What changed in this filing

/stocks — the workspaceLOADING

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

2026-05-06 compared with 2025-11-06 · 73 added, 63 removed, 58 unchanged (70% of the section changed)

15 unchanged sentences

(“Videotron”) in Toronto, Canada, alleging infringement of four patents (the “Videotron Litigation”).

On July 21, 2021, the Federal Court of Canada held a case management conference in the Videotron Litigation, shortly before which Videotron filed a motion to strike various portions of the statement of claim.

On March 22, 2022, the Court issued an order on Videotron’s motion to strike, dismissing the motion in its entirety.

On April 1, 2022, Videotron filed an appeal of the Court’s order dismissing Videotron’s motion to strike.

On June 30, 2022, the Court of Appeal issued its decision in Videotron’s appeal in which it ruled in favor of Adeia Guides and dismissed Videotron’s appeal.

The trial commenced on February 3, 2025.

Closing arguments were held April 15-17, 2025.

On October 24, 2025, the Court issued a decision in the case and awarded Adeia a permanent injunction, finding that Videotron’s Helix, illico+ and illico video platforms infringe an Adeia media patent.

The Court also ruled that Videotron’s Helix video platform infringes an additional Adeia media patent and awarded Adeia damages for both patents.

On October 24, 2025, the Federal Court of Canada issued a decision in the case and awarded Adeia Guides a permanent injunction, finding that Videotron’s Helix, illico+ and illico video platforms infringe an Adeia Guides patent.

The Court also ruled that Videotron’s Helix video platform infringes an additional Adeia Guides patent and awarded Adeia Guides damages for both patents.

Two other patents asserted in the case were found invalid.

The parties have 30 days to file a notice of appeal.

On November 24, 2025, Adeia Guides filed a Notice of Appeal with the Federal Court of Appeal of Canada appealing portions of the decision of the Federal Court of Canada.

On December 4, 2025, Videotron filed a Notice of Cross-Appeal.

No date has been set yet for a hearing on the appeal.

Bell Patent Infringement Litigation

2 unchanged sentences

(collectively, “Defendants”) in Toronto, Canada, alleging infringement of four patents (the “Bell Litigation”).

The Defendants filed a motion to strike various portions of the statement of claim in the Bell Litigation.

On March 22, 2022, the Court issued an order on Defendants’ motion to strike, dismissing-in-part and granting-in-part.

On April 1, 2022, the Defendants filed a Notice of Motion to Appeal the Court’s order on Defendants’ motion to strike.

On June 30, 2022, the Court of Appeal issued its decision in Defendants' appeal in which it ruled in Adeia Media’s favor and dismissed Defendants’ appeal.

On September 30, 2022, Defendants filed a motion for bifurcation, asking the Federal Court of Canada to bifurcate the case into two phases:

a first phase related to liability and injunction and second phase addressing damages if liability is found.

The Court held a hearing on the motion for bifurcation on December 12, 2022.

On February 15, 2023, the Court issued an order granting the motion for bifurcation in which the Court bifurcated the liability and injunction phase from the damages quantification phase of the case.

3 unchanged sentences

Shaw Breach of Contract Litigation

On October 2, 2023, Adeia Guides Inc., Adeia Media Solutions Inc., and Adeia Media Holdings LLC (collectively, “Adeia Media Companies”) filed a complaint against Shaw Cablesystems G.P.

On October 2, 2023, Adeia Guides Inc., Adeia Media Solutions Inc., and Adeia Media Holdings LLC (collectively, “Adeia Media”) filed a complaint against Shaw Cablesystems G.P.

and Shaw Satellite G.P.

(together, “Shaw”) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleging breach of contract by Shaw for failure to pay royalties owed to Adeia Media Companies under the license agreement between the parties.

(together “Shaw”) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleging breach of contract by Shaw for failure to pay royalties owed to Adeia Media under the license agreement between the parties.

On October 8, 2024, Shaw filed a motion to dismiss the complaint.

1 unchanged sentence

On October 14, 2025, Shaw filed its answer to the complaint.

Discovery is ongoing.

The trial date has not been set.

1 unchanged sentence

U.S Litigation

On November 7, 2024, Adeia Technologies Inc., (“Adeia Technologies”) and Adeia Media filed a complaint against The Walt Disney Company, Disney Media and Entertainment Distribution LLC, Disney DTC LLC, Disney Streaming Services LLC, Disney Entertainment & Sports LLC, Disney Platform Distribution, Inc., BAMTech, LLC, Hulu, LLC, and ESPN, Inc.

On November 7, 2024, Adeia Technologies, Inc., Adeia Guides Inc., and Adeia Media Holdings LLC (collectively “Adeia”) filed a complaint against The Walt Disney Company, Disney Media and Entertainment Distribution LLC, Disney DTC LLC, Disney Streaming Services LLC, Disney Entertainment & Sports LLC, Disney Platform Distribution, Inc., BAMTech, LLC, Hulu, LLC, and ESPN, Inc.

(collectively, “Disney U.S.

1 unchanged sentence

Asserted Patents”).

On January 16, 2025, Disney U.S.

Defendants filed a motion to dismiss two of the six asserted patents as invalid under 35 U.S.C.

Adeia Technologies and Adeia Media’s opposition to the motion to dismiss was filed on February 13, 2025.

Defendants’ reply was filed February 27, 2025.

On September 12, 2025, the Court denied Disney’s motion to dismiss.

On September 26, 2025, Disney U.S.

Defendants served its answer to the complaint.

Trial has been set for June 7-11, 2027.

On December 29, 2025, the Court granted the parties’ Joint Stipulation and Order of Dismissal, dismissing the case with prejudice.

On October 31, 2025, Disney U.S.

5 unchanged sentences

Asserted Patents.

No dates have been set yet by the PTAB.

On November 7, 2025, Disney U.S.

Defendants filed one petition for IPR against the last of the six U.S.

Asserted Patents.

On December 24, 2025, following the settlement between the parties, Disney U.S.

Defendants filed an Unopposed Motion to Dismiss the Proceeding Pre-Institution in each of the six IPRs.

The PTAB has terminated all six IPR petitions.

European Litigation

On November 7, 2024, Adeia Solutions LLC (“Adeia Solutions”) filed a complaint against The Walt Disney Company Benelux (BV), Disney Interactive Studios, Inc., and The Walt Disney Company Limited (collectively, “Disney Europe Defendants”) in the Regional Court of Munich, Germany, alleging infringement of one patent.

Disney Europe Defendants filed their response to the complaint on June 30, 2025.

Adeia Solutions filed its reply to Disney Europe Defendants’ response to the complaint on October 14, 2025.

The oral hearing on the merits is set for February 25, 2026.

On November 7, 2024, Adeia Guides filed a complaint against the Disney Europe Defendants in the Unified Patent Court (“UPC”) Munich Local Division, Germany, alleging infringement of one patent.

Disney Europe Defendants filed their Statement of Defence and Counterclaim for Revocation on March 10, 2025.

Adeia Guides filed its reply to Disney Europe Defendants’ Statement of Defence and Counterclaim for Revocation on May 12, 2025.

Oral hearing on the merits is set for January 15, 2026.

On November 7, 2024, Adeia Guides filed a complaint against Disney Europe Defendants in the UPC The Hague Local Division, The Netherlands, alleging infringement of one patent.

Disney Europe Defendants filed their Statement of Defence and Counterclaim for Revocation on March 5, 2025.

Adeia Guides filed its reply to the Disney Europe Defendants’ Statement of Defence and Counterclaim for Revocation on May 21, 2025.

Oral hearing on the merits is set for January 29, 2026.

On November 7, 2024, Adeia Solutions LLC filed a complaint against The Walt Disney Company Benelux (B.V.), Disney Interactive Studios, Inc., and The Walt Disney Company Limited (collectively, “Disney Europe Defendants”) in the Regional Court of Munich, Germany, alleging infringement of one patent (“German Patent”).

On December 23, 2025, Adeia Solutions LLC filed a request to withdraw the complaint following settlement between the parties.

The Court has terminated the case.

On June 23, 2025, The Walt Disney Company Benelux (B.V.) filed a nullity action in the German Federal Patent Court, challenging the validity of the German Patent.

On December 24, 2025, The Walt Disney Company Benelux (B.V.) filed a brief requesting withdrawal of the nullity action following settlement between the parties.

The Court has terminated the case.

On November 7, 2024, Adeia Guides Inc.

(“Adeia Guides”) filed a complaint against the Disney Europe Defendants in the Unified Patent Court (“UPC”) Munich Local Division, Germany, alleging infringement of one patent.

On December 23, 2025, Adeia Guides filed a request to withdraw the complaint following settlement between the parties.

The Court has terminated the case.

On November 7, 2024, Adeia Guides filed a complaint against the Disney Europe Defendants in the UPC The Hague Local Division, The Netherlands, alleging infringement of one patent.

On December 23, 2025, Adeia Guides filed a request to withdraw the complaint following settlement between the parties.

The Court has terminated the case.

Brazil Litigation

2 unchanged sentences

(collectively, “Adeia Brazil Plaintiffs”) filed a complaint against The Walt Disney Company (Brasil) LTDA (“Disney Brazil”) in Rio de Janeiro State Court, Brazil, (“Trial Court”) alleging infringement of four patents (the “Brazil Asserted Patents”) and seeking a preliminary injunction against Disney Brazil for infringement of one of the four Brazil Asserted Patents.

On November 14, 2024, the Trial Court granted the preliminary injunction (“PI Decision”).

On December 11, 2024, Disney Brazil filed an interlocutory appeal and temporary restraining order against the PI Decision in the Court of Appeals of the State of Rio de Janeiro (“Court of Appeals”), which was provisionally granted on December 19, 2024.

On July 24, 2025, the Court of Appeals dismissed Disney Brazil’s appeal of the PI Decision and reinstated the preliminary injunction.

Trial date has not been set.

On December 23, 2025, Adeia Brazil Plaintiffs filed a request to terminate the case following settlement between the parties.

The Court has terminated the case.

On January 27, 2025, Disney Brazil filed a patent invalidity lawsuit against Adeia Inc.

and Adeia Guides Inc.

(collectively.

“Adeia Brazil Invalidity Defendants”) at the Brazilian Patent and Trademark Office in Rio de Janeiro Federal Court, Brazil, alleging the Brazil Asserted Patents are invalid.

Adeia Brazil Invalidity Defendants filed their response to Disney Brazil’s invalidity complaint on September 5, 2025.

Trial date has not been set.

Altice Declaratory Judgment of Noninfringement Litigation

On June 27, 2025, Altice USA, Inc., Cequel Communications, LLC and CSC Holdings, LLC (collectively, “Altice”) filed a complaint against Adeia Inc, Adeia Guides Inc., Adeia Media Holdings LLC, Adeia Technologies Inc.

and Adeia Media Solutions Inc.

(collectively, “Adeia Group”) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York seeking a declaratory judgment of noninfringement of ten of our patents.

On September 29, 2025, Altice filed a notice of voluntary dismissal with prejudice pursuant to a settlement and patent license agreement between the parties.

The case was dismissed with prejudice on October 1, 2025.

(collectively, “Adeia Brazil Invalidity Defendants”) at the Brazilian Patent and Trademark Office in Rio de Janeiro Federal Court, Brazil, alleging the Brazil Asserted Patents are invalid.

On December 23, 2025, Disney Brazil filed a request to terminate the proceeding following settlement between the parties.

The Court has yet to rule on the request to terminate the case.

AMD Patent Infringement Litigation

On November 3, 2025, Adeia Semiconductor Bonding Technologies Inc., Adeia Semiconductor Inc., and Adeia Semiconductor Solutions LLC filed a patent infringement complaint against Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.

in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (“WDTX 1 Litigation”), alleging infringement of six patents.

No dates have been set by the Court.

On November 3, 2025, Adeia Semiconductor Bonding Technologies Inc., Adeia Semiconductor Inc., and Adeia Semiconductor Solutions LLC (collectively, “Adeia Semi”) filed a patent infringement complaint against Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.

(“AMD”) in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (“WDTX 1 Litigation”), alleging infringement of six patents.

On January 8, 2026, AMD filed a Motion to Dismiss the complaint.

On January 22, 2026, Adeia Semi filed its opposition to AMD’s Motion to Dismiss.

On January 29, 2026, AMD filed its reply on the Motion to Dismiss.

On March 10, 2026, following the settlement between the parties, the Court dismissed the case with prejudice.

On November 3, 2025, Adeia Semiconductor Bonding Technologies Inc.

filed a separate patent infringement complaint against Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.

in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (“WDTX 2 Litigation”), alleging infringement of four patents.

No dates have been set by the Court.

filed a separate patent infringement complaint against AMD in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (“WDTX 2 Litigation”), alleging infringement of four patents.

On January 9, 2026, the Court granted AMD’s unopposed motion to stay the proceedings pending a final resolution of the ITC Litigation No.

337-TA-1465 (see below).

On March 10, 2026, following the settlement between the parties, the Court dismissed the case with prejudice.

On November 17, 2025, Adeia Semiconductor Bonding Technologies Inc.

filed a patent infringement complaint against Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., Lenovo (United States) Inc., Lenovo Group Limited, Lenovo Information Products (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., and Super Micro Computer, Inc.

in the International Trade Commission (“ITC Litigation”), alleging infringement of the same four patents asserted in the WDTX 2 Litigation.

On December 16, 2025, the ITC issued a Notice of Institution of Investigation, assigning the case Investigation No.

On March 31, 2026, following the settlement between the parties, the Administrative Law Judge granted the parties’ motion to terminate the ITC Litigation.

DIRECTV Litigation

NDCA Declaratory Judgment Action

On December 29, 2025, DIRECTV LLC (“DIRECTV”) filed a complaint against Adeia Inc, Adeia Guides Inc., Adeia Media Holdings LLC, Adeia Technologies Inc.

and Adeia Media Solutions Inc.

(collectively, “Adeia Media”) in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California seeking a declaratory judgment of noninfringement of seven Adeia Media patents and a declaratory judgement of invalidity of three different Adeia Media patents (“NDCA DJ Action”).

On March 13, 2026, Adeia Media filed a motion to dismiss the NDCA DJ Action.

A hearing on the motion to dismiss is scheduled for June 18, 2026.

The trial date has not been set.

SDNY Breach of Contract and Misappropriation of Trade Secrets Action

On January 12, 2026, Adeia Media filed a complaint against DIRECTV in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York alleging Breach of Contract and Misappropriation of Trade Secrets Pursuant to The Defend Trade Secrets Act (“DTSA”).

DIRECTV’s response to the complaint is due March 27, 2026.

On January 15, 2026, Adeia Media filed a Motion for Preliminary Injunction (“PI Motion”), requesting that the Court order DIRECTV to withdraw the NDCA DJ Action and cease its misuse of Adeia Media’s confidential information.

The PI Motion is fully briefed and awaiting a decision by the Court.

On April 23, 2026, the Court granted DIRECTV’s request file a motion to dismiss the trade secret misappropriation claim under the DTSA on or before June 4, 2026.

The trial date has not been set.

DISH Litigation

Colorado Patent Infringement Litigation

Adeia Technologies Inc., Adeia Media Holdings Inc., and Adeia Media Solutions Inc.

(collectively “Adeia”) filed a complaint against DISH Network Corp., DISH Media Sales LLC, DISH DBS Corp., EchoStar Corp., Sling TV LLC, and Sling TV Holding LLC (collectively, the “DISH Defendants”) in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado on April 1, 2026 (EDT), from and after which time the DISH Defendants were unlicensed to Adeia’s patents, alleging the DISH Defendants infringe five patents.

The trial date has not been set.

NDCA Declaratory Judgment Action

DISH Network LLC and Sling TV LLC filed a complaint against Adeia Inc, Adeia Guides Inc., Adeia Media Holdings Inc., Adeia Technologies Inc., and Adeia Media Solutions Inc.

(collectively, “Adeia Media”) in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California on April 1, 2026 seeking a declaratory judgment of noninfringement and/or invalidity of ten Adeia Media patents.

The trial date has not been set.

Ri sk Factors

1 unchanged sentence

of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, which is incorporated by reference herein.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities, Use of Proceeds , and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Not applicable.

Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Not applicable.

Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.

What changed 10-Q

Item 1. Legal Proceedings