6 unchanged sentences
Patent Infringement Litigation
−Removed: In the ordinary course of our IP licensing business, we engage in litigation to protect our IP from infringement.
+Added: In the ordinary course of our business, we engage in litigation to protect our IP from infringement.
While litigation is never our preference, and we prefer to reach mutually agreeable commercial licensing arrangements with third parties, it is sometimes a necessary step to effectively protect our investment in our IP.
9 unchanged sentences
On April 1, 2022, Videotron filed an appeal of the Court’s order dismissing Videotron’s motion to strike.
−Removed: On June 30, 2022, the Court of Appeal issued its decision in Videotron’s appeal in which it ruled in Adeia Guides’s favor and dismissed Videotron’s appeal.
+Added: On June 30, 2022, the Court of Appeal issued its decision in Videotron’s appeal in which it ruled in favor of Adeia Guides and dismissed Videotron’s appeal.
The trial commenced on February 3, 2025.
Closing arguments were held April 15-17, 2025.
−Removed: There is no set deadline for the Federal Court of Canada to issue a decision.
+Added: On October 24, 2025, the Court issued a decision in the case and awarded Adeia a permanent injunction, finding that Videotron’s Helix, illico+ and illico video platforms infringe an Adeia media patent.
+Added: The Court also ruled that Videotron’s Helix video platform infringes an additional Adeia media patent and awarded Adeia damages for both patents.
+Added: Two other patents asserted in the case were found invalid.
+Added: The parties have 30 days to file a notice of appeal.
Bell Patent Infringement Litigation
18 unchanged sentences
On October 8, 2024, Shaw filed a motion to dismiss the complaint.
−Removed: The Court has yet to rule on Shaw’s motion to dismiss.
+Added: On September 29, 2025, the Court denied Shaw’s motion to dismiss Adeia Media Companies’ breach of contract claim and granted Shaw’s motion to dismiss the declaratory relief claim as duplicative.
+Added: On October 14, 2025, Shaw filed its answer to the complaint.
The trial date has not been set.
Disney Patent Infringement Litigation
+Added: U.S Litigation
On November 7, 2024, Adeia Technologies Inc., (“Adeia Technologies”) and Adeia Media filed a complaint against The Walt Disney Company, Disney Media and Entertainment Distribution LLC, Disney DTC LLC, Disney Streaming Services LLC, Disney Entertainment & Sports LLC, Disney Platform Distribution, Inc., BAMTech, LLC, Hulu, LLC, and ESPN, Inc.
(collectively, “Disney U.S.
−Removed: Defendants”) in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, alleging infringement of six patents.
+Added: Defendants”) in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, alleging infringement of six patents (“U.S.
+Added: Asserted Patents”).
On January 16, 2025, Disney U.S.
2 unchanged sentences
Defendants’ reply was filed February 27, 2025.
−Removed: The Court has yet to rule on Disney U.S.
−Removed: Defendants’ motion to dismiss.
+Added: On September 12, 2025, the Court denied Disney’s motion to dismiss.
+Added: On September 26, 2025, Disney U.S.
+Added: Defendants served its answer to the complaint.
Trial has been set for June 7-11, 2027.
+Added: On October 31, 2025, Disney U.S.
+Added: Defendants filed three petitions for IPR before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) of the U.S.
+Added: Patent and Trademark Office – one petition against each of three of the U.S.
+Added: Asserted Patents.
+Added: On November 5, 2025, Disney U.S.
+Added: Defendants filed two petitions for IPR – one petition against each of two additional U.S.
+Added: Asserted Patents.
+Added: No dates have been set yet by the PTAB.
+Added: European Litigation
On November 7, 2024, Adeia Solutions LLC (“Adeia Solutions”) filed a complaint against The Walt Disney Company Benelux (BV), Disney Interactive Studios, Inc., and The Walt Disney Company Limited (collectively, “Disney Europe Defendants”) in the Regional Court of Munich, Germany, alleging infringement of one patent.
Disney Europe Defendants filed their response to the complaint on June 30, 2025.
−Removed: Adeia Solutions’ reply to Disney Europe Defendants’ response to the complaint is due September 30, 2025.
+Added: Adeia Solutions filed its reply to Disney Europe Defendants’ response to the complaint on October 14, 2025.
The oral hearing on the merits is set for February 25, 2026.
6 unchanged sentences
Adeia Guides filed its reply to the Disney Europe Defendants’ Statement of Defence and Counterclaim for Revocation on May 21, 2025.
−Removed: Oral hearing on the merits has not been set yet.
−Removed: On November 11, 2024, Adeia Guides filed a complaint against The Walt Disney Company (Brasil) LTDA (“Disney Brazil”) in Rio de Janeiro State Court, Brazil, alleging infringement of four patents (the “Brazil Asserted Patents”).
−Removed: Disney Brazil’s answer to the complaint was filed on January 27, 2025.
−Removed: Adeia Guides filed its rebuttal to Disney Brazil’s answer to the complaint on May 15, 2025.
+Added: Oral hearing on the merits is set for January 29, 2026.
+Added: Brazil Litigation
+Added: On November 11, 2024, Adeia Inc.
+Added: and Adeia Guides Inc.
+Added: (collectively, “Adeia Brazil Plaintiffs”) filed a complaint against The Walt Disney Company (Brasil) LTDA (“Disney Brazil”) in Rio de Janeiro State Court, Brazil, (“Trial Court”) alleging infringement of four patents (the “Brazil Asserted Patents”) and seeking a preliminary injunction against Disney Brazil for infringement of one of the four Brazil Asserted Patents.
+Added: On November 14, 2024, the Trial Court granted the preliminary injunction (“PI Decision”).
+Added: On December 11, 2024, Disney Brazil filed an interlocutory appeal and temporary restraining order against the PI Decision in the Court of Appeals of the State of Rio de Janeiro (“Court of Appeals”), which was provisionally granted on December 19, 2024.
+Added: On July 24, 2025, the Court of Appeals dismissed Disney Brazil’s appeal of the PI Decision and reinstated the preliminary injunction.
+Added: Trial date has not been set.
On January 27, 2025, Disney Brazil filed a patent invalidity lawsuit against Adeia Inc.
2 unchanged sentences
“Adeia Brazil Invalidity Defendants”) at the Brazilian Patent and Trademark Office in Rio de Janeiro Federal Court, Brazil, alleging the Brazil Asserted Patents are invalid.
−Removed: Adeia Brazil Invalidity Defendants’ response to Disney Brazil’s invalidity complaint is due September 5, 2025.
+Added: Adeia Brazil Invalidity Defendants filed their response to Disney Brazil’s invalidity complaint on September 5, 2025.
+Added: Trial date has not been set.
Altice Declaratory Judgment of Noninfringement Litigation
2 unchanged sentences
(collectively, “Adeia Group”) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York seeking a declaratory judgment of noninfringement of ten of our patents.
−Removed: The date for Adeia Group to respond to Altice’s complaint and the trial date have not been set yet.
+Added: On September 29, 2025, Altice filed a notice of voluntary dismissal with prejudice pursuant to a settlement and patent license agreement between the parties.
+Added: The case was dismissed with prejudice on October 1, 2025.
+Added: AMD Patent Infringement Litigation
+Added: On November 3, 2025, Adeia Semiconductor Bonding Technologies Inc., Adeia Semiconductor Inc., and Adeia Semiconductor Solutions LLC filed a patent infringement complaint against Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
+Added: in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (“WDTX 1 Litigation”), alleging infringement of six patents.
+Added: No dates have been set by the Court.
+Added: On November 3, 2025, Adeia Semiconductor Bonding Technologies Inc.
+Added: filed a separate patent infringement complaint against Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
+Added: in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (“WDTX 2 Litigation”), alleging infringement of four patents.
+Added: No dates have been set by the Court.
Ri sk Factors
8 unchanged sentences
Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.