2 unchanged sentences
Some of the information contained in this discussion and analysis or set forth elsewhere in this Report, including information with respect to our plans and strategy for our business, includes forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties.
−Removed: You should review the sections titled “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” and “Risk Factors” for a discussion of forward-looking statements and important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results described in or implied by the forward-looking statements contained in the following discussion and analysis.
+Added: You should review the sections titled “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” and “Item 1A.
+Added: Risk Factors” for a discussion of forward-looking statements and important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results described in or implied by the forward-looking statements contained in the following discussion and analysis.
We are a bank holding company headquartered in Los Angeles, California.
5 unchanged sentences
We rely primarily on locally-generated deposits, mostly from the Korean-American market within California, to fund our loan activities.
−Removed: We currently operate eight branches in Los Angeles County and Orange County, California, one branch in Santa Clara County, California, and one branch in Carrollton, Texas.
+Added: We currently operate eight branches in Los Angeles and Orange Counties in California, one branch in Santa Clara, California, one branch in Carrollton, Texas and one branch in Las Vegas, Nevada.
We have four loan production offices in Pleasanton, California, Atlanta, Georgia, Aurora, Colorado, and Lynnwood, Washington.
+Added: We adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-13, which replaced the current incurred loss accounting model with the Current Expected Credit Losses approach.
+Added: The adoption of this ASU increased the allowance for credit losses by $1.9 million and allowance for off-balance sheet commitments by $184 thousand and recorded a deferred tax assets of $624 thousand and a decrease to opening retained earnings of $1.5 million on January 1, 2023.
+Added: Banking Economy and Recent Developments
+Added: Beginning in late 2021, the Federal Reserve Board Open Markets Committee, which strives to manage benchmark interest rates in the United States, began a series of upward adjustments to the “discount rate” for short-term borrowings in response to perceived increases in inflationary pressures.
+Added: Financial institutions and markets promptly followed these adjustments, significantly increasing interest rate pricing on loans and deposits.
+Added: While such adjustments are commonplace and tend to affect the banking industry as a whole, the pace and degree of these adjustments were nearly unprecedented, resulting in banks, including the Bank, experiencing substantial pressure on multiple fronts.
+Added: In particular, banks were forced to increase interest rates paid on deposits in order to meet competitive pressures from other financial institutions, as well as from treasury securities and other investment opportunities that offered greater earning capabilities for those
+Added: These increases correspondingly increased the Bank’s cost of funds and exerted downward pressure on our net interest margins.
+Added: The increases in market interest rates also were reflected in loan pricing, which had multiple effects, including a reduction in borrowing (and thus a reduction in interest paid to banks) by customers that had the ability to avoid or defer additional indebtedness, a decline in the origination of new loans, and an increase in credit risk as borrowers who faced rising interest rates found it more difficult to comply with their loan obligations.
+Added: The combination of these factors has exerted downward pressure on our fee income, the volume of our interest-earning assets and our net interest income.
+Added: Lastly, as a result of the prolonged low-interest-rate environment that had prevailed for years prior to the more recent market rate increases, the Bank, like most other financial institutions, had invested in treasury securities and other relatively low-yielding but stable instruments as a means to preserve liquidity, accepting the lower returns as a trade-off for a perceived lower risk profile.
+Added: However, the rapidity of the Federal Reserve’s rate increases resulted in a dramatic loss of value for bonds that were paying at lower interest rates as investors eschewed those investments for higher-yielding fixed- and adjustable-rate debt securities.
+Added: These forces even resulted in the closure of three large U.S.
+Added: banks, including two banks with extensive operations in our market area, when customers alarmed at the apparent instability in the banking sector quickly demanded a return of their deposits at a time when banks were confronting substantial challenges.
The following significant items are of note as of or for the periods presented:
2 unchanged sentences
• Gross loans were $1.77 billion, an increase of $87.6 million, or 5.2%, from $1.68 billion.
−Removed: • Total deposits were $1.89 billion, an increase of $351.7 million, or 22.9%, from $1.53 billion.
+Added: • Total deposits were $1.81 billion, a decrease of $78.2 million, or 4.1%, from $1.89 billion.
• Shareholders’ equity was $192.6 million, an increase of $15.7 million, or 8.9%, from $176.9 million.
For the year ended December 31, 2023 compared to 2022
−Removed: • Net income was $33.3 million or $2.14 per diluted common share, an increase of $4.5 million, or 15.5%, from $28.8 million or $1.88 per diluted common share.
−Removed: • Net interest income increased to $76.9 million, an increase of $15.9 million, or 26.0%, from $61.0 million.
+Added: • Net interest income decreased to $68.7 million, a decrease of $8.2 million, or 10.7%, from $76.9 million.
+Added: • Net income was $23.9 million or $1.55 per diluted common share, a decrease of $9.4 million, or 28.2%, from $33.3 million or $2.14 per diluted common share.
For the year ended December 31, 2022 compared to 2021
−Removed: • Net income was $28.8 million or $1.88 per diluted common share, an increase of $15.7 million, or 119.7%, from $13.1 million or $0.85 per diluted common share.
• Net interest income increased to $76.9 million, an increase of $15.9 million, or 26.0%, from $61.0 million.
+Added: • Net income was $33.3 million or $2.14 per diluted common share, an increase of $4.5 million, or 15.5%, from $28.8 million or $1.88 per diluted common share.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
−Removed: As of or For the Year Ended December 31,
+Added: Year Ended December 31,
($ in thousands, except share and per share data) 2023 2022 2021
3 unchanged sentences
Net interest income 68,687 76,911 61,026
−Removed: Provision for loan losses 2,976 522 5,961
+Added: Provision for credit losses 1,651 2,976 522
Noninterest income 14,181 17,619 16,017
18 unchanged sentences
57.59 47.42 46.55
+Added: (1) Represent noninterest expense divided by the sum of net interest income and noninterest income.
+Added: As of December 31,
+Added: ($ in thousands) 2023 2022
Balance Sheet Data:
−Removed: Gross loans receivable $ 1,678,292 $ 1,314,019 $ 1,099,736
+Added: Gross loans $ 1,765,845 $ 1,678,292
Loans held for sale 1,795 44,335
−Removed: Allowance for loan losses 19,241 16,123 15,352
+Added: Allowance for credit losses 21,993 19,241
Total assets 2,147,730 2,094,497
−Removed: Deposits 1,885,771 1,534,066 1,200,090
+Added: Total deposits 1,807,558 1,885,771
Shareholders’ equity 192,626 176,916
Asset Quality Data:
−Removed: Net charge-offs to average gross loans receivable 0.00 % 0.02 % 0.00 %
−Removed: Nonperforming loans to gross loans receivable 0.18 % 0.24 % 0.09 %
−Removed: Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans 624.51 % 503.84 % 1558.58 %
−Removed: Allowance for loan losses to gross loans receivable 1.15 % 1.23 % 1.40 %
+Added: Nonperforming loans to gross loans 0.34 % 0.18 %
+Added: Allowance for credit losses to nonperforming loans 362 625
+Added: Allowance for credit losses to gross loans 1.25 1.15
Balance Sheet and Capital Ratios:
−Removed: Gross loans receivable to deposits 89.00 % 85.66 % 91.64 %
+Added: Gross loans to deposits 97.69 % 89.00 %
Noninterest-bearing deposits to deposits 28.92 37.20
4 unchanged sentences
Total risk-based capital ratio 13.77 13.06
−Removed: (1) Represent noninterest expense divided by the sum of net interest income and noninterest income.
−Removed: Loan Payment Deferrals Related to the COVID-19 Pandemic
−Removed: In early 2020, we began providing payment deferrals of up to 12 months for our commercial and consumer borrowers who had been adversely impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic and had not been delinquent over 30 days on payments at the time of the borrowers’ deferral requests.
−Removed: For the loans modified under this program, in accordance with the provisions of Section 4013 of the CARES Act and the interagency statement issued by bank regulatory agencies, we elected to not apply troubled debt structuring classification to borrowers who were current as of December 31, 2019.
−Removed: As of December 31, 2022, we had no loan in deferment status, compared to total outstanding loans remaining in deferment status of $5.0 million, or 0.4% of the total portfolio, as of December 31, 2021.
−Removed: Paycheck Protection Program
−Removed: Beginning in April 2020, we accepted applications under the PPP administered by the SBA under the CARES Act, as amended by the Economic Aid Act enacted on December 27, 2020 and have originated loans to qualified small businesses.
−Removed: Under the terms of the program, loans funded through the PPP are eligible to be forgiven if certain requirements are met, including using the funds for certain costs relating to payroll, healthcare and qualifying mortgage interest, rent and utility payments.
−Removed: To the extent not forgiven, loans are subject to terms of the program.
−Removed: Since the PPP’s inception through December 31, 2022, we have funded $154.5 million, and $154.0 million of principal forgiveness has been provided on qualifying PPP loans.
−Removed: As of December 31, 2022, there were unamortized net deferred fees and unaccreted discounts of $8 thousand to be recognized over the estimated life of the loan as a yield adjustment on the loans.
−Removed: If a loan is paid off or forgiven by the SBA prior to its projected estimated life, the remaining unamortized deferred fees will be recognized as interest income in that period.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
6 unchanged sentences
Additional information about these policies can be found in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 1.
−Removed: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.”
−Removed: Allowance for Loan Losses
−Removed: The allowance for loan losses (“ALL”) is a valuation allowance for probable incurred credit losses.
−Removed: Loan losses are charged against the ALL when management believes the uncollectibility of a loan balance is confirmed.
−Removed: Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the ALL.
−Removed: Management estimates the ALL balance required using past loan loss experience, the nature and volume of the portfolio, information about specific borrower situations and estimated collateral values, economic conditions, and other factors.
−Removed: Allocations of the ALL may be made for specific loans, but the entire allowance is available for any loan that, in management’s judgment, should be charged off.
−Removed: The ALL is maintained at a level that management believes is appropriate to provide for known and inherent incurred loan losses as of the date of the Consolidated Balance Sheets and we have established methodologies for the determination of its adequacy.
−Removed: The methodologies are set forth in a formal policy and take into consideration the need for an overall general valuation allowance as well as specific allowances that are determined on an individual loan basis.
−Removed: The evaluation is inherently subjective, as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available.
−Removed: While management uses available information to recognize losses on loans, changes in economic or other conditions may necessitate revision of the estimate in future periods.
+Added: Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.”
+Added: New Accounting Pronouncements Adopted
+Added: Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2016-13, Financial Instruments — Credit Losses (Topic 326):
+Added: Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments.
+Added: The Company adopted ASU 2016-13 using a modified retrospective approach on January 1, 2023.
+Added: The Company replaced the current incurred loss accounting model with the Current Expected Credit Losses ("CECL") approach for financial instruments measured at amortized cost and other commitments to extend credit.
+Added: CECL requires the immediate recognition of estimated credit losses expected to occur over the estimated remaining life of the asset.
+Added: The forward-looking concept of CECL requires loss estimates to consider historical experience, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts.
+Added: The adoption of this ASU increased the allowance for credit losses by $1.9 million and allowance for off-balance sheet commitments by $184 thousand.
+Added: The Company also recorded a deferred tax assets of $624 thousand and a decrease to opening retained earnings of $1.5 million on January 1, 2023.
+Added: The increase to allowance for credit losses was primarily due to longer duration of home mortgage loans, offset primarily by shorter duration of commercial and industrial ("C&I")
+Added: The Company did not record an allowance for credit losses on the Company’s available-for-sale debt securities as a result of this adoption.
+Added: Disclosures for periods after January 1, 2023 are presented in accordance with ASC 326 while prior period amounts continue to be reported in accordance with previously applicable standards and the accounting policies.
+Added: Allowance for Credit Losses
+Added: The Company employs a modeled approach that takes into account current and future economic conditions to estimate lifetime expected losses on a collective basis.
+Added: With the adoption of CECL, the Company elected not to consider accrued interest receivable in its estimated credit losses because the Company writes off uncollectible accrued interest receivable in a timely manner.
+Added: The Company considers writing off accrued interest amounts once the amounts become 90 days past due to be considered within a timely manner.
+Added: The Company has elected to write off accrued interest receivable by reversing interest income.
+Added: The Company uses transition matrices to develop the Probability of Default ("PD") and Loss Given Default ("LGD") approach, incorporating quantitative factors and qualitative considerations in the calculation of the allowance for credit losses for collectively assessed loans.
+Added: The model provides forecasts of PD and LGD based on national unemployment rates using regression analysis.
+Added: The Company incorporates future economic conditions using a weighted multiple scenario approach:
+Added: baseline and adverse.
+Added: The Company applies a reasonable and supportable period of one year for the baseline scenario and two years for the adverse scenario, after which loss assumptions revert to historical loss information through a one-year reversion period for the baseline scenario and a two-year reversion period for the adverse scenario.
+Added: We make critical accounting estimates, including the judgments made in the application of significant accounting policies, sensitivity to change, and the likelihood of materially different reported results if different assumptions were used.
+Added: In order to quantify the credit risk impact of other trends and changes within the loan portfolio, we utilize qualitative adjustments to the modeled estimated loss approaches.
+Added: The parameters for making adjustments are established under a Credit Risk Matrix that provides different possible scenarios for each of the factors listed below.
+Added: The Credit Risk Matrix and the possible scenarios enable the Bank to qualitatively adjust the loss rates.
+Added: This matrix considers the following nine factors, which are patterned after the guidelines provided under the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council Interagency Policy Statement on the Allowance for Credit Losses, updated to reflect the adoption of CECL:
+Added: • Changes in lending policies and procedures, including changes in underwriting standards and practices for collection, charge-offs, and recoveries;
+Added: • Actual and expected changes in national and local economic and business conditions and developments in which the institution operates that affect the collectivity of loans;
+Added: • Changes in the nature and volume of the loan portfolio;
+Added: • Changes in the experience, ability, and depth of lending management and staff;
+Added: • Changes in the volume and severity of past due loans, the volume of nonaccrual loans, and the volume and severity of adversely classified loans;
+Added: • Changes in the quality of the credit review function;
+Added: • Changes in the value of the underlying collateral for loans that are not collateral-dependent;
+Added: • The existence, growth, and effect of any concentrations of credit, and
+Added: • The effect of other external factors, such as the regulatory, legal and technological environments;
+Added: and events such as natural disasters.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
−Removed: We reported net income for the year ended December 31, 2022 of $33.3 million, compared to net income of $28.8 million for the same period of 2021.
−Removed: The increase was primarily due to a $15.9 million increase in net interest income, partially offset by a $9.0 million increase in noninterest expense and a $2.5 million increase in provision for loan losses.
−Removed: We reported net income for the year ended December 31, 2021 of $28.8 million, compared to net income of $13.1 million for the same period of 2020.
−Removed: The increase was primarily due to a $15.7 million increase in net interest income and $5.4 million decrease in provision for loan losses, partially offset by a $6.7 million increase in provision for income taxes.
−Removed: Year Ended December 31,
−Removed: ($ in thousands) 2022 Change 2021 Change 2020
+Added: We reported net income for the year ended December 31, 2023 of $23.9 million, a decrease of $9.4 million, or 28.2%, compared to net income of $33.3 million for the same period of 2022.
+Added: The decrease was primarily due to a $8.2 million decrease in net interest income, a $3.4 million decrease in noninterest income and a $2.9 million increase in noninterest expense, offset by a $3.8 million decrease income tax expense and a $1.3 million decrease in provision for credit losses.
+Added: We reported net income for the year ended December 31, 2022 of $33.3 million, and increase of $4.5 million, or 15.5%, compared to net income of $28.8 million for the same period of 2021.
+Added: The increase was primarily due to a $15.9
+Added: million increase in net interest income, partially offset by a $9.0 million increase in noninterest expense and a $2.5 million increase in provision for credit losses.
+Added: Year Ended December 31, Change 2023 vs.
+Added: 2022 Change 2022 vs.
+Added: ($ in thousands) 2023 2022 2021
Interest income $ 121,665 $ 88,212 $ 64,158 $ 33,453 $ 24,054
1 unchanged sentence
Net interest income 68,687 76,911 61,026 (8,224) 15,885
−Removed: Provision for (reversal of) loan losses 2,976 2,454 522 (5,439) 5,961
+Added: Provision for credit losses 1,651 2,976 522 (1,325) 2,454
Noninterest income 14,181 17,619 16,017 (3,438) 1,602
5 unchanged sentences
The management of interest income and expense is fundamental to our financial performance.
−Removed: Net interest income, the difference between interest income and interest expense, is the largest component of the Company’s total revenue.
+Added: Net interest income, the difference between interest income and interest expense, is the largest component of our total revenue.
Management closely monitors both total net interest income and the net interest margin (net interest income divided by average earning assets).
−Removed: We seek to maximize net interest income without exposing the Company to an excessive level of interest rate risk through our asset and liability policies.
+Added: We seek to maximize net interest income without exposing us to an excessive level of interest rate risk through our asset and liability policies.
Interest rate risk is managed by monitoring the pricing, maturity and repricing options of all classes of interest-bearing assets and liabilities.
39 unchanged sentences
Cost of funds 2.78 % 0.66 %
−Removed: (1) Includes income and average balances for Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) and Pacific Coast Bankers Bank (“PCBB”) stock, CRA qualified mutual fund, term federal funds, interest-earning time deposits and other miscellaneous interest-earning assets.
+Added: (1) Includes income and average balances for Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) and Pacific Coast Bankers Bank stock, CRA qualified mutual fund, term federal funds, interest-earning time deposits and other miscellaneous interest-earning assets.
(2) Average loan balances include non-accrual loans and loans held for sale.
36 unchanged sentences
Cost of funds 0.66 % 0.22 %
−Removed: (1) Includes income and average balances for Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) and Pacific Coast Bankers Bank (“PCBB”) stock, CRA qualified mutual fund, term federal funds, interest-earning time deposits and other miscellaneous interest-earning assets.
+Added: (1) Includes income and average balances for Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) and Pacific Coast Bankers Bank stock, CRA qualified mutual fund, term federal funds, interest-earning time deposits and other miscellaneous interest-earning assets.
(2) Average loan balances include non-accrual loans and loans held for sale.
48 unchanged sentences
2023 Compared to 2022
+Added: Net interest income decreased $8.2 million, or 10.7%, to $68.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2023 from $76.9 million for the same period of 2022, primarily due to higher interest expense on deposits, partially offset by higher interest income on loans and investments.
+Added: Interest expense on deposits increased $38.2 million to $49.4 million for the year 2023, compared with $11.2 million for the same period of 2022.
+Added: The increase was primarily due to a 32.1% increase in average balance of interest-bearing deposits and a 285 basis point increase in average cost of interest-bearing deposits driven by the Federal Reserve's rate increases.
+Added: Average balance of interest-bearing deposits increased $295 million or 32.1% compared with the same period of 2022 because a $167 million increase in average balance of loans and a $182 million decrease in noninterest-bearing deposits for the year 2023 were primarily funded through the increase in interest-bearing deposits.
+Added: Average cost of interest-bearing deposits increased a 285 basis point to 4.1% for the year ended December 31, 2023, from 1.2% for the same period of 2022, primarily due to the Federal Reserve’s rate increases.
+Added: Interest income on total investments, including interest-bearing deposits in other banks and available-for-sale debt securities, increased $5.9 million primarily due to a 175 basis point increase in average yield on total investments to 3.79% for the year 2023 from 2.04% for the same period of 2022 driven by the Federal Reserve’s rate increases and higher yields on securities purchased in 2023.
+Added: Interest income on loans increased $27.6 million to $110.5 million for the year 2023 compared with $82.9 million for the year 2022, primarily due to a $167 million increase in average balance of loans and a 108 basis point increase in average yield on loans.
+Added: Net interest margin was 3.37% for the year ended December 31, 2023, a 81 basis point decrease from 4.18% for the same period of 2022, primarily due to a 171 basis point decrease in net interest spread from the higher increase in average cost of interest-bearing deposits compared to the increase in average yield on loans and investments.
+Added: 2022 Compared to 2021
Net interest income increased $15.9 million, or 26.0%, to $76.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2022 from $61.0 million for the same period of 2021, primarily due to higher interest income on loans.
7 unchanged sentences
Net interest margin was 4.18% for the year ended December 31, 2022, a 16 basis point increase from 4.02% for the same period of 2021, primarily due to a 56 basis point increase in average yield on interest-earning assets.
−Removed: 2021 Compared to 2020
−Removed: Net interest income for the year ended December 31, 2021 was $61.0 million compared to $45.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, an increase of $15.7 million, or 34.5%.
−Removed: This increase was primarily due to a $10.5 million increase in interest income from SBA loans, a $155.0 million increase in average SBA loan balance and a $5.2 million decrease in interest expense.
−Removed: Total interest income was $64.2 million in 2021, compared to $53.7 million in 2020, an increase of $10.5 million, or 19.6%.
−Removed: This increase was primarily due to an increase in interest earned on SBA loans.
−Removed: Interest and fees on loans was $62.4 million in 2021, compared to $51.8 million in 2020, an increase of $10.6 million, or 20.5%.
−Removed: This increase in interest income on loans was primarily due to a $155.0 million increase in average loan balance resulting from the purchase of loan portfolio from the Hana Small Business Lending, ("Hana") and PPP originations.
−Removed: Interest income on total investments was $1.7 million in 2021, compared to $1.8 million in 2020.
−Removed: Interest income on securities available for sale decreased $92 thousand, or 7.8%, to $1.1 million in 2021, compared to $1.2 million in 2020.
−Removed: The decrease was primarily due to a 60 basis point decrease in the average yield, partially offset by a 52.0% increase in the average balance of securities available for sale.
−Removed: Interest income on federal funds sold and other investments decreased $25 thousand, or 3.8%, to $625 thousand in 2021 from $650 thousand in 2020, due to a 27 basis point decrease in the average yield on the federal funds sold and other investments, partially offset by a 55.5% increase in the average balance of federal funds sold and other investments held by the Company.
−Removed: Total interest expense was $3.1 million in 2021, compared to $8.3 million in 2020, a decrease of $5.2 million, or 62.2%.
−Removed: The decrease was primarily due to a 77 basis point decrease in the average rate paid on interest-bearing deposits as a result of the downward adjustments of the Company’s rates paid on interest-bearing deposits in response to the rate decreases by the Federal Reserve.
−Removed: The average balance of interest-bearing liabilities increased $39.0 million to $743.5 million at December 31, 2021 from $704.5 million at December 31, 2020.
−Removed: Provision for Loan Losses
+Added: Provision for Credit Losses
Credit risk is inherent in the business of making loans.
−Removed: We establish an allowance for loan losses through charges to earnings, which are shown in the statements of operations as the provision for loan losses.
+Added: We establish an allowance for credit losses both on loans and off-balance sheet commitments through charges to earnings, which are shown in the statements of operations as the provision for credit losses.
Specifically identifiable and quantifiable known losses are promptly charged off against the allowance.
−Removed: The provision for loan losses is determined by conducting a quarterly evaluation of the adequacy of our allowance for loan losses and charging the shortfall or excess, if any, to the current quarter’s expense.
+Added: The provision for credit losses is determined by conducting a quarterly evaluation of the adequacy of our allowance for credit losses and charging the shortfall or excess, if any, to the current quarter’s expense.
This has the effect of creating variability in the amount and frequency of charges to earnings.
−Removed: The provision for loan losses and level of allowance for each period are dependent upon many factors, including loan growth, net charge-offs, changes in the composition of the loan portfolio, delinquencies, management’s assessment of the quality of the loan portfolio, the valuation of problem loans and the general economic conditions in our market area.
+Added: The provision for credit losses and level of allowance for each period are dependent upon many factors, including loan growth, net charge-offs, changes in the composition of the loan portfolio, delinquencies, management’s assessment of the quality of the loan portfolio, the valuation of problem loans and the general economic conditions in our market area.
2023 Compared to 2022
+Added: The provision for credit losses was $1.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to $3.0 million for the same period of 2022.
+Added: The $1.7 million in the provision for credit losses was mainly composed of a $735 thousand increase in qualitative reserves and a $754 thousand increase in net charge-offs for the year 2023.
+Added: The qualitative reserves were primarily due to upward adjustments to qualitative factors based on deteriorating economic and business conditions in 2023 compared to 2022 and an increasing trend in nonperforming and classified loans in our loan portfolio.
+Added: There was no change in quantitative reserves in 2023 as a $450 thousand increase in reserves from loan growth in 2023 was offset by an equivalent release of reserves from decreases in historical loss factors.
+Added: 2022 Compared to 2021
The provision for loan losses was $3.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to $522 thousand for the same period of 2021.
−Removed: The changes in quantitative reserves from loan growth in real estate and home mortgage loans accounted for an increase of $5.8 million in the provision for loan losses for the year ended December 31, 2022.
+Added: The changes in quantitative reserves from loan growth in real estate and home mortgage loans
+Added: accounted for an increase of $5.8 million in the provision for loan losses for the year ended December 31, 2022.
The changes in quantitative reserves included a $205 thousand decrease in the provision for accrued interest receivables on deferred loans.
The changes in qualitative factors, primarily due to improvements in economic conditions and commercial real estate concentration, accounted for a decrease of $2.8 million in the provision for loan losses for the year ended December 31, 2022.
−Removed: 2021 Compared to 2020
−Removed: The provision for loan losses was $522 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2021, compared to $6.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2020.
−Removed: Management evaluated the qualitative and quantitative factors on all loan types to reflect the COVID-19 pandemic’s prolonged potential adverse impacts on national, state, and local economic and business conditions.
−Removed: The changes in qualitative factors accounted for a decrease of $1.1 million, and the changes in quantitative factors accounted for an increase of $1.5 million in the provision for loan losses for the year ended December 31, 2021.
−Removed: The changes in quantitative factors included a $439 thousand decrease in the provision for accrued interest receivables on deferred loans.
−Removed: The allowance for loan losses as a percentage of gross loans was 1.15% and 1.23% as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
Noninterest Income
12 unchanged sentences
Total noninterest income $ 14,181 $ 17,619 $ (3,438) (19.5) %
−Removed: Noninterest income for the year ended December 31, 2022 was $17.6 million, an increase of $1.6 million, or 10.0%, compared to $16.0 million for the same period of 2021.
−Removed: Loan servicing fees, net of amortization, were $2.4 million, for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to $2.0 million for the same period of 2021.
−Removed: The increase was primarily due to an increase in loan servicing portfolio and lower amortization of loan servicing fees as a result of lower SBA loan payoffs.
−Removed: Our total SBA loan servicing portfolio was $702.1 million as of December 31, 2022, compared to $667.0 as of the same period of 2021.
−Removed: Gain on sale of loans was $12.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to $11.3 million for the same period of 2021, an increase of $1.0 million or 8.6%.
−Removed: The increase was primarily due to higher sales volume partially offset by lower average premium on loan sales.
+Added: Noninterest income for the year ended December 31, 2023 was $14.2 million, a decrease of $3.4 million, or 19.5%, compared to $17.6 million for the same period of 2022, primarily due to a decrease in gain on sale of loans.
+Added: Gain on sale of loans was $7.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to $12.3 million for the same period of 2022, a decrease of $4.4 million or 36.2%.
+Added: The decrease was primarily due to a lower sold amount in SBA loans and a lower average sales premium.
We sold $145.0 million of SBA loans with an average premium of 6.65% for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to a sale of $181.9 million of SBA loans with an average premium of 7.45% in the same period of 2022.
+Added: Other income was $1.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to $1.2 million, an increase of $523 thousand or 42.1%, primarily due to a $479 thousand increase in a holding gain on our equity in equity investments.
+Added: Equity investments had an unrealized holding gain of $48 thousand as of December 31, 2023 compared to an unrealized holding loss of $431 thousand as of December 31, 2022.
+Added: Service charges on deposit was $2.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to $1.7 million for the same period of 2022, an increase of $448 thousand or 26.7%, primarily due to an increase in deposit analysis fees from an increase in the number of analysis accounts.
2022 Compared to 2021
8 unchanged sentences
Total noninterest income $ 17,619 $ 16,017 $ 1,602 10.0 %
−Removed: Noninterest income for the year ended December 31, 2021 was $16.0 million, an increase of $5.2 million, or 48.7%, compared to $10.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2020.
−Removed: Income from service charges on deposit accounts was $1.6 million for 2021, compared to $1.4 million for 2020, an increase of $131 thousand, or 9.2%.
−Removed: The increase was primarily due to higher account analysis charges and wire transaction fees, partially offset by lower overdraft charges in the year ended December 31, 2021, compared to the same period in 2020.
−Removed: Total gain on sale of loans was $11.3 million in the year ended December 31, 2021, compared to $6.1 million for the same period of 2020, an increase of $5.2 million or 85.7%.
−Removed: Gain on sale of SBA loans totaled $11.0 million in the year ended December 31, 2021, compared to $5.9 million for the same period of 2020.
−Removed: We sold $110.3 million of SBA loans with an average premium of 11.0% in the year ended December 31, 2021, compared to the sale of $85.0 million of SBA loans with an average premium of 8.8% in the same period of 2020.
−Removed: We originated $304.9 million of SBA loans, including $88.1 million of SBA PPP loans, in 2021, compared to $204.1 million of SBA loans, including $66.3 million of SBA PPP loans, in 2020.
−Removed: Gain on sale of other loans for both periods were immaterial.
−Removed: Other income for 2021 were $1.2 million, compared to $1.4 million for 2020, a decrease of $203 thousand, or 14.6%.
−Removed: The decrease was primarily due to a $187 thousand decrease in fair value of equity investment in a mutual fund that the Company invested for CRA purposes.
+Added: Noninterest income for the year ended December 31, 2022 was $17.6 million, an increase of $1.6 million, or 10.0%, compared to $16.0 million for the same period of 2021.
+Added: Loan servicing fees, net of amortization, were $2.4 million, for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to $2.0 million for the same period of 2021.
+Added: The increase was primarily due to an increase in loan servicing portfolio and lower amortization of loan servicing fees as a result of lower SBA loan payoffs.
+Added: Our total SBA loan servicing portfolio was $702.1 million as of December 31, 2022, compared to $667.0 as of the same period of 2021.
+Added: Gain on sale of loans was $12.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to $11.3 million for the same period of 2021, an increase of $1.0 million or 8.6%.
+Added: The increase was primarily due to higher sales volume partially offset by lower average premium on loan sales.
+Added: We sold $181.9 million of SBA loans with an average premium of 7.45% for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to a sale of $110.3 million of SBA loans with an average premium of 11.04% in the same period of 2021.
Noninterest Expense
−Removed: 2022 Compared to 2021
+Added: 2023 Compared 2022
The following table sets forth the major components of our noninterest expense for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022:
13 unchanged sentences
Noninterest expense for the year ended December 31, 2023 was $47.7 million, compared with $44.8 million for the same period of 2022, an increase of $2.9 million or 6.5%.
−Removed: Salaries and employee benefits expense for the year ended December 31, 2022 was $27.2 million, compared to $21.3 million for the same period of 2021, an increase of $5.9 million, or 27.9%.
−Removed: The increase was primarily due to increased salaries as a result of additional employees to support continued growth of the Company.
−Removed: The average number of full-time equivalent employees was 207.2 in 2022 compared to 181.5 in 2021.
−Removed: Professional fees for the year ended December 31, 2022 was $1.6 million, compared to $1.2 million for the same period of 2021, an increase of $428 thousand, or 35.9%.
−Removed: The increase was primarily due to increases in accounting fees and other consulting fees.
−Removed: Occupancy and equipment expense for the year ended December 31, 2022 was $6.0 million, compared to $5.2 million for the same period of 2021, an increase of $751 thousand, or 14.4%.
−Removed: The increase was primarily due to a new branch opened in the first quarter of 2022 and increased equipment expense to support our continued growth.
−Removed: Foundation donation and other contributions for the year ended December 31, 2022 were $3.4 million, compared to $2.9 million for the same period of 2021, an increase of $503 thousand, or 17.4%.
−Removed: The increase was primarily due to higher donation accruals for Open Stewardship Foundation as a result of higher net income.
−Removed: Other expenses for the year ended December 31, 2022 were $2.5 million, compared to $1.5 million for the same period of 2021, an increase of $1.1 million, or 74.4%.
−Removed: The increase were primarily due to an increase in business development expense.
+Added: Salaries and employee benefits for the year ended December 31, 2023 was $29.6 million, compared to $27.2 million for the same period of 2022, an increase of $2.4 million, or 8.8%.
+Added: The increase was primarily due to a $1.0 million increase from a 17.2 increase in average number of full-time employees to 224.4 in 2023 from 207.2 in 2022, and a $850 thousand decrease in loan origination costs as a result of lower loan originations in 2023.
+Added: Occupancy and equipment for the year ended December 31, 2023 was $6.5 million, compared to $6.0 million for the same period of 2022, an increase of $526 thousand, or 8.8%.
+Added: The increase was primarily due to the opening of Spring Mountain Office in Las Vegas, Nevada and two renewed leases for branches in California.
+Added: FDIC insurance and regulatory assessments for the year ended December 31, 2023 was $1.5 million, compared to $813 thousand, an increase of $644 thousand, or 79.2%.
+Added: The increase was primarily due to our deposit growth from the same period of 2022 and an increase in FDIC assessment fees in 2023.
+Added: Foundation donations and other contributions for the year ended December 31, 2023 was $2.4 million, compared to $3.4 million, a decrease of $993 thousand, or 29.3%.
+Added: The decrease was primarily due to lower donation accruals for Open Stewardship Foundation as a result of lower net income.
2022 Compared to 2021
13 unchanged sentences
Total noninterest expense $ 44,830 $ 35,865 $ 8,965 25.0 %
−Removed: Salaries and employee benefits expense for the year ended December 31, 2021 was $21.3 million, compared to $20.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, an increase of $1.2 million, or 6.0%.
−Removed: The increase was primarily due to a $1.3 million increase from an increase in the number of employees to support continued growth and a $1.3 million increase in employee incentives for higher SBA loan originations and sales in 2021, partially offset by a $1.3 million increase in deferred loan origination costs.
+Added: Noninterest expense for the year ended December 31, 2022 was $44.8 million, compared with $35.9 million for the same period of 2021, an increase of $9.0 million, or 25.0%.
+Added: Salaries and employee benefits expense for the year ended December 31, 2022 was $27.2 million, compared to $21.3 million for the same period of 2021, an increase of $5.9 million, or 27.9%.
+Added: The increase was primarily due to increased salaries as a result of additional employees to support continued growth of the Company.
The average number of full-time equivalent employees was 207.2 in 2022 compared to 181.5 in 2021.
−Removed: The increase in deferred loan costs was primarily attributable to the origination of 1,979 new SBA PPP Loans, in the year ended December 31, 2021, compared to 983 new SBA PPP loans in the year ended December 31, 2020.
−Removed: Data processing and communication expense for 2021 was $2.0 million, compared to $1.7 million for 2020, an increase of $318 thousand, or 18.9%.
−Removed: This increase was primarily to support balance sheet growth.
−Removed: Our aggregate donations to the Foundation and other charitable and community contributions for 2021 were $2.9 million, compared to $1.3 million for 2020, an increase of $1.6 million, or 116.5%.
+Added: Professional fees for the year ended December 31, 2022 was $1.6 million, compared to $1.2 million for the same period of 2021, an increase of $428 thousand, or 35.9%.
+Added: The increase was primarily due to increases in accounting fees and other consulting fees.
+Added: Occupancy and equipment expense for the year ended December 31, 2022 was $6.0 million, compared to $5.2 million for the same period of 2021, an increase of $751 thousand, or 14.4%.
+Added: The increase was primarily due to a new branch opened in the first quarter of 2022 and increased equipment expense to support our continued growth.
+Added: Foundation donation and other contributions for the year ended December 31, 2022 were $3.4 million, compared to $2.9 million for the same period of 2021, an increase of $503 thousand, or 17.4%.
The increase was primarily due to higher donation accruals for Open Stewardship Foundation as a result of higher net income.
+Added: Other expenses for the year ended December 31, 2022 were $2.5 million, compared to $1.5 million for the same period of 2021, an increase of $1.1 million, or 74.4%.
+Added: The increase were primarily due to an increase in business development expense.
Income Tax Expense
+Added: Income tax expense was $9.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to $13.4 million for the same period of 2022, primarily due to a $13.2 million or 28.3% decrease in income before income tax to $33.5 million in 2023 from $46.7 million for 2022.
+Added: Effective tax rates were 28.6% and 28.7% for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
Income tax expense was $13.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to $11.8 million for the same period of 2021.
8 unchanged sentences
We recognized net deferred tax assets of $13.3 million and $14.3 million as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
−Removed: After consideration of the matters in the preceding paragraph, we have determined that it is more likely than not that net deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2022 and 2021 will be fully realized in future years.
+Added: After consideration of the matters in the preceding paragraph, we have determined that it is more likely than not that net deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2023 will be fully realized in future years.
FINANCIAL CONDITION
11 unchanged sentences
There were no held-to-maturity or trading securities in our investment portfolio as of December 31, 2023.
−Removed: All available-for-sale securities are carried at fair value and consist of U.S.
−Removed: government agencies or sponsored agency securities.
−Removed: Securities available-for-sale increased $59.4 million, or 39.5%, to $209.8 million at December 31, 2022 from $150.4 million at December 31, 2021, primarily due to purchases of $115.8 million, partially offset by principal paydowns of $32.2 million and an increase in unrealized loss of $23.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2022.
−Removed: No issuer of the available-for-sale securities, other than U.S.
−Removed: Government and its agencies, comprised more than ten percent of our shareholders’ equity as of December 31, 2022 and 2021.
+Added: All available-for-sale
+Added: securities are carried at fair value and consist of U.S.
+Added: government agencies or sponsored agency securities and tax-exempt municipal securities.
The following table summarizes the fair value of the available-for-sale securities portfolio as of the dates presented:
6 unchanged sentences
Residential collateralized mortgage obligations 162,142 144,459 (17,683) 179,953 160,045 (19,908)
+Added: Municipal securities - tax exempt 5,726 5,914 188 — — —
Total available-for-sale debt securities $ 216,186 $ 194,250 $ (21,936) $ 235,142 $ 209,809 $ (25,333)
+Added: Available-for-sale debt securities decreased $15.6 million, or 7.4%, to $194.3 million as of December 31, 2023 from $209.8 million as of December 31, 2022, primarily due to 24.4 million in principal paydowns, partially offset by purchases of $5.6 million in tax exempt municipal securities for the year ended December 31, 2023.
+Added: No issuer of the available-for-sale securities, other than U.S.
+Added: Government and its agencies, comprised more than ten percent of our shareholders’ equity as of December 31, 2023 and 2022.
Certain securities have fair values less than amortized cost and, therefore, contain unrealized losses.
−Removed: At December 31, 2022, we evaluated the securities which had an unrealized loss for other than temporary impairment (“OTTI”) and determined all decline in value to be temporary.
−Removed: We anticipate full recovery of amortized cost with respect to these securities by maturity, or sooner in the event of a more favorable market interest rate environment.
−Removed: We do not intend to sell these securities and it is not more likely than not that we will be required to sell them before recovery of the amortized cost basis, which may be at maturity.
+Added: The unrealized losses were primarily attributable to interest rate movement, not credit quality.
+Added: These securities (Fannie Mae, Ginnie Mae, and Freddie Mac) are guaranteed or sponsored by agencies of the U.S.
+Added: government, and the issuers of the securities are of high credit quality.
+Added: We believe that the net unrealized losses presented in the previous tables are temporary and no credit losses are expected.
+Added: As a result, we expects full collection of the carrying amount of these securities, does not intend to sell the securities in an unrealized loss position, and it was more-likely-than-not we will not have to sell these securities prior to recovery of amortized cost.
+Added: Accordingly, for available-for-sale debt securities, we did not record an allowance for credit losses on January 1, 2023 and does not have allowance for credit losses as of December 31, 2023.
The following table sets forth certain information regarding contractual maturities and the weighted average yields of our investment securities as of the dates presented.
10 unchanged sentences
Residential collateralized mortgage obligations — — 252 1.81 2,664 1.39 159,226 2.81
+Added: Municipal securities - tax exempt — — — — — — 5,726 5.14
Total available-for-sale debt securities $ — — % $ 1,334 2.11 % $ 3,304 1.56 % $ 211,548 2.75 %
1 unchanged sentence
Our loans represent the largest portion of our earning assets, substantially greater than the securities portfolio or any other asset category, and the quality and diversification of the loan portfolio is an important consideration when reviewing our financial condition.
−Removed: On May 24, 2021, the Company completed the purchase of the Hana’s loan portfolio and paid approximately $97.6 million that included loans of $100.0 million at a fair value discount of $8.9 million, servicing assets of $6.1 million and accrued interest receivable of $398 thousand.
−Removed: The following table summarizes the consideration paid for the loan portfolio and the amounts of assets purchased:
−Removed: ($ in thousands)
−Removed: Consideration
−Removed: Cash $ 97,631
−Removed: Recognized amounts of identifiable assets purchased:
−Removed: Loan discounts (8,867)
−Removed: Accrued interest receivable 398
−Removed: Servicing assets 6,097
−Removed: Total recognized identifiable assets $ 97,631
−Removed: (1) Consists of $92.2 million of SBA loans, $6.9 million PPP loans and $919 thousand of real estate loans.
The loan distribution table that follows sets forth our gross loans outstanding, and the percentage distribution in each category as of the dates indicated:
2 unchanged sentences
Commercial real estate $ 885,585 50.2 % $ 842,208 50.1 %
−Removed: SBA loan - real estate 221,340 13.2 220,099 16.8
−Removed: SBA loan - non-real estate 13,377 0.8 55,759 4.2
+Added: SBA—real estate 224,695 12.7 221,340 13.2
+Added: SBA—non-real estate 14,997 0.8 13,377 0.8
Commercial and industrial 120,970 6.9 116,951 7.0
2 unchanged sentences
Gross loans receivable 1,765,845 100.0 % 1,678,292 100.0 %
−Removed: Allowance for loan losses (19,241) (16,123)
+Added: Allowance for credit losses (21,993) (19,241)
Loans receivable, net (1)
$ 1,743,852 $ 1,659,051
−Removed: (1) Includes net deferred loan fees or costs, unamortized premiums and unaccreted discounts of $160 thousand and $7.0 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
+Added: (1) Includes net deferred loan costs and unamortized premiums of $140 thousand and $160 thousand as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
Gross loans increased $87.6 million, or 5.2%, to $1.77 billion as of December 31, 2023, compared to $1.68 billion as of December 31, 2022.
−Removed: The increase was primarily attributable to new loan production of $661.8 million and home mortgage loan purchases of $225.1 million, partially offset by loan payoffs and paydowns of $254.8 million and SBA loan sales of $182.3 million.
+Added: The increase was primarily attributable to new loan production of $374.5 million, partially offset by loan payoffs and paydowns of $213.8 million.
The following tables presents the contractual loan maturities by loan category and the contractual distribution of loans to changes in interest rates as of December 31, 2023 and 2022:
3 unchanged sentences
Commercial real estate $ 66,776 $ 84,427 $ 414,863 $ 79,933 $ 192,074 $ 47,512 $ 885,585
−Removed: SBA loans—real estate — — — 34 — 221,306 221,340
−Removed: SBA loan—non- real estate — 75 442 3,964 — 8,896 13,377
+Added: SBA—real estate — — — 25 — 224,670 224,695
+Added: SBA—non- real estate — 116 1 3,535 — 11,345 14,997
Commercial and industrial 18,478 30,172 7,996 27,154 23,644 13,526 120,970
6 unchanged sentences
Commercial real estate $ 27,735 $ 33,894 $ 387,902 $ 116,088 $ 248,812 $ 27,777 $ 842,208
−Removed: SBA loans—real estate — — — 42 395 219,662 220,099
−Removed: SBA loan—non- real estate 612 128 39,995 5,147 — 9,877 55,759
+Added: SBA—real estate — — — 34 — 221,306 221,340
+Added: SBA—non- real estate — 75 442 3,964 — 8,896 13,377
Commercial and industrial 8,905 27,917 1,611 28,082 31,185 19,251 116,951
2 unchanged sentences
Gross loans $ 36,640 $ 63,022 $ 389,955 $ 148,499 $ 745,746 $ 294,430 $ 1,678,292
−Removed: Our loan portfolio is concentrated in commercial real estate with the remaining balances in SBA loans (unguaranteed portion and PPP loans), home mortgage and commercial (primarily manufacturing, wholesale, and services oriented entities).
+Added: Our loan portfolio is concentrated in commercial real estate, which includes unguaranteed balances in SBA loans, home mortgage and commercial (primarily manufacturing, wholesale, and services oriented entities).
We do not have any material concentrations by industry or group of industries in the loan portfolio.
8 unchanged sentences
Adjustable rate loans are based on the Wall Street Journal prime rate.
−Removed: Our commercial real estate loan portfolio totaled $842.2 million at December 31, 2022 compared to $701.5 million at December 31, 2021.
+Added: Our commercial real estate loan portfolio totaled $885.6 million as of December 31, 2023 compared to $842.2 million as of December 31, 2022.
During the year ended December 31, 2023, we originated $103.3 million of commercial real estate loans.
2 unchanged sentences
As of December 31, 2023, our average loan to value for commercial real estate loans was 50.7%.
−Removed: Loans — SBA Loans :
+Added: Loans — SBA :
We are designated as an SBA Preferred Lender under the SBA Preferred Lender Program.
6 unchanged sentences
Our unguaranteed SBA loans collateralized by real estate are monitored by collateral type and included in our commercial real estate Concentration Guidance.
−Removed: As of December 31, 2022, our SBA portfolio totaled $234.7 million, including $442 thousand of SBA PPP loans, compared to $275.9 million, including $40.6 million of SBA PPP loans as of December 31, 2021.
+Added: As of December 31, 2023, our SBA portfolio totaled $239.7 million, compared to $234.7 million as of December 31, 2022.
We originated $141.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2023.
−Removed: We sold SBA loans of $181.9 million with 7.45% average premium and $110.3 million with 11.04% average premium during the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
+Added: We sold SBA loans of $145.0 million with a 6.65% average premium during year ended December 31, 2023.
From our total SBA loan portfolio, $224.7 million is secured by real estate and $15.0 million is unsecured or secured by business assets as of December 31, 2023.
9 unchanged sentences
Loan Servicing
−Removed: As of December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, we serviced $702.1 million, $667.0 million and $388.8 million, respectively, of SBA loans for others.
+Added: As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, we serviced $707.4 and $702.1 million, respectively, of SBA loans for others.
Activity for loan servicing rights was as follows:
7 unchanged sentences
Loan servicing rights are reported on our Consolidated Balance Sheets and reported net of amortization.
−Removed: Allowance for Loan Losses
−Removed: The allowance for loan losses is an estimate of probable incurred losses in the loan portfolio.
−Removed: Loans are charged-off against the allowance when management believes a loan balance is uncollectible.
−Removed: Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance for loan losses.
−Removed: Management’s methodology for estimating the allowance balance consists of several key elements, which include specific allowances on individual impaired loans and the formula driven allowances on pools of loans with similar risk characteristics.
−Removed: Allocations of the allowance may be made for specific loans, but the entire allowance is available for any loan that, in management’s judgment, should be charged-off.
−Removed: The allowance for loan losses is determined on a quarterly basis and reflects management’s estimate of probable incurred credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio.
−Removed: We also rely on internal and external loan review procedures to further assess individual loans and loan pools, and economic data for overall industry and geographic trends.
−Removed: The computation includes element of judgment and high levels of subjectivity.
−Removed: A loan is considered impaired when it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement.
−Removed: Impaired loans include loans on non-accrual status and performing restructured loans.
−Removed: Income from loans on non-accrual status is recognized to the extent cash is received and when the loan’s principal balance is deemed collectible.
−Removed: Depending on a particular loan’s circumstances, we measure impairment of a loan based upon either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s observable market price, or the fair value of the collateral less estimated costs to sell if the loan is collateral dependent.
−Removed: A loan is considered collateral dependent when repayment of the loan is based solely on the liquidation of the collateral.
−Removed: Fair value, where possible, is determined by independent appraisals, typically on an annual basis.
−Removed: Between appraisal periods, the fair value may be adjusted based on specific events, such as if deterioration of quality of the collateral comes to our attention as part of our problem loan monitoring process, or if discussions with the borrower lead us to believe the last appraised value no longer reflects the actual market value for the collateral.
−Removed: The impairment amount on a collateral-dependent loan is charged-off to the allowance if deemed not collectible and the impairment amount on a loan that is not collateral-dependent is set up as a specific reserve.
−Removed: In cases where a borrower experiences financial difficulties and we make certain concessionary modifications to contractual terms, the loan is classified as a troubled debt restructuring.
−Removed: These concessions may include a reduction of the interest rate, principal or accrued interest, extension of the maturity date or other actions intended to minimize potential losses.
−Removed: Loans restructured at a rate equal to or greater than that of a new loan with comparable risk at the time the loan is modified may be excluded from restructured loan disclosures in years subsequent to the restructuring if the loans are in compliance with their modified terms.
−Removed: A restructured loan is considered impaired despite its accrual status and a specific reserve is calculated based on the present value of expected cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or the fair value of the collateral less estimated costs to sell if the loan is collateral dependent.
−Removed: Interest income on impaired loans is accrued as earned, unless the loan is placed on non-accrual status.
−Removed: The allowance for loan losses was $19.2 million at December 31, 2022, compared to $16.1 million at December 31, 2021.
−Removed: The provision for loan losses was $3.0 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2022, compared to $522 thousand for the same period in 2021.
−Removed: The $3.0 million in provision for loan losses was primarily due to an increase of $5.8 million in quantitative reserves from loan growth in real estate and home mortgage loans, partially
−Removed: offset by a decrease of $2.8 million in qualitative assessments of our loan portfolio.
−Removed: The changes in qualitative factors were primarily due to improvements in economic conditions and commercial real estate concentration.
−Removed: In determining the allowance and the related provision for loan losses, we consider three principal elements:
−Removed: (i) valuation allowances based upon probable losses identified during the review of impaired commercial and industrial, commercial real estate, construction and land development loans;
−Removed: (ii) allocations, by loan classes, on loan portfolios based on historical loan loss experience and qualitative factors;
−Removed: and (iii) review of the credit discounts in relationship to the valuation allowance calculated for purchased loans.
−Removed: Provisions for loan losses are charged to operations to record changes to the total allowance to a level deemed appropriate by us.
−Removed: It is the policy of management to maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level adequate for risks inherent in the loan portfolio.
−Removed: The FDIC and the DFPI also review the allowance for loan losses as an integral part of their examination process.
−Removed: Based on information currently available, management believes that our allowance for loan losses is adequate.
−Removed: However, the loan portfolio can be adversely affected if California economic conditions and the real estate market in our market area were to weaken.
−Removed: The effect of such events, although uncertain at this time, could result in an increase in the level of nonperforming loans and increased loan losses, which could adversely affect our future growth and profitability.
−Removed: No assurance of the ultimate level of credit losses can be given with any certainty.
−Removed: Analysis of the Allowance for Loan Losses
−Removed: The following table provides an analysis of the allowance for loan losses, provision for loan losses and net charge-offs, by category, for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020:
−Removed: Year Ended December 31, 2022
−Removed: ($ in thousands) Beginning (Reversal) Provision (1)
−Removed: Charge-offs Recoveries Ending
+Added: Allowance for Credit Losses
+Added: We adopted ASU 2016-13 using a modified retrospective approach on January 1, 2023 without electing the fair value option on eligible financial instruments under ASU 2019-05.
+Added: We replaced the current incurred loss accounting model with the Current Expected Credit Losses ("CECL") approach for financial instruments measured at amortized cost and other commitments to extend credit.
+Added: CECL requires the immediate recognition of estimated credit losses expected to occur over the estimated remaining life of the asset.
+Added: The forward-looking concept of CECL requires loss estimates to consider historical experience, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts.
+Added: The adoption of this ASU increased the allowance for credit losses by $1.9 million and allowance for off-balance sheet commitments by $184 thousand.
+Added: We also recorded a deferred tax assets of $624 thousand and a decrease to opening retained earnings of $1.5 million on January 1, 2023.
+Added: The increase to allowance for credit losses was primarily longer duration of home mortgage loans, offset primarily by shorter duration of commercial and industrial loans.
+Added: We did not record an allowance for credit losses on our available-for-sale debt securities as a result of this adoption.
+Added: Disclosures for periods after January 1, 2023 are presented in accordance with ASC 326 while prior period amounts continue to be reported in accordance with previously applicable standards and the accounting policies.
+Added: We employ a modeled approach that takes into account current and future economic conditions to estimate lifetime expected losses on a collective basis.
+Added: With the adoption of CECL, we elected not to consider accrued interest receivable in its estimated credit losses because we write off uncollectible accrued interest receivable in a timely manner.
+Added: We consider writing off accrued interest amounts once the amounts become 90 days past due to be considered within a timely manner.
+Added: We have elected to write off accrued interest receivable by reversing interest income.
+Added: We use transition matrices to develop the Probability of Default ("PD") and Loss Given Default ("LGD") approach, incorporating quantitative factors and qualitative considerations in the calculation of the allowance for credit losses for collectively assessed loans.
+Added: The model provides forecasts of PD and LGD based on national unemployment rates using regression analysis.
+Added: We incorporate future economic conditions using a weighted multiple scenario approach:
+Added: baseline and adverse.
+Added: We apply a reasonable and supportable period of one year for the baseline scenario and two years for the adverse scenario, after which loss assumptions revert to historical loss information through a one-year reversion period for the baseline scenario and a two-year reversion period for the adverse scenario.
+Added: Additionally, we aggregated loan portfolio based on similar risk characteristic.
+Added: We elected to use the Call Report codes and loan risk ratings for loan segmentation in allowance for credit losses.
+Added: The allowance for credit losses is sensitive to numerous factors, including unemployment rate forecasts, change in asset quality, prepayment rates, and real estate indices.
+Added: Given the dynamic relationship between these factors within our model, it is difficult to estimate the impact of any one factor or input on the allowance for credit losses.
+Added: Changes in the factors and inputs considered may not occur at the same rate and may not be consistent across all geographies or product types.
+Added: Additionally, changes in factors and input may be discretionally inconsistent, such that improvement in one factor
+Added: may offset deterioration in others.
+Added: However, to provide additional context regarding the sensitivity of the allowance for credit losses to changes in key variable, we used the following assumptions in a sensitivity analysis of our allowance for credit losses:
+Added: unemployment rate forecast based on supervisory severely adverse scenario, 0% prepayment rates, loan risk grade changes of commercial real estate and commercial and industrial loan portfolio in worst case scenario based on our history, and applying a 100% weighting to severely adverse scenario.
+Added: The analysis demonstrates the sensitivity to the allowance for credit losses to key quantitative assumptions and it is not intended to estimate changes in the overall allowance for credit losses and it does not capture all the potential unknown variables that could arise in the forecast period, but it provides an approximation of a possible outcome under hypothetical severe conditions.
+Added: In order to quantify the credit risk impact of other trends and changes within the loan portfolio, we utilize qualitative adjustments to the modeled estimated loss approaches.
+Added: Included in the qualitative portion of our analysis of the allowance for credit losses are key inputs including GDP, unemployment rates, interest rates, asset quality ratios, loan portfolio concentration, California house price index and commercial real estate price index.
+Added: The parameters for making adjustments are established under a Credit Risk Matrix that provides different possible scenarios for each of the factors listed below.
+Added: The Credit Risk Matrix and the possible scenarios enable the Bank to qualitatively adjust the loss rates.
+Added: This matrix considers the following nine factors, which are patterned after the guidelines provided under the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council Interagency Policy Statement on the Allowance for Credit Losses, updated to reflect the adoption of CECL:
+Added: • Changes in lending policies and procedures, including changes in underwriting standards and practices for collection, charge-offs, and recoveries;
+Added: • Actual and expected changes in national and local economic and business conditions and developments in which the institution operates that affect the collectivity of loans;
+Added: • Changes in the nature and volume of the loan portfolio;
+Added: • Changes in the experience, ability, and depth of lending management and staff;
+Added: • Changes in the volume and severity of past due loans, the volume of nonaccrual loans, and the volume and severity of adversely classified loans;
+Added: • Changes in the quality of the credit review function;
+Added: • Changes in the value of the underlying collateral for loans that are not collateral-dependent;
+Added: • The existence, growth, and effect of any concentrations of credit, and
+Added: • The effect of other external factors, such as the regulatory, legal and technological environments;
+Added: and events such as natural disasters.
+Added: We segment loans primarily by Call Report codes (collateral type) and loan risk ratings, considering that the same type of loans share considerable similar risk characteristics.
+Added: For loans that do not share similar risk characteristics such as nonaccrual loans above $500 thousand, we evaluate these loans on an individual basis in accordance with ASC 326.
+Added: Such nonaccrual loans are considered to have different risk profiles than performing loans and are therefore evaluated individually.
+Added: We elected to collectively assess nonaccrual loans with balances below $500 thousand along with the performing and accrual loans, in order to reduce the operational burden of individually assessing small nonaccrual loans with immaterial balances.
+Added: For individually assessed loans, the allowance for credit losses is measured using either 1) the present value of future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate;
+Added: or 2) the fair value of the collateral, if the loan is collateral-dependent.
+Added: For the collateral-dependent loans, we obtain a new appraisal to determine the fair value of collateral.
+Added: The appraisals are based on an “as-is” valuation.
+Added: To ensure that appraised values remain current, we obtain updated appraisals every twelve months from a qualified independent appraiser.
+Added: If the fair value of the collateral is less than the amortized balance of the loan, we recognize an allowance for credit losses with a corresponding charge to the provision for credit losses.
+Added: Collateral-dependent loans are loans where repayment is expected to be provided solely by the sale of the underlying collateral and there are no other available and reliable sources of repayment.
+Added: The estimated credit losses for these loans are based on the collateral’s fair value less selling costs.
+Added: In most cases, the Company records a partial charge-off to reduce the loan’s carrying value to the collateral’s fair value less selling costs at the time of foreclosure.
+Added: As of December 31, 2023, there were $5.2 million of collateral-dependent loans which are primarily secured by residential and commercial real estate, as well as equipment.
+Added: The allowance for credit losses allocated to these loans as of December 31, 2023 was $355 thousand.
+Added: The following table represents the amortized cost basis of collateral-dependent loans by class of loans as of December 31, 2023, for which repayment is expected to be obtained through the sale of the underlying collateral.
+Added: ($ in thousands) Hotel / Motel Single-Family Residential Total
+Added: As of December 31, 2023
+Added: SBA—real estate $ 2,923 $ — $ 2,923
+Added: Home mortgage — 2,241 2,241
+Added: Total $ 2,923 $ 2,241 $ 5,164
+Added: We maintain a separate allowance for credit losses for off-balance sheet commitments.
+Added: We use an estimated funding rate to allocate an allowance to undrawn exposures.
+Added: This funding rate is used as a credit conversion factor to capture how much undrawn lines of credit can potentially become drawn at any point.
+Added: The funding rate is determined based on a look-back period of 8 quarters.
+Added: Credit loss is not estimated for off-balance sheet commitments that are unconditionally cancellable by us.
+Added: The allowance for credit losses was $22.0 million as of December 31, 2023, compared to $19.2 million as of December 31, 2022.
+Added: $1.7 million provision of credit losses was recorded for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to provision for credit losses of $3.0 million for the same period in 2022.
+Added: Analysis of the Allowance for Credit Losses
+Added: The following table provides an analysis of the allowance for credit losses, provision for credit losses and net charge-offs, by category, for the year ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021:
+Added: As of and for the Year Ended December 31, 2023
+Added: ($ in thousands) Beginning Impact of CECL Adoption Provision (Reversal) Net (Charge-offs) Recoveries Ending
Commercial real estate $ 6,951 $ 875 $ 723 $ (634) $ 7,915
−Removed: SBA loans—real estate 2,022 (409) (14) 8 1,607
−Removed: SBA loan—non- real estate 199 66 (127) 69 207
+Added: SBA—real estate 1,607 (238) 321 (33) 1,657
+Added: SBA—non- real estate 207 (142) 73 9 147
Commercial and industrial 1,643 (320) (11) (97) 1,215
3 unchanged sentences
Gross loans (1)
−Removed: Allowance for loan losses to gross loans 1.15 %
+Added: Allowance for credit losses to gross loans 1.25 %
Average loans (1)
−Removed: Net (recoveries) charge-offs to average gross loans 0.00 %
−Removed: Year Ended December 31, 2021
−Removed: ($ in thousands) Beginning (Reversal) Provision (1)
−Removed: Charge-offs Recoveries Ending
+Added: Net (charge-offs) recoveries to average gross loans (2)
+Added: As of and for the Year Ended December 31, 2022
+Added: ($ in thousands) Beginning Provision (Reversal) Net (Charge-offs) Recoveries Ending
Commercial real estate $ 8,150 $ (1,199) $ — $ 6,951
−Removed: SBA loans—real estate 1,802 279 (59) — 2,022
−Removed: SBA loan—non- real estate 278 54 (136) 3 199
+Added: SBA—real estate 2,022 (409) (6) 1,607
+Added: SBA—non- real estate 199 66 (58) 207
Commercial and industrial 2,848 (1,205) — 1,643
5 unchanged sentences
Average loans (1)
−Removed: Net (recoveries) charge-offs to average gross loans 0.02 %
−Removed: Year Ended December 31, 2020
−Removed: ($ in thousands) Beginning Provision (Reversal) (1)
−Removed: Charge-offs Recoveries Ending
+Added: Net (charge-offs) recoveries to average gross loans (2)
+Added: As of and for the Year Ended December 31, 2021
+Added: ($ in thousands) Beginning Provision (Reversal) Net (Charge-offs) Recoveries Ending
Commercial real estate $ 8,505 $ (355) $ — $ 8,150
−Removed: SBA loans—real estate 939 863 — — 1,802
−Removed: SBA loan—non- real estate 121 174 (45) 28 278
+Added: SBA—real estate 1,802 279 (59) 2,022
+Added: SBA—non- real estate 278 54 (133) 199
Commercial and industrial 2,563 285 — 2,848
5 unchanged sentences
Average loans (1)
−Removed: Net (recoveries) charge-offs to average gross loans 0.00 %
−Removed: (1) Excludes (reversal of) provision for uncollectible accrued interest receivable of $(205) thousand, $(438) thousand, and $643 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
+Added: Net (charge-offs) recoveries to average gross loans (2)
(1) Excludes loans held for sale.
−Removed: The following table presents an allocation of the allowance for loan losses by portfolio as of December 31, 2022 and 2021:
+Added: (2) Annualized.
+Added: The following table presents an allocation of the allowance for credit losses by portfolio as of December 31, 2023 and 2022:
December 31, 2023 December 31, 2022
1 unchanged sentence
Commercial real estate $ 7,915 36.0 % $ 6,951 36.1 %
−Removed: SBA loans—real estate 1,607 8.4 2,022 12.5
−Removed: SBA loan—non- real estate 207 1.1 199 1.2
+Added: SBA—real estate 1,657 7.5 1,607 8.4
+Added: SBA—non- real estate 147 0.7 207 1.1
Commercial and industrial 1,215 5.5 1,643 8.5
8 unchanged sentences
When loans are placed on non-accrual status, all interest previously accrued, but not collected, is reversed against current period interest income.
−Removed: Income on non-accrual loans is subsequently recognized only to the extent that cash is received, and the loan’s principal balance is deemed collectible.
+Added: Income on non-accrual loans is subsequently
+Added: recognized only to the extent that cash is received, and the loan’s principal balance is deemed collectible.
Loans are restored to accrual status when loans become well-secured and management believes full collectability of principal and interest is probable.
Nonperforming loans include loans that are 90 days past due and still accruing, loans accounted for on a non-accrual basis and accruing restructured loans.
−Removed: Nonperforming assets consist of nonperforming loans plus OREO.
−Removed: Nonperforming loans were $3.1 million at December 31, 2022, compared to $3.2 million at December 31, 2021.
−Removed: As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, nonaccrual loans of $1.0 million and $1.0 million, respectively were the guaranteed portion of SBA loans.
+Added: Nonperforming assets consist of nonperforming loans plus other real estate owned ("OREO").
+Added: Nonperforming loans were $6.1 million as of December 31, 2023, compared to $2.0 million as of December 31, 2022.
+Added: Nonperforming loans excluded the guaranteed portion of SBA loans of $2.0 million and $1.0 million as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
Real estate we acquire as a result of foreclosure or by deed-in-lieu of foreclosure is classified as OREO until sold, and is initially recorded at fair value less costs to sell when acquired, establishing a new cost basis.
5 unchanged sentences
Past due loans 90 days or more and still accruing — —
−Removed: Accruing troubled debt restructured loans — —
Total nonperforming loans (1)
−Removed: Other real estate owned — —
Total nonperforming assets $ 6,082 $ 2,033
1 unchanged sentence
Nonperforming assets to total assets 0.28 % 0.10 %
−Removed: Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans 625 % 504 %
+Added: Allowance for credit losses to nonperforming loans 362 % 946 %
+Added: (1) Excludes guaranteed portion of SBA loans of $2.0 million and $1.0 million as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
Deposits and Other Sources of Funds
3 unchanged sentences
The following table show the composition of deposits by type as of the dates presented:
−Removed: As of December 31,
−Removed: 2022 2021 2020
−Removed: ($ in thousands) Amount Percent Amount Percent Amount Percent
+Added: December 31, 2023 December 31, 2022
+Added: ($ in thousands) Amount Percent Amount Percent
Noninterest-bearing demand $ 522,751 28.9 % $ 701,584 37.2 %
17 unchanged sentences
As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, we had maximum borrowing capacity from the FHLB of $655.9 million and $582.8 million, respectively.
−Removed: We had no borrowing from FHLB as of December 31, 2022 and 2021.
−Removed: Liquidity and Capital Recourses
+Added: We had $105.0 million borrowings from FHLB as of December 31, 2023 and no borrowing from FHLB as of December 31, 2022.
+Added: The Company had estimated uninsured deposits of $1.14 billion, or 63.3% of total deposits, and $1.14 billion, or 60.3% of total deposits, as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
+Added: Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity refers to the measure of our ability to meet the cash flow requirements of depositors and borrowers, while at the same time meeting our operating, capital and strategic cash flow needs, all at a reasonable cost.
3 unchanged sentences
Other alternative sources of funds will supplement these primary sources to the extent necessary to meet additional liquidity requirements on either a short-term or long-term basis.
−Removed: Deposits are the primarily funding source for the Bank.
−Removed: Deposits provide a stable source of funding and reduce the Company's reliance on the wholesale funding markets.
−Removed: The following table presents the loan and deposit balances, the loans-to-deposit ratios, and deposits as a percentage of total liabilities as of dates presented:
−Removed: As of December 31,
+Added: Deposits are the primary funding source for the Bank.
+Added: Deposits provide a stable source of funding and reduce our reliance on the wholesale funding markets.
+Added: The following table presents the loan and deposit balances, the loans-to-deposit ratios, and deposits as a percentage of total liabilities as of December 31, 2023 and 2022:
($ in thousands) 2023 2022
3 unchanged sentences
Loans-to-deposits ratio 96.5 % 88.0 %
−Removed: In addition to deposits, the Company has access to various sources of wholesale funding, as well as borrowing capacity at the FHLB, Federal Reserve, and correspondent banks to sustain an adequate liquid asset portfolio, meet daily cash demands and allow management flexibility to execute the business strategy.
−Removed: Economic conditions and the stability of
−Removed: capital markets impact the access to and the cost of wholesale funding.
+Added: In addition to deposits, we have access to various sources of wholesale funding, as well as borrowing capacity at the FHLB, Federal Reserve, and correspondent banks to sustain an adequate liquid asset portfolio, meet daily cash demands and allow management flexibility to execute the business strategy.
+Added: Economic conditions and the stability of capital markets impact the access to and the cost of wholesale funding.
The access to capital markets is also affected by the ratings received from various credit rating agencies.
We had $100.0 million of unsecured federal funds lines with no amounts advanced as of December 31, 2023 and 2022.
−Removed: In addition, on such dates we had lines of credit from the Federal Reserve discount window of $175.6 million and $141.6 million..
+Added: In addition, on such dates we had lines of credit from the Federal Reserve discount window of $183.0 million and $175.6 million, respectively.
The Federal Reserve discount window lines were collateralized by a pool of commercial real estate loans and commercial and industrial loans totaling $251.0 million and $254.7 million as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
−Removed: We did not have any borrowings outstanding with the Federal Reserve as of December 31, 2022 or 2021, and our borrowing capacity is limited only by eligible collateral.
+Added: We did not have any borrowings outstanding with the Federal Reserve as of December 31, 2023 or December 31, 2022, and our borrowing capacity is limited only by eligible collateral.
Based on the values of loans pledged as collateral, we had $363.6 million of additional borrowing availability with the FHLB as of December 31, 2023.
We also maintain relationships in the capital markets with brokers to issue certificates of deposit and money market accounts.
−Removed: The Company maintains liquidity in the form of cash and cash equivalents, and unencumbered high-quality and liquid AFS debt securities.
−Removed: The following table presents the Company's liquid assets as of dates presented:
−Removed: As of December 31,
−Removed: ($ in thousands) 2022 2021
+Added: We maintain ample access to liquidity, including highly liquid assets on our balance sheet and available unused borrowings from other financial institutions.
+Added: The following table presents our liquid assets and available borrowings as of December 31, 2023 and 2022:
+Added: ($ in thousands) December 31, 2023 December 31, 2022 % Change
+Added: Liquid assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 91,216 $ 82,972 9.9 %
AFS debt securities 194,250 209,809 (7.4)
−Removed: Total liquid assets $ 292,781 $ 265,903
+Added: Liquid assets $ 285,466 $ 292,781 (2.5) %
+Added: Liquid assets to total deposits 15.8 % 15.5 %
+Added: Available borrowings:
+Added: FHLB $ 363,615 $ 440,358 (17.4) %
+Added: Federal Reserve Bank 182,989 175,605 4.2
+Added: Pacific Coast Bankers Bank 50,000 50,000 —
+Added: Zions Bank 25,000 25,000 —
+Added: First Horizon Bank 25,000 24,950 0.2
+Added: Total available borrowings $ 646,604 $ 715,913 (9.7) %
+Added: Total available borrowings to total deposits 35.8 % 38.0 %
+Added: Liquid assets and available borrowings to total deposits 51.6 % 53.5 %
The following tables summarizes short- and long-term material cash requirements as of December 31, 2023, which we believe that we will be able to fund these obligations through cash generated from our operations and available alternative sources of funds:
7 unchanged sentences
Operating lease commitments 2,586 3,809 3,605 1,925 — 11,925
+Added: Advances from FHLB (2)
+Added: 30,000 75,000 — — — 105,000
Commitments to fund investment for Low Income Housing Tax Credit 6,564 4,465 318 558 — 11,905
2 unchanged sentences
(2) Excludes accrued interest.
−Removed: In addition to contractual obligations, other commitments of the Company impact liquidity.
+Added: In addition to contractual obligations, other commitments of us impact liquidity.
These include unused commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit and commercial letters of credit.
−Removed: Since many of these commitments expire without being drawn upon, and each customer must continue to meet the conditions established in the contract, the total amount of these commercial commitments does not necessarily represent the future cash requirements of the Company.
−Removed: The Company's liquidity sources have been, and are expected to be, sufficient to meet the cash requirements of its lending activities, Information about the Company's loan commitments, standby letters of credit and commercial letters of credit is provided in Note 10.
+Added: Since many of these commitments expire without being drawn upon, and each customer must continue to meet the conditions established in the contract, the total amount of these commercial commitments does not necessarily represent the future cash requirements of us.
+Added: Our liquidity sources have been, and are expected to be, sufficient to meet the cash requirements of its lending activities, Information about our loan commitments, standby letters of credit and commercial letters of credit is provided in Note 10.
Commitments and Contingencies to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-K.
4 unchanged sentences
The capital amounts and classifications are subject to qualitative judgments by the federal banking regulators regarding components, risk weightings and other factors.
−Removed: Qualitative measures established by regulation
−Removed: to ensure capital adequacy required us to maintain minimum amounts and various ratios of CET1 capital, Tier 1 capital and total capital to risk-weighted assets and of Tier 1 capital to average consolidated assets, referred to as the “leverage ratio.”
+Added: Qualitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy required us to maintain minimum amounts and various ratios of CET1 capital, Tier 1 capital and total capital to risk-weighted assets and of Tier 1 capital to average consolidated assets, referred to as the “leverage ratio.”
The table below also summarizes the capital requirements applicable to us and the Bank in order to be considered “well-capitalized” from a regulatory perspective, as well as our and the Bank’s capital ratios as of December 31, 2023 and 2022.
17 unchanged sentences
Bank 206,936 9.49 87,207 4.00 109,008 5.00 87,207 4.00
−Removed: (1) The capital requirements are only applicable to the Bank, and the Company's ratios are included for comparison purpose.
+Added: (1) The capital requirements are only applicable to the Bank, and our ratios are included for comparison purpose.
As of December 31, 2022 Actual (1)
13 unchanged sentences
Bank 192,477 9.29 82,836 4.00 103,545 5.00 82,836 4.00
−Removed: (1) The capital requirements are only applicable to the Bank, and the Company's ratios are included for comparison purpose.
+Added: (1) The capital requirements are only applicable to the Bank, and our ratios are included for comparison purpose.
Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.