Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Disclosure controls are procedures that are designed
with the objective of ensuring that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act, such as this Report,
is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time period specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls
are also designed with the objective of ensuring that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our management
evaluated, with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial and accounting officer, the effectiveness
of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2025, pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) under the Exchange Act. Based upon that
evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial and accounting officer concluded that, as of December 31, 2025, our
disclosure controls and procedures were not effective because of the identification of a material weakness in our internal control over
financial reporting described below. In light of this material weakness, we performed additional analysis as deemed necessary to ensure
that our financial statements were prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We do not expect that our disclosure controls
and procedures will prevent all errors and all instances of fraud. Disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well conceived and
operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the disclosure controls and procedures are met.
Further, the design of disclosure controls and procedures must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits
must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all disclosure controls and procedures, no evaluation
of disclosure controls and procedures can provide absolute assurance that we have detected all our control deficiencies and instances
of fraud, if any. The design of disclosure controls and procedures also is based partly on certain assumptions about the likelihood of
future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.
Management’s Report on Internal Controls
Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing
and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for us. Under the supervision and with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, our management assessed
the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025 based on criteria specified in Internal Control-Integrated
Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on our assessment, our management,
including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, concluded that, as of December 31, 2025, our internal control over
financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2025. As previously disclosed, a material weakness exists in the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting related to ineffective controls over period end financial disclosure and reporting processes,
including not timely performing certain reconciliations and the completeness and accuracy of those reconciliations, and lack of effectiveness
of controls over accurate accounting and financial reporting and reviewing the underlying financial statement elements, and recording
incorrect journal entries that also did not have the sufficient review and approval.
75
Notwithstanding the identified material weaknesses,
discussed below, management, including the certifying officers, believes that the financial statements contained in this Report filing
fairly present, in all material respects, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented in conformity
with GAAP.
Material Weaknesses
A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination
of control deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement
of our annual or interim consolidated financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
As previously disclosed, a material weakness exists
in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting related to ineffective controls over period end financial disclosure
and reporting processes, including not timely performing certain reconciliations and the completeness and accuracy of those reconciliations,
and lack of effectiveness of controls over accurate accounting and financial reporting and reviewing the underlying financial statement
elements resulting in material adjustments that impacted revenue, expenses, assets, and liabilities in the financial statements, and recording
incorrect journal entries that also did not have the sufficient review and approval. The control deficiencies resulted in and could result
in a future misstatement in our accounts or disclosures that would result in a material misstatement to our financial statements that
would not be prevented or detected. Accordingly, we determined that these control deficiencies constitute material weaknesses.
We are in the early stages of designing and implementing
a plan to remediate the material weaknesses identified. Our plans include the following:
● Designing
and implementing a risk assessment process supporting the identification of risks.
● Implementing systems and controls to enhance our review of significant accounting transactions and other
new technical accounting and financial reporting issues and preparing and reviewing accounting memoranda addressing these issues.
● Improving our internal control policies and procedures to specifically address controls around segregation
of duties, cybersecurity, user access reviews, and changes in management.
● Implementing specific user access, segregation of duties and change management controls within our financial
reporting IT systems.
● Hiring additional experienced accounting, financial reporting and internal control personnel and changing
roles and responsibilities of our personnel as we transition to being a public company and are required to comply with Section 404 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (“Section 404”). We are in the process of hiring additional resources and we are engaging with a third-party
consulting firm to assist us with our formal internal control plan and to provide accounting services related to complex accounting transactions.
● Implementing controls to enable an effective and timely review of period-end close procedures.
● Implementing controls to enable an accurate and timely review of accounting records that support our accounting
processes and maintain documents for internal accounting reviews.
76
Management has considered and reviewed the errors
which occurred in revenue and cost of revenues cutoff, accounts payable, accrued liabilities, stock compensation, expense classification,
prepaid expenses, operating lease cash flow classification and accounting for finance lease arrangements. Management has determined that
controls are not designed effectively in these areas. To mitigate future misstatements in these areas management will implement the following
procedures at the end of each reporting period:
1. Accounts Payable – Review the accounts payable with the executive team to inquire about any
invoices not sent to accounts payable.
2. Accrued Liabilities – Review the accrued liabilities detail with the executive team to determine
if there are any expenses/liabilities for which the company should accrue an expense which has not yet been recognized.
3. Stock-Based Compensation – Review with the CEO and legal counsel the list of stock grants
which have been made and ask if there have been any other grants made (paper issued to employees or vendors) which should be included
in the analysis.
4. Classification of Expenses – Review the expense classification with the executive team to
determine all expenses are properly classified.
5. Classification of Financing Agreements – Review the financing agreements with the executive
team to determine proper classification of the agreements as debt or finance lease.
6. Prepaid Expenses – Review prepaid expenses with the executive team to determine if all prepaid
expenses have been properly recorded for future services to be rendered and subsequently amortized.
7. Revenue and Cost of Revenues Cutoff – Review revenue and related cost of revenues with executive
team to determine if revenue and related cost of revenues sold is properly recognized.
We cannot assure you that these measures will
remediate the material weaknesses described above. The implementation of these remediation measures is in the early stages and will require
validation and testing of the design and operating effectiveness of our internal controls over a sustained period of financial reporting
cycles and, as a result, the timing of when we will be able to fully remediate the material weaknesses is uncertain. If the steps we take
do not remediate the material weaknesses in a timely manner, there could be a reasonable possibility that these control deficiencies or
others may result in a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements that would not be prevented or detected on
a timely basis. This, in turn, could jeopardize our ability to comply with our reporting obligations, limit our ability to access the
capital markets and adversely impact our stock price.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial
Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control
over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) during the most recent fiscal
quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. Further,
the design of disclosure controls and procedures must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits must be considered
relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all disclosure controls and procedures, no evaluation of disclosure controls
and procedures can provide absolute assurance that we have detected all our control deficiencies and instances of fraud, if any. The design
of disclosure controls and procedures also is based partly on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can
be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION.
Insider Trading Arrangements
During the quarter ended December 31, 2025, none
of our directors or officers adopted or terminated any contract, instruction or written plan for the purchase or sale of our securities
to satisfy the affirmative defense conditions of “Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” or any “non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement”.
ITEM 9C. DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN
JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS.
Not applicable.
77
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.
Our officers and directors are as follows:
Name
Age
Position
Timothy Bridgewater
65
Chief Executive Officer and Director
Cannon Holbrook
54
Chief Financial Officer
Kalen Larsen
32
Chief Operating Officer
Brandon Bridgewater
31
Chief Sales Officer
Stirling Adams
61
General Counsel and Secretary of the Board
Dr. Abigail M. Allen
41
Director
James P. Benson
66
Director
Neil Bush
71
Director
Mark M. Jacobs
64
Director
Timothy Bridgewater. Mr. Bridgewater
has served as Sunergy’s Chief Executive Officer and chairman of the board since its creation in October 2021. He previously served
as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer from October 2021 until August 2024. Mr. Bridgewater also served as a founder and manager
for Sunergy’s predecessor company Sun First Energy since October 2019 until the Contribution of Sun First Energy, LLC into Sunergy
in October 2021. From July 2002 to the present, Mr. Bridgewater has been a founder and managing director of Capitol Financial Strategies,
LLC (also known as Interlink Capital Strategies), an investment advisory services company, where he has advised on debt and private equity
investments in industries ranging from mining, building materials, renewable energy, and automotive component manufacturing to electronics
and software technologies in the U.S. and Asia. Mr. Bridgewater is the manager of Sunergy Solar LLC. From October 2018 to September 2020,
Mr. Bridgewater held the position of manager at Micro Bolt, an energy development company. Since April 2020, he has served as a manager
at Prometheus Power Partners, LLC, a commercial and utility-scale solar energy development company. From November 2019 to April 2021,
Mr. Bridgewater served as the Chief Financial Officer of Tintic Consolidated Metals, LLC, a mining company, and from November 2019 to
November 2021, he served as a Vice President for that company. Mr. Bridgewater earned his B.S. in Finance from Brigham Young University
and completed graduate studies in International Economics from University of Utah. We believe that Mr. Bridgewater is qualified to serve
both as a member of our management team and the Board because of his visionary leadership of Sunergy from inception to date, his experience
in energy development, and his over 30 years of commercial and international banking, international finance and business development experience
working in the U.S., Asia and Latin America.
Cannon Holbrook. Mr. Holbrook began
serving as Zeo’s Chief Financial Officer on August 20, 2024. He initially joined the Company in March 2024, serving as advisor to
the Chief Executive Officer during the Company’s de-SPAC process and, since that time, has lead its accounting, finance, and treasury
functions as well as building out its external reporting processes. Mr. Holbrook brings over two decades of experience in finance and
accounting to the Company. Throughout his career, he has demonstrated expertise in strategic planning, mergers and acquisitions, and capital
raising. He has managed accounting operations for global entities, implemented shared services, and developed and driven process improvements
that have yielded significant cost savings and operational efficiencies. Prior to joining the Company as CFO, Mr. Holbrook served as the
advisor to the CEO from March to August 2024. While in this role, he led the Company’s accounting, finance, and treasury functions,
helped the Company complete its de-SPAC combination in March 2024, and built out external reporting processes. Before joining our Company,
Mr. Holbrook served as the CFO of Hawx Pest Control, a company in the business of residential pest services. While there, he led accounting,
finance, and treasury functions, helped the company increase its revenue, and helped to close a major private equity financing. Prior
to this, from September 2020 to December 2021, Mr. Holbrook served as the Head of Finance in Built Bar, a food manufacturer. In this role,
he implemented key financial reporting functions and helped raise debt and equity financing. From July to September 2020, he was the Consulting
CFO of Access CFO, a business that provides outsourced CFO services. While there, he drove company responses to quality of earnings processes
and planned and drove preparation for a company audit. From December 2017 to July 2020, Mr. Holbrook was the VP of Accounting and Finance
at HZO, Inc., a nanotechnology manufacturer. While there, he implemented accounting and finance systems and processes necessary to enable
the company to meet needs through explosive growth, completed an audit, implemented automated accounting processes, and raised debt and
equity financing.
78
Kalen Larsen. Mr. Larsen serves
as Zeo’s Chief Operating Officer, overseeing regional sales, dealer relations, operations, and process enhancements. He served as
Sunergy’s Chief of Sales and Marketing from October 2021 until Closing. In September 2019, he co-founded Sun First Energy and co-managed
sales and operations there until its Contribution that formed Sunergy in October 2021. Mr. Larsen began his solar career in October 2016
at Vivint Solar, LLC and worked there until October 2017. He worked at and co-managed a sales office at Vivint Inc. from October 2017
to March 2019, and subsequently, he managed a sales office for Atlantic Key Energy, LLC from March 2019 to October 2019. Mr. Larsen holds
an associate degree from Weber State University with an emphasis in Spanish. We believe Mr. Larsen is qualified to serve as a member of
our management team because of his sales and operations experience and proven track record in the solar energy industry.
Brandon Bridgewater. Mr. Bridgewater
has served as Sunergy’s Chief Sales Officer since October, 2021 and is the son of Timothy Bridgewater, Zeo’s Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Bridgewater co-founded Sun First Energy, LLC, as its President and Chief Sales Officer, in September 2019
until its Contribution that formed Sunergy in October 2021. From September 2017 to December 2018, Mr. Bridgewater served as a Sales Manager
at Vivint Smart Home, Inc., a smart home company in the United States and Canada. From August 2015 to September 2017, he served as an
Area Manager for Aptive Environmental, LLC, a pest control solution company. Mr. Bridgewater earned his Bachelor of Science in Business
Finance (with an emphasis in Real Estate) from Brigham Young University’s Marriott School of Business in 2019. We believe that Mr.
Bridgewater is qualified to serve as a member of our management team because of his track record in the solar energy industry and range
of sales experience.
Stirling Adams. Mr. Adams serves
as Zeo’s General Counsel and Secretary. Mr. Adams brings 30 years of legal experience to the executive team. Just prior to becoming
General Counsel and Secretary, he worked as a sole practitioner attorney since November 2022, focusing on renewable energy and nuclear
energy ventures and financing. From August 2016 to October 2022, he served as Vice President, Associate General Counsel, and Head of Intellectual
Property at Micro Focus International plc (now owned by OpenText Corporation), where he oversaw the company’s efforts to develop
and protect intellectual property. Prior to that, he spent 21 years as in-house counsel at Novell, Inc., which was acquired by Micro Focus
in 2014 through The Attachmate Group, where he served in various roles, including at times supervising legal affairs for one or more of
Novell’s business units, for its consulting services arm, and for its Latin American and emerging markets businesses. Throughout
most of his career, Mr. Adams has been engaged in international business transactions, technology licensing, and M&A transactions.
He has lived and worked in Europe, South America, and China. He has taught as an adjunct professor of law at Brigham Young University,
and holds a J.D. degree from Boston University, along with a B.S. in Computer Science and Statistics from Brigham Young University. We
believe that Mr. Adams is qualified to serve as a member of our management team because of his extensive legal expertise.
Dr. Abigail M. Allen . Dr. Allen
serves as a director of Zeo. Dr. Allen is a tenured associate professor of accounting at the Marriott School of Management at Brigham
Young University. Dr. Allen holds a doctorate in business administration from Harvard Business School, as well as undergraduate and master’s
degrees in accounting from the University of Southern California. She is a licensed CPA. Prior to BYU, Dr. Allen was a Lecturer in the
Accounting and Management Unit at Harvard Business School. Prior to academia, Dr. Allen worked as an external auditor for Deloitte. Dr.
Allen’s research focuses on the political economy and economic consequences of accounting standard setting, as well as corporate
governance and diversity. Her work has been published in the Journal of Accounting and Economics, the Journal of Accounting Research,
Management Science and the Journal of Law Finance and Accounting and has been cited and discussed in Forbes Magazine, Harvard Business
Review, Columbia Law School Blue Sky blog, and the Institute for Truth in Accounting.
79
James P. Benson . Mr. Benson
serves as a director of Zeo. Mr. Benson is a founding partner of Energy Spectrum, where he oversees Energy Spectrum’s efforts in
sourcing investments, transaction evaluation, negotiation, executing and financing, monitoring of portfolio companies and the firm’s
management and strategy. With approximately 37 years of venture capital and private equity, investment banking, financial advisory and
commercial banking experience, Mr. Benson brings extensive relationships and his network across the energy industry to the company. Mr.
Benson currently serves as a director on the boards of multiple Energy Spectrum portfolio companies and has been on two public boards
in the past. Prior to co-founding Energy Spectrum in 1996, Mr. Benson served for ten years as a Managing Director at R. Reid Investments
Inc., where his experience included energy-related private placements of debt and equity, acquisitions and divestitures. Mr. Benson began
his career at InterFirst Bank Dallas, where he served for four years and was responsible for various energy financings and financial
recapitalizations. Mr. Benson received his Bachelor of Science degree from the University of Kansas and his Master of Business Administration
degree in Finance from Texas Christian University. Due to his extensive investment experience in the energy industry,we believe Mr. Benson
is well qualified to serve on our board of directors.
Neil Bush. Mr. Bush serves as a
director of Zeo. Mr. Bush has served on the board of directors of FutureTech II Acquisition Corp. since February 2022. Mr. Bush has been
the sole member of Neil Bush Global Advisors, LLC since January 1998. Additionally, Mr. Bush has been on the board of directors for Hong
Kong Finance Investment Holding Group since 2012. Mr. Bush has also served as the co-chairman for CIIC since 2006 and as an adviser to
CP Group since 2015. Further, Mr. Bush has served as a partner for Asia & America Consultants since March 2016 and the chairman of
Singhaiyi since April 2013. Mr. Bush served on the board of Greffex, Inc. since June 2020 and the Points of Light Foundation. Mr. Bush
was appointed director of Rebound International, LLC in early 2022. Due to his extensive investment experience in the energy industry,
we believe Mr. Bush is well qualified to serve on our board of directors.
Mark M. Jacobs . Mr. Jacobs serves
as a director of Zeo. Mr. Jacobs brings more than 30 years of executive management, operations and investment banking experience across
multiple segments within the broader energy industry. Since his retirement, Mr. Jacobs has served as an independent outside consultant
serving the energy industry and privately-held entities undertaking a change in control as well as serving as board chair for a number
of nonprofit organizations.
Mr. Jacobs previously served as CEO, President
and Director of Reliant Energy, a publicly-traded, Fortune 500 energy company. During Mr. Jacobs tenure, he led the company through a
series of crises including the impact of Hurricane Ike and the financial market crisis in 2008. He initiated and negotiated a merger-of-equals
with Mirant Corporation to form GenOn Energy in 2010, where he served as President, Chief Operating Officer and a Director of the largest
competitive generator in the U.S. Mr. Jacobs was originally recruited to Reliant Energy in 2002 to serve as Chief Financial Officer. In
that role, Mr. Jacobs brokered a landmark $6.2B debt restructuring transaction, leading the company away from a potential bankruptcy filing
and repositioned the company to compete in the emerging competitive electricity market. Prior to
Reliant Energy, Mr. Jacobs served as a Managing
Director within the Natural Resources Group and Mergers & Acquisitions Department at Goldman Sachs & Co. where he provided strategic
advice for large public and private corporations related to M&A and capital markets. Mr. Jacobs received a B.B.A. from Southern Methodist
University and a Master of Management from the J.L. Kellogg Graduate School of Management at Northwestern University.
Family Relationships
Timothy Bridgewater is the father of Brandon Bridgewater.
There are no other family relationships among our directors and executive officers.
80
Corporate Governance
Composition of the Board of Directors
Zeo’s business affairs are managed under
the direction of its board of directors, which consists of six members. Under our bylaws, each director will hold office until the expiration
of the term of the class, if any, for which elected and until such director’s successor is elected and qualified or until such director’s
earlier death, resignation, disqualification, or removal. Pursuant to our charter, the number of directors on the Board will be fixed
exclusively by one or more resolutions adopted from time to time by the board. Any vacancies on the Board and any newly created directorships
resulting from any increase in the number of directors will also be filled only by the affirmative vote of a majority of the directors
then in office, even though less than a quorum, or by a sole remaining director.
Director Independence
As a result of Zeo’s Class A common stock
being listed on Nasdaq, Zeo is required to comply with the applicable rules of such exchange in determining whether a director is independent.
The Board has undertaken a review of the independence of the individuals named above and have determined that each of Dr. Abigail M. Allen,
Neil Bush, James P. Benson and Mark M. Jacobs qualifies as “independent” as defined under the applicable Nasdaq rules.
Committees of the Board of Directors
The Board directs the management of its business
and affairs, as provided by Delaware law, and conducts its business through meetings of the board of directors and standing committees.
Zeo has a standing audit committee and compensation committee, each of which operates under a written charter.
In addition, from time to time, special committees
may be established under the direction of the Board when it deems it necessary or advisable to address specific issues. Current copies
of Zeo’s committee charters are posted on its website (investors.zeoenergy.com), as required by applicable SEC and Nasdaq rules.
The information on or available through any of such website is not deemed incorporated in this Report and does not form part of this Report.
Audit Committee
Zeo has an audit committee consisting of Dr. Abigail
M. Allen, James P. Benson and Mark M. Jacobs, and Dr. Allen serves as the chair of the audit committee. The Board has determined that
each of these individuals meets the independence requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act and the
applicable listing standards of Nasdaq. Each member of Zeo’s audit committee is able to read and understand fundamental financial
statements in accordance with Nasdaq audit committee requirements. In arriving at this determination, the board examined each proposed
audit committee member’s scope of experience and the nature of their prior and/or current employment.
The Board has determined that Dr. Abigail M. Allen
qualifies as an audit committee financial expert within the meaning of SEC regulations and meets the financial sophistication requirements
of the Nasdaq rules. In making this determination, the Board considered formal education and previous and current experience in financial
and accounting roles. Both Zeo’s independent registered public accounting firm and management periodically meet privately with Zeo’s
audit committee.
The audit committee’s responsibilities include,
among other things:
● appointing, compensating, retaining,
evaluating, terminating and overseeing Zeo’s independent registered public accounting firm;
● discussing with Zeo’s
independent registered public accounting firm their independence from management;
● reviewing with Zeo’s
independent registered public accounting firm the scope and results of their audit;
● pre-approving all audit and
permissible non-audit services to be performed by Zeo’s independent registered public accounting firm;
● overseeing the financial reporting
process and discussing with management and Zeo’s independent registered public accounting firm the interim and annual financial
statements that Zeo files with the SEC;
● reviewing and monitoring Zeo’s
accounting principles, accounting policies, financial and accounting controls and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements;
and
● establishing procedures for
the confidential anonymous submission of concerns regarding questionable accounting, internal controls or auditing matters.
81
Compensation Committee
Zeo has a compensation committee consisting of
Neil Bush, James P. Benson and Mark M. Jacobs, and Mr. Bush serves as the chair of the compensation committee. All members are non-employee
directors, as defined in Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act. The Board has determined that each proposed member is “independent”
as defined under the applicable Nasdaq listing standards, including the standards specific to members of a compensation committee. The
compensation committee’s responsibilities include, among other things:
● reviewing and setting or making
recommendations to the Board regarding the compensation of Zeo’s executive officers;
● making recommendations to the
Board regarding the compensation of Zeo’s directors;
● reviewing and approving or
making recommendations to the Board regarding Zeo’s incentive compensation and equity-based plans and arrangements; and
● appointing and overseeing any
compensation consultants.
We believe that the composition and functioning
of Zeo’s compensation committee meets the requirements for independence under the current Nasdaq listing standards.
Director Nominations
Zeo does not have a nominating committee. However,
Zeo will form a nominating committee as and when required to do so by law or Nasdaq rules. In accordance with Rule 5605(e)(2) of Nasdaq
rules, a majority of the independent directors may recommend a director nominee for selection by the Board. The Board believes that the
Zeo independent directors can satisfactorily carry out the responsibility of properly selecting or approving director nominees without
the formation of a standing nominating committee. The directors who participate in the consideration and recommendation of director nominees
are Dr. Abigail M. Allen, James P. Benson, Neil Bush and Mark M. Jacobs. In accordance with Rule 5605(e)(1)(A) of Nasdaq rules, all such
directors are independent. As there is no standing nominating committee, we do not have a nominating committee charter in place.
The Board will also consider director candidates
recommended for nomination by its stockholders during such times as they are seeking proposed nominees to stand for election at the next
annual meeting of stockholders (or, if applicable, a special meeting of stockholders). Zeo’s stockholders that wish to nominate
a director for election should follow the procedures set forth in our bylaws.
Zeo has not formally established any specific,
minimum qualifications that must be met or skills that are necessary for directors to possess. In general, in identifying and evaluating
nominees for director, the Board will consider educational background, diversity of professional experience, knowledge of our business,
integrity, professional reputation, independence, wisdom, and the ability to represent the best interests of its stockholders.
Board Member Attendance at Annual Stockholder
Meetings
Although we do not have a formal policy regarding
director attendance at annual stockholder meetings, directors are encouraged to attend these annual meetings.
Number of Meetings
During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025,
our Board and audit committee met nine times, and the compensation committee met three times. During the year ended December 31, 2025,
each of our directors attended at least 75% of the meetings of the Board and committees on which he or she served as a member.
Insider Trading Policy
We have adopted insider trading policies and procedures
governing the purchase, sale, and/or other dispositions of our securities by directors, officers, and employees, which are reasonably
designed to promote compliance with insider trading laws, rules and regulations, and applicable Nasdaq listing standards (the “ Insider
Trading Policy ”).
The foregoing description of the Insider Trading
Policy does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by the terms and conditions of the Insider Trading Policy, a copy
of which is filed with this Report as Exhibit 19 and is incorporated herein by reference.
Code of Ethics
Zeo has a code of ethics that applies to all of
its executive officers, directors and employees, including its principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting
officer or controller or persons performing similar functions. The code of ethics is available on Zeo’s website (investors.zeoenergy.com).
82
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider
Participation
None of Zeo’s executive officers currently
serves, or has served during the last year, as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any entity that has one
or more executive officers serving as a member of the Board.
Communications with the Board
Any stockholder or any other interested party
who desires to communicate with our Board, our non-management directors, or any specified individual director, may do so by directing
such correspondence to the attention of the General Counsel, Zeo Energy Corp., 7625 Little Rd, Suite 200A, New Port Richey, FL 34654.
The General Counsel will forward the communication to the appropriate director or directors as appropriate.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.
Executive and Director Compensation
The following table sets forth information concerning
the compensation of the named executive officers for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024:
Name and Principal Position
Year
Salary ($)
Stock Awards
($) (1)
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
All Other
Compensation
($)
Total
($)
Timothy Bridgewater
2025
390,000
–
–
–
390,000
Chairman, CEO
2024
260,000
6,806,272
–
215,000 (2)
7,281,272
Cannon Holbrook CFO
2025
225,000
578,250
–
25,000 (3)
828,250
2024
135,577
26,250
–
–
161,827
Stirling Adams GC
2025
290,000
732,450
–
–
957,450
2024
225,308
26,250
–
119,785 (4)
371,373
(1) Amounts reflect the full grant-date
fair value of stock awards granted during the applicable fiscal year computed in accordance with ASC 718, rather than the amounts paid
to or realized by the named executive officer.
(2) For 2025 and 2024, the amounts
in this column represent the distributions paid in 2025 and 2024 to Mr. Bridgewater with respect to his partnership interests in Sunergy.
(3) Amounts paid to Mr. Holbrook
in 2025 in connection with the execution of his employment agreement.
(4) Amounts paid to Mr. Adams in
2024 for legal services provided to the Company related to the ESGEN transaction prior to his joining the Company.
Narrative to Executive Compensation Table
Employment Agreement with Timothy Bridgewater
The Company (or one of its subsidiaries) has entered
into an Executive Employment Agreement (the “ Bridgewater Agreement ”) with Mr. Timothy Bridgewater, the Company’s
Chief Executive Officer. The period of the Bridgewater Agreement commenced on the closing of the business combination between Sunergy
Renewables, LLC and ESGEN Acquisition Corp. (the “ Closing ”) and continues through the third anniversary of the Closing,
and is subject to automatic renewals for one (1) year periods, unless either party terminates employment or provides ninety (90) day notice
of intent not to renew.
In recognition of Mr. Bridgewater’s responsibilities
as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, and based on comparison to peer organizations with similar activities and risk profiles,
the Company agreed to pay Mr. Bridgewater a base salary of $390,000.
For each year the Bridgewater Agreement is in
effect, the Compensation Committee of the Board may choose to provide a discretionary cash bonus to Mr. Bridgewater, and such bonus shall
be performance based and the performance goals shall be as set forth by the Compensation Committee.
In addition, Mr. Bridgewater is eligible to receive
certain grants of vested shares under the 2024 Plan in accordance with the following schedule (collectively, the “Retention Award”):
● 50,000 vested shares to be
granted on the date that is 12 months after the effective date of the Bridgewater Agreement;
● 50,000 vested shares to be
granted on the date that is 24 months after the effective date of the Bridgewater Agreement; and
● 50,000 vested shares to be
granted on the date that is 35 months after the effective date of the Bridgewater Agreement.
83
Further, if, within three (3) years of the effective
date of the Bridgewater Agreement, (i) the volume-weighted average price of shares of the publicly traded stock of the Company exceeds
$7.50 for 20 or more days of any consecutive 30-day period, then Mr. Bridgewater will be granted vested equity from the 2024 Plan equal
to 1% of the total issued and outstanding capital stock of the Company, (ii) the volume-weighted average price of shares of the publicly
traded stock of the Company exceeds $12.50 for 20 or more days of any consecutive 30-day period, then Mr. Bridgewater will be granted
additional vested equity from the 2024 Plan equal to 1% of the total issued and outstanding capital stock of the Company, (iii) and the
volume-weighted average price of shares of the publicly traded stock of the Company exceeds $15.00 for 20 or more days of any consecutive
30-day period, then Mr. Bridgewater will be granted additional vested equity from the 2024 Plan equal to 1% of the total issued and outstanding
capital stock of the Company.
In addition, Mr. Bridgewater is eligible to participate
in the Company’s employee benefits plan for its senior executives or employees, including the Company’s medical plans. Mr.
Bridgewater is also entitled to receive six (6) weeks of paid time off in accordance with the Company’s policy for its senior executives.
In addition, Mr. Bridgewater is entitled to reimbursement by the Company for all reasonable expenses incurred by him in connection with
this employment. Reimbursable expenses include, but are not limited to, business travel expenses.
The Company may terminate Mr. Bridgewater’s
employment with or without Cause (as defined in the Bridgewater Agreement). The Company has agreed to provide thirty (30) days in notice
to Mr. Bridgewater if he is terminated without Cause (or base salary in lieu of such notice), but no notice is required if he is terminated
for Cause. For termination for Cause, Mr. Bridgewater (with his attorney) shall have the opportunity to respond to all relevant allegations
upon which a contemplated termination for Cause is based.
Mr. Bridgewater may terminate his employment with
or without Good Reason (as defined in the Bridgewater Agreement). If Mr. Bridgewater intends to terminate his employment without Good
Reason, he has agreed to provide thirty (30) days’ written notice. For termination for Good Reason, Mr. Bridgewater has agreed that
he will provide the Company with notice within thirty (30) days after receiving notice of a Good Reason event, after which the Company
will have thirty (30) days to cure the Good Reason event, and, if not cured, Mr. Bridgewater will terminate employment within fifteen
(15) days following the expiration of the cure period.
In the event of termination for any reason, Mr.
Bridgewater shall continue to receive his full salary through the date of termination, any unreimbursed and approved business expenses,
accrued but unused paid time off days, and any payments, benefits, or fringe benefits Mr. Bridgewater was entitled to under plan terms.
If the Company terminates Mr. Bridgewater without
Cause or Mr. Bridgewater terminates for Good Reason, and there is no Change of Control (as defined in the Bridgewater Agreement), the
Company has agreed to also provide Mr. Bridgewater the following:
(i) a lump sum cash payment, payable
on the date of termination, equal to the sum of the following: (x) one year’s base salary, and (y) any unpaid annual bonus for
the preceding calendar year, and the greater of (I) any annual target cash bonus opportunity for the year of termination or (II) the
average annual cash bonus for the three preceding completed years (provided, however, that if Mr. Bridgewater has not been employed for
at least three years in which an annual cash bonus was paid, such calculation will assume that an annual cash bonus equal to any target
annual cash bonus opportunity was paid in the missing years), and (z) any other target long-term incentive award granted to Mr. Bridgewater
for the year in which the termination occurs;
(ii) accelerated vesting of any
outstanding equity grants so that such equity grants vest completely as of the date of termination; and
(iii) to the extent eligible, continuation
health insurance coverage under COBRA for twelve (12) months following termination.
84
If the Company terminates Mr. Bridgewater without
Cause or Mr. Bridgewater terminates for Good Reason, and such termination occurs within two (2) years following or six (6) months prior
to a Change of Control (as defined in the Bridgewater Agreement), the Company has agreed to also provide Mr. Bridgewater the following:
(i) pro-rated, based on the number
of days worked during the year in which the termination occurs, the greater of any annual target cash bonus opportunity for the year
of termination or the highest actual annual cash bonus paid during the three preceding completed years;
(ii) a lump sum cash payment equal
to the sum of the following: (x) one year’s base salary, (y) any unpaid annual bonus for the preceding calendar year, and (z) the
Retention Award and any other target long-term incentive award granted for the year in which termination occurs;
(iii) accelerated vesting of any
outstanding equity grants so that such equity grants vest completely as of the date of termination; and
(iv) to the extent eligible, continuation
health insurance coverage under COBRA for twelve (12) months following termination.
Additionally, Mr. Bridgewater is subject to standard
confidentiality and non-disparagement covenants, and covenants not to solicit the company’s customers or employees or compete with
the company for the duration of Mr. Bridgewater’s employment and for the one year following his termination.
Employment Agreement with Cannon Holbrook
The Company (or one of its subsidiaries) entered
into an employment agreement with Mr. Holbrook (the “Holbrook Agreement”) pursuant to which Mr. Holbrook will serve as the
Chief Financial Officer of both Sunergy and the Company, reporting to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer.
The period of the Holbrook Agreement commenced
on August 19, 2024 (the “Effective Date”) and continues through the third anniversary of the Holbrook Agreement Effective
Date. The agreement is subject to automatic renewals for one (1) year periods unless either party terminates employment or provides ninety
(90) day notice of intent not to renew.
In recognition of Mr. Holbrook’s responsibilities,
the Company agreed to pay Mr. Holbrook a base salary of $225,000, which may be increased from time to time by the Compensation Committee
(the “Committee”) of the Company’s Board in its sole discretion.
A one-time payment of $25,000 was paid to Mr.
Holbrook in connection with the execution of the Holbrook Agreement. Though the agreement does not provide for a guaranteed annual target
cash bonus, for each year the Holbrook Agreement is in effect, the Committee may choose to provide a discretionary cash bonus to Mr. Holbrook,
based on meeting positive EBITDA targets, an evaluation of his performance and peer group compensation practices, taking into account
the Company and individual performance objectives, and/or such criteria as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion from time
to time.
In addition, Mr. Holbrook is eligible to receive
certain grants of vested shares under the Company’s 2024 Omnibus Incentive Equity Plan, subject to the approval of the Board, in
accordance with the following schedule:
● 15,000 vested shares to be
issued as soon as possible following the Effective Date;
● 75,000 vested shares to be
granted on the date that is 12 months after the Effective Date;
● 75,000 vested shares to be
granted on the date that is 24 months after the Effective Date; and
● 75,000 vested shares to be
granted on the date that is 35 months after the Effective Date.
The Company may terminate Mr. Holbrook’s
employment with or without Cause (as defined in the Holbrook Agreement). The Company has agreed to provide thirty (30) days in notice
to Mr. Holbrook if he is terminated without Cause (or base salary in lieu of such notice). The termination of Mr. Holbrook’s employment
will not be deemed to be for Cause unless Mr. Holbrook (with his attorney) is given a reasonable opportunity to respond to all relevant
allegations upon which a contemplated termination for Cause is based.
Mr. Holbrook may terminate his employment with
or without Good Reason (as defined in the Holbrook Agreement). If Mr. Holbrook intends to terminate his employment without Good Reason,
he has agreed to provide thirty (30) days’ written notice. For termination for Good Reason, Mr. Holbrook has agreed that he will
provide the Company with notice within thirty (30) days after receiving notice of a Good Reason event, after which the Company will have
thirty (30) days to cure the Good Reason event, and, if not cured, Mr. Holbrook will terminate employment within fifteen (15) days following
the expiration of the cure period.
85
In the event of termination for any reason, Mr.
Holbrook shall continue to receive his full salary through the date of termination, any unreimbursed and approved business expenses, accrued
but unused paid time off days, and any payments, benefits, or fringe benefits Mr. Holbrook was entitled to under plan terms.
If the Company terminates Mr. Holbrook without
Cause or Mr. Holbrook terminates for Good Reason, and there is no Change of Control (as defined in the Holbrook Agreement), the Company
has agreed to also provide Mr. Holbrook the following:
(i) a lump sum cash payment, payable
on the date of termination, equal to the sum of the following: (x) one year’s base salary at the annualized rate then in effect
(or the rate that should be in effect but for any base salary diminution), and (y) any unpaid annual bonus for the preceding calendar
year and the greater of (I) any annual target cash bonus opportunity for the year of termination or (II) the average annual cash bonus
for the three preceding calendar years in which an annual cash bonus was paid, and (z) the annual cash bonus and any other target long-term
incentive award granted for the year of the date of termination;
(ii) accelerated vesting of any
outstanding equity grants so that such equity grants vest completely as of the date of termination; and
(iii) to the extent eligible
and Mr. Holbrook properly elects coverage, continued health insurance coverage under COBRA for twelve (12) months following termination
at the same costs as applied to Mr. Holbrook prior to his termination, subject to early termination upon Mr. Holbrook becoming eligible
for group health insurance coverage under another employer’s plan.
If the Company terminates Mr. Holbrook without
Cause or Mr. Holbrook terminates for Good Reason, and such termination occurs within two (2) years following or six (6) months prior to
a Change of Control (as defined in the Holbrook Agreement), the Company has agreed to also provide Mr. Holbrook the following:
(i) severance payments pro-rated,
based on the number of days worked during the year in which the termination occurs, equal to the greater of any annual target cash bonus
opportunity for the year of termination or the highest actual annual cash bonus paid during the three preceding completed years;
(ii) a lump sum cash payment equal
to the sum of the following: (x) one year’s base salary at the annualized rate then in effect (or the rate that should be in effect
but for any base salary diminution), (y) any unpaid annual bonus for the preceding calendar year, and any other target long-term incentive
award granted for the year of the date of termination;
(iii) accelerated vesting of any
outstanding equity grants so that such equity grants vest completely as of the date of termination; and
(iv) to the extent eligible, and
Mr. Holbrook properly elects coverage, continued health insurance coverage under COBRA for twelve (12) months following termination at
the same costs as applied to Mr. Holbrook prior to his termination, subject to early termination upon Mr. Holbrook becoming eligible
for group health insurance coverage under another employer’s plan.
Additionally, Mr. Holbrook is subject to standard
confidentiality and non-disparagement covenants, and covenants not to solicit the company’s customers or employees or compete with
the company for the duration of Mr. Holbrook’s employment and for the one year following his termination.
Employment Agreement with Stirling Adams
The Company (or one of its subsidiaries) entered
into an employment agreement with Mr. Adams (the “Adams Agreement”), pursuant to which Mr. Adams will serve as the General
Counsel and Secretary of both Sunergy and the Company, reporting to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer.
The period of the Adams Agreement commenced on
the Closing and continues through the third anniversary of the Closing. The agreement is subject to automatic renewals for one (1) year
periods unless either party terminates employment or provides ninety (90) day notice of intent not to renew.
86
In recognition of Mr. Adams’ responsibilities,
the Company agreed to pay Mr. Adams a base salary of $290,000, which may be increased from time to time by the Committee in its sole discretion.
Though the agreement does not provide for a guaranteed
annual target cash bonus, for each year the Adams Agreement is in effect, the Committee may choose to provide a discretionary cash bonus
to Mr. Adams, based on an evaluation of his performance and peer group compensation practices, taking into account the Company and individual
performance objectives, and/or such criteria as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion from time to time.
In addition, Mr. Adams is eligible to receive
certain grants of vested shares under the Company’s 2024 Omnibus Incentive Equity Plan, subject to the approval of the Board, in
accordance with the following schedule:
● 15,000 vested shares which
were issued in September 2024;
● 85,000 vested shares to be
granted on the date that is within 15 months after the Closing;
● 100,000 vested shares to be
granted on the date that is on or about 24 months after the Closing; and
● 100,000 vested shares to be
granted on the date that is on or about 35 months after the Closing.
The Company may terminate Mr. Adams’ employment
with or without Cause (as defined in the Adams Agreement). The Company has agreed to provide thirty (30) days in notice to Mr. Adams if
he is terminated without Cause (or base salary in lieu of such notice). The termination of Mr. Adams’ employment will not be deemed
to be for Cause unless Mr. Adams (with his attorney) is given a reasonable opportunity to respond to all relevant allegations upon which
a contemplated termination for Cause is based.
Mr. Adams may terminate his employment with or
without Good Reason (as defined in the Adams Agreement). If Mr. Adams intends to terminate his employment without Good Reason, he has
agreed to provide thirty (30) days’ written notice. For termination for Good Reason, Mr. Adams has agreed that he will provide the
Company with notice within thirty (30) days after receiving notice of a Good Reason event, after which the Company will have thirty (30)
days to cure the Good Reason event, and, if not cured, Mr. Adams will terminate employment within fifteen (15) days following the expiration
of the cure period.
In the event of termination for any reason, Mr.
Adams shall continue to receive his full salary through the date of termination, any unreimbursed and approved business expenses, accrued
but unused paid time off days, and any payments, benefits, or fringe benefits Mr. Adams was entitled to under plan terms.
If the Company terminates Mr. Adams without Cause
or Mr. Adams terminates for Good Reason, and there is no Change of Control (as defined in the Adams Agreement), the Company has agreed
to also provide Mr. Adams the following:
(iv) a lump sum cash payment, payable
on the date of termination, equal to the sum of the following: (x) one year’s base salary at the annualized rate then in effect
(or the rate that should be in effect but for any base salary diminution), and (y) any unpaid annual bonus for the preceding calendar
year and the greater of (I) any annual target cash bonus opportunity for the year of termination or (II) the average annual cash bonus
for the three preceding calendar years in which an annual cash bonus was paid, and (z) the annual cash bonus and any other target long-term
incentive award granted for the year of the date of termination;
(v) accelerated vesting of any
outstanding equity grants so that such equity grants vest completely as of the date of termination; and
(vi) (iii) to the extent eligible
and Mr. Adams properly elects coverage, continued health insurance coverage under COBRA for twelve (12) months following termination
at the same costs as applied to Mr. Adams prior to his termination, subject to early termination upon Mr. Adams becoming eligible for
group health insurance coverage under another employer’s plan.
87
If the Company terminates Mr. Adams without Cause
or Mr. Adams terminates for Good Reason, and such termination occurs within two (2) years following or six (6) months prior to a Change
of Control (as defined in the Adams Agreement), the Company has agreed to also provide Mr. Adams the following:
(v) severance payments pro-rated,
based on the number of days worked during the year in which the termination occurs, equal to the greater of any annual target cash bonus
opportunity for the year of termination or the highest actual annual cash bonus paid during the three preceding completed years;
(vi) a lump sum cash payment equal
to the sum of the following: (x) one year’s base salary at the annualized rate then in effect (or the rate that should be in effect
but for any base salary diminution), (y) any unpaid annual bonus for the preceding calendar year, and (z) any other target long-term
incentive award granted for the year of the date of termination;
(vii) accelerated vesting of any
outstanding equity grants so that such equity grants vest completely as of the date of termination; and
(viii) to the extent eligible, and
Mr. Adams properly elects coverage, continued health insurance coverage under COBRA for twelve (12) months following termination at the
same costs as applied to Mr. Adams prior to his termination, subject to early termination upon Mr. Adams becoming eligible for group
health insurance coverage under another employer’s plan.
Additionally, Mr. Adams is subject to standard
confidentiality and non-disparagement covenants, and covenants not to solicit the company’s customers or employees or compete with
the company for the duration of Mr. Adams’ employment and for the one year following his termination.
Retirement Benefits
Sunergy currently offers certain welfare benefits
through a professional employer organization, Frank Crum, in which the named executive officers may participate. Sunergy does not currently
offer any qualified retirement benefits, or any non-qualified defined contribution plans or other retirement benefits.
Potential Payments on Termination or Change
in Control
Neither Zeo nor Sunergy has not previously offered
or had in place for our named executive officers any formal retirement, severance or similar compensation programs providing for additional
benefits or payments in connection with a termination of employment, change in job responsibility or change in control.
Outstanding Equity Awards at 2025 Fiscal Year-End
Name
Grant Date
Number of
Unvested
Stock
Awards (#)
Market
Value of
Unvested
Stock
Awards
($) (1)
Vesting Date
Timothy Bridgewater
March 13, 2024
50,000
$
54,500
March 13, 2026
March 13, 2024
50,000
54,500
February 13, 2027
Cannon Holbrook
February 5, 2025
75,000
81,750
August 5, 2026
February 5, 2025
75,000
81,750
August 5, 2027
Stirling Adams
February 5, 2025
100,000
109,000
August 5, 2026
February 5, 2025
100,000
109,000
August 5, 2027
(1) The market value of unvested
restricted stock awards as of December 31, 2025, is calculated by multiplying the number of shares subject to such awards by the closing
price of our Class A common stock on December 31, 2025, the last trading day of the year, which was $1.09 per share.
2024 Omnibus Incentive Equity Plan
The purpose of the 2024 Omnibus Incentive Plan
(the “2024 Plan”) is to provide a means whereby we can secure and retain the service of employees, directors and consultants,
to provide incentives to such persons and to align the interests of such service providers with our stockholders. This section summarizes
the material features of the 2024 Plan.
88
Securities to be Offered
The aggregate number of shares of common stock
that may be issued or used for reference purposes or with respect to which awards may be granted under the 2024 Plan at adoption was 3,220,400
(the “ Initial Share Reserve ”). The number of shares of Zeo Class A Common Stock available for issuance under
the 2024 Plan is subject to an annual increase on the first day of each calendar year beginning January 1, 2025 and ending and including
January 1, 2029, equal to the lesser of (i) 2% of the aggregate number of fully diluted shares of Zeo outstanding on the final day of
the immediately preceding calendar year and (ii) such smaller number of shares as is determined by the administrator of the 2024 Plan.
The aggregate number of shares of Zeo Class A Common Stock that may be issued or used under the 2024 Plan pursuant to incentive stock
options shall not exceed an amount equal to the Initial Share Reserve. Shares of Zeo Class A Common Stock subject to an award that expires
or is cancelled, forfeited or otherwise terminated without delivery of shares, tendered in payment of an option, covered by a stock-settled
stock appreciation right or that were otherwise not issued upon settlement, and shares delivered or withheld to satisfy any tax withholding
obligations will again be available for delivery pursuant to other awards under the 2024 Plan. No shares shall be deemed to have been
issued in settlement of a SAR, restricted stock unit or other award that only provides for settlement in, and settles only in, cash. The
number of shares of Zeo Class A Common Stock available for issuance under the 2024 Plan is not reduced by shares issued pursuant to awards
issued or assumed in connection with a merger or acquisition as contemplated by applicable stock exchange rules, provided that any substitute
awards issued in connection with the assumption of, or in substitution for, outstanding options intended to qualify as “incentive
stock options” within the meaning of Section 422 of the Code shall be counted against the aggregate number of shares available for
incentive stock option awards under the 2024 Plan).
Administration
The 2024 Plan is administered by a committee of
the Zeo Board that has been authorized to administer the 2024 Plan, except if no such committee is authorized by the Zeo Board, the Zeo
Board will administer the 2024 Plan (as applicable, the “ Committee ”). The Committee has broad discretion to
administer the 2024 Plan, including the power to determine the eligible individuals to whom awards will be granted, the number and type
of awards to be granted and the terms and conditions of awards.
Eligibility
Directors, officers, employees, consultants and
advisors of Zeo and its affiliates and prospective officers, employees, consultants and advisors who have accepted offers of employment
or consultancy with Zeo and its affiliates are eligible to receive awards under the 2024 Plan. As stated above, the basis for participation
in the 2024 Plan is the Committee’s decision to select, in its sole discretion, participants from among those eligible.
Non-Employee Director Compensation Limits
The fair value of any awards granted under the
2024 Plan to a non-employee director as compensation for services on the Zeo Board, during any one fiscal year, taken together with any
cash fees paid to such non-employee director during such period in respect of the non-employee director’s services as a member of
the Zeo Board during such year, may not exceed any limits as outlined in any Zeo compensation policy, provided that the Zeo Board can
make exceptions to this limit so long as the applicable non-employee director does not participate in the decision.
Types of Awards
The 2024 Plan provides for the grant of both incentive
stock options (“ ISOs ”), which are intended to qualify for favorable tax treatment under Section 422 of the Code,
and nonqualified stock options (“ NSOs ”), as well as the grant of restricted stock, restricted stock units (“ RSUs ”),
stock appreciation rights (“ SARs ”), and other equity-based awards and substitute awards.
Options
Zeo may grant ISOs and NSOs to eligible persons,
except that ISOs may only be granted to persons who are Zeo’s employees or employees of one of its subsidiaries or controlled affiliates,
in accordance with Section 422 of the Code. The exercise price of an option cannot be less than 100% of the fair market value of a share
of Zeo Class A Common Stock on the date on which the option is granted and the option must not be exercisable for longer than ten years
following the date of grant. However, in the case of an ISO granted to an individual who owns (or is deemed to own) at least 10% of the
total combined voting power of all classes of our capital stock, the exercise price of the option must be at least 110% of the fair market
value of a share of Zeo Class A Common Stock on the date of grant and the option must not be exercisable more than five years from the
date of grant. The aggregate fair market value, determined at the time of grant, of our Zeo Class A Common Stock with respect to ISOs
that are exercisable for the first time by an award holder during any calendar year under all of our stock plans may not exceed $100,000.
Options or portions thereof that exceed such limit will generally be treated as NSOs.
89
Payment of the exercise price may be made in a
manner approved by the Committee, which may include (i) immediately available funds in U.S. dollars, (ii) delivery of Zeo Class A Common
Stock having a value equal to the exercise price, (iii) a broker assisted cashless exercise or (iv) any other means approved by the Committee.
Unless the Committee provides otherwise, options
generally are not transferable except by will or the laws of descent and distribution.
Restricted Stock Awards
A restricted stock award is a grant of shares
of Zeo Class A Common Stock subject to the restrictions on transferability and risk of forfeiture imposed by the Committee. Unless otherwise
determined by the Committee and specified in the applicable award agreement, the holder of a restricted stock award has rights as a stockholder,
including the right to vote the shares of Zeo Class A Common Stock subject to the restricted stock award or to receive dividends (or dividend
equivalents) on such shares of Zeo Class A Common Stock subject to the restricted stock award during the restriction period. In the discretion
of the Committee, dividends distributed prior to vesting may be subject to the same restrictions and risk of forfeiture as the restricted
shares with respect to which the distribution was made.
Restricted Stock Units
An RSU is a right to receive cash, shares of Zeo
Class A Common Stock or a combination of cash and shares of Zeo Class A Common Stock at the end of a specified period equal to the fair
market value of one share of Zeo Class A Common Stock on the date of vesting. RSUs may be subject to the restrictions, including a risk
of forfeiture, imposed by the Committee. The Committee may determine that a grant of RSUs will provide a participant a right to receive
dividend equivalents, which entitles the participant to receive the equivalent value (in cash or shares of Zeo Class A Common Stock) of
dividends paid on the underlying shares of Zeo Class A Common Stock. Dividend equivalent rights may be paid currently or credited to an
account, settled in cash or shares, and may be subject to the same restrictions as the RSUs with respect to which the dividend equivalent
rights are granted.
Stock Appreciation Rights
A SAR is the right to receive an amount equal
to the excess of the fair market value of one share of common stock on the date of exercise over the grant price of the SAR. The grant
price of a SAR cannot be less than 100% of the fair market value of a share of common stock on the date on which the SAR is granted. The
term of a SAR may not exceed ten years. The Committee has the discretion to determine other terms and conditions of a SAR award.
Other Equity-Based Awards
Other equity-based awards are awards denominated
or payable in, valued in whole or in part by reference to, or otherwise based on or related to, the value of Zeo Class A Common Stock.
Substitute Awards
Awards may be granted under the 2024 Plan in substitution
for similar awards held for individuals who become participants as a result of a merger, consolidation or acquisition of another entity
by or with Zeo or one of its affiliates.
Certain Transactions
If any change is made to our capitalization, such
as a stock split, stock combination, stock dividend, exchange of stock or other recapitalization, merger or otherwise, which results in
an increase or decrease in the number of outstanding shares of common stock, appropriate adjustments will be made by the Committee in
the shares subject to an award under the 2024 Plan. The Committee also has the discretion to make certain adjustments to awards in the
event of a change in control of Zeo, such as the assumption or substitution of outstanding awards, the purchase of any outstanding awards
in cash based on the applicable change in control price, the ability for participants to exercise any outstanding stock options upon the
change in control (and if not exercised such awards will be terminated), and the acceleration of vesting or exercisability of any outstanding
awards.
90
Plan Amendment and Termination
The 2024 Plan allows the Committee to amend or
terminate any award, award agreement or the 2024 Plan at any time, provided that the rights of a participant granted an award prior to
such amendment or termination may not be impaired without such participant’s consent. In addition, stockholder approval will be
required for any amendment to the extent necessary to comply with applicable law or exchange listing standards. The Committee does not
have the authority, without the approval of stockholders, to amend any outstanding option or share appreciation right to reduce its exercise
price per share. The 2024 Plan will remain in effect for a period of ten years (unless earlier terminated by the Zeo Board).
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences
The following is a general summary under current
law of the principal U.S. federal income tax consequences related to awards under the 2024 Plan. This summary describes the general federal
income tax principles that apply, as based on current law and interpretational authorities which are subject to change at any time, and
is provided only for general information. This summary does not purport to be complete discussion of all potential tax effects relevant
to recipients of awards under the 2024 Plan. No attempt has been made to discuss certain kinds of taxes, including any potential non-U.S.,
state, or local tax consequences. This summary is not intended as tax advice to participants, who should consult their own tax advisors.
Non-Qualified Stock Options and Stock Appreciation
Rights
If a participant is granted a NSO or SAR under
the 2024 Plan, the participant should not have taxable income as of the grant of the NSO or SAR. Upon the exercise of a NSO or SAR, a
participant will recognize ordinary income equal to the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the shares acquired on the date of
exercise over the exercise price. If the participant is employed by us or one of our affiliates at the time of exercise, such income will
be subject to withholding taxes. The participant’s tax basis in the Zeo Class A Common Stock for purposes of determining gain or
loss on a subsequent sale or disposition of such shares generally will be the fair market value of such Zeo Class A Common Stock on the
date the participant exercises such option or SAR. When a participant sells the Zeo Class A Common Stock acquired as a result of the exercise
of a NSO or SAR, any appreciation or depreciation in the value of the Zeo Class A Common Stock after the exercise date will be taxable
as a long-term or short-term capital gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes, depending on the holding period. The Zeo Class
A Common Stock must be held for more than twelve (12) months to qualify for long-term capital gain treatment. Subject to the discussion
under “ - Tax Consequences to Zeo ” below, Zeo and its subsidiaries or controlled affiliates generally should be entitled
to a federal income tax deduction at the time and for the same amount as the participant recognizes ordinary income.
Incentive Stock Options
A participant receiving ISOs should not recognize
taxable income upon grant. Additionally, if applicable holding period requirements are met, the participant should not recognize taxable
income at the time of exercise. However, the excess of the fair market value of the shares of the Zeo Class A Common Stock received over
the option exercise price is an item of tax preference income potentially subject to the alternative minimum tax. If stock acquired upon
exercise of an ISO is held for a minimum of two years from the date of grant and one year from the date of exercise and otherwise satisfies
the ISO requirements, the gain or loss (in an amount equal to the difference between the fair market value on the date of disposition
and the exercise price) upon disposition of the stock will be treated as a long-term capital gain or loss, and we will not be entitled
to any deduction. If the holding period requirements are not met, the ISO will be treated as one that does not meet the requirements of
the Code for ISOs and the participant will recognize ordinary income at the time of the disposition equal to the excess of the amount
realized over the exercise price, but not more than the excess of the fair market value of the shares on the date the ISO is exercised
over the exercise price, with any remaining gain or loss being treated as capital gain or capital loss. Zeo and its subsidiaries or controlled
affiliates generally are not entitled to a federal income tax deduction upon either the exercise of an ISO or upon disposition of the
shares acquired pursuant to such exercise, except to the extent that the participant recognizes ordinary income on disposition of the
shares.
91
Restricted Stock
Generally, the recipient of a restricted stock
award will recognize ordinary income at the time the stock is received equal to the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the stock
received over any amount paid by the recipient in exchange for the stock. If, however, the stock is subject to restrictions constituting
a substantial risk of forfeiture when it is received (for example, if the employee is required to work for a period of time in order to
have the right to transfer or sell the stock), the recipient generally will not recognize income until the restrictions constituting a
substantial risk of forfeiture lapse, at which time the recipient will recognize ordinary income equal to the excess, if any, of the fair
market value of the stock on the date it becomes vested over any amount paid by the recipient in exchange for the stock. A recipient may,
however, file an election with the Internal Revenue Service, within 30 days following the date of grant, to recognize ordinary income,
as of the date of grant, equal to the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the stock on the date the award is granted over any
amount paid by the recipient for the stock. The recipient’s basis for the determination of gain or loss upon the subsequent disposition
of shares acquired from a restricted stock award will be the amount paid for such shares plus any ordinary income recognized either when
the stock is received or when the restrictions constituting a substantial risk of forfeiture lapse. Subject to the discussion under “ -
Tax Consequences to Zeo ” below, Zeo and its subsidiaries or affiliates generally should be entitled to a federal income tax
deduction at the time and for the same amount as the participant recognizes ordinary income.
RSUs
Generally, the recipient of a restricted stock
unit award will recognize ordinary income at the time the stock is delivered equal to the excess, if any, of (i) the fair market value
of the stock received over any amount paid by the recipient in exchange for the stock or (ii) the amount of cash paid to the participant.
The recipient’s basis for the determination of gain or loss upon the subsequent disposition of shares acquired from a restricted
stock unit award will be the amount paid for such shares plus any ordinary income recognized when the stock is delivered, and the participant’s
capital gain holding period for those shares will begin on the day after they are transferred to the participant. Subject to the discussion
under “ - Tax Consequences to Zeo ” below, Zeo and its subsidiaries or affiliates generally should be entitled to a federal
income tax deduction at the time and for the same amount as the participant recognizes ordinary income.
Clawback
On March 13, 2024, the Board of Directors adopted
a clawback policy which provides for the recovery of certain executive compensation in the event of an accounting restatement resulting
from material non-compliance with financial reporting requirements under the federal securities laws. Since the adoption of this policy,
there have been no accounting restatements, nor is there any compensation to be recovered.
Tax Consequences to Zeo
Reasonable Compensation
In order for the amounts described above to be
deductible by Zeo, such amounts must constitute reasonable compensation for services rendered or to be rendered by an individual service
provider and must be ordinary and necessary business expenses.
Golden Parachute Payments
Zeo’s ability (or the ability of one of
its subsidiaries) to obtain a deduction for future payments under the 2024 Plan could also be limited by the golden parachute rules of
Section 280G of the Code, which prevent the deductibility of certain excess parachute payments made in connection with a change in control
of an employer-corporation.
Compensation of Covered Employees
Zeo’s ability to obtain a deduction for
amounts paid under the 2024 Plan could be limited by Section 162(m) of the Code. Section 162(m) of the Code limits our ability to deduct
compensation, for federal income tax purposes, paid during any year to a “covered employee” (within the meaning of Section
162(m) of the Code) in excess of $1,000,000.
Zeo Compensation of Directors
Our directors did not receive any other fees for
their service in 2025.
Director Compensation Table
Name
Fees Earned
or Paid
in 2025
($)
Stock
Awards
($) (1)
Total
($)
Dr. Abigail M. Allen
$ —
$ —
$ —
Neil Bush
—
—
—
Mark Jacobs
—
—
—
(1)
As of December 31, 2025, there were no outstanding stock option awards (exercisable and unexercisable) and unvested stock awards held by our directors.
92
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN
BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS.
The following table sets forth information known to the Company regarding
beneficial ownership of shares of the Company’s common stock as of March 27, 2026, by:
● each person known by the Company
to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the Company’s outstanding common stock;
● each of the Company’s
named executive officers and directors; and
● all executive officers and
directors as a group.
Beneficial ownership is determined according to
the rules of the SEC, which generally provide that a person has beneficial ownership of a security if he, she or it possesses sole or
shared voting or investment power over that security, including options, warrants and certain other derivative securities that are currently
exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days.
The percentage of beneficial ownership is based
on 33,593,737 shares of Class A Common Stock issued and outstanding and 24,380,000 shares of Class V Common Stock issued and outstanding
as of March 27, 2026.
In accordance with SEC rules, shares of our common
stock which may be acquired upon exercise of stock options or warrants which are currently exercisable or which become exercisable within
60 days of the date of the Closing are deemed beneficially owned by the holders of such options and warrants and are deemed outstanding
for the purpose of computing the percentage of ownership of such person, but are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of computing
the percentage of ownership of any other person.
Unless otherwise indicated, the business address
of each of the entities, directors and executives in this table is 7625 Little Rd, Suite 200A, New Port Richey, FL 34654. Unless otherwise
indicated and subject to community property laws and similar laws, except as otherwise indicated below, the Company believes that all
parties named in the table below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock beneficially owned by
them.
93
Name and Address of Beneficial Owners
Number of
Shares of
Class A
Common
Stock
% of
Shares of
Class A
Common
Stock
Number of
Shares of
Class V
Common
Stock
% of
Shares of
Class V
Common
Stock
% of
total
voting
power
Directors and Executive Officers
Directors and executive officers (1)
Timothy Bridgewater (2)
812,545
2.4 %
8,110,410
33.3 %
15.4 %
Brandon Bridgewater (3)
2,827,346
8.4 %
2,515,664
10.3 %
9.2 %
Kalen Larsen (4)
2,407,236
7.2 %
3,015,664
12.4 %
9.4 %
Stirling Adams
256,847
*
–
–
*
Cannon Holbrook
75,675
*
–
–
*
Dr. Abigail M. Allen
10,000
–
–
–
–
James P. Benson
–
–
–
–
–
Neil Bush
10,000
*
–
–
*
Mark Jacobs
90,000
*
–
–
*
All directors and executive officers as
a group (9 individuals)
6,489,649
19.3 %
13,641,738
56.0 %
34.7 %
Five Percent Holders
Southern Crown Holdings, LLC
1,061,700
3.2 %
4,400,478
18.0 %
9.4 %
LAMADD LLC
1,236,817
3.7 %
4,400,478
18.0 %
9.7 %
ESGEN LLC (5)
3,257,436
9.7 %
1,500,000
6.2 %
8.2 %
LHX Intermediate, LLC (6)
9,931,851
29.6 %
–
–
17.1 %
*
Less than 1%.
(1)
Unless otherwise noted, the business address of each of the directors and officers is 7625 Little Rd, Suite 200A, New Port Richey, FL 34654.
(2)
The total number of shares of Class V Common Stock owned by Timothy Bridgewater comprise (i) 750,000 shares of Class A Common Stock and 1,558,883 shares of Class V Common Stock owned of record by LCB Trust, his family trust entity and (ii) 1,500,000 shares of Class A Common Stock and 6,651,527 shares of Class V Common Stock held of record by Sun Managers, LLC for which as the manager he has voting and investment power. Sun Managers, LLC is expected to use such shares in connection with a management equity program. Mr. Bridgewater disclaims beneficial ownership over any such shares held by Sun Managers, LLC.
(3)
Shares are held of record by Clarke Capital, LLC. Mr. Bridgewater exercises voting and dispositive power over the shares held by such entity.
(4)
Shares are held of record by JKAE Holdings, LLC. Mr. Larsen exercises voting and dispositive power over the shares held by such entity.
(5)
James P. Benson, Michael C. Mayon and Andrea Bernatova are the managers of ESGEN LLC, and each of them disclaims beneficial ownership over any securities owned by ESGEN LLC in which he or she does not have any pecuniary interest. The business address of ESGEN LLC is 5956 Sherry Lane, Suite 1400, Dallas, Texas 75225.
(6)
As reported on the Schedule 13D/A of LHX filed on December 27, 2024. Consists of 8,080,000 shares of Class A Common Stock held by LHX. This number does not take into account shares of stock of the Company held by other stockholders party to the Voting Agreement (described herein) or issuable under the Promissory Note (described herein), pursuant to which such stockholders have agreed, in certain circumstances, to vote (i) in favor of the nomination and appointment of LHX’s designee to the Board, (ii) in favor of the issuance to LHX of shares of Class A Common Stock in connection with an option that may be granted to LHX and (iii) the Share Issuance (described herein) pursuant to the Promissory Note. The business address of LHX is 5956 Sherry Lane, Suite 1400, Dallas, Texas 75225.
94
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED
TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.
Sunergy Related Party Transactions
Approximately 19% of Zeo’s customers who
have entered into leasing agreements have done so with a third-party leasing company established and managed by White Horse Energy, a
holding company of which Timothy Bridgewater, Zeo’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, is the owner and manager. Mr. Bridgewater,
through White Horse, holds 1% or less of the membership interests of the third-party leasing company established and managed by White
Horse Energy that own installed solar energy systems leased by Zeo Customers, with the remainder of the membership interests being held
by third parties. For the year ended December 31, 2025, the third-party leasing company managed by White Horse Energy had purchased approximately
$18.1 million in solar energy systems from Zeo for their leasing customers. As of December 31, 2024, the third-party leasing company managed
by White Horse Energy had purchased approximately $20.6 million in solar energy systems from Zeo for their leasing customers. As of December
31, 2025, the third-party leasing company had entered into leasing agreements with customers for an additional approximately $1.5 million
in leased systems to be installed by Zeo, if the development and installation of all of those systems continued to completion. Subject
to investor and customer demand, White Horse Energy intends to attract additional investors to form third-party leasing companies that
will be able to fund additional installations of solar systems by Zeo.
ESGEN
ESGEN Class B Ordinary Shares
On April 27, 2021, the Sponsor paid $25,000, or
approximately $0.004 per share, to cover certain of our offering and formation costs in consideration of 7,187,500 ESGEN Class B ordinary
shares, par value $0.0001. The Sponsor transferred 138,000 ESGEN Class B ordinary shares to each of our independent directors and 866,923
ESGEN Class B ordinary shares to the Westwood Client Accounts.
ESGEN Private Placement Warrants
The Sponsor purchased an aggregate of 11,240,000
ESGEN Private Placement Warrants for a purchase price of $1.00 per whole warrant, or $11,240,000 in the aggregate, in a private placement
that occurred simultaneously with the closing of our IPO. Each ESGEN Private Placement Warrant entitles the holder to purchase one Class
A ordinary share at $11.50 per share, subject to adjustment. The ESGEN Private Placement Warrants (including the ESGEN Class A ordinary
shares issuable upon exercise thereof) may not, subject to certain limited exceptions, be transferred, assigned or sold by the holder
until 30 days after the completion of our initial business combination.
Pursuant to the Amended Letter Agreement entered
into on January 24, 2024, the Sponsor and the other Initial Shareholders agreed to forfeit, for no consideration, all ESGEN Private Placement
Warrants held by them in connection with Closing.
Promissory Notes
No compensation of any kind, including finder’s
and consulting fees, were paid to the Sponsor, its officers and directors, or their respective affiliates, for services rendered prior
to or in connection with the completion of our initial business combination. However, these individuals were reimbursed for any out-of-pocket
expenses incurred in connection with activities on our behalf such as identifying potential target businesses and performing due diligence
on suitable business combinations. Our audit committee reviewed on a quarterly basis all payments that were made by us to the Sponsor,
and our officers, directors or their affiliates and determined which expenses and the amount of expenses were reimbursed. There was no
cap or ceiling on the reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses incurred by such persons in connection with activities on our behalf.
The Sponsor advanced $262,268 to cover expenses
related to our IPO under the April 2021 Promissory Note. As of December 31, 2025, no covered expenses remained outstanding and due to
the Sponsor.
95
On April 5, 2023, ESGEN issued the April 2023
Promissory Note in the principal amount of up to $1,500,000 to the Sponsor, which was amended and restated by the October 2023 Promissory
Note, which could be drawn down by ESGEN from time to time prior to the consummation of our initial business combination. The October
2023 Promissory Note, as well as the April 2021 Promissory Note was not be repaid and was cancelled at Closing. As of January 31, 2024,
ESGEN had drawn $1,787,048 and $171,346 under the October 2023 Promissory Note and April 2021 Promissory Note, respectively.
On January 24, 2024, ESGEN issued the January
2024 Promissory Note in the principal amount of up to $750,000 to the Sponsor. The January 2024 Promissory Note could be drawn down by
ESGEN from time to time prior to the consummation of our initial Business Combination for specific uses as designated therein. The January
2024 Promissory Note does not bear interest, matured on the date of consummation of the Business Combination and is subject to customary
events of default. The principal amount under the January 2024 Promissory Note was paid at Closing from funds that ESGEN had available
to it outside of its Trust Account.
Office Space, Secretarial and Administrative Services Until Closing
ESGEN incurred $10,000 per month for office space,
utilities, secretarial support and administrative services provided by the Sponsor. No amounts were paid for these services. As of December
31, 2025, there are amounts due to ESGEN reported on the balance sheet pursuant to this agreement.
Amendment to the Letter Agreement
Concurrently with the execution of the Business
Combination Agreement, the Initial Shareholders entered into the Amendment to the Letter Agreement, pursuant to which, among other things,
each of the Initial Shareholders agreed (i) not to transfer his, her or its ESGEN Class B ordinary shares (or the New PubCo Class A Common
Stock issuable in exchange for such ESGEN Class B ordinary shares pursuant to the Business Combination Agreement) prior to the earlier
of (a) six months after the Closing or (b) subsequent to the Closing (A) if the last sale price of the New PubCo Class A Common Stock
quoted on Nasdaq is greater than or equal to $12 per share (as adjusted for stock splits, stock dividends, reorganizations, recapitalizations
and the like) for any 20 trading days within a 30-consecutive trading day period commencing at least 90 days after Closing, or (B) the
date on which New PubCo completes a liquidation, merger, share exchange or other similar transaction that results in all of New PubCo’s
stockholders having the right to exchange their New PubCo Class A Common Stock for cash, securities or other property, (ii) to waive any
adjustment to the conversion ratio set forth in the governing documents of ESGEN with respect to the ESGEN Class B ordinary shares prior
to the earlier of the ESGEN Share Conversion or the Closing, (iii) the Sponsor agreed to irrevocably surrender and forfeit 2,361,641 ESGEN
ordinary shares, (iv) the Initial Shareholders other than Sponsor agreed to irrevocably surrender and forfeit 538,359 ESGEN ordinary shares,
(v) the Initial Shareholders and Sponsor agreed to forfeit an additional 500,000 shares of New PubCo Class A Common Stock if, within two
years of Closing, the Convertible OpCo Preferred Units are redeemed or converted (with such shares subject to a lock-up for two years
after Closing) and (vi) the Initial Shareholders agreed to forfeit all of their ESGEN Private Placement Warrants in connection with Closing.
Lock-Up Agreement
At the Closing, ESGEN and each of the Lock-Up
Sellers entered into the Lock-Up Agreement, pursuant to which each of the Lock-Up Sellers agreed not to transfer any of its respective
Exchangeable OpCo Units and corresponding shares of New PubCo Class V Common Stock received in connection with the Business Combination
until the earlier of (i) six months after the Closing Date and (ii) subsequent to the Closing Date, (a) if the last sale price of New
PubCo Class A Common Stock quoted on Nasdaq is greater than or equal to $12.00 per share (as adjusted for stock splits, stock dividends,
reorganizations, recapitalizations, and the like) for any 20 trading days within any period of 30 consecutive trading days commencing
at least 90 days after the Closing Date or (b) the date on which New PubCo completes a PubCo Sale (as defined in the Lock-Up Agreement).
96
PIPE Financing
At Closing, the Sponsor purchased $15,000,000
of Convertible OpCo Preferred Units in the Sponsor PIPE Investment.
Policies and Procedures for Related Person
Transactions
The Board has adopted a policy with respect to
the review, approval and ratification of related party transactions. Under the policy, Zeo’s audit committee is responsible for
reviewing and approving related person transactions. In the course of its review and approval of related party transactions, Zeo’s
audit committee will consider the relevant facts and circumstances to decide whether to approve such transactions. In particular, Zeo’s
policy requires Zeo’s audit committee to consider, among other factors it deems appropriate:
● the related person’s
relationship to Zeo and interest in the transaction;
● the material facts of the proposed
transaction, including the proposed aggregate value of the transaction;
● the impact on a director’s
or a director nominee’s independence in the event the related person is a director or director nominee or an immediate family member
of the director or director nominee;
● the benefits to Zeo of the
proposed transaction;
● if applicable, the availability
of other sources of comparable products or services; and
● an assessment of whether the
proposed transaction is on terms that are comparable to the terms available to an unrelated third party or to employees generally.
Zeo’s audit committee will only approve
those transactions that are in, or are not inconsistent with, Zeo’s best interests and those of Zeo’s stockholders, as Zeo’s
audit committee determines in good faith. In addition, under Zeo’s code of business conduct and ethics, its employees, directors
and director nominees have an affirmative responsibility to disclose any transaction or relationship that reasonably could be expected
to give rise to a conflict of interest.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.
On October 31, 2025,
the audit committee of the Board and the Board, after discussion with the management of the Company, approved the dismissal of Grant Thornton
LLP (“GT”), the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, and approved the appointment of Tanner
LLC (“Tanner”) as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December
31, 2025, effective immediately.
GT’s reports on
the Company’s consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 did not contain
any adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion and were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles.
During the period from
April 16, 2024, the date GT was appointed, to October 31, 2025, the date of dismissal, there were no (a) disagreements (as defined in
Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K and the related instructions) with GT on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial
statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedures, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of GT, would have caused
GT to make reference to such disagreement in its report on the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the relevant year
or (b) “reportable events” (as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K and the related instructions), except that there
were material weaknesses in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, related to ineffective controls over information
and communication and period end financial disclosure and reporting processes, including not timely performing certain reconciliations
and the completeness and accuracy of those reconciliations, and lack of effectiveness of controls over accurate accounting and financial
reporting and reviewing the underlying financial statement elements, and recording incorrect journal entries that also did not have the
sufficient review and approval. The Company’s management also did not design and maintain effective controls over the calculation
of earnings per share and the classification of the reinvestment of interest and dividend income in the statement of cash flows. These
material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting have been disclosed in the company’s quarterly reports on Form
10-Q for 2024 and 2025 and annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024. The Audit Committee discussed the subject
matter of each of these reportable events with GT, and the Company authorized GT to respond fully to the inquiries of the successor auditor
concerning the subject matter of each of these reportable events.
97
During the fiscal years
ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, and the subsequent interim period through October 31, 2025, the Company did not consult with Tanner
regarding the application of accounting principles to a specific completed or contemplated transaction or regarding the type of audit
opinions that might be rendered by Tanner on the Company’s financial statements, and Tanner did not provide any written or oral
advice that was an important factor considered by the Company in reaching a decision as to any such accounting, auditing or financial
reporting issue.
Fees
Tanner served as the independent registered public
accounting firm to audit our books and accounts for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025.
The table below presents the aggregate fees billed
for professional services rendered by Tanner for the year ended December 31, 2025.
2025
Audit fees
$ 369,265
Audit-related fees
–
Tax fees
–
All other fees
–
Total fees
$ 369,265
In the above table, Audit fees consist of fees
billed for professional services rendered for the audit of our year-end financial statements, reviews of our quarterly financial statements
and services that are normally provided by our independent registered public accounting firm in connection with statutory and regulatory
filings.
Our Audit Committee determined that the services
provided by Tanner were compatible with maintaining the independence of Tanner as our independent registered public accounting firm.
The table below presents the aggregate fees billed for professional
services rendered by GT for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024.
2025
2024
Audit fees
$ 80,000
$ 1,104,438
Audit-related fees
–
–
Tax fees
–
–
All other fees
115,213
–
Total fees
$ 195,213
$ 1,104,438
In the above table, Audit fees consist of fees
billed for professional services rendered for the audit of our year-end financial statements and services that are normally provided by
our independent registered public accounting firm in connection with statutory and regulatory filings.
Our Audit Committee determined that the services
provided by GT were compatible with maintaining the independence of GT as our independent registered public accounting firm.
98
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBIT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.
The following documents are filed as part of this Report:
(1) Financial Statements : Our financial statements are
listed in the “Index to Financial Statements” on page F-1.
( 2) Financial Statement Schedules : None.
(3) Exhibits
We hereby file as part of this Report the exhibits
listed in the attached Exhibit Index. Copies of such material can also be obtained on the SEC website at www.sec.gov.
Exhibit
Incorporated by Reference
Number
Description
Form
Exhibit
Filing Date
2.1
Business Combination Agreement, dated as of April 19, 2023, by and among ESGEN, Sunergy, the Sellers, OpCo, the Sponsor and Timothy Bridgewater.
8-K
2.1
April 20, 2023
2.2
Amendment No. 1 to Business Combination Agreement, dated as of January 24, 2024, by and between ESGEN and Sunergy.
8-K
2.1
January 25, 2024
2.3
Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization, dated as of May 28, 2025, by and among Zeo Energy Corp., Heliogen, Inc., Hyperion Merger Corp. and Hyperion Acquisition LLC
8-K
2.1
May 29, 2025
3.1
Certificate of Incorporation of Zeo Energy Corp.
8-K
3.1
March 20, 2024
3.2
Bylaws of Zeo Energy Corp.
8-K
3.2
March 20, 2024
4.1
Description of Securities
10.1
Amended and Restated Subscription Agreement, dated as of January 24, 2024, by and among ESGEN, OpCo and the Sponsor.
8-K
10.2
January 25, 2024
10.2
Letter Agreement, dated as of October 22, 2021, by and among ESGEN, the Sponsor and the Insiders party thereto.
8-K
10.5
October 25, 2021
10.3
Amendment to Letter Agreement, dated as of April 19, 2023, by and among ESGEN, the Sponsor and the Insiders party thereto.
8-K
10.1
April 20, 2023
10.4
Amendment No. 2 to Letter Agreement, dated as of January 24, 2024, by and among ESGEN, the Sponsor and the Insiders party thereto.
8-K
10.1
January 25, 2024
10.5
Side Letter, dated as of March 13, 2024 by and among ESGEN, Sponsor, Sunergy and the other parties thereto.
8-K
10.5
March 20, 2024
10.6
Non-Redemption Agreement, dated as of March 11, 2024, by and between ESGEN and The K2 Principal Fund L.P.
8-K
10.1
March 12, 2024
10.7
Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of March 13, 2024.
8-K
10.7
March 20, 2024
10.8
OpCo A&R LLC Agreement, dated as of March 13, 2024.
8-K
10.8
March 20, 2024
10.9
Form of Lock-Up Agreement.
8-K
2.1
April 20, 2023
10.10
Tax Receivable Agreement, dated as of March 13, 2024.
8-K
10.10
March 20, 2024
10.11
Form of Indemnification Agreement.
8-K
10.11
March 20, 2024
10.12
Employment Agreement, dated March 13, 2024, by and between Opco and Timothy Bridgewater.
8-K
10.12
March 20, 2024
10.13
Employment Agreement, dated March 13, 2024, by and between Opco and Kalen Larsen.
8-K
10.13
March 20, 2024
10.14
Employment Agreement, dated March 13, 2024, by and between Opco and Gianluca “Luke” Guy.
8-K
10.14
March 20, 2024
10.15
Employment Agreement, dated March 13, 2024, by and between Opco and Brandon Bridgewater.
8-K
10.15
March 20, 2024
10.16
Employment Agreement, dated March 13, 2024, by and between Opco and Cannon Holbrook.
8-K
10.1
August 20, 2024
10.17
Zeo Energy Corp. 2024 Omnibus Incentive Equity Plan.
8-K
10.17
March 20, 2024
10.18
Promissory Note, dated December 24, 2024, between the Company and LHX Intermediate LLC.
8-K
10.1
December 26, 2024
10.19
Form of Voting Agreement, dated December 24, 2024, between Zeo Energy Corp., LHX Intermediate LLC and certain stockholders of the Company.
8-K
10.2
December 26, 2024
10.20
Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of October 25, 2024, by and between the Company and the sellers party thereto.
8-K
10.1
October 31, 2024
99
10.21
Subscription Agreement, dated as of October 25, 2024, by and between the Company and LHX Intermediate LLC.
8-K
10.2
October 31, 2024
10.22
Form of Voting and Support Agreement.
8-K
10.1
May 29, 2025
10.23
Engagement Letter Third Amendment, dated August 11, 2025
8-K
10.1
August 19, 2025
10.24
Common Stock Purchase Agreement effective January 27, 2026 between the Company and White Lion
8-K
10.1
January 27, 2026
10.25
Registration Rights Agreement effective January 27, 2026 between the Company and White Lion
8-K
10.2
January 27, 2026
14.1
Code of Ethics
16.1
Letter from Grant Thornton LLP, dated November 4, 2025 to the Securities and Exchange Commission regarding change in certifying accountant.
8-K
16.1
November 4, 2025
16.2
Letter from BDO, USA P.C. dated April 18, 2024 to the Securities and Exchange Commission regarding change in certifying accountant.
8-K
16.1
April 18, 2024
19
Insider Trading Policy
10-K
19
May 27, 2025
21
Subsidiaries of Zeo Energy Corp.
10-K
21.1
April 1, 2024
23.1*
Consent of Tanner LLC, independent registered public accounting firm of Zeo Energy Corp.
23.2*
Consent of Grant Thornton LLP, independent registered public accounting firm of Zeo Energy Corp.
31.1**
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2**
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1**
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2**
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
97*
Clawback Policy.
101*
Interactive data file set for the financial statements and accompanying notes contained in this Report (formatted as Inline XBRL).
104*
Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101).
*
Filed herewith
**
Furnished herewith
ITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY.
None.
100
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized
this date of March 31, 2026.
Zeo Energy Corp.
By:
/s/ Timothy Bridgewater
Name:
Timothy Bridgewater
Title:
Chief Executive Officer and Director
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated on March 31, 2026.
Name
Position
/s/ Timothy Bridgewater
Chief Executive Officer and Director
Timothy Bridgewater
(Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ Cannon Holbrook
Chief Financial Officer
Cannon Holbrook
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
/s/ Dr. Abigail M. Allen
Director
Dr. Abigail M. Allen
/s/ James P. Benson
Director
James P. Benson
/s/ Neil Bush
Director
Neil Bush
/s/ Mark Jacobs
Director
Mark Jacobs
101
ZEO ENERGY CORP.
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page
Financial Statements
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Tanner, PCAOB ID 270 ) F-2
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Grant Thornton
LLP, PCAOB ID 248) F-3
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 F-4
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 F-5
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) for the Years Ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 F-6
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 F-8
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements F-9
F- 1
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and
Stockholders of ZEO Energy Corp.
Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated
balance sheet of Zeo Energy Corp. and subsidiaries (collectively, the Company) as of December 31, 2025, and the related consolidated statements
of operations, changes in redeemable noncontrolling interests and stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for the year ended
December 31, 2025, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the financial statements). In our opinion, the financial statements
present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2025, and the results of its operations
and its cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2025, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
of America.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility
of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our
audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required
to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations
of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the
standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged
to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audit, we are required to obtain an understanding
of internal control over financial reporting, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audit included performing procedures to assess
the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond
to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.
Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating
the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ Tanner
We have served as the Company’s auditor
since 2025.
Lehi, Utah
March 31, 2026
F- 2
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING
FIRM
Board of Directors and
Stockholders of ZEO Energy Corp.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated
balance sheet of Zeo Energy Corp. (a Delaware corporation) and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2024, the related
consolidated statements of operations, changes in redeemable noncontrolling interests and stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash
flows for the year ended December 31, 2024, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”).
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company
as of December 31, 2024, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2024, in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial
statements based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)
(“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws
and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the
standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged
to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audit, we are required to obtain an understanding
of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audit included performing procedures to assess
the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond
to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.
Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating
the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
We served as the Company’s auditor from
2023 to 2025.
Kansas City, Missouri
May 27, 2025
F- 3
ZEO ENERGY CORP.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 31,
December 31,
2025
2024
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents
$
6,137,939
$
5,634,115
Accounts receivable, net
8,158,909
8,994,881
Accounts receivable – related parties
611,807
191,662
Inventories
852,179
872,470
Contract assets
2,598,623
1,089,051
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
4,192,590
2,106,496
Total Current Assets
22,552,047
18,888,675
Other assets
92,712
75,935
Interest receivable – related parties
153,485
–
Deferred tax asset, net
–
238,491
Property and equipment, net
2,830,490
2,475,963
Operating lease right-of-use assets
897,476
1,268,139
Finance lease right-of-use assets
310,539
447,012
Note receivable – related party
3,000,000
3,000,000
Intangibles, net
–
7,571,156
Goodwill
27,091,695
27,010,745
TOTAL ASSETS
$
56,928,444
$
60,976,116
LIABILITIES, REDEEMABLE NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable
$
3,769,078
$
2,780,885
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
2,421,237
5,181,087
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities – related parties
49,269
3,359,101
Contract liabilities
1,301,393
201,607
Contract liabilities – related parties
–
2,000
Current portion of operating lease obligations
684,819
583,429
Current portion of finance lease obligations
142,095
130,464
Current portion of long-term debt
23,526
291,036
Convertible promissory note, net
–
2,440,000
Total Current Liabilities
8,391,417
14,969,609
Operating lease obligations, net of current portion
304,295
799,385
Finance lease obligations, net of current portion
208,865
348,807
Long-term debt, net of current portion
55,586
496,623
Warrant liabilities
491,280
1,449,000
TOTAL LIABILITIES
9,451,443
18,063,424
Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests
Class A convertible preferred units, 1,500,000 units issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2025 and 2024
17,207,469
16,130,871
Class B units, 22,880,000 and 33,730,000 units issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively
24,939,200
115,693,900
Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)
Class V common stock, $ 0.0001 par value, 100,000,000 authorized shares; 24,380,000 and 35,230,000 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively
2,438
3,523
Class A common stock, $ 0.0001 par value, 300,000,000 authorized shares; 33,180,843 and 13,252,964 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively
3,318
1,326
Additional paid-in capital
63,394,456
14,523,963
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
( 4,895
)
–
Accumulated deficit
( 58,064,985
)
( 103,440,891
)
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
5,330,332
( 88,912,079
)
TOTAL LIABILITIES, REDEEMABLE NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
$
56,928,444
$
60,976,116
The accompanying notes are an integral part
of these consolidated financial statements.
F- 4
ZEO ENERGY CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Years Ended
December 31,
2025
2024
Revenues
Revenue, net
$ 51,208,067
$ 51,088,065
Related party revenue, net
18,141,871
22,156,018
Total Net Revenues
69,349,938
73,244,083
Operating Expenses
Cost of revenues
31,066,477
38,067,096
Depreciation and amortization
8,576,502
4,836,538
Sales and marketing
22,698,405
19,587,073
General and administrative
27,540,686
21,558,136
Total Operating Expenses
89,882,070
84,048,843
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS
( 20,532,132 )
( 10,804,760 )
Other Income (Expense)
Other income
363,918
141,467
Interest expense
( 155,490 )
( 333,539 )
Gain on disposal of property and equipment
–
91,684
Gain on change in fair value of warrant liabilities
957,720
69,000
Total Other Income (Expense)
1,166,148
( 31,388 )
NET LOSS FROM OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES
( 19,365,984 )
( 10,836,148 )
Income tax benefit (provision)
( 263,649 )
963,790
NET LOSS
$ ( 19,629,633 )
$ ( 9,872,358 )
Less: Net loss attributable to Sunergy Renewables LLC prior to the business combination
$ –
$ ( 523,681 )
NET LOSS SUBSEQUENT TO THE BUSINESS COMBINATION
( 19,629,633 )
( 9,348,677 )
Less: Net loss attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests
( 5,620,879 )
( 6,679,788 )
NET LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO CLASS A COMMON STOCKHOLDERS
$ ( 14,008,754 )
$ ( 2,668,889 )
LOSS PER CLASS A COMMON SHARE – BASIC AND DILUTED
$ ( 0.56 )
$ ( 0.48 )
WEIGHTED-AVERAGE CLASS A COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING – BASIC AND DILUTED
24,936,865
5,546,925
COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
Foreign currency translation adjustments
4,895
–
NET COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
$ ( 14,013,649 )
$ ( 2,668,889 )
The accompanying notes are an integral part
of these consolidated financial statements.
F- 5
ZEO ENERGY CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES
IN REDEEMABLE
NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
2024
Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests
Class A
Convertible
Preferred Units
Class B Units
Common Units
Class V
Common Stock
Class A
Common Stock
Additional Paid-in
Accumulated
Total
Stockholders’ Equity
Units
Amount
Units
Amount
Units
Amount
Shares
Amount
Shares
Amount
Capital
Deficit
(Deficit)
Balance, December 31, 2023
–
$ –
–
$ –
1,000,000
$ 31,155,864
–
$ –
–
$ –
$ –
$ ( 533,345 )
$ 30,622,519
Retroactive application of Business Combination
–
–
–
–
( 1,000,000 )
( 31,155,864 )
33,730,000
3,373
–
–
31,152,491
–
–
Balance, December 31, 2023
–
–
–
–
–
–
33,730,000
3,373
–
–
31,152,491
( 533,345 )
30,622,519
Stockholder distributions
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
( 90,000 )
( 90,000 )
Net loss prior to the Business Combination
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
( 523,681 )
( 523,681 )
Effects of Business Combination
Issuance of Class A Shares to third party advisors
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
178,207
18
891,017
–
891,035
Issuance of Class A Shares to backstop investor
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
225,174
23
1,569,440
–
1,569,463
Reverse Recapitalization
1,500,000
6,855,076
–
–
–
–
1,500,000
150
4,248,583
425
( 2,498,380 )
–
( 2,497,805 )
Transaction costs
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
( 2,890,061 )
–
( 2,890,061 )
Establishment of redeemable noncontrolling interests
–
–
33,730,000
26,116,548
–
–
–
–
–
–
( 26,116,548 )
–
( 26,116,548 )
Activities subsequent to business combination
Stock-based compensation
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
375,000
37
7,360,697
–
7,360,734
Class A common stock issued for services
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
146,000
15
255,485
–
255,500
Class A common stock issued in the asset acquisition of Lumio
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
6,206,897
621
8,131,035
–
8,131,656
Class A common stock issued private placement
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
1,873,103
187
2,715,8143
–
2,716,000
Dividends paid to preferred unit holders
–
( 139,067 )
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Subsequent measurement of redeemable noncontrolling interests
–
–
–
105,672,002
–
–
–
–
–
–
( 6,047,026 )
( 99,624,976 )
( 105,672,002 )
Net income (loss)
–
9,414,862
–
( 16,094,650 )
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
( 2,668,889 )
( 2,668,889 )
Balance, December 31, 2024
1,500,000
$ 16,130,871
33,730,000
$ 115,693,900
–
$ –
35,230,000
$ 3,523
13,252,964
$ 1,326
$ 14,523,963
$ ( 103,440,891 )
$ ( 88,912,079 )
F- 6
ZEO ENERGY CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES
IN REDEEMABLE
NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
2025
Redeemable
Noncontrolling Interests
Class
A
Convertible
Preferred Units
Class
B Units
Class
V
Common Stock
Class
A
Common Stock
Additional
Paid-in
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Accumulated
Total
Stockholders’
Units
Amount
Units
Amount
Shares
Amount
Shares
Amount
Capital
Loss
Deficit
(Deficit)
Balance, December 31,
2024
1,500,000
$ 16,130,871
33,730,000
$ 115,693,900
35,230,000
$ 3,523
13,252,964
$ 1,326
$ 14,523,963
$ –
$ ( 103,440,891 )
$ ( 88,912,079 )
Stock-based compensation
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
6,341,542
–
–
6,341,542
Class A common stock issued upon
vesting of restricted stock awards
–
–
–
–
–
–
249,792
24
( 24 )
–
–
–
Tax withholding paid related to stock-based
compensation
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
( 166,929 )
–
–
( 166,929 )
Class A common stock issued to employees
for services
–
–
–
–
–
–
80,913
8
100,690
–
–
100,698
Class A common stock issued in exchange
for OpCo class B units and corresponding class V common stock
–
–
( 10,850,000 )
( 24,051,500 )
( 10,850,000 )
( 1,085 )
10,850,000
1,085
24,051,500
–
–
24,051,500
Class A common stock issued in the
acquisition of Heliogen, Inc.
–
–
–
–
–
–
6,217,612
622
14,424,238
–
–
14,424,860
Class A common stock issued in settlement
of accrued advisory fees
–
–
–
–
–
–
677,711
68
1,619,661
–
–
1,619,729
Class A common stock issued upon
conversion of convertible note payable
–
–
–
–
–
–
1,851,851
185
2,499,815
–
–
2,500,000
Dividends paid to preferred unit
holders
–
( 621,063 )
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Foreign currency translation
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
( 4,895 )
–
( 4,895 )
Subsequent measurement of redeemable
noncontrolling interests
–
–
–
( 59,384,660 )
–
–
–
–
–
–
59,384,660
59,414,864
Net income
(loss)
–
1,697,661
–
( 7,318,540 )
–
–
–
–
–
–
( 14,008,754 )
( 14,008,754 )
Balance, December
31, 2025
1,500,000
$ 17,207,469
22,880,000
$ 24,939,200
24,380,000
$ 2,438
33,180,843
$ 3,318
$ 63,394,456
$ ( 4,895 )
$ ( 58,064,985 )
$ 5,330,332
The accompanying notes are an integral part
of these consolidated financial statements.
F- 7
ZEO ENERGY CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Years Ended
December 31,
2025
2024
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss
$ ( 19,629,633 )
$ ( 9,872,358 )
Adjustment to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities
Depreciation and amortization
8,576,502
4,836,538
Amortization of debt discount
60,000
–
Gain on change in fair value of warrant liabilities
( 957,720 )
( 69,000 )
Gain on disposal of fixed assets
–
( 91,684 )
Stock-based compensation
6,397,925
7,695,748
Class A common stock issued to employees for services
100,698
255,500
Provision for credit losses
3,359,588
2,815,633
Deferred taxes
238,491
( 997,702 )
Non-cash operating lease expense
641,863
705,293
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable
( 2,218,236 )
( 8,785,973 )
Accounts receivable – related parties
( 420,145 )
204,826
Inventories
20,291
( 131,898 )
Contract assets
( 1,509,572 )
4,850,862
Prepaids and other current assets
( 1,076,486 )
( 1,757,354 )
Other assets
( 2,180 )
( 13,795 )
Interest receivable – related parties
( 153,485 )
–
Accounts payable
2,753,886
( 2,512,834 )
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
( 1,996,262 )
( 1,140,780 )
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities – related parties
( 3,309,832 )
943,135
Contract liabilities
1,099,786
( 3,861,063 )
Contract liabilities – related parties
( 2,000 )
( 1,158,848 )
Operating lease payments
( 664,900 )
( 630,963 )
Net cash used in operating activities
( 8,691,421 )
( 8,716,717 )
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchases of property and equipment
( 1,223,400 )
( 369,137 )
Investment in note receivable – related party
–
( 3,000,000 )
Cash paid in the asset acquisition of Lumio
–
( 4,000,000 )
Cash acquired in the acquisition of Heliogen
14,596,267
–
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
13,372,867
( 7,369,137 )
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net proceeds from the issuance of convertible preferred stock
–
9,221,649
Proceeds from the issuance of Class A common stock in a private placement
–
2,716,000
Net proceeds from the issuance of convertible promissory note
–
2,440,000
Repayments of finance lease liabilities
( 128,311 )
( 118,416 )
Repayments of debt
( 3,256,424 )
( 332,503 )
Dividends paid to OpCo Class A preferred unit holders
( 621,063 )
( 139,067 )
Tax withholdings paid related to stock-based compensation
( 166,929 )
–
Distributions to members
–
( 90,000 )
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
( 4,172,727 )
13,697,663
Effect on foreign exchange on cash
( 4,895 )
–
NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
503,824
( 2,388,191 )
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
5,634,115
8,022,306
Cash and cash equivalents, end of the period
$ 6,137,939
$ 5,634,115
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Cash paid for interest
$ 99,384
$ 124,488
Cash paid for income taxes
$ –
$ –
NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net loss attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interest
$ 7,318,540
$ 16,094,650
OpCo Class A preferred dividends
$ 1,697,661
$ 9,414,862
Subsequent measurement of redeemable noncontrolling interest
$ 59,384,660
$ 105,672,002
Class A common stock issued upon vesting of restricted stock awards
$ 24
$ –
Class A common stock issued in exchange for Class V common stock
$ 1,085
$ –
Fair value of Class A common stock issued in exchange for OpCo Class B units
$ 24,051,500
$ –
Class A common stock issued in settlement of accrued advisory fees
$ 1,619,729
$ –
Class A common stock issued upon conversion of convertible note payable
$ 2,500,000
$ –
Operating lease right-of-use asset and liability measurement
$ 140,975
$ 837,764
Accounts payable settled for loan payable
$ 2,547,877
$ –
Net assets acquired in the acquisition of Heliogen
$ 14,424,860
$ –
Class A common stock issued in the acquisition of Heliogen
$ 14,424,860
$ –
Class A common stock issued in the asset acquisition of Lumio
$ –
$ 8,131,656
Deferred equity issuance costs
$ –
$ 2,769,039
Issuance of Class A common stock to vendors
$ –
$ 891,035
Issuance of Class A common stock to backstop investors
$ –
$ 1,569,463
The accompanying notes are an integral part
of these consolidated financial statements.
F- 8
Zeo
Energy Corp.
Notes
to the Consolidated Financial Statements
DECEMBER
31, 2025
NOTE 1 —ORGANIZATION
AND NATURE OF BUSINESS
Zeo Energy Corp. (“Zeo” or the “Company”)
was incorporated on April 19, 2021 as ESGEN Acquisition Corporation, a Cayman Islands exempted blank check company formed to effect a
merger, share exchange, asset acquisition, share purchase, reorganization, or similar business combination with one or more businesses.
Sunergy Renewables, LLC, formed in October 2021, and its wholly owned subsidiaries Sunergy Solar LLC (formed in 2005), Sun First Energy,
LLC, and Sunergy Roofing and Construction, LLC (collectively, “Sunergy”) market, sell, design, procure, install and service
residential solar photovoltaic systems and provide related roofing repair and construction services to homeowners in the United States.
The Company is headquartered in New Port Richey, Florida.
ESGEN OpCo, LLC (“OpCo”), a Delaware
limited liability company, holds the operating businesses of Sunergy. The Company operates under an Up-C organizational structure in which
Zeo’s principal asset is its equity interest in OpCo. Zeo is the managing member of OpCo and controls its management and operations,
holding OpCo manager units representing its economic interest. Other members hold exchangeable OpCo units representing their economic
interests, which are exchangeable into shares of the Company’s Class A common stock on a one-for-one basis.
On March 13, 2024, ESGEN Acquisition Corporation
consummated a business combination with Sunergy and domesticated to the State of Delaware, changing its name to Zeo Energy Corp. The Sunergy
business combination was accounted for as a reverse recapitalization, with Sunergy treated as the accounting acquirer. Accordingly, the
consolidated financial statements for periods prior to March 13, 2024 represent the historical financial statements of Sunergy, with the
equity structure retroactively adjusted to reflect the capital structure of Zeo. See Note 4—Reverse Recapitalization for additional
information.
On August 8, 2025, Zeo completed the acquisition
of Heliogen, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, “Heliogen”), a provider of concentrated solar power and long-duration
energy generation and storage technology solutions for commercial and industrial applications. Heliogen became a wholly owned subsidiary
of Zeo. The acquisition was accounted for as a business combination. See Note 6—Business Combinations for additional information.
Zeo, together with OpCo and its subsidiaries,
including Sunergy and Heliogen, is referred to collectively as the “Company.” The accompanying consolidated financial statements
include the accounts of Zeo, OpCo and its subsidiaries, including Sunergy, and Heliogen. Ownership interests in OpCo held by members other
than Zeo represent noncontrolling interests (“NCI”). All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
The Company’s Class A common stock and public warrants are listed on The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (“Nasdaq”) under the
symbols “ZEO” and “ZEOWW,” respectively.
NOTE 2 —LIQUIDITY
AND GOING CONCERN ASSESSMENT
As of December 31, 2025, the Company had cash
and cash equivalents of $ 6.1 million, positive working capital of $ 14.2 million, and total stockholders’ equity of $ 5.3 million.
For the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company incurred a net loss of $ 19.6 million and $ 8.7 million of cash used in operating activities.
Management has assessed the going concern assumptions of the Company during the preparation of these consolidated financial statements.
The Company has operational plans to increase
revenue and profitability in 2026 which are expected to improve cash flows. The operational plan includes an increase in the number of
sales agents to increase revenue and improved efficiency in the operations of the Company through centralization of field offices and
labor and productivity improvement in the corporate operations through the implementation of a new CRM software.
F- 9
The Company is also working with partners to see
to short-term cash needs through the use of the common stock purchase agreement with White Lion Capital LLC (the “White Lion ELOC”),
which provides the Company the right to sell up to $ 30.0 million in shares of Class A common stock. See Note 23—Subsequent Events
for additional information. The Company also has other opportunities to raise capital, such as through a private investment in public
equity or repricing of warrants.
The Company’s consolidated financial statements
have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal
course of business.
NOTE 3 —SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements of the Company
are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) as
codified in the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”). The accompanying
consolidated financial statements include the results of operations of Heliogen subsequent to the acquisition date of August 8, 2025.
See Note 6—Business Combinations for additional information.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include
the accounts of Zeo and its subsidiaries. Zeo consolidates OpCo because Zeo is the managing member of OpCo and controls its management
and operations. Ownership interests in OpCo held by members other than Zeo represent NCI. Because these interests are redeemable at the
option of the holders, they are classified as redeemable NCI and presented outside of permanent equity in the consolidated balance sheets.
See Note 17—Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests and Equity for additional information. All intercompany balances and transactions
have been eliminated in consolidation.
Variable Interest Entities
The Company evaluates its interests in other entities
to determine whether those entities are variable interest entities (“VIEs”) and whether the Company is the primary beneficiary
of any such VIE in accordance with ASC 810, “ Consolidation. ” An entity is considered a VIE if it lacks sufficient equity
at risk to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support, or if the equity holders, as a group, lack the characteristics
of a controlling financial interest.
The Company is deemed the primary beneficiary
of a VIE if it has both (a) the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance and
(b) the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the VIE. The Company performs
this assessment at the inception of any arrangement that may involve a VIE and reassesses on an ongoing basis if certain reconsideration
events occur. If the Company determines that it is the primary beneficiary of a VIE, the VIE is consolidated in the Company’s financial
statements. If the Company holds a variable interest in a VIE but is not the primary beneficiary, the interest is not consolidated and
is accounted for under other applicable guidance.
The Company has evaluated certain related party
arrangements involving entities under common management and has concluded that it is not the primary beneficiary of those entities. See
Note 5—Variable Interest Entities for additional information.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements
in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities
and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements, as well as the reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Significant estimates include, but are not limited
to, revenue recognition for solar system installations, allowance for credit losses, reserves for excess and obsolete inventory, impairment
evaluations of long-lived assets and goodwill, fair value measurements of warrant liabilities, fair value of assets acquired and liabilities
assumed in business combinations, stock-based compensation, and assessments of contingent liabilities.
F- 10
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash on hand
and highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less. The Company maintains deposits in several financial institutions,
which may at times exceed amounts covered by insurance provided by the U.S. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”).
The Company has not experienced any losses related to amounts in excess of FDIC limits. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company
had $ 5,294,023 and $ 5,234,292 in excess of FDIC limits, respectively.
Concentration of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject
the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable. The Company maintains
its cash balances with high-credit-quality financial institutions. At times, such balances may exceed federally insured limits provided
by the FDIC. The Company has not experienced any losses related to these balances.
The Company’s accounts receivable are primarily
due from third-party financing companies that provide financing to the Company’s customers for the purchase and installation of
solar systems. The Company incurred losses due to the bankruptcy of two third-party financing companies in 2025. The Company makes efforts
to monitor the credit worthiness of these companies through communication with the companies and discussions with peer companies who also
do business with these third-party financing companies. The Company is regularly pursuing opportunities to diversify the third-party financing
companies with who it works in an effort to minimize the concentration of risk.
During the year ended December 31, 2025, approximately
46 % of the equipment installed by the Company was purchased through a single distributor, Greentech Renewables. The Company’s agreement
with Greentech does not obligate either party to continue conducting business with the other. While the Company believes alternative distributors
are available, the loss of this relationship could temporarily disrupt procurement and installation activities. The Company has certain
revenue and accounts receivable concentrations among a limited number of third-party financing companies, including a related party. See
Note 8—Disaggregation of Revenues and Segment Reporting and Note 16—Related Party Transactions for additional
information.
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Credit
Losses
Accounts receivable consist of trade receivables
arising from credit sales to customers in the normal course of business. A significant portion of the Company’s customers lease
or finance the purchase and installation of solar systems through third-party financing companies. These financing companies typically
remit payment to the Company within three weeks following installation. The Company is not deemed a borrower under these financing arrangements
and is not subject to the terms of the financing agreements between the financing companies and the customers.
Accounts receivable are recorded at the
invoiced amount, net of an allowance for current expected credit losses. In accordance with ASC 326, “ Financial
Instruments—Credit Losses ,” the Company estimates expected credit losses on accounts receivable using an aging
analysis that incorporates historical loss experience, customer creditworthiness, prevailing economic conditions, and reasonable and
supportable forward-looking information. The Company also provides an allowance for customers determined to be insolvent. Accounts
receivable balances are written off when they are determined to be uncollectible. As of December 31, 2025, the Company has chosen
not to write off the accounts receivable associated with bankrupt customers pending the outcome of the bankruptcy proceedings.
The following table presents activity in the allowance
for current expected credit losses for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024:
December 31,
2025
December 31,
2024
Allowance for credit losses – beginning balance
$ 1,165,336
$ 862,580
Provision for credit losses
3,359,588
2,815,633
Write-offs
( 50,794 )
( 2,525,100 )
Recoveries
303,420
12,223
Allowance for credit losses – ending balance
$ 4,777,550
$ 1,165,336
Revenue Recognition and Cost of Revenues
The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with
ASC 606, “ Revenue from Contracts with Customers .” Revenue is recognized when control of promised goods or services
transfers to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled in exchange for those
goods or services.
The Company generates revenue primarily from the
design, engineering, procurement, and installation of residential solar energy systems and related roofing services. Solar installation
contracts typically include equipment and installation services that are highly integrated and combined to deliver a completed solar energy
system. Because the individual goods and services are not distinct within the context of the contract and are significantly integrated,
the Company accounts for each solar installation contract as a single performance obligation.
F- 11
Revenue from roofing services is recognized at
a point in time upon completion of the roofing project when control transfers to the customer.
The transaction price is generally fixed based
on the contractual price specified in the installation agreement. The Company evaluates contracts for the existence of variable consideration
and significant financing components. Variable consideration, if present, is included in the transaction price only to the extent that
it is probable that a significant reversal of revenue will not occur. Due to the short duration of the Company’s installation projects,
contracts generally do not contain significant financing components.
The Company satisfies its performance obligation
and recognizes revenue at a point in time when control of the installed solar system transfers to the customer. Control transfers when
installation of the system is complete and the system is capable of operating as intended (the “Installation Verified” milestone).
At this stage, the system is fully installed, permanently affixed to the property, and no substantive construction or integration services
remaining to be performed by the Company.
Following completion of installation, the system
must receive Permission to Operate (“PTO”) from the local utility before electricity can be exported to the grid. PTO represents
a regulatory authorization issued by the utility and does not represent a separate performance obligation. Accordingly, PTO does not constitute
a separate performance obligation and does not affect the timing of revenue recognition.
Many customers finance the purchase and installation
of solar systems through third-party financing companies. In these arrangements, the financing company remits payment to the Company upon
completion of installation, typically net of financing-related fees. Revenue is recognized at the contractual amount with the customer,
net of financing-related fees. Cash payments received from customers or third-party financing companies prior to completion of the Company’s
performance obligation are recorded as contract liabilities and recognized as revenue when installation is complete and control of the
system transfers to the customer.
Cost of revenues consists primarily of equipment,
materials, subcontractor costs, and direct labor associated with the installation of solar energy systems and roofing projects. Costs
incurred in connection with installation activities are generally expensed as incurred. Equipment and materials purchased prior to installation
may be recorded as inventory or prepaid expenses and are recognized in cost of revenues when the related installation project is completed.
See Note 8—Disaggregation of Revenues and Segment Reporting for additional information.
Segment Reporting
The Company reports segment information in accordance
with ASC 280, “ Segment Reporting .” Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise for which separate
financial information is available and whose operating results are regularly reviewed by the chief operating decision maker (“CODM”)
to allocate resources and assess performance. The Company’s CODM is its Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”).
Following the acquisition of Heliogen on August
8, 2025, the Company reassessed its segment structure and determined that it operates in two operating and reportable segments: (1) Sunergy,
which includes the design, procurement, installation, and servicing of residential solar photovoltaic systems and related roofing services;
and (2) Heliogen, which includes concentrated solar power and long-duration energy generation and storage technology solutions for commercial
and industrial applications.
Prior to the acquisition of Heliogen, the Company
operated as a single operating and reportable segment consisting of its solar installation and related services operations. See Note
8—Disaggregation of Revenues and Segment Reporting for additional information.
Notes Receivable
The Company records notes receivable when it extends
credit or financing to related parties or third parties. The Company evaluates notes receivable for collectability each reporting period
under the current expected credit loss model in accordance with ASC 326. An allowance for expected credit losses is recorded when necessary
to reflect estimated uncollectible amounts. See Note 16—Related Party Transactions for additional information.
Inventories
Inventories are primarily comprised of solar panels
and other related components necessary for installations and service needs. Inventories are measured at the lower of cost or net realizable
value, with cost determined using the weighted-average cost method. When evidence exists that the net realizable value of inventory is
lower than its cost, the difference is recognized as cost of revenues in the consolidated statements of operations in the period identified.
As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, inventory was
$ 852,179 and $ 872,470 , respectively.
F- 12
Contract Assets and Liabilities
Contract assets represent revenue recognized in
excess of amounts billed to customers when the Company has satisfied performance obligations but does not yet have an unconditional right
to payment. Contract assets are reclassified to accounts receivable when the Company’s right to payment becomes unconditional. Contract
liabilities represent payments received in advance of the satisfaction of performance obligations and are recognized as revenue when the
related performance obligations are satisfied. Changes in contract asset and contract liability balances during the reporting period primarily
result from the timing differences between the Company’s performance of services and customer billing or cash collections and are
reflected in the corresponding balances within accounts receivable and deferred revenue in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets
Prepaid expenses and other current assets consist
primarily of employee advances, advanced sales commissions, prepaid insurance, and other similar current assets.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation.
Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets. Leasehold improvements
are amortized over the shorter of the lease term or the estimated useful life of the related asset. Maintenance and repairs are expensed
as incurred. Expenditures that substantially extend the useful lives of existing assets or improve the efficiency or functionality of
the assets are capitalized. Upon retirement or disposal, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and
any resulting gain or loss is recognized in the consolidated statements of operations.
Estimated useful lives of property and equipment
are as follows:
Description
Useful Life
(Years)
Leasehold improvements
5
Office furniture and equipment
3 – 5
Internally-developed software
3 – 5
Vehicles
3 – 5
Internally-Developed Software
The Company capitalizes certain costs incurred
in connection with the development of internally-developed software in accordance with ASC 350-40, “ Intangibles—Internal-Use
Software .” Costs incurred during the preliminary project stage and post-implementation stage are expensed as incurred. Costs
incurred during the application development stage are capitalized once management authorizes and commits to funding the project and it
is probable that the project will be completed and used as intended.
Capitalized internally-developed software costs
include payroll and payroll-related costs for employees directly involved in the development of the software and external costs incurred
in connection with the development of the software. Capitalization ceases when the software is substantially complete and ready for its
intended use. Capitalized internally-developed software costs are amortized using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life
of the software.
F- 13
Leases
The Company evaluates all contracts at inception
or upon modification to determine whether the contract contains a lease in accordance with ASC 842, “ Leases .” A contract
is or contains a lease if it conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset for a period of time in exchange for consideration.
Control over the use of the identified asset exists when the lessee has both the right to obtain substantially all of the economic benefits
from the use of the asset and the right to direct the use of the asset. Contracts containing a lease are further evaluated for classification
as operating or finance leases.
Operating leases
At the commencement of a lease, the Company recognizes
right-of-use (“ROU”) assets and related lease liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets for leases with a term greater
than one year. Lease liabilities and the corresponding ROU assets are initially measured at the present value of the unpaid lease payments
as of the lease commencement date. If a lease contains renewal or termination options, the exercise of those options is included in the
lease term when the Company is reasonably certain the option will be exercised. Because the Company’s leases generally do not provide
an implicit rate, the Company uses an estimated incremental borrowing rate (“IBR”) based on information available at the lease
commencement date to determine the present value of lease payments. The IBR represents the rate the Company would incur to borrow on a
collateralized basis over a similar term in an amount equal to the lease payments.
When calculating the present value of lease payments,
the Company accounts for lease and non-lease components as a single lease component. Variable lease payments are expensed as incurred.
The Company does not recognize ROU assets and lease liabilities for short-term leases with an initial lease term of 12 months or less.
Finance Leases
Leases that transfer substantially all of the
risks and benefits of ownership of the underlying asset to the Company are accounted for as finance leases. At lease commencement, the
Company recognizes a ROU asset and a corresponding lease liability. Lease cost for finance leases consists of amortization of the ROU
asset and interest expense on the lease liability. The ROU asset is amortized on a straight-line basis and recorded in depreciation and
amortization, while interest on the lease liability is recognized using the effective interest method and recorded as interest expense
in the consolidated statements of operations. Finance lease ROU assets are amortized over the shorter of the lease term or the estimated
useful life of the underlying asset. If the Company is reasonably certain to exercise a purchase option, the ROU asset is amortized over
the estimated useful life of the underlying asset.
Commitments and Contingencies
The Company accounts for commitments and contingencies
in accordance with ASC 450, “ Contingencies .” Liabilities for loss contingencies are recorded when it is probable that
a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. If a range of loss is determined to be probable
and no amount within the range is a better estimate than another, the minimum amount of the range is recorded. If a loss is reasonably
possible but not probable, the Company discloses the nature of the contingency and an estimate of the possible loss or range of loss if
such estimate can be made. Contingencies include, but are not limited to, litigation, regulatory matters, contractual obligations, and
other claims arising in the normal course of business.
Business Combinations
The Company accounts for business combinations
under the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with ASC 805, “ Business Combinations .” The Company allocates
the purchase price of an acquisition to the tangible and intangible assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and any NCI based on their estimated
fair values at the acquisition date. The Company recognizes the amount by which the purchase price of an acquired entity exceeds the net
of the fair values assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as goodwill. In determining the fair values of assets acquired
and liabilities assumed, the Company uses various recognized valuation methods, including the income, cost, and market approaches, in
accordance with ASC 820, “ Fair Value Measurement. ” The Company makes assumptions within certain valuation techniques,
including discount rates, royalty rates, and the amount and timing of future cash flows.
The Company initially performs these valuations
based on preliminary estimates and assumptions by management or, where appropriate, independent valuation specialists under the Company’s
supervision. The Company may revise these estimates and assumptions as additional information becomes available during the measurement
period, which may extend up to one year from the acquisition date. Acquisition-related expenses are recognized separately from business
combinations and are expensed as incurred.
F- 14
Intangible Assets
Acquired identifiable intangible assets are recorded
at fair value at the acquisition date and are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. Estimated useful lives
are determined based on the period over which the assets are expected to contribute to future cash flows. The Company has no intangible
assets with indefinite lives.
Goodwill
In accordance with ASC 350, “ Intangibles—Goodwill
and Other ,” goodwill is not amortized but is tested for impairment annually on December 31, or more frequently if events or
circumstances indicate that goodwill may be impaired.
When assessing the recoverability of goodwill,
the Company may first perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting
unit is less than its carrying amount. The qualitative assessment considers factors including the current operating environment, industry
and market conditions, cost factors, overall financial performance, and other relevant events. If the Company bypasses the qualitative
assessment, or concludes that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, the
Company performs a quantitative assessment by comparing the estimated fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying amount. The Company
estimates the fair value of its reporting units based on the present value of estimated future cash flows. Considerable management judgment
is required in evaluating operating and macroeconomic conditions and estimating future cash flows, including assumptions related to growth
rates and discount rates.
If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds
its estimated fair value, an impairment loss is recognized for the amount of the excess, limited to the total amount of goodwill allocated
to the reporting unit.
Long-Lived Assets
The Company reviews the carrying value of long-lived
assets, including property and equipment, ROU assets, and definite-lived intangible assets, for impairment in accordance with ASC 360,
“ Property, Plant, and Equipment, ” whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of
an asset or asset group may not be recoverable. Such events or circumstances may include significant decreases in the market price of
an asset, significant changes in the extent or manner in which an asset is used or in its physical condition, significant adverse changes
in legal factors or in the business climate, a history or forecast of operating or cash flow losses, significant disposal activity, a
significant decline in revenue, or other indicators that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. If indicators of impairment
are present, the Company evaluates recoverability by comparing the carrying amount of the asset or asset group to the estimated undiscounted
future cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset or asset group. If the carrying amount exceeds
the estimated undiscounted future cash flows, an impairment loss is recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the
asset’s fair value.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Fair value is the price that would be received
to sell an asset or the amount paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
The Company applies the fair value hierarchy in accordance with ASC 820, which prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. The
hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to
unobservable inputs. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:
Level 1 – Inputs based on unadjusted quoted
prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access at the measurement date.
Level 2 – Observable inputs other than quoted
prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or
similar instruments in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3 – Inputs that reflect management’s
best estimate of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date. The inputs are both unobservable
and significant to the overall fair value measurement.
In some circumstances, the inputs used to measure
fair value might be categorized within different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In those instances, the fair value measurement is
categorized in its entirety based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. See Note 20—Fair
Value Measurements for additional information.
F- 15
Warrant Liabilities
The Company accounts for warrants in accordance
with ASC 480, “ Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity ,” and ASC 815-40, “ Derivatives and Hedging—Contracts
in Entity’s Own Equity .” The Company evaluates the terms of each warrant instrument to determine whether the warrants should
be classified as equity or as liabilities. This evaluation includes an assessment of whether the warrants are freestanding financial instruments,
whether the warrants are indexed to the Company’s own common stock, and whether the warrant terms could require net cash settlement
or otherwise fail to meet the conditions for equity classification.
Warrants that meet the criteria for equity classification
are recorded in additional paid-in capital and are not subsequently remeasured. Warrants that do not meet the criteria for equity classification
are recorded as liabilities at fair value on the date of issuance. Liability-classified warrants are remeasured at fair value at each
reporting date, with changes in fair value recognized in the consolidated statements of operations until the warrants are exercised, expire,
or are otherwise settled.
Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests
Redeemable NCI represents the ownership interests
in OpCo held by legacy OpCo unitholders other than Zeo. Zeo consolidates OpCo as the managing member; however, the legacy OpCo unitholders
retain an economic interest in OpCo through their ownership of OpCo common units. In connection with the Sunergy business combination,
legacy OpCo unitholders received OpCo common units together with a corresponding number of shares of Zeo’s Class V common stock.
Each OpCo common unit, together with the cancellation of the paired share of Class V common stock, may be exchanged at the election of
the holder for either (i) one share of Zeo’s Class A common stock or (ii) cash equal to the fair value of a share of Class A common
stock, subject to the terms of the exchange agreement and approval of Zeo’s board of directors.
Because these exchange rights are not solely within
the control of the Company, the related NCI is classified as redeemable NCI and is presented outside of permanent equity as temporary
equity on the consolidated balance sheets.
Redeemable NCI were initially measured at the
legacy OpCo unitholders’ proportionate share of OpCo’s net assets at the closing of the Sunergy business combination. Subsequently,
the carrying value of the redeemable NCI is remeasured at each reporting date based on the fair value of the Company’s Class A common
stock. Changes in the redemption value are recorded as deemed dividends, which reduce additional paid-in capital or, in the absence of
additional paid-in capital, retained earnings.
Redeemable Convertible Preferred Units
Redeemable convertible preferred units represent
preferred equity interests issued at the OpCo level. These units are presented as NCI in the Company’s consolidated financial statements
because they are issued by OpCo and are not owned by Zeo. The redeemable convertible preferred units contain certain redemption features
that are not solely within the control of the Company. As a result, these units are classified outside of permanent equity as temporary
equity on the consolidated balance sheets. The redeemable convertible preferred units are initially recorded at fair value on the date
of issuance, net of issuance costs. Subsequent adjustments to the carrying value are recorded in accordance with the terms of the applicable
unit agreements and relevant accounting guidance. See Note 17—Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests and Equity for additional
information.
Stock-based Compensation
The Company accounts for stock-based compensation
in accordance with ASC 718, “ Compensation—Stock Compensation .” Stock-based awards granted to employees, non-employee
directors, and consultants are measured at the grant-date fair value of the award and recognized as compensation expense over the requisite
service period, which is generally the vesting period.
Restricted stock awards are measured based on
the closing market price of the Company’s common stock on the grant date. Compensation cost for awards with only service-based vesting
conditions is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period. For awards with graded vesting features, the Company
recognizes compensation expense for each separate vesting tranche over its respective service period.
For awards with market-based vesting conditions,
the Company estimates grant-date fair value using a Monte Carlo simulation model. Compensation cost for market-condition awards is recognized
over the derived service period regardless of whether the market condition is achieved. The Company has elected to recognize forfeitures
as they occur rather than estimate expected forfeitures.
F- 16
Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance
with ASC 740, “ Income Taxes .” Zeo is subject to U.S. federal, state, and local income taxes. OpCo is treated as a partnership
for U.S. federal income tax purposes and generally does not pay U.S. federal income taxes. Instead, the OpCo unitholders, including Zeo,
are liable for U.S. federal income taxes on their respective shares of OpCo’s taxable income. OpCo may be subject to certain state
and local income or franchise taxes in jurisdictions that tax entities classified as partnerships. Under the asset and liability method,
deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences between the financial
statement carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured
using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the periods in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered
or settled. The effect of changes in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in the period that includes the enactment
date.
The Company evaluates the realizability of deferred
tax assets and records a valuation allowance when, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or
all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
The Company recognizes the tax benefit of uncertain
tax positions only when it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination by taxing authorities, including
resolution of any related appeals or litigation. The tax benefit recognized is measured as the largest amount that has a greater than
50 percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits are recognized
as a component of income tax expense.
Tax Receivable Agreement
In connection with the Sunergy business combination,
the Company entered into a Tax Receivable Agreement (“TRA”) with certain former equity holders of Sunergy. The TRA generally
provides for the payment by the Company to the TRA holders of 85 % of the cash tax savings, if any, that the Company realizes, or is deemed
to realize, as a result of increases in the tax basis of OpCo’s assets attributable to the exchange of Exchangeable OpCo Units for
shares of the Company’s Class A common stock and certain other tax benefits. The Company records a liability under the TRA when
it is probable that future tax savings associated with exchanges or other tax attributes will be realized. The liability is measured based
on the enacted tax rates expected to apply when the tax benefits are realized. Changes in the estimated liability under the TRA are recognized
in the consolidated statements of operations in the period of change. See Note 16—Related Party Transactions for additional
information.
Loss Per Share
Basic loss per share is calculated by dividing
net loss attributable to Zeo by the weighted average number of shares of Class A common stock outstanding during the period.
Diluted loss per share is calculated by adjusting
the weighted average number of shares of Class A common stock outstanding for the potential dilutive effect of common stock equivalents,
including warrants, stock options, restricted stock awards, and other convertible instruments, if applicable.
The Company uses the treasury stock method to
determine the dilutive effect of certain potential common stock equivalents. Instruments that are convertible into shares of Class A common
stock, including Exchangeable OpCo Units, are evaluated using the if-converted method, which assumes the conversion of such instruments
at the beginning of the reporting period and adjusts the numerator and denominator of the earnings per share calculation accordingly.
Potential common stock equivalents whose effect
would be anti-dilutive are excluded from the computation of diluted loss per share. See Note 22—Net Loss Per Share for additional
information.
Advertising and Marketing Costs
Advertising and marketing costs are expensed as
incurred and are included in sales and marketing expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.
F- 17
Reclassifications
Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified
to conform to the current period presentation of the consolidated financial statements. These reclassifications had no impact on previously
reported net loss, total assets, total liabilities, stockholders’ deficit, or cash flows from operating activities.
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In August 2023, the FASB issued Accounting Standards
Update (“ASU”) 2023-05, “ Business Combinations—Joint Venture Formations (Subtopic 805-60): Recognition and
Initial Measurement ,” which requires a newly-formed joint venture to apply a new basis of accounting to its contributed net
assets, resulting in the joint venture initially measuring its contributed net assets at fair value on the formation date. ASU 2023-05
is effective for all joint venture formations with a formation date on or after January 1, 2025, with early adoption permitted. These
amendments are to be applied prospectively, with retrospective application permitted for joint ventures formed before the effective date.
The adoption of ASU 2023-05 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09,
“ Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures ,” which enhances the transparency and decision usefulness
of income tax disclosures by requiring (1) consistent categories and greater disaggregation of information in the rate reconciliation
and (2) income taxes paid disaggregated by jurisdiction. It also includes certain other amendments to improve the effectiveness of income
tax disclosures. ASU 2023-09 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024, with early adoption permitted. These amendments
are to be applied prospectively, with retrospective application permitted. The adoption of ASU 2023-09 did not have a material impact
on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
Not Yet Adopted
In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03,
“ Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income—Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation
of Income Statement Expenses ,” which requires disaggregated disclosure of specific expense categories, including purchases of
inventory, employee compensation, depreciation, and amortization included in each relevant expense caption presented on the statement
of operations. The standard also requires a qualitative description of the amounts remaining in relevant expense captions that are not
separately disaggregated quantitatively, as well as the total amount of selling expenses and an entity’s definition of selling expenses.
ASU 2024-03 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2027.
The Company is currently evaluating the impact this standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.
In May 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-03, “ Business
Combinations (Topic 805) and Consolidation (Topic 810): Determining the Accounting Acquirer in the Acquisition of a Variable Interest
Entity ,” which requires entities to consider existing factors in ASC 805 when identifying the accounting acquirer in a transaction
effected primarily by exchanging equity interests in which the legal acquiree is a variable interest entity that meets the definition
of a business. ASU 2025-03 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026, with early adoption permitted. The Company
is currently evaluating the impact this standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.
In July 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-05, “ Financial
Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses for Accounts Receivable and Contract Assets ,” which
introduces a practical expedient for the application of the current expected credit loss model to current accounts receivable and contract
assets. The amendment is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2025, with early adoption permitted. This
amendment is to be applied on a prospective basis. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this standard will have on its consolidated
financial statements.
In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-06,
“ Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Targeted Improvements to the Accounting
for Internal-Use Software. ” This guidance removes references to project stages throughout ASC 350-40 and clarifies the threshold
entities apply to begin capitalizing costs. Under the new standard, cost capitalization should only commence when an entity has committed
to funding a software project and it is probable the project will be completed and the software will be used for its intended purpose.
The amendments are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027, and interim reporting periods within those
annual reporting periods. Entities may apply the guidance using a prospective, retrospective or modified transition approach. Early adoption
is permitted as of the beginning of an annual reporting period. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this standard will have
on its consolidated financial statements.
The Company currently believes there are no other
issued and not yet effective accounting standards that are materially relevant to its consolidated financial statements.
F- 18
NOTE 4 —REVERSE
RECAPITALIZATION
On March 13, 2024, the Company consummated the
Sunergy business combination described in Note 1—Organization and Nature of Business . Prior to the closing of the transaction,
ESGEN domesticated from the Cayman Islands to the State of Delaware and changed its name to Zeo Energy Corp. In connection with the Sunergy
business combination, Sunergy and its subsidiaries were contributed to OpCo, and ESGEN contributed substantially all of its assets, including
cash held in its trust account after stockholder redemptions, to OpCo in exchange for OpCo common units. Following the transaction, the
Company operates under an Up-C organizational structure in which the Company’s principal asset is its equity interest in OpCo.
Legacy OpCo unitholders received OpCo common units
together with a corresponding number of shares of the Company’s Class V common stock. The Class V shares provide voting rights but
no economic rights and are paired with OpCo common units. The OpCo common units are exchangeable, together with the cancellation of the
paired Class V shares, for shares of the Company’s Class A common stock on a one-for-one basis or, at the Company’s election,
cash equal to the fair value of such shares.
The Sunergy business combination was accounted
for as a reverse recapitalization in accordance with U.S. GAAP, with Sunergy treated as the accounting acquirer and ESGEN treated as the
acquired company for financial reporting purposes. As a result, the consolidated financial statements represent a continuation of the
historical financial statements of Sunergy, with the net assets of ESGEN recorded at historical cost and no goodwill or other intangible
assets recognized in connection with the transaction. The equity structure of the Company was retroactively adjusted to reflect the capital
structure of Zeo Energy Corp. Operations prior to March 13, 2024 represent those of Sunergy. Earnings per share for periods prior to the
Sunergy business combination have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the capital structure of Zeo Energy Corp.
Transaction Proceeds
Upon closing of the transaction, the Company received
gross proceeds of approximately $ 17.7 million, consisting primarily of cash remaining in ESGEN’s trust account following stockholder
redemptions and proceeds from the sponsor investment in OpCo preferred units. Transaction costs and other fees totaled approximately $ 7.4
million. Liabilities assumed consisted primarily of accrued transaction costs, deferred underwriting fees, and other obligations of ESGEN
assumed by the Company at closing.
The following table reconciles the elements of
the transaction to the consolidated statements of cash flows and consolidated statements of changes in stockholders’ deficit for
the year ended December 31, 2024:
Amount
Cash received from trust account, net of redemptions
$ 2,714,091
Transaction costs and other fees paid
( 7,350,088 )
Sponsor investment in OpCo preferred units
15,000,000
Net proceeds from the Sunergy business combination
10,364,003
Liabilities assumed
( 12,861,808 )
Reverse recapitalization, net
$ ( 2,497,805 )
Equity Issued
Immediately following the closing of the Sunergy
business combination, the Company had the following shares of common stock outstanding:
Class V
Common
Stock
Class A
Common
Stock
Legacy OpCo unitholders
33,730,000
–
Public and founder shares
–
4,248,583
Shares issued to advisors and backstop investors
–
778,381
Sponsor – convertible OpCo preferred units and paired Class V shares
1,500,000
–
Total shares outstanding after closing
35,230,000
5,026,964
Warrants
The 13,800,000 public warrants issued in ESGEN’s
initial public offering remained outstanding following the Sunergy business combination and became warrants exercisable for shares of
the Company’s Class A common stock. The 14,040,000 private placement warrants were forfeited in connection with the transaction.
See Note 20—Fair Value Measurements for additional information.
F- 19
NOTE 5 —VARIABLE
INTEREST ENTITIES
The Company evaluates its involvement with other
entities to determine whether those entities are VIEs and, if so, whether the Company is the primary beneficiary required to consolidate
the entity under ASC 810. Based on this evaluation, the Company determined that it holds variable interests in White Horse Energy, LLC
(“White Horse”) and Solar Leasing I, LLC (“SLI”). However, the Company concluded that it is not the primary beneficiary
of either entity and therefore does not consolidate either entity in its consolidated financial statements.
White Horse Energy, LLC
White Horse is an entity wholly owned and controlled
by Tim Bridgewater, the Company’s CEO. White Horse provides management and consulting services across several industries, including
commercial solar and energy-related services. Although Tim Bridgewater serves as the Company’s CEO, the Company evaluated whether
Mr. Bridgewater acts as a de facto agent of the Company with respect to White Horse under ASC 810-10-25-43 and concluded that he does
not. White Horse maintains independent business activities outside of the Company’s operations, and Mr. Bridgewater’s economic
interests in White Horse provide an incentive to act independently of the Company when directing White Horse’s activities.
Sunergy, a subsidiary of the Company, extended
a $ 3.0 million subordinated loan in the form of a note receivable to White Horse. As a result of this subordinated financial support,
White Horse is considered a VIE. The Company evaluated whether it is the primary beneficiary of White Horse and concluded that it is not
the primary beneficiary because (i) White Horse’s activities are directed solely by its owner, and the Company does not have the
power to direct the activities that most significantly impact White Horse’s economic performance, and (ii) the Company’s economic
exposure to White Horse is limited to the subordinated loan and does not represent an obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive
benefits that could potentially be significant to White Horse. Accordingly, White Horse is not consolidated in the Company’s consolidated
financial statements.
Solar Leasing I, LLC
SLI is an entity formed to acquire, own, and lease
residential solar energy systems to homeowners. SLI is owned primarily by third-party investors, including Second Century Ventures and
Nexus Capital Partners (the “investing members”), which collectively hold a 99 % membership interest. White Horse holds a 1 %
membership interest and serves as the manager of SLI. Under the terms of SLI’s operating agreement, the investing members have the
right to remove White Horse as the manager if certain return thresholds are not met by December 31, 2026, subject to the removal of White
Horse’s personal guarantee on SLI’s outstanding indebtedness.
Sunergy provides engineering, procurement, and
construction services to SLI. These services are provided at market-based terms consistent with arrangements Sunergy maintains with unrelated
third-party customers.
The Company evaluated SLI under the VIE model
and concluded that SLI is considered a VIE. SLI is considered a VIE because Tim Bridgewater, the Company’s CEO is also the manager
of SLI through his company, White Horse. The Company evaluated whether it is the primary beneficiary of SLI and concluded that it is not
the primary beneficiary because (i) the Company does not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact SLI’s
economic performance, as the investing members hold substantive participating rights, including approval rights over significant expenditures
and operating decisions, and (ii) the Company’s economic exposure to SLI includes service fees earned under the engineering, procurement,
and construction agreement and related accounts receivable balances, which are at market terms and do not represent exposure to losses
or rights to benefits that could potentially be significant to SLI. Accordingly, SLI is not consolidated in the Company’s consolidated
financial statements.
Maximum Exposure to Loss
The Company’s maximum exposure to loss associated
with these variable interests is limited to its $ 3.0 million subordinated loan in the form of a note receivable from White Horse, plus
any accrued interest of $ 153,485 , immaterial accounts receivable balances from SLI related to services performed, and a guarantee of SLI’s
outstanding indebtedness under a Business Loan Agreement with a bank for up $ 10 million. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the outstanding
balance of the guaranteed loan was $ 9,976,752 and $ 3,460,840 , respectively. The loan is also personally guaranteed by the Company’s
CEO. The Company does not have any contractual obligation or implicit commitment to provide additional financial support to White Horse
or SLI beyond the amounts described above.
NOTE 6 —BUSINESS
COMBINATIONS
Heliogen Acquisition
On May 28, 2025, the Company entered into a plan
of merger and reorganization agreement with Heliogen, a renewable-energy technology company that provides solutions for delivering low-carbon
energy production by combining commercially proven solar technologies with thermal systems and storage expertise. The transaction was
completed on August 8, 2025, at which time Heliogen became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. The acquisition of Heliogen aligns
with the Company’s strategy to expand its clean-energy platform beyond residential markets into large-scale commercial and industrial
energy generation and storage. The acquisition is expected to complement the Company’s existing solar operations, create operational
synergies, and broaden the Company’s market reach.
F- 20
The total consideration transferred consisted
entirely of the Company’s Class A common stock, measured at fair value on the acquisition date. Shares were issued to Heliogen shareholders
at an exchange ratio of 0.9591 shares of the Company’s Class A common stock for each share of Heliogen common stock, resulting in
the issuance of 6,217,612 shares of Class A common stock. No contingent consideration was included in the transaction. In connection with
the merger, all outstanding Heliogen SPAC warrants and restricted stock units (“RSUs”) were automatically accelerated and
fully vested and were settled in the same equity consideration, net of applicable tax withholding. All stock options and commercial warrants
were out-of-the-money at the acquisition date and were canceled with no value.
The Company accounted for the acquisition using
the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with ASC 805. Accordingly, the purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired
and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values at the acquisition date, with the excess of the purchase price over the fair
value of the net assets acquired recorded as goodwill. Goodwill recognized in the transaction is not deductible for tax purposes. The
goodwill recognized is primarily attributable to expected operational synergies and the anticipated future growth opportunities from integrating
Heliogen’s technology platform with the Company’s existing operations.
The following table summarizes the purchase price
allocation as of the acquisition date:
Purchase Price Allocation
Purchase consideration at fair value:
Class A common stock
$ 14,424,860
Assets acquired and liabilities assumed at fair value:
Cash
$ 14,596,267
Accounts receivable
305,380
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
1,065,991
Other assets
14,597
Operating lease right-of-use assets
130,225
Goodwill
80,950
Accounts payable
( 782,184 )
Accrued expenses
( 856,141 )
Operating lease liabilities
( 130,225 )
Net assets acquired
$ 14,424,860
The Company evaluated whether any identifiable
intangible assets met the recognition criteria under ASC 805 and concluded that no separately identifiable intangible assets were recognized
in connection with the transaction.
From the date of acquisition, Heliogen contributed
revenues of $ 0 and a net loss of $ 2,405,711 , which are included in the consolidated statement of operations for year ended December 31,
2025.
Pro Forma Information
The following unaudited pro forma results include
the effects of the Heliogen acquisition as if it had been consummated on January 1, 2024. The unaudited pro forma information includes
adjustments to give effect to pro forma events that are directly attributable to the acquisition.
Years Ended
December 31,
2025
2024
Net revenues
$ 69,513,543
$ 96,467,913
Net income (loss)
( 35,286,945 )
19,161,007
Net income (loss) attributable to Class A common stockholders
( 29,666,066 )
26,364,476
Earnings (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders – basic and diluted
$ ( 1.02 )
$ 2.12
These unaudited pro forma results are presented
for informational purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that would have occurred if the acquisition
had been completed at the beginning of the period presented, nor are they indicative of the Company’s future results of operations.
NOTE 7 —ASSET
ACQUISITIONS
Lumio Asset Purchase
On October 25, 2024, the Company completed the
acquisition of certain assets from Lumio Holdings, Inc. and Lumio HX, Inc. (collectively, the “Lumio Sellers”) pursuant to
an asset purchase agreement. The assets acquired primarily consisted of uninstalled residential solar energy customer contracts, inventory,
equipment, intellectual property rights, customer records, and other related assets associated with Lumio’s residential solar operations.
The Lumio Sellers were debtors in a voluntary Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceeding before the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District
of Delaware at the time of the transaction.
Total consideration transferred in the transaction
consisted of $ 4.0 million in cash, 6,206,897 shares of the Company’s Class A common stock, and the assumption of approximately $ 1.0
million of liabilities. The fair value of the shares issued was $ 8,131,656 , resulting in total purchase consideration of $ 13,131,656 .
F- 21
Based on this evaluation, the Company concluded
that the acquired assets did not meet the definition of a business under U.S. GAAP because the Company did not acquire an assembled workforce
or a substantive process capable of producing outputs.
Accordingly, the transaction was accounted for
as an asset acquisition rather than a business combination. Under asset acquisition accounting, the total purchase consideration was allocated
to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed on a relative fair value basis. No goodwill was recognized in the transaction.
The allocation of the purchase consideration to
the assets acquired and liabilities assumed is summarized below:
Purchase Price Allocation
Purchase consideration at fair value:
Cash
$ 4,000,000
Class A common stock
8,131,656
Liabilities assumed
1,000,000
Amount of consideration
$ 13,131,656
Assets acquired:
Accounts receivable
$ 1,515,824
Inventory
390,219
Property and equipment
416,792
Customer-related intangible (order backlog)
10,808,821
Net assets acquired
$ 13,131,656
The Company determined the fair value of the order
backlog intangible asset using the multi-period excess earnings method, which estimates the present value of the incremental after-tax
cash flows expected to be generated from the backlog over its remaining economic life. Key assumptions used in the valuation included
projected revenues from the underlying solar contracts, estimated probability of contract cancellation, and an appropriate discount rate.
The valuation applied an estimated weighted-average cost of capital of 15.5 %, which reflects the risks inherent in the projected cash
flows and represents the rate of return that a market participant would require for this asset. Because the valuation relies on significant
unobservable inputs, the fair value measurement is classified as Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy. The resulting fair value of
the order backlog intangible asset was subsequently adjusted as part of the relative fair value allocation applied to the assets acquired
in the transaction.
NOTE 8 —DISAGGREGATION
OF REVENUES AND SEGMENT REPORTING
Disaggregation of Revenues
The Company’s revenues are disaggregated
based on revenue type, including (i) solar system installations, (ii) roofing installations, and (iii) energy storage solutions.
The Company’s net revenues for the years ended December 31, 2025
and 2024 are disaggregated as follows:
Years Ended
December 31,
2025
2024
Solar system installations, net
$ 68,154,316
$ 70,295,305
Roofing installations
1,195,622
2,948,778
Energy storage solutions
–
–
Total net revenues
$ 69,349,938
$ 73,244,083
For the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company had three
customers that accounted for more than 10% of revenue. Aggregate revenue from these customers was $ 56,929,240 and $ 50,002,123 for the
years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.
F- 22
Segment Reporting
The Company reports segment information in accordance
with ASC 280. Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise for which separate financial information is available and
whose operating results are regularly reviewed by the Company’s CODM to allocate resources and assess performance.
Following the acquisition of Heliogen on August
8, 2025, the Company reassessed its segment structure and determined that it operates in two operating and reportable segments: (1) Sunergy,
which includes the design, procurement, installation, and servicing of residential solar photovoltaic systems and related roofing services;
and (2) Heliogen, which includes concentrated solar power and long-duration energy generation and storage technology solutions for commercial
and industrial applications.
The CODM evaluates segment performance and allocates
resources based on the operating results of each reportable segment, including revenues, cost of revenues, operating expenses, and net
loss.
Prior to the acquisition of Heliogen on August
8, 2025, the Company operated as a single operating and reportable segment consisting of its solar installation and related services operations.
Corporate public company costs and other activities
that are not allocated to Heliogen are included within the Sunergy segment.
Segment information for the years ended December
31, 2025 and 2024 is as follows:
For the Year Ended December 31, 2025
Sunergy
Heliogen
Total
Net revenues
$ 69,349,938
$ –
$ 69,349,938
Less: cost of revenues (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown below):
Direct labor
7,920,972
( 756 )
7,920,216
Materials
19,764,287
( 6,790 )
19,757,497
Other
3,388,518
246
3,388,764
Cost of revenues (exclusive of depreciation and amortization):
31,073,777
( 7,300 )
31,066,477
Less: depreciation and amortization related to cost of revenues
8,117,196
–
8,117,196
Total gross profit
$ 30,158,965
$ 7,300
$ 30,166,265
Depreciation and amortization
459,306
–
459,306
Commissions expense
16,848,141
–
16,848,141
Sales and marketing (exclusive of commissions expense above)
5,850,264
–
5,850,264
General and administrative
25,103,491
2,437,195
27,540,686
Other income
( 339,734 )
( 24,184 )
( 363,918 )
Interest expense
155,490
–
155,490
Gain on change in fair value of warrant liabilities
( 957,720 )
–
( 957,720 )
Total net loss before income taxes
( 16,960,273 )
( 2,405,711 )
( 19,365,984 )
Income tax benefit (provision)
( 263,649 )
–
( 263,649 )
Net loss
$ ( 17,223,922 )
$ ( 2,405,711 )
$ ( 19,629,633 )
F- 23
For the Year Ended December 31, 2024
Sunergy
Heliogen
Total
Net revenues
$ 73,244,083
$ –
$ 73,244,083
Less: cost of revenues (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown below):
Direct labor
9,869,129
–
9,869,129
Materials
25,128,677
–
25,128,677
Other
3,069,290
–
3,069,290
Cost of revenues (exclusive of depreciation and amortization):
38,067,096
–
38,067,096
Less: depreciation and amortization related to cost of revenues
3,695,000
–
3,695,000
Total gross profit
$ 31,481,987
$ –
$ 31,481,987
Depreciation and amortization
1,141,538
–
1,141,538
Commissions expense
15,827,850
–
15,827,850
Sales and marketing (exclusive of commissions expense above)
3,759,223
–
3,759,223
General and administrative
21,558,136
–
21,558,136
Other income
( 141,467 )
–
( 141,467 )
Interest expense
333,539
–
333,539
Gain on disposal of property and equipment
( 91,684 )
–
( 91,684 )
Gain on change in fair value of warrant liabilities
( 69,000 )
–
( 69,000 )
Total net loss before income taxes
( 10,836,148 )
–
( 10,836,148 )
Income tax benefit (provision)
963,790
–
963,790
Net loss
$ ( 9,872,358 )
$ –
$ ( 9,872,358 )
NOTE 9 —PREPAID
EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT ASSETS
Prepaid expenses and other current assets as of
December 31, 2025 and 2024 consisted of the following:
December 31,
2025
December 31,
2024
Prepaid expenses
$ 539,844
$ 511,724
Deferred installation material costs
1,770,057
32,101
Receivable related to Lumio asset purchase
1,004,489
1,000,000
Tax receivables
307,542
230,000
Employee receivables and advances on sales commissions
105,928
332,671
Lease deposit
464,730
–
Total prepaid expenses and other current assets
$ 4,192,590
$ 2,106,496
NOTE 10 —PROPERTY
AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment as of December 31, 2025
and 2024 consisted of the following:
December 31,
December 31,
2025
2024
Internally-developed software
$ 2,211,626
$ 988,225
Office furniture and equipment
384,368
384,368
Vehicles
2,477,033
2,477,034
Leasehold improvements
10,000
10,000
Total property and equipment
5,083,027
3,859,627
Less: accumulated depreciation
( 2,252,537 )
( 1,383,664 )
Total property and equipment, net
$ 2,830,490
$ 2,475,963
Depreciation expense for the years ended December
31, 2025 and 2024 was $ 868,873 and $ 691,375 , respectively.
F- 24
NOTE 11 —INTANGIBLE
ASSETS AND GOODWILL
Intangible assets as of December 31, 2025 and
2024 consisted of the following:
December 31,
December 31,
2025
2024
Trade names
$ 3,084,100
$ 3,084,100
Customer lists
496,800
496,800
Non-compete agreements
224,000
224,000
Order backlog
10,808,821
10,808,821
Total intangible assets
14,613,721
14,613,721
Less: accumulated amortization
( 14,613,721 )
( 7,042,565 )
Total intangible assets, net
$ –
$ 7,571,156
Amortization expense for intangible assets for
the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 was $ 7,571,156 and $ 4,008,690 , respectively.
The following table summarizes the changes in
the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024:
Amount
Balance as of December 31, 2023
$ 27,010,745
Impairment losses
–
Balance as of December 31, 2024
$ 27,010,745
Goodwill recognized in connection with the acquisition of Heliogen
80,950
Impairment losses
–
Balance as of December 31, 2025
$ 27,091,695
NOTE 12 —ACCRUED
EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities as of December 31, 2025
and 2024 consisted of the following:
December 31,
2025
December 31,
2024
Accrued payroll liabilities
$ 506,829
$ 421,825
Accrued commissions
998,964
290,969
Accrued interest
–
84,425
Accrued taxes
414,490
8,900
Accrued credit cards
250,055
26,632
Accrued transaction costs
–
3,208,288
Other accrued liabilities
250,899
1,140,048
Total accrued expenses and other current liabilities
$ 2,421,237
$ 5,181,087
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
– related parties as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 consisted of the following:
December 31,
2025
December 31,
2024
Customer advances
$ 49,269
$ 3,359,101
Total accrued expenses and other current liabilities – related parties
$ 49,269
$ 3,359,101
F- 25
NOTE 13 —LEASES
Operating Leases
In November 2021, the Company entered into a lease
agreement for office space located in New Port Richey, Florida. The lease commenced on November 4, 2021 and is for a term of 5 years.
Under the terms of the lease, the Company will lease the premises at the monthly rate of $ 4,793 for the first year, with scheduled annual
increases. The lease agreement contains customary events of default, representations, warranties, and covenants. The measurement of the
ROU asset and liability associated with this operating lease was $ 277,948 .
In June 2023, the Company entered into a lease
agreement for office space located in Orlando, Florida. The lease commenced on June 1, 2023 and is for a term of 5 years. Under the terms
of the lease, the Company will lease the premises at the monthly rate of $ 10,011 for the first year, with scheduled annual increases.
The lease agreement contains customary events of default, representations, warranties, and covenants. The measurement of the ROU asset
and liability associated with this operating lease was $ 578,285 .
In July 2024, the Company entered into a lease
agreement for office space located in Provo, Utah. The lease commenced on July 1, 2024 and is for a term of 32 months. Under the terms
of the lease, the Company will lease the premises at the monthly rate of $ 14,845 for the first year, with scheduled annual increases.
The lease agreement contains customary events of default, representations, warranties, and covenants. The measurement of the ROU asset
and liability associated with this operating lease was $ 751,619 .
In October 2024, the Company entered into a lease
agreement for office space located in Euclid, Ohio. The lease commenced on October 1, 2024 and is for a term of two years . Under the terms
of the lease, the Company will lease the premises at the monthly rate of $ 2,000 for the first year, with scheduled annual increases. The
lease agreement contains customary events of default, representations, warranties, and covenants. The measurement of the ROU asset and
liability associated with this operating lease was $ 47,149 .
In June 2025, the Company entered into a lease
agreement for office space located in Richmond, Virginia. The lease commenced on June 1, 2025 and is for a term of three years . Under
the terms of the lease, the Company will lease the premises at the monthly rate of $ 1,995 for the first year, with scheduled annual increases.
The lease agreement contains customary events of default, representations, warranties, and covenants. The measurement of the ROU asset
and liability associated with this operating lease was $ 68,760 .
In July 2025, the Company entered into a lease
agreement for office space located in Sardinia, Ohio. The lease commenced on July 1, 2025 and is for a term of two years . Under the terms
of the lease, the Company will lease the premises at the monthly rate of $ 3,150 for the first year, with scheduled annual increases. The
lease agreement contains customary events of default, representations, warranties, and covenants. The measurement of the ROU asset and
liability associated with this operating lease was $ 72,215 .
In August 2025, in connection with the acquisition
of Heliogen, the Company entered into a lease agreement for office space located in Houston, Texas. The lease commenced on August 8, 2025
and is for a term of 13 months. Under the terms of the lease, the Company will lease the premises at the monthly rate of $ 10,451 . The
lease agreement contains customary events of default, representations, warranties, and covenants. The measurement of the ROU asset and
liability associated with this operating lease was $ 130,225 and is part of the net assets acquired in the acquisition of Heliogen in the
non-cash investing and financing activities of the consolidated statements of cash flows.
Operating leases as of December 31, 2025 and 2024
consisted of the following:
December 31,
2025 December 31,
2024
Operating lease right-of-use assets $ 897,476 $ 1,268,139
Operating lease liabilities, current portion 684,819 583,429
Operating lease liabilities, long-term 304,295 799,385
Total operating lease liabilities $ 989,114 $ 1,382,814
Weighted-average remaining lease term (years) 1.58 2.39
Weighted-average discount rate 4.97 % 5.00 %
F- 26
The components of operating lease expense consist
of the following for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024:
December 31,
2025
December 31,
2024
Fixed operating lease expense
$ 695,809
$ 719,049
Short-term and variable operating lease expense
737,136
166,338
Total operating lease expense
1,432,945
885,387
Sublease income
( 87,630 )
–
Total net operating lease expense
$ 1,345,315
$ 885,387
For the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024,
cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of operating lease liabilities totaled $ 718,824 and $ 645,724 , respectively.
As of December 31, 2025, future minimum lease
payments under operating lease liabilities were as follows:
Year Ending December 31,
Amount
2026
$ 717,863
2027
244,051
2028
69,147
Total
1,031,061
Less: imputed interest
( 41,947 )
Total operating lease liabilities
$ 989,114
Finance Leases
The Company leases vehicles for its operations
under finance leases. These leases generally have five-year terms with interest rates ranging from 9.24 % to 10.59 %.
Finance leases ROU assets and liabilities as of
December 31, 2025 and 2024 consisted of the following:
December 31,
2025 December 31,
2024
Finance lease right-of-use assets $ 310,539 $ 447,012
Finance lease liabilities, current portion 142,095 130,464
Finance lease liabilities, long-term 208,865 348,807
Total finance lease liabilities $ 350,960 $ 479,271
Weighted-average remaining lease term (years) 2.28 3.28
Weighted-average discount rate 9.76 % 9.76 %
Finance lease costs included in depreciation and
amortization in the consolidated statements of operations were $ 136,473 for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024. Interest expense
related to finance leases was $ 39,364 and $ 52,100 for the years ended December 31, 2025, and 2024, respectively. For the years ended December
31, 2025 and 2024, cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of finance lease liabilities and interest expense totaled $ 171,569
and $ 171,476 , respectively.
As of December 31, 2025, future minimum lease
payments under finance leases were as follows:
Year Ending December 31,
Amount
2026
$ 171,570
2027
171,570
2028
52,603
Total
395,743
Less: imputed interest
( 44,783 )
Total finance lease liabilities
$ 350,960
F- 27
NOTE 14 —DEBT
Vehicle Loans
The Company has financing arrangements for certain
vehicles used in its operations. These financing arrangements consist of direct loans associated with individual vehicles in the Company’s
fleet. Payments of debt obligations are based on equal monthly payments for 60 months and include interest rates ranging from 4.94 % to
11.09 %. As of December 31, 2025, the weighted-average interest rate on the Company’s vehicle loan obligations was 11.09 %. Amounts
outstanding under these arrangements are presented in the consolidated balance sheets as the current portion of long-term debt and long-term
debt. The Company does not have debt covenants associated with these vehicle loan arrangements.
As of December 31, 2025, estimated future minimum
principal payments of vehicle loans were as follows:
Year Ending December 31,
Amount
2026
$ 23,526
2027
26,264
2028
29,322
Total
79,112
Less: current portion
( 23,526 )
Total long-term debt
$ 55,586
Loan Payable
On July 1, 2025, the Company converted $ 2,547,877
of outstanding accounts payable to a vendor into a loan payable with the same vendor. The loan bears interest at an annual rate of 18 %
( 1.5 % monthly) and provided for scheduled principal payments beginning in July 2025, with maturity on August 22, 2025. As a result of
the transaction, the related accounts payable balance was reclassified to a loan payable in the consolidated balance sheet. The loan,
including accrued interest, was repaid during the period.
Convertible Note Payable
On December 24, 2024, the Company issued a convertible
promissory note (the “Promissory Note”) to LHX Intermediate LLC (“LHX”) with a maximum borrowing capacity of $ 4.0
million. The Promissory Note allowed the Company to draw funds in multiple tranches upon the achievement of specified operational milestones
or upon waiver of such milestones by LHX. The Promissory Note did not bear interest and was required to be repaid through the issuance
of the Company’s Class A common stock at a fixed conversion price of $ 1.35 per share. The conversion was scheduled to occur upon
the later of (i) the first anniversary of the issuance date or (ii) the date the Company’s stockholders approved the issuance of
the shares required to settle the obligation.
The Company received proceeds of $ 2.5 million
under the Promissory Note. The Company evaluated the embedded conversion feature under ASC 815 and concluded that the conversion option
did not require bifurcation as a derivative liability because the instrument was indexed to the Company’s own stock and qualified
for the scope exception. The Promissory Note was initially recorded at its estimated fair value, and the difference between the proceeds
received and the fair value of the shares issuable upon conversion was recorded as a debt discount. The debt discount was amortized to
interest expense over the expected term of the note using the effective interest method.
On October 30, 2025, the outstanding balance of
the Promissory Note totaling $ 2.5 million was converted into 1,851,851 shares of the Company’s Class A common stock. Upon conversion,
the remaining unamortized debt discount was recognized and the carrying value of the Promissory Note was reclassified to equity. No balance
remained outstanding under the Promissory Note as of December 31, 2025.
F- 28
NOTE 15 —COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES
Workmanship and Warranties
The Company typically provides workmanship warranties
for solar energy systems installed for customers for periods ranging from one to ten years against defects in design and workmanship and
that installations will remain watertight. The manufacturers’ warranties on solar energy system components are generally passed
through to customers and typically include product warranty periods ranging from 10 to 20 years and limited performance warranties of
up to 25 years.
Based on historical experience, the Company has
not incurred significant warranty costs associated with these obligations. Accordingly, no warranty reserve was recorded as of December
31, 2025 and 2024. The Company continues to evaluate warranty claims on an ongoing basis and may, at its discretion, provide reimbursements
to customers if certain solar equipment does not operate as intended.
Litigation
From time to time, the Company may be involved
in various claims, lawsuits, and legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. The Company records a liability for loss
contingencies when it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated in accordance with
ASC 450.
As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company
was not aware of any pending or threatened legal proceedings that it believes would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s
consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. Legal costs associated with loss contingencies are expensed as
incurred.
NOTE 16 —RELATED
PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Solar Leasing Arrangements
Certain customers of the Company finance their
solar energy system purchases through SLI. These arrangements are substantially similar to those with unrelated third-party financing
providers. Under these arrangements, SLI deducts financing fees and remits the net proceeds to the Company upon completion of the related
solar installation.
For the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024,
the Company recognized revenue of $ 18,141,871 and $ 22,156,018 , respectively, from installations financed through SLI, net of financing
fees of $ 0 and $ 8,246,532 , respectively. Included within revenue recognized for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 is discretionary
rebate paid by SLI of $ 3,150,000 and $ 2,943,979 , respectively. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company had accounts receivable of
$ 611,807 and $ 191,662 , respectively, due from SLI related to these arrangements. See Note 5—Variable Interest Entities for
additional information regarding the Company’s involvement with SLI.
In August 2024, the Company entered into a guarantee
of SLI’s obligations under a Business Loan Agreement between SLI and a bank for borrowings up to $ 10 million. The loan is also personally
guaranteed by the Company’s CEO, who serves as the manager of SLI through White Horse. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the outstanding
balance under the loan was $ 9,976,752 and $ 3,460,840 , respectively.
Note Receivable
During 2024, SLI performed a fair-market-value
assessment of certain lease assets. As a result of this assessment, SLI paid a discretionary rebate of $ 2,943,979 to the Company based
on the excess of fair value over the carrying value of the assets. The Company subsequently transferred the rebate proceeds as a subordinated
loan, recorded as a note receivable from White Horse.
F- 29
For the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024,
the Company recognized interest income of $ 153,485 and $ 0 , respectively, related to the note receivable, which is included in other income
in the consolidated statements of operations. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the outstanding principal balance of the loan was $ 3.0
million, which is included in related party note receivable in the consolidated balance sheets. Accrued interest of $ 153,485 and $ 0 , respectively,
is included in interest receivable – related parties in the consolidated balance sheets. See Note 5—Variable Interest Entities
for additional information regarding the note receivable.
Tax Receivable Agreement
In connection with the consummation of the Sunergy
business combination on March 13, 2024, the Company entered into a TRA with OpCo and certain OpCo members (the “TRA Holders”).
Pursuant to the TRA, the Company is required to pay the TRA Holders 85 % of the net cash savings, if any, in U.S. federal, state, and local
income and franchise taxes that the Company actually realizes, or is deemed to realize in certain circumstances, as a result of increases
in tax basis and certain other tax attributes arising from the Sunergy business combination and related transactions.
As of December 31, 2025, the Company had not recorded
a liability related to the TRA because realization of the related tax benefits was not considered more likely than not. The estimated
unrecorded TRA liability was approximately $ 5.7 million as of December 31, 2025 and $ 27.6 million as of December 31, 2024. If realization
of the related tax benefits becomes more likely than not in future periods, the Company will record a liability related to the TRA with
a corresponding charge to expense in the consolidated statements of operations.
NOTE 17 —REDEEMABLE
NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS AND EQUITY
The table below reflects share information about the Company’s
capital stock as of December 31, 2025:
Par Value
Authorized
Issued
Treasury Stock
Outstanding
Class A common stock
$ 0.0001
300,000,000
33,180,843
–
33,180,843
Class V common stock
$ 0.0001
100,000,000
24,380,000
–
24,380,000
Preferred stock
$ 0.0001
10,000,000
–
–
–
Class A convertible preferred units
$ 0.0001
1,500,000
1,500,000
–
1,500,000
Class A units
$ 0.0001
5,026,964
5,026,964
–
5,026,964
Class B units
$ 0.0001
33,730,000
22,880,000
–
22,880,000
Total shares
450,256,964
86,967,807
–
86,967,807
Class A common stock, Class V common stock, and
preferred stock represent capital stock of Zeo. Class A convertible preferred units, Class A units, and Class B units represent limited
liability company interests of OpCo. Class A convertible preferred units are held by the Sponsor and are classified as redeemable noncontrolling
interests on the consolidated balance sheet. Class B units are exchangeable for shares of Class A common stock on a one-for-one basis,
together with cancellation of an equal number of shares of Class V common stock, and are classified as redeemable noncontrolling interests
on the consolidated balance sheet. Class A units are held by Zeo as managing member of OpCo and are eliminated in consolidation.
Class A Common Stock
During the year ended December 31, 2025, 10,850,000
shares of Class A common stock were issued in exchange for OpCo Class B units and the cancellation of corresponding shares of Class V
common stock.
During the year ended December 31, 2025, an aggregate
of 80,913 shares of Class A common stock were issued to employees for services valued at $ 100,698 .
On March 13, 2025, 50,000 shares of Class A common
stock were issued upon vesting of restricted stock awards granted in March 2024. See Note 18—Stock-Based Compensation for
additional information.
F- 30
On August 5, 2025, 199,792 shares of Class A common
stock, net of tax withholding, were issued upon vesting of restricted stock awards granted in February 2025. See Note 18—Stock-Based
Compensation for additional information.
On August 8, 2025, in connection with the acquisition
of Heliogen, the Company issued 6,217,612 shares of Class A common stock to Heliogen shareholders. See Note 6—Business Combinations
for additional information.
On August 11, 2025, the Company issued 677,711
shares of Class A common stock to settle accrued buyside advisory fees of $ 1.6 million related to the Heliogen acquisition.
On October 30, 2025, the outstanding balance of
the Promissory Note totaling $ 2.5 million was converted into 1,851,851 shares of the Company’s Class A common stock. See Note
14—Debt for additional information.
Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests
During the year ended December 31, 2025, 10,850,000
OpCo units were exchanged for shares of the Company’s Class A common stock. As a result, as of December 31, 2025, 22,880,000 OpCo
units remained outstanding. The prior investors’ interests in OpCo represent redeemable noncontrolling interests. Holders of OpCo
units may exchange their units, together with the cancellation of a corresponding number of shares of Class V common stock, for shares
of the Company’s Class A common stock on a one-for-one basis, or cash proceeds of equal value at the time of redemption. Any redemption
of OpCo units for cash must be funded through a private or public offering of Class A common stock and is subject to approval by the Company’s
Board of Directors. Future exchanges of OpCo units may generate incremental tax attributes and related cash tax savings for the Company.
Pursuant to the TRA, the Company is generally required to pay the TRA holders 85 % of the net cash tax savings realized as a result of
increases in tax basis and certain other tax attributes arising from such exchanges. See Note 16—Related Party Transactions
for additional information regarding the TRA.
As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the noncontrolling
interest holders owned approximately 40.8 % and 71.8 %, respectively, of the outstanding OpCo common units.
The OpCo amended and restated agreement provides,
among other things, for the issuance of corresponding economic, non-voting Class B units of OpCo. Holders of exchangeable OpCo units may
cause OpCo to redeem one or more units, together with the cancellation of a corresponding number of shares of the Company’s Class
V common stock, for shares of the Company’s Class A common stock on a one-for-one basis, subject to certain restrictions. Under
certain circumstances, the Company may be required to redeem OpCo units. Subject to certain conditions, the Class A convertible preferred
OpCo units may be redeemed by the Company following the first anniversary of closing and converted by the Sponsor into exchangeable OpCo
units, which may then be exchanged for Class A common stock.
The Class A convertible preferred units accrue
distributions at a rate of 10 % per annum. During the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company recognized $ 1,697,661 of preferred unit
distributions and paid cash distributions of $ 621,063 to holders of the Class A preferred units. The financial results of OpCo are consolidated
with those of the Company, with the redeemable noncontrolling interests’ share of net loss presented separately in the consolidated
financial statements.
NOTE 18 —STOCK-BASED
COMPENSATION
2024 Omnibus Incentive Plan
On March 6, 2024, the shareholders of ESGEN approved
the Zeo 2024 Omnibus Incentive Equity Plan (the “Incentive Plan”), which became effective upon the closing of the Sunergy
business combination. A total of 3,220,400 shares of Class A common stock were initially reserved for issuance under the Incentive Plan
(the “Plan Share Reserve”). Each award granted under the Incentive Plan reduces the Plan Share Reserve by the number of shares
underlying the award.
The Plan Share Reserve automatically increases
on the first day of each fiscal year beginning in 2025 through 2029 by a number of shares equal to the lesser of (i) 2 % of the outstanding
shares of common stock on the last day of the immediately preceding fiscal year or (ii) a lesser number of shares determined by the Board
of Directors. The purpose of the Incentive Plan is to enable the Company and its subsidiaries to attract and retain key personnel and
to align the interests of directors, officers, employees, consultants, and advisors with those of the Company’s stockholders through
equity-based compensation.
F- 31
March 2024 Grant
On March 13, 2024, the Company entered into an
executive employment agreement with its CEO. In addition to the CEO’s annual salary and cash bonus, the CEO became eligible to receive
certain equity awards under the Incentive Plan as follows:
● 50,000 vested shares to be granted 12 months after the employment agreement date,
● 50,000 vested shares to be granted 24 months after the employment agreement date; and
● 50,000 vested shares to be granted 36 months after the employment agreement date.
The Company determined the grant date fair value
to be $ 6.97 per share, based on the quoted market price of the Company’s Class A common stock on March 13, 2024 (Level 1 fair value
measurement).
Further, if, within three ( 3 ) years of the effective
date of the Closing, (i) the volume-weighted average price of shares of the publicly traded stock of the Company exceeds $ 7.50 for 20
or more days of any consecutive 30 -day period, then the CEO will be granted vested equity from the Incentive Plan equal to 1 % of the total
issued and outstanding capital stock of the Company, (ii) the volume-weighted average price of shares of the publicly traded stock of
the Company exceeds $ 12.50 for 20 or more days of any consecutive 30 -day period, then the CEO will be granted additional vested equity
from the Incentive Plan equal to 1 % of the total issued and outstanding capital stock of the Company, (iii) and the volume-weighted average
price of shares of the publicly traded stock of the Company exceeds $ 15.00 for 20 or more days of any consecutive 30 -day period, then
the CEO will be granted additional vested equity from the Incentive Plan equal to 1 % of the total issued and outstanding capital stock
of the Company.
The per unit fair value and derived service period
for each tranche of performance based executive shares is included in the valuation of performance-based equity bonus awards as of March
13, 2024, as follows:
Fair Value Summary Tranche 1 Tranche 2 Tranche 3
Tranche per unit fair value $ 5.96 $ 4.53 $ 3.82
Stock price on valuation date $ 6.97 $ 6.97 $ 6.97
Derived service period 0.35 years 1.19 years 1.47 years
During the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024,
the Company recognized $ 1,642,043 and $ 4,746,984 , respectively, in equity compensation expense related to these awards. As of December
31, 2025, the remaining unrecognized compensation expense was $ 417,245 and is expected to be recognized over the remaining 1.12 year vesting
period.
February 2025 Grants
On February 5, 2025, the Company granted an aggregate
of 765,000 restricted shares of Class A common stock under the Incentive Plan to 10 employees and two executives. The restricted shares
vest in three equal installments as follows.
● One-third (1/3) six months following the grant date;
● One-third (1/3) 18 months following the grant date; and
● One-third (1/3) 30 months following the grant date.
F- 32
On February 5, 2025, the Company granted an aggregate
of 275,000 restricted shares of Class A common stock under the Incentive Plan to eight employees. The restricted shares vest in three
equal installments as follows.
● One-third (1/3) 12 months following the grant date;
● One-third (1/3) 24 months following the grant date; and
● One-third (1/3) 36 months following the grant date.
The Company determined the grant date fair value
to be $ 2.57 per share, based on the quoted market price of the Company’s Class A common stock on February 5, 2025 (Level 1 fair
value measurement).
During the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company
recognized $ 1,056,505 in equity compensation expense related to these awards. As of December 31, 2025, the remaining unrecognized compensation
expense was $ 1,414,977 and is expected to be recognized over the remaining 2.10 year vesting period.
July 2025 Grants
On July 5, 2025, the Company granted an aggregate
of 140,000 restricted shares of Class A common stock under the Incentive Plan to four employees. The restricted shares vest in three equal
installments as follows.
● One-third (1/3) 12 months following the grant date;
● One-third (1/3) 24 months following the grant date; and
● One-third (1/3) 36 months following the grant date.
The Company determined the grant date fair value
to be $ 2.79 per share, based on the quoted market price of the Company’s Class A common stock on July 5, 2025 (Level 1 fair value
measurement).
During the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company
recognized $ 38,767 in equity compensation expense related to these awards. As of December 31, 2025, the remaining unrecognized compensation
expense was $ 198,383 and is expected to be recognized over the remaining 2.51 year vesting period.
November 2025 Grants
On November 5, 2025, the Company granted an aggregate
of 70,000 restricted shares of Class A common stock under the Incentive Plan to seven employees. The restricted shares vest in three equal
installments as follows.
● One-third (1/3) 12 months following the grant date;
● One-third (1/3) 24 months following the grant date; and
● One-third (1/3) 36 months following the grant date.
The Company determined the grant date fair value
to be $ 1.56 per share, based on the quoted market price of the Company’s Class A common stock on November 5, 2025 (Level 1 fair
value measurement).
During the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company
recognized $ 5,586 in equity compensation expense related to these awards. As of December 31, 2025, the remaining unrecognized compensation
expense was $ 103,607 and is expected to be recognized over the remaining 2.85 year vesting period.
Sun Managers, LLC Management Incentive Plan
Sun Managers intends to grant Class B units (as
defined in the SM LLCA) in Sun Managers through the Sun Managers, LLC Management Incentive Plan (the “Management Incentive Plan”)
adopted by Sun Managers to certain eligible employees or service providers of OpCo, Sunergy or their subsidiaries, in the discretion of
Timothy Bridgewater, as manager of Sun Managers. Such Class B units may be subject to a vesting schedule, and once such Class B units
become vested, there may be an exchange opportunity through which the grantees may request (subject to the terms of the Management Incentive
Plan and the OpCo amended and restated limited liability company agreement in its entirety (the “OpCo A&R LLC Agreement”))
the exchange of their Class B units into Seller OpCo Units (together with an equal number of Zeo Class V shares), which may then be converted
into Zeo Class A common Stock (subject to the terms of the Management Incentive Plan and the OpCo A&R LLC Agreement). Grants under
the Management Incentive Plan will be made after ESGEN Closing.
F- 33
Although Sun Managers is the legal issuer of the
awards, all compensatory payments made by Sun Managers to individuals providing services to or for the benefit of the Company or its subsidiaries
(including equity interests in Sun Managers) are treated as compensation paid by the Company under ASC 718. In accordance with the OpCo
A&R LLC Agreement, the Company allocates 100 % of all related expense and deduction items to Sun Managers. These compensatory payments
are accounted for as capital contributions from Sun Managers to the Company, with no new equity units issued in return.
On March 31, 2025, Sun Managers granted an aggregate
of 875,000 restricted shares of Zeo Class A common stock under the Management Incentive Plan to three employees and one executive. The
restricted shares vested immediately upon grant. During the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company recognized $ 1,321,250 in equity
compensation expense related to these awards.
On August 4, 2025, Sun Managers granted an aggregate
of 350,000 restricted shares of Zeo Class A common stock under the Management Incentive Plan to two employees. The restricted shares vested
immediately upon grant. During the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company recognized $ 840,000 in equity compensation expense related
to these awards.
On August 13, 2025, Sun Managers granted an aggregate
of 168,500 restricted shares of Zeo Class A common stock under the Management Incentive Plan to four employees. The restricted shares
vested immediately upon grant. During the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company recognized $ 384,180 in equity compensation expense
related to these awards.
On September 17, 2025, Sun Managers granted an
aggregate of 255,000 restricted shares of Zeo Class A common stock under the Management Incentive Plan to three employees. The restricted
shares vested immediately upon grant. During the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company recognized $ 288,150 in equity compensation
expense related to these awards.
Seasonal Manager Stock Compensation Plan
Beginning January 1, 2025, certain eligible sales
managers may earn shares of the Company’s Class A common stock under the Seasonal Manager Stock Compensation Plan, which operates
under the umbrella of the Management Incentive Plan. Managers are eligible to earn 40 shares per kW installed for projects sold by the
manager’s organization, provided they exceed 1,500 kW installed during a calendar year, and as long as the manager sells 700kW the
subsequent calendar year. The number of shares awarded may be reduced if the average price for Zeo stock during the quarter in which installations
are completed exceeds $ 5 per share, the number of shares granted per kW will be correspondingly decreased.
The managers become eligible to receive certain
grants of vested shares under the Seasonal Manager Stock Compensation Plan as follows:
● 50 % of the shares for which Manager becomes eligible during a calendar year will be granted in Q1 (prior to the end of March) of the following calendar year (the “Tranche 1 Grant”) if Manager remains eligible at the time of the grant.
● The remaining 50 % of the shares for which Manager becomes eligible during a calendar year are granted in the Q1 of the second year following the calendar year in which eligibility is earned (the “Tranche 2 Grant”) if Manager remains eligible at the time of the grant.
F- 34
On March 31, 2025, Sun Managers granted an aggregate
of 577,910 restricted shares of Zeo Class A common stock under the Management Incentive Plan to 10 sales managers. The restricted shares
vest in two equal installments as follows.
● One-half (1/2) immediately on the grant date; and
● One-half (1/2) 12 months following the grant date.
During the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company
recognized $ 765,061 in equity compensation expense related to these awards. As of December 31, 2025, the remaining unrecognized compensation
expense was $ 107,585 and is expected to be recognized over the remaining 0.25 year vesting period.
NOTE 19 —WARRANTS
In connection with ESGEN’s initial public
offering (“IPO”), ESGEN issued public warrants to investors. Each public warrant entitles the holder to purchase one share
of the Company’s Class A common stock at an exercise price of $ 11.50 per share.
Simultaneously with the closing of the IPO, ESGEN
issued private placement warrants to the sponsor and certain investors. Each private warrant entitled the holder to purchase one share
of the Company’s Class A common stock at an exercise price of $ 11.50 per share. Upon the closing of the Sunergy business combination,
the 14,040,000 private placement warrants were forfeited. Accordingly, as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, there were 13,800,000 public
warrants outstanding, and no private placement warrants outstanding. The public warrants expire on the fifth anniversary of the Sunergy
business combination, unless earlier exercised, redeemed, or liquidated. The warrants became exercisable 30 days following the closing
of the Sunergy business combination, provided that the Company maintains an effective registration statement covering the shares of Class
A common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants or permits holders to exercise the warrants on a cashless basis as permitted under
the warrant agreement. Once the warrants become exercisable, the Company may redeem the outstanding public warrants for $ 0.01 per warrant,
upon 30 days’ prior written notice, if the reported last sale price of the Company’s Class A common stock equals or exceeds
$ 18.00 per share for 20 trading days within a 30-trading-day period ending three business days prior to the notice of redemption.
The public warrants are accounted for as warrant
liabilities in accordance with ASC 815. Accordingly, the Company recognized the warrants as liabilities at fair value on the date of the
Sunergy business combination and remeasures the warrant liabilities to fair value at each reporting date. Changes in the fair value of
the warrant liabilities are recognized in the consolidated statements of operations within changes in fair value of warrant liabilities.
As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the public warrants are presented as warrant liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets. See Note
20—Fair Value Measurements for additional information
NOTE 20 —FAIR
VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial
instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, inventories, prepaid expenses and other current assets, accounts
payable, accrued expenses, and contract assets and liabilities, approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments.
The carrying amounts of lease liabilities and
notes payable also approximate fair value as these instruments bear interest rates that are consistent with current market rates for similar
instruments.
Recurring Fair Value Measurements
The Company measures certain financial instruments
at fair value on a recurring basis. As of December 31, 2025, the Company’s financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring
basis consist of warrant liabilities. See Note 19—Warrants for additional information.
F- 35
The fair value of financial instruments measured
at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2025 consisted of the following:
Fair Value Measurements as of
December 31, 2025
Description
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
Warrant liabilities
$ 491,280
$ –
$ –
$ 491,280
The following table presents changes in the Company’s
warrant liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
Amount
Warrant Liabilities
Balance as of December 31, 2023
$ –
Fair value of warrant liabilities upon issuance
1,518,000
Gain on change in fair value of warrant liabilities
( 69,000 )
Extinguishment of warrant liabilities upon settlement
–
Balance as of December 31, 2024
$ 1,449,000
Gain on change in fair value of warrant liabilities
( 957,720 )
Extinguishment of warrant liabilities upon settlement
–
Balance as of December 31, 2025
$ 491,280
NOTE 21 —INCOME
TAXES
The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance
with ASC 740, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events
that have been included in the consolidated financial statements. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences
between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of existing assets and liabilities and are measured using enacted tax
rates expected to apply in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to reverse.
The Company’s effective tax rate from continuing
operations was a ( 1.7 )% provision and a 9.1 % benefit for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. The effective tax rate
differs from the U.S. federal statutory tax rate primarily due to the noncontrolling interest ownership in OpCo, which is treated as a
partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, as well as changes in the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets.
The Company evaluated the realizability of its
deferred tax assets based on all available positive and negative evidence. Based on this evaluation, the Company determined that it is
not more likely than not that certain deferred tax assets will be realized and therefore recorded a valuation allowance against those
deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2025.
F- 36
Due to the Company’s Up-C organizational
structure, a portion of the Company’s earnings is attributable to noncontrolling interests in OpCo, which is treated as a partnership
for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Accordingly, income attributable to these noncontrolling interests is generally not subject to corporate-level
income taxes, which reduces the Company’s overall effective tax rate.
The components for the provision of income taxes
include:
December 31,
2025
December 31,
2024
Current Federal and State
$ ( 25,050 )
$ ( 8,900 )
Deferred Federal and State
( 238,599 )
972,690
Total benefit (provision) for income taxes
$ ( 263,649 )
$ 963,790
A reconciliation of the statutory US Federal income
tax rate to the Company’s effective income tax rate is as follows:
December 31, 2025
December 31, 2024
Federal tax
21.0 %
21.0 %
State tax
( 0.4 )%
1.6 %
Investment in OpCo
( 0.8 )%
( 0.5 )%
Noncontrolling interest in OpCo
( 9.0 )%
( 12.1 )%
Income attributable to Sunergy prior to business combination
–
( 1.0 )%
Other
( 0.1 )%
( 0.1 )%
Change in valuation allowance
( 13.6 )
–
Remeasurement of warrant liability
1.2 %
0.2 %
Effective income tax rate
( 1.7 )%
9.1 %
The components of the deferred income tax assets
and liabilities were as follows:
December 31,
2025
December 31,
2024
Deferred tax assets:
Net operating losses and tax credit carry-forward
$ 986,740
$ 190,907
Accrued stock compensation
386,841
198,575
Accrued liabilities
–
268,766
Section 743(b)
4,196,394
–
Other
3,363
3,656
Investment in Sunergy
5,824,820
–
Total deferred tax assets
11,398,158
661,904
Valuation allowance
( 11,398,158 )
–
Net deferred tax asset
$ –
$ 661,904
Deferred tax liabilities:
Investment in Sunergy
–
( 423,413 )
Total deferred tax liabilities
–
( 423,413 )
Net deferred tax assets
$ –
$ 238,491
In connection with the Sunergy business combination,
the Company recorded deferred tax assets and liabilities related to the difference between the book carrying value of its investment in
OpCo and the tax basis of that investment. The resulting deferred tax liability was partially offset by deferred tax assets generated
in the transaction. The net impact resulted in the recognition of deferred tax benefits in the consolidated statement of operations and
a corresponding adjustment to additional paid-in capital related to the reverse recapitalization accounting.
NOTE 22 —NET
LOSS PER SHARE
Basic net loss per share is calculated by dividing
net loss attributable to Class A common stockholders by the weighted-average number of Class A common shares outstanding during the period.
Diluted net loss per share is calculated by adjusting the weighted-average number of Class A common shares outstanding for the potentially
dilutive effect of securities that could be converted into or settled in shares of Class A common stock. Potentially dilutive securities
include exchangeable OpCo units and other instruments that may be settled in shares of Class A common stock.
F- 37
The Company applies the treasury stock method
to restricted stock awards and warrants, which assumes that all Class A common share equivalents have been exercised at the beginning
of the period and that the proceeds from those exercises are assumed to be used to repurchase Class A common shares at the average closing
market price during the period. The Company applies the if-converted method to securities that are convertible into Class A common shares.
For the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024,
the Company reported a net loss. Accordingly, all potentially dilutive securities were excluded from the calculation of diluted net loss
per share because their effect would be anti-dilutive, and diluted net loss per share equals basic net loss per share. As of December
31, 2025 and 2024, 39,155,002 and 51,031,852 potential common share equivalents, respectively, consisting of convertible OpCo Class A
Preferred Units, exchangeable OpCo Class B units, convertible notes, warrants, and restricted stock awards, were excluded from the calculation
of diluted net loss per share because their effect would be anti-dilutive.
The following table presents the computation of
the basic and diluted loss per share of Class A common stock for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024:
Years Ended
December 31,
2025
2024
Numerator
Net loss attributable to Class A common stockholders
$ ( 14,008,754 )
$ ( 2,668,889 )
Denominator
Weighted-average Class A common shares outstanding – basic and diluted
24,936,865
5,546,925
Loss per Class A common share – basic and diluted
$ ( 0.56 )
$ ( 0.48 )
NOTE 23 —SUBSEQUENT
EVENTS
On January 27, 2026, the Company entered into
the White Lion ELOC with White Lion Capital LLC (“White Lion”), pursuant to which the Company has the right, but not the obligation,
to sell to White Lion up to $ 30.0 million in aggregate gross purchase price of newly issued shares of Class A common stock, subject to
certain limitations and conditions, over a period ending on the earlier of January 27, 2029 or the purchase of the full commitment amount.
In consideration for the commitment, the Company agreed to issue to White Lion $ 100,000 worth of Class A common stock. Concurrently, the
Company entered into a Registration Rights Agreement with White Lion. As of the date of this filing, the Company sold 241,000 shares for
proceeds of $ 272,020 . The Company settled the $ 100,000 commitment amount for 66,225 shares.
On January 30, 2026, the Company increased the
subordinated loan in the form of a note receivable with White Horse Energy, LLC from $ 3.0 million to $ 6.15 million under the same terms
as the original note.
F- 38