Denali Therapeutics Inc. 10-K

ITEM 1. BUSINESS Overview and Strategy Our goal is to discover, develop and deliver therapeutics to defeat degeneration. We are a clinical stage biopharmaceutical company developing a broad portfolio of product candidates engineered to cross the blood-brain barrier (“BBB”) for neurodegenerative diseases and lysosomal storage diseases ("LSDs"). We have a diversified and differentiated portfolio of both small molecule and biotherapeutic medicines, comprising seven product candidates in clinical development across seven indications as well as more than a dozen preclinical therapeutic candidates. Each of our programs has been engineered for efficient delivery across the BBB to increase drug exposure in the brain after systemic administration. We have discovered and developed a proprietary platform technology called the Transport Vehicle (“TV”), which we have used in developing our portfolio of brain-penetrant therapies based on our Enzyme Transport Vehicle (“ETV”), A ntibody Transport Vehicle (“ATV”), Protein Transport Vehicle (“PTV”), and Oligonucleotide Transport Vehicle (“OTV”). We believe the combination of a clinically validated delivery platform and a maturing therapeutic portfolio will position us for long-term success in our goal to advance next-generation, targeted medicines for people living with neurodegenerative diseases. We plan to further grow our discovery and clinical development capabilities, focusing on TV-enabled biotherapeutics programs for neurodegenerative diseases, and intend to build internal manufacturing capabilities and commercial infrastructure in a staged manner that is aligned with the progression of our portfolio. We aim to serve patients as a fully integrated global organization. We have three late-stage development programs: tividenofusp alfa (DNL310, ETV:IDS) for mucopolysaccharidosis II (" MPS II ", or " Hunter syndrome "); BIIB122/DNL151 (LRRK2 inhibitor) for Parkinson’s disease; and DNL343 (eIF2B activator) for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (“ALS”). SAR443820/DNL788 (RIPK1 inhibitor) is being evaluated in a Phase 2 study for multiple sclerosis ("MS"). In addition, we are conducting a Phase 1/2 study of TAK-594/DNL593 (PTV:PGRN) for frontotemporal dementia-granulin (“FTD-GRN”) and a Phase 1/2 study of DNL126 (ETV:SGSH) for MPS IIIA (Sanfilippo syndrome). Eclitasertib (SAR443122/DNL758, peripheral RIPK1 inhibitor) is in a Phase 2 study for ulcerative colitis ("UC"). As our portfolio matures and our company scales, we plan to maintain a deep focus on science to guide our efforts to discover, develop and deliver medicines to patients. Our discovery and development strategy is guided by three overarching principles that we believe will significantly increase the probability of success and accelerate the timing to bring effective therapeutics to people living with neurodegenerative diseases and LSDs: • Degenogenes: Genetic Pathway Realization – each of our programs addresses a molecular target or biological pathway that is genetically validated to cause or increase the risk for neurodegenerative diseases. • Brain Delivery: Validation and Optionality – we engineer our product candidates to cross the BBB and act directly in the brain. Our proprietary TV platform technology is designed to effectively deliver large therapeutic molecules, such as enzymes, proteins, antibodies, and oligonucleotides, across the BBB after intravenous administration. • Biomarker-Driven Development and Approval – we discover, develop and use biomarkers to inform dose selection, assess clinical activity, and identify patients most likely to respond to our therapies. We are actively engaged in discussions with health authorities regarding the potential use of biomarkers as primary clinical endpoints to support faster paths to approval. 6 Table of Contents Our target indications include diseases with large patient populations, such as Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease, as well as rare indications, such as MPS II (Hunter syndrome), MPS IIIA (Sanfilippo syndrome Type A), FTD-GRN and ALS. We expect our first potential product launches will be in rare disease categories. Launching first in rare indications gives us the opportunity to build and establish our commercial organization so that we are poised for success in larger indications over time. Our most advanced TV-enabled program, tividenofusp alfa (DNL310, ETV:IDS), is intended to replace the standard of care in Hunter syndrome, which belongs to a group of rare LSDs. LSDs affect more than 30,000 individuals worldwide for whom central nervous system (“CNS”) manifestations and many somatic symptoms continue to remain unaddressed by the current standard of care, if available at all. We aim to leverage certain efficiencies of scale to support the commercialization of additional product candidates to create an LSD franchise. We are actively working toward building clinical manufacturing capabilities and continuing to expand our commercial capabilities in LSDs and intend to serve patients directly in several countries. In parallel, we are advancing our programs for rare neurodegenerative diseases such as ALS and FTD, which impact around 500,000 individuals worldwide. We may commercialize these product candidates, if approved, independently in key markets and/or leverage partnerships to ensure optimal access for patients. For the common neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson's disease, which afflict 40 to 50 million individuals worldwide, we plan to initially leverage strategic collaborations that contribute existing global commercial infrastructure. Collaborations and partnering are central components of our strategy to build, develop and commercialize our portfolio of product candidates. We have numerous arrangements with biopharmaceutical companies, technology companies, academic institutions, foundations, and patient-focused data companies. Notable active arrangements include those with Biogen Inc.’s subsidiaries, Biogen MA Inc. (“BIMA”) and Biogen International GmbH (“BIG”) (BIMA and BIG, collectively, “Biogen”), Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited ("Takeda"), and Genzyme Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Sanofi S.A. ("Sanofi"). We hold significant development and commercialization rights to all of our CNS programs, including the programs which are subject to our collaboration agreements with Biogen, Sanofi and Takeda, where we share responsibility for clinical development and share commercialization rights in the United States and China. Our costs of developing programs associated with these collaborations are largely covered through upfront payments, expected incoming milestones and cost sharing. We may seek additional strategic partnering opportunities as we strive to capture the full value of our portfolio and platforms. For example, the TV platform has potential applications beyond our core focus on neurodegeneration (e.g., oncology, infectious disease, neuropsychiatry, pain). At Denali, we are guided by the core Denali values of trust, growth, grit and unity, and these values form the foundation of our Environmental, Social & Governance (“ESG”) practices. Our working culture seeks to develop quality leaders, foster diversity and inclusion, and emphasize continuous growth. We embrace differences and acknowledge the valuable perspectives that a diverse and inclusive workforce brings to problem-solving and innovation. We strive to manage our operations in a way that is sustainable and reduces our impact on the environment, including through a Green Alternative program which provides researchers with information on suitable alternative chemicals that have a lower environmental impact for common solvents. Additionally, several waste streams have been segregated on-site for proper disposal or recycling, such as containers, food waste, plastics, styrofoam, and glass chemical containers, to maximize recycling and composting. We also maintain an ongoing commitment to corporate governance principles, with oversight of ESG matters by Denali's Board of Directors, and strong performance orientation in our compensation program. 7 Table of Contents Our Approach to Defeating Neurodegeneration Our Scientific Principles Degenogene Pathways The number of genetic associations discovered in neurodegenerative diseases has grown rapidly in recent years. Degenogenes are genes that when mutated cause, or are major risk factors for, neurodegenerative diseases. Analysis of recently discovered degenogenes point to important disease pathways that, when dysregulated, increase the risk of developing neurodegenerative disease, and provide a strong scientific foundation for prioritizing drug development programs. We currently focus on programs that seek to modulate three key disease pathways: • Lysosomal Function – Dysfunction of the lysosomal system, the disposal and recycling compartment of the cell, is associated with several neurodegenerative diseases, including Parkinson's disease and neurodegeneration in the context of LSDs. Degenogenes linked to lysosomal function include leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 ("LRRK2"), progranulin ("PGRN"), alpha-synuclein ("αSyn"), and lysosomal enzymes, including iduronate 2-sulfatase ("IDS"), sulfamidase ("SGSH"), and glucocerebrosidase ("GBA"). • Glial Biology – Glial cells, the resident immune cells of the brain, serve various functions including supporting neuronal health, pruning neuronal synapses, and providing immune surveillance and response in the brain. Genetic and pathological data suggest that glial dysfunction significantly contributes to neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer’s disease. Degenogenes that implicate immune dysfunction in the brain include triggering receptors expressed on myeloid cells 2 ("TREM2") and receptor interacting serine/threonine protein kinase 1 ("RIPK1"), a critical signaling protein in a canonical inflammatory and cell death pathway. • Cellular Homeostasis – The brain is particularly susceptible to defects in lipid, protein or RNA homeostasis. Mutations in several ALS and FTD degenogenes alter RNA homeostasis and increase cellular stress. Eukaryotic initiation factor 2 B ("eIF2B") is an essential regulator of cellular stress, and modulators of eIF2B activity have been shown to be beneficial in numerous in vitro and in vivo models of neurodegenerative disease. Other degenogenes linked to cellular homeostasis include amyloid precursor protein ("APP"), Tau and Apolipoprotein E (“ApoE”). Engineering Brain Delivery Historically, the BBB has been a major challenge to the development of medicines for diseases of the CNS. While the BBB protects the brain from threats such as harmful substances and infections by tightly regulating transport of molecules into and out of the brain, the BBB also prevents the delivery of small- and large-molecule medicines to the brain in sufficient quantities to have therapeutic effect. We directly address the BBB challenge by engineering brain delivery for both small and large molecules. Most small molecules are actively excluded from the brain by efflux pumps at the BBB; it has been estimated that approximately 98% do not cross the BBB. We have rigorously designed our small molecule therapeutic candidates to be orally bioavailable with chemical and physical properties that enable them to be readily absorbed from the gut and to penetrate the BBB while avoiding transporter-mediated efflux. We invented, developed, and continue to optimize a proprietary technology, called the Transport Vehicle, to deliver our large molecule biotherapeutic candidates to the brain after systemic administration. Clinical and preclinical studies with several of our TV-enabled product candidates demonstrated high concentrations and broad distribution in all explored regions of the CNS and in key CNS cell types and showed improved pharmacodynamic effects compared to standard biotherapeutics. We believe that the TV can significantly increase the probability of success of biotherapeutics for CNS indications and can enable many new potential treatment options. 8 Table of Contents Our TV technology is modular and enables several classes of biotherapeutics to more effectively cross the BBB, including enzymes, antibodies, proteins and oligonucleotides. The TV technology is engineered to engage specific BBB transport receptors, such as the transferrin receptor (“TfR”) and CD98 heavy chain ("CD98hc"), which are highly expressed in brain capillaries and facilitate transport of proteins into the brain ( Figure 1 ) in a process called receptor mediated transcytosis, or RMT. Figure 1 : Engineering brain delivery. Schematic of the TV technologies, designed to cross the BBB through receptor-mediated transcytosis, leveraging endogenous receptors expressed on endothelial cells of the central nervous system vasculature. Our pipeline of TV-enabled programs currently includes three clinical-stage programs and more than a dozen programs in preclinical development. We demonstrated proof of concept with safety and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data from the ongoing Phase 1/2 study with DNL310 (ETV:IDS), and pharmacokinetic data from the ongoing Phase 1 study with TAK-594/DNL593 (PTV:PGRN), as well as data from several preclinical studies in mouse and nonhuman primate models. Preclinical studies demonstrated robust and sustained pharmacodynamic effects in the brain after intravenous dosing of TV-enabled antibodies, enzymes, proteins, and antisense oligonucleotides ("ASOs"), while standard antibodies, enzymes, proteins and ASOs had no or minimal pharmacodynamic effects. These data show that TV-enabled product candidates have the potential to achieve therapeutically relevant concentrations in the brain after systemic administration, making them potentially superior to traditional biologic therapeutics in targeting neurodegenerative diseases. Our TV technology is differentiated from other BBB technologies through its engineering approach, which may provide superior therapeutic efficacy and safety through higher stability, exposure, and biodistribution of drug candidates in the brain ( Figure 2 ). 9 Table of Contents Figure 2 : Denali’s TV technology is modular and highly differentiated Our most advanced TV-enabled program, DNL310 (ETV:IDS), is currently in an ongoing Phase 2/3 study for MPS II, and we are conducting Phase 1/2 studies of TAK-594/DNL593 (PTV:PGRN) and DNL126 (ETV:SGSH) for FTD-GRN and MPS IIIA, respectively. In addition, OTV:MAPT, targeting tau for Alzheimer’s disease, and OTV:SNCA, targeting αSyn for Parkinson’s disease, are our two lead IND-enabling stage OTV programs. Biogen licensed our ATV:Abeta program targeting amyloid beta for Alzheimer's disease, which is in the IND-enabling stage. We believe that we can further expand our portfolio leveraging the modularity of the TV technology as well as additional BBB receptors. In addition to our current focus on neurodegenerative diseases and LSDs, we are exploring programs in oncology (ATV:HER2) and infectious diseases as well as other neurological and neuromuscular indications ( Figure 3 ). We may develop these additional programs ourselves in the future or seek partnerships. 10 Table of Contents Figure 3 : Denali’s TV technology provides opportunities for platform expansion. In addition to TfR, we are targeting CD98hc, an amino acid transporter highly expressed on the BBB ( Figure 4 ). Our preclinical studies have established TV CD98hc as a modular brain delivery platform with favorable kinetic, biodistribution, and safety properties distinct from previously reported BBB platforms. We believe that the distinct properties of our two TV platforms, TV TfR and TV CD98hc may enable selection of the optimal platform for a given drug target thereby expanding our portfolio opportunities. Figure 4 : TV CD98hc targets the CD98hc an amino acid transporter, which is highly expressed on the BBB, for brain delivery of biotherapeutics. 11 Table of Contents Biomarker-Driven Development and Approval As part of our strategy, we identify and validate biomarkers which are relevant for both animal models and human trials and are critical for selecting patients, predicting and measuring target engagement, supporting dose selection and enabling decisions on progression of product candidates to the next phase of development. When practicable, we are developing patient selection biomarkers for our programs to enable identification of patients with the relevant disease biology and stage of disease likely to benefit from targeted therapy in order to increase the likelihood of success of clinical trials. Ultimately, we expect to positively impact market acceptance of these targeted therapies, driven by high and meaningful response rates within the targeted population as defined by the patient selection biomarkers. In certain indications, regulatory approval may limit the market of a product candidate to target patient populations when patient selection biomarkers are used. In these indications, regulatory authorities may require us to run additional clinical trials prior to expanding the label for approval that includes a broader patient population. We recognize the urgency for patients living with neurodegenerative and LSDs to have effective treatment options. Biomarkers have successfully been used as primary clinical endpoints to secure a faster path to approval in indications, such as ALS and Alzheimer’s disease. We are actively engaged in efforts, which include collaboration with our patient communities, advocacy groups and other drug developers, to press for more regulatory flexibility in using biomarker data as the basis for approval in disease indications where the unmet medical need is high and treatment options are few or non-existent. These efforts are in addition to ongoing discussions with health authorities regarding the potential use of biomarkers as primary clinical endpoints to support faster paths to approval for our product candidates. Our Programs The following table summarizes key information about our clinical programs and pipeline: Figure 5: Denali’s current development pipeline. We are developing a broad portfolio of targeted therapeutic candidates for neurodegenerative diseases and LSDs. Our programs are at different stages of clinical and preclinical development. In addition to our current clinical development portfolio, we expect to advance at least three new molecule entities (“NMEs”) into clinical development in the 2024 to 2025 timeframe. We discuss our most advanced programs in further detail below. 12 Table of Contents Late-Stage And Mid-Stage Clinical Programs Tividenofusp alfa (DNL310, ETV:IDS) Enzyme Replacement Therapy Program for MPS II (Hunter Syndrome) MPS II, also called Hunter syndrome, is a rare genetic disease that affects over 2,000 individuals, primarily males, world-wide, and leads to behavioral, cognitive, and physical symptoms ultimately resulting in shortened lifespan. MPS II is caused by mutations in the iduronate-2-sulfatase ( IDS ) gene, which leads to a deficiency of the IDS enzyme responsible for the breakdown of the glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) heparan and dermatan sulfate in lysosomes. Symptoms often begin emerging around age two and include physical complications, including organ dysfunction, joint stiffness, hearing loss and impaired growth leading to short stature, and neurocognitive symptoms with impaired development. The disease is characterized by a buildup of GAGs in lysosomes — the part of the cell that breaks down materials including GAGs. The current standard of care enzyme replacement therapy (" ERT ") partially treats the physical symptoms but does not cross the blood-brain barrier, and as a result, cognitive and behavioral symptoms experienced by the majority of patients with MPS II are not addressed. Therapies that address behavioral, cognitive, and somatic manifestations of the disease are one of the greatest unmet needs for this community. DNL310 is a fusion protein composed of IDS fused to Denali’s proprietary ETV, which is engineered to cross the BBB via receptor-mediated transcytosis into the brain and to enable broad delivery of IDS into cells and tissues throughout the body with the goal of addressing the behavioral, cognitive, and physical manifestations of MPS II. In March 2021, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration granted Fast Track designation to DNL310 for the treatment of patients with MPS II. In May 2022, the European Medicines Agency ("EMA") granted DNL310 Priority Medicines designation. DNL310 is an investigational product candidate and has not been approved by any Health Authority. Based on supportive clinical and preclinical data to date, we are enrolling the Phase 2/3 COMPASS study in North America, South America, and Europe. The Phase 2/3 COMPASS study is expected to enroll 54 participants with MPS II, with and without neuronopathic disease. The participants are randomized 2:1 to receive either DNL310 or idursulfase, respectively. Cohort A includes children ages ≥2 to <6 years with neuronopathic disease; cohort B includes children ages ≥6 to <17 without neuronopathic disease. Upon completion of the ongoing Phase 1/2 study, and together with data from the global COMPASS study, this combined data package is intended to support registration. In parallel with the Phase 2/3 COMPASS study, we are also conducting a Phase 1/2 trial for DNL310 in patients with MPS II as a multicenter, multiregional, open-label, single-arm trial to assess the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of DNL310 administered once weekly by intravenous infusion. We have previously reported interim analyses from the Phase 1/2 study and most recently at the 2024 WORLD Symposium TM in February 2024. Key results are summarized below. The additional data reported at the 2024 WORLD Symposium TM demonstrated that DNL310 enabled rapid and sustained normalization of heparan sulfate in cerebrospinal fluid ("CSF") with mean reductions from baseline of approximately 90% at weeks 24, 49, and 104. Normalization of CSF heparan sulfate was observed even in participants with high levels of preexisting serum anti-iduronate-2-sulfatase antibodies ( Figure 6 ). In urine, a high-magnitude and sustained reduction of heparan sulfate and dermatan sulfate after switching from standard-of-care ERT to DNL310 suggested added peripheral activity. 13 Table of Contents Figure 6: Normal levels of CSF HS were achieved and sustained over time, including in those with pre-existing high serum ADA. Following treatment with DNL310, mean reductions of 64%, 60%, and 71%, representing near normalization or complete normalization, were observed in levels of gangliosides GM2 and GM3 and glucosylsphingosine lipids, respectively, at week 104 in participants receiving DNL310, which is consistent with improved lysosomal function. Robust and sustained reduction in serum neurofilament light ("NfL"), a marker of neuronal damage, was observed, reaching statistical significance after 61 weeks and a reduction of 64% after two years of treatment with DNL310 ( Figure 7 ). Changes in serum and CSF NfL from baseline to week 104 were correlated; at week 104, there was a statistically significant 54% mean reduction from baseline in CSF NfL. 14 Table of Contents Figure 7 : Robust reduction of serum NfL, a marker of neuronal damage, was observed with long-term dosing. Exploratory clinical outcomes data from Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales (VABS)-II and Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (BSID)-III assessments out to 104 weeks of treatment with DNL310 were reported for the first time at the 2024 WORLD Symposium TM . Continued improvement and stabilization of adaptive behavior and cognitive scores suggest DNL310 has positive effects ( Figure 8 ). Figure 8 : Continued improvement and stabilization in sum of VABS-II scores and cognitive scores suggest DNL310 has positive effects. 15 Table of Contents Hearing, as assessed by auditory brainstem response ("ABR") testing, numerically improved over time after initiation of DNL310 across all frequencies ( Figure 9 ). At week 104, ABR thresholds showed statistically significant improvements across three of the four frequencies, with a trend toward greater improvement at higher frequencies. Figure 9: Changes of ABR thresholds with DNL310 treatment suggest improved hearing. Generally positive somatic activity on multiple endpoints was observed in participants receiving DNL310. Liver volume in standard-of-care ERT-naïve participants decreased by a mean of 25% from baseline at weeks 24 and 49. In standard-of-care ERT-experienced participants liver volume decreased by a mean of 5% from baseline at week 49. Spleen volume was normal in all participants at weeks 24 and 49 of DNL310 treatment. At baseline, spleen volume was normal in all participants except 1 standard-of-care ERT-naïve participant, who had normal spleen volumes at weeks 24 and 49 of DNL310 treatment. DNL310 continues to be generally well tolerated (median treatment duration 100 weeks and maximum treatment duration 161 weeks). The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events were infusion related reactions, which decreased in frequency and severity with continued dosing. An independent data monitoring committee met in December 2023 and recommended that the study may continue without modifications. 2024 expected progress and milestones: • Presentation of additional interim Phase 1/2 data at the Society for the Study of Inborn Errors of Metabolism (SSIEM) Annual Symposium. • Complete enrollment of global Phase 2/3 COMPASS study in MPS II. DNL343 eIF2B Activator Program for ALS We are developing DNL343 as a novel eIF2B activator with first-in-class potential for the treatment of ALS and other indications. eIF2B is an intracellular protein complex that regulates protein synthesis and is required for neuronal health and function. When neurons experience stress, activation of the integrated stress response ("ISR") pathway leads to suppression of eIF2B activity, resulting in impaired protein synthesis and formation of stress granules. Stress granules are thought to be a precursor of TDP-43 aggregation, which is a hallmark pathology in ALS. DNL343 is designed to activate eIF2B and thereby restore protein synthesis, disperse TDP-43 aggregates, and improve neuronal survival. 16 Table of Contents In May 2023, the first participant with ALS was dosed with DNL343 (Regimen G) in the Phase 2/3 HEALEY ALS Platform Trial led by the Sean M. Healey & AMG Center for ALS ("Healey Center") at Massachusetts General Hospital ("MGH") in collaboration with the Northeast ALS Consortium ("NEALS") clinical trial network. The HEALEY ALS Platform Trial is a large-scale collaborative effort made possible by contributions from patients and families, clinical trial sites, industry partners and research collaborators to evaluate multiple investigational therapies simultaneously with the goal of accelerating the development of potential new treatments for ALS. Therapeutic candidates that enter the platform trial are chosen by a group of expert ALS scientists and members of the Healey & AMG Center. Recruitment is ongoing in Regimen G (DNL343) of the Phase 2/3 HEALEY ALS Platform Trial. Late-stage development of DNL343 is supported by results of Phase 1/1b studies in 95 healthy volunteers and 28 participants with ALS. In April 2023, we presented final data from the 28-day treatment period of the Phase 1b study of DNL343 in participants with ALS at the 75th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Neurology ("AAN"). The Phase 1b study is a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, 28-day trial followed by an 18-month open-label extension, designed to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of DNL343 participants with ALS. Study results have demonstrated that once-daily oral dosing with DNL343 for 28 days was generally well tolerated and demonstrated extensive CSF penetration. In addition, robust inhibition of biomarkers associated with the ISR pathway was observed in blood samples from study participants ( Figure 10 ). Figure 10: Phase 1b results demonstrated 28-day dosing with DNL343 reduced ISR biomarkers (e.g., ATF4 protein and CHAC1 mRNA) in blood samples from ALS patients. 2024 expected progress and milestones: • Complete enrollment of participants in Regimen G (DNL343) in Phase 2/3 HEALEY ALS Platform Trial. SAR443820/DNL788 RIPK1 Inhibitor Program for CNS Disease: ALS, MS As described in more detail in “Business - Licenses and Collaborations” below, we are collaborating with Sanofi on the development of small molecules that inhibit RIPK1, a critical signaling protein in the tumor necrosis factor (“TNF”) receptor pathway and a regulator of inflammation and cell death. Increased RIPK1 activity in the brain drives neuroinflammation and cell necroptosis and contributes to neurodegeneration. RIPK1 inhibition has been shown to have beneficial effects in preclinical models of ALS, MS, Alzheimer's disease, and other diseases. SAR443820/DNL788 is our lead CNS-penetrant RIPK1 inhibitor in clinical development. Sanofi completed a Phase 1 trial of SAR443820/DNL788 in healthy volunteers, which demonstrated high brain penetrance and robust target engagement at doses that were generally well tolerated. 17 Table of Contents In February 2024, Sanofi informed us that the Phase 2 HIMALAYA study evaluating SAR443820/DNL788 in participants with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) did not meet the primary endpoint of change in ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R). Sanofi intends to present the detailed efficacy and safety results of the ALS Phase 2 HIMALAYA study at a future scientific forum. Sanofi is evaluating SAR443820/DNL788 in another Phase 2 clinical trial in participants with multiple sclerosis (MS), and the outcome of HIMALAYA study has no impact on the ongoing MS study. 2024 expected progress and milestones: • Continue Phase 2 K2 study in MS BIIB122/DNL151 LRRK2 Inhibitor Program for Parkinson's disease Parkinson's disease is one of the most common brain diseases, affecting approximately 10 million people worldwide. It is considered to be a movement disorder because patients can experience tremors, slowness of movement, stiffness and difficulty with walking and balance. In addition, Parkinson's patients can have other non-motor type problems such as constipation, depression and memory loss. The Parkinson symptoms are a result of the loss of dopamine-producing cells in the brain, which is currently thought to be caused by a combination of genetic and environmental risk factors. Mutations in the LRRK2 gene are one of the most common genetic risk factors for Parkinson's disease. LRRK2 is involved in maintaining a healthy cellular environment by regulating lysosomal function through modification of Rab proteins. Increased levels of LRRK2 kinase activity lead to lysosomal dysfunction, which is believed to contribute to neurodegeneration. Inhibition of LRRK2 activity has the potential to slow the progression of Parkinson’s disease in patients, with and without known genetic risks based on restoration of lysosomal function. As described in more detail in “Business - Licenses and Collaborations” below, we are collaborating with Biogen to co-develop and co-commercialize our small molecule inhibitors of LRRK2 for Parkinson's disease. BIIB122/DNL151 is the most clinically advanced small molecule inhibitor of LRRK2 currently in clinical testing for Parkinson's disease. Biogen is conducting the global Phase 2b LUMA study, which commenced in May 2022 and is evaluating the efficacy and safety of BIIB122/DNL151 as compared to placebo in approximately 640 participants with early-stage Parkinson's disease. Results from Phase 1 and Phase 1b trials of BIIB122/DNL151 in healthy volunteers and patients with Parkinson's disease, respectively, showed robust target and pathway engagement as measured by pS935 LRRK2 and pT73 Rab10 (“pRab10”), respectively. Furthermore, reduction in total LRRK2 in the CSF demonstrated central target engagement, and a dose-dependent reduction in urine of the lysosomal lipid 22:6-bis[monoacylglycerol] phosphate (“BMP”), a biomarker of lysosomal function, suggested improvement of lysosomal function. BIIB122/DNL151 was generally well tolerated across a broad range of doses for up to 28 days, the longest treatment duration in both studies. In June 2023, Denali in conjunction with Biogen, and based on review of portfolio timelines and resource prioritization, announced plans to revise the clinical development program for BIIB122/DNL151. Prior to the planned revisions, the BIIB122 clinical development program encompassed two global late-stage clinical trials: the Phase 2b LUMA study in participants with early-stage Parkinson’s disease noted above; and the Phase 3 LIGHTHOUSE study in participants with Parkinson’s disease related to pathogenic variants of LRRK2, which commenced in September 2022. 18 Table of Contents In consideration of the LIGHTHOUSE study’s complexity, including the long timeline with anticipated study completion in 2031, we and Biogen agreed to refocus efforts to enable a timely readout on efficacy in idiopathic early-stage Parkinson’s disease while gaining further clinical data in Parkinson’s disease with and without pathogenic variants in LRRK2. The planned revisions to the BIIB122 clinical development program were not based on any safety or efficacy data from studies of BIIB122. We have since modified the LUMA study’s enrollment criteria to allow for inclusion of eligible participants with Parkinson’s disease and a confirmed pathogenic variant of LRRK2, in addition to continuing to enroll eligible participants with idiopathic early-stage Parkinson’s disease. In February 2024, we announced the execution of a Collaboration and Development Funding Agreement in January 2024 with a third party related to a global Phase 2a study of BIIB122/DNL151, which Denali plans to solely operationalize to evaluate safety and biomarkers associated with BIIB122 in participants with Parkinson’s disease and confirmed pathogenic variants of LRRK2. This agreement includes committed funding of $75.0 million, of which $12.5 million was received in January 2024, and the remainder will be triggered based on time and operational milestones in the study. Biogen will continue to conduct the ongoing global Phase 2b LUMA study in early-stage Parkinson’s disease. Denali and Biogen will co-commercialize BIIB122/DNL151 assuming regulatory approval. The third party will be eligible to receive low single-digit royalties from Denali on annual worldwide net sales of LRRK2 inhibitors for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease, with royalty amounts varying based on the scope of the label . 2024 expected progress and milestones: • Continue Phase 2b LUMA study in early-stage PD. • Initiate Phase 2a study in PD related to pathogenic variants of LRRK2. Other LRRK2 Compounds Genetic and functional studies have linked LRRK2 and other proteins that modulate lysosomal function to Crohn's disease. Excessive LRRK2 activity leads to a reduction in lysosomal function, which contributes to the inflammation and intestinal dyshomeostasis that are characteristic of this disorder. We have discovered potent and selective small molecule inhibitors of LRRK2 and have selected a lead clinical candidate (DNL975) for treatment of Crohn's disease. As described in more detail in “Business - Licenses and Collaborations” below, we are collaborating with Biogen on the Peripheral LRRK2 program. Eclitasertib (SAR443122/DNL758) RIPK1 Inhibitor Program for Peripheral Inflammatory Diseases: UC As part of our parallel development strategy, we have also developed a number of other structurally diverse CNS-penetrant and peripherally-restricted RIPK1 inhibitor molecules, which are included as part of the collaboration agreement with Sanofi, described in more detail in “Business - Licenses and Collaborations” below. Sanofi is solely responsible for the development and commercialization of peripherally restricted RIPK1 inhibitors. In October 2023, Sanofi announced that the development of eclitasertib in cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) was being discontinued because the Phase 2 proof-of-concept study did not meet its primary endpoint (percent change from baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index-A (CLASI-A) at week 12). Eclitasertib was found to be generally well-tolerated. Sanofi is conducting a Phase 2 study of eclitasertib in patients with ulcerative colitis. Recruitment for the trial is ongoing. 2024 expected progress and milestones: • Continue Phase 2 UC study. 19 Table of Contents EARLY-STAGE CLINICAL AND PRECLINICAL PROGRAMS TAK-594/DNL593 (PTV:PGRN) Program for FTD-GRN FTD is the most common form of dementia in people under 60 years of age. While the progression of symptoms varies by individual, FTD brings an inevitable decline in function together with changes in personality and social behaviors, and sometimes language and/or motor dysfunction. Mutations in the granulin (" GRN" ) gene, which encodes the PGRN protein, generally result in reduced levels of PGRN and are among the most common genetic causes of FTD. It is estimated that FTD-GRN is 5-10% of the total FTD patient population. There are currently no approved medicines to stop or slow the progression of FTD or FTD-GRN. As described in more detail in “Business - Licenses and Collaborations” below, we are collaborating with Takeda to co-develop and co-commercialize TAK-594/DNL593 (PTV:PGRN), an investigational, brain-penetrant PGRN replacement therapy enabled by Denali's PTV platform and designed to restore PGRN levels in the brain without interfering with normal PGRN transport and processing. Preclinical proof of concept demonstrates that PTV enhances uptake of recombinant PGRN by multiple cell types in the brain, including neurons and microglia, as compared to non-PTV PGRN. In addition, TAK-594/DNL593 rescued both neurodegeneration and microglial dysfunction in PGRN-deficient mice. Our improved mechanistic understanding of the role of PGRN in lysosomal function indicates that intravenous delivery of TAK-594/DNL593 followed by PTV-enhanced transport to the brain may be an effective therapeutic approach to increase PGRN levels in lysosomes. Together with Takeda, we initiated a Phase 1/2 clinical trial of TAK-594/DNL593 for FTD-GRN in 2022. Results from Part A of this study evaluating TAK-594/DNL593 in healthy subjects were presented at the Alzheimer's Association International Conference in July 2023. Single doses of TAK-594/DNL593 were generally well-tolerated and resulted in substantial increases in CSF PGRN levels, suggesting that brain delivery of TAK-594/DNL593 was achieved and that TAK-594/DNL593 has the potential to address PGRN deficiency ( Figure 11) . Figure 11 : Dose-dependent increase in CSF PGRN in healthy volunteers with intravenous TAK-594/ DNL593. 20 Table of Contents In January 2024, Denali announced that enrollment and dosing were voluntarily paused in Part B (n=9 dosed to date) of the TAK-594/DNL593 Phase 1/2 study in participants with FTD-GRN to implement protocol modifications. The pause was based on infusion-related reactions (IRRs) reported in two study participants, one Grade 2 and one Grade 3 in severity and both deemed serious adverse events. Both study participants’ IRRs resolved within the same day with infusion discontinuation and standard treatment measures. TAK-594/DNL593 was otherwise well-tolerated in the study, with all other adverse events reported as mild in severity. The protocol modification will allow for premedication and other measures aimed at reducing the risk of IRRs. 2024 expected progress and milestones: • Resume Part B of the Phase 1/2 study in FTD-GRN. DNL126 (ETV:SGSH) Program for MPS IIIA (Sanfilippo Syndrome A) DNL126 (ETV:SGSH) is our second most advanced ETV program following DNL310 (ETV:IDS). DNL126 is an investigational therapy in development for the potential treatment of MPS IIIA (Sanfilippo syndrome A), a rare LSD that causes fatal brain damage. MPS IIIA is caused by genetic defects that result in a reduction in the activity of SGSH, an enzyme responsible for degrading heparan sulfates in the lysosome. There are no approved treatments for MPS IIIA. In January 2024, we commenced dosing in a Phase 1/2 study of DNL126 in MPS IIIA. This is a small, multicenter, open-label, Phase 1/2 study to assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and exploratory clinical efficacy of DNL126 in participants with Sanfilippo syndrome Type A (MPS IIIA). The core study period is 25 weeks (approximately 6 months) and is followed by a 72-week (approximately 18 month) open-label extension. In February 2024, we presented supportive preclinical data at the 2024 WORLD Symposium TM demonstrating that DNL126 improved lysosomal and microglial morphology, neurodegeneration, and cognitive function in adult MPS IIIA mice. As shown in ( Figure 12), peripheral treatment with ETV:SGSH lowered substrate accumulation (heparan sulfate) in the brain and in CSF, which was correlated with improved cognitive behavioral performance in adult MPS IIIA mice. Figure 12 : (A) In MPS IIIA mice, treatment with ETV:SGSH (low and high doses) lowered accumulation of heparan sulfate (HS) in the brain and in CSF compared to vehicle-treated mice. Bar graphs display mean ± SEM and p values: one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test; **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001. (B) Lower HS levels were correlated with improved cognitive performance of adult MPS IIIA mice on a spatial learning and memory assay, the active place avoidance (APA) task. Correlations were calculated using nonparametric Spearman’s correlation coefficient with two-tailed 95% confidence intervals. Correlation graphs depict linear regression line. 2024 expected progress and milestones: • Biomarker proof of concept and safety data from the Phase 1/2 study in late 2024. 21 Table of Contents DNL622 (ETV:IDUA) for MPS I (Hurler syndrome) Alpha-L-iduronidase (“IDUA”) is an enzyme responsible for degrading heparan and dermatan sulfate in the lysosome. Genetic defects in IDUA result in a reduction or absence of lysosomal IDUA activity and cause Hurler syndrome (or MPS I), which is characterized by alterations in the skeleton, heart, respiratory system, and brain. DNL622 (ETV:IDUA) is a recombinant IDUA enzyme engineered to cross the BBB, to replace IDUA, and to treat the cognitive, behavioral and physical manifestations of the disease. DNL622 is currently in the IND-enabling stage of preclinical development. Antibody Transport Vehicle Amyloid beta (ATV:Abeta) program Targeting Abeta plaques in the brain has been investigated by the field as a therapeutic approach to treat AD, and two Abeta-targeted antibodies have received accelerated approval from the U.S. FDA. These accelerated approvals were based on clinical data demonstrating that treatment was associated with a reduction in the accumulation of Abeta plaque in the brain, a defining feature of AD. Subsequently, the U.S. FDA converted one of the antibodies to traditional approval following a determination that a confirmatory trial verified clinical benefit. Our ATV:Abeta program utilizes the TfR TV platform to enable increased brain exposure and target engagement of anti-Abeta. In preclinical studies in mice, superior amyloid plaque binding ( Figure 13A ) and reduction ( Figure 13B ) with ATV:Abeta was demonstrated compared to a conventional Abeta antibody, which may enable a wider therapeutic window in treating AD as compared to conventional anti-Abeta therapy. In addition, Biogen has shown in a mouse model of AD the potential for ATV:Abeta to reduce the risk of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) associated with the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease ( Figure 13C ). Figure 13: Preclinical data showing superior amyloid plaque binding (A), superior plaque reduction (B), and fewer to no ARIA events (C). In April 2023, Biogen exercised its exclusive option to license ATV:Abeta using TV TfR and is responsible for its development and commercialization. 2024 expected progress and milestones: • IND-enabling studies. 22 Table of Contents Oligonucleotide Transport Vehicle ("OTV") Platform Oligonucleotides, such as ASOs, are a novel class of biotherapeutics with the potential to address the root cause of many diseases through modulation of gene expression. This class, however, has been limited in its potential for treatment of neurodegenerative diseases, primarily due to the challenge of delivering effective amounts of drug to relevant brain regions. Direct injection into the CSF (e.g., intrathecal injection) or certain brain regions has not achieved the robust biodistribution into deep brain tissue, which may be necessary for effective therapeutic activity. Nonhuman primate data demonstrated that intravenous delivery of an ASO enabled by our OTV technology resulted in broad brain biodistribution of the ASO ( Figure 14 ), which was superior to intrathecal administration of the ASO. These data support the potential of our OTV platform to enable peripheral administration of oligonucleotide therapeutics and to address a wide range of neurodegenerative and other neurological diseases. Figure 14: Broad brain biodistribution of an intravenously administered ASO enabled by our OTV technology (right) as compared to limited brain biodistribution of ASO delivered intrathecally (left). In January, we announced that OTV:MAPT targeting tau for Alzheimer’s disease and OTV:SNCA targeting αSyn for Parkinson’s disease are the first programs in the IND-enabling stage of development. ( Figure 15 ). As shown in ( Figure 16 ), we have optimized lead ASOs to achieve robust knock-down of human MAPT expression in the hTau x TfRmu/hu mouse brain. 23 Table of Contents Figure 15: OTV is designed to open a large potential indication space in neurodegeneration and beyond by enabling superior biodistribution of ASOs across brain regions, providing superior knockdown of target gene expression across cell types, and enabling intravenous dosing of oligonucleotide therapeutics for CNS delivery. OTV:MAPT and OTV:SNCA are lead OTV programs in the IND-enabling stage of development . Figure 16: OTV:MAPT in an unmodified format achieves approximately 20% knockdown. After optimizing the OTV molecule through protein, linker, and/or oligonucleotide engineering, the five new OTV:MAPT Leads (L1-L5) provided >50% human MAPT knockdown in hTau x TfRmu/hu KI mice, with L4 providing 75% human MAPT knockdown. 2024 expected progress and milestones: • IND-enabling studies with OTV:MAPT and OTV:SNCA. 24 Table of Contents Other TV-Enabled Discovery Programs Denali continues to use deep scientific expertise in neurodegeneration biology and the BBB to discover and develop medicines and platforms with the focus on programs enabled by the TV and targeting common neurodegenerative disease, including Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s, and LSDs. Our portfolio includes additional preclinical programs, including programs targeting TREM2 (“ATV:TREM2”) and HER2 (“ATV:HER2”). In August 2023 we announced that, in agreement with Takeda, the companies would discontinue clinical development of TAK-920/DNL919 (ATV:TREM2) in Alzheimer’s disease. This was a strategic decision based on the totality of clinical data emerging from the single ascending dose Phase 1 study of TAK-920/DNL919 in healthy volunteers and in consideration of the rapidly evolving treatment landscape for Alzheimer's disease whereby an understanding of drug combinations with newly approved therapies will be important. A preliminary analysis of Phase 1 data indicated robust target engagement and effects on microglial biomarkers (e.g., CSF1R, SPP1, IL1RA, IP10, MIP1b, MCP-1), which were consistent with preclinical studies that demonstrated that ATV:TREM2 induced robust changes to a responsive microglial cell state (van Lengerich B, et al. Nat Neurosci. 2023). In the Phase 1 study, TAK-920/DNL919 was clinically well tolerated at doses with demonstrated changes in CSF biomarkers and there were no serious adverse events or severe treatment emergent adverse events; however, safety signals of moderate, reversible hematologic effects were observed at the highest dose tested, suggesting a narrow therapeutic window for the Alzheimer’s disease patient population. The Phase 1 safety findings are believed to be specific to properties of TAK-920/DNL919 and TREM2 biology. Denali and Takeda will continue to focus research efforts on molecules in preclinical development, including exploration of potential combination therapy given recent new drug approvals in Alzheimer's disease. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 ("HER2") is a growth factor receptor that is over-expressed in multiple cancers, including breast, colorectal, and gastric cancer. Up to half of patients diagnosed with metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer have brain metastases for which limited treatment options exist. Using ATV, we have engineered mono- and bispecific formats of HER2 antibodies. In preclinical mouse studies, we have demonstrated improved anti-tumor activity of ATV-enabled HER2 antibodies in a HER2-positive peripheral tumor model. Our bispecific ATV:HER2 antibody demonstrated improved peripheral anti-tumor activity as compared to non-ATV HER2 antibodies as well as enhanced brain uptake as compared to a non-ATV HER2 antibody. The data support the potential for ATV:HER2 to treat HER2-positive peripheral tumors and brain metastases and to further validate the potential for TV applications in oncology. 25 Licenses and Collaborations Biogen License and Collaboration Agreement and Right of First Negotiation, Option and License Agreement Overview In October 2020, we entered into a Definitive LRRK2 Collaboration and License Agreement (“LRRK2 Agreement”) pursuant to which we granted Biogen a license to co-develop and co-commercialize our small molecule LRRK2 inhibitor program (the "LRRK2 Program"), and a Right of First Negotiation, Option and License Agreement (the "ROFN and Option Agreement"), pursuant to which we granted an option and right of first negotiation to certain of our programs utilizing our TV technology platform, including our amyloid beta program (collectively the "Biogen Collaboration Agreement"), with Biogen Inc.’s subsidiaries, Biogen MA Inc. (“BIMA”) and Biogen International GmbH (“BIG”) (BIMA and BIG, collectively, “Biogen”). In August 2023, we executed an Amendment to the Definitive LRRK2 Collaboration and License Agreement and Waiver of and Amendment to Right of First Negotiation, Option, and License Agreement (the "Biogen Amendment"). LRRK2 Agreement The LRRK2 Agreement includes our small molecule LRRK2 inhibitors (“LRRK2 Products”) that penetrate the BBB, including DNL201 and BIIB122/DNL151, as well as those that do not penetrate the BBB. Based on the totality of preclinical and clinical data to date, both DNL201 and BIIB122/DNL151 (two chemically distinct LRRK2 inhibitors) have met our requirements to proceed into further late-stage clinical testing, however, BIIB122/DNL151 has been selected to proceed due to pharmacokinetic properties that provide additional dosing regimen flexibility. Payments Under the terms of the LRRK2 Agreement, Biogen paid us a $400.0 million upfront payment in October 2020. With respect to the LRRK2 Program, Biogen is required to make milestone payments up to approximately $1.125 billion upon achievement of certain development and sales milestone events . Such milestone payments include $375.0 million in development, $375.0 million upon first commercial sale, and $375.0 million in net sales-based milestones. The Biogen Amendment changed certain milestone criteria while the total amount of development, regulatory, and commercial milestones across all indications remained the same. We will share profits and losses equally with Biogen for LRRK2 Products in the United States and will share profits and losses in China with Biogen sharing 60% of such profits and losses and us sharing 40% of such profits and losses. We will be entitled to receive royalties in the high teens to low twenties percentages on net sales for LRRK2 Products outside of the United States and China. Information on cost sharing reimbursements between us and Biogen is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K in our financial statements and the related notes and the section titled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” License Grant to LRRK2 Program Under the LRRK2 Agreement, we granted Biogen a co-exclusive, worldwide license under intellectual property that we control related to our LRRK2 inhibitors, including certain intellectual property licensed to us by a third party. 26 Table of Contents Development and Commercialization of LRRK2 Program We and Biogen are jointly developing LRRK2 Products pursuant to a clinical development plan set forth within the LRRK2 Agreement. We and Biogen share responsibility and costs for global development of LRRK2 Products pursuant to a mutually agreed development plan and budget, with Biogen funding 60% of such costs and us funding 40% of such costs. We have the ability to opt out of the development cost sharing arrangement, as further described below. Biogen will lead commercialization activities globally for LRRK2 Products. We will co-commercialize the LRRK2 Products with Biogen in the United States and China, provided that the profit-sharing arrangement for the LRRK2 Products is still in effect, as further described below. We may opt out of development cost sharing worldwide and upon such election, from any further profit-sharing from the LRRK2 Program. We also have the right to opt out of the profit-sharing arrangement for the LRRK2 Program or for only those LRRK2 Products that do not penetrate the BBB (“Peripheral LRRK2 Products”), in each of the United States and China. After such an opt out, we will no longer be obligated to share in the development and commercialization costs for, or be entitled to share in the applicable revenues from, such LRRK2 Program (or from the Peripheral LRRK2 Products) for such country, as applicable. If we choose to exercise our opt out rights, we will be entitled to receive tiered royalties on net sales of the applicable LRRK2 Program in the relevant country (or countries). The royalty rates for the applicable LRRK2 Program will be a percentage in the high teens to low twenties, but may increase to the low twenties to mid-twenties if we have met certain co-funding thresholds or there has been a first commercial sale at the time of our election. LRRK2 Program Manufacturing Biogen will be responsible for delivering all supplies for clinical trials and commercial production for LRRK2 Products, except that we will deliver such supplies until the point of transition which will be mutually agreed by us and Biogen, but in no event later than commencement of activities to support commercial launch, and in any event we retain manufacturing rights for certain independent clinical activities. LRRK2 Program Royalty Term For any LRRK2 Product for which Biogen is required to pay royalties, Biogen will pay us royalties on a country-by-country basis and product-by-product basis until the latest of (i) the expiration of certain patents covering the relevant product, (ii) the expiration of all regulatory exclusivity for that product in the applicable country, and (iii) an agreed period of time after the first commercial sale of that product in the applicable country. If, in a particular country, a LRRK2 Product for which Biogen is required to pay royalties is not covered by specified patent rights in that country or where generic competition exists, Biogen’s royalty obligations in the applicable country would be reduced. Exclusivity of LRRK2 Program During the term of the LRRK2 Agreement, neither we nor Biogen may conduct preclinical, clinical or commercial activities involving any small molecule that targets LRRK2 as its primary mechanism of action anywhere in the world, unless such molecule is included under the collaboration and only to the extent such activity is permitted under the LRRK2 Agreement or, with respect to Biogen, the molecule is an ASO product that is the subject of a collaboration between Biogen and a particular third party. 27 Table of Contents ROFN and Option Agreement Option & ROFN Programs In addition to the LRRK2 Program, Biogen also received an exclusive option to license two preclinical programs enabled by our TV technology platform, including our ATV:Abeta program ("Option Programs"). In April 2023, Biogen exercised its option to develop and commercialize our ATV:Abeta program. As Biogen exercised its option with respect to the ATV:Abeta Program, we granted Biogen an exclusive, worldwide license under certain intellectual property to develop, manufacture, and commercialize products that are the subject of the ATV:Abeta Program. In August 2023, Biogen agreed to waive the remaining option upon execution of the Biogen Amendment. In August 2023, upon execution of the Biogen Amendment, Biogen also agreed to waive its right of first negotiation on two additional TV-enabled therapeutics, which we initially granted to Biogen under the ROFN and Option Agreement. Payments Under the ROFN and Option Agreement, Biogen paid us a $160.0 million upfront payment in October 2020 and a $5.0 million option exercise payment in April 2023 for the ATV:Abeta program. With respect to the ATV:Abeta license granted by us to Biogen, Biogen is obligated to pay to us an aggregate of up to $142.5 million in development milestone payments, an aggregate of up to $180.0 million upon first commercial sale, and up to $190.0 million of net sales-based milestone payments. Furthermore, Biogen is obligated to pay us royalties in the mid-single digit percentages, upon the achievement of certain sales thresholds. Exclusivity of ROFN and Option Agreement Until termination or expiration of the ROFN and Option Agreement, neither party may conduct preclinical, clinical or commercial activities involving certain therapeutic products directed to ATV TfR :Abeta, unless the therapeutic is included under the collaboration and only to the extent such activity is permitted under the ROFN and Option Agreement or the therapeutic is a product that includes AAVs, oligonucleotides or small molecules. Termination Each party may terminate the Biogen Collaboration Agreement in its entirety, if the other party remains in material breach of the Biogen Collaboration Agreement following a cure period to remedy the material breach. After giving a specified amount of prior notice to us, Biogen may terminate the Biogen Collaboration Agreement for convenience in its entirety or, in the case of the LRRK2 Agreement, with respect to one or more specified regions of the world, and in the case of the Biogen Collaboration Agreement, with respect to any Option Program for one or more specified regions or in its entirety. We may terminate the LRRK2 Agreement if Biogen fails to conduct meaningful activities to advance the development or commercialization of any LRRK2 Products for a specified period of time, unless Biogen cures such failure within a certain period of time. We may terminate the Biogen Collaboration Agreement if Biogen challenges any patents licensed to it under the Biogen Collaboration Agreement. We and Biogen may each terminate the Biogen Collaboration Agreement in its entirety if the other party is declared insolvent or in similar financial distress. 28 Table of Contents Common Stock Purchase Agreement In August 2020, in connection with our collaboration with Biogen, we entered into a common stock purchase agreement with BIMA, pursuant to which we sold 13,310,243 shares of our common stock to BIMA for an aggregate purchase price of $465.0 million in September 2020. In connection with the sale of shares, we entered into a standstill and stock restriction agreement (the "Biogen Standstill Agreement") with Biogen, pursuant to which Biogen agreed to certain transfer and standstill restrictions, which have now expired, with the exception of certain volume limitations. Biogen remains entitled to certain demand registration rights for the shares received in the transaction under the terms of the Biogen Standstill Agreement. Sanofi Collaboration and License Agreement Overview In October 2018, we entered into the Collaboration Agreement with Genzyme Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Sanofi S.A. ("Sanofi") pursuant to which certain small molecule compounds that bind to and inhibit RIPK1 (“RIPK1 Inhibitors”) contributed by Sanofi and by us will be developed and commercialized. The Sanofi Collaboration Agreement became effective in November 2018 when the requirements of the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 were satisfied. We and Sanofi are jointly developing products containing RIPK1 Inhibitors for neurological indications, such as Alzheimer’s disease and MS, and Sanofi is developing products containing RIPK1 Inhibitors for systemic inflammatory indications, such as UC. The Sanofi Collaboration Agreement includes our and Sanofi’s RIPK1 Inhibitors that measurably penetrate the BBB ("CNS Products"), and our and Sanofi’s RIPK1 Inhibitors that do not measurably penetrate the BBB ("Peripheral Products"). The two most advanced RIPK1 Inhibitors in the collaboration are SAR443820/DNL788, and eclitasertib (SAR443122/DNL758). SAR443820/DNL788 is a CNS Product that was discovered by us and licensed to Sanofi who has completed Phase 1 trials in healthy volunteers, and is leading a Phase 2 clinical trial in patients with MS. Eclitasertib is a Peripheral Product discovered by us, and licensed to Sanofi who is leading a Phase 2 clinical trial in patients with UC. License Grant Under the Sanofi Collaboration Agreement, we granted Sanofi an exclusive, worldwide license under intellectual property that we control related to our RIPK1 Inhibitors, including certain intellectual property licensed to us by an academic institution. Payments When the Sanofi Collaboration Agreement became effective in November 2018, Sanofi paid us $125.0 million upfront. Under the Sanofi Collaboration Agreement, Sanofi is required to make milestone payments up to approximately $1.1 billion upon achievement of certain clinical, regulatory and sales milestone events. Such milestone payments include $215.0 million in clinical milestone payments and $385.0 million in regulatory milestone payments for CNS Products, as defined, that are developed and approved in the United States, Europe and in Japan for three indications, including Alzheimer's disease. Sanofi has made payments of $65.0 million for CNS clinical milestones through December 31, 2023. The cumulative earned and potential milestones include $120.0 million in clinical milestone payments, $175.0 million in regulatory milestone payments and $200.0 million in commercial milestone payments for Peripheral Products, as defined, that are developed and approved in the United States, Europe and in Japan for three indications. Sanofi has made payments of $35.0 million for peripheral clinical milestones through December 31, 2023 . 29 Table of Contents We will share profits and losses equally with Sanofi for CNS Products sold in the United States and China, and receive variable royalties on net sales for CNS Products sold outside of the United States and China and for Peripheral Products sold worldwide, each as further described below. RIPK1 Inhibitors contributed by Sanofi and developed and commercialized under the Sanofi Collaboration Agreement will be subject to lower milestone and royalty payments to us compared to RIPK1 Inhibitors contributed by us. We will also retain responsibility for certain payment obligations under our agreement with an academic institution which licensed certain intellectual property to us that we are sublicensing to Sanofi under the Sanofi Collaboration Agreement. Program for Development and Commercialization of CNS Products We and Sanofi jointly develop CNS Products pursuant to a global development plan ("CNS Development Plan"). We will be responsible, at our cost, for conducting Phase 1 and Phase 2 trials for CNS Products for Alzheimer’s disease and any activities required to support such clinical trials and specific for Alzheimer’s disease. Sanofi is responsible, at its cost, for all other Phase 1 and Phase 2 trials for CNS Products, including for MS. Sanofi will lead the conduct of all Phase 3 and later stage development trials for CNS Products, with Sanofi and us funding 70% and 30% of such costs, respectively. The Sanofi Collaboration Agreement contains certain protections for us with respect to Phase 3 development costs not included in the initial budget for the CNS Development Plan agreed to by the parties, including a deferral mechanism for costs incurred above the budgeted amounts for such trials and for costs incurred in respect of Phase 3 and other clinical trials not contemplated in the initial CNS Development Plan. In addition, we have the ability to opt out of the cost-profit sharing provisions of the Sanofi Collaboration Agreement, as further described below. Sanofi will lead commercialization activities globally for CNS Products. We may elect to conduct certain co-commercialization activities outside of MS with respect to each CNS Product in the United States and/or China, provided that the cost-profit sharing provisions of the Sanofi Collaboration Agreement for the relevant CNS Product are still in effect, as further described below. We may opt out of the cost-profit sharing provisions of the Sanofi Collaboration Agreement for CNS Products in the United States and China on a CNS product-by-CNS Product and country-by-country basis. Sanofi may also terminate our cost-profit sharing provisions of the Sanofi Collaboration Agreement in its entirety if, following notice from Sanofi and a cure period, we fail to satisfy our cost-sharing obligations. After such an opt out by us or termination by Sanofi, we will no longer be obligated to share in the development and commercialization costs for the applicable CNS Products and we will not share in the applicable profits from such CNS Products. Instead, we will be entitled to receive tiered royalties on net sales of the applicable CNS Products in the relevant country (or countries). The royalty rates will be a percentage in the low double digits to mid-teens, but may increase to the mid-teens to low-twenties percentages for all countries in which Sanofi is paying royalties on the applicable CNS Products, if we have met certain co-funding thresholds at the time of our election or Sanofi’s termination of our cost-profit sharing rights and obligations. Program for Development and Commercialization of Peripheral Products Sanofi will be responsible, at its cost, for conducting activities relating to the development and commercialization of all Peripheral Products. Sanofi will lead commercialization activities globally for Peripheral Products. We will be entitled to receive tiered royalties in the low- to mid- teen percentages on net sales of Peripheral Products. Manufacturing Sanofi will be responsible for delivering all supplies for current and future clinical trials and commercial production for CNS Products and Peripheral Products. However, we retain manufacturing rights for certain independent clinical activities. 30 Table of Contents Royalty Term For any CNS Product with respect to any country for which Sanofi is required to pay royalties on net sales and for each Peripheral Product, Sanofi will pay royalties to us on a country-by-country basis until the latest of (i) the expiration of certain patents covering the relevant product, (ii) the expiration of all regulatory exclusivity for that product in the applicable country, and (iii) an agreed period of time after the first commercial sale of that product in the applicable country. If, in a particular country, a CNS Product for which Sanofi is required to pay royalties or a Peripheral Product is not covered by specified patent rights in that country or net sales in that country decrease below specified thresholds as a result of generic competition, Sanofi’s royalty obligations in the applicable country would be reduced or would terminate as specified in the Sanofi Collaboration Agreement. Exclusivity During the term of the Sanofi Collaboration Agreement, neither we nor Sanofi may conduct IND-enabling, clinical or commercial activities involving any RIPK1 Inhibitor, anywhere in the world, unless the RIPK1 Inhibitor is included by us or Sanofi, as the case may be, under the collaboration and only to the extent such activity is permitted under the Sanofi Collaboration Agreement. Termination Each party may terminate the Sanofi Collaboration Agreement in its entirety, or with respect to a particular program (i.e., the CNS Products program or Peripheral Products program), as applicable, if the other party remains in material breach of the Sanofi Collaboration Agreement following a cure period to remedy the material breach. After giving a specified amount of prior notice to us, Sanofi may terminate the Sanofi Collaboration Agreement for convenience in its entirety, with respect to any particular program, or with respect to one or more specified regions of the world. Sanofi may also terminate the Sanofi Collaboration Agreement with respect to any program or a particular RIPK1 Inhibitor if a material safety event has occurred and cessation of all development and commercialization of all RIPK1 Inhibitors in the affected program or the affected RIPK1 Inhibitor is recommended. We and Sanofi may each terminate the Sanofi Collaboration Agreement in its entirety if the other party is declared insolvent or in similar financial distress or if, subject to a specified cure period, the other party challenges any patents licensed to it under the Sanofi Collaboration Agreement. Following any termination of the Sanofi Collaboration Agreement with respect to a particular program or a particular region (or regions) of the world or termination of the Sanofi Collaboration Agreement in its entirety, our rights to each of our RIPK1 Inhibitors that were licensed to Sanofi will revert to us. Sanofi will conduct certain development, manufacturing and commercialization activities on a transitional basis following termination of the Sanofi Collaboration Agreement, as outlined in the Sanofi Collaboration Agreement or agreed by Sanofi, depending upon the basis for the applicable termination. If the Sanofi Collaboration Agreement is terminated for any reason other than by Sanofi for our material uncured breach, our insolvency or our challenge to any of the patents licensed to us by Sanofi, Sanofi will grant us an exclusive license to certain intellectual property controlled by Sanofi with respect to such RIPK1 Inhibitors (which could be subject to low single digit royalties payable to Sanofi). 31 Table of Contents Takeda Option and Collaboration Agreement Overview In January 2018, we entered into a Collaboration Agreement ("Takeda Collaboration Agreement") with Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited ("Takeda"), pursuant to which we granted Takeda an option with respect to our ATV:BACE1/Tau, ATV:TREM2 and PTV:PGRN programs. Takeda paid us a $40.0 million upfront payment related to the collaboration, and an additional $110.0 million under a share purchase agreement in February 2018. The Takeda Collaboration Agreement became effective in February 2018, following satisfaction of certain requirements of the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976. In February 2019, we amended the agreement to replace the ATV:BACE1/Tau program with the ATV:Tau program and in March 2022, the parties mutually agreed to terminate activity on the ATV:Tau program over which Takeda had its option to develop and commercialize jointly with the Company. Takeda exercised the options for the PTV:PGRN and ATV:TREM2 programs in November 2021 and December 2021, respectively. Research Phase and Takeda’s Option Under the Takeda Collaboration Agreement we were responsible, at our cost, for conducting activities relating to pre-IND development of biologic products directed to the identified targets and enabled by our BBB delivery technology targeting TfR during the applicable option period. The option period continued for each target until the first biologic product candidate directed to the relevant target was IND-ready or about five years after selection of the target, whichever was earlier. Takeda was obligated to pay us up to an aggregate of $25.0 million with respect to each of the programs under the Takeda Collaboration Agreement directed to a target and based upon the achievement of certain preclinical milestone events, up to $55.0 million in total after the ATV:Tau program termination, all of which was earned and received as of September 30, 2022. Collaboration Activities Following Takeda’s Option Exercise Subsequent to Takeda exercising its option with respect to a particular target and collaboration program (i.e., the biologic products directed to the target for which Takeda has exercised its option), Takeda has the right to develop and commercialize, jointly with us, a specified number of biologic products enabled by our BBB technology that were developed during the option period and which are directed to the relevant target, and we are obligated to grant to Takeda a co-exclusive license under the intellectual property we control related to those biologic products. Takeda was obligated to pay us a $5.0 million option fee for each target for which Takeda exercised its option, and we received fees totaling $10.0 million from Takeda in 2021 for option exercise payments for the PTV:PGRN and ATV:TREM2 programs. Since Takeda exercised its option for both collaboration programs, Takeda may be obligated to pay us up to an aggregate of $280.0 million upon achievement of certain clinical milestone events and up to an aggregate of $200.0 million in regulatory milestone events relating to receipt of regulatory approval in the United States, certain European countries and Japan. Further, Takeda may also be obligated to pay us up to $75.0 million per biologic product upon achievement of a certain sales-based milestone, or an aggregate of $150.0 million if one biologic product from each program achieves the milestone. 32 Table of Contents Further, we and Takeda share equally the development and commercialization costs, and, if applicable, the profits, for each collaboration program. However, for each collaboration program, we may elect not to continue sharing development and commercialization costs, or Takeda may elect to terminate our cost-profit sharing rights and obligations if, following notice from Takeda and a cure period, we fail to satisfy our cost sharing obligations with respect to the relevant collaboration program. After such an election by us or termination by Takeda becomes effective, we will no longer be obligated to share in the development and commercialization costs for the relevant collaboration program, and we will not share in any profits from that collaboration program. Instead, we will be entitled to receive tiered royalties. The royalty rates will be in the low- to mid-teen percentages on net sales, or low- to high-teen percentages on net sales if we have met a certain co-funding threshold at the time of our election to opt out of co-development or Takeda’s termination of our cost-profit sharing rights and obligations, and, in each case, these royalty rates will be subject to certain reductions specified in the Takeda Collaboration Agreement. Takeda will pay these royalties to us for each biologic product included in the relevant collaboration program, on a country-by-country basis, until the latest of (i) the expiration of certain patents covering the relevant biologic product, (ii) the expiration of all regulatory exclusivity for that biologic product, and (iii) an agreed period of time after the first commercial sale of that biologic product in the applicable country, unless biosimilar competition in excess of a significant level specified in the Takeda Collaboration Agreement occurs earlier, in which case Takeda’s royalty obligations in the applicable country would terminate. For each collaboration program for which we are sharing costs and profits with Takeda, we will lead the conduct of clinical activities for each indication up to the first trial with a clinical outcomes-based efficacy endpoint, and Takeda will lead the conduct of all subsequent clinical activities for that indication. For each collaboration program for which we are sharing costs and profits with Takeda, we and Takeda will jointly commercialize biologic products included in the relevant collaboration program in the United States and China. Unless we have opted out of cost-sharing for both collaboration programs, we have the right to lead commercialization activities in the United States for one collaboration program and Takeda will lead commercialization activities in the United States for all collaboration programs for which we do not lead commercialization activities. Further, Takeda will lead commercialization activities in China and will solely conduct commercialization activities in all other countries. We have the right to lead all manufacturing activities for all collaboration programs for which the parties are sharing costs and profits. Information on cost sharing reimbursements between us and Takeda is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K in our financial statements and the related notes and the section titled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” Exclusivity Unless the Takeda Collaboration Agreement is terminated earlier, until expiration of an agreed period of time after the first regulatory approval in the United States or Europe of a biologic product within the applicable collaboration program, neither party may conduct clinical or commercial activities involving antibodies or protein-based therapeutic products directed to the same target (or in the case of a bi-specific program, the same combination of targets) that have an intended therapeutic effect in diseases and conditions of the CNS (including LSDs), except to the extent permitted under the Takeda Collaboration Agreement. 33 Table of Contents Termination Each party may terminate the Takeda Collaboration Agreement in its entirety, or with respect to a particular collaboration program, as applicable, if the other party remains in material breach of the Takeda Collaboration Agreement following a cure period to remedy the material breach. Takeda may terminate the Takeda Collaboration Agreement in its entirety or with respect to any particular collaboration program, for convenience and after giving a specified amount of prior notice to us. Takeda may also terminate the Takeda Collaboration Agreement with respect to any collaboration program if the joint steering committee established under the Takeda Collaboration Agreement unanimously agrees that a material safety event has occurred with respect to the applicable collaboration program. We may terminate the Takeda Collaboration Agreement with respect to a particular collaboration program if Takeda fails to conduct material development and commercial activities for a specified period of time with respect to a collaboration program, unless Takeda cures such failure within a certain period of time. We and Takeda may each terminate the Takeda Collaboration Agreement in its entirety if the other party is declared insolvent or in similar financial distress or if, subject to a specified cure period, the other party challenges any patents licensed to it under the Takeda Collaboration Agreement. Following any termination of the Takeda Collaboration Agreement with respect to a particular collaboration program or the Takeda Collaboration Agreement in its entirety, our rights to each terminated collaboration program will revert to us, Takeda will grant us a license to intellectual property owned by Takeda with respect to such collaboration program (which could be subject to certain royalty payments that would be negotiated at the time of such a termination) and, unless the termination was by Takeda on the basis of a material safety event, Takeda will conduct certain development, manufacturing and commercialization wind-down activities. Common Stock Purchase Agreement Pursuant to the terms of the Takeda Collaboration Agreement, we entered into a common stock purchase agreement with Takeda in January 2018, pursuant to which we sold 4,214,559 shares of our common stock (the “Shares”) to Takeda for an aggregate purchase price of $110.0 million. We closed the sale to Takeda in February 2018. At closing, we also entered into a standstill and stock restriction agreement (the “Takeda Standstill Agreement”) with Takeda. Pursuant to the terms of the Takeda Standstill Agreement, Takeda agreed to certain transfer and standstill restrictions for a specified period of time following the closing of the sale, which have now expired. Takeda remains entitled to certain demand registration rights with respect to the Shares following termination of the transfer restrictions if the Shares cannot be resold without restriction pursuant to Rule 144 promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"). F-star License and Collaboration Agreement Overview In August 2016, we entered into a License and Collaboration Agreement (“F-star Collaboration Agreement”) with F-star Gamma Limited (“F-star Gamma”), F-star Biotechnologische Forschungs-und Entwicklungsges m.b.H ("F-star GmbH") and F-star Biotechnology Limited ("F-star Ltd") (collectively "F-star"). The goal of the collaboration was the development of certain constant Fc domains of an antibody with non-native antigen binding activity, or Fcabs, to enhance delivery of therapeutics across the BBB into the brain. The collaboration was designed to leverage F-star’s modular antibody technology and our expertise in the development of therapies for neurodegenerative diseases. In connection with the entry into the F-star collaboration agreement, we also purchased an option for an upfront option fee of $0.5 million , which we refer to as the buy-out-option, to acquire all of the outstanding shares of F-star Gamma pursuant to a pre-negotiated buy-out option agreement (the “Option Agreement”). 34 Table of Contents In May 2018, we exercised such buy-out option and entered into a Share Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with the shareholders of F-star Gamma and Shareholder Representative Services LLC, pursuant to which we acquired all of the outstanding shares of F-star Gamma (the “Acquisition”). As a result of the Acquisition, F-star Gamma became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company and we changed the entity’s name to Denali BBB Holding Limited. In addition, we became a direct licensee of certain intellectual property of F-star Ltd (by way of the Company’s assumption of F-star Gamma’s license agreement with F-star Ltd, dated August 24, 2016, (the “F-star Gamma License”)). We made initial exercise payments under the Purchase Agreement and the F-star Gamma License of $18.0 million in the aggregate, less the net liabilities of F-star Gamma, which were approximately $0.2 million . In addition, we are required to make contingent payments, to F-star Ltd and the former shareholders of F-star Gamma, up to a maximum amount following completion of the research phase of the F-star collaboration of $243.0 million in the aggregate upon the achievement of certain defined preclinical, clinical, regulatory and commercial milestones. These include up to $3.0 million in preclinical contingent payments, $30.0 million in clinical contingent payments, $60.0 million in regulatory contingent payments and $150.0 million in commercial contingent payments. We have made payments of $49.8 million through December 31, 2023 in the aggregate consisting of up-front, preclinical and clinical contingent consideration. This contingent consideration payment fully satisfies the Company's clinical contingent consideration obligations under the Purchase Agreement. Under the terms of the original F-star Collaboration Agreement, we could nominate up to three Fcab targets (“Accepted Fcab Targets”) within the first three years of the date of the F-star Collaboration Agreement. Upon entering into the F-star Collaboration Agreement, we had selected TfR as the first Accepted Fcab Target and paid F-star Gamma an upfront fee of $5.5 million , which included selection of the first Accepted Fcab Target. In May 2018, we exercised our right to nominate two additional Fcab Targets and identified CD98 as the second Accepted Fcab Target. We made a one-time payment for the two additional Accepted Fcab Targets of, in the aggregate, $6.0 million and extended the time period for our selection of the third Accepted Fcab Target until approximately the fourth anniversary of the date of the original F-star Collaboration Agreement. We did not identify a third Fcab Target. We were also responsible for certain research costs incurred by F-star Ltd in conducting activities under an agreed development plan for each Fcab, for up to 24 months after the target Fcab is accepted. In July 2021, we executed a side letter to our agreements with F-star which confirmed the completion of the research services performed by F-star Ltd that were funded by us. Genentech Exclusive License Agreement In June 2016, we entered into an exclusive license agreement with Genentech, Inc. (“Genentech”). The agreement gives us access to Genentech’s LRRK2 inhibitor small molecule program for Parkinson’s disease. Under the agreement, Genentech granted us (i) an exclusive, worldwide, sublicensable license under Genentech’s rights to certain patents and patent applications directed to small molecule compounds which bind to and inhibit LRRK2 and (ii) a non-exclusive, worldwide, sublicensable license to certain related know-how, in each case, to develop and commercialize certain compounds and licensed products incorporating any such compound. We are obligated to use commercially reasonable efforts during the first three years of the agreement to research, develop and commercialize at least one licensed product. Our financial obligations upon entering the agreement with Genentech included an upfront payment of $8.5 million and a technology transfer fee of $1.5 million . In addition, we may owe Genentech milestone payments upon the achievement of certain development, regulatory and commercial milestones, up to a maximum of $315.0 million in the aggregate, which are subject to equal cost sharing with Biogen since execution of the Biogen Collaboration Agreement. These milestones include up to $37.5 million in clinical milestone payments, $102.5 million in regulatory milestone payments and $175.0 million in commercial milestone payments. We have made milestone payments to Genentech of $15.0 million through December 31, 2023. 35 Table of Contents In addition, we are obligated to pay royalties on net sales of licensed products ranging from low to high single-digit percentages, with the exact royalty rate dependent on various factors, including (i) whether the compound incorporated in the relevant licensed product is a Genentech-provided compound or a compound acquired or developed by us, (ii) the date a compound was first discovered, derived or optimized by us, (iii) the existence of patent rights covering the relevant licensed product in the relevant country, (iv) the existence of orphan drug exclusivity covering a licensed product that is a Genentech-provided compound and (v) the level of annual net sales of the relevant licensed product. We also have the right to credit a certain amount of third-party royalty and milestone payments against royalty and milestone payments owed to Genentech, but such credit cannot reduce our royalty obligation to Genentech by more than fifty percent. Our royalty payment obligations will expire on a country-by-country and licensed product-by-licensed product basis upon the later of (a) ten years after the first commercial sale of such licensed product in such country or (b) the expiration of the last valid claim of a licensed patent covering such licensed product in such country. If one of our licensed products incorporates a compound provided to us by Genentech, has orphan drug exclusivity, and is not covered by a valid claim of a licensed patent, we must pay royalties on net sales of such licensed products on a country-by-country and licensed product-by-licensed product basis until such orphan drug exclusivity in such country expires, but our obligation to pay these royalties may be eliminated or reduced if there is a clinically superior product marketed in such country. Under the terms of our LRRK2 Agreement with Biogen, Biogen is responsible for 50% of any payment obligation to Genentech under this agreement accruing after October 2020. Unless earlier terminated, our agreement with Genentech will continue in effect until all of our royalty and milestone payment obligations to Genentech expire. Following expiration of the agreement, we will retain our licenses under the intellectual property Genentech licensed to us on a non-exclusive, royalty-free basis. Genentech may terminate the agreement if we challenge any of the patent rights licensed to us by Genentech, or if we materially breach the agreement, subject to specified notice and cure provisions, or enter into bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings. If Genentech terminates the agreement for our material breach, bankruptcy or insolvency after we have made a milestone payment to Genentech, then we are obligated to grant to Genentech an exclusive right of first negotiation with respect to certain of our patents, know-how and regulatory filings directed to Genentech-provided compounds. We do not have the right to terminate the agreement without cause, but may terminate the agreement for Genentech’s material breach, subject to specified notice and cure provisions. Manufacturing We believe it is important to our business success to have a reliable, high-quality preclinical and clinical drug supply chain. As we mature as a company and approach commercial stage operations, securing reliable high-quality commercial drug supply will be critical. We currently rely on third-party contract development and manufacturing organizations ("CDMOs"), to manufacture and supply our preclinical and clinical materials used during the development of our product candidates. We have established relationships with several CDMOs, including Lonza Sales AG ("Lonza") and WuXi Biologics Limited ("Wuxi"). Effective September 2017, we entered into a development and manufacturing services agreement with Lonza, which we have subsequently amended to add scope of work. We refer to this agreement, as amended, as the DMSA or the Lonza agreement. Pursuant to the Lonza agreement, Lonza agreed to provide clinical development and manufacturing services with respect to certain of our biologic products on a fee-for-service basis. We do not currently operate facilities for product manufacturing, storage, distribution or testing. In April 2023 we entered into, and subsequently amended, a lease for a clinical manufacturing site in Salt Lake City, Utah after terminating our previous SLC lease in March 2023. We plan to use the facility to expand our clinical manufacturing capabilities for biologic therapeutics including the manufacture of materials for toxicology studies and drug substance for early human clinical studies, with the goal of increasing flexibility and speed in advancing new investigational therapies into clinical trials. The build-out of the Utah site is in process, and we currently expect to begin operations and manufacturing at the facility in 2024. 36 Table of Contents We currently do not need commercial manufacturing capacity. When and if this becomes relevant, we intend to evaluate both third-party manufacturers as well as building out internal capabilities and capacity. Commercialization Plan We do not currently have any approved drugs and we do not expect to have any approved drugs in 2024. Therefore, we have no sales, marketing or commercial product distribution capabilities at the current time. Our vision, however, is to become a fully integrated, independent global leader in neurodegeneration with capabilities spanning discovery, development, manufacturing and commercial in order to optimize speed, quality and level of patient access to our medicines. We look to grow strategically both in terms of therapeutic areas of high unmet need, starting with LSDs with CNS pathology and expanding into large neurodegenerative disorders, as well as from a geographic perspective, with an initial focus on establishing a commercial presence in the United States and the European Union ("EU"), with subsequent global expansion (including China). For programs covered by collaboration agreements (including those with Takeda, Sanofi and Biogen), we expect to commercialize only in certain geographies, as defined by the terms of the agreements with the counterpart, and rely on our partners to provide commercialization infrastructure for the rest of the world. Competition The biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries, including in the neurodegenerative disease field, are characterized by rapidly advancing technologies, strong competition and an emphasis on intellectual property. We face substantial competition from many different sources, including large and specialty pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, academic research institutions, governmental agencies and public and private research institutions. We believe that the key competitive factors affecting the success of any of our product candidates will include efficacy, safety profile, method of administration, cost, level of promotional activity and intellectual property protection. Our product candidates will compete with current therapies approved for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases, which to date have been primarily targeted at treating the symptoms of such diseases rather than halting or slowing the progression of the disease. However, in addition to such currently approved therapies, we believe that our product candidates, if approved, may also compete with other potential therapies intended to halt or slow the progression of neurodegenerative disease that are being developed by a number of companies and institutions, including but not limited to: • Alzheimer’s Disease: Treatments currently approved in some geographies for Alzheimer’s Disease include amyloid beta-directed antibody therapies from Biogen and Eisai. Additionally, potentially disease modifying therapeutics are being developed by several large and specialty pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, including Eli Lilly (including Prevail Therapeutics, its wholly owned subsidiary), Roche (including Genentech, its wholly owned subsidiary), Alector, and AbbVie in various stages of development. • Parkinson’s Disease: Potentially disease modifying therapeutics are being developed by several large and specialty pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, including Prothena/Roche (including Genentech, its wholly owned subsidiary), Novartis/UCB, Biogen, Ionis, Eli Lilly (including Prevail Therapeutics, its wholly owned subsidiary), AstraZeneca, Takeda, Oncodesign/Servier, and Neuron 23 in various stages of development. 37 Table of Contents • ALS: Treatments currently approved in some geographies for ALS include Relyvrio/Albrioza (Amylyx Pharmaceuticals), Radicava (Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma) and Qalsody (Biogen). Additionally, potentially disease modifying therapeutics are being developed by several large and specialty pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, including Clene Nanomedicine, AB Science, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Calico/AbbVie in various stages of development. • FTD-GRN: Potentially disease modifying therapeutics are being developed by several large and specialty pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, including Alector/GSK, Eli Lilly (including Prevail Therapeutics, its wholly owned subsidiary), Passage Bio, AviadoBio, Vesperbio, Arkuda Therapeutics, Biomarin, and Orchard Therapeutics in various stages of development. • LSDs: The currently approved treatments for LSDs are enzyme-based therapies. Various BBB-penetrant and direct to CNS delivered ERTs and gene therapies are being developed by several large and specialty pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, including JCR Pharmaceuticals, RegenxBio, Kyowa Kirin/Orchard Therapeutics, and Ultragenyx in various stages of development. In addition, there are companies that are developing technologies that would compete directly with our technologies, including: • Blood-Brain Barrier Technology: There are several large and specialty pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies developing BBB delivery technologies that utilize RMT, including JCR Pharmaceuticals, Roche (including Genentech, its wholly owned subsidiary), Alector, Bioarctic, Bicycle Therapeutics among others. Intellectual Property Our intellectual property is critical to our business and we strive to protect it, including by obtaining and maintaining patent protection in the United States and internationally for our product candidates, novel biological discoveries and BBB platform technology, including new targets and applications, and other inventions that are important to our business. We also rely on trademarks, trade secrets, know-how, continuing technological innovation and licensing opportunities to develop and maintain our proprietary position. As of December 31, 2023 , our owned and licensed patent portfolio includes over 1,700 patents and patent applications, including over 30 licensed U.S. issued patents and 30 owned U.S. issued patents, covering certain aspects of our proprietary technology, our product candidates, and related inventions and improvements. The patent portfolio also includes over 500 licensed patents issued in jurisdictions outside of the United States, and over 800 owned patent applications pending in jurisdictions outside of the United States that, in many cases, are counterparts to the foregoing U.S. patents and patent applications. For our product candidates and our BBB platform technology, we generally pursue or in-license patent protection covering compositions of matter, methods of use, and manufacture. BBB Platform We own 11 patent families related to our BBB platform technology. These include a family directed to the composition and sequences of our TfR-binding TVs, the earliest of which are expected to expire in 2038, not including any patent term adjustments and any patent term extensions. We also have 3 issued U.S. patents, which are also expected to expire in 2038, not including any patent term adjustments and any patent term extensions, as well as pending patent applications, to other BBB platform technology. Other families related to BBB platform technology, if issued, are expected to expire in 2038 or later, all not including any patent term adjustments and any patent term extensions. In addition, we license multiple patent families from F-star, the earliest issued patents of which are expected to expire in 2026, not including any patent term adjustments and any patent term extensions. 38 Table of Contents ETV Platform, ETV:IDS, and ETV:SGSH Programs We own 10 patent families directed to our ETV platform and related products, including ETV:IDS, ETV: SGSH, and ETV:IDUA. This includes 1 issued U.S. patent, which is expected to expire in 2038, not including any patent term adjustments and any patent term extensions, directed to the composition of matter of our ETV:IDS molecules, including DNL310. We also own 6 additional patent families directed to various aspects of our DNL310 program, which if issued, are expected to expire in 2039 or later, all not including any patent term adjustments and any patent term extensions. Of the 10 patent families, 2 families relate to the composition of matter of our ETV:SGSH structures, including DNL126. Any patents issuing from these families are expected to expire in 2039 and 2041, respectively, not including any patent term adjustments and any patent term extensions. PTV:PGRN Program We own 4 patent families directed to our PTV:PGRN program. This includes an issued U.S. patent, which is expected to expire in 2040, not including any patent term adjustments and any patent term extensions, directed to the composition of matter of our PTV:PGRN molecules, including TAK-594/DNL593. We also own an additional patent family directed to the composition of matter of our PTV:PGRN structures, including TAK-594/DNL593, the earliest of which are expected to expire in 2039, not including any patent term adjustments and any patent term extensions. We also own additional patent families directed to various aspects of our TAK-594/DNL593 program, which, if issued, are expected to expire in 2039 or later, all not including any patent term adjustments and any patent term extensions. Our PTV:PGRN program is subject to our Takeda collaboration. ATV:TREM2 Program We own 6 patent families related to our ATV:TREM2 program. These families include a granted U.S. patent, which is expected to expire in 2041, not including any patent term adjustments and any patent term extensions, directed to the composition of matter of our ATV:TREM2 molecules . The other 5 patent families, if issued, are expected to expire between 2038 and 2043, all not including any patent term adjustments and any patent term extensions. Our ATV:TREM2 program is subject to our Takeda collaboration. Oligonucleotide Transport Vehicle Platform We own 3 patent families related to our OTV platform. These families are directed to compositions and methods of use of our OTVs, and if issued, are expected to expire between 2042 and 2043, not including any patent term adjustments and any patent term extensions. LRRK2 Inhibitor Program Our LRRK2 program is subject to our collaboration agreement with Biogen. For this program, we license multiple patent families from Genentech directed to, among other things, DNL201, BIIB122/DNL151 and other related compounds, which are expected to expire in 2031, not including any patent term adjustments and any patent term extensions. Furthermore, we own additional patent families that have projected expiration dates in 2038 or later, not accounting for any patent term adjustments and any patent term extensions, related to the LRRK2 program. We also own a patent family that includes 3 issued U.S. patents, which are expected to expire in 2037, not including any patent term adjustments and any patent term extensions, directed to the composition of matter of BIIB122/DNL151 and methods of treatment using BIIB122/DNL151, respectively, as well as pending patent applications and granted patents in jurisdictions outside the U.S. 39 Table of Contents RIPK1 Inhibitor Program Our RIPK1 program is subject to our collaboration agreement with Sanofi. We own 7 patent families directed to our RIPK1 inhibitor program. These include a family with one issued U.S. patent, directed to the composition of matter of our current RIPK1 lead, SAR443820/DNL788, which is expected to expire in 2038, not including any patent term adjustments and any patent term extensions. We also own a patent family that includes 2 issued U.S. patents, which are expected to expire in 2037, not including any patent term adjustments and any patent term extensions, and pending patent applications, which include those directed to the composition of matter of eclitasertib (SAR443122/DNL758), as well as other RIPK1 inhibitor compounds. eIF2b Activator Program We own 9 patent families directed to our eIF2B activator program, including 4 patent families directed to DNL343 that are expected to expire in 2038 or later, with the remaining families directed to other eIF2B compounds expiring between 2038 and 2040, not including any patent term adjustments and any patent term extensions. We cannot guarantee that our owned and licensed pending patent applications, or any patent applications that we may in the future file or license from third parties, will result in the issuance of patents. We also cannot predict the scope of claims that may be allowed or enforced in our patents. In addition, the coverage claimed in a patent application can be significantly reduced before the patent is issued, and its scope can be reinterpreted after issuance. Consequently, we may not obtain or maintain adequate patent protection for any of our programs and product candidates. For more information regarding the risks related to our intellectual property, see "Risk Factors - Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property." The term of individual patents depends upon the legal term of the patents in the countries in which they are obtained. In most countries in which we file, the patent term is 20 years from the earliest date of filing a non-provisional patent application. In the United States, the patent term of a patent that covers an FDA-approved drug may also be eligible for patent term extension, which permits patent term restoration as compensation for the patent term lost during the FDA regulatory review process. The Hatch-Waxman Act permits a patent term extension of up to five years beyond the expiration of the patent. Similar provisions are available in Europe and other foreign jurisdictions to extend the term of a patent that covers an approved drug. In the future, if and when our products receive FDA approval, we expect to apply for patent term extensions on patents covering those products. We plan to seek patent term extensions to any of our issued patents in any jurisdiction where these are available, however there is no guarantee that the applicable authorities, including the FDA in the United States, will agree with our assessment of whether such extensions should be granted, and if granted, the length of such extensions. For more information regarding the risks related to our intellectual property, see "Risk Factors - Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property." 40 Table of Contents In addition to patent protection, we also rely on trademark registration, trade secrets, know how, other proprietary information and continuing technological innovation to develop and maintain our competitive position. We seek to protect and maintain the confidentiality of proprietary information to protect aspects of our business that are not amenable to, or that we do not consider appropriate for, patent protection. Although we take steps to protect our proprietary information and trade secrets, including through contractual means with our employees and consultants, third parties may independently develop substantially equivalent proprietary information and techniques or otherwise gain access to our trade secrets or disclose our technology. Thus, we may not be able to meaningfully protect our trade secrets. It is our policy to require our employees, consultants, outside scientific collaborators, sponsored researchers and other advisors to execute confidentiality agreements upon the commencement of employment or consulting relationships with us. These agreements provide that all confidential information concerning our business or financial affairs developed or made known to the individual during the course of the individual’s relationship with us is to be kept confidential and not disclosed to third parties except in specific circumstances. Our agreements with employees also provide that all inventions conceived by the employee in the course of employment with us or from the employee’s use of our confidential information are our exclusive property. However, such confidentiality agreements and invention assignment agreements can be breached and we may not have adequate remedies for any such breach. For more information regarding the risks related to our intellectual property, see "Risk Factors - Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property." The patent positions of biotechnology companies like ours are generally uncertain and involve complex legal, scientific and factual questions. Our commercial success will also depend in part on not infringing upon the proprietary rights of third parties. It is uncertain whether the issuance of any third-party patent would require us to alter our development or commercial strategies, or our drugs or processes, obtain licenses or cease certain activities. Our breach of any license agreements or our failure to obtain a license to proprietary rights required to develop or commercialize our future products may have a material adverse impact on us. If third parties prepare and file patent applications in the United States that also claim technology to which we have rights, we may have to participate in interference or derivation proceedings in the United States Patent and Trademark Office (the "USPTO") to determine priority of invention. For more information, see "Risk Factors - Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property." Government Regulation Government authorities in the United States at the federal, state and local level and in other countries regulate, among other things, the research, development, testing, manufacture, quality control, approval, labeling, packaging, storage, record-keeping, promotion, advertising, distribution, post-approval monitoring and reporting, marketing and export and import of drug and biological products. Generally, before a new drug or biologic can be marketed, considerable data demonstrating its quality, safety and efficacy must be obtained, organized into a format specific for each regulatory authority, submitted for review and approved by the regulatory authority. U.S. Drug Development In the United States, the FDA regulates drugs under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act ("FDCA"), and its implementing regulations, and biologics under the FDCA, the Public Health Service Act ("PHSA"), and their implementing regulations. Both drugs and biologics also are subject to other federal, state and local statutes and regulations. The process of obtaining regulatory approvals and the subsequent compliance with appropriate federal, state, local and foreign statutes and regulations requires the expenditure of resources. Failure to comply with the applicable U.S. requirements at any time during the product development process, approval process or post-market may subject an applicant to administrative or judicial sanctions. These sanctions could include, among other actions, the FDA’s refusal to approve pending applications, withdrawal of an approval, a clinical hold, untitled or warning letters, product recalls or market withdrawals, product seizures, total or partial suspension of production or distribution, injunctions, fines, refusals of government contracts, restitution, disgorgement and civil or criminal penalties. Any agency or judicial enforcement action could have a material adverse effect on us. 41 Table of Contents Any future product candidates must be approved by the FDA through either a new drug application ("NDA"), or a biologics license application ("BLA"), process before they may be legally marketed in the United States. The process generally involves the following: • Completion of extensive preclinical studies in accordance with applicable regulations, including studies conducted in accordance with good laboratory practice ("GLP"), requirements; • Submission of an IND to the FDA, which must become effective before human interventional clinical trials may begin; • Approval by an independent institutional review board ("IRB") at each clinical trial site before each trial may be initiated; • Performance of adequate and well-controlled human clinical trials in accordance with applicable IND regulations, good clinical practice ("GCP") requirements and other clinical trial-related regulations to establish the safety and efficacy of the investigational product for each proposed indication; • Submission to the FDA of an NDA or BLA; • A determination by the FDA within 60 days of its receipt of an NDA or BLA to accept the filing for review; • Satisfactory completion of a FDA pre-approval inspection of the manufacturing facility or facilities where the drug or biologic will be produced to assess compliance with current good manufacturing practices ("cGMP"), requirements to assure that the facilities, methods and controls are adequate to preserve the drug or biologic’s identity, strength, quality and purity; • Potential FDA inspection of the preclinical and/or clinical trial sites that generated the data in support of the NDA or BLA; • FDA review and approval of the NDA or BLA, including consideration of the views of any FDA advisory committee, prior to any commercial marketing or sale of the drug or biologic in the United States; and • Compliance with any post-approval requirements, including the potential requirement to implement a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy ("REMS"), and the potential requirement to conduct post-approval studies. Preclinical Studies and IND The preclinical developmental stage generally involves laboratory evaluations of drug chemistry, formulation and stability, as well as studies to evaluate pharmacology, pharmacokinetics and toxicity in animals, which support subsequent clinical testing. The sponsor must submit the results of the preclinical studies, together with manufacturing information, analytical data, any available clinical data or literature, and a proposed clinical protocol, to the FDA as part of the IND. An IND is a request for authorization from the FDA to administer an investigational product to humans, and must become effective before human clinical trials may begin. 42 Table of Contents Preclinical studies include laboratory evaluation of product chemistry and formulation, as well as in vitro and animal studies to assess the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and potential for adverse events and in some cases to establish a rationale for therapeutic use. The conduct of preclinical studies is subject to federal regulations and requirements, including GLP regulations for safety/toxicology studies. An IND sponsor must submit the results of the preclinical tests, together with manufacturing information, analytical data, any available clinical data or literature and plans for clinical studies, among other things, to the FDA as part of an IND. Some long-term preclinical testing, such as animal tests of reproductive adverse events, chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity, may continue after the IND is submitted. An IND automatically becomes effective 30 days after receipt by the FDA, unless before that time, the FDA raises concerns or questions related to one or more proposed clinical trials that precludes study initiation and places the trial on clinical hold. In such a case, the IND sponsor and the FDA must resolve any outstanding concerns before the clinical trial can begin. As a result, submission of an IND may not result in the FDA allowing clinical trials to commence. Clinical Trials The clinical stage of development involves the administration of the investigational product to healthy volunteers or patients under the supervision of qualified investigators, generally physicians not employed by or under the trial sponsor’s control, in accordance with GCP requirements, which include the requirement that all research subjects provide their informed consent for their participation in any clinical trial. Interventional clinical trials are conducted under protocols detailing, among other things, the objectives of the clinical trial, dosing procedures, subject selection and exclusion criteria and the parameters to be used to monitor subject safety and assess efficacy. Each protocol, and any subsequent amendments to the protocol, must be submitted to the FDA as part of the IND. Furthermore, each clinical trial must be reviewed and approved by an IRB for each institution at which the clinical trial will be conducted to ensure that the risks to individuals participating in the clinical trials are minimized and are reasonable in relation to anticipated benefits. The IRB also approves the informed consent form that must be provided to each clinical trial subject or his or her legal representative, and must monitor the clinical trial until completed. There also are requirements governing the reporting of ongoing clinical trials and completed clinical trial results to public registries. A sponsor who wishes to conduct a clinical trial outside of the United States may, but need not, obtain FDA authorization to conduct the clinical trial under an IND. If a foreign clinical trial is not conducted under an IND, the sponsor may submit data from the clinical trial to the FDA in support of an NDA or BLA. The FDA will accept a well-designed and well-conducted foreign clinical trial not conducted under an IND if the trial was conducted in accordance with GCP requirements and the FDA is able to validate the data through an onsite inspection if deemed necessary. Clinical trials in the United States generally are conducted in three sequential phases, known as Phase 1, Phase 2 and Phase 3, which may overlap or be combined: • Phase I clinical trials generally involve a small number of healthy volunteers or disease-affected patients who are initially exposed to a single dose and then multiple doses of the product candidate. The primary purpose of these clinical trials is to assess the metabolism, pharmacologic action, and initial side effect tolerability and safety of the drug. • Phase II clinical trials involve studies in a limited number of disease-affected patients to evaluate the preliminary efficacy, optimal dosages, and dosing schedule and to identify possible adverse side effects and safety risks. • Phase III clinical trials generally involve a large number of patients at multiple sites and are designed to provide the data necessary to demonstrate the effectiveness of the product for its intended use, its safety in use and to establish the overall benefit/risk relationship of the product and provide an adequate basis for product approval. These trials may include comparisons with placebo and/or other comparator treatments. The duration of treatment is often extended to mimic the actual use of a product during marketing. 43 Table of Contents When these phases overlap or are combined, the trials may be referred to as Phase 1/2 or Phase 2/3. Post-approval trials, sometimes referred to as Phase 4 clinical trials, may be conducted after initial marketing approval. These trials are used to gain additional experience from the treatment of patients in the intended therapeutic indication. In certain instances, the FDA may mandate the performance of Phase 4 clinical trials as a condition of approval of an NDA or BLA. Progress reports detailing the results of the clinical trials, among other information, must be submitted at least annually to the FDA. Expedited written IND safety reports must be submitted to the FDA, IRBs, and the investigators for serious and unexpected suspected adverse events, findings from other studies suggesting a significant risk to humans exposed to the drug, findings from animal or in vitro testing that suggest a significant risk for human subjects and any clinically important increase in the rate or severity of a serious suspected adverse reaction over that listed in the protocol or investigator brochure. Phase 1, Phase 2 and Phase 3 clinical trials may not be completed successfully within any specified period, if at all. The FDA or the sponsor may suspend or terminate a clinical trial at any time on various grounds, including a finding that the research subjects or patients are being exposed to an unacceptable health risk. Similarly, an IRB can suspend or terminate approval of a clinical trial at its institution if the clinical trial is not being conducted in accordance with the IRB’s requirements or if the drug or biologic has been associated with unexpected serious harm to patients. Additionally, some clinical trials are overseen by an independent group of qualified experts organized by the clinical trial sponsor, known as a data safety monitoring board or committee. This group provides authorization for whether a trial may move forward at designated check points based on access to certain data from the trial. Concurrent with clinical trials, companies usually complete additional animal studies and also must develop additional information about the chemistry and physical characteristics of the drug or biologic as well as finalize a process for manufacturing the product in commercial quantities in accordance with cGMP requirements. The manufacturing process must be capable of consistently producing quality batches of the product and, among other things, companies must develop methods for testing the identity, strength, quality and purity of the final product. Additionally, appropriate packaging must be selected and tested and stability studies must be conducted to demonstrate that our product candidates do not undergo unacceptable deterioration over their shelf life. We may be required to develop and implement additional clinical trial policies and procedures designed to help protect subjects from public health concerns, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. For example, the FDA has issued various guidance documents on conducting clinical trials during the pandemic, including certain reporting requirements and additional guidance on good manufacturing practice considerations for responding to COVID-19 infection. NDA/BLA Review Process Following completion of the clinical trials, data are analyzed to assess whether the investigational product is safe and effective for the proposed indicated use or uses. The results of preclinical studies and clinical trials are then submitted to the FDA as part of an NDA or BLA, along with the proposed labeling, and information relating to the product's chemistry, manufacturing, and controls, among other information, to ensure consistent product quality, safety, and efficacy. In short, the NDA or BLA is a request for approval to market the drug or biologic for the specified indication(s) and must contain proof of safety and efficacy for a drug or safety, purity and potency for a biologic. The application may include both negative and ambiguous results of preclinical studies and clinical trials, as well as positive findings. Data may come from company-sponsored clinical trials intended to test the safety and efficacy of a product’s use and/or from a number of alternative sources, including studies initiated by investigators or cooperative clinical groups. To support marketing approval, the data submitted must be sufficient in quality and quantity to establish the safety and efficacy of the investigational product to the satisfaction of FDA. FDA approval of an NDA or BLA must be obtained before a drug or biologic may be marketed in the United States. 44 Table of Contents Under the Prescription Drug User Fee Act ("PDUFA"), as amended, each NDA or BLA must be accompanied by a user fee. FDA adjusts the PDUFA user fees on an annual basis. According to the FDA’s FY 2024 user fee schedule, effective through September 30, 2024, the user fee for an application requiring clinical data, such as an NDA or BLA, is $4,048,695. PDUFA also imposes an annual program fee for each marketed human drug or biologic of $416,734. Fee waivers or reductions are available in certain limited circumstances. Additionally, no user fees are assessed on NDAs or BLAs for products designated as orphan drugs for an orphan indication submission. The FDA reviews all submitted NDAs and BLAs before it accepts them for filing, and may request additional information rather than accepting the NDA or BLA for filing, such as the issuance of a Refuse to File (RTF) letter. The FDA must make a decision on accepting an NDA or BLA for filing within 60 days of receipt. Once the submission is accepted for filing, the FDA begins an in-depth review of the NDA or BLA. Under the goals and policies agreed to by the FDA under PDUFA, the FDA has ten months, from the filing date, in which to complete its initial review of a new molecular-entity NDA or original BLA and respond to the applicant, and six months from the filing date of a new molecular-entity NDA or original BLA designated for priority review. The FDA does not always meet its PDUFA goal dates for standard and priority NDAs or BLAs, and the review process may be extended by FDA requests for additional information or clarification. Before approving an NDA or BLA, the FDA will conduct a pre-approval inspection of the manufacturing facilities for the new product to determine whether they comply with cGMP requirements. The FDA will not approve the product unless it determines that the manufacturing processes and facilities are in compliance with cGMP requirements and adequate to assure consistent production of the product within required specifications. The FDA also may audit data from clinical trials to ensure compliance with GCP requirements. Additionally, the FDA may refer applications for novel drug products or drug products which present difficult questions of safety or efficacy to an advisory committee, typically a panel that includes clinicians and other experts, for review, evaluation and a recommendation as to whether the application should be approved and under what conditions, if any. The FDA is not bound by recommendations of an advisory committee, but it considers such recommendations when making decisions on approval. The FDA likely will reanalyze the clinical trial data, which could result in extensive discussions between the FDA and the applicant during the review process. After the FDA evaluates an NDA or BLA, it will issue an approval letter or a Complete Response Letter. An approval letter authorizes commercial marketing of the drug with specific prescribing information for specific indications. A Complete Response Letter indicates that the review cycle of the application is complete and the application will not be approved in its present form. A Complete Response Letter usually describes all of the specific deficiencies in the NDA or BLA identified by the FDA. The Complete Response Letter may require additional clinical data, additional pivotal Phase 3 clinical trial(s) and/or other significant and time-consuming requirements related to clinical trials, preclinical studies or manufacturing. If a Complete Response Letter is issued, the applicant may either resubmit the NDA or BLA, addressing all of the deficiencies identified in the letter, or withdraw the application. Even if such data and information are submitted, the FDA may decide that the NDA or BLA does not satisfy the criteria for approval. Data obtained from clinical trials are not always conclusive and the FDA may interpret data differently than we interpret the same data. 45 Table of Contents If regulatory approval of a product is granted, such approval will be granted for particular indications and may entail limitations on the indicated uses for which such product may be marketed. For example, the FDA may approve the BLA with a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy, or REMS, to ensure the benefits of the product outweigh its risks. A REMS is a safety strategy to manage a known or potential serious risk associated with a product and to enable patients to have continued access to such medicines by managing their safe use, and could include medication guides, physician communication plans, or elements to assure safe use, such as restricted distribution methods, patient registries and other risk minimization tools. The FDA also may condition approval on, among other things, changes to proposed labeling or the development of adequate controls and specifications. Once approved, the FDA may withdraw the product approval if compliance with pre- and post-marketing requirements is not maintained or if problems occur after the product reaches the marketplace. The FDA may require one or more Phase 4 post-market studies and surveillance to further assess and monitor the product’s safety and effectiveness after commercialization, and may limit further marketing of the product based on the results of these post-marketing studies. Orphan Drugs Under the Orphan Drug Act, the FDA may grant orphan designation to a drug or biological product intended to treat a rare disease or condition, which is generally a disease or condition that affects fewer than 200,000 individuals in the United States, or more than 200,000 individuals in the United States and for which there is no reasonable expectation that the cost of developing and making the product available in the United States for this type of disease or condition will be recovered from sales of the product. Orphan drug designation must be requested before submitting an NDA or BLA. After the FDA grants orphan drug designation, the identity of the therapeutic agent and its potential orphan use are disclosed publicly by the FDA. Orphan drug designation does not convey any advantage in or shorten the duration of the regulatory review and approval process. If a product that has orphan designation subsequently receives the first FDA approval for the disease or condition for which it has such designation, the product is entitled to orphan drug exclusivity, which means that the FDA may not approve any other applications to market the same drug for the same indication for seven years from the date of such approval, except in limited circumstances, such as a showing of clinical superiority to the product with orphan exclusivity by means of greater effectiveness, greater safety or providing a major contribution to patient care or in instances of drug supply issues. Competitors, however, may receive approval of either a different product for the same indication or the same product for a different indication but that could be used off-label in the orphan indication. Orphan drug exclusivity also could block the approval of one of our products for seven years if a competitor obtains approval before we do for the same product, as defined by the FDA, for the same indication we are seeking approval, or if a product candidate is determined to be contained within the scope of the competitor’s product for the same indication or disease. If one of our products designated as an orphan drug receives marketing approval for an indication broader than that which is designated, it may not be entitled to orphan drug exclusivity. Orphan drug status in the EU has similar, but not identical, requirements and benefits. In view of the court decision in Catalyst Pharms., Inc. v. Becerra , 14 F.4th 1299 (11th Cir. 2021), in January 2023, the FDA published a notice in the Federal Register to clarify that while the agency complies with the court’s order in Catalyst, the FDA intends to continue to apply its longstanding interpretation of the regulations to matters outside of the scope of the Catalyst order – that is, the agency will continue tying the scope of orphan-drug exclusivity to the uses or indications for which a drug is approved, which permits other sponsors to obtain approval of a drug for new uses or indications within the same orphan designated disease or condition that have not yet been approved. It is unclear how future litigation, legislation, agency decisions, and administrative actions will impact the scope of the orphan drug exclusivity. 46 Table of Contents Expedited Development and Review Programs The FDA has a fast track program that is intended to expedite or facilitate the process for reviewing new drugs and biologics that meet certain criteria. Specifically, new drugs and biologics are eligible for fast track designation if they are intended to treat a serious or life-threatening condition and preclinical or clinical data demonstrate the potential to address unmet medical needs for the condition. Fast track designation applies to the combination of the product and the specific indication for which it is being studied. The sponsor can request the FDA to designate the product for fast track status any time before receiving NDA or BLA approval, but ideally no later than the pre-NDA or pre-BLA meeting. Additionally, a drug or biologic may be eligible for designation as a breakthrough therapy if the product is intended, alone or in combination with one or more other drugs or biologics, to treat a serious or life-threatening condition and preliminary clinical evidence indicates that the product may demonstrate substantial improvement over currently approved therapies on one or more clinically significant endpoints. The benefits of breakthrough therapy designation include the same benefits as fast track designation, plus intensive guidance from the FDA to facilitate an efficient drug development program. Any product submitted to the FDA for marketing, including under a fast track or breakthrough therapy designation program, may be eligible for other types of FDA programs intended to expedite development and review, such as priority review and accelerated approval. Any product is eligible for priority review if it treats a serious or life-threatening condition and, if approved, would provide a significant improvement in safety and effectiveness compared to available therapies. Priority review reduces the review time for an initial or supplemental marketing application by four months. A product may be eligible for accelerated approval, if it treats a serious or life-threatening condition and generally provides a meaningful advantage over available therapies based on an effect on a surrogate endpoint that is reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit or on a clinical endpoint that can be measured earlier than irreversible morbidity or mortality ("IMM"), that is reasonably likely to predict an effect on IMM or other clinical benefit. As a condition of accelerated approval, the FDA requires that a sponsor of a drug or biologic receiving accelerated approval subsequently provide additional data confirming the anticipated clinical benefit, for example by performing adequate and well-controlled post-marketing clinical trials. If clinical benefit is not confirmed, accelerated approval may be revoked. If the FDA concludes that a drug or biologic shown to be effective can be safely used only if distribution or use is restricted, it may require such post-marketing restrictions, as it deems necessary to assure safe use of the product. Further, the Food and Drug Omnibus Reform Act made several changes to the FDA’s authorities and its regulatory framework, including, among other changes, requiring the FDA to specify conditions for post-approval study requirements and setting forth procedures for the FDA to withdraw a product on an expedited basis for non-compliance with post-approval requirements. Fast track designation, breakthrough therapy designation, priority review, and accelerated approval do not change the standards for approval, but may expedite the development or approval process. Abbreviated Licensure Pathway of Biological Products as Biosimilar or Interchangeable The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act ("PPACA"), Affordable Care Act ("ACA"), signed into law in 2010, includes a subtitle called the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009 ("BPCIA"), created an abbreviated approval pathway for biological products shown to be highly similar to an FDA-licensed reference biological product. The BPCIA attempts to minimize duplicative testing, and thereby lower development costs and increase patient access to affordable treatments. An application for licensure of a biosimilar product must include information demonstrating biosimilarity based upon the following, unless the FDA determines otherwise: • analytical studies demonstrating that the proposed biosimilar product is highly similar to the approved product notwithstanding minor differences in clinically inactive components; and 47 Table of Contents • animal studies (including the assessment of toxicity). In addition, an application must include information demonstrating that: • the proposed biosimilar product and reference product utilize the same mechanism of action for the condition(s) of use prescribed, recommended, or suggested in the proposed labeling, but only to the extent the mechanism(s) of action are known for the reference product; • the condition or conditions of use prescribed, recommended, or suggested in the labeling for the proposed biosimilar product have been previously approved for the reference product; • the route of administration, the dosage form, and the strength of the proposed biosimilar product are the same as those for the reference product; and • the facility in which the biological product is manufactured, processed, packed or held meets standards designed to assure that the biological product continues to be safe, pure, and potent. Biosimilarity means that the biological product is highly similar to the reference product notwithstanding minor differences in clinically inactive components; and that there are no clinically meaningful differences between the biological product and the reference product in terms of the safety, purity, and potency of the product. In addition, the law provides for a designation of “interchangeability” between the reference and biosimilar products, whereby the biosimilar may be substituted for the reference product without the intervention of the health care provider who prescribed the reference product. The higher standard of interchangeability must be demonstrated by information sufficient to show that: • the proposed product is biosimilar to the reference product; • the proposed product is expected to produce the same clinical result as the reference product in any given patient; and • for a product that is administered more than once to an individual, the risk to the patient in terms of safety or diminished efficacy of alternating or switching between the biosimilar and the reference product is no greater than the risk of using the reference product without such alternation or switch. FDA approval is required before a biosimilar may be marketed in the United States. However, complexities associated with the large and intricate structures of biological products and the process by which such products are manufactured pose significant hurdles to the FDA’s implementation of the law that are still being worked out by the FDA. For example, the FDA has discretion over the kind and amount of scientific evidence—laboratory, preclinical and/or clinical—required to demonstrate biosimilarity to a licensed biological product. The FDA intends to consider the totality of the evidence, provided by a sponsor to support a demonstration of biosimilarity, and recommends that sponsors use a stepwise approach in the development of their biosimilar products. Biosimilar product applications thus may not be required to duplicate the entirety of preclinical and clinical testing used to establish the underlying safety and effectiveness of the reference product. However, the FDA may refuse to approve a biosimilar application if there is insufficient information to show that the active ingredients are the same or to demonstrate that any impurities or differences in active ingredients do not affect the safety, purity or potency of the biosimilar product. In addition, as with BLAs, biosimilar product applications will not be approved unless the product is manufactured in facilities designed to assure and preserve the biological product’s safety, purity and potency. 48 Table of Contents The submission of a biosimilar application does not guarantee that the FDA will accept the application for filing and review, as the FDA may refuse to accept applications that it finds are insufficiently complete. The FDA will treat a biosimilar application or supplement as incomplete if, among other reasons, any applicable user fees assessed under the Biosimilar User Fee Act of 2012 have not been paid. In addition, the FDA may accept an application for filing but deny approval on the basis that the sponsor has not demonstrated biosimilarity, in which case the sponsor may choose to conduct further analytical, preclinical or clinical studies and submit a BLA for licensure as a new biological product. The timing of final FDA approval of a biosimilar for commercial distribution depends on a variety of factors, including whether the manufacturer of the branded product is entitled to one or more statutory exclusivity periods, during which time the FDA is prohibited from approving any products that are biosimilar to the branded product. The FDA cannot approve a biosimilar application for twelve years from the date of first licensure of the reference product. Additionally, a biosimilar product sponsor may not submit an application for four years from the date of first licensure of the reference product. A reference product may also be entitled to exclusivity under other statutory provisions. For example, a reference product designated for a rare disease or condition (an “orphan drug”) may be entitled to seven years of exclusivity, in which case no product that is biosimilar to the reference product may be approved until either the end of the twelve-year period provided under the biosimilarity statute or the end of the seven-year orphan drug exclusivity period, whichever occurs later. In certain circumstances, a regulatory exclusivity period can extend beyond the life of a patent, and thus block biosimilarity applications from being approved on or after the patent expiration date. In addition, the FDA may under certain circumstances extend the exclusivity period for the reference product by an additional six months if the FDA requests, and the manufacturer undertakes, studies on the effect of its product in children, a so-called pediatric extension. The first biological product determined to be interchangeable with a branded product for any condition of use is also entitled to a period of exclusivity, during which time the FDA may not determine that another product is interchangeable with the reference product for any condition of use. This exclusivity period extends until the earlier of: (1) one year after the first commercial marketing of the first interchangeable product; (2) 18 months after resolution of a patent infringement against the applicant that submitted the application for the first interchangeable product, based on a final court decision regarding all of the patents in the litigation or dismissal of the litigation with or without prejudice; (3) 42 months after approval of the first interchangeable product, if a patent infringement suit against the applicant that submitted the application for the first interchangeable product is still ongoing; or (4) 18 months after approval of the first interchangeable product if the applicant that submitted the application for the first interchangeable product has not been sued. Post-Approval Requirements Following approval of a new product, the manufacturer and the approved product are subject to continuing regulation by the FDA, including, among other things, monitoring and record-keeping requirements, requirements to report adverse experiences, and complying with promotion and advertising requirements, which include restrictions on promoting drugs for unapproved uses or patient populations (known as “off-label use”) and limitations on industry-sponsored scientific and educational activities. Although physicians in the United States may prescribe legally available drugs for off-label uses, manufacturers may not market or promote such uses. Prescription drug promotional materials must be submitted to the FDA in conjunction with their first use. Further, an applicant would be required to submit and obtain FDA approval of a new NDA/BLA or a supplement before any material modifications can be implemented for a drug or biologic, including changes in labeling or manufacturing processes or facilities, which may require the development of additional data or nonclinical studies and clinical trials. 49 Table of Contents The FDA may also place other conditions on approvals including the requirement for a REMS, to assure the safe use of the product. A REMS could include medication guides, physician communication plans or elements to assure safe use, such as restricted distribution methods, patient registries and other risk minimization tools. Any of these limitations on approval or marketing could restrict the commercial promotion, distribution, prescription or dispensing of products. Product approvals may be withdrawn for non-compliance with regulatory standards or if problems occur following initial marketing. The FDA may withdraw approval if compliance with regulatory requirements and standards is not maintained or if problems occur after the product reaches the market. Later discovery of previously unknown problems with a product, including adverse events of unanticipated severity or frequency, or with manufacturing processes, or failure to comply with regulatory requirements, may result in revisions to the approved labeling to add new safety information; imposition of post-market studies or clinical studies to assess new safety risks; or imposition of distribution restrictions or other restrictions under a REMS program. Other potential consequences include, among other things: • restrictions on the marketing or manufacturing of the product, complete withdrawal of the product from the market or product recalls; • fines, warning letters or holds on post-approval clinical studies; • refusal of the FDA to approve pending applications or supplements to approved applications; • applications, or suspension or revocation of product license approvals; • product seizure or detention, or refusal to permit the import or export of products; or • injunctions or the imposition of civil or criminal penalties. The FDA strictly regulates marketing, labeling, advertising, and promotion of products that are placed on the market. Drugs and biologics may be promoted only for the approved indications and in accordance with the provisions of the approved label. The FDA and other agencies actively enforce the laws and regulations prohibiting the promotion of off-label uses, and a company that is found to have improperly promoted off-label uses may be subject to significant liability. Other U.S. Regulatory Matters Manufacturing, sales, promotion and other activities following product approval are also subject to regulation by numerous regulatory authorities in the United States in addition to the FDA, including the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, other divisions of the Department of Health and Human Services, the Department of Justice, the Drug Enforcement Administration, the Consumer Product Safety Commission, the Federal Trade Commission, the Occupational Safety & Health Administration, the Environmental Protection Agency and state and local governments. For example, in the United States, sales, marketing and scientific and educational programs also must comply with state and federal fraud and abuse laws. These laws include the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, which makes it illegal for any person, including a prescription drug manufacturer (or a party acting on its behalf), to knowingly and willfully solicit, receive, offer or pay any remuneration that is intended to induce or reward referrals, including the purchase, recommendation, order or prescription of a particular drug, for which payment may be made under a federal healthcare program, such as Medicare or Medicaid. Violations of this law are punishable by up to five years in prison, criminal fines, administrative civil money penalties and exclusion from participation in federal healthcare programs. Moreover, the ACA provides that the government may assert that a claim including items or services resulting from a violation of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the False Claims Act. 50 Table of Contents Pricing and rebate programs must comply with the Medicaid rebate requirements of the U.S. Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990 and more recent requirements in the ACA. If products are made available to authorized users of the Federal Supply Schedule of the General Services Administration, additional laws and requirements apply. Products must meet applicable child-resistant packaging requirements under the U.S. Poison Prevention Packaging Act. Manufacturing, sales, promotion and other activities also are potentially subject to federal and state consumer protection and unfair competition laws. The distribution of biologic and pharmaceutical products is subject to additional requirements and regulations, including extensive record-keeping, licensing, storage and security requirements intended to prevent the unauthorized sale of pharmaceutical products. The failure to comply with any of these laws or regulatory requirements subjects firms to possible legal or regulatory action. Depending on the circumstances, failure to meet applicable regulatory requirements can result in criminal prosecution, fines or other penalties, injunctions, requests for recall, seizure of products, total or partial suspension of production, denial or withdrawal of product approvals or refusal to allow a firm to enter into supply contracts, including government contracts. Any action against us for violation of these laws, even if we successfully defend against it, could cause us to incur significant legal expenses and divert our management’s attention from the operation of our business. Prohibitions or restrictions on sales or withdrawal of future products marketed by us could materially affect our business in an adverse way. Changes in regulations, statutes or the interpretation of existing regulations could impact our business in the future by requiring, for example: (i) changes to our manufacturing arrangements; (ii) additions or modifications to product labeling; (iii) the recall or discontinuation of our products; or (iv) additional record-keeping requirements. If any such changes were to be imposed, they could adversely affect the operation of our business. U.S. Patent-Term Restoration and Marketing Exclusivity Depending upon the timing, duration and specifics of FDA approval of any future product candidates, some of our U.S. patents may be eligible for limited patent term extension under the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984, commonly referred to as the Hatch-Waxman Act. The Hatch-Waxman Act permits restoration of the patent term of up to five years as compensation for patent term lost during product development and FDA regulatory review process. Patent-term restoration, however, cannot extend the remaining term of a patent beyond a total of 14 years from the product’s approval date. The patent-term restoration period is generally one-half the time between the effective date of an IND and the submission date of an NDA or BLA plus the time between the submission date of an NDA or BLA and the approval of that application, except that the review period is reduced by any time during which the applicant failed to exercise due diligence. Only one patent applicable to an approved drug is eligible for the extension and the application for the extension must be submitted prior to the expiration of the patent. The USPTO, in consultation with the FDA, reviews and approves the application for any patent term extension or restoration. In the future, we may apply for restoration of patent term for our currently owned or licensed patents to add patent life beyond its current expiration date, depending on the expected length of the clinical trials and other factors involved in the filing of the relevant NDA or BLA. 51 Table of Contents Market exclusivity provisions under the FDCA also can delay the submission or the approval of certain applications. The FDCA provides a five-year period of non-patent marketing exclusivity within the United States to the first applicant to gain approval of a NDA for a new chemical entity. A drug is a new chemical entity if the FDA has not previously approved any other new drug containing the same active moiety, which is the molecule or ion responsible for the action of the drug substance. During the exclusivity period, the FDA may not accept for review an abbreviated new drug application ("ANDA"), or a 505(b)(2) NDA submitted by another company for another version of such drug where the applicant does not own or have a legal right of reference to all the data required for approval. However, an application may be submitted after four years if it contains a certification of patent invalidity or non-infringement. The FDCA also provides three years of marketing exclusivity for a NDA, 505(b)(2) NDA or supplement to an existing NDA if new clinical investigations, other than bioavailability studies, that were conducted or sponsored by the applicant are deemed by the FDA to be essential to the approval of the application, for example, new indications, dosages or strengths of an existing drug. This three-year exclusivity covers only the conditions of use associated with the new clinical investigations and does not prohibit the FDA from approving ANDAs for drugs containing the original active agent. Five-year and three-year exclusivity will not delay the submission or approval of a full NDA. However, an applicant submitting a full NDA would be required to conduct or obtain a right of reference to all of the preclinical studies and adequate and well-controlled clinical trials necessary to demonstrate safety and effectiveness. A reference biological product is granted twelve years of data exclusivity from the time of first licensure of the product, and the FDA will not accept an application for a biosimilar or interchangeable product based on the reference biological product until four years after the date of first licensure of the reference product. “First licensure” typically means the initial date the particular product at issue was licensed in the United States. Date of first licensure does not include the date of licensure of (and a new period of exclusivity is not available for) a biological product if the licensure is for a supplement for the biological product or for a subsequent application by the same sponsor or manufacturer of the biological product (or licensor, predecessor in interest, or other related entity) for a change (not including a modification to the structure of the biological product) that results in a new indication, route of administration, dosing schedule, dosage form, delivery system, delivery device or strength, or for a modification to the structure of the biological product that does not result in a change in safety, purity, or potency. Therefore, one must determine whether a new product includes a modification to the structure of a previously licensed product that results in a change in safety, purity, or potency to assess whether the licensure of the new product is a first licensure that triggers its own period of exclusivity. Whether a subsequent application, if approved, warrants exclusivity as the “first licensure” of a biological product is determined on a case-by-case basis with data submitted by the sponsor. European Union Drug Development As in the United States, medicinal products can be marketed only if a marketing authorization from the competent regulatory agencies has been obtained. Similar to the United States, the various phases of preclinical and clinical research in the EU are subject to significant regulatory controls. In the EU, a clinical trial application, or CTA, must be submitted to each country’s national health authority and an independent ethics committee, respectively. Once the CTA is approved in accordance with a country’s requirements, clinical study development may proceed. The clinical studies must be conducted in accordance with GCP and the applicable regulatory requirements and the ethical principles that have their origin in the Declaration of Helsinki. The Clinical Trials Regulation EU No 536/2014, which replaced the Clinical Trials Directive, entered into application on January 31, 2022. The Clinical Trials Regulation harmonizes the processes for assessment and supervision of clinical trials throughout the EU. Under the Regulation, sponsors can submit one online application via a single online platform known as the Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS) for approval to run a clinical trial in several European countries, making it more efficient to carry out such multinational trials. A transition period applies to clinical trial submissions under the Regulation. For example, from 31 January 2023 onwards, clinical trial sponsors need to apply via the Clinical Trials Information System to start a clinical trial. From 31 January 2025, any trials approved under the Clinical Trials Directive that continue running will need to comply with the Clinical Trials Regulation and their sponsors must enter information on the trials in the CTIS. 52 Table of Contents European Union Drug Review and Approval In the European Economic Area ("EEA"), which is comprised of the 27 Member States of the EU, plus Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein, medicinal products can only be commercialized after obtaining a Marketing Authorization ("MA"). There are two types of marketing authorizations. • The Community MA is issued by the European Commission through the Centralized Procedure, based on the opinion of the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use ("CHMP"), of the EMA, and is valid throughout the entire territory of the EEA. The Centralized Procedure is mandatory for certain types of products, such as biotechnology medicinal products, orphan medicinal products, advanced-therapy medicines such as gene-therapy, somatic cell-therapy or tissue-engineered medicines and medicinal products containing a new active substance indicated for the treatment of HIV, AIDS, cancer, neurodegenerative disorders, diabetes, auto-immune and other immune dysfunctions and viral diseases. The Centralized Procedure may also apply for products containing a new active substance not yet authorized in the EEA, or for products that constitute a significant therapeutic, scientific or technical innovation or which are in the interest of public health in the EU. • National MAs, which are issued by the competent authorities of the Member States of the EEA and only cover their respective territory, are available for products not falling within the mandatory scope of the Centralized Procedure. Where a product has already been authorized for marketing in a Member State of the EEA, this National MA can be recognized in another Member States through the Mutual Recognition Procedure. If the product has not received a National MA in any Member State at the time of application, it can be approved simultaneously in various Member States through the Decentralized Procedure. Under the Decentralized Procedure an identical dossier is submitted to the competent authorities of each of the Member States in which the MA is sought, one of which is selected by the applicant as the Reference Member State ("RMS"). The competent authority of the RMS prepares a draft assessment report, a draft summary of the product characteristics ("SPC"), and a draft of the labeling and package leaflet, which are sent to the other Member States (referred to as the Member States Concerned) for their approval. If the Member States Concerned raise no objections, based on a potential serious risk to public health, to the assessment, SPC, labeling, or packaging proposed by the RMS, the product is subsequently granted a national MA in all the Member States (i.e., in the RMS and the Member States Concerned). Under the procedures described above, before granting the MA, the EMA or the competent authorities of the Member States of the EEA assess the risk-benefit balance of the product on the basis of scientific criteria concerning its quality, safety and efficacy. Starting in January 2021, the MHRA assumed additional regulatory responsibilities for medical products marketed in the UK, as pan-EU regulatory procedures before the EMA no longer apply in the UK. MHRA and the National Institute for Biological Standards and Control ("NIBSC") recently issued new guidance documents to the industry regarding regulation under the UK system. Proposals set forth in the new MHRA guidance will take effect through legislative changes that are subject to parliamentary approval, which may increase the amount of resources and time needed for obtaining regulatory approval in the UK and delay our clinical development and commercialization. On January 1, 2024, MHRA launched a new streamlined international recognition framework replacing the current European Commission Decision Reliance Procedure (ECDRP) and allow the MHRA to rely on or give regard to a European decision or decision of other regulators to grant a new marketing authorization for a product. 53 Table of Contents Coverage and Reimbursement Sales of our products will depend, in part, on the extent to which our products will be covered by third-party payors, such as government health programs, commercial insurance and managed healthcare organizations. In the United States no uniform policy of coverage and reimbursement for drug or biological products exists. Accordingly, decisions regarding the extent of coverage and amount of reimbursement to be provided for any of our products will be made on a payor-by-payor basis. As a result, the coverage determination process is often a time-consuming and costly process that will require us to provide scientific and clinical support for the use of our products to each payor separately, with no assurance that coverage and adequate reimbursement will be obtained. The United States government, state legislatures and foreign governments have shown significant interest in implementing cost containment programs to limit the growth of government-paid health care costs, including price-controls, restrictions on reimbursement and requirements for substitution of generic products for branded prescription drugs. For example, the ACA contains provisions that may reduce the profitability of drug products through increased rebates for drugs reimbursed by Medicaid programs, extension of Medicaid rebates to Medicaid managed care plans, mandatory discounts for certain Medicare Part D beneficiaries and annual fees based on pharmaceutical companies’ share of sales to federal health care programs. Adoption of general controls and measures, coupled with the tightening of restrictive policies in jurisdictions with existing controls and measures, could limit payments for pharmaceutical drugs. The Medicaid Drug Rebate Program requires pharmaceutical manufacturers to enter into and have in effect a national rebate agreement with the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services as a condition for states to receive federal matching funds for the manufacturer’s outpatient drugs furnished to Medicaid patients. The ACA made several changes to the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program, including increasing pharmaceutical manufacturers’ rebate liability by raising the minimum basic Medicaid rebate on most branded prescription drugs from 15.1% of average manufacturer price ("AMP"), to 23.1% of AMP and adding a new rebate calculation for “line extensions” (e.g., new formulations, such as extended release formulations) of solid oral dosage forms of branded products, as well as potentially impacting their rebate liability by modifying the statutory definition of AMP. The ACA also expanded the universe of Medicaid utilization subject to drug rebates by requiring pharmaceutical manufacturers to pay rebates on Medicaid managed care utilization and by enlarging the population potentially eligible for Medicaid drug benefits. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services ("CMS"), have proposed to expand Medicaid rebate liability to the territories of the United States as well. The Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 ("MMA"), established the Medicare Part D program to provide a voluntary prescription drug benefit to Medicare beneficiaries. Under Part D, Medicare beneficiaries may enroll in prescription drug plans offered by private entities that provide coverage of outpatient prescription drugs. Unlike Medicare Part A and B, Part D coverage is not standardized. While all Medicare drug plans must give at least a standard level of coverage set by Medicare, Part D prescription drug plan sponsors are not required to pay for all covered Part D drugs, and each drug plan can develop its own drug formulary that identifies which drugs it will cover and at what tier or level. However, Part D prescription drug formularies must include drugs within each therapeutic category and class of covered Part D drugs, though not necessarily all the drugs in each category or class. Any formulary used by a Part D prescription drug plan must be developed and reviewed by a pharmacy and therapeutic committee. Government payment for some of the costs of prescription drugs may increase demand for products for which we receive marketing approval. However, any negotiated prices for our products covered by a Part D prescription drug plan likely will be lower than the prices we might otherwise obtain. Moreover, while the MMA applies only to drug benefits for Medicare beneficiaries, private payors often follow Medicare coverage policy and payment limitations in setting their own payment rates. Any reduction in payment that results from the MMA may result in a similar reduction in payments from non-governmental payors. 54 Table of Contents For a drug product to receive federal reimbursement under the Medicaid or Medicare Part B programs or to be sold directly to U.S. government agencies, the manufacturer must extend discounts to entities eligible to participate in the 340B drug pricing program. The required 340B discount on a given product is calculated based on the AMP and Medicaid rebate amounts reported by the manufacturer. There have been several recent U.S. Congressional inquiries and proposed federal and state legislation designed to, among other things, bring more transparency to drug pricing, reduce the cost of prescription drugs under Medicare, review the relationship between pricing and manufacturer patient programs, and reform government program reimbursement methodologies for drugs. In August 2022, Congress passed the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, which includes prescription drug provisions that have significant implications for the pharmaceutical industry and Medicare beneficiaries. These include allowing the federal government to negotiate a maximum price paid by Medicare for certain single source drugs responsible for significant Medicare spending, imposing penalties and excise tax for manufacturers that fail to comply with the drug price negotiation requirements, requiring inflation rebates for all Medicare Part B and Part D drugs, with limited exceptions, if their drug prices increase faster than inflation, and redesigning Medicare Part D to reduce out-of-pocket prescription drug costs for beneficiaries, among other changes. Various industry stakeholders, including certain pharmaceutical companies and the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, have initiated lawsuits against the federal government asserting that the price negotiation provisions of the IRA are unconstitutional. The impact of these judicial challenges, legislative, executive, and administrative actions, and any future healthcare measures and agency rules implemented by the Biden administration on us and the pharmaceutical industry as a whole is unclear. The implementation of cost containment measures or other healthcare reforms may prevent us from being able to generate revenue, attain profitability, or commercialize our product candidates if approved. At the state level, legislatures have also increasingly passed legislation and implemented regulations designed to control pharmaceutical and biological product pricing, including price or patient reimbursement constraints, discounts, restrictions on certain product access and marketing cost disclosure and transparency measures, and, in some cases, designed to encourage importation from other countries and bulk purchasing. For example, a number of states are considering or have recently enacted state drug price transparency and reporting laws that could substantially increase our compliance burdens and expose us to greater liability under such state laws once we begin commercialization after obtaining regulatory approval for any of our products. We are unable to predict the future course of federal or state healthcare legislation in the United States directed at broadening the availability of healthcare and containing or lowering the cost of healthcare. These and any further changes in the law or regulatory framework that reduce our revenue or increase our costs could also have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. As noted above, the marketability of any products for which we receive regulatory approval for commercial sale may suffer if the government and third-party payors fail to provide adequate coverage and reimbursement. An increasing emphasis on cost containment measures in the United States indicates continued pressure on pharmaceutical pricing. Coverage policies and third-party reimbursement rates may change at any time. Even if favorable coverage and reimbursement status is attained for one or more products for which we receive regulatory approval, less favorable coverage policies and reimbursement rates may be implemented in the future. In addition, in most foreign countries, the proposed pricing for a drug must be approved before it may be lawfully marketed. The requirements governing drug pricing and reimbursement vary widely from country to country. For example, the EU provides options for its member states to restrict the range of medicinal products for which their national health insurance systems provide reimbursement and to control the prices of medicinal products for human use. A member state may approve a specific price for the medicinal product or it may instead adopt a system of direct or indirect controls on the profitability of the company placing the medicinal product on the market. There can be no assurance that any country that has price controls or reimbursement limitations for pharmaceutical products will allow favorable reimbursement and pricing arrangements for any of our products. Historically, products launched in the EU do not follow price structures of the United States and generally prices tend to be significantly lower. 55 Table of Contents Financial Information about Segments We manage our operations as a single reportable segment for the purposes of assessing performance and making operating decisions. See "Note 1 - Significant Accounting Policies" in the notes to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Employees and Human Capital Resources As of December 31, 2023 , we had approximately 445 full-time employees. A large majority of our employees work out of our headquarters location in South San Francisco, CA, with the remainder working out of our locations in Salt Lake City, Utah and Zurich, Switzerland. Our human capital strategy aims to attract new talent and retain and incentivize existing employees by investing in their professional development, as well as providing them with challenging and rewarding opportunities for personal growth. Our working environment is guided by the core Denali values of trust, growth, grit and unity, and reinforced by developing quality leadership, fostering diversity and inclusion, emphasizing continuous growth, creating opportunities for engagement, and embracing our goal to defeat degeneration. Our values-driven culture is complemented by our incentive plans, which serve to (1) attract and retain employees through the granting of stock-based and cash-based compensation awards; and (2) motivate employees to perform to the best of their abilities and achieve our objectives, thereby increasing the value and success of our company. Key areas of focus for Denali include: Health and Safety. Our health and safety programs are designed around global standards with specifications addressing regulations, specific hazards, and the unique working environment of our operations. We mandate employee health and safety training and ergonomic assessments, and require specialized training for all lab-based employees. We conduct regular internal safety audits to ensure that proper safety policies and program procedures are in place. In addition, we engage both internal and third-party compliance assessments and audit selected operations for adherence to health and safety standards. Denali’s safety programs have been highly effective: since we commenced operations in 2015, we have had zero reportable regulatory safety incidents. Diversity and Inclusion. Denali embraces differences and acknowledges the valuable perspectives that a diverse workforce brings to problem-solving. Our Unity in Diversity team spearheads action-oriented diversity programs, such as social responsibility through community leadership and volunteerism, investment in STEM-focused outreach, and creating a safe place for expression and ideas. As part of our plan to create a more inclusive workplace, we have adopted a zero tolerance policy towards harassment and discrimination and created safe avenues for employees to submit complaints, including an anonymous hotline and a formal complaint system that allows for direct access to our human resources department. We have implemented several measures to ensure that we are accountable for making progress on our diversity and inclusion initiatives. Diversity and inclusion objectives are embedded in our annual performance goals. We also ensure pipeline diversity by partnering with each division in their workforce planning forecasts to develop initiatives and goals to recruit diverse talent across all leadership and skill areas. As of December 31, 2023 , approximately 54% of our workforce and 48% of managers were female. As of December 31, 2023 , ethnic or racial minorities represented approximately 54% of our workforce and 46% of our managers. 56 Table of Contents Training and Development. We believe training and development are an important part of creating a safe, productive, fair, and equal environment. We encourage continuous feedback, improvement, and growth for our employees. We provide technical, leadership and compliance training to all employees in several formats, including through live seminars, online trainings and professional organizations. Managers are given annual training to hone their supervisory skills and better support their employees’ development; they are, in turn, accountable for guiding the development of a personal and professional growth plan for each employee. In addition, Denali has designed employee development programs to help employees develop essential skills that are aligned to promote growth and Denali’s values. Flexible Work Options. The global pandemic has accelerated our capabilities and culture with respect to flexible work. Denali values workplace flexibility and hybrid ways of working, and has introduced a policy which we believe balances more workplace flexibility with time together to collaborate and connect in person. We use enhanced tools and technology designed to help us optimize productivity and collaboration while facilitating a hybrid work environment for our diverse workforce. Corporate Information We were incorporated in Delaware in 2013. Our principal executive offices are located at 161 Oyster Point Blvd., South San Francisco, California 94080. Our telephone number is (650) 866-8548. Our website address is www.denalitherapeutics.com. We also use our website as a channel of distribution of important company information, including news or announcements regarding our financial performance, investor events and press releases. We intend to use our website as a means of disclosing material non-public information and for complying with our disclosure obligations under Regulation FD. We file electronically with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and current reports on Form 8-K pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended ("Exchange Act"). We make available on our website at www.denalitherapeutics.com, free of charge, copies of these reports, including amendments to such reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC. The SEC maintains a website that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. The address of that website is www.sec.gov. The information in or accessible through the SEC and our website or social media sites does not constitute part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K or any other report or document we file with the SEC, and any references to our website and social media sites are intended to be inactive textual references only. We use Denali®, the Denali Therapeutics logo, and other marks as trademarks in the United States and other countries. This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains references to our trademarks and service marks and to those belonging to other entities. Solely for convenience, trademarks and trade names referred to in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including logos, artwork and other visual displays, may appear without the ® or ™ symbols, but such references are not intended to indicate in any way that we will not assert, to the fullest extent under applicable law, our rights or the rights of the applicable licensor to these trademarks and trade names. We do not intend our use or display of other entities’ trade names, trademarks or service marks to imply a relationship with, or endorsement or sponsorship of us by any other entity.