Item 3. Legal Proceedings
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
From time to time, we are involved in claims and legal proceedings or investigations, that arise in the ordinary course of business. Such matters could have an adverse impact on our reputation, business, and financial condition and divert the attention of our management from the operation of our business. These matters are subject to many uncertainties and outcomes that are not predictable.
On February 1, 2021, a putative class action lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California (the “Court”) alleging that we and our former Chief Executive Officer, Kevin M. King, violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act and SEC Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder. On August 2, 2021, the lead plaintiff filed an amended complaint, and filed a further amended complaint on September 24, 2021. The amended complaint names as defendants, in addition to us and Mr. King, our former Chief Executive Officer, Michael J. Coyle, and former Chief Financial Officer and former Chief Operating Officer, Douglas J. Devine. The purported class in the amended complaint includes all persons who purchased or acquired our common stock between August 4, 2020 and July 13, 2021, and seeks unspecified damages purportedly sustained by the class. On October 27, 2021, we filed a motion to dismiss, which the Court granted on March 31, 2022, entering judgment in favor of us and the other defendants. On April 29, 2022, the original named plaintiff appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. On October 11, 2023, after briefing by the parties and oral argument, the Ninth Circuit dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The appellant filed a petition for rehearing en banc, which was denied on December 6, 2023.
On February 6, 2024, a second putative class action lawsuit was filed in the Court alleging that we and our current Chief Executive Officer, Quentin Blackford, our current Chief Financial Officer, Brice Bobzien, and Mr. Devine violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act and SEC Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, and seeks unspecified damages purportedly sustained by the class.
We believe the above securities class action lawsuits to be without merit and plan to continue to defend ourselves vigorously.
On March 26, 2021, we received a grand jury subpoena from the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of California requesting information related to communications with the Food and Drug Administration and our products and services. On September 14, 2021, we received a second subpoena requesting additional information. On April 4, 2023, we received a Subpoena Duces Tecum from the Consumer Protection Branch, Civil Division of the U.S. Department of Justice, requesting production of various documents regarding our products and services. We are cooperating fully on these matters.
On February 20, 2024, Welch Allyn, Inc. (“Welch Allyn”), a subsidiary of Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. which was acquired by Baxter International, Inc., filed a lawsuit against us in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, alleging that our Zio patches infringe certain of its patents. Welch Allyn seeks money damages and attorneys’ fees. We believe this lawsuit is without merit and plan to defend ourselves vigorously.
59
Table of Contents
At this time, we are unable to predict the eventual scope, duration or outcome of the aforementioned proceedings. See also Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors — Risks Related to Other Legal and Regulatory Matters” for more information on these matters.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
60
Table of Contents
PART II