Item 1. Business
ITEM
1. BUSINESS.
The
Company:
Sigma
is an 11-year-old software company that was founded by scientist-engineers composed of physicists and metallurgists then working
at Los Alamos National Labs for the entrepreneurial purpose of developing sophisticated metallurgical products. Since 2016, the
Company’s focus has been on solving the complex and challenging problem of how to best assure the high quality of metal
parts manufactured in laser powder bed additive manufacturing machines. Sigma and many others believe that until this problem
was solved, 3D manufacturing of metal parts would not be scalable enough to grow past prototyping and mature into a major industry
enjoying high quality yields and cost-efficient production runs. The solution that Sigma developed to solve this problem is In-Process-Quality-Assurance
(“IPQA®”) software known as PrintRite3D®.
In
2018, the Sigma team enhanced and added user features to its PrintRite3D® technology. In 2019, the Company began to productize
and test PrintRite3D® on various 3D metal printers at customers’ sites through the Company’s Rapid Test and Evaluation
(“RTE”) program. Upon receiving favorable responses from the various RTEs, in 2020 the Company began to aggressively
market PrintRite3D®. However, the worldwide COVID-19 pandemic caused a reduction, and in some cases a freeze, in capital spending
within the Company’s targeted industries and had what the Company believes to be a short-term negative impact on the Company’s
expected timing of generating meaningful revenue. Despite the pandemic, the Company moved forward with its plan to market PrintRite3D®
to the following industry segments: (1) global manufacturing companies with Additive Manufacturing
(“AM”) initiatives; (2) 3D printer Original Equipment Manufacturers (“OEMs”) for purchases of licenses
and generating fees and royalties thereafter; (3) additive manufacturing software venders for alliances and licenses for co-sales;
and (4) research foundations, standards organizations and universities, all in service of Sigma’s potential for setting
the industry standard of measurement by providing data and analytics as a metrics-based quality standard of metal quality for
all 3D laser powder bed manufactured parts, notwithstanding the design, metal, or brand of equipment upon which parts are manufactured.
4
Additive
Metal Manufacturing and the role and need for Sigma’s technology:
Additive
Manufacturing, or 3D printing, has been among the most heavily explored manufacturing innovations in the history of modern manufacturing.
The use of 3D printing technology dates back to the 1980s for polymer applications, but the ability to print functional parts
from metal alloys has spurred significant interest and investment into AM over recent years. AM is now reshaping the product design
process, entire supply chains, and the vast landscape of manufacturing. Engineers are embracing new design freedoms to realize
valuable product performance improvements and cost efficiencies with lighter weight, better thermal management capability, better
fluid mixing, customization, and/or the ability to make different structures and textures that yield better part integration.
Several
significant hurdles still prevent the wider adoption of additive technologies. The lack of quality, consistency and standards
are most often cited. The Company believes that the lack of technology such as PrintRite3D®, could be the last sizable barrier
to the widespread industrialization of 3D metal printing. Additionally, many believe that the disruption to complex and rigid
supply chains caused by COVID-19 exposed the country’s vulnerability to shortages in times of crisis. It appears that many
manufacturers are devising strategies to be able to be more agile, increase their ability to manufacture mission critical parts
on demand, with more customization, and closer to where the end part will be needed.
We
anticipate that the enterprise adoption of the technology will accelerate in 2021, evolving over time as follows:
●
Stage
1 – International research & development organizations and universities will establish centers of excellence for
Advanced Manufacturing and be a major resource for enterprises seeking to adopt best practices for AM.
●
Stage
2 - Enterprises will start with their own R&D initiatives and select a 3D printer vendor, or vendors, that meets their
requirements. During this time, they will focus on experimenting with different metal powder alloys, part structures, design
guidelines, and in-process quality metrics.
●
Stage
3 – Once R&D is complete, enterprises will select one part to test and move into production, improving the process
from design to production and confirming the economics and quality of the process.
●
Stage
4 – International standards will be established by organizations such as NIST, ISO, ATSM, etc., ensuring the consistency
of components and processes. These standards will become increasingly important as the industry moves to full industrialization.
●
Stage
5 – As the adoption of AM accelerates, enterprises will utilize multiple 3D printers from multiple manufacturers due
to printer innovations and advancements, varying production requirements, divisional preferences, etc.
●
Stage
6 – Independent standards-based, IPQA systems, such as PrintRite3D®, will be required to assure consistent quality
in heterogeneous factories.
5
PrintRite3D®
Technology and Product Family
PrintRite3D® is
an interactive in-process quality assurance system that combines inspection, feedback, data collection and critical analysis. It
is a platform-independent solution that can be installed as a retrofit to an existing 3D printer or requested as a factory option
from select 3D printer OEMs. PrintRite3D® provides a high-fidelity, accurate system that can confidently scale to multi-laser
3D metal printers. The PrintRite3D® system discovers potential anomalies and incorporates machine learning in conjunction
with developed metrics to map those metrics to the post-process data. This provides the ability to reduce post-production testing
and costs, while creating a certification framework that serves the needs of end-users, printer manufacturers, and standards organizations.
The
Company currently offers three versions of PrintRite3D® for Laser Bed Fusion Systems: (1) PrintRite3D® Lite which has
a smaller footprint and is geared towards single-laser machines for Research and Development, or small production lots. (2) PrintRite3D®
Pro, for single, dual and quad laser machines and is suited well for environments with less than 10 machines, and (3) PrintRite3D®
Enterprise for plant-wide networks. PrintRite3D® Lite expands the Company’s addressable market to mid-range 3D printer
manufacturers for potential OEM opportunities.
The
Company announced in late 2020 PrintRite3D® for Direct Energy Deposition (“DED”), opening up another segment of
the market for Sigma to sell and distribute its technology. DED is based on a laser process in which a laser beam generates a
melt pool on a substrate. An additional metallic powder material is transported to the melt pool, where it becomes molten. Due
to a feed movement, the molten material cools down and welding tracks are formed. By placing weld tracks side-by-side and on top
of one another, a build-up is obtained. Three-dimensional structures can then be generated by depositing one layer or track at
the top of another previously welded layer or track.
Distribution
Methods
Sigma
Labs employs a multi-channel distribution model for its IPQA products including a direct sales force, value added resellers (VARs)
and 3D printer Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs). In 2020, the majority of the Company’s revenue was generated by
direct sales in North America and Europe. VARs are currently used in Japan and India. The Company plans to extend its VAR channel
outside of North America and Europe. In 2020 the Company moved aggressively to establish and extend relationships with 3D printer
OEMs and expects that the percentage of the Company’s revenue coming from OEMs will increase in 2021 and beyond.
The
Company markets its products through webinars, email and social media campaigns, and participation, both in person and virtually,
in industry events and tradeshows. In addition, the Company collaborates with international standards organizations in the establishment
of standards for AM.
Sources
and Availability of Parts and Materials
We
have important relationships with several suppliers for critical components of our PrintRite3D® systems, in particular optics
and data acquisition components, and development of our user interface. To-date, we have not experienced shortages of components,
however, in some cases COVID-19 has resulted in increased lead times for certain parts. We manage the risk of component shortages
by sourcing backup suppliers, and in the case of our user interface, hiring engineers in-house to support the ongoing development
and maintenance.
Agreements
with Original Equipment Manufacturers (“OEMs”)
The
Company entered into distribution agreements with two international 3D printer OEMs. The Company supports the OEMs with joint
marketing programs and field sales and technical support personnel to assist in the sale of its technology. It is the Company’s
intent to continue to build the OEM channel through distribution relationships with other 3D printer OEMs in the future.
Competition
and Sigma’s Intellectual Property Safeguards
PrintRite3D®
is a third-party, agnostic In-Process Quality Assurance system designed to provide a consistent, standards-based measurement and
prediction of quality across a heterogeneous collection of 3D printers. Competition is primarily from the printer OEMs who offer
their own monitoring system, usually as a separately priced option to its printers. Sigma believes that the future of AM will
consist of factories with various generations of printers from various manufacturers. The primary reasons that global manufacturers
will have machines from various vendors is that certain machines and technologies are better suited for different applications
than others. Additionally, as the industry progresses, innovation will accelerate, and new leaders will emerge. Finally, many
believe that there will be a consolidation of 3D metal manufacturers and the number of vendors will decrease from approximately
50 to a much small number over the next decade. Although standards for monitoring are slowly being set by various international
standards organizations, it is highly unlikely that printer OEMs will modify their monitoring systems to work with other OEMs
machines. Therefore, we believe that the only way to produce parts with a consistent level of quality is with a third-party, agnostic,
standards based IPQA system, such as PrintRite3D®. To the Company’s knowledge, there is no competitor currently offering
an IPQA system with similar functionality which has been validated to operate across as many 3D metal printers as PrintRite3D®.
Sigma
began its investigation and research into optical and thermal data collection and measurement for quality assurance and intervention
approximately 7 years ago and began to develop its intellectual property protection at that time. The international IP law firm,
Kilpatrick Townsend, has advised the Company on building a patent portfolio, trade secrets, trademarks, etc. and filed and prosecuted
patents as the Company has grown its body of intellectual property.
6
Sigma
Labs, Inc. Patent Portfolio
Jurisdiction
Granted
In
Process
Total
US
13
14
27
PCT
-
1
1
EP
-
4
4
Germany
-
6
6
China
1
3
4
Japan
-
1
1
Korea
-
1
1
Total
14
30
44
Based
upon the evidence of competitors’ claims received by Sigma to-date, it appears to us that Sigma’s solution to the
quality problems of 3D metal printing is a significantly different technological approach than that of our principal known competition.
It continues to appear to the Company that the intellectual property protection of PrintRite3D®’s acuity, meaningful
metrics of thermal data correlated to part quality, and usability of its software accord Sigma freedom to operate with its technology
and will be a significant barrier to entry to competitors attempts to pursue the technology path traveled by Sigma.
Intellectual
Property
We
regard our patents, trademarks, domain names, trade secrets, know-how, and other intellectual property as critical to our success.
We rely on a combination of patent, trademark, trade secret, other intellectual property law, confidentiality procedures, and
contractual provisions with employees, partners, and others to protect the technology and other proprietary rights, information
and know-how that comprise the core of our business. The chart below summarizes our issued patents. We are currently prosecuting
thirty foreign and U.S. patent applications related to our IPQA® technology and rapid qualification of additive manufacturing
for metal parts. There is no guarantee that the patent applications we have submitted will issue or that if issued, they will
offer adequate protection under applicable law.
7
Title
Type
Patent
No. or Application No.
Expiration
Date
Controlled
Weld Pool Volume Control of Welding Processes
US
Utility
8,354,608
3/16/31
Structurally
Sound Reactive Materials
US
Utility
8,372,224
10/15/30
Composite
Projectile
US
Utility
8,359,979
3/21/27
Methods
and Systems for Monitoring Additive Manufacturing Processes
US
Utility
9,999,924
5/11/36
Systems
and Methods for Additive Manufacturing Operations
US
Utility
10,207,489
6/20/37
Material
Qualification System and Methodology
US
Utility
10,226,817
4/26/37
Material
Qualification System and Methodology
China
Utility
ZL201680010333.X
1/13/26
Optical
Manufacturing Process Sensing and Status Indication System
US
Utility
10,317,294
5/2/35
Systems
and Methods for Measuring Radiated Thermal Energy During an Additive Manufacturing Operation
US
Utility
10,479,020
8/1/38
Optical
Manufacturing Process Sensing and Status Indication System
US
Utility
10,520,372
3/25/35
Systems
and Methods for Additive Manufacturing Operations
US
Utility
10,717,264
12/28/38
Systems
and Methods for Measuring Radiated Thermal Energy During an Additive Manufacturing Operation
US
Utility
10,639,745
2/21/39
Photodetector
Array for Additive Manufacturing Operations
US
Utility
10,786,850
2/21/39
Multi-Sensor
Quality Inference and Control for Additive Manufacturing Processes
US
Utility
10,786,948
4/24/37
Government
Regulation
Any
contracts that we enter into with governmental agencies will be subject to a variety of federal, state and local laws and regulations.
These regulations are aimed at preventing the inadvertent disclosure of munitions related data or the export of technical knowledge
to foreign countries. The work we do with governmental units may also be subject to laws respecting the confidentiality of any
classified or national security information we receive during the course of our activities under any government contract.
Additionally,
with respect to our work with government agencies, our sales are driven by pricing based on costs incurred to produce products
or perform services under contracts with the U.S. government. U.S. government contracts generally are subject to Federal Acquisition
Regulations (“FAR”), agency-specific regulations that implement or supplement FAR, such as the DoD’s Defense
Federal Acquisition Regulations and other applicable laws and regulations. These regulations impose a broad range of requirements,
many of which are unique to government contracting, including various procurement, import and export, security, contract pricing
and cost, contract termination and adjustment, and audit requirements. A contractor’s failure to comply with these regulations
and requirements could result in reductions of the value of contracts, contract modifications or termination, and the assessment
of penalties and fines and could lead to suspension or debarment from government contracting or subcontracting for a period of
time. In addition, government contractors are also subject to routine audits and investigations by U.S. government agencies such
as the Defense Contract Audit Agency (“DCAA”). These agencies review a contractor’s performance, cost structure,
and compliance with applicable laws, regulations, and standards. The DCAA also reviews the adequacy of, and a contractor’s
compliance with, its internal control systems and policies, including the contractor’s purchasing, property, estimating,
compensation, and information systems.
As
of March 24, 2021, we do not have any active contracts with government agencies. During fiscal year 2020, we did not enter
into any contracts with government agencies, nor do we seek to do so in the future.
Employees
and Human Capital Resources
As
of December 31, 2020, we had 20 full-time employees. We continue to search for additional, qualified personnel, to support our
expanding operations in the area of IPQA® for AM. We believe
that our future success largely depends upon our continued ability to attract and retain highly skilled employees, as well as
highly qualified management and technical personnel. Employee engagement is important to us and we focus on continuously enhancing
our corporate culture.
Properties
We
lease approximately 3,700 square feet of space at 3900 Paseo del Sol, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87507, including 1,772 square feet
of office space at units, C-14, C-15, C-16, C-17, C-20, C-21 and D-34 for a total monthly rent expense of approximately $3,840
under the lease, and 1,928 square feet of warehouse / production space at units E-38, E-40 and E-42, for a total monthly rent
expense of approximately $2,275 under the lease, which expire on July 31, 2021.
We
believe that our facilities are suitable for our current needs. We currently intend to renew such leases, but we are evaluating
the need for a larger space as we grow.
Corporate
Information
Our
principal executive offices are located at 3900 Paseo del Sol, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87507, and our current telephone number at
that address is (505) 438-2576. Our website address is www.sigmalabsinc.com. The Company’s annual reports, quarterly reports,
current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to such reports filed or furnished pursuant to section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and other information related to the Company, are available,
free of charge, on that website as soon as we electronically file those documents with, or otherwise furnish them to, the SEC.
The Company’s website and the information contained therein, or connected thereto, are not and are not intended to be incorporated
into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Recent
Developments
On
March 15, 2021, we announced that we were awarded a contract for an initial system of our PrintRite3D in-process quality assurance
solution by Lockheed Martin Space Additive Design & Manufacturing Center based in Sunnyvale, California. The Additive Design
& Manufacturing Center supports the entire Space portfolio and integrates key materials research and manufacturing processes
to streamline the affordable delivery of satellite components. As a part of this initial contract, the Lockheed Martin team will
assess the viability and performance of PrintRite3D technology for the Space division in support of a variety of defense and civil
space programs.
On
January 12, 2021, the Company closed a public offering of equity securities in which it issued 1,711,783 shares of common stock
(including the exercise in full of the underwriters’ over-allotment option of 223,276 shares). Net proceeds to the Company
after deducting offering expenses were approximately $4,532,444.
On
December 18, 2020, we announced that we were selected by DMG MORI as the preferred melt pool monitoring system for their LASERTEC
SLM machines. Engineering teams from both companies worked extensively to test the integrated solution to ensure that it meets
the demanding needs of industrial manufacturers utilizing DMG MORI’s family of metal 3D printers. DMG MORI will be providing
an interface with its printers to accommodate our optics, ensuring that the systems are PrintRite3D® ready.
8
We
incorporated as Messidor Limited in Nevada on December 23, 1985 and changed our name to Framewaves Inc. in 2001. On September
27, 2010, we changed our name from Framewaves Inc. to Sigma Labs, Inc.
Text extracted from the filing as submitted to EDGAR. Formatting, tables and exhibits are simplified for reading; the original document is authoritative for anything you rely on.