Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
From time to time, the Company may be involved in various claims and legal actions in the ordinary course of business.
On June 6, 2024, a purported former stockholder of Broadmark filed a class action lawsuit, captioned Eibling v. Pyatt, et al., Case No. C-24-CV-24-000818, in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Maryland (the “Action”). The Action names as defendants Broadmark’s former board of directors and alleges they breached their fiduciary duties in connection with the Broadmark Merger by failing to properly consider acquisition proposals that were purportedly superior to the Broadmark Merger, by relying on purportedly false and misleading valuation analyses, and by authorizing the issuance of a purportedly false and misleading proxy statement. The Action also asserts claims against Broadmark’s financial advisor for aiding and abetting these alleged breaches of fiduciary duty. The Action seeks damages in the form of compensatory damages, quasi-appraisal damages, rescissory damages, and disgorgement of any merger-related benefits. The Action also seeks reimbursement for litigation expenses and attorneys’ and experts’ fees. Although the Company is not a defendant in the Action, it is subject to contractual indemnification obligations (conditioned on the satisfaction of various contractual requirements) in connection therewith, including with respect to the defendants’ service as Broadmark directors and provision of services to Broadmark, as applicable. The defendants intend to vigorously defend against the Action.
Text extracted from the filing as submitted to EDGAR. Formatting, tables and exhibits are simplified for reading; the original document is authoritative for anything you rely on.