What changed in this filing

/stocks — the workspaceLOADING

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis

2021-02-17 compared with 2020-02-18 · 804 added, 583 removed, 73 unchanged (95% of the section changed)

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL

CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following table sets forth, for the

years indicated, certain line items from our consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income stated as a percentage

of total revenue:

Year ended December 31,

The following table sets forth, for the years indicated, certain line items from our consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income stated as a percentage of total revenue:

Software licenses

7 unchanged sentences

Total costs and expenses

Patent related income

Operating income (loss)

Operating loss

Interest income

Income (loss) before provision for (benefit from) income taxes

Loss before provision for (benefit from) income taxes

Provision for (benefit from) income taxes

Net income (loss)

Summary of Operations

We are primarily engaged in the development

and sale of biometrics products, solutions and services.

Our software products are used in government and commercial systems and

applications and fulfill a broad range of functions critical to secure biometric enrollment, authentication, identification and

transactions.

Principal government applications of biometrics systems include border control, visa applicant screening, law enforcement,

national defense, intelligence, secure credentialing, access control, and background checks.

Principal commercial applications

We are primarily engaged in the development and sale of biometrics products, solutions and services.

Our software products are used in government and commercial systems and applications and fulfill a broad range of functions critical to secure biometric enrollment, authentication, identification and transactions.

Principal government applications of biometrics systems include border control, visa applicant screening, law enforcement, national defense, intelligence, secure credentialing, access control, and background checks.

Principal commercial applications include:

i) user enrollment and authentication used for login to mobile devices, computers, networks, and software programs;

user authentication for financial transactions and purchases (online and in-person);

ii) user authentication for financial transactions and purchases (online and in-person);

iii) physical access control to buildings;

and iv) identity proofing of prospective employees and customers.

We sell our biometrics software products and services globally

through a multifaceted distribution strategy using systems integrators, OEMs, VARs, partners, and directly to end user customers.

We also derive a portion of our revenue from the sale of imaging software licenses to OEMs and systems integrators that incorporate

our software into medical imaging products and medical systems.

Effective January 1, 2018, we adopted

Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”), Topic 606, Revenue

from Contracts with Customers (“ASC 606”), using the full retrospective transition method.

We sell our biometrics software products and services globally through a multifaceted distribution strategy using systems integrators, OEMs, VARs, partners, and directly to end user customers.

We also derive a portion of our revenue from the sale of imaging software licenses to OEMs and systems integrators that incorporate our software into medical imaging products and medical systems.

Summary of Financial Results

We used revenue and operating income (loss)

to summarize financial results over the past two years as we believe these measurements are the most meaningful way to understand

our operating performance.

We used revenue and operating loss to summarize financial results over the past two years as we believe these measurements are the most meaningful way to understand our operating performance.

2020 compared to 2019

Revenue and operating loss in 2019 were $12.2 million and $4.1

million, respectively, which compared to revenue and operating income in 2018 of $16.1 million and $0.4 million, respectively.

Lower revenue in 2019 as compared to 2018

was primarily due to lower biometrics software license revenue and to a lesser extent lower biometrics services, biometric maintenance

and imaging software license revenue.

This was partially offset by higher imaging maintenance revenue.

Lower operating income in

2019 as compared to 2018 was primarily due to:

Revenue and operating loss in 2020 were $11.3 million and $9.4 million, respectively, which compared to revenue and operating loss in 2019 of $12.2 million and $4.1 million, respectively.

Lower revenue in 2020 as compared to 2019 was primarily due to lower services revenue related to a software license agreement, we entered with a systems integrator in the second quarter of 2018 for a large project where we performed significantly more services in 2019 as compared to 2020.

This was partially offset by higher subscription revenue.

Lower operating income in 2020 as compared to 2019 was primarily due to:

i) lower revenue in 2020;

and ii) higher total costs and expenses in 2020.

Software Licenses

Software licenses consist of revenue from

the sale of biometrics and imaging software products.

Sales of software products depend on our ability to win proposals to supply

software for biometrics systems projects either directly to end user customers or indirectly through channel partners.

Software license revenue decreased 43%

from $8.0 million in 2018 to $4.6 million in 2019.

As a percentage of total revenue, software license revenue decreased from 50%

in 2018 to 38% in 2019.

The $3.4 million decrease in software license revenue was primarily due to a $3.3 million decrease in biometrics

software license sales and a $0.1 million decrease in imaging software license sales.

The reasons for the changes in biometrics

and imaging software licenses were:

i) Biometrics software licenses – Biometrics software license sales were $3.8 million in 2019

versus $7.1 million in 2018.

The dollar decrease was primarily due to:

i) the impact of a software license agreement we entered

into with a large commercial customer during the third quarter of 2018, whereas we had no such license sale in 2019;

and ii) lower

revenue from the software license agreement we entered into with a systems integrator in the second quarter of 2018.

We recognized

$0.6 million of software license revenue from this agreement in 2019 as compared to $1.8 million in 2018.

We also provide engineering

services to this systems integrator pursuant to this arrangement.

We expect our development effort on this project to continue

for approximately one more quarter.

ii) Imaging software licenses – Imaging software license sales were $0.8 million in 2019 versus

$0.9 million in 2018.

The dollar decrease was primarily due to lower imaging license sales to our systems integrator customers

Software Maintenance

Software maintenance consists of revenue

from the sale of software maintenance contracts.

Software maintenance contracts entitle customers to receive software support and

software updates, if and when they become available, during the term of the contract.

Software maintenance revenue decreased

3% from $5.4 million in 2018 to $5.3 million in 2019.

As a percentage of total revenue, software maintenance revenue increased

from 33% in 2018 to 43% in 2019.

The dollar decrease in software maintenance was primarily due to lower software maintenance revenue

from lower initial software license sales.

A majority of our customers purchase software

maintenance contracts when they initially purchase software licenses.

Since our software is used in active biometrics systems,

many of our customers continue to renew their maintenance contracts in subsequent years while systems remain operational.

Services consist of fees we charge to perform

software development, integration, installation, and customization services.

Similar to software license revenue, services revenue

depends on our ability to win biometrics systems projects either directly with end user customers or in conjunction with channel

Services revenue will fluctuate when we commence new projects and/or when we complete projects that were started in previous

Services decreased 13% from $2.7 million

in 2018 to $2.3 million in 2019.

As a percentage of total revenue, services increased from 17% in 2018 to 19% in 2019.

decrease in services revenue was primarily due to:

i) lower services revenue from our direct US government customers;

and ii) lower

services revenue related to the software license agreement we entered into with a systems integrator in the second quarter of 2018

for a large project.

We expect our development effort on this large project to continue for approximately one more quarter.

Services backlog was $0.4 million as of

December 31, 2019.

Cost of Software Licenses

Cost of software licenses consists primarily

of the cost of third party software included in certain software products delivered to the U.S.

Navy (the “Navy”).

Cost of software licenses decreased from

$20,000 in 2018 to zero in 2019.

The dollar decrease in cost of software licenses was primarily due to our having no sales of software

to the Navy in 2019.

Software License Revenue

Software license revenue consists of revenue from the sale of biometrics and imaging software products.

Sales of software products depend on our ability to win proposals to supply software for biometrics systems projects either directly to end user customers or indirectly through channel partners.

Software license revenue increased 9% from $4.6 million in 2019 to $5.0 million in 2020.

As a percentage of total revenue, software license revenue increased from 38% in 2019 to 45% in 2020.

The $0.4 million increase in software license revenue was primarily due to a $0.3 million increase in biometrics software license sales and a $0.1 million increase in imaging software license sales.

The reasons for the changes in biometrics and imaging software licenses were:

Biometrics software licenses – Biometrics software license sales were $4.1 million in 2020 versus $3.8 million in 2019.

The dollar increase was primarily due to higher subscription revenue of $0.6 million.

This was partially offset by lower license revenue of $0.4 million.

Imaging software licenses – Imaging software license sales were $0.9 million in 2020 versus $0.8 million in 2019.

The dollar increase was primarily due to higher imaging license sales to our systems integrator customers in 2020.

Software Maintenance Revenue

Software maintenance revenue consists of revenue from the sale of software maintenance contracts.

Software maintenance contracts entitle customers to receive software support and software updates, if and when they become available, during the term of the contract.

Software maintenance revenue increased 3% from $5.3 million in 2019 to $5.4 million in 2020.

As a percentage of total revenue, software maintenance revenue increased from 43% in 2019 to 48% in 2020.

A majority of our customers purchase software maintenance contracts when they initially purchase software licenses.

Since our software is used in active biometrics systems, many of our customers continue to renew their maintenance contracts in subsequent years while systems remain operational.

Services Revenue

Services revenue consists of fees we charge to perform software development, integration, installation, and customization services.

Similar to software license revenue, services revenue depends on our ability to win biometrics systems projects either directly with end user customers or in conjunction with channel partners.

Services revenue will fluctuate when we commence new projects and/or when we complete projects that were started in previous periods.

Services decreased 64% from $2.3 million in 2019 to $0.8 million in 2020.

As a percentage of total revenue, services decreased from 19% in 2019 to 7% in 2020.

The dollar decrease in services revenue was primarily due to lower services revenue related to the software license agreement we entered into with a systems integrator in the second quarter of 2018 for a large project where we performed significantly more services in 2019 as compared to 2020 and to a less extent lower services revenue from other system integrators.

Cost of Services

Cost of services consists of engineering

costs to perform customer services projects.

Cost of services consists of engineering costs to perform customer services projects.

Such costs primarily include:

i) engineering salaries, stock-based compensation, fringe

benefits, and facilities;

i) engineering salaries, stock-based compensation, fringe benefits, and facilities;

and ii) engineering consultants and contractors.

Cost of services increased 3% from $1.2

million in 2018 to $1.3 million in 2019.

Cost of services as a percentage of services revenue increased from 45% in 2018 to 54%

in 2019, which means that gross margins decreased from 55% to 46%.

The dollar increase in cost of services was primarily due to

a large project with a systems integrator that we signed in the second quarter of 2018.

The increase was partially offset by lower

cost of services due to lower services revenue from our direct US government customers.

We anticipate further cost of services

from this large project to continue for approximately one more quarter.

Gross margins on services of 46%, and 55%,

in 2019 and 2018, respectively, were a function of:

Cost of services decreased 4% from $1.3 million in 2019 to $0.8 million in 2020.

Cost of services as a percentage of services revenue increased from 54% in 2019 to 96% in 2020, which means that gross margins on services decreased from 46% in 2019 to 4% in 2020.

The dollar decrease in cost of services was primarily due to a large project with a systems integrator that we signed in the second quarter of 2018.

Gross margins on services of 4% and 46%, in 2020 and 2019, respectively, were a function of:

i) the nature of the projects;

ii) the level of engineering difficulty and

labor hours required to complete project tasks;

ii) the level of engineering difficulty and labor hours required to complete project tasks;

and iii) how much we were able to charge.

Gross margins in these years reflect

the profitability mix of customer projects.

We expect that gross margins on services will continue to fluctuate in future periods

based on the nature, complexity, and pricing of future projects.

Gross margins in these years reflect the profitability mix of customer projects.

that gross margins on services will continue to fluctuate in future periods based on the nature , complexity, and pricing of future projects.

Research and Development Expense

Research and development expense consists

of costs for:

Research and development expense consists of costs for:

i) engineering personnel, including salaries, stock-based compensation, fringe benefits, and facilities;

ii) engineering

consultants and contractors, and iii) other engineering expenses such as supplies, equipment depreciation, dues and memberships

ii) engineering consultants and contractors, and iii) other engineering expenses such as supplies, equipment depreciation, dues and memberships and travel.

Engineering costs incurred to develop our technology and products are classified as research and development expense.

As described in the cost of services section, engineering costs incurred to provide engineering services for customer projects

are classified as cost of services, and are not included in research and development expense.

The classification of total engineering

costs to research and development expense and cost of services was (in thousands):

Years ended December 31,

As described in the cost of services section, engineering costs incurred to provide engineering services for customer projects are classified as cost of services and are not included in research and development expense.

The classification of total engineering costs to research and development expense and cost of services was (in thousands):

Research and development expense

1 unchanged sentence

Total engineering costs

Research and development expense increased

12% from $7.1 million in 2018 to $7.9 million in 2019.

As a percentage of total revenue, research and development expense increased

from 44% in 2018 to 65% in 2019.

As the table above indicates, total engineering

costs increased by $0.9 million in 2019 as compared to 2018.

The spending increase was primarily due to higher spending on third-party

development costs and to a lesser extent higher employee costs.

The increase was partially offset by lower other costs.

spending on third-party development costs was primarily due to third-party vendors that were engaged to assist in our software

Our engineering headcount decreased by one in 2019.

We believe our engineering organization was adequately staffed

as of December 31, 2019.

As we described in the Part I—Business

of this Form 10-K, we intend to introduce new products that will allow us to offer more complete biometrics solutions.

believe this strategy will allow us to sell more software into biometrics systems projects in order to grow our revenue.

Our preference

is to develop such products internally, however to the extent we are unable to do that, we may purchase or license technologies

from third parties.

We anticipate that we will continue to focus our future research and development activities on enhancing existing

products and developing new products.

Research and development expense increased 8% from 2019 to 2020.

As a percentage of total revenue, research and development expense increased from 75% in 2019 to 87% in 2020.

Total engineering costs increased by $0.7 million in 2020 as compared to 2019.

The spending increase was primarily due to higher employee costs of $1.3 million.

The increase was partially offset by a $0.6 million reduction in spending on third-party software development costs.

Our engineering headcount increased by six to 52 in 2020.

We believe our engineering organization was adequately staffed as of December 31, 2020.

As we described in the Part I—Business of this Form 10-K, we intend to introduce new products that will allow us to offer more complete biometrics solutions.

We believe this strategy will allow us to sell more software into biometrics systems projects in order to grow our revenue.

Our preference is to develop such products internally, however to the extent we are unable to do that, we may purchase or license technologies from third parties.

We anticipate that we will continue to focus our future research and development activities on enhancing existing products and developing new products.

Selling and Marketing Expense

Selling and marketing expense primarily

consists of costs for:

i) sales and marketing personnel, including salaries, sales commissions, stock-based compensation, fringe

benefits, travel, and facilities;

Selling and marketing expense primarily consists of costs for:

i) sales and marketing personnel, including salaries, sales commissions, stock-based compensation, fringe benefits, travel, and facilities;

and ii) advertising and promotion expenses.

Sales and marketing expense decreased 14%

from $4.2 million in 2018 to $3.6 million in 2019.

As a percentage of total revenue, sales and marketing expense increased from

26% in 2018 to 30% in 2019.

The dollar decrease in selling and marketing expense was primarily due:

i) to lower sales commissions

due to lower revenue, and ii) lower employee costs due to lower headcount.

This decrease was slightly offset by higher stock-based

compensation expense and higher other costs.

Sales and marketing expense increased by 50% from $3.6 million in 2019 to $5.4 million in 2020.

As a percentage of total revenue, sales and marketing expense increased from 30% in 2019 to 48% in 2020.

The dollar increase in selling and marketing expense was primarily due increased headcount related costs of $1.7M and higher professional services of $0.5 million.

This increase was partially offset by lower travel costs of $0.2 million due to COVID-19 travel restrictions and lower sales commission of $0.2 million due to lower revenue.

General and Administrative Expense

General and administrative expense consists

primarily of costs for:

i) officers, directors and administrative personnel, including salaries, bonuses, director compensation,

stock-based compensation, fringe benefits, and facilities;

General and administrative expense consists primarily of costs for:

i) officers, directors and administrative personnel, including salaries, bonuses, director compensation, stock-based compensation, fringe benefits, and facilities;

ii) professional fees, including legal and audit fees;

iii) public company

iii) public company expenses;

and iv) other administrative expenses, such as insurance costs and bad debt provisions.

General and administrative expense increased

9% from $3.3 million in 2018 to $3.6 million in 2019.

As a percentage of total revenue, general and administrative expense increased

from 20% in 2018 to 29% in 2019.

The increase in general and administrative expense in 2019 was primarily due to:

i) higher employee

costs due to higher headcount;

ii) higher legal fees;

iii) higher stock-based compensation expense;

and iv) higher consultant fees.

The increases were partially offset by lower audit fees and lower bonus expense.

Patent Related Income

The composition of patent related income

in 2019 and 2018 was as follows:

We had $49,000 and $69,000 of income from

a patent arrangement in the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

We entered into an arrangement with an unaffiliated

third party in 2010 under which we assigned certain patents in return for royalties on proceeds from patent monetization efforts

by the third party.

Such third party has engaged in various patent monetization activities, including enforcement, litigation and

The party reported and we recorded $49,000 and $69,000 of income from this arrangement in the years ended December 31,

2019 and 2018, respectively.

We continue to have a contractual relationship

with this third party.

However, we are unable to predict how much more income we might receive from this arrangement, if any, because

we do not know whether any patent monetization efforts by the third party will be successful.

Future patent sales are likely to be minimal

as our remaining patents and patent applications pertain primarily to biometrics and imaging compression.

Our current intent is

to retain these patents for use in the business.

General and administrative expense increased by 51% from $3.6 million in 2019 to $5.4 million in 2020.

As a percentage of total revenue, general and administrative expense increased from 29% in 2019 to 48% in 2020.

The increase in general and administrative expense in 2020 was primarily due to costs related to the COVID-19 pandemic and turnover of over 50% our administrative personnel.

Costs included $0.7 million of severance and transition

expense, $0.2 million of legal fees, $0.1 million of bad debt expense and $0.2 million of expense related to remote working.

Also contributing to increased general and administrative expenses were $0.3 million of higher employee costs due to increased headcount legal and professional fees of $0.4 million.

Interest Income

Interest income increased 18% from $844,000

in 2018 to $1.0 million in 2019.

The dollar increase was primarily due to higher interest rates within our money market accounts.

We are subject to income taxes in the United

States and we use estimates in determining our provisions for income taxes.

We account for income taxes using the asset and liability

method for accounting and reporting income taxes.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized based on temporary differences

between the financial reporting and income tax bases of assets and liabilities using statutory rates.

A discussion of income taxes for the years

ended December 31, 2019, and 2018 follows:

ended December 31, 2019 .

Interest income decreased by 82% from $1.0 million in 2019 to $0.2 million in 2020.

The dollar decrease was primarily due to lower interest rates within our money market accounts.

We are subject to income taxes in the United States and we use estimates in determining our provisions for income taxes.

We account for income taxes using the asset and liability method for accounting and reporting income taxes.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized based on temporary differences between the financial reporting and income tax bases of assets and liabilities using statutory rates.

A discussion of income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2020, and 2019 follows:

Year ended December 31, 2020 .

Total income tax benefit for the year ended December 31, 2020 was $1.6 million.

The income tax benefit for 2020 was primarily due to the tax benefit of the current year tax loss which can be carried back due to changes made by the CARES Act.

Year ended December 31, 2019 .

Total income tax provision for the year ended December 31, 2019 was $5.2 million.

The increase in the income tax provision for 2019 was primarily due to the change in valuation allowance for our deferred tax assets.

As of December 31, 2019, we had a

total of $6.3 million of deferred tax assets, of which $5.0 million relates to research credit carryforwards.

We have assessed

the need for a valuation allowance on our deferred tax assets.

We evaluated and considered all available evidence, both positive

and negative, to determine whether, based on the weight of that evidence, a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets was needed.

As part of this analysis we have given more weight to recent, historical evidence than future projections as we consider the past

more objective.

As of the fourth quarter of 2019, we have a cumulative pretax loss over the most recent three-year period including

a pretax loss of $3.1 million in 2019.

We considered the cumulative loss as of the end of the fourth quarter of 2019 to be significant

negative evidence in the overall analysis.

Prior to this quarter, we have incurred pretax income cumulatively when calculating

it for the twelve most recent quarters, however, the levels of pretax income have been declining in recent periods, most notably

as of the fourth quarter of 2019 as a result of certain internal changes.

In September 2019, we appointed a

new Chief Executive Officer and, as a result, we reviewed and made changes to our strategy and business plans.

As a result, we

will be making additional investments in research, product development and sales and marketing including additional headcount.

These changes in strategy and additional investment started in the fourth quarter of 2019 and will continue over the proceeding

Our pretax income forecasts are highly predicated upon new product development and penetrating new markets.

Therefore, this

evidence is given nominal weight in the analysis compared to the recent history of losses and anticipated investment.

Further, a significant portion of our deferred

tax assets relates to federal and state research credits.

These credits may only offset 75% of the tax liability after net operating

loss carryforwards are utilized and thus, we have the risk that the credits could expire before utilization if sufficient taxable

income in the carryforward periods doesn’t exist.

Based upon the information available

to us at this time, the above analysis of evidence represents our best estimate regarding the utilization of the deferred tax

assets, and we have concluded that it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets of $6.3 million will not be

Therefore, we have recorded a full valuation allowance of $6.3 million against our deferred tax assets during the

fourth quarter of 2019.

We will continue to monitor the evidence and the realizability of our deferred tax assets in future

Should evidence regarding the realizability of our deferred tax assets change at a future point in time, we will

adjust the valuation allowance as required.

ended December 31, 2018 .

Total income tax benefit for the year ended December 31, 2018 was $8,000.

tax benefit for 2018 was based on:

statutory rate of 21%, ii) increased by state income taxes;

and iii) reduced by

permanent adjustments and research tax credits.

The income tax provision for 2019 was primarily due to a change in valuation allowance for our deferred tax assets.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

In recent years, we have financed the company

with our cash balances, cash generated from operations, and cash received from the sale of patent assets.

Equity financing has

not been a meaningful source of financing for us in recent years.

Cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities

are described below.

In recent years, we have financed the company with our cash balances, cash generated from operations, and cash received from the sale of patent assets.

Equity financing has not been a meaningful source of financing for us in recent years.

Cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities are described below.

Cash flow from operating activities

In the year ended December 31, 2019, our operating activities

used net cash of $2.9 million.

In the year ended December 31, 2018, our operating activities provided net cash of $0.7 million.

A discussion of cash flow from operating activities for each of the last two years follows:

ended December 31, 2019.

A discussion of cash flow from operating activities for each of the last two years is as follows:

Year ended December 31, 2020.

Cash used by operating activities was $5.3 million in 2020.

Cash used by operations was

primarily the result of $8.3 million of net loss, and $0.9 million of changes in assets and liabilities.

This was partially offset

by the add back of $6.3 million of non-cash items for depreciation, amortization, stock-based compensation and deferred tax assets.

ended December 31, 2018.

Cash provided by operating activities was $0.7 million in 2018.

Cash provided by operations

was primarily the result of $1.2 million of net income and the add back of $1.0 million of non-cash items for depreciation, amortization

and stock-based compensation.

Cash from these sources was partially offset by $1.5 million of changes in assets and liabilities.

Cash used by operations was primarily the result of $7.6 million of net loss, partially offset by $0.8 million of changes in assets and liabilities and by the add back of $1.5 million of non-cash items for depreciation, amortization and stock-based compensation.

Year ended December 31, 2019.

Cash used by operating activities was $2.9 million in 2019.

Cash used by operations was primarily the result of $8.3 million of net loss, and $0.9 million of changes in assets and liabilities.

This was partially offset by the add back of $6.3 million of non-cash items for depreciation, amortization, stock-based compensation and deferred tax assets.

Cash flow from investing activities

In the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, our investing

activities used net cash of $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively.

A discussion of cash flow from investing activities for

each of the last two years follows:

ended December 31, 2019.

Cash used by investing activities of $0.1 million in 2019 consisted of purchases of property

and equipment.

ended December 31, 2018.

Cash used by investing activities of $0.2 million in 2018 consisted of purchases of property

and equipment.

We have no material commitments for capital

expenditures.

In the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, our investing activities used net cash of $2.9 million and $0.1 million, respectively.

A discussion of cash flow from investing activities for each of the last two years is as follows:

Year ended December 31, 2020.

Investing activity cash usage was primarily the result of $2.4 million used in connection with our acquisition of certain assets and liabilities of AFIX product suite and $0.5 million of purchases of property and equipment.

Year ended December 31, 2019.

Investing activity cash usage was primarily the result of purchases of property and equipment.

We have no material commitments for capital expenditures.

Cash flow from financing activities

In the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, our financing

activities used net cash of $0.8 million and $0.5 million, respectively.

A discussion of cash flow from financing activities for

each of the last three years follows:

ended December 31, 2019.

Cash used in financing activities was $0.8 million in 2019.

Financing activity cash usage

was primarily the result of $765,000 used to buy back stock under our stock repurchase program and $93,000 used to pay income taxes

for employees who surrendered shares in connection with stock grants.

Cash used for these purposes was partially offset by $43,000

of cash received from the issuance of stock under our ESPP program.

ended December 31, 2018.

Cash used in financing activities was $0.5 million in 2018.

Financing activity cash usage

was primarily the result of $392,000 used to buy back stock under our stock repurchase program and $107,000 used to pay income

taxes for employees who surrendered shares in connection with stock grants.

Cash used for these purposes was partially offset by

$50,000 of cash received from the issuance of stock under our ESPP program.

At December 31, 2019, we had cash

and cash equivalents of $47.7 million.

While we cannot assure you that we will not require additional financing, or that such financing

will be available to us, we believe that our cash and cash equivalents will be sufficient to fund our operations for at least the

next twelve months from the filing date.

To date, inflation has not had a material

impact on our financial results.

There can be no assurance, however, that inflation will not adversely affect our financial results

in the future.

In the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, our financing activities used net cash of $1.0 million and $0.8 million, respectively.

A discussion of cash flow from financing activities for each of the last two years is as follows:

Year ended December 31, 20 20 .

Financing activity cash usage was primarily the result of $ 0.

9 million used to buy back stock under our stock repurchase program and $ 0.1 million used to pay income taxes for employees who surrendered shares in connection with stock grants.

Year ended December 31, 2019.

Financing activity cash usage was primarily the result of $0.8 million used to buy back stock under our stock repurchase program and $0.1 million used to pay income taxes for employees who surrendered shares in connection with stock grants.

At December 31, 2020, we had cash and cash equivalents of $38.6 million.

While we cannot assure you that we will not require additional financing, or that if needed such financing will be available to us, we believe that our cash and cash equivalents will be sufficient to fund our operations for at least the next twelve months from the filing date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

To date, inflation has not had a material impact on our financial results.

There can be no assurance, however, that inflation will not adversely affect our financial results in the future.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

We do not currently have any arrangements with unconsolidated

entities, such as entities often referred to as structured finance, special purpose entities, or variable interest entities which

are often established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited

We do not currently have any arrangements with unconsolidated entities, such as entities often referred to as structured finance, special purpose entities, or variable interest entities which are often established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes.

Accordingly, we are not exposed to any financing, liquidity, market or credit risk if we had such relationships.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

We consider certain accounting policies

related to revenue recognition, stock-based compensation, income taxes, and the allowance for doubtful accounts to be critical

recognition .

Effective January 1, 2018, we adopted Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”), Topic

606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC 606”), using the full retrospective transition method.

In accordance with ASC 606, revenue is

recognized when a customer obtains control of promised goods and services.

The amount of revenue recognized reflects the consideration

to which we expect to be entitled to receive in exchange for these goods and services.

In addition, ASC 606 requires disclosures

of the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers.

The core principle of the standard is that

we should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration

to which we expect to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.

To achieve that core principle, we should apply the

following five step model:

the contract with the customer;

the performance obligations in the contract;

the transaction price;

the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract;

revenue when (or as) each performance obligation is satisfied.

The Company’s significant accounting policies are discussed in Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, to our financial statements, included elsewhere in this Annual Report.

We have identified the following as our significant accounting policies and estimates, which are defined as those that are reflective of significant judgments and uncertainties, are the most pervasive and important to the presentation of our financial condition and results of operations and could potentially result in materially different results under different assumptions, judgments or conditions.

Revenue recognition .

In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”), Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC 606”), revenue is recognized when a customer obtains control of promised goods and services.

The amount of revenue recognized reflects the consideration to which we expect to be entitled to receive in exchange for these goods and services.

In addition, ASC 606 requires disclosures of the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers.

The core principle of the standard is that we should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which we expect to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.

To achieve that core principle, we apply the following five step model:

Identify the contract with the customer;

A contract with a customer exists

when (i) we enter into an enforceable contract with a customer that defines each party’s rights regarding the goods

or services to be transferred and identifies the related payment terms, (ii) the contract has commercial substance, and (iii) we

determine that collection of substantially all consideration for goods and services that are transferred is probable based on the

customer’s intent and ability to pay the promised consideration.

We apply judgment in determining the customer’s intent

and ability to pay, which is based on a variety of factors including the customer’s historical payment experience, or in

the case of a new customer, published credit and financial information pertaining to the customer.

We evaluate contract modifications

for the impact on revenue recognition if they have been approved by both parties such that the enforceable rights and obligations

under the contract have changed.

Contract modifications are either accounted for using a cumulative effect adjustment or prospectively

over the remaining term of the arrangement.

The determination of which method is more appropriate depends on the nature of the

modification, which we evaluate on a case-by-case basis.

We combine two or more contracts

entered into at or near the same time with the same customer and account for them as a single contract if (i) the contracts

are negotiated as a package with a common commercial objective, (ii) the amount of consideration to be paid in one contract

depends on the price or performance of the other contract, or (iii) some or all of the goods or services in one contract would

be combined with some or all of the goods and services in the other contract into a single performance obligation.

If two or more

contracts are combined, the consideration to be paid is aggregated and allocated to the individual performance obligations without

regard to the consideration specified in the individual contracts.

2) Identify the performance obligations in

Performance obligations promised

in a contract are identified based on the goods and services that will be transferred to the customer that are both capable of

being distinct, whereby the customer can benefit from the good or service either on its own or together with other available resources,

and are distinct in the context of the contract, whereby the transfer of the good or service is separately identifiable from other

promises in the contract.

To the extent a contract includes multiple promised goods and services, we apply judgment to determine

whether promised goods and services are capable of being distinct and distinct in the context of the contract.

If these criteria

are not met, the promised goods and services are accounted for as a combined performance obligation.

To identify performance obligations,

we consider all of the goods or services promised in a contract regardless of whether they are explicitly stated or are implied

by customary business practices.

Identify the performance obligations in the contract;

Determine the transaction price;

The transaction price is determined

based on the consideration we expect to be entitled in exchange for transferring promised goods and services to the customer.

the transaction price requires significant judgment.

To the extent the transaction price includes variable consideration, we estimate

the amount of variable consideration that should be included in the transaction price utilizing either the expected value method

or the most likely amount method depending on the nature of the variable consideration.

Variable consideration is included in the

transaction price if, in our judgment, it is probable that a significant future reversal of cumulative revenue recognized under

the contract will not occur.

Any estimates, including the effect of the constraint on variable consideration, are evaluated at

each reporting period.

The amount of consideration is not adjusted for a significant financing component if the time between payment

and the transfer of the related good or service is expected to be one year or less under the practical expedient in ASC 606-10-32-18.

Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract;

Recognize revenue when (or as) each performance obligation is satisfied.

We categorize revenue as software licenses, software maintenance, or services.

Revenue from software licenses is recognized at a point in time upon delivery, provided all other revenue recognition criteria are met.

We recognize software maintenance revenue over time on a straight-line basis over the contract period.

Services revenue is recognized over time as the services are delivered using an input method (i.e., labor hours incurred as a percentage of total labor hours budgeted), provided all other revenue recognition criteria are met.

In addition to selling software licenses, software maintenance and software services on a standalone basis, a significant portion of our contracts include multiple performance obligations, which require an allocation of the transaction price to each distinct performance obligation based on a relative standalone selling price (“SSP) basis.

The SSP is the price

at which we would sell a promised good or service separately to a customer.

The best estimate of SSP is the observable pr ice of a good o r service when we sell that good or service separately.

A contractually stated price or a list price for a good or service may be the SSP of that good or service.

We use a range of amounts to estimate SSP when we sell each of the goods and s ervices separately and need to determine whether there is a discount that needs to be allocated based on the relative SSP of the various goods and services.

In instances where SSP is not directly observable, such as when we do not sell the product or servi ce separately, we typically determine the SSP using an adjusted market assessment approach using information that may include market conditions and other observable inputs.

We typically have more than one SSP for individual goods and services due to the st ratification of those goods and services by customers and circumstances.

In these instances, we may use information such as the nature of the customer and distribution channel in determining the SSP.

When software licenses and significant customization engineering services are sold together, they are accounted for as a combined performance obligation, as the software licenses are generally highly dependent on, and interrelated with, the associated customization services and therefore are not distinct performance obligations.

Revenue for the combined performance obligation is recognized over time as the services are delivered using an input method (i.e., labor hours incurred as a percentage of total labor hours budgeted).

When software subscription licenses are sold, the term software license and software maintenance are generally considered distinct performance obligations.

The transaction price is allocated to the term software license and the software maintenance based on relative SSP.

We sell our software subscription license for a fixed fee or a usage-based royalty fee, sometimes subject to a minimum guarantee.

When the amount is in the form of a fixed fee, including the guaranteed minimum in usage-based royalty, revenue allocated to the term software license is recognized at a point in time upon delivery, provided all other revenue recognition criteria are met.

Any royalties not subject to the guaranteed minimum or earned in excess of the minimum amount are recognized as revenue when the subsequent usage occurs.

Revenue allocated to the software maintenance is recognized over the contract term.

The amount of consideration is not adjusted for a significant financing component if the time between payment and the transfer of the related good or service is expected to be one year or less under the practical expedient in ASC 606-10-32-18.

Our revenue arrangements are typically accounted for under such expedient, as payment is typically due within 30 to 60 days.

of December 31, 2019 and 2018, none of our contracts contained a significant financing component.

4) Allocate the transaction price to performance

obligations in the contract

If the contract contains a single

performance obligation, the entire transaction price is allocated to the single performance obligation.

Contracts that contain

multiple performance obligations require an allocation of the transaction price to each performance obligation based on a relative

standalone selling price (“SSP”) basis unless the transaction price is variable and meets the criteria to be allocated

entirely to a performance obligation or to a distinct service that forms part of a single performance obligation.

The consideration

to be received is allocated among the separate performance obligations based on relative SSPs.

The SSP is the price at which we

would sell a promised good or service separately to a customer.

The best estimate of SSP is the observable price of a good or service

when we sell that good or service separately.

A contractually stated price or a list price for a good or service may be the SSP

of that good or service.

We use a range of amounts to estimate SSP when we sell each of the goods and services separately and need

to determine whether there is a discount that needs to be allocated based on the relative SSP of the various goods and services.

In instances where SSP is not directly observable, such as when we do not sell the product or service separately, we typically

determine the SSP using an adjusted market assessment approach using information that may include market conditions and other observable

We typically have more than one SSP for individual goods and services due to the stratification of those goods and services

by customers and circumstances.

In these instances, we may use information such as the nature of the customer and distribution

channel in determining the SSP.

5) Recognize revenue when or as we satisfy

a performance obligation

We satisfy performance obligations

either over time or at a point in time as discussed in further detail below.

Revenue is recognized over time if 1) the customer

simultaneously receives and consumes the benefits provided by our performance, 2) our performance creates or enhances an asset

that the customer controls as the asset is created or enhanced, or 3) our performance does not create an asset with an alternative

use to us and we have an enforceable right to payment for performance completed to date.

If we do not satisfy a performance obligation

over time, the related performance obligation is satisfied at a point in time by transferring the control of a promised good or

service to a customer.

We categorize revenue as software licenses,

software maintenance, services, or royalties.

In addition to the general revenue recognition policies described above, specific

revenue recognition policies apply to each category of revenue.

As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, none of our contracts contained a significant financing component.

Stock-Based Compensation.

We grant stock and stock options to our employees and directors.

We measure stock-based compensation cost at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and recognize it as expense over the applicable vesting period of the award on a straight-line basis.

For stock awards, we determine the fair value of the award by using the fair market value of our stock on the date of grant;

provided the number of shares in the grant is fixed on the grant date.

For stock options, we use the Black-Scholes valuation model to estimate the fair value of the award.

This valuation model takes into account the exercise price of the award, as well as a variety of significant assumptions.

The assumptions used to estimate the fair value of stock options include the expected term, the expected volatility of our stock over the expected term, the risk-free interest rate over the expected term, and our expected annual dividend yield.

Income taxes .

As part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements we are required to estimate our actual current tax expense.

We must also estimate temporary and permanent differences that result from differing treatment of certain items for tax and accounting purposes.

These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included in our consolidated balance sheet.

We must then assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and to the extent we believe recovery is not likely, we must establish a valuation allowance.

To the extent we establish a valuation allowance or increase this allowance in a period for deferred tax assets, which have been recognized, we must include an expense with the tax provision in the statement of operations.

Conversely, to the extent we decrease our valuation allowance in a period for deferred tax assets, which have been previously reserved, we must include a tax benefit with the tax provision in the statement of operations.

The Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act (CARES Act) was signed into law on March 27, 2020.

The Act contained specific relief and stimulus measures including allowing net operating losses originating in 2018 through 2020 to be carried back five years to offset taxable income in the carryback period.

Significant management j udgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes, our deferred tax assets, and any valuation allowance recorded against our net deferred tax assets.

Our deferred tax assets primarily relate to :

i) research and development tax credit carry forwards related to excess stock compensation benefits ;

ii ) net operating loss carryforwards ;

and ii i ) temporary differences that result from differing treatment of certain items for tax and accounting purposes.

As of December 31, 20 20 , we had a total of $ 8.7 million of deferred tax assets for which we ha ve recorded a n $ 8.7 million valuation allowance .

Also, we have recognized the tax benefit of the amount of our current year loss that can be carried back to recover taxes paid in earlier years .

We will continue to assess the level of valuation allowance required in future periods.

Should evidence regarding the realizability of tax assets change at a future point in time, the valuation allowance will be adjusted accordingly.

Allowance for doubtful accounts.

We make judgments as to our ability to collect outstanding receivables and provide allowances for receivables when collection becomes doubtful.

Provisions are made based upon a specific review of all significant outstanding invoices.

If the judgments we make to determine the allowance for doubtful accounts do not reflect the future ability to collect outstanding receivables, additional provisions for doubtful accounts may be required.

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

Recent Accounting Pronouncements.

In December 2019, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) No.

2019-12, Income Taxes (Topic 740):

Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes .

The ASU was issued to reduce the complexity of the reporting information for financial statement users.

We adopted the standard on January 1, 2020.

The adoption of the standard did not result in any adjustment to our financial statements.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326):

Measurement of Credit Losses of Financial Instruments , which changes the methodology for measuring credit losses on financial instruments and the timing of when such losses are recorded.

This guidance was to be effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted.

In November 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-10, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326), Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815), and Leases (Topic842) Effective Dates, which deferred the effective dates for us, as a smaller reporting company, until fiscal year 2023.

We are continuing to assess the impact of the standard on our consolidated financial statements.

FINANCIAL STATEME NTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of Aware, Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Aware, Inc.

and its subsidiary (the Company) as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years then ended, and the related notes to the consolidated financial statements (collectively, the financial statements).

In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits.

We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with U.S.

federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB.

Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud.

The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting.

As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks.

Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.

Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.

We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that:

(1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments.

The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Revenue Recognition

As described in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company recognizes revenue when a customer obtains control of promised goods and services.

The amount of revenue recognized reflects the consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled to receive in exchange for these goods and services.

The Company offers customers the ability to purchase combinations of software licenses, software maintenance, and related professional services together in one arrangement.

The Company must determine which promises are distinct performance obligations and allocate the revenue to the performance obligations that are considered distinct based upon their relative stand-alone selling price.

Revenue allocated to software licenses is typically recognized at a point in time upon delivery and revenue allocated to the software maintenance and professional services is recognized over time, provided all other

revenue recognition criteria are met.

Significant judgment is exercised by t he Company in determining revenue recognition for these customer agreements, and includes the following:

Determination of whether products and services are considered distinct performance obligations that should be accounted for separately versus together, such as software maintenance or professional services that are sold with software licenses

The pattern of delivery (i.e., timing of when revenue is recognized) for each distinct performance obligation

Identification and treatment of contract terms that may impact the timing and amount of revenue recognized (e.g., variable consideration, optional purchases, and material rights)

Determination of stand-alone selling prices for each distinct performance obligation

Given these factors, the related audit effort in evaluating management's judgments in determining revenue recognition for these customer agreements was extensive and required a high degree of auditor judgment.

Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the financial statements.

Our procedures related to the Company's revenue recognition for these customer agreements included, among others:

We evaluated management's significant accounting policies related to these customer agreements for reasonableness.

We selected a sample of customer agreements and performed the following procedures:

Obtained and read contract source documents for each selection, including master agreements, and certain other documents which were part of the agreement

Tested management's identification and treatment of contract terms

Tested management’s underlying assumptions and conclusions regarding the standalone selling price for each distinct performance obligation

Assessed the terms in the customer agreement and evaluated the appropriateness of management's application of their accounting policies, along with their use of estimates, in the determination of revenue recognition conclusions

Tested the mathematical accuracy of management's calculations of revenue and the associated pattern of revenue recognized in the financial statements.

/s/ RSM US LLP

We have served as the Company's auditor since 2012.

Boston, Massachusetts

February 17, 2021

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except share data)

Current assets:

Cash and cash equivalents

Accounts receivable (less allowance for doubtful accounts of

$138 at December 31, 2020 and $20 at December 31, 2019)

Unbilled receivables

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

Total current assets

Property and equipment, net

Intangible assets, net

Long term tax receivable

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Current liabilities:

Accounts payable

Accrued expenses

Deferred revenue

Total current liabilities

Long-term deferred revenue

Commitments and contingent liabilities (Note 7)

Stockholders’ equity:

Preferred stock, $1.00 par value;

1,000,000 shares authorized,

none outstanding

Common stock, $.01 par value;

shares authorized,

70,000,000 in 2020 and 2019;

outstanding 21,378,833 as of December 31,

2020 and 21,442,781 as of December 31, 2019

Additional paid-in capital

Accumulated deficit

Total stockholders’ equity

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in thousands, except per share data)

Years ended December 31,

Software licenses

Software licenses consist of revenue from

the sale of software licenses for biometrics and imaging applications.

Our software licenses are functional intellectual property

and typically provide customers with the right to use our software in perpetuity as it exists when made available to the customer.

We recognize revenue from software licenses at a point in time upon delivery, provided all other revenue recognition criteria are

Software maintenance

Software maintenance consists of revenue

from the sale of software maintenance contracts for biometrics and imaging software.

Software maintenance contracts entitle customers

to receive software support and software updates, if and when they become available, during the term of the maintenance contract.

Total revenue

Costs and expenses:

Cost of services

Research and development

Selling and marketing

General and administrative

Total costs and expenses

Operating loss

Interest and other income

Loss before (benefit) provision for income taxes

(Benefit) provision for income taxes

Net loss per share – basic

Net loss per share – diluted

Weighted-average shares - basic

Weighted-average shares - diluted

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)

Years ended December 31,

Cash flows from operating activities:

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash

provided by operating activities:

Depreciation and amortization

Stock-based compensation

Deferred tax assets

Bad debt provision

Increase (decrease) from changes in assets and liabilities:

Accounts receivable

Unbilled receivables

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

Long-term tax receivable

Accounts payable

Accrued expenses

Deferred revenue

Net cash used in operating activities

Cash flows from investing activities:

Purchases of property and equipment

Cash paid for acquisition, net

Net cash used in investing activities

Cash flows from financing activities:

Proceeds from issuance of common stock

Payments made for taxes of employees who surrendered

shares related to unrestricted stock

Repurchase of common stock

Net cash used in financing activities

Decrease in cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year

Cash and cash equivalents, end of year

Supplemental disclosure:

Cash paid for income taxes

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(in thousands)

Stockholders’

Balance at December 31, 2018

Exercise of common stock options

Performance share award

Issuance of unrestricted stock

Shares surrendered by employees to

pay taxes related to unrestricted

Issuance of common stock under

employee stock purchase plan

Stock-based compensation expense

Repurchase of common stock

Balance at December 31, 2019

Issuance of unrestricted stock

Shares surrendered by employees to pay

taxes related to unrestricted stock

Issuance of common stock under

employee stock purchase plan

Stock-based compensation expense

Repurchase of common stock

Balance at December 31, 2020

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

NATURE O F BUSINESS

We are a global leader in biometrics software offerings and solutions.

Our portfolio enables government agencies and commercial entities to enroll, identify authenticate and enable using biometrics, which comprise physiological characteristics, such as fingerprints, faces, irises and voices.

Utilize an organization’s secure database to accurately identify individuals using biometric data

Authenticate:

Provide frictionless multi-factor, passwordless access to secured accounts and databases with biometric verification

Manage the lifecycle of secure identities through optimized biometric interchanges

We have been engaged in this business since 1993.

Our comprehensive portfolio of biometric solutions is based on innovative, robust products designed explicitly for ease of integration, including customer-managed and integration ready biometric frameworks, platforms, software development kits (SDKs) and services.

Principal commercial applications include mobile enrollment, user authentication, identity proofing, and secure transaction enablement.

Our products span multiple biometric modalities including fingerprint, face, iris and voice, and provide interoperable, standards-compliant, field-proven biometric functionality.

Our products are used to capture, verify, format, compress and decompress biometric images as well as aggregate, analyze, process, match and transport those images and templates within biometric systems.

For large deployments, we may provide project management and software engineering services.

We sell our biometrics software products and services globally through a multifaceted distribution strategy using systems integrators, original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), value added resellers (VARs), partners, and directly to end user customers.

Certain amounts in the consolidated financial statements and associated notes may not add due to rounding.

All percentages have been calculated using unrounded amounts.

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation - The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Aware, Inc.

and its subsidiary (“the Company”).

All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated.

Use of Estimates – The preparation of our financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.

The most significant estimates included in the financial statements pertain to revenue recognition, reserves for doubtful accounts, valuation of acquired assets and assumed liabilities in business combinations and valuation allowance for deferred income tax assets.

Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Fair Value Measurements - The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Codification defines fair value and establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value.

The hierarchy gives the highest priority to the unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (level 3 measurements).

The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under the FASB Codification are:

i) Level 1 – valuations that are based on quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date;

ii) Level 2 – valuations that are based on quoted prices in markets that are not active or for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly;

and iii) Level 3 – valuations that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable.

Cash and cash equivalents, which primarily include money market mutual funds, were $38.6 million and $47.7 million at December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively.

We classified our cash equivalents of $37.9

million and $ 46.2 million as of December 31, 20 20 and 201 9 , respectively, within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using quoted market prices.

Our cash equivalents are measured at fair value on a recurring basis and their carrying values approximate their respective fair values.

As of December 31, 2020, our assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis and whose carrying values approximate their respective fair values include the following (in thousands):

Fair Value Measurement at

December 31, 2020 Using:

Quoted Prices

Money market funds (included in cash

and cash equivalents)

As of December 31, 2019, our assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis and whose carrying values approximate their respective fair values include the following (in thousands):

Fair Value Measurement at

December 31, 2019 Using:

Quoted Prices

Money market funds (included in cash

and cash equivalents)

Cash and Cash Equivalents – Cash and cash equivalents, which consist primarily of money market funds and demand deposits, are stated at fair value.

All highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less are considered cash equivalents.

Our cash balances exceed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation limits.

The Company does not believe it is exposed to significant credit risk related to cash and cash equivalents.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts – Accounts are charged to the allowance for doubtful accounts as they are deemed uncollectible based on a periodic review of the accounts.

For the years ended December 31, 20 20 and 20 19 , changes to and ending balances of the allowance for doubtful acc ounts were as follows (in thousands):

Allowance for doubtful accounts balance -

beginning of year

Additions to the allowance for doubtful accounts

Deductions against the allowance for doubtful

Allowance for doubtful accounts balance - end of

Property and Equipment – Property and equipment is stated at cost.

Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment is provided using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets.

Upon retirement or sale, the costs of the assets disposed of and the related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss on disposal is included in the determination of income or loss.

Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred.

The estimated useful lives of assets used by us are:

Building improvements

5 to 20 years

Furniture and fixtures

Computer, office & manufacturing equipment

Purchased software

Goodwill – We record goodwill when consideration paid in a business acquisition exceeds the value of the net assets acquired.

Our estimates of fair value are based upon assumptions believed to be reasonable at the time, but such estimates are inherently uncertain and unpredictable.

Assumptions may be incomplete or inaccurate and unanticipated events or circumstances may occur, which may affect the accuracy of validity of such assumptions, estimates or actual results.

Goodwill is not amortized but rather is tested for impairment annually in the fourth quarter or more frequently, if facts and circumstances warrant a review.

Circumstances that could trigger an impairment test include, but are not limited to, a significant adverse change in the business climate or legal factors, an adverse action or assessment by a regulator, or unanticipated competition.

We have determined that there is a single reporting uni t for the purpose of conducting the goodwill impairment assessment.

In accordance with ASC Topic 350, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other, we first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform the quantitative goodwill impairment test.

If after assessing the totality of events or circumstances, we determine that it is more likely than not (i.e.

greater than 50% likelihood) that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then the quantitative test is required.

The quantitative goodwill impairment test requires us to estimate and compare the fair value of the reporting unit, determined using an income approach and a market approach, with its carrying value.

If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds the carrying value of the net assets, goodwill is not impaired.

If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than the carrying value, the difference is recorded as an impairment loss up to the amount of goodwill.

Application of the goodwill impairment test requires judgments, including identification of the reporting units, assigning goodwill to reporting units, a qualitative assessment to determine whether there are any impairment indicators, and determining the fair value of each reporting unit which often involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions, including assumptions with respect to future cash inflows and outflows, discount rates, asset lives and market multiples, among other items.

There is no assurance that the actual future earnings or cash flows of the reporting unit will not decline significantly from the projections used in the impairment analysis.

Goodwill impairment charges may be recognized in future periods to the extent changes in factors or circumstances occur, including deterioration in the macroeconomic environment and industry, deterioration in the Company’s performance or its future projections, or changes in plans for its reporting unit.

As of December 31, 2020, we had $ 1.7 million of goodwill .

Changes in the valuation of goodwill could materially impact our operating results and financial position.

To date, there have been no impairments of goodwill.

Valuation of Long-Lived Assets – We review long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable or that the useful lives of these assets are no longer appropriate.

Each impairment test is based on a comparison of the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets over their estimated economic life to the related carrying value of those assets to determine if the assets are impaired.

If an impairment is indicated, the asset is written down to its estimated fair value.

The cash flow estimates used to identify the potential impairment reflect our best estimates using appropriate assumptions and projections at that time.

In evaluating potential impairment of these assets, we specifically consider whether any indicators of impairment are present, including, but not limited to:

whether there has been a significant adverse change in the business climate that affects the value of an asset:

whether there has been a significant change in the extent or way an asset is used;

whether there is an expectation that the asset will be sold or disposed of before the end of its originally estimated useful life.

We did not identify any events or changes in business circumstances that the carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable or that the useful lives of these assets are no longer appropriate during the year ended December 31, 2020.

Revenue recognition .

The core principle of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC 606”) is that we should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which we expect to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.

To achieve that core principle, we should apply the following five step model:

1) Identify the contract with the customer

A contract with a customer exists when (i) we enter into an enforceable contract with a customer that defines each party’s rights regarding the goods or services to be transferred and identifies the related payment terms, (ii) the contract has commercial substance, and (iii) we determine that collection of substantially all consideration for goods and services that are transferred is probable based on the customer’s intent and ability to pay the promised consideration.

We apply judgment in determining the customer’s intent and ability to pay, which is based on a variety of factors including the customer’s historical payment experience, or in the case of a new customer, published credit and financial information pertaining to the customer.

We evaluate contract modifications for the impact on revenue recognition if they have been approved by both parties such that the enforceable rights and obligations under the contract have changed.

Contract modifications are either accounted for using a cumulative effect adjustment or prospectively over the remaining term of the arrangement.

The determination of which method is more appropriate depends on the nature of the modification, which we evaluate on a case-by-case basis.

We combine two or more contracts entered into at or near the same time with the same customer and account for them as a single contract if (i) the contracts are negotiated as a package with a common commercial objective, (ii) the amount of consideration to be paid in one contract depends on the price or performance of the other contract, or (iii) some or all of the goods or services in one contract would be combined with some or all of the goods and services in the other contract into a single performance obligation.

If two or more contracts are combined, the consideration to be paid is aggregated and allocated to the individual performance obligations without regard to the consideration specified in the individual contracts.

2) Identify the performance obligations in the contract

Performance obligations promised in a contract are identified based on the goods and services that will be transferred to the customer that are both capable of being distinct, whereby the customer can benefit from the

good or service either on its own or together with other available resources, and are distinct in the context of the con tract, whereby the transfer of the good or service is separately identifiable from other promises in the contract.

To the extent a contract includes multiple promised goods and services, we apply judgment to determine whether promised goods and services ar e capable of being distinct and distinct in the context of the contract.

If these criteria are not met, the promised goods and services are accounted for as a combined performance obligation.

To identify performance obligations, we consider all of the good s or services promised in a contract regardless of whether they are explicitly stated or are implied by customary business practices.

3) Determine the transaction price

The transaction price is determined based on the consideration we expect to be entitled in exchange for transferring promised goods and services to the customer.

Determining the transaction price requires significant judgment.

To the extent the transaction price includes variable consideration, we estimate the amount of variable consideration that should be included in the transaction price utilizing either the expected value method or the most likely amount method depending on the nature of the variable consideration.

Variable consideration is included in the transaction price if, in our judgment, it is probable that a significant future reversal of cumulative revenue recognized under the contract will not occur.

Any estimates, including the effect of the constraint on variable consideration, are evaluated at each reporting period.

Some of our arrangements include usage-based royalties where a software license is the predominant item that the royalty relates to.

In these arrangements, revenue from the usage-based royalty is recognized when the subsequent usage occurs.

Our revenue arrangements are typically accounted for under such expedient, as payment is typically due within 30 to 60 days.

As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, none of our contracts contained a significant financing component.

4) Allocate the transaction price to performance obligations in the contract

If the contract contains a single performance obligation, the entire transaction price is allocated to the single performance obligation.

Contracts that contain multiple performance obligations require an allocation of the transaction price to each performance obligation based on a relative standalone selling price (“SSP”) basis unless the transaction price is variable and meets the criteria to be allocated entirely to a performance obligation or to a distinct service that forms part of a single performance obligation.

The consideration to be received is allocated among the separate performance obligations based on relative SSPs.

The SSP is the price at which we would sell a promised good or service separately to a customer.

The best estimate of SSP is the observable price of a good or service when we sell that good or service separately.

A contractually stated price or a list price for a good or service may be the SSP of that good or service.

We use a range of amounts to estimate SSP when we sell each of the goods and services separately and need to determine whether there is a discount that needs to be allocated based on the relative SSP of the various goods and services.

In instances where SSP is not directly observable, such as when we do not sell the product or service separately, we typically determine the SSP using an adjusted market assessment approach using information that may include market conditions and other observable inputs.

We typically have more than one SSP for individual goods and services due to the stratification of those goods and services by customers and circumstances.

In these instances, we may use information such as the nature of the customer and distribution channel in determining the SSP.

5) Recognize revenue when or as we satisfy a performance obligation

We satisfy performance obligations either over time or at a point in time.

Revenue is recognized over time if 1) the customer simultaneously receives and consumes the benefits provided by our performance, 2) our performance creates or enhances an asset that the customer controls as the asset is created or enhanced, or 3) our performance does not create an asset with an alternative use to us and we have an enforceable right to payment for performance completed to date.

If we do not satisfy a performance obligation over time, the related performance obligation is satisfied at a point in time by transferring the control of a promised good or service to a customer.

We categorize revenue as software licenses, software maintenance, or services.

Specific revenue recognition policies apply to each category of revenue.

Software licenses

Software licenses consist of revenue from the sale of software licenses for biometrics and imaging applications.

Our software licenses are functional intellectual property and typically provide customers with the right to use our software on a term or perpetual basis as it exists when made available to the customer.

We recognize revenue from perpetual software licenses at a point in time upon delivery, provided all other revenue recognition criteria are met.

We also offer certain products pursuant to a usage based software model which includes a term software license to use the software for a fixed term.

We recognize revenue for fixed fees associated with usage based software licenses at a point in time upon delivery, provided all other revenue recognition criteria are met.

Fees subject to the usage-based royalty exception are recognized when the subsequent usage occurs.

Software maintenance

Software maintenance consists of revenue from the sale of software maintenance contracts for biometrics and imaging software.

Software maintenance contracts entitle customers to receive software support and software updates, if and when they become available, during the term of the maintenance contract.

Software support and software updates are considered distinct services.

However, these distinct services are considered a single

performance obligation consisting of a series of distinct services that are substantially the same and have the same pattern of

transfer to the customer.

However, these distinct services are considered a single performance obligation consisting of a series of distinct services that are substantially the same and have the same pattern of transfer to the customer.

We recognize software maintenance revenue over time on a straight-line basis over the contract period.

Service revenue consists of fees from biometrics

customers for software engineering services we provide to them.

We recognize services revenue over time as the services are delivered

using an input method (i.e., labor hours incurred as a percentage of total labor hours budgeted), provided all other revenue recognition

criteria are met.

Refer to Note 8 – Business Segments

and Major Customers for further information on the disaggregation of revenue, including revenue by geography and category.

Service revenue consists of fees from biometrics customers for software engineering services we provide to them.

We recognize services revenue over time as the services are delivered using an input method (i.e., labor hours incurred as a percentage of total labor hours budgeted), provided all other revenue recognition criteria are met.

The use of the over-time revenue recognition method requires judgment in developing budgeted labor hours.

Changes in budgeted hours may occur and the resulting impact on revenue recognition is accounted for in the period of the change in estimate.

Arrangements with multiple performance obligations

In addition to selling software licenses,

software maintenance and software services on a standalone basis, a significant portion of our contracts include multiple performance

The various combinations of multiple performance obligations and our revenue recognition for each are described as

• Software licenses and software maintenance.

When software licenses and software maintenance contracts

are sold together, the software licenses and software maintenance are generally considered distinct performance obligations.

transaction price is allocated to the software licenses and the software maintenance based on relative SSP.

Revenue allocated to

the software licenses is recognized at a point in time upon delivery, provided all other revenue recognition criteria are met.

In addition to selling software licenses, software maintenance and software services on a standalone basis, a significant portion of our contracts include multiple performance obligations.

The various combinations of multiple performance obligations and our revenue recognition for each are described as follows:

Perpetual software licenses and software maintenance.

When software licenses and software maintenance contracts are sold together, the software licenses and software maintenance are generally considered distinct performance obligations.

The transaction price is allocated to the software licenses and the software maintenance based on relative SSP.

Revenue allocated to the software licenses is recognized at a point in time upon delivery, provided all other revenue recognition criteria are met.

Revenue allocated to the software maintenance is recognized over time on a straight-line basis over the contract period.

• Software licenses and services.

When software licenses and significant customization engineering

services are sold together, they are accounted for as a combined performance obligation, as the software licenses are generally

highly dependent on, and interrelated with, the associated services and therefore are not distinct performance obligations.

for the combined performance obligation is recognized over time as the services are delivered using an input method (i.e., labor

hours incurred as a percentage of total labor hours budgeted).

When software licenses and standard implementation or consulting-type

services are sold together, they are generally considered distinct performance obligations, as the software licenses are not dependent

on or interrelated with the associated services.

The transaction price in these arrangements is allocated to the software licenses

and services based on relative SSP.

Perpetual software licenses and services.

When software licenses and significant customization engineering services are sold together, they are accounted for as a combined performance obligation, as the software licenses are generally highly dependent on, and interrelated with, the associated services and therefore are not distinct performance obligations.

Revenue for the combined performance obligation is recognized over time as the services are delivered using an input method (i.e., labor hours incurred as a percentage of total labor hours budgeted).

When software licenses and standard implementation or consulting-type services are sold together, they are generally considered distinct performance obligations, as the software licenses are not dependent on or interrelated with the associated services.

The transaction price in these arrangements is allocated to the software licenses and services based on relative SSP.

Revenue allocated to the software licenses is recognized at a point in time upon delivery, provided all other revenue recognition criteria are met.

Revenue allocated to the services is recognized over time using an input method.

In arrangements with both software licenses and services, the software license portion of the arrangement is classified as software license revenue and the services portion is classified as services revenue in our consolidated statements of operations.

Perpetual software licenses, soft ware maintenance and services.

When we sell software licenses, software maintenance and software services together, we account for the individual performance obligations separately if they are distinct.

The transaction price is allocated to the separate pe rformance obligations based on relative SSP.

Revenue allocated to the software licenses is recognized at a point in time upon delivery.

provided all other revenue recognition criteria are met.

Revenue allocated to the services is recognized over time using an input

method (i.e., labor hours incurred as a percentage of total labor hours budgeted).

In arrangements with both software licenses

and services, the software license portion of the arrangement is classified as software license revenue and the services portion

is classified as services revenue in our consolidated statements of operations.

• Software licenses, software maintenance and services.

When we sell software licenses, software

maintenance and software services together, we account for the individual performance obligations separately if they are distinct.

The transaction price is allocated to the separate performance obligations based on relative SSP.

Revenue allocated to the software

licenses is recognized at a point in time upon delivery.

Revenue allocated to the services is recognized over time using an input

method (i.e., labor hours incurred as a percentage of total labor hours budgeted).

Revenue for the software maintenance is recognized

over time on a straight-line basis over the contract period.

However, if the software services are significant customization engineering

services, they are accounted for with the software licenses as a combined performance obligation, as stated above.

the combined performance obligation is recognized over time using an input method (i.e., labor hours incurred as a percentage of

total labor hours budgeted).

We do not offer rights of return for our products and services

in the normal course of business.

Revenue allocated to the services is recognized over time using an input method (i.e., labor hours incurred as a percent age of total labor hours budgeted).

Revenue for the software maintenance is recognized over time on a straight-line basis over the contract period.

However, if the software services are significant customization engineering services, they are accounted for with the software licenses as a combined performance obligation, as stated above.

Revenue for the combined performance obligation is recognized over time using an input method.

Usage based software licenses consisting of a term software license and software maintenance.

When usage based software subscription licenses are sold, the term software license and software maintenance are generally considered distinct performance obligations.

The transaction price is allocated to term software license and the software maintenance based on relative SSP.

We sell usage based software license for a fixed fee and/or a usage-based royalty fee, sometimes subject to a minimum guarantee.

When the amount is in the form of a fixed fee, including the guaranteed minimum in usage based royalty, revenue is allocated to the term software license recognized at a point in time upon delivery, provided all other revenue recognition criteria are met.

Any royalties not subject to the guaranteed minimum or earned in excess of the minimum amount are recognized as revenue when the subsequent usage occurs.

Revenue allocated to the software maintenance is recognized over the contract term time on a straight-line basis over the contract period.

We do not offer rights of return for our products and services in the normal course of business.

Customer Acceptance

Our contracts with customers generally do not include customer

acceptance clauses.

Our contracts with customers generally do not include customer acceptance clauses.

Contract Balances

When the timing of our delivery of goods

or services is different from the timing of payments made by customers, we recognize either a contract asset (performance precedes

contractual due date) or a contract liability (customer payment precedes performance).

Customers that prepay are represented by

the deferred revenue below until the performance obligation is satisfied.

Contract assets represent arrangements in which the good

or service has been delivered but payment is not yet due.

When the timing of our delivery of goods or services is different from the timing of payments made by customers, we recognize either a contract asset (performance precedes contractual due date) or a contract liability (customer payment precedes performance).

Customers that prepay are represented by the deferred revenue below until the performance obligation is satisfied.

Our contract assets consist of unbilled receivables.

Our contract liabilities

consisted of deferred (unearned) revenue, which is generally related to software maintenance contracts.

We classify deferred revenue

as current or noncurrent based on the timing of when we expect to recognize revenue.

The following table presents changes in

our contract assets and liabilities during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2019 (in thousands):

In Advance of

Balance at End of

Our contract liabilities consisted of deferred (unearned) revenue, which is generally related to software maintenance contracts.

We classify deferred revenue as current or noncurrent based on the timing of when we expect to recognize revenue.

The following table presents changes in our contract assets and liabilities during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2020 (in thousands):

Remaining Performance Obli gations

Remaining performance obligations represent the transaction price from contracts for which work has not been performed or goods and services have not been delivered.

We expect to recognize revenue on approximately 67% of the remaining performance obligations over the next 12 months, with the remainder recognized thereafter.

As of December 31, 2020, the aggregate amount of the transaction price allocated to remaining performance obligations with a duration greater than one year, comprised of software maintenance contracts, was $2.4 million.

Year ended December 31, 2019

4 unchanged sentences

Unbilled receivables

Balance at End of

Year ended December 31, 2019

4 unchanged sentences

Deferred revenue

Remaining Performance Obligations

Remaining performance obligations represent

the transaction price from contracts for which work has not been performed or goods and services have not been delivered.

to recognize revenue on approximately 67% of the remaining performance obligations over the next 12 months, with the remainder

recognized thereafter.

As of December 31, 2019, the aggregate amount of the transaction price allocated to remaining performance

obligations for software maintenance contracts with a duration greater than one year was $1.4 million.

Contract Costs

We recognize an other asset for the incremental

costs of obtaining a contract with a customer if we expect the benefit of those costs to be longer than one year.

We have determined

that certain sales commissions meet the requirements to be capitalized, and we amortize these costs on a consistent basis with

the pattern of transfer of the goods and services in the contract.

Total capitalized costs to obtain a contract were immaterial

during the periods presented and are included in other current and long-term assets on our consolidated balance sheets.

We apply a practical expedient to expense

costs as incurred for costs to obtain a contract when the amortization period is one year or less.

These costs include sales commissions

on software maintenance contracts with a contract period of one year or less as sales commissions paid on contract renewals are

commensurate with those paid on the initial contract.

Compensation.

We grant stock and stock options to our employees and directors.

We measure stock-based compensation

cost at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and recognize it as expense over the applicable vesting period of the

award using the straight-line basis.

For stock awards, we determine the fair

value of the award by using the fair market value of our stock on the date of grant;

provided the number of shares in the grant

is fixed on the grant date.

For stock options, we use the Black-Scholes

valuation model to estimate the fair value of the award.

This valuation model takes into account the exercise price of the award,

as well as a variety of significant assumptions.

The assumptions used to estimate the fair value of stock options include the expected

term, the expected volatility of our stock over the expected term, the risk-free interest rate over the expected term, and our

We recognize an other asset for the incremental costs of obtaining a contract with a customer if we expect the benefit of those costs to be longer than one year.

We have determined that certain sales commissions meet the requirements to be capitalized, and we amortize these costs on a consistent basis with the pattern of transfer of the goods and services in the contract.

Total capitalized costs to obtain a contract were immaterial during the periods presented and are included in other current and long-term assets on our consolidated balance sheets.

We apply a practical expedient to expense costs as incurred for costs to obtain a contract when the amortization period is one year or less.

These costs include sales commissions on software maintenance contracts with a contract period of one year or less as sales commissions paid on contract renewals are commensurate with those paid on the initial contract.

Income Taxes – We compute deferred income taxes based on the differences between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted rates in effect in the years in which the differences are expected to reverse.

We establish a valuation allowance to offset temporary deductible differences, net operating loss carryforwards and tax credits when it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

We recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more-likely-than-not that the tax position will be sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the tax position.

The evaluation of an uncertain tax position is based on factors that include, but are not limited to, changes in the tax law, the measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in tax returns, the effective settlement of matters subject to audit, and changes in facts or circumstances related to a tax position.

Any changes to these estimates, based on the actual results obtained and/or a change in assumptions, could impact our tax provision in future periods.

Interest and penalty charges, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits would be classified as a provision for income tax in the consolidated statements of operations.

Capitalization of Software Costs – We capitalize certain internally developed software development costs after technological feasibility of the product has been established.

No software costs were capitalized during the years ended December 31, 20 20 and 20 19 , because such costs incurred subsequent to the establishment of technologi cal feasibility, but pr ior to commercial availability, were immaterial.

Research and Development Costs – Costs incurred in the research and development of our products are expensed as incurred.

Concentration of Credit Risk – At December 31, 2020 and 2019, we had cash and cash equivalents, in excess of federally insured deposit limits of approximately $38.3 million and $47.5 million, respectively.

Concentration of credit risk with respect to net accounts receivable and unbilled receivables consisted of amounts owed by the following customers that comprised more than 10% of net accounts receivable and unbilled receivables at December 31:

The portion of total revenue that was derived from major customers was as follows:

Stock-Based Compensation – We grant stock and stock options to our employees and directors.

We measure stock-based compensation cost at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and recognize stock-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award.

For stock awards, we determine the fair value of the award by using the fair market value of our stock on the date of grant;

provided the number of shares in the grant is fixed on the grant date.

For stock options, we use the Black-Scholes option valuation model to estimate the fair value of the award.

This valuation model takes into account the exercise price of the award, as well as a variety of significant assumptions.

Computation of Earnings per Share – Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding.

Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus additional common shares that would have been outstanding if dilutive potential common shares had been issued.

For the purposes of this calculation, stock options are considered common stock equivalents in periods in which they have a dilutive effect.

Stock options that are antidilutive are excluded from the calculation.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments – The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate fair value because of their short-term nature.

Segments – We organize ourselves into a single segment reporting to the chief operating decision maker.

We have sales outside of the United States.

All long-lived assets are maintained in the United States.

We conduct our operations in the United States and sell our products and services to domestic and international customers.

Revenues were generated from the following geographic regions (in thousands):

United States

United Kingdom

Rest of world

Revenue by product group was (in thousands):

Revenue by timing of transfer of goods or services for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 was:

Goods or services transferred at a point in time

Goods or services transferred over time

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment consisted of the following at December 31 (in thousands):

Building and improvements

Computer equipment

Purchased software

Furniture and fixtures

Office equipment

Less accumulated depreciation

Property and equipment, net

Depreciation expense was $0.5 million and 0.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 respectively.

In November 2020, the Company entered into a Bill of Sale and Assignment Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Radiant Mission Solutions Inc.

(“Radiant” as seller) and Maxar Technologies, Inc.

(as guarantor) to acquire certain assets and assume certain liabilities of Radiant’s AFIX product line for cash consideration of approximately $2.4 million.

The acquisition of AFIX, provides turnkey face and fingerprint biometric and forensic analysis software for small and medium-sized law enforcement and government agencies, extends our ABIS product family.

The acquisition was accounted for as a business combination, whereby all the assets acquired, and liabilities assumed were recognized at fair value on the acquisition date, with any excess of the consideration transfer over the fair value of the net assets acquired recognized as goodwill.

Unaudited pro forma results of operations assuming the above acquisition had taken pace at the beginning of each period are not provided because the historical operating results and pro forma results would not be materially different from reported results for the periods presented.

The preliminary fair values recorded were based on a preliminary valuation and the estimates and assumptions used in such valuation are subject to change, within the measurement period (up to one year from the acquisition date).

The Company is continuing to obtain information to determine the acquired assets and liabilities, including tax, assets, liabilities and other assets.

The following table summarizes the preliminary fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition (in thousands):

Net working capital, excluding deferred revenue

Customer relationships

Developed technology

Trade name / trademarks

Gross assets acquired

Deferred revenue

Net assets acquired

After allocating the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their fair values at the date of acquisition, the Company recorded goodwill of approximately $1.7 million.

Goodwill largely consists of expected synergies to be realized from combining operations.

The goodwill is deductible for income tax purposes.

The fair values of intangible assets were based on valuations using the income approach.

The preliminary fair value of intangible assets and their estimated useful live are as follows (dollars in thousands):

Customer relationships

Developed technology

During the year ended December 31, 2020 we recorded $23 thousand of amortization for its intangibles .

The Company expects to record amortization for the years ended December 31 (in thousands) :

We recorded a benefit for income taxes of $1.6 million in the year ended December 31, 2020 that includes a $1.4 million tax benefit of the current year tax loss which can be carried back due to changes made by the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act (CARES Act) which was signed into law on March 27, 2020.

The CARES Act contained specific relief and stimulus measures including allowing net operating losses originating in 2018 through 2020 to be carried back five years to offset taxable income in the carryback period.

We recorded a provision for income taxes of $5.2 million in the year ended December 31, 2019.

The components of the provision for income taxes are as follows (in thousands):

Provision for (benefit from) income taxes

A reconciliation of the U.S.

federal statutory rate to the effective tax rate is as follows:

Federal statutory rate

State rate, net of federal benefit

Permanent adjustments

Change in valuation allowance

Expiration of statutes on uncertain tax positions

Net operating loss carryback rate benefit under

Effective tax rate

The 2020 difference between the effective tax rate and the U.S federal statutory rates was driven primarily due to the change in valuation allowance of our deferred tax assets.

This was partially offset by an income tax rate benefit related to a carryback of the 2020 net operating losses under the CARES Act.

The 2019 difference between the effective tax rate and the U.S federal statutory rates was driven primarily due to the change in valuation allowance of our deferred tax assets.

We had deferred tax assets of $8.7 million and $6.3 million as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 respectively.

The principal components of deferred tax assets were as follows at December 31 (in thousands):

Stock compensation

Research and development credits

Net operating loss

Less valuation allowance

Deferred tax assets, net

As of December 31, 2020, $6.7 million of our deferred tax assets relates to research credit carryforwards.

We have assessed the need for a valuation allowance on our deferred tax assets.

We evaluated and considered all available evidence, both positive and negative, to determine whether, based on the weight of that evidence, a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets was needed.

As part of this analysis, we have given more weight to recent, historical evidence than future projections as we consider the past more objective.

As of the fourth quarter of 2020, we have a cumulative pretax loss over the most recent three-year period including a pretax loss of $9.2 million in 2020.

We considered the cumulative loss as of the end of the fourth quarter of 2020 to be significant negative evidence in the overall analysis.

In 2019, we appointed a new Chief Executive Officer and, as a result, we reviewed and made changes to our strategy and business plans.

We will be making additional investments in research, product development and sales and marketing including additional headcount.

These changes in strategy and additional investment started in 2019 and continued in 2020.

Our pretax income forecasts are highly predicated upon new product development and penetrating new markets.

Therefore, this evidence is given nominal weight in the analysis compared to the recent history of losses and anticipated investment.

Further, a significant portion of our deferred tax assets relates to federal and state research and development credits.

These credits may only offset 75% of the tax liability after net operating loss carryforwards are utilized and thus, we have the risk that the credits could expire before utilization if sufficient taxable income in the carryforward periods doesn’t exist.

Based upon the information available to us at the time, the above analysis of evidence represents our best estimate regarding the utilization of the deferred tax assets, and we concluded as of December 31,2019 that it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

Therefore, we have recorded a full valuation allowance of $6.3 million against our deferred tax assets as of December 2019.

We have also concluded that as of December 31, 2020 it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

Therefore, we have recorded a full valuation allowance for a total of $8.7 million as of December 31, 2020.

We will continue to monitor the evidence and the realizability of our deferred tax assets in future periods.

Should evidence regarding the realizability of our deferred tax assets change at a future point in time, we will adjust the valuation allowance as required.

A roll forward of the uncertain tax position that was primarily related to our research and development tax credits is as follows (in thousands):

Uncertain tax positions at December 31, 2018

Increase due to positions taken in prior periods

Uncertain tax positions at December 31, 2019

Decrease due to positions taken in prior periods

Uncertain tax positions at December 31, 2020

Uncertain tax positions of $0.8 million will impact our tax rate if realized.

The tax years from 2017 through 2020 are subject to examination by the IRS and the tax years 2004 through 2020 are subject to examination by state tax authorities.

EQUITY AND STOCK COMPENSATION PLANS

Stock Option Plan – We have one active fixed stock option plan which is our 2001 Nonqualified Stock Plan (“2001 Plan”).

We are authorized to grant nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights and stock awards to our employees and directors for up to 8,000,000 shares of common stock under this plan.

As of December 31, 2020, there were 3,760,815 shares available for grant under the 2001 Plan.

Options are granted at exercise prices as determined by the Board of Directors and have terms ranging from four to a maximum of ten years.

Options generally vest over three to five years.

The following table presents stock-based employee compensation expenses included in our consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income (in thousands):

Cost of services

Research and development

Selling and marketing

General and administrative

Stock-based compensation expense

Stock-based compensation expense in the preceding table includes expenses associated with grants of:

i) stock options, ii) unrestricted shares of our common stock;

and iii) performance share awards.

The methods used to determine stock-based compensation expense for each type of equity grant are described in the following paragraphs.

Stock Option Grants.

For the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, we granted stock options for 50,000 and 435,000 shares of our common stock, respectively.

We estimate the fair value of those stock options using the Black-Scholes valuation model.

The Black-Scholes valuation model takes into account the exercise price of the award, as well as a variety of significant assumptions.

We do not estimate our forfeiture rates as the actual forfeiture rate is known at the end of each reporting period due to the timing of our stock option vesting.

We believe that the valuation technique and the approach utilized to develop the underlying assumptions are appropriate in calculating the fair values of stock options granted in the year ended December 31, 2020.

Estimates of fair value are not intended to predict actual future events or the value ultimately realized by persons who receive equity awards.

Specific assumptions used to determine the fair value of options granted during the year ended December 31 , 20 20 , using the Black-Scholes valuation model were:

Expected term (1)

6.08-6.18 years

Expected volatility factor (2)

Risk-free interest rate (3)

Expected annual dividend yield

As part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements we are required to estimate our

actual current tax expense.

We must also estimate temporary and permanent differences that result from differing treatment of certain

items for tax and accounting purposes.

These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included in our

consolidated balance sheet.

We must then assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable

income and to the extent we believe recovery is not likely, we must establish a valuation allowance.

To the extent we establish

a valuation allowance or increase this allowance in a period for deferred tax assets, which have been recognized, we must include

an expense with the tax provision in the statement of operations.

Conversely, to the extent we decrease our valuation allowance

in a period for deferred tax assets, which have been previously reserved, we must include a tax benefit with the tax provision

in the statement of operations.

Significant management judgment is required

in determining our provision for income taxes, our deferred tax assets, and any valuation allowance recorded against our net deferred

Our deferred tax assets primarily relate to:

i) research and development tax credit carryforwards related to excess

stock compensation benefits, that are now recorded as tax assets as a result of the adoption of ASU 2016-09, that was effective

on January 1, 2017;

ii) net operating loss carryforwards;

and iii) temporary differences that result from differing treatment

of certain items for tax and accounting purposes.

As of December 31, 2019, we had a total of $6.3 million of deferred tax

assets for which we have recorded a $6.3 million valuation allowance.

We will continue to assess the level of

valuation allowance required in future periods.

Should evidence regarding the realizability of tax assets change at a future point

in time, the valuation allowance will be adjusted accordingly.

for doubtful accounts.

We make judgments as to our ability to collect outstanding receivables and provide allowances

for receivables when collection becomes doubtful.

Provisions are made based upon a specific review of all significant outstanding

If the judgments we make to determine the allowance for doubtful accounts do not reflect the future ability to collect

outstanding receivables, additional provisions for doubtful accounts may be required.

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

(1) The expected term for each grant was determined based on the simplified method.

(2) The expected volatility for each grant is estimated based on an average of historical volatility over the expected term of the stock options.

(3) The risk-free interest rate for each grant is based on the U.S.

Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for a period equal to the expected term of the stock option.

Unrestricted Stock Grants .

Our 2001 Plan permits us to grant shares of unrestricted stock to our directors, officers, and employees.

Stock-based compensation expense for stock grants is determined based on the fair market value of our stock on the date of grant;

provided the number of shares in the grant is fixed on the grant date.

We granted 256,250, and 285,500 shares of unrestricted stock during the years ended December 31, 2020, and 2019, respectively.

The accounting treatment of unrestricted stock awards in 2020 and 2019 is described below:

In 2020, we granted 256,250 shares of unrestricted stock to directors, officers, and employees.

In March and May 2020, we granted 243,000 shares of unrestricted stock to directors, officers, and employees.

The shares were issued in two equal installments shortly after June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2020.

In October and November, we granted 13,250 shares of unrestricted stock to employees.

The shares were issued shortly after December 31, 2020.

We expensed $0.7 million of stock-based compensation expense related to these grants in the year ended December 31, 2020.

There was no unamortized stock-based compensation charge associated with these stock grants as of December 31, 2020.

We issued 109,773 shares of common stock related to the March and May 2020 grants in early July 2020 after employees surrendered 11,727 shares for which we paid $75,000 of withholding taxes on their behalf.

In 2019 we granted 285,500 shares of unrestricted stock to directors, officers, and employees.

We also, granted 120,000 shares to be issued in four equal installments on the anniversaries of their grant dates in September and October of 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023, provided the grantee is serving as a director, officer, or employee on those dates.

We also granted 165,500 shares throughout March, September, and October of 2019.

We issued 71,500 and 94,000 shares shortly after September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2019, respectively.

The total stock-based compensation expense related to the 285,500 shares granted in 2019 is $947,000, of which $633,000 was charged to expense in the 2019 and $122,000 was charged to expense in 2020.

We anticipate the remaining $230,000 will be charged to expense ratably through 2023.

We issued shares of common stock related to the March 2019 grant as follows:

i) 58,548 net shares of common stock were issued in early July 2019 after employees surrendered 12,952 shares for which we paid $43,000 of withholding taxes on their behalf;

and ii) 56,605 net shares of common stock were issued in early January 2020 after employees surrendered 14,895 shares for which we paid $50,000 of withholding taxes on their behalf.

We also issued 20,000 and 10,000 shares of common stock related to a September 2019 and October 2019 grant in September 2020 and October 2020 respectively.

Performance Share Award .

In September 2019, we granted 20,000 shares of stock to an officer as a performance share award under our 2001 Nonqualified Stock Plan.

The shares were issued in September 2019 and became fully vested on March 19, 2020 as the officer was still serving as a director, officer or employee, 2020.

based compensation expense for this stock grant was determined based on the fair market value of our stock on the date of grant, as the number of shares in the grant was fixed on the grant date.

The total stock-based compensation expense related to this grant was $55,000, of which $31,000 was charged to expense in 2019 and $24,000 was charged to expense in 2020.

In October 2019, we granted 10,000 shares of stock to an officer as a performance share award under our 2001 Nonqualified Stock Plan.

The shares were issued in October 2019 and became full vested on April 1, 2020 as the officer was still serving as a director, officer or employee.

Stock-based compensation expense for this stock grant was determined based on the fair market value of our stock on the date of grant, as the number of shares in the grant was fixed on the grant date.

The total stock-based compensation expense related to this grant was $29,000, of which $15,000 was charged to expense in 2019 and $14,000 was charged to expense 2020.

A summary of stock option transactions for our fixed stock option plan for the years ended December 31, 2020, and 2019 are presented below:

Outstanding at beginning of year

Forfeited or cancelled

Outstanding at end of year

Exercisable at year end

Total options outstanding at December 31, 2020 were 425,000.

112,496 of those options were vested and had a weighted average exercise price of $6.00.

Options to purchase up to 50,000 and 435,000 shares of our common stock were granted in the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 respectively.

At December 31, 2020, the weighted average remaining contractual term for total options outstanding and total options exercisable was approximately 8.83 and 8.78 years, respectively.

At December 31, 2020, the aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding and options exercisable was zero.

The intrinsic value of a stock option is the amount by which the market value of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price of the option.

The following table summarizes the stock options outstanding at December 31, 20 20 :

Options Outstanding

Options Exercisable

Exercise Price Range

At December 31, 2020, unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested stock options was approximately $176,000, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.93 years.

We issue common stock from previously authorized but unissued shares to satisfy option exercises and purchases under our Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan - In June 1996, we adopted an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP Plan”) under which eligible employees could purchase common stock at a price equal to 85% of the lower of the fair market value of the common stock at the beginning or end of each six-month offering period.

On November 29, 2005 we amended the ESPP Plan to provide that eligible employees may purchase common stock at a price equal to 95% of the fair market value of the common stock as of the end of each six-month offering period.

There is no stock-based compensation expense related to our Employee Stock Purchase Plan because it is not considered a compensatory plan.

The plan does not have a look-back feature and has a minimal discount of 5% of the fair market value of the common stock as of the end of each six-month offering period.

Participation in the ESPP Plan is limited to 6% of an employee’s compensation, may be terminated at any time by the employee and automatically ends on termination of employment.

A total of 350,000 shares of common stock have been reserved for issuance.

As of December 31, 2020 there were 23,635 shares available for future issuance under the ESPP Plan.

We issued 15,388, and 13,699 common shares under the ESPP Plan in 2020, and 2019, respectively.

Share Purchases - On April 30, 2020, our Board of Directors approved a program authorizing to purchase up to $10 million of our common stock, of which $1.0 million had been utilized as of December 31, 2020.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, we repurchased 298,214 shares of our common stock.

The shares may be purchased from time to time in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions at management’s discretion, depending upon market conditions and other factors.

The authorization to repurchase Company stock expires on December 31, 2021.

Repurchases will be made under the program using our own cash resources and will been accordance with Rule 10b-18 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and other applicable laws, rules and regulations.

The program does not obligate us to acquire any particular amount of common stock and the program may be modified or suspended at any time at our Board of Director’s discretion.

Dividends – We did not pay dividends in the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES

Lease Commitments – We own our principal office and research facility in Bedford, Massachusetts, which we have occupied since November 1997.

We have no real estate lease commitments and no equipment lease commitments.

Litigation - There are no material pending legal proceedings to which we are a party or to which any of our properties are subject which, either individually or in the aggregate, are expected to have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position or results of operations.

Guarantees and Indemnification Obligations – We enter into agreements in the ordinary course of busine ss that require us:

i) to perform under the terms of the contracts, ii) to protect the confidentiality of our customers’ intellectual property, and iii) to indemnify customers, including indemnification against third party claims alleging infringement of i ntellectual property rights.

We also have agreements with each of our directors and executive officers to indemnify such directors or executive officers, to the extent legally permissible, against all liabilities reasonably incurred in connection with any action in which such individual may be involved by reason of such individual being or having been a director or officer of the Company.

Given the nature of the above obligations and agreements, we are unable to make a reasonable estimate of the maximum potential amount that we could be required to pay.

Historically, we have not made any significant payments on the above guarantees and indemnifications and no amount has been accrued in the accompanying consolidated financial statements with respect to these guarantees and indemnifications.

EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN

In 1994, we established a qualified 401(k) Retirement Plan (the “Plan”) under which employees are allowed to contribute certain percentages of their pay, up to the maximum allowed under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code.

Our contributions to the Plan are at the discretion of the Board of Directors.

Our contributions were approximately $0.3 million and $0.2 million in 2020 and 2019, respectively.

NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE

The number of common shares used in the computation of diluted net loss per share for the periods presented does not include the effect of the following potentially outstanding common shares because the effect would have been anti-dilutive (in thousands):

Stock options

Net income (loss) per share is calculated as follows (in thousands, except per share data):

Net income (loss)

Shares outstanding:

Weighted-average common shares outstanding

Additional dilutive common stock equivalents

Diluted shares outstanding

Net income (loss) per share – basic

Net income (loss) per share - diluted

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACC OUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.

What changed 10-K

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis