31 unchanged sentences
Closing arguments were held June 2-4, 2025.
−Removed: There is no set deadline for the Federal Court of Canada to issue a decision.
+Added: The matter is awaiting the Court’s decision.
Shaw Breach of Contract Litigation
5 unchanged sentences
On October 14, 2025, Shaw filed its answer to the complaint.
−Removed: Discovery is ongoing.
−Removed: The trial date has not been set.
+Added: Discovery is ongoing and no trial date has been set.
Disney Patent Infringement Litigation
−Removed: U.S Litigation
−Removed: On November 7, 2024, Adeia Technologies, Inc., Adeia Guides Inc., and Adeia Media Holdings LLC (collectively “Adeia”) filed a complaint against The Walt Disney Company, Disney Media and Entertainment Distribution LLC, Disney DTC LLC, Disney Streaming Services LLC, Disney Entertainment & Sports LLC, Disney Platform Distribution, Inc., BAMTech, LLC, Hulu, LLC, and ESPN, Inc.
−Removed: (collectively, “Disney U.S.
−Removed: Defendants”) in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, alleging infringement of six patents (“U.S.
−Removed: Asserted Patents”).
−Removed: On December 29, 2025, the Court granted the parties’ Joint Stipulation and Order of Dismissal, dismissing the case with prejudice.
−Removed: On October 31, 2025, Disney U.S.
−Removed: Defendants filed three petitions for IPR before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) of the U.S.
−Removed: Patent and Trademark Office – one petition against each of three of the U.S.
−Removed: Asserted Patents.
−Removed: On November 5, 2025, Disney U.S.
−Removed: Defendants filed two petitions for IPR – one petition against each of two additional U.S.
−Removed: Asserted Patents.
−Removed: On November 7, 2025, Disney U.S.
−Removed: Defendants filed one petition for IPR against the last of the six U.S.
−Removed: Asserted Patents.
−Removed: On December 24, 2025, following the settlement between the parties, Disney U.S.
−Removed: Defendants filed an Unopposed Motion to Dismiss the Proceeding Pre-Institution in each of the six IPRs.
−Removed: The PTAB has terminated all six IPR petitions.
−Removed: European Litigation
−Removed: On November 7, 2024, Adeia Solutions LLC filed a complaint against The Walt Disney Company Benelux (B.V.), Disney Interactive Studios, Inc., and The Walt Disney Company Limited (collectively, “Disney Europe Defendants”) in the Regional Court of Munich, Germany, alleging infringement of one patent (“German Patent”).
−Removed: On December 23, 2025, Adeia Solutions LLC filed a request to withdraw the complaint following settlement between the parties.
−Removed: The Court has terminated the case.
−Removed: On June 23, 2025, The Walt Disney Company Benelux (B.V.) filed a nullity action in the German Federal Patent Court, challenging the validity of the German Patent.
−Removed: On December 24, 2025, The Walt Disney Company Benelux (B.V.) filed a brief requesting withdrawal of the nullity action following settlement between the parties.
−Removed: The Court has terminated the case.
−Removed: On November 7, 2024, Adeia Guides Inc.
−Removed: (“Adeia Guides”) filed a complaint against the Disney Europe Defendants in the Unified Patent Court (“UPC”) Munich Local Division, Germany, alleging infringement of one patent.
−Removed: On December 23, 2025, Adeia Guides filed a request to withdraw the complaint following settlement between the parties.
−Removed: The Court has terminated the case.
−Removed: On November 7, 2024, Adeia Guides filed a complaint against the Disney Europe Defendants in the UPC The Hague Local Division, The Netherlands, alleging infringement of one patent.
−Removed: On December 23, 2025, Adeia Guides filed a request to withdraw the complaint following settlement between the parties.
−Removed: The Court has terminated the case.
−Removed: Brazil Litigation
−Removed: On November 11, 2024, Adeia Inc.
−Removed: and Adeia Guides Inc.
−Removed: (collectively, “Adeia Brazil Plaintiffs”) filed a complaint against The Walt Disney Company (Brasil) LTDA (“Disney Brazil”) in Rio de Janeiro State Court, Brazil, (“Trial Court”) alleging infringement of four patents (the “Brazil Asserted Patents”) and seeking a preliminary injunction against Disney Brazil for infringement of one of the four Brazil Asserted Patents.
−Removed: On December 23, 2025, Adeia Brazil Plaintiffs filed a request to terminate the case following settlement between the parties.
−Removed: The Court has terminated the case.
−Removed: On January 27, 2025, Disney Brazil filed a patent invalidity lawsuit against Adeia Inc.
−Removed: and Adeia Guides Inc.
−Removed: (collectively, “Adeia Brazil Invalidity Defendants”) at the Brazilian Patent and Trademark Office in Rio de Janeiro Federal Court, Brazil, alleging the Brazil Asserted Patents are invalid.
−Removed: On December 23, 2025, Disney Brazil filed a request to terminate the proceeding following settlement between the parties.
−Removed: The Court has yet to rule on the request to terminate the case.
+Added: During the fourth quarter of 2025, the Company entered into a settlement with The Walt Disney Company and its affiliates resolving the parties’ patent disputes, which were previously described in the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2026.
+Added: As a result, the U.S., European and Brazilian patent infringement actions, related patent validity proceedings, and U.S.
+Added: Patent Trial and Appeal Board inter partes review proceedings between the parties were all dismissed, withdrawn or otherwise terminated as of June 12, 2026.
+Added: No proceedings remain pending.
AMD Patent Infringement Litigation
−Removed: On November 3, 2025, Adeia Semiconductor Bonding Technologies Inc., Adeia Semiconductor Inc., and Adeia Semiconductor Solutions LLC (collectively, “Adeia Semi”) filed a patent infringement complaint against Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
−Removed: (“AMD”) in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (“WDTX 1 Litigation”), alleging infringement of six patents.
−Removed: On January 8, 2026, AMD filed a Motion to Dismiss the complaint.
−Removed: On January 22, 2026, Adeia Semi filed its opposition to AMD’s Motion to Dismiss.
−Removed: On January 29, 2026, AMD filed its reply on the Motion to Dismiss.
−Removed: On March 10, 2026, following the settlement between the parties, the Court dismissed the case with prejudice.
−Removed: On November 3, 2025, Adeia Semiconductor Bonding Technologies Inc.
−Removed: filed a separate patent infringement complaint against AMD in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (“WDTX 2 Litigation”), alleging infringement of four patents.
−Removed: On January 9, 2026, the Court granted AMD’s unopposed motion to stay the proceedings pending a final resolution of the ITC Litigation No.
−Removed: 337-TA-1465 (see below).
−Removed: On March 10, 2026, following the settlement between the parties, the Court dismissed the case with prejudice.
−Removed: On November 17, 2025, Adeia Semiconductor Bonding Technologies Inc.
−Removed: filed a patent infringement complaint against Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., Lenovo (United States) Inc., Lenovo Group Limited, Lenovo Information Products (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., and Super Micro Computer, Inc.
−Removed: in the International Trade Commission (“ITC Litigation”), alleging infringement of the same four patents asserted in the WDTX 2 Litigation.
−Removed: On December 16, 2025, the ITC issued a Notice of Institution of Investigation, assigning the case Investigation No.
−Removed: On March 31, 2026, following the settlement between the parties, the Administrative Law Judge granted the parties’ motion to terminate the ITC Litigation.
+Added: During the first quarter of 2026, the Company entered into a settlement with Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
+Added: (“AMD”) resolving the parties’ patent disputes, which were previously described in the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2026.
+Added: As a result, on March 10, 2026, the related district court actions were dismissed with prejudice and on April 30, 2026, the International Trade Commission investigation was terminated.
+Added: No proceedings remain pending.
DIRECTV Litigation
2 unchanged sentences
and Adeia Media Solutions Inc.
−Removed: (collectively, “Adeia Media”) in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California seeking a declaratory judgment of noninfringement of seven Adeia Media patents and a declaratory judgement of invalidity of three different Adeia Media patents (“NDCA DJ Action”).
+Added: (collectively, “Adeia Media”) in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California seeking a declaratory judgment of noninfringement of seven Adeia Media patents and a declaratory judgment of invalidity of three Adeia Media patents (“NDCA DJ Action”).
On March 13, 2026, Adeia Media filed a motion to dismiss the NDCA DJ Action.
−Removed: A hearing on the motion to dismiss is scheduled for June 18, 2026.
+Added: On June 18, 2026, the Court granted Adeia Media’s motion with leave to amend the complaint.
+Added: The action remains pending.
The trial date has not been set.
SDNY Breach of Contract and Misappropriation of Trade Secrets Action
−Removed: On January 12, 2026, Adeia Media filed a complaint against DIRECTV in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York alleging Breach of Contract and Misappropriation of Trade Secrets Pursuant to The Defend Trade Secrets Act (“DTSA”).
−Removed: DIRECTV’s response to the complaint is due March 27, 2026.
+Added: On January 12, 2026, Adeia Media filed a complaint against DIRECTV in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York alleging breach of contract and misappropriation of trade secrets under the Defend Trade Secrets Act (“DTSA”).
On January 15, 2026, Adeia Media filed a Motion for Preliminary Injunction (“PI Motion”), requesting that the Court order DIRECTV to withdraw the NDCA DJ Action and cease its misuse of Adeia Media’s confidential information.
−Removed: The PI Motion is fully briefed and awaiting a decision by the Court.
−Removed: On April 23, 2026, the Court granted DIRECTV’s request file a motion to dismiss the trade secret misappropriation claim under the DTSA on or before June 4, 2026.
+Added: On July 2, 2026, the Court issued an order denying the PI Motion.
+Added: On April 23, 2026, the Court granted DIRECTV’s request to file a motion to dismiss the DTSA claim.
+Added: On June 4, 2026, DIRECTV filed a motion to dismiss the DTSA claim, and on July 16, 2026, Adeia filed its opposition.
The trial date has not been set.
+Added: CDCA Patent Infringement Litigation
+Added: On July 2, 2026, Adeia Media Holdings Inc.
+Added: and Adeia Technologies Inc.
+Added: (collectively, “Adeia”) filed a complaint against DIRECTV, LLC in the United States District Court for the Central District of California alleging that DIRECTV infringes four patents.
+Added: The trial date has not been set.
DISH Litigation
3 unchanged sentences
The trial date has not been set.
+Added: On June 30, 2026, certain DISH parties filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.
+Added: As a result, this case has been stayed automatically pending the completion of the bankruptcy proceedings.
NDCA Declaratory Judgment Action
2 unchanged sentences
The trial date has not been set.
+Added: On June 30, 2026, certain DISH parties filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy
+Added: On July 9, 2026, the Court issued an order staying this case pending the completion of the DISH bankruptcy proceedings.
+Added: Fubo Litigation
+Added: On July 1, 2026, Adeia Media Holdings Inc.
+Added: (“Adeia”) filed a complaint against FuboTV Inc., Fubo Operations LLC, Fubo Services LLC, and FuboTV Media LLC (f/k/a FuboTV Media Inc.) (collectively, “Fubo”) in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware alleging infringement of four patents.
+Added: The trial date has not been set.
Ri sk Factors
2 unchanged sentences
Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.