Item 1. Business
Item 1. Business.
Overview
We are a blank check company
incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware on May 27, 2021. We were formed for the purpose of effectuating a merger, stock exchange,
asset acquisition, stock purchase, reorganization or similar business combination with one or more businesses or entities, which we refer
to throughout this Report as our “initial business combination.” We have neither engaged in any operations nor generated any
revenue to date. Based on our business activities, we are a “shell company” as defined under the Exchange Act because we have
no operations and nominal assets consisting almost entirely of cash.
In evaluating potential businesses
and assets for an initial business combination, we, together with our management team and the Sponsor, considered acquisition candidates
across various industry categories. Although our efforts to identify a prospective target business were not limited to a particular industry,
we had a focus on operating businesses in the technology metals and energy transition metals sectors. Our efforts excluded the geographic
region of China and the special administrative regions of Hong Kong and Macau or companies with their principal business operations in
China, Hong Kong or Macau.
Initial Public Offering
On December 30, 2021, WTMA
consummated the IPO of 7,500,000 Units, at a price of $10.00 per unit, generating gross proceeds of $75.00 million, and a concurrent private
placement with the Sponsor of 347,500 WTMA Units at a price of $10.00 per unit, generating gross proceeds of $3.47 million. Each WTMA
Unit consists of one share of WTMA Common Stock and one WTMA Right, with each WTMA Right entitling the holder thereof to receive one-tenth
of one share of WTMA Common Stock. On January 14, 2022, pursuant to the underwriter’s exercise of the over-allotment option in part,
WTMA consummated the sale of an additional 227,686 WTMA units, at $10.00 per unit, generating gross proceeds of $2.27 million, and a concurrent
private placement with the Sponsor of 4,554 WTMA Units at a price of $10.00 per unit, generating gross proceeds of $45,540. A total of
$77.27 million from the net proceeds of the sale of the WTMA Units in the IPO and the sale of the private units was placed in the U.S.-based
trust account with Continental, acting as trustee.
WTMA’s certificate
of incorporation provided that it had nine months from the closing of the IPO, or until September 30, 2022, to complete an initial business
combination. On September 27, 2022, WTMA announced the approval and extension of the time period to consummate a business combination
from September 30, 2022 until December 30, 2022 and the approval of the issuance of a convertible, non-interest bearing, unsecured promissory
note in the aggregate principal amount of $772,768 to the Sponsor in order to fund such extension. Such amount was placed into the trust
account on September 27, 2022. Subsequently, on December 27, 2022, WTMA announced the approval and extension of the time period to consummate
a business combination from December 30, 2022 until March 30, 2023 and the approval of the issuance of an additional convertible, non-interest
bearing, unsecured promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $772,768 to the Sponsor in order to fund such extension. Such
amount was placed into the trust account on December 27, 2022. Subsequently, on March 24, 2023, WTMA held a special meeting in connection
with the votes to approve the March 2023 extension, allowing WTMA to extend the time period to consummate a business combination on a
monthly basis from March 30, 2023 to September 30, 2023 by contributing $125,000 to the trust for each month of extension. In connection
with the extension from March 30, 2023 to September 30, 2023, WTMA issued six promissory notes in the principal amount of $125,000 to
the Sponsor, the promissory notes are convertible, non-interest bearing, and unsecured. Subsequently, on September 29, 2023, WTMA held
another special meeting in connection with the votes to approve the September 2023 extension, allowing WTMA to extend the time period
to consummate a business combination from September 30, 2023 to June 30, 2024 without any additional contribution to the trust. Similarly,
on June 28, 2024, WTMA held a special meeting in connection with the votes to approve the June 2024 extension, allowing WTMA to extend
further the time period to consummate a business combination from June 30, 2024 to June 30, 2025.
1
Prior to the consummation
of the IPO on December 30, 2021, neither WTMA, nor anyone on its behalf, contacted any prospective target business or had any substantive
discussions, formal or otherwise, with respect to any potential business combination transaction with WTMA. After the completion of its
IPO and consistent with WTMA’s business purpose, WTMA’s directors and management team commenced an active, targeted search
for an initial set of potential business combination targets, leveraging the Sponsor’s network of relationships and intimate knowledge
of the private company marketplace, as well as the prior experience and network of WTMA’s directors and management team.
A total of $77,276,860, comprised
of proceeds from the initial public offering (including the over-allotment) and proceeds of the sale of the private placement units was
placed in the trust account maintained by Continental, acting as trustee. As of December 31, 2024, $12,257,933 remains in the trust account.
On January 7, 2025, WTMA’s
securities were suspended and delisted from the Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (“Nasdaq”). WTMA’s public units and public stock
(each, as defined herein) are currently quoted on the Pink market under the symbols “WTMAU” and “WTMA,” respectively,
and public rights (as defined herein) are currently quoted on the OTCQB under the symbol “WTMAR.”
It is the job of our sponsor
and management team to complete our initial business combination. Our management team is led by Daniel Mamadou, our Chief Executive Officer,
John Stanfield, our Chief Financial Officer, and Christopher Clower, our Chief Operating Officer, who have many years of experience in
managing supply chains of bulk commodities.
Merger Agreement
On January 25, 2024, the Company
issued a press release to announce that it had entered into a non-binding letter of intent with a target in the critical materials space
(the “Target”) for a potential business combination. There can be no assurance that a definitive agreement will be entered
into or that the proposed transaction will be consummated.
On March 22, 2024, the Company
issued a press release to announce that it had entered into a binding letter of intent with Evolution Metals LLC, a Delaware company (“EM”
or the “Target”), for a potential business combination.
On April 1, 2024, the Company
entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) by and among the Company, the Merger Sub, and EM. Upon
the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in this Merger Agreement, the Company, Merger Sub and the EM (Merger Sub and EM sometimes
being referred to herein as the “Constituent Corporations”) shall cause Merger Sub to be merged with and into EM, with EM
being the surviving corporation in the Merger. The Merger shall be consummated in accordance with the Merger Agreement and shall be evidenced
by a certificate of merger with respect to the Merger (as so filed, the “Merger Certificate”), executed by the Constituent
Corporations in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law (“DGCL”), Upon consummation
of the Merger, the separate corporate existence of Merger Sub shall cease and EM, as the surviving corporation of the Merger (hereinafter
the “Surviving Corporation”), shall continue its corporate existence under the DGCL, as a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company.
The Company will immediately be renamed Evolution Metals & Technologies Corp.
On November 6, 2024, the Company
entered an Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger amending the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of April 1, 2024.
On November 11, 2024 WTMA
entered into an Amendment No. 1 to the Merger Agreement, amending and restating certain defined terms in the Merger Agreement and the
corresponding consideration schedule in the Company Disclosure Schedule, to clarify that US NewCo will be a holder of membership interests
in EM following the proposed merger that is part of the Business Combination.
On February 10, 2025 WTMA
entered into an Amendment No. 2 to the Merger Agreement restating certain recitals and defined terms in the Merger Agreement and the corresponding
consideration schedule in the Company Disclosure Schedule, clarifying the amount of Company Membership Units to be received by Korea NewCo
and US NewCo in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement. Further, the Amendment No. 2 amended and restated
certain provisions of the Merger Agreement such that the New EM board of directors after the Closing will consist of six (6)
directors, which shall initially include six (6) director nominees designated by EM and reasonably acceptable to WTMA, insofar as those
nominees are elected to the New EM board of directors. Finally, the Amendment No. 2 replaced the form of the Amended and Restated Certificate
of Incorporation to be filed immediately following the Effective Time with the form attached as Exhibit A to the Amendment No. 2.
2
CMR Merger Agreement
On February 10, 2025, as part
of the series of transactions contemplated by the Business Combination, WTMA entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “ CMR
Merger Agreement ”), by and among WTMA, Critical Mineral Recovery, Inc., a Missouri corporation (“ CMR ”), and
the other parties thereto, pursuant to which CMR will be merged out of existence and into a wholly owned subsidiary of WTMA.
Pursuant to the CMR Merger
Agreement, the sole shareholder of CMR shall receive (A) 22,500,000 shares of New EM common stock, (B) cash in an amount of $125,000,000
and (C) cash in an amount up to $50,000,000 to be used to repay CMR’s indebtedness.
The CMR Merger Agreement contains
customary representations and warranties by the parties. Certain of the representations are subject to specified exceptions and qualifications
contained in the CMR Merger Agreement or in information provided pursuant to certain disclosure schedules to the CMR Merger Agreement.
The closing of the CMR Merger
Agreement is subject to the closing of the other transactions that are part of the Business Combination and other customary closing conditions.
The consummation of the other transactions that are part of the Business Combination are conditioned on the consummation of the transactions
contemplated by the CMR Merger Agreement.
Our Business Strategy and Acquisition Criteria
Background
Decarbonization, the shift
to alternative energy sources from carbon-based energy systems, has become a central component of economic plans for governments and private
sector companies in markets throughout the world. We are positioned to help drive and benefit from this energy transition.
“Net Zero” policies,
the promotion of holistic energy systems with zero net carbon emissions, are increasingly a goal of most major economic blocs. This trend
creates a major opportunity and a supportive backdrop for companies and enterprises that foster and participate in the production of carbon-neutral
energy systems and infrastructure.
According to Goldman Sachs,
the European Union Green Deal is estimated to channel more than $12 trillion of investment in clean energy infrastructure by 2050. If
these types of policies are adopted, the manner in which energy is produced will be transformed. Buildings and real estate in general
will be upgraded and transportation will undergo a dramatic change. By now, all major economies have embraced the energy transition.
The European Union Green
Deal recently implemented a more aggressive target to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by at least 50% by 2030. The EU Green Deal has a
specific focus on hydrogen power and offshore wind.
China has also pledged to
achieve net zero carbon status by 2060, pledging $16 trillion to cleantech infrastructure investments by 2060 via renewables, green hydrogen,
carbon capture nuclear energy and hydropower.
In the United States, lawmakers
and regulators are also following suit. In May 2021, for example, California and the U.S. federal government announced an agreement to
open up areas of the Pacific Coast to the first commercial wind energy farms in an effort to promote decarbonization.
In response to these initiatives,
new sources of metals and materials will need to be developed in order to feed the supply chains of de-carbonization technologies and
renewable energy. We call these metals and materials “Technology Metals,” “techmetals” or “Energy Transition
Metals” (ETMs). We intend to focus our search for our initial business combination on the Technology Metals and ETMs markets.
3
ETMs will be needed for the
refurbishment of factories, infrastructure to help the automotive industry transition away from combustion and the efficient storage of
intermittent sources of energy such as wind and solar. Welsbach is focused on the development of supply chains to meet this surge in ETMs
demand.
Through the transition to
electric vehicles, we expect a rise in the prices of ETMs, including certain rare earth elements (REEs), lithium, cobalt, graphite, manganese,
nickel, vanadium, copper and aluminum. Current supply chains are not calibrated to handle this increase in demand. Creating, investing
and supporting new supply chains for Technology Metals is the “raison d’être” of Welsbach.
In North America, ETMs supply
chains are underdeveloped as compared with Asia. According to a report commissioned by the United States Department of Energy on rare
earth magnets, there is “little time for North American supply chain developers to move to action on economically U.S-based mine-to-magnet
technologies to rebalance the supply chain away from China’s dominance.”
The report identifies the
mid-stream and downstream segments of the rare earths supply chain as having significant gaps in the areas of magnet manufacturing processes,
magnet powder composites, recycling technologies and environmental mitigation. The situation is similar for nickel, cobalt, lithium and
vanadium. We expect a significant ramp up of U.S. investment in ETMs and Technology Metals sectors over the coming years as the Biden
administration advances its own net zero carbon policy.
Through Welsbach Holdings
Pte Ltd, Daniel Mamadou, our CEO, and Chris Clower, our COO, invest in and support companies that are part of the global supply chain
of Technology Metals. Welsbach Holdings Pte Ltd operates across the entire supply chain of Technology Metals and ETMs in many geographies
globally.
Our Business Combination
Opportunity
The coming dominance of renewables
will place further pressure on the already strained ETMs supply chains. Easy monetary policy and zero carbon policies have created the
right setting to accelerate the transition away from fossil fuels. New supply chains will need to be created to accommodate the growth
in demand for technology metals.
ETMs are critical to the
shift away from fossil fuels as the world gradually transitions to renewable and sustainable energy sources.
Electric vehicle batteries
utilize technology metals such as cobalt, lithium, manganese, nickel, graphite and vanadium. Neodymium, praseodymium, dysprosium and terbium
are also critical rare earth technology metals, and are widely used in magnet composition, with applications that range from tiny electric
motors to rotor-less drives used in wind turbines.
Traditionally, the demand
for these metals has been a fraction of the demand for major base metals consumption such as copper. Despite their critical nature, ETMs
have historically been obtained as by-products of other metals mining activities. The rise of renewables, the de-carbonization of the
grid, and the transition to electric vehicles is putting pressure on the ETMs supply chains, driving a fundamental transformation of the
Technology Metals supply chains.
We believe prices of Technology
Metals and ETMs will increase, as demand increases more than supply going forward. There is a long lead time to bring new mining projects
from discovery to production and the metallurgical and chemical midstream processes required can be capital intensive.
As the regulations designed
to address climate change act as catalysts for the Technology Metals sector, we expect renewable sources of energy to continue to increase
their share of the energy mix across the largest economies globally. With the resulting expansion in demand for battery storage solutions
and electric motors, we also expect supply chains to be reconfigured in order to withstand shocks such as pandemics and to provide more
diversity of suppliers and to protect access to critical metals and materials. From the perspective of North American and European consumption,
we expect this supply chain reconfiguration to include an emphasis on moving midstream activities currently located in Asia to European
and American based operations.
4
Our Approach to Environmental
and Social Governance
As the CEO and COO of both
WTMA and Welsbach Holdings Pte Ltd, our approach to ESG is conduct business that ensures our commercial relationships are balanced and
sustainable. Our business at WTMA as well as Welsbach Holdings Pte Ltd is guided by the United Nations Global Compact and directed by
the UN Sustainable Development Goals. We have a climate strategy that focuses on investing in and supporting energy efficient supply chains,
reducing fossil fuels, and optimizing water use. In both WTMA and Welsbach Holdings Pte Ltd we adhere to UN Sustainable Development Goals
#7 “Affordable And Clean Energy”, #8 “Decent Work And Economic Growth”, #9 “Industry Innovation and Infrastructure”,
#13 “Climate Action”, and #17 “Partnerships For The Goals”.
We believe in having our
core values implemented by our partners and business counterparties. Integrity, sustainability and accountability are the primary tenets
which guide our activity. We believe that businesses must serve the purposes of society and as such, we strongly endorse activities that
foster economic growth, while positively impacting the environment.
As an organization committed
to transitioning to a low carbon future, we deploy our resources in supply chains that support renewable energy. By facilitating the sourcing
and distribution of metals and materials that are critical to the clean energy transition, we fulfil our goal of becoming the partner
of choice for technology metals supply chain stakeholders and participants. Whether lithium or nickel for batteries, graphite for anode
material, or neodymium for the production of permanent magnets, we strive to create reliable, efficient and resilient supply chains that
deliver the highest quality product at the right time. We also ensure that our chains can withstand sudden shocks and disruptions.
As an organization committed
to good governance and social benefits, our sponsor is a participant in the United Nations Global Compact, and as such we publish our
policies regarding labor rights, anti-bribery, environmental as well as our conflict mineral policies. We keep our personnel accountable
to respect human rights and labor standards and to ensure that environmental protection is front and center in our activities. We collaborate
with our joint venture partners and our business counterparties to promote the best in class governance procedures and systems.
Our Competitive Advantage
Our team is composed of professionals
that have expertise in in private equity investments, portfolio management, corporate restructuring, metals and mining, physical commodity
trading, supply chain management and logistics. Our specific competitive strengths are:
Experience in capital
markets and financing solutions
Daniel Mamadou is the CEO
of WTMA and also an executive director of Welsbach Holdings Pte Ltd; he has honed his capital markets skills over 20 years initially as
a derivatives structurer at Bank of Mitsubishi and Deutsche Bank in London, and then as a Debt and Equity Capital Markets officer at Goldman
Sachs in London, Deutsche Bank in Singapore and Nomura holdings in Hong Kong. During this period, Mr. Mamadou led multiple fundraising
projects for a wide range of companies and financial institutions in Europe, North Asia, Australia and Japan.
Christopher Clower is the
COO of WTMA, and also an executive director of Welsbach Holdings Pte Ltd. Christopher sits on a number of boards in South East Asia companies,
including Malacca Trust Pte Ltd, a holding company in Singapore which owns the top asset management company in Indonesia. He spent 11
years at Merrill Lynch and raised over $4 billion of capital in the resources space. Prior to this, Mr. Clower was Managing Director and
Head of Corporate Finance in Merrill Lynch for South East Asia. Christopher also worked at Deutsche Bank (1997 - 1998) and Bankers Trust
(1994 - 1997).
Experience in acquisition
and development of natural resource assets
Daniel Mamadou and his team
have been actively sourcing, analyzing, and investing in Technology Metals and ETMs markets since 2015. He has built up his knowledge
of the entire supply chain of ETMs and rare earths from upstream projects to junior mining, to the midstream refining sector and the downstream
industrial applications including neodymium and praseodymium metals and permanent magnets and recycling systems. As the founder and Executive
Director of the Talaxis Group (“Talaxis”), the Techmetals division within Noble Group, Daniel Mamadou invested approximately
$22.8 million of Noble Group internal capital to acquire equity stakes in seven Technology Metals companies and achieved a weighted average
deal level multiple of invested capital of 5.6x with 75.3% IRR over an investment period of slightly more than 3 years. Christopher Clower
co-founded, built and sold PT Manoor Bulatn Lestari, an Indonesian resource company and achieved 30x multiple of invested capital (MOIC
) in two years for himself and his investors.
5
Experience in supply chain
and logistics
The team has a track record
of managing supply chains of bulk commodities. Prior to WTMA, Daniel Mamadou founded and led Talaxis, the Technology Metals division of
Noble Group Holdings. Noble Group Holdings is an Asia-based independent energy products and industrial raw materials supply chain manager.
Noble Group has operations in more than 50 countries and more than 35 years of experience in Asia. While leading Talaxis, Daniel invested
in and developed projects related to Technology Metals, with a special focus on rare earth elements. He was instrumental in establishing
a network of supply chain partners in the upstream and midstream segments. Mr. Mamadou’s range of activities involved the sourcing,
marketing, processing, supplying, financing and transporting of energy transition metals and materials, with a particular focus on projects
related to battery-grade and electric vehicle materials such as nickel, lithium, graphite, and vanadium in various worldwide locations
to cover the entire supply chain. As the founder and Executive Director of Talaxis, Daniel Mamadou invested approximately $22.8 million
of Noble Group internal capital to acquire equity stakes in seven Techmetals companies and achieved a weighted average deal level multiple
of invested capital of 5.6x with 75.3% IRR over an investment period of slightly more than 3 years.
Independent board members
and network of advisors
WTMA’s senior management
benefits from the support and assistance of independent board members and a network of advisors that have a proven track record in identifying,
evaluating and negotiating with businesses and companies in the sectors that are relevant for WTMA. A strong emphasis on diversity and
skills has been made regarding the composition of the board, with the inclusion of independent directors that are competent in the fields
of mergers and acquisitions as well as disciplines related to geology and mining sectors.
Effectuating a Business Combination
General
A business combination may
involve the acquisition of, or merger with, a company which does not need substantial additional capital but which desires to establish
a public trading market for its shares, while avoiding what it may deem to be adverse consequences of undertaking a public offering itself.
These include time delays, significant expense, loss of voting control and compliance with various U.S. Federal and state securities laws.
In the alternative, we may seek to consummate a business combination with a company that may be in its early stages of development or
growth. While we may seek to effect simultaneous business combinations with more than one target business, we will probably have the ability,
as a result of our limited resources, to effect only a single business combination.
We are not presently engaged
in, and we will not engage in, any substantive commercial business until we complete the Business Combination.
Sources of Target Businesses
Target business candidates
may be brought to our attention from various unaffiliated sources, including investment bankers, venture capital funds, private equity
funds, leveraged buyout funds, management buyout funds and other members of the financial community. Target businesses may be brought
to our attention by such unaffiliated sources as a result of being solicited by us through calls or mailings which will not commence until
after the completion of our initial public offering. These sources may also introduce us to target businesses they think we may be interested
in on an unsolicited basis, since many of these sources will have read the prospectus in connection with our initial public offering or
this Report and know what types of businesses we are targeting. Our officers and directors, as well as their respective affiliates, may
also bring to our attention target business candidates that they become aware of through their business contacts as a result of formal
or informal inquiries or discussions they may have, as well as attending trade shows or conventions. We may engage the services of professional
firms or other individuals that specialize in business acquisitions, in which event we may pay a finder’s fee, consulting fee or
other compensation to be determined in an arm’s length negotiation based on the terms of the transaction. In no event, however,
will any of our existing insiders, special advisors or any entity with which they are affiliated, be paid any finder’s fee, consulting
fee or other compensation prior to, or for any services they render in order to effectuate, the consummation of a business combination
(regardless of the type of transaction). If we decide to enter into a business combination with a target business that is affiliated with
our insiders, we will do so only if we have obtained an opinion from an independent investment banking firm that the business combination
is fair to our unaffiliated stockholders from a financial point of view. However, as of the date of this Report, there is no affiliated
entity that we consider a business combination target.
6
If any of our officers or
directors becomes aware of a business combination opportunity that falls within the line of business of any entity to which he or she
has pre-existing fiduciary or contractual obligations, he or she may be required to present such business combination opportunity to such
entity prior to presenting such business combination opportunity to us. All of our officers, directors and director nominees currently
have certain relevant pre-existing fiduciary duties or contractual obligations.
Lack of Business Diversification
For an indefinite period
of time after the completion of our initial business combination, the prospects for our success may depend entirely on the future performance
of a single business. Unlike other entities that have the resources to complete business combinations with multiple entities in one or
several industries, it is probable that we will not have the resources to diversify our operations and mitigate the risks of being in
a single line of business. By completing our business combination with only a single entity, our lack of diversification may:
● subject us to negative economic,
competitive, and regulatory developments, any or all of which may have a substantial adverse impact on the particular industry in which
we operate after our initial business combination; and
● cause us to depend on the marketing
and sale of a single product or limited number of products or services.
Limited Ability to Evaluate the Target’s
Management Team
Although we closely scrutinize
the management of a prospective target business when evaluating the desirability of effectuating our initial business combination with
that business, our assessment of the target business’ management may not prove to be correct. The future role of members of our
management team, if any, in the target business, cannot presently be stated with any certainty. Consequently, members of our management
team may not become a part of the target’s management team, and the future management may not have the necessary skills, qualifications
or abilities to manage a public company. Further, it is also not certain whether one or more of our directors will remain associated in
some capacity with us following our initial business combination. Moreover, members of our management team may not have significant experience
or knowledge relating to the operations of the particular target business. Our key personnel may not remain in senior management or advisory
positions with the combined company. The determination as to whether any of our key personnel will remain with the combined company will
be made at the time of our initial business combination.
Following our initial business
combination, we may seek to recruit additional managers to supplement the incumbent management of the target business. We may not have
the ability to recruit additional managers, or that additional managers will have the requisite skills, knowledge or experience necessary
to enhance the incumbent management.
Fair Market Value of Target Business
Pursuant to the rules of
the Nasdaq Stock Market, our initial business combination must occur with one or more target businesses having an aggregate fair market
value of at least 80% of the value of the trust account (excluding any deferred underwriter’s fees and taxes payable on the income
earned on the trust account), which we refer to as the 80% test, at the time of the agreement to enter into the initial business combination.
Therefore, the fair market value of the target business will be calculated prior to any conversions of our shares in connection with a
business combination and therefore will be a minimum of $9,806,346 in order to satisfy the 80% test. While the fair market value of the
target business must satisfy the 80% test, the consideration we pay the owners of the target business may be a combination of cash (whether
cash from the trust account or cash from a debt or equity financing transaction that closes concurrently with the business combination)
or our equity securities. The exact nature and amount of consideration would be determined based on negotiations with the target business,
although we will attempt to primarily use our equity as transaction consideration. If our board is not able to independently determine
the fair market value of the target business or businesses, we will obtain an opinion from an independent investment banking firm with
respect to the satisfaction of such criteria. We will also obtain a fairness opinion from an independent investment banking firm before
consummating a business combination with an entity affiliated with any of our officers, directors or insiders. If we are no longer listed
on Nasdaq, we will not be required to satisfy the 80% test.
7
We anticipate structuring
our initial business combination so that the post-transaction company in which our public stockholders own shares will own or acquire
100% of the equity interests or assets of the target business or businesses. We may, however, structure our initial business combination
such that the post-transaction company owns less than 100% of such interests or assets of the target business in order to meet certain
objectives of the target management team or stockholders or for other reasons, but we will only complete such business combination if
the post-transaction company owns 50% or more of the outstanding voting securities of the target or otherwise owns a controlling interest
in the target sufficient for it not to be required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act . Even if the
post-transaction company owns 50% or more of the voting securities of the target, our stockholders prior to the business combination may
collectively own a minority interest in the post-transaction company, depending on valuations ascribed to the target and us in the business
combination transaction. For example, we could pursue a transaction in which we issue a substantial number of new shares in exchange for
all of the outstanding capital stock of a target. In this case, we would acquire a 100% controlling interest in the target. However, as
a result of the issuance of a substantial number of new shares, our stockholders immediately prior to our initial business combination
could own less than a majority of our outstanding shares subsequent to our initial business combination. If less than 100% of the equity
interests or assets of a target business or businesses are owned or acquired by the post-transaction company, the portion of such business
or businesses that is owned or acquired is what will be valued for purposes of the 80% test.
Stockholder Approval of Business Combination
In connection with any proposed
business combination, we will either (1) seek stockholder approval of our initial business combination at a meeting called for such purpose
at which public stockholders (but not our insiders, officers or directors) may seek to convert their shares of common stock, regardless
of whether they vote for or against the proposed business combination, into a portion of the aggregate amount then on deposit in the trust
account, or (2) provide our stockholders with the opportunity to sell their shares to us by means of a tender offer (and therefore avoid
the need for a stockholder vote) for an amount equal to their pro rata share of the aggregate amount then on deposit in the trust account,
in each case subject to the limitations described herein. If we determine to engage in a tender offer, such tender offer will be structured
so that each stockholder may tender all of his, her or its shares rather than some pro rata portion of his, her or its shares. The decision
as to whether we will seek stockholder approval of a proposed business combination or whether we will allow stockholders to sell their
shares to us in a tender offer will be made by us, solely in our discretion, and will be based on a variety of factors such as the timing
of the transaction and whether the terms of the transaction would otherwise require us to seek stockholder approval. We anticipate that
our business combination could be completed by way of a merger, share exchange, asset acquisition, stock purchase, recapitalization, reorganization
or other similar transaction. Stockholder approval will not be required under Delaware law if the business combination is structured as
an acquisition of assets of the target company, a share exchange with target company stockholders or a purchase of stock of the target
company; however, Nasdaq rules would require us to obtain stockholder approval if we seek to issue shares representing 20% or more of
our outstanding shares as consideration in a business combination. A merger of our company into a target company would require stockholder
approval under Delaware law. A merger of a target company into our company would not require stockholder approval unless the merger results
in a change to our certificate of incorporation, or if the shares issued in connection with the merger exceed 20% of our outstanding shares
prior to the merger. A merger of a target company with a subsidiary of our company would not require stockholder approval unless the merger
results in a change in our certificate of incorporation; however, Nasdaq rules would require us to obtain stockholder approval of such
a transaction if we week to issue shares representing 20% or more of our outstanding shares as consideration.
If a stockholder vote is
not required and we do not decide to hold a stockholder vote for business or other legal reasons, we will provide our stockholders with
an opportunity to tender their shares to us pursuant to a tender offer pursuant to Rule 13e-4 and Regulation 14E of the Exchange Act,
which regulate issuer tender offers, and we will file tender offer documents with the SEC which will contain substantially the same financial
and other information about the initial business combination as is required under the SEC’s proxy rules.
8
In the event we allow stockholders
to tender their shares pursuant to the tender offer rules, our tender offer will remain open for at least 20 business days, in accordance
with Rule 14e-1(a) under the Exchange Act, and we will not be permitted to complete our initial business combination until the expiration
of the tender offer period. In addition, the tender offer will be conditioned on public stockholders not tendering more than a specified
number of public shares, which number will be based on the requirement that we may not purchase public shares in an amount that would
cause our net tangible assets to be less than $5,000,001 (so that we are not subject to the SEC’s “penny stock” rules)
or any greater net tangible asset or cash requirement which may be contained in the agreement relating to our initial business combination.
If public stockholders tender more shares than we have offered to purchase, we will withdraw the tender offer and not complete the initial
business combination.
If, however, stockholder
approval of the transaction is required by law or Nasdaq requirements, or we decide to obtain stockholder approval for business or other
legal reasons, we will:
● permit stockholders to convert
their shares in conjunction with a proxy solicitation pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act, which regulates the solicitation
of proxies, and not pursuant to the tender offer rules, and
● file proxy materials with the
SEC.
In the event that we seek
stockholder approval of our initial business combination, we will distribute proxy materials and, in connection therewith, provide stockholders
with the conversion rights described above upon completion of the initial business combination.
We will consummate our initial
business combination only if public stockholders do not exercise conversion rights in an amount that would cause our net tangible assets
to be less than $5,000,001 and a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock voted are voted in favor of the business combination.
As a result, if stockholders owning approximately 93.75% or more of the shares of common stock sold in our initial public offering exercise
conversion rights, the business combination will not be consummated. However, the actual percentages will only be able to be determined
once a target business is located and we can assess all of the assets and liabilities of the combined company (which would include the
fee payable to the underwriters in an amount equal to 3.5% of the total gross proceeds raised in the initial public offering as described
elsewhere in this Report, any out-of-pocket expenses incurred by our insiders or their affiliates in connection with certain activities
on our behalf, such as identifying and investigating possible business targets and business combinations that have not been repaid at
that time, as well as any other liabilities of ours and the liabilities of the target business) upon consummation of the proposed business
combination, subject to the requirement that we must have at least $5,000,001 of net tangible assets upon closing of such business combination.
As a result, the actual percentages of shares that can be converted may be significantly lower than our estimates. We chose our net tangible
asset threshold of $5,000,001 to ensure that we would avoid being subject to Rule 419 promulgated under the Securities Act. However, if
we seek to consummate an initial business combination with a target business that imposes any type of working capital closing condition
or requires us to have a minimum amount of funds available from the trust account upon consummation of such initial business combination,
our net tangible asset threshold may limit our ability to consummate such initial business combination (as we may be required to have
a lesser number of shares converted) and may force us to seek third-party financing which may not be available on terms acceptable to
us or at all. As a result, we may not be able to consummate such initial business combination and we may not be able to locate another
suitable target within the applicable time period, if at all. Public stockholders may therefore have to wait until June 30, 2025 in order
to be able to receive a portion of the trust account.
Our insiders, including our
officers and directors, have agreed (1) to vote any shares of common stock owned by them in favor of any proposed business combination,
(2) not to convert any shares of common stock into the right to receive cash from the trust account in connection with a stockholder vote
to approve a proposed initial business combination or a vote to amend the provisions of our certificate of incorporation relating to stockholders’
rights or pre-business combination activity and (3) not to sell any shares of common stock in any tender in connection with a proposed
initial business combination.
9
Depending on how a business
combination was structured, any stockholder approval requirement could be satisfied by obtaining the approval of either (i) a majority
of the shares of our common stock that were voted at the meeting (assuming a quorum was present at the meeting), or (ii) a majority of
the outstanding shares of our common stock. Because our insiders collectively beneficially own approximately 65.3% of our issued and
outstanding shares of common stock and as a result of the insider’s agreement to vote in favor of a business combination, unless
otherwise required by applicable law, regulation or stock exchange rules, in addition to the founder shares, we would need no public shares
sold in the initial public offering to be voted in favor of an initial business combination.
Stockholders May Not Have the Ability to
Approve an Initial Business Combination
We may conduct redemptions
without a stockholder vote pursuant to the tender offer rules of the SEC. However, we will seek stockholder approval if it is required
by law or applicable stock exchange rule, or we may decide to seek stockholder approval for business or other legal reasons. Presented
in the table below is a graphic explanation of the types of initial business combinations we may consider and whether stockholder approval
is currently required under Delaware law for each such transaction.
Type of Transaction
Whether Stockholder
Approval is Required
Purchase of assets
No
Purchase of stock of target not involving a merger with the company
No
Merger of target into a subsidiary of the company
No
Merger of the company with a target
Yes
Under Nasdaq’s listing
rules, stockholder approval would be required for our initial business combination if, for example:
● we issue shares of common stock
that will be equal to or in excess of 20% of the number of shares of our common stock then outstanding;
● any of our directors, officers
or substantial stockholders (as defined by Nasdaq rules) has a 5% or greater interest (or such persons collectively have a 10% or greater
interest), directly or indirectly, in the target business or assets to be acquired or otherwise and the present or potential issuance
of common stock could result in an increase in outstanding common shares or voting power of 5% or more; or
● the issuance or potential issuance
of common stock will result in our undergoing a change of control.
In connection with any proposed
business combination, we will either (1) seek stockholder approval of our initial business combination at a meeting called for such purpose
at which public stockholders may seek to redeem their public shares, regardless of whether they vote for or against the proposed business
combination, into their pro rata share of the aggregate amount then on deposit in the trust account (net of taxes payable) or (2)
provide our public stockholders with the opportunity to sell their public shares to us by means of a tender offer (and thereby avoid the
need for a stockholder vote) for an amount equal to their pro rata share of the aggregate amount then on deposit in the trust account
(net of taxes payable), in each case subject to the limitations described herein.
If we determine to engage
in a tender offer, such tender offer will be structured so that each stockholder may tender any or all of his, her or its public shares
rather than some pro rata portion of his, her or its shares. The decision as to whether we will seek stockholder approval of a
proposed business combination or will allow stockholders to sell their shares to us in a tender offer will be made by us based on a variety
of factors such as the timing of the transaction and whether the terms of the transaction would otherwise require us to seek stockholder
approval. If we so choose and we are legally permitted to do so, we have the flexibility to avoid a stockholder vote and allow our stockholders
to sell their shares pursuant to Rule 13e-4 and Regulation 14E of the Exchange Act which regulate issuer tender offers. In that case,
we will file tender offer documents with the SEC which will contain substantially the same financial and other information about the initial
business combination as is required under the SEC’s proxy rules. We will consummate our initial business combination only if we
have net tangible assets of at least $5,000,001 upon such consummation and, solely if we seek stockholder approval, a majority of the
issued and outstanding shares of common stock voted are voted in favor of the business combination.
10
We chose our net tangible
asset threshold of $5,000,001 to ensure that we would avoid being subject to Rule 419. However, if we seek to consummate an initial business
combination with a target business that imposes any type of working capital closing condition or requires us to have a minimum amount
of funds available from the trust account upon consummation of such initial business combination, our net tangible asset threshold may
limit our ability to consummate such initial business combination (as we may be required to have a lesser number of shares redeemed or
sold to us) and may force us to seek third party financing which may not be available on terms acceptable to us or at all. As a result,
we may not be able to consummate such initial business combination and we may not be able to locate another suitable target within the
applicable time period, if at all. Public stockholders may therefore have to until June 30, 2025 in order to be able to receive a pro
rata share of the trust account.
Permitted Purchases of our Securities
In the event we seek stockholder
approval of our initial business combination and we do not conduct redemptions in connection with our initial business combination pursuant
to the tender offer rules, our sponsor, directors, officers, or their respective affiliates may purchase shares or rights in privately
negotiated transactions or in the open market either prior to or following the completion of our initial business combination. There is
no limit on the number of shares such persons may purchase. However, they have no current commitments, plans or intentions to engage in
such transactions and have not formulated any terms or conditions for any such transactions. In the event our sponsor, directors, officers,
or their respective affiliates determine to make any such purchases at the time of a stockholder vote relating to our initial business
combination, such purchases could have the effect of influencing the vote necessary to approve such transaction. None of the funds in
the trust account will be used to purchase shares or rights in such transactions. They will not make any such purchases when they are
in possession of any material non-public information not disclosed to the seller or if such purchases are prohibited by Regulation M under
the Exchange Act. Such a purchase may include a contractual acknowledgement that such stockholder, although still the record holder of
our shares is no longer the beneficial owner thereof and therefore agrees not to exercise its redemption rights. Subsequent to the consummation
of business combination, we will adopt an insider trading policy which will require insiders to: (i) refrain from purchasing shares during
certain blackout periods and when they are in possession of any material non-public information and (ii) to clear all trades with our
legal counsel prior to execution. We cannot currently determine whether our insiders will make such purchases pursuant to a Rule 10b5-1
plan, as it will be dependent upon several factors, including but not limited to, the timing and size of such purchases. Depending on
such circumstances, our insiders may either make such purchases pursuant to a Rule 10b5-1 plan or determine that such a plan is not necessary.
In the event that our sponsor,
directors, officers, or their respective affiliates purchase shares in privately negotiated transactions from public stockholders who
have already elected to exercise their redemption rights, such selling stockholders would be required to revoke their prior elections
to redeem their shares. We do not currently anticipate that such purchases, if any, would constitute a tender offer subject to the tender
offer rules under the Exchange Act or a going-private transaction subject to the going-private rules under the Exchange Act; however,
if the purchasers determine at the time of any such purchases that the purchases are subject to such rules, the purchasers will comply
with such rules.
The purpose of such purchases
would be to (i) vote such shares in favor of the business combination and thereby increase the likelihood of obtaining stockholder approval
of the business combination or (ii) to satisfy a closing condition in an agreement with a target that requires us to have a minimum net
worth or a certain amount of cash at the closing of our initial business combination, where it appears that such requirement would otherwise
not be met. The purpose of any such purchases of rights could be to reduce the number of rights, or underlying securities, outstanding.
This may result in the completion of our initial business combination that may not otherwise have been possible.
In addition, if such purchases
are made, the public “float” of our common stock may be reduced and the number of beneficial holders of our securities may
be reduced, which may make it difficult to maintain or obtain the quotation, listing or trading of our securities on a national securities
exchange.
11
Our sponsor, directors, officers,
or their respective affiliates anticipate that they may identify the stockholders with whom our sponsor, directors, officers, or their
respective affiliates may pursue privately negotiated purchases by either the stockholders contacting us directly or by our receipt of
redemption requests submitted by stockholders following our mailing of proxy materials in connection with our initial business combination.
To the extent that our sponsor, directors, officers, or their respective affiliates enter into a private purchase, they would identify
and contact only potential selling stockholders who have expressed their election to redeem their shares for a pro rata share of the trust
account or vote against the business combination. Such persons would select the stockholders from whom to acquire shares based on the
number of shares available, the negotiated price per share and such other factors as any such person may deem relevant at the time of
purchase. The price per share paid in any such transaction may be different than the amount per share a public stockholder would receive
if it elected to redeem its shares in connection with our initial business combination. Our sponsor, directors, officers, or their respective
affiliates will only purchase shares if such purchases comply with Regulation M under the Exchange Act and the other federal securities
laws.
Any purchases by our sponsor,
directors, officers, or their respective affiliates who are affiliated purchasers under Rule 10b-18 under the Exchange Act will only be
made to the extent such purchases are able to be made in compliance with Rule 10b-18, which is a safe harbor from liability for manipulation
under Section 9(a)(2) and Rule 10b-5 of the Exchange Act. Rule 10b-18 has certain technical requirements that must be complied with in
order for the safe harbor to be available to the purchaser. Our sponsor, directors, officers, or their respective affiliates will not
make purchases of common stock if the purchases would violate Section 9(a)(2) or Rule 10b-5 of the Exchange Act.
Conversion Rights
At any meeting called to
approve an initial business combination, any public stockholder, whether voting for or against such proposed business combination, will
be entitled to demand that his or her shares of common stock be converted for a full pro rata portion of the amount then in the trust
account ($10.00 per share as of December 31, 2024), plus any pro rata interest earned on the funds held in the trust account and not previously
released to us or necessary to pay our taxes. Alternatively, we may provide our public stockholders with the opportunity to sell their
shares of our common stock to us through a tender offer (and thereby avoid the need for a stockholder vote) for an amount equal to their
pro rata share of the aggregate amount then on deposit in the trust account, net of taxes payable.
Notwithstanding the foregoing,
a public stockholder, together with any affiliate of his or hers or any other person with whom he or she is acting in concert or as a
“group” (as defined in Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act), will be restricted from seeking conversion rights with respect
to 20% or more of the shares of common stock sold in our initial public offering. Such a public stockholder would still be entitled to
vote against a proposed business combination with respect to all shares of common stock owned by him or her, or his or her affiliates.
We believe this restriction will prevent stockholders from accumulating large blocks of shares before the vote held to approve a proposed
business combination and attempt to use the conversion right as a means to force us or our management to purchase their shares at a significant
premium to the then current market price. By not allowing a stockholder to convert more than 20% of the shares of common stock sold in
our initial public offering, we believe we have limited the ability of a small group of stockholders to unreasonably attempt to block
a transaction which is favored by our other public stockholders.
None of our insiders will
have the right to receive cash from the trust account in connection with a stockholder vote to approve a proposed initial business combination
or a vote to amend the provisions of our certificate of incorporation relating to stockholders’ rights or pre-business combination
activity with respect to any shares of common stock owned by them, directly or indirectly, whether acquired prior to our initial public
offering or purchased by them in our initial public offering or in the aftermarket.
We may also require public
stockholders who wish to convert, whether they are a record holder or hold their shares in “street name,” to either tender
their certificates to our transfer agent at any time through the vote on the business combination or to deliver their shares to the transfer
agent electronically using the DWAC System, at the holder’s option. The proxy solicitation materials that we will furnish to stockholders
in connection with the vote for any proposed business combination will indicate whether we are requiring stockholders to satisfy such
delivery requirements. Accordingly, a stockholder would have from the time the stockholder received our proxy statement through the vote
on the business combination to deliver his or her shares if he or she wishes to seek to exercise his or her conversion rights. Under Delaware
law and our bylaws, we are required to provide at least 10 days’ advance notice of any stockholder meeting, which would be the minimum
amount of time a public stockholder would have to determine whether to exercise conversion rights.
12
There is a nominal cost associated
with the above-referenced delivery process and the act of certificating the shares or delivering them through the DWAC System. The transfer
agent will typically charge the tendering broker $45.00 and it would be up to the broker whether or not to pass this cost on to the holder.
However, this fee would be incurred regardless of whether or not we require holders to deliver their shares prior to the vote on the business
combination in order to exercise conversion rights. This is because a holder would need to deliver shares to exercise conversion rights
regardless of the timing of when such delivery must be effectuated. However, in the event we require stockholders to deliver their shares
prior to the vote on the proposed business combination and the proposed business combination is not consummated, this may result in an
increased cost to stockholders.
The foregoing is different
from the procedures used by many blank check companies. Traditionally, in order to perfect conversion rights in connection with a blank
check company’s business combination, the company would distribute proxy materials for the stockholders’ vote on an initial
business combination, and a holder could simply vote against a proposed business combination and check a box on the proxy card indicating
such holder was seeking to exercise his or her conversion rights. After the business combination was approved, the company would contact
such stockholder to arrange for him or her to deliver his or her certificate to verify ownership. As a result, the stockholder then had
an “option window” after the consummation of the business combination during which he or she could monitor the price of the
company’s stock in the market. If the price rose above the conversion price, he or she could sell his or her shares in the open
market before actually delivering his or her shares to the company for cancellation. As a result, the conversion rights, to which stockholders
were aware they needed to commit before the stockholder meeting, would become a “continuing” right surviving past the consummation
of the business combination until the holder delivered its certificate.
The requirement for physical
or electronic delivery prior to the meeting ensures that a holder’s election to convert his or her shares is irrevocable once the
business combination is approved.
Any request to convert such
shares once made may be withdrawn at any time up to the vote on the proposed business combination. Furthermore, if a holder of a public
share delivered his or her certificate in connection with an election of their conversion and subsequently decides prior to the vote on
the proposed business combination not to elect to exercise such rights, he or she may simply request that the transfer agent return the
certificate (physically or electronically).
If the Business Combination
is not approved or completed for any reason, then our public stockholders who elected to exercise their conversion rights would not be
entitled to convert their shares for the applicable pro rata share of the trust account. In such case, we will promptly return any shares
delivered by public holders.
Liquidation if No Business Combination
The current extension date
by which we must consummate the Business Combination is June 30, 2025. Unless we submit and our stockholders approve an extension, if
the Business Combination (or combination with another target business) is not completed by the Liquidation Date, such condition will trigger
our automatic winding up, liquidation and dissolution pursuant to the terms of the Charter. As a result, this has the same effect as if
we had formally gone through a voluntary liquidation procedure under the DGCL. Accordingly, no vote would be required from our stockholders
to commence such a voluntary winding up, liquidation and dissolution.
The amount in the trust account
(less approximately $228 representing the aggregate nominal par value of the common stock as of December 31, 2024) under the DGCL will
be treated as a share premium which is distributable under the DGCL provided that immediately following the date on which the proposed
distribution is proposed to be made, we are able to pay our debts as they fall due in the ordinary course of business. If we are forced
to liquidate the trust account, we anticipate that we would distribute to our stockholders the amount in the trust account calculated
as of the date that is two (2) business days prior to the distribution date (including any accrued interest) including interest earned
on the funds held in the trust account, and not previously released to us to pay our taxes, divided by the number of then outstanding
public stock, subject to certain limitations. Prior to such distribution, we would be required to assess all claims that may be potentially
brought against it by its creditors for amounts they are actually owed and make provision for such amounts, as creditors take priority
over our shareholders with respect to amounts that are owed to them. We cannot assure you that it will properly assess all claims that
may be potentially brought against it. As such, our stockholders could potentially be liable for any claims of creditors to the extent
of distributions received by them as an unlawful payment in the event we enter an insolvent liquidation. Furthermore, while we have obtained
and will continue to seek to have all vendors, service providers (other than its independent auditors), prospective target businesses
or other entities with which we do business and prospective target businesses execute agreements with us waiving any right, title, interest
or claim of any kind they may have in or to any monies held in the trust account, there is no guarantee that they will execute such agreements.
Nor is there any guarantee that, even if such entities execute such agreements with us, they will not seek recourse against the trust
account or that a court would conclude that such agreements are legally enforceable.
13
The Sponsor and our directors
and officers have agreed to waive their rights to participate in any liquidation of the trust account or other assets with respect to
any of our common stock held by them and to vote their common stock in favor of any dissolution and plan of distribution which we submit
to a vote of stockholders. No consideration was received by such persons in respect of such waiver. There will be no distribution from
the trust account with respect to the Rights, which will expire worthless.
If we are unable to complete
the Business Combination and expend all of the net proceeds of the IPO, other than the proceeds deposited in the trust account and without
taking into account interest, if any, earned on the trust account, the per-share distribution from the trust account would be approximately
$11.32 based on the value of the trust account as of December 31, 2024.
The proceeds deposited in
the trust account could, however, become subject to the claims of our creditors which would be prior to the claims of the public stockholders.
Although we have obtained and will continue to seek to have all vendors, including lenders for money borrowed, prospective target businesses
or other entities we engage execute agreements with us waiving any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to any monies held
in the trust account for the benefit of our stockholders, there is no guarantee that they will execute such agreements or even if they
execute such agreements that they would be prevented from bringing claims against the trust account, including but not limited to, fraudulent
inducement, breach of fiduciary responsibility or other similar claims, as well as claims challenging the enforceability of the waiver,
in each case in order to gain an advantage with a claim against our assets, including the funds held in the trust account.
The Sponsor has agreed that
it will be liable to us if and to the extent any claims by a vendor for services rendered or products sold to us, or a prospective target
business with which we have discussed entering into a transaction agreement, reduce the amount of funds in the trust account to below
(a) $10.00 per our common stock (or such higher amount then held in trust) or (b) such lesser amount per our common stock held in the
trust account as of the date of the liquidation of the trust account due to reductions in the value of the trust assets, in each case
net of the interest which may be withdrawn to pay taxes, except as to any claims by a third party who executed a waiver of any and all
rights to seek access to the trust account and except as to any claims under our indemnity of the underwriters of the IPO against certain
liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act. Moreover, in the event that an executed waiver is deemed to be unenforceable
against a third party, the Sponsor will not be responsible to the extent of any liability for such third-party claims. Additionally, if
we are forced to file a bankruptcy case or an involuntary bankruptcy case is filed against it which is not dismissed, the proceeds held
in the trust account could be subject to applicable bankruptcy law and may be included in our bankruptcy estate and subject to the claims
of third parties with priority over the claims of our stockholders. To the extent any bankruptcy claims deplete the trust account, we
cannot assure you it will be able to return to our stockholders at least $10.00 per public stock (or such higher amount then held in trust).
Because we will not be complying
with Section 280, Section 281(b) of the DGCL requires it to adopt a plan, based on facts known to us at such time that will provide for
our payment of all existing and pending claims or claims that may be potentially brought against us within the 10 years following our
dissolution. However, because we are a blank check company, rather than an operating company, and our operations are limited to searching
for prospective target businesses to acquire, the only likely claims to arise would be from our vendors (such as lawyers, investment bankers,
etc.) or prospective target businesses. If our plan of distribution complies with Section 281(b) of the DGCL, any liability of stockholders
with respect to a liquidating distribution is limited to the lesser of such stockholder’s pro rata share of the claim or the amount
distributed to the stockholder, and any liability of the stockholder would likely be barred after the third anniversary of the dissolution.
We cannot assure you that we will properly assess all claims that may be potentially brought against us. As such, our stockholders could
potentially be liable for any claims to the extent of distributions received by them (but no more) and any liability of our stockholders
may extend beyond the third anniversary of such date. Furthermore, if the pro rata portion of our trust account distributed to our public
stockholders upon the redemption of our public stock in the event we do not complete our initial business combination within the allotted
time period is not considered a liquidating distribution under Delaware law and such redemption distribution is deemed to be unlawful,
then pursuant to Section 174 of the DGCL, the statute of limitations for claims of creditors could then be six years after the unlawful
redemption distribution, instead of three years, as in the case of a liquidating distribution.
14
Certificate of Incorporation
Our certificate of incorporation
contains certain requirements and restrictions relating to our initial public offering that will apply to us until the consummation of
our initial business combination. If we hold a stockholder vote to amend any provisions of our certificate of incorporation relating to
stockholder’s rights or pre-business combination activity (including the substance or timing within which we have to complete a
business combination), we will provide our public stockholders with the opportunity to redeem their shares of common stock upon approval
of any such amendment at a per-share price, payable in cash, equal to the aggregate amount then on deposit in the trust account, including
interest earned on the funds held in the trust account and not previously released to us to pay our franchise and income taxes, divided
by the number of then outstanding public shares, in connection with any such vote. Our insiders have agreed to waive any conversion rights
with respect to any founder shares, private shares and any public shares they may hold in connection with any vote to amend our certificate
of incorporation. Specifically, our certificate of incorporation provides, among other things, that:
● prior to the consummation of
our initial business combination, we shall either (1) seek stockholder approval of our initial business combination at a meeting called
for such purpose at which public stockholders may seek to convert their shares of common stock, regardless of whether they vote for or
against the proposed business combination, into a portion of the aggregate amount then on deposit in the trust account, net of taxes
payable, or (2) provide our stockholders with the opportunity to sell their shares to us by means of a tender offer (and thereby avoid
the need for a stockholder vote) for an amount equal to their pro rata share of the aggregate amount then on deposit in the trust account,
net of taxes payable, in each case subject to the limitations described herein;
● we will consummate our initial
business combination only if public stockholders do not exercise conversion rights in an amount that would cause our net tangible assets
to be less than $5,000,001 and a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock voted are voted in favor of the business combination;
● if our initial business combination
is not consummated within 9 months of the closing of our initial public offering, then our existence will terminate, and we will distribute
all amounts in the trust account to all of our public holders of shares of common stock;
● upon the consummation of our
initial public offering and the partial exercise of the underwriter’s over-allotment option, $77,276,860 was placed into the trust
account;
● we may not consummate any other
business combination, merger, capital stock exchange, asset acquisition, stock purchase, reorganization or similar transaction prior
to our initial business combination; and
● prior to our initial business
combination, we may not issue additional shares of capital stock that would entitle the holders thereof to (i) receive funds from the
trust account or (ii) vote on any initial business combination.
Potential Revisions to Agreements with Insiders
Each of our insiders has
entered into letter agreements with us pursuant to which each of them has agreed to do certain things relating to us and our activities
prior to a business combination. We could seek to amend these letter agreements without the approval of stockholders, although we have
no intention to do so. In particular:
● Restrictions relating to liquidating
the trust account if we failed to consummate a business combination in the time-frames specified above could be amended, but only if
we allowed all stockholders to redeem their shares in connection with such amendment;
15
● Restrictions relating to our
insiders being required to vote in favor of a business combination or against any amendments to our organizational documents could be
amended to allow our insiders to vote on a transaction as they wished;
● The requirement of members
of the management team to remain our officer or director until the closing of a business combination could be amended to allow persons
to resign from their positions with us if, for example, the current management team was having difficulty locating a target business
and another management team had a potential target business;
● The restrictions on transfer
of our securities could be amended to allow transfer to third parties who were not members of our original management team;
● The obligation of our management
team to not propose amendments to our organizational documents could be amended to allow them to propose such changes to our stockholders;
● The obligation of insiders
to not receive any compensation in connection with a business combination could be modified in order to allow them to receive such compensation;
and
● The requirement to obtain a
valuation for any target business affiliated with our insiders, in the event it was too expensive to do so.
Except as specified above,
stockholders would not be required to be given the opportunity to redeem their shares in connection with such changes. Such changes could
result in:
● Our having an extended period
of time to consummate a business combination (although with less in trust as a certain number of our stockholders would certainly redeem
their shares in connection with any such extension);
● Our insiders being able to
vote against a business combination or in favor of changes to our organizational documents;
● Our operations being controlled
by a new management team that our stockholders did not elect to invest with;
● Our insiders receiving compensation
in connection with a business combination; and
● Our insiders closing a transaction
with one of their affiliates without receiving an independent valuation of such business.
We will not agree to any
such changes unless we believed that such changes were in the best interests of our stockholders (for example, if we believed such a modification
were necessary to complete a business combination). Each of our officers and directors has fiduciary obligations to us requiring that
he or she act in our best interests and the best interests of our stockholders.
Competition
In identifying, evaluating
and selecting a target business, we may encounter intense competition from other entities having a business objective similar to ours.
Many of these entities are well established and have extensive experience identifying and effectuating business combinations directly
or through affiliates. Many of these competitors possess greater technical, human and other resources than us and our financial resources
will be relatively limited when contrasted with those of many of these competitors. While we believe there may be numerous potential target
businesses that we could complete a business combination with utilizing the net proceeds of our initial public offering, our ability to
compete in completing a business combination with certain sizable target businesses may be limited by our available financial resources.
The following also may not
be viewed favorably by certain target businesses:
● our obligation to seek stockholder
approval of our initial business combination or engage in a tender offer may delay the completion of a transaction;
16
● our obligation to convert shares
of common stock held by our public stockholders may reduce the resources available to us for our initial business combination;
● our obligation to pay the deferred
underwriting discounts to the underwriters upon consummation of our initial business combination;
● our obligation to either repay
working capital loans that may be made to us by our insiders or their affiliates;
● our obligation to register
the resale of the founder shares, as well as the private units (and underlying securities) and any shares issued to our insiders or their
affiliates upon conversion of working capital loans; and
● the impact on the target business’
assets as a result of unknown liabilities under the securities laws or otherwise depending on developments involving us prior to the
consummation of a business combination.
Any of these factors may
place us at a competitive disadvantage in successfully negotiating our initial business combination. Our management believes, however,
that our status as a public entity and potential access to the United States public equity markets may give us a competitive advantage
over privately held entities having a similar business objective as ours in connection with an initial business combination with a target
business with significant growth potential on favorable terms.
If we succeed in effectuating our initial business
combination, there will be, in all likelihood, intense competition from competitors of the target business. Subsequent to our initial
business combination, we may not have the resources or ability to compete effectively. Employees
We have four executive officers.
These individuals are not obligated to devote any specific number of hours to our matters and intend to devote only as much time as they
deem necessary to our affairs. The amount of time they devote in any time period will vary based on circumstances, including whether a
target business has been selected for the business combination and the stage of the business combination process the company is in. Accordingly,
once a suitable target business to consummate our initial business combination with has been located, management will spend more time
investigating such target business and negotiating and processing the business combination (and consequently spend more time on our affairs)
than had been spent prior to locating a suitable target business. We presently expect our executive officers to devote an average of approximately
10 hours per week to our business. We do not intend to have any full time employees prior to the consummation of our initial business
combination.
Periodic Reporting and Audited Financial Statements
We have registered our units,
common stock and rights under the Exchange Act and have reporting obligations, including the requirement that we file annual, quarterly
and current reports with the SEC. In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, our annual reports, including this Report,
contain financial statements audited and reported on by our independent registered public accountants.
We will provide stockholders
with audited financial statements of the prospective target business as part of any proxy solicitation materials or tender offer documents
sent to stockholders to assist them in assessing the target business. These financial statements will need to be prepared in accordance
with or reconciled to United States GAAP or IFRS as issued by the IASB. A particular target business identified by us as a potential business
combination candidate may not have the necessary financial statements. To the extent that this requirement cannot be met, we may not be
able to consummate our initial business combination with the proposed target business.
We may be required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act to have our internal control over financial reporting audited for the year ending December 31, 2025. A target company
may not be in compliance with the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act regarding the adequacy of their internal control over financial
reporting. The development of the internal control over financial reporting of any such entity to achieve compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act may increase the time and costs necessary to complete any such initial business combination.
17
JOBS Act
We are an “emerging
growth company,” as defined in Section 2(a) of the Securities Act, as modified by the JOBS Act. As such, we are eligible to take
advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not “emerging
growth companies” including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section
404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our
periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a non-binding advisory vote on executive compensation
and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. If some investors find our securities less attractive
as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our securities and the prices of our securities may be more volatile.
In addition, Section 107
of the JOBS Act also provides that an “emerging growth company” can take advantage of the extended transition period provided
in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act for complying with new or revised accounting standards. In other words, an “emerging
growth company” can delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies.
We intend to take advantage of the benefits of this extended transition period until we are no longer an “emerging growth company.”
We will remain an emerging
growth company until the earlier of (1) the last day of the fiscal year (a) following the fifth anniversary of the completion of our initial
public offering, (b) in which we have total annual gross revenue of at least $1.235 billion, or (c) in which we are deemed to be a large
accelerated filer, which means the market value of our common stock that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the prior
June 30 th , and (2) the date on which we have issued more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt during the prior three-year
period. References herein to “emerging growth company” shall have the meaning associated with it in the JOBS Act.
Text extracted from the filing as submitted to EDGAR. Formatting, tables and exhibits are simplified for reading; the original document is authoritative for anything you rely on.