naamloze vennootschap) and changed its legal name from uniQure B.V.
+Added: Effective February 10, 2014, in connection with the initial public offering, we converted into a public company with limited liability (naamloze vennootschap) and changed its legal name from uniQure B.V.
to uniQure N.V.
−Removed: The Company is registered in the trade register of the Dutch Chamber of Commerce (Kamer van Koophandel) under number 54385229.
−Removed: The Company’s headquarters are in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, and its registered office is located at Paasheuvelweg 25a, Amsterdam 1105 BP, the Netherlands and its telephone number is +31 20 240 6000.
−Removed: From our initial public offering until December 31, 2018 we were an emerging growth company, as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (“JOBS Act”).
+Added: We are registered in the trade register of the Dutch Chamber of Commerce (Kamer van Koophandel) under number 54385229.
+Added: Our headquarters are in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, and its registered office is located at Paasheuvelweg 25a, Amsterdam 1105 BP, the Netherlands and its telephone number is +31 20 240 6000.
+Added: From our initial public offering until December 31, 2018, we were an emerging growth company, as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012.
On the last business day of our second quarter in fiscal year 2018 the aggregate worldwide market value of ordinary shares held by our non-affiliate shareholders exceeded $700.0 million.
As a result, as of December 31, 2018, we were considered a large accelerated filer and as a consequence lost our status as an emerging growth company.
−Removed: We are therefore no longer permitted to rely on exemptions from certain disclosure requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are emerging growth companies.
Our website address is www.uniqure.com.
3 unchanged sentences
We are not including the information on our website as a part of, nor incorporating it by reference into, this report.
−Removed: Additionally, the SEC maintains a website that contains annual, quarterly, and current reports, proxy statements, and other information that issuers (including us) file electronically with the SEC.
−Removed: The SEC’s website address is http://www.sec.gov.
−Removed: Unless the context indicates otherwise, all references to “uniQure” or the “Company” refer to uniQure and its consolidated subsidiaries.
Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.