−Removed: We are a clinical stage biotechnology company developing first-in-class immunology therapeutic product candidates to patients.
−Removed: We are focused on emerging immune control mechanisms applicable to inflammation and immuno-oncology indications.
−Removed: We develop our product candidates using our proprietary antibody discovery technology platform, which is based upon a breakthrough understanding of the natural process of antibody generation, known as somatic hypermutation, or SHM, and replicates this natural process of antibody generation in vitro .
+Added: We are a clinical stage biotechnology company developing first-in-class immunology therapeutic product candidates focused on emerging immune control mechanisms applicable to inflammation and immuno-oncology indications.
+Added: We develop our product candidates using our proprietary antibody discovery technology platform, which is based upon a breakthrough understanding of the natural process of antibody generation, known as somatic hypermutation (“SHM”), and replicates this natural process of antibody generation in vitro .
Our strategy is to advance the development of our proprietary product candidates, and where applicable, establish partnerships with leading biopharmaceutical companies where we retain certain development and commercialization rights.
−Removed: Our most advanced wholly-owned antibody programs, etokimab, ANB019, ANB030 and ANB032, are designed to modulate therapeutic targets that are genetically associated with human inflammatory disorders.
−Removed: Etokimab inhibits the activity of the interleukin-33 cytokine, or IL-33, which we believe is broadly applicable to the treatment of respiratory disorders.
−Removed: We are conducting a randomized, placebo-controlled Phase 2 trial of etokimab in approximately 100 adult patients with CRSwNP, also referred to as the ECLIPSE trial, which is a debilitating atopic disorder associated with elevated IL-33 pathway signaling.
−Removed: We anticipate interim top-line data from this trial to be available in the first half of 2020.
−Removed: We have previously completed a Phase 2a randomized, placebo-controlled, single dose study of etokimab in 25 severe adult eosinophilic asthma patients.
−Removed: We presented full data from this trial at the 2019 European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI), which demonstrated that a single dose of etokimab resulted in rapid and sustained lung function improvement as measured using Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second, or FEV1, patient reported outcomes associated with asthma symptoms, as measured using the Asthma Control Questionnaire 5.
−Removed: As a result of our recently completed Phase 2b etokimab ATLAS trial in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis, the Company has decided to discontinue further clinical development in atopic dermatitis.
−Removed: We have also postponed initiation of a previously announced Phase 2b etokimab clinical trial in eosinophilic asthma until data is available from the aforementioned ECLIPSE trial.
−Removed: Our ANB019 antibody inhibits the interleukin-36 receptor, or IL-36R, and is being developed for the treatment of rare inflammatory diseases including generalized pustular psoriasis, or GPP, and palmoplantar pustulosis, or PPP.
−Removed: We completed a Phase 1 clinical trial in healthy volunteers, which was presented at EAACI 2018, where ANB019 was well-tolerated by all subjects, no dose-limiting toxicities were observed, and no serious adverse events were reported among any subjects in the trial.
−Removed: We are conducting an open-label, multi-dose, single-arm Phase 2 trial of ANB019 in up to 10 GPP patients, also referred to as the GALLOP trial, where an interim analysis, announced in September 2019, was conducted after the first two patients completed 16-weeks (Day 113) with ANB019 monotherapy.
−Removed: Both patients achieved the primary endpoint of disease improvement at Day 29 and Day 113 without requiring rescue therapy.
−Removed: Patients demonstrated rapid and sustained modified Japanese Dermatology Association (mJDA) improvement and complete clearance of skin pustules from Day 8 through Day 113.
−Removed: C-reactive protein, or CRP, levels decreased to nearly normal in both patients and genotypic testing of these two patients indicated that ANB019 may be broadly applicable to pustular disease patients without a requirement for genetic screening.
−Removed: Enrollment is ongoing in GALLOP and we anticipate additional clinical data and a regulatory strategy update for the development of ANB019 in GPP during 2020.
−Removed: We are also conducting a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled approximately 50-patient multi-dose trial of ANB019 in PPP, also referred to as the POPLAR trial, where top-line data are anticipated in the second half of 2020.
−Removed: Our third wholly-owned program ANB030, an anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) agonist antibody program, is designed to augment PD-1 signaling through ANB030 treatment to suppress T-cell driven human inflammatory diseases.
−Removed: Genetic mutations in the PD-1 pathway are known to be associated with increased susceptibility to human inflammatory diseases, and hence we believe ANB030 is applicable to diseases where PD-1 checkpoint receptor function may be under-represented.
−Removed: Preclinical data for ANB030 was presented at the 2019 Federation of Clinical Immunological Societies (FOCIS) Annual Meeting in June 2019.
−Removed: We submitted an Investigational New Drug Application, or IND, for ANB030 in the fourth quarter of 2019 and anticipate initiation of a Phase 1 healthy volunteer clinical trial in the first half of 2020.
−Removed: Our fourth wholly-owned program is an anti-B-and T-lymphocyte attenuator, or BTLA, modulator antibody, known as ANB032, which is broadly applicable to human inflammatory diseases associated with lymphoid and myeloid immune cell dysregulation.
−Removed: Mutations in the BTLA signaling pathway are associated with human inflammatory disease and we believe ANB032 silences pro-inflammatory signaling by modulating BTLA binding to herpes virus entry mediator, or HVEM.
−Removed: We anticipate filing an IND for ANB032 in the second half of 2020.
−Removed: In addition to our wholly-owned antibody programs, multiple AnaptysBio-developed antibody programs have been advanced to preclinical and clinical milestones under our collaborations.
+Added: Our most advanced wholly-owned antibody programs, imsidolimab, ANB030 and ANB032, are designed to modulate therapeutic targets that are genetically associated with human inflammatory disorders.
+Added: Imsidolimab, our IL-36R antibody previously referred to as ANB019, inhibits the interleukin-36 receptor (“IL-36R”), and is being developed for the treatment of multiple dermatological inflammatory diseases.
+Added: We completed a Phase 1 clinical trial in healthy volunteers, which was presented at the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology in 2018, where imsidolimab was well-tolerated by all subjects, no dose-limiting toxicities were observed, and no serious adverse events were reported among any subjects in the clinical trial.
+Added: In July 2020, the U.S.
+Added: Food and Drug Administration (the “FDA”) granted Orphan Drug Designation for imsidolimab for the treatment of patients with GPP.
+Added: We are conducting an open-label, multi-dose, single-arm Phase 2 clinical trial of imsidolimab in 8 GPP patients, also referred to as the GALLOP clinical trial, where we announced positive topline data in October 2020.
+Added: Six of 8 (75%) patients treated with imsidolimab monotherapy achieved the primary endpoint of improvement in the clinical global impression scale (“CGI”) on Day 29.
+Added: Two of 8 (25%) patients were considered to have not met the primary endpoint because they dropped out of the clinical trial prior to Day 29.
+Added: The modified Japanese Dermatology Association Severity Index (“mJDA-SI”) score, which incorporates both dermatological and systemic aspects of GPP, decreased on average by 29% on Day 8 and 54% on Day 29.
+Added: Erythema with skin pustules, which clinically defines GPP, decreased by 60% on Day 8 and 94% on Day 29.
+Added: Serum c-reactive protein (“CRP”), which is an indicator of systemic inflammation, was normal (less than 5 mg/L) for 5 of the 6 patients achieving the primary endpoint on Day 29.
+Added: Genotypic testing indicated homozygous wild-type IL-36RN, CARD14 and AP1S3 alleles for all 8 patients.
+Added: We believe this suggests that imsidolimab may be broadly applicable to pustular diseases irrespective of genetic drivers.
+Added: Anti-drug antibodies were not detected as of Day 29 in any patient.
+Added: Imsidolimab was generally well-tolerated, and most treatment-emergent adverse events were mild to moderate in severity and resolved without sequelae.
+Added: No infusion or injection site reactions were observed.
+Added: One patient dropped out of the trial due to a diagnosis of Staphylococcal aureus bacteremia in the first week, which was a serious adverse event deemed to be possibly drug-related.
+Added: Because the patient was symptomatic prior to dosing and had a prior medical history of bacteremia, a common comorbidity of GPP, we do not believe this event is likely attributable to imsidolimab.
+Added: Another patient dropped out of the study on Day 22 due to investigator reported inadequate efficacy.
+Added: One patient contracted COVID-19 during the course of the clinical trial, which was mild, unrelated to imsidolimab, and did not lead to study discontinuation.
+Added: Data from the first two patients to have completed the Day 113 treatment period under this clinical trial, which we announced in September 2019, indicated sustained efficacy in these two patients through Day 113.
+Added: We plan to report full data from the GALLOP clinical trial at a medical conference in 2021.
+Added: While initial GPP epidemiology studies suggested at least 3,000 patients in the United States, recent medical claims analyses suggest GPP prevalence in the United States of at least 10,000 patients.
+Added: We met with the FDA during the fourth quarter of 2020 to review an orphan disease registration plan for imsidolimab for the treatment of GPP and anticipate initiating a Phase 3 clinical trial in mid-2021 following completion of protocol alignment and review of 16-week data from the GALLOP clinical trial by the FDA.
+Added: We are also conducting a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled 59-patient multi-dose clinical trial of imsidolimab in PPP, also referred to as the POPLAR clinical trial, where enrollment was completed in 2020 and top-line data are anticipated in the first quarter of 2021.
+Added: The primary endpoint of this clinical trial is change in palmo-plantar pustulosis area severity index (PPPASI) at week 16 relative to baseline.
+Added: PPP is a non-fatal form of pustular psoriasis that we estimate affects approximately 150,000 patients in the United States alone.
+Added: We have initiated a global registry of GPP and PPP patients, also referred to as the RADIANCE study, which we anticipate will improve understanding of the patient journey in these two indications and assist in enrollment of future GPP and PPP clinical trials.
+Added: We have initiated clinical development of imsidolimab for the treatment of skin toxicities associated with treatments with inhibitors of epidermal growth factor (“EGFRi”) and MAPK/ERK kinase (“MEKi”).
+Added: Treatment of solid tumors with EGFRi and/or MEKi is frequently limited by the occurrence of skin toxicities, including acneiform or papulopustular rash.
+Added: Recent translational data has suggested that these skin toxicities are mediated by excess IL-36 signaling, leading to IL-8-mediated cutaneous neutrophilia and acneiform rash.
+Added: Based on existing claims data, approximately 60,000 patients are prescribed EGFRi and/or MEKi treatments annually, and the vast majority of these patients experience skin toxicity, which in some cases leads to dose reduction and/or discontinuation of treatment.
+Added: Current standard-of-care treatments are generally
+Added: ineffective in patients with the most severe grades of EGFRi and/or MEKi mediated skin toxicity.
+Added: During the fourth quarter of 2020, we initiated a Phase 2 clinical trial, called EMERGE, of imsidolimab in combination with EGFRi inhibitors, for the treatment of patients diagnosed with a certain baseline severity of skin toxicity, where 45 patients are randomized 2:1 between imsidolimab and placebo arms, to assess the efficacy of imsidolimab in the treatment of this indication.
+Added: We anticipate interim top-line data from this clinical trial at the end of 2021.
+Added: We have also initiated clinical development of imsidolimab in ichthyosis, which is a family of rare, inherited, dermatological disorders characterized by dry, scaling and thickened skin.
+Added: Recent human translational studies have suggested that the underlying skin inflammation responsible for ichthyosis is mediated by dysregulated IL-36 signaling, and we believe that imsidolimab treatment may be efficacious in treatment of this condition.
+Added: Approximately 6,000 patients in the United States are affected with moderate-to-severe levels of ichthyosis, and no approved therapies are available for this disease.
+Added: We have initiated a Phase 2 clinical trial, called INSPIRE, of imsidolimab in patients with certain baseline severity of ichthyosis, where 24 patients are randomized 2:1 between imsidolimab and placebo arms, and interim top-line data is anticipated in 2022.
+Added: We plan to initiate clinical development of imsidolimab in hidradenitis suppurativa, also known as acne inversa, which is a chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by painful nodules in intertriginous areas that can progress to abscesses, sinus tracks and scarring.
+Added: Current treatment options for hidradenitis suppurativa, including antibiotics, corticosteroids and anti-TNF therapy, have variable efficacy in moderate-to-severe patients, which often leads to surgery for removal of hidradenitis suppurativa nodules.
+Added: Human translational studies have demonstrated elevated IL-36 cytokine expression in hidradenitis suppurativa skin biopsies, and we believe treatment of moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa with imsidolimab may lead to therapeutic benefit for this patient population.
+Added: Moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa affects approximately 150,000 adults in the United States.
+Added: We intend to initiate a Phase 2 clinical trial of imsidolimab in hidradenitis suppurativa, called HARP, in the second quarter of 2021.
+Added: We plan to initiate clinical development of imsidolimab in acne, which is the most common skin disorder in the United States, with approximately 7 million patients diagnosed with moderate-to-severe disease.
+Added: Moderate-to-severe acne typically presents with painful papules, pustules, nodules, cysts and scarring.
+Added: A key contributing factor to the pathogenesis of acne is the immune response to p.
+Added: acnes, which is associated with upregulated IL-36 cytokine activity, localized inflammation and neutrophil infiltration of the skin.
+Added: Existing therapies, including isotretinoin and systemic antibiotics, provide variable efficacy for moderate-to-severe acne patients and have practical limitations to their use given potential for clinically meaningful side effects.
+Added: We anticipate initiating a Phase 2 clinical trial of imsidolimab, called ACORN, for the treatment of moderate-to-severe acne in the second quarter of 2021.
+Added: Our second wholly-owned program, ANB030, is an anti-PD-1 agonist antibody program designed to augment PD-1 signaling through ANB030 treatment to suppress T-cell driven human inflammatory diseases.
+Added: Genetic mutations in the PD-1 pathway are known to be associated with increased susceptibility to human inflammatory diseases, and hence we believe that ANB030 is applicable to diseases where PD-1 checkpoint receptor function may be under-represented.
+Added: We presented preclinical data for ANB030 at the Festival of Biologics Annual Meeting in March 2020, including translational data demonstrating i n vitro activity of ANB030 in alopecia areata patient samples.
+Added: We initiated a Phase 1 healthy volunteer clinical trial in the first half of 2020, which is designed to assess the safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ANB030 in single and multiple ascending dose cohorts.
+Added: We anticipate top-line data from this Phase 1 clinical trial in mid-2021.
+Added: We plan to initiate Phase 2 clinical trials of ANB030 in alopecia areata and vitiligo in the second half of 2021.
+Added: Our third wholly-owned program is an anti-BTLA modulator antibody, known as ANB032, which is broadly applicable to human inflammatory diseases associated with lymphoid and myeloid immune cell dysregulation.
+Added: Mutations in the BTLA signaling pathway are associated with human inflammatory disease, and we believe ANB032 silences pro-inflammatory signaling by modulating BTLA binding to HVEM.
+Added: We filed a Clinical Trial Notification (“CTN”) in Australia for ANB032 during the first quarter of 2021 and anticipate initiating a healthy volunteer Phase 1 trial in the first half of 2021 upon clearance of the CTN.
+Added: We presented preclinical data regarding ANB032 at the 2020 Federation of Clinical Immunology Societies (FOCIS) Virtual Annual Meeting in October 2020.
+Added: Etokimab, our anti-IL-33 antibody previously referred to as ANB020, inhibits the activity of the interleukin-33 cytokine (“IL-33”).
+Added: We have conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled Phase 2 clinical trial of etokimab in approximately 100 adult patients with CRSwNP (a debilitating atopic disorder associated with elevated IL-33 pathway signaling), also referred to as the ECLIPSE clinical trial.
+Added: We recently reported top-line data from a week 16 analysis of the ECLIPSE clinical trial.
+Added: Patients dosed with etokimab every four (q4w) or eight weeks (q8w) failed to achieve the co-primary endpoints of statistically significant improvement in their bilateral nasal polyps score (“NPS”), an endoscopic measure of nasal occlusion, and in their sino-nasal outcome test (“SNOT-22”), a patient reported quality-of-life assessment, versus placebo at the week 8 time point.
+Added: Both endpoints demonstrated statistically significant improvement over baseline levels of NPS and SNOT-22.
+Added: Blood eosinophil levels, which are a biomarker of etokimab’s mechanism, demonstrated statistically significant reduction relative to
+Added: baseline in both etokimab treatment arms.
+Added: Following this data, we have decided to discontinue further development of etokimab.
+Added: In addition to our wholly-owned antibody programs, multiple Company-developed antibody programs have been advanced to preclinical and clinical milestones under our collaborations.
We have received to date approximately $164.6 million in cash receipts from collaborations.
−Removed: Our collaborations include an immuno-oncology-focused collaboration with TESARO, Inc.
−Removed: and TESARO Development, Ltd., or collectively TESARO, now a part of GlaxoSmithKline or “GSK”, and an inflammation-focused collaboration with Celgene Corporation, or Celgene, now part of Bristol-Myers Squibb.
−Removed: A Biologics License Application, or BLA, for our most advanced partnered program, which is an anti-PD-1 antagonist antibody called dostarlimab, was recently submitted by GlaxoSmithKline, and we anticipate FDA approval in the near-term.
+Added: Our collaborations include an immuno-oncology-focused collaboration with GlaxoSmithKline, Inc.
+Added: (“GSK”) and an inflammation-focused collaboration with Bristol-Myers Squibb (“BMS”).
+Added: A Biologics License Application (“BLA”) for our most advanced partnered program, which is an anti-PD-1 antagonist antibody called dostarlimab, was submitted by GSK and accepted by the FDA for the treatment of advanced or recurrent deficient mismatch repair endometrial cancer (“dMMREC”), and FDA approval is anticipated in this indication during the first half of 2021.
+Added: This FDA approval is dependent on a pre-approval inspection of the dostarlimab manufacturing site by the FDA and is therefore contingent on easing of the coronavirus (“COVID-19”) pandemic travel restrictions.
+Added: In addition, the European Medicines Agency (“EMA”) recently accepted GSK’s Marketing Authorization Application (“MAA”) for dostarlimab in the European Union (“EU”) for dMMREC, and EMA approval is anticipated in this indication during the first half of 2021.
+Added: A second BLA submitted by GSK was accepted by the FDA during the first quarter of 2021 for dostarlimab in pan-deficient mismatch repair tumors (“PdMMRT”).
+Added: We received a $10.0 million cash milestone payment upon the FDA acceptance of GSK’s first BLA for dostarlimab and anticipate an additional $20.0 million cash milestone payment upon first FDA approval of dostarlimab during the first half of 2021.
+Added: We also received a $5.0 million milestone payment for the EMA acceptance of GSK’s first MAA for dostarlimab and anticipate an additional $10.0 million cash milestone payment upon first EMA approval of dostarlimab during the first half of 2021.
+Added: An additional $10.0 million cash milestone payment is anticipated by the end of the first quarter of 2021 for acceptance of the second FDA BLA referred to above.
+Added: Dostarlimab is currently in clinical development for various solid tumor indications, including dMMREC, PdMMRT, colorectal cancer, ovarian cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, cervical cancer, rectal cancer, clear cell sarcoma and head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma.
+Added: We anticipate receiving additional milestones from GSK, of equal magnitude to the milestone payments outlined above, upon approval of the BLA and acceptance and approval of the EMA filings of dostarlimab for the PdMMRT indication.
+Added: Depending upon the timing of the aforementioned dostarlimab regulatory acceptance and approval milestones, we anticipate a total of $75.0 million in such milestone payments over the upcoming 18 months.
+Added: An additional $165.0 million in sales milestones is anticipated upon achievement of certain dostarlimab annual sales revenues.
+Added: In October 2020, we amended our GSK collaboration to increase royalties on global net sales of dostarlimab to 8-25%, add 1% royalty rate on GSK’s global net sales of Zejula and received a one-time cash payment of $60.0 million.
For more information about these collaborations, see “— Collaborations”.
−Removed: We endeavor to operate with capital efficiency and anticipate that our current cash and existing collaborations will provide cash runway at least into 2023.
−Removed: We anticipate our net cash usage in 2020 (after receipt of anticipated collaboration revenues) to be approximately $60.0 million.
Our Product Candidates
The following table summarizes certain key information about our wholly-owned and partnered product candidates:
+Added: The outbreak of the novel coronavirus and the COVID-19 disease that continues to be a global pandemic.
+Added: The full impact of the COVID-19 pandemic is inherently uncertain at the time of this Annual Report.
+Added: The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in travel restrictions and, in some cases, prohibitions of non-essential activities, disruption and shutdown of businesses, and greater uncertainty in global financial markets.
+Added: As COVID-19 has spread, it has significantly impacted the health and economic environment around the world, and many governments have closed most public establishments, including restaurants, workplaces and schools.
+Added: Our ongoing clinical trials have been, and may continue to be, affected by the closure of offices, or country borders, among other measures being put in place around the world.
+Added: The inability to travel and conduct face-to-face meetings can also make it more difficult to enroll new patients in ongoing or planned clinical trials.
+Added: Any of these circumstances will potentially have a negative impact on our financial results and the timing of our clinical trials.
+Added: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused us to modify our business practices (including but not limited to curtailing or modifying employee travel, moving to full remote work, and cancelling physical participation in meetings, events and conferences), and we may take further actions as may be required by government authorities or that we determine are in the best interests of our employees, patients and business partners.
+Added: The extent of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our future liquidity and operational performance will depend on certain developments, including the duration and spread of the outbreak, the availability and effectiveness of vaccines, the impact on our clinical trials, patients and collaboration partners, and the effect on our suppliers.
We are a leading antibody development company with a pipeline of novel therapeutic antibodies, which is being further expanded by applying our technology platform to emerging biological targets.
2 unchanged sentences
We are working to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of our wholly-owned pipeline programs.
−Removed: We are currently developing four wholly-owned programs to key 2020 milestones, including our Phase 2 chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps ECLIPSE trial with etokimab in the first half of 2020, additional data from our Phase 2 ANB019 trials in GPP during 2020 and PPP during the second half of 2020, initiation of a Phase 1 trial of ANB030 in the first half of 2020 and filing of an IND for ANB032 in the second half of 2020.
+Added: We are currently developing three wholly-owned programs to key 2021 milestones, including data from our Phase 2 imsidolimab clinical trial in PPP during the first quarter of 2021, initiation of a Phase 3 clinical trial in GPP during mid-2021, data from our Phase 2 imsidolimab clinical trial in EGFRi/MEKi during the fourth quarter of 2021, top-line data from our Phase 1 clinical trial of ANB030 in mid-2021 and initiation of Phase 2 clinical trials in alopecia areata and vitiligo during the second half of 2021 and initiation of a healthy volunteer Phase 1 trial for ANB032 in the first half of 2021.
• Continuing to expand our proprietary pipeline by generating new product candidates using our technology platform.
−Removed: Using our proprietary SHM antibody generation platform, we are able to rapidly develop novel antibodies
−Removed: against biological targets.
+Added: Using our proprietary SHM antibody generation platform, we are able to rapidly develop novel antibodies against biological targets.
Our goal is to continue expanding our wholly-owned new therapeutic antibody program pipeline by innovating additional wholly-owned novel pipeline antibodies to potentially first-in-class immune-related targets.
7 unchanged sentences
Our Wholly-Owned Product Pipeline
−Removed: Our most advanced, wholly-owned pipeline programs, etokimab, ANB019, ANB030 and ANB032, are described below:
−Removed: Anti-IL-33 Antibody
−Removed: Etokimab is a potentially first-in-class antibody that inhibits the activity of IL-33 and is being developed to treat respiratory disorders.
−Removed: We are conducting a Phase 2 clinical trial of etokimab in patients with CRSwNP.
−Removed: We have completed a Phase 2a clinical trial of etokimab in severe eosinophilic asthma, and have elected to delay initiation of further clinical development in this indication until data are available from our ongoing CRSwNP trial.
−Removed: We have previously completed a Phase 2a trial in severe peanut allergy patients and a Phase 2a and Phase 2b clinical trial of etokimab in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis and have subsequently decided to discontinue further clinical development in those indications.
−Removed: IL-33 Target Biology
−Removed: IL-33 is a pro-inflammatory cytokine that signals through the ST2 receptor, which multiple studies suggest serves as a central mediator of various immune responses leading to Th2-type inflammatory disorders, including asthma, CRSwNP and other atopic diseases.
−Removed: In response to pathogens, viruses, toxins or allergens, IL-33 is rapidly released from mucosal epithelial and endothelial cells.
−Removed: For example, a scientific study has indicated that individuals with asthma symptoms express higher levels of IL-33 than healthy control subjects.
−Removed: IL-33 initiates a diverse array of cellular immune responses, including the activation of mast cells, basophils and eosinophils, leading to production of downstream cytokines, such as IL-4, IL-5 and IL-13, which are associated with atopic diseases.
−Removed: IL-33 also acts on T helper 2, or Th2, effector cells and Innate Lymphoid Cell Type 2, or ILC2, two types of white blood cells that initiate and orchestrate atopic responses.
−Removed: Because etokimab inhibits IL-33 function and acts upstream of key cell types involved in atopy and the subsequent release of Th2 cytokines, we believe that its mechanism has advantages over that of competing therapeutic antibodies which block only a subset of IL-4, IL-5 or IL-13 cytokines.
−Removed: Genetic studies support the importance of the IL-33 pathway in respiratory diseases.
−Removed: These studies have demonstrated that certain ST2 mutations reduce IL-33 mediated signaling and thereby protect individuals with mutated ST2 from asthma.
−Removed: Certain studies also demonstrate that mutation that increases IL-33 mediated signaling increases incidence of asthma.
−Removed: This supports the hypothesis that an anti-IL-33 antibody, such as etokimab, has the potential to benefit respiratory diseases, including asthma and CRSwNP patients.
−Removed: We believe that targeting IL-33 activity is a more promising therapeutic intervention strategy than targeting its receptor, ST2, because (i) ST2 is present in significantly larger quantities, in comparison to IL-33, which will likely require high anti-ST2 antibody dosing levels, (ii) anti-ST2 antibodies are likely to be internalized in vivo , which will likely require frequent dosing and (iii) soluble ST2 inhibits IL-33 function, therefore blocking ST2, and likely leading to the release of additional IL-33, thereby exacerbating atopic disease.
−Removed: Etokimab Description
−Removed: Etokimab, which is a potential first-in-class therapeutic antibody, is our wholly-owned anti-IL-33 antibody product candidate generated using our SHM technology platform.
−Removed: The potency and functional activity of etokimab for human and cynomolgus monkey IL-33 was measured using standard in vitro assays:
−Removed: equilibrium dissociation constant, or KD, and half-maximal inhibitory concentration values, or IC50.
−Removed: Etokimab demonstrated highly potent KD values of approximately 1 pM and 37 pM for human and cynomolgus monkey IL-33, respectively.
−Removed: Etokimab inhibits secretion of IL-5 from primary basophils purified from peripheral blood of healthy human subjects with an IC50 of approximately 1.5 nM, which is approximately 15-fold greater than that of the soluble ST2 antagonist.
−Removed: Lower KD and IC50 values indicate higher potency and functional activity, respectively.
−Removed: Using peripheral blood mononuclear cells, or PBMC, etokimab inhibited human and cynomolgus monkey interferon-gamma release with an IC50 of approximately 1.1 nM and approximately 20.4 nM, respectively.
−Removed: We have developed a whole blood version of the PBMC assay, which we used in our Phase 1 trial to understand the pharmacodynamic activity of etokimab in clinical trials.
−Removed: Our preclinical development has also demonstrated that etokimab has favorable manufacturability, pharmacokinetics and toxicology to support development.
−Removed: Studies have demonstrated desirable manufacturing properties for etokimab, including robust expression from Chinese hamster ovary cells, or CHO cells, efficient purification using standard downstream techniques and stable formulation up to concentrations required for subcutaneous dosing in humans.
−Removed: Etokimab demonstrated a half-life of approximately seven days in cynomolgus monkeys, retained full functional activity when incubated in normal human serum at 37 °C for one week and proved to be fully active in cynomolgus monkey sera two weeks after dosing.
−Removed: We have conducted preclinical toxicology studies under good laboratory practices, or GLPs, for etokimab.
−Removed: In addition, we have conducted manufacturing under good manufacturing practice to produce etokimab in quantities for clinical use.
−Removed: Clinical Development Plan
−Removed: We have completed a Phase 1 trial of etokimab in healthy volunteers in Australia under an approved Clinical Trial Notification, or CTN.
−Removed: Our Phase 1 trial assessed, in single ascending doses, or SAD, and multiple ascending doses, or MAD, safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetic characteristics of etokimab.
−Removed: The SAD cohorts of this Phase 1 trial have been completed and, subsequent to review of the clinical data generated under the SAD, the Australian regulatory authority approved the initiation of MAD cohorts, which have also been completed.
−Removed: In the double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 1 trial, 96 healthy volunteer subjects were dosed with either a single subcutaneous or intravenous dose of etokimab ranging between 10 mg and 750 mg, or four multiple doses of etokimab ranging between 40 mg and 300 mg over a period of four consecutive weeks.
−Removed: In the SAD portion of our Phase 1 clinical trial of etokimab, 51 subjects (80%) experienced at least one treatment-emergent adverse events, or AE, however the occurrence of AEs was similar between etokimab (38 of 48;
−Removed: 79%) versus placebo (13 of 16, 81%) dosed individuals, and the most common AEs were upper respiratory tract infection (etokimab 48% vs.
−Removed: placebo 50%) and headache (etokimab 27% vs.
−Removed: placebo 31%).
−Removed: The only serious adverse event reported in the SAD portion of the trial was severe neutropenia 22 days post single dose of intravenous 750 mg etokimab in a single subject.
−Removed: Neutrophil levels in this subject returned to normal by 29 days post-dose and this event was preceded by prodromal viral symptoms consistent with an on-going viral infection.
−Removed: In the MAD portion of the Phase 1 clinical trial of etokimab, 24 subjects (75%) experienced an AE, however there was no difference in the percentage of AEs observed amongst subjects dosed with etokimab (18 of 24, 75%) versus placebo (6 of 8, 75%), and the most common AEs were upper respiratory tract infections (etokimab 21% versus placebo 38%) and headache (etokimab 33% versus placebo 38%).
−Removed: No severe adverse events were reported in the MAD portion of the clinical trial.
−Removed: None of these adverse events were determined to be drug-related and no dose-limiting toxicities were observed at any dose level.
−Removed: We concurrently evaluated the pharmacodynamics of etokimab in the SAD portion of the Phase 1 study using a whole blood ex vivo assay upon stimulation with IL-33/IL-12, where etokimab inhibition of IFN-gamma release was measured.
−Removed: Persistent and nearly complete inhibition was observed at 1032 hours (day 43) post-dosing for all SAD cohorts dosed with 40 mg etokimab or greater, regardless of whether such dose was through a subcutaneous or intravenous route of administration.
−Removed: In the 300 mg and 750 mg IV dosed cohorts of the SAD portion of the study, the pharmacodynamic assay was also performed at 2040 hours (day 85) post-dosing, and nearly complete IFN-gamma inhibition was observed through this time point.
−Removed: Pharmacokinetic testing indicated that the terminal half-life of etokimab among the SAD cohorts was approximately 372 hours (15–16 days) with comparable values across all doses and regardless of intravenous or subcutaneous route of administration.
−Removed: Anti-drug antibodies were detected at only low titer levels, and were observed in 5 of 48 etokimab dosed subjects in the SAD cohorts and 2 of 24 etokimab dosed subjects in the MAD cohorts, and no effect was observed on pharmacokinetic parameters in any of the subjects with anti-drug antibody titers.
−Removed: There were no adverse events that were determined to be drug-related, and no dose-limiting toxicities were observed at any dose level.
−Removed: We have concurrently utilized a whole blood ex vivo assay to evaluate pharmacodynamics, and we believe the results of this assay suggest that the pharmacodynamic activity of etokimab
−Removed: can, at certain dose levels, extend to three months subsequent to a single administration.
−Removed: We disclosed detailed data from this Phase 1 trial at the AAD and AAAAI conferences in early March 2017.
−Removed: We are conducting, under an IND to the FDA, a randomized, placebo-controlled Phase 2 trial of etokimab in approximately 100 adult patients with CRSwNP which is a debilitating atopic disorder associated with elevated IL-33 pathway signaling.
−Removed: Patients in this trial, also known as the ECLIPSE trial, will be randomized between three subcutaneous dosing cohorts, each in combination with mometasone furoate nasal spray as background therapy, as follows:
−Removed: (i) initial 300mg loading dose followed by 150mg monthly doses of etokimab, (ii) initial 300mg loading dose followed by 150mg doses of etokimab every eight weeks, and (iii) monthly doses of placebo.
−Removed: Efficacy will be assessed at week 8 and week 16 post-dosing, with an eight week monitoring period, using the bilateral endoscope Nasal Polyp Score and Sino-Nasal Outcome Test, and we anticipate interim (week 8) analysis top-line data from this trial to be available in the first half of 2020.
−Removed: In June 2019, we announced positive proof-of-concept data from our Phase 2a trial of etokimab in severe adult eosinophilic asthma patients.
−Removed: This Phase 2a proof-of-concept trial, conducted under a CTA with the MHRA in the United Kingdom and under an IND, with the U.S.
−Removed: Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, enrolled 25 adult severe eosinophilic asthma patients, who were randomized between a single 300mg intravenous dose of etokimab or placebo upon enrollment (Day 1) at six sites located in the United States and the United Kingdom.
−Removed: Upon screening, which occurred seven to 14 days prior to enrollment, patients were required to have a blood eosinophil count of at least 300 per microliter, confirmed clinical diagnosis of severe asthma according to the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) 2016, pre-bronchodilator FEV1 of less than 80 percent of predicted and at least one asthma exacerbation within the past 12 months requiring use of rescue medication.
−Removed: Patients were required to be stably maintained on high-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and long-acting beta-2-agonists (LABA) for at least three months prior to screening and were required to continue ICS/LABA therapy during the course of this trial.
−Removed: Patients were permitted to utilize rescue therapy when medically necessary, including in the management of asthma exacerbations.
−Removed: Baseline clinical assessments were conducted for each patient on Day 1 prior to etokimab or placebo dose, and patients completed follow-up clinical assessments on Days 2, 8, 22, 36, 64, 85, 106 and 127.
−Removed: Patients in the etokimab arm rapidly improved their Forced Exhaled Volume In One Second (FEV1), which is a measure of lung function, with an eight percent FEV1 improvement over placebo at Day 2, which was sustained through Day 64 with an 11 percent increase over placebo.
−Removed: Asthma Control Questionnaire 5 (ACQ-5) scores, which comprise patient-reported outcomes associated with asthma symptoms, decreased in the etokimab arm by 0.52 over placebo at Day 8 and were sustained to 0.54 over placebo at Day 64, and the etokimab arm achieved the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of 0.5 below baseline.
−Removed: Blood eosinophil level reduction, which is a biomarker of etokimab’s mechanism, demonstrated 31 percent and 46 percent reductions in the etokimab arm over placebo at Days 2 and 64, respectively.
−Removed: Etokimab was generally well tolerated in all patients and no serious adverse events were reported.
−Removed: Each of the aforementioned clinical trials are subject to regulatory review by the respective regulatory authority applicable to the jurisdiction of the trial.
−Removed: We have also conducted a Phase 2a trial in severe peanut allergy patients and Phase 2a and Phase 2b trials of etokimab in moderate-to-severe adult atopic dermatitis patients, and have subsequently decided to discontinue further clinical development in those indications.
−Removed: As described in the section titled “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this report, the clinical development of drug product candidates is subject to a wide range of risks and uncertainties, any of which could cause our actual development strategy or timeframes to vary.
−Removed: Etokimab Market Opportunity
−Removed: A significant portion of individuals in the U.S.
−Removed: population experience at least one atopic disease during their lifetime, and it is well understood that most patients with one type of atopic condition tend to present with other allergic conditions.
−Removed: While we believe etokimab may be effective across multiple atopic diseases, we have prioritized our development efforts based on unmet medical need and potential market opportunity.
−Removed: We have chosen to focus our etokimab program initially on respiratory indications, including asthma and CRSwNP.
−Removed: We estimate, based on our analysis of publicly available data sources and interviews with physicians and key opinion leaders in the field, that asthma affects approximately 7.7% of the adult U.S.
−Removed: population, or 19.0 million individuals, of which 1.1 million individuals have severe disease that cannot be controlled by standard-of-care therapy, of which 50% are believed to be eosinophilic patients.
−Removed: As a chronic inflammatory disorder, severe asthma can lead to permanent structural damage to the airways and long-term reductions in lung function.
−Removed: Although many mild-to-moderate asthmatics respond well to currently available treatments, which include inhaled corticosteroids, or ICS, and long-acting beta agonists, or LABA, severe asthma in patients is generally not adequately controlled by such available therapies.
−Removed: We believe that etokimab may have therapeutic benefit across a broad range of ICS-refractory severe adult eosinophilic asthma patients, and plan to differentiate etokimab’s therapeutic efficacy, dosing frequency and safety relative to competitors.
−Removed: Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps.
−Removed: We estimate that CRSwNP, based on our analysis of publicly available data sources and interviews with physicians and key opinion leaders in the field, affects approximately 1.3 million adults in the United States and we estimate that 400,000 of these patients are inadequately controlled with standard-of-care.
−Removed: CRSwNP is a debilitating chronic atopic condition associated with elevated IL-33 expression.
−Removed: Patients with CRSwNP that do not respond to standard-of-care are likely to undergo recurring surgeries to remove nasal polyps that block airflow through the nasal passages and often lead to recurring infections and related discomfort.
+Added: Our most advanced, wholly-owned pipeline programs, imsidolimab, ANB030 and ANB032, are described below:
Anti-IL-36R Antibody
−Removed: ANB019 is an antibody that inhibits the function of IL-36R, which we are initially developing as a potential first-in-class therapy for GPP and PPP patients.
−Removed: GPP is a life-threatening, rare systemic inflammatory disorder reported to affect approximately 3,000 patients in the United States alone, with no currently approved therapies.
+Added: Imsidolimab is an antibody that inhibits the function of IL-36R, which we are initially developing as a potential first-in-class therapy for multiple inflammation-mediated dermatological patient populations.
+Added: GPP is a life-threatening, rare systemic inflammatory disorder reported by literature to affect at least 3,000 patients while recent medical claims analysis indicates at least 10,000 patients in the United States alone, with no currently approved therapies.
Studies have shown that GPP can be associated with mutations in the gene encoding the IL-36R antagonist, or IL-36RA, or can be caused by excessive IL-36 cytokine levels, that lead to abnormally high signaling through the IL-36R and thereby cause the systemic inflammatory condition, GPP.
−Removed: We also plan to develop ANB019 for other IL-36R driven inflammatory conditions, including PPP, which is reported to affect approximately 150,000 patients in the United States.
−Removed: We plan to seek FDA Orphan Drug Designation for ANB019 for the treatment of GPP and PPP, which we believe may be differentiated from the non-rare plaque psoriasis, or psoriasis vulgaris, based upon distinctive genetic and translational features unique to GPP and/or PPP.
−Removed: We are currently conducting two Phase 2 clinical trials with ANB019 in GPP and PPP.
+Added: We are also developing imsidolimab for PPP which is reported to affect approximately 150,000 patients, EGFRi/MEKi-mediated skin toxicity which is estimated to affect 60,000 patients, certain IL-36 mediated ichthyosis subtypes that affect 6,000 patients, hidradenitis suppurativa affecting 150,000 patients and moderate-to-severe acne which affects 7 million patients, all in the United States.
+Added: We have obtained FDA Orphan Drug Designation for imsidolimab for the treatment of GPP, and plan to seek Orphan Drug Designation for additional indications in the future.
+Added: We anticipate initiating a Phase 3 clinical trial in GPP starting mid-2021, reporting top-line data from the POPLAR Phase 2 clinical trial of PPP in the first quarter of 2021, reporting interim top-line data from the EMERGE Phase 2 trial in EGFRi/MEKi mediated skin toxicity by the end of 2021, reporting top-line data from the INSPIRE Phase 2 clinical trial in ichthyosis in 2022, and initiating the HARP Phase 2 clinical trial in hidradenitis suppurativa and the ACORN Phase 2 clinical trial in moderate-to-severe acne in the second quarter of 2021.
IL-36R Target Biology
9 unchanged sentences
In addition, studies have demonstrated that humans with genetic mutations that downregulate IL-36 receptor activity are otherwise normal with no specific clinical phenotype.
−Removed: We believe that ANB019 has the potential to be the first-in-class therapeutic antibody targeting IL-36R, serving as a therapeutic opportunity for patients with IL-36 signaling mediated inflammatory disease, including GPP and PPP.
−Removed: ANB019 Description
−Removed: ANB019 was generated using our SHM technology platform and has demonstrated high functional potency in blocking human and cynomolgus monkey IL-36 signaling in preclinical studies.
−Removed: ANB019 blocks signal transduction through the human IL-36R and cynomolgus monkey IL-36R by inhibiting the interaction between the receptor and IL-36 alpha, IL-36 beta, and IL-36 gamma cytokines.
−Removed: The high potency and functional activity of ANB019 for human and cynomolgus monkey IL-36R was measured using standard in vitro assays to determine KD and IC50 values.
−Removed: ANB019 has demonstrated potent KD values of approximately of 71 pM and 209 pM for human IL-36R and cynomolgus monkey IL-36R, respectively.
−Removed: The antibody exhibits high specificity for IL-36R, displaying no detectable binding
−Removed: to related proteins.
−Removed: Functional potency of ANB019 is at least 100-fold greater than IL-36RA in human systems, which is measured as the IC50 of inhibition of interleukin-8, or IL-8, release from human keratinocytes.
−Removed: ANB019 functional activity has been demonstrated through inhibition of IL-8 secretion from human primary keratinocytes when stimulated by IL-36 gamma of approximately 0.15 nM and 1.2 nM, respectively.
+Added: We believe that imsidolimab has the potential to be the first-in-class therapeutic antibody targeting IL-36R, serving as a therapeutic opportunity for patients with IL-36 signaling mediated inflammatory diseases.
+Added: Translational studies have indicated that IL-36 signaling is upregulated in GPP, PPP, EGFRi/MEKi-mediated skin toxicity, ichthyosis, hidradenitis suppurativa and acne.
+Added: Imsidolimab Non-Clinical Development
+Added: Imsidolimab was generated using our SHM technology platform and has demonstrated high functional potency in blocking human and cynomolgus monkey IL-36 signaling in preclinical studies.
+Added: Imsidolimab blocks signal transduction through the human IL-36R and cynomolgus monkey IL-36R by inhibiting the interaction between the receptor and IL-36 alpha, IL-36 beta, and IL-36 gamma cytokines.
+Added: The high potency and functional activity of imsidolimab for human and cynomolgus monkey IL-36R was measured using standard in vitro assays to determine equilibrium dissociation constant, or KD, and half-maximal inhibitory concentration values, or IC50.
+Added: Imsidolimab has demonstrated potent KD values of approximately of 71 pM and 209 pM for human IL-36R and cynomolgus monkey IL-36R, respectively.
+Added: The antibody exhibits high specificity for IL-36R, displaying no detectable binding to related proteins.
+Added: Functional potency of imsidolimab is at least 100-fold greater than IL-36RA in human systems, which is measured as the IC50 of inhibition of interleukin-8, or IL-8, release from human keratinocytes.
+Added: Imsidolimab functional activity has been demonstrated through inhibition of IL-8 secretion from human primary keratinocytes when stimulated by IL-36 gamma of approximately 0.15 nM and 1.2 nM, respectively.
Lower KD and IC50 values indicate higher potency and functional activity, respectively.
Similar IC50 values were observed in those same preclinical studies when keratinocytes were stimulated with IL-36 alpha or beta.
−Removed: To date, we have demonstrated that the half-life of ANB019 in cynomolgus monkeys is more than nine days.
−Removed: ANB019 is well-expressed from CHO mammalian cells and is readily purified using standard methodologies.
+Added: To date, we have demonstrated that the half-life of imsidolimab in cynomolgus monkeys is more than nine days.
+Added: Imsidolimab is well-expressed from Chinese hamster ovary cells, or CHO cells, and is readily purified using standard methodologies.
In addition, the antibody retained full functional activity when incubated in normal human serum at 37 °C for one week.
Clinical Development Plan
−Removed: We have completed, under an approved CTN, a Phase 1 clinical trial in healthy volunteers for which we announced positive top-line results from an interim analysis of this trial and subsequently presented completed data from this trial at EAACI 2018.
−Removed: In the double-blinded, placebo-controlled healthy volunteer Phase 1 trial, 36 subjects were administered a single subcutaneous or intravenous dose of ANB019 ranging between 10 mg and 750 mg, 18 subjects were administered multiple ascending doses of ANB019 intravenously ranging between 40 mg and 300 mg weekly for four consecutive weeks and 18 subjects were dosed with placebo.
−Removed: ANB019 was well-tolerated by all subjects and no dose-limiting toxicities were observed.
−Removed: The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events observed in the single ascending dose cohorts were upper respiratory tract infections in 10 of 36 (28%) subjects dosed with ANB019 versus six of 12 (50%) subjects dosed with placebo, and headache in 10 of 36 (28%) subjects dosed with ANB019 versus three of 12 (25%) subjects dosed with placebo.
−Removed: In the multiple ascending dose cohorts, the most frequent treatment-emerging adverse events observed were headache in seven of 18 (39%) subjects dosed with ANB019 versus one of six (17%) subjects dosed with placebo.
−Removed: No serious adverse events were reported among any subjects in the trial.
−Removed: The in vivo half-life of ANB019 was approximately 28 days for both subcutaneous and intravenous routes of administration, with bioavailability of approximately 90 percent.
−Removed: A single dose of ANB019 at certain dose levels was able to completely suppress IL-36 cytokine function for 85 days, as measured by IL-36 cytokine-mediated release of IL-8 using an ex vivo pharmacodynamic assay.
−Removed: The favorable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic properties of ANB019 and other results demonstrated by this Phase 1 trial support advancement of ANB019 into Phase 2 studies for GPP and PPP.
−Removed: We received clearance of a CTA filing to the MHRA and an IND filing with the FDA, and have initiated a 10-patient open-label, multi-dose, single-arm Phase 2 trial of ANB019 in GPP patients, also referred to as the GALLOP trial, where an interim analysis, announced in September 2019, was conducted after the first two patients completed 16-weeks (Day 113) with ANB019 monotherapy.
−Removed: Both patients achieved the primary endpoint of disease improvement at Day 29 and Day 113 without requiring rescue therapy.
−Removed: Patients demonstrated rapid and sustained modified Japanese Dermatology Association (mJDA) improvement and complete clearance of skin pustules from Day 8 through Day 113.
−Removed: C-reactive protein, or CRP, levels decreased to nearly normal in both patients, and genotypic testing of these two patients indicated that ANB019 may be broadly applicable to pustular disease patients without a requirement for genetic screening.
−Removed: Enrollment is ongoing in GALLOP, and we anticipate additional clinical data and a regulatory strategy update for the development of ANB019 in GPP during 2020.
−Removed: We are also conducting a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled approximately 50-patient multi-dose trial of ANB019 in PPP, also referred to as the POPLAR trial, where top-line data are anticipated in the second half of 2020.
−Removed: As described in the section titled “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this report, the clinical development of drug product candidates is subject to a wide range of risks and uncertainties, any of which could cause our actual development strategy or timeframes to vary.
−Removed: ANB019 Market Opportunity
−Removed: IL-36R cytokine dysfunction is implicated in multiple inflammatory disorders including GPP and PPP.
−Removed: Generalized Pustular Psoriasis.
+Added: We have completed, under an approved Clinical Trial Notification, or CTN, a Phase 1 clinical trial in healthy volunteers for which we announced positive top-line results from an interim analysis of this clinical trial and subsequently presented completed data from this clinical trial at the 2018 European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology Congress.
+Added: In the double-blinded, placebo-controlled healthy volunteer Phase 1 clinical trial, 36 subjects were administered a single subcutaneous or intravenous dose of imsidolimab ranging between 10 mg and 750 mg, 18 subjects were administered multiple ascending doses of imsidolimab intravenously ranging between 40 mg and 300 mg weekly for four consecutive weeks and 18 subjects were dosed with placebo.
+Added: Imsidolimab was well-tolerated by all subjects, and no dose-limiting toxicities were observed.
+Added: The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events observed in the single ascending dose cohorts were upper respiratory tract infections in 10 of 36 (28%) subjects dosed with imsidolimab versus six of 12 (50%) subjects dosed with placebo and headache in 10 of 36 (28%) subjects dosed with imsidolimab versus three of 12 (25%) subjects dosed with placebo.
+Added: In the multiple ascending dose cohorts, the most frequent treatment-emerging adverse events observed were headache in seven of 18 (39%) subjects dosed with imsidolimab versus one of six (17%) subjects dosed with placebo.
+Added: No serious adverse events were reported among any subjects in the clinical trial.
+Added: The in vivo half-life of imsidolimab was approximately 28 days for both subcutaneous and intravenous routes of administration, with bioavailability of approximately 90 percent.
+Added: A single dose of imsidolimab at certain dose levels was able to completely suppress IL-36 cytokine function for 85 days, as measured by IL-36 cytokine-mediated release of IL-8 using an ex vivo pharmacodynamic assay.
+Added: The favorable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic
+Added: properties of imsidolimab and other results demonstrated by this Phase 1 clinical trial supported advancement of imsidolimab into Phase 2 studies.
+Added: We are conducting an open-label, multi-dose, single-arm Phase 2 clinical trial of imsidolimab in 8 GPP patients, also referred to as the GALLOP clinical trial, where we announced positive topline data in October 2020.
+Added: Six of 8 (75%) patients treated with imsidolimab monotherapy achieved the primary endpoint of improvement in the clinical global impression scale (“CGI”) on Day 29.
+Added: Two of 8 (25%) patients were considered to have not met the primary endpoint because they dropped out of the clinical trial prior to Day 29.
+Added: The modified Japanese Dermatology Association Severity Index (“mJDA-SI”) score, which incorporates both dermatological and systemic aspects of GPP, decreased on average by 29% on Day 8 and 54% on Day 29.
+Added: Erythema with skin pustules, which clinically defines GPP, decreased by 60% on Day 8 and 94% on Day 29.
+Added: Serum c-reactive protein (“CRP”), which is an indicator of systemic inflammation, was normal (less than 5 mg/L) for 5 of the 6 patients achieving the primary endpoint on Day 29.
+Added: Genotypic testing indicated homozygous wild-type IL-36RN, CARD14 and AP1S3 alleles for all 8 patients.
+Added: We believe this suggests that imsidolimab may be broadly applicable to pustular diseases irrespective of genetic drivers.
+Added: Anti-drug antibodies were not detected as of Day 29 in any patient.
+Added: Imsidolimab was generally well-tolerated, and most treatment-emergent adverse events were mild to moderate in severity and resolved without sequelae.
+Added: No infusion or injection site reactions were observed.
+Added: One patient dropped out of the clinical trial due to a diagnosis of Staphylococcal aureus bacteremia in the first week, which was a serious adverse event deemed to be possibly drug-related.
+Added: Because the patient was symptomatic prior to dosing and had a prior medical history of bacteremia, a common comorbidity of GPP, we do not believe this event is likely attributable to imsidolimab.
+Added: Another patient dropped out of the study on Day 22 due to investigator reported inadequate efficacy.
+Added: One patient contracted COVID-19 during the course of the clinical trial, which was mild, unrelated to imsidolimab, and did not lead to study discontinuation.
+Added: Data from the first two patients to have completed the Day 113 treatment period under this clinical trial, which we announced in September 2019, indicated sustained efficacy in these two patients through Day 113.
+Added: We plan to report full data from the GALLOP clinical trial at a medical conference in 2021.
+Added: We met with the FDA during the fourth quarter of 2020 to review an orphan disease registration plan for imsidolimab for the treatment of GPP and anticipate initiating a Phase 3 clinical trial in mid-2021 following completion of protocol alignment and review of 16-week data from the GALLOP clinical trial by the FDA.
+Added: In July 2020, the FDA granted Orphan Drug Designation for imsidolimab for the treatment of patients with GPP.
GPP is a chronic, life-threatening, rare disease with no currently approved therapies.
2 unchanged sentences
Patients with GPP suffer without robust therapeutic options because currently approved psoriasis management therapies have not demonstrated clear efficacy in the treatment of this condition.
−Removed: Through assessment of public literature and primary key opinion leader discussions, we estimate GPP affects approximately 3,000 individuals in the United States.
−Removed: We have conducted, and will continue to conduct, translational studies to identify GPP patients for potential enrollment in our ongoing clinical trials in this indication.
−Removed: Given the limited size of this patient population in the United States, we plan to seek Orphan Drug Designation from the FDA for ANB019 for the treatment of GPP.
−Removed: The FDA may grant Orphan Drug Designation to a product intended to treat a rare disease or condition—generally one that affects fewer than 200,000 individuals in the United States.
−Removed: If we obtain Orphan Drug Designation for ANB019 for the treatment of GPP and subsequently are the first Biologics License Application, or BLA applicant to receive FDA approval for a product containing the same active molecular structure as ANB019, ANB019 would be entitled to a seven-year exclusive marketing period in the United States for the treatment of GPP.
−Removed: Although the GPP patient population is small, we believe there is an unmet medical need that ANB019 may be able to address.
−Removed: Palmoplantar Pustulosis.
−Removed: PPP is a non-fatal form of pustular psoriasis that we estimate affects approximately 2% of total psoriasis cases, approximately 150,000 patients in the United States alone.
+Added: While initial GPP epidemiology studies suggested at least 3,000 patients in the United States, recent medical claims analyses suggest GPP prevalence in the United States of at least 10,000 patients.
+Added: We are also conducting a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled 59-patient multi-dose clinical trial of imsidolimab in PPP, also referred to as the POPLAR clinical trial, where enrollment was completed in 2020 and top-line data are anticipated in the first quarter of 2021.
+Added: The primary endpoint of this clinical trial is change in palmo-plantar pustulosis area severity index (PPPASI) at week 16 relative to baseline.
+Added: PPP is a non-fatal form of pustular psoriasis that we estimate affects approximately 150,000 patients in the United States alone.
Patients experience a chronic occurrence of sterile pustules on their hands and feet, while systemic levels of IL-36 cytokines and other inflammatory disease biomarkers are also elevated.
1 unchanged sentence
Existing anti-inflammatory therapeutic options to our knowledge have not proven to be consistently effective in treating PPP.
−Removed: As we believe the PPP patient population to be less than 200,000 individuals in the United States, we plan to seek Orphan Drug Designation from the FDA for ANB019 in this indication as well.
+Added: As we believe the PPP patient population to be less than 200,000 individuals in the United States, we plan to seek Orphan Drug Designation from the FDA for imsidolimab in this indication as well.
+Added: We have initiated a global registry of GPP and PPP patients, also referred to as the RADIANCE study, which we anticipate will improve understanding of the patient journey in these two indications and assist in enrollment of future GPP and PPP clinical trials.
+Added: We have initiated clinical development of imsidolimab for the treatment of skin toxicities associated with treatments with inhibitors of epidermal growth factor (“EGFRi”) and MAPK/ERK kinase (“MEKi”).
+Added: Treatment of solid tumors with EGFRi and/or MEKi is frequently limited by the occurrence of skin toxicities, including acneiform or papulopustular rash.
+Added: Recent translational data has suggested that these skin toxicities are mediated by excess IL-36 signaling, leading to IL-8-mediated cutaneous neutrophilia and acneiform rash.
+Added: Based on existing claims data, approximately 60,000 patients are prescribed EGFRi and/or MEKi treatments annually, and the vast majority of these patients experience skin toxicity, which in some cases leads to dose reduction and/or discontinuation of treatment.
+Added: Current standard-of-care treatments are generally ineffective in patients with the most severe grades of EGFRi and/or MEKi mediated skin toxicity.
+Added: During the fourth quarter of
+Added: 2020, we initiated a Phase 2 clinical trial, called EMERGE, of imsidolimab in combination with EGFRi inhibitors, for the treatment of patients diagnosed with a certain baseline severity of skin toxicity, where 45 patients are randomized 2:1 between imsidolimab and placebo arms, to assess the efficacy of imsidolimab in the treatment of this indication.
+Added: We anticipate interim top-line data from this clinical trial at the end of 2021.
+Added: We have also initiated clinical development of imsidolimab in ichthyosis, which is a family of rare, inherited, dermatological disorders characterized by dry, scaling and thickened skin.
+Added: Recent human translational studies have suggested that the underlying skin inflammation responsible for ichthyosis is mediated by dysregulated IL-36 signaling, and we believe that imsidolimab treatment may be efficacious in treatment of this condition.
+Added: Approximately 6,000 patients in the United States are affected with moderate-to-severe levels of ichthyosis, and no approved therapies are available for this disease.
+Added: We have initiated a Phase 2 clinical trial, called INSPIRE, of imsidolimab in patients with certain baseline severity of ichthyosis, where 24 patients are randomized 2:1 between imsidolimab and placebo arms, and interim top-line data is anticipated in 2022.
+Added: We plan to initiate clinical development of imsidolimab in hidradenitis suppurativa, also known as acne inversa, which is a chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by painful nodules in intertriginous areas that can progress to abscesses, sinus tracks and scarring.
+Added: Current treatment options for hidradenitis suppurativa, including antibiotics, corticosteroids and anti-TNF therapy, have variable efficacy in moderate-to-severe patients, which often leads to surgery for removal of hidradenitis suppurativa nodules.
+Added: Human translational studies have demonstrated elevated IL-36 cytokine expression in hidradenitis suppurativa skin biopsies, and we believe treatment of moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa with imsidolimab may lead to therapeutic benefit for this patient population.
+Added: Moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa affects approximately 150,000 adults in the United States.
+Added: We intend to initiate a Phase 2 clinical trial of imsidolimab in hidradenitis suppurativa, called HARP, in the second quarter of 2021.
+Added: We plan to initiate clinical development of imsidolimab in acne, which is the most common skin disorder in the United States, with approximately 7 million patients diagnosed with moderate-to-severe disease.
+Added: Moderate-to-severe acne typically presents with painful papules, pustules, nodules, cysts and scarring.
+Added: A key contributing factor to the pathogenesis of acne is the immune response to p.
+Added: acnes, which is associated with upregulated IL-36 cytokine activity, localized inflammation and neutrophil infiltration of the skin.
+Added: Existing therapies, including isotretinoin and systemic antibiotics, provide variable efficacy for moderate-to-severe acne patients and have practical limitations to their use given potential for clinically meaningful side effects.
+Added: We anticipate initiating a Phase 2 clinical trial of imsidolimab, called ACORN, for the treatment of moderate-to-severe acne in the second quarter of 2021.
+Added: As described in the section titled “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this report, the clinical development of drug product candidates is subject to a wide range of risks and uncertainties, any of which could cause our actual development strategy or timeframes to vary.
Checkpoint Receptor Modulator Programs
10 unchanged sentences
Through translational biology, we plan to focus the clinical development of ANB030 upon certain human autoimmune diseases where PD-1 checkpoint receptor function may be under-represented.
−Removed: We have submitted an IND for ANB030 in the fourth quarter of 2019 and anticipate initiating a Phase 1 trial in the first half of 2020.
+Added: We presented preclinical data for ANB030 at the Festival of Biologics Annual Meeting in March 2020, including translational data demonstrating in vitro activity of ANB030 in alopecia areata patient samples.
+Added: We initiated a Phase 1 healthy volunteer clinical trial in the first half of 2020, which is designed to assess the safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ANB030 in single and multiple ascending dose cohorts.
+Added: We anticipate top-line data from this Phase 1 clinical trial in mid-2021.
+Added: We plan to initiate Phase 2 clinical trials of ANB030 in alopecia areata and vitiligo in the second half of 2021.
ANB032 is an antibody that modulates BTLA in a manner that results in anti-inflammatory effects in vivo .
3 unchanged sentences
J Biomed Sci.
−Removed: ANB032 has demonstrated in vivo efficacy in an animal disease model and we anticipate filing an IND for this program in the second half of 2020.
+Added: ANB032 has demonstrated in vivo efficacy in an animal disease model.
+Added: We filed a CTN in Australia for ANB032 during the first quarter of 2021 and anticipate initiating a healthy volunteer Phase 1 trial in the first half of 2021 upon clearance of the CTN.
+Added: We presented preclinical data regarding ANB032 at the 2020 FOCIS Virtual Annual Meeting in October 2020.
Our SHM Antibody Discovery Platform
5 unchanged sentences
The specificity of each antibody to a target, and the potency of its binding strength to that target are defined by the amino acid sequences of heavy and light chains in the Fab domain of the antibody molecule.
−Removed: The other end of the antibody, called the Fc domain, is responsible for communication between the
−Removed: antibody and the rest of the immune system.
+Added: The other end of the antibody, called the Fc domain, is responsible for communication between the antibody and the rest of the immune system.
Fc domains bind to various receptors and cause immune system effector responses.
22 unchanged sentences
Even if antibodies are available against a certain target, they may not bind the correct region or epitope of the protein to achieve the intended functional therapeutic effects;
+Added: • Low Potency.
Antibodies from competing technologies tend to demonstrate low binding potencies against their targets.
8 unchanged sentences
Microbial antibody display systems require screening of antibodies, typically formatted as antibody fragments, from a static library diversity displayed on a bacterial or yeast microbial cell surface.
−Removed: The static nature of these libraries limits the range of antibody specificities to 10 9 or 10 10 range, which is generally insufficient to avail high-affinity antibodies against many antigens.
−Removed: This can lead to suboptimal potency, and subsequently require phage/yeast antibodies to be matured significantly, typically with random mutagenesis, to obtain therapeutic level potencies, which is
−Removed: a labor-intensive and inefficient process.
+Added: The static nature of these libraries limits the range of antibody specificities to values around 10 9 or 10 10 , which is generally insufficient to avail high-affinity antibodies against many antigens.
+Added: This can lead to suboptimal potency and subsequently require phage/yeast antibodies to be matured significantly, typically with random mutagenesis, to obtain therapeutic level potencies, which is a labor-intensive and inefficient process.
In addition, antibodies selected using this approach are expressed through the microbial cell expression machinery, which differs significantly in terms of manufacturability (expression level, glycosylation, formulation and stability) from mammalian cell expression typically utilized for clinical and commercial manufacturing of therapeutic antibodies.
17 unchanged sentences
Starting with a library of either fully-human or humanized antibodies, our platform generates AID-based variants of the starting antibody library throughout the process.
−Removed: We have demonstrated that the pattern of mutagenesis we observe in vitro using our platform technology closely mimics the pattern observed among in vivo generated antibodies, thereby increasing confidence that antibodies generated by our platform will be tolerated when used as therapeutic drugs in humans.
+Added: We have demonstrated that the pattern of mutagenesis we observe in vitro using our platform technology closely mimics the pattern
+Added: observed among in vivo generated antibodies, thereby increasing confidence that antibodies generated by our platform will be tolerated when used as therapeutic drugs in humans.
By selecting antibodies based on their antigen binding from the broad antibody library population SHM develops, we are able to evolve in an iterative fashion the binding potency and function of antibodies to levels that we believe will be required for therapeutic use.
16 unchanged sentences
Collaborations
−Removed: In March 2014, we entered into a collaboration and exclusive license agreement with TESARO, now a part of GlaxoSmithKline.
+Added: GlaxoSmithKline
+Added: In March 2014, we entered into a Collaboration and Exclusive License Agreement (the “GSK Agreement”) with TESARO, Inc.
+Added: (“Tesaro”), an oncology-focused biopharmaceutical company now a part of GlaxoSmithKline (Tesaro and GlaxoSmithKline are hereinafter referred to, collectively, as “GSK”).
We executed an amendment in November 2014 to add an additional dual-reactive antibody product candidate.
−Removed: Under the terms of the amended agreement, we granted TESARO an exclusive, royalty-bearing, sub-licensable worldwide license to research, develop, manufacture, market and sell products based on our proprietary technology for the discovery, generation and optimization of certain specified immunotherapy antibodies.
−Removed: We have granted TESARO exclusive rights to three monospecific antibody product candidates targeting TIM-3 (TSR-022), LAG-3 (TSR-033) and PD-1 (TSR-042) and a bispecific antibody product candidates targeting PD-1 and LAG-3.
−Removed: Under the amended agreement, we are responsible for performing initial discovery and development of therapeutic antibodies with the goal of generating immunotherapy antibodies for use in the treatment of cancer.
−Removed: TESARO is responsible for all subsequent preclinical, clinical, regulatory, manufacturing and other activities necessary to develop and commercialize antibodies selected under each of six development programs, and TESARO is obligated to use commercially reasonable efforts to research, develop and commercialize at least one product to each of the four targets.
−Removed: During the term, other than under the collaboration, both TESARO and we are prohibited from developing and commercializing, independently or with a third party, any agents targeting LAG-3, PD-1 or TIM- 3, as single agents or in combination with other therapies.
−Removed: We have completed our responsibilities under the terms of the agreement as of December 31, 2016 to generate and develop antibodies to certain defined stages of preclinical development.
−Removed: Under the terms of this agreement, TESARO made up-front, non-creditable and non-refundable cash payments aggregating $19.0 million to us during 2014.
−Removed: TESARO was also required to reimburse us on a quarterly basis for specified costs incurred by us in our initial discovery and development activities covered by the agreement.
−Removed: For each of the targets for which TESARO is granted exclusive rights, TESARO is required to make milestone payments to us of up to $18.0 million if certain research and development milestone events are achieved, up to an additional $90.0 million of milestone payments if certain U.S.
+Added: Under the terms of the GSK Agreement, as amended, we granted GSK an exclusive, royalty-bearing, sub-licensable worldwide license to research, develop, manufacture, market and sell products based on our proprietary technology for the discovery, generation and optimization of certain specified immunotherapy antibodies.
+Added: We have granted GSK exclusive rights to three monospecific antibody product candidates targeting TIM-3 (TSR-022), LAG-3 (TSR-033) and PD-1 (TSR-042) and a bispecific antibody product candidates targeting PD-1 and LAG-3.
+Added: Under the GSK Agreement, as amended, we are responsible for performing initial discovery and development of therapeutic antibodies with the goal of generating immunotherapy antibodies for use in the treatment of cancer.
+Added: GSK is responsible for all subsequent preclinical, clinical, regulatory, manufacturing and other activities necessary to develop and commercialize antibodies selected under each of six development programs, and GSK is obligated to use commercially reasonable efforts to research, develop and commercialize at least one product to each of the four targets.
+Added: During the term, other than under the collaboration, and except as amended by the October 23, 2020 amendment of the GSK Agreement (described below), both GSK and we are prohibited from developing and commercializing, independently or with a third party, any agents targeting LAG-3, PD-1 or TIM- 3, as single agents or in combination with other therapies.
+Added: We have completed our responsibilities under the terms of the GSK Agreement as of December 31, 2016 to generate and develop antibodies to certain defined stages of preclinical development.
+Added: Under the terms of the GSK Agreement, as amended, GSK made up-front, non-creditable and non-refundable cash payments aggregating $19.0 million to us during 2014.
+Added: GSK was also required to reimburse us on a quarterly basis for specified costs incurred by us in our initial discovery and development activities covered by the agreement.
+Added: For each of the targets for which GSK is granted exclusive rights, GSK is required to make milestone payments to us of up to $18.0 million if certain research and development milestone events are achieved, up to an additional $90.0 million of milestone payments if certain U.S.
regulatory submissions and approvals occur in initial and subsequent indications, and up to an additional $165.0 million upon the achievement of specified levels of annual worldwide net sales.
−Removed: TESARO will also be required to pay us tiered royalties ranging from 4% to 8%, on a product- by-product basis, on worldwide annual net sales, and additional commercial milestone payments if specified levels of annual net sales of a product are attained.
−Removed: This agreement expires when no further payments are due to us, unless earlier terminated.
−Removed: Either party may terminate the agreement in the event of an uncured material breach by the other party.
−Removed: TESARO may terminate the agreement at any time upon 90 days’ prior written notice to us.
−Removed: In December 2011, we entered into a collaboration agreement with Celgene, now a part of Bristol-Myers Squibb, or the Collaboration Agreement, to develop human therapeutic antibodies against multiple biological targets.
−Removed: We completed our responsibilities under the terms of the agreement to generate antibodies against various mutually agreed biological targets during fiscal 2014.
−Removed: On a target-by-target basis, we provided Celgene an option to obtain rights to develop and commercialize a defined number of antibodies against each target.
−Removed: We were successful in generating antibodies against multiple targets and Celgene has exercised its option with respect to antibodies against three targets.
−Removed: Celgene is currently advancing two anti-inflammatory antibodies, of which an anti-PD-1 agonist antibody, also known as CC-90006, is currently in a Phase 1 trial, while the other program is currently in preclinical development.
−Removed: Upon execution of the Collaboration Agreement in 2011, Celgene paid us a one-time, non-refundable, non- creditable initial fee of $6.0 million.
−Removed: Celgene has reimbursed us for specified research costs in accordance with the research plans.
−Removed: Celgene is also obligated, on a project-by-project basis, to pay us up to a total of an additional $18.0 million if certain
−Removed: research and development milestone events are achieved under such project and up to a total of an additional $35.0 million if certain regulatory milestone events are achieved under such project.
−Removed: Celgene will also be required to pay us single digit royalties on net sales of products containing the delivered antibodies on a product-by-product and country-by-country basis until the later of the expiration of the last patent right that covers manufacture, use or sale of such product in such country, and in any case at least ten years after the first commercial sale of the product in such country.
−Removed: The Collaboration Agreement continues until our royalty rights on any Celgene product resulting from the collaboration expire, which period will last at least ten years after any such product first goes to market.
−Removed: Either we or Celgene may terminate the agreement in the event of an uncured material breach by the other party.
+Added: GSK will also be required to pay us tiered royalties ranging from 4% to 8%, for each product developed under the agreement, except in the case of dostarlimab where the royalties payable will be 8% to 25% (as explained in more detail below in connection with the October 23, 2020 amendment of the GSK Agreement), on a product- by-product basis, on worldwide annual net sales, and additional commercial milestone payments if specified levels of annual net sales of a product are attained.
+Added: On October 23, 2020, we again amended the GSK Agreement (the “2020 Amendment”).
+Added: Under the 2020 Amendment, we agreed to permit GSK to conduct development and commercialization of Zejula in combination with any third-party molecules.
+Added: Zejula is an oral, once-daily poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, which has received U.S.
+Added: approval for the maintenance treatment of adult patients with advanced epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer who are in a complete or partial response to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, has been approved for certain other indications, and is under development for additional cancer indications as well.
+Added: In addition, under the 2020 Amendment, we were granted increased royalties upon sales of dostarlimab, an anti-PD-1 antagonist antibody under development by GSK for multiple oncological disorders, including endometrial cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, ovarian cancer, colorectal cancer and mismatch repair deficient solid tumors, equal to 8% of Net Sales (as defined in the GSK Agreement) below $1.0 billion and from 12% up to 25% of Net Sales above $1.0 billion.
+Added: The 2020 Amendment also provided for a one-time non-refundable cash payment of $60.0 million that we received in the fourth quarter of 2020.
+Added: GSK also agreed, starting January 1, 2021, to pay us a 1% royalty on all GSK Net Sales of Zejula.
+Added: The $1.1 billion in cash milestone payments due under the GSK Agreement remain unchanged.
+Added: Additionally, under the terms of the 2020 Amendment, GSK has agreed to certain diligence commitments with respect to the future development of dostarlimab, and the parties have agreed to review such commitments under regular joint review committee meetings going forward.
+Added: This GSK Agreement, as amended, expires when no further payments are due to us, unless earlier terminated.
+Added: Either party may terminate the GSK Agreement, as amended, in the event of an uncured material breach by the other party.
+Added: GSK may terminate the GSK Agreement, as amended, at any time upon 90 days’ prior written notice to us.
+Added: Bristol-Myers Squibb
+Added: In December 2011, we entered into a license and collaboration agreement (the “BMS Agreement”) with Celgene, now a part of Bristol-Myers Squibb (Celgene and Bristol-Myers Squibb are hereinafter referred to, collectively, as “BMS”), to develop therapeutic antibodies against multiple targets.
+Added: We completed our responsibilities under the terms of the BMS Agreement to generate antibodies against various mutually agreed biological targets during fiscal 2014.
+Added: On a target-by-target basis, we provided BMS an option to obtain rights to develop and commercialize a defined number of antibodies against each target.
+Added: We were successful in generating antibodies against multiple targets and BMS has exercised its option with respect to antibodies against three targets.
+Added: BMS is currently advancing two anti-inflammatory antibodies, of which an anti-PD-1 agonist antibody, also known as CC-90006, is currently in a Phase 1 clinical trial, while the other program is currently in preclinical development.
+Added: Upon execution of the BMS Agreement in 2011, BMS paid us a one-time, non-refundable, non-creditable initial fee of $6.0 million.
+Added: BMS has reimbursed us for specified research costs in accordance with the research plans.
+Added: BMS is also obligated, on a project-by-project basis, to pay us up to a total of an additional $18.0 million if certain research and development milestone events are achieved under such project and up to a total of an additional $35.0 million if certain regulatory milestone events are achieved under such project.
+Added: BMS will also be required to pay us single digit royalties on net sales of products containing the delivered antibodies on a product-by-product and country-by-country basis until the later of the expiration of the last patent right that covers manufacture, use or sale of such product in such country, and in any case at least 10 years after the first commercial sale of the product in such country.
+Added: The BMS Agreement continues until our royalty rights on any BMS product resulting from the collaboration expire, which period will last at least ten years after any such product first goes to market.
+Added: Either we or BMS may terminate the BMS Agreement in the event of an uncured material breach by the other party.
In-Licensing Agreements License Agreement with UKRI
8 unchanged sentences
In addition we owe UKRI royalties at 0.25% of annual net sales for worldwide sales on a product-by-product at or below $750.0 million and 1% of annual net sales of products worldwide above $750.0 million, payable on a country-by-country basis until the expiration of the last licensed patent covering such product in such country.
−Removed: Under this license agreement, we have rights to 15 patents and one pending patent application worldwide.
+Added: Under this license agreement, we have rights to 16 patents worldwide.
Unless earlier terminated, the UKRI Agreement will expire upon expiration of all royalty payment obligations under the UKRI Agreement.
10 unchanged sentences
Australian Operations
−Removed: In March 2015, we established a wholly-owned Australian subsidiary called AnaptysBio Pty Ltd, in order to conduct various preclinical and clinical activities for etokimab and ANB019.
−Removed: We believe our Australian subsidiary will be eligible for certain financial incentives made available by the Australian government for biotech research and development expenses.
−Removed: Specifically, Australia provides a refundable tax credit in the form of a cash rebate equal to 43.5% of qualified expenditures on biotech research and development projects to Australian companies that operate the majority of their research
−Removed: and development activities associated with such projects in Australia.
−Removed: A wholly-owned Australian subsidiary of a non-Australian parent company is eligible to receive the refundable tax credit, provided that the Australian subsidiary retains the rights to the data and intellectual property generated in Australia, and provided that the total revenues of the parent company and its consolidated subsidiaries during the period for which the refundable tax credit is claimed are less than $20.0 million Australian dollars.
−Removed: In addition, by establishing operations in Australia, we are able to access an established network of manufacturing and clinical development support contractors located in Australia and benefit from Australia’s streamlined approval processes for the initiation of first-in human studies.
+Added: In March 2015, we established a wholly-owned Australian subsidiary called AnaptysBio Pty Ltd, in order to conduct various preclinical and clinical activities for etokimab and imsidolimab.
+Added: By establishing operations in Australia, we are able to access an established network of manufacturing and clinical development support contractors located in Australia and benefit from Australia’s streamlined approval processes for the initiation of first-in human studies.
We have few employees with experience advancing product candidates through the Australian regulatory review process and have therefore engaged Australian consultants with expertise in the regulatory requirements and clinical development of therapeutic products in Australia.
2 unchanged sentences
Our intellectual property is critical to our business and we strive to protect it, including by obtaining and maintaining patent protection in the United States and internationally for our technology platform, product candidates, novel biological discoveries, epitopes, new therapeutic approaches and potential indications, and other inventions that are important to our business.
−Removed: In total, our patent portfolio, including patents to our technology platform licensed from UKRI and patents licensed from Kyoto University, as well as patents co-owned with GlaxoSmithKline plc., consisted of approximately 42 issued patents and 158 pending patent applications as of December 31, 2019 .
+Added: In total, our patent portfolio, including patents to our technology platform licensed from UKRI, as well as patents co-owned with GSK consisted of approximately 49 issued patents and 138 pending patent applications as of December 31, 2020.
For our product candidates, generally we initially pursue patent protection covering compositions of matter including antibody sequences, methods of use, and methods of production.
1 unchanged sentence
The patent portfolios for our internal programs and platform technology are outlined below:
−Removed: As of December 31, 2019 , we owned approximately 36 patents and patent applications in various countries directed to the antibody sequence of etokimab and its variants, methods of use and related matters.
−Removed: We also intend to prosecute our pending applications and pursue patent issuance and protection in key commercial markets where significant product sales may occur.
−Removed: Patents that may issue from our pending applications would provide protection until September 2039.
−Removed: As of December 31, 2019 , we owned 16 patents and patent applications in various countries directed to the antibody sequence of ANB019 and its variants, methods of use and related matters.
+Added: As of December 31, 2020, we owned 18 patents and patent applications in various countries directed to the antibody sequence of imsidolimab and its variants, methods of use and related matters.
We also intend to prosecute our pending applications and pursue patent issuance and protection in key commercial markets where significant product sales may occur.
−Removed: Patents that may issue from our pending applications would provide protection until April 2036.
−Removed: As of December 31, 2019 , we owned 2 U.S.
+Added: Patents that may issue from our pending applications would provide protection until July 2041.
+Added: As of December 31, 2020, we owned two U.S.
patent applications directed to the antibody sequence of ANB030 and its variants, methods of use and related matters.
1 unchanged sentence
Patents that may issue from our pending applications would provide protection until June 2040.
−Removed: GSK4057190 (TSR-042)
−Removed: As of December 31, 2019 , we owned or co-owned 37 U.S.
−Removed: patents and patent applications directed to the antibody sequence of GSK4057190 (TSR-042) and its variants, methods of use and related matters.
+Added: As of December 31, 2020, we owned one U.S.
+Added: patent application directed to the antibody sequence of ANB032 and its variants, methods of use and related matters.
+Added: We intend to prosecute this pending application and, perhaps, other patent applications, and pursue patent issuance and protection in key commercial markets where significant product sales may occur.
+Added: Patents that may issue from our pending application would provide protection until October 2041.
+Added: Dostarlimab (GSK4057190)
+Added: As of December 31, 2020, we owned or co-owned 40 patents and patent applications in various countries directed to the antibody sequence of GSK4057190 (dostarlimab), an anti-PD-1 antagonist, and its variants, methods of use and related matters.
We intend to prosecute our pending applications and pursue patent issuance and protection in key commercial markets where significant product sales may occur.
Patents that may issue from our pending applications would provide protection until November 2037.
−Removed: GSK4069889 (TSR-022)
−Removed: As of December 31, 2019 , we owned or co-owned 37 U.S.
−Removed: patents and patent applications directed to the antibody sequence of GSK4069889 (TSR-022) and its variants, methods of use and related matters.
+Added: Cobolimab (GSK4069889)
+Added: As of December 31, 2020, we owned or co-owned 39 patents and patent applications in various countries directed to the antibody sequence of GSK4069889 (cobolimab), an anti-TIM-3 antagonist, and its variants, methods of use and related matters.
We intend to prosecute our pending applications and pursue patent issuance and protection in key commercial markets where significant product sales may occur.
Patents that may issue from our pending applications would provide protection until November 2037.
−Removed: GSK4074386 (TSR-033)
−Removed: As of December 31, 2019 , we owned or co-owned 34 U.S.
−Removed: patents and patent applications directed to the antibody sequence of GSK4074386 (TSR-033) and its variants, methods of use and related matters.
+Added: As of December 31, 2020, we owned or co-owned 35 patents and patent applications in various countries directed to the antibody sequence of GSK4074386, an anti-LAG-3 antagonist, and its variants, methods of use and related matters.
We intend to prosecute our pending applications and pursue patent issuance and protection in key commercial markets where significant product sales may occur.
2 unchanged sentences
Our platform technology is covered by U.S.
−Removed: and foreign issued patents and pending patent applications, emanating from our in-licensed portfolio and wholly-owned portfolio, in various jurisdictions.
−Removed: Our wholly-owned portfolio includes patents and patent applications directed to platform technology related inventions associated with antibody library design, antibody humanization, mammalian cell display and secretion, and other technical attributes relating to the discovery, maturation and optimization of antibodies using our technology platform.
+Added: and foreign issued patents, emanating from our in-licensed portfolio and wholly-owned portfolio, in various jurisdictions.
+Added: Our portfolio includes patents directed to platform technology related inventions associated with antibody library design, antibody humanization, mammalian cell display and secretion, and other technical attributes relating to the discovery, maturation and optimization of antibodies using our technology platform.
Patents relating to our platform technology that have been issued to date provide protection through May 2033.
11 unchanged sentences
patent term extending beyond 20 years from the earliest date of filing a non-provisional patent application related to the U.S.
−Removed: In addition, in the United States, the term of a U.S.
+Added: In addition, the term of a U.S.
patent that covers an FDA-approved drug may also be eligible for patent term extension, which permits patent term restoration as compensation for the patent term lost during the FDA regulatory review process.
9 unchanged sentences
It is our policy to require our employees, consultants, outside scientific collaborators, sponsored researchers and other advisors to execute confidentiality agreements upon the commencement of employment or consulting relationships with us.
−Removed: These agreements provide that all confidential information concerning our business or financial affairs developed or made known to the individual during the course of the individual’s relationship with us is to be kept confidential and not disclosed to
−Removed: third parties except in specific circumstances.
+Added: These agreements provide that all confidential information concerning our business or financial affairs developed or made known to the individual during the course of the individual’s relationship with us is to be kept confidential and not disclosed to third parties except in specific circumstances.
Our agreements with employees also provide that all inventions conceived by the employee in the course of employment with us or from the employee’s use of our confidential information are our exclusive property.
6 unchanged sentences
We do not have and we do not currently plan to acquire or develop the facilities or capabilities to manufacture cGMP drug substance or filled drug product for use in human clinical trials.
−Removed: We rely on third-party manufacturers to generate cGMP-grade cell lines and will rely on them to produce cGMP drug product required for our planned clinical trials, and expect to continue to rely on third parties to manufacture clinical trial drug supplies for the foreseeable future.
+Added: We rely on third-party manufacturers to generate cGMP-grade cell lines and will rely on them to produce cGMP drug product required for our planned clinical trials, and we expect to continue to rely on third parties to manufacture clinical trial
+Added: drug supplies for the foreseeable future.
We also contract with additional third parties for the filling, labeling, packaging, storage and distribution of investigational drug products.
We have personnel with significant technical, manufacturing, analytical, quality, including cGMP, and project management experience to oversee our third-party manufacturers and to manage manufacturing and quality data and information for regulatory compliance purposes.
−Removed: While our contract manufacturers have not yet produced cGMP batches of our product candidates, they have previously manufactured products for other companies in compliance with cGMP and have been previously inspected by regulatory authorities for compliance with cGMP standards.
+Added: While our contract manufacturers have not yet produced commercially-approved cGMP batches of our product candidates, they have previously manufactured products for other companies in compliance with cGMP and have been previously inspected by regulatory authorities for compliance with cGMP standards.
Similarly, our personnel have had experience with cGMP at previous positions.
11 unchanged sentences
These competitors also compete with us in recruiting and retaining qualified scientific and management personnel and establishing clinical trial sites and patient registration for clinical trials, as well as in acquiring technologies complementary to, or necessary for, our programs.
−Removed: Specifically, there are several companies developing or marketing treatments that may be approved for the same indications and/or diseases as our lead product candidates, ANB019 and etokimab, including major pharmaceutical companies.
−Removed: For asthma, our competitors include omalizumab (Xolair;
−Removed: Roche), which has received FDA approval and functions by inhibiting the binding between free IgE and FceRI;
−Removed: antibodies that bind IL-5 and inhibit its interaction with the IL-5 receptor such as mepolizumab (Nucala;
−Removed: GlaxoSmithKline) and reslizumab (Cinqair;
−Removed: Teva), both of which the FDA has approved for the add-on maintenance treatment in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma;
−Removed: antibodies such as benralizumab (FASENRA, AstraZeneca) that bind the IL-5 receptor;
−Removed: antibodies that bind the IL-4 receptor and inhibit its signaling through IL-4 and IL-13 cytokines such as dupilumab (Dupixent;
−Removed: Regeneron/Sanofi), which has been approved by the FDA for use with other asthma medicines for the maintenance treatment of moderate-to-severe asthma in patients aged 12 years and older whose asthma is not controlled with their current asthma medicines;
−Removed: antibodies that bind to IL-13 such as lebrikizumab (Dermira), tralokinumab (AstraZeneca, LEO Pharma) and anrukinzumab (Pfizer), which are in clinical testing;
−Removed: antibodies that bind the IL-4 receptor alpha chain, such as AMG 317 (Amgen) in clinical testing;
−Removed: ST2-binding antibodies including Roche’s RG6149, GSK’s GSK3772847 and Regeneron’s IL-33 antibody (REGN3500), each in clinical development for asthma and related conditions;
−Removed: a recently announced IL-33 related program by AstraZeneca (MEDI3506) in a Phase 1 clinical trial indicated for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease;
−Removed: DP-2 antagonists including fevipiprant (Novartis) under development for asthma and GB001 (Gossamer Bio) under development for moderate-to-severe eosinophilic asthma;
−Removed: and an anti-TSLP antibody called tezepelumab (AMG 157, MEDI9929) being developed by Amgen and AstraZeneca for asthma.
−Removed: Our competitors in CRSwNP include dupilumab (Regeneron/Sanofi), mepolizumab (GSK), benralizumab (AstraZeneca), omalizumab (Novartis), GB001 (Gossamer Bio) and PF-06817024 (Pfizer), each of which are in clinical testing.
+Added: Specifically, there are several companies developing or marketing treatments that may be approved for the same indications and/or diseases as our lead product candidates, imsidolimab and etokimab, including major pharmaceutical companies.
For GPP and PPP, our competitors include marketed therapies such as secukinumab (Cosentyx;
3 unchanged sentences
and acitretin (Soriatane;
−Removed: GlaxoSmithKline), as well as therapies in development such as guselkumab (Janssen), which blocks IL-23 cytokine function, gevokizumab (Xoma 052) and canakinumab (Ilaris, Novartis), which binds IL-1 beta, anakinra (Kineret;
−Removed: Swedish Orphan Biovitrum AB), a recombinant form the IL-1 receptor antagonist, and an anti-IL-36 receptor antibody called BI-655130 (Boehringer Ingelheim).
−Removed: For our anti-inflammatory checkpoint modulator antibody programs, our competitors include CC-90006 (Celgene/BMS) which is an anti-PD-1 agonist antibody developed under our partnership with Celgene, a BTLA modulator antibody called LY3361237 being developed by Eli Lilly and a PD-1 agonist antibody also being developed by Eli Lilly.
+Added: GSK), as well as therapies in development such as guselkumab (Janssen), which blocks IL-23 cytokine function, gevokizumab (Xoma 052) and canakinumab (Ilaris, Novartis), which binds IL-1 beta, anakinra (Kineret;
+Added: Swedish Orphan Biovitrum AB), a recombinant form of the IL-1 receptor antagonist and an anti-IL-36 receptor antibody called BI-655130 (Boehringer Ingelheim).
+Added: For ichthyosis, systemically administered competitors include secukinumab (Cosentyx;
+Added: Novartis), liarozole (GSK), dupilumab (Dupixent;
+Added: Regeneron/Sanofi), and adalimumab (Humira;
+Added: Various topical treatments may also be used off-label for treatment of ichthyosis related symptoms.
+Added: For hidradenitis suppurativa, our competitors include adalimumab (Humira;
+Added: Abbvie) which is approved for the treatment of moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa for patients 12 years of age or older.
+Added: For acne, our competitors include retinoids and retinoid-like drugs, including tretinoin (Avita, Retin-A, adapalene (Differin) and tazarotene (Tazorac, Avage), antibiotics including clindamycin (Benzaclin, Duac) and erythromycin (Benzamycin) and isotretinoin (Amnesteem, Claravis, Accutane) and oral antibiotics including sarecycline (Seysara).
+Added: For our anti-inflammatory checkpoint modulator antibody programs, our competitors include CC-90006 (BMS), which is an anti-PD-1 agonist antibody developed under our partnership with BMS, a BTLA modulator antibody called LY3361237 being developed by Eli Lilly, a PD-1 agonist antibody called LY3462817 also being developed by Eli Lilly and two PD-1 agonist antibodies called PT627 and PT001 being developed by Pandion Therapeutics.
+Added: Our competitors in moderate-to-severe alopecia areata and vitiligo include topical and oral corticosteroids, topical immunotherapy (diphencyprone,
+Added: dinitrochlorobenzene, squaric acid dibutyl ester), calcineurin inhibitors (tacrolimus, pmecrolimus), light therapy, prostaglandins and janus kinase inhibitors (tofacitinib, rixolitinib) currently in development.
Government Regulation and Product Approval
10 unchanged sentences
Biological product development for a new product or certain changes to an approved product in the United States typically involves preclinical laboratory and animal tests, the submission to the FDA of an IND, which must become effective before clinical testing may commence in the United States, and adequate and well-controlled clinical trials to establish the safety and effectiveness of the drug for each indication for which FDA approval is sought.
−Removed: Satisfaction of FDA pre-market
−Removed: approval requirements typically takes many years and the actual time required may vary substantially based upon the type, complexity, and novelty of the product or disease.
+Added: Satisfaction of FDA premarket approval requirements typically takes many years and the actual time required may vary substantially based upon the type, complexity, and novelty of the product or disease.
Preclinical tests include laboratory evaluation of product chemistry, formulation, and toxicity, as well as animal trials to assess the characteristics and potential safety and efficacy of the product.
−Removed: The conduct of the preclinical tests must comply with federal regulations and requirements, including GLPs.
+Added: The conduct of the preclinical tests must comply with federal regulations and requirements, including good laboratory practices, or GLPs.
The results of preclinical testing are submitted to the FDA as part of an IND along with other information, including information about product chemistry, manufacturing and controls, and a proposed clinical trial protocol.
14 unchanged sentences
In Phase 1, the initial introduction of the biologic into healthy human subjects or patients, the product is tested to assess metabolism, pharmacokinetics, pharmacological actions, side effects associated with increasing doses, and, if possible, early evidence on effectiveness.
−Removed: Phase 2 usually involves trials in a limited patient population to determine the effectiveness of the drug or biologic for a particular indication, dosage tolerance, and optimal dosage, and to identify common adverse effects and safety risks.
−Removed: If a compound demonstrates evidence of effectiveness and an acceptable safety profile in Phase 2 evaluations, Phase 3 trials are undertaken to obtain the additional information about clinical efficacy and safety in a larger number of patients, typically at geographically dispersed clinical trial sites, to permit the FDA to evaluate the overall benefit risk relationship of the drug or biologic and to provide adequate information for the labeling of the product.
+Added: Phase 2 usually involves clinical trials in a limited patient population to determine the
+Added: effectiveness of the drug or biologic for a particular indication, dosage tolerance, and optimal dosage, and to identify common adverse effects and safety risks.
+Added: If a compound demonstrates evidence of effectiveness and an acceptable safety profile in Phase 2 evaluations, Phase 3 clinical trials are undertaken to obtain the additional information about clinical efficacy and safety in a larger number of patients, typically at geographically dispersed clinical trial sites, to permit the FDA to evaluate the overall benefit risk relationship of the drug or biologic and to provide adequate information for the labeling of the product.
In most cases, the FDA requires two adequate and well-controlled Phase 3 clinical trials to demonstrate the efficacy of the biologic.
−Removed: A single Phase 3 trial with other confirmatory evidence may be sufficient in rare instances where the trial is a large multicenter trial demonstrating internal consistency and a statistically persuasive finding of a clinically meaningful effect on mortality, irreversible morbidity or prevention of a disease with a potentially serious outcome and confirmation of the result in a second trial would be practically or ethically impossible.
+Added: A single Phase 3 clinical trial may be sufficient in rare instances, including (i) where the clinical trial is a large multicenter clinical trial demonstrating internal consistency and a statistically persuasive finding of a clinically meaningful effect on mortality, irreversible morbidity or prevention of a disease with a potentially serious outcome and confirmation of the result in a second clinical trial would be practically or ethically impossible or (ii) when in conjunction with other confirmatory evidence.
After completion of the required clinical testing, a BLA is prepared and submitted to the FDA.
5 unchanged sentences
The FDA has 60 days from its receipt of a BLA to determine whether the application will be accepted for filing based on the agency’s threshold determination that it is sufficiently complete to permit substantive review.
−Removed: Once the submission is accepted for filing, the FDA begins an in-depth review.
+Added: Once the submission is filed, the FDA begins an in-depth review.
The FDA has agreed to certain performance goals in the review of BLAs.
−Removed: Most such applications for standard review biologic products are reviewed within ten months of the date the BLA is filed with the FDA;
+Added: Most such applications for standard review biologic products are reviewed within 10 months of the date the BLA is filed with the FDA;
most applications for priority review biologics are reviewed within six months of the date the BLA is filed with the FDA.
2 unchanged sentences
The FDA may also refer applications for novel biologic products, or biologic products that present difficult questions of safety or efficacy, to an advisory committee—typically a panel that includes clinicians and other experts—for review, evaluation, and a recommendation as to whether the application should be approved.
−Removed: The FDA is not bound by the
−Removed: recommendation of an advisory committee, but it generally follows such recommendations.
+Added: The FDA is not bound by the recommendation of an advisory committee, but it generally follows such recommendations.
Before approving a BLA, the FDA will typically inspect one or more clinical sites to assure compliance with GCP.
30 unchanged sentences
Orphan Drug Designation
−Removed: Under the Orphan Drug Act, the FDA may grant orphan drug designation to biological products intended to treat a rare disease or condition—generally a disease or condition that affects fewer than 200,000 individuals in the United States, or if it affects more than 200,000 individuals in the United States, there is no reasonable expectation that the cost of developing and making a product available in the United States for such disease or condition will be recovered from sales of the product.
+Added: Under the Orphan Drug Act, the FDA may grant Orphan Drug Designation to biological products intended to treat a rare disease or condition—generally a disease or condition that (i) affects fewer than 200,000 individuals in the United States, or (ii) affects more than 200,000 individuals in the United States and there is no reasonable expectation that the cost of developing and making a product available in the United States for such disease or condition will be recovered from sales of the product.
Orphan Drug Designation must be requested before submitting a BLA.
10 unchanged sentences
Sponsors are also obligated to discuss the results of their clinical trials after completion.
−Removed: Disclosure of the results of these trials can be delayed in certain circumstances for up to two years after the date of completion of the trial.
+Added: Disclosure of the results of these clinical trials can be delayed in certain circumstances for up to two years after the date of completion of the clinical trial.
Competitors may use this publicly available information to gain knowledge regarding the progress of development programs.
2 unchanged sentences
The FDA may grant full or partial waivers, or deferrals, for submission of data.
−Removed: Unless otherwise required by regulation, the PREA does not apply to any biological product for an indication for which orphan designation has been granted.
+Added: Unless otherwise required by regulation, the PREA does not apply to any biological product for an indication for which Orphan Drug Designation has been granted.
+Added: The Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act, or BPCA, provides sponsors of NDAs with an additional six-month period of market exclusivity for all unexpired patent or non-patent exclusivity on all forms of the drug containing the active moiety if the sponsor submits results of pediatric studies specifically requested by the FDA under BPCA within required timeframes.
+Added: The BPCA provides sponsors of BLAs an additional six-month extension for all unexpired non-patent market exclusivity on all forms of the biological containing the active moiety pursuant to the BPCA if the conditions under the BPCA are met.
Additional controls for biologics
17 unchanged sentences
Interim patent extensions are not available for a drug or biologic for which an NDA or BLA has not been submitted.
−Removed: The Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009, or BPCIA, creates an abbreviated approval pathway for biological products shown to be highly similar to or interchangeable with an FDA licensed reference biological product.
+Added: The Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009, or BPCIA, created an abbreviated approval pathway for biological products shown to be highly similar to or interchangeable with an FDA licensed reference biological product.
Biosimilarity sufficient to reference a prior FDA-approved product requires that there be no differences in conditions of use, route of administration, dosage form, and strength, and no clinically meaningful differences between the biological product and the reference product in terms of safety, purity, and potency.
−Removed: Biosimilarity must be shown through analytical trials, animal trials, and a clinical trial or trials, unless the Secretary of Health and Human Services waives a required element.
+Added: Biosimilarity must be shown through analytical trials, animal trials, and a clinical trial or trials, unless the Secretary of the U.S.
+Added: Department of Health and Human Services waives a required element.
A biosimilar product may be deemed interchangeable with a prior approved product if it meets the higher hurdle of demonstrating that it can be expected to produce the same clinical results as the reference product and, for products administered multiple times, the biologic and the reference biologic may be switched after one has been previously administered without increasing safety risks or risks of diminished efficacy relative to exclusive use of the reference biologic.
−Removed: To date, a handful of biosimilar products and no interchangeable products have been approved under the BPCIA.
+Added: The first biosimilar was approved by the FDA in 2015, and no interchangeable products have been approved under the BPCIA.
Complexities associated with the larger, and often more complex, structures of biological products, as well as the process by which such products are manufactured, pose significant hurdles to implementation, which is still being evaluated by the FDA.
5 unchanged sentences
Biologics may be marketed only for the approved indications and in accordance with the provisions of the approved labeling.
+Added: Changes to some of the conditions established in an approved application, including changes in indications, labeling, or manufacturing processes or facilities, may require a submission to and approval by the FDA before the change can be implemented.
+Added: A BLA supplement for a new indication typically requires clinical data similar to that in the original application and similar procedures and actions in reviewing BLA or supplements as in reviewing BLAs.
Adverse event reporting and submission of periodic reports is required following FDA approval of a BLA.
5 unchanged sentences
Regulatory authorities may withdraw product approvals or request product recalls if a company fails to comply with regulatory standards, if it encounters problems following initial marketing, or if previously unrecognized problems are subsequently discovered.
+Added: In addition, biological product manufacturers in the U.S.
+Added: must comply with applicable provisions of the Drug Supply Chain Security Act and provide and receive product tracing information, maintain appropriate licenses, ensure they only work with other properly licensed entities and have procedures in place to identify and properly handle suspect and illegitimate products.
FDA regulation of companion diagnostics
2 unchanged sentences
Pursuing FDA approval of an in vitro companion diagnostic would require us to obtain a
−Removed: pre-market approval, or PMA.
+Added: premarket approval, or PMA.
The PMA process, including the gathering of clinical and preclinical data and the submission to and review by the FDA, can take several years or longer.
13 unchanged sentences
Domestic facility records and manufacturing processes are subject to periodic unscheduled inspections by the FDA.
−Removed: The FDA also may inspect foreign facilities that export products to the United States.
+Added: The FDA also may inspect foreign facilities that export products to the U.S.
health care laws and compliance requirements
3 unchanged sentences
Attorney offices within the DOJ, and state and local governments.
−Removed: For example, sales, marketing and scientific/educational grant programs may have to comply with the anti-fraud and abuse provisions of the Social Security Act, the false claims laws, the privacy and security provisions of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, or HIPAA, and similar state laws, each as amended, as applicable.
+Added: For example, sales, marketing and scientific/educational grant programs may have to comply with the anti-fraud and abuse provisions of the Social Security Act, anti-kickback statutes, false claims laws, the privacy and security provisions of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, or HIPAA, and similar state laws, each as amended, as applicable.
The federal Anti-Kickback Statute prohibits, among other things, any person or entity, from knowingly and willfully offering, paying, soliciting or receiving any remuneration, directly or indirectly, overtly or covertly, in cash or in kind, to induce or in return for purchasing, leasing, ordering or arranging for the purchase, lease or order of any item or service reimbursable under Medicare, Medicaid or other federal health care programs.
4 unchanged sentences
Failure to meet all of the requirements of a particular applicable statutory exception or regulatory safe harbor does not make the conduct per se illegal under the Anti-Kickback Statute.
−Removed: Instead, the legality of the arrangement will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis based
−Removed: on a cumulative review of all of its facts and circumstances.
+Added: Instead, the legality of the arrangement will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis based on a cumulative review of all of its facts and circumstances.
Our practices may not in all cases meet all of the criteria for protection under a statutory exception or regulatory safe harbor.
4 unchanged sentences
As a result of a modification made by the Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act of 2009, a claim includes “any request or demand” for money or property presented to the U.S.
−Removed: Recently, several pharmaceutical and other health care companies have been prosecuted under these laws for allegedly providing free product to customers with the expectation that the customers would bill federal programs for the product.
+Added: Recently, several pharmaceutical and other health care companies have been prosecuted under these laws for allegedly providing free product to customers with the expectation that the customers would bill federal
+Added: programs for the product.
Other companies have been prosecuted for causing false claims to be submitted because of the companies’ marketing of the product for unapproved, and thus generally non-reimbursable, uses.
41 unchanged sentences
Health care reform
−Removed: Government and other third-party payers (including pharmacy benefit management companies) are challenging the prices charged for health care products and increasingly limiting, and attempting to limit, both coverage and level of reimbursement for prescription drugs, such as by requiring outcomes-based or other pay-for-performance pricing arrangements.
−Removed: They are also imposing restrictions on eligible patient populations and the reimbursement process (including by means of required prior authorizations and utilization management criteria).
−Removed: In March 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the health care and Education Reconciliation Act, or collectively the ACA, was enacted in the United States.
−Removed: This legislation imposes cost-containment and other measures that are likely to adversely affect the amount of reimbursement for our current and future products.
−Removed: The full effects of this legislation depend on a number of factors, many of which are beyond our control, including new regulations and guidance issued by CMS and other federal and state agencies.
−Removed: Some states are also considering legislation that would control the prices and reimbursement of prescription drugs, and state Medicaid programs are increasingly requesting manufacturers to pay supplemental rebates and requiring prior authorization by the state program for use of any prescription drug for which supplemental rebates are not being paid.
−Removed: It is likely that federal and state legislatures and health agencies will continue to focus on additional health care reform measures in the future that will impose additional constraints on prices and reimbursements for our products.
−Removed: Some of the provisions of the ACA have yet to be implemented and there have been judicial and Congressional challenges to certain aspects of the ACA.
−Removed: In addition, the current administration and Congress have previously sought, and will likely continue to seek, legislative and regulatory changes, including repeal and replacement of all or certain provisions of the ACA.
−Removed: While Congress has not passed repeal legislation, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 includes a provision repealing, effective January 1, 2019, the tax-based shared responsibility payment imposed by the ACA on certain individuals who fail to maintain qualifying health coverage for all or part of a year that is commonly referred to as the “individual mandate”.
−Removed: Additionally, the current administration signed a continuing resolution on appropriations for fiscal year 2018 that delayed the implementation of certain ACA-mandated fees, including the so-called “Cadillac” tax on certain high cost employer-sponsored insurance plans, the annual fee imposed on certain health insurance providers based on market share, and the medical device excise tax on non-exempt medical devices.
−Removed: Further, the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018, among other things, amends the ACA, effective January 1, 2019, to increase from 50% to 70% the point-of-sale discount that is owed by pharmaceutical manufacturers who participate in Medicare Part D and to close the coverage gap in most Medicare drug plans, commonly referred to as the “donut hole”.
−Removed: Congress may consider other legislation to repeal or replace elements of the ACA.
+Added: In the United States, there have been and continue to be a number of legislative initiatives to contain healthcare costs.
+Added: The pharmaceutical industry has been significantly affected by major legislative initiatives.
+Added: For example, in March 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act, or collectively the ACA, was enacted, which was intended to broaden access to health insurance, reduce or constrain the growth of healthcare spending, enhanced remedies against fraud and abuse, add new transparency requirements for the healthcare and health insurance industries, impose new taxes and fees on the health industry and impose additional health policy reforms.
+Added: The ACA substantially changed the way healthcare is financed by both governmental and private insurers, and significantly impacts the U.S.
+Added: pharmaceutical industry.
+Added: The ACA, among other things, (i) subjected therapeutic biologics to potential competition by lower-cost biosimilars by creating a licensure framework for follow on biologic products, (ii) proscribed a new methodology by which rebates owed by manufacturers under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program are calculated for drugs and therapeutic biologics that are inhaled, infused, instilled, implanted or injected, (iii) increased the minimum Medicaid rebates owed by manufacturers under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program and extended the rebate program to individuals enrolled in Medicaid managed care organizations, (iv) established annual nondeductible fees and taxes on manufacturers of certain branded prescription drugs and therapeutic biologics, apportioned among these entities according to their market share in certain government healthcare programs, (v) established a new Medicare Part D coverage gap discount program, in which manufacturers must agree to offer 50% point-of-sale discounts off negotiated prices of applicable brand drugs and therapeutic biologics to eligible beneficiaries during their coverage gap period, as a condition for the manufacturer’s outpatient drugs and therapeutic biologics to be covered under Medicare Part D, which has since been increased to 70% by the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018, or BBA, (vi) expanded eligibility criteria for Medicaid programs by, among other things, allowing states to offer Medicaid coverage to additional individuals and by adding new mandatory eligibility categories for individuals with income at or below 133% of the federal poverty level, thereby potentially increasing manufacturers’ Medicaid rebate liability, (vii) expanded the entities eligible for discounts under the Public Health program (viii) created a new Patient-Centered Outcomes
+Added: Research Institute to oversee, identify priorities in, and conduct comparative clinical effectiveness research, along with funding for such research and (ix) established a Center for Medicare Innovation at the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, or CMS, to test innovative payment and service delivery models to lower Medicare and Medicaid spending, potentially including prescription drug spending.
+Added: There have been judicial and Congressional efforts to repeal, replace or change certain aspects of the ACA, including measures taken during the Trump administration.
+Added: The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, or Tax Reform Act, among other things, included a provision that repealed, effective January 1, 2019, the tax-based shared responsibility payment imposed by the ACA on certain individuals who fail to maintain qualifying health coverage for all or part of a year that is commonly referred to as the “individual mandate.” In November 2020, the United States Supreme Court held oral arguments on the Fifth Circuit U.S.
+Added: Court of Appeals decision that held that the individual mandate is unconstitutional.
+Added: It is uncertain how the United States Supreme Court will rule on this case or how healthcare measures of the Biden administration will impact the ACA and our business.
+Added: Additionally, the 2020 federal spending package permanently eliminated, effective January 1, 2020, the ACA-mandated “Cadillac” tax on certain high cost employer-sponsored insurance plans and the medical device excise tax, and effective January 1, 2021, also eliminates the health insurer tax.
+Added: The BBA, among other things, also amended the ACA, effective January 1, 2019, by increasing from 50% to 70% the point-of-sale discount that is owed by pharmaceutical manufacturers who participate in Medicare Part D and closing the coverage gap in most Medicare drug plans, commonly referred to as the “donut hole.” In addition, CMS published a final rule that would give states greater flexibility, effective January 1, 2020, in setting benchmarks for insurers in the individual and small group marketplaces, which may have the effect of relaxing the essential health benefits required under the ACA for plans sold through such marketplaces.
+Added: Other legislative changes have been proposed and adopted since the ACA was enacted.
+Added: On August 2, 2011, the Budget Control Act of 2011, among other things, created measures for spending reductions by Congress.
+Added: A Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction, tasked with recommending a targeted deficit reduction of at least $1.2 trillion for the years 2013 through 2021 was unable to reach required goals, thereby triggering the legislation’s automatic reduction to several government programs.
+Added: This includes aggregate reductions to Medicare payments to providers of 2% per fiscal year, which went into effect in 2013 and will remain in effect through 2030, with the exception of a temporary suspension implemented under various COVID-19 relief legislation from May 1, 2020 through March 31, 2021, unless additional Congressional action is taken.
+Added: The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012, among other things, reduced Medicare payments to several types of providers, including hospitals, imaging centers and cancer treatment centers, and increased the statute of limitations period for the government to recover overpayments to providers from three to five years.
+Added: These laws may result in additional reductions in Medicare and other health care funding.
+Added: There have been several Congressional inquiries and proposed and enacted federal and state legislation designed to, among other things, bring more transparency to product pricing, review the relationship between pricing and manufacturer patient programs, reduce the costs of drugs under Medicare and reform government program reimbursement methodologies for drug products.
+Added: At the federal level, the Trump administration’s budget proposal for fiscal year 2021 included a $135 billion allowance to support legislative proposals seeking to reduce drug prices, increase competition, lower out-of-pocket drug costs for patients, and increased patient access to lower cost generic and biosimilar drugs.
+Added: In particular, on July 24, 2020 and September 13, 2020, the Trump administration announced several executive orders related to prescription drug pricing that seek to implement several of the administration's proposals.
+Added: The FDA also released a final rule in September 2020 providing guidance for states to build and submit importation plans for drugs from Canada.
+Added: The Trump and Biden administrations both issued executive orders intended to favor government procurement from domestic manufacturers.
+Added: In addition, the Trump administration issued an executive order specifically aimed at the procurement of pharmaceutical products, which instructed the federal government to develop a list of “essential” medicines and then buy those and other medical supplies that are manufactured, including the manufacture of the API, in the United States.
+Added: It is unclear whether this executive order or something similar will be implemented by the Biden Administration.
+Added: Further, in November 2020, HHS finalized a regulation removing safe harbor protection for price reductions from pharmaceutical manufacturers to plan sponsors under Part D, either directly or through pharmacy benefit managers, unless the price reduction is required by law.
+Added: The rule also creates a new safe harbor for price reductions reflected at the point-of-sale, as well as a safe harbor for certain fixed fee arrangements between pharmacy benefit managers and manufacturers.
+Added: The CMS also issued an interim final rule implementing President Trump’s Most Favored Nation executive order, which would tie Medicare Part B payments for certain physician-administered drugs to the lowest price paid in other economically advanced countries, effective January 1, 2021.
+Added: On December 28, 2020, the United States District Court in Northern California issued a nationwide preliminary injunction against implementation of the interim final rule.
+Added: In December 2020, CMS issued a final rule implementing significant manufacturer price reporting changes under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program, including regulations that affect manufacturer-sponsored patient assistance programs subject to pharmacy benefit manager accumulator programs and Best Price reporting related to certain value-based purchasing arrangements.
The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
12 unchanged sentences
Certain countries outside of the United States have a similar process that requires the submission of a clinical trial application much like the IND prior to the commencement of human clinical trials.
−Removed: In the United Kingdom and other countries in the EU, for example, a CTA must be submitted to each country’s national health authority and an independent ethics committee, much like the FDA and IRB, respectively.
+Added: In the United Kingdom (“UK”) and countries in the EU, for example, a Clinical Trial Authorisation, or CTA, must be submitted to each country’s national health authority and an independent ethics committee, much like the FDA and IRB, respectively.
Once the CTA is approved in accordance with a country’s requirements, clinical trial development may proceed.
2 unchanged sentences
In all cases, the clinical trials are conducted in accordance with GCP and the applicable regulatory requirements and the ethical principles that have their origin in the Declaration of Helsinki.
−Removed: To obtain regulatory approval of an investigational drug or biological product under EU regulatory systems, we must submit a marketing authorization application.
−Removed: The application used to file the BLA in the United States is similar to that required in the EU, with the exception of, among other things, country-specific document requirements.
−Removed: For other countries outside of the EU, such as countries in Eastern Europe, Latin America or Asia, the requirements governing the conduct of clinical trials, product licensing, pricing and reimbursement vary from country to country.
+Added: To obtain regulatory approval of an investigational drug or biological product under EU and UK regulatory systems, we must submit a marketing authorization application.
+Added: The application used to file the BLA in the United States is similar to that required in the EU and the UK, with the exception of, among other things, country-specific document requirements.
+Added: For other countries outside of the EU and the UK, such as countries in Eastern Europe, Latin America or Asia, the requirements governing the conduct of clinical trials, product licensing, pricing and reimbursement vary from country to country.
In all cases, again, the clinical trials are conducted in accordance with GCP and the applicable regulatory requirements and the ethical principles that have their origin in the Declaration of Helsinki.
3 unchanged sentences
Typically, the process of obtaining approval of a new therapeutic drug product for inclusion in the ARTG requires compilation of clinical trial data.
−Removed: Clinical trials conducted using “unapproved therapeutic goods” in Australia, being those which have not yet been evaluated by the TGA for quality, safety and efficacy must occur pursuant to either the Clinical Trial Notification, or CTN, or Clinical Trial Exemption, or CTX, process.
+Added: Clinical trials conducted using “unapproved therapeutic goods” in Australia, being those which have not yet been evaluated by the Therapeutic Goods Administration, or the TGA, for quality, safety and efficacy must occur pursuant to either the Clinical Trial Notification, or CTN, or Clinical Trial Exemption, or CTX, process.
The CTN process broadly involves:
2 unchanged sentences
The TGA does not review any data relating to the clinical trial;
−Removed: the institution or organization at which the trial will be conducted, referred to as the “Approving Authority” gives the final approval for the conduct of the trial at the site, having due regard to the advice from the HREC;
−Removed: CTN trials cannot commence until the trial has been notified to the TGA.
+Added: • the institution or organization at which the clinical trial will be conducted, referred to as the “Approving Authority” gives the final approval for the conduct of the clinical trial at the site, having due regard to the advice from the HREC;
+Added: • CTN clinical trials cannot commence until the clinical trial has been notified to the TGA.
Under the CTX process:
• a sponsor submits an application to conduct a clinical trial to the TGA for evaluation and comment;
−Removed: a sponsor cannot commence a CTX trial until written advice has been received from the TGA regarding the application and approval for the conduct of the trial has been obtained from an ethics committee and the institution at which the trial will be conducted.
+Added: • a sponsor cannot commence a CTX clinical trial until written advice has been received from the TGA regarding the application and approval for the conduct of the clinical trial has been obtained from an ethics committee and the institution at which the clinical trial will be conducted.
In each case, it is required that:
7 unchanged sentences
The TGA has developed guidelines for a CTN.
−Removed: Under the CTN process, all material relating to the proposed trial is submitted directly to the HREC of each institution at which the trial is to be conducted.
+Added: Under the CTN process, all material relating to the proposed clinical trial is submitted directly to the HREC of each institution at which the clinical trial is to be conducted.
An HREC is an independent review committee set up under guidelines of the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council.
4 unchanged sentences
The standards for clinical research in Australia are set by the TGA and the National Health and Medical Research Council, and compliance with GCP is mandatory.
−Removed: Guidelines, such as those promulgated by the International Conference on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use, or ICH, are required across all fields, including those related to pharmaceutical quality, nonclinical and clinical data requirements and study designs.
+Added: Guidelines, such as those promulgated by the International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use, or ICH, are required across all fields, including those related to pharmaceutical quality, nonclinical and clinical data requirements and study designs.
The basic requirements for preclinical data to support a first-in- human study under ICH guidelines are applicable in Australia.
Requirements related to adverse event reporting in Australia are similar to those required in other major jurisdictions.
+Added: Employees and Human Capital Resources
As of December 31, 2020, we had 94 full-time employees.
Of these employees, 74 were primarily engaged in research and development activities and 27 have an M.D.
−Removed: None of our employees are represented by a labor union or covered by collective bargaining agreements, and we believe our relationship with our employees is good.
+Added: None of our employees are represented by a labor union or covered by collective bargaining agreements.
+Added: We have never experienced a work stoppage and believe that we have good employee relations.
+Added: We view our diverse employee population and our culture as key to our success.
+Added: Our company culture prioritizes learning, supports growth and empowers us to reach new heights.
+Added: We recruit employees with the skills and training relevant to succeed and thrive in their functional responsibilities.
+Added: We assess the likelihood that a particular candidate will contribute to the Company’s overall goals, and beyond their specifically assigned tasks.
+Added: Depending on the position, our recruitment reach can be local as well as national.
+Added: We provide competitive compensation and best in class benefits that are tailored specifically to the needs and requests of our employees.
+Added: During 2020, we worked to manage through the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and entered 2021 stronger than ever.
+Added: During 2020 all employees were retained at full salary and lab employees’ productivity and safety were a top priority.
+Added: As appropriate, others were provided the option of working remotely or at our facilities with appropriate safeguards.
+Added: We uphold our commitment to shareholders by working hard, being thoughtful about how we use resources and doing the right thing for the company at every turn.
Corporate Information
7 unchanged sentences
Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.