Item 1A. Risk Factors
Item
1A. Risk Factors
Except
as set forth below in this Item 1A and the Risk Factors included in our previous filings made with the SEC, there have been no material
changes to our risk factors from those disclosed in “Part I. Item 1A. Risk Factors” in the Form 10-K filed with the SEC on
March 18, 2026.
Management
has concluded that there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern, and our condensed financial statements
for the quarter ended March 31, 2026 includes an explanatory paragraph as to our ability to continue as a going concern, which could
prevent us from obtaining new financing on reasonable terms or at all.
Because
we have had recurring losses and negative cash flows from operating activities, substantial doubt exists regarding our ability to remain
as a going concern at the same level at which we are currently performing. Accordingly, our condensed financial statements for the quarter
ended March 31, 2026 includes an explanatory paragraph as to our potential inability to continue as a going concern. The doubts regarding
our potential ability to continue as a going concern may adversely affect our ability to obtain new financing on reasonable terms or
at all.
9
Our
products have and may in the future be subject to product notifications, recalls, or voluntary market withdrawals that could harm our
reputation, business and financial results.
After
regulatory approval has been obtained for medical device products, the product and the manufacturer are subject to continual review,
including the review of adverse events and clinical results that are reported after our products are made available to patients, and
there can be no assurance that such approval will not be withdrawn or restricted. Regulators may also subject approvals to restrictions
or conditions or impose post-approval obligations on the holders of these approvals, and the regulatory status of such products may be
jeopardized if such obligations are not fulfilled. If post-approval studies are required, such studies may involve significant time and
expense.
The
manufacturing and marketing of medical devices involves an inherent risk that our products may prove to be defective and cause a health
risk even after regulatory clearances have been obtained. The FDA and similar governmental authorities in other countries have the authority
to require the recall of commercialized products in the event of material regulatory deficiencies or defects in design or manufacture.
Medical devices may also be modified after regulatory clearance is obtained to such an extent that additional regulatory clearance is
necessary before the device can be further marketed. In these events, we may voluntarily implement a recall or market withdrawal or may
be required to do so by a regulatory authority. For example, in May 2026, we announced a voluntary recall in the U.S. of CGuard Prime,
initiated in consultation with the FDA. This decision followed our determination during controlled launch that the technical success
of the delivery system during CAS procedures had not met performance expectations Such recall, and any recalls in the future, could result
in significant current and future costs and other negative impacts associated with such recalls (including inventory write-off costs,
refunds and other remediation costs), loss of revenues, sales or customers, potential actions by regulators or other governmental entities,
potential claims and lawsuits by customers and patients (including class action product liability litigation), other operational impacts
and consequences such as business disruption, loss of personnel and distraction of management or other key employees, the restatement
of previously issued financial statements, inability to raise capital, as well as negative publicity and damage to our reputation, which
could have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
In
the European Economic Area, we must comply with the medical device vigilance system under Regulation (EU) 2017/745 on medical devices,
or the MDR. Under this system, manufacturers are generally required to report serious incidents involving medical devices via an electronic
system incorporated into the EU database on medical devices, called EUDAMED. Furthermore, manufacturers are required to take Field Safety
Corrective Actions (“FSCAs”) to reduce a risk of death or serious deterioration in the state of health associated with the
use of a medical device that is already placed on the market. An FSCA may include the recall, modification, exchange, destruction or
retrofitting of the device. FSCAs must be communicated by the manufacturer or its legal representative to its customers and/or to the
end users of the device through Field Safety Notices. FSCAs must be reported to the relevant competent authorities, even if the FSCA
was undertaken in a third country in relation to a device which is also legally made available on the Union market and the reason for
the FSCA is not limited to the device made available in the third country.
Any
adverse event involving our products could result in other future voluntary corrective actions, such as recalls or customer notifications,
or agency action, such as inspection or enforcement action. Adverse events have been reported to us in the past, and we cannot guarantee
that they will not occur in the future. Any corrective action, whether voluntary or involuntary, as well as defending ourselves in a
lawsuit, would require the dedication of our time and capital, distract management from operating our business and could harm our reputation
and financial results.
Defects
or failures associated with our products has led to recalls, and could lead to additional recalls, safety alerts or litigation, as well
as significant costs and negative publicity.
Our
business is subject to significant risks associated with the manufacture, distribution and use of medical devices that are placed inside
the human body, including the risk that patients may be severely injured by or even die from the misuse or malfunction of our products
caused by design flaws or manufacturing defects. In addition, component failures, design defects, off-label uses or inadequate disclosure
of product-related information could also result in an unsafe condition or the injury or death of a patient. These problems could lead
to a recall or market withdrawal of, or issuance of a safety alert relating to, our products and could result in significant costs, negative
publicity and adverse competitive pressure. For example,
in May 2026, we announced a voluntary recall in the U.S. of CGuard Prime, initiated in consultation with the FDA. This decision followed
our determination during controlled launch that the technical success of the delivery system during CAS procedures had not met performance
expectations. The circumstances giving rise to recalls are unpredictable, and any recalls of existing
or future products increase the probability of inspection by, or additional scrutiny from, the FDA and could have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
10
The
medical device industry has historically been subject to extensive litigation over product liability claims. Operating in the area of
the neck with the brain as the end organ is dangerous and presents risks of adverse events such as bleeding, arterial dissection, cranial
nerve injury, myocardial infarction, stroke and death, which subject us to a greater risk of being involved in litigation than companies
with products used in less critical areas of the body. We may be subject to product liability claims if our products cause, or merely
appear to have caused, an injury or death, even if due to physician error. In addition, an injury or death that is caused by the activities
of our suppliers, such as those that provide us with components and materials, or by an aspect of a treatment used in combination with
our products, such as a complementary drug or anesthesia, may be the basis for a claim against us by patients, hospitals, physicians
or others purchasing or using our products, even if our products were not the actual cause of such injury or death. We may choose to
settle any claims to avoid fault and complication, not due to failure of our products. An adverse outcome involving one of our products
could result in reduced market acceptance and demand for all of our products and could harm our reputation and our ability to market
our products in the future. In some circumstances, adverse events arising from or associated with the design, manufacture or marketing
of our products could result in the suspension or delay of regulatory reviews of our premarket notifications or applications for marketing.
Any of the foregoing problems could disrupt our business and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations.
Although
we carry product liability insurance in the United States and in other countries in which we conduct business, including for clinical
trials and product marketing, we can give no assurance that such coverage will be available or adequate to satisfy any claims. Product
liability insurance is expensive, subject to significant deductibles and exclusions, and may not be available on acceptable terms, if
at all. If we are unable to obtain or maintain insurance at an acceptable cost or on acceptable terms with adequate coverage or otherwise
protect against potential product liability claims, we could be exposed to significant liabilities. A product liability claim, recall
or other claim with respect to uninsured liabilities or for amounts in excess of insured liabilities could have a material adverse effect
on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Defending a suit, regardless of its merit or eventual outcome, could
be costly, could divert management’s attention from our business and might result in adverse publicity, which could result in reduced
acceptance of our products in the market, product recalls or market withdrawals.
We
are required to file adverse event reports under MDR and regulations with the FDA, which reports are publicly available on the FDA’s
website. We are required to file MDRs if our products may have caused or contributed to a serious injury or death or malfunctioned in
a way that could likely cause or contribute to a serious injury or death if it were to recur. Any such MDR that reports a significant
adverse event could result in negative publicity, which could harm our reputation and future sales.
Even
if products we develop receive marketing approval, we or others may later discover that the product is less effective than previously
believed or causes undesirable side effects that were not previously identified, which could compromise our ability or that of any collaborators
to market the product, and could cause regulatory authorities to take certain regulatory actions, which could harm our commercial operations.
It
is possible that our clinical trials may indicate an apparent positive effect of a product that is greater than the actual positive effect,
if any, or alternatively fail to identify undesirable side effects. For example, we, or others, may discover that our products are less
safe and effective than previously believed. If, we, or others, discover that a product is less effective than previously believed or
causes undesirable side effects that were not previously identified, any of the following adverse events could occur:
●
regulatory
authorities may withdraw their approval of the product or seize the product;
●
we,
or any of our collaborators, may be required to recall the product, change the way the product is administered or conduct additional
clinical trials;
11
●
additional
restrictions may be imposed on the marketing of, or the manufacturing processes of, the particular product;
●
we,
or any of our collaborators, may be subject to fines, injunctions or the imposition of civil or criminal penalties;
●
regulatory
authorities may require the addition of labeling statements, such as a “black box” warning or a contraindication including
with the product;
●
we,
or any of our collaborators, may be required to create a Medication Guide outlining the risks of the previously unidentified side
effects for distribution to patients;
●
we
could be sued and held liable for harm caused to patients;
●
physicians
and patients may stop using our product; and
●
our
reputation may suffer.
Any
of these events could harm our business and operations and could negatively impact our stock price.
For
example, in May 2026, we announced a voluntary recall in the U.S. of CGuard Prime, initiated in consultation with the FDA. This decision
followed our determination during controlled launch that the technical success of the delivery system during CAS procedures had not met
performance expectations. Such recall, and any recalls in the future, could result in significant current and future costs and other
negative impacts associated with such recalls (including inventory write-off costs, refunds and other remediation costs), loss of revenues,
sales or customers, potential actions by regulators or other governmental entities, potential claims and lawsuits by customers and patients
(including class action product liability litigation), other operational impacts and consequences such as business disruption, loss of
personnel and distraction of management or other key employees, or the restatement of previously issued financial statements, inability
to raise capital, as well as negative publicity and damage to our reputation, which could have a material adverse impact on our business,
results of operations and financial condition.
Material
modifications to our products may require new 510(k) clearances, premarket approval, or CE Marks, or may require us to recall or cease
marketing our products until new clearances or approvals are obtained.
Material
modifications to the intended use or technological characteristics of our products will require new 510(k) clearances, premarket approvals
(“PMA”) by the FDA or CE Marks under the EU Medical Device Regulation (“MDR”) prior to implementing the modifications,
or require us to recall or cease marketing the modified devices until these clearances or approvals are obtained. Furthermore, changes
to our manufacturing facility or supplier of components used in our products require prior FDA approval of a PMA supplement. The FDA
requires device manufacturers to initially make and document a determination of whether or not a modification requires a new approval,
supplement or clearance; however, the FDA can review a manufacturer’s decision. Any modification to an FDA cleared device that
would significantly affect its safety or effectiveness or that would constitute a major change in its intended use would require a new
510(k) clearance or approval of a PMA supplement. We may not be able to obtain additional 510(k) clearances or premarket approvals for
new products or for modifications to, or additional indications for, our products in a timely fashion, or at all. Delays in obtaining
required future clearances would harm our ability to introduce new or enhanced products in a timely manner, which in turn would harm
our future growth. We have made modifications to our products in the past that we believe do not require additional clearances or approvals,
and we may make additional modifications in the future. If the FDA or an EU Notified Body disagrees and requires new clearances or approvals
for any of these modifications, we may be required to recall and to stop selling or marketing our products as modified, which could harm
our operating results and require us to redesign our products. In these circumstances, we may be subject to significant enforcement actions.
In response to the voluntary recall in the U.S. of CGuard Prime, initiated in consultation with the FDA in May 2026, we intend to implement
design improvements to CGuard Prime. However, there can be no assurance that such design improvements will be sufficient to obtain FDA
approval, or that any such approval will be obtained in a timely manner, if at all.
12
We
bear the risk of warranty claims on our products.
We
bear the risk of warranty claims on our products. We may not be successful in claiming recovery under any warranty or indemnity provided
to us by our suppliers or vendors in the event of a successful warranty claim against us by a customer, and any recovery from such supplier
or vendor may not be adequate. Furthermore, we may not have any, or have an adequate, warranty provided by our supplier. In addition,
warranty claims brought by our customers related to third-party components may arise after our ability to bring corresponding warranty
claims against such suppliers expires, which could result in costs to us. In addition, we have been, and in the future could be, subject
to costs related to product recalls, and we could incur significant costs to correct any defects, warranty claims or other problems.
Any such events could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
If
there are significant shifts in the political, economic and military conditions in Israel and its neighbors, it could have a material
adverse effect on our business operations and ability to reach profitability.
Although
we are incorporated in the State of Delaware and our headquarters are in Miami, Florida, our current manufacturing facility, certain
of our key personnel and one of our offices are located in Israel. Our business is directly affected by the political, economic and military
conditions in Israel and its neighbors. Since the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948, a number of armed conflicts have occurred
between Israel and its neighboring countries and terrorist organizations active in the region, including Iran, Hamas (an Islamist terrorist
militia and political group that controls the Gaza strip), Hezbollah (an Islamist terrorist militia and political group based in Lebanon)
and other terrorist organizations active in the region. These conflicts have involved missile strikes, hostile infiltrations and terrorism
against civilian targets in various parts of Israel, which have negatively affected business conditions in Israel.
In
recent years, Israel has been engaged in sporadic armed conflicts with Hamas, an Islamist terrorist group that controls the Gaza Strip,
with Hezbollah, an Islamist terrorist group that controls large portions of southern Lebanon, and with Iranian-backed military forces
in Syria. In addition, Iran has threatened to attack Israel and may be developing nuclear weapons. Iran is also believed to have a strong
influence among extremist groups in the region, such as Hamas in Gaza, Hezbollah in Lebanon, the Houthi movement in Yemen and various
rebel militia groups in Syria and Iraq. On October 7, 2023, Hamas launched a series of attacks on civilian and military targets in Southern
Israel and Central Israel, to which the Israel Defense Forces responded. On October 9, 2025, Israel, Hamas, the United States and other
countries in the region agreed to a framework for a ceasefire in Gaza between Israel and Hamas.
In
addition, both Hezbollah and the Houthi movement attacked military and civilian targets in Israel, to which Israel responded, including
through increased air and ground operations in Lebanon. In addition, the Houthi movement attacked international shipping lanes in the
Red Sea, to which both Israel and the United States responded. While a ceasefire was brokered between Israel and Hezbollah in November
2024, in March 2026, hostilities resumed along Israel’s northern border with Lebanon, when Hezbollah resumed its attacks as part
of a broader regional escalation. In response, Israel resumed military operations against Hezbollah in Lebanon.
Further,
in April 2024 and October 2024, Iran launched a series of drone and missile strikes against Israel, to which Israel responded. In addition,
in response to ongoing Iranian aggression and support of proxy attacks against Israel, on June 13, 2025, Israel conducted a series of
preemptive defensive air strikes in Iran targeting Iran’s nuclear program and military commanders. While a ceasefire was reached
in June 2025 following 12 days of hostilities, on February 28, 2026, the United States and Israel launched coordinated military strikes
against Iran, including attacks on strategic military infrastructure and leadership targets, with the stated aim of degrading Iran’s
capacity to conduct or support hostile operations against them. In response, Iran has fired missiles and drones toward population centers
and military installations in Israel, Europe and neighboring countries in the Gulf region, and also launched counter-strikes against
U.S. forces and allied bases throughout the Gulf region. While a temporary ceasefire agreed to between Iran and the U.S. on April 8,
2026 as part of ongoing negotiations for a permanent ceasefire agreement, the situation remains volatile and uncertain. Although the
ceasefire has been subject to extensions and continued diplomatic engagement, it has reportedly been characterized by tensions, alleged
violations and stalled negotiations. We cannot predict if and to what extent this ceasefire will remain in effect or upheld or whether
hostilities may resume or further escalate. A broader regional conflict involving additional state and non-state actors remains a significant
risk How long and how severe the conflicts in Gaza, Northern Israel, Lebanon, Iran or the broader region last and become is unknown at
this time and any renewed or continued clash among Israel, Hamas, Hezbollah, Iran or other countries or militant groups in the region
may escalate in the future into a greater regional conflict. Continued military escalation, retaliatory actions, or broader regional
involvement may adversely affect economic conditions, disrupt markets, and create uncertainty that could negatively impact our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
13
Certain
of our employees may be obligated to perform military reserve duty generally until they reach the age of 40 (or older, for officers or
other citizens who hold certain positions in the Israeli armed forces reserves) and, in the event of a military conflict, may be called
to active duty. In response to increases in terrorist activity and military conflicts in Israel, there have been periods of significant
call-ups of military reservists. Military service call ups that result in absences of personnel from us for an extended period of time
may materially and adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.
To
date, our operations have not been adversely affected by this situation. We currently manufacture our CGuard EPS and CGuard Prime at
our facility in Tel Aviv, Israel. If there were a disruption to our existing manufacturing facility or our ability to procure raw materials
and ship our products, we would have no other means of manufacturing and distributing CGuard EPS or CGuard Prime until we were able to
restore the manufacturing and distribution capability at our facility or develop alternative manufacturing facilities and distribution
capabilities. However, the intensity and duration of the security situation in Israel have been difficult to predict, as are the economic
implications on our business and operations and on Israel’s economy in general. If the war extends for a long period of time or
expands to other fronts, our operations may be harmed.
Our
commercial insurance does not cover losses that may occur as a result of events associated with war and terrorism. Although the Israeli
government currently covers the reinstatement value of direct damages that are caused by terrorist attacks or acts of war, we cannot
assure you that this government coverage will be maintained or that it will sufficiently cover our potential damages. Any losses or damages
incurred by us could have a material adverse effect on our business. Any armed conflicts or political instability in the region would
likely negatively affect business conditions and could harm our results of operations.
The
continued political instability and hostilities between Israel and its neighbors and any future armed conflict, terrorist activity or
political instability in the region could adversely affect our operations in Israel and adversely affect the market price of our shares
of common stock. In addition, several organizations and countries may restrict doing business with Israel and Israeli companies have
been and are today subjected to economic boycotts. The interruption or curtailment of trade between Israel and its present trading partners
could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Item
2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item
3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item
4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not
applicable.
Text extracted from the filing as submitted to EDGAR. Formatting, tables and exhibits are simplified for reading; the original document is authoritative for anything you rely on.