Creatd, Inc. 10-K

10-K 1 f10k2018_jerrickmediahold.htm ANNUAL REPORT UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K ☒ ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended: December 31, 2018 or ☐ TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Commission file number: 000-51872 JERRICK MEDIA HOLDINGS, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Nevada 87-0645394 (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 2050 Center Avenue, Suite 640 Fort Lee, NJ 07024 (Address of principal executive offices) (201) 258-3770 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) (Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report) Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: None Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒ Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐ Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ☐ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Large accelerated filer ☐ Accelerated filer ☐ Non-accelerated filer ☐ Smaller reporting company ☒ Emerging growth company ☐ If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒ The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant on June 30, 2018, based on a closing price of $0.22 was $5,400,658. As of March 28, 2019, the registrant had 134,256,350 shares of its common stock, par value $0.001 per share, outstanding. Documents Incorporated By Reference: None . TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. PART I Item 1. Business 1 Item 1A. Risk Factors 4 Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments 16 Item 2. Properties 16 Item 3. Legal Proceedings 16 Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures PART II 17 Item 5. Market For Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities 17 Item 6. Selected Financial Data 22 Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation 22 Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 34 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data F-1 Item 9. Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure 35 Item 9A. Controls and Procedures 35 Item 9B. Other Information 35 PART III 36 Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance 36 Item 11. Executive Compensation 38 Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters 39 Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence 41 Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services 49 PART IV 50 Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statements Schedules 50 SIGNATURES 57 i SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS Included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are “forward-looking” statements, as well as historical information. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot assure you that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements will prove to be correct. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including matters described in the section titled “Risk Factors.” Forward-looking statements include those that use forward-looking terminology, such as the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “project,” “plan,” “will,” “shall,” “should,” and similar expressions, including when used in the negative. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable and achievable, these statements involve risks and uncertainties and we cannot assure you that actual results will be consistent with these forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to update or revise these forward-looking statements, whether to reflect events or circumstances after the date initially filed or published, to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events or otherwise. PART I Item 1. Business. Jerrick Media Holdings, Inc. (“we,” “us,” the “Company,” or “Jerrick Media”) (formerly Great Plains Holdings, Inc. or “GTPH”) was incorporated under the laws of the state of Nevada on December 30, 1999 under the name LILM, Inc. The Company changed its name on December 3, 2013 to Great Plains Holdings, Inc. as part of its plan to diversify its business through the acquisition and operation of commercial real estate, including, but not limited to, self-storage facilities, apartment buildings, 55+ senior manufactured home communities, and other income producing properties. Historically, the Company has principally engaged in the manufacture and marketing of the LiL Marc, a plastic boys’ toilet-training device, which we discontinued as of December 31, 2014. On February 5, 2016 (the “Closing Date”), GTPH, GPH Merger Sub, Inc., a Nevada corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of GTPH (“Merger Sub”), and Jerrick Ventures, Inc., a privately-held Nevada corporation headquartered in New Jersey (“Jerrick”), entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Agreement”) pursuant to which the Merger Sub was merged with and into Jerrick, with Jerrick surviving as a wholly-owned subsidiary of GTPH (the “Merger”). GTPH acquired, through a reverse triangular merger, all of the outstanding capital stock of Jerrick in exchange for issuing Jerrick’s shareholders (the “Jerrick Shareholders”), pro-rata, a total of 28,500,000 shares of GTPH’s common stock. GTPH assumed 33,415 shares of Jerrick’s Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Jerrick Series A Preferred”) and 8,064 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Jerrick Series B Preferred”). In connection with the Merger, on the Closing Date, GTPH and Kent Campbell entered into a Spin-Off Agreement (the “Spin-Off Agreement”), pursuant to which Mr. Campbell purchased from GTPH (i) all of GTPH’s interest in Ashland Holdings, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, and (ii) all of GTPH’s interest in Lil Marc, Inc., a Utah corporation, in exchange for the cancellation of 781,818 shares of GTPH’s Common Stock held by Mr. Campbell. In addition, Mr. Campbell assumed all debts, obligations and liabilities of GTPH, including any existing prior to the Merger, pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Spin-Off Agreement. Effective February 28, 2016, GTPH entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Statutory Merger Agreement”) with Jerrick, pursuant to which GTPH became the parent company of Jerrick Ventures, LLC, a wholly-owned operating subsidiary of Jerrick (the “Statutory Merger”). Upon closing of the Merger on February 5, 2016, the Company changed its business plan to that of Jerrick Media. On February 28, 2016, GTPH changed its name to Jerrick Media Holdings, Inc. to better reflect its new business strategy. 1 General Jerrick is a technology company focused on the development of digital communities, marketing of branded digital content, and e-commerce opportunities relative to particular communities. Jerrick’s flagship product is Vocal, a proprietary digital publishing platform, that enables creators of long form content and rich media to reach an engaged audience through a growing portfolio of genre-specific branded websites. Through Vocal and other associated social media channels and outlets, we produce and distribute a variety of digital media content. The content for each branded community in our portfolio and for distribution through other media channels, is derived from internal generation, user contributions, and external collaborations. The content includes, but is not limited to: videos, imagery, articles, e-books, film, and television projects. Revenue is generated in a variety of ways, including: (i) the sale of native advertising and marketing services related to our content, including but not limited to branded content campaigns and affiliate marketing; (ii) marketing and branding consulting; (iii) affiliate sales; (iv) platform processing fees; (v) the sale of genre-specific products related to our brands and, licensing of our content for download-to-own services; and (vi) royalties and production fees for original content, created for either film, television, or digital end-markets. Demand and pricing for our advertising depends on our user base and overall market conditions. We also drive additional demand through integrated sales of digital advertising inventory, through our marketing services, and by providing unique branded entertainment and custom sponsorship opportunities to our advertisers. Our advertising and e-commerce revenues may be affected by the strength of advertising markets and general economic conditions and may fluctuate depending on the success of our content, as measured by the number of people visiting our websites at any given time. Our Strategy We developed the Vocal platform, designed to develop and cost-effectively engage content creators, to enable them to reach their audience and monetize their content. In addition to providing relevant content, our technology is centered on efficiency and scalability, through a growing variety of topics, and output through a growing number of distribution methods. We believe our content-to-commerce model is an integral part of digital monetization. We focus on distribution of content through the Vocal platform that optimizes user-generated content through an algorithmically derived moderation process. Through the moderation process, we reduce manpower costs, and simultaneously increase our ability to publish content and rapidly produce genre-specific websites driven by usage data. Through these genre-specific websites, we are able to provide advertisers with a more transparent and targeted community for their brands, which we believe offers a very high value proposition. The Vocal platform and its proprietary technology can be white-labeled or licensed, to provide seamless integration to independent media companies and brands. We also use the Vocal platform for distribution and monetization of a substantial inventory of content featuring unpublished photographs, negatives, trademarks, videos, scripts, short stories, and articles across various genres. We believe we have a competitive advantage in the ownership of merchandising rights of such content which allows us to sell or license these properties. As part of our strategy, we develop transmedia assets internally, in collaboration with other production and media companies, as well as with our expanding user base. The transmedia assets we produce, such as film, television, digital shorts, books, and comic series can be leveraged beyond digital media and can be distributed across multiple platforms and formats. 2 Our Website Communities We developed genre-specific websites, designed to create self-sustaining communities, with each revolving around a specific topic or theme. The creation of these websites is driven by two factors: (i) the potential for monetization opportunities, and (ii) by the topical content provided by our users. Intellectual Property We regard our technology and other proprietary rights as essential to our business. We rely on trade secrets, confidentiality procedures, contract provisions, and trademark law to protect our technology and intellectual property. We also license technology from third parties. We have also entered into confidentiality agreements with our consultants and corporate partners and intend to control access to and distribution of our products, documentation, and other proprietary information. Protecting our Content from Copyright Theft The theft of pictures, video and other entertainment content presents a significant challenge to our industry, and we take many steps to address this concern. Where possible, we make use of technological protection tools, such as encryption, to protect our content. Notwithstanding these efforts and the many legal protections that exist to combat piracy, the proliferation of content theft and technological tools with which to carry it out continue to escalate. The failure to obtain enhanced legal protections and enforcement tools could make it more difficult for us to adequately protect our intellectual property, which could negatively impact its value. Competition We face competition in a number of aspects of our business, and particularly from other companies that seek to connect people with information on the web similar to ours, and provide them with relevant advertising. We believe we have a competitive advantage due to the underlying designs and processes of our platform Vocal. Competitive factors include community cohesion, interaction and size, website or mobile platform and application ease-of-use and accessibility, user engagement, system reliability, reliability of delivery and payment, and quality of content. Some current and potential competitors have longer operating histories, larger user bases and greater brand recognition in their respective internet sectors than we do. Other online sites with similar business models may be acquired by, receive investments from, or enter into other commercial relationships with well-established and well-financed companies. As a result, some of our competitors with other revenue sources may be able to devote more resources to marketing and promotional campaigns, adopt more aggressive pricing policies and devote more resources to website, mobile platforms and applications and systems development than we can. We also compete with destination websites that seek to increase their search-related traffic. These destination websites may include those operated by internet access providers, such as cable and DSL service providers. Because our users need to access our services through internet access providers, they have direct relationships with these providers. If an access provider or a computer or computing device manufacturer offers online services that compete with ours, the user may find it more convenient to use the services of the access provider or manufacturer. In addition, the access provider or manufacturer may make it hard to access our services by not listing them in the access provider’s or manufacturer’s own menu of offerings. Also, because the access provider gathers information from the user in connection with the establishment of a billing relationship, the access provider may be more effective than we are in tailoring services and advertisements to the specific tastes of the user. 3 There has been a trend toward industry consolidation among our competitor, and so smaller competitors today may become larger competitors in the future. If our competitors are more successful than we are at generating traffic, our revenues may decline. Employees As of April 1, 2019, we had 24 full-time employees, and 1 full-time contractors. None of our employees are subject to a collective bargaining agreement, and we believe that our relationship with our employees is good. Description of Property As of June 4, 2018, our corporate headquarters which houses operations and support personnel, is located at 2050 Center Ave, Suite 640, Fort Lee NJ 07024, an office consisting of a total of 2,300 square feet. The current lease term is effective June 5, 2018 through July 5, 2023, with monthly rent of $5,612 for the first year and increases at a rate of 3% for each subsequent year thereafter. Where You Can Find More Information Our corporate website address is located at https://jerrick.media/ . We do not intend our website address to be an active link or to otherwise incorporate by reference the contents of the website into this Report. The public may read and copy any materials the Company files with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0030. The SEC maintains an Internet website (http://www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. Item 1A. Risk Factors. RISK FACTORS RISKS RELATED TO JERRICK MEDIA’S BUSINESS doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern may hinder our ability to obtain future financing. As reflected in the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements, the Company had a net loss of approximately $11.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, and a working capital deficit and accumulated deficit of approximately $2.3 million and approximately $36.5 million respectively, at December 31, 2018. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern through April 1, 2020. The ability of the Company to continue its operations is dependent on management’s plans, which include the raising of capital through debt and/or equity markets with some additional funding from other traditional financing sources, including term notes, until such time that funds provided by operations are sufficient to fund working capital requirements. The Company may need to incur liabilities with certain related parties to sustain the Company’s existence. The Company will require additional funding to finance the growth of its current and expected future operations as well as to achieve its strategic objectives. The Company believes its current available cash, along with anticipated revenues, may be insufficient to meet its cash needs for the near future. There can be no assurance that financing will be available in amounts or terms acceptable to the Company, if at all. In response to these problems, management has taken the following actions: ● seeking additional third party debt and/or equity financing; ● execute a plan to recapitalize the company; 4 ● continue with the implementation of the business plan; ● generate new sales from international customers; and ● allocate sufficient resources to continue with advertising and marketing efforts. Based on the report from out independent auditors dated April 1, 2019, management stated that our financial statements for the period ended December 31, 2018, were prepared assuming that we would continue as a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recovery of the recorded assets or the classification of the liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. We are not profitable and may never be profitable. Since inception through the present, we have been dependent on raising capital to support our working capital needs. During this same period, we have recorded net accumulated losses and are yet to achieve profitability. Our ability to achieve profitability depends upon many factors, including our ability to develop and commercialize our websites. There can be no assurance that we will ever achieve any significant revenues or profitable operations. Our operating expenses exceed our revenues and will likely continue to do so for the foreseeable future. We are in an early stage of our development and we have not generated sufficient revenues to offset our operating expenses. Our operating expenses will likely continue to exceed our operating income for the foreseeable future, until such time as we are able to monetize our brands and generate substantial revenues, particularly as we undertake payment of the increased costs of operating as a public company. Our Operating subsidiary has a limited operating history. Our operating subsidiary has been in existence for approximately two years. Our limited operating history means that there is a high degree of uncertainty in our ability to: (i) develop and commercialize our products; (ii) achieve market acceptance; or (iii) respond to competition. Additionally, even if we do implement our business plan, we may not be successful. No assurances can be given as to exactly when, if at all, we will be able to recognize profits high enough to sustain our business. We face all the risks inherent in a new business, including the expenses, difficulties, complications, and delays frequently encountered in connection with conducting operations, including capital requirements. Given our limited operating history, we may be unable to effectively implement our business plan, which would result in a loss of your investment. WE have assumed A significant amount of debt and our operations may not be able to generate sufficient cash flows to meet our debt obligations, which could reduce our financial flexibility and adversely impact our operations. Currently the Company has considerable convertible notes, related party notes and lines of credit outstanding with various debtors. Our ability to make payments on such indebtedness will depend on our ability to generate cash flow. The Company may not generate sufficient cash flow from operations to enable us to repay this indebtedness and to fund other liquidity needs, including capital expenditure requirements. Such indebtedness could affect our operations in several ways, including the following: ● a significant portion of our cash flows could be required to be used to service such indebtedness; ● a high level of debt could increase our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions; ● any covenants contained in the agreements governing such outstanding indebtedness could limit our ability to borrow additional funds, dispose of assets, pay dividends and make certain investments; 5 ● a high level of debt may place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors that are less leveraged and, therefore, our competitors may be able to take advantage of opportunities that our indebtedness may prevent us from pursuing; and ● debt covenants to which we may agree may affect our flexibility in planning for, and reacting to, changes in the economy and in our industry. A high level of indebtedness increases the risk that we may default on our debt obligations. We may not be able to generate sufficient cash flows to pay the principal or interest on our debt. If we cannot service or refinance our indebtedness, we may have to take actions such as selling significant assets, seeking additional equity financing (which will result in additional dilution to stockholders) or reducing or delaying capital expenditures, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our operations and financial condition. If we do not have sufficient funds and are otherwise unable to arrange financing, our assets may be foreclosed upon which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We will need additional capital, which may be difficult to raise as a result of our limited operating history or any number of other reasons. We expect that we will have adequate financing for the next 6 months. However, in the event that we exceed our expected growth, we would need to raise additional capital. There is no assurance that additional equity or debt financing will be available to us when needed, on acceptable terms or even at all. Our limited operating history makes investor evaluation and an estimation of our future performance substantially more difficult. As a result, investors may be unwilling to invest in us or such investment may be on terms or conditions which are not acceptable. In the event that we are not able to secure financing, we may have to scale back our growth plans or cease operations. We depend on our key management personnel and the loss of their services could adversely affect our business. We place substantial reliance upon the efforts and abilities of Jeremy Frommer, our Chief Executive Officer, and our other executive officers and directors. Though no individual is indispensable, the loss of the services of these executive officers could have a material adverse effect on our business, operations, revenues or prospects. We do not currently maintain key man life insurance on the lives of these individuals. We have not adopted various corporate governance measures, and as a result stockholders may have limited protections against interested director transactions, conflicts of interest and similar matters. Recent Federal legislation, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, has resulted in the adoption of various corporate governance measures designed to promote the integrity of corporate management and the securities markets. Because our securities are not yet listed on a national securities exchange, we are not required to adopt these corporate governance measures and have not done so voluntarily in order to avoid incurring the additional costs associated with such measures. Among these measures is the establishment of independent committees of the Board of Directors. However, to the extent a public market develops for our securities, such legislation will require us to make changes to our current corporate governance practices. Those changes may be costly and time-consuming. Furthermore, the absence of the governance measures referred to above with respect to our Company may leave our shareholders with more limited protection in connection with interested director transactions, conflicts of interest and similar matters. We face intense competition. If we do not provide digital content that is useful to users, we may not remain competitive, and our potential revenues and operating results could be adversely affected. Our business is rapidly evolving and intensely competitive, and is subject to changing technologies, shifting user needs, and frequent introductions of new products and services. Our ability to compete successfully depends heavily on providing digital content that is useful and enjoyable for our users and delivering our content through innovative technologies in the marketplace. 6 We have many competitors in the digital content creation industry and media companies. Our current and potential competitors range from large and established companies to emerging start-ups. Established companies have longer operating histories and more established relationships with customers and users, and they can use their experience and resources in ways that could affect our competitive position, including by making acquisitions, investing aggressively in research and development, aggressively initiating intellectual property claims (whether or not meritorious) and competing aggressively for advertisers and websites. Emerging start-ups may be able to innovate and provide products and services faster than we can. Additionally, our operating results would suffer if our digital content is not appropriately timed with market opportunities, or if our digital content is not effectively brought to market. As technology continues to develop, our competitors may be able to offer user experiences that are, or that are seen to be, substantially similar to or better than ours. This may force us to compete in different ways and expend significant resources in order to remain competitive. If our competitors are more successful than we are in developing compelling content or in attracting and retaining users and advertisers, our revenues and operating results could be adversely affected. We face competition from traditional media companies, and we may not be included in the advertising budgets of large advertisers, which could harm our operating results. In addition to internet companies, we face competition from companies that offer traditional media advertising opportunities. Most large advertisers have set advertising budgets, a very small portion of which is allocated to Internet advertising. We expect that large advertisers will continue to focus most of their advertising efforts on traditional media. If we fail to convince these companies to spend a portion of their advertising budgets with us, or if our existing advertisers reduce the amount they spend on our programs, our operating results would be harmed. WE FACE RISKS ARISING FROM ACQUISITIONS. We may pursue strategic acquisitions in the future. Risks in acquisition transactions include difficulties in the integration of acquired businesses into our operations and control environment, difficulties in assimilating and retaining employees and intermediaries, difficulties in retaining the existing clients of the acquired entities, assumed or unforeseen liabilities that arise in connection with the acquired businesses, the failure of counterparties to satisfy any obligations to indemnify us against liabilities arising from the acquired businesses, and unfavorable market conditions that could negatively impact our growth expectations for the acquired businesses. Fully integrating an acquired company or business into our operations may take a significant amount of time. We cannot assure you that we will be successful in overcoming these risks or any other problems encountered with acquisitions and other strategic transactions. These risks may prevent us from realizing the expected benefits from acquisitions and could result in the failure to realize the full economic value of a strategic transaction or the impairment of goodwill and/or intangible assets recognized at the time of an acquisition. These risks could be heightened if we complete a large acquisition or multiple acquisitions within a short period of time. Our business depends on strong brands and relationships, and if we are not able to maintain our relationships and enhance our brands, our ability to expand our base of users, advertisers and affiliates will be impaired and our business and operating results could be harmed. Maintaining and enhancing our brands’ profiles may require us to make substantial investments and these investments may not be successful. If we fail to promote and maintain the brands’ profiles, or if we incur excessive expenses in this effort, our business and operating results could be harmed. We anticipate that, as our market becomes increasingly competitive, maintaining and enhancing our brands’ profiles may become increasingly difficult and expensive. Maintaining and enhancing our brands will depend largely on our ability to be a technology leader and to continue to provide attractive products and services, which we may not do successfully. 7 IF WE FAIL TO RETAIN EXISTING USERS OR ADD NEW USERS, OR IF OUR USERS DECREASE THEIR LEVEL OF ENGAGEMENT WITH OUR PRODUCTS, OUR REVENUE, FINANCIAL RESULTS, AND BUSINESS MAY BE SIGNIFICANTLY HARMED. The size of our user base and our user’s level of engagement are critical to our success. Our financial performance will be significantly determined by our success in adding, retaining, and engaging active users of our products, particularly Vocal. We anticipate that our active user growth rate will generally decline over time as the size of our active user base increases, and it is possible that the size of our active user base may fluctuate or decline in one or more markets, particularly in markets where we have achieved higher penetration rates. If people do not perceive Vocal to be useful, reliable, and trustworthy, we may not be able to attract or retain users or otherwise maintain or increase the frequency and duration of their engagement. A number of other content management systems and publishing platforms that achieved early popularity have since seen their active user bases or levels of engagement decline, in some cases precipitously. There is no guarantee that we will not experience a similar erosion of our active user base or engagement levels. Our user engagement patterns have changed over time, and user engagement can be difficult to measure, particularly as we introduce new and different products and services. Any number of factors could potentially negatively affect user retention, growth, and engagement, including if: ● users increasingly engage with other competitive products or services; ● we fail to introduce new features, products or services that users find engaging or if we introduce new products or services, or make changes to existing products and services, that are not favorably received; ● user behavior on any of our products changes, including decreases in the quality and frequency of content shared on our products and services; ● there are decreases in user sentiment due to questions about the quality or usefulness of our products or our user data practices, or concerns related to privacy and sharing, safety, security, well-being, or other factors; ● we are unable to manage and prioritize information to ensure users are presented with content that is appropriate, interesting, useful, and relevant to them; ● we are unable to obtain or attract engaging third-party content; ● users adopt new technologies where our products may be displaced in favor of other products or services, or may not be featured or otherwise available; ● there are changes mandated by legislation, regulatory authorities, or litigation that adversely affect our products or users; ● technical or other problems prevent us from delivering our products in a rapid and reliable manner or otherwise affect the user experience, such as security breaches or failure to prevent or limit spam or similar content; ● we adopt terms, policies, or procedures related to areas such as sharing, content, user data, or advertising that are perceived negatively by our users or the general public; 8 ● we elect to focus our product decisions on longer-term initiatives that do not prioritize near-term user growth and engagement; ● we make changes in how we promote different products and services across our family of apps; ● initiatives designed to attract and retain users and engagement are unsuccessful or discontinued, whether as a result of actions by us, third parties, or otherwise; ● we fail to provide adequate customer service to users, marketers, developers, or other partners; ● we, developers whose products are integrated with our products, or other partners and companies in our industry are the subject of adverse media reports or other negative publicity, including as a result of our or their user data practices; or ● our current or future products, such as our development tools and application programming interfaces that enable developers to build, grow, and monetize mobile and web applications, reduce user activity on our products by making it easier for our users to interact and share on third-party mobile and web applications. If we are unable to maintain or increase our user base and user engagement, our revenue and financial results may be adversely affected. Any decrease in user retention, growth, or engagement could render our products less attractive to users, marketers, and developers, which is likely to have a material and adverse impact on our revenue, business, financial condition, and results of operations. If our active user growth rate continues to slow, we will become increasingly dependent on our ability to maintain or increase levels of user engagement and monetization in order to drive revenue growth. IF WE ARE UNABLE TO PROTECT OUR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, THE VALUE OF OUR BRANDS AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS MAY BE DIMINISHED, AND OUR BUSINESS MAY BE ADVERSELY AFFECTED. We rely and expect to continue to rely on a combination of confidentiality, assignment, and license agreements with our employees, consultants, and third parties with whom we have relationships, as well as trademark, copyright, patent, trade secret, and domain name protection laws, to protect our proprietary rights. In the United States and internationally, we have filed various applications for protection of certain aspects of our intellectual property, and we currently hold a number of registered trademarks and issued patents in multiple jurisdictions and have acquired patents and patent applications from third parties. Third parties may knowingly or unknowingly infringe our proprietary rights, third parties may challenge proprietary rights held by us, and pending and future trademark and patent applications may not be approved. In addition, effective intellectual property protection may not be available in every country in which we operate or intend to operate our business. In any or all of these cases, we may be required to expend significant time and expense in order to prevent infringement or to enforce our rights. Although we have generally taken measures to protect our proprietary rights, there can be no assurance that others will not offer products or concepts that are substantially similar to ours and compete with our business. In addition, we regularly contribute software source code under open source licenses and have made other technology we developed available under other open licenses, and we include open source software in our products. If the protection of our proprietary rights is inadequate to prevent unauthorized use or appropriation by third parties, the value of our brands and other intangible assets may be diminished and competitors may be able to more effectively mimic our products, services, and methods of operations. Any of these events could have an adverse effect on our business and financial results. 9 WE ARE SUBJECT TO PAYMENT PROCESSING RISK. We accept payments using a variety of different payment methods, including credit and debit cards and direct debit. We rely on internal systems as well as those of third parties to process payments. Acceptance and processing of these payment methods are subject to certain certifications, rules and regulations. To the extent there are disruptions in our or third-party payment processing systems, material changes in the payment ecosystem, failure to recertify and/or changes to rules or regulations concerning payment processing, we could be subject to fines and/or civil liability, or lose our ability to accept credit and debit card payments, which would harm our reputation and adversely impact our results of operations. WE ARE SUBJECT TO RISK AS IT RELATES TO SOFTWARE THAT WE LICENSE FROM THIRD PARTIES. We license software from third parties, much of which is integral to our systems and our business. The licenses are generally terminable if we breach our obligations under the license agreements. If any of these relationships were terminated or if any of these parties were to cease doing business or cease to support the applications we currently utilize, we may be forced to spend significant time and money to replace the licensed software. FAILURES OR REDUCED ACCESSIBILITY OF THIRD-PARTY SOFTWARE ON WHICH WE RELY COULD IMPAIR THE AVAILABILITY OF OUR PLATFORM AND APPLICATIONS AND ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR BUSINESS. We license software from third parties for integration into our Vocal platform, including open source software. These licenses might not continue to be available to us on acceptable terms, or at all. While we are not substantially dependent upon any third-party software, the loss of the right to use all or a significant portion of our third-party software required for the development, maintenance and delivery of our applications could result in delays in the provision of our applications until we develop or identify, obtain and integrate equivalent technology, which could harm our business. Any errors or defects in the hardware or software we use could result in errors, interruptions, cyber incidents or a failure of our applications. Any significant interruption in the availability of all or a significant portion of such software could have an adverse impact on our business unless and until we can replace the functionality provided by these applications at a similar cost. Furthermore, this software may not be available on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. The loss of the right to use all or a significant portion of this software could limit access to our platform and applications. Additionally, we rely upon third parties’ abilities to enhance their current applications, develop new applications on a timely and cost-effective basis and respond to emerging industry standards and other technological changes. We may be unable to effect changes to such third-party technologies, which may prevent us from rapidly responding to evolving customer requirements. We also may be unable to replace the functionality provided by the third-party software currently offered in conjunction with our applications in the event that such software becomes obsolete or incompatible with future versions of our platform and applications or is otherwise not adequately maintained or updated. We need to manage growth in operations to maximize our potential growth and achieve our expected revenues and our failure to manage growth will cause a disruption of our operations, resulting in the failure to generate revenue. In order to maximize potential growth in our current and potential markets, we believe that we must expand our marketing operations. This expansion will place a significant strain on our management and our operational, accounting, and information systems. We expect that we will need to continue to improve our financial controls, operating procedures, and management information systems. We will also need to effectively train, motivate, and manage our employees. Our failure to manage our growth could disrupt our operations and ultimately prevent us from generating the revenues we expect. 10 In order to achieve the general strategies of our company we need to maintain and search for hard-working employees who have innovative initiatives, while at the same time, keep a close eye on any and all expanding opportunities in our marketplace. We plan to generate a significant portion of our revenues from advertising and affiliate sales relationships, and a reduction in spending by or loss of advertisers and general decrease in online spending could adversely harm our business. We plan to generate a substantial portion of our revenues from advertisers. Our advertisers may be able to terminate prospective contracts with us at any time. Advertisers will not continue to do business with us if their investment in advertising with us does not generate sales leads, and ultimately customers, or if we do not deliver their advertisements in an appropriate and effective manner. If we are unable to remain competitive and provide value to our advertisers, they may stop placing ads with us, which would adversely affect our revenues and business. In addition, expenditures by advertisers tend to be cyclical, reflecting overall economic conditions and budgeting and buying patterns. Adverse macroeconomic conditions can also have a material negative impact on the demand for advertising and cause our advertisers to reduce the amounts they spend on advertising, which could adversely affect our revenues and business. Security breaches could harm our business. Security breaches have become more prevalent in the technology industry. We believe that we take reasonable steps to protect the security, integrity and confidentiality of the information we collect, use, store and disclose, but there is no guarantee that inadvertent (e.g., software bugs or other technical malfunctions, employee error or malfeasance, or other factors) or unauthorized data access or use will not occur despite our efforts. Although we have not experienced any material security breaches to date, we may in the future experience attempts to disable our systems or to breach the security of our systems. Techniques used to obtain unauthorized access to personal information, confidential information and/or the systems on which such information are stored and/or to sabotage systems change frequently and generally are not recognized until launched against a target. As a result, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate preventative measures. If an actual or perceived security breach occurs, the market perception of our security measures could be harmed and we could lose sales and customers and/or suffer other negative consequences to our business. A security breach could adversely affect the digital content experience and cause the loss or corruption of data, which could harm our business, financial condition and operating results. Any failure to maintain the security of our infrastructure could result in loss of personal information and/or other confidential information, damage to our reputation and customer relationships, early termination of our contracts and other business losses, indemnification of our customers, financial penalties, litigation, regulatory investigations and other significant liabilities. In the event of a major third-party security incident, we may incur losses in excess of their insurance coverage. Moreover, if a high profile security breach occurs with respect to us or another digital entertainment company, our customers and potential customers may lose trust in the security of our business model generally, which could adversely impact our ability to retain existing customers or attract new ones. The laws and regulations concerning data privacy and data security are continually evolving; our or our platform providers’ actual or perceived failure to comply with these laws and regulations could harm our business. Customers view our content online, using third-party platforms and networks and on mobile devices. We collect and store significant amounts of information about our customers—both personally identifying and non-personally identifying information. We are subject to laws from a variety of jurisdictions regarding privacy and the protection of this player information. For example, the European Union (EU) has traditionally taken a broader view than the United States and certain other jurisdictions as to what is considered personal information and has imposed greater obligations under data privacy regulations. The U.S. Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) also regulates the collection, use and disclosure of personal information from children under 13 years of age. While none of our content is directed at children under 13 years of age, if COPPA were to apply to us, failure to comply with COPPA may increase our costs, subject us to expensive and distracting government investigations and could result in substantial fines. 11 Data privacy protection laws are rapidly changing and likely will continue to do so for the foreseeable future. The U.S. government, including the Federal Trade Commission and the Department of Commerce, is continuing to review the need for greater regulation over the collection of personal information and information about consumer behavior on the Internet and on mobile devices and the EU has proposed reforms to its existing data protection legal framework. Various government and consumer agencies worldwide have also called for new regulation and changes in industry practices. In addition, in some cases, we are dependent upon our platform providers to solicit, collect and provide us with information regarding our players that is necessary for compliance with these various types of regulations. Customer interaction with our content is subject to our privacy policy and terms of service. If we fail to comply with our posted privacy policy or terms of service or if we fail to comply with existing privacy-related or data protection laws and regulations, it could result in proceedings or litigation against us by governmental authorities or others, which could result in fines or judgments against us, damage our reputation, impact our financial condition and harm our business. If regulators, the media or consumers raise any concerns about our privacy and data protection or consumer protection practices, even if unfounded, this could also result in fines or judgments against us, damage our reputation, and negatively impact our financial condition and damage our business. In the area of information security and data protection, many jurisdictions have passed laws requiring notification when there is a security breach for personal data or requiring the adoption of minimum information security standards that are often vaguely defined and difficult to implement. Our security measures and standards may not be sufficient to protect personal information and we cannot guarantee that our security measures will prevent security breaches. A security breach that compromises personal information could harm our reputation and result in a loss of confidence in our products and ultimately in a loss of customers, which could adversely affect our business and impact our financial condition. This could also subject us to liability under applicable security breach-related laws and regulations and could result in additional compliance costs, costs related to regulatory inquiries and investigations, and an inability to conduct our business. CHANGES TO FEDERAL, STATE OR INTERNATIONAL LAWS OR REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO OUR COMPANY COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR BUSINESS. Our business is subject to a variety of federal, state and international laws and regulations, including those with respect privacy, data, and other laws. These laws and regulations, and the interpretation or application of these laws and regulations, could change. In addition, new laws or regulations affecting our business could be enacted. These laws and regulations are frequently costly to comply with and may divert a significant portion of management’s attention. If we fail to comply with these applicable laws or regulations, we could be subject to significant liabilities which could adversely affect our business. If any of our relationships with internet search websites terminate, if such websites’ methodologies are modified or if we are outbid by competitors, traffic to our websites could decline. We depend in part on various internet search websites, such as Google.com, Bing.com, Yahoo.com and other websites to direct a significant amount of traffic to our websites. Search websites typically provide two types of search results, algorithmic and purchased listings. Algorithmic listings generally are determined and displayed as a result of a set of unpublished formulas designed by search engine companies in their discretion. Purchased listings generally are displayed if particular word searches are performed on a search engine. We rely on both algorithmic and purchased search results, as well as advertising on other internet websites, to direct a substantial share of visitors to our websites and to direct traffic to the advertiser customers we serve. If these internet search websites modify or terminate their relationship with us or we are outbid by our competitors for purchased listings, meaning that our competitors pay a higher price to be listed above us in a list of search results, traffic to our websites could decline. Such a decline in traffic could affect our ability to generate advertising revenue and could reduce the desirability of advertising on our websites. 12 Our business involves risks of liability claims arising from our media content, which could adversely affect our ability to generate revenue and could increase our operating expenses. As a distributor of media content, we face potential liability for defamation, invasion of privacy, negligence, copyright or trademark infringement, obscenity, violation of rights of publicity and/or obscenity laws and other claims based on the nature and content of the materials distributed. These types of claims have been brought, sometimes successfully, against broadcasters, publishers, online services and other disseminators of media content. Any imposition of liability that is not covered by insurance or is in excess of our insurance coverage could have a material adverse effect on us. In addition, measures to reduce our exposure to liability in connection with content available through our internet websites could require us to take steps that would substantially limit the attractiveness of our internet websites and/or their availability in certain geographic areas, which could adversely affect our ability to generate revenue and could increase our operating expenses. Intellectual property litigation could expose us to significant costs and liabilities and thus negatively affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. We may be subject to claims of infringement of third party patents and trademarks and other violations of third party intellectual property rights. Intellectual property disputes are generally time-consuming and expensive to litigate or settle, and the outcome of such disputes is uncertain and difficult to predict. The existence of such disputes may require us to set-aside substantial reserves, and has the potential to significantly affect our overall financial standing. To the extent that claims against us are successful, they may subject us to substantial liability, and we may have to pay substantial monetary damages, change aspects of our business model, and/or discontinue any of our services or practices that are found to be in violation of another party’s rights. Such outcomes may severely restrict or hinder ongoing business operations and impact the value of our business. Successful claims against us could also result in us having to seek a license to continue our practices. Under such conditions, a license may or may not be offered or otherwise made available to us. If a license is made available to us, the cost of the license may significantly increase our operating burden and expenses, potentially resulting in a negative effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Although we have been and are currently involved in multiple areas of commerce, internet services, and high technology where there is a substantial risk of future patent litigation, we have not obtained insurance for patent infringement losses. If we are unsuccessful at resolving pending and future patent litigation in a reasonable and affordable manner, it could disrupt our business and operations, including by negatively impacting areas of commerce or putting us at a competitive disadvantage. If we are unable to obtain or maintain key website addresses, our ability to operate and grow our business may be impaired. Our website addresses, or domain names, are critical to our business. We currently own more than 415 domain names. However, the regulation of domain names is subject to change, and it may be difficult for us to prevent third parties from acquiring domain names that are similar to ours, that infringe our trademarks or that otherwise decrease the value of our brands. If we are unable to obtain or maintain key domain names for the various areas of our business, our ability to operate and grow our business may be impaired. We may have difficulty scaling and adapting our existing network infrastructure to accommodate increased traffic and technology advances or changing business requirements, which could cause us to incur significant expenses and lead to the loss of users and advertisers. To be successful, our network infrastructure has to perform well and be reliable. The greater the user traffic and the greater the complexity of our products and services, the more computer power we will need. We could incur substantial costs if we need to modify our websites or our infrastructure to adapt to technological changes. If we do not maintain our network infrastructure successfully, or if we experience inefficiencies and operational failures, the quality of our products and services and our users’ experience could decline. Maintaining an efficient and technologically advanced network infrastructure is particularly critical to our business because of the pictorial nature of the products and services provided on our websites. A decline in quality could damage our reputation and lead us to lose current and potential users and advertisers. Cost increases, loss of traffic or failure to accommodate new technologies or changing business requirements could harm our operating results and financial condition. 13 Because some of our brands contain adult content, companies providing products and services on which we rely may refuse to do business with us. Many companies that provide products and services we need are concerned that associating with us could lead to their becoming the target of negative publicity campaigns by public interest groups and boycotts of their products and services. As a result of these concerns, these companies may be reluctant to enter into or continue business relationships with us. There can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain our existing business relationships with the companies, domestic or international, that currently provide us with services and products. Our inability to maintain such business relationships, or to find replacement service providers, would materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. We could be forced to enter into business arrangements on terms less favorable to us than we might otherwise obtain, which could lead to our doing business with less competitive terms, higher transaction costs and more inefficient operations than if we were able to maintain such business relationships or find replacement service providers. Operating a network open to all internet users may result in legal consequences. Our Terms and Conditions clearly state that our network and services are only to be used by users who are over 13 years old. However, it is impractical to independently verify that all activity occurring on our network fits into this description. As such, we run the risk of federal and state law enforcement prosecution. Risks Related to FILTHY MEDIA Changes in laws regulating adult content could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Our brand, Filthy Media, presents content related to culture of erotic art. Regulation, investigations and prosecutions of adult content could prevent us from making such content available in certain jurisdictions and may otherwise have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Government officials may also place additional restrictions on adult content affecting the way people interact on the internet. The governments of some countries, such as China and India, have sought to limit the influence of other cultures by restricting the distribution of products deemed to represent foreign or “immoral” influences. Regulation aimed at limiting minors’ access to adult content both in the United States and abroad could also increase our cost of operations and introduce technological challenges by requiring development and implementation of age verification systems. U.S. government officials could amend or construe and seek to enforce more broadly or aggressively the adult content recordkeeping and labeling requirements set forth in 18 U.S.C. Section 2257 and its implementing regulations in a manner that is unfavorable to our business. Court rulings may place additional restrictions on adult content affecting how people interact on the internet, such as mandatory web labeling. RISKS RELATED TO OUR COMMON STOCK The price of our Common Stock may be subject to wide fluctuations. Even though we have our shares quoted on the OTCQB, a consistently active trading market for our Common Stock may not exist. You may not be able to sell your shares quickly or at the current market price if trading in our stock is not active. You may lose all or a part of your investment. The market price of our Common Stock may be highly volatile and subject to wide fluctuations in response to a variety of factors and risks, many of which are beyond our control. In addition to the risks noted elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, some of the other factors affecting our stock price may include: ● variations in our operating results; ● the level and quality of securities analysts’ coverage of our Common Stock; 14 ● announcements by us or our competitors of significant contracts, acquisitions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments; ● announcements by third parties of significant claims or proceedings against us; and ● future sales of our Common Stock. For these reasons, comparing our operating results on a period-to-period basis may not be meaningful, and you should not rely on past results as an indication of future performance. In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a public company’s securities, securities class action litigation has often been instituted against the public company. Regardless of its outcome, this type of litigation could result in substantial costs to us and a likely diversion of our management’s attention. You may not receive a positive return on your investment when you sell your shares and you may lose the entire amount of your investment. We may, in the future, issue additional SHARES OF COMMON STOCK, which would reduce investors’ percent of ownership and dilute our share value Our Articles of Incorporation authorize the issuance of 300,000,000 shares of Common Stock, and 20,000,000 shares of preferred stock. Currently the Company has issued 0 shares of Series A Preferred, 0 shares of Series B Preferred and 0 of Series D Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series D Preferred”). Additionally, the Company has issued warrants to purchase 116,333,122 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.20. As of April 1, 2019, the Series A Preferred, Series B Preferred and Series D Preferred, are convertible into 0 shares of the Company’s common stock, subject to adjustment. As of April 1, 2019, the Company has issued options exercisable into 17,649,990 shares. In addition, the Company has convertible notes outstanding that convert into 4,114,764 shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion rate of $0.20. Assuming all of the Company’s currently outstanding preferred stock be converted and all outstanding warrants and options be exercised and all convertible notes be converted, the Company would have to issue an additional 138,097,876 shares of common stock representing 102% of our current issued and outstanding common stock. The future issuance of this Common Stock would result in substantial dilution in the percentage of our Common Stock held by our then existing shareholders. We may value any Common Stock issued in the future on an arbitrary basis. The issuance of Common Stock for future services or acquisitions or other corporate actions may have the effect of diluting the value of the shares held by our investors, and might have an adverse effect on any trading market for our Common Stock. OUR COMMON SHARES ARE SUBJECT TO THE “PENNY STOCK” RULES OF THE SEC AND THE TRADING MARKET IN OUR SECURITIES IS LIMITED, WHICH MAKES TRANSACTIONS IN OUR STOCK CUMBERSOME AND MAY REDUCE THE VALUE OF AN INVESTMENT IN OUR STOCK. The Securities and Exchange Commission has adopted Rule 15g-9 which establishes the definition of a “penny stock,” for the purposes relevant to us, as any equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share or with an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. For any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, the rules require: (a) that a broker or dealer approve a person’s account for transactions in penny stocks; and (b) the broker or dealer receive from the investor a written agreement to the transaction, setting forth the identity and quantity of the penny stock to be purchased. In order to approve a person’s account for transactions in penny stocks, the broker or dealer must: (a) obtain financial information and investment experience objectives of the person; and (b) make a reasonable determination that the transactions in penny stocks are suitable for that person and the person has sufficient knowledge and experience in financial matters to be capable of evaluating the risks of transactions in penny stocks. The broker or dealer must also deliver, prior to any transaction in a penny stock, a disclosure schedule prescribed by the Commission relating to the penny stock market, which, in highlight form: (a) sets forth the basis on which the broker or dealer made the suitability determination, and (b) that the broker or dealer received a signed, written agreement from the investor prior to the transaction. Generally, brokers may be less willing to execute transactions in securities subject to the “penny stock” rules. This may make it more difficult for investors to dispose of our Common shares and cause a decline in the market value of our stock. 15 Disclosure also has to be made about the risks of investing in penny stocks in both public offerings and in secondary trading and about the commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative, current quotations for the securities and the rights and remedies available to an investor in cases of fraud in penny stock transactions. Finally, monthly statements have to be sent disclosing recent price information for the penny stock held in the account and information on the limited market in penny stocks. LIABILITY OF DIRECTORS FOR BREACH OF DUTY OF CARE IS LIMITED. According to Nevada law (NRS 78.138(7)), all Nevada corporations limit the liability of directors and officers, including acts not in good faith. Our stockholders’ ability to recover damages for fiduciary breaches may be reduced by this statute. In addition, we are obligated to indemnify our directors and officers regarding stockholder suits which they successfully defend (NRS 78.7502). BECAUSE WE DO NOT INTEND TO PAY ANY CASH DIVIDENDS ON OUR COMMON STOCK, OUR STOCKHOLDERS WILL NOT BE ABLE TO RECEIVE A RETURN ON THEIR SHARES UNLESS THEY SELL THEM. We intend to retain any future earnings to finance the development and expansion of our business. We do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our Common Stock in the foreseeable future. Unless we pay dividends, our stockholders will not be able to receive a return on their shares unless they sell them. There is no assurance that stockholders will be able to sell shares when desired. WE MAY ISSUE ADDITIONAL SHARES OF PREFERRED STOCK IN THE FUTURE THAT MAY ADVERSELY IMPACT YOUR RIGHTS AS HOLDERS OF OUR COMMON STOCK. Our articles of incorporation authorize us to issue up to issue up to 20,000,000 shares of preferred stock in various classes. As of April 1, 2019 there are 134,256,350 outstanding shares of common stock. Currently, the Company has issued 0 shares of Series A Preferred, 0 shares of Series B Preferred and 0 shares of Series D Preferred stock outstanding. As of April 1, 2019, our outstanding preferred stock is convertible into 0 shares of the Company’s Common Stock. Our board of directors will have the authority to fix and determine the relative rights and preferences of preferred shares, as well as the authority to issue additional shares, without further stockholder approval. As a result, our board of directors could authorize the issuance of a series of preferred stock that would grant to holders preferred rights to our assets upon liquidation, the right to receive dividends before dividends are declared to holders of our Common Stock, and the right to the redemption of such preferred shares, together with a premium, prior to the redemption of the Common Stock. To the extent that we do issue such additional shares of preferred stock, your rights as holders of Common Stock could be impaired thereby, including, without limitation, dilution of your ownership interests in us. In addition, shares of preferred stock could be issued with terms calculated to delay or prevent a change in control or make removal of management more difficult, which may not be in your interest as a holder of Common Stock. Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments. Not applicable. Item 2. Properties. Our corporate headquarters which houses operations and support personnel, is 2050 Center Ave, Suite 640, Fort Lee NJ 07024, an office consisting of a total of 2,300 square feet. The current lease term is effective through August 5, 2023, with monthly rent of $5,612.00 for the first year and increases at a rate of 3% for each subsequent year thereafter. Item 3. Legal Proceedings. We are not currently involved in any litigation that we believe could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. There is no action, suit, proceeding, inquiry or investigation before or by any court, public board, government agency, self-regulatory organization or body pending or, to the knowledge of the executive officers of our Company our subsidiary, threatened against or affecting our Company, our common stock, our subsidiary or of our Company’s or our Company’s subsidiary’ officers or directors in their capacities as such, in which an adverse decision could have a material adverse effect. Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures. Not applicable. 16 PART II Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities. (a) Market Information Our shares of Common Stock are quoted on the OTCQB under the symbol “JMDA”. Prior to March 3, 2016, our shares of Common Stock were quoted on the OTCQB under the symbol “GTPH”. The OTCQB is a quotation service that displays real-time quotes, last-sale prices, and volume information in over-the-counter (“OTC”) equity securities. An OTCQB equity security is not listed or traded on a national securities exchange. (b) Holders of Common Equity As of April 1, 2019, there were approximately 266 stockholders of record. An additional number of stockholders are beneficial holders of our Common Stock in “street name” through banks, brokers and other financial institutions that are the record holders. (c) Dividend Information We have not paid any cash dividends to our holders of common stock. The declaration of any future cash dividends is at the discretion of our board of directors and depends upon our earnings, if any, our capital requirements and financial position, our general economic conditions, and other pertinent conditions. It is our present intention not to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future, but rather to reinvest earnings, if any, in our business operations. (d) Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans There are currently 17,649,990 outstanding options to purchase our securities with a weighted exercise price of $0.42 per option. Currently, the Company has 350,010 available options to issue under its Plan (as defined below). The Company has accrued 500,000 options to be issued either under the 2015 Stock Incentive and Award Plan if and when the authorized shares under such plan are increased, or upon the approval of a new Stock Incentive and Award Plan, in both instances to be approved by the shareholders. Option Plan Pursuant to the Merger, on February 5, 2016, the Company assumed Jerrick’s 2015 Stock Incentive and Award Plan (the “Plan”) which provides for the issuance of up to 18,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The purpose of the Plan is to provide additional incentive to those officers, employees, consultants and non-employee directors of the Company and its parents, subsidiaries and affiliates whose contributions are essential to the growth and success of the Company’s business. Eligible recipients of option awards are employees, officers, consultants or directors (including non-employee directors) of the Company or of any parent, subsidiary or affiliate of the Company. Upon recommendation from the board or the Compensation Committee, the board has the authority to grant to any eligible recipient any options, restricted stock or other awards valued in whole or in part by reference to, or otherwise based on, our common stock. The provisions of each option granted need not be the same with respect to each option recipient. Option recipients shall enter into award agreements with us, in such form as the board shall determine. 17 The Plan shall be administered by the Compensation Committee consisting of two or more independent, non-employee and outside directors. In the absence of such a Committee, the board of the Company shall administer the Plan. Each Option shall contain the following material terms: (i) the purchase price of each share of Common Stock with respect to Incentive Options shall be determined by the Committee at the time of grant, shall not be less than 100% of the Fair Market Value (defined as the closing price on the final trading day immediately prior to the grant on the principal exchange or quotation system on which the Common Stock is listed or quoted, as applicable) of the Common Stock of the Company, provided that if the recipient of the Option owns more than ten percent (10%) of the total combined voting power of the Company, the exercise price shall be at least 110% of the Fair Market Value; (ii) The purchase price of each share of Common Stock purchasable under a Non-qualified Option shall be at least 100% of the Fair Market Value of such share of Common Stock on the date the Non-qualified Option is granted, unless the Committee, in its sole and absolute discretion, determines to set the purchase price of such Non-qualified Option below Fair Market Value. (iii) the term of each Option shall be fixed by the Committee, provided that such Option shall not be exercisable more than five (5) years after the date such Option is granted, and provided further that with respect to an Incentive Option, if the recipient owns more than ten percent (10%) of the total combined voting power of the Company, the Incentive Option shall not be exercisable more than five (5) years after the date such Incentive Option is granted; (iv) subject to acceleration in the event of a Change of Control of the Company (as further described in the Plan), the period during which the Options vest shall be designated by the Committee or, in the absence of any Option vesting periods designated by the Committee at the time of grant, shall vest and become exercisable in equal amounts on each fiscal quarter of the Company through the four (4) year anniversary of the date on which the Option was granted; (vi) no Option is transferable and each is exercisable only by the recipient of such Option except in the event of the death of the recipient; and (vii) with respect to Incentive Options, the aggregate Fair Market Value of Common Stock exercisable for the first time during any calendar year shall not exceed $100,000. Each award of Restricted Stock is subject to the following material terms: (i) no rights to an award of Restricted Stock are granted to the intended recipient of Restricted Stock unless and until the grant of Restricted Stock is accepted within the period prescribed by the Compensation Committee; (ii) Restricted Stock shall not be delivered until they are free of any restrictions specified by the Compensation Committee at the time of grant; (iii) recipients of Restricted Stock have the rights of a stockholder of the Company as of the date of the grant of the Restricted Stock; (iv) shares of Restricted Stock are forfeitable until the terms of the Restricted Stock grant have been satisfied or the employment with the Company is terminated; and (v) the Restricted Stock is not transferable until the date on which the Compensation Committee has specified such restrictions have lapsed. 18 (e) Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities During the year ended December 31, 2018, we issued securities that were not registered under the Securities Act, and were not previously disclosed in a Current Report on Form 8-K or Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as listed below. All of the securities discussed in this Item 5(e) were issued in reliance on the exemption under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act. The January 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement On January 16, 2018, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “January 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement”) with Rosen, whereby the Company issued Rosen a promissory note in the principal amount of $60,000 (the “January 2018 Rosen Note”). The January 2018 Rosen Note is secured by Jeremy Frommer, whereas upon default Mr. Frommer would owe his own personal default shares of the Company’s common stock to Rosen equal to the amount of principal outstanding divided by 0.20. Pursuant to the January 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement, the January 2018 Rosen Note bears interest at a rate of 6% per annum and is payable on the maturity date of January 31, 2018 (the “January 2018 Rosen Maturity Date”) at which time all outstanding principal, accrued and unpaid interest and other amounts due under the secured term loan in the principal amount of $1,000,000 issued by Mr. Rosen are due. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company repaid $60,000 in principal and $200 in interest and the loan is no longer outstanding. The January 2018 Gordon Loan Agreement On January 16, 2018, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “January 2018 Gordon Loan Agreement”) with Mr. Christopher Gordon (“Gordon”), whereby the Company issued Gordon a promissory note in the principal amount of $40,000 (the “January 2018 Gordon Note”). The January 2018 Gordon Note is secured by Jeremy Frommer, whereas upon default Mr. Frommer would owe his own personal default shares of the Company’s common stock to Gordon equal to the amount of principal outstanding divided by 0.20. Pursuant to the January 2018 Gordon Loan Agreement, the January 2018 Gordon Note bears interest at a rate of 6% per annum and payable on the maturity date of January 31, 2018 (the “January 2018 Gordon Maturity Date”) at which time all outstanding principal, accrued and unpaid interest and other amounts due under the January 2018 Gordon Note are due. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company repaid $40,000 in principal and $105 in interest and the loan is no longer outstanding. The February 2018 Note On February 8, 2018, the Company issued a convertible note to a third-party lender totaling $40,750 (the “February 2018 Note”). The February 2018 Note accrues interest at 18% per annum and matures with interest and principal both due on February 8, 2020. In addition, the Company issued a warrant to purchase 81,500 shares of Company common stock. The warrant entitles the holder to purchase the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.20 per share for a period of five years from the issue date. The Company recorded a $7,963 debt discount relating to the warrants issued to the investor based on the relative fair value of each equity instrument on the dates of issuance and an original issue discount of $5,298. The debt discount is being accreted over the life of the note. The February 2018 Note and accrued interest is convertible at a conversion price of $0.20 per share, subject to adjustment. During the year ended December 31, 2018 the Company repaid $40,750 of principal and $3,548 of unpaid interest and the loan is no longer outstanding. The First March 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement On March 4, 2018, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “First March 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement”) with Rosen, whereby the Company issued Rosen a promissory note in the principal amount of $10,000 (the “First March 2018 Rosen Note”). As additional consideration for entering in the First March 2018 Rosen Note Loan Agreement, the Company issued Rosen a five-year warrant to purchase 10,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.20 per share. Pursuant to the First March 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement, the First March 2018 Rosen Note bears interest at a rate of 12% per annum and is payable on the maturity date of March 19, 2018 (the “First March 2018 Rosen Maturity Date”) at which time all outstanding principal, accrued and unpaid interest and other amounts due under the First March 2018 Rosen Note was due. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company repaid $10,000 in principal and $260 in interest and the loan is no longer outstanding. 19 The Second March 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement On March 9, 2018, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “Second March 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement”) with Rosen, whereby the Company issued Rosen a promissory note in the principal amount of $15,000 (the “Second March 2018 Rosen Note”). As additional consideration for entering in the Second March 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement, the Company issued Rosen a five-year warrant to purchase 15,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.20 per share. Pursuant to the Second March 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement, the Second March 2018 Rosen Note bears interest at a rate of 12% per annum and is payable on the maturity date of March 24, 2018 (the “Second March 2018 Rosen Maturity Date”) at which time all outstanding principal, accrued and unpaid interest and other amounts due under the Second March 2018 Rosen Note was due. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company repaid $15,000 in principal and $365 in interest and the loan is no longer outstanding. The Third March 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement On March 13, 2018, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “Third March 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement”) with Rosen, whereby the Company issued Rosen a promissory note in the principal amount of $10,000 (the “Third March 2018 Rosen Note”). As additional consideration for entering in the Third March 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement, the Company issued Rosen a five-year warrant to purchase 10,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.20 per share. Pursuant to the Third March 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement, the Third March 2018 Rosen Note bears interest at a rate of 12% per annum and is payable on the maturity date of March 28, 2018 (the “Third March 2018 Rosen Maturity Date”) at which time all outstanding principal, accrued and unpaid interest and other amounts due under the Third March 2018 Rosen Note was due. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company repaid $10,000 in principal and $230 in interest and the loan is no longer outstanding. The May 2018 Schiller Loan Agreement On May 2, 2018, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “May 2018 Schiller Loan Agreement”) with Schiller, a member of the Board, whereby the Company issued Schiller a promissory note in the principal amount of $100,000 (the “May 2018 Schiller Note”). As additional consideration for entering in the May 2018 Schiller Loan Agreement, the Company issued Schiller a four-year warrant to purchase 300,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.20 per share. Pursuant to the May 2018 Schiller Loan Agreement, the May 2018 Schiller Note bears interest at a rate of 13% per annum and is payable on the maturity date of February 02, 2019 (the “May 2018 Schiller Maturity Date”). During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company converted $100,000 of principal and $4,369 of unpaid interest into the August 2018 Equity Raise (as defined below) and the loan is no longer outstanding. The June 2018 Frommer Loan Agreement On June 29, 2018, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “June 2018 Frommer Loan Agreement”) with Jeremy Frommer, an officer of the Company, whereby the Company issued Frommer a promissory note in the principal amount of $10,000 (the “June 2018 Frommer Note”). As additional consideration for entering in the June 2018 Frommer Note Loan Agreement, the Company issued Frommer a four-year warrant to purchase 30,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.20 per share. Pursuant to the June 2018 Frommer Loan Agreement, the June 2018 Frommer Note bears interest at a rate of 6% per annum and payable on the maturity date of August 17, 2018 (the “June 2018 Frommer Maturity Date”). On November 8, 2018 the Company executed an agreement that extended the maturity date of the June 2018 Frommer Loan Agreement to March 7, 2019. As part of the extension agreement, the Company issued Frommer an additional 40,854 warrants to purchase common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.30. On March 29, 2019, the Company executed an agreement to further extend the maturity date of the June 2018 Frommer Loan Agreement to May 15, 2019. 20 The First July 2018 Schiller Loan Agreement On July 3, 2018, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “First July 2018 Schiller Loan Agreement”) with Schiller, a member of the Board, whereby the Company issued Schiller a promissory note in the principal aggregate amount of $35,000 (the “First July 2018 Schiller Note”). As additional consideration for entering in the First July 2018 Schiller Loan Agreement, the Company issued Schiller a four-year warrant to purchase 75,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.20 per share. Pursuant to the agreement, the note bears interest at a rate of 6% per annum and payable on the maturity date of August 17, 2018. Subsequent to the balance sheet date, on November 8, 2018 the Company executed upon an agreement that extended the maturity date of this loan to March 7, 2019. As part of the extension agreement, the Company issued Schiller warrants to purchase 142,987 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.30. On March 29, the Company executed an agreement to further extend the maturity date of this loan to May 15, 2019. The Second July 2018 Schiller Loan Agreement On July 17, 2018, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “Second July 2018 Schiller Loan Agreement”) with Schiller, a member of the Board, whereby the Company issued Schiller a promissory note in the principal aggregate amount of $25,000 (the “Second July 2018 Schiller Note”). As additional consideration for entering in the Second July 2018 Schiller Loan Agreement, the Company issued Schiller a four-year warrant to purchase 75,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.20 per share. Pursuant to the Second July 2018 Schiller Loan Agreement, the Second July 2018 Schiller Note bears interest at a rate of 6% per annum and payable on the maturity date of August 17, 2018. On November 8, 2018 the Company executed upon an agreement that extended the maturity date of this loan to March 7, 2019. As part of the extension agreement, the Company issued Schiller warrants to purchase 101,900 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.30. On March 29, the Company executed an agreement to further extend the maturity date of this loan to May 15, 2019. The First July 2018 Rosen Loan Agreements On July 12, 2018, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “First July 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement”) with Rosen, whereby the Company issued Rosen a promissory note in the principal aggregate amount of $10,000 (the “First July 2018 Rosen Note”). Pursuant to the First July 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement, the note bears interest at a rate of 6% per annum and payable on the maturity date of August 17, 2018. Subsequent to the On November 8, 2018 the Company executed upon an agreement that extended the maturity date of this loan to March 7, 2019. As part of the extension agreement, the Company issued Rosen warrants to purchase 27,534 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.30. On March 29, the Company executed an agreement to further extend the maturity date of this loan to May 15, 2019. The Second July 2018 Rosen Loan Agreements On July 18, 2018, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “Second July 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement”) with Rosen, whereby the Company issued Rosen a promissory note in the principal aggregate amount of $50,000 (the “Second July 2018 Rosen Note”) resulting from the conversion of a demand note (as described below). As additional consideration for entering into the Second July 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement, the Company issued Rosen a four-year warrant to purchase 150,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.20 per share. The Second July 2018 Rosen Note bears interest at a rate of 6% per annum and payable on the maturity date of August 17, 2018. On November 8, 2018 the Company executed upon an agreement that extended the maturity date of this loan to March 7, 2019. As part of the extension agreement, the Company issued Rosen warrants to purchase 203,967 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.30. On March 29, the Company executed an agreement to further extend the maturity date of this loan to May 15, 2019. The November 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement On November 29, 2018, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “November 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement”) with Rosen, whereby the Company issued Rosen a promissory note in the principal amount of $25,000 (the “November 2018 Rosen Note”). As additional consideration for entering in the November 2018 Rosen Note Loan Agreement, the Company issued Rosen a four-year warrant to purchase 25,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.30 per share. The November 2018 Rosen Note bears interest at a rate of 6% per annum and is payable on the maturity date of December 23, 2018. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company repaid $25,000 of principal and $33 of unpaid interest and the loan is no longer outstanding. 21 The December 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement On December 27, 2018, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “December 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement”) with Rosen, whereby the Company issued Rosen a promissory note in the principal amount of $75,000 (the “December 2018 Rosen Note”). As additional consideration for entering in the December 2018 Rosen Note Loan Agreement, the Company issued Rosen a four-year warrant to purchase 75,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.30 per share. The December 2018 Rosen Note bears interest at a rate of 6% per annum and is payable on the maturity date of January 26, 2019. On March 29, the Company executed an agreement to further extend the maturity date of this loan to May 15, 2019. The December 2018 Gravitas Capital Loan Agreement On December 27, 2018, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “December 2018 Gravitas Capital Loan Agreement”) with Gravitas Capital, whereby the Company issued Gravitas Capital a promissory note in the principal amount of $50,000 (the “December 2018 Gravitas Capital Note”). As additional consideration for entering in the December 2018 Gravitas Capital Note Loan Agreement, the Company issued Gravitas Capital a four-year warrant to purchase 50,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.30 per share. The December 2018 Gravitas Capital Note bears interest at a rate of 6% per annum and is payable on the maturity date of January 27, 2019. In January 2019, the Company repaid $50,000 in principal and $250 in interest, and the loan is no longer outstanding. Item 6. Selected Financial Data. As a Smaller Reporting Company, the Company is not required to include the disclosure under this Item 6 Selected Financial Data. Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. THE FOLLOWING DISCUSSION OF OUR PLAN OF OPERATION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS SHOULD BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND RELATED NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED ELSEWHERE IN THIS REPORT. THIS DISCUSSION CONTAINS FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS THAT RELATE TO FUTURE EVENTS OR OUR FUTURE FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE. THESE STATEMENTS INVOLVE KNOWN AND UNKNOWN RISKS, UNCERTAINTIES AND OTHER FACTORS THAT MAY CAUSE OUR ACTUAL RESULTS, LEVELS OF ACTIVITY, PERFORMANCE OR ACHIEVEMENTS TO BE MATERIALLY DIFFERENT FROM ANY FUTURE RESULTS, LEVELS OF ACTIVITY, PERFORMANCE OR ACHIEVEMENTS EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED BY THESE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. THESE RISKS AND OTHER FACTORS INCLUDE, AMONG OTHERS, THOSE LISTED UNDER “FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS” AND “RISK FACTORS” AND THOSE INCLUDED ELSEWHERE IN THIS REPORT. Overview We intend for this discussion to provide information that will assist in understanding our financial statements, the changes in certain key items in those financial statements, and the primary factors that accounted for those changes, as well as how certain accounting principles affect our financial statements. This discussion should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and accompanying notes for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, included elsewhere in this report. The Company develops technology-based solutions designed to solve for challenges that have resulted from disruption within the broad digital media and content generation business environment. Jerrick’s flagship product Vocal is a long-form, digital publishing platform focused on supporting content creators with content management tools that are embedded within digital communities. Vocal is architected to enable targeted marketing of branded content and e-commerce opportunities in long-form content. 22 Vocal serves as a versatile home for content creators and brands. The platform supports multiple forms of content such as: short videos, podcasts, music, and written word. We partner with content creators and brands that recognize difficulties inherent in the digital advertising space and can benefit from branded content marketing opportunities available on publishing platforms like Vocal. During the first half of Fiscal Year 2019, Jerrick plans to launch additional revenue lines, including brand subscriptions to access the platform and its community of creators as well as a subscription model for content creator upgrade tools. The Company also intends to release further enhancements to the Vocal editor and introduce additional social and user analytics features. Further, in 2019 the Company plans to introduce Software as a Service (SaaS) subscriptions to the Vocal platform. Results of Operations Liquidity and Capital Resources The following table summarizes total current assets, liabilities and working capital at December 31, 2018 compared to December 31, 2017: December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017 Increase / (Decrease) Current Assets $ 6,500 $ 112,376 $ (105,876 ) Current Liabilities $ 2,569,584 $ 3,687,200 $ (1,117,616 ) Working Capital Deficit $ (2,563,084 ) $ (3,574,824 ) $ 1,011,740 At December 31, 2018, we had a working capital deficit of $2,563,084 as compared to a working capital deficit of $3,574,824 at December 31, 2017, a decrease of $1,011,740. The decrease is primarily attributable to the decrease in accounts payable and other accrued expenses, demand loan, line of credit and notes payable. These were offset by a decrease in cash. Net Cash Net cash used in operating activities for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, was $4,972,814 and $3,852,552, respectively. The net loss for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 was $12,013,542 and $8,751,586, respectively. This change is primarily attributable to the net loss for the current period offset by share-based payments in the amount of $346,954 to employees and consultants for services rendered, the accretion of debt discount and debt issuance costs of $2,090,286 due to the incentives given with debentures, and a loss on extinguishment of debt of 3,610,049, and a gain on settlement of debt of $16,257 for the incentives given to amend or convert debt in addition to a change in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $1,039,690. These increases were offset by gain on settlement of vendor liabilities of $122,886 and a change in accounts receivable of $5,175 during the year ended December 31, 2018. Net cash used in investing activities for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 was $27,605 and $14,662, respectively. This change is attributable to the cash paid for leasehold improvements. Net cash provided by financing activities for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 was $4,889,368 and $3,803,771. During the 2018 period, the Company was predominantly financed by issuance of common stock, debt and related party notes of $2,787,462, $2,366,987 and $764,852, respectively to fund operations. These increases were offset by repayment of line of credit, notes and related party notes of $44,996, $491,189 and $205,000, respectively. The Company also paid $166,761 and $35,115 for debt issuance and stock issuance costs during the year ended December 31, 2018. 23 Summary of Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2018 and 2017: Year Ended December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017 Revenue $ 80,898 $ 95,653 Gross Margin $ 80,898 $ 95,653 Operating Expenses $ (5,767,153 ) $ (5,657,981 ) Loss from operations $ (5,686,255 ) $ (5,562,328 ) Other Expenses $ (6,327,287 ) $ (3,189,258 ) Net loss $ (12,013,542 ) $ (8,751,586 ) Loss per common share – basic and diluted $ (0.21 ) $ (0.23 ) Revenue Revenue was $80,898 for the year ended December 31, 2018, as compared to $95,653 for the comparable year ended December 31, 2017, a decrease of $14,755. The decrease in revenue is primarily attributable to the Company’s transitioning from legacy businesses to generating revenue through native advertising, branded marketing, and affiliate sales, resulting from the creation of genre specific, user generated content community websites. As part of that transition, the Company focused its efforts throughout 2018 on the development of its proprietary Vocal software platform to support the scalability of its business model. Operating Expenses Operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2018 were $5,767,153 as compared to $5,657,981 for the year ended December 31, 2017. The increase of $109,172 in operating expenses is the result of an increase in consulting fees, offset by a reduction in employee compensation. Loss from Operations Loss from operations for the year ended December 31, 2018 was $5,686,255 as compared to loss of $5,562,328 for the year ended December 31, 2017. The increase in the loss from operations is primarily due to increased expenses due to the continued development of the Vocal platform and relocation expenses, offset by a Company-wide effort to reduce operating expenses while creating efficiencies in the revenue generating process. Other Income (Expenses) Other income (expenses) for the year ended December 31, 2018 was $(6,327,287) as compared to $(3,189,258) for the year ended December 31, 2017. Other expenses during the year ended December 31, 2018 was comprised of interest expense of $(923,008) on notes and related party notes, accretion of debt discount and issuance cost of $(2,090,286) due to the incentives given with debentures, loss on extinguishment of debt of $(3,453,137), and a gain on settlement of liabilities of $139,144 for the incentives given to amend or convert debt. During the year ended December 31, 2017, other expenses were comprised of interest expense of $(477,005) on notes and related party notes and accretion of debt discount and issuance cost of $(1,828,027) due to the incentives given with debentures, gain on extinguishment of liabilities of $169,984 for the incentives given to amend or convert debt. Net Loss Net loss attributable to common shareholder for year ended December 31, 2018, was $14,204,408, or loss per share of $0.21, as compared to a net loss of $9,048,909, or loss per share of $0.23, for the year ended December 31, 2017. Inflation did not have a material impact on the Company’s operations for the applicable period. Other than the foregoing, management knows of no trends, demands, or uncertainties that are reasonably likely to have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations. 24 Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements As of December 31, 2018, we have no off-balance sheet arrangements. Critical Accounting Policies We believe that the following accounting policies are the most critical to aid you in fully understanding and evaluating this “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation.” Use of Estimates We use estimates and assumptions in preparing financial statements. Those estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, and the reported revenues and expenses. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Fair Value Measurements The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount that could be received upon the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Financial assets are marked to bid prices and financial liabilities are marked to offer prices. Fair value measurements do not include transaction costs. A fair value hierarchy is used to prioritize the quality and reliability of the information used to determine fair values. Categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The fair value hierarchy is defined into the following three categories: Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities; Level 2 – Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are either directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3 – Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing. The Company recognizes income and expenses based on the accrual method of accounting. Income Taxes The Company utilizes the liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under the liability method deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between financial reporting and the tax bases of the assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect, when the differences are expected to reverse. An allowance against deferred tax assets is recorded when it is more likely than not that such tax benefits will not be realized. Derivative Liability The Company evaluates its debt and equity issuances to determine if those contracts or embedded components of those contracts qualify as derivatives to be separately accounted for in accordance with paragraph 815-10-05-4 and Section 815-40-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. The result of this accounting treatment is that the fair value of the embedded derivative is marked-to-market each balance sheet date and recorded as either an asset or a liability. In the event that the fair value is recorded as a liability, the change in fair value is recorded in the consolidated statement of operations as other income or expense. Upon conversion, exercise or cancellation of a derivative instrument, the instrument is marked to fair value at the date of conversion, exercise or cancellation and then the related fair value is reclassified to equity. In circumstances where the embedded conversion option in a convertible instrument is required to be bifurcated and there are also other embedded derivative instruments in the convertible instrument that are required to be bifurcated, the bifurcated derivative instruments are accounted for as a single, compound derivative instrument. The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is re-assessed at the end of each reporting period. Equity instruments that are initially classified as equity that become subject to reclassification are reclassified to liability at the fair value of the instrument on the reclassification date. Derivative instrument liabilities will be classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlement of the derivative instrument is expected within 12 months of the balance sheet date. 25 The Company adopted Section 815-40-15 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Section 815-40-15”) to determine whether an instrument (or an embedded feature) is indexed to the Company’s own stock. Section 815-40-15 provides that an entity should use a two-step approach to evaluate whether an equity-linked financial instrument (or embedded feature) is indexed to its own stock, including evaluating the instrument’s contingent exercise and settlement provisions. The Company utilizes an option pricing model to compute the fair value of the derivative and to mark to market the fair value of the derivative at each balance sheet date. The Company records the change in the fair value of the derivative as other income or expense in the consolidated statements of operations. Adoption of ASU 2017-11 As noted above, in connection with the securities purchase agreement and debt transactions during the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company issued warrants and convertible notes, to purchase common stock with an exercise price of $0.20 and a five-year term. Upon issuance of the warrants and convertible notes, the Company evaluated the note agreement to determine if the agreement contained any embedded components that would qualify the agreement as a derivative. The Company identified certain equity-linked financial instrument (or embedded feature) is indexed to its own stock, including evaluating the instrument’s contingent exercise and settlement provisions, requiring the Company to classify the warrants and convertible notes as a derivative liability. The Company changed its method of accounting for the convertible notes and warrants through the early adoption of ASU 2017-11 during the year ended December 31, 2017 on a retrospective basis. Accordingly, the Company recorded the warrant derivative and conversion option derivative liabilities to additional paid in capital upon issuance. Stock Based Compensation All stock-based payments to employees, non-employee consultants, and to nonemployee directors for their services as directors, including any grants of restricted stock and stock options, are measured at fair value on the grant date and recognized in the statements of operations as compensation or other expense over the relevant service period. Stock-based payments to nonemployees are recognized as an expense over the period of performance. Such payments are measured at fair value at the earlier of the date a performance commitment is reached or the date performance is completed. In addition, for awards that vest immediately and are non-forfeitable the measurement date is the date the award is issued. Recent Accounting Pronouncements Management of the Company is responsible for the selection and use of appropriate accounting policies and the appropriateness of accounting policies and their application. Critical accounting policies and practices are those that are both most important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition and results and require management’s most difficult, subjective, or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effects of matters that are inherently uncertain. The Company’s significant and critical accounting policies and practices are disclosed below as required by generally accepted accounting principles. Basis of Presentation - Interim Financial Information The Company’s consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”) and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). 26 Use of Estimates and Assumptions and Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Critical accounting estimates are estimates for which (a) the nature of the estimate is material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change and (b) the impact of the estimate on financial condition or operating performance is material. The Company’s critical accounting estimates and assumptions affecting the financial statements were: (i) Assumption as a going concern: Management assumes that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. (ii) Fair value of long-lived assets: Fair value is generally determined using the asset’s expected future discounted cash flows or market value, if readily determinable. If long-lived assets are determined to be recoverable, but the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives are shorter than originally estimated, the net book values of the long-lived assets are depreciated over the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives. The Company considers the following to be some examples of important indicators that may trigger an impairment review: (i) significant under-performance or losses of assets relative to expected historical or projected future operating results; (ii) significant changes in the manner or use of assets or in the Company’s overall strategy with respect to the manner or use of the acquired assets or changes in the Company’s overall business strategy; (iii) significant negative industry or economic trends; (iv) increased competitive pressures; (v) a significant decline in the Company’s stock price for a sustained period of time; and (vi) regulatory changes. The Company evaluates acquired assets for potential impairment indicators at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of such events. (iii) Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets: Management assumes that the realization of the Company’s net deferred tax assets resulting from its net operating loss (“NOL”) carry–forwards for Federal income tax purposes that may be offset against future taxable income was not considered more likely than not and accordingly, the potential tax benefits of the net loss carry-forwards are offset by a full valuation allowance. Management made this assumption based on (a) the Company has incurred recurring losses, (b) general economic conditions, and (c) its ability to raise additional funds to support its daily operations by way of a public or private offering, among other factors. (iv) Estimates and assumptions used in valuation of equity instruments: Management estimates expected term of share options and similar instruments, expected volatility of the Company’s common shares and the method used to estimate it, expected annual rate of quarterly dividends, and risk-free rate(s) to value share options and similar instruments. These significant accounting estimates or assumptions bear the risk of change due to the fact that there are uncertainties attached to these estimates or assumptions, and certain estimates or assumptions are difficult to measure or value. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Management regularly evaluates the key factors and assumptions used to develop the estimates utilizing currently available information, changes in facts and circumstances, historical experience and reasonable assumptions. After such evaluations, if deemed appropriate, those estimates are adjusted accordingly. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Principles of Consolidation The Company consolidates all majority-owned subsidiaries, if any, in which the parent’s power to control exists. 27 As of December 31, 2018, the Company’s consolidated subsidiaries and/or entities are as follows: Name of combined affiliate State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization Company interest Jerrick Ventures LLC The State of Delaware 100 % Jerrick Australia Pty Ltd Australia 100 % All inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated. Jerrick Australia Pty Ltd does not have any operations. Fair Value of Financial Instruments The Company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 820-10-35-37”) to measure the fair value of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in U.S. GAAP and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three (3) broad levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The three (3) levels of fair value hierarchy defined by Paragraph 820-10-35-37 are described below: Level 1 Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date. Level 2 Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date. Level 3 Pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data. Financial assets are considered Level 3 when their fair values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. If the inputs used to measure the financial assets and liabilities fall within more than one level described above, the categorization is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument. The carrying amount of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash, prepaid expenses, accounts payable and accrued liabilities and accrued liquidating damages approximate their fair value because of the short maturity of those instruments. Transactions involving related parties cannot be presumed to be carried out on an arm’s-length basis, as the requisite conditions of competitive, free-market dealings may not exist. Representations about transactions with related parties, if made, shall not imply that the related party transactions were consummated on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arm’s-length transactions unless such representations can be substantiated. Cash Equivalents The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. The Company minimizes its credit risk associated with cash by periodically evaluating the credit quality of its primary financial institution. The balance at times may exceed federally insured limits. 28 Property and Equipment Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Expenditures for major additions and betterments are capitalized. Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. Depreciation is computed by the straight-line method (after taking into account their respective estimated residual values) over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets as follows: Estimated Useful Life (Years) Computer equipment and software 3 Furniture and fixture 5 Leasehold improvements 5 Upon sale or retirement of property and equipment, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in the consolidated statements of operations. Investments - Cost Method, Equity Method and Joint Venture In accordance with sub-topic 323-10 of the FASB ASC (“Sub-topic 323-10”), the Company accounts for investments in common stock of an investee for which the Company has significant influence in the operating or financial policies even though the Company holds 50% or less of the common stock or in-substance common stock. On January 2, 2013, the Company purchased a minority interest in a business for proceeds of $83,333. The interest is accounted for under the cost method. The Company tests the carrying value annually for impairment. The company recorded an impairment of minority investment of $83,333 during the year ended December 31, 2017. Commitments and Contingencies The Company follows subtopic 450-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report accounting for contingencies. Certain conditions may exist as of the date the consolidated financial statements are issued, which may result in a loss to the Company, but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. The Company assesses such contingent liabilities, and such assessment inherently involves an exercise of judgment. In assessing loss contingencies related to legal proceedings that are pending against the Company or un-asserted claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company evaluates the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or un-asserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought therein. If the assessment of a contingency indicates that it is probable that a material loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be estimated, then the estimated liability would be accrued in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. If the assessment indicates that a potential material loss contingency is not probable but is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, and an estimate of the range of possible losses, if determinable and material, would be disclosed. Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which case the guarantees would be disclosed. Derivative Liability The Company evaluates its debt and equity issuances to determine if those contracts or embedded components of those contracts qualify as derivatives to be separately accounted for in accordance with paragraph 815-10-05-4 and Section 815-40-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. The result of this accounting treatment is that the fair value of the embedded derivative is marked-to-market each balance sheet date and recorded as either an asset or a liability. In the event that the fair value is recorded as a liability, the change in fair value is recorded in the consolidated statement of operations as other income or expense. Upon conversion, exercise or cancellation of a derivative instrument, the instrument is marked to fair value at the date of conversion, exercise or cancellation and then the related fair value is reclassified to equity. 29 In circumstances where the embedded conversion option in a convertible instrument is required to be bifurcated and there are also other embedded derivative instruments in the convertible instrument that are required to be bifurcated, the bifurcated derivative instruments are accounted for as a single, compound derivative instrument. The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is re-assessed at the end of each reporting period. Equity instruments that are initially classified as equity that become subject to reclassification are reclassified to liability at the fair value of the instrument on the reclassification date. Derivative instrument liabilities will be classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlement of the derivative instrument is expected within 12 months of the balance sheet date. The Company adopted Section 815-40-15 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Section 815-40-15”) to determine whether an instrument (or an embedded feature) is indexed to the Company’s own stock. Section 815-40-15 provides that an entity should use a two-step approach to evaluate whether an equity-linked financial instrument (or embedded feature) is indexed to its own stock, including evaluating the instrument’s contingent exercise and settlement provisions. The Company changed its method of accounting for the debt and warrants through the early adoption of ASU 2017-11 during the year ended December 31, 2017 on a retrospective basis. The Company utilizes an option pricing model to compute the fair value of the derivative and to mark to market the fair value of the derivative at each balance sheet date. The Company records the change in the fair value of the derivative as other income or expense in the condensed consolidated statements of operations. Revenue Recognition On January 1, 2018, we adopted Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 605, Revenue Recognition (Topic 605), using the modified retrospective transition method applied to those contracts which were not completed as of January 1, 2018. Results for reporting periods beginning after January 1, 2018 are presented under Topic 606, while prior period amounts have not been adjusted and continue to be reported in accordance with our historic accounting under Topic 605. The impact of adopting the new revenue standard was not material to our condensed consolidated financial statements and there was no adjustment to beginning retained earnings on January 1, 2018. Under Topic 606, revenue is recognized when control of the promised goods or services is transferred to our customers, in an amount that reflects the consideration we expect to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. We determine revenue recognition through the following steps: ● identification of the contract, or contracts, with a customer; ● identification of the performance obligations in the contract; ● determination of the transaction price; ● allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and ● recognition of revenue when, or as, we satisfy a performance obligation. Revenue disaggregated by revenue source for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 consists of the following: Year Ended December 31, 2018 2017 Branded content $ 60,485 14,190 Affiliate sales 11,553 10,016 Other revenue 8,860 71,447 $ 80,898 $ 95,653 Branded Content Branded content represents the revenue recognized from the Company’s obligation to create and publish branded articles for the Client on the Vocal platform and promote said stories, tracking engagement for the Client. The performance obligation is satisfied when the Company successfully publishes the articles on its platform and meets any required promotional milestones as per the contract. The revenue is recognized over time as the services are performed. Below are the significant components of a typical agreement pertaining to branded content revenue: ● The Company will collect fixed fees ranging from $1,000 to $15,000 ● The articles are created and published within three months of the signed agreement, or as previously negotiated with the Client 30 ● The articles are promoted per the contract and engagement reports are provided to the Client ● The Client pays 50% at signing and 50% upon completion ● Most contracts include provisions for Clients to acquire content rights at the end of the campaign for a flat fee Affiliate sales Affiliate sales represents the commission the Company receives when a purchase is made through affiliate links placed within content hosted on the Vocal platform. Affiliate revenue is earned on a "click through" basis, upon referring visitors, via said links, to an affiliate's site and having them complete a specific outcome, most commonly a product purchase. The Company uses multiple affiliate platforms, such as Skimlinks, to form and maintain thousands of vendor relationships. Each vendor establishes their own commission percentage, which typically range from 2-20%. The revenue is recognized upon receipt as reliable estimates could not be made. Deferred Revenue Deferred revenue consists of billings and payments from clients in advance of revenue recognition. As of December 31, 2018, the Company had deferred revenue of $9,005. The Company will typically record this as revenue within the next three months as the performance obligations are met. Accounts Receivable and Allowances Accounts receivable are recorded and carried when the Company uploads the articles and reaches the required number of views on the platform. We make estimates for the allowance for doubtful accounts and allowance for unbilled receivables based upon our assessment of various factors, including historical experience, the age of the accounts receivable balances, credit quality of our customers, current economic conditions, and other factors that may affect our ability to collect from customers. The Company did not record an allowance during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017. Stock-Based Compensation The Company recognizes compensation expense for all equity–based payments granted to employees in accordance with ASC 718 “Compensation – Stock Compensation”. Under fair value recognition provisions, the Company recognizes equity–based compensation net of an estimated forfeiture rate and recognizes compensation cost only for those shares expected to vest over the requisite service period of the award. Restricted stock awards are granted at the discretion of the Company. These awards are restricted as to the transfer of ownership and generally vest over the requisite service periods, typically over a five-year period (vesting on a straight–line basis). The fair value of a stock award is equal to the fair market value of a share of Company stock on the grant date. The fair value of an option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black–Scholes option valuation model. The Black–Scholes option valuation model requires the development of assumptions that are inputs into the model. These assumptions are the value of the underlying share, the expected stock volatility, the risk–free interest rate, the expected life of the option, the dividend yield on the underlying stock and the expected forfeiture rate. Expected volatility is benchmarked against similar companies in a similar industry over the expected option life and other appropriate factors. Risk–free interest rates are calculated based on continuously compounded risk–free rates for the appropriate term. The dividend yield is assumed to be zero as the Company has never paid or declared any cash dividends on its Common stock and does not intend to pay dividends on its Common stock in the foreseeable future. The expected forfeiture rate is estimated based on management’s best estimate. 31 Determining the appropriate fair value model and calculating the fair value of equity–based payment awards requires the input of the subjective assumptions described above. The assumptions used in calculating the fair value of equity–based payment awards represent management’s best estimates, which involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management’s judgment. As a result, if factors change and the Company uses different assumptions, our equity–based compensation could be materially different in the future. In addition, the Company is required to estimate the expected forfeiture rate and recognize expense only for those shares expected to vest. If the Company’s actual forfeiture rate is materially different from its estimate, the equity–based compensation could be significantly different from what the Company has recorded in the current period. The Company accounts for share–based payments granted to non–employees in accordance with ASC 505-40, “Equity Based Payments to Non–Employees”. The Company determines the fair value of the stock–based payment as either the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. If the fair value of the equity instruments issued is used, it is measured using the stock price and other measurement assumptions as of the earlier of either (1) the date at which a commitment for performance by the counterparty to earn the equity instruments is reached, or (2) the date at which the counterparty’s performance is complete. The fair value of the equity instruments is re-measured each reporting period over the requisite service period. Income Taxes Income taxes are provided in accordance with ASC No. 740, “Accounting for Income Taxes”. A deferred tax asset or liability is recorded for all temporary differences between financial and tax reporting and net operating loss carryforwards. Deferred tax expense (benefit) results from the net change during the period of deferred tax assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment. Management makes judgments as to the interpretation of the tax laws that might be challenged upon an audit and cause changes to previous estimates of tax liability. In addition, the Company operates within multiple taxing jurisdictions and is subject to audit in these jurisdictions. In management’s opinion, adequate provisions for income taxes have been made for all years. If actual taxable income by tax jurisdiction varies from estimates, additional allowances or reversals of reserves may be necessary. Loss Per Share Basic net loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per common share is determined using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period, adjusted for the dilutive effect of common stock equivalents. In periods when losses are reported, which is the case for the year ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 presented in these consolidated financial statements, the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding excludes common stock equivalents because their inclusion would be anti-dilutive. 32 The Company had the following common stock equivalents at December 31, 2018 and 2017: December 31, December 31, 2018 2017 Series A Preferred stock - 192,567 Series B Preferred stock - 40,929 Options 17,649,990 17,749,990 Warrants 110,859,062 46,193,779 Convertible notes - related party 2,889 7,080,128 Convertible notes 839,764 17,749,990 Totals 129,351,705 88,773,887 Reclassifications Certain prior year amounts in the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto have been reclassified where necessary to conform to the current year presentation. These reclassifications did not affect the prior period total assets, total liabilities, stockholders’ deficit, net loss or net cash used in operating activities. Recently Adopted Accounting Guidance In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, “Compensation – Stock Compensation” (topic 718). The FASB issued this update to improve the accounting for employee share-based payments and affect all organizations that issue share-based payment awards to their employees. Several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment award transactions are simplified, including: (a) income tax consequences; (b) classification of awards as either equity or liabilities; and (c) classification on the statement of cash flows. The updated guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption of the update is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2016-09 did not have a material effect on its financial position or results of operations or cash flows. In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-10, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing” (topic 606). In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-08, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net)” (topic 606). These amendments provide additional clarification and implementation guidance on the previously issued ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers”. The amendments in ASU 2016-10 provide clarifying guidance on materiality of performance obligations; evaluating distinct performance obligations; treatment of shipping and handling costs; and determining whether an entity’s promise to grant a license provides a customer with either a right to use an entity’s intellectual property or a right to access an entity’s intellectual property. The amendments in ASU 2016-08 clarify how an entity should identify the specified good or service for the principal versus agent evaluation and how it should apply the control principle to certain types of arrangements. The adoption of ASU 2016-10 and ASU 2016-08 is to coincide with an entity’s adoption of ASU 2014-09, which we adopted for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The adoption of ASU 2016-10 did not have a material effect on its financial position or results of operations or cash flows. In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-12, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients”, which narrowly amended the revenue recognition guidance regarding collectability, noncash consideration, presentation of sales tax and transition and is effective during the same period as ASU 2014-09. The adoption of ASU 2016-12 did not have a material effect on its financial position or results of operations or cash flows. In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments” (“ASU 2016-15”). ASU 2016-15 will make eight targeted changes to how cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-15 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. The new standard will require adoption on a retrospective basis unless it is impracticable to apply, in which case it would be required to apply the amendments prospectively as of the earliest date practicable. The adoption of ASU 2016-15 did not have a material effect on its financial position or results of operations or cash flows. In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230)”, requiring that the statement of cash flows explain the change in the total cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim reporting periods therein, beginning after December 15, 2017 with early adoption permitted. The provisions of this guidance are to be applied using a retrospective approach which requires application of the guidance for all periods presented. The adoption of ASU 2016-18 did not have a material effect on its financial position or results of operations or cash flows. 33 In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, “Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting,” which provides guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting in Topic 718. This standard is required to be adopted in the first quarter of 2018. The adoption of ASU 2017-09 did not have a material effect on its financial position or results of operations or cash flows. In July 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-11, “Earnings Per Share (Topic 260), Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480) and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): I. Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Down Round Features; II. Replacement of the Indefinite Deferral for Mandatorily Redeemable Financial Instruments of Certain Nonpublic Entities and Certain Mandatorily Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests with a Scope Exception”. Part I of this update addresses the complexity of accounting for certain financial instruments with down round features. Down round features are features of certain equity-linked instruments (or embedded features) that result in the strike price being reduced on the basis of the pricing of future equity offerings. Current accounting guidance creates cost and complexity for entities that issue financial instruments (such as warrants and convertible instruments) with down round features that require fair value measurement of the entire instrument or conversion option. Part II of this update addresses the difficulty of navigating Topic 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity, because of the existence of extensive pending content in the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. This pending content is the result of the indefinite deferral of accounting requirements about mandatorily redeemable financial instruments of certain nonpublic entities and certain mandatorily redeemable noncontrolling interests. The amendments in Part II of this update do not have an accounting effect. This ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company early adopted the ASU 2017-11 in the year ending December 31, 2017. Adoption of ASU 2017-11 As noted above, in connection with the securities purchase agreement and debt transactions during the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company issued warrants and convertible notes, to purchase common stock with an exercise price of $0.20 and a five-year term. Upon issuance of the warrants and convertible notes, the Company evaluated the note agreement to determine if the agreement contained any embedded components that would qualify the agreement as a derivative. The Company identified certain equity-linked financial instrument (or embedded feature) is indexed to its own stock, including evaluating the instrument’s contingent exercise and settlement provisions, requiring the Company to classify the warrants and convertible notes as a derivative liability. The Company changed its method of accounting for the convertible notes and warrants through the early adoption of ASU 2017-11 during the year ended December 31, 2017 on a retrospective basis. Accordingly, the Company recorded the warrant derivative and conversion option derivative liabilities to additional paid in capital upon issuance. Recent Accounting Guidance Not Yet Adopted In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842).” Under ASU 2016-02, lessees will, among other things, require lessees to recognize a lease liability, which is a lessee’s obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease, measured on a discounted basis; and a right-of-use asset, which is an asset that represents the lessee’s right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term. ASU 2016-02 does not significantly change lease accounting requirements applicable to lessors; however, certain changes were made to align, where necessary, lessor accounting with the lessee accounting model and ASC Topic 606, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers.” ASU 2016-02 will be effective for us on January 1, 2019 and initially required transition using a modified retrospective approach for leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements. In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-11 , “Leases (Topic 842) - Targeted Improvements,” which, among other things, provides an additional transition method that would allow entities to not apply the guidance in ASU 2016-02 in the comparative periods presented in the financial statements and instead recognize a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption. In December 2018, the FASB also issued ASU 2018-20, “Leases (Topic 842) - Narrow-Scope Improvements for Lessors,” which provides for certain policy elections and changes lessor accounting for sales and similar taxes and certain lessor costs. As of January 1, 2019, the Company adopted ASU 2016-02 and has recorded a right-of-use asset and lease liability on the balance sheet for its operating leases. We elected to apply certain practical expedients provided under ASU 2016-02 whereby we will not reassess(i) whether any expired or existing contracts are or contain leases, (ii) the lease classification for any expired or existing leases and (iii) initial direct costs for any existing leases. We also do not expect to apply the recognition requirements of ASU 2016-02 to any short-term leases (as defined by related accounting guidance). We expect to account for lease and non-lease components separately because such amounts are readily determinable under our lease contracts and because we expect this election will result in a lower impact on our balance sheet. In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other than Inventory”, which eliminates the exception that prohibits the recognition of current and deferred income tax effects for intra-entity transfers of assets other than inventory until the asset has been sold to an outside party. The updated guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption of the update is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the new standard. Management does not believe that any recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, when adopted, will have a material effect on the accompanying consolidated financial statements. Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk. We do not hold any derivative instruments and do not engage in any hedging activities. 34 Item 8. Financial Statements. Jerrick Media Holdings, Inc. December 31, 2018 and 2017 Index to the Consolidated Financial Statements Contents Page(s) Report Of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm F-2 Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 F-4 Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 F-5 Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2018 and 201 7 F-6 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 F-7 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements F-8 F- 1 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Jerrick Media Holdings, Inc. Opinion on the Financial Statements We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Jerrick Media Holdings, Inc. (the Company) as of December 31, 2018, and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year then ended, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the financial statements). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Basis for Opinion These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB. We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audit, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Other Matters The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 3 to the financial statements, the Company had an accumulated deficit at December 31, 2018 and a net loss and net cash used from operating activities for the year then ended. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 3. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. /s/ Rosenberg Rich Baker Berman, P.A. We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2019. Somerset, New Jersey April 1, 2019 F- 2 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Jerrick Media Holdings, Inc.: Opinion on the Financial Statements We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Jerrick Media Holdings, Inc. (“the Company”) as of December 31, 2017, the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows for the year then ended, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2017, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Basis for Opinion These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB. We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audit, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. /s/ Sadler, Gibb & Associates, LLC We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2017. Salt Lake City, UT May 17, 2018 F- 3 Jerrick Media Holdings, Inc. Consolidated Balance Sheet December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017 Assets Current Assets Cash $ - $ 111,051 Accounts receivable 6,500 1,325 Total Current Assets 6,500 112,376 Property and equipment, net 42,443 48,056 Deferred offering costs 143,146 - Security deposit 16,836 17,000 Total Assets $ 208,925 $ 177,432 Liabilities and Stockholders’ Deficit Current Liabilities Cash overdraft $ 33,573 $ - Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 1,246,207 1,462,106 Demand loan - 10,366 Convertible Notes, net of debt discount and issuance costs - 96,500 Current portion of capital lease payable - 4,732 Note payable - related party, net of debt discount 1,223,073 1,249,000 Note payable, net of debt discount and issuance costs 49,926 689,500 Line of credit - related party - 130,000 Line of credit - 44,996 Deferred revenue 9,005 Deferred rent 7,800 - Total Current Liabilities 2,569,584 3,687,200 Non-current Liabilities: Deferred rent 6,150 - Convertible Notes - related party, net of debt discount 314 1,345,246 Convertible Notes, net of debt discount and issuance costs 123,481 2,512,293 Total Non-current Liabilities 129,945 3,857,539 Total Liabilities 2,699,529 7,544,739 Commitments and contingencies Stockholders’ Deficit Series A Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 0 and 31,581 shares issued and outstanding, respectively - 31 Series B Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 0 and 8,063 shares issued and outstanding, respectively - 8 Common stock par value $0.001: 300,000,000 shares authorized; 129,506,802 and 39,520,682 issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 respectively 129,507 39,521 Additional paid in capital 33,977,295 14,387,247 Accumulated deficit (36,545,065 ) (21,775,107 ) Less: Treasury stock, 220,000 and 220,000 shares, respectively (52,341 ) (19,007 ) (2,490,604 ) (7,367,307 ) Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Deficit $ 208,925 $ 177,432 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. F- 4 Jerrick Media Holdings, Inc. Consolidated Statements of Operations For the Year Ended For the Year Ended December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017 Net revenue $ 80,898 $ 95,653 Gross margin 80,898 95,653 Operating expenses Compensation 2,378,664 2,742,459 Consulting fees 1,086,557 996,522 Research and Development 636,180 590,227 General and administrative 1,665,752 1,328,773 Total operating expenses 5,767,153 5,657,981 Loss from operations (5,686,255 ) (5,562,328 ) Other income (expenses) Interest expense (923,008 ) (477,005 ) Accretion of debt discount and issuance cost (2,090,286 ) (1,828,027 ) Change In derivative liability - (64,346 ) Settlement of vendor liabilities 122,886 167,905 Loss on extinguishment of debt (3,453,137 ) (906,531 ) Gain (loss) on settlement of debt 16,258 2,079 Impairment of minority investment - (83,333 ) Other income (expenses), net (6,327,287 ) (3,189,258 ) Loss before income tax provision (12,013,542 ) (8,751,586 ) Income tax provision - - Net loss $ (12,013,542 ) $ (8,751,586 ) Deemed dividend 174,232 297,323 Inducement expense 2,016,634 - Net loss attributable to common shareholders (14,204,408 ) (9,048,909 ) Per-share data Basic and diluted loss per share $ (0.21 ) $ (0.23 ) Weighted average number of common shares outstanding 68,369,814 38,601,987 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. F- 5 Jerrick Media Holdings, Inc. Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity For the Years Ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 Series A Preferred Stock Series B Preferred Stock Series D Preferred Stock Common Stock Treasury stock Additional Paid In Accumulated Stockholders’ Shares Amount Shares Amount Shares Amount Shares Amount Shares Amount Capital Deficit Equity Balance, December 31, 2016 33,314 33 8,063 8 914 1 33,894,582 33,895 - - 10,075,941 (13,018,811 ) (2,908,933 ) Conversion of series A to common stock (1,733 ) (2 ) 1,146,307 1,146 3,566 4,710 Conversion of series D to common stock - (914 ) (1 ) 266,325 266 (265 ) - Common stock issued to settle vendor liabilities - 1,179,107 1,179 184,648 185,827 Stock based compensation - 788,395 789 1,247,590 1,248,379 Stock warrants issued with note payable - 2,487,904 2,487,904 Issuance of common stock for prepaid services - 1,867,633 1,868 305,559 307,427 Common stock issued with note payable - 378,333 378 82,304 82,682 Purchase of treasury stock (220,000 ) (19,007 ) (19,007 ) Dividends - (4,710 ) (4,710 ) Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2017 - (8,751,586 ) (8,751,586 ) Balance, December 31, 2017 31,581 31 8,063 8 - - 39,520,682 39,521 (220,000 ) (19,007 ) 14,387,247 (21,775,107 ) (7,367,307 ) Common stock issued to settle vendor liabilities - - - - - - 18,750 19 - - 3,356 - 3,375 Stock based compensation - - - - - - 1,636,981 1,636 - - 545,669 - 547,305 Issuance of common stock and warrants in exchange for Series A and accrued dividend (31,581 ) (31 ) - - 22,249,750 22,250 2,177,904 - 2,200,123 Issuance of common stock and warrants in exchange for series B and accrued dividend (8,063 ) (8 ) 4,616,832 4,617 464,575 469,184 Cash received for common stock and warrants 11,149,848 11,150 2,776,312 2,787,462 Common stock and warrants issued upon conversion of notes payable 45,128,959 45,129 11,895,634 11,940,763 Stock issuance cost 4,200,000 4,200 (165,603 ) (161,403 ) Stock warrants issued with note payable - - - - - - - - - - 1,660,986 - 1,660,986 Issuance of common stock for prepaid services 610,000 610 - - 115,690 - 116,300 Common stock issued with note payable - - - - - - 375,000 375 - - 77,112 - 77,487 BCF issued with note payable - - - - - - - - - - 38,413 - 38,413 Purchase of treasury stock - - - - - - - - - (33,334 ) - - (33,334 ) Inducement expense - - - - - - - - - - - (2,016,635 ) (2,016,635 ) Dividends - - - - - - - - - - - (739,782 ) (739,782 ) Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2018 - - - - - - - - - - - (12,013,542 ) (12,013,542 ) Balance, December 31, 2018 - - - - - - 129,506,802 129,507 (220,000 ) (52,341 ) 33,977,295 (36,545,066 ) (2,490,605 ) See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements F- 6 Jerrick Media Holdings, Inc. Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows For the Year Ended For the Year Ended December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017 CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: Net loss $ (12,013,542 ) $ (8,751,586 ) Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: Depreciation 42,218 38,435 Accretion of debt discount and issuance cost 2,090,286 1,828,027 Share-based compensation 346,954 1,262,377 Gain on settlement of vendor liabilities (122,886 ) (167,905 ) Gain on settlement of debt (16,257 ) (2,079 ) Impairment of minority investment - 83,333 Change in fair value of derivative liability - 64,346 Loss on extinguishment of debt 3,610,049 906,531 Changes in operating assets and liabilities: Prepaid expenses 40,680 10,000 Accounts receivable (5,175 ) (1,325 ) Security deposit 164 21,445 Deferred Revenue 9,005 - Accounts payable and accrued expenses 1,039,690 855,849 Deferred Rent 6,000 - Net Cash Used In Operating Activities (4,972,814 ) (3,852,552 ) CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: Cash paid for property and equipment (27,605 ) (14,662 ) Net Cash Used In Investing Activities (27,605 ) (14,662 ) CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: Cash overdraft 33,573 - Net proceeds from issuance of notes 791,833 1,441,585 Repayment of notes (264,939 ) (100,000 ) Proceeds from issuance of demand loan 50,000 - Proceeds from issuance of convertible note 1,525,154 2,201,500 Repayment of convertible notes (226,250 ) (477,777 ) Proceeds from issuance of convertible notes - related party 299,852 655,000 Proceeds from issuance of note payable - related party 465,000 529,000 Repayment of note payable - related party (205,000 ) (145,000 ) Proceeds from issuance of common stock 2,787,462 - Proceeds from issuance of line of credit - related party - 130,000 Repayment of line of credit (44,996 ) (199,574 ) Cash paid to preferred holder (87,111 ) - Cash paid for debt issuance costs (166,761 ) (211,956 ) Cash paid for stock issuance costs (35,115 ) - Purchase of treasury stock (33,334 ) (19,007 ) Net Cash Provided By Financing Activities 4,889,368 3,803,771 Net Change in Cash (111,051 ) (63,443 ) Cash - Beginning of Year 111,051 174,494 Cash - End of Year $ - $ 111,051 SUPPLEMENTARY CASH FLOW INFORMATION: Cash Paid During the Year for: Income taxes $ - $ - Interest $ 64,892 $ 3,534 SUPPLEMENTARY DISCLOSURE OF NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES: Settlement of vendor liabilities $ 123,750 $ 353,732 Debt discount on convertible note $ - $ 1,006,753 Debt discount on related party note payable $ - $ 198,702 Debt discount on note payable $ - $ 483,745 Beneficial conversion feature on convertible notes $ 38,413 $ - Accrued dividends $ 174,232 $ 217,985 Warrants issued with debt $ 1,133,820 Issuance of common stock for prepaid services $ 116,300 $ - Derivative liability ceases to exist $ - $ 383,993 Conversion of note payable and interest into convertible notes $ 341,442 $ 765,656 Deferred offering costs $ 143,146 Issuance of common stock and warrants in exchange for Series A and accrued dividend $ 2,200,123 Issuance of common stock and warrants in exchange for series B and accrued dividend $ 469,184 Common stock and warrants issued upon conversion of notes payable $ 11,940,763 Conversion of note payable - related party and interest into convertible notes - related party $ - $ 801,026 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. F- 7 Jerrick Media Holdings, Inc. December 31, 2018 and 2017 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements Note 1 – Organization and Operations Jerrick Media Holdings, Inc. (“we,” “us,” the “Company,” or “Jerrick Media” or “Jerrick”) (formerly Great Plains Holdings, Inc. or “GTPH”) was incorporated under the laws of the state of Nevada on December 30, 1999 under the name LILM, Inc. The Company changed its name on December 3, 2013 to Great Plains Holdings, Inc. as part of its plan to diversify its business through the acquisition and operation of commercial real estate, including, but not limited to, self-storage facilities, apartment buildings, 55+ senior manufactured home communities, and other income producing properties. Historically, the Company has principally engaged in the manufacture and marketing of the LiL Marc, a plastic boys’ toilet-training device, which we discontinued as of December 31, 2014. On February 5, 2016 (the “Closing Date”), GTPH, GPH Merger Sub, Inc., a Nevada corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of GTPH (“Merger Sub”), and Jerrick Ventures, Inc., a privately-held Nevada corporation headquartered in New Jersey (“Jerrick”), entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Agreement”) pursuant to which the Merger Sub was merged with and into Jerrick, with Jerrick surviving as a wholly-owned subsidiary of GTPH (the “Merger”). GTPH acquired, through a reverse triangular merger, all of the outstanding capital stock of Jerrick in exchange for issuing Jerrick’s shareholders (the “Jerrick Shareholders”), pro-rata, a total of 28,500,000 shares of GTPH’s common stock. GTPH assumed 33,415 shares of Jerrick’s Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Jerrick Series A Preferred”) and 8,064 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Jerrick Series B Preferred”). In connection with the Merger, on the Closing Date, GTPH and Kent Campbell entered into a Spin-Off Agreement (the “Spin-Off Agreement”), pursuant to which Mr. Campbell purchased from GTPH (i) all of GTPH’s interest in Ashland Holdings, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, and (ii) all of GTPH’s interest in Lil Marc, Inc., a Utah corporation, in exchange for the cancellation of 781,818 shares of GTPH’s Common Stock held by Mr. Campbell. In addition, Mr. Campbell assumed all debts, obligations and liabilities of GTPH, including any existing prior to the Merger, pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Spin-Off Agreement. Upon closing of the Merger on February 5, 2016, the Company changed its business plan to that of Jerrick Media. Effective February 28, 2016, GTPH entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Statutory Merger Agreement”) with Jerrick, pursuant to which GTPH became the parent company of Jerrick Ventures, LLC, a wholly-owned operating subsidiary of Jerrick (the “Statutory Merger”) and GTPH changed its name to Jerrick Media Holdings, Inc. to better reflect its new business strategy. Jerrick Media is a technology company focused on the development of digital communities, marketing branded digital content, and e-commerce opportunities. Jerrick’s content distribution platform, Vocal, delivers a robust long-form, digital publishing platform organized into highly engaged niche-communities capable of hosting all forms of rich media content. Through Jerrick’s proprietary algorithm dynamics, Vocal enhances the visibility of content and maximizes viewership, providing advertisers access to target markets that most closely match their interests. Note 2 – Significant and Critical Accounting Policies and Practices Management of the Company is responsible for the selection and use of appropriate accounting policies and the appropriateness of accounting policies and their application. Critical accounting policies and practices are those that are both most important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition and results and require management’s most difficult, subjective, or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effects of matters that are inherently uncertain. The Company’s significant and critical accounting policies and practices are disclosed below as required by generally accepted accounting principles. F- 8 Basis of Presentation - Interim Financial Information The Company’s consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”) and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Use of Estimates and Assumptions and Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Critical accounting estimates are estimates for which (a) the nature of the estimate is material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change and (b) the impact of the estimate on financial condition or operating performance is material. The Company’s critical accounting estimates and assumptions affecting the financial statements were: (i) Assumption as a going concern : Management assumes that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. (ii) Fair value of long-lived assets: Fair value is generally determined using the asset’s expected future discounted cash flows or market value, if readily determinable. If long-lived assets are determined to be recoverable, but the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives are shorter than originally estimated, the net book values of the long-lived assets are depreciated over the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives. The Company considers the following to be some examples of important indicators that may trigger an impairment review: (i) significant under-performance or losses of assets relative to expected historical or projected future operating results; (ii) significant changes in the manner or use of assets or in the Company’s overall strategy with respect to the manner or use of the acquired assets or changes in the Company’s overall business strategy; (iii) significant negative industry or economic trends; (iv) increased competitive pressures; (v) a significant decline in the Company’s stock price for a sustained period of time; and (vi) regulatory changes. The Company evaluates acquired assets for potential impairment indicators at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of such events. (iii) Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets : Management assumes that the realization of the Company’s net deferred tax assets resulting from its net operating loss (“NOL”) carry–forwards for Federal income tax purposes that may be offset against future taxable income was not considered more likely than not and accordingly, the potential tax benefits of the net loss carry-forwards are offset by a full valuation allowance. Management made this assumption based on (a) the Company has incurred recurring losses, (b) general economic conditions, and (c) its ability to raise additional funds to support its daily operations by way of a public or private offering, among other factors. (iv) Estimates and assumptions used in valuation of equity instruments : Management estimates expected term of share options and similar instruments, expected volatility of the Company’s common shares and the method used to estimate it, expected annual rate of quarterly dividends, and risk-free rate(s) to value share options and similar instruments. These significant accounting estimates or assumptions bear the risk of change due to the fact that there are uncertainties attached to these estimates or assumptions, and certain estimates or assumptions are difficult to measure or value. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. F- 9 Management regularly evaluates the key factors and assumptions used to develop the estimates utilizing currently available information, changes in facts and circumstances, historical experience and reasonable assumptions. After such evaluations, if deemed appropriate, those estimates are adjusted accordingly. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Principles of consolidation The Company consolidates all majority-owned subsidiaries, if any, in which the parent’s power to control exists. As of December 31, 2018, the Company’s consolidated subsidiaries and/or entities are as follows: Name of combined affiliate State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization Company interest Jerrick Ventures LLC The State of Delaware 100% Jerrick Australia Pty Ltd Australia 100% All inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated. Jerrick Australia Pty Ltd does not have any operations. Fair Value of Financial Instruments The Company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 820-10-35-37”) to measure the fair value of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in U.S. GAAP and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three (3) broad levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The three (3) levels of fair value hierarchy defined by Paragraph 820-10-35-37 are described below: Level 1 Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date. Level 2 Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date. Level 3 Pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data. Financial assets are considered Level 3 when their fair values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. If the inputs used to measure the financial assets and liabilities fall within more than one level described above, the categorization is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument. The carrying amount of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash, prepaid expenses, accounts payable and accrued liabilities and accrued liquidating damages approximate their fair value because of the short maturity of those instruments. Transactions involving related parties cannot be presumed to be carried out on an arm’s-length basis, as the requisite conditions of competitive, free-market dealings may not exist. Representations about transactions with related parties, if made, shall not imply that the related party transactions were consummated on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arm’s-length transactions unless such representations can be substantiated. F- 10 Cash Equivalents The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. The Company minimizes its credit risk associated with cash by periodically evaluating the credit quality of its primary financial institution. The balance at times may exceed federally insured limits. Property and Equipment Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Expenditures for major additions and betterments are capitalized. Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. Depreciation is computed by the straight-line method (after taking into account their respective estimated residual values) over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets as follows: Estimated Useful Life (Years) Computer equipment and software 3 Furniture and fixture 5 Leasehold improvements 5 Upon sale or retirement of property and equipment, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in the consolidated statements of operations. Investments - Cost Method, Equity Method and Joint Venture In accordance with sub-topic 323-10 of the FASB ASC (“Sub-topic 323-10”), the Company accounts for investments in common stock of an investee for which the Company has significant influence in the operating or financial policies even though the Company holds 50% or less of the common stock or in-substance common stock. On January 2, 2013, the Company purchased a minority interest in a business for proceeds of $83,333. The interest was accounted for under the cost method. The Company tests the carrying value annually for impairment. The company recorded an impairment of minority investment of $83,333 during the year ended December 31, 2017. Commitments and Contingencies The Company follows subtopic 450-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report accounting for contingencies. Certain conditions may exist as of the date the consolidated financial statements are issued, which may result in a loss to the Company, but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. The Company assesses such contingent liabilities, and such assessment inherently involves an exercise of judgment. In assessing loss contingencies related to legal proceedings that are pending against the Company or un-asserted claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company evaluates the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or un-asserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought therein. If the assessment of a contingency indicates that it is probable that a material loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be estimated, then the estimated liability would be accrued in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. If the assessment indicates that a potential material loss contingency is not probable but is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, and an estimate of the range of possible losses, if determinable and material, would be disclosed. Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which case the guarantees would be disclosed. F- 11 Derivative Liability The Company evaluates its debt and equity issuances to determine if those contracts or embedded components of those contracts qualify as derivatives to be separately accounted for in accordance with paragraph 815-10-05-4 and Section 815-40-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. The result of this accounting treatment is that the fair value of the embedded derivative is marked-to-market each balance sheet date and recorded as either an asset or a liability. In the event that the fair value is recorded as a liability, the change in fair value is recorded in the consolidated statement of operations as other income or expense. Upon conversion, exercise or cancellation of a derivative instrument, the instrument is marked to fair value at the date of conversion, exercise or cancellation and then the related fair value is reclassified to equity. In circumstances where the embedded conversion option in a convertible instrument is required to be bifurcated and there are also other embedded derivative instruments in the convertible instrument that are required to be bifurcated, the bifurcated derivative instruments are accounted for as a single, compound derivative instrument. The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is re-assessed at the end of each reporting period. Equity instruments that are initially classified as equity that become subject to reclassification are reclassified to liability at the fair value of the instrument on the reclassification date. Derivative instrument liabilities will be classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlement of the derivative instrument is expected within 12 months of the balance sheet date. The Company adopted Section 815-40-15 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Section 815-40-15”) to determine whether an instrument (or an embedded feature) is indexed to the Company’s own stock. Section 815-40-15 provides that an entity should use a two-step approach to evaluate whether an equity-linked financial instrument (or embedded feature) is indexed to its own stock, including evaluating the instrument’s contingent exercise and settlement provisions. The Company changed its method of accounting for the debt and warrants through the early adoption of ASU 2017-11 during the year ended December 31, 2017 on a retrospective basis. The Company utilizes an option pricing model to compute the fair value of the derivative and to mark to market the fair value of the derivative at each balance sheet date. The Company records the change in the fair value of the derivative as other income or expense in the condensed consolidated statements of operations. Revenue Recognition On January 1, 2018, we adopted Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 605, Revenue Recognition (Topic 605), using the modified retrospective transition method applied to those contracts which were not completed as of January 1, 2018. Results for reporting periods beginning after January 1, 2018 are presented under Topic 606, while prior period amounts have not been adjusted and continue to be reported in accordance with our historic accounting under Topic 605. The impact of adopting the new revenue standard was not material to our condensed consolidated financial statements and there was no adjustment to beginning retained earnings on January 1, 2018. Under Topic 606, revenue is recognized when control of the promised goods or services is transferred to our customers, in an amount that reflects the consideration we expect to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. We determine revenue recognition through the following steps: ● identification of the contract, or contracts, with a customer; ● identification of the performance obligations in the contract; ● determination of the transaction price; ● allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and ● recognition of revenue when, or as, we satisfy a performance obligation. F- 12 Revenue disaggregated by revenue source for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 consists of the following: Year Ended December 31, 2018 2017 Branded content $ 60,485 14,190 Affiliate sales 11,553 10,016 Other revenue 8,860 71,447 $ 80,898 $ 95,653 Branded Content Branded content represents the revenue recognized from the Company’s obligation to create and publish branded articles for the Client on the Vocal platform and promote said stories, tracking engagement for the Client. The performance obligation is satisfied when the Company successfully publishes the articles on its platform and meets any required promotional milestones as per the contract. The revenue is recognized over time as the services are performed. Below are the significant components of a typical agreement pertaining to branded content revenue: ● The Company will collect fixed fees ranging from $1,000 to $15,000 ● The articles are created and published within three months of the signed agreement, or as previously negotiated with the Client ● The articles are promoted per the contract and engagement reports are provided to the Client ● The Client pays 50% at signing and 50% upon completion ● Most contracts include provisions for Clients to acquire content rights at the end of the campaign for a flat fee Affiliate sales Affiliate sales represents the commission the Company receives when a purchase is made through affiliate links placed within content hosted on the Vocal platform. Affiliate revenue is earned on a "click through" basis, upon referring visitors, via said links, to an affiliate's site and having them complete a specific outcome, most commonly a product purchase. The Company uses multiple affiliate platforms, such as Skimlinks, to form and maintain thousands of vendor relationships. Each vendor establishes their own commission percentage, which typically range from 2-20%. The revenue is recognized upon receipt as reliable estimates could not be made. Deferred Revenue Deferred revenue consists of billings and payments from clients in advance of revenue recognition. As of December 31, 2018, the Company had deferred revenue of $9,005. The Company will typically record this as revenue within the next three months as the performance obligations are met. Accounts Receivable and Allowances Accounts receivable are recorded and carried when the Company uploads the articles and reaches the required number of views on the platform. We make estimates for the allowance for doubtful accounts and allowance for unbilled receivables based upon our assessment of various factors, including historical experience, the age of the accounts receivable balances, credit quality of our customers, current economic conditions, and other factors that may affect our ability to collect from customers. The Company did not record an allowance during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017. F- 13 Stock-Based Compensation The Company recognizes compensation expense for all equity–based payments granted to employees in accordance with ASC 718 “Compensation – Stock Compensation”. Under fair value recognition provisions, the Company recognizes equity–based compensation net of an estimated forfeiture rate and recognizes compensation cost only for those shares expected to vest over the requisite service period of the award. Restricted stock awards are granted at the discretion of the Company. These awards are restricted as to the transfer of ownership and generally vest over the requisite service periods, typically over a five-year period (vesting on a straight–line basis). The fair value of a stock award is equal to the fair market value of a share of Company stock on the grant date. The fair value of an option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black–Scholes option valuation model. The Black–Scholes option valuation model requires the development of assumptions that are inputs into the model. These assumptions are the value of the underlying share, the expected stock volatility, the risk–free interest rate, the expected life of the option, the dividend yield on the underlying stock and the expected forfeiture rate. Expected volatility is benchmarked against similar companies in a similar industry over the expected option life and other appropriate factors. Risk–free interest rates are calculated based on continuously compounded risk–free rates for the appropriate term. The dividend yield is assumed to be zero as the Company has never paid or declared any cash dividends on its Common stock and does not intend to pay dividends on its Common stock in the foreseeable future. The expected forfeiture rate is estimated based on management’s best estimate. Determining the appropriate fair value model and calculating the fair value of equity–based payment awards requires the input of the subjective assumptions described above. The assumptions used in calculating the fair value of equity–based payment awards represent management’s best estimates, which involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management’s judgment. As a result, if factors change and the Company uses different assumptions, our equity–based compensation could be materially different in the future. In addition, the Company is required to estimate the expected forfeiture rate and recognize expense only for those shares expected to vest. If the Company’s actual forfeiture rate is materially different from its estimate, the equity–based compensation could be significantly different from what the Company has recorded in the current period. The Company accounts for share–based payments granted to non–employees in accordance with ASC 505-40, “Equity Based Payments to Non–Employees”. The Company determines the fair value of the stock–based payment as either the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. If the fair value of the equity instruments issued is used, it is measured using the stock price and other measurement assumptions as of the earlier of either (1) the date at which a commitment for performance by the counterparty to earn the equity instruments is reached, or (2) the date at which the counterparty’s performance is complete. The fair value of the equity instruments is re-measured each reporting period over the requisite service period. Income Taxes Income taxes are provided in accordance with ASC No. 740, “ Accounting for Income Taxes ”. A deferred tax asset or liability is recorded for all temporary differences between financial and tax reporting and net operating loss carryforwards. Deferred tax expense (benefit) results from the net change during the period of deferred tax assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment. Management makes judgments as to the interpretation of the tax laws that might be challenged upon an audit and cause changes to previous estimates of tax liability. In addition, the Company operates within multiple taxing jurisdictions and is subject to audit in these jurisdictions. In management’s opinion, adequate provisions for income taxes have been made for all years. If actual taxable income by tax jurisdiction varies from estimates, additional allowances or reversals of reserves may be necessary. Loss Per Share Basic net loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per common share is determined using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period, adjusted for the dilutive effect of common stock equivalents. In periods when losses are reported, which is the case for the year ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 presented in these consolidated financial statements, the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding excludes common stock equivalents because their inclusion would be anti-dilutive. F- 14 The Company had the following common stock equivalents at December 31, 2018 and 2017: December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017 Series A Preferred stock - 192,567 Series B Preferred stock - 40,929 Options 17,649,990 17,749,990 Warrants 110,859,062 46,193,779 Convertible notes - related party 2,889 7,080,128 Convertible notes 839,764 17,749,990 Totals 129,351,705 88,773,887 Reclassifications Certain prior year amounts in the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto have been reclassified where necessary to conform to the current year presentation. These reclassifications did not affect the prior period total assets, total liabilities, stockholders’ deficit, net loss or net cash used in operating activities. Recently Adopted Accounting Guidance In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, “Compensation – Stock Compensation” (topic 718). The FASB issued this update to improve the accounting for employee share-based payments and affect all organizations that issue share-based payment awards to their employees. Several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment award transactions are simplified, including: (a) income tax consequences; (b) classification of awards as either equity or liabilities; and (c) classification on the statement of cash flows. The updated guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption of the update is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2016-09 did not have a material effect on its financial position or results of operations or cash flows. In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-10, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing” (topic 606). In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-08, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net)” (topic 606). These amendments provide additional clarification and implementation guidance on the previously issued ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers”. The amendments in ASU 2016-10 provide clarifying guidance on materiality of performance obligations; evaluating distinct performance obligations; treatment of shipping and handling costs; and determining whether an entity’s promise to grant a license provides a customer with either a right to use an entity’s intellectual property or a right to access an entity’s intellectual property. The amendments in ASU 2016-08 clarify how an entity should identify the specified good or service for the principal versus agent evaluation and how it should apply the control principle to certain types of arrangements. The adoption of ASU 2016-10 and ASU 2016-08 is to coincide with an entity’s adoption of ASU 2014-09, which we adopted for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The adoption of ASU 2016-10 did not have a material effect on its financial position or results of operations or cash flows. F- 15 In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-12, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients”, which narrowly amended the revenue recognition guidance regarding collectability, noncash consideration, presentation of sales tax and transition and is effective during the same period as ASU 2014-09. The adoption of ASU 2016-12 did not have a material effect on its financial position or results of operations or cash flows. In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments” (“ASU 2016-15”). ASU 2016-15 will make eight targeted changes to how cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-15 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. The new standard will require adoption on a retrospective basis unless it is impracticable to apply, in which case it would be required to apply the amendments prospectively as of the earliest date practicable. The adoption of ASU 2016-15 did not have a material effect on its financial position or results of operations or cash flows. In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230)”, requiring that the statement of cash flows explain the change in the total cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim reporting periods therein, beginning after December 15, 2017 with early adoption permitted. The provisions of this guidance are to be applied using a retrospective approach which requires application of the guidance for all periods presented. The adoption of ASU 2016-18 did not have a material effect on its financial position or results of operations or cash flows. In July 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-11, “Earnings Per Share (Topic 260), Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480) and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): I. Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Down Round Features; II. Replacement of the Indefinite Deferral for Mandatorily Redeemable Financial Instruments of Certain Nonpublic Entities and Certain Mandatorily Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests with a Scope Exception”. Part I of this update addresses the complexity of accounting for certain financial instruments with down round features. Down round features are features of certain equity-linked instruments (or embedded features) that result in the strike price being reduced on the basis of the pricing of future equity offerings. Current accounting guidance creates cost and complexity for entities that issue financial instruments (such as warrants and convertible instruments) with down round features that require fair value measurement of the entire instrument or conversion option. Part II of this update addresses the difficulty of navigating Topic 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity, because of the existence of extensive pending content in the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. This pending content is the result of the indefinite deferral of accounting requirements about mandatorily redeemable financial instruments of certain nonpublic entities and certain mandatorily redeemable noncontrolling interests. The amendments in Part II of this update do not have an accounting effect. This ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company early adopted the ASU 2017-11 in the year ending December 31, 2017. In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, “Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting,” which provides guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting in Topic 718. The adoption of ASU 2017-09 did not have a material effect on its financial position or results of operations or cash flows. Recent Accounting Guidance Not Yet Adopted In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842).” Under ASU 2016-02, lessees will, among other things, require lessees to recognize a lease liability, which is a lessee’s obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease, measured on a discounted basis; and a right-of-use asset, which is an asset that represents the lessee’s right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term. ASU 2016-02 does not significantly change lease accounting requirements applicable to lessors; however, certain changes were made to align, where necessary, lessor accounting with the lessee accounting model and ASC Topic 606, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers.” ASU 2016-02 will be effective for us on January 1, 2019 and initially required transition using a modified retrospective approach for leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements. In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-11 , “Leases (Topic 842) - Targeted Improvements,” which, among other things, provides an additional transition method that would allow entities to not apply the guidance in ASU 2016-02 in the comparative periods presented in the financial statements and instead recognize a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption. In December 2018, the FASB also issued ASU 2018-20, “Leases (Topic 842) - Narrow-Scope Improvements for Lessors,” which provides for certain policy elections and changes lessor accounting for sales and similar taxes and certain lessor costs. As of January 1, 2019, the Company adopted ASU 2016-02 and has recorded a right-of-use asset and lease liability on the balance sheet for its operating leases. We elected to apply certain practical expedients provided under ASU 2016-02 whereby we will not reassess(i) whether any expired or existing contracts are or contain leases, (ii) the lease classification for any expired or existing leases and (iii) initial direct costs for any existing leases. We also do not expect to apply the recognition requirements of ASU 2016-02 to any short-term leases (as defined by related accounting guidance). We expect to account for lease and non-lease components separately because such amounts are readily determinable under our lease contracts and because we expect this election will result in a lower impact on our balance sheet. In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other than Inventory”, which eliminates the exception that prohibits the recognition of current and deferred income tax effects for intra-entity transfers of assets other than inventory until the asset has been sold to an outside party. The updated guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption of the update is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the new standard. Management does not believe that any recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, when adopted, will have a material effect on the accompanying consolidated financial statements. F- 16 Note 3 – Going Concern The Company’s consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that it will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. As reflected in the consolidated financial statements, the Company had an accumulated deficit at December 31, 2018, a net loss and net cash used in operating activities for the reporting period then ended. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for a period of one year from the issuance of these financial statements, or April 1, 2020. The Company is attempting to further implement its business plan and generate sufficient revenues; however, its cash position may not be sufficient to support its daily operations. While the Company believes in the viability of its strategy to further implement its business plan and generate sufficient revenues and in its ability to raise additional funds by way of a public or private offering of its debt or equity securities, there can be no assurance to that effect. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to further implement its business plan and generate sufficient revenues and its ability to raise additional funds by way of a public or private offering. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. Note 4 – Property and Equipment Property and equipment stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization, consisted of the following: December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017 Computer Equipment $ 223,574 $ 234,315 Furniture and Fixtures 61,803 61,803 Leasehold Improvements 25,446 - 310,823 296,118 Less: Accumulated Depreciation (268,380 ) (248,062 ) $ 42,443 $ 48,056 Depreciation expense was $42,218 and $38,435 for the year ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Note 5 – Line of Credit Line of credit as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 is as follows: Outstanding Balances as of December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017 Revolving Note - 44,996 $ - $ 44,996 On March 19, 2009, Astoria Surgical Supplies North LLC signed a revolving note (the “Revolving Note”) at PNC Bank (the “Bank”). The outstanding balance of this Revolving Note is limited to $200,000 and expired March 19, 2010. The outstanding balance accrues interest at a variable rate. The interest rate is subject to change based on changes in an independent index which is the highest Prime Rate as published in the “Money Rates” section of the Wall Street Journal. The Company had been in payment default since March 19, 2010; however, on May 3, 2017, the Company agreed to pay back the line of credit by December 1, 2017. On March 23, 2018 the Company sent the final payment for the Revolving Note and the Revolving Note was fully satisfied. F- 17 The balance outstanding on the Revolving Note at December 31, 2018 and 2017 was $0 and $44,996, respectively. Note 6 – Notes Payable Notes payable as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 is as follows: Outstanding Principal as of Warrants December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017 Interest Rate Maturity Date Quantity Exercise Price The February 2017 Offering $ - $ 400,000 12 % September 1, 2017 2,450,000 $ 0.20 The June 2017 Loan Agreement - 50,000 12 % September 1, 2017 35,000 0.20 The First November 2017 Loan Agreement - 100,000 15 % January 12, 2018 - - The Second November 2017 Loan Agreement - 50,000 15 % January 13, 2018 - - The Third November 2017 Loan Agreement - 100,000 15 % January 13, 2018 - - July 2018 Loan Agreement 50,000 - 6 % August 2018 300,000 - 50,000 700,000 Less: Debt Discount - (10,500 ) Less: Debt Issuance Costs (74 ) - $ 49,926 $ 689,500 Private Placement Offerings: The February 2017 Offering From February 24, 2017 through March 17, 2017, the Company conducted multiple closings of a private placement offering (the “February 2017 Offering”) of the Company’s securities by entering into subscription agreements (the “Subscription Agreements”) with accredited investors (the “Accredited Investors”) for aggregate gross proceeds of $916,585 for which the Accredited Investors received $975,511 in principal value of secured promissory notes with an original issue discount of six percent (6%) (the “February 2017 Offering Notes”) and warrants to purchase the Company’s common stock (the “February 2017 Offering Warrants”). The February 2017 Offering Notes are convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at the time of Company’s next round of financing (the “Subsequent Offering”) at a price equal to eighty-five percent (85%) of the price per share offered in the Subsequent Offering (the “Conversion Price”). The February 2017 Offering Warrants have a five-year term. Investors received the February 2017 Offering Warrants in the following amounts: (i) Investors purchasing $150,000 or more of the Offering received a February 2017 Offering Warrant equal to one hundred thirty percent (130%) of the dollar amount invested in the Offering; (ii) investors purchasing at least $100,000 but less than $150,000 of the February 2017 Offering received a February 2017 Offering Warrant equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the dollar amount invested in the Offering; and (iii) investors purchasing less than $100,000 of the Offering received to a February 2017 Offering Warrant equal to seventy percent (70%) of the dollar amount invested in the Offering. The February 2017 Offering Warrants entitle the holder to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.20 per share (the “Exercise Price”) . The Conversion Price and the Exercise Price are subject to adjustments for issuances of (i) the Company’s common stock, (ii) any equity linked instruments or (iii) securities convertible into the Company’s common stock, at a purchase price of less than the prevailing Conversion Price or Exercise Price. Such adjustments shall result in the Conversion Price or Exercise Price being reduced to such lower purchase price, as described in the February 2017 Offering Notes and the February 2017 Offering Warrants. F- 18 Pursuant to the Subscription Agreements, the February 2017 Offering Notes matured on September 1, 2017 (the “February 2017 Offering Maturity Date”). Prior to the February 2017 Offering Maturity Date, investors representing $575,511 in principal value converted their February 2017 Offering Notes into two year, 15% secured convertible promissory notes offered by the Company (the “August 2017 Convertible Note Offering”). The remaining investors representing an aggregate $400,000 in principal of the February 2017 Offering Notes agreed to forbear their right to declare an event of default until December 15, 2017 during which time they retain the right to convert their principal and any accrued but unpaid interest into the August 2017 Convertible Note Offering. In consideration of the forbearance for which the investors will receive a warrant to purchase up to fifteen percent (15%) of the shares of common stock underlying the warrant acquired with the purchase of the February 2017 Offering Notes at a purchase price of $0.20 per share, and the interest on their note would be increased to eighteen percent (18%) from September 1, 2017 through December 15, 2017 or the conversion date, whichever is sooner. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company entered into three forbearance agreement whereby the Company issued the remaining investors of The February 2017 Offering five-year warrants to purchase 500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.20 per share. These warrants had a fair value of $ 70,219 which was recorded to loss on extinguishment of debt. The new maturity date of the February 2017 Loan Agreements were from July to September of 2018. During the year ended December 31, 2018 the Company has repaid $131,606 of principal and $45,931 of unpaid interest. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company converted $268,394 of principal and $21,620 of unpaid interest into 1,444,867 shares of common stock. Upon conversion of the notes, the Company also issued 722,434 warrants with a grant date fair value of $104,124 which is recorded in Other income (expense) on the accompanying consolidated statement of operations. The June 2017 Loan Agreement On June 12, 2017, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “June 2017 Loan Agreement”) with an individual (the “June 2017 Lender”) whereby the June 2017 Lender issued the Company a promissory note of $50,000 (the “June 2017 Note”). Pursuant to the June 2017 Loan Agreement, the June 2017 Note bears interest at a rate of 10% per annum. As additional consideration for entering in the June 2017 Loan Agreement, the Company issued the June 2017 Lender a five-year warrant to purchase 35,000 shares of the Company’s common stock with an exercise price of $0.20 per share. The maturity date of the June 2017 Note was September 1, 2017 (the “June 2017 Maturity Date”) at which time all outstanding principal, accrued and unpaid interest and other amounts due under the June 2017 Note were due. During the year ended December 31, 2018 the Company repaid $50,000 principal and the debtor forgave the interest of $4,424, which was recorded as a gain on forgiveness of debt on the accompanying consolidated statement of operations. The July 2017 Loan Agreement On July 21, 2017, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “July 2017 Loan Agreement”) with an individual (the “July 2017 Lender”), the July 2017 Lender issued the Company a promissory note of $100,000 (the “July 2017 Note”). Pursuant to the July 2017 Loan Agreement, the July 2017 Note bears interest at a rate of 10% per annum. As additional consideration for entering in the July 2017 Loan Agreement, the Company issued the July 2017 Lender a five-year warrant to purchase 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock with an exercise price of $0.20 per share. The maturity date of the July 2017 Note was April 21, 2017 (the “July 2017 Maturity Date”) at which time all outstanding principal, accrued and unpaid interest and other amounts due under the July 2017 Note were due. On September 28, 2017, the July 2017 Note and accrued but unpaid interest was converted into the Company’s August 2017 Convertible Note Offering. F- 19 The First November 2017 Loan Agreement On November 28, 2017, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “First November 2017 Loan Agreement”) with an individual (the “First November 2017 Lender”), the First November 2017 Lender issued the Company a promissory note of $100,000 (the “First November 2017 Note”). Pursuant to the First November 2017 Loan Agreement, the First November 2017 Note has interest of fifteen percent (15%), (i) five percent (5%) (i.e. $5,000) shall be payable in cash or convertible into shares of the Company’s restricted common stock at a rate of $0.20 per share, at the option of the Lender, at the Maturity Date; (ii) ten percent (10%) (i.e. $10,000) shall be paid in the form of the Company’s restricted common stock at a rate of $0.20 per share (equivalent to 50,000 shares of the Company’s common stock ). The maturity date of the First November 2017 Note was January 12, 2018 (the “First November 2017 Maturity Date”). On January 12, 2018, the First November 2017 Note and accrued but unpaid interest was converted into the Company’s August 2017 Convertible Note Offering. The Second November 2017 Loan Agreement On November 29, 2017, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “Second November 2017 Loan Agreement”) with an individual (the “Second November 2017 Lender”), the Second November 2017 Lender issued the Company a promissory note of $50,000 (the “Second November 2017 Note”). Pursuant to the Second November 2017 Loan Agreement, the Second November 2017 Note has interest of fifteen percent (15%), (i) five percent (5%) (i.e. $2,500) shall be payable in cash or convertible into shares of the Company’s restricted common stock at a rate of $0.20 per share, at the option of the Lender, at the Maturity Date; (ii) ten percent (10%) (i.e. $5,000) shall be paid in the form of the Company’s restricted common stock at a rate of $0.20 per share (equivalent to 25,000 shares of the Company’s common stock ). The maturity date of the Second November 2017 Note was January 13, 2018 (the “Second November 2017 Maturity Date”). On January 12, 2018, the Second November 2017 Note and accrued but unpaid interest was converted into the Company’s August 2017 Convertible Note Offering. The Third November 2017 Loan Agreement On November 29, 2017, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “Third November 2017 Loan Agreement”) with an individual (the “Third November 2017 Lender”), the Third November 2017 Lender issued the Company a promissory note of $100,000 (the “Third November 2017 Note”). Pursuant to the Third November 2017 Loan Agreement, the Third November 2017 Note has interest of fifteen percent (15%), (i) five percent (5%) (i.e. $5,000) shall be payable in cash or convertible into shares of the Company’s restricted common stock at a rate of $0.20 per share, at the option of the Lender, at the Maturity Date; (ii) ten percent (10%) (i.e. $10,000) shall be paid in the form of the Company’s restricted common stock at a rate of $0.20 per share (equivalent to 50,000 shares of the Company’s common stock). The maturity date of the Third November 2017 Note was January 13, 2018 (the “Third November 2017 Maturity Date”) at which time all outstanding principal, accrued and unpaid interest and other amounts due under the Third November 2017 Note are due. On January 12, 2018, the Third November 2017 Note and accrued but unpaid interest was converted into the Company’s August 2017 Convertible Note Offering. On March 14, 2018, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “March 2018 Loan Agreement”) with an individual (the “March 2018 Lender”), the March 2018 Lender issued the Company a promissory note of $50,000 (the “March 2018 Note”). Pursuant to the March 2018 Loan Agreement, the March 2018 Note bears interest at a rate of 12% per annum. As additional consideration for entering in the March 2018 Loan Agreement, the Company issued the March 2018 Lender a five-year warrant to purchase 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock with an exercise price of $0.20 per share. The maturity date of the March 2018 Note was March 29, 2018 (the “March 2018 Maturity Date”) at which time all outstanding principal, accrued and unpaid interest and other amounts due under the March 2018 Note were due. On March 29, 2018, the March 2018 Note and accrued but unpaid interest was exchanged for a convertible note under the Company’s March 2018 Convertible Note Offering. The May 2018 Offering During the months of May and June 2018, the Company conducted multiple closings with accredited investors (the “May 2018 Offering”) of units of the Company’s securities by entering into subscription agreements with “accredited investors” (the “May 2018 Investors”) for aggregate gross proceeds of $608,500. The May 2018 Offering consisted of a maximum of $1,200,000 of units of the Company’s securities (each, a “May 2018 Unit” and collectively, the “May 2018 Units”), with each May 2018 Unit consisting of (i) a 13% promissory note (each, a “May 2018 Offering Note” and, together, the “May 2018 Offering Notes”), and (ii) a four-year warrant (“May 2018 Offering Warrant”) to purchase the number of shares of the Company’s common stock equal to three times the principal amount in dollars invested by such investor in each May 2018 Offering Note (the “May 2018 Warrant Shares”) at an exercise price of $0.20 per share (the “May Offering Warrant Exercise Price”), subject to adjustment upon the terms thereof. The May 2018 Offering Notes mature on the nine-month anniversary of their issuance dates. The Company recorded a $215,032 debt discount relating to 1,825,500 May 2018 Offering Warrants issued to investors based on the relative fair value of each equity instrument on the dates of issuance. The debt discount is being accreted over the life of the note to accretion of debt discount and issuance cost. During August 2018, the Company converted all outstanding principal unpaid interest into the August 2018 equity raise. F- 20 The May Offering Warrant Exercise Price of the May 2018 Offering Warrants are subject to adjustment for issuances of the Company’s common stock or any equity linked instruments or securities convertible into the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of less than the prevailing May 2018 Offering Warrant Exercise Price. Such adjustment shall result in the May 2018 Offering Warrant Exercise Price being reduced to such lower purchase price, subject to carve-outs as described therein. During the nine months ended December 31, 2018, the Company converted $608,500 of principal and $723,780 of unpaid interest into the August 2018 equity raise (as defined below). July 2018 Loan Agreements In July 2018, the Company received gross proceeds of $100,000 from the issuance of notes payable. As additional consideration for entering into the debentures, the Company issued the investor a 4-year warrant to purchase 300,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.20 per share. The Company recorded a $34,569 debt discount relating to these warrants issued to these investors based on the relative fair value of each equity instrument on the dates of issuance. The debt discount is being accreted over the life of this note to accretion of debt discount and issuance cost. On November 8, 2018 the Company executed upon agreements that extended the maturity dates of these loans to March 7, 2019. As part of the extension agreements, the Company issued 204,051 warrants to purchase common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.30. During the year ended December 31, 2018 the Company has repaid $50,000 of principal and $1,700 of unpaid interest. August 2018 Loan Agreements On August 30, 2018, the Company received gross proceeds of $33,333 from the issuance of a note payable. As additional consideration for entering into the debenture, the Company issued the investor a 4-year warrant to purchase 33,333 shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.20 per share. The Company recorded a $4,178 debt discount relating to these warrants issued to this investor based on the relative fair value of each equity instrument on the dates of issuance. The debt discount was fully accreted during the nine months ended December 31, 2018. On September 7, 2018 the Company has repaid $33,333 in principal. Note 7 – Convertible Note Payable Convertible notes payable as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 is as follows: Outstanding Principal as of Warrants December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017 Interest Rate Conversion Price Maturity Date Quantity Exercise Price The November 2016 Convertible Note Offering $ - $ 25,000 10 % 0.30 November 1, 2017 400,000 $ 0.30 The June 2017 Convertible Note Offering - 71,500 12 % Not Applicable September 1, 2017 114,700 0.20 The August 2017 Convertible Note Offering - 2,943,884 15 % 0.20 (*) August – November 2019 14,716,419 0.20 The First December 2017 Note - 100,000 15 % 0.20 (*) December 21, 2019 500,000 0.20 The February 2018 Convertible Note Offering 75,000 - 15 % 0.20 (*) January – February 2020 5,078,375 0.20 The January 2018 Note - - 0.20 (*) January 12, 2020 343,806 0.20 The February 2018 Note - - 18 % 0.20 (*) February 8, 2020 81,500 0.20 The March 2018 Convertible Note Offering 75,000 - 14 % 0.20 (*) March – April 2020 4,806,833 0.20 150,000 3,140,384 Less: Debt Discount (17,280 ) (452,022 ) Less: Debt Issuance Costs (9,239 ) (79,569 ) 123,481 2,608,793 Less: Current Debt - (96,500 ) Total Long-Term Debt $ 123,481 $ 2,512,293 (*) As subject to adjustment as further outlined in the notes F- 21 The November 2016 Convertible Note Offering During the months of November and December 2016, the Company issued convertible notes to third party lenders totaling $400,000 (the “November 2016 Convertible Note Offering”). These notes accrued interest at a rate of 10% per annum and matured with interest and principal both due between November 1, 2017 through December 29, 2017. The notes and accrued interest are convertible at a conversion price as defined therein. In addition, in connection with these notes the Company issued five-year warrants to purchase an aggregate of 400,000 shares of Company common stock at a purchase price of $0.30 per share. These investors converted $375,000 of principal and $30,719 of interest into the August 2017 Convertible Note Offering. During the year December 2018, the Company converted $25,000 of principal and $4,417 of unpaid interest into the August 2018 Equity Raise (as defined below). The June 2017 Convertible Note Offering During the month of June 2017 the Company issued convertible notes to third party lenders totaling $71,500. These notes accrued interest at 12% per annum and matured with interest and principal both due on September 1, 2017. These notes and accrued interest may be converted into a subsequent offering at a 15% discount to the offering price are convertible at a conversion price as defined therein. In addition, the Company issued warrants to purchase 67,550 shares of Company common stock. These warrants entitle the holders to purchase the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.20 per share for a period of five years from the issue date. As of December 31, 2017, the Company was currently in default on $71,500 in principal due on these notes. On February 8, 2018, the Company paid these notes and is no longer in default. The July 2017 Convertible Offering During the month of July 2017, the Company entered into Securities Purchase Agreements and conducted closings of a private placement offering (the “July 2017 Convertible Note Offering”) of the Company’s securities for aggregate gross proceeds of $445,000. In aggregate, the Company entered into Securities Purchase Agreements with three accredited investors for (i) the issuance and sale of 8.5% Convertible Redeemable Debentures, containing a ten percent (10%) original issuance discount, due April 18, 2018 (the “Debentures”) and (ii) the issuance and sale of five-year Common Stock Purchase Warrants to purchase up to 778,750 shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share. The Warrants were immediately exercisable upon issuance at an exercise price of $0.20 per share, subject to adjustment, and expire five years from the date of issuance. The accredited investors also received a total of 245,000 shares of the Company’s common stock as inducement for participating in the July 2017 Convertible Note Offering (the “Consideration Shares”). During September 8, 2017 through September 13, 2017, the Company redeemed the 8.5% Convertible Redeemable Debentures by paying the three accredited investors an aggregate $606,812 representing 117.5% of the principal along with interest. Pursuant to such redemption, the Debentures are no longer in full force and effect. The Company also repurchased 220,000 consideration shares of one of the accredited investors for $19,007, cancelling the accredited investor’s Consideration Shares. Due to the fact that these convertible notes have an option to convert at a variable amount, they are subject to derivative liability treatment. The Company has applied ASC 815, due to the potential for settlement in a variable quantity of shares. The conversion feature has been measured at fair value using a Black Scholes model at the issuance date and the period end. The conversion feature of The July 2017 Convertible Offering issued during the year ended December 31, 2017, gave rise to a derivative liability of $332,942 which was recorded as a debt discount. The debt discount is charged to accretion of debt discount and issuance cost ratably over the term of the convertible note. The Company recorded an $78,823 debt discount relating to 778,750 warrants issued to investors based on the relative fair value of each equity instrument on the dates of issuance. The debt discount is being accreted over the life of the note to accretion of debt discount and issuance cost. The August 2017 Convertible Note Offering From August through November of 2017, the Company conducted multiple closings of a private placement offering to accredited investors (the “August 2017 Convertible Note Offering”) of units of the Company’s securities by entering into subscription agreements with “accredited investors” (the “August 2017 Investors”) for aggregate gross proceeds of $1,585,000. In addition, $1,217,177 of the Company’s short-term debt along with accrued but unpaid interest of $40,146 was converted into the August 2017 Convertible Note Offering. These conversions resulted in the issuance of 6,791,419 warrants with a fair value of $583,681 and an original issue discount of $101,561. These were recorded as a loss on extinguishment of debt. The August 2017 Convertible Note Offering consisted of a maximum of $6,000,000 of units of the Company’s securities (each, a “August 2017 Unit” and collectively, the “August 2017 Units”), with each August 2017 Unit consisting of (a) a 15% Convertible Secured Promissory Note (each a “August 2017 Offering Note”, and together the “August 2017 Offering Notes”), convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock (“August 2017 Offering Conversion Shares”) at a conversion price of $0.20 per share (the “August 2017 Note Conversion Price”), and (b) a five-year warrant (each a “August 2017 Offering Warrant and together the “August 2017 Offering Warrants”) to purchase common stock equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the shares into which the August 2017 Offering Notes can be converted into (“August 2017 Offering Warrant Shares”) at an exercise price of $0.20 per share (“August 2017 Offering Warrant Exercise Price”). The August 2017 Offering Notes mature on the second (2nd) anniversary of their issuance dates. F- 22 The August 2017 Note Conversion Price and the August 2017 Offering Warrant Exercise Price are subject to adjustment for issuances of the Company’s common stock or any equity linked instruments or securities convertible into the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of less than the prevailing August 2017 Note Conversion Price or August 2017 Offering Warrant Exercise Price. Such adjustment shall result in the August 2017 Note Conversion Price and August 2017 Offering Warrant Exercise Price being reduced to such lower purchase price, subject to carve-outs as described therein. The Company recorded a $472,675 debt discount relating to 7,925,000 August 2017 Offering Warrants issued to investors based on the relative fair value of each equity instrument on the dates of issuance. The debt discount is being accreted over the life of the note to accretion of debt discount and issuance cost. In connection with the August 2017 Convertible Note Offering, the Company paid a placement agent a cash fee of $90,508 to for services rendered in connection therewith on a “best-efforts” basis, which was recorded as issuance cost and is being accreted over the life of the note to accretion of debt discount and issuance cost. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company converted $2,830,764 of principal and $409,287 of unpaid interest into the August 2018 Equity Raise (as defined below). During the year ended December 31, 2018 the Company has repaid $114,000 of principal and $18,410 of unpaid interest. The First December 2017 Note On December 27, 2017, the Company issued a convertible note to a third-party lender totaling $100,000 (the “First December 2017 Note”). The First December 2017 Note accrues interest at 15% per annum and matures with interest and principal both due on December 27, 2019. In addition, the Company issued a warrant to purchase 500,000 shares of Company common stock. The warrant entitles the holder to purchase the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.20 per share for a period of five years from the issue date. The Company recorded a $35,525 debt discount relating to the warrants issued to the investor based on the relative fair value of each equity instrument on the dates of issuance. The debt discount is being accreted over the life of the note The First December 2017 Note and accrued interest is convertible at a conversion price of $0.20 per share, subject to adjustment. The First December 2017 Note is secured by a second priority lien on the assets of the Company. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company converted $100,000 of principal and $10,292 of unpaid interest into the August 2018 Equity Raise (as defined below). The February 2018 Convertible Note Offering During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company conducted multiple closings of a private placement offering to accredited investors (the “February 2018 Convertible Note Offering”) of units of the Company’s securities by entering into subscription agreements with “accredited investors” (the “February 2018 Investors”) for aggregate gross proceeds of $725,000. In addition, $250,000 of the Company’s short-term debt along with accrued but unpaid interest of $40,675 was exchanged for convertible debt in the February 2018 Offering. These conversions resulted in the issuance of 1,453,375 warrants with a fair value of $181,139. These were recorded as a loss on extinguishment of debt. The February 2018 Convertible Note Offering consisted of a maximum of $750,000 of units of the Company’s securities (each, a “February 2018 Unit” and collectively, the “February 2018 Units”), with each February 2018 Unit consisting of (a) a 15% Convertible Secured Promissory Note (each a “February 2018 Convertible Note” and together the “February 2018 Convertible Notes”), convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $.001 per share (“February 2018 Conversion Shares”) at a conversion price of $0.20 per share (the “February 2018 Note Conversion Price”), and (b) a five-year warrant (each a “February 2018 Offering Warrant and together the “February 2018 Offering Warrants”) to purchase common stock equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the shares into which the February 2018 Convertible Notes can be converted into (“February 2018 Warrant Shares”) at an exercise price of $0.20 per share (“February 2018 Warrant Exercise Price”). The February 2018 Offering Notes mature on the second (2nd) anniversary of their issuance dates. The February 2018 Offering Notes are secured by a second priority security interest in the Company’s assets up to $1,000,000. The February 2018 Note Conversion Price and the February 2018 Offering Warrant Exercise Price are subject to adjustment for issuances of the Company’s common stock or any equity linked instruments or securities convertible into the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of less than the prevailing Conversion Price or Exercise Price. Such adjustment shall result in the Conversion Price and Exercise Price being reduced to such lower purchase price, subject to carve-outs as described therein. F- 23 The conversion feature of the February 2018 Convertible Note Offering provides for an effective conversion price that is below market value on the date of issuance. Such feature is normally characterized as a beneficial conversion feature (“BCF”). When the Company records a BCF the relative fair value of the BCF is recorded as a debt discount against the face amount of the respective debt instrument. The Company recorded a BCF and related debt discount of $37,350, the discount is being accreted over the life of the first Debenture to accretion of debt discount and issuance cost. The Company recorded a $316,875 debt discount relating to 3,625,000 February 2018 Offering Warrants issued to investors based on the relative fair value of each equity instrument on the dates of issuance. The debt discount is being accreted over the life of these notes to accretion of debt discount and issuance cost. In connection with the February 2018 Convertible Note Offering, the Company retained a placement agent (the “Placement Agent”), to carry out the Offering on a “best-efforts” basis. For services in its capacity as Placement Agent, the Company has paid the Placement Agent a cash fee of $94,250 and issued to the Placement Agent shares of the Company’s common stock equal to ten percent (10%) of the Conversion Shares underlying the February 2018 Convertible Notes or 362,500 shares that had a fair value of $74,881, which was recorded as issuance cost and is being accreted over the life of these notes to accretion of debt discount and issuance cost. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company converted $940,675 of principal and $86,544 of unpaid interest into the August 2018 Equity Raise (as defined below). The January 2018 Note On January 12, 2018, the Company issued a convertible note to a third-party lender totaling $68,761 to settle an outstanding vendor liability (the “January 2018 Note”). The January 2018 Note accrues interest at 15% per annum and matures with interest and principal both due on January 12, 2020. The conversions resulted in the issuance of 343,806 warrants with a fair value of $42,850. These were recorded as a loss on extinguishment of debt. The warrant entitles the holder to purchase the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.20 per share for a period of five years from the issue date. The January 2018 Note and accrued interest is convertible at a conversion price of $0.20 per share, subject to adjustment. The January 2018 Note is secured by a second priority lien on the assets of the Company. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company exchanged $68,761 of principal and $7,212 of unpaid interest pursuant to the August 2018 Equity Raise (as defined below). The February 2018 Note On February 8, 2018, the Company issued a convertible note to a third-party lender totaling $40,750 (the “February 2018 Note”). The February 2018 Note accrues interest at 18% per annum and matures with interest and principal both due on February 8, 2020. In addition, the Company issued a warrant to purchase 81,500 shares of Company common stock. The warrant entitles the holder to purchase the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.20 per share for a period of five years from the issue date. The Company recorded a $7,963 debt discount relating to the warrants issued to the investor based on the relative fair value of each equity instrument on the dates of issuance and an original issue discount of $5,298. The debt discount is being accreted over the life of the note. The February 2018 Note and accrued interest is convertible at a conversion price of $0.20 per share, subject to adjustment. The February 2018 Note is secured by a second priority lien on the assets of the Company. During the year ended December 31, 2018 the Company has repaid $40,750 of principal and $3,548 of unpaid interest. The March 2018 Convertible Note Offering During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company conducted multiple closings of a private placement offering to accredited investors (the “March 2018 Convertible Note Offering”) of units of the Company’s securities by entering into subscription agreements with “accredited investors” (the “March 2018 Investors”) for aggregate gross proceeds of $770,000. In addition, $50,000 of the Company’s short-term debt, $767 accrued but unpaid interest and $140,600 of the Company’s vendor liabilities was exchanged for convertible debt within the March 2018 Convertible Note Offering. These conversions resulted in the issuance of 956,833 warrants with a fair value of $84,087. These were recorded as a loss on extinguishment of debt. The March 2018 Convertible Note Offering consisted of a maximum of $900,000, with an over-allotment option of an additional $300,000 of units of the Company’s securities (each, a “March 2018 Unit” and collectively, the “March 2018 Units”), with each March 2018 Unit consisting of (a) a 14% Convertible Secured Promissory Note (each a “March 2018 Note” and together the “March 2018 Notes”), convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $.001 per share (“Conversion Shares”) at a conversion price of $0.20 per share (the “Conversion Price”), and (b) a four-year warrant (each a “Warrant and together the “Warrants”) to purchase common stock equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the shares into which the Notes can be converted into (“Warrant Shares”) at an exercise price of $0.20 per share (“Exercise Price”). The March 2018 Notes mature on the second (2nd) anniversary of their issuance dates. The Conversion Price of the March 2018 Note and the Exercise Price of the Warrants are subject to adjustment for issuances of the Company’s common stock or any equity linked instruments or securities convertible into the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of less than the prevailing Conversion Price or Exercise Price. Such adjustment shall result in the Conversion Price and Exercise Price being reduced to such lower purchase price, subject to carve-outs as described therein. F- 24 The Company recorded a $254,788 debt discount relating to 4,806,833 warrants issued to investors based on the relative fair value of each equity instrument on the dates of issuance. The debt discount is being accreted over the life of the note to accretion of debt discount and issuance cost. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company converted $886,367 of principal and $51,293 of unpaid interest pursuant to the August 2018 Equity Raise (as defined below). Note 8 – Related Party Loans Convertible notes Convertible notes payable – related party as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 is as follows: Outstanding Principal as of Warrants December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017 Interest Rate Maturity Date Quantity Exercise Price The August 2017 Convertible Note Offering $ - $ 1,416,026 15 % August – October 2019 4,589,466 $ 0.20 The Second December 2017 Note - 100,000 15 % December 21, 2019 500,000 0.20 The February 2018 Convertible Note Offering - - 15 % January – February 2020 125,000 0.20 The Second February 2018 Note - - 20 % September 30, 2018 81,500 0.20 The March 2018 Convertible Note Offering 400 - 14 % March 2020 1,197,000 0.20 400 1,516,026 Less: Debt Discount (72 ) (170,780 ) Less: Debt Issuance Costs - - 328 1,345,246 Less: Current Debt - - Total Long-Term Debt $ 328 $ 1,345,246 The August 2017 Convertible Note Offering During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company conducted multiple closings of a private placement offering to accredited investors (the “The August 2017 Convertible Offering”) of units of the Company’s securities by entering into subscription agreements with “accredited investors” (the “August 2017 Investors”) for aggregate gross proceeds of $505,000. In addition, $645,000 of the Company’s short-term debt along with accrued but unpaid interest of $206,026 was converted into the August 2017 Convertible Offering. These conversions resulted in the issuance of 4,555,129 warrants with a fair value of $440,157 and the increase of principal of $60,000. These resulted in a loss on extinguishment of debt of $500,157. The Company offered, through a placement agent, $6,000,000 of units of its securities (each, an “August 2017 Unit” and collectively, the “August 2017 Units”), with each August 2017 Unit consisting of (a) a 15% Convertible Secured Promissory Note (each a “August 2017 Note” and together the “August 2017 Notes”), convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $.001 per share (“Conversion Shares”) at a conversion price of $0.20 per share (the “Conversion Price”), and (b) a five-year warrant (each a “Warrant and together the “Warrants”) to purchase common stock equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the shares into which the Notes can be converted into (“Warrant Shares”) at an exercise price of $0.20 per share (“Exercise Price”). The August 2017 Notes mature on the second (2nd) anniversary of their issuance dates. F- 25 The Conversion Price of the August 2017 Note and the Exercise Price of the Warrants are subject to adjustment for issuances of the Company’s common stock or any equity linked instruments or securities convertible into the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of less than the prevailing Conversion Price or Exercise Price. Such adjustment shall result in the Conversion Price and Exercise Price being reduced to such lower purchase price, subject to carve-outs as described therein. The Company recorded a $160,700 debt discount relating to 2,525,000 warrants issued to investors based on the relative fair value of each equity instrument on the dates of issuance. The debt discount is being accreted over the life of these notes to accretion of debt discount and issuance cost. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company converted $1,416,026 of principal and $202,362 of unpaid interest pursuant to the August 2018 Equity Raise (as defined below). The Second December 2017 Note On December 21, 2017, the Company issued a convertible note to a third-party lender totaling $100,000 (the “Second December 2017 Note”). The Second December 2017 Note accrues interest at 15% per annum and matures with interest and principal both due on December 27, 2019. In addition, the Company issued a warrant to purchase 500,000 shares of Company common stock. The warrant entitles the holder to purchase the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.20 per share for a period of five years from the issue date. The Company recorded a $36,722 debt discount relating to the warrants issued to the investor based on the relative fair value of each equity instrument on the dates of issuance. The debt discount is being accreted over the life of the note The Second December 2017 Note and accrued interest is convertible at a conversion price of $0.20 per share, subject to adjustment. The Second December 2017 Note is secured as a second priority lien on the assets of the Company. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company converted $100,000 of principal and $10,542 of unpaid interest pursuant to the August 2018 Equity Raise (as defined below) and the note is no longer outstanding. The February 2018 Convertible Note Offering During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company conducted multiple closings of a private placement offering to accredited investors (the “February 2018 Convertible Note Offering”) of units of the Company’s securities by entering into subscription agreements with “accredited investors” (the “Investors”) for aggregate gross proceeds of $25,000. The February 2018 Convertible Note Offering consisted of a maximum of $750,000 of units of the Company’s securities (each, a “February 2018 Unit” and collectively, the “February 2018 Units”), with each February 2018 Unit consisting of (a) a 15% Convertible Secured Promissory Note (each a “February 2018 Note” and together the “February 2018 Notes”), convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $.001 per share (“Conversion Shares”) at a conversion price of $0.20 per share (the “Conversion Price”), and (b) a five-year warrant (each a “Warrant and together the “Warrants”) to purchase common stock equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the shares into which the February 2018 Notes can be converted into (“Warrant Shares”) at an exercise price of $0.20 per share (“Exercise Price”). The February 2018 Notes mature on the second (2nd) anniversary of their issuance dates. The February 2018Notes are secured by a second priority security interest in the Company’s assets up to $1,000,000. The Conversion Price of the Note and the Exercise Price of the Warrants are subject to adjustment for issuances of the Company’s common stock or any equity linked instruments or securities convertible into the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of less than the prevailing Conversion Price or Exercise Price. Such adjustment shall result in the Conversion Price and Exercise Price being reduced to such lower purchase price, subject to carve-outs as described therein. The conversion feature of the February 2018 Convertible Note Offering provides for an effective conversion price that is below market value on the date of issuance. Such feature is normally characterized as a beneficial conversion feature (“BCF”). When the Company records a BCF the relative fair value of the BCF is recorded as a debt discount against the face amount of the respective debt instrument. The Company recorded a BCF and related debt discount of $1,063, the discount is being accreted over the life of the first Debenture to accretion of debt discount and issuance cost. F- 26 The Company recorded a $11,054 debt discount relating to 125,000 warrants issued to Investors based on the relative fair value of each equity instrument on the dates of issuance. The debt discount is being accreted over the life of the note to accretion of debt discount and issuance cost. In connection with the Offering, the Company retained Network 1 Financial Securities, Inc. (the “Placement Agent”), to carry out the Offering on a “best-efforts” basis. For services in its capacity as Placement Agent, the Company has paid the Placement Agent a cash fee of $3,250 and issued to the Placement Agent shares of the Company’s common stock equal to ten percent (10%) of the Conversion Shares underlying the Notes or 12,500 shares that had a fair value of $2,606, which was recorded as issuance cost and is being accreted over the life of these notes to accretion of debt discount and issuance cost. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company converted $25,000 of principal and $2,219 of unpaid interest pursuant to the August 2018 Equity Raise (as defined below). The Second February 2018 Note On February 8, 2018, the Company issued a convertible note to a third-party lender totaling $40,750 (the “Second February 2018 Note”). The Second February 2018 Note accrues interest at 18% per annum and matures with interest and principal both due on December 31, 2018. In addition, the Company issued a warrant to purchase 81,500 shares of Company common stock. The warrant entitles the holder to purchase the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.20 per share for a period of five years from the issue date. The Company recorded a $7,963 debt discount relating to the warrants issued to the investor based on the relative fair value of each equity instrument on the dates of issuance and an original issue discount of $5,298. The debt discount is being accreted over the life of the note The Second February 2018 Note and accrued interest is convertible at a conversion price of $0.20 per share, subject to adjustment. The Second February 2018 Note is secured as a second priority lien on the assets of the Company. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company has repaid $5,298 in principal. In addition, the Company converted $35,452 of principal and $4,116 of unpaid interest into the August 2018 Equity Raise (as defined below). The March 2018 Convertible Note Offering During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company conducted multiple closings of a private placement offering to accredited investors (the “March 2018 Convertible Note Offering”) of units of the Company’s securities by entering into subscription agreements with “accredited investors” (the “Investors”) for aggregate gross proceeds of $239,400. The March 2018 Convertible Note Offering consisted of a maximum of $900,000, with an over-allotment option of an additional $300,000, of units of the Company’s securities (each, a “March 2018 Unit” and collectively, the “March 2018 Units”), with each March 2018 Unit consisting of (a) a 14% Convertible Secured Promissory Note (each a “March 2018 Note” and together the “March 2018 Notes”), convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $.001 per share (“Conversion Shares”) at a conversion price of $0.20 per share (the “Conversion Price”), and (b) a four-year warrant (each a “Warrant and together the “Warrants”) to purchase common stock equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the shares into which the Notes can be converted into (“Warrant Shares”) at an exercise price of $0.20 per share (“Exercise Price”). The Notes mature on the second (2nd) anniversary of their issuance dates. The Conversion Price of the Note and the Exercise Price of the Warrants are subject to adjustment for issuances of the Company’s common stock or any equity linked instruments or securities convertible into the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of less than the prevailing Conversion Price or Exercise Price. Such adjustment shall result in the Conversion Price and Exercise Price being reduced to such lower purchase price, subject to carve-outs as described therein. The Company recorded a $84,854 debt discount relating to 1,197,000 warrants issued to investors based on the relative fair value of each equity instrument on the dates of issuance. The debt discount is being accreted over the life of these notes to accretion of debt discount and issuance cost. F- 27 During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company converted $239,000 of principal and $15,401 of unpaid interest into the August 2018 Equity Raise (as defined below). Notes payable Notes payable – related party as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 is as follows: Outstanding Principal as of Warrants December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017 Interest Rate Maturity Date Quantity Exercise Price The May 2016 Rosen Loan Agreement $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 13 % November 26, 2017 1,000,000 $ 0.40 The September 2017 Rosen Loan Agreement - 224,000 18 % September 24, 2017 125,000 0.20 The November 2017 Schiller Loan Agreement - 25,000 15 % December 31, 2017 - - The May 2018 Schiller Loan Agreements - - 13 % February 2, 2019 300,000 0.20 The June 2018 Frommer Loan Agreement 10,000 - 6 % August 17, 2018 30,000 0.20 The July 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement 56,695 - 6 % August 17, 2018 30,000 0.20 The July 2018 Schiller Loan Agreements 40,000 - 6 % August 17, 2018 150,000 0.20 The December 2018 Gravitas Loan Agreement 50,000 - 6 % January 22, 2019 50,000 0.30 The December 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement 75,000 - 6 % January 26, 2019 75,000 0.30 1,231,695 1,249,000 Less: Debt Discount (8,125 ) - 1,223,570 Less: Current Debt (1,223,570 ) - $ - $ 1,249,000 The May 2016 Rosen Loan Agreement On May 26, 2016, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “May 2016 Rosen Loan Agreement”) with Arthur Rosen, an individual (“Rosen”), pursuant to which on May 26, 2016 (the “Closing Date”), Rosen provided the Company a secured term loan in the principal amount of $1,000,000 (the “May 2016 Rosen Loan”). In connection with the May 2016 Rosen Loan Agreement, on May 26, 2016, the Company and Rosen entered into a security agreement (the “Rosen Security Agreement”), pursuant to which the Company granted to Rosen a senior security interest in substantially all of the Company’s assets as security for repayment of the May 2016 Rosen Loan. Pursuant to the May 2016 Rosen Loan Agreement, the May 2016 Rosen Loan bears interest at a rate of 12.5% per annum, compounded annually and payable on the maturity date of May 26, 2017 (the “May 2016 Rosen Maturity Date”) at which time all outstanding principal, accrued and unpaid interest and other amounts due under the May 2016 Rosen Loan are due. The Company entered into an amendment to the May 2016 Rosen Loan extending the May 2016 Rosen Maturity Date to November 26, 2017. As additional consideration for entering in the May 2016 Rosen Loan Agreement, the Company issued Rosen a five-year warrant to purchase 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.40 per share (the “May 2016 Rosen Warrant”). The May 2016 Rosen Warrant contains anti-dilution provisions as further described therein. On September 7, 2017 (the “Conversion Date”), Rosen converted all accrued but unpaid interest on the May 2016 Rosen Loan from May 26, 2016 through September 6, 2017 in the amount of $124,306 (the “May 2016 Rosen Loan Interest”) into the Company’s August Convertible Note Offering, after which May 2016 Rosen Loan Interest was deemed paid in full through the Conversion Date. On March 29, 2019, the Company executed an agreement to further extend the maturity date of this loan to May 15, 2019. F- 28 The September 2017 Rosen Loan Agreement On September 8, 2017, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “September 2017 Rosen Loan Agreement”) with Rosen, whereby the Company issued Rosen a promissory note in the principal amount of $224,000 (the “September 2017 Rosen Note”). The September 2017 Rosen Note is secured by an officer of the Company. As additional consideration for entering in the September 2017 Rosen Note Loan Agreement, the Company issued Rosen a five-year warrant to purchase 25,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.20 per share. On November 13, 2017, in consideration for extending the September 2017 Rosen Note, Rosen was issued a warrant to purchase 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock exercisable within five (5) years and with an exercise price of $0.20 per share. On February 20, 2018, the Company entered into a forbearance agreement whereby the Company issued Rosen a five-year warrant to purchase 448,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.20 per share. These warrants had a fair value of $65,378 which was recorded to Loss on extinguishment of debt. The new maturity date of the September 2017 Rosen Loan Agreement is September 8, 2018. During the year December 31, 2018, the Company converted $224,000 of principal and $20,496 of unpaid interest pursuant to the August 2018 Equity Raise (as defined below) and the loan is no longer outstanding. The November 2017 Schiller Loan Agreement On November 20, 2017, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “November 2017 Schiller Loan Agreement”) with Mr. Len Schiller (“Schiller”), a member of the Company’s Board of Directors, whereby the Company issued Schiller a promissory note in the principal amount of $25,000 (the “November 2017 Schiller Note”). Pursuant to the November 2017 Schiller Loan Agreement, the November 2017 Schiller Note bears interest at a rate of 15% per annum. During the year ended December 31, 2018 the Company repaid $25,000 in principal and $637 in interest and the loan is no longer outstanding. The January 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement On January 16, 2018, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “January 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement”) with Rosen, whereby the Company issued Rosen a promissory note in the principal amount of $60,000 (the “January 2018 Rosen Note”). The January 2018 Rosen Note is secured by Jeremy Frommer, whereas upon default Mr. Frommer would owe his own personal default shares of the Company’s common stock to Rosen equal to the amount of principal outstanding divided by 0.20. Pursuant to the January 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement, the January 2018 Rosen Note bears interest at a rate of 6% per annum and was payable on the maturity date of January 31, 2018 (the “January 2018 Rosen Maturity Date”) at which time all outstanding principal, accrued and unpaid interest and other amounts due under the May 2016 Rosen Loan became due. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company repaid $60,000 in principal and $200 in interest and the loan is no longer outstanding. The January 2018 Gordon Loan Agreement On January 16, 2018, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “January 2018 Gordon Loan Agreement”) with Mr. Christopher Gordon (“Gordon”), whereby the Company issued Gordon a promissory note in the principal amount of $40,000 (the “January 2018 Gordon Note”). The January 2018 Gordon Note is secured by Jeremy Frommer, whereas upon default Mr. Frommer would owe his own personal default shares of the Company’s common stock to Gordon equal to the amount of principal outstanding divided by 0.20. Pursuant to the January 2018 Gordon Loan Agreement, the January 2018 Gordon Note bears interest at a rate of 6% per annum and payable on the maturity date of January 31, 2018 (the “January 2018 Gordon Maturity Date”) at which time all outstanding principal, accrued and unpaid interest and other amounts due under the January 2018 Gordon Note became due. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company repaid $40,000 in principal and $105 in interest and the loan is non longer outstanding. F- 29 The First March 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement On March 4, 2018, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “First March 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement”) with Rosen, whereby the Company issued Rosen a promissory note in the principal amount of $10,000 (the “First March 2018 Rosen Note”). As additional consideration for entering in the First March 2018 Rosen Note Loan Agreement, the Company issued Rosen a five-year warrant to purchase 10,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.20 per share. Pursuant to the First March 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement, the First March 2018 Rosen Note bears interest at a rate of 12% per annum and is payable on the maturity date of March 19, 2018 (the “First March 2018 Rosen Maturity Date”) at which time all outstanding principal, accrued and unpaid interest and other amounts due under the First March 2018 Rosen Note was due. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company repaid $10,000 in principal and $260 in interest and the loan is no longer outstanding. The Second March 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement On March 9, 2018, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “Second March 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement”) with Rosen, whereby the Company issued Rosen a promissory note in the principal amount of $15,000 (the “Second March 2018 Rosen Note”). As additional consideration for entering in the Second March 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement, the Company issued Rosen a five-year warrant to purchase 15,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.20 per share. Pursuant to the Second March 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement, the Second March 2018 Rosen Note bears interest at a rate of 12% per annum and is payable on the maturity date of March 24, 2018 (the “Second March 2018 Rosen Maturity Date”) at which time all outstanding principal, accrued and unpaid interest and other amounts due under the Second March 2018 Rosen Note was due. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company repaid $15,000 in principal and $365 in interest and the loan is no longer outstanding. The Third March 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement On March 13, 2018, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “Third March 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement”) with Rosen, whereby the Company issued Rosen a promissory note in the principal amount of $10,000 (the “Third March 2018 Rosen Note”). As additional consideration for entering in the Third March 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement, the Company issued Rosen a five-year warrant to purchase 10,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.20 per share. Pursuant to the Third March 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement, the Third March 2018 Rosen Note bears interest at a rate of 12% per annum and is payable on the maturity date of March 28, 2018 (the “Third March 2018 Rosen Maturity Date”) at which time all outstanding principal, accrued and unpaid interest and other amounts due under the Third March 2018 Rosen Note was due. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company repaid $10,000 in principal and $230 in interest and the loan is no longer outstanding. The May 2018 Schiller Loan Agreement On May 2, 2018, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “May 2018 Schiller Loan Agreement”) with Schiller, a member of the Board, whereby the Company issued Schiller a promissory note in the principal amount of $100,000 (the “May 2018 Schiller Note”). As additional consideration for entering in the May 2018 Schiller Loan Agreement, the Company issued Schiller a four-year warrant to purchase 300,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.20 per share. Pursuant to the May 2018 Schiller Loan Agreement, the May 2018 Schiller Note bears interest at a rate of 13% per annum and is payable on the maturity date of February 02, 2019 (the “May 2018 Schiller Maturity Date”). During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company converted $100,000 of principal and $4,369 of unpaid interest pursuant to the August 2018 Equity Raise (as defined below) and the loan is no longer outstanding. The June 2018 Frommer Loan Agreement On June 29, 2018, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “June 2018 Frommer Loan Agreement”) with Jeremy Frommer, an officer of the Company, whereby the Company issued Frommer a promissory note in the principal amount of $10,000 (the “June 2018 Frommer Note”). As additional consideration for entering in the June 2018 Frommer Note Loan Agreement, the Company issued Frommer a four-year warrant to purchase 30,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.20 per share. Pursuant to the June 2018 Frommer Loan Agreement, the June 2018 Frommer Note bears interest at a rate of 6% per annum and payable on the maturity date of August 17, 2018 (the “June 2018 Frommer Maturity Date”). On November 8, 2018 the Company executed upon an agreement that extended the maturity date of the June 2018 Frommer Agreement to March 7, 2019. As part of the extension agreement, the Company issued Frommer an additional 40,854 warrants to purchase common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.30. These warrants had a fair value of $4,645 which was recorded to loss on extinguishment of debt. On March 29, 2019 the Company executed upon an agreement that extended the maturity date of this loan to May 15, 2019. F- 30 The First July 2018 Schiller Loan Agreement On July 3, 2018, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “First July 2018 Schiller Loan Agreement”) with Schiller, a member of the Board, whereby the Company issued Schiller a promissory note in the principal aggregate amount of $35,000 (the “First July 2018 Schiller Note”). As additional consideration for entering in the First July 2018 Schiller Loan Agreement, the Company issued Schiller a four-year warrant to purchase 75,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.20 per share. Pursuant to the agreement, the note bears interest at a rate of 6% per annum and payable on the maturity date of August 17, 2018. Subsequent to the balance sheet date, on November 8, 2018 the Company executed upon an agreement that extended the maturity date of this loan to March 7, 2019. As part of the extension agreement, the Company issued Schiller warrants to purchase 142,987 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.30. On March 29, 2019 the Company executed upon an agreement that extended the maturity date of this loan to May 15, 2019. The Second July 2018 Schiller Loan Agreement On July 17, 2018, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “Second July 2018 Schiller Loan Agreement”) with Schiller, a member of the Board, whereby the Company issued Schiller a promissory note in the principal aggregate amount of $25,000 (the “Second July 2018 Schiller Note”). As additional consideration for entering in the Second July 2018 Schiller Loan Agreement, the Company issued Schiller a four-year warrant to purchase 75,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.20 per share. Pursuant to the Second July 2018 Schiller Loan Agreement, the Second July 2018 Schiller Note bears interest at a rate of 6% per annum and payable on the maturity date of August 17, 2018. Subsequent to the balance sheet date, on November 8, 2018 the Company executed upon an agreement that extended the maturity date of this loan to March 7, 2019. As part of the extension agreement, the Company issued Schiller warrants to purchase 101,900 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.30. On March 29, 2019 the Company executed upon an agreement that extended the maturity date of this loan to May 15, 2019. The First July 2018 Rosen Loan Agreements On July 12, 2018, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “First July 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement”) with Rosen, an officer of the Company, whereby the Company issued Rosen a promissory note in the principal aggregate amount of $10,000 (the “First July 2018 Rosen Note”). Pursuant to the First July 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement, the note bears interest at a rate of 6% per annum and payable on the maturity date of August 17, 2018. On November 8, 2018 the Company executed upon an agreement that extended the maturity date of this loan to March 7, 2019. As part of the extension agreement, the Company issued Rosen warrants to purchase 27,534 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.30. On March 29, 2019 the Company executed upon an agreement that extended the maturity date of this loan to May 15, 2019. The Second July 2018 Rosen Loan Agreements On July 18, 2018, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “Second July 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement”) with Rosen, whereby the Company issued Rosen a promissory note in the principal aggregate amount of $50,000 (the “Second July 2018 Rosen Note”) resulting from the conversion of a demand note (as described below). As additional consideration for entering into the Second July 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement, the Company issued Rosen a four-year warrant to purchase 150,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.20 per share. Pursuant to the Second July 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement, the Second July 2018 Rosen Note bears interest at a rate of 6% per annum and payable on the maturity date of August 17, 2018. On November 8, 2018 the Company executed upon an agreement that extended the maturity date of this loan to March 7, 2019. As part of the extension agreement, the Company issued Rosen warrants to purchase 203,967 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.30. On March 29, 2019 the Company executed upon an agreement that extended the maturity date of this loan to May 15, 2019. F- 31 The November 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement On November 29, 2018, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “November 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement”) with Rosen, whereby the Company issued Rosen a promissory note in the principal amount of $25,000 (the “November 2018 Rosen Note”). As additional consideration for entering in the November 2018 Rosen Note Loan Agreement, the Company issued Rosen a four-year warrant to purchase 25,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.30 per share. Pursuant to the November 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement, the November 2018 Rosen Note bears interest at a rate of 6% per annum and payable on the maturity date of December 23, 2018 (the “November 2018 Rosen Maturity Date”). During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company repaid $25,000 of principal and $33 of unpaid interest and the loan is no longer outstanding. The December 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement On December 27, 2018, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “December 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement”) with Rosen, whereby the Company issued Rosen a promissory note in the principal amount of $75,000 (the “December 2018 Rosen Note”). As additional consideration for entering in the December 2018 Rosen Note Loan Agreement, the Company issued Rosen a four-year warrant to purchase 75,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.30 per share. Pursuant to the December 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement, the December 2018 Rosen Note bears interest at a rate of 6% per annum and payable on the maturity date of January 26, 2019 (the “December 2018 Rosen Maturity Date”). On March 29, 2019 the Company executed upon an agreement that extended the maturity date of this loan to May 15, 2019. The December 2018 Gravitas Capital Loan Agreement On December 27, 2018, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “December 2018 Gravitas Capital Loan Agreement”) with Gravitas Capital, whereby the Company issued Gravitas Capital a promissory note in the principal amount of $50,000 (the “December 2018 Gravitas Capital Note”). As additional consideration for entering in the December 2018 Gravitas Capital Note Loan Agreement, the Company issued Gravitas Capital a four-year warrant to purchase 50,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.30 per share. Pursuant to the December 2018 Gravitas Capital Loan Agreement, the December 2018 Gravitas Capital Note bears interest at a rate of 6% per annum and payable on the maturity date of January 27, 2019 (the “December 2018 Gravitas Capital Maturity Date”). On March 29, 2019 the Company executed upon an agreement that extended the maturity date of this loan to May 15, 2019. Line of credit – related party On May 9, 2017, the Company entered into a Revolving Line of Credit (the “Grawin LOC”) with Grawin, LLC, a limited liability company controlled by Rosen, a related party. The Grawin LOC was established for a period of twelve months, with a maturity date of May 2018, in which the Company can borrow principal up to $130,000. The Grawin LOC bears interest at a rate of 18%. On June 8, 2018 the Grawin LOC’s maturity date was extended to June 1, 2019. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company exchanged $130,000 of principal and $30,626 of unpaid interest on the Grawin LOC into the August 2018 Equity Raise (as defined below). As of December 31, 2018 and 2017 the total outstanding balance of line of credit - related party was $0 and $130,000, respectively. Demand loan On June 6, 2018, Rosen made non-interest bearing loans of $50,000 to the Company in the form of cash. The loan is due on demand and unsecured. On July 12, 2018, this note was converted into The Second July 2018 Rosen Loan Agreements. Officer compensation During the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 the Company paid $109,407 and $132,792, respectively for living expenses for officers of the Company. F- 32 Note 9 – Capital Leases Payable Capital lease obligation consisted of the following: December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017 (i) Capital lease obligation to a financing company for a term of five (5) years, collateralized by equipment, with interest at 10.0% per annum, with principal and interest due and payable in monthly installments of $383.10 $ 4,732 $ 4,732 Less current maturities (4,732 ) (4,732 ) Capital lease obligation, net of current maturities - - Total Capital Lease Obligation $ 4,732 $ 4,732 The capital leases mature as follows: 2018: $ 4,732 $ 4,732 Note 10 – Derivative Liabilities The Company has identified derivative instruments arising from embedded conversion features in the Company’s convertible notes payable at December 31, 2017. The Company had no financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2018 and 2017. The following summarizes the Black-Scholes assumptions used to estimate the fair value of the derivative liability at the date of issuance and for the convertible notes during the year ended December 31, 2017. Low High Annual dividend rate 0 % 0 % Expected life 0.58 0.75 Risk-free interest rate 1.11 % 1.16 % Expected volatility 90.71 % 93.55 % Risk-free interest rate: The Company uses the risk-free interest rate of a U.S. Treasury Note with a similar term on the date of the grant. Dividend yield: The Company uses a 0% expected dividend yield as the Company has not paid dividends to date and does not anticipate declaring dividends in the near future. Volatility: The Company calculates the expected volatility of the stock price based on the corresponding volatility of the Company’s peer group stock price for a period consistent with the expected term. Expected term: The Company’s remaining term is based on the remaining contractual maturity of the convertible notes. F- 33 The following are the changes in the derivative liabilities during the year ended December 31, 2017. Year Ended December 31, 2017 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Derivative liabilities as January 1, 2017 $ - $ - $ - Addition - - 332,942 Conversion - - Extinguishment Expense (397,288 ) Gain on changes in fair value - - 64,346 Derivative liabilities as December 31, 2017 $ - $ - $ - There was no derivative liability activity during the year ended December 31, 2018. Note 11 - Stockholders’ Deficit Shares Authorized Upon incorporation, the total number of shares of all classes of stock which the Company is authorized to issue is Three Hundred Twenty Million (320,000,000) shares of which Three Hundred Million (300,000,000) shares shall be Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share and Twenty Million (20,000,000) shall be Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share. The designations, rights, and preferences of such preferred stock are to be determined by the Board of Directors. Preferred Stock Series A Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock On February 13, 2015, 100,000 shares of preferred stock were designated as Series A Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series A”). Each share of Series A shall have a stated value equal to $100 (as adjusted for any stock dividends, combinations or splits with respect to such shares) (the “Series A Stated Value”). The holders of the Series A shall be entitled to receive preferential dividends at the rate of 6% per share per annum on the Series A Stated Value, but before any dividend or other distribution will be paid or declared and set apart for payment on any shares of any Junior Stock, as defined. Such dividends shall compound annually and be fully cumulative, and shall accumulate from the date of original issuance of the Series A and shall be payable quarterly, in arrears, commencing on the first day of the calendar quarter following the date on which the Series A is issued. Upon the occurrence of an Event of Default (as defined below) and while such Event of Default is outstanding, such dividend rate shall be increased to 15% per annum on the Series A Stated Value. At the Company’s option, such dividend payments may be made in (i) cash (ii) additional shares of Series A valued at the Series A Stated Value thereof, in an amount equal to 150% of the cash dividend otherwise payable or (iii) a combination of cash and additional shares of Series A, provided there is not an existing current Event of Default on the date on which a dividend payment is payable, in which event the Holder entitled to receive such dividend may elect to receive such dividends in cash or additional shares of Series A Preferred. The dividends on the Series A shall be cumulative whether or not declared so that, if at any time full cumulative dividends at the rate aforesaid on all shares of the Series A then outstanding from the date from and after which dividends thereon are cumulative to the end of the annual dividend period next preceding such time shall not have been paid or declared and set apart for payment, or if the full dividend on all such outstanding Series A for the then current dividend period shall not have been paid or declared and set apart for payment, the amount of the deficiency shall be paid or declared and set apart for payment before any sum shall be set apart for or applied by the Corporation or a subsidiary of the Corporation to the purchase, redemption or other acquisition of the Series A or any shares of any other class of stock ranking on a parity with the Series A and before any dividend or other distribution shall be paid or declared and set apart for payment on any Junior Stock and before any sum shall be set aside for or applied to the purchase, redemption or other acquisition of any Junior Stock. Holder of Series A shall have the right at any time after the issuance, to convert such shares, accrued but unpaid declared dividends on the Series A and any other sum owed by the Corporation arising from the Series A into fully paid and non-assessable shares of Common Stock (the “Conversion Shares”) of the Corporation determined in accordance with the applicable conversion price (the “Conversion Price”). F- 34 The number of Conversion Shares issuable upon conversion shall equal (i) the sum of (A) the Series A Stated Value being converted and/or (B) at the Holder’s election, accrued and unpaid dividends or any other component of the Conversion Amount, divided by (ii) the Conversion Price. The Conversion Price of the Series A shall be $0.25, subject to adjustment. During the year ended December 31, 2016 the conversion price was adjusted to $0.164 The Corporation and the Holder may not convert that amount of the Conversion Amount on a Conversion Date in amounts that would result in the Holder having a beneficial ownership of Common Stock which would be in excess of the sum of (i) the number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by the Holder and its Affiliates on such Conversion Date, and (ii) the number of Conversion Shares issuable upon the conversion of the Conversion Amount with respect to which the determination of this provision is being made on such Conversion Date, which would result in the aggregate beneficial ownership by the Holder and its Affiliates of more than 4.99% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock of the Corporation. For the purposes of the proviso to the immediately preceding sentence, beneficial ownership shall be determined in accordance with Section 13(d) of the 1934 Act and Regulation 13d-3 thereunder. Subject to the foregoing, the Holder shall not be limited to successive exercises which would result in the aggregate issuance of more than 4.99%. The Holder may allocate which of the equity of the Corporation deemed beneficially owned by the Holder shall be included in the 4.99% amount described above and which shall be allocated to the excess above 4.99%. The Holder may waive the conversion limitation described in this Section in whole or in part, upon and effective after sixty-one (61) days’ prior written notice to the Corporation. The holders of our Series A do vote together with the holders of our Common Stock on an as converted basis on each matter submitted to a vote of holders of Common Stock. The number of votes that may be cast by a holder of Series A shall be equal to the number of shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of such Holder’s Series A on the record date for determining those stockholders entitled to vote on the matter. In addition, the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of our outstanding Series A is required to for the following actions: (a) amending the Corporation’s certificate of incorporation or by-laws if such amendment would adversely affect the Series A (b) purchasing any of the Corporation’s securities other than required redemptions of Series A and repurchase under restricted stock and option agreements authorizing the Corporation’s employees; (c) effecting a Liquidation Event; (d) declaring or paying any dividends other than in respect of the Series A; and (e) issuing any additional securities having rights senior to or on parity with the Series A. During the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company accrued $0 for liquidating damages on the Series A and $0 on the warrants associated with the Series A. During the year ended December 31, 2018 the Company converted the remaining Series A into the August 2018 Equity Raise. See below. Series B Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock On December 21, 2015, 20,000 shares of preferred stock were designated as Series B Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series B”). Each share of Series B shall have a stated value equal to $100.00 (as adjusted for any stock dividends, combinations or splits with respect to such shares) (the “Series B Stated Value”). The holders of outstanding shares of Series B shall be entitled to receive preferential dividends at the rate of 6% per share per annum on the Series B Stated Value, but before any dividend or other distribution will be paid or declared and set apart for payment on any shares of any Junior Stock as defined. Such dividends shall compound annually and be fully cumulative and shall accumulate from the date of original issuance of the Series B, and shall be payable quarterly, in arrears, commencing on the first day of the calendar quarter following the date on which the Series B is issued. Upon the occurrence of an Event of Default as defined below and while such Event of Default is outstanding, such dividend rate shall be increased to 15% per annum on the Series B Stated Value. At the Corporation’s option, such dividend payments may be made in (i) cash (ii) additional shares of Series B valued at the Series B Stated Value thereof, in an amount equal to 100% of the cash dividend otherwise payable or (iii) a combination of cash and additional shares of Series B, provided there is not an existing current Event of Default on the date on which a dividend payment is payable, in which event the Holder entitled to receive such dividend may elect to receive such dividends in cash or additional shares of Series B Preferred. F- 35 The dividends on the Series B shall be cumulative whether or not declared so that, if at any time full cumulative dividends at the rate aforesaid on all shares of the Series B then outstanding from the date from and after which dividends thereon are cumulative to the end of the annual dividend period next preceding such time shall not have been paid or declared and set apart for payment, or if the full dividend on all such outstanding Series B for the then current dividend period shall not have been paid or declared and set apart for payment, the amount of the deficiency shall be paid or declared and set apart for payment before any sum shall be set apart for or applied by the Corporation or a subsidiary of the Corporation to the purchase, redemption or other acquisition of the Series B or any shares of any other class of stock ranking on a parity with the Series B and before any dividend or other distribution shall be paid or declared and set apart for payment on any Junior Stock and before any sum shall be set aside for or applied to the purchase, redemption or other acquisition of any Junior Stock. Holders of shares of Series B shall have the right at any time commencing after the issuance to convert such shares, accrued but unpaid declared dividends on the Series B into fully paid and non-assessable shares of Common Stock (the “Conversion Shares”) of the Corporation determined in accordance with the applicable conversion price (the “Conversion Price”). All declared or accrued but unpaid dividends may be converted at the election of the Holder together with or independent of the conversion of the Series B Stated Value of the Series B. The number of Conversion Shares issuable upon conversion of the Conversion Amount shall equal (i) the sum of (A) the Series B Stated Value being converted and/or (B) at the Holder’s election, accrued and unpaid dividends or any other component of the Conversion Amount, divided by (ii) the Conversion Price. The Conversion Price of the Series B shall be $0.30, subject to adjustment. During the year ended December 31, 2016 the conversion price was adjusted to $0.197. The Corporation and the Holder may not convert that amount of the Conversion Amount on a Conversion Date in amounts that would result in the Holder having a beneficial ownership of Common Stock which would be in excess of the sum of (i) the number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by the Holder and its Affiliates on such Conversion Date, and (ii) the number of Conversion Shares issuable upon the conversion of the Conversion Amount with respect to which the determination of this proviso is being made on such Conversion Date, which would result in the aggregate beneficial ownership by the Holder and its Affiliates of more than 4.99% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock of the Corporation. For the purposes of the proviso to the immediately preceding sentence, beneficial ownership shall be determined in accordance with Section 13(d) of the 1934 Act and Regulation 13d-3 thereunder. Subject to the foregoing, the Holder shall not be limited to successive exercises which would result in the aggregate issuance of more than 4.99%. The Holder may allocate which of the equity of the Corporation deemed beneficially owned by the Holder shall be included in the 4.99% amount described above and which shall be allocated to the excess above 4.99%. The Holder may waive the conversion limitation described in this Section in whole or in part, upon and effective after sixty-one (61) days’ prior written notice to the Corporation. The holders of our Series B do vote together with the holders of our Common Stock on an as converted basis on each matter submitted to a vote of holders of Common Stock. The number of votes that may be cast by a holder of Series B shall be equal to the number of shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of such Holder’s Series B on the record date for determining those stockholders entitled to vote on the matter. In addition, the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of our outstanding Series B is required to for the following actions: (a) amending the Corporation’s certificate of incorporation or by-laws if such amendment would adversely affect the Series B (b) purchasing any of the Corporation’s securities other than required redemptions of Series B and repurchase under restricted stock and option agreements authorizing the Corporation’s employees; (c) effecting a Liquidation Event; (d) declaring or paying any dividends other than in respect of the Company’s Series A or Series B; and (e) issuing any additional securities having rights senior to the Series B. F- 36 During the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company accrued $0 for liquidating damages on the Series B and $0 on the warrants associated with the Series B. During the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company issued 0 shares of Series B upon conversion of interest totaling $0. During the year ended December 31, 2018 the Company converted the remaining Series B into the August 2018 Equity Raise. See below. Series D Convertible Preferred Stock On January 29, 2016, 2,100,000 shares of preferred stock were designated as Series D Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series D”). Each share of Series A shall have a stated value equal to $100.00 (as adjusted for any stock dividends, combinations or splits with respect to such shares) (the “Series D Stated Value”). Holders of shares of Series D shall have the right at any time commencing after the issuance to convert such shares into fully paid and non-assessable shares of Common Stock (the “Conversion Shares”) of the Corporation determined in accordance with the applicable conversion price (the “Conversion Price”). The number of Conversion Shares issuable upon conversion of the Conversion Amount shall equal (i) the sum of (A) the Series D Stated Value being converted and/or (B) at the Holder’s election, accrued and unpaid dividends or any other component of the Conversion Amount, divided by (ii) the Conversion Price. The Conversion Price of the Series D is $0.25, subject to adjustment. The Company and the Holder may not convert that amount of the Conversion Amount on a Conversion Date in amounts that would result in the Holder having a beneficial ownership of Common Stock which would be in excess of the sum of (i) the number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by the Holder and its Affiliates on such Conversion Date, and (ii) the number of Conversion Shares issuable upon the conversion of the Conversion Amount with respect to which the determination of this proviso is being made on such Conversion Date, which would result in the aggregate beneficial ownership by the Holder and its Affiliates of more than 4.99% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock of the Corporation. For the purposes of the proviso to the immediately preceding sentence, beneficial ownership shall be determined in accordance with Section 13(d) of the 1934 Act and Regulation 13d-3 thereunder. Subject to the foregoing, the Holder shall not be limited to successive exercises which would result in the aggregate issuance of more than 4.99%. The Holder may allocate which of the equity of the Corporation deemed beneficially owned by the Holder shall be included in the 4.99% amount described above and which shall be allocated to the excess above 4.99%. The Holder may waive the conversion limitation described in this Section in whole or in part, upon and effective after sixty one (61) days’ prior written notice to the Corporation. The holders of Series D Preferred shall not be entitled to a vote on matters submitted to a vote of the stockholders of the Company. Also, as long as any shares of Series D Preferred are outstanding, the Company shall not, without the affirmative vote of all of the Holders of the then outstanding shares of the Series D Preferred, (a) alter or change adversely the powers, preferences or rights given to the Series D Preferred or alter or amend this Certificate of Designation, (b) amend its articles of incorporation or other charter documents in any manner that adversely affects any rights of the Holders, (c) increase the number of authorized shares of Series D Preferred, or (d) enter into any agreement with respect to any of the foregoing. F- 37 During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company converted 914 shares of Series D into 266,325 shares of common stock. Common Stock On January 30, 2017, the Company issued 947,440 shares of its restricted common stock to settle outstanding vendor liabilities of $353,732. In connection with this transaction the company also recorded a gain on settlement of vendor liabilities of $167,905. On February 7, 2017, the Company issued 1,767,633 shares of its restricted common stock to consultants in exchange for services at a fair value of $293,427. On February 1, 2017, the Company issued 800,000 shares of its restricted common stock to its placement agent. Such shares were issued pursuant to a Placement Agent Agreement with the Company and services rendered in connection with a private placement of the Company’s securities. On February 13, 2017, the Company issued 133,333 shares of its restricted common stock to its placement agent. Such shares were issued pursuant to a Placement Agent Agreement with the Company and services rendered in connection with a private placement of the Company’s securities. On January 31, 2018, the Company issued 18,750 shares of its restricted common stock to settle outstanding vendor liabilities of $3,750. In connection with this transaction the Company also recorded a gain on settlement of vendor liabilities of $375. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company issued 610,000 shares of its restricted common stock to consultants in exchange for services at a fair value of $116,300. These shares were recorded as common stock issued for prepaid services and will be expensed over the life of the consulting contract to share based payments. During the year ended December 31, 2018 the Company recorded $72,835 to share based payments. August 2018 Equity Raise Effective August 31, 2018 (the “Effective Date”), the Company consummated the initial closing (the “Initial Closing”) of a private placement offering of its securities of up to $5,000,000 (the “August 2018 Equity Raise”). In connection with the August 2018 Equity Raise, the Company entered into definitive securities purchase agreements (the “Purchase Agreements”) for aggregate gross proceeds of $2,787,462 . Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the Purchasers purchased an aggregate of 11,149,848 shares of common stock at $0.25 per share and received warrants to purchase 11,149,848 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.30 per share (the “Purchaser Warrants”, collectively, the “Securities”). The Purchaser Warrants are exercisable for a term of five years from the Initial Exercise Date (as defined in the Purchaser Warrants). In connection with the August 2018 Equity Raise, the Company will issue 2,200,000 shares of Common Stock, will pay fees of $161,406 and will grant warrants to purchase 139,984 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.30 per share for services rendered as the Company’s placement agent in the Private Offering. The Company has recorded $536,342 to stock issuances costs, and is part of Additional Paid-in Capital. Letter Agreements for the Conversion of Debt and Preferred Stock In connection with the August 2018 Equity Raise, the Company entered into those certain letter agreements (the “Debt Conversion Agreements”) with certain holders of its debt securities (the “Debt Holders”), for the conversion of an aggregate amount of $7,997,939 of principal and $1,028,890 of accrued but unpaid interest of the Company’s debt obligations into 45,128,959 shares of Common Stock at a conversion price equal to $0.20 per share. Additionally, as inducement to enter into the Debt Conversion Agreement, the Debt Holders were issued warrants to purchase 22,564,504 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price equal to $0.30 per share, expiring five years from the date of issuance (the “Incentive Debt Warrants”). The Company recorded a Loss on extinguishment of debt of $2,913,934 in connection with of the debt conversions. See Notes 6, 7 and 8. F- 38 Concurrently with its entrance in the Debt Conversion Agreements, the Company entered into those letter agreements (the “Preferred Stock Conversion Agreements”) with certain holders (the “Preferred Holders”) of its Series A Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock and Series B Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock (the “collectively, the Preferred Stock”) whereby the Preferred Holders converted 38,512 shares of the Preferred Stock into an aggregate of 26,866,582.00 shares of Common Stock at conversion prices equal to $0.19683 per share for Series A and $0.164 per share for Series B. As in an inducement to enter into the Preferred Stock Conversion Agreements, the Preferred Holders were issued warrants to purchase 13,433,305 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price equal to $0.30 per share, expiring five years from the date of issuance (the “Incentive Preferred Warrants”, and together with the Incentive Debt Warrants, the “Incentive Warrants”). The Company recorded an inducement of $2,016,634 in connection with of the Preferred conversions and is recorded as an adjustment to net loss attributable to common shareholders, on the statements of operations. Stock Options The Company applied fair value accounting for all share-based payments awards. The fair value of each option granted is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The assumptions used for options granted during the year ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 are as follows: December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017 Exercise price 0.30-0.75 0.16-0.75 Expected dividends 0% 0% Expected volatility 93.64%-116.27% 86.62% - 92.14% Risk free interest rate 2.2%-2.56 1.74% - 2.10% Expected life of option 3.6 - 4.3 years 5 years The following is a summary of the Company’s stock option activity: Options Weighted Average Exercise Price Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years) Balance – December 31, 2016 – outstanding 2,250,000 $ 0.34 4.38 Granted 15,499,990 0.43 5.00 Exercised - - - Cancelled/Modified (100,000 ) 0.40 - Balance – December 31, 2017 – outstanding 17,649,990 0.42 4.27 Balance – December 31, 2017 – exercisable 8,983,322 0.27 4.15 Balance – December 31, 2017 – outstanding 17,649,990 0.42 4.27 Granted - - - Exercised - - - Cancelled/Modified - - - Balance – December 31, 2018 – outstanding 17,649,990 0.42 3.27 Balance – December 31, 2018 – exercisable 15,316,654 $ 0.36 3.25 F- 39 During the year ended December 31, 2018 the Company granted options of 500,000 to consultants. As of the date of this filing the company has not issued these options. At December 31, 2018, the aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding and exercisable was $1,000 and $1,000, respectively. Stock-based compensation for stock options has been recorded in the consolidated statements of operations and totaled $320,564 and $1,092,970, for the year ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The following is a summary of the Company’s stock options granted during the year ended December 31, 2018: Options Value Purpose for Grant 700,000 $ 56,495 Service Rendered Warrants The Company applied fair value accounting for all share-based payments awards. The fair value of each warrant granted is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The assumptions used for warrants granted during the year ended December 31, 2018 are as follows: December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017 Exercise price $0.20-0.30 $0.20-0.30 Expected dividends 0% 0% Expected volatility 92.14%-109.54% 96.76%-102.21% Risk free interest rate 1.64%-3.09% 1.63%-2.26% Expected life of warrant 4 - 5 years 5 years F- 40 Warrant Activities The following is a summary of the Company’s warrant activity: Warrants Weighted Average Exercise Price Outstanding and Exercisable – December 31, 2016 15,541,666 $ 0.36 Granted 30,652,113 0.20 Exercised - - Forfeited/Cancelled - - Outstanding – December 31, 2017 46,193,779 0.25 Granted 64,665,283 0.27 Exercised - - Forfeited/Cancelled - - Outstanding and Exercisable – December 31, 2018 110,859,062 $ 0.27 Warrants Outstanding Warrants Exercisable Exercise price Number Outstanding Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years) Weighted Average Exercise Price Number Exercisable Weighted Average Exercise Price $ 0.27 110,859,062 3.84 0.27 110,819,062 0.27 During the year ended December 31, 2017, a total of 5,811,360 warrants were issued with promissory notes (See Note 6 above). In addition, the placement agent was granted a total of 487,755 warrants to purchase common stock. The warrants have a grant date fair value of $1,189,235 using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the above assumptions. During the year ended December 31, 2017, a total of 16,597,719 warrants were issued with convertible notes (See Note 7 above). In addition, the placement agent was granted a total of 12,150 warrants to purchase common stock. The warrants have a grant date fair value of $1,472,161 using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the above assumptions. During the year ended December 31, 2017, a total of 345,500 warrants were issued with notes payable – related party (See Note 8 above). The warrants have a grant date fair value of $38,109 using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the above assumptions. During the year ended December 31, 2017, a total of 7,115,129 warrants were issued with convertible notes payable – related party (See Note 8 above). The warrants have a grant date fair value of $680,037 using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the above assumptions. F- 41 During the year ended December 31, 2018, a total of 2,962,884 warrants were issued with promissory notes (See Note 6 above). The warrants have a grant date fair value of $501,268 using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the above assumptions. During the year ended December 31, 2018, a total of 10,481,016 warrants were issued with convertible notes (See Note 7 above). The warrants have a grant date fair value of $1,284,683 using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the above assumptions. During the year ended December 31, 2018, a total of 2,530,242 warrants were issued with notes payable – related party (See Note 8 above). The warrants have a grant date fair value of $429,340 using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the above assumptions. During the year ended December 31, 2018, a total of 1,403,500 warrants were issued with convertible notes payable – related party (See Note 8 above). The warrants have a grant date fair value of $162,834 using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the above assumptions. During the year ended December 31, 2018, a total of 47,287,641 warrants were issued with the August 2018 Equity Raise (See above). The warrants have a grant date fair value of $6,418,381 using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the above assumptions. Stock Incentive Plan On December 9, 2015, Jerrick adopted the 2015 Stock Incentive and Award Plan (the “Plan”) which will provide for the issuance of up to 18,000,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock. The purpose of the Plan is to provide additional incentive to those officers, employees, consultants and non-employee directors of the Company and its parents, subsidiaries and affiliates whose contributions are essential to the growth and success of the Company’s business. Eligible recipients of option awards are employees, officers, consultants or directors (including non-employee directors) of the Company or of any parent, subsidiary or affiliate of the Company. Upon recommendation from the Compensation Committee, the board has the authority to grant to any eligible recipient any options, restricted stock or other awards valued in whole or in part by reference to, or otherwise based on, our Common Stock. The provisions of each option granted need not be the same with respect to each option recipient. Option recipients shall enter into award agreements with us, in such form as the board shall determine. The Plan shall be administered by the Compensation Committee consisting of two or more independent, non-employee and outside directors. In the absence of such a Committee, the Board of the Company shall administer the Plan. Each Option shall contain the following material terms: (i) the purchase price of each share of Common Stock with respect to Incentive Options shall be determined by the Committee at the time of grant, shall not be less than 100% of the Fair Market Value (defined as the closing price on the final trading day immediately prior to the grant on the principal exchange or quotation system on which the Common Stock is listed or quoted, as applicable) of the Common Stock of the Jerrick, provided that if the recipient of the Option owns more than ten percent (10%) of the total combined voting power of the Jerrick, the exercise price shall be at least 110% of the Fair Market Value; (ii) The purchase price of each share of Common Stock purchasable under a Non-qualified Option shall be at least 100% of the Fair Market Value of such share of Common Stock on the date the Non-qualified Option is granted, unless the Committee, in its sole and absolute discretion, determines to set the purchase price of such Non-qualified Option below Fair Market Value. F- 42 (iii) the term of each Option shall be fixed by the Committee, provided that such Option shall not be exercisable more than five (5) years after the date such Option is granted, and provided further that with respect to an Incentive Option, if the recipient owns more than ten percent (10%) of the total combined voting power of the Jerrick, the Incentive Option shall not be exercisable more than five (5) years after the date such Incentive Option is granted; (iv) subject to acceleration in the event of a Change of Control of the Jerrick (as further described in the Plan), the period during which the Options vest shall be designated by the Committee or, in the absence of any Option vesting periods designated by the Committee at the time of grant, shall vest and become exercisable in equal amounts on each fiscal quarter of the Jerrick through the four (4) year anniversary of the date on which the Option was granted; (v) no Option is transferable, and each is exercisable only by the recipient of such Option except in the event of the death of the recipient; and (vi) with respect to Incentive Options, the aggregate Fair Market Value of Common Stock exercisable for the first time during any calendar year shall not exceed $100,000. Each award of Restricted Stock is subject to the following material terms: (i) no rights to an award of Restricted Stock are granted to the intended recipient of Restricted Stock unless and until the grant of Restricted Stock is accepted within the period prescribed by the Compensation Committee; (ii) Restricted Stock shall not be delivered until they are free of any restrictions specified by the Compensation Committee at the time of grant; (iii) recipients of Restricted Stock have the rights of a stockholder of the Jerrick as of the date of the grant of the Restricted Stock; (iv) shares of Restricted Stock are forfeitable until the terms of the Restricted Stock grant have been satisfied or the employment with the Company is terminated; and (v) the Restricted Stock is not transferable until the date on which the Compensation Committee has specified such restrictions have lapsed. Note 11 – Commitments and Contingencies Lease Agreements On May 5, 2018, the Company signed a 5-year lease for approximately 2,300 square feet of office space at 2050 Center Avenue Suite 640, Fort Lee, New Jersey 07024. Commencement date of the lease is June 1, 2018. Total amount due under this lease is $411,150. Total future minimum payments required under the lease as of December 31, 2018 are as follows: Twelve Months Ending December 31, 2019 $ 75,358 2020 79,281 2021 83,321 2022 88,528 2023 53,935 Total $ 380,423 Rent expense for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 was $179,186 and $146,056 respectively. F- 43 Note 12 – Income Taxes Components of deferred tax assets are as follows: December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017 Net deferred tax assets – Non-current: Depreciation $ 14,168 $ 10,500 Stock based compensation 533,187 350,622 Expected income tax benefit from NOL carry-forwards 3,413,650 1,953,856 Less valuation allowance (3,961,005 ) (2,314,978 ) Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance $ - $ - Income Tax Provision in the Consolidated Statements of Operations A reconciliation of the federal statutory income tax rate and the effective income tax rate as a percentage of income before income taxes is as follows: For the Year Ended December 31, 2018 For the Year Ended December 31, 2017 Federal statutory income tax rate 21.0 % 21.0 % State tax rate, net of federal benefit 6.5 % 6.3 % Change in valuation allowance on net operating loss carry-forwards (27.5 )% (27.3 )% Effective income tax rate 0.0 % 0.0 % Based on the available objective evidence, management believes it is more likely than not that the net deferred tax assets of the Company will not be fully realizable for the year ended December 31, 2018 and 2017. Accordingly, management had applied a full valuation allowance against net deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2018 and 2017. As of December 31, 2018, the Company had approximately $12.5 million of federal net operating loss carryforwards available to reduce future taxable income which will begin to expire in 2033 for both federal and state purposes. On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “Act”) was signed into law making significant changes to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). The Act reduces the federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017. ASC 470 requires the Company to remeasure the existing net deferred tax asset in the period of enactment. The Act also provides for immediate expensing of 100% or the costs of qualified property that is incurred and placed in service during the period from September 27, 2017 to December 31, 2022. Beginning January 1, 2023, the immediate expensing provision is phased down by 20% per year until it is completely phased out as of January 1, 2027. Additionally, effective January 1, 2018, the Act imposes possible limitations on the deductibility of interest expense. As a result of the provisions of the Act, the Company’s deduction for interest expense could be limited in future years. The effects of other provisions of the Act are not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements. On December 22, 2017, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 (“SAB 118”) to provide guidance on accounting for the tax effects of the Act. SAB 118 provides a measurement period that begins in the reporting period that includes the Act’s enactment date and ends when an entity has obtained, prepared and analyzed the information that was needed in order to complete the accounting requirements under ASC 720. However, in no circumstance should the measurement period extend beyond one year from the enactment date. In accordance with SAB 118, a company must reflect in its financial statements the income tax effects of those aspects of the Act for which the accounting under ASC 740 is complete. SAB 118 provides that to the extent that a company’s accounting for certain income tax effects of the Tax Act is incomplete but it is able to determine a reasonable estimate, it must record a provisional estimate in the financial statements. The Company does not reflect a deferred tax asset in its financial statements but includes that calculation and valuation in its footnotes. We are still analyzing the impact of certain provisions of the Act and refining our calculations. The Company will disclose any change in the estimates as it refines the accounting for the impact of the Act. Federal and state tax laws impose limitations on the utilization of net operating losses and credit carryforwards in the event of an ownership change for tax purposes, as defined in Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code. Accordingly, the Company’s ability to utilize these carryforwards may be limited as a result of an ownership change which may have already happened or may happen in the future. Such an ownership change could result in a limitation in the use of the net operating losses in future years and possibly a reduction of the net operating losses available. F- 44 Note 13 – Subsequent Events Subsequent to December 31, 2018 the company concluded the August 2018 Equity Raise. In connection with the August 2018 Equity Raise, the Company entered into definitive securities purchase agreements (the “Purchase Agreements) with an additional 25 accredited investors (the “Purchasers”) for aggregate gross proceeds of $581,829. Pursuant to the Purchase Agreements, the Purchasers purchased an aggregate of 2,727,320 shares of common stock at $0.25 per share and received warrants to purchase 2,727,320 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.30 per share (the “Purchaser Warrants”, collectively, the “Securities”). Subsequent to December 31, 2018 the company entered into four promissory note agreements with related parties. The Company received proceeds of $380,000. As additional consideration for entering in the promissory note agreements, the investors were granted a total of 417,500 warrants to purchase the Company’s common stock. Subsequent to December 31, 2018 the company entered into eight convertible promissory note agreements. The Company received proceeds of $655,000. As additional consideration for entering in the convertible promissory note agreements, the investors were granted a total of 864,600 warrants to purchase the Company’s common stock. Subsequent to December 31, 2018, the Company filed a tender offer statement on Schedule TO with the SEC, relating to the offer by the Company to holders of certain of the Company's outstanding warrants, each with an exercise price of $0.20, to receive an aggregate of 61,832,962 shares of the Company's Common Stock, by agreeing to receive thirty-three thousand three-hundred thirty-three (33,333) shares of Common Stock in exchange for every one-hundred thousand (100,000) warrants tendered by the holders of these warrants. As of the date of this filing, this tender offer by the Company remains open. On January 31, 2019, Mr. Rick Schwartz informed the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Jerrick Media Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), that he was resigning as the Company’s President, effective immediately. Mr. Schwartz’s resignation was not the result of any disagreement with the Company on any matter relating to the Company’s operations, policies or practices. Mr. Schwartz will continue on as an employee of the Company in the capacity of senior advisor. On January 31, 2019, the Board appointed Mr. Justin Maury as the Company’s new President. Mr. Maury has been with the Company since 2013 as an employee of the Company and previously led the Company’s product development. F- 45 Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure. None Item 9A. Controls and Procedures. (a) Evaluation of Disclosure and Control Procedures Based on his evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer has concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(c) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) are not effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in report that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. (b) Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting This Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal controls over financial reporting and disclosure controls. Internal Control Over Financial Reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Company’s principal executive and principal financial officer, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that: (1) Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the issuer; (2) Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the issuer are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the registrant; and (3) Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the issuer’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is appropriately recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the specified time periods. Management has conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, based on the framework established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework-2013 issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). Based on this assessment, management concluded that as of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, it had material weaknesses in its internal control procedures. As of period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we have concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective. The Company’s assessment identified certain material weaknesses which are set forth below: Functional Controls and Segregation of Duties Because of the Company’s limited resources, there are limited controls over information processing. There is an inadequate segregation of duties consistent with control objectives. Our Company’s management is composed of a small number of individuals resulting in a situation where limitations on segregation of duties exist. In order to remedy this situation we would need to hire additional staff to provide greater segregation of duties. Currently, it is not feasible to hire additional staff to obtain optimal segregation of duties. Management will reassess this matter in the following year to determine whether improvement in segregation of duty is feasible. Accordingly, as the result of identifying the above material weakness we have concluded that these control deficiencies resulted in a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by the Company’s internal controls. Management believes that the material weaknesses set forth above were the result of the scale of our operations and are intrinsic to our small size. Management believes these weaknesses did not have a material effect on our financial results and intends to take remedial actions upon receiving funding for the Company’s business operations. This annual report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the SEC that permit the Company to provide only management’s report herein. (c) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act, during our most recently completed fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. Item 9B. Other Information. None. 35 PART III Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance. Directors and Executive Officers The following table and biographical summaries set forth information, including principal occupation and business experience, about our directors and executive officers at April 1, 2019: Name Age Positions Jeremy Frommer(1)(2) 50 Chief Executive Officer, Director Rick Schwartz(1)(4) 51 Former President Leonard Schiller(2) 77 Director Andrew Taffin(3) 53 Director Justin Maury (4) 30 President (1) Effective February 5, 2016, Jeremy Frommer was appointed as our Chief Executive Officer and Rick Schwartz was appointed as our President. (2) Effective February 5, 2016, Jeremy Frommer and Leonard Schiller were appointed as members of the Board of Directors. (3) Effective May 2, 2016, Andrew Taffin was appointed as a member of the Board of Directors. (4) On January 31, 2019, Rick Schwartz resigned from his position as President. The Board of Directors appointed Justin Maury as President on the same date. Jeremy Frommer, Chief Executive Officer and Director Mr. Frommer, age 51, combines over 20 years of experience in the financial technology industry. Previously, Mr. Frommer held key leaderships roles in the investment banking and trading divisions of large financial institutions. From 2009 to 2012, Mr. Frommer was briefly retired until beginning concept formation for Jerrick Ventures which he officially founded in 2013. From 2007 to 2009, Mr. Frommer was Managing Director of Global Prime Services at RBC Capital Markets, the investment banking arm of the Royal Bank of Canada, the largest financial institution in Canada, after the sale of Carlin Financial Group, a professional trading firm. From 2004 to 2007, Mr. Frommer was the Chief Executive Officer of Carlin Financial Group after the sale of NextGen Trading, a software development company focused on building equity trading platforms. From 2002 to 2004, Mr. Frommer was Founder and Chief Executive Officer of NextGen Trading. From 2000 to 2002, he was Managing Director of Merger Arbitrage Trading at Bank of America, a financial services firm. Mr. Frommer was also a director of LionEye Capital, a hedge fund from June 2012 to June 2014. He holds a B.A. from the University of Albany. Justin Maury, President Justin Maury, age 30, is a full stack design director with an expertise in product development. With over ten years of design and product management experience in the creative industry, Maury’s passion for the creative arts and technology ultimately resulted in the vision for Vocal. Since joining Jerrick in 2013, Maury has overseen the development and launch of the company’s flagship product, Vocal, an innovative platform that provides storytelling tools and engaged communities for creators and brands to get discovered while funding their creativity. Under Maury’s supervision, Vocal has achieved growth to over 380,000 creators across 34 genre-specific communities in its first two years since launch. 36 Leonard Schiller, Director Leonard Schiller, age 74, is President and Managing Partner of the Chicago law firm of Schiller Klein PC and has been associated with the firm since 1977. Mr. Schiller also has served as the President of The Dearborn Group, a residential property management and real estate company with properties located in the Midwest. Mr. Schiller has also been involved in the ownership of residential properties and commercial properties throughout the country. Mr. Schiller has acted as a principal in numerous private loan transactions and has been responsible for the structure, and management of these transactions. Mr. Schiller has also served as a member of the Board of Directors of IMALL, an internet search engine company, which was acquired by Excite@Home. He also served as a member of the Board of AccuMed International, Inc., a company which manufactured and marketed medical diagnostic screening products, which was acquired by Molecular Diagnostics, Inc. He presently serves as a director of Milestone Scientific, Inc., a Delaware company and as a director of Point Capital, Inc., a Delaware corporation. Andrew Taffin, Director Andrew Taffin, age 52, has over 25 years of entrepreneurial and executive leadership experience. He is currently the Chief Executive Officer and co-founder of Tallen Technology Rentals (“Tallen”), a leading provider of technology services and short-term rental AV equipment for businesses and organizations of all sizes. Under Mr. Taffin’s leadership, Tallen has experienced consistent revenue growth, secured multimillion dollar contracts with Fortune 100 companies, expanded into multiple business categories including pharmaceutical and financial services, and established a global presence to include supporting clients across the globe. Mr. Taffin was also one of the founding members and former president of the International Technology Rental Associations (“ITRA”). Mr. Taffin is a consistent speaker at industry conferences and events and contributes regularly to several technology publications. Mr. Taffin graduated from Plymouth State University with a B.A. in communications. The members of the Board of Directors serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders, or until their successors have been elected. When considering whether directors and nominees have the experience, qualifications, attributes and skills to enable the Board of Directors to satisfy its oversight responsibilities effectively in light of the Company’s business and structure, the Board of Directors focuses primarily on the industry and transactional experience, and other background, in addition to any unique skills or attributes associated with a director. With regard to Mr. Frommer, the Board of Directors considered his significant experience, expertise and background with regard to the Company’s business and his prior experience as a chief executive for other business enterprises. With regard to Mr. Schiller, the Board of Directors considered his background and experience as an investor in many different businesses, together with his prior experience serving on the boards of public and private companies. With regard to Mr. Taffin, the Board of Directors considered his management experience in growing small businesses. Family Relationships There are currently no family relationships among any of our directors or executive officers. Board Committees Our Board of Directors does not have any committees formed. As independent directors are added to our board, we intend to form a formal Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and adopt appropriate written charters for such committees. Presently, however, there are no plans to appoint certain directors to specific committees. Until such time as an Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is formed, the full Board of Directors fulfills the functions normally undertaken by such committees. Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company’s directors, executive officers and persons who beneficially own 10% or more of a class of securities registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act to file reports of beneficial ownership and changes in beneficial ownership with the SEC. Directors, executive officers and greater than 10% stockholders are required by the rules and regulations of the SEC to furnish the Company with copies of all reports filed by them in compliance with Section 16(a). 37 Based solely on our review of certain reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the reports required to be filed with respect to transactions in our common stock during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, the following persons did not file timely. Leonard Schiller, a member of our Board, did not file timely two times, but has made all required filings as of this date; and Mr. Andrew Taffin, a member of our Board, did not file timely once, but has made all required filings as of this date. Mr. Arthur Rosen, a beneficial owner of more than 10% of our Common Stock did not file his Form 3 on a timely basis during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017. On April 23, 2018, Mr. Rosen filed a Form 3 and a Schedule 13D. To the Company’s knowledge, Mr. Rosen has made all required filings as of this date. Code of Ethics The Company does not currently maintain a Code of Ethics but plans to adopt one in the near future. Legal Proceedings There are no material proceedings to which any director or officer, or any associate of any such director or officer, is a party that is adverse to our Company or any of our subsidiaries or has a material interest adverse to our Company or any of our subsidiaries. No director or executive officer has been a director or executive officer of any business which has filed a bankruptcy petition or had a bankruptcy petition filed against it during the past ten years. No director or executive officer has been convicted of a criminal offense or is the subject of a pending criminal proceeding during the past ten years. No director or executive officer has been the subject of any order, judgment or decree of any court permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities during the past ten years. No director or officer has been found by a court to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law during the past ten years. Item 11. Executive Compensation. The following summary compensation table sets forth all compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to the named executive officers paid by us during the years ended December 31, 2018, and 2017. Name and Principal Position Year Salary ($) Bonus ($) Stock Awards ($) Option Awards ($) Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($) All Other Compensation ($) Total ($) Jeremy Frommer 2018 $ 152,879 $ 135,700 $ 96,463 (3) $ 385,042 Chief Executive Officer 2017 $ 126,010 $ 160,350 $ 189,650 $ 132,792 (1) $ 608,802 Rick Schwartz 2018 $ 124,476 $ 124,476 Former President 2017 $ 119,151 $ 189,650 $ 12,944 (2) $ 321,745 Justin Maury 2018 $ 90,846 $ 90,846 President 2017 $ 80,923 $ 134,066 $ 214,987 (1) The $132,792 includes payment to Mr. Frommer for living expenses, health insurance and a vehicle allowance. (2) The $12,944 includes payment to Mr. Schwartz for health insurance. (3) The $96, 463 includes payment to Mr. Frommer for living expenses, health insurance and a vehicle allowance. 38 Employment Agreements As of April 1, 2019, the Company has not entered into any employment agreements, but intends on entering into such agreements with its Chief Executive Officer and President in the fiscal year 2019. Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End 2018 At December 31, 2018, we had outstanding equity awards as follows: Name Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options Weighted Average Exercise Price Expiration Date Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested Jeremy Frommer (1) 4,000,000 2,000,000 4,000,000 $ 0.375 May 22, 2022 2,000,000 $ 390,000 - - Rick Schwartz (1) 4,000,000 2,000,000 4,000,000 $ 0.375 May 22, 2022 2,000,000 $ 390,000 - - Justin Maury (2) 3,359,090 May 22, 2022 (1) Effective February 5, 2016, Jeremy Frommer was appointed as our Chief Executive Officer and Rick Schwartz was appointed as our President. (2) On January 31, 2019, Rick Schwartz resigned from his position as President. The Board of Directors appointed Justin Maury as President on the same date. Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters. As of the close of business April 1, 2019, we had outstanding 134,256,350 shares of common stock. Each share of common stock is currently entitled to one vote on all matters put to a vote of our stockholders. The following table sets forth the number of common shares, and percentage of outstanding common shares, beneficially owned as of April 1, 2019, by: ● each person known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent of our outstanding common stock; ● each of our current directors; ● each our current executive officers and any other persons identified as a “named executive” in the Summary Compensation Table above; and ● all our current executive officers and directors as a group. 39 Shares beneficially owned and percentage ownership before this offering is based on 134,256,350 shares of common stock outstanding as of April 1, 2019. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC, and includes general voting power and/or investment power with respect to securities. Shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of options or warrants that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of the record date, and shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of other securities currently convertible or convertible within 60 days, are deemed outstanding for computing the beneficial ownership percentage of the person holding such securities but are not deemed outstanding for computing the beneficial ownership percentage of any other person. Under the applicable SEC rules, each person’s beneficial ownership is calculated by dividing the total number of shares with respect to which they possess beneficial ownership by the total number of outstanding shares. In any case where an individual has beneficial ownership over securities that are not outstanding, but are issuable upon the exercise of options or warrants or similar rights within the next 60 days, that same number of shares is added to the denominator in the calculation described above. Because the calculation of each person’s beneficial ownership set forth in the “Percentage Beneficially Owned” column of the table may include shares that are not presently outstanding, the sum total of the percentages set forth in such column may exceed 100%. Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each of the following persons is 2050 Center Avenue, Suite 640, Fort Lee, NJ 07024, and, based upon information available or furnished to us, each such person has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares set forth opposite his, her or its name. Name and Address Shares Beneficially Owned (1) Percentage Beneficially Owned 5% or Greater Stockholders Rick Schwartz 7,110,486 5.14 % Chris Gordon 22,029,672 (2) 15.15 % Arthur Rosen 28,473,396 (3) 19.46 % All 5% or Greater Stockholders as a Group 57,613,599 39.75 % Named Executive Officers and Directors Jeremy Frommer 16,124,726 (4) 11.63 % Justin Maury 3,907,517 (6) 2.84 % Leonard Schiller 5,914,108 (7) 4.29 % Andrew Taffin 3,353,343 (8) 2.46 % All current directors and officers as a group (4) 29,299,694 21.22 % * less than one percent (1) The securities “beneficially owned” by a person are determined in accordance with the definition of “beneficial ownership” set forth in the regulations of the SEC and accordingly, may include securities owned by or for, among others, the spouse, children or certain other relatives of such person, as well as other securities over which the person has or shares voting or investment power or securities which the person has the right to acquire within 60 days. (2) This total includes 10,877,672 shares of Common Stock and 11,152,045 shares underlying warrants. (3) This total includes 16,416, 896 shares of Common Stock and 12,056,500 shares underlying warrants. (4) This total includes 11,674,876 shares of Common Stock, 449,850 shares underlying warrants, and 4,000,000 shares underlying stock options. (5) This total includes 3,110,486 shares of Common Stock and 4,000,000 shares underlying stock options. (6) This total includes 548,427 shares of Common Stock and 3,359,090 shares underlying stock options. (7) This total includes 2,336,455 shares of Common Stock, 3,027,653 shares underlying warrants, and 600,000 shares underlying stock options. (8) This total includes 1,375,562 shares of Common Stock, 1,527,781 shares underlying warrants, and 500,000 shares underlying stock options. 40 Market for our Securities Our Common Stock is quoted on the OTC Markets OTCQB under the symbol “JMDA”. The market price of our Common Stock is subject to significant fluctuations in response to variations in our quarterly operating results, general trends in the market and other factors, over many of which we have little or no control. In addition, broad market fluctuations, as well as general economic, business and political conditions, may adversely affect the market for our Common Stock, regardless of our actual or projected performance. Anti-Takeover Provisions Our charter and bylaws contain provisions that may make it more difficult for a third party to acquire or may discourage acquisition bids for us. Our Board may, without action of our stockholders, issue authorized but unissued shares of preferred stock. The existence of unissued preferred stock may enable the Board, without further action by the stockholders, to issue such stock to persons friendly to current management or to issue such stock with terms that could render more difficult or discourage an attempt to obtain control of us, thereby protecting the continuity of our management. Our shares of preferred stock could therefore be issued quickly with terms that could delay, defer, or prevent a change in control of us, or make removal of management more difficult. Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions. Upon completion of the Merger, as of February 5, 2016, the Company had a commercial lease agreement with 202 S Dean, LLC for its prior office building located at 202 S Dean Street, Englewood, NJ 07631. Under the agreement, the Company paid monthly rent to 202 S. Dean LLC, which is 50% owned by our Chief Executive Officer, Jeremy Frommer. Monthly rent is $8,500 through 2015. Commencing 2016 through the expiration of the lease, monthly rent will be $14,165. The lease expired April 30, 2018. Before moving to the current office space, the Company paid rent on a month-to-month basis at the rate of $14,165 per month. On April 25, 2017, the Company issued convertible notes to Arthur Rosen, a lender, totaling $25,000 (the “April Rosen Notes”). The April Rosen Notes accrue interest at 12% per annum and mature with interest and principal both due on September 1, 2017. In addition, in connection with the April Rosen Notes, the Company issued a five-year warrant to purchase 17,500 shares of Company common stock at a purchase price of $0.20 per share. On September 7, 2017, the April Rosen Notes and accrued interest was converted into the August 2017 Convertible Note Offering. On April 25, 2017, the Company issued a convertible note to Chris Gordon, a lender totaling $25,000 (the “April Gordon Notes”). The April Gordon Notes accrue interest at 12% per annum and matures with interest and principal both due on September 1, 2017. In addition, the Company issued a five-year warrant to purchase 17,500 shares of Company common stock at a purchase price of $0.20 per share. The April Gordon Notes and accrued interest were converted into the August 2017 Convertible Note Offering. 41 The August 2017 Convertible Note Offering – Related Party During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company conducted multiple closings of a private placement offering to accredited investors (the “The August 2017 Convertible Offering”) of units of the Company’s securities by entering into subscription agreements with “accredited investors” (the “Investors”) for aggregate gross proceeds of $505,000. In addition, $645,000 of the Company’s short term debt along with accrued but unpaid interest of $206,026 was converted into the August 2017 Convertible Offering. The conversions resulted in the issuance of 4,555,129 warrants with a fair value of $440,157 and the increase of principal of $60,000. These resulted in a loss on extinguishment of debt of $500,157. The Company offered, through a placement agent, $6,000,000 of units of its securities (each, a “Unit” and collectively, the “Units”), with each Unit consisting of (a) a 15% Convertible Secured Promissory Note (each a “Note” and together the “Notes”), convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $.001 per share (“Conversion Shares”) at a conversion price of $0.20 per share (the “Conversion Price”), and (b) a five-year warrant ( each a “Warrant and together the “Warrants”) to purchase common stock equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the shares into which the Notes can be converted into (“Warrant Shares”) at an exercise price of $0.20 per share (“Exercise Price”). The Notes mature on the second (2nd) anniversary of their issuance dates. The Conversion Price of the Note and the Exercise Price of the Warrants are subject to adjustment for issuances of the Company’s common stock or any equity linked instruments or securities convertible into the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of less than the prevailing Conversion Price or Exercise Price. Such adjustment shall result in the Conversion Price and Exercise Price being reduced to such lower purchase price, subject to carve-outs as described therein. The Company recorded a $160,700 debt discount relating to 2,525,000 warrants issued to investors based on the relative fair value of each equity instrument on the dates of issuance. The debt discount is being accreted over the life of the note to accretion of debt discount and issuance cost. On December 21, 2017, the Company issued a convertible note to a third party lender totaling $100,000 (the “Second December 2017 Note”). The Second December 2017 Note accrues interest at 15% per annum and matures with interest and principal both due on December 27, 2019. In addition, the Company issued a warrant to purchase 500,000 shares of Company common stock. The warrant entitles the holder to purchase the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.20 per share for a period of five years from the issue date. The Company recorded a $36,722 debt discount relating to the warrants issued to the investor based on the relative fair value of each equity instrument on the dates of issuance. The debt discount is being accreted over the life of the note The Second December 2017 Note and accrued interest is convertible at a conversion price of $0.20 per share, subject to adjustment. The Second December 2017 Note is secured as a second priority lien on the assets of the Company. Notes payable Notes payable – related party as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 is as follows: Outstanding Principal as of Warrants December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017 Interest Rate Maturity Date Quantity Exercise Price The May 2016 Rosen Loan Agreement $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 13 % November 26, 2017 1,000,000 $ 0.40 The September 2017 Rosen Loan Agreement - 224,000 18 % September 24, 2017 125,000 0.20 The November 2017 Schiller Loan Agreement - 25,000 15 % December 31, 2017 - - The May 2018 Schiller Loan Agreements - - 13 % February 2, 2019 300,000 0.20 The June 2018 Frommer Loan Agreement 10,000 - 6 % August 17, 2018 30,000 0.20 The July 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement 56,695 - 6 % August 17, 2018 30,000 0.20 The July 2018 Schiller Loan Agreements 40,000 - 6 % August 17, 2018 150,000 0.20 The December 2018 Gravitas Loan Agreement 50,000 - 6 % January 22, 2019 50,000 0.30 The December 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement 75,000 - 6 % January 26, 2019 75,000 0.30 1,231,695 1,249,000 Less: Debt Discount (8,125 ) - 1,223,570 Less: Current Debt (1,223,570 ) - $ - $ 1,249,000 42 On May 26, 2016, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “May 2016 Rosen Loan Agreement”) with Arthur Rosen, an individual (“Rosen”), pursuant to which on May 26, 2016 (the “Closing Date”), Rosen provided the Company a secured term loan of $1,000,000 (the “May 2016 Rosen Loan”). In connection with the May 2016 Rosen Loan Agreement, on May 26, 2016, the Company and Rosen entered into a security agreement (the “Rosen Security Agreement”), pursuant to which the Company granted to Rosen a senior security interest in substantially all of the Company’s assets as security for repayment of the May 2016 Rosen Loan. Pursuant to the May 2016 Rosen Loan Agreement, the May 2016 Rosen Loan bears interest at a rate of 12.5% per annum, compounded annually and payable on the maturity date of May 26, 2017 (the “May 2016 Rosen Maturity Date”) at which time all outstanding principal, accrued and unpaid interest and other amounts due under the May 2016 Rosen Loan are due. The Company entered into an amendment to the May 2016 Rosen Loan extending the May 2016 Rosen Maturity Date to November 26, 2017. As additional consideration for entering in the May 2016 Rosen Loan Agreement, the Company issued Rosen a five-year warrant to purchase 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.40 per share (the “May 2016 Rosen Warrant”). The May 2016 Rosen Warrant contains anti-dilution provisions as further described therein. On September 7, 2017 (the “Conversion Date”), Rosen converted all accrued but unpaid interest on the May 26 Rosen Loan from May 26, 2016 through September 6, 2017 in the amount of $124,306 (the “May 26 Rosen Loan Interest”) into the Company’s August Convertible Note Offering, after which May 26 Rosen Loan Interest was deemed paid in full through the Conversion Date. On September 12, 2016, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “September 2016 Rosen Loan Agreement”) with Rosen, pursuant to which on September 12, 2016 (the “Closing Date”), the Company issued Rosen a promissory note of $100,000 (the “September 2016 Rosen Note”). Pursuant to the September 2016 Rosen Loan Agreement, the September 2016 Rosen Note bears interest at a rate of 12% per annum. As additional consideration for entering in the September 2016 Rosen Loan Agreement, the Company issued Rosen a five-year warrant to purchase 150,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.40 per share. During the year ended December 31, 2017 the principal and interest of this note were converted into the August 2017 Convertible Note Offering. On October 13, 2016, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “October 2016 Gordon Loan Agreement”) with Chris Gordon, an individual (the “Gordon”), pursuant to which on October 13, 2016 (the “Closing Date”), the Company issued a promissory note of $50,000 to Gordon (the “October 2016 Gordon Note”). Pursuant to the October 2016 Gordon Loan Agreement, the October 2016 Gordon Note bears interest at a rate of 12% per annum. As additional consideration for entering in the October 2016 Gordon Loan Agreement, the Company issued Gordon a five-year warrant to purchase 50,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.40 per share. During the year ended December 31, 2017 the principal and interest of this note were converted into the August 2017 Convertible Note Offering. On October 24, 2016, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “October 2016 Schiller Loan Agreement”) with Leonard Schiller, a Board Member (the “Schiller”), pursuant to which on October 24, 2016 (the “Closing Date”), the Company issued Schiller a promissory note of $15,000 (the “October 2016 Schiller Note”). Pursuant to the October 2016 Schiller Loan Agreement, the October 2016 Schiller Note bears interest at a rate of 9% per annum. As additional consideration for entering in the October 2016 Schiller Loan Agreement, the Company issued Schiller a 5-year warrant to purchase 30,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.30 per share. During the year ended December 31, 2017 the principal and interest of this note were converted into the August 2017 Convertible Note Offering. On October 31, 2016, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “October 2016 Rosen Loan Agreement”) with Rosen, pursuant to which on October 31, 2016 (the “Closing Date”), Company issued Rosen a promissory note of $10,000 (the “October 2016 Rosen Note”). Pursuant to the October 2016 Rosen Loan Agreement, the October 2016 Rosen Note bears interest at a rate of 10% per annum. As additional consideration for entering in the October 2016 Rosen Loan Agreement, the Company issued Rosen a five-year warrant to purchase 10,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.30 per share. During the year ended December 31, 2017 the principal and interest of this note were converted into the August 2017 Convertible Note Offering. 43 On December 21, 2016, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “December 2016 Gordon Loan Agreement”) with Gordon, pursuant to which on December 21, 2016 (the “Closing Date”), the Company issued Gordon a promissory note of $275,000 (the “December 2016 Gordon Note”). Pursuant to the December 2016 Gordon Loan Agreement, the December 2016 Gordon Note bears interest at a rate of 10% per annum. As additional consideration for entering in the December 2016 Gordon Loan Agreement, the Company issued Gordon a five-year warrant to purchase 166,666 shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.40 per share. During the year ended December 31, 2017 the principal and interest of this note were converted into the August 2017 Convertible Note Offering. On January 25, 2017, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “January 2017 Rosen Loan Agreement”) with Rosen pursuant to which on January 25, 2017 (the “Closing Date”), the Company issued Rosen a promissory note of $50,000 (the “January 2017 Rosen Note”). The January 2017 Rosen Note is secured by an officer of the Company. Pursuant to the January 2017 Rosen Loan Agreement, the January 2017 Rosen Note bears interest at a rate of 10% per annum. As additional consideration for entering in the January 2017 Rosen Loan Agreement, the Company issued Rosen a five-year warrant to purchase 50,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.30 per share. During the year ended December 31, 2017 the principal and interest of this note were converted into the August 2017 Convertible Note Offering. On January 26, 2017, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “January 2017 Gordon Loan Agreement”) with Gordon pursuant to which on January 26, 2017 (the “Closing Date”), the Company issued Gordon a promissory note of $50,000 (the “January 2017 Gordon Note”). The January 2017 Gordon Note is secured by an officer of the Company. Pursuant to the January 2017 Gordon Loan Agreement, the January 2017 Gordon Note bears interest at a rate of 10% per annum. As additional consideration for entering in the January 2017 Gordon Loan Agreement, the Company issued Gordon a five-year warrant to purchase 50,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.30 per share. During the year ended December 31, 2017 the principal and interest of this note were repaid. On February 7, 2017, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “February 2017 Schiller Loan Agreement”) with Schiller, a member of the Board, pursuant to which on October 24, 2016 (the “Closing Date”), the Company issued Schiller a promissory note of $10,000 (the “February 2017 Schiller Note”). The February 2017 Schiller Note is secured by an officer of the Company. Pursuant to the February 2017 Schiller Loan Agreement, the February 2017 Schiller Note bears interest at a rate of 10% per annum. As additional consideration for entering in the February 2017 Schiller Note Loan Agreement, the Company issued Schiller a five-year warrant to purchase 10,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.30 per share. During the year ended December 31, 2017 the principal and interest of this note were converted into the August 2017 Convertible Note Offering. On April 12, 2017, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “April 2017 Schiller Loan Agreement”) with Schiller, a member of the Board, whereby the Company issued Schiller a promissory note of $10,000 (the “April 2017 Schiller Note”). The April 2017 Schiller Note is secured by an officer of the Company. Pursuant to the April 2017 Schiller Loan Agreement, the April 2017 Schiller Note bears interest at a rate of 10% per annum. As additional consideration for entering in the April 2017 Schiller Loan Agreement, the Company issued Schiller a five-year warrant to purchase 10,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.30 per share. During the year ended December 31, 2017 the principal and interest of this note were converted into the August 2017 Convertible Note Offering. On April 12, 2017, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “April 2017 Rosen Loan Agreement”) with Rosen, whereby the Company issued Rosen a promissory note of $10,000 (the “April 2017 Rosen Note”). The April 2017 Rosen Note is secured by an officer of the Company. Pursuant to the April 2017 Rosen Loan Agreement, the April 2017 Rosen Note bears interest at a rate of 10% per annum. As additional consideration for entering in the April 2017 Rosen Loan Agreement, the Company issued Rosen a five-year warrant to purchase 10,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.30 per share. During the year ended December 31, 2017 the principal and interest of this note were converted into the August 2017 Convertible Note Offering. 44 On May 4, 2017, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “May 2017 Rosen Loan Agreement”) with Rosen, whereby the Company issued Rosen a promissory note of $15,000 (the “May 2017 Rosen Note”). The May 2017 Rosen Note is secured by an officer of the Company. Pursuant to the May 2017 Rosen Note Loan Agreement, the May 2017 Rosen Note bears interest at a rate of 12% per annum. As additional consideration for entering in the May 2017 Rosen Note Loan Agreement, the Company issued Rosen a five-year warrant to purchase 10,500 shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.30 per share. During the year ended December 31, 2017 the principal and interest of this note were converted into the August 2017 Convertible Note Offering. On May 11, 2017, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “May 2017 Schiller Loan Agreement”) with Schiller, a member of the Board, whereby the Company issued Schiller a promissory note of $20,000 (the “May 2017 Schiller Note”). Pursuant to the May 2017 Schiller Loan Agreement, the May 2017 Schiller Note bears interest at a rate of 10% per annum. As additional consideration for entering in the May 2017 Schiller Note Loan Agreement, the Company issued Schiller a five-year warrant to purchase 20,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.20 per share. During the year ended December 31, 2017 the principal and interest of this note were converted into the August 2017 Convertible Note Offering. On June 26, 2017, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “June 2017 Schiller Loan Agreement”) Schiller, a member of the Board, whereby the Company issued Schiller a promissory note of $30,000 (the “June 2017 Schiller Note”). Pursuant to the June 2017 Schiller Loan Agreement, the June 2017 Schiller Note bears interest at a rate of 10% per annum. As additional consideration for entering in the June 2017 Schiller Loan Agreement, the Company issued Schiller a five-year warrant to purchase 22,500 shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.20 per share. During the year ended December 31, 2017 the principal and interest of this note were converted into the August 2017 Convertible Note Offering. On July 6, 2017, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “July 2017 Rosen Loan Agreement”) with Rosen, whereby the Company issued Rosen a promissory note of $25,000 (the “July 2017 Rosen Note”). The July 2017 Rosen Note is secured by an officer of the Company. Pursuant to the July 2017 Rosen Note Loan Agreement, the July 2017 Rosen Note bears interest at a rate of 10% per annum. As additional consideration for entering in the July 2017 Rosen Note Loan Agreement, the Company issued Rosen a five-year warrant to purchase 18,750 shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.20 per share. During the year ended December 31, 2017 the principal and interest of this note were converted into the August 2017 Convertible Note Offering. On July 6, 2017, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “July 2017 Gordon Loan Agreement”) with Gordon, whereby the Company issued Gordon a promissory note of $25,000 (the “July 2017 Gordon Note”). The July 2017 Gordon Note is secured by an officer of the Company. Pursuant to the July 2017 Gordon Note Loan Agreement, the July 2017 Gordon Note bears interest at a rate of 10% per annum. As additional consideration for entering in the July 2017 Gordon Note Loan Agreement, the Company issued Gordon a five-year warrant to purchase 18,750 shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.20 per share. During the year ended December 31, 2017 the principal and interest of this note were converted into the August 2017 Convertible Note Offering. On August 24, 2017, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “August 2017 Rosen Loan Agreement”) with Rosen, whereby the Company issued Rosen a promissory note of $20,000 (the “August 2017 Rosen Note”). The August 2017 Rosen Note is secured by an officer of the Company. Pursuant to the August 2017 Rosen Note Loan Agreement, the August 2017 Rosen Note bears interest at a rate of 12% per annum. During the year ended December 31, 2017 the principal and interest of this note were converted into the August 2017 Convertible Note Offering. On September 8, 2017, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “September 2017 Rosen Loan Agreement”) with Rosen, whereby the Company issued Rosen a promissory note of $224,000 (the “September 2017 Rosen Note”). The September 2017 Rosen Note is secured by an officer of the Company. As additional consideration for entering in the September 2017 Rosen Note Loan Agreement, the Company issued Rosen a five-year warrant to purchase 1,650,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.20 per share. On November 20, 2017, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “November 2017 Schiller Loan Agreement”) Schiller, a member of the Board, whereby the Company issued Schiller a promissory note of $25,000 (the “November 2017 Schiller Note”). Pursuant to the November 2017 Schiller Loan Agreement, the November 2017 Schiller Note bears interest at a rate of 15% per annum. 45 On November 20, 2017, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “November 2017 Rosen Agreement”) whereby the Company issued Rosen a promissory note of $25,000 (the “November 2017 Rosen Note”). Pursuant to the November 2017 Rosen Loan Agreement, the November 2017 Rosen Note bears interest at a rate of 15% per annum. During the year ended December 31, 2017 the principal and interest of this note were repaid. Line of credit On May 9, 2017, the Company entered into a Revolving Line of Credit (the “LOC”) with Grawin, LLC, an LLC controlled by Arthur Rosen, a related party. The LOC is was established for a period of twelve months in which the Company can borrow principal up to $130,000. The LOC bears interest at a rate of 18%. On May 09, 2017, in connection with the LOC the Company issued a promissory note in the principal aggregate amount of $56,000 in favor Grawin, LLC. On May 16, 2017, in connection with the LOC the Company issued a promissory note in the principal aggregate amount of $30,000 in favor Grawin, LLC. On May 22, 2017, in connection with the LOC the Company issued a promissory note in the principal aggregate amount of $6,000 in favor Grawin, LLC. On May 25, 2017, in connection with the LOC the Company issued a promissory note in the principal aggregate amount of $35,000 in favor Grawin, LLC. On June 16, 2017, in connection with the LOC the Company issued a promissory note in the principal aggregate amount of $3,000 in favor Grawin, LLC. The January 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement On January 16, 2018, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “January 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement”) with Rosen, whereby the Company issued Rosen a promissory note in the principal amount of $60,000 (the “January 2018 Rosen Note”). The January 2018 Rosen Note is secured by Jeremy Frommer, whereas upon default Mr. Frommer would owe his own personal default shares of the Company’s common stock to Rosen equal to the amount of principal outstanding divided by 0.20. Pursuant to the January 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement, the January 2018 Rosen Note bears interest at a rate of 6% per annum and is payable on the maturity date of January 31, 2018 (the “January 2018 Rosen Maturity Date”) at which time all outstanding principal, accrued and unpaid interest and other amounts due under the May 2016 Rosen Loan are due. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company repaid $60,000 in principal and $200 in interest and the loan is no longer outstandinng. The January 2018 Gordon Loan Agreement On January 16, 2018, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “January 2018 Gordon Loan Agreement”) with Mr. Christopher Gordon (“Gordon”), whereby the Company issued Gordon a promissory note in the principal amount of $40,000 (the “January 2018 Gordon Note”). The January 2018 Gordon Note is secured by Jeremy Frommer, whereas upon default Mr. Frommer would owe his own personal default shares of the Company’s common stock to Gordon equal to the amount of principal outstanding divided by 0.20. Pursuant to the January 2018 Gordon Loan Agreement, the January 2018 Gordon Note bears interest at a rate of 6% per annum and payable on the maturity date of January 31, 2018 (the “January 2018 Gordon Maturity Date”) at which time all outstanding principal, accrued and unpaid interest and other amounts due under the January 2018 Gordon Note are due. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company repaid $40,000 in principal and $105 in interest and the loan is no longer outstanding. The First March 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement On March 4, 2018, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “First March 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement”) with Rosen, whereby the Company issued Rosen a promissory note in the principal amount of $10,000 (the “First March 2018 Rosen Note”). As additional consideration for entering in the First March 2018 Rosen Note Loan Agreement, the Company issued Rosen a five-year warrant to purchase 10,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.20 per share. Pursuant to the First March 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement, the First March 2018 Rosen Note bears interest at a rate of 12% per annum and is payable on the maturity date of March 19, 2018 (the “First March 2018 Rosen Maturity Date”) at which time all outstanding principal, accrued and unpaid interest and other amounts due under the First March 2018 Rosen Note was due. During the nine months ended December 31, 2018, the Company repaid $10,000 in principal and $260 in interest and the loan is no longer outstanding. 46 The Second March 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement On March 9, 2018, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “Second March 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement”) with Rosen, whereby the Company issued Rosen a promissory note in the principal amount of $15,000 (the “Second March 2018 Rosen Note”). As additional consideration for entering in the Second March 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement, the Company issued Rosen a five-year warrant to purchase 15,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.20 per share. Pursuant to the Second March 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement, the Second March 2018 Rosen Note bears interest at a rate of 12% per annum and is payable on the maturity date of March 24, 2018 (the “Second March 2018 Rosen Maturity Date”) at which time all outstanding principal, accrued and unpaid interest and other amounts due under the Second March 2018 Rosen Note was due. During the nine months ended December 31, 2018, the Company repaid $15,000 in principal and $365 in interest and the loan is no longer outstanding. The Third March 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement On March 13, 2018, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “Third March 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement”) with Rosen, whereby the Company issued Rosen a promissory note in the principal amount of $10,000 (the “Third March 2018 Rosen Note”). As additional consideration for entering in the Third March 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement, the Company issued Rosen a five-year warrant to purchase 10,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.20 per share. Pursuant to the Third March 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement, the Third March 2018 Rosen Note bears interest at a rate of 12% per annum and is payable on the maturity date of March 28, 2018 (the “Third March 2018 Rosen Maturity Date”) at which time all outstanding principal, accrued and unpaid interest and other amounts due under the Third March 2018 Rosen Note was due. During the nine months ended December 31, 2018, the Company repaid $10,000 in principal and $230 in interest and the loan is no longer outstanding. The May 2018 Schiller Loan Agreement On May 2, 2018, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “May 2018 Schiller Loan Agreement”) with Schiller, a member of the Board, whereby the Company issued Schiller a promissory note in the principal amount of $100,000 (the “May 2018 Schiller Note”). As additional consideration for entering in the May 2018 Schiller Loan Agreement, the Company issued Schiller a four-year warrant to purchase 300,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.20 per share. Pursuant to the May 2018 Schiller Loan Agreement, the May 2018 Schiller Note bears interest at a rate of 13% per annum and is payable on the maturity date of February 02, 2019 (the “May 2018 Schiller Maturity Date”) at which time all outstanding principal, accrued and unpaid interest are due under the May 2018 Schiller Loan. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company converted $100,000 of principal and $4,369 of unpaid interest into the August 2018 Equity Raise (as defined below) and the loan is no longer outstanding. The June 2018 Frommer Loan Agreement On June 29, 2018, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “June 2018 Frommer Loan Agreement”) with Jeremy Frommer, an officer of the Company, whereby the Company issued Frommer a promissory note in the principal amount of $10,000 (the “June 2018 Frommer Note”). As additional consideration for entering in the June 2018 Frommer Note Loan Agreement, the Company issued Frommer a four-year warrant to purchase 30,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.20 per share. Pursuant to the June 2018 Frommer Loan Agreement, the June 2018 Frommer Note bears interest at a rate of 6% per annum and payable on the maturity date of August 17, 2018 (the “June 2018 Frommer Maturity Date”) at which time all outstanding principal, accrued and unpaid interest are due under the June 2018 Frommer Loan. Subsequent to the balance sheet date, on November 8, 2018 the Company executed upon an agreement that extended the maturity date of this loan to March 7, 2019. As part of the extension agreement, the Company issued 40,854 warrants to purchase common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.30. On March 29, 2019 the Company executed upon an agreement that extended the maturity date of this loan to May 15, 2019. 47 The First July 2018 Schiller Loan Agreement On July 3, 2018, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “First July 2018 Schiller Loan Agreement”) with Schiller, a member of the Board, whereby the Company issued Schiller a promissory note of $35,000 (the “First July 2018 Schiller Note”). As additional consideration for entering in the First July 2018 Schiller Loan Agreement, the Company issued Schiller a four-year warrant to purchase 75,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.20 per share. Pursuant to the agreement, the note bears interest at a rate of 6% per annum and payable on the maturity date of August 17, 2018 at which time all outstanding principal, accrued and unpaid interest were due under the First July 2018 Schiller Loan. Subsequent to the balance sheet date, on November 8, 2018 the Company executed upon an agreement that extended the maturity date of this loan to March 7, 2019. As part of the extension agreement, the Company issued 142,987 warrants to purchase common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.30. On March 29, 2019 the Company executed upon an agreement that extended the maturity date of this loan to May 15, 2019. The Second July 2018 Schiller Loan Agreement On July 17, 2018, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “Second July 2018 Schiller Loan Agreement”) with Schiller, a member of the Board, whereby the Company issued Schiller a promissory note of $25,000 (the “Second July 2018 Schiller Note”). As additional consideration for entering in the Second July 2018 Schiller Loan Agreement, the Company issued Schiller a four-year warrant to purchase 75,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.20 per share. Pursuant to the Second July 2018 Schiller Loan Agreement, the Second July 2018 Schiller Note bears interest at a rate of 6% per annum and payable on the maturity date of August 17, 2018 at which time all outstanding principal, accrued and unpaid interest were due under the Second July 2018 Schiller Loan. Subsequent to the balance sheet date, on November 8, 2018 the Company executed upon an agreement that extended the maturity date of this loan to March 7, 2019. As part of the extension agreement, the Company issued 101,900 warrants to purchase common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.30. On March 29, 2019 the Company executed upon an agreement that extended the maturity date of this loan to May 15, 2019. The First July 2018 Rosen Loan Agreements On July 12, 2018, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “First July 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement”) with Rosen, an officer of the Company, whereby the Company issued Rosen a promissory note of $10,000 (the “First July 2018 Rosen Note”). Pursuant to the First July 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement, the note bears interest at a rate of 6% per annum and payable on the maturity date of August 17, 2018 at which time all outstanding principal, accrued and unpaid interest are due under the First July 2018 Rosen Note. Subsequent to the balance sheet date, on November 8, 2018 the Company executed upon an agreement that extended the maturity date of this loan to March 7, 2019. As part of the extension agreement, the Company issued 27,534 warrants to purchase common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.30. On March 29, 2019 the Company executed upon an agreement that extended the maturity date of this loan to May 15, 2019. The Second July 2018 Rosen Loan Agreements On July 18, 2018, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “Second July 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement”) with Rosen, whereby the Company issued Rosen a promissory note of $50,000 (the “Second July 2018 Rosen Note”) resulting from the conversion of a demand note (as described below). As additional consideration for entering into the Second July 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement, the Company issued Rosen a four-year warrant to purchase 150,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.20 per share. Pursuant to the Second July 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement, the Second July 2018 Rosen Note bears interest at a rate of 6% per annum and payable on the maturity date of August 17, 2018 at which time all outstanding principal, accrued and unpaid interest are due under the Second July 2018 Rosen Note. Subsequent to the balance sheet date, on November 8, 2018 the Company executed upon an agreement that extended the maturity date of this loan to March 7, 2019. As part of the extension agreement, the Company issued 203,967 warrants to purchase common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.30. On March 29, 2019 the Company executed upon an agreement that extended the maturity date of this loan to May 15, 2019. 48 The November 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement On November 29, 2018, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “November 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement”) with Rosen, whereby the Company issued Rosen a promissory note in the principal amount of $25,000 (the “November 2018 Rosen Note”). As additional consideration for entering in the November 2018 Rosen Note Loan Agreement, the Company issued Rosen a four-year warrant to purchase 25,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.30 per share. Pursuant to the November 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement, the November 2018 Rosen Note bears interest at a rate of 6% per annum and payable on the maturity date of December 23, 2018 (the “November 2018 Rosen Maturity Date”) at which time all outstanding principal, accrued and unpaid interest are due under the November 2018 Rosen Loan. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company repaid $25,000 of principal and $33 of unpaid interest and the loan is no longer outstanding. The December 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement On December 27, 2018, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “December 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement”) with Rosen, whereby the Company issued Rosen a promissory note in the principal amount of $75,000 (the “December 2018 Rosen Note”). As additional consideration for entering in the December 2018 Rosen Note Loan Agreement, the Company issued Rosen a four-year warrant to purchase 75,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.30 per share. Pursuant to the December 2018 Rosen Loan Agreement, the December 2018 Rosen Note bears interest at a rate of 6% per annum and payable on the maturity date of January 26, 2018 (the “December 2018 Rosen Maturity Date”) at which time all outstanding principal, accrued and unpaid interest are due under the November 2018 Rosen Loan. On March 29, 2019 the Company executed upon an agreement that extended the maturity date of this loan to May 15, 2019. The December 2018 Gravitas Capital Loan Agreement On December 27, 2018, the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “December 2018 Gravitas Capital Loan Agreement”) with Gravitas Capital, whereby the Company issued Gravitas Capital a promissory note in the principal amount of $50,000 (the “December 2018 Gravitas Capital Note”). As additional consideration for entering in the December 2018 Gravitas Capital Note Loan Agreement, the Company issued Gravitas Capital a four-year warrant to purchase 50,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.30 per share. Pursuant to the December 2018 Gravitas Capital Loan Agreement, the December 2018 Gravitas Capital Note bears interest at a rate of 6% per annum and payable on the maturity date of January 27, 2018 (the “December 2018 Gravitas Capital Maturity Date”) at which time all outstanding principal, accrued and unpaid interest are due under the November 2018 Gravitas Capital Loan. In January 2019, the Company repaid $50,000 in principal and $250 in interest, and the loan is no longer outstanding. Director Independence Our Board of Directors will periodically review relationships that directors have with the Company to determine whether the directors are independent. Directors are considered “independent” as long as they do not accept any consulting, advisory or other compensatory fee (other than director fees) from the Company, are not an affiliated person of the Company or its subsidiaries (e.g., an officer or a greater-than-ten-percent stockholder) and are independent within the meaning of applicable laws, regulations and th