What changed in this filing

/stocks — the workspaceLOADING

Item 1A. Risk Factors

2021-02-22 compared with 2020-02-21 · 281 added, 346 removed, 88 unchanged (88% of the section changed)

1 unchanged sentence

Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or future results.

Business and Operating Risks

Declines in crude oil prices to record low levels as a result of the COVID-19 outbreak and a significantly oversupplied crude oil market have negatively impacted, and are expected to continue to negatively impact, demand for our products and services resulting in a material negative impact on our results of operations, financial position and liquidity.

Public health crises, pandemics and epidemics, such as the ongoing outbreak of COVID-19, have adversely impacted and are expected to continue to adversely impact our operations, the operations of our customers and the global economy, including the worldwide demand for oil and natural gas and the level of demand for our services.

Fear of such events has also altered the level of capital spending by oil and gas companies for exploration and production activities and adversely affected the economies and financial markets of many countries resulting in an economic downturn that has affected demand for our services.

A significant majority of states as well as local jurisdictions have imposed, and others in the future may impose, quarantines, executive orders and similar government orders and restrictions for their residents to control the spread of COVID-19.

Such orders or restrictions, and the perception that such orders or restrictions could occur, have resulted in business closures, work stoppages, slowdowns and delays, work-from-home policies, travel restrictions and cancellation of events, among other effects.

In an effort to minimize the spread of illness, we and our customers have implemented various worksite restrictions as well as quarantining in order to minimize the chances of a potential COVID-19 outbreak, which could result in decreased operational effectiveness and disruptions in our equipment delivery and supply chain for our customers.

As of the date of filing of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2020, our manufacturing and services facilities are open, but our operations still face certain interruptions related to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Even once the worst impacts have subsided, the COVID-19 pandemic could continue to adversely impact our business through, for example, reductions in the demand for gasoline by consumers who may be more inclined to work from home than commute to work.

We are continuing to monitor the impact of COVID-19 on our business, including as a result of changes in consumer behavior, which has resulted in a decrease in the demand for crude oil and natural gas and, consequently, our products and services.

Contemporaneously with the widespread outbreak of COVID-19 in the United States, the increase in crude oil supply resulting from production escalations from OPEC, combined with a decrease in crude oil demand stemming from the uncertainties surrounding COVID-19 resulted in a sharp decline in crude oil prices.

In response, a number of our exploration and production company customers announced significant reductions in capital spending for drilling, completion, production and other projects on which our products and services would be used.

These reductions in spending and activity levels have negatively impacted, and we expect they will continue to negatively impact, demand for our products and services, the prices we can charge for those products and services and, as a result, our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition.

Although OPEC, its members and other state-controlled oil companies ultimately agreed to reduce production and many operators have shut-in production in the United States, supply continues to exceed demand and crude oil prices remain volatile and at lower levels.

Further actions among OPEC members and other producing nations as to production levels and prices could result in further declines in crude oil prices, which would prove detrimental, particularly given the weak demand environment for crude oil and associated products caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.

The extent to which COVID-19 and lower crude oil prices impacts our results, financial position and liquidity will depend on future developments, such as the availability of effective treatments and vaccines, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted.

Demand for the majority of our products and services is substantially dependent on the levels of expenditures by companies in the oil and natural gas industry.

Lower oil and natural gas prices since 2014 have significantly reduced the demand for our products and services and the prices we are able to charge.

Lower oil and natural gas prices have significantly reduced the demand for our products and services and the prices we are able to charge.

This has had and may continue to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Demand for most of our products and services depends substantially on the level of expenditures by companies in the oil and natural gas industry.

Lower oil and natural gas prices since 2014 have caused a reduction in most of our customers' drilling, completion and other production activities and related spending on our products and services.

The reduction in demand from our customers has resulted in an oversupply of many of the services and products we provide, and such oversupply has substantially reduced the prices we can charge our customers for many of our products and services.

Although oil prices improved since the trough in 2016, these price improvements have not resulted in significant global improvements in the demand for our products and services or the prices we are able to charge.

If oil prices remain persistently low or decline further, our customers' activity levels and spending, along with the prices we charge, could worsen.

In addition, a continuation or worsening of these conditions may result in a material adverse impact on certain of our customers' liquidity and financial position, resulting in further spending reductions, delays in the collection of amounts owing to us and similar impacts.

These conditions have had, and may continue to have, an adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, and it is difficult to predict how long the current depressed commodity price environment will continue.

While conditions in our industry improved in 2018, particularly in the shale resource plays in the United States, crude oil prices again declined significantly beginning in the fourth quarter of 2018.

Given the historical volatility of crude oil prices, there remains a degree of risk that prices could remain highly volatile due to increases in global inventory levels, increasing domestic or international crude oil production, trade tensions with China, sanctions on Iranian production and tensions with Iran, civil unrest in Libya and Venezuela, increasing price differentials between markets, slowing growth rates in China and other global regions, use of alternative fuels, improved vehicle fuel efficiency, a more sustained movement to electric vehicles and/or the potential for ongoing supply/demand imbalances.

If oil prices remain low or decline further, we could encounter difficulties such as an inability to access needed capital on attractive terms or at all, the incurrence of asset impairment charges, the inability to meet financial ratios contained in our debt agreements, the need to reduce our capital spending and other similar impacts.

For example, our reduced EBITDA during recent periods resulted in our inability to access the full borrowing capacity available under our Revolving Credit Facility as a result of the maximum leverage ratio covenant.

As more fully disclosed in Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations under the heading "Liquidity, Capital Resources and Other Matters," we discuss our expectations regarding liquidity and covenant compliance for 2020.

Many factors affect the supply of and demand for oil and natural gas and, therefore, influence product prices, including:

Demand for most of our products and services depends substantially on the level of capital expenditures invested in the oil and natural gas industry.

The decline in crude oil prices, coupled with higher crude oil inventory levels in 2020, caused rapid reductions in most of our customers' drilling, completion and production activities which resulted in an oversupply of many of our services and products and substantially reduced the prices we could charge our customers for these services and products.

A continuation or worsening of these conditions may result in a material adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, and it is difficult to predict how long the current commodity price environment will continue.

Prices could remain highly volatile and have adverse effects on our business and operations due to numerous factors, including:

• public health crises, such as the COVID-19 outbreak at the beginning of 2020, which has negatively impacted the global economy, and correspondingly, the price of crude oil;

• worldwide demand for oil and natural gas;

• the level of drilling and completion activity;

2 unchanged sentences

• depletion rates;

worldwide demand for oil and natural gas;

• the expected cost of finding, developing and producing new reserves;

2 unchanged sentences

• the availability of transportation infrastructure for oil and natural gas, refining capacity and shifts in end-customer preferences toward fuel efficiency and the use of natural gas;

public health crises, such as the coronavirus outbreak at the beginning of 2020, which could impact the global economy;

• global weather conditions and natural disasters;

1 unchanged sentence

• national government political requirements, including the ability and willingness of OPEC to set and maintain production levels and prices for oil and government policies which could nationalize or expropriate oil and natural gas exploration, production, refining or transportation assets;

shareholder activism or activities by non-governmental organizations to limit or cease certain sources of funding for the energy sector or restrict the exploration, development and production of oil and natural gas;

• shareholder activism or activities by non-governmental organizations to limit or cease certain sources of funding for the energy sector or restrict the exploration, development, production and transportation of oil and natural gas;

• the impact of armed hostilities involving one or more oil producing nations;

rapid technological change and the timing and extent of development of energy sources, including liquefied natural gas or alternative fuels;

• rapid technological change and the timing and extent of development of energy sources, including liquefied natural gas as well as solar, wind and other renewable energy sources;

• environmental and other governmental laws and regulations;

1 unchanged sentence

In response to lower oil prices, many of our customers have reduced or delayed their capital spending, which reduced the demand for our products and services and exerted downward pressure on the prices paid for our products and services.

Although some of our customers increased their 2019 capital expenditure budgets, these customers are still spending significantly less than their pre-2015 levels.

Additionally, if oil prices remain at current levels or decline further, these customers may further reduce their spending levels.

We expect that we will continue to encounter weakness in the demand for, and prices of, our products and services until commodity prices stabilize at higher levels and our customers' capital spending increases.

Any prolonged reduction in the overall level of exploration and production activities, whether resulting from changes in oil and natural gas prices or otherwise, could materially adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows in many ways including by negatively affecting:

our equipment utilization, revenues, cash flows and profitability;

Any prolonged reduction in the overall level of exploration and production activities, whether resulting from changes in oil and natural gas prices or otherwise, could have an adverse effect on our equipment utilization, revenues, cash flows and profitability;

our ability to obtain additional capital to finance our business and the cost of that capital;

our ability to attract and retain skilled personnel.

and our ability to attract and retain skilled personnel.

We might be unable to compete successfully with other companies in our industry.

The markets in which we operate are highly competitive and certain of them have relatively few barriers to entry.

The principal competitive factors in our markets are product, equipment and service quality, availability, responsiveness, experience, technology, safety performance and price.

In some of our product and service offerings, we compete with the oil and natural gas industry's largest oilfield service providers.

These large national and multi-national companies have greater financial, technical and other resources, and greater name recognition than we do.

Several of our competitors provide a broader array of services and have a stronger presence in more geographic markets.

In addition, we compete with many smaller companies capable of competing effectively on a regional or local basis.

Our competitors may be able to respond more quickly to new or emerging technologies and services, and changes in customer requirements.

Many contracts are awarded on a bid basis, which further increases competition based on price.

As a result of competition, we may lose market share or be unable to maintain or increase prices for our present products and services, or to acquire additional business opportunities, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Consolidation of our customers and competitors may impact our results of operations.

The oil and gas industry has historically experienced periods of consolidation which has accelerated since the COVID-19 pandemic began.

Industry consolidation may result in reduced capital spending by some of our customers, the acquisition of one or more of our primary customers or competitors or consolidated entities using size and purchasing power to seek pricing or other concessions, which may lead to decreased demand for our products and services.

In addition, recent, ongoing and future mergers, combinations and consolidations in our industry could result in existing competitors increasing their market share.

As a result, industry consolidation may have a significant negative impact on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

If we do not develop new competitive technologies and products, our business and revenues may be adversely affected.

The market for our products and services is characterized by continual technological developments to provide better performance in increasingly greater depths, higher pressure levels and harsher conditions.

If we are unable to design, develop and produce commercially competitive products in a timely manner in response to changes in technology, our business and revenues will be adversely affected.

Many of our competitors are large multinational companies that may have significantly greater financial resources than we have, and they may be able to devote greater resources to research and development of new systems, services and technologies than we are able to do.

In addition, competitors or customers may develop new technologies, which address similar or improved solutions to our existing technology.

In 2019, for example, our Downhole Technologies segment sales of perforating products declined due, in part, to the introduction of integrated gun systems by its competitors.

Additionally, the development and commercialization of new products and services requires substantial capital expenditures and we may not have access to needed capital at attractive rates or at all due to our financial condition, disruptions of the bank or capital markets, or other reasons beyond our control to continue these activities.

Should our technologies become the less attractive solution, our operations and profitability would be negatively impacted.

Our business and results of operations could be negatively impacted by security threats, including cybersecurity threats, and other disruptions.

We may experience various security threats, including cybersecurity threats to gain unauthorized access to sensitive information or to render data or systems unusable;

threats to the safety of our employees;

threats to the security of our facilities and infrastructure, or third-party facilities and infrastructure;

and threats from terrorist acts.

Although we devote significant resources to protect the information systems and data we rely on in our business, cybersecurity attacks in particular are evolving and include, use of phishing/ransomware attacks and fraudulent domain names/websites, among others, which increased in 2020 following the outbreak of COVID-19.

While we utilize various procedures and controls to monitor these security threats and mitigate our exposure to such threats and other disruptions, there can be no assurance that these procedures and controls will be sufficient in preventing security threats from materializing.

If any of these events were to materialize, they could lead to losses of sensitive information (including our intellectual property and customer data), critical infrastructure, personnel or capabilities, essential to our operations, and could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

Our inability to control the inherent risks of identifying and integrating businesses that we have or may acquire, including any related increases in debt or issuances of equity securities, could adversely affect our operations.

We continually review complementary acquisition opportunities and we may seek to consummate acquisitions of such businesses in the future.

However, we may not be able to identify and acquire acceptable acquisition candidates on favorable terms in the future or at all.

In addition, we may incur substantial indebtedness to finance future acquisitions and also may issue equity securities in connection with such acquisitions, which could impose a significant burden on our results of operations and financial condition and could result in significant dilution to stockholders.

We expect to gain certain business, financial, and strategic advantages as a result of business combinations we undertake, including synergies and operating efficiencies.

However, these transactions involve risks including:

• retaining key employees and customers of acquired businesses;

• retaining supply and distribution relationships key to the supply chain;

• increased administrative burden, including additional costs associated with regulatory compliance;

• diversion of management time and attention;

• developing our sales and marketing capabilities;

• managing our growth effectively;

• integrating operations, workforce, product lines and technology;

• managing tax and foreign exchange exposure;

• operating a new line of business;

• inability to pursue and protect patents covering acquired technology;

• addition of acquisition-related debt and increased expenses and working capital requirements;

• substantial accounting charges for restructuring and related expenses, write-off of in-process research and development, impairments of goodwill, amortization of intangible assets, and stock-based compensation expense;

• becoming subject to unanticipated liabilities of the acquired business, including litigation related to the acquired business;

• achieving the expected benefits from the acquisition, including certain cost savings and operational efficiencies or synergies.

If we fail to manage any of these risks successfully, our business could be harmed.

Our capitalization and results of operations may change significantly following an acquisition, and our stockholders may not have the opportunity to evaluate the economic, financial, and other relevant information that we will consider in evaluating future acquisitions.

For example, see Note 7, "Long-term Debt," and Note 14, "Commitments and Contingencies," to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10‑K for a discussion of certain unanticipated issues and claims that have arisen following the GEODynamics Acquisition.

We might be unable to employ and retain a sufficient number of key personnel.

We believe that our success depends upon our ability to employ and retain key personnel with both technical and business expertise.

As observed in the U.S.

shale play regions such as the Permian Basin in recent years, during periods of increased activity, the demand for such personnel is high, and the supply is limited.

When these events occur, our cost structure increases and our growth potential could be impaired.

Conversely, during periods of reduced activity, we are forced to reduce headcount, freeze or reduce wages, and implement other cost-saving measures which could lead skilled personnel to migrate to other industries.

We depend on several significant customers in each of our business segments, and the loss of one or more such customers or the inability of one or more such customers to meet their obligations to us, could adversely affect our results of operations.

While no customer accounted for more than 10% of our consolidated revenues in 2020 or 2019, Halliburton Company individually accounted for 10% of our total consolidated revenues in 2018.

The loss of a significant portion of customers in any of our business segments, or a sustained decrease in demand by any of such customers, could result in a loss of revenues and could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

In addition, the concentration of customers in one industry impacts our overall exposure to credit risk, in that customers may be similarly affected by changes in economic and industry conditions.

While we perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers, we do not generally require collateral in support of our trade receivables.

As a result of our industry concentration, risks of nonpayment and nonperformance by our counterparties are a concern in our business.

Many of our customers finance their activities through cash flow from operations, the incurrence of debt, or the issuance of equity.

In 2020, many of our customers experienced substantial reductions in their cash flows from operations, and some are experiencing liquidity shortages, lack of access to capital and credit markets, a reduction in borrowing bases under reserve-based credit facilities and other adverse impacts to their financial condition.

These conditions caused a number of our customers to claim bankruptcy protection in 2020 which could continue.

The inability, or failure of, our significant customers to meet their obligations to us, or their insolvency or liquidation, may adversely affect our financial results.

Weather conditions in our regions of operations may limit our ability to operate our business and could adversely affect our operating results, which are susceptible to seasonal earnings volatility.

Our operations are directly affected by seasonal differences in weather in the areas in which we operate, most notably in the Rocky Mountain and Northeast regions of the United States, where severe winter weather conditions can restrict access to work areas.

In addition, summer and fall completion and drilling activity can be restricted due to hurricanes and other storms

prevalent in the Gulf of Mexico and along the Gulf Coast.

As a result of these seasonal differences, full year results are not likely to be a direct multiple of any particular quarter or combination of quarters.

Many forecasters also expect that potential climate changes may have significant physical effects, such as increased frequency and severity of storms, floods and other climatic events and could have an adverse effect on our or our customers' operations.

Any unusual or prolonged severe weather or increased frequency thereof, such as freezing rain, earthquakes, hurricanes, droughts, or floods in our or our oil and gas exploration and production customers' areas of operations or markets, whether due to climate change or otherwise, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Our planning for normal climatic variation, insurance programs and emergency recovery plans may inadequately mitigate the effects of such weather conditions, and not all such effects can be predicted, eliminated or insured against.

Financial Risks

We may be unable to access the capital and credit markets or borrow on affordable terms to obtain additional capital that we may require.

We rely on our liquidity to pay our operating and capital expenditures, interest and principal payments on debt, taxes and other similar costs.

Historically, we have sought to finance the operation of our business primarily with cash on-hand and cash provided by operating activities, but we have also relied on capital from the bank and capital markets.

The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in significant disruption to and volatility in the global financial markets.

For companies like ours in the energy industry, this market disruption has significantly impacted the value of our common stock;

has and may continue to reduce our ability to access capital in the bank and capital markets;

and has and may continue to result in capital being available on less favorable terms, all of which could negatively affect our liquidity and our ability to fund our operations.

In addition, a recession or long-term market correction could further materially impact the value of our common stock, our access to capital or our liquidity or ability to generate cash from operations in the near and long-term.

If we are unable to access the bank and capital markets on favorable terms, or if we are not successful in raising capital at an attractive cost within the time period required or at all, we may not be able to grow or maintain our business, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Backlog in our Offshore/Manufactured Products segment is subject to unexpected adjustments and cancellations and, therefore, has limitations as an indicator of our future revenues and earnings.

The revenues projected in our Offshore/Manufactured Products segment backlog may not be realized or, if realized, may not result in profits.

Because of potential changes in the scope or schedule of our customers' projects, we cannot predict with certainty when or if backlog will be realized.

Material delays, cancellations or payment defaults could materially affect our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

Some of the contracts in our backlog are cancellable by the customer, subject to the payment of termination fees and/or the reimbursement of our costs incurred.

We typically have no contractual right to the total revenues reflected in our backlog once a project is canceled.

While backlog cancellations have not been significant in the past, we incurred cancellations totaling $2.2 million, $5.0 million and $6.5 million during 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

If commodity prices do not further improve, or decline, we may incur additional cancellations or experience further declines in our backlog.

We may assume contractual risks in developing, manufacturing and delivering products in our Offshore/Manufactured Products business segment.

Many of our products from our Offshore/Manufactured Products segment are ordered by customers under frame agreements or project-specific contracts.

In many cases these contracts stipulate a fixed price for the delivery of our products and impose liquidated damages or late delivery fees if we do not meet specific customer deadlines.

Our actual costs, and any gross profit realized on these fixed-price contracts, may vary from the expected contract economics for various reasons, including but not limited to:

• errors or omissions in estimates or bidding;

• changes in availability and cost of materials and labor;

• failures of our suppliers to deliver raw materials and other goods that comply with our specifications;

• variations in productivity from our original estimates;

• changes in tariffs or tax regimes;

• material changes in foreign currency exchange rates.

These variations and the risks inherent in our projects may result in reduced profitability or losses on projects.

Depending on the size of a project, variations from estimated contract performance could have a material adverse impact on our operating results.

In addition, there are other risks and liabilities associated with these contracts, such as consequential damages payable (generally as a result of our gross negligence or willful misconduct), unforeseen technical or logistical challenges in fulfilling the contracts, or warranty claims, any of which could result in our not being fully or properly compensated for the cost to develop, design, and manufacture the final product and resulting in a significant impact on our reported operating results as we progress towards completion of major jobs.

Exchange rate fluctuations could adversely affect our U.S.

reported results of operations and financial position.

In the ordinary course of our business, we enter into purchase and sales commitments that are denominated in currencies that differ from the functional currency used by our operating subsidiaries.

Currency exchange rate fluctuations can create volatility in our consolidated financial position, results of operations, and/or cash flows.

Although we may enter into foreign exchange agreements with financial institutions in order to reduce our exposure to fluctuations in currency exchange rates, these transactions, if entered into, will not eliminate that risk entirely.

To the extent that we are unable to match revenues received in foreign currencies with expenses paid in the same currency, exchange rate fluctuations could have a negative impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, and/or cash flows.

Additionally, because our consolidated financial results are reported in U.S.

dollars, if we generate net revenues or earnings in countries whose currency is not the U.S.

dollar, the translation of such amounts into U.S.

dollars can result in an increase or decrease in the amount of our net revenues and earnings depending upon exchange rate movements.

As a result, a material decrease in the value of these currencies relative to the U.S.

dollar may have a negative impact on our reported results of operations and cash flows.

Any currency controls implemented by local monetary authorities in countries where we currently operate could also adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Given the cyclical nature of our business, a severe prolonged downturn could negatively affect the value of our goodwill and other intangible assets.

2 unchanged sentences

We are required to at least annually review the goodwill and other intangible assets of our applicable reporting units (Completion Services, Downhole Technologies and Offshore/Manufactured Products) for impairment in value and to recognize a non-cash charge against earnings causing a corresponding decrease in stockholders' equity if circumstances, some of which are beyond our control, indicate that the carrying amounts will not be recoverable.

In the fourth quarter of 2019, for example, we recognized a goodwill impairment charge of $165 million in our Downhole Technologies reporting unit due to, among other factors, a reduction in our near-term outlook for demand related to our short-cycle products and services in the U.S.

shale play regions.

It is possible that we could recognize goodwill or other intangible assets impairment losses in the future if, among other factors:

In the first quarter of 2020, we recognized goodwill impairment charges totaling $406.1 million in our Completion Services, Downhole Technologies and Offshore/Manufactured Products reporting units due to, among other factors, the significant decline in our stock price and that of our peers and reduced growth rate expectations given weak energy market conditions resulting from the demand destruction caused by the global response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

In addition, the estimated returns required by market participants increased materially in our March 31, 2020 assessment from our assessment as of December 1, 2019, resulting in higher discount rates used in the discounted cash flow analysis.

While no additional provisions for impairment were identified during our December 1, 2020 assessment, it is possible that we could recognize goodwill or other intangible assets impairment losses in the future if, among other factors:

• global economic and industry conditions deteriorate;

• the outlook for future profits and cash flow for any of our reporting units deteriorate further as the result of many possible factors, including, but not limited to, increased or unanticipated competition, lack of technological development, further reductions in customer capital spending plans, loss of key personnel, adverse legal or regulatory judgment(s), future operating losses at a reporting unit, downward forecast revisions, or restructuring plans;

• laws, executive actions or regulatory initiatives are imposed, which significantly restrict, delay or otherwise reduce the drilling, completion and production of oil and natural gas wells;

• domestic and/or foreign income tax rates increase, or regulations change;

2 unchanged sentences

• our stock price experiences a sustained decline.

Laws, regulations and other regulatory initiatives regarding hydraulic fracturing could increase our costs of doing business and result in additional operating restrictions, delays or cancellations in the completion of oil and natural gas wells, or possible bans on the performance of hydraulic fracturing that may reduce demand for our products and services and could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Although we do not directly engage in hydraulic fracturing, a material portion of our Completion Services, Downhole Technologies and Offshore/Manufactured Products operations support many of our oil and natural gas exploration and production customers in such activities.

Hydraulic fracturing is an important and commonly used process for the completion of oil and natural

gas wells in targeted subsurface formations with low permeability, such as shale formations, and involves the pressurized injection of water, sand or other proppants and chemical additives into rock formations to stimulate oil and natural gas production.

Hydraulic fracturing onshore in the United States is typically regulated by state oil and natural gas commissions and similar agencies.

However, the practice continues to attract considerable public, scientific and governmental attention in certain parts of the country, resulting in increased scrutiny and regulation, including by federal agencies.

For example, in 2016, the EPA released its final report on the potential impacts of hydraulic fracturing on drinking water resources, concluding that "water cycle" activities associated with hydraulic fracturing may impact drinking water resources under certain circumstances.

Additionally, Congress has from time to time considered legislation to provide for federal regulation of hydraulic fracturing in the United States and to require disclosure of the chemicals used in the hydraulic fracturing process.

Due primarily to the threat of climate change arising from GHG emissions, certain candidates seeking the office of President of the United States in 2020 have pledged to take actions banning hydraulic fracturing of oil and natural gas.

At the state level, some states have adopted, and other states are considering adopting, legal requirements that could impose new or more stringent permitting, public disclosure or well construction requirements on hydraulic fracturing activities, including states where we or our customers operate, in addition to assessing more taxes, fees or royalties on production, or otherwise limiting the use of the technique.

For example, in April 2019, the Governor of Colorado signed Senate Bill 19-181 into law, which legislation, among other things, revises the mission of the state oil and gas agency from fostering energy development in the state to instead focusing on regulating the oil and natural gas industry, in a manner that is protective of public health and safety and the environment, as well as authorizing cities and counties to regulate oil and natural gas operations within their jurisdiction as they do other developments.

Among other things, the state oil and gas agency will consider enhanced safety and environmental protections during well development operations, including drilling and hydraulic fracturing activities.

States could also elect to place prohibitions on hydraulic fracturing, following the approach taken by the States of Vermont, Maryland and New York.

Local governments may seek to adopt ordinances within their jurisdictions regulating the time, place or manner of drilling activities in general or hydraulic fracturing activities in particular.

In the event that new or more stringent federal, state or local legal restrictions relating to use of the hydraulic fracturing process in the United States are adopted in areas where our oil and natural gas exploration and production customers operate, those customers could incur potentially significant added costs to comply with requirements relating to permitting, construction, financial assurance, monitoring, recordkeeping, and/or plugging and abandonment, as well as could experience delays or cancellations in the pursuit of production or development activities, any of which could reduce demand for the products and services of each of our business segments and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

In countries outside of the United States, including provincial, regional, tribal or local jurisdictions therein where we conduct operations, there may exist similar governmental restrictions or controls on our customers' hydraulic fracturing activities, which, if such restrictions or controls exist or are adopted in the future, our customers may incur significant costs to comply with such requirements or may experience delays or cancellations in the permitting or pursuit of their operations, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Explosive incidents arising out of dangerous materials used in our business could disrupt operations and result in bodily injuries and property damages, which occurrences could have a material adverse effect our business, results of operations and financial conditions.

Our Downhole Technologies business operations include the licensing, storage and handling of explosive materials.

Despite our use of specialized facilities to store and handle dangerous materials and our performance of employee training programs, the storage and handling of explosive materials could result in explosive incidents that temporarily shut down or otherwise disrupt our or our customers' operations or could cause restrictions, delays or cancellations in the delivery of our services.

It is possible that such incidents could result in death or significant injuries to employees and other persons.

Material property damage to us, our customers and third parties arising from an explosion or resulting fire could also occur.

Any explosion could expose us to adverse publicity and liability for damages or cause production restrictions, delays or cancellations, any of which occurrences could have a material adverse effect on our operating results, financial condition and cash flows.

Moreover, failure to comply with applicable requirements or the occurrence of an explosive incident may also result in the loss of our license to store and handle explosives, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial conditions.

Legislative and regulatory initiatives related to induced seismicity could result in operating restrictions or delays in the drilling and completion of oil and natural gas wells that may reduce demand for our products and services and could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Our oil and natural gas producing customers dispose of flowback water or certain other oilfield fluids gathered from oil and natural gas producing operations in accordance with permits issued by government authorities overseeing such disposal activities.

In recent years, wells in the United States used for the disposal by injection of flowback water or certain other oilfield fluids below ground into non-producing formations have been associated with an increased number of seismic events.

When seismic events are caused by human activity, such events are called induced seismicity and developing research suggests that the link between seismic events and wastewater disposal may vary by region and local geology.

In 2016, the U.S.

geological survey identified six states with the most significant hazards from induced seismicity:

Oklahoma, Kansas, Texas, Colorado, New Mexico, and Arkansas.

In response to concerns regarding induced seismicity, regulators in some states have imposed, or are considering imposing, additional requirements in the permitting of produced water disposal wells or otherwise to assess any relationship between seismicity and the use of such wells.

For example, in recent years, Oklahoma and Texas have issued rules for wastewater disposal wells that imposed certain permitting and operating restrictions and reporting requirements on disposal wells in proximity to faults.

States such as Oklahoma have also issued orders, from time to time, for certain wells where seismic incidents have occurred to restrict or suspend disposal well operations.

Another consequence of seismic events may be lawsuits alleging that disposal well operations have caused damage to neighboring properties or otherwise violated state and federal rules regulating waste disposal.

In countries outside of the United States where we conduct operations, there may exist similar governmental restrictions or controls over well disposal activities in an effort to limit the occurrence of induced seismicity.

Increased regulation and public scrutiny of induced seismicity could lead to greater opposition, including litigation, to oil and natural gas activities utilizing injection wells for waste disposal.

As a result, our customers may have to limit disposal well volumes, disposal rates or locations, or require those customers or third party disposal well operators that are used to dispose of customers' wastewater to shut down disposal wells, which developments could adversely affect our customers' business and result in a corresponding decrease in the need for our products and services, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Legal or Regulatory Risks

We do business in international jurisdictions which exposes us to unique risks.

13 unchanged sentences

• changes in trade activity;

military or social situations, such as a widespread outbreak of an illness such as the coronavirus or other public health issues, in foreign areas where we do business, and the possibilities of war, other armed conflict or terrorist attacks;

• military or social situations, such as a widespread outbreak of an illness such as COVID-19 or other public health issues, in foreign areas where we do business, and the possibilities of war, other armed conflict or terrorist attacks;

• regional economic downturns.

2 unchanged sentences

Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (the "FCPA"), and similar anti-bribery laws in other jurisdictions, including the United Kingdom Bribery Act 2010, generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to foreign officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business.

We operate in many parts of the world that have experienced governmental

corruption to some degree and, in certain circumstances, strict compliance with anti-bribery laws may conflict with local customs and practices and impact our business.

We operate in many parts of the world that have experienced governmental corruption to some degree and, in certain circumstances, strict compliance with anti-bribery laws may conflict with local customs and practices and impact our business.

Any failure to comply with the FCPA or other anti-bribery legislation could subject us to civil and criminal penalties or other sanctions, which could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

8 unchanged sentences

tariffs on steel and aluminum, the European Union and several other countries, including Canada and China, have threatened and/or imposed retaliatory tariffs.

The effect of these new tariffs and the application and interpretation of existing trade agreements and customs, anti-dumping and countervailing duty regulations continues to evolve, and we continue to monitor these matters.

The effect of these tariffs and the application and interpretation of existing trade agreements and customs, anti-dumping and countervailing duty regulations continues to evolve,

and we continue to monitor these matters.

If we encounter difficulty in procuring these raw materials and component products, or if the prices we have to pay for these products increase further as a result of customs, anti-dumping and countervailing duty regulations or otherwise, and we are unable to pass corresponding cost increases on to our customers, our financial position and results of operations could be adversely affected.

1 unchanged sentence

See Note 14, "Commitments and Contingencies," to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10‑K for further discussion.

Additional domestic and international deepwater drilling laws, regulations and other restrictions, any delays in the processing and approval of drilling permits and exploration, development, oil spill-response and decommissioning plans and any other offshore-related developments may reduce demand for our services and products and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or results of operations.

A significant portion of our Offshore/Manufactured Products segment provides products and services for oil and natural gas exploration and production customers operating offshore in the deepwaters of the United States' outer continental shelf ("OCS") and in other countries.

In the United States, the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management ("BOEM") and the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement ("BSEE"), each an agency of the U.S.

Department of the Interior, have, over time, imposed more stringent permitting procedures and regulatory safety and performance requirements with respect to new wells to be drilled in federal waters.

Our customers' compliance with these more stringent regulatory requirements, as well as with existing environmental and oil spill regulations, which compliance may be exacerbated by any uncertainties or inconsistencies in decisions and rulings by governmental agencies, delays in the processing and approval of drilling permits or exploration, development, oil spill-response and decommissioning plans and possible additional regulatory initiatives, could result in those customers incurring difficult and more costly actions and adversely affect, delay or curtail new drilling and ongoing development efforts.

Additionally, the trend in the United States over the past decade has been for governmental agencies to continue to evaluate and, as necessary, develop and implement new, more restrictive requirements that could result in additional costs, delays, restrictions or obligations on offshore oil and natural gas exploration and production operations, although in recent years under the Trump Administration, there have been actions seeking to mitigate or delay certain of those more rigorous standards.

For example, in 2016, the BSEE under the Obama Administration published a final rule on well control that, among other things, imposed rigorous standards relating to the design, operation and maintenance of blowout preventers, real-time monitoring of deepwater and high temperature, high pressure drilling activities, and enhanced reporting requirements.

Pursuant to certain executive orders issued by President Trump in 2017 ("Executive Orders"), however, the BSEE initiated a review of the well control rule and other offshore rules and initiatives to determine whether they are consistent with the stated policy of encouraging energy exploration and production, while ensuring that any such activity is safe and environmentally responsible.

One consequence of this review is that in May 2019, the BSEE published final revisions to the existing April 2016 rule on well control that, among other things, eliminated the requirement for a BSEE-approved verification organization for third party-parties providing certifications of certain critical well control functions and the removal or modification of certain other prescriptive requirements.

Additional consequences of this BSEE review were (i) the September 2018 BSEE publication of final revisions to its Production Safety Systems Rule, pursuant to which the agency removed a requirement for offshore operators to certify through an independent third party that their critical safety and pollution prevention equipment (e.g., subsea safety equipment, including blowout preventers) was operational and functioning as designed in the most

extreme conditions , and (ii) a June 2017 delay in implementation of a Notice to Lessees and Operators ("NTL") issued by BSEE under the Obama Administration that would bolster supplemental bonding procedures for the decommissioning of offshore wells, platforms, pipelines, and other facilities by oil and natural gas exploration and production operators on the OCS.

Implementation of this NTL could result in significant increases in financial assurances for our customers operating on the OCS but the NTL was delayed indefinitely beyond June 30, 2017 so that BOEM could further assess this financial assurance program.

This delay is expected to be temporary in nature.

There exists the possibility that certain of these recent mitigatory actions under the Trump Administration could be withdrawn or revised in the future by a different administration to impose or re-implement more stringent standards.

Moreover, due primarily to the threat of climate change arising from GHG emissions, certain candidates seeking the office of President of the United States in 2020 have pledged to take actions banning new mineral leases on federal properties, including offshore leases on the OCS.

Outside of the United States, there are countries and provincial, regional, tribal or local jurisdictions therein where our offshore oil and gas exploration and production customers are conducting business that also have, or may be developing, regulatory initiatives or analogous controls that regulate the permitting and regulatory safety and performance aspects of those customers’ development and production activities.

While the legal requirements imposed in foreign countries or jurisdictions therein may be similar in form to U.S.

laws and regulations, in some cases the actual implementation of these requirements may impose additional, or more stringent, conditions or controls that can significantly restrict, delay or cancel the permitting, development or expansion of an offshore energy project or substantially increase the cost of doing business offshore.

These regulatory actions, or any new rules, regulations, or legal initiatives or controls, whether in the United States under the Trump Administration or another administration following the 2020 U.S.

presidential elections or in other countries, that impose increased costs or more stringent operational standards could delay or disrupt our customers' operations, increase the risk of expired leases due to the time required to develop new technology, result in increased supplemental bonding and costs and limit activities in certain areas, or cause our customers to incur penalties, fines, or shut-in production at one or more of their facilities or result in the suspension or cancellation of leases, any or all of which could reduce demand for our products and services under our Offshore/Manufactured Products segment.

While the United States under the Trump Administration has generally indicated an interest in scaling back or rescinding regulations that inhibit the development of the domestic oil and natural gas industry, it is difficult to predict the extent to which such policies will be implemented or the outcome of any litigation challenging such implementation.

Also, if material spill events were to occur in the future, the United States or other countries where such an event were to occur could elect to issue directives to temporarily cease drilling activities and, in any event, may from time to time issue further safety and environmental laws and regulations regarding offshore oil and natural gas exploration and development, any of which developments could have a material adverse effect on our business.

We cannot predict with any certainty the full impact of any new laws, regulations or legal initiatives or controls on our customers' drilling operations or on the cost or availability of insurance to cover the risks associated with such operations.

The matters described above, individually or in the aggregate, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Consolidation of our customers and competitors may impact our results of operations.

The oil and gas industry continues to experience consolidation.

In addition, recent, ongoing and future mergers, combinations and consolidations in our industry could result in existing competitors increasing their market share and may result in stronger competitors.

As a result, industry consolidation may have a significant negative impact on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

Exchange rate fluctuations could adversely affect our U.S.

reported results of operations and financial position.

In the ordinary course of our business, we enter into purchase and sales commitments that are denominated in currencies that differ from the functional currency used by our operating subsidiaries.

Currency exchange rate fluctuations can create volatility in our consolidated financial position, results of operations, and/or cash flows.

Additionally, because our consolidated financial results are reported in U.S.

dollars, if we generate net revenues or earnings in countries whose currency is not the U.S.

dollar, the translation of such amounts into U.S.

dollars can result in an increase or decrease in the amount of our net revenues and earnings depending upon exchange rate movements.

As a result, a material decrease in the value of these currencies relative to the U.S.

dollar may have a negative impact on our reported results of operations and cash flows.

Any currency controls implemented by local monetary authorities in countries where we currently operate could also adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

The results of the United Kingdom's decision to withdraw from the European Union including subsequent exchange rate fluctuations and political and economic uncertainties may have a negative effect on global economic conditions, financial markets and our business.

4 unchanged sentences

Parliament ratified a withdrawal agreement between the U.K.

government and the European Union, which contemplates a transition period to allow time for a future trade deal to be agreed upon.

The terms of these trade agreements could potentially disrupt the markets we serve and the jurisdictions in which we operate and may cause us to lose customers, suppliers and employees.

The impact from Brexit on our business and operations will depend on the outcome of tariff, tax treaty, trade, regulatory and other negotiations, as well as the impact of the withdrawal on macroeconomic growth and currency volatility, which are uncertain at this time.

Any of these effects of Brexit could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

government and the European Union (the "EU"), which contemplated a transition period to end on December 31, 2020, to allow time for a future trade deal to be agreed upon.

On December 24, 2020, the U.K.

and the EU agreed on a trade and cooperation agreement (the "Trade and Cooperation Agreement"), which covers the general objectives and framework of the relationship between the U.K.

and the EU as it relates to trade, transport, visas, judicial, law enforcement and security matters, and continued participation in community programs and mechanisms for dispute resolution.

Notably, under the Trade and Cooperation Agreement, U.K.

service suppliers no longer benefit from automatic access to the entire EU single market, U.K.

goods no longer benefit from the free movement of goods and there is no longer the free movement of people between the U.K.

The terms of the Trade and Cooperation Agreement could potentially disrupt the markets we serve and the jurisdictions in which we operate and may cause us to lose customers, suppliers and employees.

Brexit and the Trade and Cooperation Agreement can subject us to increased risks, including but not limited to, changes in regulatory oversight, disruptions to supply, increases in prices, fees, taxes or tariffs on goods that are sold between the EU and the U.K., inspections or barriers on goods sold between the U.K.

and the EU, extra charges, and/or difficulty staffing.

Any of these risks could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We are currently in the process of evaluating our own risks and uncertainty related to what financial, trade, regulatory and legal implications this new Brexit trade deal could have on our U.K.

business operations.

This uncertainty also includes the impact on our customers' business operations and capital planning as well as the overall impact on the staffing industry.

While we have not experienced any direct material financial impact since Brexit in 2016, we cannot predict its future implications which could result in a negative impact on our financial position and results of operations.

Our Downhole Technologies segment operations include the licensing, storage and handling of explosive materials that are subject to regulation by the ATF and analogous state agencies.

It is possible that such incidents could result in death or significant injuries to employees and other persons.

Material property damage to us, our customers and third parties arising from an explosion or resulting fire could also occur.

Moreover, failure to comply with applicable requirements or the occurrence of an explosive incident may also result in the loss of our ATF or analogous state license to store and handle explosives, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial conditions.

We may not have adequate insurance for potential liabilities and our insurance may not cover certain liabilities, including litigation risks.

The products that we manufacture and the services that we provide are complex, and the failure of our equipment to operate properly or to meet specifications may greatly increase our customers' costs.

In addition, many of these products are used in inherently hazardous applications where an accident or product failure can cause personal injury or loss of life, damages to property, equipment, or the environment, regulatory investigations and penalties, and the suspension or cancellation of the end-user's operations.

If our products or services fail to meet specifications, or are involved in accidents or failures, we could

face warranty, contract, or other litigation claims for which we may be held responsible and our reputation for providing quality products may suffer.

In the ordinary course of business, we become the subject of various claims, lawsuits, and administrative proceedings, seeking damages or other remedies concerning our commercial operations, products, employees, and other matters, including occasional claims by individuals alleging exposure to hazardous materials as a result of our products or operations.

Some of these claims relate to the activities of businesses that we have sold, and some relate to the activities of businesses that we have acquired, even though these activities may have occurred prior to our acquisition of such businesses.

We maintain insurance to cover many of our potential losses, and we are subject to various self-retentions and deductibles under our insurance policies.

It is possible, however, that a judgment could be rendered against us in cases in which we could be uninsured and beyond the amounts that we currently have reserved or anticipate incurring for such matters.

Even a partially uninsured or underinsured claim, if successful and of significant size, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or consolidated financial position.

We also face the following other risks related to our insurance coverage:

• we may not be able to continue to obtain insurance on commercially reasonable terms;

• we may be faced with types of liabilities that will not be covered by our insurance, such as damages from environmental contamination, terrorist attacks or acts of war;

• the counterparties to our insurance contracts may pose credit risks;

• we may incur losses from interruption of our business or cybersecurity attacks that exceed our insurance coverage.

We might be unable to protect our intellectual property rights and we may be subject to litigation if another party claims that we have infringed upon its intellectual property rights.

We rely on a variety of intellectual property rights that we use in our businesses, including our patents relating to our FlexJoint ® , Merlin™ and SmartStart Plus ® technologies, and intervention and downhole extended-reach tools (including our HydroPull ® tool) utilized in the completion or workover of oil and natural gas wells.

The market success of our technologies will depend, in part, on our ability to obtain and enforce our proprietary rights in these technologies, to preserve rights in our trade secret and non-public information.

We may not be able to successfully preserve these intellectual property rights and these rights could be invalidated, circumvented or challenged.

In addition, we may be required to expend significant amounts of money pursuing and defending our intellectual property rights, and these proceedings may not ultimately be successful.

For example, during 2018 we incurred expenses in excess of $8 million in connection with patent defense.

In addition, the laws of some foreign countries in which our products and services may be sold do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States.

If any of our patents or other intellectual property rights are determined to be invalid or unenforceable, or if a court or other tribunal limits the scope of claims in a patent or fails to recognize our trade secret rights, our competitive advantages could be significantly reduced in the relevant technology, allowing competition for our customer base to increase, adversely affecting our competitive position.

In addition, the tools, techniques, methodologies, programs and components we use to provide our products and services may infringe, or be alleged to infringe, upon the intellectual property rights of others.

Infringement claims generally result in significant legal and other costs, and may distract us from running our core business.

Royalty payments under a license from third parties, if available, would increase our costs.

If a license was not available, we might not be able to continue providing a particular service or product.

Any of these developments could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Laws, regulations and other executive actions or regulatory initiatives regarding hydraulic fracturing could increase our costs of doing business and result in additional operating restrictions, delays or cancellations in the completion of oil and natural gas wells, or possible bans on the performance of hydraulic fracturing that may reduce demand for our products and services and could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

There exists federal regulatory initiatives and various state laws and regulations that have increased, and have the potential to further increase, the regulatory burden imposed on hydraulic fracturing.

Moreover, there also exists, under the Biden Administration, the potential for new or amended laws, regulations, executive actions and other regulatory initiatives that could impose more stringent restrictions on hydraulic fracturing, including potential restrictions on hydraulic fracturing by banning new oil and gas permitting on federal lands.

The Biden Administration issued an order temporarily suspending the issuance of new leases and authorizations on federal lands and waters for a period of 60 days beginning January 20, 2021, and subsequently issued a second order in January 2021 suspending the issuance of new leases on federal lands and waters pending completion of a study of current oil and gas practices.

Although theses suspensions do not limit existing operations under valid leases and are not applicable to tribal lands that the federal government holds in trust,

further constraints may be adopted by the Biden Administration in the future.

See "Part I, Item 1.

Business – Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety Matters" for more discussion on these hydraulic fracturing matters.

The occurrence of any one or more of these developments with respect to hydraulic fracturing in areas where our oil and natural gas exploration and production customers operate could result in potentially significant added costs to comply with requirements relating to permitting, construction, financial assurance, monitoring, recordkeeping, and/or plugging and abandonment.

In addition, they could experience restrictions, delays or cancellations in the pursuit of production or development activities.

Any of the foregoing could reduce demand for the products and services of one or more of our business segments and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

In countries outside of the United States, including provincial, regional, tribal or local jurisdictions therein where we conduct operations, there may exist similar governmental restrictions or controls on our customers' hydraulic fracturing activities, which, if such restrictions or controls exist or are adopted in the future, our customers may incur significant costs to comply with such requirements or may experience restrictions, delays or cancellations in the permitting or pursuit of their operations, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

In response, regulators in states in which our customers operate have adopted additional requirements related to seismicity and its potential association with hydraulic fracturing.

See "Part I, Item 1.

Business–Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety Matters" for more discussion on these seismicity matters.

The introduction of new environmental laws and regulations related to the disposal of wastes associated with the exploration or production of hydrocarbons could limit or prohibit the ability of our customers to utilize underground injection wells.

As a result, our customers may have to limit disposal well volumes, disposal rates or locations and, in some instances those customers, or third party disposal well operators that are used by those customers to dispose of the customers' wastewater, may be obligated to shut down disposal wells, which developments could adversely affect our customers' business and result in a corresponding decrease in the need for our products and services, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Imposition of laws, executive actions or regulatory initiatives to restrict, delay or cancel leasing, permitting or drilling activities in deepwaters of the United States or foreign countries may reduce demand for our services and products and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or results of operations.

In the United States, the Biden Administration has issued orders suspending the issuance of new oil and gas leases and authorizations on federal lands and waters, including the OCS.

Separately, President Biden has issued an executive order that commits to substantial action on climate change, calling for, among other things, the elimination of subsidies provided to the fossil fuel industry and an increased emphasis on climate-related risks across government agencies and economic sectors.

President Biden may pursue additional executive orders, new legislation and regulatory initiatives to further implement his regulatory agenda.

Additionally, regulatory agencies under the Biden Administration may issue new or amended rulemakings regarding deepwater leasing, permitting or drilling that could result in more stringent or costly restrictions, delays or cancellations in offshore oil and natural gas exploration and production activities, such as the Biden Administration's suspension of the issuance of authorizations for oil and gas activities on federal lands and waters, although the suspension does not limit existing operations under valid leases.

See "Part I, Item 1.

Business – Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety Matters" for more discussion on these deepwater regulatory matters.

Any new legislation, executive actions or regulatory initiatives, whether in the United States under the Biden Administration or in other countries, that impose increased costs, more stringent operational standards or result in significant delays, cancellations or disruptions in our customers' operations, increase the risk of losing leasing or permitting opportunities, expired leases due to the time required to develop new technology, increased supplemental bonding costs, or cause our customers to incur penalties, fines, or shut-in production at one or more of their facilities, any or all of which could reduce demand for our products and services.

exploration and development, any of which developments could have a material adverse effect on our business.

We cannot predict with any certainty the full impact of any new laws, regulations, executive actions or regulatory initiatives on our customers' drilling operations or the opportunity to pursue such operations, or on the cost or availability of insurance to cover the risks associated with such operations.

The matters described above, individually or in the aggregate, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We are subject to numerous environmental laws and regulations that may expose us to significant costs and liabilities.

Our operations are significantly affected by numerous laws and regulations domestically at the federal, regional, state, tribal and local levels or by foreign governments regarding the discharge of substances into the environment or otherwise relating to environmental protection.

We could be exposed to liabilities for cleanup costs, natural resource damages, and other damages under these laws and regulations, with certain of these legal requirements imposing strict liability for such damages and costs, even though our conduct was lawful at the time it occurred or the conduct resulting in such damage and costs were caused by prior operators or other third-parties.

Our oil and natural gas exploration and production customers are similarly subject to these environmental laws and regulations, which could result in increased costs or delay or cancel new drilling and ongoing development efforts, which developments could reduce the demand for our services and products.

Environmental laws and regulations in the United States and in foreign countries are subject to change in the future, possibly resulting in more stringent legal requirements.

If existing regulatory requirements or enforcement policies change or new regulatory or enforcement initiatives are developed and implemented in the future, we or our customers may be required to make significant, unanticipated capital and operating expenditures.

Examples of recent regulations or other regulatory initiatives in the United States include the following:

Ground-Level Ozone Standards.

In 2015, the EPA issued a final rule under the CAA, lowering the National Ambient Air Quality Standard ("NAAQS") for ground-level ozone from 75 parts per billion to 70 parts per billion under both the primary and secondary standards to provide requisite protection of public health and welfare, respectively.

Since that time, the EPA has issued area designations with respect to ground-level ozone and final requirements that apply to state, local, and tribal air agencies for implementing the 2015 NAAQS for ground-level ozone.

State implementation of the revised NAAQS could, among other things, require installation of new emission controls on some of our or our customers' equipment, result in longer permitting timelines, and significantly increase our or our customers' capital expenditures and operating costs.

EPA Review of Drilling Waste Classification.

Drilling, fluids, produced water and most of the other wastes associated with the exploration, development and production of oil or natural gas, if properly handled, are currently exempt from regulation as hazardous waste under the RCRA and instead, are regulated under RCRA's less stringent non-hazardous waste provisions.

However, it is possible that certain of our oil and natural gas customers' drilling and production wastes, now classified as non-hazardous, could be classified as hazardous wastes in the future.

For example, pursuant to a consent decree issued by the U.S.

District Court for the District of Columbia in late 2016, the EPA was required to propose by no later than March 15, 2019, a rulemaking for revision of certain Subtitle D criteria regulations that could result in oil and natural gas exploration and production wastes being regulated as hazardous wastes.

In response, the EPA conducted a review as required under the consent decree and, on April 23, 2019, issued its determination that revisions to the Subtitle D regulations were unnecessary.

Nonetheless, this determination could be made subject to legal challenge, or the EPA may in the future propose a rulemaking for revised oil and natural gas waste regulations.

Notwithstanding the EPA's 2019 determination, any future loss of such RCRA exemption could require our customers to make significant expenditures to attain and maintain compliance.

Waters of the United States.

In 2015, the EPA and U.S.

Army Corps of Engineers ("Corps") released a final rule outlining federal jurisdictional reach under the Clean Water Act over waters of the United States, including wetlands.

In 2017, the EPA and the Corps agreed to reconsider the 2015 rule and, thereafter, on October 22, 2019, the agencies published a final rule to rescind the 2015 rule and recodify the regulatory text that governed waters of the United States prior to promulgation of the 2015 rule.

This final rule became effective on December 23, 2019.

The re-codified regulatory text will govern waters of the United States until such time as the EPA and Corps issue a final rule re-defining the Clean Water Act's jurisdiction over waters of the United States in replacement of the 2015 rule but, to date, the two agencies have only published a proposed rulemaking on re-defining such jurisdiction in February 2019.

The 2015 final rule is being challenged by various factions in federal district court with the 2015 rule currently being in force in twenty-two states;

however, with the December 2019 effectiveness of the rule rescinding the 2015 rule, it is expected that those challenges will become moot unless additional legal actions challenging this 2019 rule arise.

The adoption of any laws, regulations or other legal enforceable mandates that result in expanding the scope of the Clean Water Act's jurisdiction in areas where we or our customers conduct operations could result in us or our customers incurring increased costs and restrictions, delays or cancellations in permitting or development of projects.

Compliance with these regulations and other regulatory initiatives, or any other new environmental laws and regulations could, among other things, require us or our customers to install new or modified emission controls on equipment or processes, incur longer permitting timelines, and incur significantly increased capital or operating expenditures, which costs may be significant.

Additionally, one or more of these developments that impact our oil and natural gas exploration and production customers could reduce demand for our products and services.

Moreover, any failure by us to comply with applicable environmental laws and regulations may result in governmental authorities taking actions against our business that could adversely impact our operations and financial condition, including the:

issuance of administrative, civil, and/or criminal penalties;

denial or revocation of permits or other authorizations;

reduction, delay or cessation in operations, including any development or expansion of projects;

performance of site investigatory, remedial, or other corrective actions or the incurrence of capital expenditures.

Our operations and those of our customers in the United States and in foreign countries are subject to stringent federal, state and local legal requirements governing environmental protection.

These requirements may take the form of laws, regulations, executive actions and various other legal initiatives.

See "Part I, Item 1.

Business – Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety Matters" for more discussion on these matters.

Compliance with these regulations and other regulatory initiatives, or any other new environmental laws and regulations could, among other things, require us or our customers to install new or modified emission controls on equipment or processes, incur longer permitting timelines, and incur increased capital or operating expenditures, which costs may be significant.

Additionally, one or more of these developments that impact our oil and natural gas exploration and production customers could reduce demand for our products and services, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

An accidental release of pollutants into the environment may cause us to incur significant costs and liabilities.

5 unchanged sentences

We could incur significant costs in complying with stringent occupational health and safety requirements.

We are subject to stringent federal and state laws and regulations, including the federal Occupational Safety and Health Act and comparable state statutes, whose purpose is to protect the health and safety of workers, both generally and within the Well Site Services, Downhole Technologies, and Offshore Manufactured Products industries.

We are subject to stringent federal and state laws and regulations, including OSHA and comparable state statutes, whose purpose is to protect the health and safety of workers, both generally and within the Well Site Services, Downhole Technologies, and Offshore Manufactured Products business segments.

In addition, OSHA's hazard communication standard, the EPA community right-to-know regulations under Title III of the Federal Superfund Amendment and Reauthorization Act and comparable state statutes require that information be maintained concerning hazardous materials used or produced in our operations and that this information be provided to employees, state and local government authorities and citizens.

We, and the entities in which we own an interest, are subject to OSHA Process Safety Management regulations, which are designed to prevent or minimize the consequences of catastrophic releases of toxic, reactive, flammable or explosive chemicals.

The regulations apply to any process that (1) involves a listed chemical in a quantity at or above the threshold quantity specified in the regulation for that chemical or (2) involves certain flammable gases or flammable liquids present on site in one location in a quantity of 10,000 pounds or more.

We are subject to OSHA Process Safety Management regulations, which are designed to prevent or minimize the consequences of catastrophic releases of toxic, reactive, flammable or explosive chemicals.

We have incurred and will continue to incur operating and capital expenditures to comply with occupational health and safety laws and regulations.

Historically these costs have not had a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

However, there can be no assurance that such costs will not be material in the future or that such future compliance will not have a material adverse effect on our business and operational results.

Our and our customers' operations are subject to a series of risks arising out of the threat of climate change that could result in increased operating costs, limit the areas in which oil and natural gas production may occur, and reduce demand for the products and services we provide.

2 unchanged sentences

As a result, our operations as well as the operations of our oil and natural gas exploration and production customers are subject to a series of regulatory, political, financial and litigation risks associated with the production and processing of fossil fuels and emission of GHGs.

In the United States, no comprehensive climate change legislation has been implemented at the federal level.

However, with the U.S.

Supreme Court finding that GHG emissions constitute a pollutant under the CAA, the EPA has adopted rules that, among other things, establish construction and operating permit reviews for GHG emissions from certain large stationary sources, require the monitoring and annual reporting of GHG emissions from certain petroleum and natural gas system sources, implement New Source Performance Standards directing the reduction of methane from certain new, modified, or reconstructed facilities in the oil and natural gas sector, and together with the DOT, implement GHG emissions limits on vehicles manufactured for operation in the United States.

Additionally, various states and groups of states have adopted or are considering adopting legislation, regulations or other regulatory initiatives that are focused on such areas as GHG cap and trade programs, carbon taxes, reporting and tracking programs, and restriction of emissions.

At the international level, there exists the United Nations-sponsored "Paris Agreement," which is a non-binding agreement for nations to limit their GHG emissions through individually-determined reduction goals every five years after 2020, although the United States has announced its withdrawal from such agreement, effective November 4, 2020.

Governmental, scientific, and public concern over the threat of climate change arising from GHG emissions has resulted in federal political risks in the United States in the form of pledges made by certain candidates seeking the office of the President of the United States in 2020.

Critical declarations made by one or more presidential candidates include proposals to ban hydraulic fracturing of oil and natural gas wells and ban new leases for production of minerals on federal properties, including onshore lands and offshore waters.

Other actions to oil and natural gas production activities that could be pursued by presidential candidates may include more restrictive requirements for the establishment of pipeline infrastructure or the permitting of liquefied natural gas export facilities, as well as the rescission of the United States’ withdrawal from the Paris Agreement in November 2020.

Litigation risks are also increasing, as a number of cities, local governments and other plaintiffs have sought to bring suit against the largest oil and natural gas exploration and production companies in state or federal court, alleging, among other things, that such energy companies created public nuisances by producing fuels that contributed to global warming effects, such as rising sea levels, and therefore, are responsible for roadway and infrastructure damages as a result, or alleging that the companies have been aware of the adverse effects of climate change for some time but defrauded their investors by failing to adequately disclose those impacts.

There are also increasing financial risks for fossil fuel producers as shareholders and bondholders currently invested in fossil-fuel energy companies concerned about the potential effects of climate change may elect in the future to shift some or all of their investments into non-fossil fuel energy related sectors.

Institutional lenders who provide financing to fossil-fuel energy companies also have become more attentive to sustainable lending practices and some of them may elect not to provide funding for fossil fuel energy companies.

Additionally, the lending practices of institutional lenders have been the subject of intensive lobbying efforts in recent years, oftentimes public in nature, by environmental activists, proponents of the international Paris Agreement, and foreign citizenry concerned about climate change not to provide funding for fossil fuel producers.

Limitation of investments in and financings for fossil fuel energy companies could result in the restriction, delay or cancellation of drilling programs or development or production activities.

The adoption and implementation of new or more stringent international, federal or state legislation, regulations or other regulatory initiatives that impose more stringent standards for GHG emissions from the oil and natural gas sector or otherwise restrict the areas in which this sector may produce oil and natural gas or generate GHG emissions could result in increased costs of compliance or costs of consuming fossil fuels.

Such legislation or regulations could consequently reduce demand for oil and natural gas, which could reduce demand for our services and products.

For example, President Biden has signed a series of executive orders that, among other things, recommitted

the United States to the Paris Agreement, called for increased emphasis on climate change across government agencies and economic sectors, suspended the issuance of new leases and authorizations for oil and gas development on federal leans and waters, and called for the issuance of new or more stringent emissions standards for new, modified and existing oil and gas facilities.

See "Part I, Item 1.

Business – Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety Matters" for more discussion on the threat of regulation of GHG emissions.

The adoption and implementation of new or more stringent international, federal or state executive actions, legislation, regulations or regulatory initiatives that impose more stringent standards for GHG emissions from the oil and natural gas sector or otherwise restrict the areas in which this sector may produce oil and natural gas or generate GHG emissions could result in increased costs of compliance or costs of consuming fossil fuels.

Such legislation or regulations could result in increased costs of compliance or costs of consuming, and thereby reduce demand for oil and natural gas, which could reduce demand for our services and products.

Additionally, political, financial and litigation risks may result in our oil and natural gas customers restricting or canceling production activities, incurring liability for infrastructure damages as a result of climatic changes, or impairing the ability to continue to operate in an economic manner, which also could reduce demand for our services and products.

One or more of these developments could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operation.

The Endangered Species Act, the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and other laws intended to protect certain species of wildlife govern our and our oil and natural gas exploration and production customers' operations, which constraints could have an adverse impact on our ability to expand some of our existing operations or limit our customers' ability to develop new oil and natural gas wells.

In the United States, the federal Endangered Species Act and comparable state laws were established to protect endangered and threatened species.

Under the Endangered Species Act, if a species is listed as threatened or endangered, restrictions may be imposed on activities adversely affecting that species' habitat.

Similar protections are offered to migratory birds under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act.

Moreover, the increased competitiveness of alternative energy sources (such as wind, solar, geothermal, tidal and biofuels) could reduce demand for hydrocarbons, and therefore for our products and services, which would lead to a reduction in our revenues.

The ESA, the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and other laws intended to protect certain species of wildlife govern our and our oil and natural gas exploration and production customers' operations, which constraints could have an adverse impact on our ability to expand some of our existing operations or limit our customers' ability to develop new oil and natural gas wells.

In the United States, the ESA and comparable state laws were established to protect endangered and threatened species.

Under the ESA, if a species is listed as threatened or endangered, restrictions may be imposed on activities adversely affecting that species' habitat.

Similar protections are offered to migratory birds under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act ("MBTA").

Fish and Wildlife Service ("FWS") under former President Trump issued a final rule on January 7, 2021, which notably clarifies that criminal liability under the MBTA will apply only to actions "directed at" migratory birds, its nests, or its eggs;

however, in 2020, the U.S.

District Court for the Southern District of New York vacated a DOI memorandum articulating a similar interpretation.

We expect that the January 7 rulemaking will be subject to litigation or to reconsideration by the Biden Administration.

Oil and natural gas operations in our operating areas may be adversely affected by seasonal or permanent restrictions on drilling activities designed to protect various wildlife, which may limit our ability to operate in protected areas.

Permanent restrictions imposed to protect endangered and threatened species could prohibit drilling in certain areas or require the implementation of expensive mitigation measures.

Moreover, as a result of one or more settlements approved by the United States federal government, the U.S.

Fish and Wildlife Service must make determinations on the listing of numerous species as endangered or threatened under the Endangered Species Act.

Moreover, the FWS may make determinations on the listing of numerous species as endangered or threatened under the ESA.

The designation of previously unidentified endangered or threatened species could indirectly cause us to incur additional costs, cause our or our oil and natural gas exploration and production customers' operations to become subject to operating restrictions or bans, and limit future development activity in affected areas, which could reduce demand for our products and services to those customers.

Our inability to control the inherent risks of identifying and integrating businesses that we may acquire, including any related increases in debt or issuances of equity securities, could adversely affect our operations.

Acquisitions have been, and our management believes will continue to be, a key element of our growth strategy.

We continually review complementary acquisition opportunities and we expect to seek to consummate acquisitions of such businesses in the future.

However, we may not be able to identify and acquire acceptable acquisition candidates on favorable terms in the future or at all.

In addition, we may be required to incur substantial indebtedness to finance future acquisitions and also may issue equity securities in connection with such acquisitions.

Such additional debt service requirements could impose a significant burden on our results of operations and financial condition, and the issuance of additional equity securities could result in significant dilution to stockholders.

We expect to gain certain business, financial, and strategic advantages as a result of business combinations we undertake, including synergies and operating efficiencies.

Our forward-looking statements assume that we will successfully integrate our business acquisitions and realize these intended benefits.

However, our inability to realize expected financial performance and strategic advantages as a result of an acquisition could negatively affect the anticipated benefits of the acquisition.

Additional risks we could face in connection with acquisitions include:

retaining key employees and customers of acquired businesses;

retaining supply and distribution relationships key to the supply chain;

increased administrative burden, including additional costs associated with regulatory compliance;

diversion of management time and attention;

developing our sales and marketing capabilities;

managing our growth effectively;

integrating operations, workforce, product lines and technology;

managing tax and foreign exchange exposure;

operating a new line of business;

increased logistical problems common to large, expansive operations;

inability to pursue and protect patents covering acquired technology;

addition of acquisition-related debt and increased expenses and working capital requirements;

substantial accounting charges for restructuring and related expenses, write-off of in-process research and development, impairment of goodwill, amortization of intangible assets, and stock-based compensation expense;

becoming subject to unanticipated liabilities of the acquired business, including litigation related to the acquired business;

achieving the expected benefits from the acquisition, including certain cost savings and operational efficiencies or synergies.

If we fail to manage any of these risks successfully, our business could be harmed.

Our capitalization and results of operations may change significantly following an acquisition, and stockholders of the Company may not have the opportunity to evaluate the economic, financial, and other relevant information that we will consider in evaluating future acquisitions.

Following our acquisition of GEODynamics in January 2018, we determined that certain steel products historically imported by GEODynamics from China for use in its manufacturing process may potentially be subject to anti-dumping and countervailing duties based on recent clarifications/decisions rendered by the U.S.

Department of Commerce and the U.S.

Court of International Trade.

Following these findings, we commenced an internal review of this matter and ceased further purchases of these potentially affected Chinese products.

As part of our internal review, we engaged trade counsel and decided to voluntarily disclose this matter to U.S.

Customs and Border Protection in September 2018.

In connection with the GEODynamics Acquisition, the seller agreed to indemnify and hold us harmless against certain claims related to matters such as this, and we have provided notice to and asserted indemnification claims against the seller.

Additionally, we are able to set-off payments due under the $25.0 million promissory note issued to the seller of GEODynamics in respect of indemnification claims.

Such note was scheduled to mature on July 12, 2019, but, because we have provided notice to and asserted indemnification claims, the maturity date of the note is extended until the resolution of such claim.

We expect that the amount ultimately paid in respect of such note will be reduced as a result of these indemnification claims.

See Note 7 , "Long-term Debt," to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10‑K for further discussion.

We might be unable to compete successfully with other companies in our industry.

The markets in which we operate are highly competitive and certain of them have relatively few barriers to entry.

The principal competitive factors in our markets are product, equipment and service quality, availability, responsiveness, experience, technology, safety performance, and price.

In some of our product and service offerings, we compete with the oil and natural gas industry's largest oilfield service providers.

These large national and multi-national companies have longer operating histories, greater financial, technical, and other resources, and greater name recognition than we do.

Several of our competitors provide a broader array of services and have a stronger presence in more geographic markets.

In addition, we compete with many smaller companies capable of competing effectively on a regional or local basis.

Our competitors may be able to respond more quickly to new or emerging technologies and services, and changes in customer requirements.

Many contracts are awarded on a bid basis, which further increases competition based on price.

As a result of competition, we may lose market share or be unable to maintain or increase prices for our present services, or to acquire additional business opportunities, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Our business and results of operations could be negatively impacted by security threats, including cybersecurity threats, and other disruptions.

We rely heavily on information systems to conduct our business.

Although we devote significant resources to protect our systems and data, we may experience various security threats, including cybersecurity threats to gain unauthorized access to sensitive information or to render data or systems unusable;

threats to the safety of our employees;

threats to the security of our facilities and infrastructure, or third-party facilities and infrastructure;

and threats from terrorist acts.

Cybersecurity attacks in particular are evolving and include, but are not limited to, malicious software, attempts to gain unauthorized access to data, and other electronic security breaches that could lead to disruptions in critical systems, unauthorized release of confidential or otherwise protected information, and corruption of data.

Although we utilize various procedures and controls to monitor these threats and mitigate our exposure to such threats, there can be no assurance that these procedures and controls will be sufficient in preventing security threats from materializing.

We may not have adequate insurance for potential liabilities and our insurance may not cover certain liabilities, including litigation risks.

If our products or services fail to meet specifications, or are involved in accidents or failures, we could face warranty, contract, or other litigation claims for which we may be held responsible and our reputation for providing quality products may suffer.

In the ordinary

course of business, we become the subject of various claims, lawsuits, and administrative proceedings, seeking damages or other remedies concerning our commercial operations, products, employees, and other matters, including occasional claims by individuals alleging exposure to hazardous materials as a result of our products or operations.

We maintain insurance to cover many of our potential losses, and we are subject to various self-retentions and deductibles under our insurance policies.

Even a partially uninsured or underinsured claim, if successful and of significant size, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or consolidated financial position.

We also face the following other risks related to our insurance coverage:

we may not be able to continue to obtain insurance on commercially reasonable terms;

we may be faced with types of liabilities that will not be covered by our insurance, such as damages from environmental contamination or terrorist attacks;

the counterparties to our insurance contracts may pose credit risks;

we may incur losses from interruption of our business that exceed our insurance coverage.

Weather conditions in our regions of operations may limit our ability to operate our business and could adversely affect our operating results, which are susceptible to seasonal earnings volatility.

Our operations are directly affected by seasonal differences in weather in the areas in which we operate, most notably in the Rocky Mountain region of the United States and the Gulf of Mexico.

Severe winter weather conditions in the Rocky Mountain region of the United States can restrict access to work areas for our Well Site Services and Downhole Technologies segment customers.

Our operations in and near the Gulf of Mexico are also affected by weather patterns.

Weather conditions in the Gulf Coast region generally result in higher drilling activity in the spring, summer and fall months, with the lowest levels of activity in the winter months.

In addition, summer and fall drilling activity can be restricted due to hurricanes and other storms prevalent in the Gulf of Mexico and along the Gulf Coast.

As a result of these seasonal differences, full year results are not likely to be a direct multiple of any particular quarter or combination of quarters.

Some forecasters also expect that potential climate changes may have significant physical effects, such as increased frequency and severity of storms, floods and other climatic events and could have an adverse effect on our or our customers’ operations.

Any unusual or prolonged severe weather or increased frequency thereof, such as freezing rain, earthquakes, hurricanes, droughts, or floods in our or our oil and gas exploration and production customers’ areas of operations or markets, whether due to climate change or otherwise, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We are exposed to risks relating to subcontractors' performance in some of our projects.

In many cases, we subcontract the performance of portions of our operations to subcontractors.

While we seek to obtain appropriate indemnities and guarantees from these subcontractors, we remain ultimately responsible for the performance of our subcontractors.

Industrial disputes, natural disasters, financial failure or default, or inadequate performance in the provision of services, or the inability to provide services by such subcontractors, has the potential to materially adversely affect us.

We depend on several significant customers in each of our business segments.

While no customer accounted for more than 10% of our consolidated revenues in 2019, Halliburton Company individually accounted for 10% and 16% of our total consolidated revenues in 2018 and 2017 , respectively.

In addition, the concentration of customers in one industry impacts our overall exposure to credit risk, in that customers may be similarly affected by changes in economic and industry conditions.

While we perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers, we do not generally require collateral in support of our trade receivables.

As a result of our customer concentration, risks of nonpayment and nonperformance by our counterparties are a concern in our business.

Many of our customers finance their activities through cash flow from operations, the incurrence of debt, or the issuance of equity.

Many of our customers have experienced substantial reductions in their cash flows from operations, and some are experiencing liquidity shortages, lack of access to capital and credit markets, a reduction in borrowing bases under reserve-based credit facilities, and other adverse impacts to their financial condition.

These conditions may result in a significant reduction in our customers' liquidity and ability to pay or otherwise perform on their obligations to us.

The inability, or failure of, our significant customers to meet their obligations to us, or their insolvency or liquidation, may adversely affect our financial results.

We may assume contractual risks in developing, manufacturing and delivering products in our Offshore/Manufactured Products business segment.

Many of our products from our Offshore/Manufactured Products segment are ordered by customers under frame agreements or project-specific contracts.

In some cases these contracts stipulate a fixed price for the delivery of our products and impose liquidated damages or late delivery fees if we do not meet specific customer deadlines.

Our actual costs, and any gross profit realized on these fixed-price contracts, may vary from the initially expected contract economics.

This may occur for various reasons, including but not limited to:

errors in estimates or bidding;

changes in availability and cost of materials and labor;

failures of our suppliers to deliver raw materials and other goods that comply with our specifications;

variations in productivity from our original estimates;

changes in tariffs or tax regimes;

material changes in foreign currency exchange rates.

These variations and the risks inherent in our projects may result in reduced profitability or losses on projects.

Depending on the size of a project, variations from estimated contract performance could have a material adverse impact on our operating results.

In addition, some customer contracts stipulate consequential damages payable, generally as a result of our gross negligence or willful misconduct.

The final delivered products may also include customer and third-party supplied equipment, the delay of which can negatively impact our ability to deliver our products on time at our anticipated profitability.

In certain cases these orders include new technology or unspecified design elements.

There is inherent risk in the estimation process including significant unforeseen technical and logistical challenges, or longer than expected lead times.

In some cases we may not be fully, or, properly compensated for the cost to develop and design the final products, negatively impacting our profitability on the projects.

In addition, our customers, in many cases, request changes to the original design or bid specifications for which we may not be fully or properly compensated.

In fulfilling some contracts, we provide limited warranties for our products.

Although we estimate and record a provision for potential warranty claims, repair or replacement costs under warranty provisions in our contracts could exceed the estimated cost to cure the claim, which could be material to our financial results.

We utilize percentage-of-completion accounting, depending on the size and length of a project, and variations from estimated contract performance could have a significant impact on our reported operating results as we progress toward completion of major jobs.

Backlog in our Offshore/Manufactured Products segment is subject to unexpected adjustments and cancellations and, therefore, has limitations as an indicator of our future revenues and earnings.

The revenues projected in our Offshore/Manufactured Products segment backlog may not be realized or, if realized, may not result in profits.

Because of potential changes in the scope or schedule of our customers' projects, we cannot predict with certainty when or if backlog will be realized.

Material delays, cancellations or payment defaults could materially affect our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

Reductions in our backlog due to cancellations or deferrals by customers, or for other reasons, would adversely affect, potentially to a material extent, the revenues and earnings we actually receive from contracts included in our backlog.

Some of the contracts in our backlog are cancellable by the customer, subject to the payment of termination fees and/or the reimbursement of our costs incurred.

We typically have no contractual right to the total revenues reflected in our backlog once a project is canceled.

While backlog cancellations have not been significant in the past, we incurred cancellations totaling $5.0 million , $6.5 million and $3.5 million during 2019 , 2018 and 2017, respectively.

If commodity prices do not improve, or decline further, we may incur additional cancellations or experience declines in our backlog.

We might be unable to employ a sufficient number of technical and service personnel.

Many of the products that we sell in our Offshore/Manufactured Products and Downhole Technologies segments are complex and highly engineered, and often must perform in harsh conditions.

We believe that our success depends upon our ability to employ and retain technical personnel with the ability to design, utilize, and enhance these products.

In addition, our ability to expand our operations in each of our businesses depends in part on our ability to increase our skilled labor force.

As observed in the U.S.

shale play regions such as the Permian Basin in recent years, during periods of increased activity, the demand for skilled workers is high, and the supply is limited.

When these events occur, our cost structure increases and our growth potential could be impaired.

Conversely, during periods of reduced activity, we are forced to reduce headcount, freeze or reduce wages, and implement other cost-saving measures which could lead to job abandonment by our technical and service personnel.

If we do not develop new competitive technologies and products, our business and revenues may be adversely affected.

If we are unable to design, develop, and produce commercially competitive products in a timely manner in response to changes in technology, our business and revenues will be adversely affected.

In addition, competitors or customers may develop new technologies, which address similar or improved solutions to our existing technology.

In 2019, for example, our Downhole Technologies segment sales of perforating products declined due, in part, to the introduction of integrated gun systems by its competitors.

Should our technologies become the less attractive solution, our operations and profitability would be negatively impacted.

We may be subject to litigation if another party claims that we have infringed upon its intellectual property rights.

The tools, techniques, methodologies, programs, and components we use to provide our products and services may infringe, or be alleged to infringe, upon the intellectual property rights of others.

Infringement claims generally result in significant legal and other costs, and may distract management from running our core business.

Royalty payments under a license from third parties, if available, would increase our costs.

If a license was not available, we might not be able to continue providing a particular service or product.

Any of these developments could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

During periods of strong demand or limited supply, we may be unable to obtain critical materials on a timely basis.

Our operations depend on our ability to procure, on a timely basis, certain project materials, such as forgings, to complete projects and produce products in an efficient and timely manner.

Our inability to procure critical materials during times of strong demand/limited supply or at reasonable costs due to supply issues, plant closures due to heath concerns or other issues, import taxes or the like, could have a material adverse effect on our business and operations.

Our oilfield operations involve a variety of operating hazards and risks that could cause losses.

Our operations are subject to the hazards inherent in the oilfield business.

These include, but are not limited to, equipment defects, blowouts, explosions, spills, fires, collisions, capsizing, and severe weather conditions.

These hazards could result in personal injury and loss of life, severe damage to, or destruction of, property and equipment, pollution or environmental damage, and suspension of operations.

We may incur substantial liabilities or losses as a result of these hazards as part of our ongoing business operations.

We may agree to indemnify our customers against specific risks and liabilities.

While we maintain insurance protection against some of these risks, and seek to obtain indemnity agreements from our customers requiring the customers to hold us harmless from some of these risks, our insurance and contractual indemnity protection may not be sufficient or effective enough to protect us under all circumstances or against all risks.

The occurrence of a significant event not fully insured or indemnified against or the failure of a customer to meet its indemnification obligations to us could materially and adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Our common stock price has been and is likely to continue to be highly volatile.

The trading price of our common stock is subject to wide fluctuations in response to the highly cyclical nature of our industry and a variety of other factors, including quarterly variations in operating results, conditions in the oil and gas industry, perceptions of our industry, analyst reports, estimates and commentary, general economic conditions and numerous other events or factors that are beyond our control.

In addition, the U.S.

stock markets in general and the market for oilfield service companies in particular, have experienced large price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating results or asset values of those companies.

These broad market and industry factors may materially impact the market price and trading volume of our common stock regardless of our actual operating performance.

We might be unable to protect our intellectual property rights and we may be subject to litigation if another party claims that we have infringed upon its intellectual property rights.

We may not be able to successfully preserve these intellectual property rights and these rights could be invalidated, circumvented or challenged.

In addition, we may be required to expend significant amounts of money pursuing and defending our intellectual property rights, and these proceedings may not ultimately be successful.

For example, during 2018 we incurred expenses in excess of $8 million in connection with patent defense.

In addition, the laws of some foreign countries in which our products and services may be sold do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States.

The failure of our Company to protect our proprietary information and any successful intellectual property challenges or infringement proceedings against us could adversely affect our competitive position.

Increasing attention to environmental, social & governance ("ESG") matters may impact our business.

Companies across all industries are facing increasing scrutiny from stakeholders related to their ESG practices.

Companies which do not adapt to or comply with investor or stakeholder expectations and standards, which are evolving, or which are perceived to have not responded appropriately to the growing concern for ESG issues, regardless of whether there is a legal requirement to do so, may suffer from reputational damage and the business, financial condition, and/or stock price of such a company could be materially and adversely affected.

Increasing attention to climate change, increasing societal expectations on companies to address climate change, and potential consumer use of substitutes to energy commodities may result in increased costs, reduced demand for our customers' hydrocarbon products and our services, reduced profits, increased investigations and litigation, and negative impacts on our stock price and access to capital markets.

Increasing attention to climate change, for example, may result in demand shifts for our customers' hydrocarbon products and additional governmental investigations and private litigation against those customers.

In addition, organizations that provide information to investors on corporate governance and related matters have developed ratings processes for evaluating companies on their approach to ESG matters.

Currently, there are no universal standards for such scores or ratings, but the importance of sustainability evaluations is becoming more broadly accepted by investors and shareholders.

Such ratings are used by some investors to inform their investment and voting decisions.

Additionally, certain investors use these scores to benchmark companies against their peers and if a company is perceived as lagging, these investors may engage with companies to require improved ESG disclosure or performance.

Moreover, certain

members of the broader investment community may consider a company's sustainability score as a reputational or other factor in making an investment decision.

Consequently, a low sustainability score could result in exclusion of our stock from consideration by certain investment funds, engagement by investors seeking to improve such scores and a negative perception of our operations by certain investors.

Unresolved Staff Comments

Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.

What changed 10-K

Item 1A. Risk Factors