Item 1A. Risk Factors
ITEM
1A. RISK FACTORS
Except
as described below, there have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed
with the SEC on March 11, 2021 as amended by Form 10-K/A filed on May 10, 2021.The disclosure of risks identified below does not imply
that the risk has not already materialized.
Disruption of operations in our manufacturing
facilities, including as a result of, among other things, workplace injuries, pandemics or natural disasters, has and could increase our
costs of doing business or lead to delays in shipping our products and could materially adversely affect our operating results and our
ability to grow our business.
We have three manufacturing
plants, which are located in Alpine, Utah, Grantsville, Utah, and McDonough, Georgia. We began operations on March 3, 2021 in McDonough,
Georgia. In the future we may also enter into leases for additional manufacturing plants.
The disruption of operations
of our manufacturing facilities for a significant period of time, or even permanently, or disruptions to the scheduled build-out of the
Georgia facility such as through a closure related to the COVID-19 pandemic or the loss of a lease, may increase our costs of doing business
and lead to delays in shipping our products to customers and could materially adversely affect our operating results and our ability to
grow our business. In addition, the occurrence of workplace injuries or other industrial accidents at one or more of our manufacturing
plants has required, and may require in the future, that we suspend production or modify our operations, which could lead to delays in
manufacturing and shipping our products to customers. Likewise, acts of workplace violence may require us to temporarily suspend production
or modify our operations. Such delays could adversely affect our sales, customer satisfaction, profitability, cash flows, liquidity and
financial condition. Because two of our currently operating manufacturing plants are located within the same geographic region, regional
economic downturns, natural disasters, closures due to COVID-19, the unavailability of utilities as a result of climate events or otherwise,
or other issues could potentially disrupt a significant portion of our manufacturing and other operating activities, which could adversely
affect our business. On March 18, 2020, Magna, Utah was the epicenter of a 5.7 magnitude earthquake that was felt approximately 20
miles away at our Grantsville, Utah manufacturing plant but not felt at our Alpine, Utah manufacturing plant. Since that date, there have
been approximately one-thousand aftershocks. Though no damage occurred at either manufacturing plant from the 5.7 earthquake or its aftershocks,
continued or increased earthquake activity in the area could disrupt manufacturing and other operating activities, which could adversely
affect our business.
Our manufacturing processes involve the
use of heavy machinery and equipment, which exposes us to potentially significant financial losses and reputational harm due to workplace
injuries or industrial accidents that may occur at our facilities.
Our manufacturing processes
involve the use of heavy machinery and equipment and are subject to risks involving workplace injuries, mechanical failures, and industrial
accidents, including, among other things, personal injury or death resulting from such incidents at our manufacturing plants. A workplace
accident, mechanical failure, industrial accident or any similar problem involving any one or more of our facilities has required, and
may require in the future, that we suspend production at one or more of our manufacturing plants, which could lead to delays in manufacturing
and shipping our products and adversely affect our business and results of operations. The occurrence of such incidents, or any perceived
insufficiency in our response to any such deficiency or problem, could also materially adversely affect our reputation. If we are unable
to meet workplace safety standards or, if our employees or customers perceive us having a poor safety record, it could materially impact
our ability to attract and retain new employees and our reputation with our customers could suffer, which could adversely affect our
business and results of operations.
44
We recently experienced an
incident involving our manufacturing equipment that resulted in the death of one of our employees. As a result, we ceased using such equipment
while we evaluated the safety of our manufacturing equipment and identified and implemented safety improvements. In addition, once safety
improvements were implemented and manufacturing resumed, we experienced unanticipated mechanical
and maintenance issues while ramping up to normal production. These delays in production limited our ability to fill customer orders,
which has adversely affected our financial results. Other incidents could result in further production delays, which could adversely affect our operating performance and reputation with our customers. While we have lowered our risk of future safety incidents by committing significant
financial resources and time to implement safety improvements, these safety improvements may cause our production output to decrease and
could materially adversely affect our operating results and our ability to grow our business.
The occurrence of this and
other such incidents could also result in investigations by or the imposition of fines from regulatory authorities or require us to implement
corrective actions to address the causes of such incidents, which could require the expenditure of significant resources and may adversely
affect our financial condition and operations. Further, the occurrence of such incidents may result in litigation, including personal
injury or workers’ compensation claims, which could also adversely affect our financial condition and reputation. While we maintain
insurance coverage for certain types of losses, such insurance coverage may be insufficient to cover all losses that may arise.
We depend on executive employees, and if
we lose the services of members of the executive team, we may not be able to run our business effectively.
Our future success depends in part on our ability to attract and retain
key executive, merchandising, marketing, sales, finance, operations and engineering personnel. If any of our executives cease to be employed
by us, or if our growth or other changes in circumstances require executives with additional skill sets, we would have to hire replacement
or additional qualified personnel. Our ability to successfully attract and hire other experienced and qualified executives cannot be assured
and may be difficult because we face competition for these professionals from our competitors, our suppliers and other companies operating
in our industry and in our geographic locations. Departures and any delay in replacing executives could significantly disrupt
our ability to grow and pursue our strategic plans. While we believe our current executives have benefitted and will continue to benefit
us, finding qualified replacements is time-consuming, takes Company resources, and can disrupt our growth and achievement of strategic
plans. We do not maintain key-person insurance for members of our executive management team.
Regulatory requirements relating to the
manufacture and disposal of mattresses may increase our product costs and increase the risk of disruption to our business.
The U.S. Consumer Product
Safety Commission (“CPSC”) and other jurisdictions have adopted rules relating to fire retardancy standards for the mattress
industry. Some states and the U.S. Congress continue to consider fire retardancy regulations that may be different from or more stringent
than the current standard. In addition, these regulations require manufacturers to implement quality assurance programs and encourage
manufacturers to conduct random testing of products. These regulations also require maintenance and retention of compliance documentation.
These quality assurance and documentation requirements are costly to implement and maintain. If any product testing, other evidence, or
regulatory inspections yield results indicating that any of our products may not meet the flammability standards, we may be required to
temporarily cease production and distribution or to recall products from the field, and we may be subject to fines or penalties, any of
which outcomes could harm our business, reputation, sales, profitability, cash flows and financial condition.
The CPSC adopted new flammability
standards and related regulations which became effective nationwide in July 2007 for mattresses and mattress and foundation sets. Compliance
with these requirements has resulted in higher materials and manufacturing costs for our products and has required modifications to our
information systems and business operations, further increasing our costs and negatively impacting our capacity. Some states and the U.S.
Congress continue to consider fire retardancy regulations that may be different from or more stringent than the CPSC standard. Adoption
of multi-layered regulatory regimes, particularly if they conflict with each other, could increase our costs, alter our manufacturing
processes and impair the performance of our products which may have an adverse effect on our business.
Also, California recently
enacted laws effective in 2021 requiring mattress retailers delivering mattresses via common carrier in California to offer to pick up
their customers’ old mattresses at no cost to the customer. Additionally, California, Rhode Island and Connecticut have all enacted
laws requiring the recycling of mattresses discarded in their states. State and local bedding industry regulations vary among the states
in which we operate but generally impose requirements as to the proper labeling of bedding merchandise, restrictions regarding the identification
of merchandise as “new” or otherwise, controls as to hygiene and other aspects of product handling, disposal, sales, resales
and penalties for violations. We or our suppliers may be required to incur significant expense to the extent that these regulations change
and require new and different compliance measures.
New legislation aimed at improving
the fire retardancy of mattresses, regulating the handling of mattresses in connection with preventing or controlling the spread of bed
bugs could be passed, or requiring the collection or recycling of discarded mattresses, could result in product recalls or in a significant
increase in the cost of operating our business. In addition, failure to comply with these various regulations may result in penalties,
the inability to conduct business as previously conducted or at all, or adverse publicity, among other things. Adoption of multi-layered
regulatory regimes, particularly if they conflict with each other, could increase our costs, alter our manufacturing processes and impair
the performance of our products which may have an adverse effect on our business. We are also subject to various health and environmental
provisions such as 16 CFR Part 1633 (Standard for the Flammability (Open Flame) of Mattress Sets).
Text extracted from the filing as submitted to EDGAR. Formatting, tables and exhibits are simplified for reading; the original document is authoritative for anything you rely on.