8 unchanged sentences
Plaintiffs allege that defendants exercised an impermissible degree of control over plaintiffs’ operations through the terms of the parties’ contracts and defendants’ policies, including enforcement of requirements imposed on motor carriers by state and federal law.
−Removed: The particular claims asserted vary from case to case but generally include claims that, should the contract carriers be determined to be employees, they would be entitled to reimbursement for unpaid wages, unpaid overtime, unpaid
−Removed: wages for missed meal and rest periods, reimbursement of certain of the contract carriers’ business expenses (including fuel and insurance related costs), Labor Code penalties under California’s Private Attorneys General Act, and attorneys’ fees and costs associated with bringing the action.
−Removed: Discovery is ongoing in these matters, and defendants continue to mount a vigorous defense on the merits of plaintiffs’ claims, including as to the threshold issue of employment classification.
+Added: The particular claims asserted vary from case to case but generally include claims that, should the contract carriers be determined to be employees, they would be entitled to reimbursement for unpaid wages, unpaid overtime, unpaid wages for missed meal and rest periods, reimbursement of certain of the contract carriers’ business expenses
+Added: (including fuel and insurance related costs), Labor Code penalties under California’s Private Attorneys General Act, and attorneys’ fees and costs associated with bringing the action.
+Added: Defendants continue to mount a vigorous defense on the merits of plaintiffs’ claims, including as to the threshold issue of employment classification.
Both cases are scheduled for trial in September 2021;
14 unchanged sentences
On March 19, 2021, the Court dismissed the first amended consolidated class action complaint with prejudice and closed the case.
−Removed: The Pension Funds filed a notice of appeal, and the appellate process is ongoing.
+Added: On April 29, 2021, the Pension Funds filed a notice of appeal, and the appellate process is ongoing.
Also, on May 13, 2019, Adriana Jez filed a purported shareholder derivative action captioned Jez v.
Jacobs, et al.
−Removed: , (“Jez complaint”) in the U.S.
+Added: , (the “Jez complaint”) in the U.S.
District Court for the District of Delaware, alleging breaches of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, waste of corporate assets, and violations of the Exchange Act against some of our current and former directors and officers, with the company as a nominal defendant.
13 unchanged sentences
Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.