ELITE PHARMACEUTICALS INC /NV/ 10-K

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS An investment in the Company’s securities involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks described below as well as other information provided to you in this report, including information in the section of this document entitled “Forward Looking Statements.” The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently believe are immaterial may also impair our business operations. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially adversely affected, the value of our Common Stock could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment. In addition to the other information contained in this report, the following risk factors should be considered carefully in evaluating an investment in us and in analyzing our forward-looking statements. Risk Factor Summary The following is a summary of the risk factors contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K that could adversely affect our business, ability to operate, financial condition, results of operation, equity and cash flows. This summary does not address all of the risks that we face and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the more detailed descriptions included below. In addition to this summary, we strongly encourage you to carefully review the full risk factors in their entirety. Business Related Risks ● The pharmaceutical industry is highly competitive. ● Natural disasters and associated supply chain effects. ● Interruptions in operations at our sole facility could have a material adverse effect on our business. ● We may sell, withdraw or discontinue manufacture of certain products. ● We may fail to successfully identify, develop, and commercialize new products. ● Introduction of generic equivalents of our products by competitors. ● Our operations could be disrupted by failure of our information systems or cyber-attacks. ● Artificial intelligence (“AI”) based platforms may present new risks and challenges to our business. ● Delays in product development may result in failure to achieve adequate return on investment. 16 ● Our business is dependent on market acceptance of our products and social and political pressures, including public concern over the abuse of certain products, including opioids may adversely affect our business. ● Unstable economic conditions may adversely affect our business. ● We depend on qualified scientific and technical personnel and our ability to attract and retained such. ● Unsuccessful collaboration or licensing arrangements could limit revenues and product development. ● Substantial portion of revenues is derived from a limited number of products. ● We depend to a large extent on third-party suppliers and distributors for the raw materials for our products. ● Risks related to incorrect or inadequate provision for price adjustments and sales allowances Financial and Liquidity Related Risks ● We have identified material weaknesses in our internal controls over financial reporting ● While we currently qualify as a smaller reporting company under SEC regulations, we cannot be certain, if we take advantage of the reduced disclosure requirements applicable to these companies, that we will not make our stock less attractive to investors. Once we lose smaller reporting company status, the costs and demands placed upon our management are expected to increase. ● Our operating results could fluctuate significantly. ● Our ability to fund operations is uncertain and we may require additional financing to meet objectives. ● There is a risk of impairment of significant intangible assets on our balance sheet. ● GAAP requires estimates, judgments and assumptions which inherently contain uncertainties. Legal and Regulatory Risks ● The pharmaceutical industry is heavily regulated, which creates uncertainty and substantial compliance costs. ● Disruptions at the FDA, the DEA, the SEC, and other government agencies could negatively impact our business. ● Our business may be adversely affected by legislation or healthcare regulatory reform and initiatives. ● Use of generics may be limited through legislative, regulatory or efforts of pharmaceutical companies. ● Our revenues and profits from generic products may decline as a result of changes in regulatory policy. ● New tariffs and evolving trade policy between the US and other countries may adversely affect our business. ● The DEA could limit the availability of active ingredients used in many of our products. ● We received a CRL from the FDA indicating that the SequestOx™ NDA is not ready for approval. ● Regulatory factors may cause us to be unable to manufacture products or face interruptions in our manufacturing process. ● Agreements between branded pharmaceutical companies and generic pharmaceutical companies are facing increased government scrutiny in the United States and internationally. ● Complex reporting and payment obligations under the Medicaid rebate and other governmental programs. ● Investigations and litigation concerning the calculation of average wholesale prices may adversely affect our business Litigation and Liability Related Risks ● We may not be able to obtain or maintain adequate insurance coverages. ● Litigation, product liability claims, product recalls, government investigations and other significant legal proceedings are common in the pharmaceutical industry. ● We are subject to various fraud and abuse laws which could expose us to criminal sanctions, civil penalties, contractual damages, reputational harm, and diminished profits and future earnings. ● Our products contain controlled substances which may subject us to increased litigation risk and regulation. ● Mandatory REMS programs could increase the cost, burden, and liability associated with the commercialization of certain products. 17 ● Illegal distribution and third-party sale of counterfeit versions of our products could have a detrimental effect on our reputation and business. ● Competitors or other third parties may allege that we are infringing upon their intellectual property. Intellectual Property Related Risks ● Our ability to protect intellectual property rights and successfully defend third-party allegations of intellectual property infringement is vital to our business and uncertain. Risks Related to our Common Shares ● Dilution from issuance of shares pursuant to the exercise of warrants and options or the perception that dilution may occur could cause the price per share of common stock to fall. ● Our common stock is a penny stock, quoted on the OTC bulletin board, with rules in place that could limit trading and liquidity of our shares, increased transaction costs that could adversely affect our price per share. ● Shareholder activism could negatively affect us. ● Our stock price has been volatile. ● Capital raises through sales of securities may cause substantial dilution to existing shareholders. ● Issuance of shares of common or preferred stock could make achieving a change of control more difficult. ● We have no plans to pay regular dividends or conduct ordinary share purchases. Business Related Risks The pharmaceutical industry is highly competitive. The pharmaceutical industry is highly competitive and subject to rapid and significant technological change, and we may be unable to compete effectively, which could impair our ability to implement our business model. Competitive factors faced include, without limitation: ● Introduction of other generic drug manufacturers’ products in direct competition with our generic drug products; ● Introduction of authorized generic drug products in direct competition with our products, particularly during any period of exclusivity; ● The ability of generic drug product competitors to quickly enter the market after the expiration of patents or exclusivity periods, diminishing the amount and duration of significant profits; ● Consolidation among distribution outlets through mergers and acquisitions and the formation of buying groups; ● The willingness of generic drug customer, including, without limitation, wholesale and retail customers, to switch among products of different generic pharmaceutical manufacturers; ● Pricing pressures by competitors and customers, even if similar price savings are not passed on to consumers; ● A company’s reputation as a manufacturer and distributor of quality generic pharmaceutical products; ● A company’s level of service, including, without limitation, maintaining sufficient inventory levels for deliveries consistent with customer expectations; ● A company’s ability to use and integrate technology, including the use and integration of AI; ● Product appearance and labeling; ● A company’s breadth of product offerings; ● Rapid and significant technological change; ● Development and commercialization of advanced or novel drug delivery systems; ● Availability of greater financial resources to fund research and development, marketing, human resources and other operational and overhead resources and capabilities; ● Development of new formulations and products, or improvement of existing ones, at higher levels of efficiency; and ● We depend on third-party suppliers and distributors for the raw materials for our products. ● Our success, if any, will depend in part on our ability to successfully keep pace with these factors. 18 As we expand our presence in the generic pharmaceuticals market our products may face intense competition from brand-name companies that have taken aggressive steps to thwart competition from generic companies. In particular, brand-name companies continue to sell or license their products directly or through licensing arrangements or strategic alliances with generic pharmaceutical companies (so-called “authorized generics”). No significant regulatory approvals are required for a brand-name company to sell directly or through a third-party to the generic market, and brand-name companies do not face any other significant barriers to entry into such market. In addition, such companies continually seek to delay generic introductions and to decrease the impact of generic competition, using tactics which include, without limitation: ● Obtaining new patents on drugs whose original patent protection is about to expire; ● Filing patent applications that are more complex and costly to challenge; ● Filing suits for patent infringement that automatically delay approval from the FDA; ● Filing citizens’ petitions with the FDA contesting approval of the generic versions of products due to alleged health and safety issues; ● Developing controlled-release or other “next-generation” products, which often reduce demand for the generic version of the existing product for which we may be seeking approval; ● Changing product claims and product labeling; ● Developing and marketing as over-the-counter products those branded products which are about to face generic competition; and, ● Making arrangements with managed care companies and insurers to reduce the economic incentives to purchase generic pharmaceuticals. These strategies may increase the costs and risks associated with our efforts to introduce our generic products under development and may delay or prevent such introduction altogether. In addition, sales of our products may be adversely affected by the continuing consolidation within the retail and wholesale pharmaceutical markets. Our products, whether sold directly by the Company or through third parties that are licensed to market and distribute our products are sold in large part to a market that is comprised of a relatively few retail drug chains, wholesalers, and managed care organizations, with such entities continuing to undergo consolidation. Such consolidation may provide these customers or our products with additional purchasing leverage, and consequently, may increase the pricing pressures faced by us. Additionally, the emergence of large buying groups representing independent retail pharmacies, and the prevalence and influence of managed care organizations and similar institutions, enable those groups to extract price discounts on our products and our revenues and quarterly results comparisons may also be affected by fluctuations in the buying patterns of retail chains, major distributors, and other trade buyers. Furthermore, policies regarding returns, rebates, allowances and chargebacks, and marketing programs adopted by wholesalers may reduce our revenues in future fiscal periods. Based on industry practice, generic drug manufacturers have liberal return policies and have been willing to give customers post-sale inventory allowances. Such industry practices apply to the current sales of our products by our marketing partners, which in turn effect profit splits and license fees received, and they will also affect prospective future sales made directly by Company. Under these arrangements, from time to time, customers are given credits on our generic products that are held by them in inventory after there is a decrease in the market prices of the same generic products due to competitive pricing. Therefore, if new competitors enter the marketplace and significantly lower the prices of any of their competing products, the price of our products would also likely be reduced. As a result, we, or are marketing partners, would be obligated to provide credits to our customers who are then holding inventories of such products, which could reduce sales revenue, profit splits, license fees and gross margin for the period the credit is provided. Like most competitors in this market, our marketing partners, or us in the case of prospective direct sales made by the Company, also give credits for chargebacks to wholesalers that have contracts with our marketing partners, or us, prospectively, for their sales to hospitals, group purchasing organizations, pharmacies, or other customers. A chargeback is the difference between the price the wholesaler pays and the price that the wholesaler’s end-customer pays for a product. Although, our marketing partners establish, and prospectively we would also establish reserves based on prior experience and best estimates of the impact that these policies may have in subsequent periods, we cannot ensure that such reserves established are adequate or that actual product returns, rebates, allowances, and chargebacks will not exceed estimates. Differences between established reserves and actual amounts of such credits and charges, could result in a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and stock price. The existence and occurrence of any of the above could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, ability to operate and stock price. 19 Natural disasters could cause closures of our facilities and disrupt our operations. Furthermore, the occurrence of one or more unexpected events, including fires, tornadoes, tsunamis, hurricanes, earthquakes, floods, and other forms of severe hazards in the United States or in other countries in which we or our suppliers operate or are located could adversely affect our operations and financial performance. We have lost power or had to shut down operations as a result of extreme weather and natural disasters. These types of unexpected events could result in physical damage to and complete or partial closure of one or more of distribution centers or manufacturing facilities, or the temporary or long-term disruption in the supply of products, and/or disruption of our ability to deliver products to customers. Further, the long-term effects of climate change on general economic conditions and the pharmaceutical manufacturing and distribution industry in particular are unclear, and changes in the supply, demand or available sources of energy and the regulatory and other costs associated with energy production and delivery may affect the availability or cost of goods and services, including natural resources, necessary to run our businesses. Existing insurance arrangements may not provide protection for the costs that may arise from such events, particularly if such events are catastrophic in nature or occur in combination. Any long-term disruption in our ability to service our customers from one or more distribution centers or outsourcing facilities could have a material adverse effect on our operations, our business, results of operations and stock price. In addition, outbreaks of contagious diseases and other adverse public health developments affecting us and/or the third parties on which we rely could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. For example, the COVID-19 pandemic, which impacted the operation of healthcare systems, global travel, supply and labor markets and other business and economic activity worldwide, had a disruptive and adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations and on those of many of the third parties on which we rely. Although the acute COVID-19 public health emergency has lapsed, we will continue to monitor its long-term impacts, including impacts on market practices and on the labor market, and adjust our policies and practices as needed to mitigate any adverse impacts to our business operations and financial condition. We will also work with our internal teams and the third-parties on which we rely to assess, and seek to mitigate, the potential impacts on our business operations and financial condition of any future outbreaks of contagious diseases or other adverse public health developments that may emerge from time to time. Interruptions in operations at our sole facility could have a material adverse effect on our business. If our manufacturing facility or the facilities of any of our suppliers fail to comply with regulatory requirements or encounter other manufacturing difficulties, it could adversely affect our ability to manufacture and supply products. All facilities and manufacturing processes used for the manufacture of pharmaceutical products are subject to inspection by regulatory agencies at any time and must be operated in conformity with cGMP and, in the case of controlled substances, DEA regulations. Compliance with the FDA’s cGMP and DEA requirements applies to both drug products seeking regulatory approval and to approved drug products. In complying with cGMP requirements, pharmaceutical manufacturing facilities must continually expend significant time, money and effort in production, recordkeeping, quality assurance and quality control so that their products meet applicable specifications and other requirements for product safety, efficacy and quality. Failure to comply with applicable legal requirements subjects us, our manufacturing facilities and the facilities of our third-party suppliers to possible legal or regulatory action, including, without limitation, shutdown, which may adversely affect our ability to supply the product. Additionally, our manufacturing facilities, and those of our third-party suppliers may face other significant disruptions due to labor strikes, failure to reach acceptable agreement with labor unions, infringement of intellectual property rights, vandalism, natural disaster, pandemics, storm or other environmental damage, civil or political unrest, export or import restrictions or other events. Were we not able to manufacture products at our manufacturing facilities or were our third-party suppliers unable to manufacture products at their facilities because of regulatory, business or any other reasons, the manufacture and marketing of these products would be interrupted. This could have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operation, financial condition, cash flows, competitive position and ability to operate. Furthermore, all of our manufacturing operations are conducted at the Northvale Facility and any delays or unanticipated expenses in connection with the operation at the Northvale Facility, resulting in a significant disruption at this facility, even on a short-term basis, whether due to, without limitation, an adverse quality or compliance observation, including a total or partial suspension of production and/or distribution by regulatory authorities, an act of God, civil or political unrest, force majeure situation or other events could impair our ability to produce and ship products on a timely basis, and could, among other consequences, subject us to exposure to claims from customers. Any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows. 20 We may sell, withdraw or discontinue manufacture of certain products. We may discontinue the manufacture and distribution of certain existing products, which may adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows. As part of regular evaluations of product performance, we may determine that it is in our best interest to discontinue the manufacture and distribution of certain of our products. We cannot guarantee that we have correctly forecasted, or will correctly forecast in the future, the appropriate products to discontinue or that a decision to discontinue various products is prudent if market conditions change. In addition, there can be no assurances that the discontinuance of products will reduce operating expense or not cause the incurrence of material charges associated with such a decision. Furthermore, the discontinuance of existing products, entails various risks, including, without limitation, the ability to find a purchaser for such products, if there is a decision to sell the product, as well as the risk that the purchase price obtained will not be equal to at least the book value of the net assets relating to such products. Other risks associated with a product discontinuance, include, without limitation, managing the expectations of and maintaining good relations with our customers who previously purchased a discontinued product from us, and the effects such would have on future sales to these customers. We may also incur significant liabilities and costs associated with our product discontinuance. In addition, we may, from time to time, sell and/or withdraw approved ANDAs if we determine that the costs of maintaining such ANDAs is excessive when compared to their actual current value and their perceived value and place in our strategic plans. Although our expectations are to engage only in the sale or withdrawal of ANDAs if they advance or otherwise support our overall strategy, any such ANDA sale by definition reduces the size and scope of our business, with a direct correlation to opportunities with respect to certain markets, products or therapeutic categories. All of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, cash flows and ability to operate. We may fail to successfully identify, develop and commercialize new products. Elite’s product pipeline, including the paused development of its abuse-deterrent opioid products, are in various stages of development. Prior to commercialization, product development must be completed that could include scale-up, clinical studies, bioequivalence studies, regulatory filing, regulatory review, approval by the FDA, and/or other development steps. Development is subject to risks. We cannot assure you that development will be successful, or that during development unexpected delays might occur or additional costs might be incurred. In order to obtain FDA approval to market a new drug product, we must demonstrate proof of safety and effectiveness in humans or bioequivalence to the reference listed drug. To meet these requirements, we must conduct extensive preclinical testing and “adequate and well-controlled” clinical trials and/or bioequivalence studies. Conducting clinical trials and bioequivalence studies is a lengthy, time-consuming, and expensive process. Completion of necessary clinical trials may take several years or more. Delays associated with product candidates for which we are directly conducting preclinical or clinical trials may cause us to incur additional operating expenses. The commencement and rate of completion of clinical trials may be delayed by many factors, including, without limitation, for example: ● Ineffectiveness of our product candidate or perceptions by physicians that the product candidate is not safe or effective for a particular indication; ● Inability to manufacture sufficient quantities of the product candidate for use in clinical trials or bioequivalence studies; ● Delay or failure in obtaining approval of our clinical trial protocols from the FDA or institutional review boards; ● Slower than expected rate of patient recruitment and enrollment; ● Inability to adequately follow and monitor patients after treatment; ● Difficulty in managing multiple clinical sites; ● Unforeseen safety issues; ● Government or regulatory delays, including as a result of staffing reductions at FDA, DEA or other governmental agencies; and, ● Clinical trial or bioequivalence costs that are greater than we currently anticipate. Even if we achieve positive interim results in clinical trials and bioequivalence studies, these results do not necessarily predict final results, and positive results in early trials and studies may not be indicative of success in later trials and studies. A number of companies in the pharmaceutical industry have suffered significant setbacks in advanced clinical trials, even after achieving promising results in earlier trials. Negative or inconclusive results or adverse medical events during a clinical trial could cause us to repeat or terminate a clinical trial or require us to conduct additional trials. We do not know whether our existing or any future clinical trials or bioequivalence studies will demonstrate safety and efficacy, or bioequivalence to the reference listed drug, sufficiently to result in marketable products. Our clinical trials may be suspended at any time for a variety of reasons, including if the FDA or we believe the patients participating in our trials are exposed to unacceptable health risks or if the FDA finds deficiencies in the conduct of these trials. 21 Failures or perceived failures in our clinical trials or bioequivalence studies will directly delay our product development and regulatory approval process, damage our business prospects, make it difficult for us to establish collaboration and partnership relationships, and negatively affect our reputation and competitive position in the pharmaceutical community. Our ability to sustain current operations, engender business growth, achieve current and future revenues and profitability, significantly depends on our ability to successfully identify, develop, obtain regulatory approval, commercialize and market new pharmaceutical products, including, without limitation, our own products as well as those that may be developed in partnership with other entities, such as those that were previously developed with Praxgen pursuant to a now terminated product development agreement. As a result, we must continually develop, test and manufacture new products, which must meet regulatory standards to receive requisite marketing authorizations. The process of developing and obtaining regulatory approvals for new products is time-consuming, costly and inherently unpredictable. There are direct, indirect, known and unknown risks inherent in the development of pharmaceuticals, including, without limitation, product candidates which initially show promise in preliminary pharmacological or marketing studies, but fail to yield the positive results consistent with initial indications. Product candidates we may develop may not receive the marketing authorizations necessary for us to market them and, if approved, we may be unable to successfully commercialize them on a timely basis or at all, or if commercialized, revenues and profits achieved from the sale of such products might not reach levels that provide sufficient return on those costs incurred during the commercialization process. The successful commercialization of a product is subject to a number of factors, including: ● The timely filing of any NDA, ANDA or other regulatory submission applicable to our product candidates; ● Any adverse development or perceived adverse development with respect to the applicable regulatory agency’s review of such regulatory submission and approval for the indication sought; ● The effectiveness, ease of use and safety of our products as compared to existing products; ● Customer demand and the willingness of physicians and customers to adopt our products over products with which they may have more loyalty or familiarity and overcoming any biases towards our products; ● The cost of our product compared to alternative products and the pricing and commercialization strategies of our competitors; ● The success of our launch and marketing efforts; ● Adverse publicity about us, our products, our competitors and their products or the industry as a whole or favorable publicity about competitors; ● The advent of new and innovative alternative products; and ● Any unforeseen issues or adverse developments in connection with a product and any resulting litigation or regulatory scrutiny and harm to our reputation or the reputation or acceptance of the product in the market. In addition, there are many risks associated with developing, commercializing and marketing new products that are beyond our control. For example, without limitation, our collaboration partner(s) may decide to make substantial changes to a product’s formulation or design, may experience financial difficulties or may have limited financial resources. Any of the foregoing may delay the development, commercialization and/or marketing of new products. In addition, if a codeveloper on a new product terminates our collaboration agreement or does not perform under the agreement, we may experience delays and additional costs in developing and marketing that product, with no assurances of us having the resources that may be required to overcome such delays or additional costs that were beyond our control. We conduct research and development to enable us to manufacture and market pharmaceutical products in accordance with specific government regulations. Our drug development efforts relating to SequestOx™, which are currently paused, and certain generics are focused on technically difficult-to-formulate products and/or products that require advanced manufacturing technology. Typically, expenses related to research, development, and regulatory approval of compounds for SequestOx™, which is a branded pharmaceutical product, the development of which is currently paused, are significantly greater than those expenses associated with generic products. Expanded research and development efforts are required, resulting in increased research expenses. Because of the inherent risk associated with research and development efforts in the healthcare industry, particularly with respect to new drugs, our research and development expenditures may not result in the successful regulatory approval and introduction of new pharmaceutical products and failure in the development of any new product can occur at any point in the process, including late in the process after substantial investment. Also, after we submit a regulatory application, the relevant governmental health authority may require that we conduct additional studies, including, for example, studies to assess the product’s interaction with alcohol. As a result, we may be unable to reasonably predict the total research and development costs to develop a particular product and there is a significant risk that the funds we invest in research and development will not generate financial returns. In addition, our operating results and financial condition may fluctuate as the amount we spend to research and develop, commercialize, acquire or license new products, technologies and businesses changes. Much of the preceding occurred with the development of SequestOx™, which has not received marketing approval from the FDA, for which continued development has been paused and with material adverse effects on our business, results of operations, financial condition, cash flows and ability to operate resulting in the past, as well as the risk remaining for the future. 22 Because of these risks, our research and development efforts may not result in any commercially viable products. Any delay in, or termination of, preclinical or clinical trials will delay the filing of our drug applications with the FDA and, ultimately, our ability to commercialize product candidates and generate product revenues. If a significant portion of these development efforts are not successfully completed, required regulatory approvals are not obtained, or any approved products are not commercially successful, our business, financial condition, and results of operations may be materially harmed. As our competitors introduce their own generic equivalents of our generic drug products, our revenues and gross margin from such products generally decline, often rapidly. Revenues and gross margin derived from generic pharmaceutical products often follow a pattern based on regulatory and competitive factors that we believe are unique to the generic pharmaceutical industry. As the patent(s) for a brand name product or any statutory period of marketing exclusivity expires, the first generic manufacturer to receive regulatory approval for a generic equivalent of the product is often able to capture a substantial share of the market. However, as other generic manufacturers receive regulatory approvals for their own generic versions, that market share, and the price of that product, will typically decline depending on several factors, including, without limitation, the number of competitors, the price of the branded product and the pricing strategy of the new competitors. Significant competition in the generic pharmaceutical marketplace is not uncommon with one result of such being significant decline in revenue and gross margins. There can be no assurances of our ability to continue to develop new products or that the number of competitors for any given product will not increase to such an extent that we may stop marketing a generic drug product for which we previously obtained approval, resulting in a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, ability to operate and stock price. Our operations could be disrupted by failure of our information systems or cyber-attacks. Significant disruptions to our IT systems or breaches of information security could adversely affect our business. In the ordinary course of business, we collect, store and transmit what we consider to be large amounts of confidential information, and it is critical that we do so in a secure manner to maintain the confidentiality and integrity of such information. Additionally, our IT systems are critical to our ability to store electronic and financial information and to manage a variety of business processes and activities, including, without limitation, manufacturing, financial, logistics, sales, marketing and administrative functions. We depend on our IT infrastructure to communicate internally and externally with employees, customers, suppliers and others. We also use IT networks and systems to comply with regulatory, legal and tax requirements. We have outsourced significant elements of our IT infrastructure. As a result, we manage independent vendor relationships with third-parties who are responsible for maintaining significant elements of our IT systems and infrastructure and who may or could have access to our confidential information. The size and complexity of our IT systems, and those of our third-party vendors, make such systems potentially vulnerable to service interruptions and security breaches from inadvertent or intentional actions by our employees, partners or vendors. These systems are also vulnerable to attacks by malicious third-parties, such as phishing or ransomware attacks, and may be susceptible to intentional or accidental physical damage to the infrastructure maintained by us or by third parties, including, without limitation, as a result of extreme weather events, such as fires, floods, hurricanes or tornadoes or as the result of the use of AI or other new technologies. Maintaining the secrecy of confidential, proprietary, and/or trade secret information is important to our competitive business position. We continually assess these threats and make investments to increase internal protection, detection, and response capabilities, as well as ensure our third-party providers have required capabilities and controls, to address these risks. Like other public companies, our computer systems and those of our third-party vendors and service providers are regularly subject to, and will continue to be the target of, computer viruses, malware or other malicious code (including ransomware), unauthorized access, cyber-attacks or other computer-related penetrations, which have caused, and may continue to cause, disruptions to our operations. Over time, the sophistication of these threats continues to increase. Our reliance on unsupported and vulnerable operating systems and other software in certain cases may increase both the likelihood and potential severity of cyber incidents. The preventative actions we take to reduce the risk of cyber incidents and protect our information may be insufficient. Our efforts may not prevent service interruptions or security breaches in our systems or the unauthorized or inadvertent wrongful use or disclosure of confidential information that could adversely affect our business operations or result in the loss, dissemination, or misuse of critical or sensitive information. A breach of our security measures or the accidental loss, inadvertent disclosure, unapproved dissemination, misappropriation or misuse of trade secrets, proprietary information, or other confidential information, whether as a result of theft, hacking, fraud, trickery or other forms of deception, or for any other cause, could enable others to produce competing products, use our proprietary technology or information, and/or adversely affect our business position. Further, any such interruption, security breach, loss or disclosure of confidential information could result in financial, legal, business, and reputational harm to us and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, ability to operate and stock price. 23 Artificial intelligence based platforms may present new risks and challenges to our business. AI technologies may exacerbate existing risks, including risks associated with data privacy, cybersecurity, IP, healthcare fraud and abuse, drug development and manufacturing, and risks to patients or human subjects in clinical trials. AI also introduces new risks, due to the autonomous nature of the technology, which, in some cases, may be deployed to perform tasks, inform decisions, automate decisions, and make predictions. AI may amplify biased and discriminatory decision making, perform unreliably and malfunction, generate insights which are difficult to interpret and explain, and cause direct harm to individuals or groups. Regulators are proposing, adopting, and implementing new AI laws and regulations. We may be required to change our business practices and policies as a result of such laws and regulations and may incur substantial compliance-related costs. Regulators are also using existing laws and regulations to take enforcement actions related to the deployment of AI in ways that result in non-compliance with current laws and regulations. If we fail to comply with AI laws and regulations, we may be subject to sanctions, fines, and reputational damage, orders to stop certain processing of personal data, orders to delete certain data or destroy AI algorithms derived from data collects, legal action on behalf of impacted individuals or other enforcement or other actions. If we fail to take steps to protect our confidential data, trade secrets, IP and personal data, we may be subject to legal, regulatory, financial, and reputational risks. AI technologies present significant opportunities and risks to our business. Harnessing AI’s transformative potential may enable us to speed up the discovery and development of new drugs, optimize our manufacturing processes, and drive efficiencies. Our failure to use AI technologies in a way that maintains trust, quality and control in our business activities and to capitalize on opportunities presented by AI may also place us at a competitive disadvantage. Failure to address AI risks will reduce our ability to deliver strategic objectives. Also, investments in AI may not realize the benefits that were anticipated. Delays in generic product development may result in failure to achieve adequate return on investment. The time necessary to develop generic drugs may adversely affect whether, and the extent to which, we receive a return on our capital. The development process for generic products, including, without limitation, drug formulation, testing, and FDA review and approval, often takes three or more years. We must also successfully address any challenges brought by the owner of the listed patent. This process requires that we expend considerable capital to pursue activities that do not yield an immediate or near-term return. Also, because of the significant time necessary to develop a product, the actual market for a product at the time it is available for sale may be significantly less than the originally projected market for the product. If this were to occur, our potential return on our investment in developing the product, if approved for marketing by the FDA, would be adversely affected and we may never receive a return on our investment in the product. It is also possible for the manufacturer of the brand-name product for which we are developing a generic drug to obtain approvals from the FDA to switch the brand-name drug from the prescription market to the OTC market. If this were to occur, we would be prohibited from marketing our product other than as an OTC drug, in which case revenues could be substantially less than we anticipated. Our business is dependent on market acceptance of our products and social and political pressures, including public concern over the abuse of opioids may adversely affect our business. Market acceptance of our products among physicians, patients, health care payors and the medical community, is a key component of commercial success and if such is not achieved, our business will be adversely affected. The degree of market acceptance of any of our approved products among physicians, patients, health care payors and the medical community will depend on a number of factors, including, without limitation: ● Acceptable evidence of safety and efficacy; ● Relative convenience and ease of administration; ● The prevalence and severity of any adverse side effects; ● Availability of alternative treatments; ● Pricing and cost effectiveness; ● Effectiveness of sales and marketing strategies; and ● Ability to obtain sufficient third-party coverage or reimbursement. If we are unable to achieve market acceptance for our products, then such products will not be commercially successful, and our business will be adversely affected. 24 Some of these factors are not within our control, and our products may not achieve expected levels of market acceptance. Additionally, continuing and increasingly sophisticated studies of the proper utilization, safety and efficacy of pharmaceutical products are being conducted by the industry, government agencies and others which can call into question the utilization, safety, and efficacy of previously marketed products. In some cases, studies have resulted, and may in the future result, in the discontinuance of product marketing or other risk management programs such as the need for a patient registry. We may also experience downward pressure on the price of our products due to social or political pressure to lower the cost of drugs, which would reduce our revenue and future profitability. Public concern over the abuse of opioid medications, including increased legal and regulatory action, could also negatively affect our business. Certain governmental and regulatory agencies, as well as state and local jurisdictions, are focused on the abuse of opioid medications in the United States. State and local governmental agencies may investigate us as a manufacturer and/or distributor of medicines containing opioids or in conjunction with their investigation of other pharmaceutical wholesale distributors, and others in the supply chain that have a direct or indirect connection to our operations in relation to the distribution of opioid medications. In addition, multiple lawsuits have been filed against other pharmaceutical manufacturers and distributors alleging, among other claims, that they failed to provide effective controls and procedures to guard against the diversion of controlled substances, acted negligently by distributing controlled substances to pharmacies that serve individuals who abuse controlled substances, and failed to report suspicious orders of controlled substances in accordance with regulations. Additional governmental entities have indicated an intent to sue these other manufacturers and distributors. While no such actions have been taken against us, the immediate effect on the Company has been an inability to commercialize and market three opioid products approved during fiscal years prior to the year ended March 31, 2021 and a cessation of orders for another two other opioid products that had been marketed by our marketing partners. During the year ended March 31, 2020, we disposed of four approved ANDAs for opioid products. We currently hold four approved ANDAs for opioid products. Further, defense against any such opioid related lawsuits could be cost-prohibitive resulting in an adverse material effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and stock price. Similar allegations made against us, even without litigation, could also negatively affect our business in various ways, including through increased costs and harm to our reputation. In addition, an adverse resolution of any lawsuit or investigation could also have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows and stock price. Market perceptions of our business are important to us, especially market perceptions of the safety and quality of our products. If any of our products or similar products that other companies distribute are subject to market withdrawal, recall, or are proven to be, or are claimed to be, harmful to consumers, then this could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows. Furthermore, due to the importance of market perceptions, negative publicity associated with product quality, illness or other adverse effects resulting from, or perceived to be resulting from, our products, or similar products made by other companies, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows. Any or all of the above could result in a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, ability to operate and stock price. Unstable economic conditions may adversely affect our business. The global economy has undergone a period of significant volatility, which has led to diminished credit availability, declines in consumer confidence, and increases in unemployment rates. There remains caution about the stability of the U.S. economy, and we cannot assure that further deterioration in the financial markets will not occur. These economic conditions have resulted in, and could lead to further, reduced consumer spending related to healthcare in general and pharmaceutical products in particular. In addition, we have exposure to many different industries and counterparties, including our partners under our alliance and collaboration agreements, suppliers of raw chemical materials, drug wholesalers and other customers that may be affected by an unstable economic environment. Any economic instability may affect these parties’ ability to fulfil their respective contractual obligations to us, cause them to limit or place burdensome conditions upon future transactions with us or drive us and our competitors to decrease prices, each of which could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition, cash flows and stock price. We depend on qualified scientific and technical personnel and our ability to attract and retain such personnel. Because of the specialized scientific nature of our business, we are highly dependent upon our ability to continue to attract and retain qualified scientific and technical personnel. We are not aware of any pending, significant losses of scientific or technical personnel. Loss of the services of, or failure to recruit, key scientific and technical personnel, however, would be significantly detrimental to our product development programs. As a result of our small size and limited financial and other resources, it may be difficult for us to attract and retain qualified officers and qualified scientific and technical personnel. 25 In addition, marketing of our branded product, SequestOx™, if approved, will require much greater use of a direct sales force compared to marketing of our generic products, should we reinstate development and successfully commercialize this product. Our ability to realize significant revenues from marketing and sales activities depends on our ability or the ability of our partners to attract and retain qualified sales personnel. Competition for qualified sales personnel is intense. Any failure to attract or retain qualified sales personnel could negatively impact our sales revenue and have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, cash flows and stock price. We have entered into employment agreements with our executive officers and certain other key employees. We do not maintain “ Key Man ” life insurance on any executives. Unsuccessful collaboration or licensing arrangements could limit revenues and product development. We have entered into several collaborations and licensing arrangements for the development of products. However, there can be no assurance that any of these agreements will result in FDA approvals, or that we will be able to market any such products, if approved, at a profit. Collaboration and licensing arrangements pose the following risks: ● Collaborations and licensing arrangements may be terminated, in which case we will experience increased operating expenses and capital requirements if we elect to pursue further development of the related product candidate; ● Collaborators and licensees may delay clinical trials and prolong clinical development, under-fund a clinical trial program, stop a clinical trial, or abandon a product candidate; ● Expected revenue might not be generated because milestones may not be achieved, and product candidates may not be developed; ● Collaborators and licensees could independently develop, or develop with third parties, products that compete with our future products; ● The terms of our contracts with current or future collaborators and licensees may not be favorable to us in the future; ● A collaborator or licensee with marketing and distribution rights to one or more of our products may not commit enough resources to the marketing and distribution of our products, limiting our potential revenues from the commercialization of a product; ● Disputes may arise delaying or terminating the research, development, or commercialization of our product candidates, or result in significant and costly litigation or arbitration; and ● One or more third-party developers could obtain approval for a similar product prior to the collaborator or licensee resulting in unforeseen price competition in connection with the development product. Any or all of the above could result in a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, ability to operate and stock price. A substantial portion of our total revenues is expected to be derived from sales of a limited number of products to a limited number of customers. We expect that we will continue to derive a substantial portion of our revenue from sales of a limited number of products. For the year ended March 31, 2026, our significant product families (defined as the top four products based on active pharmaceutical ingredient) accounted for in excess of 75% of allocated revenues (defined as gross revenues less chargebacks and government rebates processed). The sale of our products may be significantly influenced by market conditions, as well as regulatory actions. We may experience decreases in the sale of our products in the future as a result of actions taken by our competitors, such as price reductions, or as a result of regulatory actions, such as changes in quota, related to our products or to competing products, which could result in a material adverse on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, ability to operate and stock price. We also expect that we will continue to derive a substantial portion of our revenue from sales to a limited number of customers. For the year ended March 31, 2026, our six largest customers accounted for in excess of 75% of revenues. The loss of any one or more of these customers, without replacement by a customer of similar significance, or the substantial reduction in orders from any one or more of these customers, without replacement of orders of a similar magnitude from other customers, could result in a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, ability to operate and stock price. 26 We depend to a large extent on third-party suppliers and distributors for the raw materials for our products, particularly the chemical compounds comprising the active pharmaceutical ingredients (“API’s”) that we use to manufacture our products, as well as for certain finished goods. We purchase the bulk of the raw materials essential to our manufacturing business from third parties. If we experience supply interruptions or delays, or if a supplier discontinues the sale of certain products, we may have to obtain substitute materials or products, which in turn would require us to obtain amended or additional regulatory approvals, subjecting us to additional expenditures of significant time and resources. In addition, changes in our raw material suppliers could result in significant delays in production, higher raw material costs and loss of sales and customers, because regulatory authorities must generally approve raw material sources for pharmaceutical products, which may be time consuming. For example, it may take as long as 18 months to find and qualify a new sole-source supplier. If we receive less than one year’s termination notice from a sole-source supplier that intends to cease supplying raw materials, it could result in disruption of our ability to produce the drug involved. Any significant interruption could result in a material adverse on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, ability to operate and stock price. We issue price adjustments and other sales allowances to our customers. Although we may establish reserves based on our estimates of these amounts, if estimates are incorrect and the reserves are inadequate, it may result in adjustments to these liabilities that may have a material adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations. Based on estimates, we establish liabilities for sales allowances, including, without limitation, sales discounts, returns, chargebacks, sales volume rebates, shelf stocks, cash discounts and Medicaid rebate obligations at each reporting period. Although we believe our liabilities are adequate as of the date of this report, there can be no assurances given by us that our reserves will ultimately prove to be adequate. Increases in such sales allowances may exceed our estimates for a variety of reasons, including, without limitation, unanticipated competition, an unexpected change in one or more contractual relationships or changes in ratios in contractual sales volumes as compared to historical ratios. We will continue to evaluate the relevant factors upon which our estimates and reserves are calculated and record appropriate adjustments if and when deemed necessary. Any failure to establish adequate liabilities with respect to these sales allowances could result in a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations, cash flows, ability to operate and cash flows. Financial and Liquidity Risks We have identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting which could, if not remediated, adversely affect our ability to report our financial condition, cash flows and results of operations in a timely and fairly stated manner and/or increase the risk of future misstatements, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations and could cause the market value of our common shares and/or debt securities to decline. Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over our financial reporting, as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Based on reviews conducted by management and specific guidance from third-party subject matter experts engaged by the Company, we have concluded that material weaknesses in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting existed. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal controls over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The Company has identified certain remediation actions and is in the process of implementing them, but such efforts are not complete, most likely require the retention of additional personnel or consultants, both of which are further subject to the Company’s financial condition and financial ability to retain such resources. Although no material misstatement of historical financial statements was identified, if we are unable to complete our remediation in a timely manner or if our remedial measures are insufficient to address the material weaknesses, or if additional material weaknesses in our internal controls are discovered or occur in the future, it may adversely affect our ability to report our financial condition and results of operations in a timely and accurate manner and there will continue to be an increased risk of future misstatements. In our periodic review and evaluation of internal control systems to allow management to assess the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting, we may discover additional weaknesses in our internal controls over financial reporting or disclosure controls and procedures. The next time we evaluate our internal controls over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures, if we identify one or more new material weaknesses or have been unable to timely remediate our existing material weaknesses, we would be unable to conclude that our internal controls over financial reporting or disclosure controls and procedures are effective. If we are unable to conclude that our internal controls over financial reporting or our disclosure controls and procedures are effective or, if required to issue such an opinion, our independent registered public accounting firm expresses an opinion that our internal controls over financial reporting is ineffective, we may not be able to report our financial condition and results of operations in a timely and accurate manner, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations and could cause the market value of our common shares to decline. In addition, any potential future restatements could subject us to additional adverse consequences, including sanctions by the SEC, shareholder litigation and other adverse actions. Moreover, we may be the subject of further negative publicity focusing on such financial statement adjustments and resulting restatement and negative reactions from our shareholders, creditors or others with whom we do business. The occurrence of any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations and could cause the market value of our common shares to decline. Please see Item 9A “ Controls and Procedures ” in Part II. 27 While we currently qualify as a smaller reporting company under SEC regulations, we cannot be certain, if we take advantage of the reduced disclosure requirements applicable to these companies, that we will not make our stock less attractive to investors. Once we lose smaller reporting company status, the costs and demands placed upon our management are expected to increase. The SEC’s rules exempt smaller reporting companies, like us, from various reporting requirements applicable to public companies that are not smaller reporting companies. As long as we qualify as a smaller reporting company based on our public float and report less than $100 million in annual revenues in a fiscal year, we are permitted, and we intend, to omit the auditor’s attestation on internal control over financial reporting that would otherwise be required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. This Annual Report on Form 10-K reports annual revenues for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2026 in excess of $100 million. We therefore expect to no longer qualify for smaller reporting company status in the near future. Until such time that we lose smaller reporting company status, it is unclear if investors will find our stock less attractive because we may rely on certain disclosure exemptions. If some investors find our stock less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for the stock, and our stock price may be more volatile and could cause our stock price to decline. Even if we remain a smaller reporting company, if our public float exceeds $75 million and we report $100 million or more in annual revenues in a fiscal year, we will become subject to the provisions of Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, requiring our independent registered public accounting firm to provide an attestation report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, making the public reporting process more costly. Our operating results could fluctuate significantly. Our revenues and operating results may vary significantly from year-to-year and quarter-to-quarter as well as in comparison to the corresponding quarter of the preceding year. Variations may result from one or more factors, including, without limitation: ● Timing of approval of applications filed with the FDA; ● Timing of process validation, product launches and market acceptance of products launched; ● Changes in the amounts spent to research, develop, acquire, license or promote new and existing products; ● Results of clinical trial programs; ● Serious or unexpected health or safety concerns with our products, brand products which we have genericized, products currently under development or any other product candidates; ● Introduction of new products by others that render our products obsolete or non-competitive; ● The ability to maintain selling prices and gross margin on our products; ● Mix of product manufactured and sold due to each product having different gross margins; ● The cost and outcome of litigation, in the event that such occurs in relation to, without limitation, IP issues, regulatory or other matters; ● The ability to comply with complex and numerous governmental regulations and regulatory authorities which oversee and regulate many aspects of our business and operations; ● Changes in coverage and reimbursement policies of health plans and other health insurers, including changes to Medicare, Medicaid, and similar state programs, especially in relation to those products that are currently manufactured, under development or identified for future development by the Company; ● Increases in the cost of raw materials contained within our products; ● Manufacturing and supply interruptions, including product rejections or recalls due to failure to comply with manufacturing specifications; ● Timing of revenue recognition relating to our licensing and other agreements; ● The ability to avoid infringing the intellectual property of others; ● The ability to protect our intellectual property from being acquired by other entities; ● Our ability to manage growth and integrate acquired products and assets successfully; and ● The addition or loss of customers. 28 A negative variation in one, many or all of the above factors could, may or will have a material adverse effect on Elite’s business, results of operations, financial condition, and cash flow and ability to operate in the future, depending on the nature and magnitude of the variation. In addition, we have been in operation since 1990, and were not profitable until the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021. In certain years prior to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021, the auditor’s opinion on our financial statements was qualified with respect to there being substantial doubt as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern due to continued losses not being sufficiently offset by operating revenues. There can be no assurances of our ability to sustain current profitability and a failure to generate sufficient revenues to offset related costs of operations will have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, cash flow and ability to operate. Furthermore, our business model is likely to continue to evolve as we attempt to expand our product offerings and our presence in the generic pharmaceutical market. As a result, our potential for future profitability must be considered in view of the risks, uncertainties, expenses, and difficulties frequently encountered by companies that are attempting to move into new markets and continuing to innovate with new and unproven technologies. Some of these risks relate to our potential inability to: ● Develop new products; ● Obtain regulatory approval of our products; ● Manage our growth, control expenditures and align costs with revenues and ● Attract, retain, and motivate qualified personnel; and respond to competitive developments. If we do not effectively address the risks we face, our business model may become unworkable and we may not achieve or sustain profitability or successfully develop any products, resulting in a material adverse effect on Elite’s business, results of operations, financial condition, and cash flow and ability to operate in the future. Our ability to fund and grow operations is uncertain and we may require additional financing to meet objectives. Our ability to fund current operations, maintain liquidity and execute growth plans is reliant on resources generated from our operations, which are subject to significant risks and uncertainties. We rely mainly on cash generated by operations and have also in the past accessed financial markets and equipment financings, to fund our commercial, product development and other operations, maintain liquidity and meet our financial obligations. As of March 31, 2026, we had cash on hand of approximately $30 million and a working capital of approximately $95 million, and for the year ended March 31, 2026, we generated income from operations totaling approximately $49 million, net other income totaling approximately $8 million and a net tax expense of approximately $12 million, resulting in a net income of approximatley $45 million. There can be no assurances of the continuation of revenues being earned from the current generic product line, nor Elite’s successful commercialization of other products in our development pipeline. In addition, there can be no assurances of Elite being able to raise additional funds in a timely manner, on acceptable terms, if needed to support commercial operations, implement necessary facility upgrades or finance the execution of strategic growth initiatives, resulting in a material detrimental effect on Elite’s operations and profits as well as having a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, and cash flow. Our operations are also subject to many significant risks and uncertainties, as described, without limitation, in this “ Risk Factors ” section, including, without limitation, competition in the markets in which we operate, litigation risks, government investigations, including those related to our sale, marketing and/or distribution of prescription opioid medications in prior periods, and others. Any negative development or outcome in connection with any or all of these risks and uncertainties could result in significant consequences, including, without limitation, one or more of the following: ● The dedication of a substantial portion of our cash flows from operations to the payment of legal or related expenses, resulting in these same funds being unavailable for other purposes, including, without limitation, debt service, operations, capital expenditures, product development and future business opportunities; ● A limitation in our ability to adjust to changing market conditions, causing us to be more vulnerable to periods of negative or impaired growth in the general economy or in our business, resulting in the Company being put at a competitive disadvantage as a result of a decreased or unavailable ability to engage in capital spending and take all other actions that would otherwise be required to ensure growth and competitiveness; ● A limitation in our ability to attract and retain key personnel; ● A decrement in our debt service and compliance obligations related to certain of our outstanding debt obligations, exposing us to events of default and reduced credit ratings, which in turn lead to increased capital costs and potential unavailability of capital and ● An overall inability to fund our operations and liquidity needs. 29 The occurrence or possibility of one or more of these or similar events may cause us to pursue one or more significant corporate transactions as well as other remedial measures, including refinancing all or part of our then-existing indebtedness, selling assets, reducing, delaying or eliminating capital expenditures, seeking to raise additional capital or pursuing internal reorganizations, restructuring activities, strategic alliances, or cost-saving initiatives. Any refinancing of indebtedness could be at significantly higher interest rates, which will depend on both the conditions of the market as well as the Company’s finances at such time, and may also require our compliance with covenants that could be more onerous than current, which in turn could result in the further restriction of our business operations. Any refinancing may also increase the amount of our secured indebtedness. In addition, the terms of existing or future debt agreements may restrict us from adopting any of the alternatives. Internal reorganizations, restructuring activities, asset sales and cost saving initiatives may also be complex and could entail significant costs and charges or could otherwise negatively impact shareholder value. There can also be no assurance that we will be able to accomplish any of these alternatives on terms acceptable to us, or at all, or that even if accomplished, that the intended results and benefits would be realized. There is a risk of impairment of significant intangible assets on our balance sheet. We have significant intangible assets on our balance sheet. Consequently, potential impairment of intangible assets may have an adverse material effect on our profitability. Intangible assets represent a material asset on our balance sheet. As of March 31, 2026, intangible assets were approximately $4.8 million. Generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”) requires that intangible assets be subject to regular impairment analysis to determine if changes in circumstances indicate that the value of the asset as recorded may not be recoverable. Such events or changes in circumstances are an inherent risk in the pharmaceutical industry and often cannot be predicted. However, should a change in circumstance occur, requiring the impairment of an intangible asset, the result of such an impairment may have an adverse material effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and stock price. During the year ended March 31, 2026, we recorded impairment of approximately $1 million related to our ANDA and patent intangible assets. GAAP requires estimates, judgments and assumptions which inherently contain uncertainties. There are inherent uncertainties involved in estimates, judgments and assumptions used in the preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP. Any future changes in estimates, judgments and assumptions used or necessary revisions to prior estimates, judgments or assumptions could lead to a restatement of our results. The consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are prepared in accordance with GAAP. This involves making estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets (including intangible assets), liabilities, mezzanine equity, stockholders’ equity, operating revenues, costs of sales, operating expenses, other income, and other expenses. Estimates, judgments, and assumptions are inherently subject to change in the future and any necessary revisions to prior estimates, judgments or assumptions could lead to a restatement. Any such changes could result in corresponding changes to the amounts of assets (including goodwill and other intangible assets), liabilities, mezzanine equity, stockholders’ equity, operating revenues, costs of sales, operating expenses, other income and other expenses. Legal and Regulatory Risks The pharmaceutical industry is heavily regulated which creates uncertainty and substantial compliance costs. The pharmaceutical industry is heavily regulated, which creates uncertainty about our ability to bring new products to market and imposes substantial compliance costs on our business in relation to product development as well as commercial operations. Governmental authorities such as the FDA impose substantial requirements on the development, manufacture, holding, labelling, marketing, advertising, promotion, distribution and sale of therapeutic pharmaceutical products through lengthy and detailed laboratory and clinical testing and other costly and time-consuming procedures. In addition, before obtaining regulatory approvals for certain generic products, we must conduct limited bioequivalence studies and other research to show comparability to the branded products. A failure to obtain satisfactory results in required pre-marketing trials may prevent us from obtaining required regulatory approvals. The FDA may also require companies to conduct post-approval studies and companies are subject to post-approval surveillance regarding their drug products and to report adverse events. The FDA also can require companies to formulate approved (REMS) to help ensure that a drug’s benefits outweigh its risks. We may seek FDA approval for certain product candidates through the 505(b)(2) regulatory pathway. Even if we receive approval for an NDA under Section 505(b)(2), the FDA may not take timely enforcement action against companies marketing unapproved versions of the drug; therefore, we cannot be sure that that we will receive the benefit of any de facto exclusive marketing period or that we will fully recoup the expenses incurred to obtain an approval. In addition, certain competitors and others have objected to the FDA’s interpretation of Section 505(b)(2). If the FDA’s interpretation of Section 505(b)(2) is successfully challenged, this could delay or even prevent the FDA from approving any NDA that we submit under Section 505(b)(2). 30 Moreover, even if our product candidates are approved under Section 505(b)(2), the approval may be subject to limitations on the indicated uses for which the products may be marketed or to other conditions of approval or may contain requirements for costly post-marketing testing and surveillance to monitor the safety or efficacy of the products. The ANDA approval process for a new product varies in time, is difficult to estimate and can vary significantly, from as little as 10 months from the date of application, to several years or more. Furthermore, ANDA approvals, if granted, may not include all indications for which the Company may seek to market each product. Further, once a product is approved or cleared for marketing, failure to comply with applicable regulatory requirements can result in, among other things, suspensions or withdrawals of approvals or clearances, seizures or recalls of products, injunctions against the manufacture, holding, distribution, marketing and sale of a product, and civil and criminal sanctions. Furthermore, changes in existing regulations or the adoption of new regulations could prevent us from obtaining, or affect the timing of, future regulatory approvals or clearances. Meeting regulatory requirements and evolving government standards may delay marketing of our new products for a considerable period of time, impose costly procedures upon our activities and result in a competitive advantage to larger companies that compete against us. Even if regulatory approval is obtained for a particular product candidate, the FDA and foreign regulatory authorities may, nevertheless, impose significant restrictions on the indicated uses or marketing of such products, or impose ongoing requirements for post-approval studies. Following any regulatory approval of our product candidates, we will be subject to continuing regulatory obligations, such as safety reporting requirements, and additional post-marketing obligations, including regulatory oversight of the promotion and marketing of our products. If we become aware of previously unknown problems with any of our product candidates here or overseas or at our contract manufacturers’ facilities, a regulatory agency may impose restrictions on our products, our contract manufacturers or on us, including requiring us to reformulate our products, conduct additional clinical trials, make changes in the labelling of our products, implement changes to or obtain re-approvals of our contract manufacturers’ facilities or withdraw the product from the market. In addition, we may experience a significant drop in the sales of the affected products, our reputation in the marketplace may suffer and we may become the target of lawsuits, including class action suits. Moreover, if we fail to comply with applicable regulatory requirements, we may be subject to fines, suspension or withdrawal of regulatory approvals, product recalls, seizure of products, operating restrictions, and criminal prosecution. Any of these events could harm or prevent sales of the affected products or could substantially increase the costs and expenses of commercializing and marketing these products. Compliance with federal and state and local law regulations, including compliance with any newly enacted regulations, requires substantial expenditures of time, money, and effort to ensure full compliance. Failure to comply with the FDA, DEA, EPA and other governmental regulations can result in fines, disgorgement, unanticipated compliance expenditures, recall or seizure of products, exposure to product liability claims, total or partial suspension of production or distribution, suspension of the FDA’s review of NDAs or ANDAs, enforcement actions, injunctions and civil or criminal prosecution, any of which could have a material and adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Disruptions at the FDA, the DEA, the SEC and other government agencies could negatively impact our business. Disruptions at, without limitation, the FDA, the DEA, and other regulatory agencies, including due to changes in government or significant changes in leadership or personnel, could increase the time required for new products to be reviewed and approved, or otherwise cause delays to the regulatory approval or post-approval processes for our products, which could adversely affect our business. The ability of the FDA, the DEA or other regulatory agencies to review and approve new products or manage post-approval requirements for marketed products can be affected by a variety of factors, including government budget and funding levels, ability to hire and retain key personnel and accept the payment of user fees, and statutory, regulatory, political and policy changes. Average review times for product submissions have fluctuated in recent years as a result. In addition, government funding of the SEC and other government agencies on which our operations may rely is subject to the impacts of political events, which are inherently fluid and unpredictable. For example, over the last several years, the U.S. government has shut down several times, including the fall of 2025, and certain regulatory agencies, such as the FDA, the DEA and the SEC, have had to furlough critical employees and stop critical activities. If a prolonged government shutdown occurs, or if other global, political or economic conditions impact the regulatory agencies with which we interact, it could significantly impact the ability of the FDA, the DEA, the SEC and other agencies to timely review and process our submissions, which could have a material and adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. 31 Our business may be adversely affected by legislation or healthcare regulatory reform and initiatives. There have been, and there will continue to be, legislative, regulatory and third-party payor proposals to change the healthcare system in ways that could impact our ability to commercialize our products profitably. We anticipate that the federal and state legislatures and the private sector will continue to consider and may adopt and implement healthcare policies, such as the IRA and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act enacted in 2010 (“ACA”), intended to curb rising healthcare costs. These cost-containment measures may include, among other measures: requirements for pharmaceutical companies to negotiate prescription drug prices with government healthcare programs; controls on government-funded reimbursement for drugs; new or increased requirements to pay prescription drug rebates to government healthcare programs, including if drug prices increase at a higher rate than inflation; controls on healthcare providers; challenges to or limits on the pricing of drugs, including pricing controls or limits or prohibitions on reimbursement for specific products through other means; requirements to try less expensive products or generics before a more expensive branded product; and public funding for cost effectiveness research, which may be used by government and private third-party payors to make coverage and payment decisions. For example, the ACA includes numerous provisions that affect pharmaceutical companies, including provisions intended to expand healthcare coverage to the uninsured through private health insurance reforms and an expansion of Medicaid. The ACA also imposes substantial costs on pharmaceutical manufacturers, such as an increase in liability for rebates paid to Medicaid, new drug discounts that must be offered to certain enrollees in the Medicare prescription drug benefit and an annual fee imposed on all manufacturers of brand prescription drugs in the U.S. The ACA also requires increased disclosure obligations and an expansion of an existing program requiring pharmaceutical discounts to certain types of hospitals and federally subsidized clinics and contains cost-containment measures that could reduce reimbursement levels for pharmaceutical products. The ACA also includes provisions known as the Physician Payments Sunshine Act, which require manufacturers of drugs, biologics, devices and medical supplies covered under Medicare and Medicaid to record any transfers of value to certain U.S. healthcare providers (including, but not limited to, physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, dentists, optometrists, podiatrists, chiropractors and other healthcare providers) and teaching hospitals and to report this data to the CMS annually for subsequent public disclosure. Similar reporting requirements have also been enacted on the state level domestically, and an increasing number of countries worldwide either have adopted or are considering similar laws requiring transparency of interactions with healthcare professionals. Failure to report appropriate data may result in civil or criminal fines and/or penalties. In addition, the IRA contains provisions intended to lower beneficiary drug spending. The IRA enables Medicare to negotiate prescription drug prices with manufacturers of certain high-cost drugs for the first time. A separate provision requires drug manufacturers to pay rebates to Medicare if their drug prices increase at a higher rate than the rate of inflation (the so-called inflation rebate provision). Additionally, beginning in 2024, the IRA eliminated the 5% coinsurance for catastrophic coverage under Medicare Part D; and in 2025, the IRA capped the beneficiary annual out-of-pocket expenditure and required new mandatory manufacturer discounts. Since its enactment, CMS has taken steps to implement various provisions of the IRA, including negotiating and publishing maximum fair prices for drugs selected under the IRA’s negotiation framework. The ultimate impact of the IRA’s drug pricing provisions on the pharmaceutical industry, including on pricing, reimbursement, and market dynamics, remains uncertain. Legislative and regulatory efforts to implement drug pricing reforms, including MFN models, can adversely affect our business, if implemented. These reforms create uncertainty for our business, and they remain subject to change through potential legal challenges or subsequent rulemaking or sub-regulatory guidance. While we are unable to predict whether any pending or future reforms may be adopted, if such reforms are adopted they could lower our pricing, which would have a material negative impact on our competitive position in the market, our sales levels and our profitability. In addition, while we are not currently engaged in clinical trials at this time, if that changes and we are unable to adapt to changes in existing requirements or the adoption of new requirements or policies governing clinical trials, our development plans may be impacted. For example, in December 2022, with the passage of Food and Drug Omnibus Reform Act (“FDORA”), Congress required sponsors to develop and submit a Diversity Action Plan (“DAP”) for each Phase 3 clinical trial or any other “pivotal study” of a new drug or biological product. These plans are meant to encourage the enrollment of more diverse patient populations in late-stage clinical trials of FDA-regulated products. In June 2024, as mandated by FDORA, the FDA issued draft guidance outlining the general requirements for DAPs. Unlike most guidance documents issued by the FDA, the DAP guidance when finalized will have the force of law because FDORA specifically dictates that the form and manner for submission of DAPs are specified in FDA guidance. In January 2025, in response to an Executive Order issued by the President of the United States on Diversity, Equity and Inclusion programs, the FDA removed this draft guidance from its website. This action raises questions about the applicability of statutory obligations to submit DAPs and the agency’s current thinking on best practices for clinical development. 32 Any new laws or regulations that have the effect of imposing additional costs or regulatory burden on pharmaceutical manufacturers, or otherwise negatively affect the industry, could adversely affect our ability to successfully commercialize our products and any future product candidates, if approved. The implementation of any price controls, caps on prescription drugs or price transparency requirements, whether at the federal level or state level, could have a material adverse effect on our business, ability to operate as a going concern, financial condition, results of operations and cash flow. Use of generics may be limited through legislative, regulatory or efforts of pharmaceutical companies. Many pharmaceutical companies increasingly have used state and federal legislative and regulatory means to delay generic competition, which, if successful, could limit the use of generic pharmaceuticals. These efforts have included: ● Pursuing new patents for existing products which may be granted just before the expiration of earlier patents, which could extend patent protection for additional years; ● Using the Citizen Petition process (for example, under 21 C.F.R. Sections 10.30) to request amendments to FDA standards; ● Attempting to use the legislative and regulatory process to have drugs reclassified or rescheduled or to set definitions of abuse-deterrent formulations to protect patents and profits; and ● Engaging in state-by-state initiatives to enact legislation that restricts the substitution of some generic drugs. ● Seeking changes to U.S. Pharmacopeia, an organization that publishes industry recognized compendia of drug standards; ● Attaching patent extension amendments to non-related federal legislation; ● Persuading regulatory bodies to withdraw the approval of brand-name drugs for which the patents are about to expire and converting the market to another product of the brand company on which longer patent protection exists; ● Entering into agreements whereby other generic companies will begin to market an authorized generic at the same time or after generic competition initially enters the market; ● Filing suits for patent infringement and other claims that may delay or prevent regulatory approval, manufacture and/or scale of generic products; and ● Introducing “next generation” products prior to the expiration of market exclusivity for the reference product, which often materially reduces demand for the generic or the reference product for which we seek regulatory approval for a generic equivalent. If pharmaceutical companies or other third parties are successful in limiting the use of generic products through these or other means, our sales of generic products and our growth prospects may decline. A material decline in generic product sales will have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, cash flows and our ability to operate. Our revenues and profits from generic products may decline as a result of changes in regulatory policy. The IRA contains substantial drug pricing reforms, including the establishment of a drug price negotiation program within the HHS that would require manufacturers to charge a negotiated “maximum fair price” for certain selected drugs or pay an excise tax for noncompliance, the establishment of rebate payment requirements on manufacturers of certain drugs payable under Medicare Parts B and D to penalize price increases that outpace inflation, and requires manufacturers to provide discounts on Part D drugs. Substantial penalties can be assessed for noncompliance with the drug pricing provisions. Drugs with an available generic or biosimilar, certain drugs that represent a limited portion of Medicare program spending, drugs with an orphan designation as their only FDA approved indication, and all plasma-derived products are exempt from direct negotiation. The number of negotiated products will be phased in between 2026 and 2029, and the law sets a maximum fair price the manufacturer can charge based on the number of years the product has been on the market. The law allows HHS to levy an excise and civil monetary penalties against non-compliant manufacturers or those who refuse to negotiate. 33 The IRA also imposes rebate requirements on manufacturers of single-source generics and other drugs covered under Medicare Part B and Part D where the price of the drug increases faster than inflation. Multisource generics and all products with an average manufacturer’s price of less than $100 per year, per individual, are exempt from rebate requirements. Beginning on October 1, 2022 for Part D products and on January 1, 2023 for Part B products, CMS will monitor for products with price increases higher than the rate of inflation on a quarterly basis. Rebates will be calculated as the total number of units sold by the amount the product exceeds the inflation-adjusted price, with 2021 as the base year to measure cumulative changes relative to inflation. Noncompliant manufacturers will be subject to a civil monetary penalty of at least 125% of the calculated rebate amount. The effect of the IRA on our business, generic manufacturers, and the pharmaceutical industry in general is not yet known. On May 12, 2025, President Trump issued an executive order implementing the concept of MFN pricing. Under this order, the Department of Health and Human Services would direct federal health insurers to pay no more than the lowest price paid by other high-income countries for medications covered by such insurers, including Medicare and Medicaid. Under the order, MFN pricing will apply only to brand products without generic or biosimilar competition. The effect of this order on our business and the generic pharmaceutical industry in general is not yet known. New tariffs, evolving trade policy, and geopolitical factors and military conflicts between the US and other countries may adversely affect our business. New tariffs and evolving trade policy between the United States and other countries, including China and Mexico, may have an adverse effect on our sourcing of critical raw materials from suppliers located outside of the United States and corresponding adverse effects on our business and results of operations. Some of our suppliers, including those of critical active pharmaceutical ingredients are located outside of the United States. There is uncertainty about the future relationship between the U.S. and various other countries, including China, with respect to trade policies, treaties, government regulations and tariffs. Changes could potentially disrupt our existing supply chains and impose additional costs on our business, including costs with respect to raw materials upon which our business depends. Furthermore, if tariffs, trade restrictions or trade barriers are placed on products such as ours by foreign governments, it could cause us to raise prices for our products, which may result in the loss of customers. If we are unable to pass along increased costs to our customers, our margins could be adversely affected. Additionally, it is possible that further tariffs may be imposed that could affect imports of APIs and other materials used in our products, or our business may be adversely impacted by retaliatory trade measures taken by other countries, including restricted access to APIs or other materials used in our products, causing us to raise prices or make changes to our products. Further, the continued threats of tariffs, trade restrictions, retaliatory actions and trade barriers could have a generally disruptive impact on the global economy and, therefore, negatively impact our sales. Given the volatility and uncertainty regarding the scope and duration of these tariffs and other aspects of U.S. international trade policy, the impact on our operations and results is uncertain and could be significant. Further governmental action related to tariffs, additional taxes, regulatory changes or other retaliatory trade measures could occur in the future. Any of these factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Further, recent global events may adversely affect workforces, organizations, economies, and financial markets globally, leading to economic downturns, inflation, and increased market volatility. Military conflicts and wars (such as the ongoing conflicts between the US and Iran, Russia and Ukraine, and Israel and Hamas), terrorist attacks, other geopolitical events, high inflation, increasing interest rates, bank failures and associated financial instability and crises, and supply chain and logistics issues can cause exacerbated volatility and disruptions to various aspects of the global economy. The uncertain nature, magnitude, and duration of hostilities stemming from such conflicts, including the potential effects of sanctions and counter-sanctions, or retaliatory cyber-attacks on the world economy and markets, have contributed to increased market volatility and uncertainty, which could have an adverse impact on macroeconomic factors that affect our business and operations. The DEA could limit the availability of active ingredients used in many of our products. The DEA limits the availability of the active ingredients used in many of our current products and products in development, as well as the production and distribution of these products, and, as a result, our procurement, production, and distribution quotas may not be sufficient to meet commercial demand or complete clinical trials. The DEA regulates chemical compounds as Schedule I, II, III, IV or V substances, with Schedule I substances considered to present the highest risk of substance abuse and Schedule V substances the lowest risk. The active ingredients in some of our current products and products in development, including, without limitation, hydromorphone, methadone, phentermine, phendimetrazine and oxycodone, are listed by the DEA as Scheduled substances under the Controlled Substances Act of 1970. Consequently, their manufacture, shipment, storage, sale, and use are subject to a high degree of regulation. Furthermore, the DEA limits the availability of the active ingredients used in many of our current products and products in development and we and/or our contract customers and suppliers, must annually apply to the DEA for procurement quotas in order to obtain and distribute these substances. As a result, our procurement and production quotas may not be sufficient to meet commercial demand or to complete any clinical trials we may conduct. Moreover, the DEA may adjust these quotas from time to time during the year, although the DEA has substantial discretion in whether or not to make such adjustments. Any delay or refusal by the DEA in establishing our quotas, or modification of our quotas, for controlled substances could delay or result in the stoppage of our clinical trials or product launches or could cause trade inventory disruptions for those products that already been launched, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, cash flows and stock price. 34 We received a CRL from the FDA indicating that the SequestOx™ NDA is not ready for approval . We received a CRL from the FDA that indicated that our SequestOx™ NDA is not ready for approval in its present form. We have paused further development of this product and we cannot assure that development will restart. If we are unable to obtain approval for SequestOx™ or if we incur significant costs or delays in obtaining such approval, our return on investment in SequestOx™ will be materially adversely affected. In July 2016, the FDA issued a Complete Response Letter, or CRL, regarding the NDA. The CRL stated that the review cycle for the SequestOx™ NDA is complete and the application is not ready for approval in its present form. On December 21, 2016, we met with the FDA for an end-of-review meeting to discuss steps that we could take to obtain approval of SequestOx™. Based on the FDA response, we believe there is a path forward to address the issues cited in the CRL, with such path forward including modification of the SequestOx™ formulation, and the successful completion of in vitro and in vivo studies. If we are unable to modify the formulation or if we are unable to successfully complete the required studies, we will not meet the requirements specified by the FDA for resubmission of the NDA. Furthermore, there can be no assurances given that the FDA will eventually approve our NDA. If we are unable to obtain approval for SequestOx™, we will be unable to commercialize the product. Furthermore, in the event that the Company does receive marketing approval for SequestOx™, there can be no assurances of the Company realizing future revenues or profits related to this product, or that any such future revenues and profits would be in amounts that provide adequate return on the significant investments made to secure this marketing authorization. The Company has currently paused further development of SequestOx™ due to the prohibitive cost of such and attendant risks related thereto. Regulatory factors may cause us to be unable to manufacture products or face interruptions in our manufacturing process. Our manufacturing operations as well as our suppliers’ manufacturing operations are subject to establishment registration by the FDA and periodic inspections by the FDA to assure compliance regarding the manufacturing of our products. If we or our suppliers do not maintain the current registrations or if we or our partners receive notices of manufacturing and quality-related observations following inspections by the FDA, our operating results would be materially negatively impacted. Our facilities, as well as those of applicable suppliers, rely on maintaining current FDA, and DEA if applicable, registration and other license to produce and develop generic drugs and raw materials used in such operations. If we, or one of our suppliers does not successfully renew and maintain current FDA, DEA and other required licenses, our operations and financial results would be negatively impacted. We and our suppliers are subject to periodic inspection by the FDA, DEA and other regulatory agencies, as applicable, to assure regulatory compliance regarding the manufacture and distribution of pharmaceutical products and raw materials. These regulatory bodies impose stringent mandatory requirements on the manufacture and distribution of pharmaceutical products to ensure their safety and efficacy. If we or any of our third-party suppliers receive notices of manufacturing and quality-related observations and are unable to satisfactorily resolve the issues and observations identified in a timely fashion, there could be a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and stock price. Agreements between branded pharmaceutical companies and generic pharmaceutical companies are facing increased government scrutiny in the United States and Internationally. There are numerous and continuing litigation in which generic companies challenge the validity or enforceability of an innovator products patents and/or the applicability of such patents to a generic applicant’s products. Settlement of such litigation is a common outcome, with review of such agreements by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (the “FTC”) and the Antitrust Division of the DOJ being required by law. The FTC has stated publicly its view that some of these settlement agreements violate antitrust laws and has commenced actions against the branded and generic companies that are parties to these agreements. Accordingly, in the event of the Company being party to a settlement agreement, either as the branded, innovator product owner, or as the generic applicant, we may receive formal or informal requests from the FTC for information about a settlement agreement and there is a risk of the FTC or DOJ alleging a violation of antitrust laws and commencing an action against us. Any such action could have an adverse effect on the Company’s business, operations and financial condition. Our reporting and payment obligations under the Medicaid rebate program and other governmental purchasing and rebate programs are complex and may involve subjective decisions. Any determination that we have failed to comply with those obligations could subject us to penalties and sanctions which could have a material adverse effect on our business. We participate in, without limitation, the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program, the 340B program, the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs’ FSS pricing program and other governmental purchasing and rebate programs and have obligations to report the average sales price for certain of our drugs. Pricing and rebate calculations vary across products and programs, are complex and are often subject to interpretations by us, governmental or regulatory agencies and the courts, which can change and evolve over time. In the case of our Medicaid pricing data, if we become aware that our reporting for a prior quarter was incorrect, or has changed as a result of recalculation of the pricing data, we are generally obligated to resubmit the corrected data for up to three years after those data were originally due. Such restatements and recalculations increase our costs for complying with the laws and regulations governing the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program and could result in an adjustment to our rebate liability for past quarters. Price recalculations also may affect the ceiling price at which we are required to offer our products under the 340B program and give rise to an obligation to refund entities participating in the 340B program for overcharges during past quarters by a price recalculation. 35 Civil monetary penalties can be applied if we are found to have knowingly submitted any false price or product information to the government, if we are found to have made a misrepresentation in the reporting of our average sales price, if we fail to submit the required price data on a timely basis, or if we are found to have charged 340B covered entities more than the statutorily mandated ceiling price. CMS could also decide to terminate our Medicaid drug rebate agreement, in which case federal payments may not be available under Medicaid or Medicare Part B for our covered outpatient drugs. We cannot assure you that our submissions will not be found by CMS to be incomplete or incorrect. Our failure to comply with our reporting and payment obligations under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program and other governmental programs could negatively impact our financial results. CMS issued a final regulation, which became effective in April 2016, to implement the changes to the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program under the Affordable Care Act. Since that time, CMS has issued multiple proposed and final rules that change the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program. Regulatory and legislative changes, and judicial rulings relating to the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program and related policies have increased and will continue to increase our costs and the complexity of compliance, have been and will continue to be time-consuming to implement, and could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, particularly if CMS or another agency challenges the approach we take in our implementation. Health Resources and Service Administration (“HRSA”) issued a final regulation regarding the calculation of the 340B ceiling price and the imposition of civil monetary penalties on manufacturers that knowingly and intentionally overcharge covered entities, which became effective in January 2019. Implementation of this regulation could affect our obligations and potential liability under the 340B program in ways we cannot anticipate. We are also required to report the 340B ceiling prices for our covered outpatient drugs to HRSA, which then publishes them to 340B covered entities. Any charge by HRSA that we have violated this regulation or other requirements of the program could negatively impact our financial results. Moreover, HRSA has established an administrative dispute resolution (“ADR”) process, which is governed by a final regulation effective June 2024, for claims by covered entities that a manufacturer engaged in overcharging, including claims that a manufacturer limited the ability of a covered entity to purchase the manufacturer’s drugs at the 340B ceiling price, and by manufacturers that a covered entity violated the prohibitions against diversion or duplicate discounts. Such claims are to be resolved through an ADR panel of government officials rendering a decision that could be appealed only in federal court. An ADR proceeding could potentially subject us to discovery by covered entities and other onerous procedural requirements and could result in additional liability. HRSA could also decide to terminate a manufacturer’s agreement to participate in the 340B program for a violation of that agreement or other good cause shown, in which case the manufacturer’s covered outpatient drugs may no longer be eligible for federal payment under the Medicaid or Medicare Part B program. Further, legislation may be introduced that, if passed, would, among other things, further expand the 340B program to include additional covered entities or would require participating manufacturers to agree to provide 340B discounted pricing on drugs used in an inpatient setting, and any additional future changes to the definition of average manufacturer price or the Medicaid rebate amount could affect our 340B ceiling price calculations and negatively impact our results of operations. Additionally, we have implemented a policy governing the eligibility of covered entities to purchase our products at the 340B price for shipment to a contract pharmacy. We implemented this policy out of concern that contract pharmacy arrangements are diverting the benefits of the 340B program from patients to contract pharmacies and contributing to the pervasive lack of transparency within the 340B program, rendering it difficult to identify inappropriate duplicate discounts and product diversion. Certain pharmaceutical manufacturers and the industry group, Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (“PhRMA”) are involved in ongoing litigation with the HRSA regarding manufacturer initiatives that restrict covered entities’ ability to purchase products at the 340B program price for shipment through an unlimited number of contract pharmacies. Additionally, several states have enacted, and many other states are considering, laws that prohibit manufacturer restrictions on contract pharmacies. Certain pharmaceutical manufacturers and PhRMA have initiated litigation challenging these state laws. The outcome of pending judicial proceedings and the potential impact on the way in which manufacturers extend discounts to covered entities through contract pharmacies remain uncertain and negative legal rulings, or the passage of legislation in respect of this topic, may materially adversely impact our results of operations. We have obligations to report the average sales price for certain of our drugs to the Medicare program. In addition, we are required to report the best price for our drugs, as defined under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program, to CMS. Statutory or regulatory changes or changes in CMS guidance could affect the average sales price or best price calculations for our products and the resulting Medicare payment rate or rebates we owe to state Medicaid programs. Such changes could negatively impact our results of operations. 36 Pursuant to applicable law, knowing provision of false information in connection with price reporting under the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, FSS or Tricare programs can subject a manufacturer to civil monetary penalties. These program obligations also contain extensive disclosure and certification requirements. If we overcharge the government in connection with our arrangements with FSS or Tricare, we are required to refund the difference to the government. Failure to make necessary disclosures and/or to identify contract overcharges can result in allegations against us under the False Claims Act and other laws and regulations. Unexpected refunds to the government, and responding to a government investigation or enforcement action, would be expensive and time-consuming, and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects. Investigations and litigation concerning the calculation of average wholesale prices may adversely affect our business Many government and third-party payers, including Medicare, Medicaid, HMOs and others, reimburse doctors and others for the purchase of certain prescription drugs based on a drug’s average wholesale price (“AWP”). In the past several years, state and federal government agencies have conducted ongoing investigations of manufacturers’ reporting practices with respect to AWP, as a result of which certain agencies have suggested that reporting of inflated AWPs by manufacturers has led to excessive payments for prescription drugs. Numerous pharmaceutical companies have been named as defendants in actions brought by various State Attorneys General and have faced state law qui tam actions brought on behalf of various states, alleging generally that the defendants defrauded state Medicaid systems by purportedly reporting or causing the reporting of AWP and/or “Wholesale Acquisition Costs” that exceeded the actual selling price of the defendants’ prescription drugs. These cases generally seek some combination of actual damages, and/or double damages, treble damages, compensatory damages, statutory damages, civil penalties, disgorgement of excessive profits, restitution, disbursements, counsel fees and costs, litigation expenses, investigative costs, injunctive relief, punitive damages, imposition of a constructive trust, accounting of profits or gains derived through the alleged conduct, expert fees, interest and other relief that the court may have deemed proper. We can give no assurance that we will be able to settle current or future actions on terms that we deem reasonable, or that such settlements or adverse judgments, if entered, will not exceed the amount of any liability we have recorded. Accordingly, such actions could adversely affect us and may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, cash flows ability to operate and stock price. Litigation and Liability Related Risks We may not be able to obtain or maintain adequate insurance coverages. The cost of insurance, including directors and officers insurance, workers compensation, product liability for products containing opioids and products not containing opioids, truck and general liability insurance have increased significantly in recent years and may continue to increase in the future. We have increased deductibles and/or decreased coverages to mitigate some of these costs. These insurance premium increases, as well as our increased risk due to reduced coverage and increased deductibles could have an adverse material effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and stock price. We may not have and may be unable to obtain or maintain in the future insurance, on acceptable terms, that provide adequate coverage against potential liabilities or other losses, such as the cost of a recall or defense against claims, if any claim is brought against us, for any reason, regardless of the merits, success or failure of such claim. In past years, as a result of product liability and securities litigation in the general marketplace, and a threatened claim of action against us in relation to the shareholder vote conducted in December 2019, our insurance premiums have increased significantly, while also providing no greater, and in most cases, lower levels of coverage. The amount of our insurance coverage is accordingly limited by our financial resources and greatly impacted by the significant premium increases of the past year and reasonably expected further increases in the near to mid-term due to the global pandemic. Furthermore, even where claims are submitted to insurance carriers for defenses and indemnity that are within coverage limits, there can be no assurance that such claims will be fully covered by insurance or that the indemnitors or insurers will remain financially viable to provide reimbursement consistent with coverage maintained. Any failure by us, to obtain sufficient insurance coverage, with reimbursement of claims being provided and generate sufficient cash flow, if needed, above insurance coverage, to pay amounts due in relation to potential claims, will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and ability to operate as a going concern. 37 Litigation, product liability claims, product recalls, government investigations and other significant legal proceedings are common in the pharmaceutical industry. Litigation, product liability claims, other significant legal proceedings, government investigations and product recalls are common in the pharmaceutical industry and can be protracted and expensive and could delay and/or prevent entry of our products into the market, which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our business. As a business that operates in the pharmaceutical industry, we are inherently exposed to significant potential risks from lawsuits, product liability claims, patent and proprietary rights claims, other significant proceedings, government investigations or product recalls, including, without limitation, such matters associated with the testing, manufacturing, marketing and sale of our products. While no such judgements have been made against us to date, some plaintiffs have received substantial damage awards or settlements against other healthcare companies based upon various legal theories, including, without limitation, claims for injuries allegedly caused by use of their products. Our business continues to be inherently exposed to the risk of being subject to product liability cases, as well as other significant legal proceedings and government investigations. For example, we have been a manufacturer of prescription opioid medications in the past, and while we have not been subject to lawsuits, other manufacturers of such products, as well as distributors and other sellers of such medications, have been subjects of subject of lawsuits and have received subpoenas and other requests for information from various federal, state and local government agencies regarding the sale, marketing and/or distribution of prescription opioid medications. Numerous claims against opioid manufacturers, have been and may continue to be filed by or on behalf of states, counties, cities, Native American tribes, other government-related persons or entities, hospitals, health systems, unions, health and welfare funds, other third-party payers and/or individuals. In these cases, plaintiffs seek various remedies, including without limitation declaratory and/or injunctive relief; compensatory, punitive and/or treble damages; restitution, disgorgement, civil penalties, abatement, attorneys’ fees, costs and/or other relief. Settlement demands may seek significant monetary and other remedies, or otherwise be on terms that would result in material adverse effects on our business and ability to operate as a going concern. The precedent of awards against and settlements by our competitors could also incentivize parties to bring additional claims against us. In addition to the risks of direct expenditures for defense costs, settlements and/or judgments in connection with these claims, proceedings and investigations, there is a possibility of loss of revenues, injunctions and disruption of business. Furthermore, we and other manufacturers of prescription opioid medications have been, and will likely continue to be, subject to negative publicity and press, which could harm our brand and the demand for our products. In addition, current or future regulatory and legislative proposals could impact us and other manufacturers of prescription opioid medications. See the risk factor “Our business and financial condition may be adversely affected by legislation” for more information. In addition, our current and former products may cause or appear to cause serious adverse side effects or potentially dangerous drug interactions if misused or improperly prescribed or as a result of faulty surgical technique. Any failure to effectively identify, analyze, report and protect adverse event data and/or to fully comply with relevant laws, rules and regulations around adverse event reporting could expose the Company to legal proceedings, penalties, fines and/or reputational damage. Also, through the use of social media, plaintiff’s attorneys have a wide variety of tools to advertise their services and solicit new clients for litigation, including using judgments and settlements obtained in litigation against us or other pharmaceutical companies as an advertising tool. For these or other reasons, any significant product liability or mass tort litigation in which we are a defendant could have a larger number of plaintiffs than such actions have seen historically and we could also see an increase in the number of cases filed against us because of the increasing use of widespread and media-varied advertising. Furthermore, a ruling against other pharmaceutical companies in product liability or mass tort litigation in which we are not a defendant could have a negative impact on pending litigation where we are a defendant. In addition, in certain circumstances, such as in the case of products that do not meet approved specifications or for which subsequent data demonstrate such products may be unsafe, ineffective or misused, it may be necessary for us to initiate voluntary or mandatory recalls or withdraw such products from the market. Any such recall or withdrawal could result in adverse publicity, costs connected to the recall and loss of revenue. Adverse publicity could also result in an increased number of additional product liability claims, whether or not these claims have a basis in scientific fact. See the risk factor “ Our business is dependent on market perceptions, social and political pressures, including public concern over the abuse of opioids ” for more information. We are also inherently exposed to litigation concerning patents and proprietary rights which can be protracted and expensive. Companies routinely bring litigation against applicants and allege patent infringement or other violations of intellectual property rights as the basis for filing suit against an applicant. Elite develops, owns, and/or manufactures generic and branded pharmaceutical products and such drug products may be subject to such litigation. Litigation often involves significant expense and can delay or prevent introduction or sale of our products. There may also be situations where we use our business judgment and decide to market and sell products, notwithstanding the fact that allegations of patent infringement have not been finally resolved by the courts. The risk involved in doing so can be substantial because the remedies available to the owner of a patent for infringement include, among other things, damages measured by the profits lost by the patent owner and not by the profits earned by the infringer. In the case of a willful infringement, the definition of which is subjective, such damages may be trebled. Moreover, because of the discount pricing typically involved with bioequivalent products, patented brand products generally realize a substantially higher profit margin than bioequivalent products. An adverse decision in a case such as this or in other similar litigation could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position and results of operations and could cause the market value of our Common Stock to decline. 38 If we are found liable in any lawsuits, including patent infringement, violation of proprietary rights, product liability claims or actions related to our manufacture, sales, marketing or pricing practices or the sale, marketing and/or distribution of prescription opioid medications, or if we are subject to government investigations or product recalls, it could result in the imposition of damages, including punitive damages, fines, reputational harm, civil lawsuits, criminal penalties, interruptions of business, modification of business practices, equitable remedies and other sanctions against us or our personnel as well as significant legal and other costs. We may also voluntarily settle cases even if we believe that we have meritorious defenses because of the significant legal and other costs that may be required to defend such actions. Any judgments, claims, settlements and related costs could be well in excess of any applicable insurance. As a result, we may experience significant negative impacts on our operations. To satisfy judgments or settlements, we also may need to seek financing, which may not be available on terms acceptable to us, or at all, when required. Judgments also could cause defaults under our debt agreements and/or restrictions on our product use and we could incur losses as a result. Any of the risks above could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows and ability to operate as a going concern. The occurrence or possibility of any such result may cause us to pursue one or more significant corporate transactions as well as other remedial measures, including internal reorganizations, restructuring activities, strategic corporate alignments, cost saving initiatives or asset sales. See the risk factor “ Our ability to fund our operations, maintain liquidity and meet our financing obligations is reliant on our operations, which are subject to significant risks and uncertainties ” for more information. Likewise, any internal reorganizations, restructuring activities, strategic corporate alignments, cost-saving initiatives or asset sales may be complex, could entail significant costs and charges or could otherwise negatively impact shareholder value and there can be no assurance that we will be able to accomplish any of these alternatives on terms acceptable to us, or at all, or that they will result in their intended benefits. We also may incur significant liability if it is determined that we are promoting or have in the past promoted the “off-label” use of drugs. In jurisdictions including, without limitation, the United States, a company is not permitted to promote drugs for uses that are not described in the product’s labelling and that differ from those that were approved or cleared by the FDA. Such users are commonly referred to as “off-label uses”. Under what is known as the “practice of medicine”, physicians and other healthcare practitioners may prescribe drug products for off-label or unapproved uses. While the FDA does not regulate a physician’s choice of medications, treatments, or product uses, the FFDCA and FDA regulations significantly restrict permissible communications on the subject of off-label uses of drug products by pharmaceutical companies. The FDA, FTC, the Office of the Inspector General of the HHS, the DOJ and various state Attorneys General actively enforce laws and regulations that prohibit the promotion of off-label uses. A company that is found to have improperly promoted off-label uses may be subject to significant liability, including civil fines, criminal fines and penalties, civil damages, exclusion from federal funded healthcare programs and potential liability under the federal False Claims Act and any applicable state false claims act. Conduct giving rise to such liability could also form the basis for private civil litigation by third-party payers or other persons claiming to be harmed by such conduct. Notwithstanding the regulatory restrictions on off-label promotion, the FDA’s regulations and judicial case law allows companies to engage in some forms of truthful, non-misleading and non-promotional speech concerning the off-label use of products. Elite believes it and its marketing partners comply with these restrictions. Nonetheless, the FDA, HHS, DOJ, and/or state Attorneys General, and qui tam relators may take the position that the Company is not in compliance with such requirements, and if such non-compliance is proven, the consequences of such may have an adverse material effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and stock price. We are subject to various fraud and abuse laws which could expose us to criminal sanctions, civil penalties, contractual damages, reputational harm and diminished profits and future earnings. Our activities are subject to various federal and state fraud and abuse laws, including, without limitation, the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, the federal civil False Claims Act, and laws and regulations pertaining to limitations on and reporting of healthcare provider payments (physician sunshine laws). These laws and regulations are interpreted and enforced by various federal, state and local authorities including CMS, the Office of Inspector General for the HHS, DOJ, individual U.S. Attorney offices within the Department of Justice, and state and local governments. These laws include: ● the U.S. federal Anti-Kickback Statute, which prohibits, among other things, persons or entities from knowingly and willfully soliciting, offering, receiving or paying any remuneration, directly or indirectly, overtly or covertly, in cash or in kind, to induce or reward either the referral of an individual for, or the purchase, lease, order, or arranging for or recommending the purchase, lease or order of, any good or service, for which payment may be made, in whole or in part, under federal healthcare programs such as Medicare and Medicaid. A person or entity does not need to have actual knowledge of the statute or specific intent to violate it in order to have committed a violation 39 ● the U.S. civil False Claims Act (which can be enforced through “qui tam,” or whistleblower actions, by private citizens on behalf of the federal government and impose civil and criminal penalties), prohibits any person from, among other things, knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented false or fraudulent claims for payment of government funds or knowingly making, using or causing to be made or used, a false record or statement material to an obligation to pay money to the government or knowingly and improperly avoiding, decreasing or concealing an obligation to pay money to the U.S. federal government; ● HIPAA, which imposes criminal liability and amends provisions on the reporting, investigation, enforcement, and penalizing of civil liability for, among other things, knowingly and willfully executing, or attempting to execute, a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program, or knowingly and willfully falsifying, concealing or covering up a material fact or making any materially false statement, in connection with the delivery of, or payment for healthcare benefits, items or services by a healthcare benefit program, which includes both government and privately funded benefits programs; similar to the U.S. federal Anti-Kickback Statute, a person or entity does not need to have actual knowledge of the statute or specific intent to violate it in order to have committed a violation; ● HIPAA, as amended by HITECH, and its implementing regulations, which also imposes obligations, including mandatory contractual terms, with respect to safeguarding the privacy, security and transmission of individually identifiable health information without appropriate authorization by covered entities subject to the rule, such as health plans, healthcare clearinghouses and healthcare providers as well as their business associates and their subcontractors that perform certain services for or on their behalf involving the use or disclosure of individually identifiable health information; ● state laws and regulations, including state anti-kickback and false claims laws, that may apply to our business practices, including but not limited to, research, distribution, sales and marketing arrangements and claims involving healthcare items or services reimbursed by any third-party payer, including private insurers; state laws that require pharmaceutical companies to comply with the pharmaceutical industry’s voluntary compliance guidelines and the relevant compliance guidance promulgated by the U.S. federal government, or otherwise restrict payments that may be made to healthcare providers and other potential referral sources; and state laws and regulations that require drug manufacturers to file reports relating to pricing and marketing information, which requires tracking gifts and other remuneration and items of value provided to healthcare professionals and entities; ● the Physician Payments Sunshine Act, implemented as the Open Payments program, and its implementing regulations, requires certain manufacturers of drugs, devices, biologics and medical supplies that are reimbursable under Medicare, Medicaid, or the Children’s Health Insurance Program to report annually to CMS information related to certain payments made in the preceding calendar year and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals, as well as ownership and investment interests held by physicians and their immediate family members; beginning in 2022, applicable manufacturers are required to report such information regarding payments and transfers of value provided, as well as ownership and investment interests held, during the previous year to physician assistants, nurse practitioners, clinical nurse specialists, certified nurse anesthetists, and certified nurse-midwives; and ● the FCPA, which generally prohibits offering, promising, giving, or authorizing others to give anything of value, either directly or indirectly, to a non-U.S. government official in order to influence official action, or otherwise obtain or retain business. The FCPA also requires public companies to make and keep books and records that accurately and fairly reflect the transactions of the corporation and to devise and maintain an adequate system of internal accounting controls. Our industry is heavily regulated and therefore involves significant interaction with public officials, including officials of non-U.S. governments. Additionally, in many other countries, the health care providers who prescribe pharmaceuticals are employed by their government, and the purchasers of pharmaceuticals are government entities; therefore, our dealings with these prescribers and purchasers are subject to regulation under the FCPA. Recently, the SEC and DOJ have increased their FCPA enforcement activities with respect to pharmaceutical companies. Violations of any of these laws or any other governmental regulations that may apply to us, may subject us to significant civil, criminal and administrative sanctions including penalties, damages, fines, imprisonment, and exclusion from government funded healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, and/or adverse publicity. Moreover, government entities and private litigants have asserted claims under state consumer protection statutes against pharmaceutical companies for alleged false or misleading statements in connection with the marketing, promotion and/or sale of pharmaceutical products, including state investigations and litigation by certain government entities regarding the marketing of opioid products. 40 Our products contain controlled substances which may subject us to increased litigation risk and regulation. Some of our current products and products under development contain controlled substances. Misuse or abuse of such drugs can lead to physical or other hard. The FDA and/or the DEA may impose new regulations concerning the manufacture, storage, transportation, distribution, and sale of prescription narcotics. Such regulations may include new labelling requirements, the development and implementation of a formal REMS, restrictions on prescription and sale of such products and mandatory reformulation in order to make abuse of such products more difficult. In 2007, Congress passed legislation authorizing the FDA to require companies to undertake post-approval studies in order to assess known or signaled potential serious safety risks and to make any labelling changes necessary to address safety risks. Congress also empowered the FDA to require companies to formulate REMS to confirm a drug’s benefits exceed its risks. In 2011, the FDA issued letters to manufacturers of long-acting and extended-release opioids requiring them to develop and submit to the FDA a post-market REMS plan to require that training be provided to prescribers of these products and that information is provided to prescribers that they can use in counselling patients on the risks and benefits of opioid drug use. Elite does not currently own a product that requires a REMS plan, but some of the products in our pipeline may require a REMS plan. The federal government has also released a comprehensive action plan to reduce prescription drug abuse, which may include proposed legislation to amended existing controlled substances laws to require healthcare practitioners who request DEA registration to prescribe controlled substances to receive training on opioid prescribing practices as a condition of registration. In addition, state health departments and boards of pharmacy have authority to regulate distribution and may modify their regulations with respect to prescription narcotics in an attempt to curb abuse. Mandatory REMS programs could increase the cost, burden and liability associated with the commercialization of certain products. The FDA has imposed a class-wide REMS on all IR, ER and long acting opioid drug products (known as the Opioid Analgesic REMS). The FDA continually evaluates whether the REMS program is meeting its goal of ensuring that the benefit of these drugs continue to outweigh their risks, and whether the goals or elements of the program should be modified. If the FDA determines that additional measures are necessary, the modification of the Opioid Analgesic REMS to impose additional or more burdensome requirements could increase the costs associated with marketing opioid products and/or reduce the willingness of healthcare providers to prescribe those products, both which would have a material adverse effect on the ability to successfully commercializing, or to generate sufficient revenue from, such products. Illegal distribution and third-party sale of counterfeit versions of our products could have a detrimental effect on our reputation and business. Third parties could illegally distribute and sell counterfeit versions of our products, which do not meet the rigorous manufacturing and testing standards that our products undergo. Counterfeit products are frequently unsafe or ineffective and can be life-threatening. Counterfeit medicines may contain harmful substances, the wrong dose of the active pharmaceutical ingredient or no active pharmaceutical ingredients at all. However, to distributors and users, counterfeit products may be visually indistinguishable from the authentic version. Reports of adverse reactions to counterfeit drugs or increased levels of counterfeiting could materially affect patient confidence in the authentic product. It is possible that adverse events caused by unsafe counterfeit products will mistakenly be attributed to the authentic product. In addition, thefts of inventory at warehouses, plants or while in-transit, which are not properly stored, and which are sold through unauthorized channels could adversely impact patient safety, our reputation, and our business. Public loss of confidence in the integrity of pharmaceutical products as a result of counterfeiting or theft could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Our competitors or other third parties may allege that we are infringing upon their IP, forcing us to expend substantial resources in litigation, the outcome of which is uncertain. Any unfavorable outcome of such litigation, including, without limitation, losses related to “at-risk” product launches, could have a material effect our business, financial position and results of operations. Companies that produce branded pharmaceutical products routinely bring litigation against ANDA filers or similar applicants that seek regulatory approval to manufacture and market generic forms of their branded products alleging patent infringement or other violations of IP rights. Patent holders may also bring patent infringement suits against companies that are currently marketing and selling approved generic products. Litigation often involves significant expense and can delay or prevent introduction or sale of our generic and/or biosimilar products. If valid and enforceable patents are infringed by our products, we would need to delay selling the infringing generic product unless we could obtain a license from the patent holder, and, if we were already selling the infringing product, cease selling and potentially destroy existing product stock. 41 There may be situations in which we may make business and legal judgments to market and sell products that are subject to claims of alleged patent infringement prior to final resolution of those claims by the courts, based upon our belief that such patents are invalid, unenforceable, or are not infringed by our marketing and sale of such products. This is referred to in the pharmaceutical industry as an “at-risk” launch. The risk involved in an at-risk launch can be substantial because, if a patent holder ultimately prevails against us, the remedies available to such holder may include, among other things, damages measured by the profits lost by the patent holder or treble damages, which can be significantly higher than the profits we make from selling the generic version of the product. We may also be harmed by the loss of any value of such inventory that we are unable to market or sell. Any or all of the above could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, ability to operate as a going concern and stock price. Intellectual Property Related Risks Our ability to protect intellectual property rights and successfully defend against third-party allegations of IP infringement is vital to our business and uncertain. Our success depends on our ability to protect our current and future products and to defend our IP rights. If we fail to protect our intellectual property adequately, competitors may manufacture and market products similar to ours. We currently hold two patents and we may intend to file further patent applications in the future. We cannot be certain that any further patent applications will result in the issuance of patents. If patents are issued, third parties may sue us to challenge our patent protection, and although we know of no reason why they should prevail, it is possible that they could. In addition to modification or revocation of patents in legal proceedings, issued patents may later be modified or revoked by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office or by analogous foreign offices. It is likewise possible that our patent rights may not prevent or limit our present and future competitors from developing, using or commercializing products that are similar or functionally equivalent to our products. In addition, we may be required to obtain licenses to patents, or other proprietary rights of third parties, in connection with the development and use of our products and technologies as they relate to other persons’ technologies. At such time as we discover a need to obtain any such license, we will need to establish whether we will be able to obtain such a license on favorable terms, if at all. The failure to obtain the necessary licenses or other rights could preclude the sale, manufacture or distribution of our products. We rely particularly on trade secrets, unpatented proprietary expertise and continuing innovation that we seek to protect, in part, by entering into confidentiality agreements with licensees, suppliers, employees, and consultants. We cannot provide assurance that these agreements will not be breached or circumvented. We also cannot be certain that there will be adequate remedies in the event of a breach. Disputes may arise concerning the ownership of intellectual property or the applicability of confidentiality agreements. We cannot be sure that our trade secrets and proprietary technology will not otherwise be obtained by other entities, such as government or regulatory authorities, or become known, obtained, or independently developed by our competitors or by other entities through means beyond our control. We also cannot be sure that, if patents are not issued with respect to products arising from research, we will be able to maintain the confidentiality of information relating to these products. In addition, efforts to ensure our intellectual property rights can be costly, time-consuming, and/or ultimately unsuccessful. Furthermore, companies that produce branded pharmaceutical products routinely bring litigation against ANDA or similar applicants that seek regulatory approval to manufacture and market generic forms of branded products, alleging patent infringement or other violations of intellectual property rights. Patent holders may also bring patent infringement suits against companies that are currently marketing and selling approved generic products. Litigation often involves significant expense. Additionally, if the patents of others are held valid, enforceable and infringed by our current products or future product candidates, we would, unless we could obtain a license from the patent holder, need to delay selling our corresponding generic product and, if we are already selling our product, cease selling and potentially destroy existing product stock. Additionally, we could be required to pay monetary damages or royalties to license proprietary rights from third parties and we may not be able to obtain such licenses on commercially reasonable terms or at all. There may be situations in which we may make business and legal judgments to market and sell products that are subject to claims of alleged patent infringement prior to final resolution of those claims by the courts based upon our belief that such patents are invalid, unenforceable or are not infringed by our marketing and sale of such products. This is commonly referred to in the pharmaceutical industry as an “at-risk” launch. The risk involved in an at-risk launch can be substantial because, if a patent holder ultimately prevails against us, the remedies available to such holder may include, among other things, damages calculated based on the profits lost by the patent holder, which can be significantly higher than the profits we make from selling the generic version of the product. Moreover, if a court determines that such infringement is willful, the damages could be subject to trebling. We could face substantial damages from adverse court decisions in such matters. We could also be at risk for the value of such inventory that we are unable to market or sell. The occurrence of any of the above could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and stock price. 42 Risks Related to our Common Shares Dilution from issuance of shares upon exercise of warrants and options or the perception that dilution may occur could cause the price per share of common stock to fall. As of March 31, 2026, there were outstanding warrants to purchase an aggregate of approximately 79.0 million shares of Common Stock at a cash exercise price of $0.1521 per share and vested options to purchase an aggregate of approximately 5 million shares at a weighted average cash exercise price of $0.06. Additional shares of Common Stock may be issuable as a result of anti-dilution provisions in the outstanding warrants. We may also issue shares from time to time to our directors, officers, employees, and consultants. As a result of the above discussed potential issuance of securities, such issuances by us could result in substantial dilution to the interests of other holders of our common stock, and the subsequent sale of these shares, or the perception that the sale of these shares may occur, could cause the price of our common stock to fall. Additionally, the conversion or exercise of outstanding shares of warrants, or the anticipation of such issuances, could make it more difficult for us to sell equity or equity-related securities in the future at a time and at a price that we might otherwise wish to effect sales. Our common stock is a penny stock, quoted on the OTC bulletin board, with rules in place that could limit trading and liquidity of our shares, increased transaction costs that could adversely affect our price per share. Our common stock is a “low-priced” security or “penny stock” under rules promulgated under the Exchange Act. In accordance with these rules, broker-dealers participating in transactions in low-priced securities must first deliver a risk disclosure document which describes the risks associated with such stocks, the broker-dealer’s duties in selling the stock, the customer’s rights and remedies and certain market and other information. Furthermore, the broker-dealer must make a suitability determination approving the customer for low-priced stock transactions based on the customer’s financial situation, investment experience and objectives. Broker-dealers must also disclose these restrictions in writing to the customer, obtain specific written consent from the customer, and provide monthly account statements to the customer. The effect of these restrictions will likely decrease the willingness of broker-dealers to make a market in our Common Stock, will decrease liquidity of our Common Stock and will increase transaction costs for sales and purchases of our Common Stock as compared to other securities. In addition, our Common stock is quoted on the Venture Market (the “OTCQB”), which is a regulated quotation service that displays real-time quotes, last sale prices and volume limitations in over-the-counter securities. Because trades and quotations on the OTCQB involve a manual process, the market information for such securities cannot be guaranteed. In addition, quote information, or even firm quotes, may not be available. The manual execution process may delay order processing and intervening price fluctuations may result in the failure of a limit order to execute or the execution of a market order at a significantly different price. Execution of trades, execution reporting and the delivery of legal trade confirmations may be delayed significantly. Consequently, one may not be able to sell shares of our Common Stock at the optimum trading prices. When fewer shares of a security are being traded on the OTCQB, volatility of prices may increase, and price movement may outpace the ability to deliver accurate quote information. Lower trading volumes in a security may result in a lower likelihood of an individual’s orders being executed, and current prices may differ significantly from the price one was quoted by the OTCQB at the time of the order entry. Orders for OTCQB securities may be cancelled or edited like orders for other securities. All requests to change or cancel an order must be submitted to, received, and processed by the OTCQB. Due to the manual order processing involved in handling OTCQB trades, order processing and reporting may be delayed, and an individual may not be able to cancel or edit his order. Consequently, one may not be able to sell shares of Common Stock at the optimum trading prices. The dealer’s spread (the difference between the bid and ask prices) may be large and may result in substantial losses to the seller of securities on the OTCQB if the Common Stock or other security must be sold immediately. Further, purchasers of securities may incur an immediate “paper” loss due to the price spread. Moreover, dealers trading on the OTCQB may not have a bid price for securities bought and sold through the OTCQB. Due to the foregoing, demand for securities that are traded through the OTCQB may be decreased or eliminated. Shareholder activism could negatively affect us. In recent years, shareholder activism involving corporate governance, fiduciary duties of directors and officers, strategic direction and operations has become increasingly prevalent. If we become the subject of such shareholder activism, their demands may disrupt our business and divert the attention of our management, Board and employees. Also, we may incur substantial costs, including legal fees and other expenses, related to such activist shareholder matters. Perceived uncertainties resulting from such activist shareholder matters may result in loss of potential business opportunities with our current and potential customers and business partners, be exploited by our competitors and make attracting and retaining qualified personnel more difficult. In addition, such shareholder activism may cause significant fluctuations in our share price based on temporary or speculative market perceptions, uncertainties or other factors that do not necessarily reflect the underlying fundamentals and prospects of our business. The effects of shareholder activism pursued against the Company could have an adverse material effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and stock price. 43 Our stock price has been volatile . The market price for the publicly traded stock of pharmaceutical companies is generally characterized by high volatility. There has been significant volatility in the market prices for our Common Stock. For the year ended March 31, 2026, the closing sale price on the OTCQB of our Common Stock fluctuated from a high of $0.77 per share to a low of $0.32 per share. The price per share of our Common Stock may not exceed or even remain at current levels in the future. The market price of our Common Stock may be affected by a number of factors, including, without limitation: ● Results of our clinical trials; ● Approval or disapproval of our ANDAs or NDAs; ● Announcements of innovations, new products, or new patents by us or by our competitors; ● Announcements of other material events; ● Governmental regulation; ● Patent or proprietary rights developments; ● Proxy contests or litigation; ● News regarding the efficacy of, safety of or demand for drugs or drug technologies; ● Economic and market conditions, generally and related to the pharmaceutical industry; ● Healthcare legislation; ● Changes in third-party reimbursement policies for drugs; and ● Fluctuations in our operating results. Capital raises through sales of securities may cause substantial dilution to existing shareholders . Any additional financing that involves the further sale of our securities could cause existing holders of our Common Stock to experience substantial dilution. On the other hand, if we incurred debt, we would be subject to risks associated with indebtedness, including the risk that interest rates might fluctuate, and cash flow would be insufficient to pay principal and interest on such indebtedness. Issuance of shares of common or preferred stock could make achieving a change of control more difficult . The issuance of additional shares of our Common Stock, including those shares issued pursuant to conversion of convertible preferred shares, or the issuance of shares of an additional series of preferred stock could be used to make a change of control of us more difficult and expensive. Under certain circumstances, such shares could be used to create impediments to, or frustrate persons seeking to cause, a takeover or to gain control of us. Such shares could be sold to purchasers who might side with our Board of Directors in opposing a takeover bid that the Board of Directors determines not to be in the best interests of our shareholders. It might also have the effect of discouraging an attempt by another person or entity through the acquisition of a substantial number of shares of our Common Stock to acquire control of us with a view to consummating a merger, sale of all or part of our assets, or a similar transaction, since the issuance of new shares could be used to dilute the stock ownership of such person or entity. We have no plans to pay regular dividends or conduct share purchases . We do not intend to pay any cash dividends either currently or in the foreseeable future on our common shares. Additionally, we do not intend to conduct share repurchases either currently or in the foreseeable future.