LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
−Removed: 2019, our subsidiary, HTS USA, INC., was in litigation with Sagy Amit, a former employee.
−Removed: As of the date of this filing, the case has been resolved.
−Removed: The Company is currently pursuing legal
−Removed: claims against two former employees who resigned from the Company to launch a competing business, RedLPR LLC (the “RedLPR
−Removed: case”).
−Removed: The claims include trade secret misappropriation and tortious interference.
−Removed: The RedLPR case was filed in the U.S.
−Removed: District Court, District of Utah on June 24, 2019.
−Removed: The Company recently was named a defendant
−Removed: in a Mississippi state lawsuit that is directly related to the RedLPR case (the “Mississippi case”).
−Removed: The Mississippi
−Removed: case also names RedLPR, LLC as a defendant.
−Removed: The Mississippi case was brought by Riverland Park Technologies (“Riverland”).
−Removed: Riverland is also a party to the RedLPR case.
−Removed: The Mississippi case was filed in the Circuit Court of Rankin County, Mississippi
−Removed: on September 21, 2020.
−Removed: The Company was named a defendant in
−Removed: a case involving a former employee who claims he is owed approximately $60 thousand in unpaid commissions.
−Removed: The Company’s
−Removed: position is that the former employee’s claims have no apparent factual basis and appear to be designed to force a quick
−Removed: “nuisance value”
−Removed: This case was filed in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Diego
−Removed: on October 21, 2020.
+Added: The Company was named a defendant in a case involving
+Added: a former employee who claims he is owed approximately $60 thousand in unpaid commissions.
+Added: The Company intends to defend the
+Added: This case was filed in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Diego on October 21, 2020.
MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.