We are a clinical-stage biotechnology company discovering and developing tumor-activated immuno-oncology, or I-O, therapies with the goal of significantly improving outcomes for people living with cancer without the systemic side effects of current I-O treatments.
−Removed: We are leveraging our proprietary geographically precise solutions, or GPS, platform to build a pipeline of novel, tumor-activated molecules, including cytokines and other biologics, which are designed to optimize their therapeutic index by localizing anti-tumor activity within the tumor microenvironment.
+Added: We are leveraging our proprietary platform to build a pipeline of novel, tumor-activated I-O molecules that are designed to optimize the therapeutic index by localizing anti-tumor activity within the tumor microenvironment, including tumor-activated cytokines and antibodies (including bispecifics) and immune cell engagers (including tumor-activated cell engagers and tumor-activated effector-enhanced cell engagers).
Current I-O therapies have curative potential for patients with cancer;
1 unchanged sentence
Our molecules are engineered to localize activity within the tumor microenvironment with minimal systemic effects, resulting in the potential to achieve enhanced anti-tumor activity and increasing the population of patients who may be eligible to receive our medicines.
−Removed: Our most advanced tumor-activated, clinical-stage product candidates are XTX202, an interleukin 2, or IL-2, therapy, XTX301, an interleukin 12, or IL-12, therapy and XTX101, an Fc-enhanced, anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody, or mAb.
−Removed: In addition to our clinical-stage product candidates, we are continuing to leverage our GPS platform and expertise in developing tumor-activated I-O therapies as we seek to expand our pipeline of discovery-stage programs and develop additional tumor-activated immunotherapies, including product candidates with a range of tumor targeting approaches.
−Removed: XTX202 is an investigational tumor-activated beta-gamma biased (non-alpha), engineered IL-2 molecule designed to potently stimulate CD8+ effector T cells and natural killer, or NK, cells without concomitant stimulation of regulatory T cells when activated (unmasked) in the tumor microenvironment.
−Removed: We are currently evaluating XTX202 in an ongoing Phase 1 clinical trial in patients with advanced solid tumors.
−Removed: The Phase 1 trial is a first-in-human, multi-center, open-label trial designed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of multiple ascending doses of XTX202 with the goal of establishing a recommended Phase 2 dose, or RP2D, for XTX202 as a monotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumors.
−Removed: We recently completed dosing patients at the 1 mg/kg dose level (dose level four) and are currently enrolling patients at the 1.4 mg/kg dose level (dose level five) in monotherapy dose-escalation (Part 1A) of the clinical trial.
−Removed: Importantly, no signs of vascular leak syndrome, or VLS, including hypotension or decreases in albumin (an early sign of VLS) or hemodynamic compromise, have been observed in patients to date.
−Removed: Monotherapy dose expansion (Part 1B) of the Phase 1 clinical trial is open for enrollment, and we plan to initiate patient enrollment in a Phase 2 clinical trial evaluating XTX202 as a monotherapy in patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma and metastatic renal cell carcinoma, or RCC, in April 2023.
−Removed: In addition, we plan to report preliminary anti-tumor activity, safety, pharmacokinetic, or PK, and pharmacodynamic, or PD, data from the Phase 1/2 clinical trial in the third quarter of 2023, which we anticipate will include approximately 15-20 patients across a range of solid tumors treated at the 1 mg/kg dose or higher across all cohorts in the Phase 1/2 clinical trial.
−Removed: XTX301 is an investigational tumor-activated, engineered IL-12 molecule designed to potently stimulate anti-tumor immunity and reprogram the tumor microenvironment of poorly immunogenic “cold” tumors towards an inflamed, or “hot,” state.
−Removed: In November 2022, we announced clearance of our investigational new drug application, or IND, by the U.S.
−Removed: Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, for XTX301 for evaluation in patients with advanced solid tumors.
−Removed: We recently opened clinical trial sites and are actively screening patients for enrollment at a starting dose of 5.0 μg/kg (0.005 mg/kg) in monotherapy dose-escalation for our Phase 1 clinical trial evaluating the safety and tolerability of XTX301 in patients with advanced solid tumors.
−Removed: We anticipate reporting preliminary safety data from the Phase 1 clinical trial into at least the third dose level in the fourth quarter of 2023.
−Removed: XTX101 is an investigational Fc-enhanced, tumor-activated anti-CTLA-4 mAb designed to deplete regulatory T cells when activated (unmasked) in the tumor microenvironment and improve upon the therapeutic index of existing anti-CTLA-4 therapies.
−Removed: We are currently evaluating XTX101 in an ongoing Phase 1 clinical trial in patients with advanced solid tumors.
−Removed: The Phase 1 clinical trial is a first in-human, multi-center, open-label trial designed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of XTX101 for the treatment of adult patients with advanced solid tumors.
−Removed: We recently completed enrollment in monotherapy dose-escalation (Part 1A) of the Phase 1 trial, and enrollment in monotherapy dose-expansion (Part 1B) of the Phase 1 trial is ongoing.
−Removed: In addition, we have determined an RP2D of 150 mg once every six weeks, or Q6W.
−Removed: anticipate reporting preliminary safety, PK, PD and anti-tumor activity data from the Phase 1 clinical trial in the second quarter of 2023.
−Removed: As previously announced, we plan to continue to explore strategic opportunities to advance XTX101 with a partner beyond the current Phase 1 clinical trial.
−Removed: In addition to our most advanced product candidates, we believe our proprietary GPS platform has the potential to develop additional product candidates using a range of approaches to achieve tumor-activation and derive a clinically meaningful improvement in therapeutic index.
−Removed: We currently have worldwide development and commercialization rights to all of our product candidates.
+Added: Our most advanced tumor-activated, clinical-stage product candidates are XTX101, an Fc-enhanced, anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody, or mAb, XTX301, an interleukin 12, or IL-12, therapy, and XTX202, an interleukin 2, or IL-2, therapy.
+Added: In 2023, we presented clinical data across these programs showing initial clinical validation for each of these molecules and our tumor-activated approach.
+Added: In addition to our clinical-stage product candidates, we are continuing to leverage our differentiated research platform and expertise in developing tumor-activated I-O therapies to advance preclinical development for tumor-activated bispecific molecules and immune cell engager molecules (including tumor-activated cell engagers and tumor-activated effector-enhanced cell engagers).
+Added: XTX101 is an investigational tumor-activated, Fc-enhanced, high-affinity binding anti-CTLA-4 mAb designed to block CLTA-4 and deplete regulatory T cells when activated (unmasked) in the tumor microenvironment and improve upon the therapeutic index of existing anti-CTLA-4 therapies.
+Added: In the third quarter of 2023, we entered into a co-funded clinical trial collaboration with F.
+Added: Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., or Roche, to evaluate XTX101 in combination with atezolizumab (Tecentriq®) in a multi-center, open-label Phase 1/2 clinical trial.
+Added: We are currently evaluating the safety and tolerability of the combination in patients with advanced solid tumors in the Phase 1 dose escalation portion of the clinical trial.
+Added: We plan to select a recommended Phase 2 dose, or RP2D, for XTX101 in combination with atezolizumab in the second quarter of 2024, and subject to the results of the Phase 1 combination dose escalation portion of the trial, we plan to initiate the Phase 2 portion of the trial for XTX101 in combination with atezolizumab in patients with microsatellite stable colorectal cancer, or MSS CRC, in the third quarter of 2024.
+Added: In addition, we plan to report initial Phase 2 data for XTX101 in combination with atezolizumab in approximately 20 patients with MSS CRC in the fourth quarter of 2024 and in approximately 20 additional patients (40 patients total) in the first quarter of 2025.
+Added: XTX301 is an investigational tumor-activated IL-12 designed to potently stimulate anti-tumor immunity and reprogram the tumor microenvironment of poorly immunogenic “cold” tumors towards an inflamed or “hot” state.
+Added: In March 2024, our wholly-owned subsidiary Xilio Development, Inc., or Xilio Development, entered into an exclusive license agreement with Gilead Sciences, Inc., or Gilead, pursuant to which it granted Gilead an exclusive global license to develop and commercialize XTX301 and specified other molecules directed at IL-12.
+Added: For more information, please see “—License and Collaboration Agreements—Exclusive License Agreement with Gilead” below.
+Added: We are currently evaluating XTX301 in an ongoing Phase 1 first-in-human, multicenter, open-label clinical trial designed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of XTX301 as a monotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumors.
+Added: In January 2024, we reported preliminary safety data into the third dose level in the Phase 1 dose escalation and anticipate reporting safety, pharmacokinetic, or PK, and pharmacodynamic, or PD, data for XTX301 in the fourth quarter of 2024.
+Added: XTX202 is an investigational tumor-activated, beta-gamma biased IL-2 designed to potently stimulate CD8+ effector T cells and natural killer, or NK, cells without concomitant stimulation of regulatory T cells, or TREGs, when activated (unmasked) in the tumor microenvironment.
+Added: In March 2024, we announced updated data from our Phase 2 clinal trial evaluating XTX202 as a monotherapy in patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma and metastatic renal cell carcinoma, or RCC, who have progressed on standard-of-care treatment.
+Added: Together with previously reported data, we believe these additional data further validate our tumor-activated approach and support the broad potential for XTX202 as a combination therapy.
+Added: In March 2024, we also announced plans to explore strategic opportunities to continue to develop XTX202 in combination with other agents and, as part of a strategic portfolio reprioritization, plans to discontinue further investment in XTX202 as a monotherapy.
+Added: Future Opportunities
+Added: In addition to our most advanced product candidates, we believe our proprietary platform technology has the potential to develop additional product candidates using our tumor-activated masking approach, which is designed to achieve tumor-specific molecule activation and derive a clinically meaningful improvement in therapeutic index.
+Added: We are currently leveraging our differentiated platform technology, and our unique expertise in masking antibodies and cytokines, to develop a new generation of tumor-activated bispecific molecules and immune cell engager molecules.
+Added: Subject to obtaining sufficient additional capital, we plan to advance XTX501, our tumor-activated PD-1/IL-2 bispecific development candidate, into IND-enabling studies.
+Added: We also plan to continue to make focused investments in our promising research-stage pipeline for additional tumor-activated bispecific molecules and immune cell engager molecules (including tumor-activated cell engagers and tumor-activated effector-enhanced cell engagers).
+Added: We will continue to evaluate opportunities for better tolerated and more efficacious combination therapies, using product candidates from across our portfolio with other cancer therapies, to increase the potential for curative regimens in oncology.
+Added: March 2024 Private Placement
+Added: On March 28, 2024, we entered into a securities purchase agreement with certain existing accredited investors, including Bain Capital Life Sciences and Rock Springs Capital, to issue and sell an aggregate of 1,953,125 shares of our common stock at a price of $0.64 per share and prefunded warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 15,627,441 shares of our common stock at a purchase price of $0.6399 per prefunded warrant share, through a private investment in public equity financing.
+Added: The prefunded warrants will have an exercise price of $0.0001 per share of common stock, be immediately exercisable and remain exercisable until exercised in full.
+Added: We anticipate receiving aggregate gross proceeds from the private placement of approximately $11.3 million, before deducting placement agent fees and expenses payable by us.
+Added: The private placement is expected to close on April 2, 2024, subject to the satisfaction of customary closing conditions.
+Added: We expect to use the proceeds from the private placement to fund working capital and other general corporate purposes.
Our Approach—Improving the Therapeutic Index of I-O Therapies
4 unchanged sentences
Similar to cytokines, checkpoint inhibitors have shown the potential to provide meaningful improvements in survival for patients with cancer, but the utilization of these therapies, beyond those that target the immune proteins PD(L)-1, is also limited largely by toxicity.
+Added: Finally, immune cell engagers, including T cell engaging bispecific molecules, have demonstrated encouraging clinical activity, but treatment is typically associated with significant toxicities including cytokine-release syndrome and on-target/off-tumor cytotoxicity.
Our goal is to overcome the limitations of current I-O therapies by developing products with an improved efficacy-to-toxicity ratio, or therapeutic index.
−Removed: The toxicities for cytokines and checkpoint inhibitors stem from their activity outside of the tumor microenvironment.
−Removed: Our GPS platform is designed to overcome these systemic toxicities by creating tumor-activated molecules and unleashing the activity of cytokines and checkpoint inhibitors in the tumor microenvironment.
−Removed: These molecules are intended to be inactive until they reach the tumor microenvironment, where they are activated, resulting in localized clinical activity with minimal dose-limiting toxicities.
−Removed: To achieve this tumor selectivity, we apply our GPS platform, which includes engineered features and a proprietary protein masking technology that render our molecules inactive until reaching the tumor.
−Removed: Our GPS platform also enables PK and protease-dependent activation, resulting in geographically localized anti-tumor activity.
+Added: The toxicities for cytokines, checkpoint inhibitors and immune cell engagers stem from their activity outside of the tumor microenvironment.
+Added: Our proprietary platform is designed to overcome these systemic toxicities by creating tumor-activated molecules and unleashing the activity of tumor-activated cytokines and antibodies
+Added: (including bispecifics) and immune cell engagers (including tumor-activated cell engagers and tumor-activated effector-enhanced cell engagers) in the tumor microenvironment.
+Added: These molecules are intended to be inactive until they reach the tumor microenvironment, where they are activated by the unique conditions of the tumor microenvironment, resulting in localized clinical activity with minimal dose-limiting toxicities.
+Added: To achieve this tumor selectivity, we apply our platform, which includes engineered features and a proprietary protein masking technology that seeks to minimize interaction with healthy tissue and cells by rendering our molecules inactive until reaching the tumor.
+Added: Our platform is also designed to enable optimal PK by preventing undesired binding and elimination outside of the tumor microenvironment, resulting in geographically localized pharmacology.
The engineered features are designed to ensure that our product candidates are stable molecules with well-understood properties and a reproducible manufacturing approach.
−Removed: Leveraging our GPS platform, we intend to develop a number of additional product candidates using a range of tumor targeting approaches, with the goal of achieving a clinically meaningful improvement in their therapeutic index.
−Removed: We also plan to evaluate opportunities for better tolerated and more efficacious combination therapies, using product candidates from across our portfolio with other cancer therapies, to increase the potential for curative regimens in oncology.
−Removed: Beyond oncology, we also plan to apply our GPS platform to other disease areas in which the immune system is dysregulated, such as in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases.
Our vision is to transform the lives of patients with cancer by harnessing the power of highly potent, tumor-selective I-O therapies that deliver deep and durable clinical responses.
−Removed: By leveraging our GPS platform, we aim to discover, develop and, ultimately, commercialize I-O therapies that overcome the known limitations of today’s approaches and provide effective, tolerable and durable therapeutic options for patients and their physicians.
+Added: By leveraging our proprietary platform for tumor-activated molecules, we aim to discover, develop and, ultimately, commercialize I-O therapies that overcome the known limitations of today’s approaches and provide effective, tolerable and durable therapeutic options for patients and their physicians.
In order to achieve these goals, the key elements of our strategy are to:
−Removed: ● Efficiently progress XTX202, our tumor-activated IL-2, through initial Phase 1 clinical proof-of-concept data, and if successful, expand clinical development for multiple cancer indications as a monotherapy and in combination with other therapies, including in combination with XTX301, our tumor-activated IL-12.
−Removed: XTX202 is a tumor-activated beta-gamma biased (non-alpha), engineered IL-2 molecule designed to potently stimulate CD8+ effector T cells and NK cells without concomitant stimulation of regulatory T cells when activated (unmasked) in the tumor microenvironment.
−Removed: We are currently evaluating XTX202 as a monotherapy in an ongoing Phase 1 clinical trial in patients with advanced solid tumors, and we anticipate initiating patient
−Removed: enrollment in a Phase 2 clinical trial evaluating XTX202 as a monotherapy in patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma and metastatic RCC in April 2023.
−Removed: In addition, we plan to report preliminary anti-tumor activity, safety, PK and PD data from the Phase 1/2 clinical trial in the third quarter of 2023, which we anticipate will include approximately 15-20 patients across a range of solid tumors treated at the 1 mg/kg dose or higher across all cohorts in the Phase 1/2 clinical trial.
−Removed: Subject to these interim trial results and establishing initial clinical proof-of-concept for XTX202, we plan to complete the Phase 2 trial evaluating XTX202 as monotherapy in patients with RCC and melanoma with the goal of determining the potential to conduct monotherapy registration-enabling trials for XTX202.
−Removed: In parallel to the completion of the planned Phase 2 monotherapy trial, we plan to initiate a Phase 1/2 trial evaluating XTX202 in combination with an anti-PD-1/PD-L1 for the treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer, or NSCLC.
−Removed: Subject to the results from this combination study, we anticipate initiating registration-enabling clinical trials for XTX202 in combination with an anti-PD-1/PD-L1 in patients with NSCLC.
−Removed: We also plan to explore the potential for XTX202 in combination with other therapies, including combinations with XTX301, our tumor-activated IL-12, and potential collaborations with cell therapies or anti-cancer vaccines.
−Removed: ● Efficiently progress XTX301, our tumor-activated IL-12, through initial Phase 1 monotherapy dose-escalation, and if successful, expand clinical development for multiple “hot” and “cold” tumors as a monotherapy and in combination with other therapies.
−Removed: IL-12 plays a key role in bridging innate and adaptive cellular immunity, making it a compelling target for immunotherapy.
−Removed: However, life-threatening toxicity observed with systemically active IL-12, including severe liver toxicity, have limited the therapeutic potential of IL-12 agents.
−Removed: XTX301, our tumor-activated IL-12, is designed to potently stimulate anti-tumor immunity and reprogram the tumor microenvironment of poorly immunogenic “cold” tumors towards an inflamed, or “hot,” state.
−Removed: We recently opened clinical trial sites and are actively screening patients for enrollment at a starting dose of 5.0 μg/kg (0.005 mg/kg) in monotherapy dose-escalation for our Phase 1 clinical trial evaluating the safety and tolerability of XTX301 in patients with advanced solid tumors.
−Removed: We anticipate reporting preliminary safety data from the Phase 1 clinical trial into at least the third dose level in the fourth quarter of 2023.
−Removed: Subject to achieving a minimal target dose, we would continue monotherapy dose-escalation of the Phase 1 clinical trial and initiate treatment in cohorts of patients with both “cold” and “hot” tumors to determine the potential for anti-tumor activity.
−Removed: Following an assessment of anti-tumor effect as a monotherapy in selected tumor types, we also plan to explore the combination potential of XTX301 with an anti-PD-1/PD-L1 and with XTX202, our tumor-activated IL-2 product candidate, prior to initiation of registration-enabling clinical trials.
−Removed: Subject to the successful completion of trials showing the ability to combine XTX301 with other I-O agents and immune activation in “cold” tumors, we would plan to explore potential registration-enabling trials in both “hot” tumors, such as head and neck cancer and NSCLC, and in “cold” tumors, such as microsatellite stable colorectal cancer, or MSS CRC, and pancreatic cancer.
−Removed: Report Phase 1 monotherapy data for XTX101 and explore strategic opportunities to advance XTX101 with a partner.
−Removed: We are currently evaluating XTX101 in an ongoing Phase 1 clinical trial in patients with advanced solid tumors.
−Removed: We recently completed enrollment in monotherapy dose-escalation (Part 1A) of the Phase 1 trial, and enrollment in monotherapy dose-expansion (Part 1B) of the Phase 1 trial is ongoing.
−Removed: In addition, we have determined an RP2D of 150 mg Q6W, and we anticipate reporting preliminary safety, PK, PD and anti-tumor activity data from the Phase 1 clinical trial in the second quarter of 2023.
−Removed: As previously announced, we plan to continue to explore strategic opportunities to advance XTX101 with a partner beyond the current Phase 1 clinical trial.
−Removed: Broadly expand our portfolio by applying the versatility and reproducibility of our GPS platform to develop novel I-O therapies for cancer.
−Removed: We have prioritized efforts to develop novel I-O therapies based on the therapeutic activity of I-O agents established in other clinical trials, while recognizing that the benefit of many of these I-O agents, particularly cytokines, has been historically hampered by issues of short half-life, poor bioavailability and significant toxicity.
−Removed: By leveraging the insights and capabilities of our GPS platform and our leadership team, we aim to systematically create novel molecules, including cytokines, mAbs and multi-functional biologics, that overcome these challenges to safely localize their potent activity to the tumor microenvironment.
−Removed: We believe that our GPS platform, which enables us to develop molecules with the potential to trigger anti-tumor immunity while limiting systemic exposure to improve tolerability, is broadly applicable in oncology and has the potential to develop a number of additional product candidates using a range of tumor targeting approaches, with the goal of achieving a clinically meaningful improvement in their therapeutic index.
−Removed: Build a fully-integrated I-O company by independently commercializing approved products in indications and key geographies where we believe we can maximize our product candidates’ value.
−Removed: We currently own all worldwide development and commercialization rights to our product candidates and programs, which we believe have been optimally selected based on our extensive preclinical data, including data with disease-specific animal models and biomarkers, supporting their potential for clinical success.
−Removed: To maximize the full potential and value of our pipeline, we intend to retain key development and commercialization rights for our product candidates in key indications and geographies where we believe we can ultimately commercialize successfully on our own, if approved.
−Removed: In addition, we intend to pursue strategic collaborations where a collaborator may have geographic operations or other capabilities that are synergistic or additive to our own.
−Removed: Leverage the broad applicability of our GPS platform through strategic collaborations in autoimmune diseases.
−Removed: We believe the collective components of our GPS platform and the reproducibility it enables in our drug discovery and development efforts present a meaningful opportunity for us to leverage our GPS platform not only in oncology but also in multiple therapeutic areas beyond oncology, such as in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases.
−Removed: We plan to explore strategic collaborations that would enable us to accelerate the development of additional product candidates or programs as well as expand our capabilities, pipeline opportunities and product offerings, particularly where a collaborator may have expertise or capabilities that are synergistic or additive to our own.
+Added: ● Rapidly advance clinical development for XTX101, our tumor-activated, Fc-enhanced anti-CTLA-4, through our co-funded clinical collaboration with Roche.
+Added: In the third quarter of 2023, we entered into a co-funded clinical trial collaboration with Roche to evaluate XTX101 in combination with atezolizumab (Tecentriq®) in a multi-center, open-label Phase 1/2 clinical trial.
+Added: We are currently evaluating XTX101 in combination with atezolizumab (Tecentriq®) in Phase 1 combination dose escalation.
+Added: We plan to select a RP2D for XTX101 in combination with atezolizumab in the second quarter of 2024, and subject to the results of the Phase 1 combination dose escalation portion of the trial, we plan to initiate the Phase 2 portion of the trial for XTX101 in combination with atezolizumab in patients with MSS CRC in the third quarter of 2024.
+Added: In addition, we plan to report initial Phase 2 data for XTX101 in combination with atezolizumab in approximately 20 patients with MSS CRC in the fourth quarter of 2024 and in approximately 20 additional patients (40 patients total) in the first quarter of 2025.
+Added: ● Rapidly advance clinical development for XTX301, our tumor-activated IL-12, through our partnership with Gilead.
+Added: In March 2024, we entered into an exclusive license agreement with Gilead to develop and commercialize XTX301, as well as other molecules directed at IL-12.
+Added: We are currently evaluating XTX301 in Phase 1 monotherapy dose escalation, and we anticipate reporting safety, PK and PD data for XTX301 in the fourth quarter of 2024.
+Added: Under our license agreement with Gilead, we are responsible for conducting clinical development for XTX301 in the ongoing Phase 1 clinical trial through an initial planned Phase 2 dose expansion, and then following the delivery by us of a specified clinical data package for XTX301, Gilead can elect to transition responsibilities for the development and commercialization of XTX301 to Gilead, subject to the terms of the license agreement and payment by Gilead of a transition fee.
+Added: ● Explore opportunities for strategic partnerships to evaluate XTX202, our tumor-activated, beta-gamma biased IL-2, in combination with other agents.
+Added: In March 2024, we announced additional data from our Phase 2 clinical trial evaluating XTX202 in patients with metastatic RCC or unresectable or metastatic melanoma.
+Added: Together with previously reported data, we believe these additional data further validate our tumor-activated approach and support the broad potential for XTX202 as a combination therapy.
+Added: In March 2024, we also announced plans to explore strategic opportunities to continue to develop XTX202 in combination with other agents and, as part of a strategic portfolio reprioritization, plans to discontinue further investment in XTX202 as a monotherapy.
+Added: ● Leverage our promising research platform to advance differentiated, tumor-activated bispecific molecules and immune cell engager molecules (including tumor-activated cell engagers and tumor-activated effector-enhanced cell engagers).
+Added: We believe our proprietary platform technology has the potential to develop additional product candidates using our tumor-activated masking approach.
+Added: In particular, we are currently leveraging our
+Added: differentiated platform technology and our unique expertise in masking antibodies and cytokines to develop a new generation of tumor-activated bispecific molecules and immune cell engager molecules.
+Added: Subject to obtaining sufficient additional capital, we plan to advance XTX501, our tumor-activated PD-1/IL-2 bispecific development candidate, into IND-enabling studies.
+Added: We also plan to continue to make focused investments in our promising research-stage pipeline for additional tumor-activated bispecific molecules and immune cell engager molecules (including tumor-activated cell engagers and tumor-activated effector-enhanced cell engagers).
+Added: We will continue to evaluate opportunities for better tolerated and more efficacious combination therapies, using product candidates from across our portfolio with other cancer therapies, to increase the potential for curative regimens in oncology.
+Added: ● Leverage the broad applicability of our proprietary platform for tumor-activated I-O molecules through strategic collaborations and partnerships.
+Added: We believe the collective components of our proprietary platform technology and the reproducibility it enables in our drug discovery and development efforts present a meaningful opportunity for us to leverage our platform in combination with other agents in oncology.
+Added: We plan to continue to explore strategic collaborations and partnership that would enable us to access capital, accelerate the development of our current product candidates or additional product candidates or programs, evaluate our current or additional product candidates in combination with other agents, and expand our capabilities, pipeline opportunities and product offerings, particularly where a collaborator may have expertise or capabilities that are synergistic or additive to our own.
The discovery of a role for immunotherapy in the treatment of cancer was made more than 100 years ago, when William Coley treated patients with heat-treated bacterial toxins, resulting in a profound anti-tumor effect in some of those patients.
5 unchanged sentences
Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors have been used broadly because they generally achieve efficacy with minimal systemic toxicity, enabling their administration at their maximally effective doses.
−Removed: Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatments have become the most widely utilized immunotherapy agent in oncology, with FDA approvals in more than a dozen separate tumor types and $27 billion in worldwide sales in 2020.
+Added: Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatments have become the most widely utilized immunotherapy agent in oncology, with the U.S.
+Added: Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, approvals in more than a dozen separate tumor types and $27 billion in worldwide sales in 2020.
Our mission is to overcome the limitations of cytokine therapies and checkpoint inhibitors, such as anti-CTLA-4, and make immunotherapies beyond anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatments more accessible, efficacious and safe for patients with cancer.
−Removed: The promise and limitations of cytokines
−Removed: Cytokines are small signaling proteins that serve as master regulators of the body’s response to inflammation and immune attack.
−Removed: There are multiple cytokines, including IL-2, which are approved in a range of oncology and non-oncology indications.
−Removed: Aldesleukin, a high-dose IL-2 therapy, was first approved in 1992 as a monotherapy for patients with
−Removed: melanoma and RCC.
−Removed: In addition, cytokines have shown potential beyond oncology with approvals for the treatment of patients with multiple sclerosis, resulting in cytokines becoming a key treatment option for a range of conditions.
−Removed: However, cytokines have not achieved therapeutic success in a broad population of patients because their use has been limited by severe toxicity, including fatal outcomes.
−Removed: We believe XTX202, our tumor-activated IL-2 product candidate, and XTX301, our tumor-activated IL-12 product candidate, each have the potential to overcome these limitations and deliver a therapeutic dose with low systemic toxicity and the ability to achieve a broad therapeutic index.
The promise and limitations of checkpoint inhibitors
5 unchanged sentences
This has reduced the use of anti-CTLA-4 mAbs both as a monotherapy and in combination therapy.
−Removed: We believe XTX101, our Fc-enhanced, tumor-activated anti-CTLA-4, has the potential to overcome these limitations and deliver the full clinical benefit of anti-CTLA-4 mechanisms without the dose-limiting toxicities associated with existing CTLA-4 treatments.
+Added: We believe XTX101, our tumor-activated, Fc-enhanced high affinity binding anti-CTLA-4, has the potential to overcome these limitations and deliver the full clinical benefit of anti-CTLA-4 mechanisms without the dose-limiting toxicities associated with existing CTLA-4 treatments.
+Added: The promise and limitations of cytokines
+Added: Cytokines are small signaling proteins that serve as master regulators of the body’s response to inflammation and immune attack.
+Added: There are multiple cytokines, including IL-2, which are approved in a range of oncology and non-oncology indications.
+Added: Aldesleukin, a high-dose IL-2 therapy, was first approved in 1992 as a monotherapy for patients with melanoma and RCC.
+Added: Similarly, IL-12 development has been relentlessly pursued due to its unique potential to treat immunologically cold tumors, but currently there are no approved IL-12 therapies.
+Added: Cytokines such as IL-2 and IL-12 have not achieved therapeutic success in a broad population of patients because their use has been limited by severe toxicity, including fatal outcomes.
+Added: We believe XTX301, our tumor-activated IL-12 product candidate, has the potential to overcome these limitations and deliver a therapeutic dose with low systemic toxicity and the ability to achieve a broad therapeutic index.
+Added: We also believe that XTX202, our IL-2 product candidate, has broad potential as a combination therapy based on the safety, PK and PD data reported to date from our Phase 1 and Phase 2 clinical trials.
I-O Combinations
8 unchanged sentences
The potential of our tumor-activated molecules to minimize the systemic toxicity of I-O could allow us to combine I-O agents to meaningfully improve survival in a broader range of tumor types.
+Added: We are currently evaluating XTX101, our anti-CTLA-4 product candidate, in combination with atezolizumab, and as discussed above, we plan to explore opportunities to continue to develop XTX202, our IL-2 product candidate, in combination with other agents.
Our Solution:
−Removed: Our GPS Platform Enables Tumor-Activated I-O Molecules Designed to Optimize Their Therapeutic Index
+Added: Our Proprietary Platform Enables Tumor-Activated I-O Molecules Designed to Optimize Their Therapeutic Index
I-O therapies have curative potential for patients with cancer.
However, this potential has been significantly curtailed to date by dose-limiting toxicities that result from activity of the therapeutic molecule outside the tumor microenvironment.
−Removed: We believe that geographic localization of the activity of I-O agents to the tumor microenvironment can overcome these dose-limiting toxicities and enable maximal therapeutic benefit for patients.
+Added: We believe that selectively targeting the activity of I-O agents to the tumor microenvironment can overcome these dose-limiting toxicities and enable maximal therapeutic benefit for patients.
Tumor-selective activation could be achieved by harnessing unique characteristics of the tumor microenvironment to activate therapeutic molecules locally that have minimal or non-detectable levels of activity outside of the tumor microenvironment.
1 unchanged sentence
MMPs are dysregulated in the tumor microenvironment, resulting in preferential activity of MMPs in the tumor microenvironment by comparison to non-tumor, healthy tissues.
−Removed: As a result, we believe that our GPS platform,
−Removed: which is designed to harness tumor MMP activity, can activate our molecules selectively within the tumor microenvironment while maintaining minimal or non-detectable levels of activity outside of the tumor microenvironment.
−Removed: Our GPS platform enables us to engineer a broad range of immune-modulatory molecules, including cytokines, antibodies and multi-functional molecules, that contain masking domains designed to minimize their activity outside of the tumor microenvironment and turn on selectively in the tumor microenvironment where they are preferentially activated by tumor MMPs.
+Added: As a result, we believe that our platform for tumor-activated molecules, which is designed to harness tumor MMP activity, can design molecules that selectively activate within the tumor microenvironment while maintaining minimal or non-detectable levels of activity outside of the tumor microenvironment.
+Added: Our platform enables us to engineer a broad range of immune-modulatory molecules, including tumor-activated cytokines and antibodies (including bispecifics) and immune cell engagers (including tumor-activated cell engagers and tumor-activated effector-enhanced cell engagers), that contain masking domains designed to minimize their activity outside of
+Added: the tumor microenvironment and turn on selectively in the tumor microenvironment where they are preferentially activated by tumor MMPs.
Specifically, MMPs enzymatically cleave a protease cleavage site incorporated in a peptide linker that connects the masking protein domain to the active agent.
This separates the mask from the active agent, enabling the unmasked agent to promote an anti-tumor response within the tumor microenvironment.
−Removed: Key features of our tumor-activated molecules exemplify the engineering approach that underpins our GPS platform.
+Added: Key features of our tumor-activated molecules exemplify the engineering approach that underpins our platform.
Each feature contributes to multiple characteristics of the molecule that are designed to enable tumor selective biological activity and tumor growth inhibition while minimizing toxicity outside of the tumor microenvironment.
3 unchanged sentences
a protease cleavage site;
−Removed: a half-life extension domain for cytokine molecules, as appropriate;
−Removed: the active engineered molecule (i.e., an engineered cytokine or antibody).
+Added: a cleavable or retained half-life extension domain for cytokine, immune cell engager and bispecific molecules, as appropriate;
+Added: the effector domain (i.e., an engineered cytokine, antibody or immune cell engager).
The engineered features are designed to ensure that our product candidates are stable molecules with well-understood properties and a reproducible manufacturing approach.
−Removed: In preclinical studies, we have successfully applied our GPS platform to cytokines, antibodies that regulate immune checkpoints and multi-functional molecules in order to promote localized anti-tumor immune responses, while avoiding the dose-limiting toxicities associated with systemic immune responses.
−Removed: The graphic below illustrates XTX202, our tumor-activated IL-2, which contains a masking domain that is released by protease cleavage.
−Removed: When the linker sequence, which contain a protease cleavage site, is cleaved by proteases, the masking domain is released, allowing the cytokine to bind to the target receptor.
−Removed: Before cleavage by the MMP in the tumor microenvironment, the engineered cytokine has minimal or non-detectable levels of activity outside the tumor microenvironment.
+Added: We have applied our masking approach to cytokines and antibodies that regulate immune checkpoints, and with our earlier stage work, we have expanded the application of our platform to tumor-activated bispecific molecules and immune cell engager molecules (including tumor-activated cell engagers and tumor-activated effector-enhanced cell engagers).
+Added: Our molecules are designed to contain a masking domain that is released by protease cleavage.
+Added: When the linker sequence, which contains a protease cleavage site, is cleaved by MMPs, the masking domain is released, allowing the unmasked molecule to bind to the target receptor, or in the case of an immune cell engager, bind to the immune cell and tumor antigen to facilitate an immune synapse.
+Added: Before cleavage by the MMPs in the tumor microenvironment, the engineered molecule is designed to minimize interaction with healthy tissue and cells outside the tumor microenvironment.
Specifically, there is no binding to target receptors, and the molecule has a long half-life outside the tumor microenvironment.
−Removed: After cleavage in the tumor microenvironment, the engineered cytokine is locally activated and has a relatively short half-life.
−Removed: Key Features of Xilio’s Tumor-Activated Cytokines
−Removed: We believe that the characteristics of our GPS platform described above enable the following key advantages:
+Added: After cleavage in the tumor microenvironment, the engineered molecule is locally activated and has a relatively short half-life.
+Added: Key Features of Xilio’s Tumor-Activated Molecules
+Added: We believe that the characteristics of our proprietary platform for tumor-activated molecules described above will enable the following key advantages:
masking that takes advantage of multiple intra-molecular interactions, minimizing the risk of activity outside of the tumor microenvironment and therefore minimizing the risk of toxicity;
1 unchanged sentence
early consideration and incorporation of manufacturing and development aspects into the design of molecules to facilitate production of high-quality drug product for clinical use;
−Removed: half-life extending inactive (masked) cytokines, as appropriate, to support administration to patients on a schedule consistent with other biologics agents;
−Removed: locally activating cytokine molecules that have a short half-life in the tumor microenvironment, which minimizes the risk of the released cytokine exhibiting activity outside of the tumor microenvironment and, therefore, further reduces the risk of toxicity.
−Removed: We have shown preclinical validation and promising early clinical evidence of the ability of our GPS platform to develop tumor-activated cytokines and antibodies.
−Removed: In preclinical studies, each of our most advanced product candidates exhibited tumor-activated biological activity, tumor growth inhibition and minimal to no toxicity outside of the tumor microenvironment.
−Removed: The reproducibility of these preclinical data highlights the potential breadth of application of our GPS platform to multiple structurally diverse cytokines, antibodies and multi-functional molecules.
−Removed: In our Phase 1 trial for XTX202, our tumor-activated IL-2, we have demonstrated initial clinical validation of our GPS platform, as evidenced by preliminary intratumoral PD data for two patients treated with XTX202, each of whom had an optional on-treatment tumor biopsy and were the only two patients from whom a tumor biopsy analysis was available as March 1, 2023.
−Removed: For each patient, the tumor sample featured increased numbers of stromal tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, or TILs, and increased frequency of CD8+ effector T cells among these TILs.
−Removed: At the time of the tumor sample, these changes occurred in each patient in the absence of peripheral changes to CD8+ effector T cells, demonstrating preliminary evidence of tumor-selective activation.
−Removed: We believe our GPS platform can be applied to numerous molecules, which have potential as cancer therapies, but require localized activity within the tumor microenvironment to overcome the dose-limiting toxicities that result from activity outside of the tumor microenvironment.
−Removed: Leveraging our GPS platform, we are building a pipeline of tumor-activated cytokine, checkpoint inhibitor and multi-functional immunotherapies to treat cancer.
+Added: half-life optimized molecules with prolonged half-life in the inactive (masked) state to support administration to patients on a schedule consistent with other biologics agents;
+Added: locally activating molecules that have a short half-life in the tumor microenvironment, which minimizes the risk of the activated molecule exhibiting activity outside of the tumor microenvironment and, therefore, further reduces the risk of toxicity.
+Added: Leveraging our platform technology, we are building a pipeline of tumor-activated I-O molecules to treat cancer, including tumor-activated cytokines and antibodies (including bispecifics) and immune cell engagers (including tumor-activated cell engagers and tumor-activated effector-enhanced cell engagers).
Our goal is to overcome the limitations of current I-O therapies by developing products with an improved therapeutic index.
Consistent with this goal, we selected molecules that have prior clinical validation demonstrating therapeutic benefit, but that have been limited by significant toxicities that we believe can be addressed with our approach.
−Removed: We currently have worldwide development and commercialization rights to all of our product candidates.
−Removed: Disease Indication
Mechanism of Action
Stage of Development
−Removed: Cytokine Programs
−Removed: Phase 1 monotherapy dose-escalation (Part 1A) ongoing and monotherapy dose expansion (Part 1B) open for enrollment
−Removed: Phase 1 clinical trial sites open and actively screening patients for enrollment
−Removed: Undisclosed Research Program
−Removed: Tumor-Activated
−Removed: Multi-Functional
+Added: XTX101 in combination with atezolizumab (1)
+Added: Advanced MSS CRC
+Added: anti-CTLA-4 +
+Added: Phase 1 combination dose escalation ongoing
+Added: Co-funded clinical collaboration with Roche
+Added: Advanced Solid Tumors
+Added: Phase 1 monotherapy dose escalation ongoing
+Added: Exclusive global license with Gilead
+Added: Advanced RCC and Melanoma
+Added: Phase 2 monotherapy enrollment complete (3)
+Added: Plan to explore strategic opportunities to develop in combinations (3)
+Added: Advanced Solid Tumors
+Added: PD-1/IL-2 bispecific
+Added: Development candidate (4)
+Added: Additional research-stage programs
+Added: Tumor-activated immune cell engagers
Discovery-stage
−Removed: Antibody Program
−Removed: Enrollment in Phase 1 monotherapy dose-escalation (Part 1A) complete;
−Removed: Phase 1 monotherapy dose-expansion (Part 1B) ongoing
−Removed: Plan to initially evaluate XTX202 as a monotherapy in patients with melanoma and RCC prior to evaluating XTX202 in combination with an anti-PD-1/PD-L1 for the treatment of patients with NSCLC or potential expansion into additional cancer indications as a monotherapy or combination therapy.
−Removed: Plan to initially evaluate XTX301 as a monotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumors.
−Removed: Plan to explore opportunities for strategic collaborations to advance XTX101 with a partner beyond the current Phase 1 clinical trial.
−Removed: Our development strategy for our clinical-stage, tumor-activated cytokine product candidates is focused on the following:
−Removed: achieve an acceptable safety profile while maintaining dose levels sufficient to confer localized anti-tumor activity in the tumor microenvironment;
−Removed: achieve clinical proof-of-mechanism for our GPS platform by showing tumor-selective activation, as demonstrated by increased tumor fighting immune cells in patient tumors, including CD8+ effector T cells and NK cells, without an increase in tumor fighting immune cells in the periphery;
−Removed: establish clinical proof-of-concept for each product candidate, as demonstrated by monotherapy anti-tumor activity in patients treated at the target dose level for such product candidate;
−Removed: demonstrate the ability to administer our product candidates in combination with other therapies, so they can be explored and administered with relevant standard-of-care agents to potentially improve patient outcomes.
−Removed: Assuming we successfully achieve an improved therapeutic index during our initial clinical trials, we plan to proceed into an expansive set of registration-enabling clinical trials across a range of tumor types.
+Added: Evaluating XTX101 in combination with atezolizumab (Tecentriq®) in Phase 1 combination dose escalation trial and planned Phase 2 combination trial in MSS CRC.
+Added: Evaluating XTX301 in Phase 1 monotherapy dose escalation for the treatment of advanced solid tumors.
+Added: Plan to discontinue further investment in XTX202 as a monotherapy.
+Added: Plan to advance in IND-enabling studies, subject to sufficient additional capital.
+Added: XTX101, Our Clinical-Stage, Tumor-Activated, Fc-Enhanced, High Affinity Binding Anti-CTLA-4 Product Candidate
+Added: XTX101 is an investigational tumor-activated, Fc-enhanced, high-affinity binding anti-CTLA-4 mAb designed to block CLTA-4 and deplete TREGs when activated (unmasked) in the tumor microenvironment and improve upon the therapeutic index of existing anti-CTLA-4 therapies.
+Added: In the third quarter of 2023, we entered into a co-funded clinical trial collaboration with Roche to evaluate XTX101 in combination with atezolizumab (Tecentriq®) in a multi-center, open-
+Added: label Phase 1/2 clinical trial.
+Added: We are currently evaluating the safety and tolerability of the combination in patients with advanced solid tumors in the Phase 1 dose escalation portion of the clinical trial.
+Added: Subject to the results of Phase 1 combination dose escalation, we plan to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the combination in the Phase 2 portion of the clinical trial in patients with microsatellite stable colorectal cancer.
+Added: Background on CTLA-4
+Added: CTLA-4 is an immune checkpoint protein that is well-established as playing a central role in the development of tumors.
+Added: The scientific insight that led to the early development of CTLA-4 therapeutics is attributable to investigators recognizing CTLA-4 as a protein on T cells that acts as a brake on T cell activation.
+Added: By removing this brake, T cells were freed to attack cancer.
+Added: This work led to the development and FDA approval of ipilimumab, a CTLA-4 mAb, for the treatment of unresectable or metastatic melanoma at a dose of 3 mg/kg in 2011 and in additional indications in subsequent years.
+Added: While anti-CTLA-4 therapies such as ipilimumab have demonstrated meaningful efficacy across a range of tumor types, autoimmune toxicities have significantly limited their use to date.
+Added: Clinical trials have shown that 20% of ipilimumab-treated melanoma patients survive at least three years, and a subset survive for 10 years or longer.
+Added: Ipilimumab remains one of the most impactful drugs for these patients;
+Added: however, the number of patients who benefit from treatment with ipilimumab remains limited due to its toxicity.
+Added: Investigation of dose-response in two third-party clinical trials of melanoma patients showed that higher doses of ipilimumab are likely to increase the proportion of patients who benefit;
+Added: however, the increased dose also resulted in an unacceptable toxicity profile for most patients.
+Added: In a Phase 2 trial of ipilimumab conducted by Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, a dose range of 0.3 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg was tested and efficacy was measured both by response rate and by clinical outcome.
+Added: Both the response rate and median overall survival, or mOS, were higher at 10 mg/kg than at 3 mg/kg, with the 0.3 mg/kg dose determined as being ineffective.
+Added: The rate of severe AEs was 25% at the 10 mg/kg dose, 7% at the 3 mg/kg dose and 0% at the ineffective dose of 0.3 mg/kg.
+Added: Similarly, as shown in the table below, in a Phase 3 trial conducted by Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, mOS was higher at the 10 mg/kg dose but resulted in unacceptable toxicity for most patients.
+Added: Therefore, we believe that achieving a three-fold increase in therapeutic index would be transformational.
+Added: High-Dose Ipilimumab Improved Survival but Resulted in Unacceptable Toxicity
+Added: Adverse Events:
+Added: Gr 3/4 irAEs / disconts.
+Added: Ipilimumab has shown preliminary evidence of promising anti-tumor activity in a range of tumor types outside of its currently approved indications, but successful additional approvals have been limited due to its toxicity.
+Added: For example, ipilimumab has been observed to be more active when combined with the anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody nivolumab.
+Added: However, the combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab has been shown to cause a greatly increased rate of immune-related toxicity when compared to treatment with either ipilimumab or nivolumab as a monotherapy.
+Added: Clinical results from patients who express high-affinity FcγR polymorphisms have shown improved responses to ipilimumab, but efforts to improve the potency of the antibody have been limited by perceived toxicity risk.
+Added: There remains a critical need to develop safe and effective forms of anti-CTLA-4 mAbs that can achieve efficacious doses within the tumor microenvironment.
+Added: Our Solution:
+Added: XTX101, a Tumor-Activated, Fc-Enhanced Anti-CTLA-4
+Added: XTX101 is a clinical-stage, tumor-activated, Fc-enhanced anti-CTLA-4 mAb that is designed to improve upon the therapeutic index of existing anti-CTLA-4 therapies by overcoming potency and tolerability limitations.
+Added: Our goal is to demonstrate an improved safety profile enabling higher anti-CTLA-4 exposure in the tumor that will result in increased efficacy.
+Added: In preclinical studies, we observed the following tolerability and activity profile of XTX101:
+Added: improved in vivo potency and the intra-tumoral PD effects of XTX101 are consistent with the improved potency being a result of the higher affinity binding to the target CTLA-4 and enhanced IgG1-Fc effector function, which
+Added: further improves checkpoint inhibition and enhances antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity to deplete immune-suppressive TREGs in the tumor microenvironment;
+Added: reduced peripheral immune activity due to masking of the CDR sequences;
+Added: activation by protease-dependent release of the masks, which acts selectively in the tumor microenvironment and minimizes toxicity associated with systemic immune activation.
+Added: XTX101 is designed to enhance the desirable features of an anti-CTLA-4 antibody while mitigating the known limitations of anti-CTLA-4 antibodies due to toxicity.
+Added: We expect this combination of features to result in an increased therapeutic index.
+Added: Tumor-Activated Design Components of XTX101
+Added: Preliminary Phase 1 Monotherapy Data Presented in May 2023
+Added: In May 2023, we announced initial Phase 1 monotherapy dose escalation data for XTX101.
+Added: As of a data cutoff date of May 2, 2023, 25 patients had been treated with XTX101, including dose levels ranging from 7 mg to 180 mg administered once every three weeks, or Q3W, and one dose level at 150 mg administered once every six weeks, or Q6W.
+Added: Of these patients, 20 patients were dosed in monotherapy dose-escalation and five patients were dosed in monotherapy dose-expansion.
+Added: Patients had a wide range of advanced and treatment-refractory solid tumors, including colorectal cancer, or CRC, non-small cell lung cancer, or NSCLC, and pancreatic cancer.
+Added: In addition, 76% of patients had been previously treated with at least three prior lines of anti-cancer therapy, and 44% had been previously treated with at least one I-O agent.
+Added: As of the data cutoff date, three patients were continuing on treatment with XTX101, and 22 patients had discontinued treatment with XTX101.
+Added: Preliminary Safety Data
+Added: A recommended Phase 2 dose, or RP2D, and schedule of 150 mg Q6W was determined based on the favorable preliminary safety, PK and PD data for XTX101.
+Added: At the RP2D, no dose-limiting toxicities were observed, and there was no reported evidence of immune-related endocrine or skin AEs that are commonly associated with systemically active anti-CTLA-4 agents.
+Added: In addition, evidence of effective masking of XTX101 was demonstrated by low levels of unmasked drug detected in peripheral circulation, and XTX101 achieved target PK exposure at the RP2D, reaching the targeted area under the curve, or AUC, and peak concentration, or C max .
+Added: As of the data cutoff date of May 2, 2023:
+Added: ● Across all dosing levels and dosing intervals, no Grade 4 or Grade 5 treatment-related AEs were reported by investigators.
+Added: ● Among seven patients who received XTX101 administered at the RP2D of 150 mg on a Q6W dosing schedule, the most common treatment-related AEs (≥10% incidence) of any grade reported by investigators were diarrhea (14%), fatigue (14%) and decreased appetite (14%).
+Added: In these patients, no treatment-related colitis or infusion related reaction of any grade was observed.
+Added: Investigators reported only one Grade 3 treatment-related AE of diarrhea, which occurred after two doses and resolved after five days without steroid use.
+Added: This patient tolerated two additional doses of XTX101 after dose reduction to 75 mg Q6W without any symptom recurrence.
+Added: At the RP2D of 150 mg Q6W, this was the only patient with a dose reduction due to an AE, and no patients discontinued treatment due to a treatment-related AE.
+Added: ● Among 18 patients who received XTX101 administered on a Q3W dosing schedule, the most common treatment-related AEs (≥10% incidence) of any grade reported by investigators were diarrhea (28%), colitis (28%), infusion related reaction (28%), nausea (17%), vomiting (17%) and abdominal pain (11%).
+Added: Of these, investigators reported the following Grade 3 treatment-related AEs:
+Added: diarrhea (6%), colitis (22%) and infusion related reaction (17%).
+Added: Infusion related reactions were associated with antidrug antibodies.
+Added: Across all dose levels administered Q3W, two patients had dose reductions due to AEs, and four patients discontinued treatment due to an infusion related reaction.
+Added: Preliminary Anti-Tumor Activity Data
+Added: A partial response, or PR, was observed at nine weeks in one patient with advanced PD-L1 negative NSCLC with hepatic metastases treated with XTX101 at the 150 mg Q6W dose level and confirmed after the data cutoff date at week 27.
+Added: The only treatment-related AE reported for this patient was Grade 1 fatigue.
+Added: In addition, PD markers for anti-CTLA-4 reported for this patient showed minimal immune activation in peripheral circulation, demonstrating evidence of tumor-selective activation of XTX101.
+Added: Updated Phase 1 Monotherapy Data Presented at the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Immuno-Oncology Congress in December 2023
+Added: In December 2023, we reported updated Phase 1 monotherapy data for XTX101 at the ESMO Immuno-Oncology Congress.
+Added: As of a data cutoff date of November 13, 2023, 36 patients with advanced solid tumors had been administered XTX101 monotherapy, including 18 patients at the RP2D and schedule of 150 mg Q6W.
+Added: Patients treated at the RP2D of 150 mg Q6W were heavily pre-treated, with 83% of patients receiving three or more lines of anti-cancer therapy and 56% previously treated with an immunotherapy.
+Added: Preliminary Safety Data
+Added: At the RP2D of 150 mg Q6W, 18 patients (including nine patients previously reported) were evaluable for safety as of the data cutoff date of November 13, 2023:
+Added: ● Safety data were consistent with previously reported results.
+Added: XTX101 monotherapy was generally well-tolerated with treatment-related AEs primarily Grade 1 or 2, and no patients discontinued treatment due to a treatment-related AE.
+Added: In addition, as previously reported, only one patient had a dose reduction due to an AE.
+Added: ● The most common treatment-related AE of any grade (≥10% incidence) reported by investigators was fatigue (11%).
+Added: ● As previously reported, investigators reported only two Grade 3 treatment-related AEs:
+Added: Grade 3 treatment-related AE of diarrhea, which occurred after two doses and resolved after five days without steroid use, and one Grade 3 treatment-related AE of dermatitis.
+Added: In addition, no Grade 4 or 5 treatment-related AEs were reported by investigators across all dosing levels and dosing intervals.
+Added: Preliminary Anti-Tumor Activity Data
+Added: At the RP2D of 150 mg Q6W, 12 patients were evaluable for anti-tumor activity as of the data cutoff date:
+Added: ● As previously reported, a confirmed PR was observed in a patient with Stage 4 PD-L1 negative NSCLC, including complete resolution of liver metastases.
+Added: The confirmed PR continued through 36 weeks of treatment with XTX101, with the patient discontinuing treatment after week 36 due to an unrelated AE.
+Added: ● Additional data reported demonstrated a disease control rate, or DCR, of 33% in late-line and I-O refractory patients administered XTX101 monotherapy at the RP2D of 150 mg Q6W, consisting of the confirmed PR in the NSCLC patient and stable disease in three patients (triple-negative breast cancer, melanoma and MSS CRC (n=1 each)).
+Added: Preliminary Pharmacokinetic Data
+Added: As previously reported, consistent with the tumor-selective design for XTX101, preliminary pharmacokinetic analyses demonstrated 96% activation of XTX101 in a melanoma tumor and 73% activation in a metastatic liver lesion in a CRC patient, compared to minimal peripheral activation of XTX101 of 13% in both patients.
Cytokine Programs
The major focus in our cytokine programs is the development of tumor-activated cytokines with exemplary clinical activity and tolerability.
−Removed: These cytokine programs include our clinical-stage, tumor-activated product candidates, XTX202 (IL-2) and XTX301 (IL-12), as well as discovery-stage programs for oncology and autoimmune diseases.
+Added: These cytokine programs include our clinical-stage, tumor-activated product candidates, XTX301 (IL-12) and XTX202 (IL-2), as well as discovery-stage programs for oncology.
XTX301, Our Clinical-Stage, Tumor-Activated IL-12 Product Candidate
−Removed: XTX202 is an investigational tumor-activated beta-gamma biased (non-alpha), engineered IL-2 molecule designed to potently stimulate CD8+ effector T cells and NK cells without concomitant stimulation of regulatory T cells when activated (unmasked) in the tumor microenvironment.
−Removed: We are currently evaluating XTX202 as a monotherapy in an ongoing Phase 1 clinical trial in patients with advanced solid tumors.
−Removed: For more information, please see the sections entitled “—Clinical Development Plans for XTX202” and “—Phase 1 Clinical Trial for XTX202” below.
+Added: XTX301 is an investigational tumor-activated IL-12 designed to potently stimulate anti-tumor immunity and reprogram the tumor microenvironment of poorly immunogenic “cold” tumors towards an inflamed or “hot” state.
+Added: In March 2024, our wholly-owned subsidiary Xilio Development entered into an exclusive license agreement with Gilead pursuant to which it granted Gilead an exclusive global license to develop and commercialize XTX301 and specified other molecules directed at IL-12.
+Added: For more information, please see “—License and Collaboration Agreements—Exclusive License Agreement with Gilead” below.
+Added: We are currently evaluating XTX301 in an ongoing Phase 1 first-in-human, multicenter, open-label clinical trial designed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of XTX301 as a monotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumors.
+Added: In January 2024, we reported preliminary safety data into the third dose level in the Phase 1 dose escalation and anticipate reporting safety, PK and PD data for XTX301 in the fourth quarter of 2024.
Background on IL-12
+Added: IL-12 is a potent, pro-inflammatory cytokine produced by antigen-presenting cells such as dendritic cells, macrophages and B cells.
+Added: IL-12 has two subunits, p35 and p40, that together form a heterodimer protein.
+Added: IL-12 is a key cytokine in the body’s response to pathogen infection, sending a signal to T cells, among others.
+Added: IL-12 interacts with diverse immune cells, including CD4+ T cells, CD8+ effector T cells, NK cells, monocytes and macrophages.
+Added: IL-12’s broad range of pro-inflammatory functions suggests that it could potentially be highly potent in controlling anti-cancer immunity.
+Added: IL-12 has been shown in preclinical studies to induce robust anti-tumor effects against many types of malignancies and it has been tested against multiple human cancers in clinical trials.
+Added: Recombinant human IL-12 has been evaluated in clinical trials, and anti-tumor efficacy was observed in a small number of patients across a range of tumor types.
+Added: Unfortunately, systemic IL-12 therapy has historically caused severe AEs in patients with cancer.
+Added: Life-threatening liver damage, called hepatotoxicity, was identified during the early development of previous IL-12 therapies, which severely limited the dose of IL-12 that could be administered, and further trials to evaluate efficacy were therefore conducted at sub-optimal doses due to the toxicity.
+Added: In an early Phase 2 trial of recombinant human IL-12, the MTD of 0.5 μg/kg (administered in days 1-5 in a 21-day dosing cycle) caused severe side effects in 70% of patients, or 12 of 17 patients, of whom two died from gastrointestinal bleeding and multi-organ failure, respectively.
+Added: The severe toxicities indicated that recombinant human IL-12 could not be used systemically due to rapid increases in the cytokines IFN-γ, TNF-α and IL-6 that caused a cytokine storm syndrome characterized by systemic inflammation, multi-organ dysfunction and immune cytopenias.
+Added: Efforts to overcome these systemic liabilities include alternate drug delivery approaches such as intra-tumoral administration of IL-12 encoding DNA vaccines or administration of oncolytic viruses expressing IL-12.
+Added: Despite activity in individual lesions, cancer is a systemic disease that cannot be cured with local therapy once it has reached an advanced stage.
+Added: Therefore, to unleash the potential for IL-12 in the majority of patients with advanced or metastatic cancer, an IL-12 that can be administered systemically but act locally at the tumor site is needed.
+Added: The failure of systemic IL-12 to induce meaningful anti-tumor efficacy is generally attributed to tolerability, which limits the dose and, as a result, the ability to reach therapeutic concentrations within the tumor microenvironment.
+Added: Therefore, maximizing the amount of IL-12 that reaches the tumor, while minimizing exposure of non-tumor tissue, may be critical for a safe and effective anti-tumor response.
+Added: Tumor-selective activation is therefore a desirable therapeutic profile.
+Added: Our Solution:
+Added: XTX301, a Tumor-Activated IL-12
+Added: Our goal for our IL-12 program is to create a tumor-activated, extended half-life IL-12 therapeutic with minimal peripheral effects.
+Added: We are using our platform technology and proprietary approach to achieve systemic delivery of tumor-activated IL-12, which we believe would have potential as a monotherapy and in combination with other therapies.
+Added: The design of our masked IL-12 cytokine molecule is closely related to that of our masked IL-2 cytokine molecule, described below, which illustrates the flexibility and robustness of our cytokine engineering approach.
+Added: The masking domain is designed to prevent binding to the cell-surface IL-12 receptor, unless the linker containing the protease site is cleaved by proteases preferentially active in the tumor microenvironment.
+Added: The half-life extension domain is designed to overcome the short circulating half-life of the native cytokine and the overall molecule is designed to enhance the efficiency of manufacturing.
+Added: Tumor-Activated Design Components of XTX301
+Added: We have undertaken extensive preclinical studies that demonstrated the ability of XTX301 to induce potent anti-tumor activity and PD changes consistent with known IL-12 biology.
+Added: Importantly, these effects on the tumor were observed without inducing concomitant systemic toxicity, which provides evidence that the masking design was performing as intended in preclinical studies.
+Added: Preliminary Phase 1 Dose Escalation Safety Data Reported in January 2024
+Added: In January 2024, we reported preliminary safety data into the third dose level in the Phase 1 clinical trial.
+Added: As of a data cutoff date of January 5, 2024, nine patients had been treated with XTX301 in the outpatient setting in Phase 1 dose escalation at three dose levels ranging from 5 ug/kg to 45 ug/kg administered once every three weeks.
+Added: XTX301 was generally well-tolerated across all dose levels with no dose-limiting toxicities observed in patients as of the data cutoff date.
+Added: We anticipate reporting safety, PK and PD data for XTX301 in the fourth quarter of 2024.
+Added: XTX202, Our Clinical-Stage, Tumor-Activated IL-2 Product Candidate
+Added: XTX202 is an investigational tumor-activated, beta-gamma biased IL-2 designed to potently stimulate CD8+ effector T cells and NK cells without concomitant stimulation of TREGs when activated (unmasked) in the tumor microenvironment.
+Added: In March 2024, we announced updated data from our Phase 2 clinal trial evaluating XTX202 as a monotherapy in patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma and metastatic RCC who have progressed on standard-of-care treatment.
+Added: Together with previously reported data, we believe these additional data further validate our tumor-activated approach and support the broad potential for XTX202 as a combination therapy.
+Added: In March 2024, we also announced plans to explore strategic opportunities to continue to develop XTX202 in combination with other agents and, as part of a strategic portfolio reprioritization, plans to discontinue further investment in XTX202 as a monotherapy.
+Added: Background on IL-2
Extensive clinical evidence of the promise and limitations of cytokines
5 unchanged sentences
When administered locally, IL-2 has been shown to be clinically active and well-tolerated, shrinking local cancerous lesions and reducing malignant effusions.
−Removed: However, when administered systemically, treatment with IL-2 has been shown to induce severe toxicities, including VLS, myocardial infarction, or heart attack, acute renal failure and immune-mediated neuropathy.
+Added: However, when administered systemically, treatment with IL-2 has been shown to induce severe toxicities, including vascular leak syndrome, or VLS, myocardial infarction, or heart attack, acute renal failure and immune-mediated neuropathy.
This toxicity profile greatly limits its current use.
6 unchanged sentences
IL-2 anti-tumor activity and toxicity are both dependent on the amount of IL-2 administered.
−Removed: Therefore, in order
−Removed: to provide the greatest benefit to patients, the goal is to engineer a form of IL-2 that can minimize systemic effects while harnessing and directing activity to the tumor microenvironment.
+Added: Therefore, in order to provide the greatest benefit to patients, the goal is to engineer a form of IL-2 that can minimize systemic effects while harnessing and directing activity to the tumor microenvironment.
Rationale for non-alpha IL-2
10 unchanged sentences
The critical challenge in the development of IL-2 therapies is to improve patient tolerability without reducing efficacy.
−Removed: Deploying the key structural components of our GPS platform, we have designed XTX202 with three key features designed to overcome this:
+Added: Deploying the key structural components of our platform technology, we have designed XTX202 with three key features designed to overcome this:
(1) avoidance of binding to CD25, the IL-2α receptor subunit, in order to reduce the activation of Treg cells that inhibit immune response, while maintaining effective activation of CD8+ and NK cells that promote an anti-tumor immune response;
1 unchanged sentence
and (3) a removable protease-cleavable protein mask that prevents XTX202 from binding and signaling until the mask is removed by the MMPs that are preferentially active within the tumor microenvironment.
+Added: Tumor-Activated Design Components of XTX202
These key features are intended to ensure that XTX202 is released and activated preferentially within the tumor microenvironment, where it has been designed to bind to lymphocytes.
2 unchanged sentences
The unmasked XTX202 is then rapidly internalized by these lymphocytes, shortening the systemic half-life of the active (unmasked) molecule and localizing its activity to the tumor.
−Removed: Overview of preclinical studies and data
−Removed: We have undertaken extensive preclinical studies to demonstrate the two key characteristics of XTX202:
−Removed: (1) anti-tumor activity and (2) minimal or no evidence of systemic toxicity.
−Removed: In order to assess this, we compared XTX202 to both aldesleukin and a non-masked version of the molecule, which we refer to as XTX200, a non-α IL-2 with the same half-life extension domain feature but no mask to block IL-2 function systemically.
−Removed: XTX200 also serves as a surrogate for other non-α IL-2 molecules currently being investigated by others.
−Removed: This was done to assess the activity of our masking technology and compare XTX202 against high-dose IL-2.
−Removed: We believe that these studies collectively provide preclinical proof-of-concept with an improved therapeutic index due to tumor microenvironment-dependent activation of XTX202 that, if replicated in clinical trials, could result in significant benefits to patients with a variety of cancer types.
−Removed: The key findings of our XTX202 preclinical studies are as follows:
−Removed: XTX202 demonstrated minimal signaling through the IL-2 receptor when masked, and MMP activation of XTX202 restored full potency of IL-2 signaling in in vitro assays illustrating the tight, protease-dependent control of IL-2 activity conferred by XTX202;
−Removed: XTX202 activated an immune response in the tumor but not in peripheral organs, demonstrating geographically selective tumor PD activity in vivo in mice;
−Removed: XTX202 matched the tumor growth inhibition activity of XTX200 and aldesleukin, without activation of immune response outside of the tumor microenvironment, thereby avoiding the systemic toxicity (VLS and enlargement of the spleen, or splenomegaly), body weight loss and mortality in mice that were associated with the doses of XTX200 or aldesleukin required for tumor growth inhibition;
−Removed: XTX202 was well-tolerated in non-human primates, or NHPs, with no evidence of VLS or systemic immune activation in non-tumor, healthy tissue, whereas XTX200 induced both;
−Removed: XTX202 exhibited a half-life of greater than one week in NHPs, compared to a half-life of less than 0.5 days for XTX200.
−Removed: Based on these data, we believe that circulating levels of masked XTX202 can be achieved with clinically meaningful concentrations of activated (unmasked) XTX202 within tumors and that any unmasked cytokine of XTX202 that reaches the systemic circulation will be rapidly cleared with minimal systemic AEs.
−Removed: We then used syngeneic mouse tumor models to evaluate the activity of XTX202 in vivo .
−Removed: In these mouse tumor models, we observed tumor-activated PD effects of XTX202 and robust monotherapy activity against established tumors.
−Removed: Importantly, these experiments were conducted with XTX202 and not mouse surrogates.
−Removed: We examined established B16F10 melanoma tumors for PD evidence of XTX202 activity and compared the results to activity seen systemically.
−Removed: These data were compared to the non-masked control XTX200 and the vehicle-treated negative controls.
−Removed: Animals received 10 mg/kg of XTX202 or 0.36 mg/kg of XTX200, the non-masked control, on day zero and day three.
−Removed: The presence of CD8+ effector T cells was used as a measure of immune activation.
−Removed: The figure below depicts activity in B16F10 melanoma tumors on the left and in the spleen, a peripheral immune organ, on the right.
−Removed: We observed that both XTX202 and XTX200 induced an increase in CD8+ effector T cells in the tumor compared to vehicle control, while, in the spleen, expansion observed following XTX202 was limited compared to non-masked XTX200, which induced a significant expansion of splenic CD8+ effector T cells.
−Removed: XTX202 Tumor Selectivity in B16F10 Tumor Mice
−Removed: In a separate experiment, we compared the effect of aldesleukin and XTX202 on tumor growth and the level of intra-tumoral CD8+ effector T cell, NK cell and TREG infiltration.
−Removed: MC38 tumor-bearing mice were treated with either vehicle, aldesleukin (3 mg/kg twice per day, or BID) or XTX202 (10 mg/kg once every five days, or Q5D) and tumor volumes, as well as intra-tumoral immune cell infiltration were assessed on day five post-treatment.
−Removed: As illustrated in the figure below, XTX202 and aldesleukin treatment resulted in tumor growth inhibition, as well as increased CD8+ effector T cell and NK cell infiltration compared to vehicle.
−Removed: In contrast to aldesleukin, XTX202 treatment did not result in significantly increased intra-tumoral TREG frequencies compared to vehicle.
−Removed: In a separate experiment, we compared the ability of XTX202, XTX200 and aldesleukin to inhibit growth of established MC38 colon cancer tumors in mice.
−Removed: Prior experiments had demonstrated that 0.5 mg/kg of XTX200 dosed once every three days, or Q3D, and 3 mg/kg of aldesleukin BID for five days were the maximum tolerated doses, or MTDs, in mice
−Removed: for these molecules.
−Removed: Previous experiments had also demonstrated that XTX202 was well-tolerated in mice at doses up to at least 25 mg/kg dosed Q3D, with reversible, mild decrease in body weight and no mortality, and no decrease in body weight at 10 mg/kg.
−Removed: In this study, on day zero, animals received 10 mg/kg of XTX202, a well-tolerated dose for this molecule, or XTX200 at an MTD of 0.5 mg/kg on day zero and day three, or aldesleukin at an MTD dose of 3 mg/kg BID on days zero through four.
−Removed: As shown in the below figure, on day 5 post-dose, a well-tolerated dose of XTX202 demonstrated comparable activity to aldesleukin or non-masked IL-2 at their MTDs.
−Removed: XTX202 Tumor Growth Inhibition Was Comparable to Non-Masked Control XTX200 and Aldesleukin
−Removed: We also conducted a preclinical study in a second syngeneic tumor model, using mice bearing established MB49 bladder cancer tumors.
−Removed: On day zero, mice received 2 mg/kg of XTX202, or 0.4 mg/kg of systemically active non-masked XTX200 every two days.
−Removed: Aldesleukin was given twice daily at 3 mg/kg for three days.
−Removed: As a result of the removal of one mouse from a study cohort due to mortality or unacceptable body weight loss, the tumor progression curve for that cohort has been censored.
−Removed: As shown in the left panel in the figure below, a well-tolerated dose of 2 mg/kg of XTX202 achieved similar activity to the non-masked IL-2 at its MTD of 0.4 mg/kg.
−Removed: As shown in the right panel, XTX202 at 2 mg/kg had no observed effect on weight gain compared to animals that received vehicle control.
−Removed: By contrast, 0.4 mg/kg of the non-masked molecule led to significant weight loss.
−Removed: The dose of aldesleukin required to match XTX202 activity was not tolerated in this study and resulted in animal mortality by day five.
−Removed: The tumor growth inhibition observed with the 2 mg/kg dose of XTX202 was comparable to the activity of the non-masked engineered IL-2 surrogate at its MTD, but body weight loss and mortality were seen in the aldesleukin group and activity could not be determined effectively.
−Removed: Effects of XTX202 on Tumor Growth Inhibition and Body Weight in MB49 Tumor Mice
−Removed: In the same MB49 tumor study, in animals in which effective tumor growth inhibition was observed, blood samples were collected on day five from all surviving animals.
−Removed: These samples were evaluated for changes in immune cell populations in the blood by fluorescent activated cell sorting.
−Removed: XTX202 did not cause an increase in circulating CD8+ effector T cells, NK cells or TREGs.
−Removed: In contrast, XTX200 caused an increase in circulating CD8+ and NK cells, but no effect on TREGs, and aldesleukin had variable but stimulatory effects on all three cell types.
−Removed: XTX202 Did Not Affect Immune Cells in the Periphery
−Removed: These preclinical data collectively support the hypothesis that the activity of XTX202 is limited to the tumor microenvironment.
−Removed: The lack of expansion of the CD8+ T cell, NK cell or Treg cell populations in the peripheral blood suggest that XTX202 achieved tumor growth inhibition while exhibiting no evidence of activity outside of the tumor microenvironment.
−Removed: By contrast, the non-masked molecule XTX200 and aldesleukin both showed significant increases in immune cell populations in the blood, demonstrating that these molecules are both active outside of the tumor microenvironment.
−Removed: This conclusion was further supported by measurements of animal health in the bladder cancer tumor model.
−Removed: As shown in the figure below, we did not observe XTX202 to induce splenomegaly, while significant increases in spleen size were observed in animals treated with either XTX200 or aldesleukin.
−Removed: Similarly, XTX202 did not lead to VLS in treated mice as demonstrated by the lack of pulmonary edema, shown in the right panel.
−Removed: By contrast, XTX200 or aldesleukin administration resulted in vascular leak and pulmonary edema.
−Removed: Splenomegaly and Pulmonary Edema Observed in Mice with
−Removed: Aldesleukin and Non-Masked XTX200, But Not with XTX202
−Removed: Tolerability of XTX202 and XTX200 was also evaluated in NHP studies.
−Removed: All animals were administered a single IV infusion of either XTX200 at 0.73 mg/kg or a masked analog of XTX202 at 1.0 mg/kg.
−Removed: Peripheral lymphocyte counts and serum albumin levels were monitored for four weeks post-administration.
−Removed: The data show that at a molar equivalent dose, the masked molecule does not result in lymphocytosis or hypoalbunemia that is induced by the unmasked version of the same non-alpha molecule (XTX200).
−Removed: XTX202 Overcame Toxicity of Non-Masked XTX200 in NHPs
−Removed: XTX202 was evaluated in a repeat-dose toxicology study in NHPs in compliance with FDA’s good laboratory practices, or GLPs.
−Removed: The study evaluated vehicle and 1, 10 and 25 mg/kg doses of XTX202 given once weekly intravenously.
−Removed: As shown in the figure below, we observed dose dependent lymphocyte expansion following administration of XTX202, with the 1 mg/kg group showing no systemic expansion.
−Removed: These results were further supported by analysis of circulating albumin.
−Removed: A decrease in serum albumin levels is an indication of VLS.
−Removed: Serum albumin remained within the normal range for the 1 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg dosing groups, indicating no systematic expansion occurred and demonstrating minimal or no systemic toxicity for XTX202 in those dosing groups.
−Removed: The results from this repeat-dose GLP toxicology study in NHPs demonstrated that XTX202 was well-tolerated with the highest non-severely toxic dose, or HNSTD, equal to 10 mg/kg when administered once per week for four weeks.
−Removed: XTX202 Toxicology in a GLP NHP Study Demonstrated Favorable Tolerability
−Removed: The circulating half-life and PK properties of masked XTX202 and non-masked control cytokine were evaluated in a preliminary NHP study.
−Removed: Drug levels were measured with a custom enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay following a single IV infusion of 1 mg/kg of XTX202 or the molar equivalent of XTX200 at 0.7 mg/kg.
−Removed: PK parameters were calculated using a non-compartmental analysis.
−Removed: As shown in the table below, XTX202 exhibited a half-life of 5.3 days, whereas the half-life of the non-masked XTX200 was shorter at 1 day.
−Removed: The half-life extension moiety and the decrease in target-mediated disposition due to masking of IL-2 result in the longer half-life of XTX202.
−Removed: These data support starting with a dosing schedule of intravenous administration once every three weeks, or Q3W.
−Removed: Measured PK Parameters in Single Dose NHP Study
−Removed: XTX202 (masked at 1 mg/kg)
−Removed: XTX200 (unmasked at 0.73 mg/kg)
−Removed: Based on these data, we believe that circulating levels of masked XTX202 can be achieved with clinically meaningful concentrations of activated (unmasked) XTX202 within tumors and that any unmasked cytokine of XTX202 that reaches systemic circulation will be rapidly cleared with no systemic AEs.
−Removed: We believe that our preclinical data support clinical development of XTX202 for the treatment of a range of cancer indications, both as a monotherapy and in combination with other agents.
−Removed: In head-to-head preclinical tumor model studies, XTX202 achieved activity with 2-10 mg/kg dosed Q3D comparable to aldesleukin at 3 mg/kg dosed BID.
−Removed: XTX202 was well-tolerated up to 10 mg/kg repeated administration over four weeks in NHPs, whereas the published MTD for aldesleukin in NHPs is 25 ug/kg daily for 28 days.
−Removed: Therefore, in our preclinical studies, XTX202 demonstrated a calculated improvement in overall therapeutic index compared to aldesleukin.
−Removed: While there can be no assurances that these results will be replicated in clinical trials, we believe these preclinical data demonstrate XTX202 has the potential to deliver high concentrations of IL-2 selectively to the tumor while minimizing peripheral toxicity.
−Removed: We expect this to allow dose-escalation to achieve intra-tumor cytokine levels high enough to induce local T cell and NK cell activation, proliferation and anti-tumor cytotoxicity.
−Removed: In addition to the monotherapy potential for XTX202, we believe the combination of XTX202 with additional agents, including anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents that are widely used in a range of solid tumors, has the potential to ultimately lead to the widest utilization of XTX202 in cancer patients.
−Removed: Based on preclinical data, we believe XTX202 has the potential to provide enhanced anti-tumor activity when combined with an anti-PD-1/PD-L1.
−Removed: As shown in the figure below, in preclinical studies, XTX202 combined with an anti-PD-1/PD-L1 induced complete responses in a preclinical setting where neither XTX202 nor the anti-PD-1/PD-L1 were able to achieve complete responses as a monotherapy.
−Removed: In these preclinical studies, mice with complete responses rejected rechallenge with tumor, indicating evidence of the development of a memory response.
−Removed: Anti-tumor activity of XTX202 as a single agent and in combination with anti-mPD-1 was evaluated in hFcRn Tg32 transgenic mice bearing the murine MB49 bladder carcinoma model.
−Removed: The combination of XTX202 with anti-mPD-1 further improved anti-tumor activity with TGI 92% on Day 13 (Data presented as mean ±SEM, two-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Dunnett’s test, *P < 0.05;
−Removed: **P < 0.005).
−Removed: The treatment with XTX202 alone or in combination with anti-mPD-1 improved animal survival from 19 days to 27.5 and 38 days, respectively (Geham-Breslow-Wilcoxon test, **P < 0.01).
−Removed: A mouse with complete regression of MB49 tumor after combination therapy with XTX202 and anti-mPD-1 was resistant to tumor rechallenge with autologous MB49 tumor implanted on the opposite flank.
−Removed: Clinical Development Plans for XTX202
−Removed: We are currently evaluating XTX202 in monotherapy dose-escalation (Part 1A) in an ongoing Phase 1 clinical trial in patients with advanced solid tumors, and monotherapy dose expansion (Part 1B) is open for enrollment.
−Removed: The Phase 1 trial is a first-in-human, multi-center, open-label trial designed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of multiple ascending doses of XTX202 with the goal of establishing recommended Phase 2 dose, or RP2D, for XTX202 as a monotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumors.
−Removed: We plan to initiate patient enrollment in a Phase 2 clinical trial evaluating XTX202 as a monotherapy in patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma and metastatic RCC in April 2023.
−Removed: The planned Phase 2 clinical trial for XTX202 is a multi-center, open-label trial designed to evaluate the safety and anti-tumor activity of XTX202 as a monotherapy in patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma and metastatic RCC at the RP2D.
−Removed: In addition, we plan to report preliminary anti-tumor activity, safety, PK and PD data from the Phase 1/2 clinical trial in the third quarter of 2023, which we anticipate will include approximately 15-20 patients across a range of solid tumors treated at the 1 mg/kg dose or higher across all cohorts in the Phase 1/2 clinical trial.
−Removed: Subject to these interim trial results and establishing initial clinical proof-of-concept for XTX202, we plan to complete the Phase 2 trial evaluating XTX202 as monotherapy in patients with RCC and melanoma with the goal of determining the potential to conduct monotherapy registration-enabling trials for XTX202.
−Removed: In parallel to the completion of the planned Phase 2 monotherapy trial, we plan to initiate a Phase 1/2 trial evaluating XTX202 in combination with an anti-PD-1/PD-L1 for the treatment of patients with NSCLC.
−Removed: Subject to the results from this combination study, we anticipate initiating registration-enabling clinical trials for XTX202 in combination with an anti-PD-1/PD-L1 in patients with NSCLC.
−Removed: We also plan to explore the potential for XTX202 in combination with other therapies, including combinations with XTX301, our tumor-activated IL-12, and potential collaborations with cell therapies or anti-cancer vaccines.
−Removed: The figure below shows our Phase 1/2 trial design for XTX202 in RCC, melanoma and other indications to evaluate its activity as both a monotherapy and in combination with other agents.
−Removed: Phase 1 Clinical Trial for XTX202
−Removed: We recently completed dosing patients at the 1 mg/kg dose level (dose level four) and are currently enrolling patients at the 1.4 mg/kg dose level (dose level five) in monotherapy dose-escalation (Part 1A) for our Phase 1 clinical trial.
−Removed: As of March 1, 2023, a total of 16 patients have been treated with XTX202 in the outpatient setting at five dose levels ranging from 0.27 mg/kg to 1.4 mg/kg Q3W in Part 1A for the Phase 1 clinical trial, and Part 1B is open for enrollment.
−Removed: No signs of VLS, including hypotension or decreases in albumin (an early sign of VLS) or hemodynamic compromise, have been
−Removed: observed in patients to date.
−Removed: A maximum tolerated dose has not yet been determined, and enrollment in Part 1A and Part 1B of the clinical trial is ongoing.
−Removed: In addition, we recently reported preliminary clinical intra-tumoral PD data for two patients treated with XTX202 who each had an optional on-treatment tumor biopsy and were the only two patients for whom a tumor biopsy analysis was available as of March 1, 2023.
−Removed: The first patient was a melanoma patient treated with XTX202 at the 0.38 mg/kg dose level, and the second patient was an RCC patient treated with XTX202 at the 0.53 mg/kg dose level.
−Removed: For each patient, as shown in the figures below, the tumor biopsy featured increased numbers of stromal TILs and increased frequency of CD8+ effector T cells among these TILs.
−Removed: Importantly, in each patient, at the time of the tumor biopsy, these changes occurred in the absence of peripheral changes to either CD8+ effector T cells, demonstrating preliminary evidence of tumor-selective activation.
−Removed: Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) Overview
−Removed: RCC accounts for 2% of global cancer diagnoses and deaths annually, and the global incidence is increasing.
−Removed: Most cases of RCC are discovered incidentally on imaging, and approximately one-third of cases are advanced or metastatic at the time of diagnosis.
−Removed: Survival is highly dependent on the stage at diagnosis, with metastatic disease having a five-year survival rate of only 15%.
−Removed: RCC is the ninth most common cancer in the United States, with approximately 79,000 estimated new cases in 2022 and approximately 13,920 deaths in 2022.
−Removed: The landscape of therapeutic options has rapidly evolved such that the treatment goal, even in the metastatic setting, is to cure patients or ensure their long-term survival.
−Removed: Systemic frontline therapy options now include combinations of checkpoint inhibitors and TKIs such as pembrolizumab and axitinib, nivolumab and ipilimumab, and avelumab and axitinib.
−Removed: Despite these recent approvals, there remains a pressing need to identify new therapeutic targets and effective treatments since the substantial majority of patients continue to experience relapses and progression and ultimately succumb to their cancer.
−Removed: As a result, cures are not commonly achieved, as in the example of pembrolizumab combined with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-targeted TKI.
−Removed: As shown in the figure below, most patients with metastatic RCC will eventually relapse even after treatment with sunitinib or pembrolizumab and axitinib as the median time to progression-free survival, or PFS, is 11.1 months and 15.1 months, respectively.
−Removed: Pembrolizumab+Axitinib Improved Overall Survival in Metastatic RCC,
−Removed: but Most Patients Still Relapsed Within 18 Months
−Removed: In contrast to the TKI and anti-PD-1/PD-L1 combination shown above, IL-2-directed therapy offers the opportunity for durable responses and cures, as was seen in the historical aldesleukin treatment data.
−Removed: Only 15% of RCC patients treated with high-dose IL-2 obtained an objective response but approximately half of these, or 7% of all patients treated, achieved a CR.
−Removed: The unique feature of high-dose IL-2 is that approximately 90% of patients with RCC who achieved a CR remained permanently disease-free and off-treatment.
−Removed: Assuming a successful Phase 1 dose escalation trial and identification of a RP2D, we plan to pursue a rapid Phase 2 proof-of-concept clinical trial in RCC, an indication in which recombinant IL-2 produces positive clinical responses, but in which its use is limited due to toxicity.
−Removed: We believe XTX202’s characteristics can overcome these limitations and address the unmet need in RCC.
−Removed: Treatment of Metastatic Melanoma with IL-2 Agents
−Removed: In clinical trials evaluating recombinant IL-2 for the treatment of metastatic melanoma, recombinant IL-2 produced an ORR of 16% and produced CRs and functional cures in 6% of patients.
−Removed: However, use of recombinant IL-2 has been hampered by dose-limiting toxicities.
−Removed: While treatments that target PD-1 and CTLA-4 have grown to dominate the metastatic melanoma treatment landscape, many patients do not respond, and relapses are common, with a five-year survival rate of around 50% in metastatic melanoma.
−Removed: We believe that a safe and effective form of IL-2 may improve initial response rates and clinical outcomes when added to checkpoint inhibitor therapy and may maintain responses in patients with melanoma who have relapsed from checkpoint inhibitor treatment.
−Removed: Importantly, high-dose IL-2 has shown a response rate, including CRs in patients with melanoma despite those patients having progressed on prior treatment with an anti-PD-1/PD-L1 showing the potential for IL-2 mechanism of action-based efficacy in patients who have previously been treated with an anti-PD-1/PD-L1.
−Removed: Similar to our development plan for RCC, assuming a successful Phase 1 dose escalation trial, we plan to rapidly pursue a Phase 2 proof-of-concept clinical trial in melanoma, where recombinant IL-2 has demonstrated clinical responses but has been historically limited due to toxicity.
−Removed: Our clinical development plan includes the evaluation of patients with melanoma who have previously been treated with an anti-PD-1/PD-L1 to demonstrate clinical proof-of-concept.
−Removed: Potential Future Indications
−Removed: Beyond RCC and melanoma, we intend to explore XTX202 in additional solid tumor indications for which there is a significant unmet medical need, and for which IL-2 has previously demonstrated utility.
−Removed: These indications may include NSCLC, head and neck squamous cell cancer, or HNSCC, bladder cancer and ovarian cancer.
−Removed: Aldesleukin has been studied in a broad range of tumor types.
−Removed: Dose-limiting toxicities have prevented most patients with cancer from receiving the high doses necessary for systemic efficacy.
−Removed: Multiple clinical trials have evaluated IL-2 where localized administration is possible.
−Removed: In these trials, IL-2 has induced objective responses in patients with ovarian cancer when administered in the peritoneum, in patients with bladder cancer when administered directly into the bladder and in patients with NSCLC and mesothelioma when administered into the pleural cavity.
−Removed: In patients with resectable HNSCC, perioperative administration of IL-2 into the lymph nodes near the tumor resulted in increased survival in a randomized trial.
−Removed: These data provide evidence that multiple tumor types are likely sensitive to IL-2 if high levels of localized exposure can be obtained.
−Removed: In addition, we believe the novel design of XTX202 and preclinical and clinical data observed to date support the potential for XTX202 as a treatment in combination with other agents where tumor-activation may be required in order to combine with IL-2, including:
−Removed: monoclonal antibodies, other pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-12 and IL-18, cell therapies such as CAR-T and CAR-NK, and cancer vaccines.
−Removed: XTX301, Our Clinical-Stage, Tumor-Activated IL-12 Product Candidate
−Removed: XTX301 is an investigational tumor-activated, engineered IL-12 molecule designed to potently stimulate anti-tumor immunity and reprogram the tumor microenvironment of poorly immunogenic “cold” tumors towards an inflamed, or “hot,” state.
−Removed: In November 2022, we announced clearance of our IND by the FDA for XTX301 for evaluation in patients with advanced solid tumors.
−Removed: We recently opened clinical trial sites and are actively screening patients for enrollment at a starting dose of 5.0 μg/kg (0.005 mg/kg) in monotherapy dose-escalation for our Phase 1 clinical trial evaluating the safety and tolerability of XTX301 in patients with advanced solid tumors.
−Removed: For more information, please see the section entitled “—Clinical Development Plans for XTX301” below.
−Removed: Background on IL-12
−Removed: IL-12 is a potent, pro-inflammatory cytokine produced by antigen-presenting cells such as dendritic cells, macrophages and B cells.
−Removed: IL-12 has two subunits, p35 and p40, that together form a heterodimer protein.
−Removed: IL-12 is a key cytokine in the body’s response to pathogen infection, sending a signal to T cells, among others.
−Removed: IL-12 interacts with diverse immune cells, including CD4+ T cells, CD8+ effector T cells, NK cells, monocytes and macrophages.
−Removed: IL-12’s broad range of pro-inflammatory functions suggests that it could potentially be highly potent in controlling anti-cancer immunity.
−Removed: IL-12 has been shown in preclinical studies to induce robust anti-tumor effects against many types of malignancies and it has been tested against multiple human cancers in clinical trials.
−Removed: Recombinant human IL-12 has been evaluated in clinical trials, and anti-tumor efficacy was observed in a small number of patients across a range of tumor types.
−Removed: Unfortunately, systemic IL-12 therapy has historically caused severe AEs in patients with cancer.
−Removed: Life-threatening liver damage, called hepatotoxicity, was identified during the early development of previous IL-12 therapies, which severely limited the dose of IL-12 that could be administered, and further trials to evaluate efficacy were therefore conducted at sub-optimal doses due to the toxicity.
−Removed: In an early Phase 2 trial of recombinant IL-12, the MTD of 0.5 μg/kg per day caused severe side effects in 70% of patients, or 12 of 17 patients, of whom two died from gastrointestinal bleeding and multi-organ failure, respectively.
−Removed: The severe toxicities indicated that recombinant IL-12 could not be used systemically due to rapid increases in the cytokines IFN-γ, TNF-α and IL-6 that caused a cytokine storm syndrome characterized by systemic inflammation, multi-organ dysfunction and immune cytopenias.
−Removed: Efforts to overcome these systemic liabilities include alternate drug delivery approaches such as intra-tumoral administration of IL-12 encoding DNA vaccines or administration of oncolytic viruses expressing IL-12.
−Removed: Despite activity in individual lesions, cancer is a systemic disease that cannot be cured with local therapy once it has reached an advanced stage.
−Removed: Therefore, to unleash the potential for IL-12 in the majority of patients with advanced or metastatic cancer, an IL-12 that can be administered systemically but act locally at the tumor site is needed.
−Removed: The failure of systemic IL-12 to induce meaningful anti-tumor efficacy is generally attributed to tolerability, which limits the dose and, as a result, the ability to reach therapeutic concentrations within the tumor microenvironment.
−Removed: Therefore, maximizing the amount of IL-12 that reaches the tumor, while minimizing exposure of non-tumor tissue, may be critical for a safe and effective anti-tumor response.
−Removed: Tumor-selective activation is therefore a desirable therapeutic profile.
−Removed: Our Solution:
−Removed: XTX301, a Tumor-Activated IL-12
−Removed: Our goal for our IL-12 program is to create a tumor-activated, extended half-life IL-12 therapeutic with minimal peripheral effects.
−Removed: We are using our GPS platform and proprietary approach to achieve systemic delivery of tumor-activated IL-12, which we believe would have potential as a monotherapy and in combination with other therapies.
−Removed: The design of our masked IL-12 cytokine molecule is closely related to that of our masked IL-2 cytokine molecule, which illustrates the flexibility and robustness of our cytokine engineering approach.
−Removed: The masking domain is designed to prevent binding to the cell-surface IL-12 receptor, unless the linker containing the protease site is cleaved by proteases preferentially active in the tumor microenvironment.
−Removed: The half-life extension domain is designed to overcome the short circulating half-life of the native cytokine and the overall molecule is designed to enhance the efficiency of manufacturing.
−Removed: Overview of preclinical studies and data
−Removed: We have undertaken extensive preclinical studies that demonstrate the ability of XTX301 to induce potent anti-tumor activity and PD changes consistent with known IL-12 biology.
−Removed: Importantly, these effects on the tumor were observed without inducing concomitant systemic toxicity, which provides evidence that the masking design is performing as intended in preclinical studies.
−Removed: In murine preclinical models, we used a murine surrogate for XTX301, which we refer to as mXTX301, which included mouse sequences for IL-12 and the masking domain in place of the human sequences present in XTX301, since human IL-12 does not activate mouse IL-12 receptors.
−Removed: mXTX301 is architecturally analogous to XTX301 and shares the same half-life extension domain and protease linker as XTX301.
−Removed: Collectively, our preclinical data showed that:
−Removed: XTX301 demonstrated minimal signaling through the IL-12 receptor when masked, and MMP activation of XTX301 restored potent IL-12 signaling in in vitro assays, illustrating the tight, protease-dependent control of IL-12 activity enabled by XTX301;
−Removed: mXTX301 treatment induced potent anti-tumor activity in response to single dose administration in multiple tumor models without inducing significant body weight loss and toxicity;
−Removed: mXTX301 treatment resulted in increased infiltration of CD8+ effector T cells into tumors and induced broad pro-inflammatory gene expression changes in tumors consistent with IL-12 biology and its ability to reprogram the tumor microenvironment towards a more immune-permissive state;
−Removed: XTX301 was tolerated in NHPs at doses up to 2 mg/kg once weekly for four doses, or QWx4, and demonstrated a circulating half-life of four days.
−Removed: In preclinical models with mXTX301, tumor growth inhibition was observed in melanoma and bladder cancer models without AEs.
−Removed: Mice bearing established tumors received a single dose of mXTX301 at doses of 0.039 mg/kg, 0.13 mg/kg or 0.39 mg/kg or received 0.038 mg/kg of the non-masked mouse IL-12 cytokine, and tumor growth was measured over time.
−Removed: As shown in the figure below, mXTX301 demonstrated anti-tumor activity in all doses tested, including complete regressions at the 0.13 mg/kg and 0.39 mg/kg dose levels in a subset of the mice dosed.
−Removed: While the non-masked mouse IL-12 cytokine also induced complete regressions, severe weight loss and mortality were observed, as compared to a lack of toxicity observed in all of the mice treated with mXTX301 across dose levels.
−Removed: 0.5x106 cells;
−Removed: single IV dose of mXTX301 and mXTX302 on Day 0.
−Removed: Tumor growth data shown as mean±SEM.
−Removed: Tumor volume data was assessed by a two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc test on Day 11 compared to vehicle treated animals.
−Removed: ****p<0.0001 for all mXTX301 treatment groups.
−Removed: Body weight data are shown as mean ±SEM.
−Removed: A two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc test compared to vehicle treated animals was performed **p<0.005, ****p<0.0001.
−Removed: Additional experiments confirmed the anti-tumor activity of mXTX301 across a range of mouse models including MC38, CT26 and B16F10.
−Removed: As shown in the figure below, a single dose of mXTX301 treatment resulted in marked anti-tumor activity in all models, including complete regressions in a subset of animals with MC38 or CT26 tumors and transient regressions in a subset of mice with B16F10 tumors, which feature a “cold” non-inflamed tumor microenvironment.
−Removed: To gain deeper insight into the mechanism-of-action of XTX301, we conducted a series of experiments focused on measuring the effect of mXTX301 treatment on the tumor microenvironment in the MC38 model.
−Removed: The results of these experiments are summarized in the figure below.
−Removed: Consistent with known IL-12 biology, mXTX301 treatment resulted in increased infiltration of CD8+ effector T cells into tumors.
−Removed: Additionally, mXTX301 induced robust gene expression changes indicative of broad immune activation in tumors including changes tied to infiltration of diverse immune cell subtypes, interferon gamma signaling and enhancement of antigen presentation.
−Removed: In addition, preclinical data for XTX301 support the potential to achieve a broad therapeutic index.
−Removed: As shown in the figure below, in preclinical studies, mXTX301 induced tumor regressions in a murine model following a single dose of mXTX301 at 0.13 mg/kg, and XTX301 was tolerated at doses up to 2.0 mg/kg dosed once every week, or Q1W, four times in NHPs.
−Removed: Measured PK Parameters in Single Dose NHP Study
−Removed: XTX301 (2.0 mg/kg)
−Removed: Clinical Development Plans for XTX301
−Removed: In November 2022, we announced clearance of our IND by the FDA for XTX301 for evaluation in patients with advanced solid tumors.
−Removed: We recently opened clinical trial sites and are actively screening patients for enrollment at a starting dose of 5.0 μg/kg (0.005 mg/kg) in monotherapy dose-escalation for our Phase 1 clinical trial evaluating the safety and tolerability of XTX301 in patients with advanced solid tumors.
−Removed: We anticipate reporting preliminary safety data from the Phase 1 clinical trial into at least the third dose level in the fourth quarter of 2023.
−Removed: Our clinical development plan for XTX301 will focus initially on monotherapy dose-escalation in patients with solid tumors.
−Removed: Subject to the successful completion of monotherapy dose-escalation, we anticipate evaluating initial PD and anti-tumor activity data in cohorts of patients focused on tumor types that are sensitive to treatment with I-O agents and a separate cohort of patients with tumor types historically insensitive to treatment with I-O agents.
−Removed: Following an assessment of anti-tumor effect as a monotherapy in selected tumor types, we also plan to explore the combination potential of XTX301 with an anti-PD-1/PD-L1 and with XTX202, our tumor-activated IL-2 product candidate, prior to initiation of registration-enabling clinical trials.
−Removed: Subject to the successful completion of trials showing the ability to combine XTX301 with other I-O agents and immune activation in “cold” tumors, we would plan to explore potential registration-enabling trials in both “hot” tumors, such as head and neck cancer and NSCLC, and in “cold” tumors, such as MSS CRC and pancreatic cancer.
−Removed: The figure below shows our planned Phase 1/2 trial design for XTX301 to enable multiple monotherapy and combination opportunities for expansion in both hot and cold solid tumors.
−Removed: XTX101, Our Clinical-Stage, Fc-Enhanced Tumor-Activated Anti-CTLA-4 Product Candidate
−Removed: XTX101 is an investigational Fc-enhanced, tumor-activated anti-CTLA-4 mAb designed to deplete regulatory T cells when activated (unmasked) in the tumor microenvironment and improve upon the therapeutic index of existing anti-CTLA-4 therapies.
−Removed: We are currently evaluating XTX101 in an ongoing Phase 1 clinical trial in patients with advanced solid tumors.
−Removed: For more information, please see the section entitled “—Clinical Development Plans for XTX101” below.
−Removed: As previously announced, we plan to continue to explore strategic opportunities to advance XTX101 with a partner beyond the current Phase 1 clinical trial.
−Removed: Background on CTLA-4
−Removed: CTLA-4 is an immune checkpoint protein that is well-established as playing a central role in the development of tumors.
−Removed: The scientific insight that led to the early development of CTLA-4 therapeutics is attributable to investigators recognizing CTLA-4 as a protein on T cells that acts as a brake on T cell activation.
−Removed: By removing this brake, T cells were freed to
−Removed: attack cancer.
−Removed: This work led to the development and FDA approval of ipilimumab, a CTLA-4 mAb, for the treatment of unresectable or metastatic melanoma at a dose of 3 mg/kg in 2011 and in additional indications in subsequent years.
−Removed: While anti-CTLA-4 therapies such as ipilimumab have demonstrated meaningful efficacy across a range of tumor types, autoimmune toxicities have significantly limited their use to date.
−Removed: Clinical trials have shown that 20% of ipilimumab-treated melanoma patients survive at least three years, and a subset survive for 10 years or longer.
−Removed: Ipilimumab remains one of the most impactful drugs for these patients;
−Removed: however, the number of patients who benefit from treatment with ipilimumab remains limited due to its toxicity.
−Removed: Investigation of dose-response in two third-party clinical trials of melanoma patients showed that higher doses of ipilimumab are likely to increase the proportion of patients who benefit;
−Removed: however, the increased dose also resulted in an unacceptable toxicity profile for most patients.
−Removed: In a Phase 2 trial of ipilimumab conducted by Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, a dose range of 0.3 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg was tested and efficacy was measured both by response rate and by clinical outcome.
−Removed: Both the response rate and median overall survival, or mOS, were higher at 10 mg/kg than at 3 mg/kg, with the 0.3 mg/kg dose determined as being ineffective.
−Removed: The rate of severe AEs was 25% at the 10 mg/kg dose, 7% at the 3 mg/kg dose and 0% at the ineffective dose of 0.3 mg/kg.
−Removed: Similarly, as shown in the table below, in a Phase 3 trial conducted by Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, mOS was higher at the 10 mg/kg dose but resulted in unacceptable toxicity for most patients.
−Removed: Therefore, we believe that achieving a three-fold increase in therapeutic index would be transformational.
−Removed: High-Dose Ipilimumab Improved Survival but Resulted in Unacceptable Toxicity
−Removed: Adverse Events:
−Removed: Gr 3/4 irAEs / disconts.
−Removed: Ipilimumab has shown preliminary evidence of promising anti-tumor activity in a range of tumor types outside of its currently approved indications, but successful additional approvals have been limited due to its toxicity.
−Removed: For example, ipilimumab has been observed to be more active when combined with the anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody nivolumab.
−Removed: However, the combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab has been shown to cause a greatly increased rate of immune-related toxicity when compared to treatment with either ipilimumab or nivolumab as a monotherapy.
−Removed: Clinical results from patients who express high-affinity FcγR polymorphisms have shown improved responses to ipilimumab, but efforts to improve the potency of the antibody have been limited by perceived toxicity risk.
−Removed: There remains a critical need to develop safe and effective forms of anti-CTLA-4 mAbs that can achieve efficacious doses within the tumor microenvironment.
−Removed: Our Solution:
−Removed: XTX101, a Fc-Enhanced, Tumor-Activated Anti-CTLA-4
−Removed: XTX101 is a clinical-stage, Fc-enhanced, tumor-activated anti-CTLA-4 mAb that is designed to improve upon the therapeutic index of existing anti-CTLA-4 therapies by overcoming potency and tolerability limitations.
−Removed: Our goal is to demonstrate an improved safety profile enabling higher anti-CTLA-4 exposure in the tumor that will result in increased efficacy.
−Removed: In preclinical studies, we have observed the following tolerability and activity profile of XTX101:
−Removed: improved in vivo potency and the intra-tumoral PD effects of XTX101 are consistent with the improved potency being a result of the higher affinity binding to the target CTLA-4 and enhanced IgG1-Fc effector function, which further improves checkpoint inhibition and enhances antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity to deplete immune-suppressive TREGs in the tumor microenvironment;
−Removed: reduced peripheral immune activity due to masking of the CDR sequences;
−Removed: activation by protease-dependent release of the masks, which acts selectively in the tumor microenvironment and minimizes toxicity associated with systemic immune activation.
−Removed: XTX101 is designed to enhance the desirable features of an anti-CTLA-4 antibody while mitigating the known limitations of anti-CTLA-4 antibodies due to toxicity.
−Removed: We expect this combination of features to result in an increased therapeutic index.
−Removed: Overview of preclinical studies and data
−Removed: We have examined XTX101 in several preclinical and IND-enabling studies that we believe have demonstrated the potential for XTX101 to have an enhanced activity and an improved tolerability profile compared to ipilimumab.
−Removed: As summarized below, we believe that these studies collectively provide preclinical proof-of-concept with an improved therapeutic index due to tumor microenvironment-dependent activation of XTX101 that, if replicated in clinical trials, could result in significant benefits to patients with a variety of different solid tumors.
−Removed: XTX101 showed tight control and full reliance on MMP activity for binding to CTLA-4 in an in vitro study using a sensitive surface plasmon residence, or SPR, assay.
−Removed: XTX101 was activated by human tumors in a study of 82 tumor biopsies across a variety of solid tumors that demonstrated 67% overall activation.
−Removed: XTX101 demonstrated activity similar to an ipilimumab analog in in vivo mouse models of bladder cancer tumor growth.
−Removed: XTX101 dosed at 0.3 mg/kg and 1.0 mg/kg resulted in 2/8 CRs and 5/8 CRs, respectively.
−Removed: In the same mouse study, we observed that XTX101 induced an increase in CD8+ effector T cells within the tumor and a decrease in TREGs in the tumor, without increasing CD4+ T cells in the blood.
−Removed: The ipilimumab analog had less activity than XTX101 in the tumor but did show an increase in CD4+ T cells in the blood.
−Removed: In a separate mouse study, the combination of XTX101 and an anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody showed robust tumor growth inhibition in excess of either drug as a monotherapy, with minimal systemic toxicity.
−Removed: We observed the dependency of XTX101 on proteolytic cleavage to achieve binding using an SPR assay, which measures on-rate and off-rate of antibody binding to the target protein, allowing an accurate assessment of binding.
−Removed: The data demonstrate tight control and full reliance on MMP activity for binding of XTX101 to CTLA-4.
−Removed: The figure below shows protease-dependent activation of XTX101 in vitro using a biophysical assay.
−Removed: The left panel shows the binding of non-masked anti-CTLA-4 mAb, XTX100, to CTLA-4 coated on the SPR chip.
−Removed: Binding is indicated by a positive response measured in resonance units, or RUs.
−Removed: The middle panel shows minimal binding of unmasked anti-CTLA-4 mAb, XTX101, under the same conditions.
−Removed: The right panels show that treatment of masked XTX101 with MMPs restores binding to CTLA-4 in the SPR assay.
−Removed: After Proteolytic Activation, Full Binding was Restored to XTX101
−Removed: In in vivo models of bladder cancer tumor growth, XTX101 showed activity superior to that of an ipilimumab analog.
−Removed: MB49 cells were inoculated subcutaneously into C57BL/6-huCTLA-4 mice.
−Removed: When tumors reached approximately 150 mm3, mice received a single intravenous, or IV, dose of each molecule at the doses indicated in the figure.
−Removed: These were 0.3 mg/kg or 1.0 mg/kg for XTX101 and 0.3 mg/kg, 1.0 mg/kg and 3.0 mg/kg for the ipilimumab analog, which we produced to conduct these studies.
−Removed: As shown in the figure below, we observed that XTX101 was more clinically active than the ipilimumab analog in the MB49 bladder cancer model.
−Removed: The left panel shows the effect of different doses of XTX101 on tumor growth, with two CRs achieved with a dose of 0.3 mg/kg and five CRs achieved with a dose of 1.0 mg/kg.
−Removed: The right panel shows the effect of different doses of the ipilimumab analog on tumor growth, with no CRs achieved with a dose of either 0.3 or 1.0 mg/kg.
−Removed: XTX101 exhibited superior tumor growth inhibition compared to the ipilimumab analog.
−Removed: A dose of 3 mg/kg of the ipilimumab analog was required to achieve similar activity and CR rate as XTX101 at 0.3 mg/kg, suggesting XTX101 has 10-fold higher potency than the ipilimumab analog.
−Removed: Clinical Activity of XTX101 and Ipilimumab Analog in MB49 Tumor Mice
−Removed: Further, as shown in the below figure, we observed that XTX101 induced an increase in CD8+ effector T cells within the tumor, as shown in the left panel, and a decrease in TREGs in the tumor, as shown in the middle panel.
−Removed: We observed that XTX101 did not promote an increase in CD4+ T cells in the blood even at 3 mg/kg despite achieving complete responses at 0.3 mg/kg, suggesting tumor-activated activity of XTX101.
−Removed: We further observed that the ipilimumab analog promoted an increase in CD4+ T cells in the blood at the 3 mg/kg dose required for efficient tumor growth inhibition in the blood, as shown in the right panel, demonstrating that the ipilimumab analog was active outside of the tumor microenvironment at doses required for activity.
−Removed: XTX101 Demonstrated Tumor-Activated PD and Treg Depletion
−Removed: The effect of the combination of XTX101 with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody was evaluated in another preclinical study in which female C57BL/6-huCTLA-4 mice, were implanted subcutaneously with MC38 cells.
−Removed: When the tumors reached approximately 150 mm 3 on day zero, the mice were intravenously administered 10mg/kg isotype control antibody, 0.3 mg/kg of XTX101 or 10mg/kg anti-PD-1/PD-L1.
−Removed: As shown in the figure and table below, XTX101 and the anti-PD(L)-1 antibody each showed limited activity as a monotherapy.
−Removed: However, the combination of XTX101 with the anti-PD(L)-1 antibody showed robust tumor growth inhibition of 82%, including two out of eight animals achieving a CR.
−Removed: Minimal toxicity was observed in animals treated with either monotherapy or the combination, suggesting that XTX101 can be effectively combined with an anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody without enhanced toxicity.
−Removed: Single Dose Combination of XTX101 with anti-muPD-1 Enhanced Tumor
−Removed: Growth Inhibition with No Impact on Body Weight
−Removed: Isotype Control
−Removed: XTX101 0.3 mg/kg
−Removed: anti-PD-1/PD-L1 10 mg/kg
−Removed: 0.3 mg/kg + anti-PD-1/PD-L1
−Removed: Complete responses
−Removed: In GLP toxicology studies completed in NHPs, XTX101 exhibited a highest non-severely toxic dose, or HNSTD, of 3 mg/kg, supporting the targeted clinical dose for XTX101 in patients of 1-3 mg/kg.
−Removed: In addition, the half-life for XTX101 was 92 to 208 hours in single dose studies in NHPs, supporting the potential for dosing once every three weeks.
−Removed: Clinical Development Plans for XTX101
−Removed: In September 2021, we initiated a first in-human, multi-center, open-label Phase 1 trial designed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of XTX101 for the treatment of adult patients with advanced solid tumors.
−Removed: As of March 1, 2023, 24 patients have been treated with XTX101 in the Phase 1 trial.
−Removed: Enrollment in monotherapy dose-escalation (Part 1A) of the Phase 1 trial has been completed, and enrollment in monotherapy dose-expansion (Part 1B) is ongoing.
−Removed: In addition, we have determined an RP2D of 150 mg Q6W.
−Removed: We anticipate reporting preliminary safety, PK, PD and anti-tumor activity data from the Phase 1 clinical trial in the second quarter of 2023.
−Removed: As previously announced, we plan to continue to explore strategic opportunities to advance XTX101 with a partner beyond the current Phase 1 clinical trial.
−Removed: The figure below shows our Phase 1 trial design for XTX101.
−Removed: Future Discovery Opportunities Leveraging Our GPS Platform for Tumor-Activation and Tumor-Targeting
−Removed: We have prioritized efforts to develop novel cytokines, checkpoint inhibitors and multi-functional molecules based on the therapeutic activity established in other clinical trials, while recognizing that their benefit has been historically hampered by issues of significant toxicity, poor bioavailability and, in the case of cytokines, a short half-life.
−Removed: By leveraging the insights and capabilities of our GPS platform, we aim to systematically create novel cytokines, checkpoint inhibitors and multi-functional molecules that overcome these challenges in order to safely localize their potent activity to the tumor microenvironment.
−Removed: We believe our proprietary GPS platform has the potential to develop additional product candidates using a range of approaches to achieve tumor-selective activation and derive a clinically meaningful improvement in therapeutic index.
−Removed: We intend to further advance our tumor-activated therapeutic platform combining our masking approach with active, antibody-directed tumor targeting to create multi-functional, masked molecules designed to enable enhanced selectivity down to the cellular level and modulating multiple immune pathways synergistically.
−Removed: Preliminary data from preclinical studies indicates the promise of this approach, as the addition of a targeting domain to a tumor-activated masked cytokine has demonstrated superior tumor growth inhibition and tumor-specific PD activity compared to the same masked cytokine without the targeting.
−Removed: In addition, in these preclinical studies the masked targeted cytokine has demonstrated superior safety compared to a non-masked version of the same targeted cytokine.
−Removed: We plan to evaluate the opportunity for better tolerated and more efficacious combination therapies, using product candidates from across our portfolio with other cancer therapies, to increase the potential for curative regimens in oncology.
−Removed: Beyond oncology, we also plan to apply our GPS platform to other disease areas in which the immune system is dysregulated, such as in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases.
−Removed: We believe our novel and proprietary GPS platform and masking approach represent a meaningful competitive advantage in seeking to develop novel and highly effective treatments for cancer.
−Removed: However, the biotechnology and biopharmaceutical industries are characterized by rapid evolution of technologies and sharp competition and emphasis on intellectual
+Added: Initial Phase 1/2 Monotherapy Data Presented at Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) 38 th Annual Meeting in November 2023
+Added: In November 2023, we reported initial Phase 1/2 monotherapy data for XTX202 at the SITC Annual Meeting.
+Added: As of a data cutoff date of October 26, 2023, 62 patients with advanced solid tumors had been administered XTX202 in an outpatient setting.
+Added: Fifty-four patients were treated in Phase 1 monotherapy dose-escalation and dose-expansion at seven dose levels ranging from 0.27 mg/kg to 4 mg/kg administered on a Q3W dosing schedule.
+Added: Eight patients were treated in Phase 2 monotherapy at a dose level of 1.4 mg/kg Q3W.
+Added: Patients enrolled in Phase 1 were heavily pre-treated, with 74% of patients previously treated with three or more lines of anti-cancer therapy and 69% of patients previously treated with an immunotherapy.
+Added: All patients in Phase 2 had been previously treated with an immunotherapy.
+Added: As of the data cutoff date, 20 patients were continuing treatment with XTX202 across the Phase 1/2 trial.
+Added: Preliminary Safety Data
+Added: Across all dose levels administered in the Phase 1/2 trial, 62 patients were evaluable for safety.
+Added: ● No signs or symptoms of vascular leak syndrome were reported by investigators through the 4.0 mg/kg dose.
+Added: ● XTX202 was generally well-tolerated.
+Added: Treatment-related adverse events, or TRAE, were primarily Grade 1 or 2, and no patients discontinued treatment due to a TRAE.
+Added: Higher grade TRAEs were primarily asymptomatic laboratory abnormalities, and no Grade 5 TRAEs were reported by investigators.
+Added: ● The most common TRAEs (≥10% incidence) of any grade reported by investigators across all dose levels were:
+Added: fatigue (19%, no grade ≥3);
+Added: pyrexia (18%, no grade ≥3);
+Added: chills (16%, 2% grade 3);
+Added: and lymphocyte count decreased (15%, 8% grade 3-4).
+Added: Grade 3 TRAEs reported in one patient each (2%) were:
+Added: diarrhea/colitis;
+Added: and aspartate transferase, or AST/alanine transaminase, or ALT, increased.
+Added: Investigators reported two Grade 4 TRAEs of lymphocyte count decreased/lymphopenia, which were both transient (<3 days) and resolved without intervention, with both patients able to continue on treatment.
+Added: ● Across all dose levels, only two patients (3%) had a dose reduction due to a TRAE, and only one dose-limiting toxicity was observed, which was a reversible and transient (<5 days) Grade 3 elevation of AST and ALT at the 1 mg/kg dose.
+Added: Preliminary Anti-Tumor Activity
+Added: Across all dose levels administered in the Phase 1/2 trial, 42 patients were evaluable for anti-tumor activity.
+Added: Of these response-evaluable patients, 27 patients were treated at dose levels of 1.4 mg/kg or higher, including six patients treated at the 2.8 mg/kg dose level or higher.
+Added: ● Data demonstrated evidence of a dose-dependent increase in disease control rate, or DCR.
+Added: Among the 42 response-evaluable patients treated across all dose levels, investigators reported stable disease, or SD, of at least 9-weeks duration in 13 patients (31% DCR) across a range of solid tumors, including cold tumors:
+Added: melanoma (n=3);
+Added: and myoepithelial carcinoma, vaginal cancer, testicular cancer and squamous penile cancer (n=1 each).
+Added: Among the six response-evaluable patients treated at the 2.8 mg/kg dose level or higher, investigators reported SD of at least 9-weeks duration in three patients (50% DCR).
+Added: ● In addition, two patients were ongoing on treatment for more than one year as of the data cutoff date, including a treatment-refractory MSS CRC patient and an RCC patient, suggesting XTX202 was well-tolerated with repeated, long-term dosing in these patients.
+Added: Preliminary PK and PD Data
+Added: Preliminary PK analysis demonstrated limited XTX202 activation in peripheral circulation, including:
+Added: ● Dose-proportional exposure for XTX202 with minimal levels of unmasked XTX202 detected in peripheral circulation that were consistent across dose levels.
+Added: ● Approximately 15% activated XTX202 in the tumor based on an analysis of an on-treatment patient biopsy for a patient treated with XTX202 at the 2.8 mg/kg dose level as compared to <1% activated XTX202 in plasma across patients treated with XTX202 at the 2.8 mg/kg dose level for whom PK analysis was available.
+Added: These data along with non-clinical pharmacology data suggest 2.8 mg/kg or higher monotherapy doses of XTX202 are approaching the optimal range to activate CD8+ effector T cells and NK cells in the tumor.
+Added: Consistent with IL-2 beta-gamma biology, preliminary PD analysis of four available on-treatment tumor samples showed an average increase >200% of CD8+ effector T cells in the tumor as compared to pre-treatment biopsies.
+Added: Additional Phase 2 Monotherapy Data Reported in March 2024
+Added: In March 2024, we announced additional data from our Phase 2 clinical trial evaluating XTX202 in patients with metastatic RCC or unresectable or metastatic melanoma.
+Added: As of a data cutoff date of March 6, 2024:
+Added: ● A total of 17 RCC patients and 20 melanoma patients were administered XTX202 in the Phase 2 trial in an outpatient setting at dose levels of 1.4 mg/kg Q3W or 4 mg/kg Q3W.
+Added: ● In 26 patients evaluable for anti-tumor activity in the Phase 2 trial, SD continued to be the best response.
+Added: Investigators reported SD of at least nine-weeks duration in seven RCC patients (70% disease control rate) and in nine melanoma patients (56% disease control rate).
+Added: In addition, XTX202 continued to be generally well-tolerated with safety data consistent with previously reported results.
+Added: We plan to present the full data set at a future medical meeting.
+Added: Together with previously reported data, we believe these additional data further validate our tumor-activated approach and support the broad potential for XTX202 as a combination therapy.
+Added: We plan to explore strategic opportunities to continue to develop XTX202 in combination with other agents.
+Added: As part of a strategic portfolio reprioritization announced in March 2024, we plan to discontinue further investment in XTX202 as a monotherapy.
+Added: Future Opportunities Leveraging Our Proprietary Platform for Tumor-Activated Bispecific Molecules and Immune Cell Engager Molecules (Including Tumor-Activated Cell Engagers and Tumor-Activated Effector-Enhanced Cell Engagers)
+Added: To date, we have prioritized efforts to develop XTX101 (anti-CTLA-4), XTX301 (IL-12) and XTX202 (IL-2) based on the therapeutic activity established in other clinical trials, while recognizing that the benefits of anti-CTLA-4, IL-12 and IL2 have been historically hampered by issues of significant toxicity, poor bioavailability and, in the case of cytokines like IL-12 and IL-2, a short half-life.
+Added: By leveraging the insights and capabilities of our proprietary platform and building on our unique expertise in masking antibodies as well as cytokines, we are focusing our differentiated research platform on developing tumor-activated bispecific molecules and immune cell engager molecules (including tumor-activated cell engagers and tumor-activated effector-enhanced cell engagers).
+Added: Subject to obtaining sufficient additional capital, we plan to advance XTX501, our tumor-activated PD-1/IL-2 bispecific development candidate, into IND-enabling studies.
+Added: We also plan to continue to make focused investments in our promising research-stage pipeline for additional tumor-activated bispecific molecules and immune cell engager molecules (including tumor-activated cell engagers and tumor-activated effector-enhanced cell engagers).
+Added: We will continue to evaluate opportunities for better tolerated and more efficacious combination therapies, using product candidates from across our portfolio with other cancer therapies, to increase the potential for curative regimens in oncology.
+Added: We believe our novel and proprietary platform technology and masking approach represent a meaningful competitive advantage in seeking to develop novel and highly effective treatments for cancer.
+Added: However, the biotechnology and biopharmaceutical industries are characterized by rapid evolution of technologies and sharp competition and emphasis on intellectual property.
Any product candidates that we successfully develop and commercialize will have to compete with existing therapies and new therapies that may become available in the future.
3 unchanged sentences
Merger and acquisition activity in the biotechnology and biopharmaceutical industries may result in resources being concentrated among a smaller number of our competitors.
−Removed: These companies also compete with us in recruiting and retaining qualified scientific and management personnel, establishing clinical trial sites and patient registration for clinical trials and acquiring technologies complementary to, or necessary for, our programs.
+Added: These companies also compete with
+Added: us in recruiting and retaining qualified scientific and management personnel, establishing clinical trial sites and patient registration for clinical trials and acquiring technologies complementary to, or necessary for, our programs.
Smaller or early-stage companies may also prove to be significant competitors, particularly through collaborative arrangements with large and established companies.
−Removed: In addition to competitors specifically targeting IL-2, IL-12, and anti-CTLA-4, we also face competition more broadly across the oncology market.
+Added: In addition to competitors specifically targeting anti-CTLA-4, IL-12 and IL-2, we also face competition more broadly across the oncology market.
The most common methods of treating patients with cancer are surgery, radiation and drug therapy, including chemotherapy, hormone therapy, biologic therapy, such as monoclonal and bispecific antibodies, immunotherapy, cell-based therapy and targeted therapy, or a combination of any such treatments.
4 unchanged sentences
The key competitive factors affecting the success of any products we may develop are likely to be their efficacy, safety, convenience, price and availability of reimbursement.
−Removed: Cytokine Programs
−Removed: With respect to our most advanced cytokine product candidate, XTX202, if approved, it may face competition from other IL-2 based cancer therapies.
−Removed: For example, Proleukin (aldesleukin), a synthetic protein very similar to IL-2, is approved and marketed for the treatment of metastatic RCC and melanoma.
−Removed: In addition, we are aware of several companies that have modified or low-dose IL-2 programs in development for the treatment of cancer, including Alkermes plc, Anaveon AG, Ascendis Pharma A/S, Asher Biotherapeutics, Inc., Aulos Bioscience, Inc., Bright Peak Therapeutics, Cue Biopharma, Inc., Cugene Inc., Egle Therapeutics SAS, GI Innovation, Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc., Medicenna Therapeutics Corp., Medikine, Inc., Modulate Therapeutics, Inc., Neoleukin Therapeutics, Inc., Philogen S.p.A., Roche AG, Sanofi, Selecxine, Synthekine, Inc., Trutino Biosciences Inc., Werewolf Therapeutics, Inc., XOMA Corporation and Zydus Cadila.
+Added: Tumor-Activated Anti-CTLA-4 Program
+Added: We are aware of a number of companies that are developing anti-CTLA-4 therapies as immunotherapies.
+Added: With respect to XTX101, if approved, we may face competition from other anti-CTLA-4 based therapies.
+Added: For example, Yervoy (ipilimumab), an anti-CTLA-4, is approved to treat melanoma, RCC, NSCLC and certain cancers of the large intestine, and Imjudo (tremelimumab) is approved as a combination therapy to treat unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.
+Added: In addition, we are aware that several companies have anti-CTLA-4 programs in development, including Adagene, Inc., Agenus Inc., AstraZeneca plc, BioAtla, Inc., CytomX Therapeutics, Inc., MacroGenics, Inc.
+Added: and OncoC4, Inc.
+Added: Tumor Activated Cytokine Programs
With respect to XTX301, there are no approved IL-12 therapies currently on the market for the treatment of cancer;
1 unchanged sentence
and Zymeworks Inc.
−Removed: Anti-CTLA-4 Therapies
−Removed: We are aware of a number of companies that are developing anti-CTLA-4 therapies as immunotherapies.
−Removed: With respect to XTX101, if approved, we may face competition from other anti-CTLA-4 based therapies.
−Removed: For example, Yervoy (ipilimumab), an anti-CTLA-4, is approved to treat melanoma, RCC, NSCLC and certain cancers of the large intestine.
−Removed: addition, we are aware that several companies have anti-CTLA-4 programs in development, including Adagene, Inc., Agenus Inc., AstraZeneca plc, BioAtla Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb Inc., CytomX Therapeutics, Inc.
−Removed: and MacroGenics, Inc.
+Added: With respect to XTX202, if approved, it may face competition from other IL-2 based cancer therapies.
+Added: For example, Proleukin (aldesleukin), a human recombinant interleukin-2 product, is approved and marketed for the treatment of metastatic RCC and melanoma.
+Added: In addition, we are aware that a number of other companies have modified or low-dose IL-2 programs in development for the treatment of cancer, including Alkermes plc, Anaveon AG, Ascendis Pharma A/S, Asher Biotherapeutics, Inc., Aulos Bioscience, Inc., Bright Peak Therapeutics, Cue Biopharma, Inc., Cugene Inc., Cullinan Management Inc., Egle Therapeutics SAS, GI Innovation, Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc., Kymab Ltd., Medicenna Therapeutics Corp., Medikine, Inc., Modulate Therapeutics, Inc., Neoleukin Therapeutics, Inc., Philogen S.p.A., Proviva Therapeutics, Inc., Roche AG, Sanofi, Selecxine, Synthekine, Inc., Trutino Biosciences Inc., Werewolf Therapeutics, Inc., XOMA Corporation and Zydus Cadila.
Intellectual Property
We strive to protect our proprietary technology, inventions, improvements, and platforms, including composition of matter for product candidates, methods of use and processes for their manufacture that we believe are important to our business, including by obtaining, maintaining, defending and enforcing patent and other intellectual property rights for the foregoing in the United States and in certain foreign jurisdictions.
−Removed: We also rely on trade secrets and confidentiality agreements to protect our confidential information and know-how and other aspects of our business that are not amenable to, or that we do not consider appropriate for, patent protection.
+Added: We also rely on trade secrets and confidentiality agreements to
+Added: protect our confidential information and know-how and other aspects of our business that are not amenable to, or that we do not consider appropriate for, patent protection.
Our success depends in part on our ability to:
5 unchanged sentences
Patent portfolio
−Removed: As of February 15, 2023, we own, co-own or exclusively license 16 patent application families related to our business, including four pending Patent Cooperation Treaty, or PCT, patent applications, 15 pending U.S.
−Removed: non-provisional applications, two issued U.S.
−Removed: patents, three issued patents in Indonesia, Japan and South Korea and 144 pending foreign applications in Europe, Japan, China, Australia, Brazil, Canada, Eurasia, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Israel, India, South Korea, Mexico, Malaysia, New Zealand, the Philippines, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, South Africa and Taiwan, including five allowed patent applications.
+Added: As of March 31, 2024, we own, co-own or exclusively license 18 patent application families related to our business, including four pending Patent Cooperation Treaty, or PCT, patent applications, 14 pending U.S.
+Added: non-provisional applications, seven issued U.S.
+Added: patents, 19 issued patents in Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, China, India, Indonesia, Japan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Malaysia, Mexico, South Korea, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Taiwan, Tajikistan, and Turkmenistan and 169 pending foreign applications in Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Eurasia, Europe, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Israel, India, Japan, South Korea, Mexico, Malaysia, New Zealand, the Philippines, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, South Africa and Taiwan.
In addition, we own four U.S.
3 unchanged sentences
patents issued from non-provisional applications we may file in connection with our provisional patent applications will have a statutory expiration date ranging between 2037 and 2045, without taking into account any possible patent term adjustments or extensions and assuming payment of all appropriate maintenance, renewal, annuity and other governmental fees.
−Removed: Xilio’s GPS Platform for Tumor-Activated I-O Molecules
−Removed: Our proprietary engineering GPS platform enables tumor-activated I-O molecules that can effect tumor-activated immunotherapy while minimizing systemic toxicity.
−Removed: By masking biological agents such as cytokines, antibodies and multi-functional molecules, our GPS platform can be used to decouple therapeutic effects from toxicity for treating different cancers.
−Removed: As of February 15, 2023, we own one patent family covering the GPS platform in the cytokine space, including five pending U.S.
−Removed: patent applications and corresponding foreign applications in Europe, Japan, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Eurasia, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Israel, India, South Korea, Mexico, Malaysia, New Zealand, the Philippines, Saudi Arabia, Singapore and South Africa.
−Removed: We exclusively license two patent families relating to the GPS platform technology and our cytokine and antibody programs.
−Removed: One of the two patent families is exclusively in-licensed in the oncology field
−Removed: from AskGene Pharma, Inc., or AskGene, and covers the GPS platform technology for cytokines.
+Added: Xilio’s Platform for Tumor-Activated I-O Molecules
+Added: Our proprietary engineering platform technology enables tumor-activated I-O molecules that can effect tumor-activated immunotherapy while minimizing systemic toxicity.
+Added: By masking biological agents such as cytokines, antibodies and multi-functional molecules, our platform technology can be used to decouple therapeutic effects from toxicity for treating different cancers.
+Added: As of March 31, 2024, we own four patent families covering the platform in the cytokine space:
+Added: a first patent family, including one pending U.S.
+Added: patent application and corresponding foreign applications in Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Eurasia, Europe, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Israel, India, South Korea, Mexico, Malaysia, New Zealand, the Philippines, Saudi Arabia, Singapore and South Africa;
+Added: and three additional patent families covering our multi-functional, including bispecific, platform technology in the cytokine space, include two pending U.S.
+Added: and Taiwan applications, two pending PCT applications, and one provisional application within the priority year.
+Added: We exclusively license two patent families relating to the platform technology and our cytokine and antibody programs.
+Added: One of the two patent families is exclusively in-licensed in the oncology field from AskGene Pharma, Inc., or AskGene, and covers certain aspects of the platform technology for cytokines.
These owned and exclusively licensed patent families will have a statutory expiration date ranging between 2039 and 2041, without taking into account any possible patent term adjustments or extensions and assuming payment of all appropriate maintenance, renewal, annuity and other governmental fees.
−Removed: In addition, we own two patent families covering various linker designs that are used or can be used in our technology, including pending patent applications in the U.S., PCT and Taiwan.
+Added: In addition, we own two patent families covering various linker designs that are used or can be used in our technology, including one pending PCT application, and pending patent applications in the United States, Canada, Europe, Japan, South Korea and Taiwan.
Cytokine Programs
−Removed: Our cytokine pipeline includes our clinical-stage, tumor-activated product candidates, XTX202 (IL-2) and XTX301 (IL-12).
+Added: Our cytokine pipeline includes our clinical-stage, tumor-activated product candidates, XTX202 (IL-2) and XTX301 (IL-12), and our preclinical bispecific product candidate XTX501 (PD-1/IL-2).
● IL-12 Program.
−Removed: As of February 15, 2023, we own two patent families relating to masked IL-2 cytokines, including XTX202, with composition of matter and methods of use claims.
−Removed: These patent families include six pending U.S.
−Removed: applications, one issued U.S.
−Removed: patent and corresponding foreign applications in Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Eurasian Patent Organization, European Patent Office, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Israel, India, Japan, Republic of Korea, Mexico, Malaysia, New Zealand, Philippines, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, South Africa and Taiwan.
+Added: As of March 31, 2024, we own two patent families directed to different masked IL-12 constructs and sequences, including XTX301, with composition of matter and methods of use claims.
+Added: These patent families include one issued U.S.
+Added: patent, one pending U.S.
+Added: application, and corresponding foreign applications in Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Eurasia, Europe, Indonesia, Israel, India, Japan, South Korea, Mexico, Malaysia, New Zealand, Philippines, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, South Africa and Taiwan.
+Added: These patent families will have a statutory expiration date in 2039 and 2041, without taking into account any possible patent term adjustments or extensions and assuming payment of all appropriate maintenance, renewal, annuity and other governmental fees.
+Added: ● IL-2 Program.
+Added: As of March 31, 2024, we own two patent families relating to masked IL-2 cytokines, including XTX202, and seven families related to multi-functional, including bispecific, IL-2 cytokines, including XTX501, with composition of matter and methods of use claims.
+Added: The masked IL-2 cytokine patent families include one pending U.S.
+Added: application, five issued U.S.
+Added: patents, one issued patent in India and corresponding foreign applications pending in Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Eurasia, Europe, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Israel, India, Japan, South Korea, Mexico, Malaysia, New Zealand, Philippines, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, South Africa and Taiwan.
+Added: The multi-functional/bispecific IL-2 cytokine patent families include three pending PCT applications and four provisional applications within the priority year.
The patent family exclusively in-licensed in the oncology field from AskGene also relates to the IL-2 program.
These owned and exclusively in-licensed patent families will have a statutory expiration date ranging between 2039 and 2045, without taking into account any possible patent term adjustments or extensions and assuming payment of all appropriate maintenance, renewal, annuity and other governmental fees.
−Removed: ● IL-12 Program.
−Removed: As of February 15, 2023, we own one patent family directed to different masked IL-12 constructs and sequences, including XTX301, with composition of matter and methods of use claims.
−Removed: This family includes one pending U.S.
−Removed: application, and corresponding foreign applications in Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Eurasian Patent Organization, European Patent Office, Indonesia, Israel, India, Japan, Republic of Korea, Mexico, Malaysia, New Zealand, Philippines, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, South Africa and Taiwan.
−Removed: This patent family will have a statutory expiration date in 2041, without taking into account any possible patent term adjustments or extensions and assuming payment of all appropriate maintenance, renewal, annuity and other governmental fees.
−Removed: Checkpoint Inhibitor Program
−Removed: As of February 15, 2023, we own, co-own or exclusively in-license three patent families relating to masked anti-CTLA-4 antibody constructs and sequences, including XTX101, with composition of matter and methods of use claims.
+Added: Antibody Program
+Added: As of March 31, 2024, we own, co-own or exclusively in-license three patent families relating to masked anti-CTLA-4 antibody constructs and sequences, including XTX101, with composition of matter and methods of use claims.
A first patent family is exclusively in-licensed from WuXi Biologics (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
and directed to anti-CTLA-4 antibodies.
−Removed: This family includes one allowed U.S.
−Removed: application and one issued U.S.
−Removed: patent covering certain complementarity-determining regions and variable region sequences of anti-CTLA-4 antibodies, including XTX101.
−Removed: Corresponding foreign applications are issued and allowed in China, Eurasia, Indonesia, Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan, and pending in Taiwan, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Eurasian Patent Organization, European Patent Office, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Israeli, Japan, Republic of Korea, Mexico, Malaysia, New Zealand, Philippines, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, and South Africa.
+Added: This family includes two issued U.S.
+Added: patents covering certain complementarity-determining regions and variable region sequences of anti-CTLA-4 antibodies, including XTX101.
+Added: Corresponding foreign applications are issued in Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, China, Indonesia, Japan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Malaysia, Mexico, Russia, South Korea, Saudi Arabia, Taiwan, Tajikistan, and Turkmenistan and pending in Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, European Patent Office, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Israel, Japan, South Korea, Mexico, New Zealand, Philippines, Singapore, South Africa and Taiwan.
A second patent family is owned and directed to anti-CTLA-4 antibodies with modifications that improve antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and includes one pending U.S.
−Removed: Corresponding foreign applications are pending in Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Eurasian Patent Organization, European Patent Office, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Israeli, Japan, Republic of Korea, Mexico, Malaysia, New Zealand, Philippines, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, and South Africa.
+Added: Corresponding foreign applications are pending in Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Eurasia, Europe, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Israel, Japan, South Korea, Mexico, Malaysia, New Zealand, Philippines, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, and South Africa.
A third patent family is co-owned and directed to masked anti-CTLA-4 antibodies, which includes one pending U.S.
−Removed: Corresponding foreign applications are pending in Australia, Brazil, Canada, Eurasian Patent Organization, European Patent Office, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Israeli, Japan, Republic of Korea, Mexico, Malaysia, New Zealand, Philippines, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, South Africa and Taiwan.
+Added: Corresponding foreign applications are pending in Australia, Brazil, Canada, Eurasia, Europe, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Israel, Japan, South Korea, Mexico, Malaysia, New Zealand, Philippines, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, South Africa and Taiwan.
In addition, we own two patent applications directed to combination therapies using masked or unmasked anti-CTLA-4 antibodies, including XTX101 and PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies.
−Removed: These families are presently pending as PCT and Taiwan applications.
−Removed: These owned, co-owned and licensed patent families will have a statutory expiration date ranging between 2037 and 2042, without taking
−Removed: into account any possible patent term adjustments or extensions and assuming payment of all appropriate maintenance, renewal, annuity and other governmental fees.
+Added: These families include two pending U.S.
+Added: applications.
+Added: Corresponding foreign applications are pending in Australia, Canada, Eurasia, Europe, Japan, South Africa and Taiwan.
+Added: These owned, co-owned and licensed patent families will have a statutory expiration date ranging between 2037 and 2042, without taking into account any possible patent term adjustments or extensions and assuming payment of all appropriate maintenance, renewal, annuity and other governmental fees.
Trademark portfolio
−Removed: As of February 15, 2023, we own two federal trademark registrations for XILIO and XILIO THERAPEUTICS (Class 42) in the U.S.
−Removed: and a pending federal trademark application for XILIO (Class 5) in the U.S.
−Removed: that has been approved and published for opposition.
+Added: As of March 15, 2024, we own two federal trademark registrations for XILIO and XILIO THERAPEUTICS (Class 42) in the United States and a pending federal trademark application for XILIO (Class 5) in the United States that has been approved and published for opposition.
Patent prosecution
5 unchanged sentences
While we intend to timely file additional provisional patent applications and national stage and non-provisional patent applications relating to our PCT patent applications, we cannot predict whether any of our patent applications will result in the issuance of patents.
−Removed: If we do not successfully obtain patent protection, or if the scope of the patent protection we or our licensors obtain with respect to our product candidates, GPS platform or technology is not sufficiently broad, we will be unable to prevent others from using our technology or from developing or commercializing technology and products similar or identical to ours or other similar competing products and technologies.
+Added: If we do not successfully obtain patent protection, or if the scope of the patent protection we or our licensors obtain with respect to our product candidates, platform or technology is not sufficiently broad, we will be unable to prevent others from using our technology or from developing or commercializing technology and products similar or identical to ours or other similar competing products and technologies.
Our ability to stop third parties from making, using, selling, offering to sell, importing or otherwise commercializing any of our technology, inventions and improvements, either directly or indirectly, will depend in part on our success in obtaining, maintaining, defending and enforcing patent claims that cover our technology, inventions and improvements.
12 unchanged sentences
However, the term of U.S.
−Removed: patents may be extended or adjusted for delays incurred due to compliance with FDA requirements or by delays encountered during prosecution that are caused by the United States Patent and Trademark Office, or the USPTO.
+Added: patents may be extended or adjusted for delays incurred due to compliance with FDA requirements or by delays encountered during prosecution that are caused by the U.S.
+Added: Patent and Trademark Office, or the USPTO.
For example, in the United States, a patent claiming a new biologic product, its method of use or its method of manufacture may be eligible for a limited patent term extension under the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984, or the Hatch-Waxman Act, for up to five years beyond the normal expiration date of the patent.
2 unchanged sentences
A patent that covers multiple products for which approval is sought can only be extended in connection with one of the approvals.
−Removed: For more information on patent term extensions, see “Business—Government Regulation and Product Approval—Patent Term Restoration and Extension”.
−Removed: In the future, if and when any product candidates we may develop receive FDA approval, we expect to apply for patent term extensions on issued patents covering those product candidates.
+Added: For more information on patent term extensions, see “Business—Government Regulation and Product Approval—Patent Term Restoration and Extension.” In the future, if and when any product candidates we may develop receive FDA approval, we expect to apply for patent term extensions on issued patents covering those product candidates.
Moreover, we intend to seek patent term adjustments and extensions for any of our issued patents in any jurisdiction where such adjustments and extensions are available.
9 unchanged sentences
For more information, please see the section entitled “Risk Factors—Risks Related to our Intellectual Property.”
−Removed: License agreements
+Added: License and Collaboration Agreements
+Added: Exclusive License Agreement with Gilead
+Added: In March 2024, Xilio Development entered into an exclusive license agreement with Gilead pursuant to which it granted Gilead an exclusive global license to develop and commercialize our clinical-stage product candidate XTX301, a tumor-activated IL-12, and specified other molecules directed to IL-12.
+Added: Xilio Development will be responsible for conducting clinical development for XTX301 in the ongoing Phase 1 clinical trial through an initial planned Phase 2 dose expansion.
+Added: Following the delivery by Xilio Development of a specified clinical data package for XTX301 related to the Phase 1 clinical trial and planned Phase 2 clinical trial, Gilead can elect to transition responsibilities for the development and commercialization of XTX301 to Gilead, subject to the terms of the agreement and payment by Gilead of a $75.0 million transition fee.
+Added: Under the license agreement, we are eligible to receive approximately $43.5 million in upfront payments, including a cash payment of $30.0 million and an initial equity investment by Gilead of approximately $13.5 million of our common stock at a purchase price of $1.97 per share.
+Added: The initial equity investment closed on March 28, 2024, and the $30.0 million upfront cash payment is payable by Gilead within a specified time period promptly following signing of the license agreement.
+Added: We are eligible to receive up to $604.0 million in additional contingent payments, which include (i) the proceeds from up to three additional private placements of common stock, (ii) the $75.0 million transition fee and (iii) specified development, regulatory and sales-based milestones.
+Added: Prior to the potential transition fee, up to $29.0 million of the total contingent payments are related to the potential additional private placements of common stock and a near-term development milestone.
+Added: In addition, we are eligible to receive tiered royalties ranging from high single digits to mid-teens on annual global net product sales.
+Added: Unless earlier terminated in accordance with its terms, the license agreement will expire upon expiration of the last royalty term for the last licensed product.
+Added: Gilead may terminate the license agreement for convenience upon specified time periods.
+Added: If Gilead elects not to transition responsibilities for development and commercialization of the licensed products and pay the transition fee, then the license agreement will automatically terminate.
+Added: Either party may terminate the license agreement for the other party’s uncured material breach or insolvency.
+Added: Subject to the terms of the license agreement, effective upon termination of the license agreement, the licenses to Gilead terminate and Xilio Development is entitled to continue to exploit the licensed products.
+Added: During the term of the license agreement, Xilio Development and its affiliates have agreed not to directly or indirectly conduct specified development, manufacturing or commercialization activities with respect to any molecule that contains, comprises or incorporates IL-12, except for the performance of Xilio Development’s activities under and in accordance with the license agreement.
+Added: In connection with the execution of the license agreement, on March 27, 2024, we entered into a stock purchase agreement with Gilead.
+Added: In addition to the initial equity investment by Gilead of approximately $13.5 million of our common stock, through March 27, 2025, we may, at our election and subject to the terms and conditions of the stock purchase agreement, cause Gilead to purchase up to approximately $11.5 million of additional shares of common stock (including, at Gilead’s sole election, prefunded warrants in lieu of shares of common stock) in up to three additional private placements at a predetermined price per share specified therein, at all times subject to Gilead not being deemed the beneficial owner of greater than 19.9% of our common stock upon the closing of the applicable additional private placement with Gilead.
+Added: If Gilead elects to purchase prefunded warrants, each prefunded warrant will have an exercise price of $0.0001 per share of common stock, be immediately exercisable and remain exercisable until exercised in full.
+Added: Gilead may not exercise its prefunded warrants to the extent that it would beneficially own more than 19.99% of the number of shares of common stock outstanding immediately after giving effect to such exercise.
+Added: Any prefunded warrants that may be issued to Gilead in an additional private placement with Gilead will be in substantially the same form as the prefunded warrants issued to investors in the March 2024 private placement.
+Added: In-License Agreements
We are a party to license agreements under which we license patents, patent applications and other intellectual property from third parties.
3 unchanged sentences
Cross-License Agreement with AskGene
−Removed: In December 2020, our subsidiary, Xilio Development, entered into a cross-license agreement with AskGene Pharma, Inc., or AskGene, pursuant to which AskGene granted us certain exclusive licenses for AskGene patent rights related to non-antigen binding IL-2 products in the field of oncology and certain co-exclusive licenses for AskGene patent rights related to antigen binding IL-2 products in all fields.
+Added: In December 2020, Xilio Development entered into a cross-license agreement with AskGene Pharma, Inc., or AskGene, pursuant to which AskGene granted us certain exclusive licenses for AskGene patent rights related to non-antigen binding IL-2 products in the field of oncology and certain co-exclusive licenses for AskGene patent rights related to antigen binding IL-2 products in all fields.
Under the agreement, AskGene retains rights to the AskGene patent rights in Singapore, Thailand, Malaysia, Vietnam, the People’s Republic of China, Taiwan, Macau, Hong Kong, Korea and India, which we refer to as the AskGene territory, and granted licenses to us for the AskGene patent rights worldwide, excluding the AskGene territory, which we refer to as the Xilio territory.
10 unchanged sentences
Amended and Restated Exclusive License Agreement with City of Hope
−Removed: In August 2016, our subsidiary, Xilio Development, entered into an amended and restated exclusive license agreement with City of Hope pursuant to which City of Hope granted us an exclusive worldwide license to specified patent rights related to our anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody program.
+Added: In August 2016, Xilio Development entered into an amended and restated exclusive license agreement with City of Hope pursuant to which City of Hope granted us an exclusive worldwide license to specified patent rights related to our anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody program.
For the first three licensed products or licensed services to achieve specified development and regulatory milestones, we are obligated to pay City of Hope up to $10.3 million in the aggregate per licensed product or licensed service.
−Removed: Subject to specified conditions, we are obligated to pay City of Hope tiered royalties in the low single digits on aggregate annual net sales of licensed products or licensed services on a country-by-country basis until the expiration of the last-to-expire patent or patent application licensed from City of Hope covering the applicable licensed product or licensed service in such country.
+Added: Subject to specified conditions, we are obligated to pay City of Hope tiered royalties in the low single digits on aggregate annual net
+Added: sales of licensed products or licensed services on a country-by-country basis until the expiration of the last-to-expire patent or patent application licensed from City of Hope covering the applicable licensed product or licensed service in such country.
We are also obligated to pay City of Hope a portion of any consideration we receive for the grant of sublicenses under the agreement ranging from a low to mid double-digit percentage of such consideration, subject to specified conditions under that agreement at the time that we grant any such sublicense.
−Removed: In addition, we paid $0.5 million to City of Hope in connection with the closing of our IPO.
+Added: In addition, we paid $0.5 million to City of Hope in connection with the closing of our initial public offering.
The agreement continues on a country-by-country basis until the expiration of the last to expire licensed patent right in such country.
14 unchanged sentences
Manufacturing
−Removed: We currently contract with a third party to manufacture our product candidates for preclinical studies and our ongoing clinical trials, and we intend to do so with one or more third parties for future preclinical studies and clinical trials.
−Removed: not own or operate manufacturing facilities for the production of our product candidates, and we currently do not have plans to build our own clinical or commercial scale manufacturing capabilities.
−Removed: To date, our third-party manufacturer has met our manufacturing requirements.
−Removed: Our third-party manufacturer has agreed to provide clinical material meeting current good manufacturing practice, or cGMP, requirements and in sufficient quantities to meet anticipated clinical-trial demands.
+Added: We currently contract with a third-party contract development and manufacturing organization, or CDMO, to manufacture our product candidates for preclinical studies and our ongoing clinical trials, and we intend to continue to do so with one or more third parties for future preclinical studies and clinical trials.
+Added: We do not own or operate manufacturing facilities for the production of our product candidates, and we currently do not have plans to build our own clinical or commercial scale manufacturing capabilities.
+Added: To date, our CDMO has met our production requirements.
+Added: Our CDMO is under contract to provide clinical material meeting FDA current good manufacturing practice, or cGMP, requirements and in sufficient quantities to meet anticipated clinical-trial demands.
To meet our projected needs for commercial manufacturing, our current third-party manufacturer will need to increase its scale of production, or we will need to secure one or more alternate suppliers.
1 unchanged sentence
Although we expect to rely on one or more third-party contract manufacturers for the production of our current and future product candidates, we have personnel with extensive technical, manufacturing, analytical and quality experience in biotherapeutic protein manufacturing to oversee our contract manufacturer relationships.
−Removed: In collaboration with our third-party manufacturer, we have manufactured cGMP clinical supply for our clinical trials for our tumor-activated, clinical-stage product candidates, XTX202 (IL-2), XTX301 (IL-12) and XTX101 (anti-CTLA-4).
−Removed: As we scale clinical and commercial manufacturing for each of our product candidates, we intend to continue to expand and strengthen our network of contract manufacturers to include multiple suppliers globally.
+Added: In collaboration with our third-party manufacturer, we have manufactured cGMP clinical supply for our clinical trials for our tumor-activated, clinical-stage product candidates, XTX101 (anti-CTLA-4), XTX301 (IL-12), and XTX202 (IL-2).
+Added: As we scale clinical and develop commercial manufacturing capability for each of our product candidates, we intend to develop the network of contract manufacturing sites operated by our CDMO to include EU- or U.S.-based sites.
Government Regulation and Product Approval
−Removed: Government authorities in the United States, at the federal, state and local level, and in other countries and jurisdictions, including the European Union, or EU, extensively regulate, among other things, the research, development, testing, manufacture, quality control, approval, packaging, storage, recordkeeping, labeling, advertising, promotion, distribution, marketing, sales, pricing, reimbursement, post-approval monitoring and reporting, and import and export of pharmaceutical products.
+Added: Government authorities in the United States, at the federal, state and local level, and in other countries and foreign jurisdictions, including the European Union, or EU, extensively regulate, among other things, the research, development, testing, manufacture, quality control, approval, packaging, storage, recordkeeping, labeling, advertising, promotion, distribution, marketing, sales, pricing, reimbursement, post-approval monitoring and reporting, and import and export of pharmaceutical products.
The processes for obtaining regulatory approvals in the United States and in foreign countries and jurisdictions, along with subsequent compliance with applicable statutes and regulations and other regulatory authorities, require the expenditure of substantial time and financial resources.
8 unchanged sentences
● performance of adequate and well-controlled human clinical trials in accordance with good clinical practices, or GCPs, to establish the safety and efficacy of the proposed drug product, and with respect to biologics, the purity, potency and safety of such drug product, for each proposed indication;
−Removed: ● submission to the FDA of an NDA for a drug candidate product and a biologics license application, or BLA, for a biological product requesting marketing for one or more proposed indications;
+Added: ● submission to the FDA of a new drug application, or NDA, for a drug candidate product and a biologics license application, or BLA, for a biological product requesting marketing for one or more proposed indications;
● review of the request for approval by an FDA advisory committee, where appropriate or if applicable;
−Removed: ● completion of one or more FDA inspections of the manufacturing facility or facilities at which the product, or components thereof, are produced to assess compliance with cGMPs to assure the product’s identity, strength, quality and purity;
+Added: ● completion of one or more FDA inspections of the manufacturing facility or facilities at which the product, or components thereof, are produced to assess compliance with current good manufacturing practices, or cGMPs, to assure the product’s identity, strength, quality and purity;
● completion of FDA audits of clinical trial sites to assure compliance with GCPs and the integrity of the clinical data;
14 unchanged sentences
The FDA requires a 30-day waiting period after the filing of each IND before clinical trials may begin.
−Removed: This waiting period is designed to allow the FDA to review the IND to determine whether human research subjects and patients will be exposed to unreasonable health risks.
+Added: This waiting period is designed to allow the FDA to review the IND to determine whether human research subjects and patients will be exposed to unreasonable health risks or whether there are any issues surrounding chemistry, manufacturing and controls, or CMC, for the proposed product.
At any time during this 30-day period, or thereafter, the FDA may raise concerns or questions about the conduct of the trials as outlined in the IND and impose a clinical hold or partial clinical hold.
2 unchanged sentences
Following commencement of a clinical trial under an IND, the FDA may also place a clinical hold or partial clinical hold on that trial.
−Removed: Clinical holds are imposed by the FDA whenever there is concern for patient safety and may be a result of new data, findings, or developments in clinical, nonclinical, and/or chemistry, manufacturing, and controls, or CMC.
+Added: Clinical holds are imposed by the FDA whenever there is concern for patient safety and may be a result of new data, findings, or developments in clinical, nonclinical, and/or CMC.
A clinical hold is an order issued by the FDA to the sponsor to delay a proposed clinical investigation or to suspend an ongoing investigation.
10 unchanged sentences
They further help ensure that non-IND foreign studies are conducted in a manner comparable to that required for IND studies.
−Removed: In addition to the foregoing IND requirements, an IRB representing each institution participating in the clinical trial must review and approve the plan for any clinical trial before it commences at that institution, and the IRB must conduct continuing review and reapprove the trial at least annually.
+Added: In addition to the foregoing IND requirements, an IRB representing each institution participating in the clinical trial must review and approve the plan for any clinical trial before it commences at that institution, and the IRB must conduct
+Added: continuing review and reapprove the trial at least annually.
The IRB must review and approve, among other things, the trial protocol and informed consent information to be provided to trial subjects.
1 unchanged sentence
An IRB can suspend or terminate approval of a clinical trial at its institution, or an institution it represents, if the clinical trial is not being conducted in accordance with the IRB’s requirements or if the product candidate has been associated with unexpected serious harm to patients.
−Removed: Additionally, some trials are overseen by an independent group of qualified experts organized by the trial sponsor, known as a data safety monitoring board, or DSMB, or committee.
+Added: Additionally, some trials are overseen by an independent group of qualified experts organized by the trial sponsor, known as a data monitoring committee, or DMC.
This group provides authorization for whether a trial may move forward at designated check points based on access that only the group maintains to available data from the trial.
−Removed: Suspension or termination of development during any phase of clinical trials can occur if it is determined that the participants or patients are being exposed to an unacceptable health risk.
−Removed: Other reasons for suspension or termination may be made based on evolving business objectives and/or competitive climate.
+Added: Suspension or termination of development during any phase of clinical trials can occur if it is determined that the participants or patients are being exposed to an unacceptable health risk or for other reasons, including evolving business objectives and/or competitive climate.
Human Clinical Studies in Support of an NDA or BLA
19 unchanged sentences
In addition to these requirements, the legislation directs the FDA to issue new guidance on diversity action plans.
−Removed: Progress reports detailing the results of the clinical trials must be submitted at least annually to the FDA and more frequently if serious AEs occur.
−Removed: In addition, IND safety reports must be submitted to the FDA for any of the following:
−Removed: serious and unexpected suspected adverse reactions;
−Removed: findings from other studies or animal or in vitro testing that suggest a significant risk in humans exposed to the drug;
−Removed: and any clinically important increase in the case of a serious suspected adverse reaction over that listed in the protocol or investigator brochure.
−Removed: The FDA will typically inspect one or more clinical sites to assure compliance with GCP and the integrity of the clinical data submitted.
+Added: In January 2024, the FDA issued draft guidance setting out its policies for the collection of race and ethnicity data in clinical trials.
In March 2022, the FDA released a final guidance entitled “Expansion Cohorts:
2 unchanged sentences
Expansion cohort trials can potentially bring efficiency to biological product development and reduce developmental costs and time.
+Added: In June 2023, the FDA issued draft guidance with updated recommendations for GCPs aimed at modernizing the design and conduct of clinical trials.
+Added: The updates are intended to help pave the way for more efficient clinical trials to facilitate the development of medical products.
+Added: The draft guidance is adopted from the International Council for Harmonisation’s recently updated E6(R3) draft guideline that was developed to enable the incorporation of rapidly developing technological and methodological innovations into the clinical trial enterprise.
+Added: In addition, the FDA issued draft guidance outlining recommendations for the implementation of decentralized clinical trials.
Concurrent with clinical trials, companies often complete additional animal studies and must also develop additional information about the chemistry and physical characteristics of the candidate product as well as finalize a process for manufacturing the product in commercial quantities in accordance with cGMP requirements.
5 unchanged sentences
The NIH’s Final Rule on registration and reporting requirements for clinical trials became effective in 2017.
−Removed: Although the FDA has historically not enforced these reporting requirements due to the long delay by the Department of Health and Human Services, or HHS, in issuing final implementing regulations, the FDA has issued several Notices of Noncompliance to manufacturers since April 2021.
−Removed: The failure to submit required clinical trial information to clinicaltrials.gov is a prohibited act under the FDCA with violations subject to potential civil monetary penalties of up to $10,000 for each day the violation continues.
+Added: Although the FDA has historically not enforced these reporting requirements due to the long delay by the Department of Health and Human Services, or HHS, in issuing final implementing regulations, the FDA has issued several pre-notices for voluntary corrective action and several notices of non-compliance during the past two years.
+Added: While these notices of non-compliance did not result in civil monetary penalties, the failure to submit clinical trial information to clinicaltrials.gov is a prohibited act under the FDCA with violations subject to potential civil monetary penalties of up to $10,000 for each day the violation continues.
+Added: Interactions with FDA During the Clinical Development Program
+Added: Following the clearance of an IND and the commencement of clinical trials, the sponsor will continue to have interactions with the FDA.
+Added: An annual report on the progress of the study must be submitted to the FDA and more frequently if serious AEs occur.
+Added: In addition, IND safety reports must be submitted to the FDA for any of the following:
+Added: serious and unexpected suspected adverse reactions;
+Added: findings from other studies or animal or in vitro testing that suggest a significant risk in humans exposed to the product;
+Added: and any clinically important increase in the occurrence of a serious suspected adverse reaction over that listed in the protocol or investigator brochure.
+Added: Phase 1, Phase 2 and Phase 3 clinical trials may not be completed successfully within any specified period, or at all.
+Added: The FDA will typically inspect one or more clinical sites to assure compliance with GCP and the integrity of the clinical data submitted.
+Added: In addition, sponsors are given opportunities to meet with the FDA at certain points in the clinical development program.
+Added: Specifically, sponsors may meet with the FDA prior to the submission of an IND, or Pre-IND meeting, at the end of Phase 1 clinical trial, or EOP1 meeting, at the end of Phase 2 clinical trial, or EOP2 meeting, and before an NDA or BLA is submitted, or Pre-NDA or Pre-BLA meeting.
+Added: Meetings at other times may also be requested.
+Added: There are five types of meetings that occur between sponsors and the FDA.
+Added: Type A meetings are those that are necessary for an otherwise stalled product development program to proceed or to address an important safety issue.
+Added: Type B meetings include pre-IND and pre-NDA/pre-BLA meetings, as well as end of phase meetings such as EOP2 meetings.
+Added: A Type C meeting is any meeting other than a Type A or Type B meeting regarding the development and review of a product, including, for example, meetings to facilitate early consultations on the use of a biomarker as a new surrogate endpoint that has never been previously used as the primary basis for product approval in the proposed context of use.
+Added: A Type D meeting is focused on a narrow set of issues and does not require input from more than three disciplines or divisions.
+Added: Finally, INTERACT meetings are intended for novel products and development programs that present unique challenges in the early development of an investigational product.
+Added: The FDA has indicated that its responses, as conveyed in meeting minutes and advice letters, only constitute mere recommendations and/or advice made to a sponsor and, as such, sponsors are not bound by such recommendations and/or advice.
+Added: Nonetheless, from a practical perspective, a sponsor’s failure to follow the FDA’s recommendations for design of a clinical program may put the program at significant risk of failure.
+Added: In September 2023, the FDA issued draft guidance outlining the terms of such meetings in more detail.
Expanded Access
18 unchanged sentences
Pediatric Studies
−Removed: Under the Pediatric Research Equity Act of 2003, an application or supplement thereto must contain data that are adequate to assess the safety and effectiveness of the product for the claimed indications in all relevant pediatric subpopulations, and to support dosing and administration for each pediatric subpopulation for which the product is safe and effective.
+Added: Under the Pediatric Research Equity Act of 2003, or PREA, an application or supplement thereto must contain data that are adequate to assess the safety and effectiveness of the product for the claimed indications in all relevant pediatric subpopulations, and to support dosing and administration for each pediatric subpopulation for which the product is safe and effective.
Sponsors must also submit pediatric study plans prior to the assessment data.
2 unchanged sentences
The FDA or the sponsor may request an amendment to the plan at any time.
+Added: In May 2023, the FDA issued new draft guidance that further describes the pediatric study requirements under PREA.
For investigational products intended to treat a serious or life-threatening disease or condition, the FDA must, upon the request of a sponsor, meet to discuss preparation of the initial pediatric study plan or to discuss deferral or waiver of pediatric assessments.
1 unchanged sentence
The FDA may, on its own initiative or at the request of the sponsor, grant deferrals for submission of some or all pediatric data until after approval of the product for use in adults, or full or partial waivers from the pediatric data requirements.
−Removed: A deferral may be granted for several reasons, including a finding that the product is ready for approval for use in adults before pediatric trials are complete or that additional safety or effectiveness data needs to be collected before the pediatric
−Removed: trials begin.
+Added: A deferral may be granted for several reasons, including a finding that the product is ready for approval for use in adults before pediatric trials are complete or that additional safety or effectiveness data needs to be collected before the pediatric trials begin.
The law now requires the FDA to send a PREA Non-Compliance letter to sponsors who have failed to submit their pediatric assessments required under PREA, have failed to seek or obtain a deferral or deferral extension or have failed to request approval for a required pediatric formulation.
1 unchanged sentence
The FDA maintains a list of diseases that are exempt from PREA requirements due to low prevalence of disease in the pediatric population.
−Removed: Additional requirements and procedures relating to deferral requests and requests for extension of deferrals are contained in the Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act, or FDASIA.
−Removed: The FDA maintains a list of diseases that are exempt from PREA requirements due to low prevalence of disease in the pediatric population.
In 2017, with the passage of the FDA Reauthorization Act of 2017, or FDARA, Congress established new requirements to govern certain molecularly targeted cancer indications.
−Removed: Any company that submits an application three years after the date of enactment of that statute must submit pediatric assessments with the application if the product is intended for the treatment of an adult cancer and is directed at a molecular target that the FDA determines to be substantially relevant to the growth or progression of a pediatric cancer.
−Removed: The investigation must be designed to yield clinically meaningful pediatric study data regarding the dosing, safety and preliminary efficacy to inform pediatric labeling for the product.
+Added: Section 505B of the FDCA, as amended by FDARA, requires that any original NDA or BLA submitted on or after August 18, 2020, for a new active ingredient, must contain reports on the molecularly targeted pediatric cancer investigation, unless the requirement is waived or deferred, if the drug that is the subject of the application is:
+Added: (i) intended for the treatment of an adult cancer, and (ii) directed at a molecular target that the Secretary of HHS determines to be substantially relevant to the growth or progression of a pediatric cancer in accordance with FDA guidance.
+Added: The FDA maintains a list of diseases that are exempt from PREA requirements due to low prevalence of disease in the pediatric population.
Submission and Review of an NDA or BLA by the FDA
4 unchanged sentences
The application is the vehicle through which sponsors formally propose that the FDA approve a new product for marketing and sale in the United States for one or more indications.
−Removed: Every new product candidate must be the subject of an approved NDA or BLA before it may be commercialized in the United States.
+Added: Every new product candidate must be the subject of an approved
+Added: NDA or BLA before it may be commercialized in the United States.
Under federal law, the submission of most applications is subject to an application user fee.
3 unchanged sentences
If an application is withdrawn after filing, a lower portion of these fees may be refunded in certain circumstances.
−Removed: Currently, the fee required for the submission and review of an application for federal fiscal year 2023 is approximately $3.25 million, and the sponsor of an approved application is also subject to an annual program fee, currently more than $394,000.
+Added: Currently, the fee required for the submission and review of an application for federal fiscal year 2024 is approximately $4.05 million, and the sponsor of an approved application is also subject to an annual program fee, currently more than $416,000 for federal fiscal year 2024.
The FDA conducts a preliminary review of all applications within 60 days of receipt and must inform the sponsor at that time or before whether an application is sufficiently complete to permit substantive review.
8 unchanged sentences
The FDA has agreed to specified performance goals in the review process of NDAs and BLAs.
−Removed: Under that agreement, 90% of applications seeking approval of New Molecular Entities, or NMEs, are meant to be reviewed within
−Removed: ten months from the date on which FDA accepts the NDA for filing, and 90% of applications for NMEs that have been designated for “priority review” are meant to be reviewed within six months of the filing date.
+Added: Under that agreement, 90% of applications seeking approval of New Molecular Entities, or NMEs, are meant to be reviewed within ten months from the date on which FDA accepts the NDA for filing, and 90% of applications for NMEs that have been designated for “priority review” are meant to be reviewed within six months of the filing date.
The review process and the Prescription Drug User Fee Act goal date may be extended by the FDA for three additional months to consider new information or clarification provided by the sponsor to address an outstanding deficiency identified by the FDA following the original submission.
15 unchanged sentences
Under certain circumstances, however, the FDA has indicated that a single trial with certain characteristics and additional information may satisfy this standard.
+Added: In December 2019, the FDA issued draft guidance further explaining the studies that are needed to establish substantial evidence of effectiveness.
+Added: Although the FDA has not yet finalized that guidance, it did issue additional draft guidance in September 2023 that outlines considerations for relying on confirmatory evidence in lieu of a second clinical study.
After evaluating the application and all related information, including the advisory committee recommendations, if any, and inspection reports of manufacturing facilities and clinical trial sites, the FDA will issue either an approval letter or a Complete Response Letter, or CRL.
45 unchanged sentences
An intermediate clinical endpoint is a measurement of a therapeutic effect that is considered reasonably likely to predict the clinical benefit of a drug, such as an effect on IMM.
−Removed: The FDA has limited experience with accelerated approvals based on intermediate clinical endpoints but has indicated that such endpoints generally may support accelerated approval where the therapeutic effect measured by the endpoint is not itself a clinical benefit and basis for traditional approval, if there is a basis for concluding that the therapeutic effect is reasonably likely to predict the ultimate clinical benefit of a product.
+Added: The FDA has limited experience with accelerated approvals based on intermediate clinical endpoints but has indicated that such endpoints generally may support accelerated approval where the therapeutic
+Added: effect measured by the endpoint is not itself a clinical benefit and basis for traditional approval, if there is a basis for concluding that the therapeutic effect is reasonably likely to predict the ultimate clinical benefit of a product.
The accelerated approval pathway is most often used in settings in which the course of a disease is long, and an extended period of time is required to measure the intended clinical benefit of a product, even if the effect on the surrogate or intermediate clinical endpoint occurs rapidly.
8 unchanged sentences
Further, FDORA requires the agency to publish on its website “the rationale for why a post-approval study is not appropriate or necessary” whenever it decides not to require such a study upon granting accelerated approval.
+Added: In March 2023, the FDA issued draft guidance that outlines its current thinking and approach to accelerated approval.
+Added: The agency indicated that the accelerated approval pathway is commonly used for approval of oncology drugs due to the serious and life-threatening nature of cancer.
+Added: Although single-arm trials have been commonly used to support accelerated approval, a randomized controlled trial is the preferred approach as it provides a more robust efficacy and safety assessment and allows for direct comparisons to an available therapy.
+Added: To that end, the FDA outlined considerations for designing, conducting, and analyzing data for trials intended to support accelerated approvals of oncology therapeutics.
+Added: While this guidance is currently only in draft form and will ultimately not be legally binding even when finalized, sponsors typically observe the FDA’s guidance closely to ensure that their investigational products qualify for accelerated approval.
Post-Approval Regulation
4 unchanged sentences
Changes to the manufacturing process are strictly regulated and often require prior FDA approval before being implemented.
−Removed: FDA regulations also require investigation and correction of any deviations from cGMP and impose reporting and documentation requirements upon the sponsor and any third-party manufacturers that the sponsor may decide to use.
+Added: FDA regulations also require investigation and correction of any deviations from cGMP and impose reporting and documentation requirements
+Added: upon the sponsor and any third-party manufacturers that the sponsor may decide to use.
Accordingly, manufacturers must continue to expend time, money, and effort in the area of production and quality control to maintain cGMP compliance.
17 unchanged sentences
Moreover, with the passage of the Pre-Approval Information Exchange Act in December 2022, sponsors of products that have not been approved may proactively communicate to payors certain information about products in development to help expedite patient access upon product approval.
−Removed: Previously, such communications were permitted under FDA guidance
−Removed: but the new legislation explicitly provides protection to sponsors who convey certain information about products in development to payors, including unapproved uses of approved products.
+Added: Previously, such communications were permitted under FDA guidance, but the new legislation explicitly provides protection to sponsors who convey certain information about products in development to payors, including unapproved uses of approved products.
+Added: In addition, in October 2023, the FDA published draft guidance outlining the agency’s non-binding policies governing the distribution of scientific information on unapproved uses to healthcare providers.
+Added: This draft guidance calls for such communications to be truthful, non-misleading, factual, and unbiased and include all information necessary for healthcare providers to interpret the strengths and weaknesses and validity and utility of the information about the unapproved use.
+Added: In addition, the distribution of prescription pharmaceutical products is subject to a variety of federal and state laws.
+Added: The Prescription Drug Marketing Act, or PDMA, was the first federal law to set minimum standards for the registration and regulation of drug distributors by the states and to regulate the distribution of drug samples.
+Added: Both the PDMA and state laws limit the distribution of prescription pharmaceutical product samples and impose requirements to ensure accountability in distribution.
+Added: In November 2013, the federal Drug Supply Chain Security Act, or DSCSA, became effective in the United States, mandating an industry-wide, electronic, interoperable system to trace prescription drugs through the pharmaceutical distribution supply chain with a ten-year phase-in process.
+Added: Manufacturers were required by November 2023 to have such systems and processes in place but, in August 2023, the FDA set a one-year period in which it would exercise its enforcement discretion with respect to these requirements.
Biosimilars and Regulatory Exclusivity
1 unchanged sentence
The BPCIA established a regulatory scheme authorizing the FDA to approve biosimilars and interchangeable biosimilars.
−Removed: To date, the FDA has approved a number of biosimilars, and the first interchangeable biosimilar product was approved in July 2021, and a second product previously approved as a biosimilar was designated as interchangeable in October 2021.
+Added: To date, the FDA has approved a number of biosimilar products and several interchangeable biosimilar products.
The FDA has also issued numerous guidance documents outlining its approach to reviewing and licensing biosimilars and interchangeable biosimilars under the PHSA.
−Removed: Under the BPCIA, a manufacturer may submit an application for licensure of a biologic product that is “biosimilar to” or “interchangeable with” a previously approved biological product or “reference product.” In order for the FDA to approve a biosimilar product, it must find that there are no clinically meaningful differences between the reference product and proposed biosimilar product in terms of safety, purity, and potency.
−Removed: For the FDA to approve a biosimilar product as interchangeable with a reference product, the agency must find that the biosimilar product can be expected to produce the same clinical results as the reference product, and (for products administered multiple times) that the biologic and the reference biologic may be switched after one has been previously administered without increasing safety risks or risks of diminished efficacy relative to exclusive use of the reference biologic.
−Removed: In December 2022, Congress clarified through FDORA that the FDA may approve multiple first interchangeable biosimilar biological products so long as the products are all approved on the first day on which such a product is approved as interchangeable with the reference product.
+Added: Under the BPCIA, a manufacturer may submit an application for licensure of a biologic product that is “biosimilar to” or “interchangeable with” a previously approved biological product or “reference product.” In order for the FDA to license a biosimilar product, it must find that there are no clinically meaningful differences between the reference product and proposed biosimilar product in terms of safety, purity, and potency.
+Added: For the FDA to license a biosimilar product as interchangeable with a reference product, the agency must find that the biosimilar product can be expected to produce the same clinical results as the reference product, and (for products administered multiple times) that the biologic and the reference biologic may be switched after one has been previously administered without increasing safety risks or risks of diminished efficacy relative to exclusive use of the reference biologic.
+Added: In December 2022, Congress clarified through FDORA that the FDA may license multiple first interchangeable biosimilar biological products so long as the products are all approved on the first day on which such a product is approved as interchangeable with the reference product.
Under the BPCIA, an application for a biosimilar product may not be submitted to the FDA until four years following the date of approval of the reference product.
−Removed: The FDA may not approve a biosimilar product until 12 years from the date on which the reference product was approved.
+Added: The FDA may not license a biosimilar product until 12 years from the date on which the reference product was approved.
Even if a product is considered to be a reference product eligible for exclusivity, another company could market a competing version of that product if the FDA approves a full BLA for such product containing the sponsor’s own preclinical data and data from adequate and well-controlled clinical trials to demonstrate the safety, purity and potency of their product.
11 unchanged sentences
If a drug or biologic designated as an orphan drug ultimately receives marketing approval for an indication broader than what was designated in its orphan drug application, it may not be entitled to exclusivity.
−Removed: Orphan exclusivity will not bar approval of another product under certain circumstances, including if a company with orphan drug exclusivity is not able to meet market demand and in cases where
−Removed: a subsequent product with the same drug or biologic for the same indication is shown to be clinically superior to the approved product on the basis of greater efficacy or safety, or providing a major contribution to patient care.
−Removed: Under Omnibus legislation signed by President Trump on December 27, 2020, the requirement for a subsequent product to show clinical superiority in order to break the previous product’s orphan drug exclusivity applies to drugs and biologics that received orphan drug designation before enactment of FDARA in 2017 but have not yet been approved or licensed by FDA.
+Added: Orphan exclusivity will not bar approval of another product under certain circumstances, including if a company with orphan drug exclusivity is not able to meet market demand and in cases where a subsequent product with the same drug or biologic for the same indication is shown to be clinically superior to the approved product on the basis of greater efficacy or safety, or providing a major contribution to patient care.
+Added: Under Omnibus legislation signed by President Trump on December 27, 2020, the requirement for a subsequent product to show clinical superiority in order to break the previous product’s orphan drug exclusivity applies to drugs and biologics that
+Added: received orphan drug designation before enactment of FDARA in 2017 but have not yet been approved or licensed by FDA.
Further, in September 2021, the Court of Appeals for the 11 th Circuit held that, for the purpose of determining the scope of market exclusivity, the term “same disease or condition” in the statute means the designated “rare disease or condition” and could not be interpreted by the FDA to mean the “indication or use.” Thus, the court concluded, orphan drug exclusivity applies to the entire designated disease or condition rather than the “indication or use.” Although there have been legislative proposals to overrule this decision, they have not been enacted into law.
10 unchanged sentences
Patent Term Restoration and Extension
−Removed: A patent claiming a new drug product may be eligible for a limited patent term extension under the Hatch-Waxman Amendments, which permits a patent restoration of up to five years for patent term lost during product development and the FDA regulatory review.
+Added: A patent claiming a new drug product may be eligible for a limited patent term extension under the Hatch-Waxman Act, which permits a patent restoration of up to five years for patent term lost during product development and the FDA regulatory review.
The restoration period granted on a patent covering a product is typically one-half the time between the effective date of the IND approval and the submission date of an application, plus the time between the submission date of an application and the ultimate approval date.
2 unchanged sentences
A patent that covers multiple products for which approval is sought can only be extended in connection with one of the approvals.
−Removed: The United States Patent and Trademark Office reviews and approves the application for any patent term extension or restoration in consultation with the FDA.
+Added: The USPTO reviews and approves the application for any patent term extension or restoration in consultation with the FDA.
Pharmaceutical Coverage, Pricing and Reimbursement
25 unchanged sentences
State and foreign laws also govern the privacy and security of health information in some circumstances, many of which differ from each other in significant ways and often are not preempted by HIPAA, thus complicating compliance efforts.
−Removed: In particular, numerous federal and state laws and regulations, including state data breach notification laws, state health information privacy laws, and federal and state consumer protection laws, govern the collection, use, disclosure, and protection of health-related and other personal information.
+Added: In particular, numerous federal and state laws and regulations, including state data breach notification laws, state health
+Added: information privacy laws, and federal and state consumer protection laws, govern the collection, use, disclosure, and protection of health-related and other personal information.
In addition, we may be subject to laws and regulations prohibiting bribery and corruption such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, or FCPA, which prohibits companies and their intermediaries from making, or offering or promising to make, improper payments to non-U.S.
21 unchanged sentences
Specifically, with respect to price negotiations, Congress authorized Medicare to negotiate lower prices for certain costly single-source drug and biologic products that do not have competing generics or biosimilars and are reimbursed under Medicare Part B and Part D.
−Removed: CMS may negotiate prices for ten high-cost drugs paid for by Medicare Part D starting in 2026, followed by 15 Part D drugs in 2027, 15 Part B or Part D drugs in 2028, and 20 Part B or Part D drugs in 2029 and beyond.
+Added: CMS may negotiate prices for ten high-cost drugs paid for by Medicare Part D starting in 2026, followed by 15 Part D drugs in 2027, 15 Part B or Part D drugs in 2028, and 20 Part B or Part D drugs in 2029 and
This provision applies to drug products that have been approved for at least 9 years and biologics that have been licensed for 13 years, but it does not apply to drugs and biologics that have been approved for a single rare disease or condition.
2 unchanged sentences
The new law also caps Medicare out-of-pocket drug costs at an estimated $4,000 a year in 2024 and, thereafter beginning in 2025, at $2,000 a year.
+Added: On June 6, 2023, Merck & Co.
+Added: filed a lawsuit against the HHS and CMS asserting that, among other things, the IRA’s Drug Price Negotiation Program for Medicare constitutes an uncompensated taking in violation of the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution.
+Added: Subsequently, a number of other parties, including the U.S.
+Added: Chamber of Commerce, Bristol Myers Squibb Company, the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, or PhRMA, Astellas, Novo Nordisk, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, AstraZeneca and Boehringer Ingelheim, also filed lawsuits in various courts with similar constitutional claims against the HHS and CMS.
+Added: We expect that litigation involving these and other provisions of the IRA will continue, with unpredictable and uncertain results.
+Added: In addition, the HHS and the FDA published a final rule allowing states and other entities to develop a Section 804 Importation Program to import certain prescription drugs from Canada into the United States.
+Added: That regulation was challenged in a lawsuit by PhRMA but the case was dismissed by a federal district court in February 2023 after the court found that PhRMA did not have standing to sue the HHS.
+Added: Nine states (Colorado, Florida, Maine, New Hampshire, New Mexico, North Dakota, Texas, Vermont and Wisconsin) have passed laws allowing for the importation of drugs from Canada.
+Added: Certain of these states have submitted Section 804 Importation Program proposals and are awaiting FDA approval.
+Added: On January 5, 2024, the FDA approved Florida’s plan for Canadian drug importation.
At the state level, legislatures are increasingly passing legislation and implementing regulations designed to control pharmaceutical and biological product pricing, including price or patient reimbursement constraints, discounts, restrictions on certain product access and marketing cost disclosure and transparency measures, and, in some cases, designed to encourage importation from other countries and bulk purchasing.
5 unchanged sentences
Data Privacy Regulation
−Removed: There are multiple privacy and data security laws that may impact our business activities in the United States and in other countries where we conduct trials or where we may conduct trials or do business in the future.
+Added: There are multiple privacy and data security laws that may impact our business activities in the United States and in other countries where we may conduct trials or do business in the future.
These laws are evolving and may increase both our obligations and our regulatory risks in the future.
4 unchanged sentences
Our clinical trials are regulated by the Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects, also known as the Common Rule, which also includes specific privacy-related provisions.
−Removed: In addition to federal privacy regulations, there are a number of state laws governing confidentiality and security of health information that may be applicable to our business.
+Added: In addition to federal privacy regulations, there are a number
+Added: of state laws governing confidentiality and security of health information that may be applicable to our business.
In addition to possible federal civil and criminal penalties for HIPAA violations, state attorneys general are authorized to file civil actions for damages or injunctions in federal courts to enforce HIPAA and seek attorney’s fees and costs associated with pursuing federal civil actions.
5 unchanged sentences
In 2018, California passed into law the California Consumer Privacy Act, or the CCPA, which took effect on January 1, 2020 and imposed many requirements on businesses that process the personal information of California residents.
−Removed: Many of the CCPA’s requirements are similar to those found in the General Data Protection Regulation, or the GDPR, including requiring
−Removed: businesses to provide notice to data subjects regarding the information collected about them and how such information is used and shared, and providing data subjects the right to request access to such personal information and, in certain cases, request the erasure of such personal information.
+Added: Many of the CCPA’s requirements are similar to those found in the General Data Protection Regulation, or the GDPR, including requiring businesses to provide notice to data subjects regarding the information collected about them and how such information is used and shared, and providing data subjects the right to request access to such personal information and, in certain cases, request the erasure of such personal information.
The CCPA also affords California residents the right to opt-out of “sales” of their personal information.
The CCPA contains significant penalties for companies that violate its requirements.
−Removed: In November 2020, California voters passed a ballot initiative for the California Privacy Rights Act, or the CPRA, which went into effect on January 1, 2023 and significantly expanded the CCPA to incorporate additional GDPR-like provisions including requiring that the use, retention, and sharing of personal information of California residents be reasonably necessary and proportionate to the purposes of collection or processing, granting additional protections for sensitive personal information, and requiring greater disclosures related to notice to residents regarding retention of information.
−Removed: The CPRA also created a new enforcement agency – the California Privacy Protection Agency – whose sole responsibility is to enforce the CPRA, which will further increase compliance risk.
−Removed: The provisions in the CPRA may apply to some of our business activities.
−Removed: In addition, other states, including Virginia, Colorado, Utah, and Connecticut already have passed state privacy laws.
−Removed: Virginia’s privacy law also went into effect on January 1, 2023, and the laws in the other three states will go into effect later in the year.
−Removed: Other states will be considering these laws in the future, and Congress has also been debating passing a federal privacy law.
+Added: In addition, the California Privacy Rights Act, or the CPRA, went into effect on January 1, 2023 and significantly expanded the CCPA to incorporate additional GDPR-like provisions including requiring that the use, retention, and sharing of personal information of California residents be reasonably necessary and proportionate to the purposes of collection or processing, granting additional protections for sensitive personal information, and requiring greater disclosures related to notice to residents regarding retention of information.
+Added: The CPRA also created the California Privacy Protection Agency, a new enforcement agency whose sole responsibility is to enforce the CPRA, which will further increase compliance risk.
+Added: In addition to California, 11 other states have passed comprehensive privacy laws similar to the CCPA and CPRA.
+Added: These laws are either in effect or will go into effect sometime before the end of 2026.
+Added: Like the CCPA and CPRA, these laws create obligations related to the processing of personal information, as well as special obligations for the processing of “sensitive” data, which includes health data in some cases.
+Added: Some of the provisions of these laws may apply to our business activities.
+Added: There are also states that are strongly considering or have already passed comprehensive privacy laws during the 2024 legislative sessions that will go into effect in 2025 and beyond.
+Added: Other states will be considering similar laws in the future, and Congress has also been debating passing a federal privacy law.
+Added: There are also states that are specifically regulating health information that may affect our business.
+Added: For example, the State of Washington passed the My Health My Data Act in 2023 which specifically regulated health information that is not otherwise regulated by the HIPAA rules, and the law also has a private right of action, which further increases the relevant compliance risk.
+Added: Connecticut and Nevada have also passed similar laws regulating consumer health data, and more states are considering such legislation in 2024, including New York and New Jersey.
These laws may impact our business activities, including our identification of research subjects, relationships with business partners and ultimately the marketing and distribution of our products.
5 unchanged sentences
The GDPR also imposes strict rules on the transfer of personal data to countries outside the EEA, including the United States, and permits data protection authorities to impose large penalties for violations of the GDPR, including potential fines of up to €20 million or 4% of annual global revenues, whichever is greater.
−Removed: The GDPR also confers a private right of action on data subjects and consumer associations to lodge complaints with supervisory authorities, seek judicial remedies, and obtain compensation for damages resulting from violations of the GDPR.
+Added: The GDPR also confers a private right of action on data subjects and consumer associations to lodge complaints with supervisory authorities, seek judicial remedies, and obtain compensation for damages resulting from
+Added: violations of the GDPR.
Compliance with the GDPR is a rigorous and time-intensive process that may increase the cost of doing business or require companies to change their business practices to ensure full compliance.
−Removed: There are ongoing concerns about the ability of companies to transfer personal data from the EU to other countries.
−Removed: In July 2020, the Court of Justice of the European Union, or the CJEU, invalidated the EU-U.S.
−Removed: Privacy Shield framework, one of the mechanisms used to legitimize the transfer of personal data from the EEA to the United States.
−Removed: The CJEU decision also drew into question the long-term viability of an alternative means of data transfer, the standard contractual clauses, for transfers of personal data from the EEA to the United States.
−Removed: This CJEU decision may lead to increased scrutiny on data transfers from the EU to the U.S.
−Removed: generally and increase our costs of compliance with data privacy legislation as well as our costs of negotiating appropriate privacy and security agreements with our vendors and business partners.
−Removed: Additionally, in October 2022, President Biden signed an executive order to implement the EU-U.S.
−Removed: Data Privacy Framework, which would serve as a replacement to the EU-US Privacy Shield.
−Removed: The European Commission, or the EC, initiated the process to adopt an adequacy decision for the EU-U.S.
−Removed: Data Privacy Framework in December 2022.
−Removed: It is unclear if and when the framework will be finalized and whether it will be challenged in court.
−Removed: The uncertainty around this issue may further impact our business operations in the EU.
+Added: Following the Court of Justice of the European Union, or the CJEU, decision, in October 2022, President Biden signed an executive order to implement the EU-U.S.
+Added: Data Privacy Framework, which would serve as a replacement to the EU-U.S.
+Added: Privacy Shield.
+Added: The EU initiated the process to adopt an adequacy decision for the EU-U.S.
+Added: Data Privacy Framework in December 2022, and the European Commission, or EC, adopted the adequacy decision in July 2023.
+Added: The adequacy decision permits U.S.
+Added: companies who self-certify to the EU-U.S.
+Added: Data Privacy Framework to rely on it as a valid data transfer mechanism for data transfers from the EU to the United States.
+Added: However, some privacy advocacy groups have already suggested that they will be challenging the EU-U.S.
+Added: Data Privacy Framework.
+Added: If these challenges are successful, they may not only impact the EU-U.S.
+Added: Data Privacy Framework, but also further limit the viability of the standard contractual clauses and other data transfer mechanisms.
+Added: The uncertainty around this issue has the potential to impact our business.
+Added: On June 23, 2016, the electorate in the United Kingdom voted in favor of leaving the EU, commonly referred to as Brexit.
As with other issues related to Brexit, there are open questions about how personal data will be protected in the United Kingdom and whether personal information can transfer from the EU to the United Kingdom.
−Removed: Following the withdrawal
−Removed: of the United Kingdom from the EU, the U.K.
−Removed: Data Protection Act 2018 applies to the processing of personal data that takes place in the United Kingdom and includes parallel obligations to those set forth by GDPR.
−Removed: While the Data Protection Act of 2018 in the United Kingdom that “implements” and complements the EU General Data Protection Regulation, or GDPR, has achieved Royal Assent on May 23, 2018 and is now effective in the United Kingdom, it is still unclear whether transfer of data from the EEA to the United Kingdom will remain lawful under GDPR.
+Added: Following the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the EU, the United Kingdom Data Protection Act 2018 applies to the processing of personal data that takes place in the United Kingdom and includes parallel obligations to those set forth by GDPR.
+Added: While the Data Protection Act of 2018 in the United Kingdom that “implements” and complements the GDPR has achieved Royal Assent on May 23, 2018 and is now effective in the United Kingdom, it is unclear whether transfer of data from the EEA to the United Kingdom will remain lawful under the GDPR, although these transfers currently are permitted by an adequacy decision from the EC.
The United Kingdom government has already determined that it considers all EU 27 and EEA member states to be adequate for the purposes of data protection, ensuring that data flows from the United Kingdom to the EU/EEA remain unaffected.
In addition, a recent decision from the European Commission appears to deem the United Kingdom as being “essentially adequate” for purposes of data transfer from the EU to the United Kingdom, although this decision may be re-evaluated in the future.
+Added: The United Kingdom and the United States have also agreed to a U.S.-UK “Data Bridge,” which functions similarly to the EU-U.S.
+Added: Data Privacy Framework and provides an additional legal mechanism for companies to transfer data from the United Kingdom to the United States.
+Added: In addition to the United Kingdom, Switzerland is also in the process of approving an adequacy decision in relation to the Swiss-U.S.
+Added: Data Privacy Framework (which would function similarly to the EU-U.S.
+Added: Data Privacy Framework and the U.S.-UK Data Bridge in relation to data transfers from Switzerland to the United States).
+Added: Any changes or updates to these developments have the potential to impact our business.
Beyond GDPR, there are privacy and data security laws in a growing number of countries around the world.
2 unchanged sentences
Employees and Human Capital Resources
−Removed: As of February 15, 2023, we had 89 full-time employees, including 36 employees with M.D., Pharm.D.
−Removed: Of these full-time employees, 65 are engaged in research and development activities and 24 are engaged in general and administrative activities.
+Added: As of March 25, 2024, we had 73 full-time employees, including 32 employees with M.D., Pharm.D.
+Added: Of these full-time employees, 53 were engaged in research and development activities and 20 were engaged in general and administrative activities.
None of our employees is represented by a labor union or covered by a collective bargaining agreement.
We consider our relationship with our employees to be good.
+Added: In March 2024, as part of a strategic portfolio reprioritization, we announced plans to undergo a workforce reduction to further reduce our expenses and streamline our operations, including a reduction in headcount of 15 employees, representing approximately 21% of our workforce prior to the workforce reduction.
+Added: We anticipate that the workforce reduction will be substantially completed in the first half of 2024.
Our human capital resources objectives include, as applicable, identifying, recruiting, retaining, incentivizing and developing our existing and additional employees.
1 unchanged sentence
Each year, we review employee demographic information to evaluate our diversity efforts across all functions and levels of the company.
−Removed: We conduct annual performance and development reviews for each of our employees to discuss the individual’s strengths and development opportunities, career development goals and performance goals.
+Added: annual performance and development reviews for each of our employees to discuss the individual’s strengths and development opportunities, career development goals and performance goals.
We also regularly survey employees to assess employee engagement and satisfaction.
2 unchanged sentences
We value our employees and regularly benchmark total rewards we provide, such as short- and long-term compensation, 401(k) contributions, tuition reimbursement, health, welfare and quality of life benefits, paid time off and personal leave, against our industry peers to ensure we remain competitive and attractive to potential new hires.
−Removed: Note Regarding the COVID-19 Pandemic
−Removed: The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic continues to be widespread, rapidly-evolving and unpredictable on global societies, economies, financial markets, supply chains and business practices.
−Removed: The extent of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, including variants of the COVID-19 virus, on our business, operations, and clinical development timelines and plans remains uncertain.
−Removed: For a discussion regarding risks and uncertainties related to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and its potential impact on our business and financial results, please refer to our “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Corporate Information
7 unchanged sentences
In addition, we routinely post on the “Investors & Media” page of our website investor and scientific presentations, SEC filings, press releases, public conference calls and webcasts and other statements about our business and results of operations, some of which may contain information that may be deemed material to investors.
−Removed: Accordingly, investors should monitor these portions of our website, in addition to following our press releases, SEC filings, public conference calls and webcasts, as well as our social media channels (our Twitter (@xiliotx) and LinkedIn).
−Removed: This list of channels may be updated from time to time on our investor relations website and may include other social media channels than the ones described above.
+Added: Accordingly, investors should monitor these portions of our website, in addition to following our press releases, SEC filings, public conference calls and webcasts, as well as current or future social media channels (including LinkedIn).
+Added: This list of channels may be updated from time to time on our investor relations website and may include other social media channels than the one described above.
The contents of our website or these channels, or any other website that may be accessed from our website or these channels, shall not be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
2 unchanged sentences
Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.