Legal Proceedings.
−Removed: On September 2, 2020, a putative class action
−Removed: lawsuit, Chapman v.
−Removed: Fennec Pharmaceuticals Inc., was filed against us, our Chief Executive Officer, Rostislav Raykov, and our Chief Financial
−Removed: Officer, Robert Andrade, in the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina.
−Removed: The complaint alleged that prior
−Removed: to our August 10, 2020 receipt of a CRL from the FDA concerning our NDA for PEDMARK TM , we made materially false or misleading
−Removed: statements and failed to disclose material facts about the status of our PEDMARK TM manufacturing facility, its compliance with
−Removed: current good manufacturing practices, and the impact its status and compliance would have on regulatory approval for PEDMARK TM
+Added: On September 2, 2020, a putative class action lawsuit, Chapman v.
+Added: Fennec Pharmaceuticals Inc., was filed against us, our Chief Executive Officer, Rostislav Raykov, and our Chief Financial Officer, Robert Andrade, in the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina.
+Added: The complaint alleged that prior to our August 10, 2020 receipt of a CRL from the FDA concerning our NDA for PEDMARK TM , we made materially false or misleading statements and failed to disclose material facts about the status of our PEDMARK TM manufacturing facility, its compliance with current good manufacturing practices, and the impact its status and compliance would have on regulatory approval for PEDMARK TM .
On December 3, 2020, the court appointed a lead plaintiff to represent the putative class.
−Removed: On February 1, 2021, the lead plaintiff
−Removed: filed an amended complaint.
−Removed: The amended complaint added members of our board of directors as defendants, asserts a putative class period
−Removed: from December 10, 2018 through August 10, 2020, makes allegations similar to those in the original complaint, and claims the
−Removed: defendants violated Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
−Removed: On March 3, 2021, defendants filed a motion to dismiss
−Removed: the amended complaint.
+Added: On February 1, 2021, the lead plaintiff filed an amended complaint.
+Added: The amended complaint added members of our board of directors as defendants, asserts a putative class period from December 10, 2018 through August 10, 2020, makes allegations similar to those in the original complaint, and claims the defendants violated Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
+Added: On March 3, 2021, we and the other defendants filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint.
On April 2, 2021, plaintiffs filed an opposition to the motion.
−Removed: On April 16, 2021, defendants filed a reply brief
−Removed: in support of the motion.
+Added: On April 16, 2021, we and the other defendants filed a reply brief in support of the motion.
The court has not scheduled argument or issued an order on the motion.
−Removed: We believe that the suit is without merit and
−Removed: intend to defend it vigorously.
+Added: We believe that the suit is without merit and intend to defend it vigorously.
We cannot predict the outcome of this suit.
−Removed: Failure by us to obtain a favorable resolution of the suit
−Removed: could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
−Removed: We have not recorded a liability
−Removed: as of March 31, 2021, because we believe a potential loss is not probable or reasonably estimable given the preliminary nature of
−Removed: the proceedings.
+Added: Failure by us to obtain a favorable resolution of the suit could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
+Added: We have not recorded a liability as of June 30, 2021, because we believe a potential loss is not probable or reasonably estimable given the preliminary nature of the proceedings.
Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.