Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Item
1. Legal Proceedings
On
or about February 25, 2020, the Company, as plaintiff, filed a complaint with the Circuit Court of Montgomery County, Maryland against
Vivos Holdings, LLC, Vivos Real Estate Holdings, LLC and Dr. Doki, to enforce Maslow’s rights under certain promissory notes
and a personal guarantee made by the defendants. The case is proceeding. The Company believes that it will be granted a judgment in its
favor. MMG intends to continue to vigorously pursue this litigation.
On
or about May 6, 2020, the Defendants filed with the Circuit Court of Montgomery County, Maryland a Counterclaim and Third-Party Complaint
for Damages, Declaratory and Injunctive Relief and Jury Demand (the “Counterclaim”), The Company believes that the Counterclaim
has no merit. The Company will vigorously defend itself and its indemnified officers, directors and other parties as permitted by the
Company’s organizational documents. The Company and the other Counterclaim defendants have moved to have the Debt Collection Suit
and the Counterclaim stayed pending the outcome of the Arbitration which began March 21, 2022, described below.
On
or about June 5, 2020, the Company submitted a Claimant’s Notice of Intention to Arbitrate and Demand for Arbitration (the “Arbitration”)
with the American Arbitration Association in New York, and to the Respondents thereto: Dr. Doki; Silvija Valleru; Shirisha Janumpally
(individually and in her capacity as trustee of Judos Trust); Kalyan Pathuri (individually in his capacity as trustee of Igly Trust)
and Federal Systems (the “Respondents”). The Arbitration alleges that the Respondents breached the Merger Agreement in a
number of significant respects and committed fraud in connection with the Merger. The Company is seeking damages which if granted will
likely be the remedy set forth within the Merger Agreement which is in whole or in part shares of Company Common Stock received by the
Respondents in connection with the Merger. The Company has brought a motion to compel the Arbitration which is currently being decided
by the Federal Courts in New York. On August 4, 2021, the US District Court, Southern District
of New York, denied the Respondents motion to dismiss.
On
June 12, 2020, Igly Trust, a Vivos Group entity, asked the Texas court for an injunction requiring the Company to provide a shareholder
list and to hold a shareholder meeting. On October 20, 2020, the Texas court denied the injunction but, incongruously, dismissed all
the Vivos Group plaintiffs for lack of personal jurisdiction. The Company appealed the dismissal because the court had jurisdiction over
Igly Trust once it made affirmative claims in Texas and because the Court’s order denying the injunction is an important precedent
for establishing that the directors under Texas law retain control of shareholder lists and determining the timing of shareholder meetings.
This matter has since been moved into a single binding arbitration proceeding in Maryland.
After
an extension was granted to Reliability’s “reply brief,” on June 2, 2021, Reliability Incorporated, MMG Media Group,
Inc, Nick Tsahalis and Mark Speck filed an appellant’s brief in the Fourteenth District of Texas, Houston Texas to challenge the
court’s prior ruling granting a special appearance to Igly Trust and to the Doki Shareholders. A response to the filed appellant
brief has not yet been received. This matter has since been moved into a single binding arbitration proceeding in Maryland.
On
December 23, 2020, at a hearing in the Maryland District Court, a motion by the Vivos Group to compel a shareholder meeting was summarily
dismissed. The judge agreed with the Company that permitting the Vivos Group to vote their shares at a meeting of shareholders could
materially harm the interests of the Company as a whole, its employees and minority shareholders. The
judge also commented that, based on the evidence presented, management was performing its fiduciary duties to protect the Company despite
adverse circumstances. A full trial to address the Company’s lawsuit to enforce the repayment of notes and the Vivos Group counterclaim,
was scheduled to commence in early October 2021 but was pre-empted by an agreement by both sides to go to arbitration in March 2022.
On
January 20, 2021, Defendants and Counter/Third-Party Plaintiffs, Vivos Holdings, LLC (“Vivos”), Vivos Real Estate Holdings,
LLC (“VREH”), Dr. Doki, Mr. Pathuri, Igly Trust (“Igly”), Judos Trust (“Judos”),
by counsel, filed a Notice of Appeal with the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, Maryland denying their Motion for Preliminary Injunction
signed on December 23, 2020. However, the deadline to pursue the appeal lapsed absent additional filings by the Vivos Group.
21
On
August 9, 2021, Reliability filed an additional claim in the Debt Collection Suit and Vivos Default Counterclaim in the Circuit
Court of Montgomery County, Maryland against Dr. Doki, Valleru, Mr. Pathuri, Mrs. Janumpally, Igly, and Judos, that
the Respondents breached the Merger Agreement in a number of significant respects and committed fraud in connection with the
Merger.
On
September 7, 2021, the Company entered in Arbitration and Tolling Agreements with alleged shareholder Dr. Doki. and his affiliates
and all other persons who were parties to the pending litigation previously reported in the Texas, New York and Maryland courts and before
the American Arbitration Association. The Agreements call for the stay or dismissal of the pending litigation, with the parties agreeing
to resolve their disputes before a single arbitrator in Maryland. The parties also agreed to maintain the status quo in corporate governance
and related matters pending a final non-appealable judgment confirming any award in arbitration. The parties also signed a Tolling Agreement
to toll the statute of limitations following the dismissal of a pending litigation. The
hearing portion of the binding Arbitration formally began on March 21, 2022, and has since concluded.
There are other phases forthcoming. A decision is anticipated in the third quarter , 2022.
The
following legal proceedings where Vivos Group borrowings impacting MMG:
On
September 28, 2018, Credit Cash filed a complaint against MMG, Vivos, Vivos Acquisitions, LLC, Dr. Doki, Dr. Valleru (the “Parties”)
and other defendants in the United States Circuit Court of Montgomery County, Maryland for the District of New Jersey for, among other
things, breach of contract of the MMG and HCRN Credit Facilities and their respective guaranties in relation to the November 15, 2017,
agreement (the “DNJ Action”). On October 30, 2018, Credit Cash filed a motion to intervene in an action pending in New York
State, Monroe County, filed by HCRN and LE Finance, LLC against the Parties, and other defendants (“NY State Action”). On
December 10, 2018, the Parties entered into a settlement agreement for the purpose of settling certain claims related to the DNJ Action
only. Pursuant to the settlement agreement, certain repayment terms were agreed upon between Credit Cash and the Parties, but Credit
Cash did not relinquish the right to pursue any claims related to the NY State Action, nor to pursue any remedies against any of the
parties in relation to the November 15, 2017, agreement. Certain of the Vivos Group executed and delivered to MMG that certain Agreement
for the Contingent Liquidation of the Common Stock of MMG, dated as of October 28, 2019 (the “Liquidation Agreement”), pursuant
to which such Vivos Group pledged to MMG the shares of Company Common Stock they received in the Merger to provide the capital required
to satisfy the Parties’ obligations under the Settlement Agreements. Vivos Group misrepresented upon the execution of the Liquidation
Agreement to MMG the status of its obligations under the Settlement Agreement, which were, in fact, then in default. To date these Vivos
Group have not cooperated with the Company to monetize those shares as contemplated by the Liquidation Agreement. The Company will take
appropriate action to enforce its rights under the Liquidation Agreement, which actions will be dictated in part by the outcome of the
Arbitration. On or about March 16, 2020, Credit Cash entered its New Jersey confession of judgment with the Circuit Court of Montgomery
County, Maryland. MMG needs to confirm whether this matter has been settled and if so whether MCA lenders and HCRN remitted payments
to Credit Cash, and if so, which liens have been removed.
Healthcare
Resource Network Complaint: On or about February 25, 2020, the Company, as plaintiff, filed a complaint with the Circuit Court of Montgomery
County, Maryland against Vivos Holdings, LLC, Vivos Real Estate Holdings, LLC and Dr. Doki, to enforce MMG’s rights under
certain promissory notes and a personal guarantee made by the defendants. The case is proceeding. The Company believes that it will be
granted a judgment in its favor. MMG intends to continue to vigorously pursue this litigation. On September 3, 2020, MMG and HCRN entered
into a Tolling Agreement pursuant to which HCRN dismissed MMG from this litigation without prejudice and agreed to forebear filing a
new complaint or initiating any lawsuit or other legal proceeding against MMG until January 31, 2022.
On
or about May 5, 2020, Kinetic Direct Funding domesticated a foreign judgement in the Montgomery County Circuit Court system again Health
Care Resources Network (HCRN), Maslow Media Group, US IT Solutions Inc., 360 IT Professionals, Alliance Micro, Inc. and Dr. Doki.
This foreign judgement from the State of New York relates to loans the Vivos Group took out by adding Maslow Media Group as additional
collateral. This loan is currently in default. Foreign Judgement total is $579. There was a settlement reached on October 1,2021 with
both parties releasing each other of any and all claims with no assets changing hands. MMG needs to determine which lien releases have
been filed.
On
July 21, 2021, MMG came to an agreement with Kinetic and Libertas for $475 to release MMG from being obligated to this Vivos Group debt.
The intended shield to protect MMG from having to pay Vivos Group’s debt was the aforementioned Liquidation Agreement which Vivos
Debtors refuse to comply with.
22
On
September 7, 2021, the Company entered in Arbitration and Tolling Agreements with alleged shareholder Dr. Doki, and his affiliates
and all other persons who were parties to the pending litigation previously reported in the Texas, New York and Maryland courts and before
the American Arbitration Association. The Agreements call for the stay or dismissal of the pending litigation, with the parties agreeing
to resolve their disputes before a single arbitrator in Maryland. The parties also agreed to maintain the status quo in corporate governance
and related matters pending a final non-appealable judgment confirming any award in arbitration. The parties also signed a Tolling Agreement
to toll the statute of limitations following the dismissal of a pending litigation. The hearing portion of the binding Arbitration formally
began on March 21, 2022, and has since concluded. There are other phases forthcoming. A decision is anticipated in the
third quarter , 2022.
Text extracted from the filing as submitted to EDGAR. Formatting, tables and exhibits are simplified for reading; the original document is authoritative for anything you rely on.