27 unchanged sentences
The loss of Capella University’s accreditation by the Higher Learning Commission or the Higher Learning Commission’s loss of recognition by the Department of Education would render Capella University ineligible to participate in Title IV programs and would have a material adverse effect on our business.
−Removed: Similarly, the loss of Strayer University’s accreditation by Middle States or
−Removed: Middle States’ loss of recognition by the Department of Education would render Strayer University ineligible to participate in Title IV programs and would have a material adverse effect on our business.
+Added: Similarly, the loss of Strayer University’s accreditation by the Middle States
+Added: Commission on Higher Education (“Middle States”) or Middle States’ loss of recognition by the Department of Education would render Strayer University ineligible to participate in Title IV programs and would have a material adverse effect on our business.
In addition, an adverse action by the Higher Learning Commission or Middle States other than loss of accreditation, such as issuance of a warning, could have a material adverse effect on our business.
19 unchanged sentences
and eliminates the requirement for live hearings with an opportunity for cross-examination at the post-secondary level.
−Removed: Multiple states have joined lawsuits against the Department challenging the new rules, and federal district courts have granted preliminary injunctions enjoining the Department from enforcing the final rule in Alaska, Arkansas, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, and Wyoming.
−Removed: On July 15, 2024, the scope of one of these orders was expanded to nearly 700 schools nationwide, irrespective of where those schools are located, including both Capella University and Strayer University.
−Removed: The new rules are otherwise effective on August 1, 2024.
+Added: Multiple states have joined lawsuits against the Department challenging the new rules, and federal district courts have granted preliminary injunctions enjoining the Department from enforcing the final rule in Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, and Wyoming.
+Added: Certain courts have issued orders expanding the injunction to named schools, irrespective of where those schools are located;
+Added: Capella University and Strayer University were named among nearly 700 schools in one such order on July 15, 2024.
+Added: Dep’t of Educ.
+Added: 5:24-cv-4041 (D.
+Added: Except where enjoined, the new rules otherwise became effective on August 1, 2024.
Failure to comply with these final rules and the resulting sanctions could have a material adverse effect on our business.
36 unchanged sentences
In addition to the public comment forum, NC-SARA accepted written comments between April 15, 2024 and May 17, 2024.
−Removed: NC-SARA’s regional compacts/regional steering committees and the NC-SARA board of directors will vote on each proposal presented by September 6, 2024, and October 25, 2024, respectively.
−Removed: We cannot predict whether NC-SARA will adopt any of these proposals.
−Removed: The adoption of certain proposals, including those described above, could have a material adverse effect on Capella University, Strayer University, and the Company.
+Added: On September 10, 2024, NC-SARA announced that the four regional compacts/regional steering committees approved 10 policy change proposals, which include proposed changes related to when an institution may be placed on provisional status and when a state must deny or may exercise its discretion to deny an institution’s participation in SARA.
+Added: The NC-SARA board of directors approved the proposals on October 23-25, 2024, concluding the 2024 policy modification process.
+Added: The adoption of certain proposals, including those described above to the extent they affect the ability of institutions to participate in the agreements, could have a material adverse effect on Capella University, Strayer University, and the Company.
For example, if excluded from the ability to participate in the agreements, Capella University and Strayer University would need to seek authorization in each state, which would increase costs and present the risk that certain jurisdictions would decline authorization.
8 unchanged sentences
We cannot predict whether the Department of Education will promulgate any regulations that would negatively affect Capella University or Strayer University.
+Added: Our enrollment rate is uncertain, and we may not be able to estimate our future enrollments effectively.
+Added: Our ability to grow enrollment depends on a number of factors, including macroeconomic factors like unemployment and the resulting lower confidence in job prospects, and many of the regulatory risks discussed above.
+Added: Our enrollment will be affected by legislative uncertainty and regulatory activity in the U.S.
+Added: and Australia, and macroeconomic conditions globally.
+Added: It is likely that legislative, regulatory, and economic uncertainties will continue for the foreseeable future, and thus it is difficult to assess our long-term growth prospects.
+Added: Since 2013, we have selectively closed physical locations of Strayer University to align our resources in keeping with the increasing preference of our current students for online course delivery.
+Added: Although we plan to continue investing selectively in new campus facilities, and to pursue other growth opportunities in the future, there can be no assurance as to what our growth rate will be or as to the steps we may need to take to adapt to the changing regulatory, legislative, and economic conditions.
+Added: On May 16, 2024, the Education Services for Overseas Students Amendment (Quality and Integrity) Bill 2024 , which would amend the Education Services for Overseas Students Act 2000 , was introduced into the House of Representatives of the Australian Parliament.
+Added: On August 15, 2024, the Bill was introduced into the Senate of the Australian Parliament.
+Added: The Bill contains several measures that would authorize the Minister for Education to regulate the provision of education to overseas students, including, among other things, by limiting the enrollments of overseas students by provider.
+Added: These limits would apply to Torrens University and to Think Education.
+Added: The Company is unable to predict the final specific limits or their effect at this time.
+Added: Limitations on the number of enrollments of oversees students could materially and adversely affect our business.
+Added: If Capella University and Strayer University fail to comply with the extensive legal and regulatory requirements for higher education institutions, they could face significant monetary or other liabilities and penalties, including loss of access to federal student loans and grants for their students.
+Added: As providers of higher education, Capella University and Strayer University are subject to extensive laws and regulation on both the federal and state levels and by accrediting agencies.
+Added: In particular, the Higher Education Act and related regulations subject Capella University, Strayer University, and all other higher education institutions that participate in the various Title IV programs to significant regulatory scrutiny.
+Added: The Higher Education Act mandates specific regulatory responsibilities for each of the following components of the higher education regulatory triad:
+Added: (1) the federal government through the Department of Education;
+Added: (2) the accrediting agencies recognized by the Secretary of Education;
+Added: and (3) state education regulatory bodies.
+Added: In addition, other federal agencies such as the CFPB, Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”), and Federal Communications Commission and various state agencies and state attorneys general enforce consumer protection, calling and texting, marketing, privacy and data security, and other laws applicable to post-secondary educational institutions.
+Added: Findings of noncompliance could result in monetary damages, fines, penalties, injunctions, or restrictions or obligations that could have a material adverse effect on our business.
+Added: Some of these laws also include private rights of action.
+Added: On October 8, 2021, the Department of Education announced establishment of an Office of Enforcement within the Department’s Office of Federal Student Aid, designed to strengthen oversight over and enforcement against post-secondary schools that participate in federal student loan, grant, and work-study programs.
+Added: The Office of Enforcement restores an office first established by the Department in 2016.
+Added: The Department announced the Office of Enforcement would comprise four existing divisions:
+Added: Administrative Actions and Appeals Services Group, Borrower Defense Group, Investigations Group, and Resolution and Referral Management Group.
+Added: The Department intends the Office of Enforcement to coordinate with other state and federal partners, including the U.S.
+Added: Department of Justice, CFPB, FTC, state attorneys general, and other state and federal partners.
+Added: On October 6, 2021, the FTC announced that it is resurrecting Penalty Offense Authority under Section 5(m) of the FTC Act (the “Act”).
+Added: Under the Act, the FTC may secure penalties against entities not a party to an original proceeding if the FTC can show that the entity had actual knowledge that the conduct in question was found to be unfair or deceptive.
+Added: In an effort to establish actual knowledge and create a pathway for penalties in the event of post-notice acts or practices, the FTC issued that same day an informational notice to the 70 largest for-profit schools based on enrollment and revenues.
+Added: The notice included a list of acts and practices that the FTC has determined are unfair or deceptive, including but not limited to acts relating to misrepresentation of employment opportunities and other benefits, together with citation to various prior determinations from cases previously litigated by the FTC.
+Added: Capella University and Strayer University received the FTC’s notice on October 7, 2021, although the FTC made clear that receipt of the notice itself does not reflect any assessment by the FTC as to whether Capella University or Strayer University has engaged in deceptive or unfair conduct.
+Added: On April 4, 2022, the Company received correspondence from the CFPB, in which the CFPB took the position that it has supervisory authority over the Company as a covered person that offers or provides private education loans pursuant to 12 U.S.C.
+Added: 5514(a)(1)(D) and further indicated the CFPB is considering whether to cite violations based on preliminary findings that the Company may have violated the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, 12 U.S.C.
+Added: 5301 et seq., due to alleged student loan servicing and collections practices or policies.
+Added: Specifically, the CFPB referred to Capella University and Strayer University’s historical practice of withholding official transcripts from students who were delinquent in paying amounts due, a practice which both universities discontinued prior to receipt of the correspondence.
+Added: While the Company disagrees with CFPB’s position as to its supervisory authority and disputes any alleged legal or regulatory violations, the Company cooperated with CFPB’s inquiry and responded to CFPB as requested on April 25, 2022.
+Added: The CFPB subsequently sent a letter on July 8, 2022, indicating that it believed the withholding of transcripts was a violation, and requiring the Company to cease withholding transcripts for those with an outstanding balance and to take other remedial actions.
+Added: The Company had already discontinued its historical practice prior to the CFPB’s notice, and informed the CFPB that it completed the remedial actions in the allotted 30 days.
+Added: On April 26, 2022, the CFPB informed the Company that it intended to conduct an announced education loan exam in June
+Added: The examination started on June 13, 2022 and fieldwork concluded on August 5, 2022.
+Added: On September 12, 2022, the CFPB informed the Company of a preliminary finding related to a product that is no longer utilized, and invited the Company’s response.
+Added: The Company timely responded to the CFPB’s letter, disagreeing with the preliminary finding and noting that the product to which it related is no longer utilized.
+Added: On November 29, 2022, the CFPB informed the Company that, within 90 days, it should remediate the finding for any impacted students, and it also identified areas for the Company to address to ensure regulatory compliance.
+Added: The Company took remedial action and responded to the CFPB within the 90-day deadline.
+Added: On December 15, 2023, the Company provided answers to questions from the CFPB in the first of two annual telephone conversations as part of the CFPB’s periodic monitoring practice.
+Added: On October 25, 2024, CFPB notified the Company that it would be conducting a review of the Company’s remediation efforts and, upon completion, will determine whether it will close the 2022 exam.
+Added: The laws, regulations, standards, and policies applicable to our business frequently change, and changes in, or new interpretations of, applicable laws, regulations, standards, or policies could have a material adverse effect on our accreditation, authorization to operate in various states, permissible activities, ability to communicate with prospective students, receipt of funds under Title IV programs, or costs of doing business.
+Added: The Department of Education periodically engages in negotiated rulemaking sessions to revise regulations that govern the federal Title IV student financial aid programs.
+Added: Certain proposals or new rules related to these issues could raise the cost of compliance for Capella University or Strayer University or require changes in the educational programs offered by Capella University and Strayer University.
+Added: We cannot predict whether the Department of Education will promulgate any regulations that would negatively affect Capella University or Strayer University.
+Added: Title IV requirements are enforced by the Department of Education and, in some instances, by private plaintiffs or other third parties.
+Added: If Capella University and Strayer University are found not to be in compliance with these laws, regulations, standards, or policies, they could lose access to Title IV program funds and face related monetary liability, which would have a material adverse effect on the Company.
Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.