3 unchanged sentences
In December 2016, a copyright lawsuit was filed against our subsidiary, Wooga, in the regional court of Berlin, Germany.
−Removed: The plaintiff is suing for additional remuneration for his contributions to a storyline provided for two of Wooga’s games and alleged reuse of parts of that storyline in one of Wooga’s other games.
+Added: The plaintiff is suing for additional remuneration for his contributions to a storyline provided for one of Wooga’s games and alleged reuse of parts of that storyline in one of Wooga’s other games.
We have defended this case vigorously and will continue to do so.
−Removed: In April 2018, a putative class action lawsuit, Sean Wilson, et al.
−Removed: Playtika LTD, Playtika Holding Corp.
−Removed: and Caesars Interactive Entertainment, Inc.
−Removed: was filed against us in federal district court that is directed against certain of our social casino games, including Caesars Slots , Slotomania , House of Fun and Vegas Downtown Slots .
−Removed: The plaintiff alleged three causes of action, including that our social casino games violate Washington State gambling laws, violate Washington State consumer protection laws and a claim of unjust enrichment.
−Removed: The plaintiff sought certification of a class action, monetary damages and injunctive relief.
−Removed: In August 2020, we entered into a settlement agreement, which remains contingent on final court approval, to settle the Sean Wilson litigation.
−Removed: Under the terms of the settlement, which will take effect only after final court approval of the proposed class settlement, we and CIE will pay a combined total of $38.0 million into a settlement fund and all members of the settlement class who do not exclude themselves will release all claims relating to the subject matter of the lawsuit.
−Removed: In August 2020, the court granted preliminary approval of the settlement agreement, and in February 2021, the court granted final approval of the settlement agreement.
In November 2013, our subsidiary, Playtika, Ltd., sent an initial demand letter to Enigmatus s.r.o., a game developer in the Czech Republic, which owns various U.S.
4 unchanged sentences
applied to register one of our trademarks in the United Kingdom and European Union, and we successfully opposed its applications.
−Removed: 2016, Enigmatus s.r.o., filed a trademark infringement lawsuit, Enigmatus, s.r.o.
+Added: In December 2016, Enigmatus s.r.o., filed a trademark infringement lawsuit, Enigmatus, s.r.o.
Playtika LTD and Caesars Interactive Entertainment, Inc.
10 unchanged sentences
District Court, District of Nevada.
−Removed: The plaintiff alleges that the defendants are infringing certain patents related to certain of its games and is seeking monetary damages.
−Removed: We submitted our response to the complaint on February 18, 2021.
−Removed: Due to the early nature of this case, it is not possible to assess whether this case may be material to our business.
−Removed: We intend to defend the case vigorously.
+Added: The plaintiff alleged that the defendants are infringing certain patents in the field of communication and the transferring of images between the gaming server and the end device on certain of its social casino games.
+Added: The plaintiff is seeking monetary damages.
+Added: On April 7, 2021, following the Company’s preliminary motions for dismissal and stay, the Company’s motion for stay was approved by the court pending ruling on motions to dismiss.
+Added: On July 7, 2021, the Court issued an order finding each of the plaintiff’s asserted patents invalid as failing to comply with certain legal requirements and dismissing the lawsuit as to all parties.
+Added: On July 19, 2021, the Plaintiff filed an appeal.
+Added: Playtika Holding Corp.
+Added: and Playtika Ltd.
+Added: intend to defend the case vigorously.
+Added: On November 23, 2021, the Company, its directors and certain of its officers were named in a putative class action lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Bar-Asher v.
+Added: Playtika Holding Corp.
+Added: The complaint is allegedly brought on behalf of a class of purchasers of the Company’s securities between January 15, 2021 and November 2, 2021, and alleges violations of federal securities laws arising out of alleged misstatements or omissions by the defendants during the alleged class period.
+Added: The complaint seeks, among other things, damages and attorneys’ fees and costs on behalf of the putative class.
+Added: As the case is in preliminary stages, the Company cannot estimate what impact, if any, the litigation may have on its results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.
MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
1 unchanged sentence
Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.