Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 1C. Cybersecurity
Risk Management and Strategy
We recognize the importance of assessing, identifying, and managing material risks associated with cybersecurity threats, as such term is defined in Item 106(a) of Regulation S-K. These risks include, among other things: operational risks, intellectual property theft, fraud, extortion, harm to employees or customers and violation of data privacy or security laws.
Identifying and assessing cybersecurity risk is integrated into our overall risk management systems and processes. We have an enterprise-wide information security program designed to identify, protect, detect, and respond to and manage reasonably foreseeable cybersecurity risks and threats. To protect our information systems from cybersecurity threats, we use various security tools that help prevent, identify, escalate, investigate, resolve, and recover from identified vulnerabilities and security incidents in a timely manner. These include, but are not limited to, incoming (external) physical infrastructure with enhanced firmware, continuous employee training, internal reporting, and monitoring and detection tools. We also engage top third-party security providers for applications and infrastructure to identify, prioritize, assess, mitigate, and remediate risks.
58
Table of Contents
Our information technology (“IT”) department regularly assess risks from cybersecurity and technology threats and monitors our information systems for potential vulnerabilities. We use a widely adopted risk quantification model to identify, measure and prioritize cybersecurity and technology risks and develop related security controls and safeguards. We conduct regular reviews and tests of our information security program, including but not limited to tabletop exercises, penetration and vulnerability testing, red team exercises, simulations, and other exercises to evaluate the effectiveness of our information security program and improve our security measures and planning.
We have implemented incident response and breach management processes which have four overarching and interconnected stages: (i) preparation for a cybersecurity incident, (ii) detection and analysis of a security incident, (iii) containment, eradication, and recovery, and (iv) post-incident analysis. Such incident responses are overseen by our Leadership Committee comprised of our Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer, General Counsel and Senior Vice President of FP&A.
Security events and data incidents are evaluated, ranked by severity, and prioritized for response and remediation. Incidents are evaluated to determine materiality as well as operational and business impact and reviewed for privacy impact.
As part of the above processes, we regularly engage external resources and consultants to assess our internal cybersecurity programs and compliance with applicable practices and standards.
Our risk management program also assesses third party risks, and we perform third-party risk management to identify and mitigate risks from key third parties such as vendors, suppliers, and other business partners. Cybersecurity risks are evaluated when determining the selection and oversight of applicable third-party service providers when handling and/or processing our employee, business, or customer data. In addition, we perform risk management during third-party cybersecurity compromise incidents to identify and mitigate risks to us from third-party incidents.
Management has not identified any risks from cybersecurity threats, including as a result of any previous cybersecurity incidents, that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect the Company , including its business strategy, results of operations or financial condition. See Item 1A. Risk Factors, “ We are highly dependent on information systems and therefore systems failures, cybersecurity incidents or other technology disruptions could negatively impact our business” and “Security breaches and other disruptions could compromise our information and expose us to liability, which would cause our business and reputation to suffer.” above for more information. While we continually work to safeguard the information systems we use, and the proprietary, confidential and personal information residing therein, and mitigate potential risks, there can be no assurance that such actions will be sufficient to prevent cybersecurity incidents or mitigate all potential risks to such systems, networks and data or those of our third-party providers.
Governance
Our Board holds oversight responsibility over our strategy and risk management, including material risks related to cybersecurity threats. This oversight is executed directly by the Board and through its committees. The Audit Committee meets annually to review enterprise security, technology risks and cybersecurity threats, risk assessments and areas of emerging risks, incidents and mitigation strategies, and industry trends.
Our IT department maintains internal and external resources and is led by our Vice President of IT and assisted by our Risk Assessment/IT Compliance & Enterprise Manager . These two individuals have a combined 45+ years of industry experience, including serving in similar roles leading and overseeing cybersecurity programs at other public companies. The IT department is responsible for the information security of the organization and for the oversight of all cybersecurity infrastructure and programs. The department provides regular reports to senior management and other relevant teams on various cybersecurity threats, assessments, and findings.
Our Leadership Committee is responsible for the oversight of risks from cybersecurity threats. The Leadership Committee receive updates on a quarterly basis from leaders of our IT department and compliance and legal teams regarding matters of cybersecurity. This includes existing and new cybersecurity risks, status on how management is addressing and/or mitigating those risks, cybersecurity, and data privacy incidents (if any) and status on key information security initiatives. Our Leadership Committee and IT department discuss cybersecurity-related current events and any updates to our cybersecurity risk management and strategy programs.
Management, in coordination with our IT department, is responsible for hiring appropriate personnel, helping to integrate cybersecurity risk considerations into our overall risk management strategy, and communicating key priorities to relevant personnel. Management is responsible for approving budgets, approving cybersecurity processes, and reviewing cybersecurity assessments and other cybersecurity-related matters.
59
Table of Contents
Item 2. Investments
As of December 31, 2025, we held nineteen consolidated investments and five preferred equity investments. The following tables provide summary information regarding our consolidated investments and preferred equity investments.
Consolidated Investments
Occupancy –
Number of
Average Year
Ownership
Average
Occupancy –
Excluding Held for
Operating Investment Name
Market / Location
Units (1)
Built
Interest
Rent (2)
All Units (3)
Sale/Reno Units (4)
Residential Communities
Allure at Southpark
Charlotte, NC
350
2014
98
%
$
1,681
95.7
%
96.0
%
Amira at Westly
Tampa, FL
408
1999/2023
(5)
1,847
93.1
%
93.4
%
Avenue at Timberlin Park
Jacksonville, FL
200
2001
100
%
1,591
94.5
%
95.0
%
District at Parkview (6)
Stone Mountain, GA
264
2023
69
%
1,907
88.3
%
88.6
%
Skytop Apartments (6)
Cincinnati, OH
361
2024
3
%
1,721
94.5
%
95.0
%
Southern Pines Reserve (6)
Aberdeen, NC
272
2000/2003
22
%
1,486
93.4
%
93.7
%
Villas at Huffmeister
Houston, TX
294
2007
95
%
1,601
96.3
%
96.6
%
Wayford at Concord
Concord, NC
150
2019
83
%
2,157
98.0
%
98.7
%
Yauger Park Villas
Olympia, WA
80
2010
95
%
2,476
97.5
%
97.5
%
Total Residential Communities Units / Average
2,379
$
1,746
93.7
%
94.5
%
Scattered Single-Family Homes
Ballast
AZ / CO / WA
84
1998
95
%
$
2,130
77.4
%
77.4
%
Golden Pacific
IN / KS / MO
161
1977
97
%
1,802
73.9
%
79.9
%
ILE
TX / SE US
450
1991
95
%
1,862
92.9
%
93.9
%
Indy-Springfield
IN / MO
304
1999
100
%
1,426
91.8
%
95.5
%
Peak JV 2
Various / TX
549
1982
100
%
1,382
88.3
%
90.0
%
Peak JV 3
Dallas-Fort Worth, TX
42
1960
100
%
1,082
14.3
%
—
Savannah-84
Savannah, GA
84
2022
100
%
1,875
97.6
%
97.6
%
Total Scattered Single-Family Homes / Average
1,674
$
1,625
86.9
%
90.8
%
Total Operating Units / Average
4,053
$
1,695
90.9
%
93.0
%
Development / Lease-up Investment Name
Residential Communities
Abode Wendell Falls (7)
Wendell, NC
170
—
100
%
—
—
—
Harmony at Clear Creek (7)
Shawnee, KS
188
—
85
%
—
—
—
Parkside at Summers Corner (8)
Summerville, SC
12
2025
100
%
—
—
—
Total Development Units
370
Total Units
4,423
(1) Total operating units includes an aggregate of 107 units classified as held for sale, with such units included in the following portfolios: 12 units of Golden Pacific, 27 units of ILE, 18 units of Indy-Springfield, 8 units of Peak JV 2, and all 42 units of Peak JV 3.
(2) Represents the average of the ending average effective rent per occupied unit as of the last day of each month in the three months ended December 31, 2025.
(3) Percent occupied is calculated as (i) the number of units occupied as of December 31, 2025 divided by (ii) total number of units, expressed as a percentage.
(4) Percent occupied is calculated as (i) the number of units occupied as of December 31, 2025 divided by (ii) total number of units, expressed as a percentage, and excludes 107 units classified as held for sale and an aggregate of 11 down/renovation units.
60
Table of Contents
(5) Amira at Westly is held through our DST Program (refer to Note 9 of our consolidated financial statements for further information). The Amira at Westly DST has been fully subscribed with equity from individual investors.
(6) District at Parkview, Skytop Apartments and Southern Pines Reserve are held through our DST Program.
(7) Represents a development project with no units delivered as of December 31, 2025. Abode Wendell Falls commenced construction in 2024 and Harmony at Clear Creek is anticipated to commence construction in 2026.
(8) Parkside at Summers Corner represents a development project with units to be acquired in tranches as construction is completed. Of the total 100 units that we have committed to acquire, 12 units had been acquired as of December 31, 2025.
Preferred Equity Investments
Total Actual/
Actual/
Estimated
Actual/
Actual/
Actual/
Planned
Construction
Estimated
Estimated
Estimated
Estimated
Number
Cost
Cost to Date
Construction
Initial
Construction
Average
Development Investment Name (1)
Location
of Units
(in millions)
(in millions)
Cost Per Unit
Occupancy
Completion
% Occupied
Rent (2)
River Ford
Brunswick, GA
170
$
51.6
$
18.0
$
303,529
1Q 2026
1Q 2027
—
$
2,004
Sanford Marketplace
Sanford, NC
300
59.6
12.7
198,667
4Q 2026
2Q 2027
—
1,587
Canvas at Wildwood
Wildwood, FL
224
60.3
17.0
269,196
4Q 2026
4Q 2027
—
1,937
Archer at RiverBlue (3)
Asheville, NC
245
71.8
10.8
293,061
1Q 2028
2Q 2028
—
2,113
Total Development Units
939
Operating Investment Name (4)
Wayford at Innovation Park
Charlotte, NC
210
91.4
%
2,313
Total Operating Units
210
Total Units/Average
1,149
$
1,934
(1) None of the development investments had commenced lease-up as of December 31, 2025.
(2) For development investments, represents the average pro forma effective monthly rent per occupied unit for all expected occupied units during the first full quarter of stabilization. For the operating investment, represents the average effective monthly rent per occupied unit.
(3) In December 2025, we entered into a joint venture agreement and made a commitment to invest capital for preferred equity interests in Archer at RiverBlue. No capital had been funded as of December 31, 2025.
(4) Operating investment represents a stabilized operating property.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
We are not party to, and none of our properties are subject to, any material pending legal proceeding.
Item 4. Mining Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
61
Table of Contents
PART II