−Removed: We are a leader in the field of gene therapy, seeking to develop single treatments with potentially curative results for patients suffering from genetic and other devastating diseases.
−Removed: We are advancing a focused pipeline of innovative gene therapies, including product candidates for the treatment of hemophilia B, which we intend to license to CSL Behring pursuant to the CSL Behring Agreement (as defined below), and Huntington’s disease.
−Removed: We believe our validated technology platform and manufacturing capabilities provide us distinct competitive advantages, including the potential to reduce development risk, cost, and time to market.
+Added: We are a leader in the field of gene therapy and seek to deliver to patients suffering from rare and other devastating diseases single treatments with potentially curative results.
+Added: We are advancing a focused pipeline of innovative gene therapies, including product candidates for the treatment of hemophilia B, which effective May 6, 2021, we licensed to CSL Behring pursuant to the CSL Behring Agreement (as defined below), and Huntington’s disease.
+Added: We believe our technology platform and manufacturing capabilities provide us distinct competitive advantages, including the potential to reduce development risk, cost, and time to market.
We produce our Adeno-associated virus (“AAV”) -based gene therapies in our own facilities with a proprietary, commercial-scale, current good manufacturing practices (“cGMP”)-compliant, manufacturing process.
We believe our Lexington, Massachusetts-based facility is one of the world’s most versatile gene therapy manufacturing facilities.
+Added: Acquisition of Corlieve Therapeutics
+Added: On June 21, 2021, we entered into a share and purchase agreement (“SPA”) to acquire all outstanding ordinary shares of Corlieve Therapeutics SAS (“Corlieve”), a privately held French gene therapy company (together, the “Corlieve Transaction”).
+Added: Upon the closing of the Corlieve Transaction on July 30, 2021 (“Acquisition Date”), we acquired 97.7% of the outstanding ordinary shares of Corlieve in return for EUR 44.9 million ($53.3 million as of the Acquisition Date).
+Added: As contractually required in the SPA, we acquired the remaining outstanding ordinary shares on February 9, 2022 following the expiration of a minimum holding period (“Mandatorily Redeemable Shares”).
+Added: We recorded a liability related to these Mandatorily Redeemable Shares for an amount of EUR 0.7 million ($0.9 million) as of the Acquisition Date.
+Added: We financed the Corlieve Transaction from cash on hand.
+Added: Following its formation in November 2019, Corlieve obtained exclusive licenses to certain patents from two French research institutions that continue to collaborate with Corlieve and us.
+Added: Corlieve also obtained an exclusive license from Regenxbio Inc.
+Added: (“Regenxbio”) for the use of AAV9 to deliver any sequence that affects the expression of the Glutamate inotropic receptor kainate type subunit 2 (“GRIK 2”) gene sequence in humans.
+Added: Corlieve and Regenxbio simultaneously entered into a collaboration plan related to agreed joint preclinical research and development activities.
+Added: At the Acquisition Date, Corlieve and its Swiss subsidiary, Corlieve Therapeutics AG, employed seven employees.
+Added: Corlieve’s gene therapy program, AMT-260, employs micro ribonucleic acid (“miRNA”) silencing technology to target suppression of aberrantly expressed kainate receptors in the hippocampus of patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (“TLE”).
+Added: TLE affects approximately 1.3 million people in the U.S.
+Added: and Europe alone, of which approximately 0.8 million patients are unable to adequately control acute seizures with currently approved anti-epileptic therapies.
+Added: Patients with refractory TLE experience increased morbidity, excess mortality, and poor quality of life.
+Added: In addition to the payments to acquire 100% of the outstanding ordinary shares, Corlieve’s former and remaining shareholders are eligible to receive up to EUR 35.8 million (or $40.6 million as of December 31, 2021) upon the achievement of development milestones through Phase I/II and EUR 143.1 million (or $162.3 million as of December 31, 2021) upon the achievement of milestones associated with Phase III development and obtaining approval to commercialize AMT-260 in the United States of America and the European Union.
+Added: We may elect to pay up to 25% of such milestone payments through the issuance of our ordinary shares.
+Added: We recorded a EUR 20.2 million ($24.0 million) liability related to these contingent consideration payments as of the Acquisition Date.
+Added: Total consideration of EUR 65.8 million ($78.1 million), which consisted of the cash paid upon the Acquisition Date, the payment for the Mandatorily Redeemable Shares and the contingent consideration payments, was allocated to identifiable intangible assets related to the in-process research and development of AMT-260 (“IPR&D Intangible Asset”).
+Added: The IPR&D Intangible Asset’s fair value was determined at EUR 53.6 million ($63.6 million) as of the Acquisition Date.
+Added: We also recognized a EUR 13.4 million ($15.9 million) deferred tax liability in relation to this IPR&D Intangible Asset.
+Added: The total consideration in excess of the net assets acquired was EUR 23.9 million ($28.4 million) and was allocated to goodwill.
CSL Behring commercialization and license agreement
−Removed: On June 24, 2020, uniQure biopharma B.V., a wholly-owned subsidiary of uniQure N.V., entered into a commercialization and license agreement (as amended, the “CSL Behring Agreement”) with CSL Behring LLC (“CSL Behring”) pursuant to which CSL Behring will receive exclusive global rights to etranacogene dezaparvovec, our investigational gene therapy for patients with hemophilia B (the “Product”).
−Removed: Under the terms of the CSL Behring Agreement, we will receive a $450.0 million upfront cash payment upon the closing of the CSL Behring Agreement and be eligible to receive up to $1.6 billion in additional payments based on regulatory and commercial milestones.
−Removed: The CSL Behring agreement also provides that we will be eligible to receive tiered double-digit royalties in a range of up to a low-twenties percent of net sales of the Product based on sales thresholds.
−Removed: Pursuant to the CSL Behring Agreement, we will be responsible for the completion of the HOPE-B clinical trial, manufacturing process validation, and the manufacturing supply of the Product until such time that these capabilities may be transferred to CSL Behring or its designated contract manufacturing organization.
−Removed: Concurrently with the execution of the CSL Behring Agreement, we and CSL Behring entered into a development and commercial supply agreement, pursuant to which, among other things, we will supply the Product to CSL Behring at an agreed-upon price.
−Removed: Clinical development and regulatory activities performed by us pursuant to the CSL Behring Agreement will be reimbursed by CSL Behring.
−Removed: CSL Behring will be responsible for global regulatory submissions and commercialization requirements for the Product.
+Added: On June 24, 2020, (the “Signing Date”), uniQure biopharma B.V., a wholly-owned subsidiary of uniQure N.V., entered into a commercialization and license agreement (as amended, the “CSL Behring Agreement”) with CSL Behring LLC (“CSL Behring”) pursuant to which CSL Behring received exclusive global rights to etranacogene dezaparvovec, our investigational gene therapy for patients with hemophilia B (the “Product”).
+Added: The transaction became fully effective on May 6, 2021, one day after the waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 (the “HSR Act”) expired on May 5, 2021.
+Added: CSL Behring is responsible for the development and commercialization of the Product.
+Added: We agreed to complete the validation of the current manufacturing process as well as to the development and validation of a next generation manufacturing process.
+Added: We will be entitled to receive a development milestone payment if we complete these activities in accordance with an agreed development plan and timeline.
+Added: CSL Behring is responsible for global regulatory submissions and commercialization requirements for the Product.
+Added: Certain clinical development and regulatory activities performed by us are reimbursed by CSL Behring.
+Added: On the Signing Date, we and CSL Behring also entered into a development and commercial supply agreement, pursuant to which, among other things, we will supply the Product to CSL Behring at an agreed-upon price commensurate with the stand-alone selling price (“SSP”).
+Added: We will be responsible to supply the Product until such time that these capabilities may be transferred to CSL Behring or its designated contract manufacturing organization.
Other than under the CSL Behring Agreement, neither we nor CSL Behring may perform any clinical trials, with the exception of trials required to extend the label or gain marketing authorization outside the United States or the European Union, for any gene therapy product, gene-editing product, or any other product comprising an AAV vector to conduct nucleotide transfer (including deoxyribonucleic acid (“DNA”) and ribonucleic acid (“RNA”)) for the treatment, prevention, or cure of hemophilia B for a period commencing on June 24, 2020 and continuing for a period of four years following the first commercial sale of the Product in the United States, and neither we nor CSL Behring may commercialize such a product for a period commencing as of June 24, 2020 and continuing for a period of seven years following the first commercial sale of the Product in the United States.
5 unchanged sentences
CSL Behring may also terminate the CSL Behring Agreement for convenience.
−Removed: The effectiveness of the transactions contemplated by the CSL Behring Agreement is contingent on completion of review under antitrust laws in the United States, Australia, and the United Kingdom, and certain provisions of the CSL Behring Agreement will not become effective until after we receive all such regulatory approvals.
−Removed: On November 11, 2020, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (“ACCC”) determined, pursuant to section 50 of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 of Australia, that it will not intervene in the CSL Behring Agreement.
−Removed: Thus, the ACCC has completed its review of the CSL Behring Agreement, and the transactions contemplated by the CSL Behring Agreement may close from the perspective of the Australian competition authority.
−Removed: On November 24, 2020, the Competition and Markets Authority in the United Kingdom (the “CMA”) adopted a decision not to refer the CSL Behring Agreement for proceedings under section 33 of the Enterprise Act 2002 of the United Kingdom.
−Removed: The decision was made public by the CMA on January 6, 2021.
−Removed: Thus, the CMA has completed its review of the CSL Behring Agreement, and the transactions contemplated by the CSL Behring Agreement may close from the perspective of the United Kingdom competition authority.
−Removed: On December 3, 2020, we and CSL Behring filed a premerger notification and report form under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 (the “HSR Act”).
−Removed: On January 4, 2021, the United States Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) issued to us a request for additional information and documentary material (a “Second Request”) under the HSR Act.
−Removed: The FTC similarly issued a Second Request to CSL Behring also with respect to the antitrust review of the CSL Behring Agreement.
−Removed: The effect of the Second Request is to extend the waiting period imposed under the HSR Act until 30 days after all parties to the CSL Behring Agreement have substantially complied with the requests unless the waiting period is terminated earlier by the FTC or voluntarily extended by the parties.
−Removed: We do not believe that the FTC will determine that the consummation of the transaction will result in a violation of the HSR Act.
−Removed: However, there can be no assurance as to the outcome of the Second Request.
−Removed: Closing of the transaction is expected to materially impact our profitability and cash flows.
−Removed: Receipt of the $450.0 million payment due on closing would extend the funding of our operations into the second half of 2024 (assuming a full repayment of funds borrowed from Hercules Capital Inc.
−Removed: (“Hercules”) under our term loan facility by 2023).
−Removed: However, we expect to continue to incur losses and to generate negative cash flows beyond the fiscal year in which we would close the transaction.
+Added: The effectiveness of the transactions contemplated by the CSL Behring Agreement was contingent on completion of review under antitrust laws in the United States, Australia, and the United Kingdom, and certain provisions of the CSL Behring Agreement did not become effective until after we had received all such regulatory approvals and after the waiting period under the HSR Act expired on May 5, 2021.
+Added: Following the closing of the CSL Behring Agreement, we recorded $462.4 million, including a $450.0 million upfront cash payment, as license revenue.
+Added: Upon closing, we contractually owed to our licensors $15.5 million of the upfront payment received from CSL Behring.
+Added: We are eligible to receive more than $0.3 billion in regulatory, development, and first commercial sale milestones, $1.3 billion in additional commercial milestones, and tiered double-digit royalties of up to a low-twenties percentage of net product sales arising from the collaboration.
+Added: As of December 31, 2021, we accrued revenue of $55.0 million related to milestone payments we expect to receive under the CSL Behring Agreement following the submissions of a Biological License Application (“BLA”) to the U.S.
+Added: Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) and a Marketing Access Authorization (“MAA”) to the European Medicines Agency (“EMA”), which are expected to be submitted during the first half of 2022.
Hemophilia B program – Etranacogene dezaparvovec (AMT-061)
−Removed: Etranacogene dezaparvovec is our lead gene therapy candidate and includes an Adeno-associated virus (“AAV”) serotype 5 (together “AAV-5”) vector incorporating the functional human Factor IX (“FIX”) Padua variant.
−Removed: We are currently conducting a pivotal study in patients with severe and moderately-severe hemophilia B.
−Removed: In August 2018, we initiated a Phase IIb dose-confirmation study of etranacogene dezaparvovec and in September 2018, we completed the dosing for that study.
−Removed: In February, May, July, and December 2019, and in December 2020, we presented updated data from the Phase IIb dose-confirmation study of etranacogene dezaparvovec.
−Removed: The most recent data that we announced from the Phase IIb study of etranacogene dezaparvovec show that all three patients experienced increasing and sustained FIX levels after a one-time administration of etranacogene dezaparvovec.
−Removed: Mean FIX activity was 44.2% of normal two years after administration, exceeding threshold FIX levels generally considered sufficient to significantly reduce the risk of bleeding events.
−Removed: The first patient achieved FIX activity of 44.7% of normal, the second patient was 51.6% of normal and the third patient was 36.3% of normal.
−Removed: The second and third patients had previously screen-failed and were excluded from another gene therapy study due to pre-existing neutralizing antibodies to a different AAV vector.
−Removed: At two years after dosing, two of the three participants remain free from bleeds and use of FIX replacement therapy.
−Removed: A single bleed has been reported in one participant, who has used a total of two FIX infusions (excluding surgery).
−Removed: All patients have remained free of prophylaxis in the two years since receiving etranacogene dezaparvovec.
−Removed: In June 2018, we initiated the six-month lead-in period of our Phase III HOPE-B pivotal trial of etranacogene dezaparvovec (the “HOPE-B trial”).
−Removed: The HOPE-B trial is a multinational, multi-center, open-label, single-arm study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of etranacogene dezaparvovec.
−Removed: After the six-month lead-in period, patients received a single intravenous administration of etranacogene dezaparvovec.
−Removed: Patients enrolled in the HOPE-B trial were tested for the presence of pre-existing neutralizing antibodies to AAV5 but not excluded from the trial based on their titers.
−Removed: The primary endpoints of the study are based on the FIX activity level achieved following the administration of etranacogene dezaparvovec after 26 weeks and 52 weeks after dosing as well as annualized bleed rates during the 52 weeks after dosing.
−Removed: In March 2020, we completed dosing of the 54 patients in the HOPE-B trial.
−Removed: The targeted number of patients to be dosed per the clinical trial protocol was 50.
−Removed: As set forth below, we have implemented and continue to implement various measures to allow us to closely monitor the trial within the guidance provided by the U.S.
−Removed: Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) regarding the impact of the COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic (“COVID-19”) to minimize any risk or disruption in patient follow-up visits.
−Removed: In December 2020, we announced top-line data from the HOPE-B trial.
−Removed: The 26-week follow-up date from the trial showed that FIX activity in the 54 patients increased after dosing from ≤ 2% to a mean of 37.2% at 26 weeks, meeting a first primary endpoint of the HOPE-B trial.
−Removed: No correlation between pre-existing neutralizing antibodies and FIX activity was found in patients with neutralizing antibody titers up to 678.2, a range expected to include more than 95% of the general population;
−Removed: one patient with a neutralizing antibody titer of 3,212.3 did not show an increase in FIX activity.
−Removed: Less than 1% of the general population is expected to have neutralizing antibody titers of greater than 3,000.
−Removed: During the 26-week period after dosing, 15 patients (28%) reported a total of 21 bleeding events, representing a reduction of 83% compared to the 123 bleeding events reported by 38 patients (70%) during the observational lead-in phase of the trial.
−Removed: Total bleeds include any bleeding event reported after the treatment of etranacogene dezaparvovec, including spontaneous, traumatic, and those associated with unrelated medical procedures, whether or not FIX treatment was required.
−Removed: Of the total bleeding events reported during the 26-week period after dosing, only three were classified as spontaneous bleeds requiring treatment, representing a reduction of 92% compared to the 37 such bleeding events reported during the observational lead-in phase.
−Removed: Mean annualized usage of FIX replacement therapy, a secondary endpoint in the clinical trial, declined by 96% during the 26-week period after dosing compared to the observational lead-in phase.
−Removed: Etranacogene dezaparvovec was generally well-tolerated.
−Removed: As of the November 2020 cut-off date, most adverse events were classified as mild (81.5%).
−Removed: The most common events included transaminase elevation treated with steroids per protocol (9 patients;
−Removed: 17%), infusion-related reactions (7 patients;
−Removed: 13%), headache (7 patients;
−Removed: 13%) and influenza-like symptoms (7 patients;
−Removed: Liver enzyme elevations resolved with a tapering course of corticosteroids and FIX activity remained in the mild range in the steroid treated patients.
−Removed: No relationship between safety and neutralizing antibody titers was observed.
−Removed: Based on interactions with the FDA and the European Medicines Agency (“EMA”), we plan to incorporate FIX activity and bleeding rates at 52 weeks as additional co-primary endpoints in the study.
−Removed: On December 21, 2020, our clinical trials of etranacogene dezaparvovec, including our HOPE-B trial, were placed on clinical hold by the FDA.
−Removed: The clinical hold was initiated following the submission of a safety report in mid-December relating to a possibly related serious adverse event associated with a preliminary diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (“HCC”), a form of liver cancer, in one patient in the HOPE-B trial that was treated with etranacogene dezaparvovec in October 2019.
−Removed: The patient has multiple risk factors associated with HCC, including a twenty-five-year history of hepatitis C (“HCV”), hepatitis B virus (“HBV”), evidence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and advanced age.
−Removed: Chronic infections with hepatitis B and C have been associated with approximately 80% of HCC cases.
−Removed: The liver lesion was detected during a routine abdominal ultrasound conducted as part of the required study assessments in patients at one-year post dosing.
−Removed: A surgical resection of the lesion has occurred, and an analysis of the tissue samples was initiated in early 2021.
−Removed: On February 19, 2021, we reported initial results from this analysis to the FDA in accordance with pharmacovigilance requirements.
−Removed: We are gathering final data from these molecular analyses and will be preparing a detailed response to the FDA’s clinical hold questions regarding this event.
−Removed: Currently, we do not have adequate data to determine a possible causal relationship, especially in the context of the other known risk factors.
−Removed: We currently do not anticipate any impact on our regulatory submission timelines, including the filing of a BLA.
−Removed: No other cases of HCC have been reported in our clinical trials conducted in more than 67 patients in hemophilia B, with some patients dosed more than 5 years ago.
−Removed: Etranacogene dezaparvovec has been granted Breakthrough Therapy Designation by the FDA and access to the current priority medicines (“PRIME”) initiative by the EMA.
+Added: Etranacogene dezaparvovec is our lead gene therapy candidate and includes an AAV serotype 5 (“AAV-5”) vector incorporating the functional human Factor IX (“FIX”) Padua variant.
+Added: We are currently conducting, on behalf of CSL Behring, a pivotal Phase III study in 54 patients with severe and moderately-severe hemophilia B (“HOPE-B Study”).
+Added: We expect that a BLA is to be submitted to the FDA and MAA to the EMA in the first half of 2022.
+Added: The FDA has agreed that etranacogene dezaparvovec will fall under the existing Breakthrough Therapy Designation and IND for AMT-060 (our first-generation hemophilia B gene therapy), and the EMA has also agreed that etranacogene dezaparvovec will fall under the PRIME designation.
+Added: On December 9, 2021, we announced the achievement of the pre-specified primary endpoint of non-inferiority in annualized bleeding rate (“ABR”) 18-months following administration compared to baseline Factor IX (“FIX”) prophylactic therapy in the HOPE-B Study.
+Added: ABR for all bleeds after stable FIX expression, assessed at 18 months, was 1.51 compared with the ABR of 4.19 for the lead-in period of at least six months, achieving the primary non-inferiority endpoint and a secondary superiority endpoint (p=0.0002) in the HOPE-B Study.
+Added: ABR for investigator-adjudicated FIX-treated bleeds was 0.83 compared with lead-in ABR of 3.65 (p<0.0001).
+Added: All participants continued to demonstrate durable, sustained increases in FIX activity at 18-months post-infusion with a mean FIX activity of 36.9 percent of normal, as measured by a one-stage activated partial thromboplastin time-based (“aPTT-based”) clotting assay, compared to a mean FIX activity of 39.0 percent of normal at 26-weeks of follow-up.
+Added: Etranacogene dezaparvovec was generally well-tolerated with over 80% of adverse events considered mild.
Huntington’s disease program (AMT-130)
AMT-130 is our novel gene therapy candidate for the treatment of Huntington’s disease.
−Removed: AMT-130 utilizes our proprietary, gene-silencing miQURE platform and incorporates an AAV vector carrying an miRNA specifically designed to silence the huntingtin gene and the potentially highly toxic exon 1 protein fragment.
+Added: AMT-130 utilizes our proprietary, gene-silencing miQURE platform and incorporates an AAV vector carrying a miRNA specifically designed to silence the huntingtin gene and the potentially highly toxic exon 1 protein fragment.
+Added: We are currently conducting a Phase I/II clinical trial for AMT-130 in the U.S.
+Added: and a Phase Ib/II study in the EU.
+Added: Together, these studies are intended to establish safety, proof of concept, and the optimal dose of AMT-130 to take forward into Phase III development or into a confirmatory study should an accelerated registration pathway be feasible.
AMT-130 has received Orphan Drug and Fast Track designations from the FDA and Orphan Medicinal Product Designation from the EMA.
−Removed: In June 2020, we announced the completion of the first two patient procedures in the Phase I/II clinical trial of AMT-130 for the treatment of Huntington’s disease.
−Removed: These procedures occurred after a postponement that resulted from the COVID-19 pandemic and the associated states of emergency declarations in the United States.
−Removed: The Phase I/II protocol is a randomized, imitation surgery-controlled, double-blinded study conducted at three surgical sites, and multiple referring, non-surgical sites in the U.S.
−Removed: The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of AMT-130 at two doses.
−Removed: On September 25, 2020, we announced that the independent Data Safety Monitoring Board (“DSMB”) overseeing the Phase I/II clinical trial of AMT-130 for the treatment of Huntington’s disease had met and reviewed 90-day safety data from the first two patients enrolled in the trial.
−Removed: No significant safety concerns were noted to prevent further dosing.
−Removed: On October 13, 2020, we announced the completion of the third and fourth patient procedures in the Phase I/II clinical trial.
−Removed: On February 8, 2021, we announced that the DSMB had met and reviewed the six-month safety data from the first two enrolled patients and the 90-day safety data from the next two enrolled patients in the study.
−Removed: No significant safety concerns were noted to prevent further dosing, and the final six patients in the first cohort are now cleared for enrollment.
−Removed: BMS collaboration
−Removed: We and Bristol-Myers Squibb (“BMS”) entered into a collaboration and license agreement in May 2015 (“BMS CLA”).
−Removed: BMS had initially designated four Collaboration Targets in 2015 and in accordance with the terms of the BMS CLA could have designated a fifth to tenth Collaboration Target.
−Removed: In February 2019, BMS requested a one-year extension of the initial research term.
−Removed: In April 2019, following an assessment of the progress of this collaboration and our expanding proprietary programs, we notified BMS that we did not intend to agree to an extension of the initial research term.
−Removed: Accordingly, the initial four-year research term under the collaboration terminated on May 21, 2019.
−Removed: On December 1, 2020, we and BMS amended the BMS CLA (“amended BMS CLA”).
−Removed: Following the amendment BMS is no longer entitled to designate a fifth to tenth Collaboration Target and as such we are no longer entitled to receive an aggregate $16.5 million in target designation payments for research, development, and regulatory milestone payments related to the fifth and tenth Collaboration Targets.
−Removed: For a period of one-year from the effective date of the amended BMS CLA, BMS may replace up to two of the four active Collaboration Targets with two new targets in the field of cardiovascular disease.
−Removed: We continue to be entitled to receive up to $217.0 million for each of the four Collaboration Targets if defined milestones are achieved, as well as royalties on net sales associated with any Collaboration Target.
−Removed: On December 17, 2020, BMS designated one of the four Collaboration Targets as a candidate to advance into IND-enabling studies entitling us to receive a $4.4 million research milestone payment.
−Removed: We recorded the $4.4 million as License Revenue in the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2020.
−Removed: The amended BMS CLA does not extend the initial research term.
−Removed: BMS may place purchase orders to provide limited services primarily related to analytical and development efforts in respect of the four Collaboration Targets.
−Removed: BMS may request such services for a period not to exceed the earlier of (i) the completion of all activities under a Research Plan and (ii) either (A) three years after the last replacement target has been designated by BMS during the one-year replacement period following the amended BMS CLA effective date or (B) three years if no replacement targets are designated during this one-year period and BMS continues to reimburse us for these services.
−Removed: For as long as any of the four Collaboration Targets are being advanced, BMS may place a purchase order to be supplied with research, clinical and commercial supplies.
−Removed: Subject to the terms of the amended BMS CLA, BMS has the right to terminate the research, clinical and commercial supply relationships, and has certain remedies for failures of supply, up to and including technology transfer for any such failure that otherwise cannot be reasonably resolved.
−Removed: Both we and BMS may agree to a technology transfer of manufacturing capabilities pursuant to the terms of the amended BMS CLA.
−Removed: We have agreed to certain restrictions on our ability to work independently of the collaboration, either directly or indirectly through any affiliate or third party, on certain programs that would be competitive with a Collaboration Target.
−Removed: We have agreed to indication exclusivity for the current four Collaboration Targets.
−Removed: BMS may add or change the exclusive indications in the process of replacing Collaboration Targets as described above.
−Removed: We can opt out of the indication exclusivity by giving up certain economic rights under the amended BMS CLA for each such indication that is affected by us opting out.
−Removed: If we opt out of an exclusive indication, we could pursue other targets for such indication other than a Collaboration Target.
−Removed: The amended BMS CLA also terminated two warrants to increase BMS ownership in the Company up to 19.9% through purchasing a specific number of our ordinary shares following the designation of a seventh, and a tenth Collaboration Target, respectively.
−Removed: We and BMS agreed that upon the consummation of a change of control transaction of uniQure that occurs prior to the earlier of (i) December 1, 2026 and (ii) BMS’ delivery of a target cessation notice for all four Collaboration Targets, uniQure (or its third party acquirer) shall pay to BMS a one-time, non-refundable, non-creditable cash payment of $70.0 million, provided that (x) if $70.0 million is greater than five percent of the net proceeds (as contractually defined) from such change of control transaction, the payment shall be an amount equal to five percent of such net proceeds, and (y) if $70.0 million is less than one percent of such net proceeds, the change of control payment shall be an amount equal to one percent of such net proceeds.
−Removed: We have not consummated any change of control transaction as of December 31, 2020 that would obligate us to make a payment to BMS.
−Removed: The amended BMS CLA did not change any of the provisions of the Investor Agreement with BMS that we entered into in 2015.
−Removed: We have granted BMS certain registration rights that allow BMS to require us to register our securities beneficially held by BMS under the U.S.
−Removed: Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”).
−Removed: BMS may make up to two such demands for us to register the shares, provided that we may deny such demand if (i) the market value of the shares to be registered is less than $10.0 million (provided however, if BMS holds less than $10.0 million worth of our shares, we must comply with their demand for registration), (ii) we certify to BMS that we plan to effect a registration within 120 days of their demand or we are engaged in a transaction that would be required to be disclosed in a registration statement and that is not reasonably practicable to be disclosed at that time, or (iii) we have already effected one registration statement within the twelve months preceding BMS’s demand for registration.
−Removed: In addition, independent of their demand registration rights, upon the occurrence of certain events, we must also provide BMS the opportunity to include their ordinary shares in any registration statement that we effect.
−Removed: We also continue to grant BMS certain information rights under the Investor Agreement, although these requirements may be satisfied by our public filings required by U.S.
−Removed: securities laws.
−Removed: BMS also continues to be subject to a lock up pursuant to the Investor Agreement for as long as BMS holds more than 4.9% of our ordinary shares (as of December 31, 2020 BMS holds 5.3%).
−Removed: Without our prior consent, BMS may not sell or dispose any of its current ordinary shares.
−Removed: The Investor Agreement also continues to require BMS to vote all of our ordinary shares it beneficially holds in favor of all items on the agenda for the relevant general meeting of shareholders of our company as proposed on behalf of our company, unless, in the context of a change of control or similar transaction, BMS has itself made an offer to our company or our board in connection with the transaction that is the subject of the vote, in which case it is free to vote its shares at its discretion.
−Removed: This voting provision will terminate upon the later of the date on which BMS no longer beneficially owns at least 4.9% of our outstanding ordinary shares, the closing of a transaction that provides BMS exclusive and absolute discretion to vote our shares it beneficially holds, or the termination of the amended BMS CLA for breach by us.
−Removed: Term loan facility
−Removed: As of December 31, 2020, a $35.0 million term loan was outstanding in accordance with the Second Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement (“2018 Amended Facility”) between us and Hercules.
−Removed: On January 29, 2021 we and Hercules entered into amendments to the 2018 Amended Facility (the “2021 Amended Facility”).
−Removed: Pursuant to the 2021 Amended Facility, Hercules agreed to make additional term loans in the maximum aggregate amount of $100.0 million (the “2021 Term Loan”), increasing the aggregate principal amount of the term loan facility from $35.0 million to up to $135.0 million.
−Removed: On January 29, 2021 we drew down $35.0 million of the 2021 Term Loan.
−Removed: We may draw down the remaining $65.0 million under the 2021 Term Loan in a series of one or more advances of not less than $20.0 million each until December 15, 2021.
−Removed: Advances under the 2021 Term Loan bear interest at a rate equal to the greater of (i) 8.25% or (ii) 8.25% plus the prime rate, less 3.25% per annum.
−Removed: The principal balance and all accrued but unpaid interest on advances under the 2021 Term Loan is due on June 1, 2023, which date may be extended by us by up to two twelve-month periods.
−Removed: Advances under the 2021 Term Loan may not be prepaid until six-months after the Closing Date, following which we may prepay all such advances without charge.
−Removed: In addition to the 2021 Term Loan, the amendment also extends the interest only payment period of the previously funded $35.0 million term loan from January 1, 2022 to June l, 2023.
−Removed: COVID-19 measures
−Removed: The coronavirus disease (“COVID-19) caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (“Sars-CoV 2 virus) was characterized as a pandemic by the World Health Organization (“WHO”) on March 11, 2020.
−Removed: During late 2020 various, potentially more infectious, variants of the Sars-CoV 2 virus causing COVID-19 were identified.
−Removed: Starting March 2020, we implemented measures to address the impact of COVID-19 on our business.
−Removed: We mandated a work-from-home policy for all non-essential employees at our Amsterdam and Lexington facilities when the pandemic began.
−Removed: We implemented a series of protocols governing the operations of our Lexington facility to comply with the requirements of the various orders and guidance from the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and other related orders, guidance, laws, and regulations.
−Removed: We supported our employees in setting up a healthy and efficient remote working environment.
−Removed: In conjunction with implementing this policy, we accelerated the roll-out of several information technology security measures, such as dual factor authentication, to address the increased risks to which we might be exposed as a result of remote working conditions.
−Removed: In addition, we conducted awareness training around cybersecurity for critical functions involved in making payments to vendors such as finance and supply chain.
−Removed: We continue to monitor local government rules and recommendations and office protocols will be aligned with these rules and recommendations.
−Removed: We conduct frequent status video-meetings of local management at our two sites as well as leadership-team video meetings to implement these measures and to monitor the evolving situation.
−Removed: In addition, we inform our employees through periodic newsletters and have organized virtual local and global townhalls to share information and provide direction and support to our employees.
−Removed: We started to reopen the Amsterdam and Lexington facilities in phases, in line with the reopening plans that are prescribed by the local government.
−Removed: Between June 1, 2020 until September 29, 2020, we encouraged our Amsterdam employees to work a minimum of two days per week from the office, and approximately 50% of local staff worked on site during that period.
−Removed: As of September 29, 2020, we reinstated the mandatory work-from-home policy that was initiated in March in Amsterdam to align with the updated Dutch government’s measures.
−Removed: Employees based in Amsterdam who cannot perform their duties outside of our Amsterdam facility will continue to work at our Amsterdam facility.
−Removed: We adapted to operate our laboratories at our Amsterdam site to comply with social distancing rules and to ensure the health and wellbeing of our employees under the current circumstances.
−Removed: All other employees in Amsterdam will work from home through at least the end of August 2021, partly in conjunction with the ongoing expansion of our laboratory space.
−Removed: As a biopharma research and development company, we were deemed to provide essential services under the “stay at home” advisory that was issued by the Governor of Massachusetts on March 23, 2020 and we therefore have maintained our manufacturing operations at our Lexington site.
−Removed: To ensure adequate social distancing in our Lexington facility, our COVID-19 protocols generally have limited occupancy to numbers below those allowed by the Massachusetts COVID-19 guidelines.
−Removed: In our Lexington facility, we currently have implemented an occupancy limitation of approximately 25%.
−Removed: Our employees that cannot perform their duties outside of our Lexington facility continue to work at our Lexington facility.
−Removed: All other employees are required to work remotely to the extent possible through at least the end of the second quarter of 2021.
−Removed: Our actual occupancy at the Lexington facility has been less than approximately 25% of our permitted occupancy during all phases of the Massachusetts reopening plan.
−Removed: We have also implemented a mandatory COVID-19 PCR testing protocol effective February 11, 2021 that requires employees to have tested negative for COVID-19 prior to entering the Lexington facility.
−Removed: We have adapted our ongoing clinical research activities based on the directions and flexibility provided by the “FDA Guidance on Conduct of Clinical Trials of Medical Products during COVID-19 Pandemic” issued on March 18, 2020 and updated throughout the pandemic to minimize any risk, disruption, or delay in either patient dosing or follow-up visits.
−Removed: These procedures occurred after a postponement that resulted from the COVID-19 pandemic and the associated states of emergency declarations in the United States.
−Removed: The broader implications of COVID-19 on our results of operations and overall financial performance remain uncertain.
−Removed: The COVID-19 pandemic and its adverse effects have become more prevalent in the locations where we, and our third-party business partners conduct business.
−Removed: While we have experienced disruptions in our operations as a result of COVID-19, we are adapting to the current environment to minimize the effect to our business.
−Removed: However, we may experience more pronounced disruptions in our operations in the future.
−Removed: On September 14, 2020, we appointed Ricardo Dolmetsch, Ph.D.
−Removed: as President, Research and Development.
−Removed: Dolmetsch succeeded Sander van Deventer, M.D., Ph.D., our former Executive Vice President, Research and Product Development.
−Removed: On October 14, 2020, our Chief Medical Officer, Robert Gut, M.D., Ph.D., resigned to allow him to return as a non-executive director on our Board of Directors.
−Removed: Gut was appointed to our Board of Directors as a non-executive director at an extraordinary meeting of shareholders on December 1, 2020.
−Removed: On June 17, 2020, our shareholders voted to approve the appointment of Leonard E.
−Removed: as a non-executive director of the Board of Directors.
−Removed: Post replaced Dr.
−Removed: David Schaffer, whose term as a non-executive director of the Board of Directors ended on the same date.
−Removed: Post has also assumed the role of chair of our Research & Development Committee of the Board of Directors.
+Added: On April 5, 2021, we announced the completion of enrollment of the low-dose cohort of the U.S.
+Added: Phase I/II study of AMT-130.
+Added: The low- dose cohort includes 10 patients, of which six patients received treatment with AMT-130 and four patients received imitation (“Sham”) surgery.
+Added: Phase I/II clinical trial is a randomized, controlled, double-blinded, dose-escalation study of AMT-130.
+Added: On June 13, 2021, we announced the enrollment of the first two patients in the high-dose cohort of a U.S.
+Added: Phase I/II study.
+Added: The high-dose cohort is planned to include 16 patients, of which 10 patients will receive treatment with AMT-130 and six patients will receive Sham surgery.
+Added: The initiation of patient enrollment in the high-dose cohort followed a meeting of the trial’s independent Data Safety Monitoring Board (“DSMB”) that reviewed safety data for the fully enrolled first cohort of 10 patients.
+Added: On December 16, 2021, we announced initial 12-month observations on the first four patients enrolled in the low-dose cohort of the U.S.
+Added: Phase I/II study.
+Added: Two of the four enrolled patients received AMT-130, and two patients received Sham surgery as a control.
+Added: AMT-130 was generally well tolerated in the treated patients, with no serious adverse events related to AMT-130.
+Added: Neurofilament light chain (“NfL”), a biomarker of injury in the brain, increased as expected immediately following the surgical procedure and returned to baseline in the treated patients.
+Added: NfL remained relatively constant in the two untreated control patients.
+Added: Structural magnetic resonance imaging did not reveal any clinically meaningful safety findings in either treated or control patients at one year of follow-up.
+Added: Measurements of total and mutant HTT protein in the cerebral spinal fluid of the four patients were highly variable and inconclusive.
+Added: As of December 31, 2021, 19 patients have been enrolled in the clinical trial to date, including nine of 16 in the high-dose cohort.
+Added: Also on December 16, 2021, we announced the initiation of patient screening in our 15 patient, open-label, Phase Ib/II study of AMT-130 in the EU, as well our plans to initiate a third cohort in the ongoing U.S.
+Added: Phase I/II clinical trial.
+Added: The third cohort, which will include up to 18 additional randomized patients receiving the higher dose, will explore the use of alternative stereotactic navigation systems to simplify placement of catheters for infusions of AMT-130.
+Added: As of December 31, 2020, a $35.0 million term loan was outstanding in accordance with the Second Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement (the “2018 Amended Facility”) between us and Hercules Capital, Inc.
+Added: (“Hercules”).
+Added: On January 29, 2021, we and Hercules amended the 2018 Amended Facility (“2021 Amended Facility”).
+Added: Pursuant to the 2021 Amended Facility, Hercules agreed to an additional Facility of $100.0 million (“Tranche B”) increasing the aggregate principal amount of the term loan facilities from $35.0 million to up to $135.0 million.
+Added: On January 29, 2021, we drew down $35.0 million of the Tranche B.
+Added: Advances under Tranche B bore interest at a rate equal to the greater of (i) 8.25% or (ii) 8.25% plus the prime rate, less 3.25% per annum.
+Added: The principal balance of $70.0 million and all accrued but unpaid interest on advances under Tranche B was due on June 1, 2023.
+Added: The back-end fee in respect of advances under the 2021 Amended Facility ranged from 1.65% to 6.85%, depending on the repayment date.
+Added: In addition to Tranche B, the 2021 Amended Facility also extended the interest only payment period of the previously funded $35.0 million term loan (“Tranche A”) from January 1, 2022 to June l, 2023.
+Added: On December 15, 2021, we and Hercules amended and restated the 2021 Amended Facility (“2021 Restated Facility”).
+Added: Pursuant to the 2021 Restated Facility, Tranche A and Tranche B of the 2021 Amended Facility with a total outstanding balance of $70.0 million were consolidated into one tranche with a total commitment of $100.0 million.
+Added: We drew down an additional $30.0 million, resulting in total principal outstanding as of December 31, 2021 of $100.0 million.
+Added: The 2021 Restated Facility extended the loan’s maturity date from June 1, 2023 until December 1, 2025.
+Added: The interest-only period is extended from January 1, 2023 to December 1, 2024, or December 1, 2025 if, prior to June 30, 2024, either (a) the BLA for AMT-061 is approved by the FDA or (b) AMT-130 is advanced into a pivotal trial.
+Added: The interest rate is adjustable and is the greater of (i) 7.95% and (ii) 7.95% plus the prime rate less 3.25% per annum.
+Added: Under the 2021 Restated Facility, we owe a back-end fee of 4.85% of the outstanding debt.
+Added: We are required to repay the facility in equal monthly installments of principal and interest between the end of the interest-only period and the maturity date.
+Added: We continue to owe a $2.5 million back-end fee related to the 2021 Amended Facility which is due on June 1, 2023.
+Added: On March 1, 2021, we entered into a Sales Agreement with SVB Leerink LLC (“SVB Leerink”) with respect to an at-the-market (“ATM”) offering program, under which we may, from time to time in our sole discretion, offer and sell through SVB Leerink, acting as agent, our ordinary shares, up to an aggregate offering price of $200.0 million.
+Added: We pay SVB Leerink a commission equal to 3% of the gross proceeds of the sales price of all ordinary shares sold through it as a sales agent under the Sales Agreement.
+Added: In March and April of 2021, we issued 921,730 ordinary shares at a weighted average price of $33.52 per ordinary share, with net proceeds of $29.6 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and net of offering expenses.
+Added: In February 2021, we commenced the expansion of our Amsterdam site to build additional laboratories to support the expansions of our research and development activities as well as the construction of a cleanroom capable of manufacturing cGMP materials at a 500-liter scale.
+Added: The construction and validation of the cleanroom and the additional laboratories were completed in December 2021.
+Added: In May 2021, we entered into a sublease agreement to let an additional approximately 1,080 square meters of office space at our Amsterdam site to accommodate the hiring of additional full-time employees.
+Added: The lease expires in October 2028 and includes an option to break the lease on October 31, 2023.
+Added: In December 2021, we entered into a new lease for an additional facility in Lexington, Massachusetts, United States of approximately 13,501 square feet of space.
+Added: The lease is expected to commence in the second half of 2022, is set for seven years starting from the rent commencement date and is non-cancellable.
+Added: The lease is renewable for one five-year term.
+Added: In February 2022, we also entered into a new lease for an additional facility in Lexington, Massachusetts, United States of approximately 12,716 square feet.
+Added: The lease is expected to commence in the second half of 2022 and is set for a non-cancellable period of seven years and four months.
+Added: The lease is renewable for one five-year term.
+Added: On May 17, 2021, Pierre Caloz was appointed as Chief Operating Officer.
+Added: Caloz oversees all manufacturing operations, global CMC development and innovation, supply chain, and facilities.
+Added: On June 15, 2021, Christian Klemt was appointed as Chief Financial Officer.
+Added: Klemt was our Chief Accounting Officer from August 2017 to June 2021, and he will continue to serve as general manager of our Amsterdam site.
+Added: Matthew Kapusta, who has been our Chief Executive Officer since December 2016 and had been our Chief Financial Officer from January 2015 to June 2021, will continue to serve as our Chief Executive Officer.
+Added: In connection with his transition to Chief Financial Officer, Mr.
+Added: Klemt will also serve as our Principal Financial Officer.
+Added: On June 16, 2021, our shareholders voted to approve the reappointment of Mr.
+Added: David Meek and Ms.
+Added: Paula Soteropoulos as non-executive directors of the Board of Directors.
+Added: Meek has been appointed chairman of the Board.
+Added: Philip Astley-Sparke did not stand for reappointment and retired from the Board on June 16, 2021.
+Added: On October 21, 2021, we held an Extraordinary General Meeting of our shareholders and Rachelle Jacques was appointed to the Board of Directors (the “Board”).
+Added: Jacques will also serve as a member of the Audit Committee of the Board effective as of October 21, 2021.
+Added: Intellectual Property
+Added: On May 11, 2021, Pfizer, Inc.
+Added: filed three petitions at the USPTO seeking Inter Partes Review of U.S.
+Added: 9,982,248 (the “‘248 Patent”) and 10,465,180 (the “‘180 Patent” and together with the ‘248 Patent, the “Patents”).
+Added: The petitions collectively seek to invalidate all claims of the Patents.
+Added: In August 2021, we filed our responses asking the USPTO to deny institution of the IPR proceedings.
+Added: On November 17, 2021, the PTAB issued decisions granting institution on all three IPR proceedings.
+Added: Our response to the petition is currently due to be filed on March 3, 2022.
Our Mission and Strategy
−Removed: Our mission is to build an industry-leading, fully integrated, and global company that leverages its validated technology and manufacturing platform to deliver transformative gene therapy products to patients with serious unmet medical needs.
+Added: Our mission is to deliver curative, one-time administered genomic medicines that transform the lives of patients.
+Added: We aim to build an industry-leading, fully integrated, and global company that leverages its technology and proprietary manufacturing platform to deliver these medicines to patients with serious unmet medical needs.
Our strategy to achieve this mission is to:
−Removed: Advance the development of etranacogene dezaparvovec (AMT-061), a potentially best-in-class treatment of hemophilia B.
−Removed: Etranacogene dezaparvovec combines the potential advantages of AAV5 with an enhanced Padua-FIX transgene, and may provide optimized clinical and tolerability benefits to all, or nearly all patients with hemophilia B.
−Removed: In March 2020, we completed dosing of 54 patients in our Phase III HOPE-B pivotal study.
+Added: In collaboration with our partner, achieve regulatory approvals and the commercial launch of etranacogene dezaparvovec (AMT-061).
+Added: Etranacogene dezaparvovec is a one-time administered gene therapy that combines the potential advantages of AAV5 with an enhanced Padua-FIX transgene, and may provide clinical and tolerability benefits to nearly all patients with hemophilia B.
+Added: In June 2020, we entered into a commercialization and license agreement with CSL Behring pursuant to which CSL Behring received exclusive global rights to etranacogene dezaparvovec.
+Added: We are responsible for the manufacturing of etranacogene dezaparvovec and CSL Behring is responsible for the development and commercialization of the Product.
+Added: In September 2021, we completed the last patient’s 78-week follow-up visit in the HOPE-B Phase III pivotal study, which enrolled a total of 54 patients.
+Added: Advance the development of AMT-130, a potential one-time gene-therapy approach for the treatment of Huntington’s disease.
+Added: AMT-130 is the first AAV-based gene therapy to enter clinical development for Huntington’s disease.
+Added: It consists of an AAV5 vector carrying an artificial micro-RNA specifically tailored to silence the huntingtin gene and leverages our proprietary miQURE™ silencing technology.
+Added: The therapeutic goal of AMT-130 is to inhibit the production of the mutant protein (mHTT).
+Added: Patient enrollment is ongoing in two clinical trials of AMT-130 being conducted in the U.S.
+Added: Build a pipeline of gene therapy programs focused on rare, liver-directed and central-nervous system (“CNS”) diseases.
+Added: Beyond our lead clinical program in Huntington’s disease and our late-stage program in hemophilia B now partnered with CSL Behring, we have a pipeline of additional AAV-based gene therapy programs in various stages of preclinical development focused on larger market opportunities and built on validated targets and technologies.
+Added: We are leveraging novel vectors, promoters, and manufacturing capabilities, to develop gene therapies that have the potential to be best or first in class and are primarily focused on rare, monogenic liver-directed, and CNS disorders as well as cardiovascular and muscle diseases.
Maintain our leadership position in commercial-scale AAV manufacturing.
−Removed: We have established cGMP, commercial-scale manufacturing capabilities for AAV-based gene therapies in our state-of-the-art Lexington, Massachusetts facility.
−Removed: We believe the modularity of our platform provides us with distinct advantages, including the potential for reduced development risk and faster times to market.
−Removed: Build a pipeline of gene therapy programs focused on rare and orphan diseases targeting liver-directed and central-nervous system (“CNS”) diseases.
−Removed: Beyond our lead clinical program for hemophilia B and our Huntington’s disease program, we have a pipeline of additional AAV-based gene therapy programs in various stages of preclinical development.
−Removed: We are leveraging our leading technology platform, which includes novel vectors, promoters, and manufacturing capabilities, to develop gene therapies primarily focused on rare, monogenic liver-directed, and CNS disorders as well as cardiovascular diseases.
+Added: We have established cGMP, commercial-scale manufacturing capabilities for AAV-based gene therapies in our state-of-the-art Lexington, Massachusetts facility and begun construction of a second cGMP manufacturing facility in our Amsterdam, the Netherlands facility that will complement our work in Lexington.
+Added: We seek to establish larger scale and highly cost-effective capabilities to address more prevalent disorders, and we believe the modularity of our platform provides us with distinct advantages, including the potential for reduced development risk and faster times to market.
Leverage the favorable immunogenicity profile of AAV5-based gene therapies to develop multiple products.
2 unchanged sentences
Additionally, the AAV5 capsid has demonstrated a low avidity to pre-existing neutralizing antibodies (“Nab”), which may enable all, or nearly all patients to be eligible for treatment with AAV5-based gene therapies.
+Added: We are now in the process of developing Smart AAV capsids that combine the advantages of AAV5 with antibody-directed delivery to move cargo across the blood brain barrier and to improve transduction of cells in the CNS.
Invest in next-generation technologies with the goal of enhancing safety, improving efficacy, and expanding the applicability of gene therapy to patients.
We are developing proprietary technologies that have the potential to augment the safety and efficacy of our product candidates and broaden the applicability of our gene therapies to a wider range of diseases and patients.
−Removed: These technologies include (i) miQURE, our one-time administered gene silencing platform, (ii) tailored vectors, promoters, and other enhancers;
−Removed: (iii) optimized delivery and administration techniques;
−Removed: and (iv) novel transgenes.
+Added: These technologies include (i) miQURE, our one-time administered gene silencing platform, (ii) goQURE for simultaneous silencing of a disease gene and replacement with a healthy gene, (iii) AbQURE, using the power of AAV5 to deliver therapeutic antibodies systemically from the liver or into the CNS from cells in the brain, (iv) QUREDose for dosing through neutralizing antibodies and re-dosing technology;
+Added: along with other tailored vectors, promoters, and novel transgenes.
These technologies are developed both in-house by our experienced research team in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, as well as via collaborations with third parties.
Continue to expand our intellectual property portfolio.
−Removed: We have established what we believe is a leading intellectual property portfolio covering various aspects of our technology and programs, including (i) elements of our gene therapy constructs, such as AAV vectors, promoters and transgenes, including the novel Padua-FIX gene we utilize in etranacogene dezaparvovec for hemophilia B;
−Removed: (ii) innovative delivery technologies, such as re-administration of AAV gene therapy;
+Added: We have established what we believe is a leading intellectual property portfolio covering various aspects of our technology and programs, including (i) elements of our gene therapy constructs, such as AAV vectors, promoters and transgenes (ii) innovative delivery technologies, such as re-administration of AAV gene therapy;
and (iii) proprietary manufacturing processes covering key components of our upstream and downstream capabilities.
13 unchanged sentences
CSL Behring collaboration
−Removed: On June 24, 2020, we entered into the CSL Behring Agreement pursuant to which CSL Behring would receive exclusive global rights to etranacogene dezaparvovec.
−Removed: Pursuant to the CSL Behring Agreement, we would be responsible for the completion of the HOPE-B clinical trial, manufacturing process validation, and the manufacturing supply of etranacogene dezaparvovec until such time that these capabilities may be transferred to CSL Behring or its designated contract manufacturing organization.
−Removed: Concurrently with the execution of the CSL Behring Agreement we and CSL Behring entered into a development and commercial supply agreement, pursuant to which, among other things, we would supply etranacogene dezaparvovec to CSL Behring at an agreed-upon price.
−Removed: Clinical development and regulatory activities performed by us pursuant to the CSL Behring Agreement would be reimbursed by CSL Behring.
−Removed: CSL Behring would be responsible for global regulatory submissions and commercialization requirements for etranacogene dezaparvovec.
−Removed: The CSL Behring Agreement continues to be subject to antitrust review in the U.S.
−Removed: and as such is not yet effective.
−Removed: Our Development of etranacogene dezaparvovec for Hemophilia B
−Removed: We are currently developing etranacogene dezaparvovec, a gene therapy for patients with hemophilia B that is designed to restore FIX activity, an essential protein for blood clotting.
+Added: On June 24, 2020, we entered into the CSL Behring Agreement pursuant to which CSL Behring received exclusive global rights to etranacogene dezaparvovec.
+Added: The transaction became fully effective on May 6, 2021, one day after the waiting period under the HSR Act expired on May 5, 2021.
+Added: CSL Behring is responsible for the development and commercialization of the Product.
+Added: We agreed to complete the validation of the current manufacturing process as well as to the development and, if requested by CSL Behring, the validation of a next generation manufacturing process.
+Added: We will be entitled to receive a development milestone payment if we complete these activities in accordance with an agreed development plan and timeline.
+Added: CSL Behring is responsible for global regulatory submissions and commercialization requirements for the Product.
+Added: Certain clinical development and regulatory activities performed by us are reimbursed by CSL Behring.
+Added: On the Signing Date, we and CSL Behring also entered into a development and commercial supply agreement, pursuant to which, among other things, we will supply the Product to CSL Behring at an agreed-upon price commensurate with the SSP.
+Added: We will be responsible to supply the Product until such time that these capabilities may be transferred to CSL Behring or its designated contract manufacturing organization.
+Added: Development of etranacogene dezaparvovec for Hemophilia B
+Added: We believe we have substantially completed the development of etranacogene dezaparvovec, a gene therapy for patients with hemophilia B that is designed to restore FIX activity, an essential protein for blood clotting.
Etranacogene dezaparvovec includes an AAV5 vector incorporating the FIX-Padua variant (“FIX-Padua”).
−Removed: Etranacogene dezaparvovec is identical in structure to our first-generation hemophilia B product candidate, AMT-060, apart from two nucleotide substitutions in the coding sequence for FIX.
−Removed: The FIX-Padua variant expresses a protein with a single amino acid substitution that has been reported in multiple preclinical and nonclinical studies to provide an approximate eight-to nine-fold increase in FIX activity compared to the wild-type FIX protein, which was incorporated in AMT-060.
−Removed: All other critical quality attributes of AMT-061 are expected to be comparable to those of AMT-060, as AMT-061 utilizes the same AAV5 capsid and proprietary insect cell-based manufacturing platform.
Etranacogene dezaparvovec is intended to be delivered by intravenous (“IV”)-infusion, without immunosuppressant therapy, through the peripheral vein in a single treatment session for approximately 30 minutes.
−Removed: Our goal for etranacogene dezaparvovec is to develop a gene therapy with the following profile:
+Added: Our goal for etranacogene dezaparvovec was to develop a gene therapy with the following profile:
- long-term safety, including a favorable immunogenicity profile;
6 unchanged sentences
Data from our clinical, preclinical, and nonclinical studies suggest that all, or nearly all patients may be eligible for treatment with etranacogene dezaparvovec.
−Removed: The FDA has agreed that etranacogene dezaparvovec will fall under the existing Breakthrough Therapy Designation and IND for AMT-060, and the EMA has also agreed that etranacogene dezaparvovec will fall under the PRIME designation.
In June 2018, we initiated our Phase III HOPE-B pivotal trial of etranacogene dezaparvovec.
2 unchanged sentences
The targeted number of patients to be dosed per the clinical trial protocol was 50.
−Removed: As set forth previously, we have implemented and continue to implement various measures to allow us to closely monitor the trial within the guidance provided by the FDA regarding the impact of the COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic to minimize any risk or disruption in patient follow-up visits.
The adult hemophilia B patients, who were classified as severe or moderately severe, were enrolled in a six-month observational period prior to dosing during which time they continued to use their current standard of care to establish a baseline control.
1 unchanged sentence
Patients enrolled in the HOPE-B trial were tested for the presence of pre-existing neutralizing antibodies to AAV5 but not excluded from the trial based on their titers.
−Removed: The primary endpoints of the study are based on the FIX activity level achieved following the administration of etranacogene dezaparvovec after 26 weeks and 52 weeks after dosing as well as annualized bleed rates during the 52 weeks after dosing.
−Removed: In December 2020, we announced top-line data from the HOPE-B trial.
−Removed: The 26-week follow-up date from the trial showed that FIX activity in the 54 patients increased after dosing from ≤ 2% to a mean of 37.2% at 26 weeks, meeting a first primary endpoint of the HOPE-B trial.
−Removed: No correlation between pre-existing neutralizing antibodies and FIX activity was found in patients with neutralizing antibody titers up to 678.2, a range expected to include more than 95% of the general population;
−Removed: one patient with a neutralizing antibody titer of 3,212.3 did not show an increase in FIX activity.
−Removed: Less than 1% of the general population is expected to have neutralizing antibody titers of greater than 3,000.
−Removed: During the 26-week period after dosing, 15 patients (28%) reported a total of 21 bleeding events, representing a reduction of 83% compared to the 123 bleeding events reported by 38 patients (70%) during the observational lead-in phase of the trial.
−Removed: Total bleeds include any bleeding event reported after the treatment of etranacogene dezaparvovec, including spontaneous, traumatic, and those associated with unrelated medical procedures, whether or not FIX treatment was required.
−Removed: Of the total bleeding events reported during the 26-week period after dosing, only three were classified as spontaneous bleeds requiring treatment, representing a reduction of 92% compared to the 37 such bleeding events reported during the observational lead-in phase.
−Removed: Mean annualized usage of FIX replacement therapy, a secondary endpoint in the clinical trial, declined by 96% during the 26-week period after dosing compared to the observational lead-in phase.
−Removed: Etranacogene dezaparvovec was generally well-tolerated.
−Removed: As of the November 2020 cut-off date, most adverse events were classified as mild (81.5%).
−Removed: The most common events included transaminase elevation treated with steroids per protocol (9 patients;
−Removed: 17%), infusion-related reactions (7 patients;
−Removed: 13%), headache (7 patients;
−Removed: 13%) and influenza-like symptoms (7 patients;
−Removed: Liver enzyme elevations resolved with a tapering course of corticosteroids and FIX activity remained in the mild range in the steroid treated patients.
−Removed: No relationship between safety and neutralizing antibody titers was observed.
−Removed: Based on interactions with the FDA and the EMA, we plan to incorporate FIX activity and bleeding rates at 52 weeks as additional co-primary endpoints in the study.
−Removed: On December 21, 2020, our clinical trials of etranacogene dezaparvovec, including our HOPE-B trial were placed on clinical hold by the FDA.
−Removed: The clinical hold was initiated following the submission of a safety report in mid-December relating to a possibly related serious adverse event associated with a preliminary diagnosis of HCC, a form of liver cancer, in one patient in the HOPE-B trial that was treated with etranacogene dezaparvovec in October 2019.
−Removed: The patient has multiple risk factors associated with HCC, including a twenty-five-year history of HCV, HBV, evidence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and advanced age.
−Removed: Chronic infections with hepatitis B and C have been associated with approximately 80% of HCC cases.
−Removed: The liver lesion was detected during a routine abdominal ultrasound conducted as part of the required study assessments in patients at one-year post dosing.
−Removed: A surgical resection of the lesion has occurred, and an analysis of the tissue samples was initiated in early 2021.
−Removed: On February 19, 2021, we reported initial results from this analysis to the FDA in accordance with pharmacovigilance requirements.
−Removed: We are gathering final data from these molecular analyses and will be preparing a detailed response to the FDA’s clinical hold questions regarding this event.
−Removed: Currently, we do not have adequate data to determine a possible causal relationship, especially in the context of the other known risk factors.
−Removed: We currently do not anticipate any impact on our regulatory submission timelines, including the filing of a BLA.
−Removed: No other cases of HCC have been reported in our clinical trials conducted in more than 67 patients in hemophilia B, with some patients dosed more than 5 years ago.
+Added: Following a pre-BLA submission meeting with the FDA on June 4, 2021 the primary endpoint was set as a non-inferiority analysis in ABR 18-months following administration compared to baseline FIX prophylactic therapy in the pivotal Phase III HOPE-B gene therapy trial (approximately 52-weeks after steady-state is achieved).
+Added: In September 2021, we completed the last patient’s 18-months follow-up visit which enrolled a total of 54 patients.
+Added: On December 9, 2021, we announced the achievement of the pre-specified primary endpoint of non-inferiority in ABR 18-months following administration compared to baseline FIX prophylactic therapy in the HOPE-B Study.
+Added: ABR for all bleeds after stable FIX expression, assessed at 18 months, was 1.51 compared with the ABR of 4.19 for the lead-in period of at least six months, achieving the primary non-inferiority endpoint and a secondary superiority endpoint (p=0.0002) in the HOPE-B Study.
+Added: ABR for investigator-adjudicated FIX-treated bleeds was 0.83 compared with lead-in ABR of 3.65 (p<0.0001).
+Added: All participants continued to demonstrate durable, sustained increases in FIX activity at 18-months post-infusion with a mean FIX activity of 36.9 percent of normal, as measured by a one-stage aPTT-based clotting assay, compared to a mean FIX activity of 39.0 percent of normal at 26-weeks of follow-up.
+Added: Etranacogene dezaparvovec was generally well-tolerated with over 80% of adverse events considered mild.
+Added: We expect that a BLA is to be submitted to the FDA and a MAA to the EMA in the first half of 2022.
In September 2018, we completed the dosing of a Phase IIb dose-confirmation study of etranacogene dezaparvovec.
6 unchanged sentences
In February, May, July, and December 2019, and in December 2020, we presented updated data from the Phase IIb dose-confirmation study of etranacogene dezaparvovec.
−Removed: The most recent data that we announced in December 2020 from the Phase IIb study of etranacogene dezaparvovec show that all three patients experienced increasing and sustained FIX levels after a one-time administration of etranacogene dezaparvovec.
+Added: The most recent data that we announced in December 2020 from the Phase IIb study of etranacogene dezaparvovec showed that all three patients experienced increasing and sustained FIX levels after a one-time administration of etranacogene dezaparvovec.
Mean FIX activity was 44.2% of normal two years after administration, exceeding threshold FIX levels generally considered sufficient to significantly reduce the risk of bleeding events.
4 unchanged sentences
All patients have remained free of prophylaxis in the two years since receiving etranacogene dezaparvovec.
+Added: The FDA has agreed that etranacogene dezaparvovec will fall under the existing Breakthrough Therapy Designation and IND for AMT-060 (our first-generation hemophilia B gene therapy), and the EMA has also agreed that etranacogene dezaparvovec will fall under the PRIME designation.
Intellectual Property for etranacogene dezaparvovec
2 unchanged sentences
The intellectual property includes U.S.
−Removed: Patent Number 9,249,405, which covers compositions of FIX-Padua nucleic acids and polypeptides (proteins), as well as their therapeutic uses.
−Removed: On May 29, 2018, the U.S.
−Removed: Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) granted us a second patent, U.S.
+Added: Patent Number 9,249,405, (the “‘405 Patent”).
+Added: The ‘405 Patent was subject to Inter Partes Review (“IPR”) proceedings at the Patent Trials and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) of the USPTO.
+Added: Ultimately, the challenged claims of the ‘405 Patent were withdrawn but the unchanged claims remain in force.
+Added: The ‘405 Patent thus covers compositions of FIX-Padua polypeptides (proteins), their therapeutic uses as well as nucleic acid sequences encoding FIX-Padua.
+Added: The FIX Padua variant is a FIX protein carrying a leucine at the R338 position, often called the “FIX-Padua” or “Padua mutant”.
+Added: On May 29, 2018, the USPTO granted us a second patent, U.S.
Patent Number 9,982,248, which covers methods of treating coagulopathies (bleeding disorders), including hemophilia B, using AAV-based gene therapy with nucleic acid encoding the hyperactive FIX Padua variant.
−Removed: The FIX Padua variant is a FIX protein carrying a leucine at the R338 position, often called the "FIX-Padua"
−Removed: or "Padua mutant".
On November 5, 2019, the USPTO granted us a third patent, U.S.
3 unchanged sentences
patents, on February 20, 2018, the Canadian Intellectual Property Office granted Patent Number 2,737,094, which covers FIX-Padua nucleic acids for use in gene therapy and FIX-Padua polypeptides for use in FIX replacement therapy.
−Removed: On June 13, 2018, we were granted European Patent 2337849 directed to a FIX polypeptide protein.
−Removed: The opposition period with respect to such patent expired on March 13, 2019, by which time five parties had filed an opposition.
−Removed: On July 25, 2019, we submitted responses to such oppositions with the European Patent Office (“EPO”).
−Removed: Oral proceedings were scheduled for June and July 2020 but were postponed due to COVID-19.
−Removed: New dates for virtual oral proceedings have been set for May 2021.
−Removed: In addition, on May 15, 2019, a divisional European patent application in the FIX-Padua family, EP 3252157, was refused.
−Removed: In September 2019, we filed a notice of appeal with respect to such refusal.
−Removed: We are also pursuing a European divisional patent application that was filed on May 14, 2019.
+Added: In Europe, European Patent 2337849 directed to a FIX polypeptide protein was withdrawn during opposition proceedings with the European Patent Office (“EPO”).
+Added: In addition, EP 3252157, a refused divisional European patent application was withdrawn.
+Added: We are still pursuing a European divisional patent application that was filed on May 14, 2019.
Both in the U.S.
and in Europe, we have pending divisional applications still in prosecution phases.
−Removed: The appeal process has been delayed as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, and we do not currently know when the appeal is likely to be resolved.
−Removed: On January 4, 2020, a petition seeking Inter Partes Review of U.S.
−Removed: 9,249,405 (the “’405 Patent”) was filed by Pfizer, Inc.
−Removed: (the “IPR Proceeding”).
−Removed: The petition sought to invalidate claims 6 and 9-15 of the ‘405 Patent.
−Removed: On April 17, 2020, we filed our preliminary response to the petition, disclaiming claims 6 and 9-13 of the ‘405 patent and otherwise requesting the denial of the petition.
−Removed: On July 13, 2020, the United States Patent and Trademark Office issued its decision to institute the Inter Partes Review.
−Removed: On October 13, 2020, we filed a motion to amend the patent claims at issue in the proceeding.
−Removed: On January 13, 2021, Pfizer filed a brief in opposition to our motion to amend the claims.
−Removed: On February 3, 2021 the Patent Appeals Board of the USPTO (the “PTAB”) provided its preliminary guidance with respect to the proposed amended claims, which stated among other things that the proposed amended claims were not anticipated but were obvious in light of the cited prior art.
−Removed: On February 16, 2021 and in response to the preliminary guidance, we moved to dismiss our motion to amend the claims before the PTAB and requested an adverse judgement in the IPR Proceeding.
−Removed: As a result, we expect to maintain the currently issued and unchallenged claims of the ‘405 Patent and pursue additional claims based on our proposed amended claims in continuation applications before the USPTO.
−Removed: Phase I/II Clinical Trial of AMT-060
−Removed: In the third quarter of 2015, we initiated a Phase I/II clinical trial of AMT-060, our first-generation hemophilia B product candidate, in patients with severe or moderately-severe hemophilia B.
−Removed: AMT-060 consists of an AAV5 vector carrying a codon-optimized, wild-type, human FIX gene cassette licensed from St.
−Removed: Jude Children’s Research Hospital.
−Removed: The study is a five-year, open-label, uncontrolled, single-dose, dose-ascending multi-center trial that includes two cohorts, with the low-dose cohort using a treatment of 5x10 12 gc/kg and the second-dose cohort using 2x10 13 gc/kg.
−Removed: We enrolled five patients into the low dose cohort in the third quarter of 2015.
−Removed: Another five patients were enrolled into the high dose cohort between March and May 2016.
−Removed: In December 2020, we presented five-year follow-up data related to this Phase I/II clinical trial.
−Removed: All 10 patients enrolled continue to show long-term clinical benefit, including sustained increases in FIX activity, reduced usage of FIX replacement therapy, and decreased bleeding frequency.
−Removed: At up to five years of follow-up, AMT-060 continues to be well-tolerated, with no new treatment-related adverse events since the last reported data and no development of inhibitors during the study.
−Removed: All five patients in the second dose cohort of 2x10 13 gc/kg (the same dose being studied in the Phase III HOPE-B study of etranacogene dezaparvovec) continue to be free of routine FIX replacement therapy at four-and-a-half years after treatment.
−Removed: Based on the six months of data collected during the fifth year of follow-up, the mean annualized bleeding rate was zero compared to an average of four bleeds during the year prior to treatment, representing a 100% reduction.
−Removed: During this same period, the usage of FIX replacement therapy declined to zero compared to 354,800 IU in the year prior to treatment, representing a 100% reduction.
−Removed: Mean FIX activity over 4.5 years was 7.4% (compared to 7.5% at three and a half years, 7.9% in the third year, 8.4% in the second year and 7.1% in the first year), while in the lower dose cohort, mean FIX activity was 5.2% over 5 years since treatment.
+Added: On May 11, 2021, Pfizer, Inc.
+Added: filed three petitions at the USPTO seeking Inter Partes Review of U.S.
+Added: 9,982,248 (the “‘248 Patent”) and 10,465,180 (the “‘180 Patent” and together with the ‘248 Patent, the “Patents”).
+Added: The petitions collectively seek to invalidate all claims of the Patents.
+Added: In August 2021, we filed our responses asking the USPTO to deny institution of the IPR proceedings.
+Added: On November 17, 2021, the PTAB issued decisions granting institution on all three IPR proceedings.
+Added: Our response to the petition is currently due to be filed on March 3, 2022.
Fabry disease program (AMT-191)
18 unchanged sentences
Our Development of AMT-191 for Fabry Disease
−Removed: In September 2020, we selected a lead gene therapy candidate (AMT-190) for the treatment of Fabry disease to advance into IND-enabling studies.
+Added: In September 2020, we selected a lead gene therapy candidate (AMT-191) for the treatment of Fabry disease to advance into Investigational New Drug-enabling studies (“IND-enabling studies”).
The lead candidate is a one-time administered AAV5 gene therapy incorporating the GLA transgene.
In preclinical studies comparing multiple product candidates, including constructs incorporating a modified alpha-N-acetylgalactosaminidase transgene (modNAGA), AMT-191 demonstrated the most robust and sustained increases in GLA activity.
−Removed: Hemophilia A program (AMT-180)
−Removed: In June 2020, we announced that we plan to de-prioritize our research program of AMT-180 for patients with hemophilia A, as part of our effort to focus on those gene therapy programs that have the greatest potential to improve patients’ lives and generate long-term value for shareholders.
+Added: In October 2021, we presented preclinical data for AMT-191 at the European Society of Gene and Cell Therapy (“ESGCT”), confirming efficiency and cross correction in a Fabry mouse model, with increased gamma-linolenic acid in the liver, kidney, heart, and brain and normalized lysoglobotriaosylceramide-3 levels in main target organs.
Central Nervous System diseases
9 unchanged sentences
Our Development of AMT-130 for Huntington’s Disease
−Removed: AMT-130 is our gene therapy candidate targeting Huntington’s disease that utilizes an AAV vector carrying an engineered micro ribonucleic acid (“miRNA”) designed to silence HTT and exon 1 HTT, a potentially highly toxic protein fragment that may also contribute to disease pathology.
−Removed: AMT-130 comprises a recombinant AAV5 vector carrying a deoxyribonucleic acid (“DNA”) cassette, encoding a miRNA that non-selectively lowers or knocks-down HTT and exon 1 HTT in Huntington’s disease patients.
−Removed: AMT-130 was developed using our miQURE technology, a proprietary, one-time administered gene silencing platform.
−Removed: AMT-130 has received orphan drug designation from the FDA and Orphan Medicinal Product Designation from the EMA.
−Removed: AMT-130 is intended to be administered directly into the brain via a stereotactic, magnetic resonance imaging guided catheter.
+Added: AMT-130 is our novel gene therapy candidate for the treatment of Huntington’s disease.
+Added: AMT-130 utilizes our proprietary, gene-silencing miQURE platform and incorporates an AAV vector carrying a miRNA specifically designed to silence the huntingtin gene and the potentially highly toxic exon 1 protein fragment.
+Added: We are currently conducting a Phase I/II clinical trial for AMT-130 in the U.S.
+Added: and a Phase Ib/II study in the EU.
+Added: Together, these studies are intended to establish safety, proof of concept, and the optimal dose of AMT-130 to take forward into Phase III development or into a confirmatory study should an accelerated registration pathway be feasible.
+Added: AMT-130 has received Orphan Drug and Fast Track designations from the FDA and Orphan Medicinal Product Designation from the EMA.
Our goal for AMT-130 is to develop a gene therapy with the following profile:
2 unchanged sentences
(3) Safe, on-target and durable knockdown of HTT and exon 1 HTT.
−Removed: In April 2018, we presented an overview of preclinical data establishing proof-of-concept for AMT-130 at the 2018 American Academy of Neurology Annual Meeting in Los Angeles, California.
−Removed: Data from multiple studies in Huntington's disease animal models across three different species showed that a single intraparenchymal administration of AMT-130 into the striatum, resulted in a dose-dependent and sustained reduction of mutant huntingtin protein (“mHTT”) in both the deep structures of the brain and the cortex.
−Removed: Specifically, we presented data from the ongoing preclinical study in transgenic minipigs, one of the largest Huntington's disease animal models available, demonstrating significant reductions in human mHTT by a median of 68% in the striatum and a median of 47% in the frontal cortex at 6 months after administration of AMT-130.
−Removed: In January 2019, our IND application for AMT-130 was cleared by the FDA and in the fourth quarter of 2019 we initiated patient screening for a Phase I/II study.
−Removed: The Phase I/II protocol is a randomized, imitation surgery-controlled, double-blinded study conducted at three surgical sites, and multiple referring, non-surgical sites in the U.S.
−Removed: The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability and efficacy of AMT-130 at two doses.
+Added: In January 2019, our IND application for AMT-130 was cleared by the FDA.
In February 2019, we presented new preclinical data at the 14 th Annual CHDI Huntington’s disease Therapeutics Conference that illustrate the therapeutic potential of AMT-130 in restoring function of damaged brain cells in Huntington’s disease.
In that study, AMT-130 was generally well-tolerated and resulted in a sustained reduction of mutant huntingtin protein.
−Removed: In June 2020, we announced the completion of the first two patient procedures in the Phase I/II clinical trial of AMT-130 for the treatment of Huntington’s disease.
−Removed: These procedures occurred after a postponement that resulted from the COVID-19 pandemic and the associated states of emergency declarations in the United States.
−Removed: The Phase I/II protocol is a randomized, imitation surgery-controlled, double-blinded study conducted at three surgical sites, and multiple referring, non-surgical sites in the U.S.
−Removed: The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of AMT-130 at two doses.
−Removed: On September 25, 2020, we announced that the independent DSMB overseeing the Phase I/II clinical trial of AMT-130 for the treatment of Huntington’s disease had met and reviewed 90-day safety data from the first two patients enrolled in the trial.
−Removed: No significant safety concerns were noted to prevent further dosing.
−Removed: On October 13, 2020, we announced the completion of the third and fourth patient procedures in the Phase I/II clinical trial.
−Removed: On February 8, 2021, we announced that the DSMB had met and reviewed the six-month safety data from the first two enrolled patients and the 90-day safety data from the next two enrolled patients in the study.
−Removed: No significant safety concerns were noted to prevent further dosing, and the final six patients in the first cohort are now cleared for enrollment.
−Removed: Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3 program
−Removed: Spinocerebellar Ataxia type 3 and Market Background
−Removed: Spinocerebellar Ataxia type 3 (“SCA3”), also known as Machado-Joseph disease, is a central nervous system disorder caused by a cytosine-adenine-guanine (“CAG”)-repeat expansion in the ATXN3 gene that results in an abnormal form of the protein ataxin-3.
−Removed: Patients with SCA3 experience brain degeneration that results in movement disorders, rigidity, muscular atrophy, and paralysis.
−Removed: There is currently no treatment available that slows the progressive course of this potentially lethal disease.
−Removed: Prevalence of SCA3 is estimated to be one to two per 100,000 with significant geographical and ethnic variations, with the highest prevalence rates observed in the Azores (Flores Island (1/239)), the intermediate prevalence rates observed in Portugal, Germany, the Netherlands, China and Japan, and the lower prevalence observed in North America, Australia, and India.
−Removed: SCA3 is the most common form of autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia (“ADCA”) type 1 in most genetically characterized populations.
−Removed: Our preclinical SCA3 program (AMT-150)
−Removed: AMT-150 is a one-time, intrathecally-administered, AAV gene therapy incorporating our proprietary miQURE silencing technology that is designed to halt ataxia in early manifest SCA3 patients.
−Removed: In an in-vitro study with human induced pluripotent stem (“IPS”) derived neurons, AMT-150 has been shown to lower the human ataxin-3 protein by 65%, without any off-target effects.
−Removed: We also performed a proof-of-concept in-life study in SCA3 mice demonstrating that AMT-150 was able to lower toxic ataxin-3 protein by up to 53% in the cerebellum and up to 65% in the brain stem after a single administration.
−Removed: Further studies in non-human primates (“NHP”) demonstrate the ability to distribute and express a reporter gene in the most degenerated brain regions in SCA3.
−Removed: In these preclinical studies, a single administration of AMT-150 resulted in sustained expression and efficient processing with on-target engagement.
−Removed: Additionally, AMT-150 lacked off-target activity in these studies.
−Removed: At the 2019 American Academy of Neurology Annual Meeting, we presented preclinical data on AMT-150 demonstrating mechanistic proof-of-concept of the non-allele-specific ataxin-3 protein-silencing approach by using artificial miRNA candidates engineered to target the ataxin-3 gene in a SCA3 knock-in mouse model.
−Removed: In this proof-of-concept study, a single AMT-150 injection in the cerebrospinal fluid resulted in AAV transduction and mutant ataxin-3 lowering at the primary sites of disease neuropathology, the cerebellum (up to 53%) and the brainstem (up to 65%).
−Removed: In May 2020, we presented preclinical data at the American Society of Gene and Cell Therapy (“ASGCT”) Annual Meeting, on our gene therapy candidate SCA3.
−Removed: In an in vivo preclinical study, six NHP received a one-time injection of AMT-150 via the cisterna magna to assess expression and distribution.
−Removed: Samples taken after eight weeks showed widespread transduction of the brain and spinal cord, with the highest genome copies found in the posterior fossa and cortical regions.
−Removed: In other preclinical studies, researchers evaluated AMT-150 in SCA3 mouse models, as well as human induced pluripotent stem cell (“iPSC”)-derived neurons and astrocytes, to investigate potential off-target effects of AAV5-micro ataxin type 3 (“miATXN3”).
−Removed: The iPSC-derived cell cultures, which were derived from two SCA3 patients, represent the most disease-relevant cell type for therapeutic targeting of AMT-150.
−Removed: A clear dose-dependent expression of miATXN3 was observed in the iPSC-derived neurons and astrocytes transduced with AMT-150.
−Removed: Mature miATXN3 molecules were also associated with extracellular vesicles that strongly correlated with the dose and miATXN3 expression, suggesting the potential therapeutic spread of the engineered miATXN3.
−Removed: Additionally, AMT-150 demonstrated ATXN3 knockdown in human neurons and various SCA3 mouse models with subsequent neuropathology improvement.
−Removed: In September 2020, we initiated a safety and toxicology study of AMT-150 in NHP.
+Added: On April 5, 2021, we announced the completion of enrollment of the low-dose cohort of the U.S.
+Added: Phase I/II study of AMT-130.
+Added: The low-dose cohort includes 10 patients, of which six patients received treatment with AMT-130 and four patients received Sham surgery.
+Added: Phase I/II clinical trial is a randomized, controlled, double-blinded, dose-escalation study of AMT-130.
+Added: On June 13, 2021, we announced the enrollment of the first two patients in the high-dose cohort of a U.S.
+Added: Phase I/II study.
+Added: The high-dose cohort is planned to include 16 patients, of which 10 patients will receive treatment with AMT-130 and six patients will receive Sham surgery.
+Added: The initiation of patient enrollment in the high-dose cohort followed a meeting of the trial’s independent DSMB that reviewed safety data for the fully enrolled first cohort of 10 patients.
+Added: On December 16, 2021, we announced initial 12-month observations on the first four patients enrolled in the low-dose cohort of the U.S.
+Added: Phase I/II study.
+Added: Two of the four enrolled patients received AMT-130, and two patients received Sham surgery as a control.
+Added: AMT-130 was generally well tolerated in the treated patients, with no serious adverse events related to AMT-130.
+Added: NfL, a biomarker of injury in the brain, increased as expected immediately following the surgical procedure and returned to baseline in the treated patients.
+Added: NfL remained relatively constant in the two untreated control patients.
+Added: Structural magnetic resonance imaging did not reveal any clinically meaningful safety findings in either treated or control patients at one year of follow-up.
+Added: Measurements of total and mutant HTT protein in the cerebral spinal fluid of the four patients were highly variable and inconclusive.
+Added: As of December 31, 2021, 19 patients have been enrolled in the clinical trial to date, including nine of 16 in the high-dose cohort.
+Added: Also on December 16, 2021, we announced the initiation of patient screening in our 15 patient, open-label, Phase Ib/II study of AMT-130 in the EU, as well our plans to initiate a third cohort in the ongoing U.S.
+Added: Phase I/II clinical trial.
+Added: The third cohort, which will include up to 18 additional randomized patients receiving the higher dose, will explore the use of alternative stereotactic navigation systems to simplify placement of catheters for infusions of AMT-130.
+Added: Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Program (AMT-260)
+Added: Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Disease and Market Background
+Added: TLE affects approximately 1.3 million people in the U.S.
+Added: and Europe alone, of which approximately 0.8 million patients are unable to adequately control acute seizures with currently approved anti-epileptic therapies.
+Added: Patients with refractory TLE experience increased morbidity, excess mortality, and poor quality of life.
+Added: Our Development of AMT-260 for Temporal Lobe Epilepsy
+Added: AMT-260 is being developed based on exclusive licenses to certain patents obtained in 2020 from two French research institutions that continue to collaborate with us.
+Added: AMT-260 is a gene therapy using an AAV9 vector.
+Added: The use of AAV9 to deliver any sequence that affects the expression of the GRIK 2 gene sequence in humans has been exclusively licensed from Regenxbio.
+Added: Regenxbio provides contractually agreed research and development services up to the transfer of manufacturing activities to a designated contract manufacturer.
+Added: AMT-260, employs miRNA silencing technology to target suppression of aberrantly expressed kainate receptors in the hippocampus of patients with TLE.
+Added: In October 2021, we presented preclinical data for AMT-260 at the ESGCT.
+Added: AMT-260 reduces the expression of GluK2 in cortical neurons, reduces epileptiform activity and hyperlocomotion in a preclinical model of epilepsy and blocks epileptiform discharges in organotypic slices from patients with TLE .
+Added: Parkinson’s Disease (AMT-210)
+Added: AMT-210 is our preclinical product candidate for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease, targeting alpha-synuclein as a potential treatment for Parkinson’s disease.
+Added: Parkinson’s disease is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder that leads to motor deterioration and debilitating non-motor symptoms.
+Added: It is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder after Alzheimer’s disease, and no disease-modifying therapies are available.
+Added: Parkinson’s disease is believed to be caused through the presence of toxic alpha-synuclein aggregates, affecting dopaminergic circuits.
+Added: AMT-210 is a one-time, brain-targeting AAV gene therapy incorporating uniQure’s miQURE gene silencing technology.
+Added: It is designed to halt misfolded alpha-synuclein and subsequent fibril formation in familial and sporadic Parkinson’s disease patients.
+Added: Alzheimer’s Disease (AMT-240)
+Added: AMT-240 is our preclinical product candidate for the treatment autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s disease.
+Added: Alzheimer’s disease is the most prevalent neurodegenerative disease, causing dementia and subsequent gradual loss of ability to function with disease progression.
+Added: Apolipoprotein E (APOE) is believed to potentially be an important factor in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease.
+Added: APOE consists of 3 major isoforms that are structurally and functionally different.
+Added: The APOE4 isoform is believed to potentially be the largest risk factor to develop Alzheimer’s.
+Added: In contrast to the toxic properties of APOE4, clinical case studies indicate a potentially protective role of other APOE variants.
+Added: AMT-240 is a one-time gene therapy using uniQure's miQURE gene-silencing technology to silence the toxic APOE variant, in combination with overexpressing a protective APOE variant as treatment for autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s disease patients.
+Added: Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (AMT-160)
+Added: AMT-161 is our preclinical product candidate utilizing our miQURE gene silencing technology to target toxic C9ORF72 as a potential treatment for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).
+Added: ALS is caused by degeneration of upper and lower motor neurons, resulting in muscle weakness and atrophy.
+Added: This rapid progressive loss of motor neurons typically starts at mid-life and median survival from disease manifestation is no more than two to four years.
+Added: The most prevalent genetic defect causing ALS is a G4C2 hexanucleotide repeat expansion in the C9ORF72 gene, which acquires toxic properties resulting in degeneration starting in motor neurons in the spinal cord.
+Added: AMT-161 is designed to be a one-time, intrathecally-administered AAV gene therapy using the miQURE silencing technology to target repeat-expanded C9ORF72 to lower toxic RNA aggregates and prevent dipeptide protein formation.
+Added: Spinocerebellar Ataxia, Type 3 (AMT-150)
+Added: After conducting a comprehensive review of our product candidates, we decided in December 2021 to deprioritize the preclinical development of AMT-150, shifting resources and focus to our other research programs.
+Added: BMS Partnered Research Programs
+Added: We and Bristol-Myers Squibb (“BMS”) entered into a collaboration and license agreement in May 2015 (“BMS CLA”).
+Added: The BMS CLA p rovides BMS with exclusive access to our gene therapy technology platform for four targets primarily in cardiovascular diseases.
New Technology Development
5 unchanged sentences
We dedicate significant effort to designing and screening novel AAV capsids with the potential for (i) higher biological potency;
−Removed: (ii) increased specificity and penetration of specific tissue types;
+Added: (ii) improved biodistribution including greater cell transduction and increased cellular specificity;
and (iii) enhanced safety.
We believe we have significant expertise in vector engineering and have created promising genetically engineered capsids using a “rational design” approach.
−Removed: In addition to the directed evolution approach where we screen a library of AAV mutants, we are also rationally engineering the AAV capsids to target them to specific cells and/or tissues.
−Removed: Using such engineered AAV capsids will ensure selected transduction of the targeted, desired cell type.
−Removed: The strategy will diminish potential off target effects.
+Added: We are focusing our efforts on rationally engineering the AAV capsids to target them to specific cells and/or tissues.
+Added: These engineered viruses contain antibody fragments or peptides that target them to specific tissues or cells and to diminish potential off target effects.
We work extensively on designing synthetic promoters with the potential of enabling higher levels of protein expression in specific tissue types.
A “promoter” is an essential component of a gene therapy construct that controls expression of a therapeutic protein.
−Removed: Synthetic promoters, which do not exist in nature, are optimally tailored to drive gene expression at a desired level and specificity.
−Removed: To further tailor gene therapies to optimally address certain disorders we may also incorporate specific modifications into the transgenes of our gene therapy constructs.
+Added: Synthetic promoters, that do not exist in nature, are optimally tailored to drive gene expression at a desired level and specificity.
+Added: To further tailor and optimize gene therapies to address certain disorders we may also incorporate specific modifications into the transgenes of our gene therapy constructs.
For example, we incorporated the Padua-FIX variant into our hemophilia B gene therapy to substantially increase the resulting FIX activity and potentially improve clinical outcomes.
For other programs, such as our gene therapy construct for Fabry disease, we have also utilized modified transgenes with the goal of enhancing efficacy, durability, and safety, as well as expanding the access of gene therapies to patients with inhibitors.
+Added: We are developing methods for delivering multiple doses of a gene therapy to a patient using a combination of immune modulation and antibody neutralization.
+Added: The ability to deliver multiple doses of an AAV to a patient could potentially increase our ability to deliver the correct dose of a virus to a patient and might enable us to re-administer our gene therapies to patients that have lost expression of a transgene.
We have also demonstrated the ability to deliver engineered DNA constructs that can silence or suppress disease-causing genes.
16 unchanged sentences
We believe our manufacturing platform enables us to rapidly produce new products for clinical investigation, minimize time between clinical phases and complete scale-up as product candidates advance into late-stage development and commercialization.
−Removed: For example, in transitioning our hemophilia B program from AMT-060 to AMT-061, we were able to rapidly demonstrate manufacturing comparability and produce clinical material for our ongoing Phase III pivotal study, thereby accelerating our time to market.
+Added: For example, in transitioning our hemophilia B program from AMT-060 to AMT-061, we were able to rapidly demonstrate manufacturing comparability and produce clinical material for our ongoing Phase III pivotal study.
(4) High Purity.
27 unchanged sentences
We also may seek, usually on a case-by-case basis, local patent protection in Canada, Australia, Japan, China, India, Israel, South Africa, New Zealand, South Korea, and Eurasia, as well as South American jurisdictions such as Brazil and Mexico.
−Removed: As of December 31, 2020, our intellectual property portfolio included 99 issued or granted patents and 121 pending patent applications.
−Removed: The geographic breakdown of our owned and exclusively in-licensed patent portfolio was as follows:
−Removed: ● 26 issued U.S.
−Removed: ● 13 granted European patents;
−Removed: ● 7 pending PCT patent applications;
−Removed: ● 18 pending U.S.
−Removed: patent applications;
−Removed: ● 20 pending European patent applications;
−Removed: ● 83 pending and 60 granted patent applications in other jurisdictions.
+Added: As of December 31, 2021, our intellectual property portfolio included 105 issued patents (including 27 U.S.
+Added: patents and 10 patents granted by the European Patent Office (“EPO”) and 120 pending patent applications (including 24 U.S.
+Added: patent applications and 23 EPO patent applications.
These patents relate to a variety of technologies including our product candidates that are in development and our manufacturing and technology platform.
2 unchanged sentences
We own a patent family, including patents and patent applications, directed to the use of the Padua mutation in hFIX for gene therapy in etranacogene dezaparvovec.
−Removed: A PCT application was filed on September 15, 2009, and patents have been issued in the United States, Europe, and Canada.
−Removed: Further applications are pending in the United States (three issued patents), Europe, and Hong Kong.
−Removed: The issued patents include claims directed to FIX protein with a leucine at the R338 position of the protein sequence, nucleic acid sequences coding for this protein, and therapeutic applications, including gene therapy.
−Removed: The standard 20-year patent term of patents in this family will expire in 2029.
−Removed: On June 13, 2018, we were granted European Patent 2337849 directed to a polypeptide protein.
−Removed: The opposition period with respect to such patent expired on March 13, 2019, by which time five parties had filed an opposition.
−Removed: On July 25, 2019, we submitted responses to such oppositions with the EPO and oral proceedings with respect to such oppositions were scheduled for June and July 2020 but were postponed due to COVID-19.
−Removed: New dates for virtual oral proceedings have been set for May 2021.
−Removed: In addition, on May 15, 2019, a divisional European patent application in the FIX-Padua family, EP 3252157, was refused.
−Removed: In September 2019, we filed a notice of appeal with respect to such refusal.
−Removed: We are also pursuing a European divisional patent application that was filed on May 14, 2019.
−Removed: Both in the U.S.
−Removed: and in Europe, we have pending divisional applications still in prosecution phases.
−Removed: The appeal process has been delayed as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, and we do not currently know when the appeal is likely to be resolved.
−Removed: On November 5, 2019, the USPTO granted us a third patent, U.S.
−Removed: Patent Number 10,465,180, which covers any AAV comprising a nucleic acid encoding a FIX-Padua protein, and promoter sequences, transcription termination and control elements.
−Removed: The claims also cover FIX-Padua variants with at least 70% sequence identity to FIX-R338L.
−Removed: On January 4, 2020, the IPR Proceeding was filed by Pfizer, Inc.
−Removed: The petition sought to invalidate claims 6 and 9-15 of the ‘405 Patent.
−Removed: On April 17, 2020, we filed our preliminary response to the petition, disclaiming claims 6 and 9-13 of the ‘405 patent and otherwise requesting the denial of the petition.
−Removed: On July 13, 2020, the United States Patent and Trademark Office issued its decision to institute the Inter Partes Review.
−Removed: On October 13, 2020, we filed a motion to amend the patent claims at issue in the proceeding.
−Removed: On January 13, 2021, Pfizer filed its opposition to our motion to amend the claims.
−Removed: On February 3, 2021 the PTAB provided its preliminary guidance with respect to the proposed amended claims, which stated among other things that the proposed amended claims were not anticipated but were obvious in light of the cited prior art.
−Removed: On February 16, 2021 and in response to the preliminary guidance, we moved to dismiss our motion to amend the claims before the PTAB and requested an adverse judgement in the IPR Proceeding.
−Removed: As a result, we expect to maintain the currently issued and unchallenged claims of the ‘405 Patent and pursue additional claims based on our proposed amended claims in continuation applications before the USPTO.
Huntington’s disease (AMT-130)
−Removed: We own a patent family directed to gene therapy treatment of Huntington’s disease within AMT-130.
−Removed: This family includes an issued patent in the United States and pending patent applications in the US, Europe, and other jurisdictions.
−Removed: The standard 20-year term of patents in this family will expire in 2035.
−Removed: In May 2019, we announced the issuance of two new patents covering AMT-130, U.S.
−Removed: Patent 10,174,321 and European Patent EP 3237618 B1.
−Removed: The claims as granted cover the RNA constructs specifically designed to target exon1 and the embedding of these Huntington’s disease RNA sequences into the miR451 scaffold, which is exclusively licensed to us from CSHL.
−Removed: The claims also cover certain expression cassettes comprising the RNA constructs and the use of gene therapy vectors including AAV vectors encompassing the described expression cassettes.
−Removed: In addition, this patent family has multiple pending family members, including pending applications in U.S.
−Removed: AMT-130 incorporates our proprietary miQURE gene silencing technology platform, which is designed to degrade disease-causing genes, without off-target toxicity, and induce silencing of the entire target organ through secondary exosome-mediated delivery.
−Removed: We have filed additional patent applications related to this technology generally and AMT-130, specifically which will potentially provide further patent protection for our Huntington’s disease clinical candidate AMT-130.
+Added: We own two patent families directed to gene therapy treatment of Huntington’s disease, including with AMT-130.
+Added: This miQURE gene silencing technology platform is designed to degrade disease-causing genes, without off-target toxicity, and induce silencing of the entire target organ through secondary exosome-mediated delivery.
We have obtained exclusive or non-exclusive rights from third parties under a range of patents and other technology that we use in our product and development programs, as described below.
11 unchanged sentences
If we meet certain diligence milestones during the initial three-year development term, we may include exclusively additional disease classifications within the additional Fields on similar terms and conditions as the CNS diseases.
−Removed: We are currently using the technology in our Huntington’s disease and SCA 3 programs.
Under this license agreement, annual fees, development milestone payments and future single-digit royalties on net sales of a licensed product are payable to CSHL.
1 unchanged sentence
In 2016, we revised our existing license contract with Protein Sciences Corporation for the use of its expresSF + insect cell line and associated technology for human therapeutic and prophylactic uses (except influenza) to provide us with a royalty free, perpetual right and license to the licensed technology in the field of AAV-based gene therapy.
−Removed: Technology Used for Specific Development Programs
National Institutes of Health—AAV production
11 unchanged sentences
National Institutes of Health—AAV5
−Removed: In 2011, we entered into another license agreement with the NIH, superseding an earlier agreement.
+Added: In 2011, we entered into another license agreement with the NIH, superseding the 2007 agreement.
This agreement was amended in 2016.
Under this agreement, the NIH granted us an exclusive, worldwide license to patents relating to AAV5 for use in therapeutic products to be delivered to the brain or liver for treatment of human diseases originating in the brain or liver but excluding arthritis-related diseases, and a non-exclusive, worldwide license to patents relating to AAV5 for all other diseases.
−Removed: The license technology under the patents of this license is also used in connection with the Huntington’s disease program.
We refer to the products licensed under this agreement as AAV5 products.
We may grant sublicenses under this agreement only with the NIH’s consent, which may not be unreasonably withheld.
−Removed: The standard 20-year term for the underlying patents expired in 2019, but there are U.S.
−Removed: patents still in force of which the latest will expire in 2021.
+Added: The last patent under this license expired in July 2021.
Payment obligations to the NIH under this license agreement include royalties equal to a low single-digit percentage of net sales of AAV5 products;
3 unchanged sentences
We have agreed to meet benchmarks in our development efforts, including as to development events, clinical trials, and marketing approval, within specified timeframes.
−Removed: The NIH may terminate this agreement in specified circumstances relating to our insolvency or bankruptcy.
−Removed: We may terminate this agreement for any reason, in any country or territory, subject to a specified notice period.
+Added: Technology Used for Specific Development Programs
On April 17, 2017, we entered into an Assignment and License Agreement with Dr.
3 unchanged sentences
Under the Padua Assignment, we have also licensed certain know-how included in the Padua IP.
−Removed: We will provide Dr.
−Removed: Simioni with an initial license fee and reimbursement of past expenses, as well as payments that may come due upon the achievement of certain milestone events related to the development of the Padua IP and may also include royalties on a percentage of certain revenues.
+Added: We have provided Dr.
+Added: Simioni with an initial license fee and reimbursement of past expenses.
+Added: Under the agreement, additional payments may come due upon the achievement of certain milestone events related to the development of the Padua IP or as royalties on a percentage of certain revenues.
We have granted a license of the Padua IP back to Dr.
5 unchanged sentences
In 2008, we entered into a license agreement with St.
+Added: Jude Children’s Research Hospital (“St.
Jude”), which we amended in 2012.
6 unchanged sentences
Jude a royalty equal to a low single-digit percentage of net sales, if any, by us or our sublicensees of products covered by the licensed patent rights, and a portion of certain amounts we receive from sublicensees ranging from a mid-single digit to a mid-teen double-digit percentage of such amounts.
+Added: With respect to our collaboration with CSL Behring, we have agreed with St.
+Added: Jude on an apportionment of certain amounts we receive from CSL Behring as sublicensing revenue that is equivalent to a low-single digit percentage of such amounts.
We have also agreed to pay St.
−Removed: Jude one-time milestone fees totaling $6.5 million upon the achievement of specified development and regulatory milestones, and an annual maintenance fee creditable against royalties and milestones in the same year.
−Removed: We have agreed to use commercially reasonable efforts to diligently develop and commercialize products licensed under this agreement.
+Added: Jude a one-time milestone of $5.0 million upon the BLA and MAA approval, and an annual maintenance fee creditable against royalties and milestones in the same year.
The agreement will remain in effect until no further payment is due relating to any licensed product under this agreement or either we or St.
2 unchanged sentences
We may terminate the agreement for convenience at any time subject to a specified notice period.
+Added: Temporal Lobe Epilepsy
+Added: In June 2020, Corlieve entered into an agreement, subsequently amended in June 2021, with Regenxbio for an exclusive (in the field of using AAV9 to expression of the GRIK 2 gene in humans (the “Field”)), sublicensable, royalty-bearing, worldwide license under Regenxbio’s interest in EU patent application 19185533.7 (the “Foreground Patents”) and related patents, as well as patents covering inventions developed during the collaboration and certain patents and know-how relating to AAV9 (the “Background Technology”).
+Added: The license also includes non-exclusive rights to exploit the licensed Foreground Patents and certain related patents know-how developed in collaboration pursuant to the license agreement outside the Field.
+Added: The license also includes retained and license back rights that permit Regenxbio and its upstream licensors to exploit for any research, development, commercialization, or other purposes certain patents, inventions and know-how (other than the Foreground Patents) subject to or created pursuant to the license agreement.
+Added: Payment obligations under the agreement provide for royalty payments on net sales in the mid-single digit to low-double digits, and milestone payments to Regenxbio in the mid-tens of millions of dollars related to clinical trials, commercialization, and net sales.
+Added: The agreement also calls for sublicense fees in the low-double digit range.
+Added: The royalty is paid on sales of license products using any of licensed patents or know-how for as long as the agreement is in effect.
+Added: Royalty and milestone payments may continue to be owed under the license following termination of the agreement if licensed products are sold following termination of the license.
+Added: Under the agreement, Corlieve has certain diligence obligations and Regenxbio has certain obligations related to the pre-clinical development of manufacturing technology.
+Added: Inserm Transfert
+Added: In January 2020, Corlieve entered into license agreement with Inserm Transfert SA (also acting as a delegate for the French National Institute of Health and Medical Research) and La societe SATT Aquitaine (the counterparties collectively referred to as “Inserm Transfert”).
+Added: Under the license agreement, Corlieve is granted an exclusive, sublicensable, royalty-bearing, worldwide license under European Patent (“EP”) patent application 13306265.3 in the field of the prevention and treatment of epilepsy, and in Inserm Transfert’s share in EP patent application 19185533.7 (which is co-owned by Regenxbio) in the field of all human use.
+Added: Corlieve also is granted a non-exclusive, sublicensable, royalty-bearing, worldwide license under certain know-how in the fields that may be developed by Inserm pursuant to the agreements.
+Added: Under the agreements, Inserm retains certain rights for teaching, academic and/or research purposes.
+Added: Payment obligations under the agreements include a royalty on the net sales of license products in the low single digits, milestone payments associated with clinical trial and regulatory approval milestones of multiple licensed products totaling in the low-single digit millions of Euros.
+Added: The agreement also calls for sublicense fees in the low to mid double-digit range depending on the timing of such sublicense.
+Added: The obligation to pay royalties extends until the later of the expiration of the patent rights, any regulatory exclusivity period, and 10 years from the first commercial sale of a licensed product.
Trade Secrets
7 unchanged sentences
We face substantial competition from many different sources, including large and specialty pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, academic research institutions and governmental agencies and public and private research institutions.
−Removed: We are aware of numerous companies focused on developing gene therapies in various indications, including Applied Genetic Technologies Corp., Abbvie, Abeona Therapeutics, Adverum Biotechnologies, Ally Therapeutics, Apic Bio, Asklepios BioPharmaceutical, Astellas, AVROBIO, Bayer, Biogen, BioMarin, bluebird bio, CRISPR Therapeutics, Editas Medicine, Expression Therapeutics, Fate, Freeline Therapeutics, Generation Bio, Genethon, GlaxoSmithKline, Homology Medicines, Intellia Therapeutics, Johnson & Johnson, Krystal Biotech, Lexeo Therapeutics, LogicBio Therapeutics, Lysogene, MeiraGTx, Milo Biotechnology, Mustang Bio, Novartis, Orchard Therapeutics, Oxford Biomedica, Passage Bio, Pfizer, REGENXBIO, Renova Therapeutics, Roche, Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Sangamo Therapeutics, Sanofi, Selecta Biosciences, Sarepta Therapeutics, Sio Therapeutics, Solid Biosciences, SwanBio, Takeda, Taysha Gene Therapies, Ultragenyx, Vivet Therapeutics, and Voyager Therapeutics, as well as several companies addressing other methods for modifying genes and regulating gene expression.
−Removed: We may also face competition with respect to the treatment of some of the diseases that we are seeking to target with our gene therapies from protein, nucleic acid, antisense, RNAi and other pharmaceuticals under development or commercialized at pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies such as Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Bayer, BioMarin, CSL Behring, Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Translate Bio, Roche, Sanofi, Sobi, Takeda, WaVe Life Sciences, and numerous other pharmaceutical and biotechnology firms.
+Added: We face worldwide competition from larger pharmaceutical companies, specialty pharmaceutical companies and biotechnology firms, universities and other research institutions and government agencies that are developing and commercializing pharmaceutical products.
+Added: Our key competitors focused on developing therapies in various indications, include among others, Pfizer, Freeline Therapeutics, Intellia Therapeutics, Sangamo Biosciences, Voyager Therapeutics, Passage Bio, Roche, PTC Therapeutics, Prilenia Therapeutics, Triplet Therapeutics, CombiGene, AvroBio, Caritas Therapeutics, and 4D Molecular Therapeutics.
We also compete with existing standards of care, therapies, and symptomatic treatments, as well as any new therapies that may become available in the future for the indications we are targeting.
26 unchanged sentences
● approval by an independent institutional review board (“IRB”) and Institutional Biosafety Committee (“IBC”) before each clinical trial may be initiated;
−Removed: ● performance of adequate and well-controlled human clinical trials in accordance with the FDA’s current good clinical practices (“cGCP”) to establish substantial evidence of the proposed biological product for each indication;
−Removed: ● preparation and submission to the FDA of a Biologics License Application (“BLA”);
+Added: ● performance of adequate and well-controlled human clinical trials in accordance with the FDA’s cGCP to establish substantial evidence of the safety and efficacy proposed biological product for each indication;
+Added: ● preparation and submission to the FDA of a BLA;
● satisfactory completion of one or more FDA inspections of the manufacturing facility or facilities at which the product, or components thereof, are produced to assess compliance with cGMP requirements and to assure that the facilities, methods, and controls are adequate to preserve the product’s identity, strength, quality, and purity, as well as selected clinical trial sites and investigators to determine cGCP compliance;
9 unchanged sentences
A clinical trial may not proceed in the United States unless and until an IND becomes effective, which is 30 days after its receipt by the FDA.
−Removed: The FDA may raise concerns or questions related to one or more components of an IND and place the IND on clinical hold if during its review the FDA determines that study subjects would be exposed to significant risk of illness or injury the trial may be put on clinical hold.
+Added: The FDA may raise concerns or questions related to one or more components of an IND and place the IND on clinical hold if during its review the FDA determines that study subjects would be exposed to significant risk of illness or injury.
In such a case, the IND sponsor and the FDA must resolve any outstanding concerns before the clinical trial can begin.
4 unchanged sentences
Information about certain clinical trials, including results, must be submitted within specific timeframes for listing on the ClinicalTrials.gov website.
−Removed: Sponsors or distributors of investigational products for the diagnosis, monitoring, or treatment of one or more serious diseases or conditions must also have a publicly available policy on evaluating and responding to requests for expanded access requests.
+Added: Sponsors or distributors of investigational products for the diagnosis, monitoring, or treatment of one or more serious diseases or conditions must also have a publicly available policy on evaluating and responding to requests for expanded access.
Investigators must also provide certain information to the clinical trial sponsors to allow the sponsors to make certain financial disclosures to the FDA.
20 unchanged sentences
Additionally, appropriate packaging must be selected and tested, and stability studies must be conducted to demonstrate that the product candidate does not undergo unacceptable deterioration over its shelf life.
−Removed: FDA Guidance Governing Gene Therapy Products
−Removed: The FDA has issued various guidance documents regarding gene therapies that outline additional factors that the FDA will consider at each of the above stages of development and which relate to, among other things, the proper preclinical assessment of gene therapies;
−Removed: the chemistry, manufacturing, and control information that should be included in an IND application;
+Added: Regulation and FDA Guidance Governing Gene Therapy Products
+Added: The FDA has and continues to issue various guidance documents with respect to the development and commercialization of gene therapies.
+Added: These include guidance on, among other things, the proper preclinical and nonclinical assessment of gene therapies;
+Added: the chemistry, manufacturing, and controls;
+Added: the design and conduct of clinical trials;
the design and analysis of shedding studies for virus or bacteria based gene therapies;
1 unchanged sentence
and measures to observe delayed adverse effects in subjects and patients who have been exposed to gene therapies via long-term follow-up with associated regulatory reporting.
+Added: The FDA has also issued guidance documents specific to gene therapies during the COVID-19 public health emergency, including one on manufacturing considerations and the conduct of risk assessments.
+Added: FDA has further issued guidance focused on the development of gene therapies for the treatment of rare neurodegenerative diseases, rare diseases, and hemophilia, as such products may face special challenges.
+Added: Certain gene therapy studies are also subject to the National Institutes of Health’s Guidelines for Research Involving Recombinant DNA Molecules, (“NIH Guidelines”).
+Added: The NIH Guidelines include the review of the study by an IBC.
+Added: The IBC assesses the compliance of the research with the NIH Guidelines, assesses the safety of the research and identifies any potential risk to public health or the environment.
Compliance with cGMP Requirements
20 unchanged sentences
All promotional materials for drug or biologic candidates approved under accelerated regulations are subject to prior review by the FDA.
+Added: In recent years, the accelerated approval pathway has come under significant FDA and public scrutiny.
+Added: Accordingly, the FDA may be more conservative in granting accelerated approval or, if granted, may be more apt to withdrawal approval if clinical benefit is not confirmed.
Even if a product qualifies for one or more of these programs, the FDA may later decide that the product no longer meets the conditions for qualification or decide that the time period for FDA review or approval will not be shortened.
1 unchanged sentence
The results of the preclinical and clinical studies, together with detailed information relating to the product’s chemistry, manufacture, controls, and proposed labeling, among other things, are submitted to the FDA as part of a BLA requesting a license to market the product for one or more indications.
−Removed: The submission of a BLA is subject to an application user fee, products with orphan designation are exempt from the BLA filing fee.
−Removed: The sponsor of an approved BLA is also subject to annual program user fees for each.
+Added: The submission of a BLA is subject to an application user fee, though products with orphan designation are exempt from the BLA filing fee.
+Added: The sponsor of an approved BLA is also subject to annual program user fees.
Orphan products may also be exempt from program fees provided that certain criteria are met.
7 unchanged sentences
Once the submission is accepted, the FDA begins an in-depth substantive review.
−Removed: The FDA will assign a date for its final decision for the product (the PDUFA action date) but can extend this date to complete review of a product application.
+Added: The FDA will assign a date for its final decision for the product (the PDUFA action date) but can extend this date to complete review of a product application or to consider additional information submitted during the application review period.
The PDUFA action date is only a goal, thus, the FDA does not always meet its PDUFA dates.
+Added: Additionally, this review period may change as the PDUFA statute must be reauthorized by Congress by September 2022.
The FDA may also refer certain applications to an advisory committee.
25 unchanged sentences
Several gene therapy products that have been approved by FDA have required substantial REMS, which included requirements for dispensing hospital and clinic certification, training, adverse event reporting, documentation, and audits and monitoring conducted by the sponsor, among other conditions.
−Removed: REMS, such as these, can be expensive and burdensome to implement, and burdensome for hospitals, clinics, and health care providers to comply with.
+Added: REMS, such as these, can be expensive and burdensome to implement, and burdensome for hospitals, clinics, and healthcare providers to comply with.
Biosimilars and Exclusivity
13 unchanged sentences
The biosimilar applicant may also be able to bring an action for declaratory judgment concerning the patent.
+Added: The FDA maintains a list of approved biological products, which is commonly referred to as the Purple Book.
+Added: This list includes product names, the date of licensure, and any periods of regulatory exclusivity.
+Added: Additionally, under a newly enacted statute related to biological product patent transparency, following the exchange of patent information between the biosimilar and reference product sponsor, the reference product sponsor must also provide the exchanged patent information and patent expiry dates to the FDA.
+Added: The FDA then publishes this information in the Purple Book.
To increase competition in the drug and biologic product marketplace, Congress, the executive branch, and the FDA have taken certain legislative and regulatory steps.
−Removed: By example, in 2020 the FDA finalized a guidance to facilitate biologic product importation.
+Added: By example, the FDA finalized a guidance to facilitate biologic product importation.
Moreover, the 2020 Further Consolidated Appropriations Act included provisions requiring that sponsors of approved biologic products, including those subject to REMS, provide samples of the approved products to persons developing biosimilar products within specified timeframes, in sufficient quantities, and on commercially reasonable market-based terms.
Failure to do so can subject the approved product sponsor to civil actions, penalties, and responsibility for attorney’s fees and costs of the civil action.
−Removed: This same bill also includes provisions with respect to shared and separate REMS programs for reference and generic drug products.
+Added: This same bill also includes provisions with respect to shared and separate REMS programs.
Orphan Drug Exclusivity
2 unchanged sentences
This hypothesis must be demonstrated to obtain orphan exclusivity.
+Added: With respect to gene therapies, the FDA has issued a specific guidance on how the agency interprets its sameness regulations.
+Added: Specifically, whether two products are deemed to be the same by the FDA will depend on the products’ transgene expression, viral vectors groups and variants, and additional product features that may contribute to therapeutic effect.
+Added: Minor product differences will not, generally, result in a finding that two products are different and there are some factors that FDA will consider on a case by case basis.
+Added: Any of the FDA sameness determinations could impact our ability to receive approval for our product candidates and to obtain or retain orphan drug exclusivity.
If a product with orphan designation receives the first FDA approval, it will be granted seven years of marketing exclusivity, which means that the FDA may not approve any other applications for the same product for the same indication for seven years, unless clinical superiority is demonstrated.
3 unchanged sentences
meaning that they would receive orphan drug exclusivity if they are the first products approved for their respective indications.
−Removed: Orphan product sameness decisions are an evolving space when it comes to gene therapies.
−Removed: Specifically, the FDA has issued guidance regarding how it will determine whether a gene therapy product is the same as another product for the purpose of the agency’s orphan drug regulations.
−Removed: Any of the FDA sameness determinations could impact our ability to receive approval for our product candidates and to obtain or retain orphan drug exclusivity.
Pediatric Exclusivity
15 unchanged sentences
Similarly, our product candidates may require delivery devices.
−Removed: A biologic product may be regulated as a combination product if it is intended for use in conjunction with a medical device, such as a drug delivery device or in vitro diagnostic device.
+Added: A biologic product may be regulated as a combination product if it is intended for use in conjunction with a medical device, such as a drug delivery device or an in vitro diagnostic device.
For combination products, the biologic and device components must, when used together, be safe and effective and the product labeling must reflect their combined use.
11 unchanged sentences
After approval, most changes to the approved product, such as adding new indications or other labeling claims, are subject to prior FDA review and approval.
−Removed: There also are continuing annual program user fee requirements for approved products, excluding orphan products.
+Added: There also are continuing annual program user fee requirements for approved products, excluding orphan products provided that certain criteria are met.
Regulatory authorities may withdraw product approvals, require label modifications, or request product recalls, among other actions, if a company fails to comply with regulatory standards, if it encounters problems following initial marketing, or if previously unrecognized problems are subsequently discovered.
6 unchanged sentences
Biopharmaceutical companies, however, are required to promote their products only for the approved indications and in accordance with the provisions of the approved label.
−Removed: The FDA and other agencies actively enforce the laws and regulations prohibiting the promotion of off-label uses, and a company that is found to have improperly promoted off-label uses may be subject to significant liability, including, but not limited to, criminal and civil penalties under the FDCA and False Claims Act, exclusion from participation in federal healthcare programs, mandatory compliance programs under corporate integrity agreements, suspension and debarment from government contracts, and refusal of orders under existing government contracts.
+Added: The FDA and other agencies actively enforce the laws and regulations prohibiting the promotion of off-label uses, and a company that is found to have improperly promoted off-label uses may be subject to significant liability, including, but not limited to, criminal and civil penalties under the FDCA and False Claims Act, exclusion from participation in federal healthcare programs, mandatory compliance programs under corporate integrity agreements, suspension and debarment from government procurement and non-procurement programs, and refusal of orders under existing government contracts.
In addition, the distribution of prescription biopharmaceutical samples is subject to the Prescription Drug Marketing Act (the “PDMA”), which regulates the distribution of samples at the federal level.
Both the PDMA and state laws limit the distribution of prescription biopharmaceutical product.
−Removed: Certain reporting related to samples is also required samples and impose requirements to ensure accountability in distribution.
+Added: Certain reporting related to samples is also required and laws and regulations impose requirements to ensure accountability in distribution.
Free trial or starter prescriptions provided through pharmacies are also subject to regulations under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program and potential liability under anti-kickback and false claims laws.
3 unchanged sentences
Sponsors must also verify that purchasers of the sponsors’ products are appropriately licensed.
−Removed: Further, under this legislation, manufactures have product investigation, quarantine, disposition, and notification responsibilities related to counterfeit, diverted, stolen, and intentionally adulterated products that would result in serious adverse health consequences of death to humans, as well as products that are the subject of fraudulent transactions or which are otherwise unfit for distribution such that they would be reasonably likely to result in serious health consequences or death.
−Removed: Similar requirements additionally are and will be imposed through this legislation on other companies within the biopharmaceutical product supply chain, such as distributors and dispensers, as well as certain sponsor licensees and affiliates.
+Added: Further, under this legislation, manufactures have product investigation, quarantine, disposition, and notification responsibilities related to counterfeit, diverted, stolen, and intentionally adulterated products that would result in serious adverse health consequences or death to humans, as well as products that are the subject of fraudulent transactions or which are otherwise unfit for distribution such that they would be reasonably likely to result in serious health consequences or death.
+Added: Similar requirements additionally are also imposed through this legislation on other companies within the biopharmaceutical product supply chain, such as distributors and dispensers, as well as certain sponsor licensees and affiliates.
Later discovery of previously unknown problems with a product, including adverse events of unanticipated severity or frequency, or with manufacturing processes, or failure to comply with regulatory requirements before or after approval, may result in significant regulatory actions.
−Removed: Such actions may include refusal to approve pending applications, license or approval suspension or revocation, imposition of a clinical hold or termination of clinical trials, warning letters, untitled letters, cyber letters, modification of promotional materials or labeling, provision of corrective information, imposition of post-market requirements including the need for additional testing, imposition of distribution or other restrictions under a REMS, product recalls, product seizures or detentions, refusal to allow imports or exports, total or partial suspension of production or distribution, FDA debarment, injunctions, fines, consent decrees, corporate integrity agreements, suspension and debarment from government contracts, and refusal of orders under existing government contracts, exclusion from participation in federal and state healthcare programs, restitution, disgorgement, or civil or criminal penalties, including fines and imprisonment, and adverse publicity, among other adverse consequences.
+Added: Such actions may include refusal to approve pending applications, license or approval suspension or revocation, imposition of a clinical hold or termination of clinical trials, warning letters, untitled letters, cyber letters, modification of promotional materials or labeling, provision of corrective information, imposition of post-market requirements including the need for additional testing, imposition of distribution or other restrictions under a REMS, product recalls, product seizures or detentions, refusal to allow imports or exports, total or partial suspension of production or distribution, FDA debarment, injunctions, fines, consent decrees, corporate integrity agreements, suspension and debarment from government procurement and non-procurement programs, and refusal of orders under existing government contracts, exclusion from participation in federal and state healthcare programs, restitution, disgorgement, or civil or criminal penalties, including fines and imprisonment, and adverse publicity, among other adverse consequences.
Additional controls for biologics
6 unchanged sentences
In addition, the FDA conducts laboratory research related to the regulatory standards on the safety, purity, potency, and effectiveness of biological products.
−Removed: Certain gene therapy studies are also subject to the National Institutes of Health’s Guidelines for Research Involving Recombinant DNA Molecules, (“NIH Guidelines”).
−Removed: The NIH Guidelines include the review of the study by an IBC.
−Removed: The IBC assesses the compliance of the research with the NIH Guidelines, assesses the safety of the research and identifies any potential risk to public health or the environment.
−Removed: The FDA has also issued guidance with respect to gene therapies, such as guidance concerning preclinical studies, chemistry manufacturing and controls, potency testing, and long-term patient and clinical study subject follow up and regulatory reporting.
−Removed: The FDA further issued a draft guidance specific to the development of gene therapy products for neurodegenerative diseases as such products may face special challenges.
Patent Term Restoration
6 unchanged sentences
Anti-Kickback Provisions and other Fraud and Abuse Requirements
−Removed: The federal Anti-Kickback Statute prohibits, among other things, knowingly and willfully offering, paying, soliciting, or receiving remuneration directly or indirectly, overtly or covertly, in cash or in kind, to induce or in return for purchasing, leasing, ordering, or arranging for the purchase, lease or order of any healthcare item or service reimbursable under Medicare, Medicaid or other federally financed healthcare programs, in whole or in part.
−Removed: This statute has been interpreted to apply to arrangements between pharmaceutical manufacturers on the one hand and prescribers, purchasers and formulary managers on the other.
+Added: The federal Anti-Kickback Statute is a criminal statute that prohibits, among other things, knowingly and willfully offering, paying, soliciting, or receiving remuneration directly or indirectly, overtly or covertly, in cash or in kind, to induce or in return for purchasing, leasing, ordering, or arranging for the purchase, lease or order of any healthcare item or service reimbursable under Medicare, Medicaid or other federally financed healthcare programs, in whole or in part.
The term “remuneration” has been interpreted broadly to include anything of value.
−Removed: The Anti-Kickback Statute has been interpreted to apply to arrangements between biopharmaceutical industry members on one hand and prescribers, purchasers, formulary managers, and beneficiaries on the other.
−Removed: There are certain statutory exceptions and regulatory safe harbors protecting some common activities from prosecution.
−Removed: The exceptions and safe harbors are drawn narrowly, and practices that involve remuneration that may be alleged to be intended to induce prescribing, purchases, or recommendations may be subject to scrutiny if they do not qualify for an exception or safe harbor.
+Added: The Anti-Kickback Statute has been interpreted to apply to arrangements between biopharmaceutical industry members on the one hand and prescribers, purchasers, and formulary managers on the other.
+Added: The Beneficiary Inducement Civil Monetary Penalties Law imposes similar restrictions on interactions between the biopharmaceutical industry and federal healthcare program beneficiaries.
+Added: There are certain statutory exceptions and regulatory safe harbors to the Anti-Kickback Statute protecting some common activities from prosecution.
+Added: The exceptions and safe harbors are drawn narrowly, and practices that involve remuneration that may be alleged to be intended to induce or reward prescribing, purchases, or recommendations may be subject to scrutiny if they do not qualify for an exception or safe harbor.
Failure to meet all the requirements of a particular applicable statutory exception or regulatory safe harbor does not make the conduct per se illegal under the Anti-Kickback Statute.
Instead, the legality of the arrangement will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis based on a cumulative review of all its facts and circumstances.
+Added: Several courts have interpreted the statute’s intent requirement to mean that if any one purpose of an arrangement involving remuneration is to induce or reward referrals of federal healthcare program business, including purchases of products paid by federal healthcare programs, the statute has been violated.
+Added: The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, of 2010, as amended, (the “ACA”) modified the intent requirement under the Anti-Kickback Statute to a stricter standard, such that a person or entity no longer needs to have actual knowledge of the statute or specific intent to violate it to have committed a violation.
+Added: In addition, the ACA also provided that a violation of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute is grounds for the government or a whistleblower to assert that a claim for payment of items or services resulting from such violation constitutes a per se false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the federal civil False Claims Act.
The Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) recently promulgated a regulation with respect to the safe harbors that is effective in two phases.
First, the regulation excludes from the definition of “remuneration” limited categories of (a) Pharmacy Benefit Manager (“PBM”) rebates or other reductions in price to a plan sponsor under Medicare Part D or a Medicaid Managed Care Organization plan reflected in point-of-sale reductions in price and (b) PBM service fees.
−Removed: Second, as amended, effective January 1, 2023, the regulation expressly provides that rebates to plan sponsors under Medicare Part D either directly to the plan sponsor under Medicare Part D, or indirectly through a pharmacy benefit manager will not be protected under the anti-kickback discount safe harbor.
−Removed: Several courts have interpreted the statute’s intent requirement to mean that if any one purpose of an arrangement involving remuneration is to induce referrals of federal healthcare covered business, including purchases of products paid by federal healthcare programs, the statute has been violated.
−Removed: The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, of 2010, as amended, (the “ACA”) modified the intent requirement under the Anti-Kickback Statute to a stricter standard, such that a person or entity no longer needs to have actual knowledge of the statute or specific intent to violate it to have committed a violation.
−Removed: In addition, the ACA also provided that a violation of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute is grounds for the government or a whistleblower to assert that a claim for payment of items or services resulting from such violation constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the federal civil False Claims Act.
−Removed: Federal civil false claims laws prohibit any person from knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, a false or fraudulent claim for payment to, or approval by, the federal government, knowingly making, using, or causing to be made or used a false record or statement material to a false or fraudulent claim to the federal government, or avoiding, decreasing, or concealing an obligation to pay money to the federal government.
+Added: Second, the regulation expressly provides that rebates to plan sponsors under Medicare Part D either directly to the plan sponsor under Medicare Part D, or indirectly through a pharmacy benefit manager will not be protected under the anti-kickback discount safe harbor.
+Added: Recent legislation delayed implementation of this portion of the rule until January 1, 2026, and further proposed legislation would permanently prohibit implementation of the rule beginning in 2026.
+Added: The federal Civil False Claims Act prohibits any person from knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, a false or fraudulent claim for payment to, or approval by, the federal government, knowingly making, using, or causing to be made or used a false record or statement material to a false or fraudulent claim to the federal government, or avoiding, decreasing, or concealing an obligation to pay money to the federal government.
A claim includes “any request or demand” for money or property presented to the U.S.
2 unchanged sentences
Intent to deceive is not required to establish liability under the civil False Claims Act.
−Removed: Rather, a claim may be false for deliberate ignorance of the truth or falsity of the information provided or acts in reckless disregard of the truth or falsity of that information.
+Added: Rather, a claim may be false for deliberate ignorance of the truth or falsity of the information provided or for acts in reckless disregard of the truth or falsity of that information.
Civil False Claims Act actions may be brought by the government or may be brought by private individuals on behalf of the government, called “qui tam” actions.
−Removed: If the government decides to intervene in a qui tam action and prevails in the lawsuit, the individual will share in the proceeds from any fines or settlement funds.
+Added: If the government decides to intervene in a qui tam action and prevails in the lawsuit, the individual will share in the proceeds from any damages, penalties or settlement funds.
If the government declines to intervene, the individual may pursue the case alone.
−Removed: The civil FCA provides for treble damages and a civil penalty for each false claim, such as an invoice or pharmacy claim for reimbursement, which can aggregate into millions of dollars.
+Added: The civil FCA provides for treble damages and a civil penalty for each false claim, such as an invoice or pharmacy claim for reimbursement, which can aggregate into tens and even hundreds of millions of dollars.
For these reasons, since 2004, False Claims Act lawsuits against biopharmaceutical companies have increased significantly in volume and breadth, leading to several substantial civil and criminal settlements, as much as $3.0 billion, regarding certain sales practices and promoting off label uses.
Civil False Claims Act liability may further be imposed for known Medicare or Medicaid overpayments, for example, overpayments caused by understated rebate amounts, that are not refunded within 60 days of discovering the overpayment, even if the overpayment was not caused by a false or fraudulent act.
−Removed: In addition, conviction, or civil judgment for violating the FCA may result in exclusion from federal health care programs, and suspension and debarment from government contracts, and refusal of orders under existing government contracts.
+Added: In addition, conviction, or civil judgment for violating the FCA may result in exclusion from federal healthcare programs, suspension and debarment from government procurement and non-procurement programs, and refusal of orders under existing government contracts.
The majority of states also have statutes or regulations similar to the federal anti-kickback law and false claims laws, which apply to items and services reimbursed under Medicaid and other state programs, or, in several states, apply regardless of the payer.
4 unchanged sentences
Payment or reimbursement of prescription therapeutics by Medicaid or Medicare requires sponsors to submit certified pricing information to Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”).
−Removed: The Medicaid Drug Rebate statute requires sponsors to calculate and report price points, which are used to determine Medicaid rebate payments shared between the states and the federal government and Medicaid payment rates for certain therapeutics.
+Added: The Medicaid Drug Rebate statute requires sponsors to calculate and report price points, which are used to determine Medicaid manufacturer rebate payments shared between the states and the federal government and Medicaid payment rates for certain therapeutics.
For therapeutics paid under Medicare Part B, sponsors must also calculate and report their Average Sales Price, which is used to determine the Medicare Part B payment rate.
In addition, therapeutics covered by Medicaid are subject to an additional inflation penalty which can substantially increase rebate payments.
−Removed: For products approved under a BLA (including biosimilars), the Veterans Health Care Act, (the “VHCA”), requires sponsors to calculate and report to the Veterans Administration, or VA, a different price called the Non-Federal Average Manufacturing Price, which is used to determine the maximum price that can be charged to certain federal agencies, referred to as the Federal Ceiling Price, (“FCP”).
+Added: For certain products, including those approved under a BLA (including biosimilars), the Veterans Health Care Act (the “VHCA”) requires sponsors to calculate and report to the Department of Veterans Affairs (“VA”) a different price called the Non-Federal Average Manufacturer Price, which is used to determine the maximum price that can be charged to certain federal agencies, referred to as the Federal Ceiling Price (“FCP”).
Like the Medicaid rebate amount, the FCP includes an inflation penalty.
4 unchanged sentences
In addition, the VHCA requires sponsors participating in Medicaid to agree to provide different mandatory discounts to certain Public Health Service grantees and other safety net hospitals and clinics under the 340B program based on the sponsor’s reported Medicaid pricing information.
−Removed: The 340B program has its own regulatory authority to impose sanctions for non-compliance and adjudicate overcharge claims against sponsors by the purchasing entities and, impose civil monetary penalties for instances of overcharging.
−Removed: The federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, (“HIPAA”), also created federal criminal statutes that prohibit, among other actions, knowingly and willfully executing, or attempting to execute, a scheme to defraud or to obtain, by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations or promises, any of the money or property owned by, or under the custody or control of, a healthcare benefit program, regardless of whether the payor is public or private, in connection with the delivery or payment for health care benefits, knowingly and willfully embezzling or stealing from a health care benefit program, willfully obstructing a criminal investigation of a health care offense and knowingly and willfully falsifying, concealing, or covering up by any trick or device a material fact or making any materially false statements in connection with the delivery of, or payment for, healthcare benefits, items, or services relating to healthcare matters.
+Added: The 340B program has its own regulatory authority to impose sanctions for non-compliance, adjudicate overcharge claims against sponsors by the purchasing entities, and impose civil monetary penalties for instances of overcharging.
+Added: The federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, (“HIPAA”), also created federal criminal statutes that prohibit, among other actions, knowingly and willfully executing, or attempting to execute, a scheme to defraud or to obtain, by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations or promises, any of the money or property owned by, or under the custody or control of, a healthcare benefit program, regardless of whether the payor is public or private, in connection with the delivery or payment for healthcare benefits, knowingly and willfully embezzling or stealing from a healthcare benefit program, willfully obstructing a criminal investigation of a healthcare offense and knowingly and willfully falsifying, concealing, or covering up by any trick or device a material fact or making any materially false statements in connection with the delivery of, or payment for, healthcare benefits, items, or services relating to healthcare matters.
Additionally, the ACA amended the intent requirement of certain of these criminal statutes under HIPAA so that a person or entity no longer needs to have actual knowledge of the statute, or the specific intent to violate it, to have committed a violation.
In addition, as part of the ACA, the federal government enacted the Physician Payment Sunshine Act.
−Removed: Manufacturers of drugs biologics and devices for which payment is available under Medicare, Medicaid, or the Children’s Health Insurance Program (with certain exceptions) are required to annually report to CMS payments and transfers of value made to or at the request of covered recipients, such as, but not limited to, physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, clinical nurse specialists, and certified registered nurse anesthetists and teaching hospitals, as well as ownership and investment interests held by physicians and their immediate family.
−Removed: Payments made to physicians and certain research institutions for clinical trials are also included within this law.
+Added: Manufacturers of drugs biologics and devices for which payment is available under Medicare, Medicaid, or the Children’s Health Insurance Program (with certain exceptions) are required to annually report to CMS certain payments and other transfers of value made to or at the request of covered recipients, which are physicians (as defined under the Social Security Act), physician assistants, nurse practitioners, clinical nurse specialists, certified registered nurse anesthetists and certified nurse midwifes licensed in the U.S.
+Added: teaching hospitals, as well as ownership and investment interests held by physicians and their immediate family.
+Added: Payments made to principal investigators and research institutions at teaching hospitals for clinical trials are also included within this law.
Reported information is made publicly available by CMS.
Failure to submit required information may result in civil monetary penalties.
−Removed: If not preempted by this federal law, several states currently also require reporting of marketing and promotion expenses, as well as gifts and payments to healthcare professionals.
−Removed: State legislation may also prohibit various other marketing related activities or require the public posting of information.
+Added: If not preempted by this federal law, several states currently also require reporting of marketing and promotion expenses, as well as gifts and payments to healthcare professionals and organizations.
+Added: State legislation may also prohibit gifts and various other marketing related activities or require the public posting of information.
Certain states also require companies to implement compliance programs.
Further, we may be subject to data privacy and security regulation by both the federal government and the states in which we conduct our business.
−Removed: HIPAA, as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act, (“HITECH Act”), and their respective implementing regulations impose certain requirements on covered entities relating to the privacy, security, and transmission of individually identifiable health information, known as protected health information.
−Removed: Among other things, the HITECH Act, through its implementing regulations, makes HIPAA’s security standards and certain privacy standards directly applicable to business associates, defined as a person or organization, other than a member of a covered entity’s workforce, that creates, receives, maintains, or transmits protected health information on behalf of a covered entity for a function or activity regulated by HIPAA.
+Added: HIPAA, as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act, (“HITECH Act”), and their respective implementing regulations impose certain requirements on covered entities relating to the privacy, security, and transmission of protected health information.
+Added: Among other things, the HITECH Act, and its implementing regulations, made HIPAA’s security standards and certain privacy standards directly applicable to “business associates,” defined as persons or organizations, other than members of a covered entity’s workforce, that create, receive, maintain, or transmit protected health information on behalf of a covered entity for a function or activity regulated by HIPAA.
The HITECH Act also strengthened the civil and criminal penalties that may be imposed against covered entities, business associates, and individuals, and gave state attorneys general new authority to file civil actions for damages or injunctions in federal courts to enforce the federal HIPAA laws and seek attorneys’ fees and costs associated with pursuing federal civil actions.
−Removed: In addition, other federal and state laws, such as the California Consumer Privacy Act, may govern the privacy and security of health and other information in certain circumstances, many of which differ from each other in significant ways and may not be preempted by HIPAA, thus complicating compliance efforts.
+Added: In addition, other federal and state laws, such as the California Consumer Privacy Act, may govern the privacy and security of health and other information in certain circumstances, many of which differ from each other in significant ways, thus complicating compliance efforts.
Many states have also adopted laws similar to each of the above federal laws, which may be broader in scope and apply to items or services reimbursed by any third-party payor, including commercial insurers.
3 unchanged sentences
or require sponsors to track and report information related to payments, gifts, and other items of value to physicians and other healthcare providers.
−Removed: Recently, states have enacted or are considering legislation intended to make drug prices more transparent and deter significant price increases.
+Added: Recently, states have enacted or are considering legislation intended to make drug prices more transparent and deter significant price increases that impose reporting requirements on biopharmaceutical companies.
These laws may affect our future sales, marketing, and other promotional activities by imposing administrative and compliance burdens.
−Removed: If our operations are found to be in violation of any of the laws or regulations described above or any other laws that apply to us, we may be subject to penalties or other enforcement actions, including criminal and significant civil monetary penalties, damages, fines, disgorgement, imprisonment, exclusion from participation in government healthcare programs, corporate integrity agreements, suspension and debarment from government contracts, and refusal of orders under existing government contracts, reputational harm, diminished profits and future earnings, and the curtailment or restructuring of our operations, any of which could adversely affect our business.
+Added: Such laws also typically impose significant civil monetary penalties for each instance of reporting noncompliance that can quickly aggregate into the millions of dollars.
+Added: If our operations are found to be in violation of any of the laws or regulations described above or any other laws that apply to us, we may be subject to penalties or other enforcement actions, including criminal and significant civil monetary penalties, damages, fines, disgorgement, imprisonment, exclusion from participation in government healthcare programs, corporate integrity agreements, suspension and debarment from government procurement and non-procurement programs, and refusal of orders under existing government contracts, reputational harm, diminished profits and future earnings, and the curtailment or restructuring of our operations, any of which could adversely affect our business.
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
5 unchanged sentences
If these third-party payers do not consider a product to be cost-effective compared to other available therapies and/or the standard of care, they may not cover the product after approval as a benefit under their plans or, if they do, measures including prior authorization and step-throughs could be required, manufacturer rebates may be negotiated or required and/or the level of payment may not be sufficient to allow a company to sell its products at a profit.
−Removed: federal and state governments and foreign governments have shown significant interest in implementing cost containment programs to limit the growth of government-paid health care costs, including price controls, restrictions on coverage and reimbursement and requirements for substitution of generic products for branded prescription drugs.
+Added: federal and state governments and foreign governments have shown significant interest in implementing cost containment programs to limit the growth of government-paid healthcare costs, including price controls, restrictions on coverage and reimbursement and requirements for substitution of generic products for branded prescription drugs.
In this regard, for example, on November 27, 2020, CMS issued an interim final rule implementing a Most Favored Nation payment model under which reimbursement for certain Medicare Part B drugs and biologicals will be based on a price that reflects the lowest per capital Gross Domestic Product-adjusted (“GDP-adjusted”) price of any non-U.S.
1 unchanged sentence
GDP per capita.
+Added: While this rule now has been rescinded, government negotiation of certain Medicare drug pricing continues to be the focus of recent proposed legislation.
+Added: The Budget Control Act of 2011, among other things, created measures for spending reductions by Congress.
+Added: Failure of the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction to reach required deficit reduction goals triggered the legislation’s automatic reduction to several government programs.
+Added: This includes aggregate reductions of Medicare payments to providers up to 2% per fiscal year.
+Added: While President Biden previously signed legislation to eliminate this reduction through the end of 2021, recent legislation will restart the reductions, which will thereafter remain in effect through 2031 unless additional congressional action is taken.
Adoption of additional healthcare reform controls and measures and tightening of restrictive policies in jurisdictions with existing controls and measures, could limit payments for pharmaceuticals.
1 unchanged sentence
In addition, an increasing emphasis on managed care in the United States has increased and will continue to increase the pressure on drug pricing.
+Added: Decisions regarding whether to cover any of our products, the extent of coverage and amount of reimbursement to be provided are made on a plan-by-plan basis.
+Added: Further, no uniform policy for coverage and reimbursement exists in the United States, and coverage and reimbursement can differ significantly from payor to payor.
Coverage policies, third party reimbursement rates and drug pricing regulation may change at any time.
−Removed: In particular, the ACA contains provisions that may reduce the profitability of drug products, including, for example, increased rebates for drugs sold to Medicaid programs, extension of Medicaid rebates to Medicaid managed care plans, mandatory discounts for certain Medicare Part D beneficiaries and annual fees based on pharmaceutical companies’ share of sales to federal health care programs.
+Added: In particular, the ACA contains provisions that may reduce the profitability of drug products, including, for example, increased rebates for drugs sold to Medicaid programs, extension of Medicaid rebates to Medicaid managed care plans, mandatory discounts for certain Medicare Part D beneficiaries and annual fees based on pharmaceutical companies’ share of sales to federal healthcare programs.
Multiple other current and proposed legislative and regulatory efforts require and likely will in the future require payment of increased manufacturer rebates and implement mechanisms to reduce drug prices.
4 unchanged sentences
In addition, drugs are subject to the extensive price and reimbursement regulations of the various EU member states.
−Removed: The Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC, as amended (“CTD”) (and to be replaced by the Clinical Trial Regulation EU 536/2014) (“CTR”) (it is anticipated by December 2021), provides a system for the approval of clinical trials in the European Union via (in the case of the CTD) implementation through national legislation of the member states.
+Added: The Clinical Trial Regulation EU 536/2014 (“CTR”), which replaced the current Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC, as amended (“CTD”), on January 31, 2022, provides a system for the approval of clinical trials in the European Union via (in the case of the CTD) implementation through national legislation of the member states.
The CTR is directly applicable in all member states without the need for national implementation.
−Removed: Under this system, approval must be obtained from the competent national authority of an EU member state in which the clinical trial is to be conducted.
−Removed: Once the CTR comes into effect however, it will be possible within the EU to make a single harmonized electronic submission and have a single assessment process for clinical trials conducted in multiple member states.
+Added: Whilst, for trials conducted in only one country, approval has to be obtained from the competent national authority of an EU member state in which the clinical trial is to be conducted before cross-border trials within the EU, it is possible to make a single harmonized electronic submission and have a single assessment process for clinical trials conducted in multiple member states.
Furthermore, a clinical trial may only be started after a competent ethics committee has issued a favorable opinion on the clinical trial application (“CTA”), which must be supported by an investigational medicinal product dossier with supporting information prescribed by the CTD and corresponding national laws of the member states and further detailed in applicable guidance documents.
4 unchanged sentences
European regulators and ethics committees also require the submission of adverse event reports during a study and a copy of the final study report.
−Removed: When the CTR comes into force member states may dispense with the requirement for a legal representative for a non-EU resident sponsor provided there is a contact person based in the EEA.
+Added: Under the CTR, member states may dispense with the requirement for a legal representative for a non-EU resident sponsor provided there is a contact person based in the EEA.
+Added: Under the CTR, the introduction of a new databased called the Clinical Trial Information System (“CTIS”), requires sponsors to upload and submit all data, including initial clinical trial application data and documentation, to the CTIS, with such data being publicly available, with few exceptions.
+Added: This means data transparency throughout the development process with the onus on sponsors to protect patient confidentiality at the point of submission.
Marketing approval
4 unchanged sentences
Because of our focus on gene therapies, which fall within the category of advanced therapy medicinal products (“ATMPs”) and orphan indications, our products and product candidates will need to go through the centralized procedure.
−Removed: In the marketing authorization application (“MAA”) the applicant must properly and sufficiently demonstrate the quality, safety, and efficacy of the drug.
+Added: In the MAA the applicant must properly and sufficiently demonstrate the quality, safety, and efficacy of the drug.
Guidance on the factors that the EMA will consider in relation to the development and evaluation of ATMPs have been issued and include, among other things, the preclinical studies required to characterize ATMPs;
84 unchanged sentences
Human Capital Resources
−Removed: As of December 31, 2020, we had a total of 332 employees, 162 of whom are based in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, and 170 in Lexington, Massachusetts, United States of America.
+Added: As of December 31, 2021, we had a total of 463 employees, 250 of whom are based in The Netherlands, 206 in the United States of America, and seven in other European countries.
As of December 31, 2021, 142 of our employees had an M.D.
1 unchanged sentence
During 2017, we established a works council in the Netherlands.
−Removed: None of our employees are subject to collective bargaining or other labor organizations.
+Added: None of our employees are subject to collective bargaining agreements or other labor organizations.
We believe that we have good relations with all our employees and with the works council in the Netherlands.
8 unchanged sentences
We invest in numerous learning opportunities focused on individual, management and team development and other initiatives to support our employees and build our culture.
+Added: In 2021 we initiated activities to coordinate our various ongoing activities and initiatives within an environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) framework.
Corporate Information
7 unchanged sentences
We are registered in the trade register of the Dutch Chamber of Commerce (Kamer van Koophandel) under number 54385229.
−Removed: Our headquarters are in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, and its registered office is located at Paasheuvelweg 25a, Amsterdam 1105 BP, the Netherlands and its telephone number is +31 20 240 6000.
+Added: Our headquarters are in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, and its registered office is located at Paasheuvelweg 25, Amsterdam 1105 BP, the Netherlands and its telephone number is +31 20 240 6000.
From our initial public offering until December 31, 2018, we were an emerging growth company, as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012.
7 unchanged sentences
Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.