5 unchanged sentences
• Difficult market and geopolitical conditions may reduce the value or hamper the performance of the investments made by our products or impair the ability of our products to raise or deploy capital.
−Removed: • Elevated interest rates and persistent inflation could have a material adverse effect on our business and that of our products’ portfolio companies and investments.
+Added: • Fluctuations in interest rates and future increases in inflation could have a material adverse effect on our business and that of our products’ portfolio companies and investments.
Investment Management
3 unchanged sentences
• Intense competition among alternative asset managers may make fundraising and the deployment of capital more difficult, thereby limiting our ability to grow or maintain our FPAUM.
−Removed: Such competition may be amplified by changes in fund investor allocations away from alternative asset managers.
+Added: Such competition may be amplified by changes in product investor allocations away from alternative asset managers.
• The historical returns attributable to our products should not be considered as indicative of the future results of our products or of our future results or of any returns expected on an investment in our Class A Shares.
3 unchanged sentences
• The products and investment strategies we currently pursue may expose us to specific market, tax, regulatory and other risks.
−Removed: Conflicts of Interest
−Removed: • Conflicts of interest may arise in our allocation of capital and co-investment opportunities, fees and expenses amongst products or in circumstances where our products hold investments at different levels of the capital structure.
−Removed: • Our entitlement and that of certain Principals and employees to receive performance revenues from certain of our products may create an incentive for us to make decisions, including more speculative investments and determinations on behalf of our products, than would be the case in the absence of such performance income.
−Removed: • Conflicts of interest may arise when one or more products make an investment in a company with which other products or platforms have a business relationship.
−Removed: • Fulfilling our obligations incident to being a public company, including compliance with the Exchange Act and the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the Dodd-Frank Act, are expensive and time-consuming, and there can be no assurance that we will satisfy these obligations.
−Removed: • The anticipated benefits of acquisitions that we may pursue may not be realized or may take longer than expected to realize.
+Added: • The anticipated benefits of recent or future acquisitions may not be realized or may take longer than expected to realize.
• Rapid growth of our business may be difficult to sustain and may place significant demands on our administrative, operational and financial resources.
3 unchanged sentences
• We depend on our senior management team, senior investment professionals and other key personnel to provide their services to us, our investment advisers and our products.
−Removed: • Employee misconduct could harm us by impairing our ability to attract and retain fund investors and subjecting us to significant legal liability, regulatory scrutiny and reputation harm.
+Added: • Employee misconduct could harm us by impairing our ability to attract and retain product investors and subjecting us to significant legal liability, regulatory scrutiny and reputational harm.
• Our future growth depends on our ability to attract, retain and develop human capital in a highly competitive talent market.
+Added: Conflicts of Interest
+Added: • Conflicts of interest may arise in our allocation of capital and co-investment opportunities, fees and expenses amongst products or in circumstances where our products hold investments at different levels of the capital structure.
+Added: • Our entitlement and that of certain Principals and employees to receive performance revenues from certain of our products may create an incentive for us to make decisions, including more speculative investments and determinations on behalf of our products, than would be the case in the absence of such performance income.
+Added: • Conflicts of interest may arise when one or more products make an investment in a company with which other products or platforms have a business relationship.
Legal and Regulatory Environment
• Our business is subject to extensive domestic and foreign regulations that may subject us to significant costs and compliance requirements, and there can be no assurance that we will satisfactorily comply with such regulations.
−Removed: • We and our products are subject to increasing scrutiny from certain investors, third party assessors, our stockholders and other stakeholders with respect to ESG-related matters.
+Added: • We, our products and our products’ portfolio companies are subject to increasing scrutiny from certain investors, third party assessors, our stockholders and other stakeholders with respect to ESG-related topics.
• Increased data protection regulation may result in increased complexities and risk in connection with the operation of our business and our products.
2 unchanged sentences
• The multi-class structure of our common stock has the effect of concentrating voting power with the Principals, which limits an investor’s ability to influence the outcome of important transactions, including a change in control.
−Removed: • The Registrant is a holding company and its only material source of cash is its indirect interest (held through Blue Owl GP) in the Blue Owl Operating Partnerships, and it is accordingly dependent upon distributions made by its subsidiaries to pay taxes, make payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement and pay dividends.
+Added: • Blue Owl Capital Inc.
+Added: is a holding company and its only material source of cash is its indirect interest (held through Blue Owl GP) in the Blue Owl Operating Partnerships, and it is accordingly dependent upon distributions made by its subsidiaries to pay taxes, make payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement and pay dividends.
Class A Shares
3 unchanged sentences
Difficult market and geopolitical conditions may reduce the value or hamper the performance of the investments made by our products or impair the ability of our products to raise or deploy capital.
−Removed: Our business is affected by conditions and trends in the global financial markets and the global economic and political climate relating to, among other things, elevated and rising interest rates, the availability and cost of credit, persistent inflation, economic uncertainty, changes in laws (including laws and regulations relating to our taxation, taxation of our clients and applicable to alternative asset managers), trade policies, commodity prices, tariffs, currency exchange rates and controls, political elections and administration transitions, and national and international political events (including wars and other forms of conflict, terrorist acts, and security operations), work stoppages, labor shortages and labor disputes, supply chain disruptions and catastrophic events such as fires, floods, earthquakes, tornadoes, hurricanes and global health pandemics.
+Added: Our business is affected by conditions and trends in the global financial markets and the global economic and political climate relating to, among other things, fluctuations in interest rates, the availability and cost of credit, future increases in inflation, economic uncertainty, changes in laws (including laws and regulations relating to our taxation, taxation of our clients and applicable to alternative asset managers), trade policies, commodity prices, tariffs, currency exchange rates and controls, political elections and administration transitions, and national and international political events (including wars and other forms of conflict, terrorist acts, and security operations), work stoppages, labor shortages and labor disputes, supply chain disruptions and catastrophic events such as fires, floods, earthquakes, tornadoes, hurricanes and global health pandemics.
+Added: The United States has recently enacted and proposed to enact significant new tariffs.
+Added: Additionally, the new Presidential administration has directed various federal agencies to further evaluate key aspects of U.S.
+Added: trade policy and there has been ongoing discussion and commentary regarding potential significant changes to U.S.
+Added: trade policies, treaties and tariffs.
These factors are outside of our control and may affect the level and volatility of credit and securities prices and the liquidity and value of fund investments, and we and our products may not be able to or may choose not to manage our exposure to these conditions.
−Removed: Global financial markets have experienced heightened volatility in recent periods, including as a result of economic and political events in or affecting the world’s major economies, such as the conflict between Russia and Ukraine and more recently between Israel and Hamas.
−Removed: Concerns over increasing inflation, economic recession, as well as interest rate volatility and fluctuations in oil and gas prices resulting from global production and demand levels, as well as geopolitical tension, have exacerbated market volatility.
+Added: Global financial markets have experienced heightened volatility in recent periods, including as a result of economic and political events in or affecting the world’s major economies, such as the ongoing wars and conflicts between Russia and Ukraine, as well as political and social unrest in the Middle East and North Africa region.
+Added: Concerns over economic recession, future increases in inflation, interest rate volatility, fluctuations in oil and gas prices resulting from global production and demand levels and geopolitical tension, have exacerbated market volatility.
+Added: Additionally, social unrest and other political and security concerns may not abate, may worsen and could spread.
+Added: Our business and financial performance could be adversely affected by political, economic or related developments both within and outside of regions experiencing ongoing conflicts because of interrelationships within the global financial markets.
During periods of difficult market conditions or slowdowns, which may be across one or more industries, sectors or geographies, our products’ portfolio companies may experience decreased revenues, financial losses, credit rating downgrades, difficulty in obtaining access to financing and increased funding costs.
−Removed: During such periods, those companies may also have difficulty in pursuing growth strategies, expanding their businesses and operations (including to the extent that they are Partner Managers, raising additional capital) and be unable to meet their debt service obligations or other expenses as they become due, including obligations and expenses payable to our products.
+Added: During such periods, those companies may also have difficulty in pursuing growth strategies, expanding their businesses and operations (including raising additional capital for those that are Partner Managers) and be unable to meet their debt service obligations or other expenses as they become due, including obligations and expenses payable to our products.
Negative financial results in our products’ portfolio companies may reduce the net asset value of our products, result in the impairment of assets and reduce the investment returns for our products, which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and cash flow or ability to raise additional capital through new or successor products.
−Removed: In addition, such conditions would increase the risk of default with respect to credit-oriented or debt investments by our products.
+Added: In addition, such conditions would increase the risk of default with respect to credit-oriented or debt investments by our products or their portfolio companies, which could require our products, or their portfolio companies, to write down investments or foreclose upon the associated assets.
Our products may be adversely affected by reduced opportunities to exit and realize value from their investments, by lower than expected returns on investments made prior to the deterioration of the credit markets and by our inability to find suitable investments for our products to effectively deploy capital, which could adversely affect our ability to raise new products and thus adversely impact our prospects for future growth.
−Removed: Inflation may adversely affect the business, results of operations and financial condition of our products and their portfolio companies.
+Added: Fluctuations in interest rates and future increases in inflation may adversely affect the business, results of operations and financial condition of our products and their portfolio companies.
Certain of our products and their portfolio companies operate in industries that have been impacted by inflation.
−Removed: Although the U.S.
−Removed: inflation rate has decreased in the fourth quarter, it remains well above the historic levels over the past several decades.
−Removed: Such inflationary pressures have increased the costs of labor, energy and raw materials and have adversely affected consumer spending, economic growth and our products’ portfolio companies’ operations.
+Added: Recent inflationary pressures have increased the costs of labor, energy and raw materials and have adversely affected consumer spending, economic growth and our products’ portfolio companies’ operations.
If such portfolio companies are unable to pass any increases in the costs of their operations along to their customers, it could adversely affect their operating results.
2 unchanged sentences
Any decreases in the fair value of our products’ investments could result in future realized or unrealized losses.
−Removed: Elevated and rising interest rates could have a material adverse effect on our business and that of our products’ portfolio companies.
−Removed: Elevated and rising interest rates could have a dampening effect on overall economic activity, the financial condition of our customers and the financial condition of the end customers who ultimately create demand for the capital we supply, all of which could negatively affect demand for our products’ capital.
−Removed: The Federal Reserve increased the federal funds rate four times in 2023, increasing the federal funds rate by 1% since the start of 2023 and 5.25% since the start of 2022.
−Removed: Although the Federal Reserve has signaled the potential for federal funds rate cuts in 2024, the rate and timing of such decreases remains unknown.
−Removed: Persistently high interest rates and uncertainty surrounding future Federal Reserve actions may have a material effect on our business making it particularly difficult for us to obtain financing at attractive rates, impacting our ability to execute on our growth strategies or future acquisitions.
−Removed: Our cash and cash equivalents could be adversely affected if the financial institutions in which we hold our cash and cash
−Removed: equivalents fail.
+Added: Fluctuations in interest rates could have a material adverse effect on our business and that of our products’ portfolio companies.
+Added: Fluctuations in interest rates could have a dampening effect on overall economic activity, the financial condition of our customers and the financial condition of the end customers who ultimately create demand for the capital we supply, all of which could negatively affect demand for our products’ capital.
+Added: The Federal Reserve decreased the federal funds rate twice in 2024.
+Added: Although the Federal Reserve has signaled the potential for additional federal funds rate cuts, there remains uncertainty around the rate and timing of decreases, including as a result of the transition to the new U.S presidential administration.
+Added: Uncertainty surrounding future Federal Reserve actions may have a material effect on our business making it particularly difficult for us to obtain financing at attractive rates, impacting our ability to execute on our growth strategies or future acquisitions.
+Added: Our cash and cash equivalents could be adversely affected if the financial institutions in which we hold our cash and cash equivalents fail.
We regularly maintain cash balances at third-party financial institutions in excess of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance limits.
6 unchanged sentences
If any of our BDCs’ gross assets or net investment income (before Part I Fees and Part II Fees) were to decline significantly for any reason, including, without limitation, due to fair value accounting requirements, the poor performance of its investments or the inability or increased cost to obtain or maintain borrowings for each of our BDCs, the amount of the fees we receive from our BDCs, including the base management fee and the Part I Fees, would also decline significantly, which could have an adverse effect on our revenues and results of operations.
−Removed: Our investment advisory and management agreements typically provide that the rates at which we earn advisory fees from certain of our BDCs increase after our BDCs are publicly listed (where before the listing the advisory fees typically are a reduced base management fee with a reduced or no Part I or II Fees).
−Removed: If our BDCs do not become publicly listed on anticipated timeframes or at all for any reason, including the NAV performance of our BDCs, Blue Owl will not benefit from this increase, and those BDCs may need to return their capital to investors, further reducing our management fees.
+Added: Our investment advisory and management agreements typically provide that the rates at which we earn advisory fees from certain of our BDCs increase after such BDCs are publicly listed (where before the listing the advisory fees typically are a reduced base management fee with a reduced or no Part I or II Fees).
+Added: If these BDCs do not become publicly listed on anticipated timeframes or at all for any reason, including the NAV performance of our BDCs, Blue Owl will not benefit from this increase, and those BDCs may need to return their capital to investors, further reducing our management fees.
We may also, from time to time, (a) waive or voluntarily defer any fees payable to us by our BDCs or any BDCs that we may manage after the date hereof and (b) restructure any existing fee waivers in place with our BDCs so that such of our BDCs will be obligated to pay fee amounts that are less than the full fee amounts owed to us pursuant to the terms of the applicable investment advisory and management agreements between us and such BDC, and the duration and extent of such waivers and deferrals in each of (a) and (b) may need to be significant to support continued fundraising.
−Removed: In addition to those arrangements, we have entered into and in the future may enter into expense supporting arrangements with certain of our BDCs where we pay or reimburse certain expenses of our BDCs in order to support their target dividend payments.
+Added: In addition to those arrangements, we have entered into and in the future may enter into expense supporting arrangements with certain of our BDCs under which we pay or reimburse certain expenses of our BDCs in order to support their target dividend payments.
Our investment advisory and management agreements with our BDCs renew for successive annual periods subject to the approval of the applicable BDC’s board of directors, including a separate vote of a majority of such BDC’s independent directors, or by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of such BDC’s outstanding voting securities.
2 unchanged sentences
Private Funds
−Removed: For our other non-BDC Credit products, as well as GP Strategic Capital and certain Real Estate products, which we refer to as our private funds, we enter into investment advisory and management agreements whereby we generally receive base management fees from the inception of such fund through the liquidation of such fund or for most of our GP Strategic Capital products for a set period.
−Removed: Non-BDC Credit products generally have a base management fee that is typically based on a percentage of gross asset value (which, if applicable, includes the portion of such investments purchased with leverage), whereas our GP Strategic Capital products generally have a management fee that is initially a set percentage of capital committed by investors, and then, following a step down event (generally either the end of the investment period or, for certain funds, when the fund’s commitments become substantially invested or drawn), is adjusted to a lower percentage of the fund’s cost of unrealized investments, subject to impairment losses for certain funds.
−Removed: With respect to our Real Estate products, our Permanent Capital vehicles have a management fee that is typically based on a percentage of net asset value, and our closed-end vehicles generally have a management fee that is initially a set percentage of capital committed by investors, and then, following a step down event (generally the end of the investment period or commencement of a successor fund), is adjusted to the same or in some cases a lower percentage of the fund’s cost of unrealized investments.
−Removed: Following a management fee step down event, the management fee we receive will be reduced when a fund realizes investments or in certain cases when there are
−Removed: permanent changes to the cost basis of unrealized investments.
−Removed: While those funds are not required to realize assets as of any date, there is an obligation to explore liquidity strategies with respect to a fund, and should a liquidity strategy event occur prior to the management fee end date, it could cause a reduction in the amount of management fees we are otherwise entitled to receive.
−Removed: Further, any realization of assets will be within the control of certain of our employees who own an interest in a portion of the carried interest that does not belong to us and who may have an incentive to effect a realization earlier than one otherwise would expect had carried interest not been applicable.
−Removed: As our private funds generally have end dates for paying management fees, our revenues will decline in respect of such funds if we are unable to successfully raise successor funds that replace the management fee payments that terminate on the older funds or such successor funds do not generate fees at the same rate due to their size and/or fee structure.
+Added: For our other non-BDC Credit products, as well as GP Strategic Capital and certain Real Assets products, which we refer to as our private funds, we enter into investment advisory and management agreements whereby we generally receive base management fees from the inception of such fund through the liquidation of such fund or for certain of our GP Strategic Capital
+Added: products for a set period.
+Added: Non-BDC Credit products generally have a base management fee that is typically based on a percentage of gross asset value (which, if applicable, includes the portion of such investments purchased with leverage) although our alternative credit products generally have a management fee that is typically based on net invested capital, whereas our GP Strategic Capital products generally have a management fee that is initially a set percentage of capital committed by investors, and then, following a step down event (generally either the end of the investment period or, for certain funds, when the fund’s commitments become substantially invested or drawn), is adjusted to a lower percentage of the fund’s cost of unrealized investments, subject to impairment losses for certain funds.
+Added: While GP Strategic Capital funds are not required to realize assets as of any date, if and to the extent a liquidity strategy event occurs prior to the management fee end date, this could cause a reduction in the amount of management fees we are otherwise entitled to receive.
+Added: Further, any realization of assets will be within the control of certain of our employees who separately own an interest in a portion of the carried interest and who therefore may have an incentive to effect a realization earlier than one otherwise would expect without such carried interest ownership.
+Added: With respect to our Real Assets products, our Permanent Capital vehicles have a management fee that is typically based on a percentage of net asset value, and our closed-end vehicles generally have a management fee that is initially a set percentage of capital committed by investors plus a set percentage of the fund’s invested capital with respect to unrealized investments, and then, following a step down event (generally the end of the investment period or commencement of a successor fund), is adjusted to the same or in some cases a lower percentage of the fund’s invested capital with respect to unrealized investments.
+Added: Following a management fee step down event, the management fee we receive will be reduced when a fund realizes investments or in certain cases when there are permanent changes to the cost basis of unrealized investments.
+Added: As our private funds generally have end dates for paying management fees, our revenues will decline in respect of such funds if we are unable to successfully raise successor funds to replace the management fee payments that terminate on the older funds or such successor funds do not generate fees at the same rate due to their size and/or fee structure.
Further, to the extent we are unable to meet anticipated fundraising targets or if there are significant redemptions, our ability to collect management fees will be impaired.
Additionally, given that such management fees are often based on gross asset value, acquisition costs or invested capital, either throughout the fund term or the portion of the term following the investment period, the management fee received in respect of such fund will be reduced when a fund realizes investments or if the value of an investment is impaired.
−Removed: During the investment period of many funds, the fund expects to actively recycle capital into new investments, which would have the impact of replacing investments that have been realized during the investment period, but there are many factors that may limit our ability to effectively recycle capital and realize the full fee potential of any particular fund.
+Added: During the investment period of many funds, the fund expects to actively recycle capital into new investments, which would have the impact of replacing investments that have been realized during the investment period, but there are many factors that may limit our ability to effectively recycle capital and realize the full fee potential of any particular fund, including availability of new investments suitable to a particular fund’s strategy.
Further, our right to receive management fees can be impaired by certain actions of investors in a private fund.
−Removed: Our private funds generally provide investors with:
−Removed: (1) the right to terminate such fund on both a cause basis and a no fault basis;
−Removed: (2) the right to remove us as manager of a fund for cause or on a no-fault basis;
−Removed: and (3) the right to create an early step down event with respect to a fund on a cause basis.
−Removed: If the investors exercised their right to vote for an early termination, we would typically continue to receive management fee through the liquidation of such fund, but we could face pressure to liquidate investments earlier than we otherwise believe is appropriate to maximize the value of such investment.
+Added: Our private funds generally provide investors with the right to terminate such fund on both a for-cause basis and a no-fault basis, and may also provide for the right to remove us as manager of a fund for cause or on a no-fault basis and/or the right to create an early step down event with respect to a fund on a for cause basis.
+Added: If investors in a private fund exercised their right to vote for an early termination, we would typically continue to receive management fee through the liquidation of such fund, but we could face pressure to liquidate investments earlier than we otherwise believe is appropriate to maximize the value of such investment.
Certain funds also provide investors with the right to remove the general partner of such fund for cause or on a no-fault basis.
−Removed: Upon the removal of the general partner of a fund becoming effective, the investment advisory and management agreement in respect of such fund will cease to exist and our rights to payment of management fee will terminate.
+Added: Upon the removal of the general partner of a fund becoming effective, the investment advisory and management agreement in respect of such fund will cease to exist and our rights to payment of management fees will terminate.
In some cases, investors may also have the right to redeem after certain periods of time or following regulatory or key person concerns, which would also reduce the base on which fees are charged.
1 unchanged sentence
as such interests are redeemed, the fees will decrease unless we are able to find new investors to replace those redeeming.
−Removed: Notwithstanding the formulas for calculating management fees provided in the governing documents for our products, Blue Owl has provided (and expects to provide in the future) discounts to investors on such fees based on the size of their commitments to the fund (or Blue Owl products generally), the timing of their commitments to the fund or other factors that Blue Owl deems relevant.
+Added: Notwithstanding the formulas for calculating management fees provided in the governing documents for our products, Blue Owl has provided (and expects to provide in the future) discounts or fee holidays to investors on such fees based on the size of their commitments to the fund (or Blue Owl products generally), the timing of their commitments to the fund or other factors that Blue Owl deems relevant.
Certain investors are effectively given management fee discounts through specified interests and discounts with respect to carried interest or performance income through the grant of participation rights, fee rebates or revenue shares.
Although such discounts will typically be awarded in circumstances where Blue Owl management believes there will ultimately be long-term benefits to Blue Owl, there can be no assurance that the ultimate benefit attained will be commensurate with the discount awarded, or as to how long it may take to recoup such value.
−Removed: Additionally, Blue Owl may not be able to maintain its current fee structure as a result of increased transparency required by SEC rules or industry pressure from fund investors to reduce fees.
+Added: Additionally, Blue Owl may not be able to maintain its current fee structure as a result of increased transparency required by SEC rules or industry pressure from product investors to reduce fees.
More recently, institutional investors have been increasing pressure to reduce management and incentive fees charged by external managers, whether through direct fee discounts as described in this paragraph, deferrals, rebates or by other means.
3 unchanged sentences
Such services include arrangement, syndication, origination, structuring analysis, capital structure and business plan advice and other services.
−Removed: Certain types of transaction-related fees are required to be distributed to Blue Owl products and other products under the terms of our Co-investment Exemptive Order, as discussed in “—Risks Related to Our Products—Conflicts of Interest—Conflicts of interest may arise in our allocation of capital and co-investment opportunities .
−Removed: ” below, or are required to be distributed to investors in our products or offset against management fees that would otherwise be payable pursuant to the terms of the governing agreements of the relevant vehicles, while other types of related fees may be retained by us with no offset against management fees and contribute to our revenues and, ultimately, to our net income.
+Added: Certain types of transaction-related fees are required to be distributed to Blue Owl products and other products under the terms of our Co-investment Exemptive Order, as discussed below in “—Conflicts of Interest—Conflicts of interest may arise in our allocation of capital and co-investment opportunities,” or are required to be distributed to investors in our products or offset against management fees that would otherwise be payable pursuant to the terms of the governing agreements of the relevant vehicles, while other types of related fees may be retained by us with no offset against management fees and contribute to our revenues and, ultimately, to our net income.
We may decide not to seek those fees for any reason, including market conditions and expectations.
−Removed: Our ability to receive and retain those fees, and to continue to receive and retain those fees in the future, is dependent on the terms we negotiate with investors in our products, our ability to successfully negotiate for those fees with underlying portfolio companies, the permissibility of receiving and retaining those fees under the
−Removed: relevant legal and regulatory frameworks, and our business determination to negotiate for those fees.
+Added: Our ability to receive and retain those fees, and to continue to receive and retain those fees in the future, is dependent on the terms we negotiate with investors in our products, our ability to successfully negotiate for those fees with underlying portfolio companies, the permissibility of receiving and retaining those fees under the relevant legal and regulatory frameworks, and our business determination to negotiate for those fees.
As a result, any change to the willingness of portfolio companies to bear those fees, the terms of our products that permit us to receive and retain those fees, the legal and regulatory framework in which we operate or our willingness to negotiate for those fees with portfolio companies of our products, could result in a decrease to our revenues and net income, and ultimately decrease the value of our common stock and our dividends to our stockholders.
6 unchanged sentences
A decline in the size or pace of growth of FPAUM or applicable fee rates may result from a range of factors, including:
−Removed: • Volatile economic and market conditions, which could cause fund investors to delay making new commitments to alternative investment funds or limit the ability of our existing products to deploy capital;
+Added: • Volatile economic and market conditions, which could cause product investors to delay making new commitments to alternative investment funds or limit the ability of our existing products to deploy capital;
• Intense competition among alternative asset managers may make fundraising and the deployment of capital more difficult, thereby limiting our ability to grow or maintain our FPAUM.
−Removed: Competition may be amplified by changes in fund investors allocating increased amounts of capital away from alternative asset managers;
−Removed: • Poor performance of one or more of our products, either relative to market benchmarks or in absolute terms (e.g., based on market value or net asset value of our BDCs’ shares), or compared to our competitors may cause fund investors to regard our products less favorably than those of our competitors, thereby adversely affecting our ability to raise new or successor products.
+Added: Competition may be amplified by changes in product investors allocating increased amounts of capital away from alternative asset managers;
+Added: • Poor performance of one or more of our products, either relative to market benchmarks or in absolute terms (e.g., based on market value or net asset value of our BDCs’ shares), or compared to our competitors may cause product investors to regard our products less favorably than those of our competitors, thereby adversely affecting our ability to raise new or successor products.
The investment management business is intensely competitive.
−Removed: The investment management business is intensely competitive, with competition based on a variety of factors, including investment performance, business relationships, quality of service provided to clients, fund investor liquidity, fund terms (including fees and economic sharing arrangements), brand recognition and business reputation.
−Removed: Maintaining our reputation is critical to attracting and retaining fund investors and for maintaining our relationships with our regulators, sponsors, Partner Managers, potential co-investors and joint venture partners, as applicable.
+Added: The investment management business is intensely competitive, with competition based on a variety of factors, including investment performance, business relationships, quality of service provided to clients, product investor liquidity, fund terms (including fees and economic sharing arrangements), brand recognition and business reputation.
+Added: Maintaining our reputation is critical to attracting and retaining product investors and for maintaining our relationships with our regulators, sponsors, Partner Managers, potential co-investors and joint venture partners, as applicable.
Negative publicity regarding our company, our personnel or our Partner Managers could give rise to reputational risk that could significantly harm our existing business and business prospects.
We are also currently subject to and may be subject in the future to litigation between ourselves and our Partner Managers, which may harm our reputation.
−Removed: Similarly, events could occur that damage the reputation of our industry generally, such as the insolvency or bankruptcy of large funds or a significant number of funds or highly publicized incidents of fraud or other scandals, any one of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, regardless of whether any of those events directly relate to our products or the investments made by our products.
−Removed: Our products compete with a number of specialized funds, corporate buyers, traditional asset managers, real estate companies, commercial banks, investment banks, other investment managers and other financial institutions, including certain of our stockholders, as well as domestic and international pension funds and sovereign wealth funds, and we expect that competition will continue to increase.
+Added: Similarly, events could occur that damage the reputation of our industry generally, such as the insolvency or bankruptcy of large funds or a significant number of funds, or their portfolio companies, or highly publicized incidents of fraud or other scandals, any one of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, regardless of whether any of those events directly relate to our products or the investments made by our products.
+Added: See also “— Risks Related to Macroeconomic Factors — Difficult market and geopolitical conditions may reduce the value or hamper the performance of the investments made by our products or impair the ability of our products to raise or deploy capital.”
+Added: Our products compete with a number of specialized funds, corporate buyers, traditional asset managers, real estate companies, insurance companies, commercial banks, investment banks, other investment managers and other financial institutions, including certain of our stockholders, as well as domestic and international pension funds and sovereign wealth funds, and we expect that competition will continue to increase.
Numerous factors increase our competitive risks, including, but not limited to:
−Removed: • A number of our competitors may have or are perceived to have more expertise or financial, technical, marketing and other resources and more personnel than we do;
+Added: • Some of our competitors may have or are perceived to have more expertise or financial, technical, marketing and other resources and more personnel than we do;
• Some of our products may not perform as well as competitors’ funds or other available investment products;
−Removed: • Several of our competitors have raised significant amounts of capital, and many of them have similar investment objectives to ours, which may create additional competition for investment opportunities;
+Added: • Some of our competitors have raised significant amounts of capital, and many of them have similar investment objectives to ours, which may create additional competition for investment opportunities;
• Some of our competitors may have lower fees or alternative fee arrangements that potential clients of ours may find more appealing;
1 unchanged sentence
• Some of our competitors may have higher risk tolerances, different risk assessments or lower return thresholds than us, which could allow them to consider a wider variety of investments and to bid more aggressively than us or to agree to less restrictive legal terms and protections for investments that we want to make;
−Removed: • Some of our competitors may be subject to less regulation or conflicts of interest and, accordingly, may have more flexibility to undertake and execute certain businesses or investments than we do, bear less compliance expense than we do or be viewed differently in the marketplace;
+Added: • Some of our competitors may be subject to less regulation or fewer conflicts of interest and, accordingly, may have more flexibility to undertake and execute certain businesses or investments than we do, bear less compliance expense than we do or be viewed differently in the marketplace;
• Some of our competitors offer greater liquidity to investors in their products;
−Removed: • Some of our competitors may have more flexibility than us in raising and deploying certain types of products under the investment management contracts they have negotiated with their fund investors;
+Added: • Some of our competitors may have more flexibility than us in raising and deploying certain types of products under the investment management contracts they have negotiated with their product investors;
• Some of our competitors may offer broader investment offerings and more partnership opportunities to portfolio companies than we are able to offer;
• Some of our competitors have instituted or may institute low cost high speed financial applications and services based on artificial intelligence and new competitors may enter the asset management space using new investment platforms based on artificial intelligence.
−Removed: Certain of our strategic relationship investors (including early-stage investors in new products) may be granted the right to participate in the net profits or revenues of certain products.
+Added: Certain of our strategic relationship investors (including early-stage investors in new products) may be granted the right to participate in the net profits or gross revenues or receive rebates.
Certain investors in our products have been granted, and may in the future receive various forms of, participation rights with respect to certain products or strategies, including, but not limited to, the right to the net profits or gross revenues of certain products.
4 unchanged sentences
We currently expect, at least in certain instances, to continue to offer these economic sharing arrangements to our strategic relationship investors (which may include certain of our stockholders) in the future, which may reduce the revenues ultimately earned by us in respect of these products.
+Added: Our failure to comply with investment guidelines set by our clients and/or investors could negatively impact our client and investor relationships, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
+Added: When clients retain us to manage assets on their behalf, they specify certain guidelines regarding investment allocation and strategy that we are required to observe in the management of their portfolios.
+Added: Similarly, investors in our products often require certain investment restrictions or limitations be included in their side letters or related governing documents that we are contractually obligated to observe in the management of such investors’ interests in the applicable products.
+Added: Our failure to comply with these guidelines, restrictions and other limitations could result in clients terminating their investment management agreement with us or investors seeking to withdraw from our products, as well as regulatory scrutiny.
+Added: Clients or investors could also sue us for breach of contract and seek to recover damages from us, which could negatively impact our reputation.
+Added: In addition, such guidelines may restrict our ability to pursue certain investments and strategies on behalf of our clients or limit an investor’s exposure to such investments and strategies that we believe are economically desirable, which could similarly result in losses to a client account or investor capital account or termination or potential withdrawal of the account or investor and a corresponding reduction in AUM.
+Added: Even if we comply with all applicable investment guidelines, restrictions and limitations, a client or investor may be dissatisfied with its investment performance or our services or fees, and may terminate their customized separate accounts or advisory accounts, seek to withdraw from our funds or be unwilling to commit new capital to our specialized funds, customized separate accounts or advisory accounts.
+Added: Any of these events could cause our earnings to decline and materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Risks Related to Our Products
11 unchanged sentences
• our products’ historical investments were made over a long period of time and over the course of various market and macroeconomic cycles, and the circumstances under which our current or future products may make future investments may differ significantly from those conditions prevailing in the past;
−Removed: • the attractive returns of certain of our products have been driven by the rapid return on invested capital, which has not occurred with respect to all of our products and we believe is less likely to occur in the future;
+Added: • the attractive returns of certain of our products have been driven by the rapid return on invested capital, which has not occurred with respect to all of our products;
• in recent years, there has been increased competition for investment opportunities resulting from the increased amount of capital invested in alternative funds and high liquidity in debt markets, and the increased competition for investments may reduce our returns in the future;
9 unchanged sentences
A fund’s net asset value could be adversely affected if the determinations regarding the fair value of the investments were materially higher than the values that are ultimately realized upon the disposal of such investments.
−Removed: These valuations could, in turn, affect the management fees or performance income that our business receives.
+Added: These valuations could, in turn, affect the management fees or performance income that we receive.
The use of leverage by our products may materially increase the returns of such products but may also result in significant losses or a total loss of capital.
−Removed: Our products, particularly our Credit and Real Estate products, use leverage as part of their respective investment programs and in certain products regularly borrow a substantial amount of their capital.
+Added: Our products, particularly our Credit and Real Assets products, use leverage as part of their respective investment programs and certain products regularly borrow a substantial amount of their capital.
The use of leverage poses a significant degree of risk and enhances the possibility of a significant loss in the value of the investment portfolio.
A fund may borrow money from time to time to purchase or carry securities or may enter into derivative transactions with counterparties that have embedded leverage.
−Removed: The use of leverage by our products increases the volatility of investments by magnifying the potential for gain or loss
−Removed: on invested equity capital.
+Added: The use of leverage by our products increases the volatility of investments by magnifying the potential for gain or loss on invested equity capital.
If the value of a fund’s assets were to decrease, leverage would cause net asset value to decline more sharply than it otherwise would if the fund had not employed leverage.
7 unchanged sentences
Non-traded products often conduct share redemption programs or tender offers to provide liquidity to investors in such vehicles.
−Removed: While such share redemption programs and tender offers may contain restrictions that limit the amount of shares that may be redeemed or purchased in particular periods, an increased number of investors requesting redemptions or participating in tender offers of our non-traded products could lead to a decline in the management fees and incentive fees we receive.
+Added: While such share redemption programs and tender offers may contain restrictions that limit the amount of shares that may be redeemed or purchased in particular periods, an increase in the number of investors requesting redemptions or participating in tender offers, or an increase in the amount of shares redeemed or purchased through such redemption programs or tender offers, of our non-traded products could lead to a decline in the management fees and incentive fees we receive.
Economic events affecting the U.S.
−Removed: economy, such as volatility in the financial markets, inflation, higher interest rates or global or national events that are beyond our control, could cause investors to request redemption of an increased number of shares pursuant to the share redemption programs of our non-traded products, potentially in excess of established limits.
−Removed: Such prolonged economic disruptions have caused a number of similar products to deny redemption requests or to suspend or partially suspend their share redemption programs and ten der offers and such suspension may have a negative reputational impact on the manager or on its ability to continue fundraising.
+Added: economy, such as volatility in the financial markets, inflation, fluctuations in interest rates or global or national events that are beyond our control, could cause investors to request redemption of an increased number of shares pursuant to the share redemption programs of our non-traded products, potentially in excess of established limits.
+Added: Such prolonged economic disruptions have caused a number of similar products to deny redemption requests or to suspend or partially suspend their share
+Added: redemption programs and ten der offers and such suspension may have a negative reputational impact on the manager or on its ability to continue fundraising.
Our no n-traded products may redeem or purchase fewer shares than investors request due to a lack of readily available funds due to a number of factors, including adverse market conditions beyond our control or the need to maintain liquidity for operations.
9 unchanged sentences
Our GP Strategic Capital products may suffer losses if our Partner Managers are unable to raise new products or grow their AUM.
−Removed: As our GP Strategic Capital products’ investments in Partner Managers are intended to be held for an indefinite duration, we are dependent upon the ability of our Partner Managers to execute successfully their investment program and grow their assets under management.
+Added: As our GP Strategic Capital products’ investments in Partner Managers are intended to be held for an indefinite duration, we are dependent upon the ability of our Partner Managers to successfully execute their investment program and grow their assets under management.
In the event that a Partner Manager is unable to grow their assets under management or such Partner Manager’s investment returns fail to meet expectations, the returns attributable to such investment may be reduced or our products may suffer a loss on such investment.
A Partner Manager’s failure to grow assets under management may result from a range of factors common to asset managers, including factors to which we are subject ourselves, or specific factors attributable to its business including the departure of key persons, the inability of such Partner Manager to diversify into new investment strategies, investment performance and regulatory enforcement actions.
−Removed: Our Real Estate products are subject to the risks inherent in the ownership and operation of real estate and the construction and development of real estate.
−Removed: Investments in our Real Estate products will be subject to the risks inherent in the ownership and operation of real estate and real estate-related businesses and assets.
−Removed: These risks include the following:
−Removed: • general and local economic conditions;
−Removed: • changes in supply of and demand for competing properties in an area (as a result, for example, of overbuilding);
+Added: Our alternative credit products may expose us to incremental risks and complexities.
+Added: We engage in various forms of alternative credit structured finance arrangements that are collateralized by various asset classes.
+Added: Asset-based financing investments are generally structured as loans or securities that represent the purchase or participation in, or are collateralized by and payable from, a stream of payments generated by pools of financial, physical or other assets.
+Added: Specifically, our alternative credit portfolio targets investments in markets that are underserved by traditional lenders, including, without limitation, secured and unsecured consumer credit receivables, less established companies (including startups and emerging growth companies), consumer leases, residential and commercial real estate, hard assets (such as equipment leases), aviation assets, shipping assets, transportation and storage assets and financial assets such as factoring receivables, litigation claims, financial claims, trade claims and other receivables.
+Added: These forms of alternative credit generally expose a lender to a greater degree of business and credit risks than traditional lending, as repayment of the loans often depends upon the performance of credit or credit-related assets, the successful operation of the businesses, greater exposure of less established companies to market volatility and potential for fraud and the income stream of the borrower.
+Added: Additionally, investments in such markets expose our business to additional regulations promulgated by state and federal regulators, including the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”), which may impact our business in new and unexpected ways.
+Added: The CFPB has broad powers to administer, investigate compliance with and, in some cases, enforce U.S.
+Added: federal financial consumer protection laws.
+Added: The CFPB has broad rule-making authority for a wide range of financial consumer protection laws that apply to investments our products make in markets, products or services that serve consumers, including laws that regulate "unfair, deceptive or abusive" consumer acts and practices.
+Added: The CFPB and other federal or state regulators may examine, investigate and take enforcement actions against the companies that our products invest in that offer consumer financial services and products, as well as financial institutions and other third parties upon which such companies rely to provide consumer financial services and products.
+Added: State regulators also have certain authority in enforcing and promulgating financial consumer protection laws.
+Added: As a result, some states have issued new and broader financial consumer protection laws and others may in the future, which are more comprehensive than existing U.S.
+Added: federal regulations.
+Added: In addition, state attorneys general may in some cases bring actions to enforce federal consumer protection laws.
+Added: Depending on how governmental authorities elect to exercise their statutory authority, it could increase the compliance
+Added: costs for the companies that our alternative credit products invest in, potentially delay their ability to respond to marketplace changes, result in requirements to alter products and services that would make them less attractive to consumers, and experience other negative impacts on their business condition and results of operations that in turn impact their ability to repay loans and negatively affect our products' investments in such companies.
+Added: Our Real Assets products are subject to the risks inherent in the ownership and operation of real estate and the construction and development of real estate.
+Added: Investments in our Real Assets products are subject to the risks inherent in the ownership and operation of real estate and real estate-related businesses and assets.
+Added: These investments are subject to the potential for deterioration of real estate fundamentals and the risk of adverse changes in local market and economic conditions, which may include changes in supply of and demand for competing properties in an area, fluctuating occupancy rates and changes in demand for commercial office properties (including as a result of an increased prevalence of remote work).
+Added: Additionally, our products’ properties are generally self-managed by the tenant or managed by a third party, which makes us dependent upon such third parties and subjects us to risks associated with the actions and financial resources of such third parties.
+Added: More generally, investments in real estate-related businesses and assets are subject to risks including the following:
• the financial resources of tenants;
3 unchanged sentences
• natural disasters, extreme weather events and other physical risks related to climate change;
−Removed: • changes in government regulations (such as rent control and tax laws);
+Added: • changes in government regulations (such as rent control, digital infrastructure regulation and tax laws);
• changes in interest rates;
4 unchanged sentences
• unexpected cost overruns in connection with development projects;
−Removed: • terrorist attacks and similar conflicts (including in the Middle East), war (including between Russia and Ukraine) and other factors that are beyond our control.
−Removed: Additionally, our products’ properties are generally self-managed by the tenant or managed by a third party, which makes us dependent upon such third parties and subjects us to risks associated with the actions of such third parties.
−Removed: Any of these factors may cause the value of the investments in our Real Estate products to decline, which may have a material impact on our results of operations.
−Removed: Our professional sports minority stakes strategy is small and may be difficult to grow.
−Removed: Our professional sports minority stakes strategy is small and may be difficult to grow.
−Removed: Our Blue Owl HomeCourt Fund makes minority investments in NBA franchises.
+Added: • terrorist attacks and conflicts and other factors that are beyond our control.
+Added: Following completion of the IPI Acquisition, we expect our products will have and increasingly make investments in infrastructure assets such as data center and logistics hubs.
+Added: The acquisition of infrastructure assets involves substantial and continual involvement by, or an ongoing commitment to, regulatory agencies, which often have considerable discretion to change or increase regulation of the operations of infrastructure assets.
+Added: In many instances, the operation or acquisition of infrastructure assets may involve an ongoing commitment to or from municipal, state, federal or foreign government, regulatory agencies or governing bodies.
+Added: The nature of these obligations exposes the owners of infrastructure assets to a higher level of regulatory control than is typically imposed on other businesses, which could impair or prevent operation of a facility owned by an infrastructure asset, the completion of a previously announced acquisition or sale to third parties, or could otherwise result in additional costs and material adverse consequences to an infrastructure asset and investments in such assets.
+Added: In addition, revenues for such investments may rely on contractual agreements for the provision of services with a limited number of counterparties and are consequently subject to heightened counterparty default risk.
+Added: Any of these factors may cause the value of the investments in our Real Assets products to decline, which may have a material impact on our results of operations.
+Added: In connection with obtaining commercial loans backed by real estate, the lender will
+Added: typically require a “bad boy” guarantee, in which our investment vehicles and we may guarantee liability for environmental liabilities and bad acts including fraud, intentional misrepresentation, voluntary bankruptcy and other acts.
+Added: It is expected that commercial real estate financing arrangements generally will require “bad boy” guarantees and in the event such guarantee is called, a fund’s or our assets could be materially and adversely affected.
+Added: Our professional sports minority stakes strategy is small, but may have a disproportionate effect on our reputation.
+Added: Our professional sports minority stakes strategy is small and has been difficult to grow.
+Added: Our Blue Owl HomeCourt Fund makes minority investments in NBA franchises and may also invest in entities with exposure to other sports leagues or franchises outside of the NBA.
The NBA provides certain services with respect to the Blue Owl HomeCourt Fund and receives a share of management fees and incentive allocations attributable to the fund.
There is no assurance that we will be able to raise sufficient funds to continue to execute this strategy in the future.
−Removed: As adviser to the Blue Owl HomeCourt Fund, we may be exposed to liability to the NBA or one or more NBA teams in which we invest in a range of circumstances, including as a result of a violation of rules applicable to NBA franchise owners by us or investors in our Blue Owl HomeCourt Fund or, in certain circumstances, by our co-owners of a team (regardless of whether such persons were acting under our direction or control).
−Removed: In addition, the NBA may terminate its relationship with the adviser for a variety of reasons, including the departure of certain key persons or the occurrence of certain events constituting cause.The Blue Owl HomeCourt Fund may also evoke a high profile in the marketplace relative to its economic significance to our business.
+Added: As adviser to the Blue Owl HomeCourt Fund, we may be exposed to liability to the NBA, other sports leagues or one or more NBA or other league teams in which we invest in a range of circumstances, including as a result of a violation of rules applicable to NBA or other league franchise owners by us or investors in our Blue Owl HomeCourt Fund or, in certain circumstances, by our co-owners of a team (regardless of whether such persons were acting under our direction or control).
+Added: In addition, the NBA may terminate its relationship with us for a variety of reasons, including the departure of certain key persons or the occurrence of certain events constituting cause.The Blue Owl HomeCourt Fund may also evoke a high profile in the marketplace relative to its economic significance to us.
Therefore, any failure in the growth or performance of the professional sports minority stakes strategy could not only result in a decrease in our FPAUM growth potential but could also have a disproportionately adverse effect on our reputation.
−Removed: Conflicts of Interest
−Removed: Conflicts of interest may arise in our allocation of capital and co-investment opportunities.
−Removed: As an asset manager with multiple clients, including our various and expanding strategies and products, we increasingly confront conflicts of interests relating to our investment activities and operations.
−Removed: In particular, our allocation of capital and co-investment opportunities across our products are subject to numerous actual or potential conflicts of interest.
−Removed: Although we have implemented policies and procedures to address those conflicts, our failure to effectively identify and address them could cause reputational harm and a loss of investor confidence in our business.
−Removed: It could also result in regulatory lapses that could lead to applicable penalties, as well as increased regulatory oversight of our business.
−Removed: Identifying potential conflicts of interest is complex and fact-intensive, and it is not possible to foresee every conflict of interest that could or will arise.
−Removed: Potential conflicts of interest in allocation among our products.
−Removed: Certain of our products may have overlapping investment objectives, including products that have different fee structures, and conflicts may arise with respect to our allocation of investment opportunities among those products as well as other co-investors.
−Removed: We may allocate an investment opportunity that is appropriate for two or more investment products in a manner that excludes one or more products or results in a disproportionate allocation based on factors or criteria that we determine, including but not limited to differences with respect to available capital, the current or anticipated size of a product, minimum investment amounts, the remaining life of a product, differences in investment objectives, guidelines or strategies, diversification, portfolio construction considerations, liquidity needs, legal, tax and regulatory requirements and other considerations deemed relevant to us and in accordance with our policy.
−Removed: Although we have adopted investment allocation policies and procedures that are designed to ensure fair and equitable treatment over time, and expect these policies and procedures to continue to evolve, those policies and procedures will not eliminate all potential conflicts.
−Removed: Certain investment opportunities may be allocated to certain products that have lower fees or to our co-investment products that pay no fees.
−Removed: To the extent that those investments could otherwise have been allocated to products generating FPAUM, our revenues will be less than what would otherwise have been generated were those investments made through fee paying structures.
−Removed: Potential conflicts of interest in connection with co-investments between our private funds and our BDCs.
−Removed: Our BDCs are permitted to co-invest in portfolio companies with each other and with affiliated investment funds in negotiated transactions pursuant to an SEC order (the “Co-investment Exemptive Order”).
−Removed: Pursuant to that exemptive relief, our BDCs and other affiliated investment funds generally are permitted to make such co-investments if a “required majority” (as defined in Section 57(o) of the Investment Company Act) of such BDC’s directors (including the independent directors) makes certain conclusions in connection with the co-investment transaction, including that (1) the terms of the transaction, including the consideration to be paid, are reasonable and fair to such BDC and its shareholders and do not involve overreaching in respect of such BDC or its shareholders on the part of any person concerned, (2) the transaction is consistent with the interests of such BDC’s shareholders and with its investment objective and strategies, and (3) the investment by one of our BDCs and other affiliated investment funds would not disadvantage any other of our BDCs, and such BDC’s participation would not be on a basis different from or less advantageous than that on which the other BDCs or other affiliated investment funds are investing.
−Removed: The different investment objectives or terms of the BDCs and affiliated investment funds may result in a potential conflict of interest, including in connection with the allocation of investments among our BDCs and/or our affiliated investment funds pursuant to the Co-investment Exemptive Order or otherwise.
−Removed: As a result of our structure, our private funds are affiliated investment funds of our BDCs and are prohibited from co-investing with our BDCs, except as permitted by the Investment Company Act and the Co-investment Exemptive Order.
−Removed: Those restrictions may limit the ability of our private funds to make certain investments they otherwise may have made, and subject our products to additional compliance and regulatory risk.
−Removed: The Co-investment Exemptive Order will require that any opportunities that are appropriate for both our BDCs and our private funds will need to be offered to our BDCs and any such investments, if made, will need to be conducted in compliance with the conditions of the Co-Investment Exemptive Order and other requirements under the Investment Company Act.
−Removed: Conflicts related to investments by several of our products at different levels of the capital structure of a single portfolio company or Partner Manager.
−Removed: Different products that we advise may invest in a single portfolio company, including at different levels of the capital structure of the same portfolio company.
−Removed: For example, in the normal course of business, one of our products may acquire debt positions in, or lend to, companies in which another of our products owns common equity securities or a subordinated debt position.
−Removed: Such investments or commitments may be made at different times, at different prices and on different terms.
−Removed: The interests of these
−Removed: different products invested in different levels of the capital structure of a portfolio company may not always be aligned and actions taken for one product may be adverse to one or more other products, which may give rise to conflicts of interest.
−Removed: The interests of these different products may diverge significantly particularly in the case of financial distress of the portfolio company.
−Removed: For example, in a bankruptcy proceeding or out-of-court restructuring, the interests of a product owning equity or subordinated debt securities may be subordinated or otherwise adversely affected by virtue of a different product’s actions in respect of its own interests as a senior debt holder.
−Removed: Alternatively, we may be incentivized to cause a product invested in a senior debt position to be more passive or refrain from taking actions adverse to other products invested in equity or subordinated debt given the possibility for losses for these products.
−Removed: In addition, if one of our BDCs is an investor in a portfolio company alongside other of our products that have invested in a different part of the portfolio company’s capital structure, the Investment Company Act may prohibit us from negotiating on behalf of any such product in connection with a reorganization or restructuring of the portfolio company.
−Removed: While we have developed general guidelines regarding when two or more products can invest in different parts of the same company’s capital structure and created a process that we employ to handle those conflicts when they arise, our decision to permit the investments to occur in the first instance or our judgment on how to minimize the conflict could be challenged.
−Removed: If we fail to appropriately address those conflicts, it could negatively impact our reputation and ability to raise additional products and the willingness of counterparties to do business with us or result in potential litigation against us.
−Removed: Conflicts of interest may arise in our allocation of costs and expenses, and we are subject to increased regulatory scrutiny and uncertainty with regard to those allocations.
−Removed: As an asset manager with multiple products, we regularly allocate costs and expenses among our products and between our products and us.
−Removed: Certain of those allocation determinations are inherently subjective and virtually all of them are subject to regulatory oversight.
−Removed: Allegations of, or investigation into, a potential improper expense allocation could cause reputational harm and a loss of investor confidence in our business.
−Removed: It could also result in regulatory lapses or penalties, as well as increased regulatory oversight of our business.
−Removed: In addition, any determination to allocate costs and expenses to us could negatively affect our net income, and ultimately decrease the value of our common stock and our dividends to our stockholders.
−Removed: Similar considerations arise when allocating expenses to, or away from vehicles to which specified interests apply.
−Removed: We have a conflict of interest in determining whether certain costs and expenses are incurred in the course of operating our products, including the extent to which services provided by certain employees and associated costs, including compensation, are allocable to certain products.
−Removed: Our products generally pay or otherwise bear all legal, accounting, filing, and other expenses incurred in connection with organizing and establishing the products and the offering of interests in the products, including certain employee compensation.
−Removed: Such determinations often require subjective judgment and may result in us, rather than our products, bearing certain fees and expenses.
−Removed: In addition, our products generally pay all expenses related to the operation of the products and their investment activities, in certain cases subject to caps.
−Removed: We also determine, in our sole discretion, the appropriate allocation of investment-related expenses, including broken deal expenses and expenses more generally relating to a particular investment strategy, among our products, vehicles and accounts participating or that would have participated in such investments or that otherwise participate in the relevant investment strategy, as applicable.
−Removed: That often requires judgment and could result in one or more of our products bearing more or less of these expenses than other investors or potential investors in the relevant investments or a fund paying a disproportionate share, including some or all, of the broken deal expenses or other expenses incurred by potential investors.
−Removed: Any dispute regarding such allocations could lead to our products or us, as further described below, having to bear some portion of these costs as well as reputational risk.
−Removed: In addition, for products that do not pay or otherwise bear the costs and expenses described above because of the application of caps or otherwise, such amounts may be borne by us, which will reduce the amount of net fee income we receive for providing advisory services to the products.
−Removed: For example, our Business Services Platform provides strategic services to Partner Managers.
−Removed: Certain expenses associated with the Business Services Platform (“BSP Expenses”) are allocated among, and payable by, each of the GP minority equity investment products.
−Removed: Those GP Strategic Capital products are generally allocated an amount equal to their pro rata allocation of BSP Expenses based on the relative number of Partner Managers in which investments are held from time to time by each of those products;
−Removed: provided that the amount of BSP Expenses borne by a particular fund is subject to certain floors and/or caps specified in its respective governing documents.
−Removed: We are required to bear any BSP Expenses allocated to a product that exceeds the product’s cap on those expenses.
−Removed: In addition, in certain instances, we expect to determine not to allocate or charge certain BSP Expenses to any product, in response to regulatory, products investor relations, governance or other applicable considerations and determine instead for those BSP Expenses to be borne by us.
−Removed: Any such determination could have the effect of materially reducing the reimbursement payments received by us with respect to the Business Services Platform or result in losses attributable to certain activities thereof.
−Removed: The allocation methodology for allocating BSP Expenses and other similar expenses is complex and subject to interpretation.
−Removed: Accordingly, there can be no assurance that any conflict arising from these allocations of expenses will be resolved in a manner responsive to the interests of all of our clients, which could damage our reputation.
−Removed: The activities of the Business Services Platform and the allocation of BSP Expenses have in the past been subject to an SEC order.
−Removed: These and other expense allocation practices could in the future be subject to regulatory scrutiny.
−Removed: Potential conflicts of interest in allocation among Blue Owl, our products and our investment professionals.
−Removed: Certain of our products may have overlapping investment objectives with Blue Owl, and conflicts may arise with respect to our decisions regarding how to allocate investment opportunities amongst our products or between Blue Owl and our products.
−Removed: We have provided and expect to continue to provide funds to support new product and strategy launches to enable our products to achieve a level of scale and profitability.
−Removed: We have used, and expect to continue to use, our balance sheet capital to warehouse seed investments in our products pending the contribution of committed capital by the investors in such products and/or to extend bridge loans to our products, which may decrease the liquidity available for other parts of our business.
−Removed: If new strategies or products do not develop as anticipated or our balance sheet assets cease to provide adequate liquidity, we may be forced to realize losses or become limited in our ability to seed new products or strategies or support existing ones as currently contemplated.
−Removed: Furthermore, our investment professionals or entities controlled by them may make similar investments or loans to new products or third party investment opportunities, including in connection with their personal or family office investment activities.
−Removed: These activities may result in actual or perceived conflicts of interest.
−Removed: Although we have adopted personal trading policies and procedures that are designed to ensure that, in such circumstances, Blue Owl or our products, as the case may be, has first priority in investment opportunities that align with its investment objectives, and expect these policies and procedures to continue to evolve as Blue Owl’s business evolves, those policies and procedures may not eliminate all potential conflicts.
−Removed: Existing and future relationships between or among our Partner Managers, our products and their investors could give rise to actual or perceived conflicts of interest.
−Removed: Certain of our GP Strategic Capital products’ Partner Managers directly or through their investment funds, own securities in Blue Owl or its subsidiaries.
−Removed: In addition, Blue Owl GPSC IV Advisors LLC, a controlled affiliate of Blue Owl, serves as investment manager to Blue Owl GP Stakes IV.
−Removed: Blue Owl GP Stakes IV may have different interests, including different investment horizons, than Blue Owl.
−Removed: However, any decision made with respect to holding or disposing of Blue Owl GP Stakes IV’s interest in Blue Owl will be determined by Blue Owl GPSC IV Advisors LLC in a manner consistent with its duties to Blue Owl GP Stakes IV.
−Removed: Because those decisions will be made independent from consideration of Blue Owl’s interests, they may, due to a range of factors, conflict with Blue Owl’s or its stockholders’ own interests at such time.
−Removed: GP Strategic Capital products hold minority, noncontrolling interests in a broad range of Partner Managers.
−Removed: Those Partner Managers may, from time to time, directly or through their funds, enter into transactions or other contractual arrangements with us or our products outside of the GP minority stakes strategy, including our private funds, BDCs and Real Estate products, or between or among one another in the ordinary course of business, which may result in additional conflicts of interest.
−Removed: None of those transactions or other contractual arrangements are believed to be currently material to our operations or performance but there may be material transactions entered into in the future.
−Removed: Portfolio companies of products managed by our Partner Managers may also be borrowers under debt facilities or instruments owned, arranged or managed by our products.
−Removed: In its capacity as agent or lender under such facilities or instruments, a fund is required to act in the best interests of its stockholders or investors.
−Removed: In certain circumstances, one of our products may be required to take actions that may be adverse to the investments owned by funds managed by Partner Managers, which could adversely affect our relationships with the Partner Managers, or potentially impact the value of a GP Strategic Capital product’s investment in such Partner Manager.
−Removed: From time to time, companies in which our products or products managed by our Partner Managers have invested or may invest may enter into sale-leaseback transactions with, or otherwise become tenants of, our Real Estate products.
−Removed: These arrangements could result in our products or products managed by our Partner Managers, being creditors to, or equity owners of, such companies at the same time as those companies are tenants of our Real Estate products.
−Removed: If such a company were to encounter financial difficulty or default on its obligations as a borrower, our product or a product managed by a Partner Manager, could be required to take actions that may be adverse to those of our Real Estate products in enforcing its rights under the relevant facilities or agreements, or vice versa.
−Removed: Investments in portfolio companies connected to other business relationships may cause us to take different actions with respect to such investment than would have otherwise occurred had the portfolio company had no other business relationship with us or our products.
−Removed: Even if those relationships do not create actual conflicts, the perception of conflicts in the press or the financial community generally could create negative publicity with respect to Blue Owl, which could adversely affect the relationships of with our product investors.
−Removed: Conflicts related to our lack of information barriers.
−Removed: Our products, investment platforms and investment professionals regularly obtain non-public information regarding target companies and other investment opportunities.
−Removed: Since we do not currently maintain permanent information barriers among our businesses, we generally impute non-public information received by one investment team to all other investment professionals, including all of the personnel who make investment decisions for our products.
−Removed: In the event that any of our products or people obtain confidential or material non-public information, we and our products may be restricted in acquiring or disposing of investments.
−Removed: Notwithstanding the maintenance of restricted securities lists and other internal controls, the internal controls relating to the management of material non-public information could fail and result in us, or one of our people, buying or selling a security while deemed to be in possession of material non-public information.
−Removed: Inadvertent trading on material non-public information could negatively impact our reputation, result in the imposition of regulatory or financial sanctions and, consequently, negatively impact our ability to provide investment management services to our products and clients.
−Removed: These risks are heightened by the existence of our public equity products, which may limit the products’ investment opportunities or ability to dispose of investments.
−Removed: In limited circumstances, we may put in place temporary information barriers to restrict the transfer of non-public information, which limit our products’ abilities to benefit from Blue Owl expertise and such temporary information barriers could be breached, resulting in the same restrictions on such products’ investment activities.
−Removed: Further, in the future, we could be required by certain regulations, or decide that it is advisable, to establish permanent information barriers, which would impair our ability to operate as an integrated platform, limit management’s ability to manage our investments and reduce potential synergies across our businesses.
−Removed: The establishment of information barriers may also lead to operational disruptions and result in restructuring costs, including costs related to hiring additional personnel as existing investment professionals are allocated to either side of a barrier.
−Removed: Additional and unpredictable conflicts of interests may rise in the future.
−Removed: In addition to the conflicts outlined above, we may experience conflicts of interest in connection with the management of our business affairs relating to and arising from a number of matters, including the amounts paid to us by our products;
−Removed: services that may be provided by us and our affiliates to investments in which our products invest (including the determination of whether or not to charge fees to our investments for our provision of such services);
−Removed: investments by our products and our other clients, subject to the limitations of the Investment Company Act;
−Removed: our formation of additional products;
−Removed: differing recommendations given by us to different clients;
−Removed: and our use of information gained from a products’ investments used to inform investments by other clients, subject to applicable law.
−Removed: In resolving these conflicts of interest, we may favor our products’ interests or investors’ interests over the interests of our stockholders.
−Removed: Our GP Strategic Capital products hold and make investments in Partner Managers and there may be provisions within our arrangements with Partner Managers that could affect our right to receive or share information or cause us to sell our interests in the Partner Manager.
−Removed: The terms of our GP Strategic Capital products’ investments in Partner Managers generally include provisions relating to competitors of the Partner Managers, access to information about the Partner Managers and their business, and affirmative and negative confidentiality obligations regarding the Partner Managers.
−Removed: While we have implemented information control procedures with restrictions regarding the sharing of a Partner Manager’s confidential information, such procedures may not reduce a Partner Manager’s concern over the sharing of confidential and competitively sensitive information.
−Removed: Certain Partner Managers that are engaged in managing funds focused on similar businesses as our other product lines may consider Blue Owl to be a competitor with respect to their business and may seek to invoke remedies available to them under the investment agreements or pursue other remedies.
−Removed: Potential remedies available to them under the investment agreements, as applicable, include limiting the rights of our products to receive confidential information from the Partner Manager regarding its business, requiring us to sequester confidential information received from the Partner Manager, or requiring us to sell our interests in the Partner Manager for fair value as determined under the relevant investment agreement.
−Removed: A forced sale of a Partner Manager interest may reduce the amount of fees we receive with respect to the applicable GP Strategic Capital product, and any reduction in information may impede our ability to supervise our products’ investments.
−Removed: Further, the affiliation may hinder the GP Strategic Capital products’ ability to make future investments in Partner Managers who are in the same space and who may
−Removed: consider Blue Owl a competitor, including follow-on investments in existing Partner Managers and investments with new Partner Managers.
−Removed: The operations of our business and related transactions may affect our reputation and relationship with our Partner Managers.
−Removed: We are reliant upon our strong relationships with our Partner Managers for the continued growth and development of business.
−Removed: Due to the number of Partner Managers with which we have relationships, we may compete with existing or prospective Partner Managers, which could negatively impact our ability to attract new Partner Managers to our products who may seek relationships with non-competitors over concerns of sharing information with competitors or other potential conflicts, including the ability to exercise our fiduciary duties.
−Removed: Additionally, our investments in Partner Managers may affect our relationships with other sponsors that are key relationships for our Credit products, because of similar concerns around information sharing or other reasons.
−Removed: While we have implemented procedures to address any such conflict, such procedures may not reduce the perception that such conflicts exist and may make us a less attractive partner/investor.
−Removed: Our entitlement and that of certain Principals and employees to receive performance income from certain of our products may create an incentive for us to make more decisions, including speculative investments and determinations on behalf of our products, than would be the case in the absence of such performance income.
−Removed: Some of our products generate performance-based fees, including carried interest.
−Removed: With respect to Blue Owl GP Stakes I - V and their related co-investment vehicles, none of the carried interest will be allocated to us.
−Removed: We will generally be allocated 15% of the carried interest attributable to Blue Owl GP Stakes V and future GP Strategic Capital products as well as 15% of the carried interest in existing and future Real Estate and Credit products.
−Removed: If a new GP Strategic Capital product is formed to facilitate a secondary transaction with respect to any of Blue Owl GP Stakes I - V (which would include, without limitation, any continuation fund or other new product whose primary purpose is to acquire directly or indirectly all or a portion of the assets of or interests in Blue Owl GP Stakes I - V), any carried interest generated by such product will not be allocated to us, notwithstanding that such secondary vehicle is formed in the future.
−Removed: Performance revenues not allocated to us is allocated to certain Principals and employees in vehicles not controlled by us.
−Removed: Carried interest and performance based fees or allocations may create an incentive for us or our investment professionals to make more speculative or riskier investments and determinations, directly or indirectly on behalf of our products, or otherwise take or refrain from taking certain actions than it would otherwise make in the absence of such carried interest or performance-based fees or allocations.
−Removed: It may also create incentives to influence how we establish economic terms for future products.
−Removed: In addition, we may have an incentive to make exit determinations based on factors that maximize economics in favor of the Principals and employees relative to us and our non-participating stockholders.
−Removed: Our failure to appropriately address any actual, potential or perceived conflicts of interest resulting from our entitlement to receive performance income from many of our products could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, which could materially and adversely affect our business in a number of ways, including limiting our ability to raise additional products, attract new clients or retain existing clients.
+Added: Our equity investments and some of our debt investments rank junior to investments made by others, exposing us to greater risk of losing our investment.
+Added: In addition, in many cases, the portfolio companies in which we or our products invest have, or are permitted to have, outstanding indebtedness or equity securities that rank senior to our or our products’ investment.
+Added: By their terms, such instruments may provide that their holders are entitled to receive payments of distributions, interest or principal on or before the dates on which payments are to be made in respect of our or our investment products’ investment.
+Added: Also, in the event of insolvency, liquidation, dissolution, reorganization or bankruptcy of a portfolio company in which an investment is made, holders of securities ranking senior to our investment would typically be entitled to receive payment in full before distributions could be made in respect of our investment.
+Added: In addition, debt investments made by us or our investment products in our portfolio companies may rank junior to the senior debt investments made by third parties in our portfolio companies.
+Added: After repaying senior security holders, the portfolio company may not have any remaining assets to use for repaying amounts owed in respect of our investment.
+Added: To the extent that any assets remain, holders of claims that rank equally with our investment would be entitled to share on an equal and ratable basis in distributions that are made out of those assets.
+Added: Also, during periods of financial distress or following insolvency, the ability of us or our products to influence a portfolio company’s affairs and to take actions to protect an investment will likely be substantially less than that of the senior creditors.
Risks Related to Our Operations
−Removed: Fulfilling our obligations incident to being a public company, including compliance with the Exchange Act and the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the Dodd-Frank Act, are expensive and time-consuming, and there can be no assurance that we will satisfy these obligations.
−Removed: As a public company, we are subject to the reporting, accounting and corporate governance requirements of the NYSE, the Exchange Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Sarbanes-Oxley Act”) and Section 619 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) that apply to issuers of listed equity, which impose certain significant compliance requirements, costs and obligations upon us.
−Removed: The requirements of being a publicly listed company and ongoing compliance with these rules and regulations require a significant commitment of additional resources and management oversight, which increases our operating costs and could divert the attention of our management and personnel from other business concerns.
−Removed: The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires us, among other things, to maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting.
−Removed: In order to maintain and improve the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting, we have expended, and anticipate that we will continue to expend, significant resources, including accounting-related costs and significant management oversight.
−Removed: In addition, our internal resources and personnel may in the future be insufficient to avoid accounting errors, and our auditors may identify deficiencies, significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in our internal control environment in the future.
−Removed: failure to develop or maintain effective controls or any difficulties encountered implementing required new or improved controls could harm our operating results or cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations and may result in a restatement of our financial statements for prior periods.
−Removed: Any failure to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting also could adversely affect the results of periodic management evaluations and annual independent registered public accounting firm attestation reports regarding the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting.
−Removed: Ineffective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting could also cause investors in our common stock or investors in our products to lose confidence in our reported financial and other information, which would likely have a negative effect on the trading price of our common stock and/or investors’ confidence in our products.
−Removed: In addition, if we are unable to continue to meet these requirements, we may not be able to remain listed on the NYSE.
−Removed: The expenses associated with being a public company include auditing, accounting and legal fees and expenses, investor relations expenses, increased directors’ fees and director and officer liability insurance costs, registrar and transfer agent fees and listing fees.
−Removed: In addition, as a public company, we are required to institute comprehensive compliance and investor relations functions.
−Removed: These obligations and constituents require significant attention from our senior management and could divert their attention away from the day-to-day management of our business.
−Removed: Failure to comply with the requirements of being a public company could potentially subject us to sanctions or investigations by the SEC or other regulatory authorities.
−Removed: Moreover, changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure are creating uncertainty for public companies, increasing legal and financial compliance costs and making some activities more time consuming.
−Removed: We must invest resources to comply with evolving laws, regulations and standards, and such investment may result in increased general and administrative expenses.
−Removed: If our efforts to comply with new laws, regulations and standards differ from the activities intended by regulatory or governing bodies due to ambiguities related to their application and practice, regulatory authorities may initiate legal proceedings against us, and there could be a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.
−Removed: The anticipated benefits of future acquisitions that we may pursue may not be realized or may take longer than expected to realize.
−Removed: We may pursue acquisitions of assets or business that are complementary to our business.
−Removed: For any such acquisitions, the optimization of our combined operations may be a complex, costly and time-consuming process and if we experience difficulties in this process, the anticipated benefits may not be realized fully or at all, or may take longer to realize than expected, which could have an adverse effect on us for an undetermined period after any such future acquisition.
+Added: The anticipated benefits of recent or future acquisitions may not be realized or may take longer than expected to realize.
+Added: We have recently acquired assets or businesses, and may in the future pursue acquisitions of assets or business, that are complementary to our business.
+Added: For any such acquisitions, the optimization of our combined operations may be a complex, costly and time-consuming process and if we experience difficulties in this process, the anticipated benefits may not be realized fully or at all, or may take longer to realize than expected, which could have an adverse effect on us for an undetermined period after any such acquisition.
There can be no assurances that we will realize any potential operating efficiencies, synergies and other benefits anticipated in connection with such acquisitions.
11 unchanged sentences
Some of those factors are outside of our control, and any one of them could result in delays, increased costs, performance shortfalls, decreases in the amount of potential revenues or synergies, potential cost savings, and diversion of management’s time and energy, which could materially and potentially adversely affect our financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.
−Removed: We are subject to risks in using custodians, counterparties, administrators and other agents.
−Removed: Many of our products depend on the services of custodians, counterparties, administrators and other agents to carry out certain transactions and other administrative services, including compliance with regulatory requirements in U.S.
−Removed: jurisdictions.
−Removed: We are subject to risks of errors and mistakes made by these third parties, which may be attributed to us and subject us or our products’ investors to reputational damage, penalties or losses.
−Removed: We depend on third parties to provide primary and back up communications and information systems.
−Removed: Any failure or interruption of those systems, including as a result of the termination of an agreement with any third-party service providers, could cause delays or other problems in our activities.
−Removed: Our financial, accounting, data processing, portfolio monitoring, backup or other operating systems and facilities may fail to operate properly or become disabled or damaged as a result of a number of factors including events that are wholly or partially beyond our control.
−Removed: The terms of the contracts with third-party service providers are often customized and complex, and many of these arrangements occur in markets or relate to products that are not subject to regulatory oversight.
−Removed: Accordingly, we may be unsuccessful in seeking reimbursement or indemnification from these third-party service providers.
−Removed: In addition, we rely on a select number of third-party services providers and replacement of any one of our service providers could be difficult and result in disruption and expense.
We may continue to enter into new product lines and expand into new investment strategies, geographic markets and businesses, each of which may result in upfront costs and additional risks and uncertainties in our business.
1 unchanged sentence
markets) and products.
−Removed: For example, in December 2023, we completed the CHI Acquisition, which expanded our offerings to include life sciences-focused products.
We may pursue growth through acquisitions of other investment management companies, expansion into new markets, acquisitions of critical business partners or other strategic initiatives, in each case, which may include entering into new lines of business.
6 unchanged sentences
• increasing demands on our operational and management systems and controls;
−Removed: • compliance with or applicability to our business or our products’ portfolio companies of regulations and laws, including, in particular, local regulations and laws (for example, consumer protection related laws) and the impact that noncompliance or even perceived noncompliance could have on us and our products’ portfolio companies;
+Added: • compliance with or applicability to our business or our products’ portfolio companies of regulations and laws, including, in particular, local regulations and laws (for example, consumer protection-related laws, digital infrastructure regulation, environmental regulation, insurance regulation and tax laws) and the impact that noncompliance or even perceived noncompliance could have on us and our products’ portfolio companies;
• conflicts between business lines in deal flow or objectives;
• we may be dependent upon, and subject to liability, losses or reputational damage relating to, systems, controls and personnel that are not under our control;
−Removed: • potential increase in fund investor concentration;
+Added: • potential increase in product investor concentration;
• the broadening of our geographic footprint, increasing the risks associated with conducting operations in foreign jurisdictions where we currently have little or no presence, such as different legal, tax and regulatory regimes and currency fluctuations, which require additional resources to address.
−Removed: Because we have not yet identified these potential new investment strategies, geographic markets or lines of business, we cannot identify all of the specific risks we may face and the potential adverse consequences on us and their investment that may result from any attempted expansion.
+Added: Because we have not yet identified these potential new investment strategies, geographic markets or lines of business, we cannot identify all of the specific risks we may face and the potential adverse consequences on us and our investments that may result from any attempted expansion.
Rapid growth of our business may be difficult to sustain and may place significant demands on our administrative, operational and financial resources.
6 unchanged sentences
• maintaining adequate financial, regulatory (legal, tax and compliance) and business controls;
−Removed: • providing current and future fund investors and stockholders with accurate and consistent reporting;
+Added: • providing current and future product investors and stockholders with accurate and consistent reporting;
• implementing new or updated information and financial systems and procedures;
1 unchanged sentence
We may not be able to manage our expanding operations effectively and may not be ready to continue to grow because of operational needs, and any failure to do so could adversely affect our ability to generate revenue and control our expenses.
−Removed: Our use of leverage to finance our business or that of our products and our BDCs exposes us to substantial risks.
+Added: Our use of leverage to finance our business or that of our products may expose us to substantial risks.
Any security interests or negative covenants required by a credit facility we enter into may limit our ability to create liens on assets to secure additional debt.
−Removed: We may choose to finance our business operations through the issuance of senior notes, borrowings under our Revolving Credit Facility or by issuing additional debt in the future.
+Added: We may choose to finance our business operations through the issuance of senior notes, borrowing under our Revolving Credit Facility (as defined in Note 7 to our Financial Statements) or by issuing additional debt in the future.
Our existing and future indebtedness exposes us to the typical risks associated with the use of leverage.
5 unchanged sentences
Non-compliance with any of the covenants without cure or waiver would constitute an event of default, and an event of default resulting from a breach of certain covenants could result, at the option of the lenders, in an acceleration of the principal and interest outstanding.
−Removed: Additionally, for many Credit products, the gross asset value used as the base for the management fee
−Removed: includes investments purchased with leverage.
+Added: Additionally, for many Credit products, the gross asset value used as the base for the management fee includes investments purchased with leverage.
If we are unable to obtain leverage at the expected level, or at all, this will have a negative impact on our ability to realize the full fee potential of any particular fund.
−Removed: Blue Owl may provide financial guarantees of performance in connection with certain investments, particularly in our Real Estate products, to certain lenders to its products and investments.
−Removed: Lenders in commercial real estate financing customarily will require such guarantees, which typically provides that the lender can recover losses from the guarantors for certain bad acts, such as fraud or intentional misrepresentation, intentional waste, willful misconduct, criminal acts, misappropriation of funds, voluntary incurrence of prohibited debt and environmental losses sustained by lender.
−Removed: It is expected that commercial real estate financing arrangements will generally require such guarantees and in the event that such a guarantee is called, Blue Owl’s assets could be materially and adversely affected.
As borrowings under our senior notes, Revolving Credit Facility and any future indebtedness mature, we may be required to either refinance them by entering into new facilities or issuing additional debt, which could result in higher borrowing costs, or issuing equity, which would dilute existing stockholders.
−Removed: We could also repay these borrowings by using cash on hand, cash provided by our continuing operations or cash from the sale of our assets.
+Added: We could also repay these borrowings by using cash on hand, cash
+Added: provided by our continuing operations or cash from the sale of our assets.
We may be unable to enter into new facilities or issue debt or equity in the future on attractive terms, or at all.
−Removed: Borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility are SOFR-based obligations.
+Added: Borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility are SOFR-based (as defined in Note 7 to our Financial Statements) obligations.
As a result, an increase in SOFR will increase our interest costs if such borrowings are not been hedged into fixed rates in the future.
+Added: Additionally, Blue Owl may provide financial guarantees of performance in connection with certain investments, particularly in our Real Assets products, to certain lenders to its products and investments.
+Added: Lenders in commercial real estate financing customarily will require such guarantees, which typically provides that the lender can recover losses from the guarantors for certain bad acts, such as fraud or intentional misrepresentation, intentional waste, willful misconduct, criminal acts, misappropriation of funds, voluntary incurrence of prohibited debt and environmental losses sustained by the lenders.
+Added: It is expected that commercial real estate financing arrangements will generally require such guarantees and in the event that such a guarantee is called, Blue Owl’s assets could be materially and adversely affected.
Risk management activities may adversely affect the return on our and our products’ investments.
14 unchanged sentences
Cyber-attacks and other security threats could originate from a wide variety of sources, including cyber criminals, nation state hackers, hacktivists and other outside parties.
−Removed: As a result, we may face a heightened risk of a security breach or disruption with respect to sensitive information resulting from an attack by computer hackers, foreign governments or cyber terrorists.
−Removed: The efficient operation of our business is dependent on computer hardware and software systems, as well as data processing systems and the secure processing, storage and transmission of information, which are vulnerable to security breaches and
−Removed: cyber-attacks.
+Added: Additionally, cyber-attacks and other security threats have become increasingly complex as a result of the emergence of new technologies, such as artificial intelligence, which are able to identify and target new vulnerabilities in information technology systems.
+Added: As a result, we may face a heightened risk of a security breach or disruption with respect to confidential information resulting from an attack by computer hackers, foreign governments or cyber terrorists.
+Added: The efficient operation of our business is dependent on computer hardware and software systems, as well as data processing systems and the secure processing, storage and transmission of information, which are vulnerable to security breaches and cyber-attacks.
A cyber-attack is considered to be any adverse event that threatens the confidentiality, integrity or availability of our information resources.
These incidents may be an intentional attack or an unintentional event and could involve gaining unauthorized access to our information systems for purposes of misappropriating assets, stealing confidential information, corrupting data or causing operational disruption.
−Removed: In addition, we and our employees may be the target of fraudulent emails or other targeted attempts to gain unauthorized access to proprietary or sensitive information.
+Added: In addition, we and our employees may be the target of fraudulent emails or
+Added: other targeted attempts to gain unauthorized access to proprietary or sensitive information.
The result of any cyber-attack may include disrupted operations, misstated or unreliable financial data, fraudulent transfers or requests for transfers of money, liability for stolen assets or information (including personal information), increased cybersecurity protection and insurance costs, litigation or damage to our business relationships and reputation, in each case causing our business and results of operations to suffer.
The rapid evolution and increasing prevalence of artificial intelligence technologies may also intensify our cybersecurity risks.
−Removed: Although we are not currently aware of any cyber-attacks or other incidents that, individually or in the aggregate, have materially affected, or would reasonably be expected to materially affect, our operations or financial condition, there has been an increase in the frequency and sophistication of the cyber and security threats that we face, with attacks ranging from those common to businesses generally to more advanced and persistent attacks.
As our reliance on technology has increased, so have the risks posed to our information systems, both internal and those provided by third-party service providers.
+Added: We cannot guarantee that third parties and infrastructure in our networks or our partners’ networks have not been compromised or that they do not contain exploitable defects or bugs that could result in a breach of or disruption to our information technology systems or the third-party information technology systems that support our services.
+Added: Our ability to monitor these third parties’ information security practices is limited, and they may not have adequate information security measures in place.
We have implemented processes, procedures and internal controls designed to mitigate cybersecurity risks and cyber intrusions and rely on industry accepted security measures and technology to securely maintain confidential and proprietary information maintained on our information systems.
−Removed: However, these measures, as well as our increased awareness of the nature and extent of a risk of a cyber-incident, do not guarantee that a cyber-incident will not occur or that our financial results, operations or confidential information will not be negatively impacted by such an incident, especially because the cyber-incident techniques change frequently or are not recognized until launched and because cyber-incidents can originate from a wide variety of sources.
−Removed: Cybersecurity risks are exacerbated by the rapidly increasing volume of highly sensitive data, including our proprietary business information and intellectual property, personally identifiable information of our employees, our clients and others and other sensitive information that we collect and store in our data centers and on our networks.
+Added: However, these measures, as well as our increased awareness of the nature and extent of a risk of a cyber-attack, do not guarantee that a cyber-attack will not occur or that our financial results, operations or confidential information will not be negatively impacted by such an incident, especially because the cyber-attack techniques change frequently or are not recognized until launched and because cyber-attacks can originate from a wide variety of sources.
+Added: Cybersecurity risks are exacerbated by the rapidly increasing volume of highly sensitive data, including our proprietary business information and intellectual property, personally identifiable information of our employees, our clients and others and other sensitive information that we collect and store in our data centers,on our cloud environments and on our networks.
Our products may also invest in strategic assets having a national or regional profile or in infrastructure assets, the nature of which could expose them to a greater risk of being subject to a terrorist attack or security breach than other assets or businesses.
The secure processing, maintenance and transmission of this information are critical to our operations.
−Removed: A significant actual or potential theft, loss, corruption, exposure, fraudulent use or misuse of fund investor, employee or other personally identifiable, proprietary business data or other sensitive information, whether by third parties or as a result of employee malfeasance (or the negligence or malfeasance of third party service providers that have access to such confidential information) or otherwise, non-compliance with our contractual or other legal obligations regarding such data or intellectual property or a violation of our privacy and security policies with respect to such data could result in significant remediation and other costs, fines, litigation or regulatory actions against us and significant reputational harm, any of which could harm our business and results of operations.
+Added: A significant actual or potential theft, loss, corruption, exposure, fraudulent use or misuse of product investor, employee or other personally identifiable, proprietary business data or other sensitive information, whether by third parties or as a result of employee malfeasance (or the negligence or malfeasance of third party service providers that have access to such confidential information) or otherwise, non-compliance with our contractual or other legal obligations regarding such data or intellectual property or a violation of our privacy and security policies with respect to such data could result in significant remediation and other costs, fines, litigation or regulatory actions against us and significant reputational harm, any of which could harm our business and results of operations.
+Added: We are subject to risks in using custodians, counterparties, administrators and other agents.
+Added: Many of our products depend on the services of custodians, counterparties, administrators and other agents to carry out certain transactions and other administrative services, including compliance with regulatory requirements in U.S.
+Added: jurisdictions.
+Added: We are subject to risks of errors and mistakes made by these third parties, which may be attributed to us and subject us or our products’ investors to reputational damage, penalties or losses.
+Added: We depend on third parties to provide primary and back up communications and information systems.
+Added: Any failure or interruption of those systems, including as a result of the termination of an agreement with any third-party service providers, or as a result of cyber-attacks or other breaches could cause delays or other problems in our activities.
+Added: Our financial, accounting, data processing, portfolio monitoring, backup or other operating systems and facilities may fail to operate properly or become disabled or damaged as a result of a number of factors including events that are wholly or partially beyond our control.
+Added: The terms of the contracts with third-party service providers are often customized and complex, and many of these arrangements occur in markets or relate to products that are not subject to regulatory oversight.
+Added: Accordingly, we may be unsuccessful in seeking reimbursement or indemnification from these third-party service providers.
+Added: In addition, we rely on a select number of third-party services providers and replacement of any one of our service providers could be difficult and result in disruption and expense.
Risks Related to Personnel
1 unchanged sentence
Our success depends on the efforts, judgment and personal reputations of our senior management team, senior investment professionals and other key personnel.
−Removed: Their reputations, expertise in investing, relationships with fund investors and with other members of the business communities on whom we and our products depend on for investment opportunities and financing are each critical elements in operating and expanding our business.
−Removed: The loss of the services of our senior management team, senior investment professionals or other key personnel could have a material adverse effect on us and our products, and on the performance of our products, including on our ability to retain and attract fund investors and raise capital.
+Added: Their reputations, expertise in investing, relationships with product investors and with
+Added: other members of the business communities on whom we and our products depend on for investment opportunities and financing are each critical elements in operating and expanding our business.
+Added: The loss of the services of our senior management team, senior investment professionals or other key personnel could have a material adverse effect on us and our products, and on the performance of our products, including on our ability to retain and attract product investors and raise capital.
The departure of some or all of those individuals could also trigger certain provisions tied to the departure of, or cessation of committed time, by those persons (known as “key person” provisions) in the documentation governing certain of our products, which could permit the investors in those products to suspend or terminate those products’ investment periods.
1 unchanged sentence
In addition, each of Doug Ostrover, Marc Lipschultz, Michael Rees and Marc Zahr (each a “Key Individual”) is entitled to significant compensation payments and under certain circumstances (including the Key Individual’s death or disability), the Key Individual (or his estate) is entitled to retain those payments for up to five years following such person’s ceasing to be employed by us.
−Removed: While we continue to make such payments, we may need to find or promote new employees to replace the
−Removed: former Key Individual, which may require additional significant compensation to be paid by us, which could adversely affect our earnings.
−Removed: Employee misconduct could harm us by impairing our ability to attract and retain fund investors and subjecting us to significant legal liability, regulatory scrutiny and reputational harm.
−Removed: Our ability to attract and retain fund investors and to pursue investment opportunities for our clients depends heavily upon the reputation of our professionals, especially our senior professionals as well as third-party service providers.
+Added: While we continue to make such payments, we may need to find or promote new employees to replace the former Key Individual, which may require additional significant compensation to be paid by us, which could adversely affect our earnings.
+Added: Employee misconduct could harm us by impairing our ability to attract and retain product investors and subjecting us to significant legal liability, regulatory scrutiny and reputational harm.
+Added: Our ability to attract and retain product investors and to pursue investment opportunities for our clients depends heavily upon the reputation of our professionals, especially our senior professionals as well as third-party service providers.
We are subject to a number of obligations and standards arising from our investment management business and our authority and statutory fiduciary status over the assets managed by our investment management business.
5 unchanged sentences
It is not always possible to detect or deter misconduct by employees or third-party service providers, and the extensive precautions we take to detect and prevent this activity may not be effective in all cases.
−Removed: If one or more of our employees, former employees or third-party service providers were to engage in misconduct or were to be accused of such misconduct, our business and our reputation could be adversely affected and a loss of fund investor confidence could result, which would adversely impact our ability to raise future products.
+Added: If one or more of our employees, former employees or third-party service providers were to engage in misconduct or were to be accused of such misconduct, our business and our reputation could be adversely affected and a loss of product investor confidence could result, which would adversely impact our ability to raise future products.
Our current and former employees and those of our products’ investments as well as our third-party service providers may also become subject to allegations of sexual harassment, racial and gender discrimination or other similar misconduct, which, regardless of the ultimate outcome, may result in adverse publicity that could harm our and such portfolio company’s brand and reputation.
7 unchanged sentences
Moreover, if our personnel join competitors or form businesses that compete with ours, that could adversely affect our ability to raise new or successor products.
+Added: Conflicts of Interest
+Added: Conflicts of interest may arise in our allocation of capital and co-investment opportunities.
+Added: As an asset manager with multiple clients, including our various and expanding strategies and products, we increasingly confront conflicts of interests relating to our investment activities and operations.
+Added: In particular, our allocation of capital and co-investment opportunities across our products are subject to numerous actual or potential conflicts of interest.
+Added: Although we have implemented policies and procedures to address those conflicts, our failure to effectively identify and address them could cause reputational harm and a loss of investor confidence in our business.
+Added: It could also result in regulatory lapses that could lead to applicable penalties, as well as increased regulatory oversight of our business.
+Added: Identifying potential conflicts of interest is complex and fact-intensive, and it is not possible to foresee every conflict of interest that could or will arise.
+Added: Potential conflicts of interest in allocation among our products.
+Added: Certain of our products may have overlapping investment objectives, including products that have different fee structures, and conflicts may arise with respect to our allocation of investment opportunities among those products as well as other co-investors.
+Added: We may allocate an investment opportunity that is appropriate for two or more investment products in a manner that excludes one or more products or results in a disproportionate allocation based on factors or criteria that we determine including, but not limited to, differences with respect to available capital;
+Added: the current or anticipated size of a product;
+Added: minimum investment amounts;
+Added: the remaining life of a product;
+Added: differences in investment objectives, guidelines or strategies;
+Added: diversification;
+Added: portfolio construction considerations;
+Added: liquidity needs;
+Added: legal, tax and regulatory requirements and other considerations deemed relevant to us and in accordance with our policies and procedures.
+Added: Although we have adopted investment allocation policies and procedures that are designed to ensure fair and equitable treatment over time, and expect such policies and procedures to continue to evolve, those policies and procedures will not eliminate all potential conflicts.
+Added: Additionally, certain investment opportunities may be allocated to certain products that have lower fees or to our co-investment products or third-party co-investors that pay no fees.
+Added: To the extent that those investments could otherwise have been allocated to products generating FPAUM, our revenues will be less than what would otherwise have been generated were those investments made through fee paying structures.
+Added: Potential conflicts of interest in connection with co-investments between our private funds and our BDCs.
+Added: Our BDCs are permitted to co-invest in portfolio companies with each other and with affiliated investment funds in negotiated transactions pursuant to an SEC order (the “Co-investment Exemptive Order”).
+Added: Pursuant to that exemptive relief, our BDCs and other affiliated investment funds generally are permitted to make such co-investments if a “required majority” (as defined in Section 57(o) of the Investment Company Act) of such BDC’s directors (including the independent directors) makes certain conclusions in connection with the co-investment transaction, including that (1) the terms of the transaction, including the consideration to be paid, are reasonable and fair to such BDC and its shareholders and do not involve overreaching in respect of such BDC or its shareholders on the part of any person concerned, (2) the transaction is consistent with the interests of such BDC’s shareholders and with its investment objective and strategies, and (3) the investment by one of our BDCs and other affiliated investment funds would not disadvantage any other of our BDCs, and such BDC’s participation would not be on a basis different from or less advantageous than that on which the other BDCs or other affiliated investment funds are investing.
+Added: The different investment objectives or terms of the BDCs and affiliated investment funds may result in a potential conflict of interest, including in connection with the allocation of investments among our BDCs and/or our affiliated investment funds pursuant to the Co-investment Exemptive Order or otherwise.
+Added: As a result of our structure, our private funds are affiliated investment funds of our BDCs and are prohibited from co-investing with our BDCs, except as permitted by the Investment Company Act and the Co-investment Exemptive Order.
+Added: Those restrictions may limit the ability of our private funds to make certain investments they otherwise may have made, and subject our products to additional compliance and regulatory risk.
+Added: The Co-investment Exemptive Order requires that any opportunities that are appropriate for both our BDCs and our private funds will need to be offered to our BDCs and any such investments, if made, will need to be conducted in compliance with the conditions of the Co-Investment Exemptive Order and other requirements under the Investment Company Act.
+Added: Conflicts related to investments by several of our products at different levels of the capital structure of a single portfolio company or Partner Manager.
+Added: Different products that we advise may invest in a single portfolio company, including at different levels of the capital structure of the same portfolio company.
+Added: For example, in the normal course of business, one of our products may acquire debt positions in, or lend to, portfolio companies in which another of our products owns common equity securities or a subordinated debt
+Added: Such investments or commitments may be made at different times, at different prices and on different terms.
+Added: The interests of these different products invested in different levels of the capital structure of a portfolio company may not always be aligned and actions taken for one product may be adverse to one or more other products, which may give rise to conflicts of interest.
+Added: The interests of these different products may diverge significantly particularly in the case of financial distress of the portfolio company.
+Added: For example, in a bankruptcy proceeding or out-of-court restructuring, the interests of a product owning equity or subordinated debt securities may be subordinated or otherwise adversely affected by virtue of a different product’s actions in respect of its own interests as a senior debt holder.
+Added: The governing documents of our products may also prevent or impose conditions on other products investing at different levels of the capital structure.
+Added: Alternatively, we may be incentivized to cause a product invested in a senior debt position to be more passive or refrain from taking actions adverse to other products invested in equity or subordinated debt given the possibility for losses for these products.
+Added: In addition, if one of our BDCs is an investor in a portfolio company alongside other of our products that have invested in a different part of the portfolio company’s capital structure, the Investment Company Act may prohibit us from negotiating on behalf of any such product in connection with a reorganization or restructuring of the portfolio company.
+Added: While we have developed general guidelines regarding when two or more products can invest in different parts of the same company’s capital structure and created a process that we employ to handle those conflicts when they arise, our decision to permit the investments to occur in the first instance or our judgment on how to minimize the conflict could be challenged.
+Added: If we fail to appropriately address those conflicts, it could negatively impact our reputation and ability to raise additional products and the willingness of counterparties to do business with us or result in potential litigation against us.
+Added: Conflicts of interest may arise in our allocation of costs and expenses, and we are subject to increased regulatory scrutiny and uncertainty with regard to those allocations.
+Added: As an asset manager with multiple products, we regularly allocate costs and expenses among our products and between our products and us.
+Added: Certain of those allocation determinations are inherently subjective and virtually all of them are subject to regulatory oversight.
+Added: Allegations of, or investigation into, a potential improper expense allocation could cause reputational harm and a loss of investor confidence in our business.
+Added: It could also result in regulatory lapses or penalties, as well as increased regulatory oversight of our business.
+Added: In addition, any determination to allocate costs and expenses to us could negatively affect our net income, and ultimately decrease the value of our common stock and our dividends to our stockholders.
+Added: Similar considerations arise when allocating expenses to, or away from vehicles to which specified interests apply.
+Added: We have a conflict of interest in determining whether certain costs and expenses are incurred in the course of operating our products, including the extent to which services provided by certain employees and associated costs, including compensation, are allocable to certain products.
+Added: Our products generally pay or otherwise bear all legal, accounting, filing, and other expenses incurred in connection with organizing and establishing the products and the offering of interests in the products, including certain employee compensation.
+Added: Such determinations often require subjective judgment and may result in us, rather than our products, bearing certain fees and expenses.
+Added: In addition, our products generally pay all expenses related to the operation of the products and their investment activities, in certain cases subject to caps.
+Added: We also determine, in our sole discretion, the appropriate allocation of investment-related expenses, including broken deal expenses and expenses more generally relating to a particular investment strategy, among our products, vehicles and accounts participating or that would have participated in such investments or that otherwise participate in the relevant investment strategy, as applicable.
+Added: That often requires judgment and could result in one or more of our products bearing more or less of these expenses than other investors or potential investors in the relevant investments or a fund paying a disproportionate share, including some or all, of the broken deal expenses or other expenses incurred by potential investors.
+Added: Any dispute regarding such allocations could lead to our products or us, as further described below, having to bear some portion of these costs as well as reputational risk.
+Added: In addition, for products that do not pay or otherwise bear the costs and expenses described above because of the application of caps or otherwise, such amounts may be borne by us, which will reduce the amount of net fee income we receive for providing advisory services to the products.
+Added: For example, our Business Services Platform provides strategic services to Partner Managers.
+Added: Certain expenses associated with the Business Services Platform (“BSP Expenses”) are allocated among, and payable by, each of the flagship GP minority equity investment products;
+Added: however, co-investment and similar vehicles sponsored and/or managed by us do not bear any portion of BSP Expenses.
+Added: Those GP Strategic Capital products are generally allocated an amount equal to their pro rata allocation of BSP Expenses based on the relative number of Partner Managers in which investments are held from time to time by each of those products;
+Added: provided that the amount of BSP Expenses borne by a particular fund is subject to certain floors and/or caps specified in its respective governing documents.
+Added: We are required to bear any BSP Expenses allocated to a product that exceeds the product’s cap on those expenses.
+Added: In addition, in certain instances, we expect to determine not to allocate or charge certain BSP Expenses to any product, in response to regulatory, investor relations, governance or other applicable considerations and determine instead for those BSP Expenses to be borne by us.
+Added: Any such determination could have the effect of materially reducing the reimbursement payments received by
+Added: us with respect to the Business Services Platform or result in losses attributable to certain activities thereof.
+Added: The allocation methodology for allocating BSP Expenses and other similar expenses is complex and subject to interpretation.
+Added: Accordingly, there can be no assurance that any conflict arising from these allocations of expenses will be resolved in a manner responsive to the interests of all of our clients, which could damage our reputation.
+Added: The activities of the Business Services Platform and the allocation of BSP Expenses have in the past been subject to an SEC order.
+Added: These and other expense allocation practices could in the future be subject to regulatory scrutiny.
+Added: Potential conflicts of interest in allocation among Blue Owl, our products and our investment professionals.
+Added: Certain of our products may have overlapping investment objectives with Blue Owl, and conflicts may arise with respect to our decisions regarding how to allocate investment opportunities amongst our products or between Blue Owl and our products.
+Added: We have provided and expect to continue to provide funds to support new product and strategy launches to enable our products to achieve a level of scale and profitability.
+Added: We have used, and expect to continue to use, our balance sheet capital to warehouse seed investments in our products pending the contribution of committed capital by the investors in such products and/or to extend bridge loans to our products, which may decrease the liquidity available for other parts of our business.
+Added: If new strategies or products do not develop as anticipated or our balance sheet assets cease to provide adequate liquidity, we may be forced to realize losses or become limited in our ability to seed new products or strategies or support existing ones as currently contemplated.
+Added: Furthermore, our investment professionals or entities controlled by them may make similar investments or loans to new products or third party investment opportunities, including in connection with their personal or family office investment activities.
+Added: These activities may result in actual or perceived conflicts of interest.
+Added: Although we have adopted personal trading policies and procedures that are designed to ensure that, in such circumstances, Blue Owl or our products, as the case may be, has first priority in investment opportunities that align with its investment objectives, and expect these policies and procedures to continue to evolve as Blue Owl’s business evolves, those policies and procedures may not eliminate all potential conflicts.
+Added: Existing and future relationships between or among our Partner Managers, our products and their investors could give rise to actual or perceived conflicts of interest.
+Added: Certain of our GP Strategic Capital products’ Partner Managers directly or through their investment funds, own securities in Blue Owl or its subsidiaries.
+Added: In addition, certain GP Strategic Capital products own securities in Blue Owl or its subsidiaries and may have different interests, including different investment horizons, than Blue Owl.
+Added: Any decision with respect to holding or disposing of any such products’ interests in Blue Owl will be determined by the applicable investment manager in a manner consistent with its duties to the product.
+Added: Because those decisions will be made independent from consideration of Blue Owl’s interests, they may, due to a range of factors, conflict with the interest of Blue Owl or its stockholders.
+Added: GP Strategic Capital products hold minority, noncontrolling interests in a broad range of Partner Managers.
+Added: Those Partner Managers may, from time to time, directly or through their funds, enter into transactions or other contractual arrangements with us or our products outside of the GP minority stakes strategy, including our private funds, BDCs and Real Assets products, or between or among one another in the ordinary course of business, which may result in additional conflicts of interest.
+Added: For example, in 2024 Blue Owl agreed to acquire Partner Managers in which certain of our GP Strategic Capital products held, directly or indirectly, minority, non-controlling interests, in connection with which we implemented procedures to minimize or eliminate any conflicts.
+Added: None of those transactions or other contractual arrangements are believed to be material to our operations or performance but future transactions may be material.
+Added: Portfolio companies of products managed by our Partner Managers may also be borrowers under debt facilities or instruments owned, arranged or managed by our products.
+Added: In its capacity as agent or lender under such facilities or instruments, a fund is required to act in the best interests of its stockholders or investors.
+Added: In certain circumstances, one of our products may be required to take actions that may be adverse to the investments owned by funds managed by Partner Managers, which could adversely affect our relationships with the Partner Managers, or potentially impact the value of a GP Strategic Capital product’s investment in such Partner Manager.
+Added: From time to time, companies in which our products or products managed by our Partner Managers have invested or may invest may enter into sale-leaseback transactions with, or otherwise become tenants of, our Real Assets products.
+Added: These arrangements could result in our products or products managed by our Partner Managers being creditors to, or equity owners of, such companies at the same time as those companies are tenants of our Real Assets products.
+Added: If such a company were to encounter financial difficulty or default on its obligations as a borrower, our product or a product managed by a Partner Manager, could be
+Added: required to take actions that may be adverse to those of our Real Assets products in enforcing its rights under the relevant facilities or agreements, or vice versa.
+Added: Investments in portfolio companies connected to other business relationships may cause us to take different actions with respect to such investment than would have otherwise occurred had the portfolio company had no other business relationship with us or our products.
+Added: Even if the foregoing relationships and transactions do not create actual conflicts, the perception of conflicts in the press or the financial community generally could create negative publicity with respect to Blue Owl, which could adversely affect the relationships of with our product investors.
+Added: Conflicts related to our lack of information barriers.
+Added: Our products, investment platforms and investment professionals regularly obtain non-public information regarding target companies and other investment opportunities.
+Added: Since we do not currently maintain permanent information barriers among our businesses, we generally impute non-public information received by one investment team to all other investment professionals, including all of the personnel who make investment decisions for our products.
+Added: In the event that any of our products or people obtain confidential or material non-public information, we and our products may be restricted in acquiring or disposing of investments.
+Added: Notwithstanding the maintenance of restricted securities lists and other internal controls, the internal controls relating to the management of material non-public information could fail and result in us, or one of our people, buying or selling a security while deemed to be in possession of material non-public information.
+Added: Inadvertent trading on material non-public information could negatively impact our reputation, result in the imposition of regulatory or financial sanctions and, consequently, negatively impact our ability to provide investment management services to our products and clients.
+Added: These risks are heightened by the existence of our public equity products, which may limit the products’ investment opportunities or ability to dispose of investments.
+Added: In limited circumstances, we may put in place temporary information barriers to restrict the transfer of non-public information, which limit our products’ abilities to benefit from Blue Owl expertise and such temporary information barriers could be breached, resulting in the same restrictions on such products’ investment activities.
+Added: In certain instances, Blue Owl may decline to receive material nonpublic information from an investment or prospective investment, even if such material nonpublic information would be beneficial to a Blue Owl product, because the receipt of such material non-public information may inhibit the investment activities of Blue Owl and/or one or more other Blue Owl products and foregoing such material nonpublic information may negatively impact the potential receiving Blue Owl products and/or one or more of its portfolio investments.
+Added: Further, in the future, we could be required by certain regulations, or decide that it is advisable, to establish permanent information barriers, which would impair our ability to operate as an integrated platform, limit management’s ability to manage our investments and reduce potential synergies across our businesses.
+Added: The establishment of information barriers may also lead to operational disruptions and result in restructuring costs, including costs related to hiring additional personnel as existing investment professionals are allocated to either side of a barrier.
+Added: Additional and unpredictable conflicts of interests may rise in the future.
+Added: In addition to the conflicts outlined above, we may experience conflicts of interest in connection with the management of our business affairs relating to and arising from a number of matters, including the amounts paid to us by our products;
+Added: services that may be provided by us and our affiliates to investments in which our products invest (including the determination of whether or not to charge fees to our investments for our provision of such services);
+Added: investments by our products and our other clients, subject to the limitations of the Investment Company Act;
+Added: our formation of additional products;
+Added: differing recommendations given by us to different clients;
+Added: and our use of information gained from a product’s investments used to inform investments by other clients, subject to applicable law.
+Added: In resolving these conflicts of interest, we may favor our products’ interests or investors’ interests over the interests of our stockholders.
+Added: Our GP Strategic Capital products hold and make investments in Partner Managers and there may be provisions within our arrangements with Partner Managers that could affect our right to receive or share information or cause us to sell our interests in the Partner Manager.
+Added: The terms of our GP Strategic Capital products’ investments in Partner Managers generally include provisions relating to competitors of the Partner Managers, access to information about the Partner Managers and their business, and affirmative and negative confidentiality obligations regarding the Partner Managers.
+Added: While we have implemented information control procedures with restrictions regarding the sharing of a Partner Manager’s confidential information, such procedures may not reduce a Partner Manager’s concern over the sharing of confidential and competitively sensitive information.
+Added: Certain Partner Managers that are engaged in managing funds focused on similar businesses as our other product lines may consider Blue Owl
+Added: to be a competitor with respect to their business and may seek to invoke remedies available to them under the investment agreements or pursue other remedies.
+Added: Potential remedies available to them under the investment agreements, as applicable, include limiting the rights of our products to receive confidential information from the Partner Manager regarding its business, requiring us to sequester confidential information received from the Partner Manager, or requiring us to sell our interests in the Partner Manager for fair value as determined under the relevant investment agreement.
+Added: A forced sale of a Partner Manager interest may reduce the amount of fees we receive with respect to the applicable GP Strategic Capital product, and any reduction in information may impede our ability to supervise our products’ investments.
+Added: Further, the affiliation may hinder the GP Strategic Capital products’ ability to make future investments in Partner Managers who are in the same space and who may consider Blue Owl a competitor, including follow-on investments in existing Partner Managers and investments with new Partner Managers.
+Added: The operations of our business and related transactions may affect our reputation and relationship with our Partner Managers.
+Added: We are reliant upon our strong relationships with our Partner Managers for the continued growth and development of business.
+Added: Due to the number of Partner Managers with which we have relationships, we may compete with existing or prospective Partner Managers, which could negatively impact our ability to attract new Partner Managers to our products who may seek relationships with non-competitors over concerns of sharing information with competitors or other potential conflicts, including the ability to exercise our fiduciary duties.
+Added: Additionally, our investments in Partner Managers may affect our relationships with other sponsors that are key relationships for our Credit products, because of similar concerns around information sharing or other reasons.
+Added: While we have implemented procedures to address any such conflict, such procedures may not reduce the perception that such conflicts exist and may make us a less attractive partner/investor.
+Added: Our entitlement and that of certain Principals and employees to receive performance income from certain of our products may create an incentive for us to make more decisions, including speculative investments and determinations on behalf of our products, than would be the case in the absence of such performance income.
+Added: Some of our products generate performance-based fees, including carried interest.
+Added: With respect to Blue Owl GP Stakes I - V and their related co-investment vehicles, none of the carried interest will be allocated to us.
+Added: We will generally be allocated 15% of the carried interest attributable to Blue Owl GP Stakes VI and future GP Strategic Capital products as well as 15% of the carried interest in existing and future Real Assets and Credit products.
+Added: If a new GP Strategic Capital product is formed to facilitate a secondary transaction with respect to any of Blue Owl GP Stakes I - V (which would include, without limitation, any continuation fund or other new product whose primary purpose is to acquire directly or indirectly all or a portion of the assets of or interests in Blue Owl GP Stakes I - V), any carried interest generated by such product will not be allocated to us, notwithstanding that such secondary vehicle is formed in the future.
+Added: Performance revenues not allocated to us are allocated, in part, to certain Principals and employees of Blue Owl in vehicles not controlled by us.
+Added: Carried interest and performance-based fees or allocations may create an incentive for us or our investment professionals to make more speculative or riskier investments and determinations, directly or indirectly on behalf of our products, or otherwise take or refrain from taking certain actions than it would otherwise make in the absence of such carried interest or performance-based fees or allocations.
+Added: It may also create incentives to influence how we establish economic terms for future products.
+Added: In addition, we may have an incentive to make exit determinations based on factors that maximize economics in favor of the persons entitled to performance-based fees relative to us and our non-participating stockholders.
+Added: Our failure to appropriately address any actual, potential or perceived conflicts of interest resulting from our entitlement to receive performance income from many of our products could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, which could materially and adversely affect our business in a number of ways, including limiting our ability to raise additional products, attract new clients or retain existing clients.
Risks Related to Our Legal and Regulatory Environment
3 unchanged sentences
Each of the regulatory bodies with jurisdiction over us has regulatory powers dealing with many aspects of financial services, including the authority to grant, and in specific circumstances to cancel, permissions to carry on particular activities.
−Removed: The financial services industry may continue to face a difficult regulatory environment under the current presidential administration.
−Removed: In particular, the SEC has signaled an increased emphasis on investment adviser and private fund regulation and has proposed and enacted a number of new rules that would impose significant changes on investment advisers and their management of private funds (including with respect to fund audits, adviser-led secondary transactions, fee and expense allocation and reporting, and preferential rights), and the SEC is expected to propose additional changes in the future.
−Removed: Any of the foregoing could lead to further regulatory uncertainty, particularly regarding those rules that are currently (or in the future may become)
−Removed: subject to legal challenge from private fund industry groups and others, result in changes to our operations and could materially impact our products and/or their investments, including by causing us to incur additional expenses.
+Added: In particular, the SEC increased emphasis on investment adviser and private fund regulation and proposed and adopted a number of new rules that would impose significant changes on investment advisers and their management of private funds in recent years.
+Added: While the new Presidential administration and the current leadership of the SEC have indicated that they intend to
+Added: modify or repeal certain regulations perceived as burdensome to private funds advisers, particularly those related to ESG investing and cybersecurity, new SEC rules could result in changes to our operations and could materially impact our products and/or their investments, including by causing us to incur additional expenses.
We have expanded our business globally.
Differences between the laws and rules governing our business in foreign jurisdictions compared to the United States result in inconsistent regulatory requirements that it may not be possible to fully reconcile in a cost-efficient manner across our business.
+Added: As a public company, we are subject to the reporting, accounting and corporate governance requirements of the NYSE, the Exchange Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Sarbanes-Oxley Act”) and Section 619 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) that apply to issuers of listed equity, which impose certain significant compliance requirements, costs and obligations upon us.
+Added: The requirements of being a publicly listed company and ongoing compliance with these rules and regulations require a significant commitment of additional resources and management oversight, which increases our operating costs and could divert the attention of our management and personnel from other business concerns.
The SEC oversees the activities of certain of our subsidiaries that are registered investment advisers under the Advisers Act and the activities of our BDCs that are regulated under the Investment Company Act.
5 unchanged sentences
restrictions on the types of fees we may charge, including performance fees and carried interest;
−Removed: solicitation arrangements;
maintaining effective compliance programs;
21 unchanged sentences
Our BDCs are also prohibited from knowingly participating in certain transactions with their affiliates, except as permitted by the Investment Company Act and the Co-investment Exemptive Order.
−Removed: For additional details, see “ — Risks Related to Our Products—Conflicts of Interest—Conflicts of interest may arise in our allocation of capital and co-investment opportunities.”
+Added: For additional details, see “ — Conflicts of Interest—Conflicts of interest may arise in our allocation of capital and co-investment opportunities.”
The Dodd-Frank Act
−Removed: In addition, the Dodd-Frank Act authorizes federal regulatory agencies to review and, in certain cases, prohibit compensation arrangements at financial institutions that give employees incentives to engage in conduct deemed to encourage inappropriate risk-taking by covered financial institutions.
+Added: The Dodd-Frank Act authorizes federal regulatory agencies to review and, in certain cases, prohibit compensation arrangements at financial institutions that give employees incentives to engage in conduct deemed to encourage inappropriate risk-taking by covered financial institutions.
In 2016, federal bank regulatory authorities and the SEC revised and re-proposed a rule that generally (1) prohibits incentive-based payment arrangements that are determined to encourage inappropriate risks by certain financial institutions by providing excessive compensation or that could lead to material financial loss and (2) requires those financial institutions to disclose information concerning incentive-based compensation arrangements to the appropriate federal regulator.
−Removed: The Dodd-Frank Act also directs the SEC to adopt a rule that requires public companies to adopt and disclose
−Removed: policies requiring, in the event the company is required to issue an accounting restatement, the contingent repayment of obligations of related incentive compensation from current and former executive officers.
+Added: The Dodd-Frank Act also directs the SEC to adopt a rule that requires public companies to adopt and disclose policies requiring, in the event the company is required to issue an accounting restatement, the contingent repayment of obligations of related incentive compensation from current and former executive officers.
The SEC has proposed but not yet adopted such rule.
To the extent the aforementioned rules are adopted, our ability to recruit and retain investment professionals and senior management executives could be limited.
+Added: Under the Dodd-Frank Act, a 10 voting-member Financial Stability Oversight Council (“FSOC”) has the authority to review the activities of certain nonbank financial firms engaged in financial activities and designate them as systemically important financial institutions (“SIFI”), evaluating, among other things, evaluating the impact of the distress of the financial firm on the stability of the U.S.
+Added: Currently, there are no non-bank financial companies with a non-bank SIFI designation.
+Added: The FSOC has, however, designated certain non-bank financial companies as SIFIs in the past, and additional non-bank financial companies, which may include large asset management companies such as us, may be designated as SIFIs in the future.
+Added: In November 2023, FSOC adopted amendments to its guidance regarding procedures for designating non-bank financial companies as SIFIs which eliminated the prior guidance’s prioritization of an “activities-based” approach for identifying, assessing and addressing potential risks to financial stability.
+Added: Under the previous guidance’s “activities-based” approach, FSOC indicated that it would primarily focus on regulating activities that pose systemic risk rather than focusing on individual firm-specific determinations.
+Added: The elimination of an “activities-based” approach over designation of an individual firm as a non-bank SIFI may increase the likelihood of FSOC designating one or more firms as a non-bank SIFI.
+Added: If we were designated as such, it would result in increased regulation of our businesses, including the imposition of capital, leverage, liquidity and risk management standards, credit exposure reporting and concentration limits, enhanced public disclosures, restrictions on acquisitions and annual stress tests by the Federal Reserve.
+Added: Requirements such as these, which were designed to regulate banking institutions, would likely need to be modified to be applicable to an asset manager, although no proposals have been made indicating how such measures would be adapted for asset managers.
Other Securities Laws
8 unchanged sentences
We may be adversely affected by changes in the interpretation or enforcement of existing laws and rules by these governmental authorities and self-regulatory organizations.
−Removed: Additional legislation, increasing global regulatory oversight of fundraising activities, changes in rules promulgated by self-regulatory organizations or exchanges or changes in the interpretation or enforcement of existing laws and rules, either in the United States or elsewhere, may directly affect our mode of operation and profitability.
+Added: Additional legislation or regulations, increasing global regulatory oversight of fundraising activities, changes in rules promulgated by self-regulatory organizations or exchanges or changes in the interpretation or enforcement of existing laws and rules, either in the United States or elsewhere, may directly affect our mode of operation and profitability.
Moreover, our failure to comply with applicable laws or regulations, including labor and employment laws, could result in fines, censure, suspensions of personnel or other sanctions, including revocation of the registration of our relevant subsidiaries as investment advisers or our broker-dealer affiliate as a registered broker-dealer.
1 unchanged sentence
The adverse publicity related to the sanction could harm our reputation, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on our business, making it harder for us to raise new and successor products and discouraging others from doing business with us or accepting investments from our products.
−Removed: United Kingdom Exit from the European Union
+Added: United Kingdom Exit from the European Union (“EU”)
On January 31, 2020, the UK formally withdrew from the European Union (“Brexit”).
−Removed: After this, the UK entered into a transition period during which the majority of the existing EU rules continued to apply in the UK.
−Removed: Following the end of the transition period on 31 December 2020, EU rules ceased to apply in the UK.
−Removed: Although the terms of the UK’s future relationship with the EU were agreed in a trade and cooperation agreement signed on 30 December 2020, this did not include an agreement on financial services.
−Removed: In the absence of a formal agreement on this issue, UK firms in the financial sector have more limited access to the EU market than prior to Brexit and EU firms similarly have more limited access to the UK, owing to the loss of passporting rights under applicable EU and UK legislation.
+Added: As a result of the onshoring of EU legislation in the UK, UK firms are currently subject to many of the same rules and regulations as prior to Brexit.
+Added: Since Brexit, UK firms in the financial sector have more limited access to the EU market than prior to Brexit and EU firms similarly have more limited access to the UK, owing to the loss of passporting rights under applicable EU and UK legislation.
Alternative arrangements and structures may allow for the provision of cross-border marketing and services between the EU and UK, but these are subject to legal uncertainty and the risk that further legislative and regulatory restrictions could be imposed in the future.
−Removed: As a result of the onshoring of EU legislation in the UK, UK firms are currently subject to substantially many of the same rules and regulations as prior to Brexit.
−Removed: However, the UK Government has begun the process of revising certain areas of onshored EU legislation as part of UK financial services legislation and regulation, which could result in substantive changes to regulatory requirements in the UK.
−Removed: It remains to be seen to what extent the UK may elect to diverge from the current EU-influenced regime over time, either through actively legislating to replace onshored EU rules or by passively not implementing or mirroring EU legislative changes.
−Removed: It is possible that the EU may respond to UK initiatives by restricting third country access
−Removed: to EU markets.
−Removed: If the regulatory regimes for EU and UK financial services change or diverge further, this could have an adverse impact on certain of our products and their investments, including the ability of those products to achieve their investment objectives in whole or in part (for example, owing to increased costs and complexity and/or new restrictions in relation to cross-border access between the EU and non-EU jurisdictions).
+Added: There remains considerable uncertainty as to the nature of the UK’s future relationships with the EU as well as the extent to which the UK may elect to diverge over time from the current EU-influenced regime, creating continuing uncertainty as to the full extent to which our business could be adversely affected.
The legal, political and economic uncertainty and disruption generally resulting from Brexit may adversely affect both EU- and UK-based businesses.
2 unchanged sentences
Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (“AIFMD”)
−Removed: The AIFMD regulates the activities of certain private fund managers undertaking fund management activities or marketing fund interests to investors in the EEA and the UK respectively.
+Added: The AIFMD regulates the activities of certain private fund managers undertaking fund management activities or marketing fund interests to investors in the European Economic Area (“EEA”) and the UK, respectively.
To the extent our products are actively marketed to investors domiciled or having their registered office in the EEA or the UK:
2 unchanged sentences
(iii) certain Blue Owl entities will be required to make detailed information relating to certain products and their investments available to regulators and third parties;
−Removed: and (iv) the AIFMD will also restrict certain activities of those products in relation to EEA or UK portfolio companies, including, in some circumstances, a products’s ability to recapitalise, refinance or potentially restructure a portfolio company within the first two years of ownership, which may in turn affect operations of said products generally.
+Added: and (iv) the AIFMD will also restrict certain activities of those products in relation to EEA or UK portfolio companies, including, in some circumstances, a product’s ability to recapitalize, refinance or potentially restructure a portfolio company within the first two years of ownership, which may in turn affect operations of said products generally.
In addition, it is possible that some jurisdictions will elect to restrict or prohibit the marketing of non-EEA products to investors based in EEA jurisdictions, which may make it more difficult for certain products to raise its targeted amount of Commitments.
9 unchanged sentences
Alternatively, if we are able to find a replacement service provider to act as AIFM, the replacement service provider may demand terms that are unfavorable to the relevant product.
−Removed: The European Commission published proposals for a Directive to amend AIFMD (“AIFMD II”) in November 2021.
−Removed: Technical negotiations have completed and the final text is expected to be published in 2024, with AIFMD II due to be implemented by EU Member States in 2026.
+Added: The European Union is implementing a Directive to amend AIFMD (“AIFMD II”).
AIFMD II will impose obligations including:
−Removed: (i) minimum substance considerations that EU regulators will need to take into account during the AIFM authorisation process;
+Added: (i) minimum substance considerations that EU regulators will need to take into account during the AIFM authorization process;
(ii) enhanced requirements around delegation, including additional reporting requirements in relation to delegation arrangements;
2 unchanged sentences
and (v) a prohibition on non-EU AIFMs and AIFs established in jurisdictions identified as “high risk” countries under the European Anti-Money Laundering Directive (as amended) or the revised EU list of non-cooperative tax jurisdictions.
−Removed: It is possible that AIFMD II may require additional costs, expenses and/or resources, as well as restricting or prohibiting certain activities, including in
−Removed: relation to loan-originating products and managers or products established in jurisdictions outside the EU identified as having anti-money laundering and/or tax failings.
+Added: The final text of AIFMD II was published in the Official Journal of the European Union in March 2024, with AIFMD II due to be implemented by EU Member States from 2026.
+Added: It is possible that AIFMD II may require additional costs, expenses and/or resources, as well as restricting or prohibiting certain activities, including in relation to loan-originating products and managers or products established in jurisdictions outside the EU identified as having anti-money laundering and/or tax failings.
+Added: In some circumstances, certain Blue Owl entities may be considered non-EEA managers under AIFMD.
+Added: Non-EEA managers are expected to be subject to reporting and disclosure requirements under AIFMD II as well as the prohibition in respect of “high risk” jurisdictions for anti-money laundering and tax purposes.
+Added: The application of other AIFMD II requirements may depend on how far individual Member States elect to apply AIFMD II to non-EEA managers, and whether any Blue Owl entities market products into the EEA.
+Added: This may affect certain Blue Owl products from implementing their strategy, and/or lead to increased legal and compliance costs, in one or more EEA Member States.
Heightened scrutiny of the financial services industry by regulators may materially and adversely affect our business.
2 unchanged sentences
In recent periods there have been a number of enforcement actions within the industry, and it is expected that the SEC will continue to pursue enforcement actions against asset managers.
−Removed: This increased enforcement activity has caused, and could further cause us to reevaluate certain practices and adjust our compliance control function as necessary and appropriate.
+Added: This enforcement activity has caused, and could further cause us to reevaluate certain practices and adjust our compliance control function as necessary and appropriate.
Regulators are also increasing scrutiny and considering regulation of the use of technologies.
We cannot predict what, if any, actions may be taken, but such regulation could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
−Removed: The SEC’s recent list of examination priorities includes such items as cybersecurity compliance controls and conducting risk-based examinations of investment advisory firms, as well specific priority areas for advisers to private funds, including calculation and allocation of fees and expenses and consistency with disclosures to investors (see “— Risks Related to Our Products—Conflicts of Interest—Conflicts of interest may arise in our allocation of capital and co-investment opportunities ”).
+Added: The SEC’s recent list of examination priorities for investment advisers includes such items as investment advisers’ adherence to fiduciary standards of conduct and effectiveness of advisers’ compliance programs, as well as specific priority areas for advisers to private funds, including accuracy of calculations and allocations of private fund fees and expense;
+Added: disclosure of conflicts of interests and risks, and adequacy of policies and procedures;
+Added: and compliance with newly adopted SEC rules, including amendments to Form PF (see “— Conflicts of Interest—Conflicts of interest may arise in our allocation of capital and co-investment opportunities ”).
Many firms have received inquiries during examinations or directly from the SEC’s Division of Enforcement regarding various transparency-related topics, including the acceleration of monitoring fees, the allocation of broken-deal expenses, outside business activities of firm principals and employees, group purchasing arrangements, climate-related disclosures and general conflicts of interest disclosures.
2 unchanged sentences
If the SEC were to investigate and find errors in a BDC board’s methodologies or procedures, we and/or members of any such BDC’s board and management could be subject to penalties and fines, which could harm our reputation and our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
+Added: Our provision of asset management services to the insurance industry subjects us to a variety of risks and uncertainties.
+Added: In July 2024, we acquired KAM and established Blue Owl Insurance Solutions (“Insurance Solutions”).
+Added: This platform offers insurance-focused strategies across a wide range of asset classes and risk spectrum, including asset-backed finance, commercial real estate lending, private corporate credit and structured products.
+Added: Insurance Solutions currently manages assets for a number
+Added: of insurance and reinsurance companies and their affiliates pursuant to several investment management agreements and has developed, and may continue to develop, other capital-efficient products for insurance and reinsurance companies.
+Added: The growth and performance of our Insurance Solutions platform will depend on our ability to obtain and maintain asset management arrangements and other investment partnerships with current and new insurance and/or reinsurance company clients.
+Added: As we only recently began offering products focused on insurance and reinsurance company client balance sheets through Insurance Solutions as a result of our acquisition of KAM in July 2024, there is no assurance of whether or when we will be able to achieve the growth we expect, if at all.
+Added: If we fail to deliver high-quality, high-performing products and strategies that help our insurance and reinsurance company clients meet long-term policyholder obligations, we may not be successful in retaining existing investment partnerships, developing new investment partnerships or originating or selling capital-efficient assets or products and such failure may have a material adverse effect on the growth of our Insurance Solutions platform, and on our overall business, results and financial condition.
+Added: insurance and reinsurance industries are subject to significant regulatory oversight.
+Added: Regulatory authorities in many relevant jurisdictions have broad regulatory (including through certain regulatory support organizations), administrative, and in some cases discretionary, authority with respect to insurance and reinsurance companies and/or their investment advisors, which may include, among other things, the investments insurance and reinsurance companies may acquire and hold, marketing practices, affiliate transactions, reserve requirements and capital adequacy.
+Added: These requirements are primarily concerned with the protection of policyholders, and regulatory authorities often have wide discretion in applying the relevant restrictions and regulations to insurance and reinsurance companies, which may indirectly affect us as a result of our relationships with our insurance and reinsurance company clients.
+Added: We may be the target or subject of, or may have indemnification obligations related to, litigation (including class action litigation by policyholders), enforcement investigations or regulatory scrutiny.
+Added: Regulators and other authorities generally have the power to bring administrative or judicial proceedings against insurance and/or reinsurance companies, which could result in, among other things, suspension or revocation of licenses, cease-and-desist orders, fines, civil penalties, criminal penalties or other disciplinary action.
+Added: To the extent we are involved in such regulatory actions, our reputation could be harmed, we may become liable for indemnification obligations and we could potentially be subject to enforcement actions, fines and penalties.
+Added: Insurance and reinsurance regulatory authorities and regulatory support organizations in the U.S.
+Added: and outside the U.S.
+Added: have increased scrutiny of alternative asset managers’ involvement in the insurance and reinsurance industries, including with respect to the ownership by such managers or their affiliated funds of, and the management of assets on behalf of, insurance companies.
+Added: For example, insurance regulators, including the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (“NAIC”) — the U.S.
+Added: standard-setting and regulatory support organization for the insurance industry — have increasingly focused on the terms and structure of investment management agreements, including whether they are at arms’ length, establish a control relationship with the insurance company, grant the asset manager excessive authority or oversight over the investment strategy of the insurance company or provide for management fees that are not fair and reasonable or termination provisions that make it difficult or costly for the insurer to terminate the agreement.
+Added: Regulators have also increasingly focused on the risk profile of certain investments held by insurance and reinsurance companies (including, without limitation, all or certain tranches of collateralized loan obligations and other structured securities), appropriateness of investment ratings and potential conflicts of interest, including affiliated investments, and potential misalignment of incentives and any potential risks from these and other aspects of an insurance or reinsurance company’s relationship with alternative asset managers that may impact the insurance or reinsurance company’s risk profile.
+Added: This enhanced scrutiny may increase the risk of regulatory actions against us and could result in new or amended regulations that limit our ability, or make it more burdensome or costly, to enter into new investment management agreements with insurance or reinsurance companies and thereby grow our insurance strategy.
+Added: Some of the arrangements we have or will develop with insurance and reinsurance companies involve complex U.S.
+Added: tax structures for which no clear precedent or authority may be available.
+Added: Such structures may be subject to potential regulatory, legislative, judicial or administrative change, scrutiny or differing interpretations and any adverse regulatory, legislative, judicial or administrative changes, scrutiny or interpretations may result in substantial costs to insurance or reinsurance companies or us.
+Added: Insurance company investment portfolios are often subject to internal and regulatory requirements governing the categories and ratings of investment products and assets they may acquire and hold.
+Added: Many of the insurance-focused strategies we originate or develop for, or other assets or investments we include in, insurance company portfolios will be rated and a ratings downgrade or any other negative action by a rating agency or the NAIC’s Securities Valuation Office (“SVO”), as applicable, with respect to such products, assets or investments could make them less attractive and limit our ability to invest or deploy capital on behalf of insurers.
+Added: Furthermore, insurance and reinsurance companies are subject to certain minimum capital and surplus requirements that vary by the jurisdiction where the insurance or reinsurance company is domiciled and are generally subject to change over time.
+Added: In the United States, our insurance company clients are subject to risk-based capital (“RBC”) standards and other
+Added: minimum capital and surplus requirements imposed by state laws.
+Added: The RBC standards are based upon the Risk-Based Capital for Insurers Model Act promulgated by the NAIC, as adopted by applicable clients’ insurance regulators.
+Added: Our Bermuda reinsurance company clients are subject to Bermuda Solvency Capital Requirements standards and other minimum capital and surplus requirements imposed by the Bermuda Monetary Authority.
+Added: New statutory accounting guidance or changes or clarifications in interpretations of existing guidance may adversely impact our ability to originate, or invest in, such assets on behalf of our insurance and reinsurance company clients or cause such clients to increase their required capital in respect of such assets, thus making such assets less attractive to insurers, which may adversely affect our business.
+Added: Certain proposals or exposure drafts released by insurance regulatory authorities, including the NAIC or the SVO, may result in changes to the risk-based capital treatment and/or ratings or re-ratings processes of certain assets or investments that are, or may be, held by our insurance company clients.
Regulations governing the operations of certain of our products affect their ability to raise, and the way in which the applicable products raise, additional capital.
4 unchanged sentences
BDCs are not generally able to issue and sell their common stock at a price below net asset value per share.
−Removed: BDCs may, however, issue and sell their common stock, or warrants, options or rights to acquire such common stock, at a price below the then-current net asset value of such common stock if (1) the applicable BDC’s board of directors determines that such sale is in the BDC’s best interests and the best interests of the BDC’s stockholders, and (2) the applicable BDC’s stockholders have approved a policy and practice of making such sales within the preceding 12-months.
+Added: BDCs may, however, issue and sell their common stock, or warrants, options or rights to acquire such common stock, at a price below the then-current net asset value of such common stock if (1) the applicable BDC’s board of directors determines that such sale is in the BDC’s best interests and the best interests of the BDC’s stockholders, and (2) the applicable BDC’s stockholders have approved, within the 12 months preceding any such sale, a policy and practice of making such sales.
In any such case, the price at which the securities of BDCs are to be issued and sold may not be less than a price which, in the determination of the applicable board of directors, closely approximates the market value of such securities.
−Removed: In addition, as BDCs that are subject to regulations under the Investment Company Act, our BDCs are currently permitted to incur indebtedness or issue senior securities only in amounts such that their asset coverage ratio equals at least 150% after each such issuance, except in the instance of ORCC II, which is required to maintain an asset coverage ratio of at least 200%.
+Added: In addition, as BDCs that are subject to regulations under the Investment Company Act, our BDCs are currently permitted to incur indebtedness or issue senior securities only in amounts such that their asset coverage ratio equals at least 150% after each such issuance, except in the instance of OBDC II, which is required to maintain an asset coverage ratio of at least 200%.
Our BDCs’ ability to pay dividends will be restricted if such BDC’s asset coverage ratio falls below the required asset coverage ratio and any amounts that it uses to service its indebtedness are not available for dividends to its common stockholders.
Any of the foregoing circumstances could have a material adverse effect on our BDCs, and as a result, on us.
−Removed: federal income tax purposes, our BDCs have elected to be treated as RICs under Subchapter M of the Code and one or more products that we manage includes in its structure a real estate investment trust (“REIT”).
+Added: federal income tax purposes, our BDCs have elected to be treated as RICs under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) and one or more products that we manage includes in its structure a REIT.
To maintain their status as RICs or REITs, each such vehicle must meet, among other things, certain source of income, asset and annual distribution requirements.
5 unchanged sentences
federal income tax at corporate rates, the resulting taxes could substantially reduce their net assets, which could have a material adverse effect on our BDCs, and as a result, on the management fees we may earn from our BDCs and REITs.
−Removed: We and our products are subject to increasing scrutiny from certain investors, third party assessors, our stockholders and other stakeholders with respect to ESG-related topics.
−Removed: We and our products face increasing scrutiny from certain investors, third party assessors that measure companies’ ESG performance, our stockholders and other stakeholders related to ESG-related topics, including in relation to diversity and inclusion, human rights, environmental stewardship, support for local communities, corporate governance and transparency.
−Removed: For example, we, our products and our products’ portfolio companies risk damage to our brands and reputations if we or they do not act (or are perceived to not act) responsibly either with respect to responsible investing processes or ESG-related practices.
+Added: We, our products and our products’ portfolio companies are subject to increasing scrutiny from certain investors, third party assessors, our stockholders and other stakeholders with respect to ESG-related topics.
+Added: We, our products and our products’ portfolio companies face increasing scrutiny from certain investors, third party assessors that measure companies’ ESG performance, our stockholders and other stakeholders related to ESG-related topics, including in relation to diversity and inclusion, human rights, environmental stewardship, support for local communities, corporate governance and transparency.
+Added: For example, we, our products and our products’ portfolio companies risk damage to our brands and reputations if we or they do not act (or are perceived to not act) responsibly either with respect to responsible investing
+Added: processes or ESG-related practices.
Adverse incidents related to ESG practices could impact the value of our brand, the brand of our products or our products’ portfolio companies, or the cost of our or their operations and relationships with investors, all of which could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
−Removed: Further, there can be no assurance that investors and other stakeholders will determine that any of our ESG initiatives or commitments are sufficiently robust.
+Added: Further, there can be no assurance that any of our ESG initiatives or commitments will meet the standards or expectations of investors or other stakeholders.
There can be no assurance that we will be able to accomplish our goals related to responsible investing or ESG practices, as statements regarding our ESG and responsible investing commitments and priorities reflect our current estimates, plans and/or aspirations and are not guarantees that we will be able to achieve them within the timelines we announce or at all.
7 unchanged sentences
To the extent our access to capital from investors focused on ESG ratings or ESG-related matters is impaired, we may not be able to maintain or increase the size of our existing products or raise sufficient capital for new products, which may adversely affect our revenues.
−Removed: Further, growing interest on the part of investors and regulators in ESG-related topics and themes and increased demand for, and scrutiny of, ESG-related disclosure by asset managers, have also increased the risk that asset managers could be perceived as, or accused of, making inaccurate or misleading statements regarding the ESG-related investment strategies or their and their funds’ responsible investing or ESG-related efforts or initiatives, or “greenwashing.” Such perception or accusation could damage our reputation, result in litigation or regulatory actions and adversely impact our ability to raise capital.
+Added: Further, growing interest on the part of investors and regulators in ESG-related topics and themes and increased demand for, and scrutiny of, ESG-related disclosure by asset managers, have also increased the risk that asset managers could be perceived as, or accused of, making inaccurate or misleading statements regarding the ESG-related investment strategies of their and their funds’ responsible investing or ESG-related efforts or initiatives, or “greenwashing.” This risk may also materialize where ESG-related statements and/or disclosures made by a product’s portfolio companies are materially inconsistent with our ESG-related statements or disclosures, including those made on a voluntary basis or pursuant to any applicable regulation, such as Regulation EU 2019/2088 on sustainability-related disclosures in the financial services sector (the “SFDR”) or the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (“CSRD”).
+Added: Such perception or accusation could damage our reputation, result in litigation or regulatory actions and adversely impact our ability to raise capital.
At the same time, various stakeholders may have differing approaches to responsible investing activities or divergent views on the consideration of ESG topics, including in the countries in which Blue Owl operates and invests, as well as in the states and localities where Blue Owl serves public sector clients.
These differing views increase the risk that any action or lack thereof with respect to our consideration of responsible investing or ESG-related practices will be perceived negatively.
−Removed: “Anti-ESG” sentiment has gained momentum across the U.S., with several states having enacted or proposed “anti-ESG” policies, legislation or issued related legal opinions.
−Removed: (i) boycott bills target financial institutions that “boycott” or
−Removed: “discriminate against” companies in certain industries (e.g., energy and mining) and prohibit state entities from doing business with such institutions and/or investing the state’s assets (including pension plan assets) through such institutions and (ii) ESG investment prohibitions require that state entities or managers/administrators of state investments make investments based solely on pecuniary factors without consideration of ESG factors.
−Removed: If investors subject to such legislation view our products’ responsible investing or ESG practices as being in contradiction of such “anti-ESG” policies, legislation or legal opinions, such investors may not invest in our products, our ability to maintain the size of our products could be impaired, and/or it could negatively affect the price of our common stock.
+Added: A growing number of states have enacted or proposed “anti-ESG” policies, legislation, issued related legal opinions and engaged in related litigation.
+Added: (i) boycott bills target financial institutions that “boycott” or “discriminate against” companies in certain industries (e.g., energy and mining) and prohibit state entities from doing business with such institutions and/or investing the state’s assets (including pension plan assets) through such institutions and (ii) ESG investment prohibitions require that state entities or managers/administrators of state investments make investments based solely on pecuniary factors without consideration of ESG factors.
+Added: If investors subject to such legislation view our products’ responsible investing or ESG practices as being in contradiction of such “anti-ESG” policies, legislation or legal opinions, such investors may not invest in our products, our ability to maintain the size of our products could be impaired, and/or it could negatively affect the results of our operations, cash flow, or price of our common stock.
Further, asset managers have been subject to recent scrutiny related to ESG-focused industry working groups, initiatives and associations, including organizations advancing action to address climate change or climate-related risk.
−Removed: Such scrutiny could expose us to the risk of antitrust investigations or challenges by federal authorities, result in reputational harm and/or discourage certain investors from investing in our products.
In addition, state attorneys general, among others, have asserted that the Supreme Court’s decision striking down race-based affirmative action in higher education in June 2023 should be analogized to private employment matters and private contract matters.
−Removed: Several new cases alleging discrimination based on similar arguments have been filed since that decision, with scrutiny of certain corporate DEI practices increasing.
−Removed: If we do not successfully manage expectations across these varied stakeholder interests, it could erode stakeholder trust, impact our reputation, and/or constrain our investment and fundraising opportunities.
+Added: Cases alleging discrimination based on similar arguments have been filed since that decision, with scrutiny of certain corporate DEI practices increasing throughout 2024.
+Added: Additionally, in January 2025, the new Presidential administration signed a number of executive orders focused on DEI (the “Executive Orders”), which include a broad mandate to eliminate federal DEI programs and a caution to the private sector to end what may be viewed as illegal DEI discrimination and preferences.
+Added: The Executive Orders also indicate upcoming compliance investigations of private entities, including publicly traded companies, and changes to federal contracting regulations.
+Added: If we do not successfully manage expectations across these varied stakeholder interests, it could erode stakeholder trust, impact our reputation, and/or constrain
+Added: our investment and fundraising opportunities.
+Added: Such scrutiny of both ESG and DEI related practices could expose us to the risk of investigations or challenges by federal or state authorities, result in reputational harm and/or discourage certain investors from investing in our products.
We are subject to increasing scrutiny from regulators with respect to ESG-related issues and the regulatory disclosure landscape surrounding related topics continues to evolve.
−Removed: Responsible investing, ESG practices and ESG-related disclosures have been the subject of increased focus by certain regulators, and new regulatory initiatives related to ESG-specific topics that are applicable to us, our products and our products’ portfolio companies could adversely affect our business.
−Removed: There is a growing regulatory interest across jurisdictions in improving transparency regarding the definition, measurement and disclosure of ESG factors in order to allow investors to validate and better understand sustainability claims, including in the United States, the European Union and the United Kingdom.
−Removed: On March 21, 2022, the SEC issued a proposed rule regarding the enhancement and standardization of mandatory climate-related disclosures.
−Removed: The proposed rule would mandate extensive disclosure of climate-related data, risks, and opportunities, including financial impacts, physical and transition risks, related governance and strategy, and greenhouse gas emissions, for certain public companies.
−Removed: Although the ultimate date of effectiveness and the final form and substance of the requirements for this proposed rule is not yet known and the ultimate scope and impact on our business is uncertain, compliance with this proposed rule, if finalized, may result in increased legal, accounting and financial compliance costs, make some activities more difficult, time-consuming and costly, and place strain on our personnel, systems and resources.
−Removed: Further, on May 25, 2022, the SEC proposed amendments to rules and reporting forms concerning, among other things, enhanced disclosure requirements for investment managers regarding the ability to market products as green, sustainable or ESG-focused and the incorporation of ESG factors by registered investment companies and advisers.
−Removed: On August 23, 2023, the SEC adopted its final rule enhancing the regulation of private fund advisers, which includes requirements with respect to the disclosure of certain information to investors that could affect the way certain ESG-related information is shared.
−Removed: In addition, in 2021 the SEC established an enforcement task force to look into ESG practices and disclosures by public companies and investment managers and has begun to bring enforcement actions based on ESG disclosures not aligning with actual investment processes.
−Removed: Further, in October 2023, California enacted legislation that will ultimately require certain companies that (i) do business in California to publicly disclose their Scopes 1, 2 and 3 greenhouse gas emissions, with third party assurance of such data, and issue public reports on their climate-related financial risk and related mitigation measures and (ii) operate in California and make certain climate-related claims to provide enhanced disclosures around the achievement of climate-related claims, including the use of voluntary carbon credits to achieve such claims.
−Removed: From a European perspective, the European Union has adopted legislative reforms which include, without limitation:
−Removed: (a) Regulation 2019/2088 on sustainability-related disclosures in the financial services sector (the “SFDR”), for which most rules to effect beginning on March 10, 2021 and (b) Regulation (EU) 2020/852 on the establishment of a framework to facilitate sustainable investment (the “Taxonomy”).
−Removed: Further, there are ongoing consultations that may result in further changes or amendments to the SFDR.
−Removed: There is an increasing focus on anti-greenwashing and transparency initiatives affecting investment managers.
−Removed: The EU’s European Securities and Markets Authority announced in its 2024 Work Program a series of initiatives aimed at enhancing transparency around sustainability risks and disclosures, including a stocktaking report on the supervision of sustainability information and greenwashing and remediation actions, the introduction of guidelines on funds’ names with ESG or sustainability-related terms, common supervisory actions on the integration of sustainability risks and disclosures in the investment management sector.
−Removed: There are still some uncertainties regarding the operation of these requirements, and an established market practice is still being developed in certain cases, which can lead to diverging implementation and/or operationalization, data gaps or methodological challenges which may affect our ability to collect relevant data.
−Removed: These regimes continue to evolve and there is still a lack of clarity and established practice around the approach to their supervision and enforcement, which may vary across national
−Removed: competent authorities.
+Added: Responsible investing, ESG practices and ESG-related disclosures have been the subject of increased focus by certain regulators, and regulatory initiatives related to ESG-specific topics that are applicable to us, our products and our products’ portfolio companies could adversely affect our business.
+Added: There has been a growing regulatory interest across jurisdictions in improving transparency regarding the definition, measurement and disclosure of ESG factors in order to allow investors to validate and better understand sustainability claims, including in the United States, the European Union and the United Kingdom.
+Added: For example, in the United States, in March 2024, the SEC adopted final rules intended to enhance and standardize climate-related disclosures;
+Added: however, these rules are stayed pending the outcome of consolidated legal challenges in the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals.
+Added: Further, the SEC sometimes reviews compliance with ESG commitments in examinations, and it has taken enforcement actions against registered investment advisers for not establishing adequate or consistently implementing ESG policies and procedures to meet ESG commitments to investors.
+Added: In addition, in October 2023, California enacted legislation that will ultimately require certain companies that (i) do business in California to publicly disclose their Scopes 1, 2 and 3 greenhouse gas emissions, with third party assurance of such data, and issue public reports on their climate-related financial risk and related mitigation measures and (ii) operate in California and make certain climate-related claims to provide enhanced disclosures around the achievement of climate-related claims, including the use of voluntary carbon credits to achieve such claims.
+Added: From a European perspective, the European Union has adopted legislation aimed at increasing transparency for investors of sustainability-related policies, processes, performance and commitments which apply to certain of our products, including, without limitation:
+Added: (a) the SFDR, for which most rules took effect beginning on March 10, 2021 and (b) Regulation (EU) 2020/852 on the establishment of a framework to facilitate sustainable investment, and amending the SFDR.
+Added: Further, the European Commission is currently considering whether to propose further changes or amendments to the SFDR and the associated regulatory framework.
+Added: Relatedly, the European Securities and Markets Authority (“ESMA”) has identified promoting transparency through effective sustainability disclosures and addressing greenwashing as one of its key priorities per ESMA’s sustainable finance roadmap and strategy.
+Added: ESMA has also introduced guidelines on funds with ESG, impact, transition or sustainability-related terms in their names.
+Added: There are still some uncertainties regarding the operation of some of these requirements and how they might evolve, and an established market practice is still being developed in certain cases, which can lead to diverging implementation and/or operationalization, data gaps or methodological challenges which may affect our ability to collect relevant data.
+Added: These regimes continue to evolve and there is still a lack of clarity and established practice around the approach to their supervision and enforcement, which may vary across national competent authorities.
There is a risk that a development or reorientation in the regulatory requirements or market practice in this respect could be adverse to our investments if they are perceived to be less valuable as a consequence of, among other things, their carbon footprint or perceived “greenwashing.” Compliance with requirements of this nature may also increase risks relating to financial supervision and enforcement action.
−Removed: There is the additional risk that market expectations in relation to certain commitments under the SFDR, such as categorization of financial products, could adversely affect our ability to raise capital, especially from EEA investors.
−Removed: Outside of the EU, the U.K.
−Removed: Government’s stated policy goal is to introduce economy-wide mandatory Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (“TCFD”) reporting by 2025.
−Removed: has introduced mandatory TCFD-aligned disclosure requirements for certain U.K.
−Removed: regulated firms.
−Removed: The regime captures (amongst others) any firm providing portfolio management (which includes managing investments or private equity or other private market activities consisting of either advising on investments or managing investments on a recurring or ongoing basis in connection with an arrangement which aims to invest in unlisted securities) where the assets under management exceed £5.0 billion calculated as a 3-year rolling average.
−Removed: In November 2023, the Sustainability Labelling and Disclosure of Sustainability-Related Financial Information Instrument 2023 (“SDR”) introduced sustainability disclosure requirements, investment product labels and an ‘anti-greenwashing’ rule.
−Removed: The anti-greenwashing rule applies to all UK-authorised firms in relation to ESG-related claims made in their financial promotions and communications with clients in the UK.
−Removed: The balance of the new regime is directed at UK investment funds and UK-regulated asset management firms as well as distributors of such funds.
−Removed: The FCA has indicated it will continue to work with His Majesty’s Treasury on their approach to overseas funds and consult on an alternative approach to applying the regime to all types of portfolio managers.
−Removed: In Asia, regulators in Singapore and Hong Kong have introduced requirements for asset managers to integrate climate risk considerations in investment and risk management processes, together with enhanced disclosure and reporting and have also issued enhanced rules for certain ESG funds on general ESG risk management and disclosure.
−Removed: As a result of these legislative and regulatory initiatives, we may be required to provide additional disclosure to investors in our products with respect to ESG matters.
+Added: There is the additional risk that market expectations in relation to certain commitments under the SFDR, such as disclosures made in relation to financial products, could adversely affect our ability to raise capital, especially from EEA investors.
+Added: There are a variety of other regulatory initiatives related to ESG-specific topics that may be applicable to us, our products or our products’ portfolio companies.
+Added: For example, on January 5, 2023, the CSRD came into effect.
+Added: The CSRD amends and strengthens the rules introduced on sustainability reporting for companies, banks and insurance companies under the Non-Financial Reporting Directive (2014/95/EU) (“NFRD”).
+Added: The CSRD requires a much broader range of companies, including non-EU companies with significant turnover and a legal presence in EU markets, to produce detailed and prescriptive reports on sustainability-related matters within their financial statements.
+Added: Although we are not currently directly in-scope of CSRD, it is possible that we may become subject to CSRD.
+Added: This may result in additional compliance burdens and increased legal, accounting and compliance costs and enhanced disclosure obligations.
+Added: In November 2023, the Sustainability Labelling and Disclosure of Sustainability-Related Financial Information Instrument 2023 (“SDR”) introduced sustainability disclosure requirements, voluntary investment product labels and an “anti-greenwashing” rule.
+Added: The anti-greenwashing rule applies to all UK-authorized firms in relation to sustainability-related claims made in their communications, and/or communications of financial promotions with, clients in the UK.
+Added: The balance of the new
+Added: regime is currently directed at UK investment funds and UK-regulated asset management firms as well as distributors of such funds;
+Added: however, the FCA consulted in Spring 2024 as to whether to extend the SDR to portfolio management, and the UK Government also announced in May 2024 its intention to launch a consultation on whether to extend the scope of SDR to overseas funds, and so certain of our products may be affected in the future.
+Added: In Asia, examples of ESG-related regulations include those by regulators in Singapore and Hong Kong have released guidelines for asset managers to integrate climate risk considerations in investment and risk management processes, together with enhanced disclosure and reporting and have also issued enhanced rules for certain ESG funds on general ESG risk management and disclosure.
+Added: As a result of these and other legislative and regulatory initiatives, and as our business grows through acquisition activity or changes to our structure, we may be required to provide additional disclosure to investors in our products with respect to ESG matters.
This exposes us to increased disclosure risks, for example due to a lack of available or credible data, and the potential for conflicting disclosures may also expose us to an increased risk of misstatement litigation or miss-selling allegations.
10 unchanged sentences
On the other hand, a decrease in energy use due to weather changes may affect some of our products’ portfolio companies’ financial condition through decreased revenues.
−Removed: Additionally, extreme weather conditions in general require more system backup, adding to costs, and can contribute to increased system stresses, including service interruptions.
−Removed: Further, the current U.S.
−Removed: presidential administration has focused on climate change policies and has re-joined the Paris Agreement, which includes commitments from countries to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions, among other commitments.
−Removed: The Paris Agreement and other regulatory and voluntary initiatives launched by international, federal, state, and regional policymakers and regulatory authorities as well as private actors seeking to reduce greenhouse gas emissions may expose our
−Removed: business operations, products and products’ portfolio companies to other types of transition risks, such as:
−Removed: (i) political and policy risks, including changing regulatory incentives, and legal requirements (including with respect to greenhouse gas emissions) that could result in increased costs or changes in business operations, (ii) regulatory and litigation risks, including changing legal requirements that could result in increased permitting, tax and compliance costs, changes in business operations, or the discontinuance of certain operations, and litigation seeking monetary or injunctive relief related to impacts related to climate change, (iii) technology and market risks, including declining market for investments in industries seen as greenhouse gas intensive or less effective than alternatives in reducing greenhouse gas emissions, (iv) business trend risks, including the increased attention to ESG considerations by our investors (including in connection with their determination of whether to invest), and (v) potential harm to our reputation if certain stakeholders, such as our investors or stockholders, believe that we are not adequately or appropriately responding to climate change and/or climate risk management, including through the way in which we operate our business, the composition of our products’ existing portfolios, the new investments made by our products, or the decisions we make to continue to conduct or change our activities in response to climate change considerations.
+Added: Additionally, extreme weather conditions in general require more system backup, adding to costs, including costs of insurance (particularly for real estate in certain regions), and can contribute to increased system stresses, including service interruptions.
+Added: The United States is currently a party to the Paris Agreement, which includes commitments from countries to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions, among other commitments.
+Added: While the new Presidential administration recently announced the United States’ withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, the withdrawal is not expected to go into effect until early 2026.
+Added: In addition, various other regulatory and voluntary initiatives launched by international, federal, state, and regional policymakers and regulatory authorities as well as private actors seeking to reduce greenhouse gas emissions may expose our business operations, products and products’ portfolio companies to other types of transition risks, such as:
+Added: (i) political and policy risks, including changing regulatory incentives, and legal requirements (including with respect to greenhouse gas emissions) that could result in increased costs or changes in business operations, (ii) regulatory and litigation risks, including changing legal requirements that could result in increased permitting, tax and compliance costs, enhanced disclosure obligations, changes in business operations, or the discontinuance of certain operations, and litigation seeking monetary or injunctive relief related to impacts related to climate change, (iii) technology and market risks, including declining market for investments in industries seen as greenhouse gas intensive or less effective than alternatives in reducing greenhouse gas emissions, (iv) business trend risks, including requirements for certain portfolio companies related to capital expenditures, product or service redesigns, and changes to operations and supply chains to meet changing customer expectations, and the increased attention to ESG considerations by our investors (including in connection with their determination of whether to invest), and (v) potential harm to our reputation if certain stakeholders, such as our investors or stockholders, believe that we are not adequately or appropriately responding to climate change and/or climate risk management, including through the way in which we operate
+Added: our business, the composition of our products’ existing portfolios, the new investments made by our products, or the decisions we make to continue to conduct or change our activities in response to climate change considerations.
Increased data protection regulation may result in increased complexities and risk in connection with the operation of our business and our products.
8 unchanged sentences
We also expect to face increased costs to comply with the new SEC rules, including increased costs for cybersecurity training and management.
−Removed: Many jurisdictions in which we operate have laws and regulations relating to data privacy, cybersecurity and protection of personal information, including, for example the CCPA, the GDPR and the U.K.
+Added: Many jurisdictions in which we operate have laws and regulations relating to data protection, privacy, cybersecurity and/or information security to which we may be subject (collectively, “Privacy Laws”).
+Added: Compliance with applicable Privacy Laws may require adhering to stringent legal and operational requirements, which could increase compliance costs for us and require the dedication of additional time and resources to compliance.
+Added: A failure to comply with applicable Privacy Laws could result in fines, sanctions, enforcement actions or other penalties or reputational damage.
In addition, the SEC has indicated in recent periods that one of its examination priorities for the Division of Examinations is to continue to examine cybersecurity procedures and controls, including testing the implementation of these procedures and controls.
−Removed: There may be substantial financial penalties or fines for breach of privacy laws (which may include insufficient security for our personal or other sensitive information).
−Removed: For example, the maximum penalty for breach of the GDPR is the greater of 20 million Euros and 4% of group annual worldwide turnover, and fines for each violation of the CCPA are $2,500 or $7,500 per violation for intentional violations.
−Removed: Non-compliance with any applicable privacy or data security laws represents a serious risk to our business.
−Removed: Some jurisdictions have also enacted laws requiring companies to notify individuals of data security breaches involving certain types of personal information.
+Added: There may be substantial financial penalties or fines for a failure to comply with applicable Privacy Laws (which may include insufficient security for our personal or other sensitive information).
+Added: For example, failure to comply with Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (the “GDPR”) and the GDPR as it forms part of the laws of England and Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland (the “UK GDPR”) could (in the worst case) attract regulatory penalties up to the greater of (i) 20 million Euros in respect of the GDPR / £17.5 million in respect of the UK GDPR (as applicable), and (ii) 4% of group annual worldwide turnover, as well as the possibility of other enforcement actions (such as suspension of processing activities and audits), and liabilities from third-party claims.
+Added: Our operations will be impacted by a growing movement to adopt comprehensive privacy and data protection laws similar to the GDPR, including in the U.S., where such laws focus on privacy as an individual right in general.
+Added: For example, the State of California passed the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 (as amended, the “CCPA”), which took effect on January 1, 2020.
+Added: The CCPA generally applies to businesses that collect personal information about California consumers and meet certain thresholds with respect to revenue or buying and/or selling consumers’ personal information.
+Added: The CCPA imposes stringent legal and operational obligations on such businesses as well as certain affiliated entities that share common branding.
+Added: The CCPA is enforceable by the California Attorney General.
+Added: Additionally, if unauthorized access, theft, or disclosure of a consumer’s personal information occurs, and the business did not maintain reasonable security practices, consumers could file a civil action (including a class action) without having to prove actual damages.
+Added: Statutory damages range from $100 to $750 per consumer per incident, or actual damages, whichever is greater.
+Added: The California Attorney General also may impose civil penalties ranging from $2,500 to $7,500 per violation.
+Added: Further, California passed the California Privacy Rights Act of 2020 (the “CPRA”) to amend and extend the protections of the CCPA.
+Added: Under the CPRA, which became effective on January 1, 2023, California established a new state agency focused on the enforcement of its privacy laws, leading to greater levels of enforcement and greater costs related to compliance with the CCPA and CPRA.
+Added: Other jurisdictions, including other states in the United States, have either passed, proposed, adopted or are considering similar laws and regulations to the CCPA, CPRA and GDPR, which could impose similarly significant costs, potential liabilities and operational and legal obligations.
+Added: Further, the fund’s portfolio companies and/or each of their affiliates are subject to regulations related to privacy, data protection and information security in the jurisdictions in which they do business.
+Added: Such laws and regulations vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, thus increasing costs, operational and legal burdens and the potential for significant liability on regulated entities.
+Added: Non-compliance with any applicable Privacy Laws represents a serious risk to our business.
+Added: Many jurisdictions have also enacted laws requiring companies to notify individuals of data security breaches involving certain types of personal
Breaches in security could potentially jeopardize our, our employees’ or our product investors’ or counterparties’ confidential or other information processed and stored in, or transmitted through, our computer systems and networks (or those of our third party vendors), or otherwise cause interruptions or malfunctions in our, our employees’, our product investors’, our counterparties’ or third parties’ operations, which could result in significant losses, increased costs, disruption of our business, liability to our product investors and other counterparties, fines or penalties, litigation, regulatory intervention or reputational damage, which could also lead to loss of product investors or clients.
−Removed: Finally, there has been significant evolution and developments in the use of artificial intelligence technologies, such as ChatGPT.
+Added: Finally, there continues to be significant evolution and developments in the use of artificial intelligence technologies, such as ChatGPT.
We cannot fully determine the impact or cybersecurity risk of such evolving technology to our business at this time.
+Added: We may incorporate, directly or through third-party vendors, the use of artificial intelligence (“AI”) into our business and operations, and anticipate that usage and adoption of AI in the marketplace will continue to grow.
+Added: As with many disruptive innovations, AI presents risks and challenges that could affect its accuracy and adoption and therefore our business.
+Added: While we intend the use of any AI to make processes more efficient, AI models may not achieve sufficient levels of accuracy.
+Added: AI algorithms may be flawed, the datasets on which such algorithms are trained may be insufficient, raise privacy concerns or contain biased information, which could undermine the decisions, predictions or analysis AI applications produce, subjecting us to competitive harm, legal liability, and brand or reputational harm.
+Added: A number of jurisdictions have passed laws and implemented regulations, or are considering the same, related to the use of AI and affecting AI companies, which could limit or adversely affect our business.
+Added: For example, the EU Artificial Intelligence Act, enacted on 14 March 2024 will incrementally come into force over the next two years.
+Added: It has extra-territorial application and imposes significant penalties up to the greater of:
+Added: (i) €35 million;
+Added: and (ii) 7% of an entire group’s total annual worldwide turnover.
+Added: Further, we may not be able to control how third-party AI technologies that we choose to use are developed or maintained, or how data we input is used or disclosed, even where we have sought contractual protections with respect to these matters.
+Added: The misuse or misappropriation of our data could have an adverse impact on our reputation and could subject us to legal and regulatory investigations and/or actions.
We are subject to litigation risks, and consequently, we may face liabilities and damage to our professional reputation.
Legal liability could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations or cause reputational harm to us.
−Removed: We depend to a large extent on our business relationships and our reputation for integrity and high-caliber professional services to attract and retain fund investors and to pursue investment opportunities for our products.
+Added: We depend to a large extent on our business relationships and our reputation for integrity and high-caliber professional services to attract and retain product investors and to pursue investment opportunities for our products.
As a result, allegations of improper conduct asserted by private litigants or regulators, regardless of whether the ultimate outcome is favorable or unfavorable to us, as well as negative publicity and press speculation about us, our investment activities or the investment industry in general, whether or not valid, may harm our reputation, which may be damaging to our business.
−Removed: In addition, the laws and regulations governing the limited liability of such issuers and investments vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, and in certain contexts the laws of certain jurisdictions may provide not only for carve-outs from limited liability
−Removed: protection for the issuer or portfolio company that has incurred the liabilities, but also for recourse to assets of other entities under common control with, or that are part of the same economic group as, such issuer.
+Added: In addition, the laws and regulations governing the limited liability of such issuers and investments vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, and in certain contexts the laws of certain jurisdictions may provide not only for carve-outs from limited liability protection for the issuer or portfolio company that has incurred the liabilities, but also for recourse to assets of other entities under common control with, or that are part of the same economic group as, such issuer.
For example, if any of our products’ investments is subject to bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings in a jurisdiction and is found to have liabilities under the local consumer protection, labor, tax or bankruptcy laws, the laws of that jurisdiction may permit authorities or creditors to file a lien on, or to otherwise have recourse to, assets held by other investments (including assets held by our products) in that jurisdiction.
4 unchanged sentences
Insurance and other safeguards might only partially reimburse us for our losses, if at all, and if a claim is successful and exceeds or is not covered by our insurance policies, we may be required to pay a substantial amount in respect of such successful claim.
−Removed: Certain losses of a catastrophic nature, such as losses arising as a result of wars, earthquakes, typhoons, terrorist attacks or other similar events, may be uninsurable or may only be insurable at rates that are so high that maintaining coverage would cause an adverse impact on our business, our investment funds and their investments.
−Removed: In general, losses related to terrorism are becoming harder and more expensive to insure against.
+Added: Certain losses of a catastrophic nature, such as losses arising as a result of wars, systemic risk associated with cyber-kinetic warfare, earthquakes, typhoons, terrorist attacks or other similar events, may be uninsurable or may only be insurable at rates that are so high that maintaining coverage would cause an adverse impact on our business, our investment funds and their investments.
+Added: In general, losses related to terrorism and catastrophic nation-state hacks are becoming harder and more expensive to insure against.
Some insurers are excluding terrorism coverage from their all-risk policies.
−Removed: In some cases, insurers are offering significantly limited coverage against terrorist acts for additional premiums, which can greatly increase the total cost of casualty insurance for a property.
+Added: In some cases, insurers are offering significantly limited coverage
+Added: against terrorist acts for additional premiums, which can greatly increase the total cost of casualty insurance for a property.
As a result, we, our products and their investments may not be insured against terrorism or certain other catastrophic losses.
3 unchanged sentences
The terms of our BDCs’ debt investments generally included minimum interest rate floors which were calculated based on LIBOR.
−Removed: In July 2017, the U.K.’s Financial Conduct Authority “FCA”, as supervisor of ICE Benchmark Administrator (“IBA”), the administrator of LIBOR, announced that it would phase out LIBOR by the end of 2021 (later extended to the end of June 2023 for USD LIBOR only).
+Added: In July 2017, the FCA, as supervisor of ICE Benchmark Administrator (“IBA”), the administrator of LIBOR, announced that it would phase out LIBOR by the end of 2021 (later extended to the end of June 2023 for USD LIBOR only).
IBA ceased publishing GBP, EUR, CHF and JPY LIBOR rates on January 1, 2022 and ceased publishing overnight and 12-month USD LIBOR on June, 30 2023.
In January 2023, the Federal Reserve adopted a final rule implementing the LIBOR Act that, among other things, identifies the applicable SOFR-based benchmark replacements under the LIBOR Act.
−Removed: Since 2022, our BDCs’ have been transitioning their investments to SOFR, the Secured Overnight Financing Rate, published by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
−Removed: Our Partner Managers and their respective portfolio companies also amended their credit agreements to replace LIBOR with SOFR.
SOFR is considered to be a risk-free rate, and USD LIBOR was a risk weighted rate.
6 unchanged sentences
Certain states and other regulatory authorities require investment managers to register as lobbyists.
−Removed: We are registered as a lobbyist in California and in New York.
+Added: We, and certain of our employees, are registered as lobbyists in California and in New York.
These registration requirements impose significant compliance obligations on registered lobbyists and their employers, which may include annual registration fees, periodic disclosure reports and internal record keeping, and may also prohibit the payment of contingent fees.
3 unchanged sentences
As we have public pension plans that are investors in our products, these rules could impose significant economic sanctions on our business if we or one of the other persons covered by the rules make any prohibited contribution or payment, whether or not material or with an intent to secure an investment from a public pension plan.
−Removed: We may also acquire other investment managers or hire additional personnel who are not subject to the same restrictions as us, but whose activity, and the activity of their Principals, prior to our ownership or employment of such person, could affect our product raising.
+Added: We may also acquire other investment managers or hire additional personnel who are not subject to the same restrictions as us, but whose activity, and the activity of their employees, prior to our ownership or employment of such person, could affect our product raising.
Any failure on our part to comply with these rules could cause us to lose compensation for our advisory services or expose us to significant penalties and reputational damage.
−Removed: Failure to comply with regulations regarding the prevention of money laundering or terrorism or national security could adversely affect our business.
+Added: Failure to comply with anti-corruption laws or with regulations regarding the prevention of money laundering or terrorism or national security could adversely affect our business.
+Added: We are committed to complying with all applicable anti-corruption and anti-bribery laws.
+Added: As a result, we may forgo investment opportunities because of our unwillingness to participate in transactions that may expose us to risks under applicable anti-corruption and anti-bribery laws.
+Added: In recent years, law enforcement agencies in the European Union, the United States and elsewhere have devoted significant resources to enforcement of anti-corruption and anti-bribery laws and regulations, including with respect to investments made by private equity investors.
+Added: Any failure to comply with anti-corruption and anti-bribery laws and regulations could have serious legal, financial and reputational consequences, including operational disruptions and significant financial penalties.
As part of our responsibility for the prevention of money laundering under applicable laws, we may require detailed verification of a prospective investor’s identity and the source of such prospective investor’s funds.
In the event of delay or failure by a prospective investor to produce any such information required for verification purposes, we may refuse to admit the investor to our products.
−Removed: We may from time-to-time request (outside of the subscription process), and our products’ investors will be obligated to provide to us as appropriate upon such request, additional information as from time to time may be required for us to satisfy our obligations under these and other laws that may be adopted in the future.
+Added: We may from time to time request (outside of the subscription process), and our products’ investors will be obligated to provide to us as appropriate upon such request, additional information as may be required for us to satisfy our obligations under these and other laws that may be adopted in the future.
Additionally, we may from time to time be obligated to file reports with regulatory authorities in various jurisdictions with regard to, among other things, the identity of our products’ investors and suspicious activities involving the interests of our products.
1 unchanged sentence
The Bank Secrecy Act of 1970 and the USA PATRIOT Act require that financial institutions (a term that includes banks, broker-dealers and investment companies) establish and maintain compliance programs to guard against money laundering activities.
+Added: These implementing regulations were recently amended to include registered investment advisers within scope of financial institutions that will be obliged by January 1, 2026 to adopt stand-alone anti-money laundering programs.
Laws or regulations may presently or in the future require us, our products or any of our affiliates or other service providers to establish additional anti-money laundering procedures, to collect information with respect to our products’ investors, to share information with governmental authorities with respect to our products’ investors or to implement additional restrictions on the transfer of the interests.
7 unchanged sentences
economic and trade sanctions, which restrict or prohibit, among other things, direct and indirect transactions with, and the provision of services to, certain non-U.S.
−Removed: countries, territories, individuals and entities.
+Added: countries, territories, industry sectors, individuals and entities.
These types of sanctions may significantly restrict or completely prohibit lending activities in certain jurisdictions, and violation of any such laws or regulations, may result in significant legal and monetary penalties, as well as reputational damage.
OFAC sanctions programs change frequently, which may make it more difficult for us or our affiliates to ensure compliance.
−Removed: Moreover, OFAC enforcement is increasing, which may increase the risk that we become subject of such actual or threatened enforcement.
+Added: Moreover, OFAC enforcement is increasing, which may increase the risk that we become the subject of such actual or threatened enforcement.
In addition, further sanctions imposed by the United States and other countries in connection with the war between Russia and Ukraine may impact portfolio companies of our products, which may in turn impact us.
1 unchanged sentence
In some cases, the ITRA requires companies to disclose these types of transactions even if they were permissible under U.S.
−Removed: Companies that currently may be or may have been at the time
−Removed: considered our affiliates, may have from time to time publicly filed and/or provided to us such disclosures.
+Added: Companies that currently may be or may have been at the time considered our affiliates, may have from time to time publicly filed and/or provided to us such disclosures.
We do not independently verify or participate in the preparation of these disclosures.
2 unchanged sentences
Disclosure of such activity, even if such activity is not subject to sanctions under applicable law, and any sanctions actually imposed on us or our affiliates as a result of these activities, could harm our reputation and have a negative impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations, and any failure to disclose any such activities as required could additionally result in fines or penalties.
−Removed: Certain of the products or accounts we advise or manage are subject to the fiduciary responsibility and prohibited transaction provisions of ERISA and Section 4975 of the Code, and our business could be adversely affected if certain of our other products or accounts fail to satisfy an exception under the “plan assets” regulation under ERISA.
−Removed: A number of investors in our products are subject to the fiduciary and prohibited transaction provisions of Title I of ERISA and the parallel provisions of the Internal Revenue Code;
−Removed: however, the substantial majority of our products rely on the “insignificant participation” exception under the “plan assets” regulation under ERISA.
−Removed: We are not, therefore subject to the requirements of ERISA (or the parallel provision of the Internal Revenue Code) with respect to the management of those products.
+Added: Certain of the products or accounts we advise or manage comply with an exception under the “plan assets” regulation under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) in order to not be subject to ERISA and Section 4975 of the Code, and our business could be adversely affected if such products or accounts fail to satisfy an exception under the “plan assets” regulation under ERISA.
+Added: A number of investors in our products are subject to the fiduciary and prohibited transaction provisions of Title I of ERISA and the parallel provisions of the Code;
+Added: however, the substantial majority of our products rely on the “insignificant participation”
+Added: exception under the “plan assets” regulation under ERISA.
+Added: We are not, therefore subject to the requirements of ERISA (or the parallel provision of the Code) with respect to the management of those products.
However, if those products fail to satisfy that exception for any reason and if no other exception is available, that failure could materially interfere with our activities in relation to those products or expose us to risks related to our failure to comply with the applicable requirements.
For example, the governing documents of a fund generally impose certain obligations on the general partner or manager of the fund to cause the assets of the fund to not be treated as “plan assets” and a breach of that obligation could create liability for us.
−Removed: Further, if the assets of a fund become plan assets (whether because of our breach, a change in law or otherwise), the application of ERISA-related requirements on our product may prevent us from operating the fund as intended and may cause the fund to breach its obligations with Partner Managers or other investments, which would create significant liabilities for our products and could significantly impact the fund’s ability to make any further investments.
−Removed: Further, we have formed a small number of holding vehicles to facilitate co-investments alongside our products by ERISA investors, the assets of which holding vehicles constitute “plan assets” and with respect to which we serve as a fiduciary.
−Removed: While we may be required to satisfy applicable fiduciary standards and avoid the prohibited transaction provisions of ERISA with respect to such holding vehicles and their assets, in each case, our authority with respect to the management and control of those vehicles is limited by contract with the relevant fund investor.
+Added: Further, if the assets of a fund that is not intended to hold plan assets become plan assets (whether because of our breach, a change in law or otherwise), the application of ERISA-related requirements on our product may prevent us from operating the fund as intended and may cause the fund to breach its obligations with Partner Managers or other investments, which would create significant liabilities for our products and could significantly impact the fund’s ability to make any further investments.
+Added: Certain of our products and accounts that we manage or advise are subject to ERISA and/or Section 4975 of the Code.
+Added: Failure to comply with the requirements of ERISA and/or Section 4975 could subject us to consequences including the imposition of excise taxes, disgorgement of profits, and personal liability.
+Added: Some of our products and accounts are subject to ERISA and/or Section 4975 of the Code, and we act as a fiduciary under ERISA and Section 4975 of the Code with respect to the plan assets invested in such products and accounts.
+Added: In the management and operation of such products and accounts, we seek to comply with the applicable provisions of ERISA and Section 4975 of the Code, and do not engage in any transactions which we know or should know are “prohibited transactions” for which no exemption applies.
+Added: We have adopted and comply with customary ERISA policies and procedures to avoid violating ERISA or Section 4975 of the Code, including engaging in a non-exempt “prohibited transaction.” However, if we were to cause a product or account subject to ERISA or Section 4975 of the Code to violate ERISA or engage in a prohibited transaction, we could, among other consequences, be subject to an excise tax on prohibited transactions, be required to disgorge profits and/or make the affected plans whole, or be held personally liable for breach of fiduciary duties.
+Added: In addition to the products and accounts described above, we have formed a small number of holding vehicles to facilitate co-investments alongside our products by ERISA investors, the assets of which holding vehicles constitute “plan assets” and with respect to which we serve as a fiduciary.
+Added: While we may be required to satisfy applicable fiduciary standards and avoid engaging in prohibited transactions with respect to such holding vehicles and their assets, in each case, our authority with respect to the management and control of those vehicles is limited by contract with the relevant product investor.
Accordingly, we do not anticipate any liabilities with respect to our serving as a fiduciary with respect to such vehicles.
2 unchanged sentences
Congress may introduce new policies and regulations or enforce existing policies and regulations that may create uncertainty for our business and investment strategies, which could have an adverse impact on us.
−Removed: For example, a top legislative priority of the Presidential administration is significant changes to U.S.
−Removed: tax regulations.
−Removed: On August 16, 2022, the Inflation Reduction Act (the “IRA”) was signed into law, which, among other things, imposes a minimum “book” tax on certain large corporations and creates a new excise tax on net stock repurchases made by certain publicly traded corporations after December 31, 2022.
−Removed: While the application of this new law is uncertain and we continue to evaluate its potential impact, these changes could materially change the amount and/or timing of tax Blue Owl may be required to pay.
−Removed: As required under GAAP, we reviewed the impact on income taxes due to the change in legislation and concluded there was no material impact to the financial statements as of December 31, 2023.
+Added: On August 16, 2022, the Inflation Reduction Act was signed into law, which, among other things, imposes a minimum “book” tax on certain large corporations and creates a new excise tax on net stock repurchases made by certain publicly traded corporations.
+Added: While the application of this law is uncertain, including as a result of the transition to the new U.S.
+Added: presidential administration, and we continue to evaluate its potential impact, these changes could materially change the amount and/or timing of tax Blue Owl may be required to pay.
There may also be changes in tax laws or interpretations of tax laws (possibly with retrospective effect) in a jurisdiction in which we and/or our affiliates operate, are managed, are advised, are promoted or invest, or in which any of the investors in our products is resident, that are adverse to us or our affiliates.
4 unchanged sentences
In particular, pursuant to the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development’s (the “OECD”) BEPS Project, many jurisdictions have introduced domestic legislation implementing certain of the BEPS Actions.
−Removed: Several of the areas of tax law
−Removed: (including double taxation treaties) on which the BEPS Project focuses are relevant to our ability to efficiently realize income or capital gains and to efficiently repatriate income and capital gains from the jurisdictions in which they arise to investors and, depending on the extent to and manner in which relevant jurisdictions have implemented (or implement, as the case may be) changes in those areas of tax law (including double taxation treaties), our ability to do those things may be adversely impacted.
+Added: Several of the areas of tax law (including double taxation treaties) on which the BEPS Project focuses are relevant to our ability to efficiently realize income or capital gains and to efficiently repatriate income and capital gains from the jurisdictions in which they arise to investors and,
+Added: depending on the extent to and manner in which relevant jurisdictions have implemented (or implement, as the case may be) changes in those areas of tax law (including double taxation treaties), our ability to do those things may be adversely impacted.
Many of the jurisdictions in which we or our affiliates invest or may invest have now ratified, accepted and approved the OECD’s Multilateral Instrument which brings into force a number of relevant changes to double tax treaties within scope.
2 unchanged sentences
The Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive 2016/1164 (commonly referred to as “ATAD I”) directly implements some of the BEPS Project actions points within EU law.
−Removed: On May 29, 2017, the Council of the EU formally adopted the Council Directive amending Directive (“EU”) 2016/1164 as regards hybrid mismatches with third countries (commonly referred to as “ATAD II”).
+Added: On May 29, 2017, the Council of the EU formally adopted the Council Directive amending Directive 2016/1164 as regards hybrid mismatches with third countries (commonly referred to as “ATAD II”).
ATAD II came into force in Member States on January 1, 2020 (subject to relevant derogation).
14 unchanged sentences
The GloBE Rules must be implemented through domestic legislation, and on December 20, 2021 the OECD released Pillar Two model rules providing a template for this purpose.
−Removed: Many jurisdictions have begun that process, including EU Member States pursuant to the EU minimum tax directive and the UK, with a view to the IIR and the UTPR taking effect for fiscal years beginning on or after December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2024 respectively.
+Added: Many jurisdictions have enacted legislation, including most EU Member States pursuant to the EU minimum tax directive and the UK, with a view to the IIR and the UTPR taking effect for fiscal years beginning on or after December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2024, respectively.
Amount A of Pillar One will be implemented through a multilateral convention and the STTR will be implemented, where applicable, either through modifications to bilateral tax treaties or alternatively through a multilateral instrument.
The timeline for implementation of both Amount A of Pillar One and the STTR remains uncertain.
−Removed: Subject to the development and implementation of both Amount A of Pillar One and Pillar Two (including the implementation of the EU minimum tax directive by EU Member States) and the details of any domestic legislation, double taxation treaty amendments and multilateral agreements which are necessary to implement them, effective tax rates could increase for Blue Owl and/or its subsidiaries or within the structure of our products or on their
−Removed: investments, including by way of higher levels of tax being imposed than is currently the case, possible denial of deductions or increased withholding taxes and/or profits being allocated differently and/or penalties could be due.
−Removed: This could adversely affect our returns.
+Added: Subject to the development and implementation of both Amount A of Pillar One and Pillar Two (including the implementation of the EU minimum tax directive by EU Member States) and the details of any domestic legislation, double taxation treaty amendments and multilateral agreements which are necessary to implement them, effective tax rates could increase for Blue Owl and/or its subsidiaries or within the structure of our products or on their investments, including by way of higher levels of tax being imposed than is currently the case, possible denial of deductions or increased withholding taxes and/or profits being allocated differently and/or penalties could be due.
+Added: adversely affect our returns.
The implementation of BEPS 2.0 in relevant jurisdictions is complex and likely to remain uncertain for a number of years.
18 unchanged sentences
As a result, conflicts of interest may arise among the Principals, on the one hand, and us and holders of our Class A and Class C Shares, on the other hand.
−Removed: The Principals have the ability to influence our business and affairs through their ownership of the high vote shares of our common stock, their general ability to appoint our board of directors, and provisions under the Amended and Restated Investor Rights Agreement dated as of August 7, 2023, between Blue Owl, certain former equity holders of Owl Rock and certain former equity holders of Dyal Capital (the “Investor Rights Agreement”) and our certificate of incorporation requiring their approval for certain corporate actions (in addition to approval by our board of directors).
−Removed: If the holders of our Class A and Class C Shares are dissatisfied with the performance of our board of directors, they have no ability to remove any of our directors, with or without cause.
−Removed: Further, through their ability to elect our board of directors, the Principals have the ability to indirectly influence the determination of the amount and timing of our investments and dispositions, cash expenditures, allocation of expenses, indebtedness, issuances of additional partnership interests, tax liabilities and amounts of reserves, each of which can affect the amount of cash that is available for distribution to holders of Common Units (as defined in Note 1 to the Financial Statements) and our Class A Shares.
+Added: The Principals have the ability to influence our business and affairs through their ownership of the high vote shares of our common stock, their general ability to appoint our Board, and provisions under the Amended and Restated Investor Rights Agreement dated as of August 7, 2023, between Blue Owl, certain former equity holders of Owl Rock and certain former equity holders of Dyal Capital (as amended from time to time, the “Investor Rights Agreement”) and our certificate of incorporation requiring their approval for certain corporate actions (in addition to approval by our Board).
+Added: If the holders of our Class A and Class C Shares are dissatisfied with the performance of our Board, they have no ability to remove any of our directors, with or without cause.
+Added: Further, through their ability to elect our Board, the Principals have the ability to indirectly influence the determination of the amount and timing of our investments and dispositions, cash expenditures, allocation of expenses, indebtedness, issuances of additional partnership interests, tax liabilities and amounts of reserves, each of which can affect the amount of cash that is available for distribution to holders of Common Units (as defined in Note 1 to the Financial Statements) and our Class A Shares.
In addition, conflicts may arise relating to the selection, structuring and disposition of investments and other transactions, declaring dividends and other distributions and other matters due to the fact that the Principals hold their Blue Owl Operating Group Units directly or through pass-through entities that are not subject to corporate income taxation.
14 unchanged sentences
These provisions, alone or together, could delay or prevent hostile takeovers and changes in control or changes in the Board or management.
−Removed: In addition, as a Delaware corporation, the Registrant is generally subject to provisions of Delaware law, including the DGCL, although we have elected not to be governed by Section 203 of the DGCL.
+Added: In addition, as a Delaware corporation, Blue Owl Capital Inc.
+Added: is generally subject to provisions of Delaware law, including the DGCL, although we have elected not to be governed by Section 203 of the DGCL.
Any provision of our certificate of incorporation, our bylaws or Delaware law that has the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control could limit the opportunity for stockholders to receive a premium for their shares of our capital stock and could also affect the price that some investors are willing to pay for our common stock.
5 unchanged sentences
This choice-of-forum provision may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with us or our or its directors, officers, stockholders, agents or other employees, which may discourage such lawsuits.
−Removed: Alternatively, if a court were to find this provision of our certificate of incorporation inapplicable or unenforceable with respect to one or more of the specified types of actions or proceedings, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such matters in other jurisdictions, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations and result in a diversion of the time and resources of management and our board of directors.
−Removed: The Registrant is a holding company and its only material source of cash is its indirect interest (held through Blue Owl GP) in the Blue Owl Operating Partnerships, and it is accordingly dependent upon distributions made by its subsidiaries to pay taxes, make payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement, and pay dividends.
−Removed: The Registrant is a holding company with no material assets other than its indirect ownership of the GP Units (as defined in Note 1 to the Financial Statements) through Blue Owl GP and certain deferred tax assets.
−Removed: As a result, the Registrant has no independent means of generating revenue or cash flow.
−Removed: The Registrant’s ability to pay taxes, make payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement, and pay dividends will depend on the financial results and cash flows of the Blue Owl Operating Partnerships and the distributions it receives (directly or indirectly) from the Blue Owl Operating Partnerships.
+Added: Alternatively, if a court were to find this provision of our certificate of incorporation inapplicable or unenforceable with respect to one or more of the specified types of actions or proceedings, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such matters in other jurisdictions, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations and result in a diversion of the time and resources of management and our Board.
+Added: Blue Owl Capital Inc.
+Added: is a holding company and its only material source of cash is its indirect interest (held through Blue Owl GP) in the Blue Owl Operating Partnerships, and it is accordingly dependent upon distributions made by its subsidiaries to pay taxes, make payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement, and pay dividends.
+Added: Blue Owl Capital Inc.
+Added: is a holding company with no material assets other than its indirect ownership of the GP Units (as defined in Note 1 to the Financial Statements) through Blue Owl GP and certain deferred tax assets.
+Added: As a result, Blue Owl Capital Inc.
+Added: has no independent means of generating revenue or cash flow.
+Added: Blue Owl Capital Inc.’s ability to pay taxes, make payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement, and pay dividends will depend on the financial results and cash flows of the Blue Owl Operating Partnerships and the distributions it receives (directly or indirectly) from the Blue Owl Operating Partnerships.
Deterioration in the financial condition, earnings or cash flow of the Blue Owl Operating Partnerships for any reason could limit or impair the Blue Owl Operating Partnerships’ ability to pay such distributions.
−Removed: Additionally, to the extent that the Registrant or Blue Owl GP needs funds and the Blue Owl Operating Partnerships are restricted from making such distributions under applicable law or regulation or under the terms of any financing arrangements, or the Blue Owl Operating Partnerships are otherwise unable to provide such funds, it could materially adversely affect the Registrant’s liquidity and financial condition.
+Added: Additionally, to the extent that Blue Owl Capital Inc.
+Added: or Blue Owl GP needs funds and the Blue Owl Operating Partnerships are restricted from making such distributions under applicable law or regulation or under the terms of any financing arrangements, or the Blue Owl Operating Partnerships are otherwise unable to provide such funds, it could materially adversely affect Blue Owl Capital Inc.’s liquidity and financial condition.
Subject to the discussion herein, the Blue Owl Operating Partnerships expect to continue to be treated as partnerships for U.S.
5 unchanged sentences
In addition to tax expenses, Blue Owl will also incur expenses related to its operations, including Blue Owl GP’s payment obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement, which could be significant, and some of which will be reimbursed by the Blue Owl Operating Partnerships (excluding payment obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement).
−Removed: Blue Owl intends to
−Removed: cause Blue Owl GP to cause the Blue Owl Operating Partnerships to make ordinary distributions and tax distributions to holders of the interests in the Blue Owl Operating Partnerships on a pro rata basis in amounts sufficient to cover all applicable taxes, relevant operating expenses, payments by Blue Owl GP under the Tax Receivable Agreement and dividends, if any, declared by Blue Owl.
+Added: Blue Owl intends to cause Blue Owl GP to cause the Blue Owl Operating Partnerships to make ordinary distributions and tax distributions to holders of the interests in the Blue Owl Operating Partnerships on a pro rata basis in amounts sufficient to cover all applicable taxes, relevant operating expenses, payments by Blue Owl GP under the Tax Receivable Agreement and dividends, if any,
+Added: declared by Blue Owl.
However, as discussed above, the Blue Owl Operating Partnerships’ ability to make such distributions may be subject to various limitations and restrictions including, but not limited to, retention of amounts necessary to satisfy the obligations of the Blue Owl Operating Partnerships and restrictions on distributions that would violate any applicable restrictions contained in the Blue Owl Operating Partnerships’ debt agreements, or any applicable law, or that would have the effect of rendering the Blue Owl Operating Partnerships insolvent.
4 unchanged sentences
federal tax laws governing audits of partnerships for adjustments to prior year tax returns, absent an election to the contrary.
−Removed: In the event the Blue Owl Operating Partnerships’ calculations of taxable income are incorrect, the Blue Owl Operating Partnerships and/or their partners, including the Registrant or Blue Owl GP, in later years may be subject to material liabilities under these rules.
+Added: In the event the Blue Owl Operating Partnerships’ calculations of taxable income are incorrect, the Blue Owl Operating Partnerships and/or their partners, including Blue Owl Capital Inc.
+Added: or Blue Owl GP, in later years may be subject to material liabilities under these rules.
If either of the Blue Owl Operating Partnerships were treated as a corporation for U.S.
−Removed: federal income tax or state tax purposes, then the amount available for distribution by such Blue Owl Operating Partnerships could be substantially reduced and the value of the Registrant’s shares could be adversely affected.
+Added: federal income tax or state tax purposes, then the amount available for distribution by such Blue Owl Operating Partnerships could be substantially reduced and the value of Blue Owl Capital Inc.’s shares could be adversely affected.
An entity that would otherwise be classified as a partnership for U.S.
6 unchanged sentences
In addition, we would no longer have the benefit of increases in the tax basis of the Blue Owl Operating Partnership’s assets as a result of exchanges of Common Units.
−Removed: Pursuant to the Exchange Agreement, certain Blue Owl equity holders may, from time to time, subject to the terms of the Exchange Agreement, exchange their interests in the Blue Owl Operating Partnerships and have such interests redeemed by Blue Owl Operating Partnerships for cash or the Registrant’s stock.
+Added: Pursuant to the Exchange Agreement, certain Blue Owl equity holders may, from time to time, subject to the terms of the Exchange Agreement, exchange their interests in the Blue Owl Operating Partnerships and have such interests redeemed by Blue Owl Operating Partnerships for cash or Blue Owl Capital Inc.’s stock.
While such exchanges could be treated as trading in the interests of the Blue Owl Operating Partnerships for purposes of testing “publicly traded partnership” status, the Exchange Agreement contains restrictions on redemptions and exchanges of interests in the Blue Owl Operating Partnerships that are intended to prevent either of the Blue Owl Operating Partnerships from being treated as a “publicly traded partnership” for U.S.
2 unchanged sentences
federal income tax law.
−Removed: Blue Owl GP may also impose additional restrictions on exchanges that the Registrant or Blue Owl GP determines to be necessary or advisable so that neither of the Blue Owl Operating Partnerships is treated as a “publicly traded partnership” for U.S.
+Added: Blue Owl GP may also impose additional restrictions on exchanges that Blue Owl Capital Inc.
+Added: or Blue Owl GP determines to be necessary or advisable so that neither of the Blue Owl Operating Partnerships is treated as a “publicly traded partnership” for U.S.
federal income tax purposes.
1 unchanged sentence
federal income tax purposes and we intend to take the position that neither of the Blue Owl Operating Partnerships is so treated as a result of exchanges of its interests pursuant to the Exchange Agreement.
−Removed: Pursuant to the Tax Receivable Agreement, Blue Owl GP will be required to make payments to certain equity holders for certain tax benefits the Registrant and Blue Owl GP may claim and those payments may be substantial.
+Added: Pursuant to the Tax Receivable Agreement, Blue Owl GP will be required to make payments to certain equity holders for certain tax benefits Blue Owl Capital Inc.
+Added: and Blue Owl GP may claim and those payments may be substantial.
Certain equity holders have exchanged, and may in the future exchange, their Common Units, together with the cancellation of an equal number of Class C Shares or Class D Shares, for Class A Shares or Class B Shares, respectively, or cash pursuant to the Blue Owl Operating Partnership Agreements and the Exchange Agreement, subject to certain conditions and transfer restrictions as set forth therein and in the Investor Rights Agreement.
−Removed: Such transactions have resulted in, or are in the future expected to result in, increases in the Registrant’s (and Blue Owl GP’s) allocable share of the tax basis of the tangible and intangible assets of the Blue Owl Operating Partnerships.
−Removed: These increases in tax basis may increase for income tax purposes depreciation and amortization deductions, and therefore reduce the amount of tax that the Registrant or Blue Owl GP would otherwise be required to pay had such sales and exchanges never occurred.
−Removed: In connection with the Business Combination, Blue Owl GP entered into the Tax Receivable Agreement, which generally provides for the payment by it of 85% of certain tax benefits, if any, that Blue Owl GP realizes (or in certain cases is deemed to realize) as a result of these increases in tax basis and certain other tax attributes of Blue Owl GP, the corporations acquired from certain former Owl Rock equity holders in the transaction, and tax benefits related to entering into the Tax Receivable Agreement.
+Added: Such transactions have resulted in, or are in the future expected to result in, increases in Blue Owl Capital Inc.’s (and Blue Owl GP’s) allocable share of the tax basis of the tangible and intangible assets of the Blue Owl Operating Partnerships.
+Added: These increases in tax basis may increase for income tax purposes depreciation and amortization deductions, and therefore reduce the amount of tax that Blue Owl Capital Inc.
+Added: or Blue Owl GP would otherwise be required to pay had such sales and exchanges never occurred.
+Added: In connection with the Business Combination, Blue Owl GP entered into the Tax Receivable Agreement, which generally provides for the payment by it of 85% of certain tax benefits, if any, that Blue Owl GP realizes (or in certain cases is deemed to
+Added: realize) as a result of these increases in tax basis and certain other tax attributes of Blue Owl GP, the corporations acquired from certain former Owl Rock equity holders in the transaction, and tax benefits related to entering into the Tax Receivable Agreement.
Those payments are the obligation of Blue Owl GP and not of Blue Owl Operating Partnerships.
−Removed: The actual increase in Blue Owl GP’s allocable share of the Blue Owl Operating Partnerships’ tax basis in their assets, as well as the amount and timing of any payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement, will vary depending upon a number of factors, including the timing of exchanges, the market price of the Class A Shares at the time of the exchange, the extent to which such exchanges are taxable and the amount and timing of the recognition of the Registrant’s (and Blue Owl GP’s) income.
+Added: The actual increase in Blue Owl GP’s allocable share of the Blue Owl Operating Partnerships’ tax basis in their assets, as well as the amount and timing of any payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement, will vary depending upon a number of factors, including the timing of exchanges, the market price of the Class A Shares at the time of the exchange, the extent to which such exchanges are taxable and the amount and timing of the recognition of Blue Owl Capital Inc.’s (and Blue Owl GP’s) income.
While many of the factors that will determine the amount of payments that Blue Owl GP will make under the Tax Receivable Agreement are outside of its control, Blue Owl GP expects that the payments it will make under the Tax Receivable Agreement will be substantial and could have a material adverse effect on Blue Owl’s financial condition.
−Removed: Any payments made by Blue Owl GP under the Tax Receivable Agreement will generally reduce the amount of overall cash flow that might have otherwise been available to the Registrant and Blue Owl GP.
+Added: Any payments made by Blue Owl GP under the Tax Receivable Agreement will generally reduce the amount of overall cash flow that might have otherwise been available to Blue Owl Capital Inc.
+Added: and Blue Owl GP.
To the extent that Blue Owl GP is unable to make timely payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement for any reason, the unpaid amounts will be deferred and will accrue interest until paid;
1 unchanged sentence
Furthermore, Blue Owl GP’s obligation to make payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement could make Blue Owl a less attractive target for an acquisition, particularly in the case of an acquirer that cannot use some or all of the tax benefits that may be realized or deemed realized under the Tax Receivable Agreement.
−Removed: In certain cases, payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement may exceed the actual tax benefits t he Registrant or Blue Owl GP realizes or be accelerated.
−Removed: Payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement will be based on the tax reporting positions that the Registrant or Blue Owl GP determines, and the IRS or another taxing authority may challenge all or any part of the tax basis increases, as well as other tax positions that the Registrant or Blue Owl GP takes, and a court may sustain such a challenge.
−Removed: In the event that any tax benefits initially claimed by the Registrant or Blue Owl GP are disallowed, recipients of payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement will not be required to reimburse the Registrant or Blue Owl GP for any excess payments that may previously have been made under the Tax Receivable Agreement, for example, due to adjustments resulting from examinations by taxing authorities.
+Added: In certain cases, payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement may exceed the actual tax benefits Blue Owl Capital Inc.
+Added: or Blue Owl GP realizes or be accelerated.
+Added: Payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement will be based on the tax reporting positions that Blue Owl Capital Inc.
+Added: or Blue Owl GP determines, and the Internal Revenue Service or another taxing authority may challenge all or any part of the tax basis increases, as well as other tax positions that Blue Owl Capital Inc.
+Added: or Blue Owl GP takes, and a court may sustain such a challenge.
+Added: In the event that any tax benefits initially claimed by Blue Owl Capital Inc.
+Added: or Blue Owl GP are disallowed, recipients of payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement will not be required to reimburse Blue Owl Capital Inc.
+Added: or Blue Owl GP for any excess payments that may previously have been made under the Tax Receivable Agreement, for example, due to adjustments resulting from examinations by taxing authorities.
Rather, excess payments made to such holders will be netted against any future cash payments otherwise required to be made by Blue Owl GP under the Tax Receivable Agreement, if any, after the determination of such excess.
−Removed: However, a challenge to any tax benefits initially claimed by the Registrant or Blue Owl GP may not arise for a number of years following the initial time of such payment or, even if challenged early, such excess cash payment may be greater than the amount of future cash payments that Blue Owl GP might otherwise be required to make under the terms of the Tax Receivable Agreement and, as a result, there might not be future cash payments against which to net.
−Removed: As a result, in certain circumstances Blue Owl GP could make payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement in excess of Blue Owl’s or Blue Owl GP’s actual tax savings, which could materially impair Blue Owl’s financial condition.
+Added: However, a challenge to any tax benefits initially claimed by Blue Owl Capital Inc.
+Added: or Blue Owl GP may not arise for a number of years following the initial time of such payment or, even if challenged early, such excess cash payment may be greater than the amount of future cash payments that Blue Owl GP might otherwise be required to make under the terms of the Tax Receivable Agreement and, as a result, there might not be future cash payments against which to net.
+Added: As a result, in certain circumstances Blue Owl GP could make payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement in excess of Blue Owl Capital Inc.’s or Blue Owl GP’s actual tax savings, which could materially impair Blue Owl’s financial condition.
Moreover, the Tax Receivable Agreement provides that, in certain events, including a change of control, breach of a material obligation under the Tax Receivable Agreement, or Blue Owl GP’s exercise of early termination rights, Blue Owl GP’s obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement will accelerate and Blue Owl GP will be required to make a lump-sum cash payment under the Tax Receivable Agreement equal to the present value of all forecasted future payments that would have otherwise been made under the Tax Receivable Agreement, which lump-sum payment would be based on certain assumptions, including those relating to Blue Owl GP’s future taxable income.
−Removed: The lump-sum payment could be substantial and could exceed the actual tax benefits that the Registrant or Blue Owl GP realizes subsequent to such payment because such payment would be calculated assuming, among other things, that the Registrant and Blue Owl GP would have certain tax benefits available to it and that the Registrant and Blue Owl GP would be able to use the potential tax benefits in future years.
−Removed: There may be a material negative effect on the Registrant’s liquidity if the payments required to be made by Blue Owl GP under the Tax Receivable Agreement exceed the actual tax savings that the Registrant (or Blue Owl GP) realizes.
+Added: The lump-sum payment could be substantial and could exceed the actual tax benefits that Blue Owl Capital Inc.
+Added: or Blue Owl GP realizes subsequent to such payment because such payment would be calculated assuming, among other things, that Blue Owl Capital Inc.
+Added: and Blue Owl GP would have certain tax benefits available to it and that Blue Owl Capital Inc.
+Added: and Blue Owl GP would be able to use the potential tax benefits in future years.
+Added: There may be a material negative effect on Blue Owl Capital Inc.’s liquidity if the payments required to be made by Blue Owl GP under the Tax Receivable Agreement exceed the actual tax savings that Blue Owl Capital Inc.
+Added: (or Blue Owl GP) realizes.
Furthermore, Blue Owl GP’s obligations to make payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement could also have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing certain mergers, asset sales, other forms of business combinations or other changes of control.
2 unchanged sentences
Our effective tax rate and the amount of “tax distributions” that the Blue Owl Operating Partnerships are required to make to equity holders could also change materially as a result of various evolving factors, including changes in income tax law or changes in the scope of our operations.
−Removed: The Registrant and Blue Owl GP are subject to U.S.
−Removed: federal income taxation, and the Registrant, Blue Owl GP, and the Blue Owl Operating Partnerships and their subsidiaries are subject to income taxation by certain states and municipalities and certain foreign jurisdictions in which such subsidiaries operate.
+Added: Blue Owl Capital Inc.
+Added: and Blue Owl GP are subject to U.S.
+Added: federal income taxation, and Blue Owl Capital Inc., Blue Owl GP, and the Blue Owl Operating Partnerships and their subsidiaries are subject to income taxation by certain states and municipalities and certain foreign jurisdictions in which such subsidiaries operate.
In addition, the Blue Owl Operating Partnerships are required to make tax distributions to their partners pursuant to the Blue Owl Limited Partnership Agreements.
12 unchanged sentences
Any cash received from such distributions is first be used to satisfy any tax liability and then used to make any payments required to be made by Blue Owl GP under the Tax Receivable Agreement.
−Removed: Subject to having available cash and subject to limitations imposed by applicable law and contractual restrictions, the Blue Owl Operating Group Agreements require the Blue Owl Operating Partnerships to make certain distributions to holders of Common Units and to Blue Owl GP pro rata to facilitate the payment of taxes with respect to the income of the Blue Owl Operating Partnerships that is allocated to them.
+Added: Subject to having available cash and subject to limitations imposed by applicable law and contractual restrictions, the Limited Partnership Agreements require the Blue Owl Operating Partnerships to make certain distributions to holders of Common Units and to Blue Owl GP pro rata to facilitate the payment of taxes with respect to the income of the Blue Owl Operating Partnerships that is allocated to them.
To the extent that the tax distributions we directly or indirectly receive exceed the amounts we actually require to pay taxes, Tax Receivable Agreement payments and other expenses (which is likely to be the case given that the assumed tax rate for such distributions will generally exceed our effective tax rate), we will not be required to distribute such excess cash.
−Removed: Our board of directors may, in its sole discretion, choose to use such excess cash for certain purposes, including to make distributions to the holders of our stock.
−Removed: Unless and until our board of directors chooses, in its sole discretion, to declare a distribution, we will have no obligation to distribute such cash (or other available cash other than any declared dividend) to our stockholders.
+Added: Our Board may, in its sole discretion, choose to use such excess cash for certain purposes, including to make distributions to the holders of our stock.
+Added: Unless and until our Board chooses, in its sole discretion, to declare a distribution, we will have no obligation to distribute such cash (or other available cash other than any declared dividend) to our stockholders.
No adjustments to the exchange ratio of Common Units for shares of our common stock will be made as a result of either (i) any cash distribution by us or (ii) any cash that we retain and do not distribute to our stockholders.
12 unchanged sentences
• changes in market valuations of similar companies;
+Added: • the financial performance of our products’ portfolio companies, whether or not material to Blue Owl;
• speculation in the press or investment community;
6 unchanged sentences
Broad market and industry factors, as well as general economic, political, regulatory and market conditions, may negatively affect the market price of our Class A Shares, regardless of Blue Owl’s actual operating performance.
+Added: Sales of Class A Shares resulting from exchanges of Common Units pledged by our directors and officers could cause the price of our Class A Shares to decrease.
+Added: Under our Insider Trading Policy, our directors, officers and employees may seek approval to pledge our securities under loan arrangements that meet requirements established by our audit committee, including with respect to the pledge amount, the minimum loan to value ratio and the minimum unencumbered net asset value.
+Added: Each of Messrs.
+Added: Ostrover and Lipschultz has pledged 43,409,692 and 33,000,000 Common Units, respectively, as security for loans.
+Added: Failure or delay by a borrower to promptly meet a margin call under his loan documents or other default under these financing arrangements could result in the foreclosure on some or all of the pledged Common Units by the applicable third-party lender.
+Added: Although these arrangements provide for the borrowers to pledge alternative collateral in lieu of the pledged Common Units in the event of a margin call, upon any foreclosure on Common Units and subsequent sale of the corresponding Class A Shares the price of our Class A Shares could decline materially.
A decline in our share price could subject us to securities class action litigation.
6 unchanged sentences
Similarly, if one or more of the analysts who write reports on us downgrades our stock or publishes inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, our share price could decline.
−Removed: In addition, securities research analysts may compare Blue Owl to companies that are not appropriately comparable, which could lead to lower than expected valuations.
+Added: In addition, securities research analysts may compare Blue Owl to companies that are not appropriately
+Added: comparable, which could lead to lower than expected valuations.
If one or more analysts cease coverage of us or fail to publish reports on us regularly, our share price or trading volume could decline.
5 unchanged sentences
Issuing additional Class A Shares or other equity securities or securities convertible into equity may dilute the economic and voting rights of our existing stockholders or reduce the market price of our Class A Shares or both.
−Removed: Upon liquidation, holders of
−Removed: debt securities and preferred shares, if issued, and lenders with respect to other borrowings would receive a distribution of our available assets prior to the holders of our Class A Shares.
+Added: Upon liquidation, holders of debt securities and preferred shares, if issued, and lenders with respect to other borrowings would receive a distribution of our available assets prior to the holders of our Class A Shares.
Debt securities convertible into equity could be subject to adjustments in the conversion ratio pursuant to which certain events may increase the number of equity securities issuable upon conversion.
2 unchanged sentences
Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.