2 unchanged sentences
Some of these proceedings may result in fines, penalties, judgments or costs being assessed against the Company at some future time.
−Removed: The Company’s operations are subject to extensive local, state and federal legislation and regulations, including CERCLA and the Superfund amendments of 1986 (Superfund) as well as comparable regulations applicable to the Company’s foreign locations.
+Added: The Company’s operations are subject to extensive local, state and federal laws and regulations, including CERCLA and the Superfund amendments of 1986 (Superfund) as well as comparable regulations applicable to the Company’s foreign locations.
Over the years, the Company has received requests for information related to or has been named by government authorities as a potentially responsible party (PRP) at a number of sites where cleanup costs have been or may be incurred by the Company under CERCLA and similar state statutes.
5 unchanged sentences
The Company’s property in Maywood, New Jersey and property formerly owned by the Company adjacent to its current site and other nearby properties (collectively, the Maywood site) were listed on the National Priorities List in September 1993 pursuant to the provisions of CERCLA because of alleged chemical contamination.
−Removed: Pursuant to (i) a September 21, 1987 Administrative Order on Consent entered into between the USEPA and the Company for property formerly owned by the Company at the Maywood site and (ii) the issuance of an order on November 12, 2004 by the USEPA to the Company for property currently owned by the Company at the Maywood site, the Company has completed various remedial investigation feasibility studies (RI/FS), and on September 24, 2014, USEPA issued its Record of Decision (ROD) for chemically-contaminated soil at the Maywood site, which requires Stepan to perform remedial cleanup of the soil and buried waste.
−Removed: The USEPA has not yet issued a ROD for chemically-contaminated groundwater for the Maywood site.
+Added: Pursuant to (i) a September 21, 1987 Administrative Order on Consent entered into between the USEPA and the Company for property formerly owned by the Company at the Maywood site and (ii) the issuance of an order on November 12, 2004 by the USEPA to the Company for property currently owned by the Company at the Maywood site, the Company has completed various Remedial Investigation Feasibility Studies (RI/FS), and on September 24, 2014, USEPA issued its Record of Decision (ROD) for chemically-contaminated soil at the Maywood site, which requires the Company to perform remedial cleanup of the soil and buried waste.
+Added: The USEPA has not yet issued a ROD for chemically-contaminated groundwater at the Maywood site.
Based on the most current information available, the Company believes its recorded liability is reasonable having considered the range of estimated costs of remediation for the Maywood site.
−Removed: The estimate of the cost of remediation for the Maywood site could change as the Company continues to hold discussions with USEPA, as the design of the remedial action is finalized, if a groundwater ROD is issued or if other PRPs are identified.
+Added: The estimate of the cost of remediation for the Maywood site could change as the Company continues to hold discussions with the USEPA, as the design of the remedial action is finalized, if a groundwater ROD is issued or if other PRPs are identified.
The ultimate amount for which the Company is liable could differ materially from the Company’s current recorded liability.
1 unchanged sentence
In addition, under the terms of a settlement agreement reached on November 12, 2004, the U.S.
−Removed: Department of Justice and the Company agreed to fulfill the terms of a Cooperative Agreement reached in 1985 under which the United States has taken title to and is responsible for the removal of radioactive waste at the Maywood site, including past and future remediation costs incurred by the United States.
+Added: Department of Justice and the Company agreed to fulfill the terms of a Cooperative Agreement reached in 1985.
+Added: Under the Cooperative Agreement, the United States is responsible for the removal of radioactive waste at the Maywood site, including past and future remediation costs at the site.
As such, the Company recorded no liability related to this settlement agreement.
4 unchanged sentences
In 2021, the PRPs were provided with updated remediation cost estimates by the PRP group technical consultant and project manager, which the Company considered in its determination of its range of estimated possible losses and liability balance.
−Removed: The changes in range of possible losses and liability balance related to such updated remediation cost estimates were immaterial.
+Added: The changes in range of possible losses and liability balance were immaterial.
Remediation work continues at the D’Imperio site.
−Removed: Based on current information, the Company believes that its recorded liability is reasonable having considered the range of estimated costs of remediation for the D’Imperio site.
−Removed: Depending on the ultimate cost of the remediation at this site, the amount for which the Company is liable could differ materially from the current estimates.
+Added: Based on current information, the Company believes that its recorded liability is reasonable having considered the range of estimated cost of remediation for the D’Imperio site.
+Added: Depending on the ultimate cost of the remediation at this site, the amount for which the Company is liable could differ materially from the current recorded liability.
Wilmington Site
1 unchanged sentence
Remediation at this site is being managed by its current owner, to whom the Company sold the property in 1980.
−Removed: Under the Company’s October 1, 1993 agreement with the current owner of the Wilmington site, once total site remediation costs exceed certain levels, the Company is obligated to contribute up to five percent of future response costs associated with this site with no limitation on the ultimate amount of the Company’s contributions.
−Removed: The Company had paid the current owner $2.97 million for the Company’s portion of environmental response costs at
−Removed: the Wilmington site through December 31, 2020.
+Added: Under the Company’s October 1, 1993 agreement with the current owner of the Wilmington site, once total site remediation costs exceed certain levels, the Company is obligated to contribute up to five percent of future response costs associated with this site with no limitation on the ultimate amount of contributions.
+Added: The Company has paid the current owner $3.2 million for the Company’s portion of environmental response costs at the Wilmington site
+Added: through December 31, 202 1 .
The Company has recorded a liability for its portion of the estimated remediation costs for the site.
−Removed: Depending on the ultimate cost of the remediation at this site, the amount for which the Company is liable could differ materially from the current estimates.
+Added: Depending on the ultimate cost of the remediation at this site, the amount for which the Company is liable could differ materially from the current recorded liability .
The Company and other prior owners of the Wilmington site also entered into an agreement in April 2004 waiving certain statute of limitations defenses for claims that may be filed by the Town of Wilmington, Massachusetts, in connection with this site.
4 unchanged sentences
Based on current information, the Company believes that its recorded liability for the remediation of the affected areas is appropriate based on an estimate of expected costs.
−Removed: However, actual costs could differ materially from current estimates.
+Added: However, actual costs could differ materially from current recorded liabilities.
Mine Safety Disclosures
1 unchanged sentence
Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.